|
1 |
|
00:00:08,370 --> 00:00:13,950 |
|
Today, inshallah, we'll start chapter six. Chapter |
|
|
|
2 |
|
00:00:13,950 --> 00:00:20,350 |
|
six talks about the normal distribution. In this |
|
|
|
3 |
|
00:00:20,350 --> 00:00:24,810 |
|
chapter, there are mainly two objectives. The |
|
|
|
4 |
|
00:00:24,810 --> 00:00:30,470 |
|
first objective is to compute probabilities from |
|
|
|
5 |
|
00:00:30,470 --> 00:00:34,530 |
|
normal distribution. And mainly we'll focus on |
|
|
|
6 |
|
00:00:34,530 --> 00:00:37,270 |
|
objective number one. So we are going to use |
|
|
|
7 |
|
00:00:37,270 --> 00:00:40,290 |
|
normal distribution in this chapter. And we'll |
|
|
|
8 |
|
00:00:40,290 --> 00:00:43,830 |
|
know how can we compute probabilities if the data |
|
|
|
9 |
|
00:00:43,830 --> 00:00:46,810 |
|
set is normally distributed. You know many times |
|
|
|
10 |
|
00:00:46,810 --> 00:00:50,690 |
|
you talked about extreme points or outliers. So |
|
|
|
11 |
|
00:00:50,690 --> 00:00:54,490 |
|
that means if the data has outliers, that is the |
|
|
|
12 |
|
00:00:54,490 --> 00:00:57,290 |
|
distribution is not normally distributed. Now in |
|
|
|
13 |
|
00:00:57,290 --> 00:01:01,090 |
|
this case, If the distribution is normal, how can |
|
|
|
14 |
|
00:01:01,090 --> 00:01:04,350 |
|
we compute probabilities underneath the normal |
|
|
|
15 |
|
00:01:04,350 --> 00:01:10,030 |
|
curve? The second objective is to use the normal |
|
|
|
16 |
|
00:01:10,030 --> 00:01:13,210 |
|
probability plot to determine whether a set of |
|
|
|
17 |
|
00:01:13,210 --> 00:01:18,150 |
|
data is approximately normally distributed. I mean |
|
|
|
18 |
|
00:01:18,150 --> 00:01:25,550 |
|
beside box plots we discussed before. Beside this |
|
|
|
19 |
|
00:01:25,550 --> 00:01:30,190 |
|
score, how can we tell if the data point or |
|
|
|
20 |
|
00:01:30,190 --> 00:01:35,350 |
|
actually the entire distribution is approximately |
|
|
|
21 |
|
00:01:35,350 --> 00:01:39,410 |
|
normally distributed or not. Before we learn if |
|
|
|
22 |
|
00:01:39,410 --> 00:01:44,110 |
|
the point is outlier by using backsplot and this |
|
|
|
23 |
|
00:01:44,110 --> 00:01:46,750 |
|
score. In this chapter we'll know how can we |
|
|
|
24 |
|
00:01:46,750 --> 00:01:51,630 |
|
determine if the entire distribution is |
|
|
|
25 |
|
00:01:51,630 --> 00:01:54,770 |
|
approximately normal distributed. So there are two |
|
|
|
26 |
|
00:01:54,770 --> 00:01:56,710 |
|
objectives. One is to compute probabilities |
|
|
|
27 |
|
00:01:56,710 --> 00:01:59,370 |
|
underneath the normal curve. The other, how can we |
|
|
|
28 |
|
00:01:59,370 --> 00:02:05,310 |
|
tell if the data set is out or not? If you |
|
|
|
29 |
|
00:02:05,310 --> 00:02:09,330 |
|
remember, first class, we mentioned something |
|
|
|
30 |
|
00:02:09,330 --> 00:02:13,130 |
|
about data types. And we said data has mainly two |
|
|
|
31 |
|
00:02:13,130 --> 00:02:17,930 |
|
types. Numerical data, I mean quantitative data. |
|
|
|
32 |
|
00:02:18,690 --> 00:02:22,630 |
|
and categorical data, qualitative. For numerical |
|
|
|
33 |
|
00:02:22,630 --> 00:02:26,190 |
|
data also it has two types, continuous and |
|
|
|
34 |
|
00:02:26,190 --> 00:02:30,430 |
|
discrete. And discrete takes only integers such as |
|
|
|
35 |
|
00:02:30,430 --> 00:02:35,310 |
|
number of students who take this class or number |
|
|
|
36 |
|
00:02:35,310 --> 00:02:40,190 |
|
of accidents and so on. But if you are talking |
|
|
|
37 |
|
00:02:40,190 --> 00:02:45,320 |
|
about Age, weight, scores, temperature, and so on. |
|
|
|
38 |
|
00:02:45,560 --> 00:02:49,260 |
|
It's continuous distribution. For this type of |
|
|
|
39 |
|
00:02:49,260 --> 00:02:53,320 |
|
variable, I mean for continuous distribution, how |
|
|
|
40 |
|
00:02:53,320 --> 00:02:56,300 |
|
can we compute the probabilities underneath the |
|
|
|
41 |
|
00:02:56,300 --> 00:02:59,640 |
|
normal? So normal distribution maybe is the most |
|
|
|
42 |
|
00:02:59,640 --> 00:03:02,380 |
|
common distribution in statistics, and it's type |
|
|
|
43 |
|
00:03:02,380 --> 00:03:07,820 |
|
of continuous distribution. So first, let's define |
|
|
|
44 |
|
00:03:07,820 --> 00:03:12,010 |
|
continuous random variable. maybe because for |
|
|
|
45 |
|
00:03:12,010 --> 00:03:15,230 |
|
multiple choice problem you should know the |
|
|
|
46 |
|
00:03:15,230 --> 00:03:19,110 |
|
definition of continuous random variable is a |
|
|
|
47 |
|
00:03:19,110 --> 00:03:22,070 |
|
variable that can assume any value on a continuous |
|
|
|
48 |
|
00:03:23,380 --> 00:03:27,020 |
|
it can assume any uncountable number of values. So |
|
|
|
49 |
|
00:03:27,020 --> 00:03:31,080 |
|
it could be any number in an interval. For |
|
|
|
50 |
|
00:03:31,080 --> 00:03:35,720 |
|
example, suppose your ages range between 18 years |
|
|
|
51 |
|
00:03:35,720 --> 00:03:39,580 |
|
and 20 years. So maybe someone of you, their age |
|
|
|
52 |
|
00:03:39,580 --> 00:03:44,000 |
|
is about 18 years, three months. Or maybe your |
|
|
|
53 |
|
00:03:44,000 --> 00:03:47,580 |
|
weight is 70 kilogram point five, and so on. So |
|
|
|
54 |
|
00:03:47,580 --> 00:03:49,780 |
|
it's continuous on the variable. Other examples |
|
|
|
55 |
|
00:03:49,780 --> 00:03:53,140 |
|
for continuous, thickness of an item. For example, |
|
|
|
56 |
|
00:03:53,740 --> 00:03:54,440 |
|
the thickness. |
|
|
|
57 |
|
00:03:58,260 --> 00:04:02,490 |
|
This one is called thickness. Now, the thickness |
|
|
|
58 |
|
00:04:02,490 --> 00:04:05,930 |
|
may be 2 centimeters or 3 centimeters and so on, |
|
|
|
59 |
|
00:04:06,210 --> 00:04:09,730 |
|
but it might be 2.5 centimeters. For example, for |
|
|
|
60 |
|
00:04:09,730 --> 00:04:13,030 |
|
this remote, the thickness is 2.5 centimeters or 2 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
00:04:13,030 --> 00:04:16,510 |
|
.6, not exactly 2 or 3. So it could be any value. |
|
|
|
62 |
|
00:04:16,650 --> 00:04:19,450 |
|
Range is, for example, between 2 centimeters and 3 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
00:04:19,450 --> 00:04:23,010 |
|
centimeters. So from 2 to 3 is a big range because |
|
|
|
64 |
|
00:04:23,010 --> 00:04:25,670 |
|
it can take anywhere from 2.1 to 2.15 and so on. |
|
|
|
65 |
|
00:04:26,130 --> 00:04:28,810 |
|
So thickness is an example of continuous random |
|
|
|
66 |
|
00:04:28,810 --> 00:04:31,190 |
|
variable. Another example, time required to |
|
|
|
67 |
|
00:04:31,190 --> 00:04:36,010 |
|
complete a task. Now suppose you want to do an |
|
|
|
68 |
|
00:04:36,010 --> 00:04:39,710 |
|
exercise. Now the time required to finish or to |
|
|
|
69 |
|
00:04:39,710 --> 00:04:45,150 |
|
complete this task may be any value between 2 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
00:04:45,150 --> 00:04:48,730 |
|
minutes up to 3 minutes. So maybe 2 minutes 30 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
00:04:48,730 --> 00:04:52,150 |
|
seconds, 2 minutes 40 seconds and so on. So it's |
|
|
|
72 |
|
00:04:52,150 --> 00:04:55,550 |
|
continuous random variable. Temperature of a |
|
|
|
73 |
|
00:04:55,550 --> 00:05:00,140 |
|
solution. height, weight, ages, and so on. These |
|
|
|
74 |
|
00:05:00,140 --> 00:05:03,720 |
|
are examples of continuous random variable. So |
|
|
|
75 |
|
00:05:03,720 --> 00:05:08,040 |
|
these variables can potentially take on any value |
|
|
|
76 |
|
00:05:08,040 --> 00:05:11,340 |
|
depending only on the ability to precisely and |
|
|
|
77 |
|
00:05:11,340 --> 00:05:14,020 |
|
accurately measure. So that's the definition of |
|
|
|
78 |
|
00:05:14,020 --> 00:05:17,320 |
|
continuous random variable. Now, if you look at |
|
|
|
79 |
|
00:05:17,320 --> 00:05:21,810 |
|
the normal distribution, It looks like bell |
|
|
|
80 |
|
00:05:21,810 --> 00:05:25,990 |
|
-shaped, as we discussed before. So it's bell |
|
|
|
81 |
|
00:05:25,990 --> 00:05:31,270 |
|
-shaped, symmetrical. Symmetrical means the area |
|
|
|
82 |
|
00:05:31,270 --> 00:05:34,390 |
|
to the right of the mean equals the area to the |
|
|
|
83 |
|
00:05:34,390 --> 00:05:37,950 |
|
left of the mean. I mean 50% of the area above and |
|
|
|
84 |
|
00:05:37,950 --> 00:05:41,770 |
|
50% below. So that's the meaning of symmetrical. |
|
|
|
85 |
|
00:05:42,490 --> 00:05:46,370 |
|
The other feature of normal distribution, the |
|
|
|
86 |
|
00:05:46,370 --> 00:05:49,510 |
|
measures of center tendency are equal or |
|
|
|
87 |
|
00:05:49,510 --> 00:05:53,170 |
|
approximately equal. Mean, median, and mode are |
|
|
|
88 |
|
00:05:53,170 --> 00:05:55,530 |
|
roughly equal. In reality, they are not equal, |
|
|
|
89 |
|
00:05:55,650 --> 00:05:58,210 |
|
exactly equal, but you can say they are |
|
|
|
90 |
|
00:05:58,210 --> 00:06:01,850 |
|
approximately equal. Now, there are two parameters |
|
|
|
91 |
|
00:06:01,850 --> 00:06:05,750 |
|
describing the normal distribution. One is called |
|
|
|
92 |
|
00:06:05,750 --> 00:06:10,820 |
|
the location parameter. location, or central |
|
|
|
93 |
|
00:06:10,820 --> 00:06:13,800 |
|
tendency, as we discussed before, location is |
|
|
|
94 |
|
00:06:13,800 --> 00:06:17,160 |
|
determined by the mean mu. So the first parameter |
|
|
|
95 |
|
00:06:17,160 --> 00:06:20,340 |
|
for the normal distribution is the mean mu. The |
|
|
|
96 |
|
00:06:20,340 --> 00:06:24,240 |
|
other parameter measures the spread of the data, |
|
|
|
97 |
|
00:06:24,280 --> 00:06:27,680 |
|
or the variability of the data, and the spread is |
|
|
|
98 |
|
00:06:27,680 --> 00:06:31,860 |
|
sigma, or the variation. So we have two |
|
|
|
99 |
|
00:06:31,860 --> 00:06:36,770 |
|
parameters, mu and sigma. The random variable in |
|
|
|
100 |
|
00:06:36,770 --> 00:06:39,930 |
|
this case can take any value from minus infinity |
|
|
|
101 |
|
00:06:39,930 --> 00:06:44,270 |
|
up to infinity. So random variable in this case |
|
|
|
102 |
|
00:06:44,270 --> 00:06:50,310 |
|
continuous ranges from minus infinity all the way |
|
|
|
103 |
|
00:06:50,310 --> 00:06:55,100 |
|
up to infinity. I mean from this point here up to |
|
|
|
104 |
|
00:06:55,100 --> 00:06:58,380 |
|
infinity. So the values range from minus infinity |
|
|
|
105 |
|
00:06:58,380 --> 00:07:02,080 |
|
up to infinity. And if you look here, the mean is |
|
|
|
106 |
|
00:07:02,080 --> 00:07:05,600 |
|
located nearly in the middle. And mean and median |
|
|
|
107 |
|
00:07:05,600 --> 00:07:10,820 |
|
are all approximately equal. That's the features |
|
|
|
108 |
|
00:07:10,820 --> 00:07:14,740 |
|
or the characteristics of the normal distribution. |
|
|
|
109 |
|
00:07:16,460 --> 00:07:20,360 |
|
Now, how can we compute the probabilities under |
|
|
|
110 |
|
00:07:20,360 --> 00:07:25,840 |
|
the normal killer? The formula that is used to |
|
|
|
111 |
|
00:07:25,840 --> 00:07:29,220 |
|
compute the probabilities is given by this one. It |
|
|
|
112 |
|
00:07:29,220 --> 00:07:33,560 |
|
looks complicated formula because we have to use |
|
|
|
113 |
|
00:07:33,560 --> 00:07:36,040 |
|
calculus in order to determine the area underneath |
|
|
|
114 |
|
00:07:36,040 --> 00:07:40,120 |
|
the cube. So we are looking for something else. So |
|
|
|
115 |
|
00:07:40,120 --> 00:07:45,300 |
|
this formula is it seems to be complicated. It's |
|
|
|
116 |
|
00:07:45,300 --> 00:07:49,600 |
|
not hard but it's complicated one, but we can use |
|
|
|
117 |
|
00:07:49,600 --> 00:07:52,380 |
|
it. If we know calculus very well, we can use |
|
|
|
118 |
|
00:07:52,380 --> 00:07:55,240 |
|
integration to create the probabilities underneath |
|
|
|
119 |
|
00:07:55,240 --> 00:07:58,900 |
|
the curve. But for our course, we are going to |
|
|
|
120 |
|
00:07:58,900 --> 00:08:04,460 |
|
skip this formula because this |
|
|
|
121 |
|
00:08:04,460 --> 00:08:09,340 |
|
formula depends actually on mu and sigma. A mu can |
|
|
|
122 |
|
00:08:09,340 --> 00:08:13,110 |
|
take any value. Sigma also can take any value. |
|
|
|
123 |
|
00:08:13,930 --> 00:08:17,310 |
|
That means we have different normal distributions. |
|
|
|
124 |
|
00:08:18,470 --> 00:08:23,830 |
|
Because the distribution actually depends on these |
|
|
|
125 |
|
00:08:23,830 --> 00:08:27,610 |
|
two parameters. So by varying the parameters mu |
|
|
|
126 |
|
00:08:27,610 --> 00:08:29,790 |
|
and sigma, we obtain different normal |
|
|
|
127 |
|
00:08:29,790 --> 00:08:32,710 |
|
distributions. Since we have different mu and |
|
|
|
128 |
|
00:08:32,710 --> 00:08:36,310 |
|
sigma, it means we should have different normal |
|
|
|
129 |
|
00:08:36,310 --> 00:08:38,770 |
|
distributions. For this reason, it's very |
|
|
|
130 |
|
00:08:38,770 --> 00:08:43,430 |
|
complicated to have tables or probability tables |
|
|
|
131 |
|
00:08:43,430 --> 00:08:46,010 |
|
in order to determine these probabilities because |
|
|
|
132 |
|
00:08:46,010 --> 00:08:50,130 |
|
there are infinite values of mu and sigma maybe |
|
|
|
133 |
|
00:08:50,130 --> 00:08:57,750 |
|
your edges the mean is 19. Sigma is, for example, |
|
|
|
134 |
|
00:08:57,910 --> 00:09:01,990 |
|
5. For weights, maybe the mean is 70 kilograms, |
|
|
|
135 |
|
00:09:02,250 --> 00:09:04,990 |
|
the average is 10. For scores, maybe the average |
|
|
|
136 |
|
00:09:04,990 --> 00:09:08,710 |
|
is 65, the mean is 20, sigma is 20, and so on. So |
|
|
|
137 |
|
00:09:08,710 --> 00:09:11,090 |
|
we have different values of mu and sigma. For this |
|
|
|
138 |
|
00:09:11,090 --> 00:09:13,650 |
|
reason, we have different normal distributions. |
|
|
|
139 |
|
00:09:18,490 --> 00:09:25,740 |
|
Because changing mu shifts the distribution either |
|
|
|
140 |
|
00:09:25,740 --> 00:09:29,640 |
|
left or to the right. So maybe the mean is shifted |
|
|
|
141 |
|
00:09:29,640 --> 00:09:32,440 |
|
to the right side, or the mean maybe shifted to |
|
|
|
142 |
|
00:09:32,440 --> 00:09:37,140 |
|
the left side. Also, changing sigma, sigma is the |
|
|
|
143 |
|
00:09:37,140 --> 00:09:40,660 |
|
distance between the mu and the curve. The curve |
|
|
|
144 |
|
00:09:40,660 --> 00:09:45,220 |
|
is the points, or the data values. Now this sigma |
|
|
|
145 |
|
00:09:45,220 --> 00:09:48,380 |
|
can be increases or decreases. So if sigma |
|
|
|
146 |
|
00:09:48,380 --> 00:09:52,860 |
|
increases, it means the spread also increases. Or |
|
|
|
147 |
|
00:09:52,860 --> 00:09:55,780 |
|
if sigma decreases, also the spread will decrease. |
|
|
|
148 |
|
00:09:56,200 --> 00:09:59,660 |
|
So the distribution or the normal distribution |
|
|
|
149 |
|
00:09:59,660 --> 00:10:02,820 |
|
depends actually on these two values. For this |
|
|
|
150 |
|
00:10:02,820 --> 00:10:05,120 |
|
reason, since we have too many values or infinite |
|
|
|
151 |
|
00:10:05,120 --> 00:10:07,600 |
|
values of mu and sigma, then in this case we have |
|
|
|
152 |
|
00:10:07,600 --> 00:10:14,500 |
|
different normal distributions. There is another |
|
|
|
153 |
|
00:10:14,500 --> 00:10:16,940 |
|
distribution. It's called standardized normal. |
|
|
|
154 |
|
00:10:20,330 --> 00:10:26,070 |
|
Now, we have normal distribution X, and how can we |
|
|
|
155 |
|
00:10:26,070 --> 00:10:31,930 |
|
transform from normal distribution to standardized |
|
|
|
156 |
|
00:10:31,930 --> 00:10:35,310 |
|
normal distribution? The reason is that the mean |
|
|
|
157 |
|
00:10:35,310 --> 00:10:40,310 |
|
of Z, I mean, Z is used for standardized normal. |
|
|
|
158 |
|
00:10:40,850 --> 00:10:44,490 |
|
The mean of Z is always zero, and sigma is one. |
|
|
|
159 |
|
00:10:45,770 --> 00:10:48,150 |
|
Now it's a big difference. The first one has |
|
|
|
160 |
|
00:10:48,150 --> 00:10:53,160 |
|
infinite values of Mu and Sigma. Now, for the |
|
|
|
161 |
|
00:10:53,160 --> 00:10:56,200 |
|
standardized normal distribution, the mean is |
|
|
|
162 |
|
00:10:56,200 --> 00:11:01,540 |
|
fixed value. The mean is zero, Sigma is one. So, |
|
|
|
163 |
|
00:11:01,620 --> 00:11:04,340 |
|
the question is, how can we actually transform |
|
|
|
164 |
|
00:11:04,340 --> 00:11:09,720 |
|
from X, which has normal distribution, to Z, which |
|
|
|
165 |
|
00:11:09,720 --> 00:11:13,160 |
|
has standardized normal with mean zero and Sigma |
|
|
|
166 |
|
00:11:13,160 --> 00:11:23,330 |
|
of one. Let's see. How can we translate x which |
|
|
|
167 |
|
00:11:23,330 --> 00:11:27,510 |
|
has normal distribution to z that has standardized |
|
|
|
168 |
|
00:11:27,510 --> 00:11:32,190 |
|
normal distribution? The idea is you have just to |
|
|
|
169 |
|
00:11:32,190 --> 00:11:39,170 |
|
subtract mu of x, x minus mu, then divide this |
|
|
|
170 |
|
00:11:39,170 --> 00:11:43,150 |
|
result by sigma. So we just subtract the mean of |
|
|
|
171 |
|
00:11:43,150 --> 00:11:49,660 |
|
x. and dividing by its standard deviation now so |
|
|
|
172 |
|
00:11:49,660 --> 00:11:52,360 |
|
if we have x which has normal distribution with |
|
|
|
173 |
|
00:11:52,360 --> 00:11:55,940 |
|
mean mu and standard deviation sigma to transform |
|
|
|
174 |
|
00:11:55,940 --> 00:12:00,960 |
|
or to convert to z score use this formula x minus |
|
|
|
175 |
|
00:12:00,960 --> 00:12:05,220 |
|
the mean then divide by its standard deviation now |
|
|
|
176 |
|
00:12:05,220 --> 00:12:09,090 |
|
all of the time we are going to use z for |
|
|
|
177 |
|
00:12:09,090 --> 00:12:12,230 |
|
standardized normal distribution and always z has |
|
|
|
178 |
|
00:12:12,230 --> 00:12:15,370 |
|
mean zero and all and sigma or standard deviation. |
|
|
|
179 |
|
00:12:16,250 --> 00:12:20,170 |
|
So the z distribution always has mean of zero and |
|
|
|
180 |
|
00:12:20,170 --> 00:12:25,490 |
|
sigma of one. So that's the story of standardizing |
|
|
|
181 |
|
00:12:25,490 --> 00:12:33,070 |
|
the normal value. Now the Formula for this score |
|
|
|
182 |
|
00:12:33,070 --> 00:12:37,570 |
|
becomes better than the first one, but still we |
|
|
|
183 |
|
00:12:37,570 --> 00:12:40,570 |
|
have to use calculus in order to determine the |
|
|
|
184 |
|
00:12:40,570 --> 00:12:45,710 |
|
probabilities under the standardized normal k. But |
|
|
|
185 |
|
00:12:45,710 --> 00:12:49,470 |
|
this distribution has mean of zero and sigma of |
|
|
|
186 |
|
00:12:49,470 --> 00:12:56,910 |
|
one. So we have a table on page 570. Look at page |
|
|
|
187 |
|
00:12:56,910 --> 00:13:00,910 |
|
570. We have table or actually there are two |
|
|
|
188 |
|
00:13:00,910 --> 00:13:05,010 |
|
tables. One for negative value of Z and the other |
|
|
|
189 |
|
00:13:05,010 --> 00:13:08,830 |
|
for positive value of Z. So we have two tables for |
|
|
|
190 |
|
00:13:08,830 --> 00:13:14,730 |
|
positive and negative values of Z on page 570 and |
|
|
|
191 |
|
00:13:14,730 --> 00:13:15,470 |
|
571. |
|
|
|
192 |
|
00:13:17,870 --> 00:13:22,770 |
|
Now the table on page 570 looks like this one. The |
|
|
|
193 |
|
00:13:22,770 --> 00:13:26,610 |
|
table you have starts from minus 6, then minus 5, |
|
|
|
194 |
|
00:13:26,750 --> 00:13:32,510 |
|
minus 4.5, and so on. Here we start from minus 3.4 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
00:13:32,510 --> 00:13:38,850 |
|
all the way down up to 0. Look here, all the way |
|
|
|
196 |
|
00:13:38,850 --> 00:13:44,490 |
|
up to 0. So these scores here. Also we have 0.00, |
|
|
|
197 |
|
00:13:44,610 --> 00:13:51,880 |
|
0.01, up to 0.09. Also, the other page, page 571, |
|
|
|
198 |
|
00:13:52,140 --> 00:13:56,940 |
|
gives the area for positive z values. Here we have |
|
|
|
199 |
|
00:13:56,940 --> 00:14:01,760 |
|
0.0, 0.1, 0.2, all the way down up to 3.4 and you |
|
|
|
200 |
|
00:14:01,760 --> 00:14:05,920 |
|
have up to 6. Now let's see how can we use this |
|
|
|
201 |
|
00:14:05,920 --> 00:14:11,020 |
|
table to compute the probabilities underneath the |
|
|
|
202 |
|
00:14:11,020 --> 00:14:12,460 |
|
normal curve. |
|
|
|
203 |
|
00:14:14,940 --> 00:14:19,190 |
|
First of all, you have to know that Z has mean |
|
|
|
204 |
|
00:14:19,190 --> 00:14:23,750 |
|
zero, standard deviation of one. And the values |
|
|
|
205 |
|
00:14:23,750 --> 00:14:26,610 |
|
could be positive or negative. Values above the |
|
|
|
206 |
|
00:14:26,610 --> 00:14:32,850 |
|
mean, zero, have positive Z values. The other one, |
|
|
|
207 |
|
00:14:32,910 --> 00:14:36,690 |
|
values below the mean, have negative Z values. So |
|
|
|
208 |
|
00:14:36,690 --> 00:14:42,770 |
|
Z score can be negative or positive. Now this is |
|
|
|
209 |
|
00:14:42,770 --> 00:14:46,530 |
|
the formula we have, z equals x minus mu divided |
|
|
|
210 |
|
00:14:46,530 --> 00:14:46,990 |
|
by six. |
|
|
|
211 |
|
00:14:52,810 --> 00:15:01,170 |
|
Now this value could be positive if x is above the |
|
|
|
212 |
|
00:15:01,170 --> 00:15:04,810 |
|
mean, as we mentioned before. It could be a |
|
|
|
213 |
|
00:15:04,810 --> 00:15:09,870 |
|
negative if x is smaller than the mean or zero. |
|
|
|
214 |
|
00:15:13,120 --> 00:15:18,140 |
|
Now the table we have gives the area to the right, |
|
|
|
215 |
|
00:15:18,420 --> 00:15:21,240 |
|
to the left, I'm sorry, to the left, for positive |
|
|
|
216 |
|
00:15:21,240 --> 00:15:26,220 |
|
and negative values of z. Okay, so we have two |
|
|
|
217 |
|
00:15:26,220 --> 00:15:32,160 |
|
tables actually, one for negative on page 570, and |
|
|
|
218 |
|
00:15:32,160 --> 00:15:38,260 |
|
the other one for positive values of z. I think we |
|
|
|
219 |
|
00:15:38,260 --> 00:15:41,060 |
|
discussed that before when we talked about these |
|
|
|
220 |
|
00:15:41,060 --> 00:15:44,080 |
|
scores. We have the same formula. |
|
|
|
221 |
|
00:15:47,120 --> 00:15:53,700 |
|
Now let's look at this, the next slide. Suppose x |
|
|
|
222 |
|
00:15:53,700 --> 00:16:01,880 |
|
is distributed normally with mean of 100. So the |
|
|
|
223 |
|
00:16:01,880 --> 00:16:06,470 |
|
mean of x is 100. and the standard deviation of |
|
|
|
224 |
|
00:16:06,470 --> 00:16:11,110 |
|
50. So sigma is 50. Now let's see how can we |
|
|
|
225 |
|
00:16:11,110 --> 00:16:17,750 |
|
compute the z-score for x equals 200. Again the |
|
|
|
226 |
|
00:16:17,750 --> 00:16:22,790 |
|
formula is just x minus mu divided by sigma x 200 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
00:16:22,790 --> 00:16:28,330 |
|
minus 100 divided by 50 that will give 2. Now the |
|
|
|
228 |
|
00:16:28,330 --> 00:16:33,910 |
|
sign of this value is positive That means x is |
|
|
|
229 |
|
00:16:33,910 --> 00:16:37,950 |
|
greater than the mean, because x is 200. Now, |
|
|
|
230 |
|
00:16:37,990 --> 00:16:42,270 |
|
what's the meaning of 2? What does this value tell |
|
|
|
231 |
|
00:16:42,270 --> 00:16:42,410 |
|
you? |
|
|
|
232 |
|
00:16:48,230 --> 00:16:55,430 |
|
Yeah, exactly. x equals 200 is two standard |
|
|
|
233 |
|
00:16:55,430 --> 00:16:58,690 |
|
deviations above the mean. Because if you look at |
|
|
|
234 |
|
00:16:58,690 --> 00:17:05,210 |
|
200, the x value, The mean is 100, sigma is 50. |
|
|
|
235 |
|
00:17:05,730 --> 00:17:09,690 |
|
Now the difference between the score, which is |
|
|
|
236 |
|
00:17:09,690 --> 00:17:16,810 |
|
200, and the mu, which is 100, is equal to |
|
|
|
237 |
|
00:17:16,810 --> 00:17:18,690 |
|
standard deviations, because the difference is |
|
|
|
238 |
|
00:17:18,690 --> 00:17:24,230 |
|
100. 2 times 50 is 100. So this says that x equals |
|
|
|
239 |
|
00:17:24,230 --> 00:17:29,070 |
|
200 is 2 standard deviations above the mean. If z |
|
|
|
240 |
|
00:17:29,070 --> 00:17:34,330 |
|
is negative, you can say that x is two standard |
|
|
|
241 |
|
00:17:34,330 --> 00:17:38,710 |
|
deviations below them. Make sense? So that's how |
|
|
|
242 |
|
00:17:38,710 --> 00:17:42,670 |
|
can we compute the z square. Now, when we |
|
|
|
243 |
|
00:17:42,670 --> 00:17:45,970 |
|
transform from normal distribution to |
|
|
|
244 |
|
00:17:45,970 --> 00:17:49,490 |
|
standardized, still we will have the same shape. I |
|
|
|
245 |
|
00:17:49,490 --> 00:17:51,350 |
|
mean the distribution is still normally |
|
|
|
246 |
|
00:17:51,350 --> 00:17:55,800 |
|
distributed. So note, the shape of the |
|
|
|
247 |
|
00:17:55,800 --> 00:17:58,840 |
|
distribution is the same, only the scale has |
|
|
|
248 |
|
00:17:58,840 --> 00:18:04,500 |
|
changed. So we can express the problem in original |
|
|
|
249 |
|
00:18:04,500 --> 00:18:10,640 |
|
units, X, or in a standardized unit, Z. So when we |
|
|
|
250 |
|
00:18:10,640 --> 00:18:16,620 |
|
have X, just use this equation to transform to |
|
|
|
251 |
|
00:18:16,620 --> 00:18:17,160 |
|
this form. |
|
|
|
252 |
|
00:18:21,360 --> 00:18:23,200 |
|
Now, for example, suppose we have normal |
|
|
|
253 |
|
00:18:23,200 --> 00:18:26,040 |
|
distribution and we are interested in the area |
|
|
|
254 |
|
00:18:26,040 --> 00:18:32,660 |
|
between A and B. Now, the area between A and B, it |
|
|
|
255 |
|
00:18:32,660 --> 00:18:34,700 |
|
means the probability between them. So |
|
|
|
256 |
|
00:18:34,700 --> 00:18:39,140 |
|
statistically speaking, area means probability. So |
|
|
|
257 |
|
00:18:39,140 --> 00:18:42,700 |
|
probability between A and B, I mean probability of |
|
|
|
258 |
|
00:18:42,700 --> 00:18:45,380 |
|
X greater than or equal A and less than or equal B |
|
|
|
259 |
|
00:18:45,380 --> 00:18:49,420 |
|
is the same as X greater than A or less than B. |
|
|
|
260 |
|
00:18:50,450 --> 00:18:57,210 |
|
that means the probability of X equals A this |
|
|
|
261 |
|
00:18:57,210 --> 00:19:02,510 |
|
probability is zero or probability of X equals B |
|
|
|
262 |
|
00:19:02,510 --> 00:19:06,930 |
|
is also zero so in continuous distribution the |
|
|
|
263 |
|
00:19:06,930 --> 00:19:10,630 |
|
equal sign does not matter I mean if we have equal |
|
|
|
264 |
|
00:19:10,630 --> 00:19:15,130 |
|
sign or we don't have these probabilities are the |
|
|
|
265 |
|
00:19:15,130 --> 00:19:19,390 |
|
same so I mean for example if we are interested |
|
|
|
266 |
|
00:19:20,310 --> 00:19:23,450 |
|
for probability of X smaller than or equal to E. |
|
|
|
267 |
|
00:19:24,850 --> 00:19:30,370 |
|
This probability is the same as X smaller than E. |
|
|
|
268 |
|
00:19:31,330 --> 00:19:33,730 |
|
Or on the other hand, if you are interested in the |
|
|
|
269 |
|
00:19:33,730 --> 00:19:39,010 |
|
area above B greater than or equal to B, it's the |
|
|
|
270 |
|
00:19:39,010 --> 00:19:44,770 |
|
same as X smaller than E. So don't worry about the |
|
|
|
271 |
|
00:19:44,770 --> 00:19:48,660 |
|
equal sign. Or continuous distribution, exactly. |
|
|
|
272 |
|
00:19:49,120 --> 00:19:53,820 |
|
But for discrete, it does matter. Now, since we |
|
|
|
273 |
|
00:19:53,820 --> 00:19:58,200 |
|
are talking about normal distribution, and as we |
|
|
|
274 |
|
00:19:58,200 --> 00:20:01,320 |
|
mentioned, normal distribution is symmetric around |
|
|
|
275 |
|
00:20:01,320 --> 00:20:05,900 |
|
the mean, that means the area to the right equals |
|
|
|
276 |
|
00:20:05,900 --> 00:20:09,340 |
|
the area to the left. Now the entire area |
|
|
|
277 |
|
00:20:09,340 --> 00:20:12,940 |
|
underneath the normal curve equals one. I mean |
|
|
|
278 |
|
00:20:12,940 --> 00:20:16,500 |
|
probability of X ranges from minus infinity up to |
|
|
|
279 |
|
00:20:16,500 --> 00:20:21,500 |
|
infinity equals one. So probability of X greater |
|
|
|
280 |
|
00:20:21,500 --> 00:20:26,920 |
|
than minus infinity up to infinity is one. The |
|
|
|
281 |
|
00:20:26,920 --> 00:20:31,480 |
|
total area is one. So the area from minus infinity |
|
|
|
282 |
|
00:20:31,480 --> 00:20:38,080 |
|
up to the mean mu is one-half. The same as the |
|
|
|
283 |
|
00:20:38,080 --> 00:20:42,600 |
|
area from mu up to infinity is also one-half. That |
|
|
|
284 |
|
00:20:42,600 --> 00:20:44,760 |
|
means the probability of X greater than minus |
|
|
|
285 |
|
00:20:44,760 --> 00:20:48,300 |
|
infinity up to mu equals the probability from mu |
|
|
|
286 |
|
00:20:48,300 --> 00:20:52,120 |
|
up to infinity because of symmetry. I mean you |
|
|
|
287 |
|
00:20:52,120 --> 00:20:56,160 |
|
cannot say that for any distribution. Just for |
|
|
|
288 |
|
00:20:56,160 --> 00:20:59,000 |
|
symmetric distribution, the area below the mean |
|
|
|
289 |
|
00:20:59,000 --> 00:21:03,780 |
|
equals one-half, which is the same as the area to |
|
|
|
290 |
|
00:21:03,780 --> 00:21:07,110 |
|
the right of the mean. So the entire Probability |
|
|
|
291 |
|
00:21:07,110 --> 00:21:11,330 |
|
is one. And also you have to keep in mind that the |
|
|
|
292 |
|
00:21:11,330 --> 00:21:17,570 |
|
probability always ranges between zero and one. So |
|
|
|
293 |
|
00:21:17,570 --> 00:21:20,030 |
|
that means the probability couldn't be negative. |
|
|
|
294 |
|
00:21:22,870 --> 00:21:27,730 |
|
It should be positive. It shouldn't be greater |
|
|
|
295 |
|
00:21:27,730 --> 00:21:31,710 |
|
than one. So it's between zero and one. So always |
|
|
|
296 |
|
00:21:31,710 --> 00:21:39,020 |
|
the probability lies between zero and one. The |
|
|
|
297 |
|
00:21:39,020 --> 00:21:44,500 |
|
tables we have on page 570 and 571 give the area |
|
|
|
298 |
|
00:21:44,500 --> 00:21:46,040 |
|
to the left side. |
|
|
|
299 |
|
00:21:49,420 --> 00:21:54,660 |
|
For negative or positive z's. Now for example, |
|
|
|
300 |
|
00:21:54,940 --> 00:22:03,060 |
|
suppose we are looking for probability of z less |
|
|
|
301 |
|
00:22:03,060 --> 00:22:08,750 |
|
than 2. How can we find this probability by using |
|
|
|
302 |
|
00:22:08,750 --> 00:22:12,210 |
|
the normal curve? Let's go back to this normal |
|
|
|
303 |
|
00:22:12,210 --> 00:22:16,410 |
|
distribution. In the second page, we have positive |
|
|
|
304 |
|
00:22:16,410 --> 00:22:17,070 |
|
z-scores. |
|
|
|
305 |
|
00:22:23,850 --> 00:22:33,390 |
|
So we ask about the probability of z less than. So |
|
|
|
306 |
|
00:22:33,390 --> 00:22:40,690 |
|
the second page, gives positive values of z. And |
|
|
|
307 |
|
00:22:40,690 --> 00:22:44,590 |
|
the table gives the area below. And he asked about |
|
|
|
308 |
|
00:22:44,590 --> 00:22:49,550 |
|
here, B of z is smaller than 2. Now 2, if you |
|
|
|
309 |
|
00:22:49,550 --> 00:22:54,910 |
|
hear, up all the way down here, 2, 0, 0. So the |
|
|
|
310 |
|
00:22:54,910 --> 00:23:00,530 |
|
answer is 9772. So this value, so the probability |
|
|
|
311 |
|
00:23:00,530 --> 00:23:02,130 |
|
is 9772. |
|
|
|
312 |
|
00:23:03,990 --> 00:23:05,390 |
|
Because it's 2. |
|
|
|
313 |
|
00:23:09,510 --> 00:23:14,650 |
|
It's 2, 0, 0. But if you ask about what's the |
|
|
|
314 |
|
00:23:14,650 --> 00:23:20,590 |
|
probability of Z less than 2.05? So this is 2. |
|
|
|
315 |
|
00:23:23,810 --> 00:23:30,370 |
|
Now under 5, 9, 7, 9, 8. So the answer is 9, 7. |
|
|
|
316 |
|
00:23:34,360 --> 00:23:38,900 |
|
Because this is two, and we need five decimal |
|
|
|
317 |
|
00:23:38,900 --> 00:23:44,820 |
|
places. So all the way up to 9798. So this value |
|
|
|
318 |
|
00:23:44,820 --> 00:23:54,380 |
|
is 2.05. Now it's about, it's more than 1.5, |
|
|
|
319 |
|
00:23:55,600 --> 00:23:56,880 |
|
exactly 1.5. |
|
|
|
320 |
|
00:24:02,140 --> 00:24:04,880 |
|
1.5. This is 1.5. |
|
|
|
321 |
|
00:24:08,800 --> 00:24:09,720 |
|
9332. |
|
|
|
322 |
|
00:24:12,440 --> 00:24:16,300 |
|
1.5. Exactly 1.5. So 9332. |
|
|
|
323 |
|
00:24:18,780 --> 00:24:27,990 |
|
What's about probability less than 1.35? 1.3 all |
|
|
|
324 |
|
00:24:27,990 --> 00:24:35,250 |
|
the way to 9.115. 9.115. 9.115. 9.115. 9.115. 9 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
00:24:35,250 --> 00:24:35,650 |
|
.115. 9.115. |
|
|
|
326 |
|
00:24:41,170 --> 00:24:42,430 |
|
9.115. 9.115. 9.115. 9.115. 9.115. 9.115. 9.115. 9 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
00:24:42,430 --> 00:24:42,450 |
|
.115. 9.115. 9.115. 9.115. 9.115. 9.115. 9.115. 9 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
00:24:42,450 --> 00:24:44,050 |
|
.115. 9.115. 9.115. 9.115. 9.115. 9.115. 9.115. 9 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
00:24:44,050 --> 00:24:50,530 |
|
.115. 9.115. 9.115. 9.115. 9.115. 9.115. 9.115. 9 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
00:24:50,530 --> 00:24:54,980 |
|
.115. 9. But here we are looking for the area to |
|
|
|
331 |
|
00:24:54,980 --> 00:25:01,280 |
|
the right. One minus one. Now this area equals |
|
|
|
332 |
|
00:25:01,280 --> 00:25:05,660 |
|
one minus because |
|
|
|
333 |
|
00:25:05,660 --> 00:25:11,420 |
|
since suppose |
|
|
|
334 |
|
00:25:11,420 --> 00:25:18,760 |
|
this is the 1.35 and we are interested in the area |
|
|
|
335 |
|
00:25:18,760 --> 00:25:24,030 |
|
to the right or above 1.35. The table gives the |
|
|
|
336 |
|
00:25:24,030 --> 00:25:28,230 |
|
area below. So the area above equals the total |
|
|
|
337 |
|
00:25:28,230 --> 00:25:31,970 |
|
area underneath the curve is 1. So 1 minus this |
|
|
|
338 |
|
00:25:31,970 --> 00:25:39,050 |
|
value, so equals 0.0885, |
|
|
|
339 |
|
00:25:39,350 --> 00:25:42,250 |
|
and so on. So this is the way how can we compute |
|
|
|
340 |
|
00:25:42,250 --> 00:25:47,850 |
|
the probabilities underneath the normal curve. if |
|
|
|
341 |
|
00:25:47,850 --> 00:25:51,090 |
|
it's probability of z is smaller than then just |
|
|
|
342 |
|
00:25:51,090 --> 00:25:55,910 |
|
use the table directly otherwise if we are talking |
|
|
|
343 |
|
00:25:55,910 --> 00:26:00,390 |
|
about z greater than subtract from one to get the |
|
|
|
344 |
|
00:26:00,390 --> 00:26:04,870 |
|
result that's how can we compute the probability |
|
|
|
345 |
|
00:26:04,870 --> 00:26:13,750 |
|
of z less than or equal now |
|
|
|
346 |
|
00:26:13,750 --> 00:26:18,890 |
|
let's see if we have x and x that has normal |
|
|
|
347 |
|
00:26:18,890 --> 00:26:22,070 |
|
distribution with mean mu and standard deviation |
|
|
|
348 |
|
00:26:22,070 --> 00:26:26,250 |
|
of sigma and let's see how can we compute the |
|
|
|
349 |
|
00:26:26,250 --> 00:26:33,790 |
|
value of the probability mainly |
|
|
|
350 |
|
00:26:33,790 --> 00:26:38,190 |
|
there are three steps to find the probability of x |
|
|
|
351 |
|
00:26:38,190 --> 00:26:42,490 |
|
greater than a and less than b when x is |
|
|
|
352 |
|
00:26:42,490 --> 00:26:47,000 |
|
distributed normally first step Draw normal curve |
|
|
|
353 |
|
00:26:47,000 --> 00:26:54,880 |
|
for the problem in terms of x. So draw the normal |
|
|
|
354 |
|
00:26:54,880 --> 00:26:58,140 |
|
curve first. Second, translate x values to z |
|
|
|
355 |
|
00:26:58,140 --> 00:27:03,040 |
|
values by using the formula we have. z x minus mu |
|
|
|
356 |
|
00:27:03,040 --> 00:27:06,440 |
|
divided by sigma. Then use the standardized normal |
|
|
|
357 |
|
00:27:06,440 --> 00:27:15,140 |
|
table on page 570 and 571. For example, Let's see |
|
|
|
358 |
|
00:27:15,140 --> 00:27:18,420 |
|
how can we find normal probabilities. Let's assume |
|
|
|
359 |
|
00:27:18,420 --> 00:27:23,760 |
|
that X represents the time it takes to download an |
|
|
|
360 |
|
00:27:23,760 --> 00:27:28,580 |
|
image from the internet. So suppose X, time |
|
|
|
361 |
|
00:27:28,580 --> 00:27:33,760 |
|
required to download an image file from the |
|
|
|
362 |
|
00:27:33,760 --> 00:27:38,460 |
|
internet. And suppose we know that the time is |
|
|
|
363 |
|
00:27:38,460 --> 00:27:42,060 |
|
normally distributed for with mean of eight |
|
|
|
364 |
|
00:27:42,060 --> 00:27:46,130 |
|
minutes. And standard deviation of five minutes. |
|
|
|
365 |
|
00:27:46,490 --> 00:27:47,510 |
|
So we know the mean. |
|
|
|
366 |
|
00:27:50,610 --> 00:27:59,670 |
|
Eight. Eight. And sigma of five minutes. And they |
|
|
|
367 |
|
00:27:59,670 --> 00:28:03,410 |
|
ask about what's the probability of X smaller than |
|
|
|
368 |
|
00:28:03,410 --> 00:28:07,990 |
|
eight one six. So first thing we have to compute, |
|
|
|
369 |
|
00:28:08,170 --> 00:28:12,190 |
|
to draw the normal curve. The mean lies in the |
|
|
|
370 |
|
00:28:12,190 --> 00:28:18,060 |
|
center. which is 8. He asked about probability of |
|
|
|
371 |
|
00:28:18,060 --> 00:28:22,580 |
|
X smaller than 8.6. So we are interested in the |
|
|
|
372 |
|
00:28:22,580 --> 00:28:27,920 |
|
area below 8.6. So it matched the table we have. |
|
|
|
373 |
|
00:28:29,980 --> 00:28:34,900 |
|
Second step, we have to transform from normal |
|
|
|
374 |
|
00:28:34,900 --> 00:28:37,280 |
|
distribution to standardized normal distribution |
|
|
|
375 |
|
00:28:37,280 --> 00:28:42,120 |
|
by using this form, which is X minus mu divided by |
|
|
|
376 |
|
00:28:42,120 --> 00:28:51,430 |
|
sigma. So x is 8.6 minus the mean, 8, divided by |
|
|
|
377 |
|
00:28:51,430 --> 00:28:57,130 |
|
sigma, gives 0.12. So just straightforward |
|
|
|
378 |
|
00:28:57,130 --> 00:29:02,890 |
|
calculation, 8.6 is your value of x. The mean is |
|
|
|
379 |
|
00:29:02,890 --> 00:29:12,810 |
|
8, sigma is 5, so that gives 0.12. So now, the |
|
|
|
380 |
|
00:29:12,810 --> 00:29:17,210 |
|
problem becomes, instead of asking x smaller than |
|
|
|
381 |
|
00:29:17,210 --> 00:29:25,110 |
|
8.6, it's similar to z less than 0.12. Still, we |
|
|
|
382 |
|
00:29:25,110 --> 00:29:26,310 |
|
have the same normal curve. |
|
|
|
383 |
|
00:29:29,450 --> 00:29:32,990 |
|
8, the mean. Now, the mean of z is 0, as we |
|
|
|
384 |
|
00:29:32,990 --> 00:29:39,230 |
|
mentioned. Instead of x, 8.6, the corresponding z |
|
|
|
385 |
|
00:29:39,230 --> 00:29:43,000 |
|
value is 0.12. So instead of finding probability |
|
|
|
386 |
|
00:29:43,000 --> 00:29:48,580 |
|
of X smaller than 8.6, smaller than 1.12, so they |
|
|
|
387 |
|
00:29:48,580 --> 00:29:53,760 |
|
are equivalent. So we transform here from normal |
|
|
|
388 |
|
00:29:53,760 --> 00:29:56,980 |
|
distribution to standardized normal distribution |
|
|
|
389 |
|
00:29:56,980 --> 00:29:59,980 |
|
in order to compute the probability we are looking |
|
|
|
390 |
|
00:29:59,980 --> 00:30:05,820 |
|
for. Now, this is just a portion of the table we |
|
|
|
391 |
|
00:30:05,820 --> 00:30:06,100 |
|
have. |
|
|
|
392 |
|
00:30:10,530 --> 00:30:18,530 |
|
So for positive z values. Now 0.1 is 0.1. Because |
|
|
|
393 |
|
00:30:18,530 --> 00:30:25,670 |
|
here we are looking for z less than 0.1. So 0.1. |
|
|
|
394 |
|
00:30:27,210 --> 00:30:32,950 |
|
Also, we have two. So move up to two decimal |
|
|
|
395 |
|
00:30:32,950 --> 00:30:38,190 |
|
places, we get this value. So the answer is point. |
|
|
|
396 |
|
00:30:42,120 --> 00:30:45,860 |
|
I think it's straightforward to compute the |
|
|
|
397 |
|
00:30:45,860 --> 00:30:49,460 |
|
probability underneath the normal curve if X has |
|
|
|
398 |
|
00:30:49,460 --> 00:30:53,160 |
|
normal distribution. So B of X is smaller than 8.6 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
00:30:53,160 --> 00:30:56,740 |
|
is the same as B of Z less than 0.12, which is |
|
|
|
400 |
|
00:30:56,740 --> 00:31:02,680 |
|
around 55%. Makes sense because the area to the |
|
|
|
401 |
|
00:31:02,680 --> 00:31:07,080 |
|
left of 0 equals 1 half. But we are looking for |
|
|
|
402 |
|
00:31:07,080 --> 00:31:12,440 |
|
the area below 0.12. So greater than zero. So this |
|
|
|
403 |
|
00:31:12,440 --> 00:31:16,600 |
|
area actually is greater than 0.5. So it makes |
|
|
|
404 |
|
00:31:16,600 --> 00:31:20,440 |
|
sense that your result is greater than 0.5. |
|
|
|
405 |
|
00:31:22,320 --> 00:31:22,960 |
|
Questions? |
|
|
|
406 |
|
00:31:25,480 --> 00:31:30,780 |
|
Next, suppose we are interested of probability of |
|
|
|
407 |
|
00:31:30,780 --> 00:31:35,380 |
|
X greater than. So that's how can we find normal |
|
|
|
408 |
|
00:31:35,380 --> 00:31:41,980 |
|
upper tail probabilities. Again, the table we have |
|
|
|
409 |
|
00:31:41,980 --> 00:31:46,580 |
|
gives the area to the left. In order to compute |
|
|
|
410 |
|
00:31:46,580 --> 00:31:50,880 |
|
the area in the upper tail probabilities, I mean |
|
|
|
411 |
|
00:31:50,880 --> 00:31:55,620 |
|
this area, since the normal distribution is |
|
|
|
412 |
|
00:31:55,620 --> 00:32:00,160 |
|
symmetric and The total area underneath the curve |
|
|
|
413 |
|
00:32:00,160 --> 00:32:04,680 |
|
is 1. So the probability of X greater than 8.6 is |
|
|
|
414 |
|
00:32:04,680 --> 00:32:11,640 |
|
the same as 1 minus B of X less than 8.6. So first |
|
|
|
415 |
|
00:32:11,640 --> 00:32:17,020 |
|
step, just find the probability we just have and |
|
|
|
416 |
|
00:32:17,020 --> 00:32:21,680 |
|
subtract from 1. So B of X greater than 8.6, the |
|
|
|
417 |
|
00:32:21,680 --> 00:32:25,930 |
|
same as B of Z greater than 0.12. which is the |
|
|
|
418 |
|
00:32:25,930 --> 00:32:30,370 |
|
same as 1 minus B of Z less than 0.5. It's 1 minus |
|
|
|
419 |
|
00:32:30,370 --> 00:32:36,230 |
|
the result we got from previous one. So this value |
|
|
|
420 |
|
00:32:36,230 --> 00:32:39,410 |
|
1 minus this value gives 0.452. |
|
|
|
421 |
|
00:32:41,610 --> 00:32:45,090 |
|
So for the other tail probability, just subtract 1 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
00:32:45,090 --> 00:32:47,690 |
|
from the lower tail probabilities. |
|
|
|
423 |
|
00:32:51,930 --> 00:32:55,750 |
|
Now let's see how can we find Normal probability |
|
|
|
424 |
|
00:32:55,750 --> 00:33:01,750 |
|
between two values. I mean if X, for example, for |
|
|
|
425 |
|
00:33:01,750 --> 00:33:06,610 |
|
the same data we have, suppose X between 8 and 8 |
|
|
|
426 |
|
00:33:06,610 --> 00:33:13,360 |
|
.6. Now what's the area between these two? Here we |
|
|
|
427 |
|
00:33:13,360 --> 00:33:17,220 |
|
have two values of x, x is 8 and x is 8.6. |
|
|
|
428 |
|
00:33:24,280 --> 00:33:33,780 |
|
Exactly, so below 8.6 minus below 8 and below 8 is |
|
|
|
429 |
|
00:33:33,780 --> 00:33:40,840 |
|
1 half. So the probability of x between 8 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
00:33:40,840 --> 00:33:47,340 |
|
and And 8.2 and 8.6. You can find z-score for the |
|
|
|
431 |
|
00:33:47,340 --> 00:33:52,480 |
|
first value, which is zero. Also compute the z |
|
|
|
432 |
|
00:33:52,480 --> 00:33:55,540 |
|
-score for the other value, which as we computed |
|
|
|
433 |
|
00:33:55,540 --> 00:34:01,580 |
|
before, 0.12. Now this problem becomes z between |
|
|
|
434 |
|
00:34:01,580 --> 00:34:04,540 |
|
zero and 0.5. |
|
|
|
435 |
|
00:34:07,480 --> 00:34:15,120 |
|
So B of x. Greater than 8 and smaller than 8.6 is |
|
|
|
436 |
|
00:34:15,120 --> 00:34:20,800 |
|
the same as z between 0 and 0.12. Now this area |
|
|
|
437 |
|
00:34:20,800 --> 00:34:25,320 |
|
equals b of z smaller than 0.12 minus the area |
|
|
|
438 |
|
00:34:25,320 --> 00:34:26,520 |
|
below z which is 1.5. |
|
|
|
439 |
|
00:34:31,100 --> 00:34:37,380 |
|
So again, b of z between 0 and 1.5 equal b of z |
|
|
|
440 |
|
00:34:37,380 --> 00:34:42,840 |
|
small. larger than 0.12 minus b of z less than |
|
|
|
441 |
|
00:34:42,840 --> 00:34:46,520 |
|
zero. Now, b of z less than 0.12 gives this |
|
|
|
442 |
|
00:34:46,520 --> 00:34:53,060 |
|
result, 0.5478. The probability below zero is one |
|
|
|
443 |
|
00:34:53,060 --> 00:34:56,160 |
|
-half because we know that the area to the left is |
|
|
|
444 |
|
00:34:56,160 --> 00:34:59,320 |
|
zero, same as to the right is one-half. So the |
|
|
|
445 |
|
00:34:59,320 --> 00:35:04,240 |
|
answer is going to be 0.478. So that's how can we |
|
|
|
446 |
|
00:35:04,240 --> 00:35:07,540 |
|
compute the probabilities for lower 10 directly |
|
|
|
447 |
|
00:35:07,540 --> 00:35:12,230 |
|
from the table. upper tail is just one minus lower |
|
|
|
448 |
|
00:35:12,230 --> 00:35:18,990 |
|
tail and between two values just subtracts the |
|
|
|
449 |
|
00:35:18,990 --> 00:35:21,970 |
|
larger one minus smaller one because he was |
|
|
|
450 |
|
00:35:21,970 --> 00:35:26,310 |
|
subtracted bz less than point one minus bz less |
|
|
|
451 |
|
00:35:26,310 --> 00:35:29,430 |
|
than or equal to zero that will give the normal |
|
|
|
452 |
|
00:35:29,430 --> 00:35:36,850 |
|
probability another example suppose we are looking |
|
|
|
453 |
|
00:35:36,850 --> 00:35:49,350 |
|
for X between 7.4 and 8. Now, 7.4 lies below the |
|
|
|
454 |
|
00:35:49,350 --> 00:35:55,270 |
|
mean. So here, this value, we have to compute the |
|
|
|
455 |
|
00:35:55,270 --> 00:36:00,130 |
|
z-score for 7.4 and also the z-score for 8, which |
|
|
|
456 |
|
00:36:00,130 --> 00:36:04,090 |
|
is zero. And that will give, again, |
|
|
|
457 |
|
00:36:07,050 --> 00:36:13,710 |
|
7.4, if you just use this equation, minus |
|
|
|
458 |
|
00:36:13,710 --> 00:36:17,690 |
|
the mean, divided by sigma, negative 0.6 divided |
|
|
|
459 |
|
00:36:17,690 --> 00:36:21,150 |
|
by 5, which is negative 0.12. |
|
|
|
460 |
|
00:36:22,730 --> 00:36:31,410 |
|
So it gives B of z between minus 0.12 and 0. And |
|
|
|
461 |
|
00:36:31,410 --> 00:36:35,700 |
|
that again is B of z less than 0. minus P of Z |
|
|
|
462 |
|
00:36:35,700 --> 00:36:40,140 |
|
less than negative 0.12. Is it clear? Now here we |
|
|
|
463 |
|
00:36:40,140 --> 00:36:42,260 |
|
converted or we transformed from normal |
|
|
|
464 |
|
00:36:42,260 --> 00:36:45,960 |
|
distribution to standardized. So instead of X |
|
|
|
465 |
|
00:36:45,960 --> 00:36:52,100 |
|
between 7.4 and 8, we have now Z between minus 0 |
|
|
|
466 |
|
00:36:52,100 --> 00:36:57,480 |
|
.12 and 0. So this area actually is the red one, |
|
|
|
467 |
|
00:36:57,620 --> 00:37:03,740 |
|
the red area is one-half. Total area below z is |
|
|
|
468 |
|
00:37:03,740 --> 00:37:10,700 |
|
one-half, below zero, and minus z below minus 0 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
00:37:10,700 --> 00:37:17,820 |
|
.12. So B of z less than zero minus negative 0.12. |
|
|
|
470 |
|
00:37:18,340 --> 00:37:21,940 |
|
That will give the area between minus 0.12 and |
|
|
|
471 |
|
00:37:21,940 --> 00:37:28,860 |
|
zero. This is one-half. Now, B of z less than |
|
|
|
472 |
|
00:37:28,860 --> 00:37:33,270 |
|
negative 0.12. look you go back to the normal |
|
|
|
473 |
|
00:37:33,270 --> 00:37:37,650 |
|
curve to the normal table but for the negative |
|
|
|
474 |
|
00:37:37,650 --> 00:37:42,310 |
|
values of z negative point one two negative point |
|
|
|
475 |
|
00:37:42,310 --> 00:37:53,290 |
|
one two four five two two it's four five point |
|
|
|
476 |
|
00:37:53,290 --> 00:37:56,630 |
|
five minus point four five two two will give the |
|
|
|
477 |
|
00:37:56,630 --> 00:37:58,370 |
|
result we are looking for |
|
|
|
478 |
|
00:38:01,570 --> 00:38:06,370 |
|
So B of Z less than 0 is 0.5. B of Z less than |
|
|
|
479 |
|
00:38:06,370 --> 00:38:12,650 |
|
negative 0.12 equals minus 0.4522. That will give |
|
|
|
480 |
|
00:38:12,650 --> 00:38:14,290 |
|
0 forcibility. |
|
|
|
481 |
|
00:38:16,790 --> 00:38:23,590 |
|
Now, by symmetric, you can see that this |
|
|
|
482 |
|
00:38:23,590 --> 00:38:28,470 |
|
probability between |
|
|
|
483 |
|
00:38:28,470 --> 00:38:38,300 |
|
Z between minus 0.12 and 0 is the same as the |
|
|
|
484 |
|
00:38:38,300 --> 00:38:43,340 |
|
other side from 0.12 I mean this area the red one |
|
|
|
485 |
|
00:38:43,340 --> 00:38:46,200 |
|
is the same up to 8.6 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
00:38:55,600 --> 00:38:58,840 |
|
So the area between minus 0.12 up to 0 is the same |
|
|
|
487 |
|
00:38:58,840 --> 00:39:04,920 |
|
as from 0 up to 0.12. Because of symmetric, since |
|
|
|
488 |
|
00:39:04,920 --> 00:39:09,680 |
|
this area equals the same for the other part. So |
|
|
|
489 |
|
00:39:09,680 --> 00:39:15,660 |
|
from 0 up to 0.12 is the same as minus 0.12 up to |
|
|
|
490 |
|
00:39:15,660 --> 00:39:19,100 |
|
0. So equal, so the normal distribution is |
|
|
|
491 |
|
00:39:19,100 --> 00:39:23,200 |
|
symmetric. So this probability is the same as B of |
|
|
|
492 |
|
00:39:23,200 --> 00:39:27,980 |
|
Z between 0 and 0.12. Any question? |
|
|
|
493 |
|
00:39:34,520 --> 00:39:36,620 |
|
Again, the equal sign does not matter. |
|
|
|
494 |
|
00:39:42,120 --> 00:39:45,000 |
|
Because here we have the complement. The |
|
|
|
495 |
|
00:39:45,000 --> 00:39:49,250 |
|
complement. If this one, I mean, complement of z |
|
|
|
496 |
|
00:39:49,250 --> 00:39:53,350 |
|
less than, greater than 0.12, the complement is B |
|
|
|
497 |
|
00:39:53,350 --> 00:39:56,350 |
|
of z less than or equal to minus 0.12. So we |
|
|
|
498 |
|
00:39:56,350 --> 00:40:00,070 |
|
should have just permutation, the equality. But it |
|
|
|
499 |
|
00:40:00,070 --> 00:40:04,830 |
|
doesn't matter. If in the problem we don't have |
|
|
|
500 |
|
00:40:04,830 --> 00:40:07,470 |
|
equal sign in the complement, we should have equal |
|
|
|
501 |
|
00:40:07,470 --> 00:40:11,430 |
|
sign. But it doesn't matter actually if we have |
|
|
|
502 |
|
00:40:11,430 --> 00:40:14,510 |
|
equal sign or not. For example, if we are looking |
|
|
|
503 |
|
00:40:14,510 --> 00:40:19,430 |
|
for B of X greater than A. Now what's the |
|
|
|
504 |
|
00:40:19,430 --> 00:40:25,950 |
|
complement of that? 1 minus less |
|
|
|
505 |
|
00:40:25,950 --> 00:40:32,450 |
|
than or equal to A. But if X is greater than or |
|
|
|
506 |
|
00:40:32,450 --> 00:40:37,870 |
|
equal to A, the complement is without equal sign. |
|
|
|
507 |
|
00:40:38,310 --> 00:40:40,970 |
|
But in continuous distribution, the equal sign |
|
|
|
508 |
|
00:40:40,970 --> 00:40:44,990 |
|
does not matter. Any question? |
|
|
|
509 |
|
00:40:52,190 --> 00:40:58,130 |
|
comments. Let's move to the next topic which talks |
|
|
|
510 |
|
00:40:58,130 --> 00:41:05,510 |
|
about the empirical rule. If you remember before |
|
|
|
511 |
|
00:41:05,510 --> 00:41:16,750 |
|
we said there is an empirical rule for 68, 95, 95, |
|
|
|
512 |
|
00:41:17,420 --> 00:41:23,060 |
|
99.71. Now let's see the exact meaning of this |
|
|
|
513 |
|
00:41:23,060 --> 00:41:23,320 |
|
rule. |
|
|
|
514 |
|
00:41:37,580 --> 00:41:40,460 |
|
Now we have to apply the empirical rule not to |
|
|
|
515 |
|
00:41:40,460 --> 00:41:43,020 |
|
Chebyshev's inequality because the distribution is |
|
|
|
516 |
|
00:41:43,020 --> 00:41:48,670 |
|
normal. Chebyshev's is applied for skewed |
|
|
|
517 |
|
00:41:48,670 --> 00:41:52,630 |
|
distributions. For symmetric, we have to apply the |
|
|
|
518 |
|
00:41:52,630 --> 00:41:55,630 |
|
empirical rule. Here, we assume the distribution |
|
|
|
519 |
|
00:41:55,630 --> 00:41:58,390 |
|
is normal. And today, we are talking about normal |
|
|
|
520 |
|
00:41:58,390 --> 00:42:01,330 |
|
distribution. So we have to use the empirical |
|
|
|
521 |
|
00:42:01,330 --> 00:42:02,410 |
|
rules. |
|
|
|
522 |
|
00:42:07,910 --> 00:42:13,530 |
|
Now, the mean is the value in the middle. Suppose |
|
|
|
523 |
|
00:42:13,530 --> 00:42:16,900 |
|
we are far away. from the mean by one standard |
|
|
|
524 |
|
00:42:16,900 --> 00:42:22,720 |
|
deviation either below or above and we are |
|
|
|
525 |
|
00:42:22,720 --> 00:42:27,040 |
|
interested in the area between this value which is |
|
|
|
526 |
|
00:42:27,040 --> 00:42:33,040 |
|
mu minus sigma so we are looking for mu minus |
|
|
|
527 |
|
00:42:33,040 --> 00:42:36,360 |
|
sigma and mu plus sigma |
|
|
|
528 |
|
00:42:53,270 --> 00:42:59,890 |
|
Last time we said there's a rule 68% of the data |
|
|
|
529 |
|
00:42:59,890 --> 00:43:06,790 |
|
lies one standard deviation within the mean. Now |
|
|
|
530 |
|
00:43:06,790 --> 00:43:10,550 |
|
let's see how can we compute the exact area, area |
|
|
|
531 |
|
00:43:10,550 --> 00:43:15,250 |
|
not just say 68%. Now X has normal distribution |
|
|
|
532 |
|
00:43:15,250 --> 00:43:18,390 |
|
with mean mu and standard deviation sigma. So |
|
|
|
533 |
|
00:43:18,390 --> 00:43:25,280 |
|
let's compare it from normal distribution to |
|
|
|
534 |
|
00:43:25,280 --> 00:43:29,700 |
|
standardized. So this is the first value here. Now |
|
|
|
535 |
|
00:43:29,700 --> 00:43:34,940 |
|
the z-score, the general formula is x minus the |
|
|
|
536 |
|
00:43:34,940 --> 00:43:40,120 |
|
mean divided by sigma. Now the first quantity is |
|
|
|
537 |
|
00:43:40,120 --> 00:43:45,660 |
|
mu minus sigma. So instead of x here, so first z |
|
|
|
538 |
|
00:43:45,660 --> 00:43:49,820 |
|
is, now this x should be replaced by mu minus |
|
|
|
539 |
|
00:43:49,820 --> 00:43:55,040 |
|
sigma. So mu minus sigma. So that's my x value, |
|
|
|
540 |
|
00:43:55,560 --> 00:44:00,240 |
|
minus the mean of that, which is mu, divided by |
|
|
|
541 |
|
00:44:00,240 --> 00:44:07,900 |
|
sigma. Mu minus sigma minus mu mu cancels, so plus |
|
|
|
542 |
|
00:44:07,900 --> 00:44:13,520 |
|
one. And let's see how can we compute that area. I |
|
|
|
543 |
|
00:44:13,520 --> 00:44:16,980 |
|
mean between minus one and plus one. In this case, |
|
|
|
544 |
|
00:44:17,040 --> 00:44:23,180 |
|
we are interested or we are looking for the area |
|
|
|
545 |
|
00:44:23,180 --> 00:44:28,300 |
|
between minus one and plus one this area now the |
|
|
|
546 |
|
00:44:28,300 --> 00:44:31,360 |
|
dashed area i mean the area between minus one and |
|
|
|
547 |
|
00:44:31,360 --> 00:44:39,460 |
|
plus one equals the area below one this area minus |
|
|
|
548 |
|
00:44:39,460 --> 00:44:44,980 |
|
the area below minus one that will give the area |
|
|
|
549 |
|
00:44:44,980 --> 00:44:48,200 |
|
between minus one and plus one now go back to the |
|
|
|
550 |
|
00:44:48,200 --> 00:44:52,500 |
|
normal table you have and look at the value of one |
|
|
|
551 |
|
00:44:52,500 --> 00:45:02,620 |
|
z and one under zero what's your answer one point |
|
|
|
552 |
|
00:45:02,620 --> 00:45:11,520 |
|
one point now without using the table can you tell |
|
|
|
553 |
|
00:45:11,520 --> 00:45:17,360 |
|
the area below minus one one minus this one |
|
|
|
554 |
|
00:45:17,360 --> 00:45:17,840 |
|
because |
|
|
|
555 |
|
00:45:23,430 --> 00:45:29,870 |
|
Now the area below, this is 1. The area below 1 is |
|
|
|
556 |
|
00:45:29,870 --> 00:45:31,310 |
|
0.3413. |
|
|
|
557 |
|
00:45:34,430 --> 00:45:37,590 |
|
Okay, now the area below minus 1. |
|
|
|
558 |
|
00:45:40,770 --> 00:45:42,050 |
|
This is minus 1. |
|
|
|
559 |
|
00:45:46,810 --> 00:45:49,550 |
|
Now, the area below minus 1 is the same as above |
|
|
|
560 |
|
00:45:49,550 --> 00:45:50,510 |
|
1. |
|
|
|
561 |
|
00:45:54,310 --> 00:45:58,810 |
|
These are the two areas here are equal. So the |
|
|
|
562 |
|
00:45:58,810 --> 00:46:03,110 |
|
area below minus 1, I mean b of z less than minus |
|
|
|
563 |
|
00:46:03,110 --> 00:46:09,130 |
|
1 is the same as b of z greater than 1. And b of z |
|
|
|
564 |
|
00:46:09,130 --> 00:46:12,650 |
|
greater than 1 is the same as 1 minus b of z |
|
|
|
565 |
|
00:46:12,650 --> 00:46:17,310 |
|
smaller than 1. So b of z less than 1 here. You |
|
|
|
566 |
|
00:46:17,310 --> 00:46:19,710 |
|
shouldn't need to look again to the table. Just |
|
|
|
567 |
|
00:46:19,710 --> 00:46:26,770 |
|
subtract 1 from this value. Make sense? Here we |
|
|
|
568 |
|
00:46:26,770 --> 00:46:30,490 |
|
compute the value of B of Z less than 1, which is |
|
|
|
569 |
|
00:46:30,490 --> 00:46:35,430 |
|
0.8413. We are looking for B of Z less than minus |
|
|
|
570 |
|
00:46:35,430 --> 00:46:39,770 |
|
1, which is the same as B of Z greater than 1. |
|
|
|
571 |
|
00:46:40,750 --> 00:46:43,850 |
|
Now, greater than means our tail. It's 1 minus the |
|
|
|
572 |
|
00:46:43,850 --> 00:46:48,700 |
|
lower tail probability. So this is 1 minus. So the |
|
|
|
573 |
|
00:46:48,700 --> 00:46:52,240 |
|
answer again is 1 minus 0.8413. |
|
|
|
574 |
|
00:46:54,280 --> 00:47:00,040 |
|
So 8413 minus 0.1587. |
|
|
|
575 |
|
00:47:11,380 --> 00:47:17,030 |
|
So 8413. minus 1.1587. |
|
|
|
576 |
|
00:47:21,630 --> 00:47:27,570 |
|
Okay, so that gives 0.6826. |
|
|
|
577 |
|
00:47:29,090 --> 00:47:37,550 |
|
Multiply this one by 100, we get 68.1826. |
|
|
|
578 |
|
00:47:38,750 --> 00:47:44,010 |
|
So roughly 60-80% of the observations lie between |
|
|
|
579 |
|
00:47:44,010 --> 00:47:50,470 |
|
one standard deviation around the mean. So this is |
|
|
|
580 |
|
00:47:50,470 --> 00:47:53,850 |
|
the way how can we compute the area below one |
|
|
|
581 |
|
00:47:53,850 --> 00:47:57,250 |
|
standard deviation or above one standard deviation |
|
|
|
582 |
|
00:47:57,250 --> 00:48:03,790 |
|
of the mean. Do the same for not mu minus sigma, |
|
|
|
583 |
|
00:48:05,230 --> 00:48:11,540 |
|
mu plus minus two sigma and mu plus two sigma. The |
|
|
|
584 |
|
00:48:11,540 --> 00:48:14,600 |
|
only difference is that this one is going to be |
|
|
|
585 |
|
00:48:14,600 --> 00:48:17,280 |
|
minus 2 and do the same. |
|
|
|
586 |
|
00:48:20,620 --> 00:48:23,080 |
|
That's the empirical rule we discussed in chapter |
|
|
|
587 |
|
00:48:23,080 --> 00:48:28,980 |
|
3. So here we can find any probability, not just |
|
|
|
588 |
|
00:48:28,980 --> 00:48:33,660 |
|
95 or 68 or 99.7. We can use the normal table to |
|
|
|
589 |
|
00:48:33,660 --> 00:48:36,900 |
|
give or to find or to compute any probability. |
|
|
|
590 |
|
00:48:48,270 --> 00:48:53,090 |
|
So again, for the other one, mu plus or minus two |
|
|
|
591 |
|
00:48:53,090 --> 00:49:00,190 |
|
sigma, it covers about 95% of the axis. For mu |
|
|
|
592 |
|
00:49:00,190 --> 00:49:03,750 |
|
plus or minus three sigma, it covers around all |
|
|
|
593 |
|
00:49:03,750 --> 00:49:08,450 |
|
the data, 99.7. So just do it at home, you will |
|
|
|
594 |
|
00:49:08,450 --> 00:49:14,210 |
|
see that the exact area is 95.44 instead of 95. |
|
|
|
595 |
|
00:49:14,840 --> 00:49:18,520 |
|
And the other one is 99.73. So that's the |
|
|
|
596 |
|
00:49:18,520 --> 00:49:23,520 |
|
empirical rule we discussed in chapter three. I'm |
|
|
|
597 |
|
00:49:23,520 --> 00:49:32,560 |
|
going to stop at this point, which is the x value |
|
|
|
598 |
|
00:49:32,560 --> 00:49:38,400 |
|
for the normal probability. Now, what we discussed |
|
|
|
599 |
|
00:49:38,400 --> 00:49:43,560 |
|
so far, we computed the probability. I mean, |
|
|
|
600 |
|
00:49:43,740 --> 00:49:49,120 |
|
what's the probability of X smaller than E? Now, |
|
|
|
601 |
|
00:49:49,200 --> 00:49:56,240 |
|
suppose this probability is known. How can we |
|
|
|
602 |
|
00:49:56,240 --> 00:50:01,500 |
|
compute this value? Later, we'll talk about that. |
|
|
|
603 |
|
00:50:06,300 --> 00:50:09,820 |
|
It's backward calculations. It's inverse or |
|
|
|
604 |
|
00:50:09,820 --> 00:50:11,420 |
|
backward calculation. |
|
|
|
605 |
|
00:50:13,300 --> 00:50:14,460 |
|
for next time inshallah. |
|
|
|
|