|
1 |
|
00:00:20,650 --> 00:00:23,910 |
|
As-salamu alaykum and good day everyone. Welcome |
|
|
|
2 |
|
00:00:23,910 --> 00:00:27,090 |
|
back and let's continue our lesson on our friend |
|
|
|
3 |
|
00:00:27,090 --> 00:00:33,930 |
|
John Donne. As we saw last time we examined some |
|
|
|
4 |
|
00:00:33,930 --> 00:00:38,970 |
|
texts by John Donne himself and by George Herbert |
|
|
|
5 |
|
00:00:38,970 --> 00:00:42,450 |
|
who is also a follower of John Donne. We realized |
|
|
|
6 |
|
00:00:42,450 --> 00:00:47,910 |
|
that during the Elizabethan and the Jacobian ages |
|
|
|
7 |
|
00:00:47,910 --> 00:00:53,030 |
|
there were poets, major poets following the rules |
|
|
|
8 |
|
00:00:53,030 --> 00:00:56,990 |
|
of decorum. They were writing according to a set |
|
|
|
9 |
|
00:00:56,990 --> 00:00:59,910 |
|
of rules they had to follow in a way or another. |
|
|
|
10 |
|
00:01:01,230 --> 00:01:04,830 |
|
But despite that, despite the strong current, the |
|
|
|
11 |
|
00:01:04,830 --> 00:01:06,710 |
|
many people who were writing this kind of |
|
|
|
12 |
|
00:01:06,710 --> 00:01:11,050 |
|
literature, there were some poets who were writing |
|
|
|
13 |
|
00:01:11,050 --> 00:01:14,490 |
|
something different, totally different. In a way, |
|
|
|
14 |
|
00:01:14,590 --> 00:01:17,590 |
|
they were experimenting on new forms, new |
|
|
|
15 |
|
00:01:17,590 --> 00:01:20,150 |
|
language, new themes. They were breaking the rules |
|
|
|
16 |
|
00:01:20,150 --> 00:01:23,970 |
|
of decorum. They were challenging the authority |
|
|
|
17 |
|
00:01:23,970 --> 00:01:28,010 |
|
itself, the mainstream opinion of what it is to |
|
|
|
18 |
|
00:01:28,010 --> 00:01:31,510 |
|
write poetry and literature. Today, I'll continue |
|
|
|
19 |
|
00:01:31,510 --> 00:01:35,900 |
|
talking about John Donne. and examine the features |
|
|
|
20 |
|
00:01:35,900 --> 00:01:38,660 |
|
of his poetry and that of the metaphysical poetry. |
|
|
|
21 |
|
00:01:38,740 --> 00:01:42,500 |
|
In general, last time I summed up the class and I |
|
|
|
22 |
|
00:01:42,500 --> 00:01:46,820 |
|
concluded saying that because John Donne did this, |
|
|
|
23 |
|
00:01:46,860 --> 00:01:50,240 |
|
because he wrote different poetry, he was not |
|
|
|
24 |
|
00:01:50,240 --> 00:01:54,400 |
|
welcomed in a way. He was not received well. He |
|
|
|
25 |
|
00:01:54,400 --> 00:01:58,940 |
|
was negatively framed, remember? As a bad poet, as |
|
|
|
26 |
|
00:01:58,940 --> 00:02:02,840 |
|
a difficult poet, A person who doesn't write |
|
|
|
27 |
|
00:02:02,840 --> 00:02:05,740 |
|
poetry but writes verse. So his poetry is not |
|
|
|
28 |
|
00:02:05,740 --> 00:02:10,520 |
|
poetry because it breaks the rules. For about 200 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
00:02:10,520 --> 00:02:13,840 |
|
years, John Donne and his followers were outside |
|
|
|
30 |
|
00:02:13,840 --> 00:02:16,580 |
|
the English canon. Remember the English canon when |
|
|
|
31 |
|
00:02:16,580 --> 00:02:20,000 |
|
we said it's not objective? Because the people who |
|
|
|
32 |
|
00:02:20,000 --> 00:02:23,200 |
|
determine the canon are the people who benefit |
|
|
|
33 |
|
00:02:23,200 --> 00:02:25,540 |
|
from the canon, who are closer to the king |
|
|
|
34 |
|
00:02:25,540 --> 00:02:31,720 |
|
probably or the queen. And it was T.S. Eliot. And |
|
|
|
35 |
|
00:02:31,720 --> 00:02:34,280 |
|
we already know who T.S. Eliot is. He's a famous |
|
|
|
36 |
|
00:02:34,280 --> 00:02:39,460 |
|
20th century poet and critic. T.S. Eliot brought |
|
|
|
37 |
|
00:02:39,460 --> 00:02:44,500 |
|
those poets back to life. He resurrected them. He |
|
|
|
38 |
|
00:02:44,500 --> 00:02:47,780 |
|
opened their graves and brought them back to life |
|
|
|
39 |
|
00:02:47,780 --> 00:02:50,360 |
|
and made them famous again. He showed how |
|
|
|
40 |
|
00:02:50,360 --> 00:02:52,980 |
|
important their poetry was. And as a matter of |
|
|
|
41 |
|
00:02:52,980 --> 00:02:55,180 |
|
fact, many poets in the 20th century were |
|
|
|
42 |
|
00:02:55,180 --> 00:02:59,620 |
|
following the example of John Donne and his poets. |
|
|
|
43 |
|
00:02:59,980 --> 00:03:02,900 |
|
And a very important example how John Donne and |
|
|
|
44 |
|
00:03:02,900 --> 00:03:07,860 |
|
his followers were negatively framed is the fact |
|
|
|
45 |
|
00:03:07,860 --> 00:03:10,000 |
|
that they were described as metaphysical poets. |
|
|
|
46 |
|
00:03:11,160 --> 00:03:14,220 |
|
The term meta and physical, what does it have to |
|
|
|
47 |
|
00:03:14,220 --> 00:03:16,560 |
|
do with pottery? Physical and metaphysical, beyond |
|
|
|
48 |
|
00:03:16,560 --> 00:03:19,720 |
|
nature and supernatural and beyond the physical. |
|
|
|
49 |
|
00:03:21,040 --> 00:03:23,180 |
|
Many people try to explain the term, what it |
|
|
|
50 |
|
00:03:23,180 --> 00:03:27,560 |
|
means. But personally, I believe it doesn't mean |
|
|
|
51 |
|
00:03:27,560 --> 00:03:32,300 |
|
much. Because it was used as a negative word, as |
|
|
|
52 |
|
00:03:32,300 --> 00:03:37,070 |
|
TSE let's say, as a term of abuse. As an insult, |
|
|
|
53 |
|
00:03:37,170 --> 00:03:40,990 |
|
thank you. Metaphysical. Seriously, when you see, |
|
|
|
54 |
|
00:03:41,130 --> 00:03:44,650 |
|
when I tell you, OK, here is a romantic poem, and |
|
|
|
55 |
|
00:03:44,650 --> 00:03:46,810 |
|
here is a metaphysical poem, which one would you |
|
|
|
56 |
|
00:03:46,810 --> 00:03:49,810 |
|
choose before reading? Probably the romantic, |
|
|
|
57 |
|
00:03:50,010 --> 00:03:54,250 |
|
because it's a romantic poem. Something you might |
|
|
|
58 |
|
00:03:54,250 --> 00:03:57,290 |
|
find good, you think would be good. But |
|
|
|
59 |
|
00:03:57,290 --> 00:04:02,010 |
|
metaphysical poetry. So early in the 20th century, |
|
|
|
60 |
|
00:04:02,270 --> 00:04:03,430 |
|
TS Eliot again |
|
|
|
61 |
|
00:04:06,180 --> 00:04:10,120 |
|
showed how important Don and his followers were at |
|
|
|
62 |
|
00:04:10,120 --> 00:04:14,450 |
|
Marvel and at George Herbert. And many poets |
|
|
|
63 |
|
00:04:14,450 --> 00:04:16,770 |
|
started, in a way, imitating them, following them, |
|
|
|
64 |
|
00:04:17,050 --> 00:04:19,650 |
|
using them as examples. And they become, nowadays, |
|
|
|
65 |
|
00:04:20,130 --> 00:04:21,930 |
|
John Donne and his followers are more important |
|
|
|
66 |
|
00:04:21,930 --> 00:04:25,670 |
|
than Johnson and even probably Dryden and other |
|
|
|
67 |
|
00:04:25,670 --> 00:04:29,490 |
|
poets. And this is how funny life can be and |
|
|
|
68 |
|
00:04:29,490 --> 00:04:32,130 |
|
literature can be. When you are alive, nobody |
|
|
|
69 |
|
00:04:32,130 --> 00:04:34,710 |
|
cares about you. 100 years later, nobody cares |
|
|
|
70 |
|
00:04:34,710 --> 00:04:37,450 |
|
about you. 100 years, even 200 years later, nobody |
|
|
|
71 |
|
00:04:37,450 --> 00:04:39,510 |
|
cares about you. But later on, something happens |
|
|
|
72 |
|
00:04:39,510 --> 00:04:42,410 |
|
and you become the most important poet around. |
|
|
|
73 |
|
00:04:43,600 --> 00:04:46,120 |
|
John Donne, in my opinion, is one of the most |
|
|
|
74 |
|
00:04:46,120 --> 00:04:49,240 |
|
famous poets. Not only for his good poetry, |
|
|
|
75 |
|
00:04:49,340 --> 00:04:51,620 |
|
wonderful poetry, that still even today talks to |
|
|
|
76 |
|
00:04:51,620 --> 00:04:55,640 |
|
us like Shakespeare. But because he brought new |
|
|
|
77 |
|
00:04:55,640 --> 00:04:59,200 |
|
things, new themes, new forms to English poetry |
|
|
|
78 |
|
00:04:59,200 --> 00:05:06,200 |
|
early in the 17th century. So let's study more |
|
|
|
79 |
|
00:05:06,200 --> 00:05:08,640 |
|
about John Donne. |
|
|
|
80 |
|
00:05:11,780 --> 00:05:14,340 |
|
Remember this? Did we study this already before? |
|
|
|
81 |
|
00:05:14,500 --> 00:05:21,480 |
|
Can someone read? Please. Come live with me and be |
|
|
|
82 |
|
00:05:21,480 --> 00:05:24,740 |
|
my love and we will have some new pleasures as |
|
|
|
83 |
|
00:05:24,740 --> 00:05:30,000 |
|
well. Very good. Come live with me and be my love |
|
|
|
84 |
|
00:05:30,000 --> 00:05:32,620 |
|
and we will have some new pleasures as well. |
|
|
|
85 |
|
00:05:32,680 --> 00:05:34,420 |
|
Pleasures as well. Did we study this before |
|
|
|
86 |
|
00:05:34,420 --> 00:05:39,120 |
|
already? Yes. Who is the poet here? Did we study |
|
|
|
87 |
|
00:05:39,120 --> 00:05:41,480 |
|
this? Haven't we studied this before? Oh, we |
|
|
|
88 |
|
00:05:41,480 --> 00:05:45,640 |
|
studied something by Marlowe, remember? Are you |
|
|
|
89 |
|
00:05:45,640 --> 00:05:52,020 |
|
sure? Are you sure this is Marlowe? Remember the |
|
|
|
90 |
|
00:05:52,020 --> 00:05:54,460 |
|
passionate Chiba to his love? How does it begin? |
|
|
|
91 |
|
00:05:56,020 --> 00:05:57,800 |
|
Does anybody memorize the lines, the first |
|
|
|
92 |
|
00:05:57,800 --> 00:06:00,760 |
|
couplet? The passionate Chiba to his love. What |
|
|
|
93 |
|
00:06:00,760 --> 00:06:07,840 |
|
does he say? He says, What is this Marlowe? The |
|
|
|
94 |
|
00:06:07,840 --> 00:06:11,200 |
|
first line is Marlowe. What is the second one |
|
|
|
95 |
|
00:06:11,200 --> 00:06:17,860 |
|
Marlowe? All. This is Marlowe. Come live with me |
|
|
|
96 |
|
00:06:17,860 --> 00:06:21,600 |
|
and be my love and we will all the pleasures grow. |
|
|
|
97 |
|
00:06:22,520 --> 00:06:28,580 |
|
And this is done. Done says some, new. Here all, |
|
|
|
98 |
|
00:06:28,920 --> 00:06:34,530 |
|
old. Here some, but this some is new it's |
|
|
|
99 |
|
00:06:34,530 --> 00:06:37,850 |
|
interesting so let's try to compare between these |
|
|
|
100 |
|
00:06:37,850 --> 00:06:42,970 |
|
couplets so again this is مانو but this is دانس |
|
|
|
101 |
|
00:06:42,970 --> 00:06:45,290 |
|
what do you notice what is the major difference |
|
|
|
102 |
|
00:06:45,290 --> 00:06:50,730 |
|
here same number of feet same rhyme scheme same |
|
|
|
103 |
|
00:06:50,730 --> 00:06:54,210 |
|
almost everything same first line but the second |
|
|
|
104 |
|
00:06:54,210 --> 00:07:01,890 |
|
line we have here all the definite article, and |
|
|
|
105 |
|
00:07:01,890 --> 00:07:09,950 |
|
here we have some, but this some is new. And this |
|
|
|
106 |
|
00:07:09,950 --> 00:07:11,790 |
|
is the metaphysical poetry, this is John Donne. He |
|
|
|
107 |
|
00:07:11,790 --> 00:07:15,210 |
|
knew, he was conscious that he was writing new |
|
|
|
108 |
|
00:07:15,210 --> 00:07:18,450 |
|
poetry, that he was writing something different. |
|
|
|
109 |
|
00:07:19,520 --> 00:07:22,540 |
|
that he was changing the history of English poetry |
|
|
|
110 |
|
00:07:22,540 --> 00:07:24,180 |
|
in a way or another, that he was breaking the |
|
|
|
111 |
|
00:07:24,180 --> 00:07:28,280 |
|
rule. Many people, critics say that Jonathan was |
|
|
|
112 |
|
00:07:28,280 --> 00:07:31,340 |
|
just a digression. He just was writing poetry the |
|
|
|
113 |
|
00:07:31,340 --> 00:07:35,790 |
|
way he liked. That's true, but There's also strong |
|
|
|
114 |
|
00:07:35,790 --> 00:07:39,050 |
|
evidence in his poetry that John Donne knew that |
|
|
|
115 |
|
00:07:39,050 --> 00:07:41,950 |
|
he was contradicting, swimming against the |
|
|
|
116 |
|
00:07:41,950 --> 00:07:44,650 |
|
current, like some of you said last time, that he |
|
|
|
117 |
|
00:07:44,650 --> 00:07:47,090 |
|
was breaking the rules of decorum of the |
|
|
|
118 |
|
00:07:47,090 --> 00:07:52,570 |
|
Elizabethan poetry writing process. So here, |
|
|
|
119 |
|
00:07:52,930 --> 00:07:55,590 |
|
remember we said this represents the Elizabethan |
|
|
|
120 |
|
00:07:55,590 --> 00:07:59,030 |
|
English poetry. Rules, decorum, everything counts, |
|
|
|
121 |
|
00:07:59,170 --> 00:08:02,150 |
|
and the poet is idealistic. Remember the courtly |
|
|
|
122 |
|
00:08:02,150 --> 00:08:05,260 |
|
love? Come live with me and be like, because I own |
|
|
|
123 |
|
00:08:05,260 --> 00:08:09,320 |
|
all the pleasures, the idealism. Idealized love. |
|
|
|
124 |
|
00:08:09,780 --> 00:08:11,500 |
|
And in John Donne, we said John Donne is |
|
|
|
125 |
|
00:08:11,500 --> 00:08:15,320 |
|
realistic. He's an individual. He's more |
|
|
|
126 |
|
00:08:15,320 --> 00:08:19,520 |
|
realistic. He knows he can't own all. But when he |
|
|
|
127 |
|
00:08:19,520 --> 00:08:22,400 |
|
is doing this, he's contradicting. So he's saying |
|
|
|
128 |
|
00:08:22,400 --> 00:08:26,200 |
|
some in other ways. He's telling us, no one can |
|
|
|
129 |
|
00:08:26,200 --> 00:08:29,880 |
|
own all things. And at the same time, he tells us, |
|
|
|
130 |
|
00:08:30,770 --> 00:08:35,950 |
|
I have new kinds of pleasure, exactly like his |
|
|
|
131 |
|
00:08:35,950 --> 00:08:40,950 |
|
poetry, new kinds of poetry, poems in a way that |
|
|
|
132 |
|
00:08:40,950 --> 00:08:44,090 |
|
he is giving us new forms. We saw, for example, |
|
|
|
133 |
|
00:08:44,550 --> 00:08:47,250 |
|
the new rhyme scheme for the sonnet and we saw the |
|
|
|
134 |
|
00:08:47,250 --> 00:08:52,760 |
|
new themes he introduced to the sonnet. Turn the |
|
|
|
135 |
|
00:08:52,760 --> 00:08:57,080 |
|
sonnet from a love poem into a religious poem. |
|
|
|
136 |
|
00:08:58,160 --> 00:09:01,220 |
|
Remember, the sonnet is the most sacred form of |
|
|
|
137 |
|
00:09:01,220 --> 00:09:05,080 |
|
all poetry. 14 lines, love, Italian, |
|
|
|
138 |
|
00:09:05,520 --> 00:09:09,920 |
|
Shakespearean. For Don, he broke this. He mixed |
|
|
|
139 |
|
00:09:09,920 --> 00:09:13,000 |
|
both forms, and he had his own form, the John |
|
|
|
140 |
|
00:09:13,000 --> 00:09:18,750 |
|
Donne form of sonnets. Is it about love? It's |
|
|
|
141 |
|
00:09:18,750 --> 00:09:22,510 |
|
about religion, about God, batter my heart, three |
|
|
|
142 |
|
00:09:22,510 --> 00:09:29,110 |
|
persons, God, death, be not proud, et cetera. In |
|
|
|
143 |
|
00:09:29,110 --> 00:09:31,970 |
|
this context here, I need to talk about something |
|
|
|
144 |
|
00:09:31,970 --> 00:09:36,570 |
|
called parody and something else called |
|
|
|
145 |
|
00:09:36,570 --> 00:09:40,210 |
|
intertextuality. |
|
|
|
146 |
|
00:09:41,350 --> 00:09:46,080 |
|
Listen. We spoke probably briefly about parody |
|
|
|
147 |
|
00:09:46,080 --> 00:09:49,160 |
|
before. Parody is to parody something to imitate, |
|
|
|
148 |
|
00:09:50,680 --> 00:09:53,800 |
|
to copy. You do something, I do something similar |
|
|
|
149 |
|
00:09:53,800 --> 00:09:58,920 |
|
to it. But I change a little bit. So parody in |
|
|
|
150 |
|
00:09:58,920 --> 00:10:01,520 |
|
Arabic is some kind of like muhaka, something like |
|
|
|
151 |
|
00:10:01,520 --> 00:10:04,320 |
|
this. When someone writes a text, you write a text |
|
|
|
152 |
|
00:10:04,320 --> 00:10:07,360 |
|
similar to it. We studied this probably in Arabic, |
|
|
|
153 |
|
00:10:07,940 --> 00:10:10,100 |
|
Jareer, Al-Farazdaq, and how they were writing, |
|
|
|
154 |
|
00:10:10,520 --> 00:10:13,700 |
|
using the same meter and the same rhyme to write |
|
|
|
155 |
|
00:10:13,700 --> 00:10:16,580 |
|
about the same thing, but it's the opposite. Now, |
|
|
|
156 |
|
00:10:16,700 --> 00:10:20,520 |
|
parody is a very important literary device. |
|
|
|
157 |
|
00:10:21,760 --> 00:10:25,080 |
|
Generally, it means when you imitate another |
|
|
|
158 |
|
00:10:25,080 --> 00:10:30,490 |
|
literary work. When you imitate another literal in |
|
|
|
159 |
|
00:10:30,490 --> 00:10:35,810 |
|
a comic way, okay? In a comic way, just to make |
|
|
|
160 |
|
00:10:35,810 --> 00:10:40,950 |
|
fun of it. However, for John Donne, comedy is also |
|
|
|
161 |
|
00:10:40,950 --> 00:10:41,570 |
|
serious. |
|
|
|
162 |
|
00:10:44,450 --> 00:10:47,430 |
|
It's not only comic, ha ha ha, let's laugh at |
|
|
|
163 |
|
00:10:47,430 --> 00:10:49,970 |
|
Marlow, let's make fun of Marlow. It's also |
|
|
|
164 |
|
00:10:49,970 --> 00:10:53,130 |
|
serious. Why is it serious? Because in his parody, |
|
|
|
165 |
|
00:10:53,230 --> 00:10:56,110 |
|
when we study the whole poem, we see how, for |
|
|
|
166 |
|
00:10:56,110 --> 00:11:00,890 |
|
example, Marlow is idealistic, is dreamy. Dreamy, |
|
|
|
167 |
|
00:11:00,930 --> 00:11:03,470 |
|
you know? He dreams of owning all the pleasures. |
|
|
|
168 |
|
00:11:03,990 --> 00:11:07,110 |
|
And we saw, for example, how he represents the |
|
|
|
169 |
|
00:11:07,110 --> 00:11:15,210 |
|
woman as silent and weak. He's just, she doesn't |
|
|
|
170 |
|
00:11:15,210 --> 00:11:17,470 |
|
reply, she doesn't act. She is not there in the |
|
|
|
171 |
|
00:11:17,470 --> 00:11:21,670 |
|
text. She's just listening to him. Assuming that |
|
|
|
172 |
|
00:11:21,670 --> 00:11:25,070 |
|
she is there. Probably he sent her a letter. So |
|
|
|
173 |
|
00:11:25,070 --> 00:11:26,970 |
|
come live with me and be my love. In a way, he's |
|
|
|
174 |
|
00:11:26,970 --> 00:11:30,150 |
|
very persuasive. He's tricking her. He doesn't |
|
|
|
175 |
|
00:11:30,150 --> 00:11:33,250 |
|
think highly of the woman. He thinks the woman is |
|
|
|
176 |
|
00:11:33,250 --> 00:11:36,790 |
|
not smart as he is. Because any smart woman would |
|
|
|
177 |
|
00:11:36,790 --> 00:11:40,980 |
|
say, come on, you're just a shepherd. I can't come |
|
|
|
178 |
|
00:11:40,980 --> 00:11:43,620 |
|
with you. You don't have one pleasure, let alone |
|
|
|
179 |
|
00:11:43,620 --> 00:11:46,460 |
|
all the pleasures. And instead of wasting your |
|
|
|
180 |
|
00:11:46,460 --> 00:11:49,600 |
|
time, go take care of the sheep you're supposed to |
|
|
|
181 |
|
00:11:49,600 --> 00:11:54,660 |
|
be taken care of. So the woman here is weak. It's |
|
|
|
182 |
|
00:11:54,660 --> 00:11:58,100 |
|
not weak, actually. It's presented as weak. And in |
|
|
|
183 |
|
00:11:58,100 --> 00:11:59,860 |
|
Dan, when you read the whole poem, you will |
|
|
|
184 |
|
00:11:59,860 --> 00:12:04,980 |
|
realize that he presents us with a smart woman, an |
|
|
|
185 |
|
00:12:04,980 --> 00:12:05,480 |
|
intellectual. |
|
|
|
186 |
|
00:12:09,620 --> 00:12:12,620 |
|
An intellectual, a woman who thinks for herself, a |
|
|
|
187 |
|
00:12:12,620 --> 00:12:15,840 |
|
woman who understands poetry and understands |
|
|
|
188 |
|
00:12:15,840 --> 00:12:19,700 |
|
debate and understands what the poet is trying to |
|
|
|
189 |
|
00:12:19,700 --> 00:12:24,280 |
|
do. So when Jonathan is doing this, he's |
|
|
|
190 |
|
00:12:24,280 --> 00:12:28,400 |
|
criticizing not only Marlowe, but criticizing |
|
|
|
191 |
|
00:12:28,400 --> 00:12:32,560 |
|
Marlowe's society. Thank you very much. He's |
|
|
|
192 |
|
00:12:32,560 --> 00:12:35,480 |
|
criticizing the society in which women are |
|
|
|
193 |
|
00:12:35,480 --> 00:12:41,440 |
|
negatively portrayed. as objects for men to own |
|
|
|
194 |
|
00:12:41,440 --> 00:12:46,200 |
|
and control. But in John Donne, the woman is |
|
|
|
195 |
|
00:12:46,200 --> 00:12:49,700 |
|
strong, is powerful, is independent. You know |
|
|
|
196 |
|
00:12:49,700 --> 00:12:54,720 |
|
independent? Yes. Not dependent on man. So that's |
|
|
|
197 |
|
00:12:54,720 --> 00:12:57,980 |
|
why parody for John Donne is very serious. Serious |
|
|
|
198 |
|
00:12:57,980 --> 00:13:02,850 |
|
because it criticizes not only other poets, but |
|
|
|
199 |
|
00:13:02,850 --> 00:13:06,050 |
|
also the society itself. He's telling, why are you |
|
|
|
200 |
|
00:13:06,050 --> 00:13:11,130 |
|
treating women this badly? Why? Why? Women are as |
|
|
|
201 |
|
00:13:11,130 --> 00:13:15,490 |
|
smart as men and maybe smarter. We see this |
|
|
|
202 |
|
00:13:15,490 --> 00:13:20,050 |
|
constantly in Joan Dunn's portrait. The other |
|
|
|
203 |
|
00:13:20,050 --> 00:13:23,950 |
|
thing is intertextuality. So again, how does Joan |
|
|
|
204 |
|
00:13:23,950 --> 00:13:27,550 |
|
Dunn criticize the society? By parodying it, by |
|
|
|
205 |
|
00:13:27,550 --> 00:13:32,440 |
|
making fun, by mocking. You know mock? Make fun of |
|
|
|
206 |
|
00:13:32,440 --> 00:13:39,420 |
|
something in a serious way. Intertextuality, in a |
|
|
|
207 |
|
00:13:39,420 --> 00:13:41,220 |
|
way it's similar to this. Text, you know text? |
|
|
|
208 |
|
00:13:42,620 --> 00:13:47,300 |
|
Intertext. Intertext, where texts are |
|
|
|
209 |
|
00:13:47,300 --> 00:13:50,880 |
|
interconnected, linked. Intertextuality in Arabic |
|
|
|
210 |
|
00:13:50,880 --> 00:13:53,560 |
|
is attanas. |
|
|
|
211 |
|
00:13:56,740 --> 00:14:02,760 |
|
When a critic, sorry, a poet quotes, uses poetry |
|
|
|
212 |
|
00:14:02,760 --> 00:14:07,560 |
|
from another poet, from another person. When a |
|
|
|
213 |
|
00:14:07,560 --> 00:14:11,160 |
|
writer uses a quote, a quotation, or an extract |
|
|
|
214 |
|
00:14:11,160 --> 00:14:16,400 |
|
from another text. This is called intertextuality. |
|
|
|
215 |
|
00:14:18,300 --> 00:14:21,260 |
|
Marlow says, come live with me and be my love. Don |
|
|
|
216 |
|
00:14:21,260 --> 00:14:25,040 |
|
says, come live with me and So this text has |
|
|
|
217 |
|
00:14:25,040 --> 00:14:29,220 |
|
intertextuality. Why? Because originally it was |
|
|
|
218 |
|
00:14:29,220 --> 00:14:33,920 |
|
said by Marlowe. But is John Donne criticizing, |
|
|
|
219 |
|
00:14:34,140 --> 00:14:38,680 |
|
copying Marlowe 100%, copy-paste, photocopying |
|
|
|
220 |
|
00:14:38,680 --> 00:14:43,800 |
|
him? No, he changed. But why does he do this? He |
|
|
|
221 |
|
00:14:43,800 --> 00:14:45,840 |
|
could have written the whole poem without this |
|
|
|
222 |
|
00:14:45,840 --> 00:14:48,540 |
|
couplet and it would be a totally different poem. |
|
|
|
223 |
|
00:14:49,820 --> 00:14:53,880 |
|
But he's telling us, wait, my whole poem here is |
|
|
|
224 |
|
00:14:53,880 --> 00:14:57,380 |
|
mainly to criticize Marlow and the society. So I'm |
|
|
|
225 |
|
00:14:57,380 --> 00:14:59,860 |
|
beginning from Marlow. You would say, hey, Dan is |
|
|
|
226 |
|
00:14:59,860 --> 00:15:03,240 |
|
using Marlow. I know many people confuse this, |
|
|
|
227 |
|
00:15:04,020 --> 00:15:06,900 |
|
confused between these couplets. He is using |
|
|
|
228 |
|
00:15:06,900 --> 00:15:12,040 |
|
Marlow not as, you know, to imitate him in a way |
|
|
|
229 |
|
00:15:12,040 --> 00:15:15,840 |
|
where he is following his steps. Oh, I want to be |
|
|
|
230 |
|
00:15:15,840 --> 00:15:18,360 |
|
like Marlow. I want to do like Marlow. He's doing |
|
|
|
231 |
|
00:15:18,360 --> 00:15:21,920 |
|
this to criticize him and criticize his portrait. |
|
|
|
232 |
|
00:15:22,640 --> 00:15:27,400 |
|
The idealism of the Elizabethan age, the way that |
|
|
|
233 |
|
00:15:27,400 --> 00:15:30,060 |
|
women were negatively portrayed as silent and |
|
|
|
234 |
|
00:15:30,060 --> 00:15:37,200 |
|
weak, and other things are mocked. criticized and |
|
|
|
235 |
|
00:15:37,200 --> 00:15:39,880 |
|
attacked in John Donne. He does this constantly in |
|
|
|
236 |
|
00:15:39,880 --> 00:15:41,780 |
|
an amazing way. That's why many women, by the way, |
|
|
|
237 |
|
00:15:41,820 --> 00:15:44,760 |
|
love John Donne's poetry. Because it gives them a |
|
|
|
238 |
|
00:15:44,760 --> 00:15:49,320 |
|
voice. It gives them a presence. And sometimes the |
|
|
|
239 |
|
00:15:49,320 --> 00:15:53,860 |
|
woman is smarter than the man himself. She can't |
|
|
|
240 |
|
00:15:53,860 --> 00:15:56,080 |
|
be tricked by, come live with me and be my love. |
|
|
|
241 |
|
00:15:58,220 --> 00:16:02,120 |
|
OK? So if in the exam I ask you to contextualize |
|
|
|
242 |
|
00:16:02,120 --> 00:16:06,000 |
|
this, In exam, there will be a question asking you |
|
|
|
243 |
|
00:16:06,000 --> 00:16:09,140 |
|
to contextualize extracts from poetry we studied. |
|
|
|
244 |
|
00:16:09,800 --> 00:16:13,580 |
|
Here, you should say, this is a text by Marlow |
|
|
|
245 |
|
00:16:13,580 --> 00:16:16,200 |
|
from a passionate shepherd or a passionate |
|
|
|
246 |
|
00:16:16,200 --> 00:16:22,160 |
|
shepherd to his love. In this couplet, the poet is |
|
|
|
247 |
|
00:16:22,160 --> 00:16:26,540 |
|
inviting his mistress or beloved and promising her |
|
|
|
248 |
|
00:16:26,540 --> 00:16:29,940 |
|
all the pleasures. Here, we have what we call |
|
|
|
249 |
|
00:16:29,940 --> 00:16:38,040 |
|
courtly love. or idealized love. What is idealized |
|
|
|
250 |
|
00:16:38,040 --> 00:16:44,260 |
|
love about idealism? Not realistic. Okay, so |
|
|
|
251 |
|
00:16:44,260 --> 00:16:46,980 |
|
Marlow, the passionate shepherd promising all, |
|
|
|
252 |
|
00:16:47,160 --> 00:16:55,180 |
|
however, the imperfect rhyme here might expose the |
|
|
|
253 |
|
00:16:55,180 --> 00:17:03,660 |
|
poet as fake, as ungenuine. Not truthful, because |
|
|
|
254 |
|
00:17:03,660 --> 00:17:06,820 |
|
we realize that he is a shepherd. He doesn't own |
|
|
|
255 |
|
00:17:06,820 --> 00:17:10,740 |
|
anything. If you need to comment on this, you |
|
|
|
256 |
|
00:17:10,740 --> 00:17:14,780 |
|
should say, this is by John Donne from a poem |
|
|
|
257 |
|
00:17:14,780 --> 00:17:20,820 |
|
called The Bait. You know what a bait is? Remember |
|
|
|
258 |
|
00:17:20,820 --> 00:17:30,770 |
|
Shylock? I'll bait with it. Bait. Shylock. When |
|
|
|
259 |
|
00:17:30,770 --> 00:17:32,650 |
|
they said, what do you want to do with a pound of |
|
|
|
260 |
|
00:17:32,650 --> 00:17:35,970 |
|
flesh? I will bait. Bait, to'am al-samaka. When |
|
|
|
261 |
|
00:17:35,970 --> 00:17:39,290 |
|
you want to fish, you use some kind of food for |
|
|
|
262 |
|
00:17:39,290 --> 00:17:43,350 |
|
strange name for a love poem. So this is by John |
|
|
|
263 |
|
00:17:43,350 --> 00:17:48,310 |
|
Donne from The Bait. In this poem, John Donne is |
|
|
|
264 |
|
00:17:48,310 --> 00:17:51,750 |
|
parodying Marlow. |
|
|
|
265 |
|
00:17:52,930 --> 00:17:56,170 |
|
It's important to use the word parody. Parodying |
|
|
|
266 |
|
00:17:56,170 --> 00:18:01,310 |
|
Marlow because he's criticizing Oh, and the |
|
|
|
267 |
|
00:18:01,310 --> 00:18:05,430 |
|
society. In this couplet, John Donne is more |
|
|
|
268 |
|
00:18:05,430 --> 00:18:12,410 |
|
realistic because he says some, not all, and at |
|
|
|
269 |
|
00:18:12,410 --> 00:18:15,690 |
|
the same time, he clearly tells us that he's |
|
|
|
270 |
|
00:18:15,690 --> 00:18:20,030 |
|
bringing new themes, new issues, new forms to |
|
|
|
271 |
|
00:18:20,030 --> 00:18:25,150 |
|
poetry. Again, John Donne criticizes Malo by |
|
|
|
272 |
|
00:18:25,150 --> 00:18:26,250 |
|
parodying him. |
|
|
|
273 |
|
00:18:29,330 --> 00:18:32,850 |
|
Criticizes the way he represents women. Criticizes |
|
|
|
274 |
|
00:18:32,850 --> 00:18:38,170 |
|
his idealized love. He's more realistic because he |
|
|
|
275 |
|
00:18:38,170 --> 00:18:41,630 |
|
uses the word son. And at the same time, John |
|
|
|
276 |
|
00:18:41,630 --> 00:18:48,570 |
|
Donne clearly and consciously tells us that he is |
|
|
|
277 |
|
00:18:48,570 --> 00:18:53,750 |
|
bringing new themes, new issues, and new forms to |
|
|
|
278 |
|
00:18:53,750 --> 00:18:54,050 |
|
poetry. |
|
|
|
279 |
|
00:18:57,290 --> 00:18:59,790 |
|
It's interesting what parody can do. |
|
|
|
280 |
|
00:19:02,950 --> 00:19:05,970 |
|
So this is again the summary I said last time. |
|
|
|
281 |
|
00:19:09,750 --> 00:19:13,430 |
|
Okay, for next class we can probably examine two |
|
|
|
282 |
|
00:19:13,430 --> 00:19:19,650 |
|
extracts from Andrew Marvel and Herbert. What are |
|
|
|
283 |
|
00:19:19,650 --> 00:19:21,710 |
|
the features of John Donne's portrait? |
|
|
|
284 |
|
00:19:31,390 --> 00:19:31,890 |
|
Someone. |
|
|
|
285 |
|
00:19:35,450 --> 00:19:38,590 |
|
Tell me, what are the features of John Donne's |
|
|
|
286 |
|
00:19:38,590 --> 00:19:42,410 |
|
poetry? What are the characteristics? I remember |
|
|
|
287 |
|
00:19:42,410 --> 00:19:44,490 |
|
we had the characteristics of Old English, Middle |
|
|
|
288 |
|
00:19:44,490 --> 00:19:46,410 |
|
English, Shakespeare, Marlow. |
|
|
|
289 |
|
00:19:49,350 --> 00:19:51,830 |
|
If you have to mention three or four features |
|
|
|
290 |
|
00:19:51,830 --> 00:19:54,690 |
|
about John Donne, what is special? What is |
|
|
|
291 |
|
00:19:54,690 --> 00:19:56,410 |
|
different about his poetry? Can you tell me, |
|
|
|
292 |
|
00:19:57,250 --> 00:20:01,930 |
|
please? His poetry, |
|
|
|
293 |
|
00:20:02,090 --> 00:20:05,110 |
|
thank you, is more realistic than the Elizabethan |
|
|
|
294 |
|
00:20:05,110 --> 00:20:09,490 |
|
poetry, which is generally idealistic. He's more |
|
|
|
295 |
|
00:20:09,490 --> 00:20:11,450 |
|
realistic. |
|
|
|
296 |
|
00:20:12,710 --> 00:20:16,640 |
|
His poetry is about a man's problems, a woman's |
|
|
|
297 |
|
00:20:16,640 --> 00:20:21,180 |
|
problems, about individual issues, things we face |
|
|
|
298 |
|
00:20:21,180 --> 00:20:24,720 |
|
probably on a daily basis, not idealized love. |
|
|
|
299 |
|
00:20:28,340 --> 00:20:32,020 |
|
In the sonnet, thank you. So this is an example, |
|
|
|
300 |
|
00:20:32,100 --> 00:20:36,240 |
|
but generally he introduced us to new poetic forms |
|
|
|
301 |
|
00:20:36,240 --> 00:20:40,620 |
|
where the meaning is more important than the rule. |
|
|
|
302 |
|
00:20:41,760 --> 00:20:45,400 |
|
For example, in the sonnet, He changes the rhyme |
|
|
|
303 |
|
00:20:45,400 --> 00:20:49,360 |
|
scheme, the form, and changes the theme itself of |
|
|
|
304 |
|
00:20:49,360 --> 00:20:50,560 |
|
the sonnet. Very good. More. |
|
|
|
305 |
|
00:20:54,360 --> 00:20:54,840 |
|
More. |
|
|
|
306 |
|
00:20:59,720 --> 00:21:01,780 |
|
I just, by the way, mentioned most of them right |
|
|
|
307 |
|
00:21:01,780 --> 00:21:07,100 |
|
now. OK, again, please. His poetry is a mixture |
|
|
|
308 |
|
00:21:07,100 --> 00:21:10,660 |
|
between love religion and daily life issues. OK, |
|
|
|
309 |
|
00:21:11,000 --> 00:21:15,910 |
|
so generally, his poetry mixes between secular and |
|
|
|
310 |
|
00:21:15,910 --> 00:21:19,930 |
|
religious. There are many love poems by John Donne |
|
|
|
311 |
|
00:21:19,930 --> 00:21:21,950 |
|
and many religious poems by John Donne, but |
|
|
|
312 |
|
00:21:21,950 --> 00:21:24,650 |
|
sometimes the same poem could have a mixture of |
|
|
|
313 |
|
00:21:24,650 --> 00:21:28,190 |
|
both. We discussed this when we spoke about battle |
|
|
|
314 |
|
00:21:28,190 --> 00:21:31,150 |
|
my heart three person God. There is this strong |
|
|
|
315 |
|
00:21:31,150 --> 00:21:33,570 |
|
love intimate relationship between him and the |
|
|
|
316 |
|
00:21:33,570 --> 00:21:39,860 |
|
person and the person in the poem is God. More. |
|
|
|
317 |
|
00:21:41,040 --> 00:21:42,760 |
|
Please. He uses parody. |
|
|
|
318 |
|
00:21:45,640 --> 00:21:48,400 |
|
Thank you very much. He was critical of his |
|
|
|
319 |
|
00:21:48,400 --> 00:21:53,160 |
|
community. In his poetry, he shows his opinion |
|
|
|
320 |
|
00:21:53,160 --> 00:21:56,900 |
|
about not only poetry, but also the society |
|
|
|
321 |
|
00:21:56,900 --> 00:22:00,000 |
|
itself. So he uses parody and intertextuality to |
|
|
|
322 |
|
00:22:00,000 --> 00:22:06,140 |
|
criticize. To criticize his society and poetry |
|
|
|
323 |
|
00:22:06,140 --> 00:22:11,930 |
|
itself. What else? Please. He had great knowledge |
|
|
|
324 |
|
00:22:11,930 --> 00:22:17,690 |
|
about the classical literature. Yeah, but it |
|
|
|
325 |
|
00:22:17,690 --> 00:22:20,010 |
|
doesn't show much in his portrait, because he |
|
|
|
326 |
|
00:22:20,010 --> 00:22:24,010 |
|
doesn't follow the rules of neoclassicism. He |
|
|
|
327 |
|
00:22:24,010 --> 00:22:27,250 |
|
breaks these rules. But again, you don't break |
|
|
|
328 |
|
00:22:27,250 --> 00:22:31,110 |
|
something unless you are well read into it. Yeah? |
|
|
|
329 |
|
00:22:31,590 --> 00:22:38,080 |
|
More? He wanted to say the same thing. He broke |
|
|
|
330 |
|
00:22:38,080 --> 00:22:41,840 |
|
the rules of Decorum. We've seen his poem, |
|
|
|
331 |
|
00:22:41,940 --> 00:22:46,140 |
|
remember, The Sun Rising? Some lines are five |
|
|
|
332 |
|
00:22:46,140 --> 00:22:50,880 |
|
feet, some two, some three. So he, simply |
|
|
|
333 |
|
00:22:50,880 --> 00:22:53,860 |
|
speaking, he breaks the rules of Decorum. What |
|
|
|
334 |
|
00:22:53,860 --> 00:22:54,100 |
|
else? |
|
|
|
335 |
|
00:22:59,310 --> 00:23:03,350 |
|
Okay, so let's go through the list and speak about |
|
|
|
336 |
|
00:23:03,350 --> 00:23:06,050 |
|
two or three features that I didn't mention |
|
|
|
337 |
|
00:23:06,050 --> 00:23:10,950 |
|
before. So number one, he introduces us to new |
|
|
|
338 |
|
00:23:10,950 --> 00:23:13,510 |
|
poetic forms, for example, the sonnet. Sorry, this |
|
|
|
339 |
|
00:23:13,510 --> 00:23:18,830 |
|
should be the sonnet, okay? And he didn't create |
|
|
|
340 |
|
00:23:18,830 --> 00:23:22,290 |
|
the sonnet, it was already there, but he changed |
|
|
|
341 |
|
00:23:22,290 --> 00:23:26,350 |
|
the theme and the form. He uses parody and |
|
|
|
342 |
|
00:23:26,350 --> 00:23:30,900 |
|
intertextuality sometimes. to make fun of, to |
|
|
|
343 |
|
00:23:30,900 --> 00:23:34,040 |
|
criticize the existing rules of decorum and social |
|
|
|
344 |
|
00:23:34,040 --> 00:23:38,440 |
|
rules. Mainly here, the status of women. In Donne, |
|
|
|
345 |
|
00:23:38,860 --> 00:23:42,920 |
|
the woman is equal to man. If not, sometimes |
|
|
|
346 |
|
00:23:42,920 --> 00:23:46,180 |
|
smarter and more intellectual than him. This is |
|
|
|
347 |
|
00:23:46,180 --> 00:23:49,260 |
|
new. This is like Shakespeare, like Portia in The |
|
|
|
348 |
|
00:23:49,260 --> 00:23:52,700 |
|
Magic of Venice. He uses the conceit. Listen, the |
|
|
|
349 |
|
00:23:52,700 --> 00:23:54,120 |
|
conceit is a very important |
|
|
|
350 |
|
00:23:57,030 --> 00:23:59,870 |
|
literary device in the metaphysical photo. A |
|
|
|
351 |
|
00:23:59,870 --> 00:24:01,390 |
|
conceit is generally a metaphor. |
|
|
|
352 |
|
00:24:04,470 --> 00:24:07,570 |
|
Remember a metaphor when you liken something to |
|
|
|
353 |
|
00:24:07,570 --> 00:24:10,710 |
|
something? But here a conceit is a literal device |
|
|
|
354 |
|
00:24:10,710 --> 00:24:12,590 |
|
where the relationship between the two things |
|
|
|
355 |
|
00:24:12,590 --> 00:24:17,670 |
|
you're talking about is unlikely. So you liken a |
|
|
|
356 |
|
00:24:17,670 --> 00:24:24,220 |
|
woman to a rose, right? You liken a woman to what? |
|
|
|
357 |
|
00:24:24,320 --> 00:24:28,760 |
|
To a tree, to the moon. Beautiful thing. But these |
|
|
|
358 |
|
00:24:28,760 --> 00:24:32,120 |
|
are conventional images. For Jonathan, he uses |
|
|
|
359 |
|
00:24:32,120 --> 00:24:35,940 |
|
totally different imagery. He uses what we call |
|
|
|
360 |
|
00:24:35,940 --> 00:24:38,800 |
|
the conceit. The conceit is a long metaphor. |
|
|
|
361 |
|
00:24:41,880 --> 00:24:45,120 |
|
a long metaphor. Sometimes the whole poem is one |
|
|
|
362 |
|
00:24:45,120 --> 00:24:47,820 |
|
metaphor, one conceit, in which the relationship |
|
|
|
363 |
|
00:24:47,820 --> 00:24:52,020 |
|
between A and B, when you say A is like B, |
|
|
|
364 |
|
00:24:53,560 --> 00:24:55,580 |
|
sometimes there is a similarity. When you say she |
|
|
|
365 |
|
00:24:55,580 --> 00:25:00,660 |
|
is like a rose, she is like a dove, you want to |
|
|
|
366 |
|
00:25:00,660 --> 00:25:04,410 |
|
say that she's peaceful like the dove. She's |
|
|
|
367 |
|
00:25:04,410 --> 00:25:08,690 |
|
beautiful as the rose, right? But here, for Joan |
|
|
|
368 |
|
00:25:08,690 --> 00:25:12,050 |
|
Dunn, the vehicle and the tenor do not usually |
|
|
|
369 |
|
00:25:12,050 --> 00:25:14,310 |
|
have an apparent relationship. Take this example. |
|
|
|
370 |
|
00:25:14,730 --> 00:25:20,150 |
|
When he talks to his wife, he tells her, we are |
|
|
|
371 |
|
00:25:20,150 --> 00:25:22,890 |
|
like stiff twin compasses. Do you know what a |
|
|
|
372 |
|
00:25:22,890 --> 00:25:27,910 |
|
compass is? Yeah, the compass is the device that |
|
|
|
373 |
|
00:25:27,910 --> 00:25:31,790 |
|
shows us north. But that's the compass. Here, this |
|
|
|
374 |
|
00:25:31,790 --> 00:25:34,550 |
|
is different. This is, in geometry, when you're |
|
|
|
375 |
|
00:25:34,550 --> 00:25:37,630 |
|
doing mathematics and draw shapes in geometry, you |
|
|
|
376 |
|
00:25:37,630 --> 00:25:42,710 |
|
know, you need to use this device to make circles. |
|
|
|
377 |
|
00:25:43,550 --> 00:25:45,950 |
|
You know? What do you call this? Yeah. |
|
|
|
378 |
|
00:25:50,190 --> 00:25:55,990 |
|
So Jonathan is telling his wife that you and I are |
|
|
|
379 |
|
00:25:55,990 --> 00:25:58,490 |
|
like a stiff twin compasses. |
|
|
|
380 |
|
00:26:02,340 --> 00:26:05,100 |
|
What? Weird, strange. We're not used to this. This |
|
|
|
381 |
|
00:26:05,100 --> 00:26:10,740 |
|
is new. How? It's like you and I are like this, |
|
|
|
382 |
|
00:26:10,880 --> 00:26:13,820 |
|
like we're part of the same thing. We are one. |
|
|
|
383 |
|
00:26:14,440 --> 00:26:20,020 |
|
It's like you and I are like this notebook. How? |
|
|
|
384 |
|
00:26:20,960 --> 00:26:24,460 |
|
Weird, strange. But when you think of it, oh, we |
|
|
|
385 |
|
00:26:24,460 --> 00:26:26,600 |
|
are connected, we come together, even if we are |
|
|
|
386 |
|
00:26:26,600 --> 00:26:29,440 |
|
sometimes far away from each other, we're still |
|
|
|
387 |
|
00:26:29,440 --> 00:26:32,180 |
|
connected in the center here. Oh, that's genius. |
|
|
|
388 |
|
00:26:32,880 --> 00:26:35,840 |
|
That's new at the same time. So the stiff twin |
|
|
|
389 |
|
00:26:35,840 --> 00:26:38,540 |
|
compasses, he tells his wife lesson, we are one |
|
|
|
390 |
|
00:26:38,540 --> 00:26:41,040 |
|
because sometimes it's like this, the stiff twin |
|
|
|
391 |
|
00:26:41,040 --> 00:26:45,500 |
|
compasses. Sometimes I go away, but when I am |
|
|
|
392 |
|
00:26:45,500 --> 00:26:51,020 |
|
away, we are still connected. And he tells the |
|
|
|
393 |
|
00:26:51,020 --> 00:26:53,960 |
|
woman, his wife, you are the fixed foot. You are |
|
|
|
394 |
|
00:26:53,960 --> 00:26:56,880 |
|
here. So again, it's the woman who controls this |
|
|
|
395 |
|
00:26:56,880 --> 00:27:00,320 |
|
relationship. She is fixed here. She is the core |
|
|
|
396 |
|
00:27:00,320 --> 00:27:03,160 |
|
of the relationship. So no matter how long I am |
|
|
|
397 |
|
00:27:03,160 --> 00:27:06,820 |
|
far away, when I go around, at the end of the day, |
|
|
|
398 |
|
00:27:06,860 --> 00:27:10,100 |
|
I'm going to go back as long as you are fixed in |
|
|
|
399 |
|
00:27:10,100 --> 00:27:13,840 |
|
the middle. This is called a conceit. In another |
|
|
|
400 |
|
00:27:13,840 --> 00:27:18,560 |
|
poem called The Flea, this is another example. You |
|
|
|
401 |
|
00:27:18,560 --> 00:27:22,140 |
|
know what the flea is? What's the flea? A tiny |
|
|
|
402 |
|
00:27:22,140 --> 00:27:28,620 |
|
insect? Barghout? Barghout? You know? Barghout? |
|
|
|
403 |
|
00:27:29,620 --> 00:27:33,500 |
|
Insect? The flea. So a flea bites him, sucks his |
|
|
|
404 |
|
00:27:33,500 --> 00:27:36,500 |
|
blood, and bites the woman and sucks her blood. |
|
|
|
405 |
|
00:27:36,560 --> 00:27:43,600 |
|
And he tells her, listen, we are you, I, the flea |
|
|
|
406 |
|
00:27:43,600 --> 00:27:49,160 |
|
are one. Because our blood is inside one. And at |
|
|
|
407 |
|
00:27:49,160 --> 00:27:51,660 |
|
the beginning, it's like, this is strange in a |
|
|
|
408 |
|
00:27:51,660 --> 00:27:54,800 |
|
way. But when you come to think of it, it's also |
|
|
|
409 |
|
00:27:54,800 --> 00:27:58,560 |
|
genius. And imagine they, remember we spoke about |
|
|
|
410 |
|
00:27:58,560 --> 00:28:02,220 |
|
three persons, God, Trinity. Here, there's the |
|
|
|
411 |
|
00:28:02,220 --> 00:28:06,720 |
|
idea of Trinity again. Because the flea, you, and |
|
|
|
412 |
|
00:28:06,720 --> 00:28:10,160 |
|
I are like a religious triangle. We form it here. |
|
|
|
413 |
|
00:28:11,550 --> 00:28:14,330 |
|
His imagery and conceit sometimes might sound |
|
|
|
414 |
|
00:28:14,330 --> 00:28:17,710 |
|
strange. But when you analyze them, when you |
|
|
|
415 |
|
00:28:17,710 --> 00:28:20,810 |
|
understand them in their context, they are new and |
|
|
|
416 |
|
00:28:20,810 --> 00:28:23,290 |
|
innovative and genius and smart. They always make |
|
|
|
417 |
|
00:28:23,290 --> 00:28:26,990 |
|
you laugh. Really interesting. Because for John |
|
|
|
418 |
|
00:28:26,990 --> 00:28:30,770 |
|
Donne, he was fit up with, shall I compare the |
|
|
|
419 |
|
00:28:30,770 --> 00:28:34,030 |
|
blossoms of the day or the trees or the flowers or |
|
|
|
420 |
|
00:28:34,030 --> 00:28:37,790 |
|
the moon or the sun. Okay, realism against |
|
|
|
421 |
|
00:28:37,790 --> 00:28:42,170 |
|
Elizabethan idealism, display of wit. He was |
|
|
|
422 |
|
00:28:42,170 --> 00:28:46,510 |
|
educated and also wit, he was smart. He uses his |
|
|
|
423 |
|
00:28:46,510 --> 00:28:49,690 |
|
argumentative style. He tells you an idea and |
|
|
|
424 |
|
00:28:49,690 --> 00:28:52,410 |
|
you're like, you're crazy, this can't be possible. |
|
|
|
425 |
|
00:28:52,530 --> 00:28:55,310 |
|
At the end of the poem, interesting, that could be |
|
|
|
426 |
|
00:28:55,310 --> 00:28:56,110 |
|
possible in a way. |
|
|
|
427 |
|
00:28:59,270 --> 00:29:02,130 |
|
Yeah, and then he's convincing, you know, he's |
|
|
|
428 |
|
00:29:02,130 --> 00:29:04,550 |
|
argumentative. But when he does this, he's not |
|
|
|
429 |
|
00:29:06,970 --> 00:29:10,650 |
|
controlling the other person. Because in the flea, |
|
|
|
430 |
|
00:29:11,050 --> 00:29:14,510 |
|
when he tells the woman, oh, this flea is sacred. |
|
|
|
431 |
|
00:29:14,650 --> 00:29:19,250 |
|
It has our blood. What does she do? She kills the |
|
|
|
432 |
|
00:29:19,250 --> 00:29:23,850 |
|
flea. Yeah. Because she can't be deceived. She's |
|
|
|
433 |
|
00:29:23,850 --> 00:29:27,430 |
|
powerful. She's smart. Come on. And she kills the |
|
|
|
434 |
|
00:29:27,430 --> 00:29:35,770 |
|
flea to show that she can't be tricked by him. And |
|
|
|
435 |
|
00:29:35,770 --> 00:29:40,010 |
|
the dramatic, remember the poem last time, The Sun |
|
|
|
436 |
|
00:29:40,010 --> 00:29:46,370 |
|
Rising? How does it begin? Busy old fool unruly |
|
|
|
437 |
|
00:29:46,370 --> 00:29:49,810 |
|
sun. This is drama. This is dramatic. He |
|
|
|
438 |
|
00:29:49,810 --> 00:29:53,890 |
|
dramatizes his experience. He's sitting here. His |
|
|
|
439 |
|
00:29:53,890 --> 00:29:57,270 |
|
beloved is sitting there. A flea bites her, and a |
|
|
|
440 |
|
00:29:57,270 --> 00:29:59,330 |
|
flea bites him. And it's a whole poetic |
|
|
|
441 |
|
00:29:59,330 --> 00:30:01,850 |
|
experience. He dramatizes this in a beautiful way. |
|
|
|
442 |
|
00:30:02,250 --> 00:30:04,710 |
|
He wants to talk about his relationship to God, |
|
|
|
443 |
|
00:30:04,770 --> 00:30:09,370 |
|
with God. And then, butter my heart, three-person |
|
|
|
444 |
|
00:30:09,370 --> 00:30:13,410 |
|
God. It's like every poem is either an inner |
|
|
|
445 |
|
00:30:13,410 --> 00:30:15,990 |
|
personal dialogue, a soliloquy, or a public |
|
|
|
446 |
|
00:30:15,990 --> 00:30:19,920 |
|
speech. And that's the drama here. Again, he lived |
|
|
|
447 |
|
00:30:19,920 --> 00:30:22,660 |
|
during the golden age of drama, during the time of |
|
|
|
448 |
|
00:30:22,660 --> 00:30:25,220 |
|
Shakespeare. And he must have seen some of |
|
|
|
449 |
|
00:30:25,220 --> 00:30:28,620 |
|
Shakespeare's plays and other dramatists. So the |
|
|
|
450 |
|
00:30:28,620 --> 00:30:32,280 |
|
dramatic style is also there. Each poem is like a |
|
|
|
451 |
|
00:30:32,280 --> 00:30:34,440 |
|
sketch. When you go home today, try to read, for |
|
|
|
452 |
|
00:30:34,440 --> 00:30:38,640 |
|
example, or watch or listen to The Sun Rising on |
|
|
|
453 |
|
00:30:38,640 --> 00:30:41,700 |
|
YouTube. You'll see a lot of drama. Even if you |
|
|
|
454 |
|
00:30:41,700 --> 00:30:45,340 |
|
look at the poem, remember? I think I still have |
|
|
|
455 |
|
00:30:45,340 --> 00:30:45,960 |
|
it here. |
|
|
|
456 |
|
00:30:52,060 --> 00:30:58,640 |
|
okay okay okay do i have it i don't okay if you |
|
|
|
457 |
|
00:30:58,640 --> 00:31:04,440 |
|
look here everyone there's |
|
|
|
458 |
|
00:31:04,440 --> 00:31:11,600 |
|
also curtain what's curtain It's like there's a |
|
|
|
459 |
|
00:31:11,600 --> 00:31:14,820 |
|
stage here, and the curtain opens, and people are, |
|
|
|
460 |
|
00:31:15,140 --> 00:31:18,100 |
|
in a way, performing this act. This is what is |
|
|
|
461 |
|
00:31:18,100 --> 00:31:22,800 |
|
meant by drama. Drama that the singular experience |
|
|
|
462 |
|
00:31:22,800 --> 00:31:28,240 |
|
he lives comes out to life as a play, as a short |
|
|
|
463 |
|
00:31:28,240 --> 00:31:32,300 |
|
sketch that can easily be performed. He dramatizes |
|
|
|
464 |
|
00:31:32,300 --> 00:31:35,180 |
|
the experience, the way he speaks, the way he |
|
|
|
465 |
|
00:31:35,180 --> 00:31:35,980 |
|
portrays it. |
|
|
|
466 |
|
00:31:41,810 --> 00:31:45,910 |
|
And don't forget this, there is a lot of criticism |
|
|
|
467 |
|
00:31:45,910 --> 00:31:50,290 |
|
of mainstream established rules of decorum. Simply |
|
|
|
468 |
|
00:31:50,290 --> 00:31:56,250 |
|
speaking, John Donne breaks the rules. And |
|
|
|
469 |
|
00:31:56,250 --> 00:32:00,430 |
|
thematically speaking, Metaphysical poetry |
|
|
|
470 |
|
00:32:00,430 --> 00:32:04,270 |
|
empowers women. You know what empower means? Gives |
|
|
|
471 |
|
00:32:04,270 --> 00:32:07,330 |
|
them power. Gives them a voice and gives them |
|
|
|
472 |
|
00:32:07,330 --> 00:32:10,850 |
|
space in their... When you compare women in |
|
|
|
473 |
|
00:32:10,850 --> 00:32:13,650 |
|
Marlow, for example, sometimes Shakespeare, and |
|
|
|
474 |
|
00:32:13,650 --> 00:32:16,490 |
|
women in John Donne, you'll find that they have a |
|
|
|
475 |
|
00:32:16,490 --> 00:32:19,870 |
|
strong presence. Even if sometimes they don't |
|
|
|
476 |
|
00:32:19,870 --> 00:32:22,050 |
|
speak, they act. In The Flea, the woman doesn't |
|
|
|
477 |
|
00:32:22,050 --> 00:32:26,440 |
|
speak. But what does she do? She does the most |
|
|
|
478 |
|
00:32:26,440 --> 00:32:29,740 |
|
important thing. She acts. She kills the flame. He |
|
|
|
479 |
|
00:32:29,740 --> 00:32:33,160 |
|
gives her voice. That's why many women critics, |
|
|
|
480 |
|
00:32:34,460 --> 00:32:38,240 |
|
they love John Donne. And they praise him for the |
|
|
|
481 |
|
00:32:38,240 --> 00:32:40,600 |
|
way he depicts a powerful, strong woman. Even |
|
|
|
482 |
|
00:32:40,600 --> 00:32:42,640 |
|
Virginia Woolf. We'll talk about Virginia Woolf |
|
|
|
483 |
|
00:32:42,640 --> 00:32:45,000 |
|
probably in two months. She's a very famous |
|
|
|
484 |
|
00:32:45,000 --> 00:32:47,560 |
|
feminist of the 20th century. She praises John |
|
|
|
485 |
|
00:32:47,560 --> 00:32:52,360 |
|
Donne as a poet who depicts women as powerful as |
|
|
|
486 |
|
00:32:52,360 --> 00:32:57,200 |
|
the man is. And we have many personal experiences |
|
|
|
487 |
|
00:32:57,200 --> 00:32:59,780 |
|
rather than a poet who talks about the fairy queen |
|
|
|
488 |
|
00:32:59,780 --> 00:33:03,140 |
|
or the queen of England or the battles and the... |
|
|
|
489 |
|
00:33:03,140 --> 00:33:06,300 |
|
We have someone who speaks about, who conveys the |
|
|
|
490 |
|
00:33:06,300 --> 00:33:10,040 |
|
inner feelings of an individual, of a man. How he |
|
|
|
491 |
|
00:33:10,040 --> 00:33:12,440 |
|
feels when he's sad, when he's in love, when he's |
|
|
|
492 |
|
00:33:12,440 --> 00:33:16,990 |
|
not, etc. In brief, Metaphysical poetry is full of |
|
|
|
493 |
|
00:33:16,990 --> 00:33:21,130 |
|
modern ideas, modern ideas that we still feel |
|
|
|
494 |
|
00:33:21,130 --> 00:33:26,010 |
|
today and can internalize and externalize. There |
|
|
|
495 |
|
00:33:26,010 --> 00:33:29,150 |
|
are scientific geographical explorations, there is |
|
|
|
496 |
|
00:33:29,150 --> 00:33:32,170 |
|
original imagery there, and sometimes the inner |
|
|
|
497 |
|
00:33:32,170 --> 00:33:35,610 |
|
conflict in the soliloquies like the ones we had |
|
|
|
498 |
|
00:33:35,610 --> 00:33:38,710 |
|
in Shakespeare. The whole poem could be an |
|
|
|
499 |
|
00:33:38,710 --> 00:33:42,430 |
|
internal monologue in a way. Finally, they |
|
|
|
500 |
|
00:33:42,430 --> 00:33:45,530 |
|
experimented with language and verse forms with |
|
|
|
501 |
|
00:33:45,530 --> 00:33:48,390 |
|
great originality. Originality means new things. |
|
|
|
502 |
|
00:33:49,250 --> 00:33:52,570 |
|
They experimented with poetic forms like we saw in |
|
|
|
503 |
|
00:33:52,570 --> 00:33:58,830 |
|
the sonnet and the other texts, The Sun Rising. |
|
|
|
504 |
|
00:34:00,610 --> 00:34:05,570 |
|
Now, to conclude this, remember I said John Donne |
|
|
|
505 |
|
00:34:05,570 --> 00:34:09,210 |
|
was not well-received during his time and after. |
|
|
|
506 |
|
00:34:10,600 --> 00:34:13,840 |
|
Many critics of that time were not happy with John |
|
|
|
507 |
|
00:34:13,840 --> 00:34:17,240 |
|
Donne. And they said many horrible things about |
|
|
|
508 |
|
00:34:17,240 --> 00:34:22,140 |
|
him. So horrible that it influenced the way we see |
|
|
|
509 |
|
00:34:22,140 --> 00:34:26,260 |
|
John Donne even today. Many people nowadays, not |
|
|
|
510 |
|
00:34:26,260 --> 00:34:29,280 |
|
many, but some people who don't like John Donne |
|
|
|
511 |
|
00:34:30,360 --> 00:34:33,040 |
|
Generally, it's not because they don't like John |
|
|
|
512 |
|
00:34:33,040 --> 00:34:36,520 |
|
Donne, but because they read John Donne through |
|
|
|
513 |
|
00:34:36,520 --> 00:34:39,860 |
|
these critics. When you read what Ben Jonson, John |
|
|
|
514 |
|
00:34:39,860 --> 00:34:44,520 |
|
Dryden, Alexander Poe, Osama Johnson, what they |
|
|
|
515 |
|
00:34:44,520 --> 00:34:46,620 |
|
say about John Donne, you think, oh my God, this |
|
|
|
516 |
|
00:34:46,620 --> 00:34:50,460 |
|
is a horrible poet. And this is how serious and |
|
|
|
517 |
|
00:34:50,460 --> 00:34:53,900 |
|
dangerous framing is, remember? Framing when |
|
|
|
518 |
|
00:34:53,900 --> 00:34:57,780 |
|
critics make us think in a particular way. So I |
|
|
|
519 |
|
00:34:57,780 --> 00:34:59,620 |
|
tell you, don't read Shakespeare. Shakespeare is |
|
|
|
520 |
|
00:34:59,620 --> 00:35:02,420 |
|
difficult. So what do you think of Shakespeare? |
|
|
|
521 |
|
00:35:02,480 --> 00:35:05,620 |
|
He's difficult. Have you read Shakespeare? No. Ben |
|
|
|
522 |
|
00:35:05,620 --> 00:35:07,280 |
|
Jonson told me this, or somebody else told me. |
|
|
|
523 |
|
00:35:07,600 --> 00:35:11,080 |
|
That's why it's always good to read the text |
|
|
|
524 |
|
00:35:11,080 --> 00:35:15,930 |
|
itself for yourself. Go for the text. Try to |
|
|
|
525 |
|
00:35:15,930 --> 00:35:18,110 |
|
understand it. Read it once and twice and see how |
|
|
|
526 |
|
00:35:18,110 --> 00:35:23,090 |
|
it relates to you. So to summarize, the whole |
|
|
|
527 |
|
00:35:23,090 --> 00:35:26,450 |
|
reception thing, the framing, reception and |
|
|
|
528 |
|
00:35:26,450 --> 00:35:29,670 |
|
framing of John Donne, generally by mainstream |
|
|
|
529 |
|
00:35:29,670 --> 00:35:32,450 |
|
critics, the official critics, he was received |
|
|
|
530 |
|
00:35:32,450 --> 00:35:35,890 |
|
negatively. See, for example, Ben Johnson said he |
|
|
|
531 |
|
00:35:35,890 --> 00:35:41,330 |
|
would perish. Hanging. And he deserved hanging. |
|
|
|
532 |
|
00:35:41,450 --> 00:35:45,410 |
|
Oh, my God. When someone commits a crime, kills |
|
|
|
533 |
|
00:35:45,410 --> 00:35:49,010 |
|
somebody, maybe he deserves hanging, right? Why |
|
|
|
534 |
|
00:35:49,010 --> 00:35:51,970 |
|
would you hang someone because he breaks the rules |
|
|
|
535 |
|
00:35:51,970 --> 00:35:57,830 |
|
of poetry? This is how extreme. But in my opinion, |
|
|
|
536 |
|
00:35:58,410 --> 00:36:02,110 |
|
those people viewed John Donne as a threat. Oh, |
|
|
|
537 |
|
00:36:02,210 --> 00:36:04,090 |
|
someone writing different poetry. Maybe he's going |
|
|
|
538 |
|
00:36:04,090 --> 00:36:07,770 |
|
to steal all the patrons, all the money from us, |
|
|
|
539 |
|
00:36:07,790 --> 00:36:11,420 |
|
maybe. But many people love the rules of Decorum. |
|
|
|
540 |
|
00:36:11,500 --> 00:36:14,000 |
|
If you don't follow the rules, you're not a good |
|
|
|
541 |
|
00:36:14,000 --> 00:36:17,620 |
|
person. John Dryden said, John Donne affects the |
|
|
|
542 |
|
00:36:17,620 --> 00:36:20,480 |
|
metaphysics and he perplexes the mind of the first |
|
|
|
543 |
|
00:36:20,480 --> 00:36:25,280 |
|
six. The first six, women. You know what perplex |
|
|
|
544 |
|
00:36:25,280 --> 00:36:31,240 |
|
means? Confused. John Donne confuses women. This |
|
|
|
545 |
|
00:36:31,240 --> 00:36:36,320 |
|
is what Dryden says. Who the hell are you to speak |
|
|
|
546 |
|
00:36:36,320 --> 00:36:41,720 |
|
for women? Seriously. Who are you to speak for |
|
|
|
547 |
|
00:36:41,720 --> 00:36:44,520 |
|
women? Why do you appoint yourself as the |
|
|
|
548 |
|
00:36:44,520 --> 00:36:45,700 |
|
spokesperson for women? |
|
|
|
549 |
|
00:36:49,000 --> 00:36:52,300 |
|
His idea here, he says, in other words, he says |
|
|
|
550 |
|
00:36:52,300 --> 00:36:55,760 |
|
John Donne is anti-feminist. But I think he is |
|
|
|
551 |
|
00:36:55,760 --> 00:36:58,180 |
|
anti-feminist, because he assumes that women will |
|
|
|
552 |
|
00:36:58,180 --> 00:37:01,680 |
|
not understand John Donne's poetry. He thinks |
|
|
|
553 |
|
00:37:01,680 --> 00:37:04,500 |
|
women are less intellectual, are, I don't know, |
|
|
|
554 |
|
00:37:04,560 --> 00:37:09,470 |
|
maybe stupid. And that's how anti-feminist Dryden |
|
|
|
555 |
|
00:37:09,470 --> 00:37:16,390 |
|
is himself. So this guy says he would perish, he |
|
|
|
556 |
|
00:37:16,390 --> 00:37:20,770 |
|
deserves hanging. Dryden said he perplexes, he |
|
|
|
557 |
|
00:37:20,770 --> 00:37:25,450 |
|
confuses the mind of the fair sex, the women. And |
|
|
|
558 |
|
00:37:25,450 --> 00:37:30,210 |
|
then Samuel Johnson, another critic, said John |
|
|
|
559 |
|
00:37:30,210 --> 00:37:38,010 |
|
Donne uses a combination of dissimilar images and |
|
|
|
560 |
|
00:37:38,010 --> 00:37:41,790 |
|
heterogeneous ideas linked with violence. |
|
|
|
561 |
|
00:37:44,310 --> 00:37:47,270 |
|
Yeah, there is some dissimilarity when you read |
|
|
|
562 |
|
00:37:47,270 --> 00:37:50,270 |
|
some imagery by John Donne, some poetry, but later |
|
|
|
563 |
|
00:37:50,270 --> 00:37:53,010 |
|
on, upon second reading and a third reading and |
|
|
|
564 |
|
00:37:53,010 --> 00:37:55,790 |
|
more analysis and more interpretation, you can see |
|
|
|
565 |
|
00:37:55,790 --> 00:37:58,450 |
|
the connection. But if you don't want to see the |
|
|
|
566 |
|
00:37:58,450 --> 00:37:59,650 |
|
connection, you're not going to see the |
|
|
|
567 |
|
00:37:59,650 --> 00:38:03,670 |
|
connection. But again, I'll go back to framing. |
|
|
|
568 |
|
00:38:04,650 --> 00:38:06,790 |
|
When you study John Donne, and the first thing you |
|
|
|
569 |
|
00:38:06,790 --> 00:38:09,590 |
|
read about John Donne is what Johnson says here, |
|
|
|
570 |
|
00:38:09,670 --> 00:38:11,790 |
|
that he uses dissimilar ideas. And oh, yeah, he |
|
|
|
571 |
|
00:38:11,790 --> 00:38:14,830 |
|
uses dissimilar ideas. Bye bye, Donne. That's why |
|
|
|
572 |
|
00:38:14,830 --> 00:38:18,010 |
|
it's dangerous to read poets through what critics |
|
|
|
573 |
|
00:38:18,010 --> 00:38:21,410 |
|
say about him. Read the poet. Read the writer face |
|
|
|
574 |
|
00:38:21,410 --> 00:38:23,690 |
|
to face. Come face to face with his poetry. And |
|
|
|
575 |
|
00:38:23,690 --> 00:38:29,510 |
|
finally, many people said, OK, even Dryden. And |
|
|
|
576 |
|
00:38:29,510 --> 00:38:33,630 |
|
Johnson said, John Donne is not a poet, but they |
|
|
|
577 |
|
00:38:33,630 --> 00:38:38,910 |
|
said he is an intelligent person. He is a wit. He |
|
|
|
578 |
|
00:38:38,910 --> 00:38:44,110 |
|
has a strong sharp wit. He's smart. He's genius. |
|
|
|
579 |
|
00:38:45,070 --> 00:38:50,670 |
|
Even this Alexander Pope says no. John Donne |
|
|
|
580 |
|
00:38:50,670 --> 00:38:54,610 |
|
doesn't have imagination. This is how much they |
|
|
|
581 |
|
00:38:54,610 --> 00:39:00,580 |
|
disliked him. But believe me, it was much for his |
|
|
|
582 |
|
00:39:00,580 --> 00:39:04,080 |
|
breaking the rules, for him criticizing their way |
|
|
|
583 |
|
00:39:04,080 --> 00:39:08,480 |
|
of writing, the way poetry was written, than |
|
|
|
584 |
|
00:39:08,480 --> 00:39:10,420 |
|
anything else. It wasn't because his poetry was |
|
|
|
585 |
|
00:39:10,420 --> 00:39:13,480 |
|
bad. The evidence is that people like T.S. Eliot |
|
|
|
586 |
|
00:39:13,480 --> 00:39:17,260 |
|
nowadays, in the 20th century, 21st century, |
|
|
|
587 |
|
00:39:17,900 --> 00:39:21,880 |
|
studied him, loved him, and quoted him, and used |
|
|
|
588 |
|
00:39:21,880 --> 00:39:28,410 |
|
his poetry as praised him in a way or another. So |
|
|
|
589 |
|
00:39:28,410 --> 00:39:30,550 |
|
Ben Jonson was a contemporary of Shakespeare, but |
|
|
|
590 |
|
00:39:30,550 --> 00:39:34,310 |
|
Dryden and Johnson and Alexander Pope came later |
|
|
|
591 |
|
00:39:34,310 --> 00:39:37,230 |
|
after Shakespeare. But they played a very |
|
|
|
592 |
|
00:39:37,230 --> 00:39:40,450 |
|
important role in negatively framing John Donne |
|
|
|
593 |
|
00:39:40,450 --> 00:39:43,770 |
|
and kicking him out. But because John Donne is a |
|
|
|
594 |
|
00:39:43,770 --> 00:39:47,390 |
|
beautiful poet, strong genius, he came back to |
|
|
|
595 |
|
00:39:47,390 --> 00:39:51,790 |
|
life 200 years later. I'll stop here. And if you |
|
|
|
596 |
|
00:39:51,790 --> 00:39:54,310 |
|
have a question, please do ask. |
|
|
|
597 |
|
00:40:02,390 --> 00:40:05,030 |
|
No, no, no, you don't. But just that those people |
|
|
|
598 |
|
00:40:05,030 --> 00:40:09,370 |
|
criticized John Donne, it's probably too much for |
|
|
|
599 |
|
00:40:09,370 --> 00:40:11,510 |
|
you. Just I want you to know that at least Ben |
|
|
|
600 |
|
00:40:11,510 --> 00:40:14,090 |
|
Jensen said he deserved hanging. If you know this, |
|
|
|
601 |
|
00:40:14,450 --> 00:40:17,910 |
|
maybe one other thing that perplexes the minds of |
|
|
|
602 |
|
00:40:17,910 --> 00:40:19,490 |
|
the first six, that's enough. You don't have to |
|
|
|
603 |
|
00:40:19,490 --> 00:40:21,830 |
|
memorize everything. And you don't have to |
|
|
|
604 |
|
00:40:21,830 --> 00:40:27,290 |
|
memorize word for word. Thank you very much. I'll |
|
|
|
605 |
|
00:40:27,290 --> 00:40:27,750 |
|
stop here. |
|
|
|
|