Datasets:
configs:
- config_name: DDC
default: true
data_files:
- split: train
path:
- DDC.jsonl.gz
- config_name: LCC
data_files:
- split: train
path:
- LCC.jsonl.gz
- config_name: UDC
data_files:
- split: train
path:
- UDC.jsonl.gz
- config_name: CLC
data_files:
- split: train
path:
- CLC.jsonl.gz
- config_name: RVK
data_files:
- split: train
path:
- RVK.jsonl.gz
- config_name: BBK
data_files:
- split: train
path:
- BBK.jsonl.gz
task_categories:
- text-classification
task_ids:
- multi-class-classification
pretty_name: Library Classification Systems
tags:
- library-science
- information-organization
- ontology
Library Classification Systems
This comprehensive dataset contains hierarchical outlines of major library classification systems, offering a valuable resource for researchers, librarians, and information scientists.
Classification System | Abbreviation | Primary Usage | Language | Entries |
---|---|---|---|---|
Dewey Decimal Classification | DDC | International | English | 1110 |
Library of Congress Classification | LCC | International | English | 6517 |
Universal Decimal Classification | UDC | International | English | 2431 |
Chinese Library Classification | CLC | China | Simplified Chinese | 8826 |
Regensburger Verbundklassifikation | RVK | German universities | German | 5032 |
Библиотечно-библиографическая классификация | BBK | Russia | Russian | 2588 |
Total Entries: 26504
Note that the full classification systems can be much more detailed than presented here. For DDC, LCC, and UDC, they have to be purchased from their organizations.
Data Structure
Each instance in the dataset represents a library classification entry.
The data is structured in JSONL (JSON Lines) format, with each entry containing the following fields:
Field | Type | Description | Example |
---|---|---|---|
call_number |
string | The alphanumeric call number that uniquely identifies the classification | "AC1-999" |
description |
string | A textual description of the classification topic or subject area | "Collections. Series. Collected works" |
broader |
string or null | The call number of the parent/broader classification; null for root-level classifications | null (for a top-level classification) |
narrower |
list of strings | An array of call numbers representing child/narrower classifications | ["AC1-195", "AC200", "AC801-895", "AC901-995", "AC999"] |
Example Instance
{
"call_number": "AC1-999",
"description": "Collections. Series. Collected works",
"broader": null,
"narrower": ["AC1-195", "AC200", "AC801-895", "AC901-995", "AC999"]
}
Dataset Creation
Click for details
On 2024-09-18, publicly available classification outlines were collected from:
- LCC: Library of Congress Classification Outline
- UDC: Universal Decimal Classification Summary (ROSSIO Vocabulary Server)
- DDC: Dewey Services - Resources (OCLC)
- CLC: CLC Index
- RVK: RVK Online
- BBK: КлассИнформ (crawled 2024-09-19)
Versions used:
- UDC Master Reference File (2011)
- DDC 23 Summaries
- RVK aktuelle csv-Datei (2023_2)
Data processing steps:
- DDC: Downloaded summary PDF and formatted for consistency.
- LCC: Converted Word files to plain text, extracting headings and call numbers programmatically.
- UDC: Parsed
udc-summary.rdf
using RDFlib, retaining only English labels. - CLC: Crawled website, including only the first 3 hierarchy levels.
- RVK: Processed CSV file, keeping only the first 3 hierarchy levels.
- BBK: Crawled website, no limit on hierarchy levels.
Supported Tasks and Leaderboards
This dataset is valuable for various tasks in information science and machine learning, including:
- Hierarchical Text Classification
- Library Science and Information Organization
- Ontology and Knowledge Graph Construction
- Comparative Studies of Classification Systems
- Machine Learning for Library Cataloging
While no leaderboards are currently associated with this dataset, it provides opportunities for developing benchmarks in automated classification accuracy and ontology mapping.
Considerations for Using the Data
Social Impact
This dataset broadens access to library classification knowledge, potentially:
- Facilitating research in information science and digital humanities.
- Supporting improved information retrieval systems.
- Enhancing educational resources for library and information science students.
Discussion of Biases
Be aware that library classification systems may reflect historical, cultural, and geographical biases, such as:
- Overrepresentation of Western Perspectives
- Outdated Terminology or Categorizations
- Uneven Depth of Coverage across subject areas.
Known Limitations
- Scope: Includes only freely available outlines, not complete texts.
- Granularity: Detail levels vary across systems and subjects.
- Currency: Updates to classification systems may not be immediately reflected.
- Structural Differences: UDC's structure differs from DDC and LCC, affecting comparisons.
Additional Information
Dataset Curator
Alan Tseng
Licensing Information
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)