From: sys1@exnet.co.uk (Xavier Gallagher)
Subject: Re: Using California's Antidiscrimination: The Sort Of Case I Predicted
Organization: ExNet Systems Ltd Public Access News, London, UK
Lines: 26

In article <15312@optilink.COM> cramer@optilink.COM (Clayton Cramer) writes:
>In article <1993Apr08.092954.13507@armory.com>, rstevew@armory.com (Richard Steven Walz) writes:
># Face it, Clayton, he was not found guilty, and so what if gays sometimes
># make it consensually with 16 year old boys. There ARE 16 year old gays, you
># know. And as I recall, the case of the state rested on the testimony of one
># "victim" who declined to testify, even under threat. I have had teens since
># I was 40, and so have a lot of people. Face it Clayton, you're just a jerk!
># -RSW
># -- 
># * Richard STEVEn Walz   rstevew@deeptht.armory.com   (408) 429-1200  *
># * 515 Maple Street #1   * Without safe and free abortion women are   *
># * Santa Cruz, CA 95060    organ-surrogates to unwanted parasites.*   *
>
>I am always amazed to see people admit to breaking the law -- and
>putting their address in the signature.  Please tell us more about 
>this.  Were they 13?  14?  Would you like to make a statement for
>the district attorney?

I had sex with a 13 year old boy, it was great, we did *everything*,
well, a hell of a lot.  It was fun anyway.  Oh, and before you turn 
purple with rage I was 12 at the time.
>-- 
>Clayton E. Cramer {uunet,pyramid}!optilink!cramer  My opinions, all mine!
>Relations between people to be by mutual consent, or not at all.


