From: kmr4@po.CWRU.edu (Keith M. Ryan)
Subject: Re: After 2000 years, can we say that Christian Morality is
Organization: Case Western Reserve University
Lines: 23
NNTP-Posting-Host: b64635.student.cwru.edu

In article <1993Apr16.173720.19151@scic.intel.com> sbradley@scic.intel.com (Seth J. Bradley) writes:

>In article <C5L14I.JJ3@news.cso.uiuc.edu> cobb@alexia.lis.uiuc.edu (Mike Cobb) writes:
>>Why isn't this falsifiable? I.E. There is no God, the world has existed forever
>>and had no starting point. ?
>
>How does one falsify God's existance?  This, again, is a belief, not a scien-
>tific premise.  The original thread referred specifically to "scientific
>creationism".  This means whatever theory or theories you propose must be
>able to be judged by the scientific method.  This is in contrast to
>purely philosophical arguments.

	If given a definite definition of "God", it is sometimes possible to 
falsify the existance of that God. 
	But, when one refuses to give an immutable definition, one can not.

--- 

        " Whatever promises that have been made can than be broken. "

        John Laws, a man without the honor to keep his given word.


