From: eapu174@orion.oac.uci.edu (Wayne Chen)
Subject: Re: Disappointed by La Cie
Article-I.D.: news.2BC1F81D.20078
Organization: UC Irvine
Lines: 12
Nntp-Posting-Host: dialin33626.slip.nts.uci.edu
X-UserAgent: Nuntius v1.1.1d17
X-XXMessage-ID: <A7E737A8C3018EB7@dialin33626.slip.nts.uci.edu>
X-XXDate: Tue, 6 Apr 93 05:35:36 GMT

In article <1993Apr5.173853.14752@umiami.ir.miami.edu> ,
f2ehg786@umiami.ir.miami.edu writes:
> It seems to me that reconditioned hardware should be sold as
reconditioned at a
> discounted price, and that replacements for new hardware gone bad
(still
> covered under a 90-day warranty) should be new. 
> 
Well, sounds like we need some kind of a Lemon Law on the hardware
industry.  After all it does sound unfair to me for someone that has
paid the price of a new drive for a reconditioned one.  What do you
guys think?
