From: cramer@optilink.COM (Clayton Cramer)
Subject: Re: Why not concentrate on child molesters?
Organization: Optilink Corporation, Petaluma, CA
Lines: 28

In article <C5oG5H.4DE@exnet.co.uk>, sys1@exnet.co.uk (Xavier Gallagher) writes:
> In article <15409@optilink.COM> cramer@optilink.COM (Clayton Cramer) writes:
> >In article <MJCUGLEY.93Apr14110319@glenturret.maths-and-cs.dundee.ac.uk>, mjcugley@maths-and-cs.dundee.ac.uk (Womble with Attitude) writes:
# ## Absolutely nothing, seeing as there is no table for heterosexuals.
# ## If, as you claim, the supposedly higher promescuity amongst homosexual
# ## males makes them an insurance risk, you need to be show that
# ## heterosexual males are less promiscuous than homosexual males.
# ## Without the data on heterosexual males, we cannot make a comparison
# ## between promiscuity rates of heterosexuals and homosexuals.
# ## 
# ## *             mjcugley@maths-and-cs.dundee.ac.uk (world)		*
# ## *              or mjcugley@uk.ac.dund.maths-and-cs (UK)			*
# 
# Well, the obvious point to make is would straight men fuck like rabbits
# if the oppertunity presented itself?
# 
# I reckon *any* *man* would go wildly promiscuous if presented with a
# huge variety of willing partners.  The question here is not of being

That, I suppose, says a lot about how screwed up you are.

# #Clayton E. Cramer {uunet,pyramid}!optilink!cramer  My opinions, all mine!
# Xavier


-- 
Clayton E. Cramer {uunet,pyramid}!optilink!cramer  My opinions, all mine!
Relations between people to be by mutual consent, or not at all.
