From: bob1@cos.com (Bob Blackshaw)
Subject: Re: Tieing Abortion to Health Reform -- Is Clinton Nuts?
Organization: Corporation for Open Systems
Distribution: world 
Lines: 37

In <1993Apr5.170349.10700@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth) writes:

>In article <1993Apr2.230831.18332@wdl.loral.com> bard@cutter.ssd.loral.com writes:
>>sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth) writes:
>># sandvik@newton.apple.com (Kent Sandvik) writes:
>># >We already kill people (death penalty), and that costs even more
>># >money, so you could as well complain about this extremely barbaric
>># >way of justice.
>>#
>># But the death penalty is right.
>>#
>># And how expensive can an execution be? I mean, I think rope, cyanide
>># (for the gas), or the rifles and ammunition to arm firing squads are
>># affordable.
>>#
>># Now, perhaps lethal injection might be expensive, in that case, let's
>># return to the more efficient methods employed in the past.
>>
>>Oh, sure, the death *penalty* is fairly inexpensive, but the trial and
>>sentencing can run millions.

>>
>>--strychnine	unless you wanna cut costs by skipping the trial and
>> sentencing... you murderous little rat-bastard

>  Why as a matter of fact, I was thinking of that as a way to make
>the system more efficient.  And the only murderous rat-bastards are
>aboritionists.

Yeah, Simon's no rat-bastard, he's the Head Attack Puppy :-)


>Simon


TOG

