From: bob1@cos.com (Bob Blackshaw)
Subject: Re: Tieing Abortion to Health Reform -- Is Clinton Nuts?
Organization: Corporation for Open Systems
Distribution: na
Lines: 44

In <1993Apr5.172920.11779@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth) writes:

>In article <bob1.734020014@cos> bob1@cos.com (Bob Blackshaw) writes:
>>In <1993Apr2.230831.18332@wdl.loral.com> bard@cutter.ssd.loral.com (J H Woodyatt) writes:
>>
>>>sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth) writes:
>>># sandvik@newton.apple.com (Kent Sandvik) writes:
>>># >We already kill people (death penalty), and that costs even more
>>># >money, so you could as well complain about this extremely barbaric
>>># >way of justice.
>>>#
>>># But the death penalty is right.
>>>#
>>># And how expensive can an execution be? I mean, I think rope, cyanide
>>># (for the gas), or the rifles and ammunition to arm firing squads are
>>># affordable.
>>>#
>>># Now, perhaps lethal injection might be expensive, in that case, let's
>>># return to the more efficient methods employed in the past.
>>
>>>Oh, sure, the death *penalty* is fairly inexpensive, but the trial and
>>>sentencing can run millions.
>>
>>That's assuming our attack puppy is willing to grant people trials in
>>his new order.

>And why the hell would I waste my time doing that??

>(to a convicted criminal getting a death sentence)

>'Go directly to Hell, do not pass go, do not collect $200'
>(judge laughing)

Hey puppy, you are getting further around the bend every day. But
I wouldn't miss your adolescent ravings for the world, everyone
needs a good laugh now and then. :-)

>Simon

 TOG




