Jos B. (Nicky Verstappen) PsyOp yanzu ma yana buƙatar bayanan abokan ciniki ga lauya? : Martin Vrijland
Madogararsa: akamaized.net
A yau akwai wani sabon zama a kusa da Jos Brech a cikin rahoton Nicky Verstappen (duba Telegraph). JOS Brech, wanda yanzu ake kira Jos B. a cikin kafofin watsa labarai kuma ba a nuna shi da hotunan amma ta zane. An fara shari'ar tare da sanarwar cewa mai kula da shari'ar a cikin wannan yanayin ya mutu a cikin wani hatsari mai tsanani. Yanzu sai ku yi mamakin idan mutumin ya damu da lamirinsa lokacin da ya gano cewa yana aiki a kan PsyOp (aiki na ruhaniya), yana so yayi magana kuma saboda haka ya kamata a tsaftace shi? Ba za mu iya tabbatar da hakan ba. Tidy ne m.
Abin da za ku iya tabbatarwa ita ce, duk abin da aka kula a cikin shari'ar an saka shi a kan hanyar ƙarya a cikin tattaunawa game da DNA da aka samu. Wannan ba zato ba tsammani game da hanyar Bayesian na lissafin yiwuwar maimakon maimakon tabbatar da hujjar cewa DNA na Jos Brech, wanda aka samu a cikin abin da ya ɓace, an yi amfani dashi a "wani laifin kisan kai" wanda ba gaskiya ba ne, saboda ba a tabbatar da kisan kai ba. Ba a yarda da ku ta hanyar doka don amfani da DNA na shari'ar A ba idan dai B. Gaskiyar cewa Gerald Roethof bai sake yin kariya ga wannan ba har yanzu wata alama ce da muke magana da shi a halin da ake ciki a PsyOp a nan. Wannan zai iya dakatar da tsare sirri na Jos B.
Har ila yau an sake tattaunawa akan batun cin zarafin ko a'a:
Lawyer Gerald Roethof ya ruwaito rahoton da likitan ilimin likita Rob Bilo ya furta cewa cutar da cutar Nicky ba ya nufin cewa yaron ya ci gaba da cin zarafin jima'i: "Wannan zai iya haifar dashi ta hanyar tsabtace jiki ko kuma mai tsanani."
Abin takaici daidai ne, binciken bincike na ruhaniya ya nuna cewa Ayuba B. yana da ladabi, kuma hakan yana ba da wani ɓangare a zukatan mutanen da ke bin ra'ayin cewa Jos B. ya kasance mai aikatawa, don haka babu wanda ya tambaya ko muna iya yin aiki tare da aiki na zuciya (PsyOp) don gabatar da sabuwar doka.
Mai gabatar da kara a yanzu ya amsa ga ƙarshe na Roethof cewa masana masana PBC sun dauki Jos B. "mutumin da ya dace". "Sun kuma gano wani cuta, wato 'yan sanda." #Nicky
- Saskia Belleman (@SaskiaBelleman) Yuni 5 2019
A bayyane yake cewa babu wata shaida game da kisan kai ko cin zarafi, saboda haka DNA na (mai daukar hoto na PSYOp) Jos B., wanda aka samu a cikin (yayi?) Bace, ya kamata ba a taɓa amfani dasu ba (wanda ba shi da shi) Kotun kisan kai Nicky Verstappen. Duk da haka, ta hanyar sake yin wasa a kan halayen masu kallo, an janye hankali daga wannan aikin rashin adalci. A gaskiya ma, kotun tana ci gaba da sababbin dokoki (ta hanyar amincewa da amfani da DNA) akan sababbin dokokin. Gaskiya mai sauki cewa Gerald Roethof bai ambaci wannan ba ya sa shi lauya (PsyOp) lauya.
Amma kamar abubuwa da yawa, ana amfani da sharuɗan PsyOp don dalilai masu yawa. A wannan yanayin, Jos Brech zai kuma ba da sanarwa ga lauya. Wannan shi ne haƙiƙa dukkan mataki na mataki na PsyOp, domin yana da shakka game da daidaitawa da yawa dokokin da za ta yiwu, don haka dole ne ake aiki a cikin hanyar da kake son canza dokokin.
A cikin Thijs H. case mun riga mun gani cewa dole ne a sake mayar da asirin gwaninta na GGZ a cikin wani lokaci, domin in ba haka ba za a iya amfani da hotunan kamara da maganganun ma'aikatan ba. A cikin rahoton Jos B. Suna son bayanin daga Jos B. zuwa ga lauya (Psypp) Gerald Roethof. Sabili da haka yawancin haƙƙin 'yancin' yan ƙasa suna kwance daga mataki zuwa mataki (duba a nan). Duk da haka, saboda ya faru ta hanyar babban kisan kai, munafukai ga kafofin watsa labaru, mutane sun yarda da shi. Babu wanda ya ga cewa canje-canjen da aka kawowa doka zai iya shafar kowane dan kasa, don haka babu wanda ya shiga hanya. An umarci mata da maza a cikin tufafi don su rufe bakinsu, saboda sun yi rantsuwa da kambi kuma idan kambi ya gabatar da sabuwar doka ta hanyar PsyOp, za su yi aiki tare ko shiru.
51 Hannun jari
tags: B., Brech, mai gudanarwa, tsanani, featured, dubawa, Gerald, Hof, Jos, Adalci, Nicky, hadari, ya mutu, OvJ, kotu, kara, kara, Roethof, Verstappen
5 Yuni 2019 a 15: 07
Lokacin da aka kama Jos B, Gerald Roethof ya ce an samu DNA ba tare da izini ba, amma sai ya yi shiru game da shi. Zai yiwu a sauya shi, domin in ba haka ba lauya zai tsaya kawai a kan wannan.
An umarce shi da ya yi kamar yadda zai iya idan ya kasance ainihin abu. Anyi wannan ne don tabbatar da yanayin a matsayin ainihin yadda zai yiwu.
Domin wannan shari'ar ba daidai ba ce, na yarda da hakan. Tabbatar cewa gaskiyar yiwuwar cin zarafi da dama ba'a ambata ba, yayin da littafin nan 'Nicky Verstappen' ya nuna cewa shugaban sansanin Joos Barten ya san inda ake samun jikin Nicky. Kuma akwai wasu alamu da yawa a cikin wannan cewa akalla ya kasance mataimaki a wannan yanayin.
Ina tsammanin manufar ta sa Jos B ta yanke hukunci, don haka zaman lafiya a Heibloem zai iya dawowa. Amma idan aka duba shi, sai ya zama da wuya. Domin yaya za a iya ƙirƙirar dabaru na asali tare da Jos B a matsayin kawai mai aikatawa? Ciki har da dukkanin abubuwan da aka sani, irin su cewa zai yi motsa jiki a kan bayanan bayan binciken Nicky.
Ina zargin cewa bai yi zagaye ba a nan. An ƙirƙira wannan don ya bada kyautar DNA a bara. Idan bai yi tafiya a can ba, ba zai zo cikin hoto ba. Sojojin 'yan sanda da suka mutu a Iraki da kuma zargin da aka kama shi ba zai iya warware wannan da'awar ba.
Abu mafi mahimmanci shine idan Jos zai musanta B kuma ya ce bai san yadda DNA ta samo tufafi ba. Sa'an nan kuma ba za a iya yanke masa hukumcin ba, saboda akwai isasshen shaida. Amma mun ga cewa yana gabatar da shari'ar. Suna iya aiki a kan wani labari mai zurfi a bayan al'amuran kuma wannan bai gama ba - kuma ina sha'awar idan har zai kasance gaskiya. Kuma a, ba na rabu da yiwuwar an kashe wani mai kula da bincike ba. Dan Adam yana da rashin alheri haka rashin lafiya.
5 Yuni 2019 a 15: 39
Wani lokaci ba tare da sauran labarinku ba, Ina so in ga inda Roethof ya faɗi haka. Ba zan iya tunawa ko neman hira ba inda na ji shi ya faɗi haka. Gaskiya mai sauki cewa baiyi tsayayya akan wannan alama ya sanya shi lauyan lauya ba.
5 Yuni 2019 a 17: 53
Na tuna a cikin wani ɗan gajeren hira a kan titi bayan da aka kama Jos. Ban san inda wannan yake ba, kuma ba zan kasance a intanet ba. Amma na tuna da wannan saboda na riga na yi mamaki ko an samu DNA ta hanyar haramtacciyar doka. Lokacin da lauya ya ce haka, na san yadda za a ci gaba da wannan gardama. To mun sani cewa yanzu, ba a sake jin labarin ba.
5 Yuni 2019 a 18: 33
Rabin lauyoyi suna aiki a kai tsaye / kai tsaye ga gwamnati. Sauran rabi baiyi haka ba kuma yana jin tsoron Dean, wanda yake kula da lauyoyi a madadin 'jihar', kuma ya dubi ƙungiyar farko. Tsoron kasancewar lauyoyi na rukunin farko sun watsar da su. Wannan shine dalilin da yasa basuyi iyakar komai ba.
Masu lauyoyi na rukuni na farko suna da kyakkyawar dangantaka da alƙalai da kungiyar Bar. Babbar damar samun nasara idan ka sami irin lauya. Kada ku sami jayayya na shari'a game da matsayi na mutane daga rubutun. Sa'an nan kuma ba za su dauki shari'ar ba ko sabotage your case.
5 Yuni 2019 a 23: 01
Har ila yau, jaridar Daily News ta buga labarin "DNA" ne kawai babi daya daga cikin fayil na laifi "na karshe 28 Agusta. A cikin wannan, Ton Broeders, Farfesa Farfesa na Harkokin Shari'a a Jami'ar Leiden, ya ce: "Abin mamaki ne cewa an samu DNA na wanda ake tuhuma saboda ya rasa. Wannan ya zama babban bayanan bayanai guda biyu: wadanda ake zargi da mutanen da bace ba. "A cewar Hukumar Harkokin Shari'a ta Jama'a ta tafi bisa ka'idodin, amma lauya na B. na iya yin jayayya don kare shaidar.
Saboda haka mamaki cewa Roethof baya amfani da wannan a cikin tsaron. A hanyar, wannan labarin ya ɓace daga tarihin yanar gizo na Trouw, amma har yanzu zan sami shi ta hanyar http://www.topics.nl.
6 Yuni 2019 a 22: 53
Don haka Jos yana riƙe da bayanan rubuce-rubuce "a matsayin kadari", kamar yadda Pauw ya ji a jiya. Ba ya so ya bayyana maganarsa har yanzu, saboda duk abin da ake amfani dashi a kansa, in ji shi. Dalilin da ya sa yana tunanin cewa wannan sanarwa zai zama kadari bayan ba zato ba tsammani.
Wannan fall na tattauna da wani a kafofin yada labaran da suka yi ikirarin cewa Yusu ya yi mamakin yayinda yara ke yin iyo kuma Nicky ya kasance a can. Wannan shine yadda DNA DNA ta ƙare a kan wajan Nicky. Wannan mutumin kuma ya yi iƙirarin cewa ya ji wannan daga kafofin watsa labarai. Wataƙila kuskure, saboda ba zan iya samun wani abu ba game da wannan. Kashegari wannan mutumin ya goge amsawarsa. Jos zai yiwuwa ya zo da irin wannan bayani daga bisani.
« Anja Schaap bata riga ya tabbatar da wani PsyOp? Dubi dalilin da ya sa (bidiyo)
Neman binciken wannan ma'aikaci na PBS daga Den Kolder »
Jimlar Ziyara: 10.139.953
Riffian op Rushewar rushewa na 'rechts' alama, Trump, da Brexit (da duk abin da aka haɗa shi) ya fara
Martin Vrijland op Idan annabce-annabce sun cika, to wannan hujja ne cewa gaskatawarka gaskiya ce?
SalmonInClick op Idan annabce-annabce sun cika, to wannan hujja ne cewa gaskatawarka gaskiya ce?
danny op Idan annabce-annabce sun cika, to wannan hujja ne cewa gaskatawarka gaskiya ce?