Prednisone therapy for acute graft-versus-host disease: short- versus long-term treatment. A prospective randomized trial. A prospective randomised trial of cyclosporin and methotrexate versus cyclosporin, methotrexate and prednisolone for prevention of graft-versus-host disease after HLA-identical sibling marrow transplantation for haematological malignancy. Randomized prospective trial of early steroid withdrawal compared with low-dose steroids in renal transplant recipients using serial protocol biopsies to assess efficacy and safety. High-dose methylprednisolone as initial therapy in patients with acute bronchospasm. Cyclosporine or cyclosporine plus methylprednisolone for prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease: a prospective, randomized trial. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind comparison of different doses of intravenous immunoglobulin for prevention of graft-versus-host disease and infection after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Phase 1/2 randomized, placebo-control trial of palifermin to prevent graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Early treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease with high- or low-dose 6-methylprednisolone: a multicenter randomized trial from the Italian Group for Bone Marrow Transplantation. Does adjuvant nutritional support diminish steroid dependency in Crohn disease? Methotrexate is steroid sparing in acute sarcoidosis: results of a double blind, randomized trial. Effect of a single oral dose of prednisolone in acute childhood asthma.
We report the results of a controlled study in which BMT patients with moderate/severe acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) who responded to primary treatment with corticosteroids were prospectively randomized to short versus long taper of their steroid doses. Thirty patients with moderate/severe acute GVHD who responded by 14 days were eligible for random assignment of their steroid tapering schedule. Patients in the short taper group received a total PRED dose of 2275 mg/m2 over 86 days, whereas those in the long taper group received 6300 mg/m2 over 147 days. Patients in the long taper group achieved resolution of acute GVHD after a median of 30 days of therapy (range 6-30), whereas those receiving the short taper resolved after a median of 42 days (12-74) (P = 0.01). After 8 weeks of therapy, only 2 of 13 evaluable long taper and 3 of 13 short taper patients still had active GVHD. The median PRED dose required to achieve complete resolution of acute GVHD was not different between the two groups: 1300 mg/m2 for the long taper patients and 1800 mg/m2 for the short taper patients. Importantly, the incidence of chronic GVHD and survival at 6 months was similar in the 2 groups. The incidence of steroid-related complications was similar, as well. This study suggests that the rapid administration of high-dose PRED to a cumulative dose of 2000 mg/m2 might lead to complete and prompt resolution of acute GVHD in the majority of patients and that rapid PRED taper might provide a mechanism for minimizing steroid-related morbidity. Further investigation and formal studies of the dose-response relationships and kinetics of steroid administration may lead to improvement in the management of acute GVHD. A prospective randomised trial was performed in patients given HLA-identical sibling bone marrow transplants for haematological malignancy comparing the combination of cyclosporin and methotrexate (CM) (n = 20) with the combination of cyclosporin, methotrexate and prednisolone (CMP) (n = 21) as prophylaxis for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). There was no significant differences between the two arms for the incidence of acute GVHD grades I-IV, acute GVHD grades II-IV, chronic GVHD, interstitial pneumonitis, relapse, survival and disease-free survival. The actuarial incidence of acute GVHD grades II-IV in the CMP group was 10% and in the CM group 15% (ns). The incidence of leukaemic relapse in good risk patients was 42% in the CMP group and 40% in the CM group (ns), although the majority of these relapses were cytogenetic relapses only in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia. The incidence of acute GVHD grades II-IV in both arms of the current trial was significantly lower than in our previous trial comparing cyclosporin and methotrexate as single agents. Leukaemic relapse is now the principal cause of treatment failure in this patient population. We conclude that prednisolone should not be included as part of the prophylactic GVHD regime and that further improvement in therapeutic outcome is dependent upon better control of the underlying malignancy. Corticosteroid therapy after renal transplantation is associated with many adverse effects. Newer immunosuppressive agents may allow for safe and effective reductions in dose or early steroid withdrawal.
                In this prospective, single-center clinical trial, 60 patients were randomized into 2 groups: control patients (n = 28), who received low doses of prednisone throughout, and study patients (n = 32), who were withdrawn from steroids 7 days posttransplant. Patients received a limited course of rabbit antilymphocyte globulin (rALG) induction therapy, tacrolimus (TAC), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Patients were followed for clinical outcomes and renal function. Protocol biopsies were performed at 1, 6, and 12 months.
                Clinical rejections occurred in 11% of controls and 13% of study patients. Renal function was well maintained and equivalent in both groups. In all, 111 protocol biopsies were performed without complications. Subclinical rejection was noted in only 2 protocol biopsies, and borderline changes were seen in 12 biopsies, all of which were distributed equally between both groups. Unsuspected acute TAC toxicity was seen in 8 biopsies. Protocol biopsies led to changes in therapy in 10% of patients. In both groups, serial protocol biopsies demonstrated increased allograft fibrosis over time, which was significant at 1 year in the steroid withdrawal group.
                The immunosuppressive combination of rALG, TAC, and MMF prevents subclinical rejection and the need for high doses of steroids after transplantation. However, continual low-dose steroid therapy may aid in preventing chronic allograft fibrosis. Protocol biopsies help define the short-term and long-term risks of steroid withdrawal therapy. The use of steroids in treating acute respiratory obstruction is still controversial. In this double-blind controlled trial, we decided to examine the beneficial effects of a single large dose of methylprednisolone (MSSP), using objective criteria. In the emergency setting, methylprednisolone (30 mg/kg) has been shown to decrease the need for hospital admission in patients with acute bronchospasm. No difference in this improvement was seen among patients in the steroid-dependent or non-steroid-dependent populations. Based on our findings, we suggest that the early use of single-dose steroid therapy is appropriate treatment for patients with acute bronchospastic attacks. Patients with a lymphohematopoietic malignancy considered to be at high risk for posttransplant relapse were enrolled in a study to compare the use of cyclosporine (CSP) as a single agent with a combination of methylprednisolone (MP) and CSP for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis after marrow transplantation from an HLA-identical sibling donor. Sixty patients were randomized to receive CSP only and 62 were randomized to receive CSP plus MP. Daily CSP was started on day -1 (5 mg/kg/d intravenously) and administered at gradually reduced doses until day 180. MP was started on day 7 at 0.5 mg/kg/d, increased to 1.0 mg/kg/d on day 15, started on a taper schedule on day 29, and discontinued on day 72. All 104 evaluable patients (surviving > or =28 days) had sustained engraftment. The incidence rates of grades II-IV acute GVHD were 73% and 60% for patients receiving CSP and CSP plus MP, respectively (P = .01). No difference was seen for grades III-IV GVHD. However, chronic GVHD occurred somewhat more frequently in patients receiving CSP plus MP (44%) than in patients receiving only CSP (21%; P = .02). The incidence of de novo chronic GVHD was marginally higher in patients receiving CSP plus MP (P = .08). No significant differences in the risk of infections were observed. There was a suggestion that the risk of relapse was lower in patients receiving CSP plus MP (P = .10) and, although the overall survival in the two groups was not different (P = .44), there was a slight advantage in favor of CSP plus MP-treated patients for relapse-free survival (P = .07). These results suggest that prophylactic MP, when combined with CSP, has only limited efficacy in acute GVHD prevention and may increase the probability of chronic GVHD. Intravenous immunoglobulin is approved for use in allogeneic bone marrow transplant recipients for prevention of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and infections, but the minimally effective dose has not been established. In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial, patients undergoing allogeneic marrow transplantation were randomized to receive 100 mg/kg, 250 mg/kg, or 500 mg/kg doses of intravenous immunoglobulin. Each dose was given weekly for 90 days and then monthly until 1 year after transplant. Six hundred and eighteen patients were evaluated. Acute GVHD (grades 2-4) occurred in 39% of the patients (80 of 206) in the 100 mg/kg group, 42% of the patients (88 of 208) in the 250 mg/kg group, and in 35% of the patients (72 of 204) in the 500 mg/kg group (P = 0.344). Among patients with unrelated marrow donors, a higher dose of intravenous immunoglobulin (500 mg/kg) was associated with less acute GVHD (P = 0.07). The incidences of chronic GVHD, infection and interstitial pneumonia were similar for all three doses of intravenous immunoglobulin. The dose of intravenous immunoglobulin also had no effect on the types of infection, relapse of hematological malignancy or survival. Except for more frequent chills (P = 0.007) and headaches (P = 0.015) in patients given the 500 mg/kg or 250 mg/kg dose of immunoglobulin, adverse events were similar for all three doses. These results suggest that 100 mg/kg, 250 mg/kg, and 500 mg/kg doses of intravenous immunoglobulin are associated with similar incidences of GVHD and infections in most allogeneic marrow transplants. These results should be considered when designing cost-effective strategies for the use of intravenous immunoglobulin in allogeneic marrow transplants receiving other current regimens for prophylaxis of GVHD and infection. Palifermin, a recombinant human keratinocyte growth factor, was tested for potential benefits on acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and hematopoietic recovery in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study assessed the safety and tolerability of palifermin (n = 69) as compared with placebo (n = 31) in patients conditioned with cyclophosphamide and fractionated total-body irradiation (Cy/TBI) or busulfan and cyclophosphamide (Bu/Cy) and given methotrexate along with a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine A, tacrolimus) for GVHD prophylaxis. All patients received 3 doses before conditioning and either 3 (cohort 1), 6 (cohort 2), or 9 (cohort 3) doses after HSCT. Palifermin doses were 40 mug/kg per day (cohort 1 only) or 60 mug/kg per day (all cohorts). Six patients (placebo = 2, palifermin = 4) experienced a total of 11 dose-limiting toxicities (most often skin, respiratory, or oral mucositis). The most common adverse events included edema, infection, skin pain, or rash. Times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were similar. No significant differences in acute GVHD incidence or severity, survival, or day 100 relapse rates were observed between groups. Palifermin was associated with reduced incidence and mean severity of mucositis in patients conditioned with Cy/TBI but not Bu/Cy. We conclude that palifermin was generally safe in allogeneic HSCTs but had no significant effect on engraftment, acute GVHD, or survival in this trial. Ninety-five patients undergoing an allogeneic bone marrow transplant (BMT) and developing acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) were randomized to receive low-dose intravenous 6-methylprednisolone (6MPred; 2 mg/kg /d; n = 47) or high-dose 6MPred (10 mg/kg/d; n = 48) for 5 days, with subsequent tapering doses. On day 5 patients not responding or progressing on low-dose 6MPred could be switched to high-dose 6MPred. All patients, aged 1 to 55 years, were recipients of unmanipulated BMT from HLA identical sibling donors. Patients were stratified at randomization for age (</>/= 20 years), disease (acute leukemia, chronic myeloid leukemia [CML], nonneoplastic disease), disease status (early/advanced), and GvHD prophylaxis (cyclosporin/cyclosporin + methotrexate). Primary endpoints were response to treatment and evolution of aGvHD to grade III-IV. Secondary endpoints were cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections, transplant-related mortality (TRM), and relapse. The median interval between BMT and treatment was 12 days (6 to 43). Results in the two groups (2 v 10 mg/kg) were as follows: response of aGvHD 68% versus 71% (P = .9), evolution to aGvHD grade III-IV 17% versus 20% (P = . 6), CMV infections 55% versus 60% (P = .7), 3-year actuarial TRM 28% versus 32% (P = .7), relapse 17% versus 7% (P = .1). The actuarial survival at 3 years was 63% versus 62% (P = .9) with a median follow up of 580 and 778 days. On day 5 of therapy, 26 patients assigned to low-dose (2 mg/kg) 6MPred were switched to a higher dose of 6MPred because of no response or progression. Their actuarial TRM was 46%, which is significantly higher than TRM of patients who responded on 2 mg/kg and continued with tapering doses (TRM = 16%, P = .007). In conclusion, early treatment of acute GvHD with 6MPred 10 mg/kg/d does not improve the response rate as compared with 2 mg/kg/d, nor does it prevent evolution to aGvHD grade III-IV. CMV infections, TRM, and survival were also comparable. A group of patients at high risk of TRM can be identified after 5 days of treatment with 6MPred 2 mg/kg and could be eligible for alternative forms of therapy. Nutritional therapy plays an important role in the management of Crohn disease, particularly during the acute phase. Nutritional supplementation may also prevent relapses during the quiescent phase of Crohn disease, though this aspect has not been widely explored.
                Thirty-three patients with Crohn disease in remission were studied. All had steroid-dependent disease. Patients were randomized to receive either elemental diet (n = 19, EO28 Extra) or polymeric diet (Forticips, n = 14). The supplement was given orally in addition to normal food in an amount to provide 35%-50% of pre-trial total calorie intake. Prednisolone was withdrawn gradually. Patients were followed up for 12 months. Failure was defined as increase in CDAI by 100 points from baseline to >200, inability to withdraw chronic steroid therapy completely, need for surgery or steroid therapy.
                The nutritional supplement was successful in 14 (43%) patients who remained in remission for 12 months with complete withdrawal of steroids. The response to elemental diet (42%) was similar to that of polymeric diet (43%). Nutrition supplement failed in 13 (39%). Six (18%) patients were intolerant to enteral feeding because of smell and taste problems. Per-protocol analysis of data indicated that the success rate of nutrition supplement in steroid-dependent patients was 52% (14 out of 27 patients). No disease or patient-related factors helped predict the response to nutrition supplement.
                Nutritional supplementation with either an elemental or polymeric diet may provide a safe and effective alternative to chronic steroid therapy in patients with steroid-dependent Crohn disease. Methotrexate has been steroid sparing for some patients with chronic sarcoidosis. We wished to determine whether methotrexate can be steroid sparing in the first year of corticosteroid therapy in sarcoidosis.
                Patients with new onset, symptomatic disease within four weeks of starting on prednisone were randomized to receive either methotrexate or placebo for the next year. They were seen monthly and prednisone dosage was tapered following a pre-determined schedule.
                Of 24 patients enrolled, only 15 received at least six months of therapy. Since methotrexate appears to take six months to be effective, only patients who completed six or more months of therapy were evaluated. The amount of prednisone per day decreased for both groups: methotrexate (First 6 months: Median 26 (Range 15-37) mg/day); Second 6 months 8 (1-22) mg/day, p < 0.01) and placebo (First 6 Months 28 (24-33) mg/day; Second 6 months 16 (11-22) mg/day, p < 0.02), with less prednisone used for the methotrexate patients versus placebo in the last six months (p < 0.01). There was also less weight gain for those patients receiving methotrexate. There was no difference in toxicity between methotrexate and placebo. The difference between methotrexate versus placebo was not seen when all patients (including the dropouts) were analyzed.
                Methotrexate can be a steroid sparing agent in acute sarcoidosis. 140 children of 184 with acute asthma entered a randomised double-blind trial of oral prednisolone (n = 67) compared with placebo (n = 73) administered soon after admission. The dose of prednisolone was 30 mg in children under 5, otherwise 60 mg. All children also received salbutamol. All had moderate or severe dyspnoea. Initial evaluation was similar for both groups. On reassessment after a few hours 20 children in the prednisolone group were fit for discharge compared with only 2 in the placebo group. There were no early reattendances. Children remaining in hospital had a shorter median duration of stay and were less likely to require further steroid therapy if they had initially received prednisolone. In acute asthma the prompt use of a single dose of oral prednisolone can reduce morbidity and the need for hospital care.
There is no certain study regarding appropriate use, dose and length of therapy for acute GvHD. Further studies are needed to define the appropriate use of steroids and whether other agents are appropriate as frontline therapy.