An evaluation of preoperative ibuprofen for treatment of pain associated with orthodontic separator placement. Comparison of pre-emptive ibuprofen, paracetamol, and placebo administration in reducing post-operative pain in primary tooth extraction. The efficacy of preoperative analgesic administration for postoperative pain management of pediatric dental patients. Efficacy of preoperative skin traction in hip fracture patients: a prospective, randomized study. Preoperative skin traction or pillow nursing in hip fractures: a prospective, randomized study in 123 patients. Analgesic efficacy and safety of preoperative versus postoperative ketorolac in paediatric tonsillectomy. Pain perception following first orthodontic archwire placement--thermoelastic vs superelastic alloys: a randomized controlled trial. The effect of preemptive and/or postoperative ibuprofen therapy for orthodontic pain. Preoperative oral granisetron for the prevention of vomiting following paediatric surgery. Comparison of preoperative ibuprofen, acetaminophen, and placebo administration on the parental report of postextraction pain in children. Postoperative comfort in paediatric outpatient surgery.
Patients undergoing orthodontic treatment can experience significant levels of pain. This study assessed the effectiveness of preoperative ibuprofen in reducing the incidence and the severity of pain after orthodontic separator placement. Sixty-three adolescent patients (mean age, 13 years) were included in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, prospective study. Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 experimental conditions: (1) 400 mg of ibuprofen taken orally 1 hour before separator placement and a lactose placebo taken orally immediately after the appointment, (2) a lactose placebo taken orally 1 hour before separator placement and 400 mg of ibuprofen taken orally immediately after the appointment, or (3) a lactose placebo taken orally 1 hour before separator placement and again immediately after the appointment. The patient's level of discomfort was assessed with a visual analog scale at 2, 6, and 24 hours, as well as at 2, 3, and 7 days after placement of the orthodontic separators. An analysis of variance and Duncan's multiple range test revealed that 2 hours after their orthodontic appointment the patients who had taken ibuprofen 1 hour before separator placement had significantly less pain with chewing than did the patients who received either ibuprofen postoperatively or a placebo. Additional measures suggest a trend for less pain for this group of patients. These results support the use of pretreatment ibuprofen for patients requiring analgesics for orthodontic discomfort. Future study of the use of preemptive analgesics in orthodontics is warranted. This study investigates preliminary investigations that a pre-emptive analgesia administration may reduce post-extraction pain.
                This prospective, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind trial was planned to compare the efficacy of the pre-emptive administration of ibuprofen, paracetamol, and placebo in reducing post-extraction pain in children.
                Forty-five children, ages 6-12, who needed primary mandibular molar tooth extraction were treated in paediatric dental clinics, with treatment preceded by local anaesthesia and analgesic drugs during the preoperative period. A five-face scale was used to evaluate pain reaction during the injection, extraction, and post-operative period. Self-report scores were recorded when the local anaesthesia had been administered in soft tissues and both before and after the extraction was completed. The Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (with Bonferroni correction paired t-test as the post hoc test) were used at a confidence level of 95%.
                The use of pre-emptive analgesics showed lower scores compared to the placebo, irrespective of the age, weight, gender of the child, and the number of teeth extracted during the study period. Additionally, ibuprofen exhibited lower pain scores (P < 0.05) compared to paracetamol at the 15-min (P < 0.001) and 4-h (P < 0.009) periods.
                Preoperative use of ibuprofen and paracetamol may provide a pre-emptive analgesic effect in paediatric patients who receive adequate analgesia during mandibular primary tooth extraction.
                © 2011 The Authors. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry © 2011 BSPD, IAPD and Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Appropriate pain-management strategies for children receiving dental care continue to be poorly delineated. Recent studies have demonstrated the benefit of preoperative analgesic administration upon alteration of the postoperative pain experience in adults. It is the purpose of this study to assess the efficacy of preoperative administration of acetaminophen on the prevalence of postoperative pain-related behaviors and the frequency of postoperative analgesic use in 4- to 10-year-old children following various dental procedures. The results indicate a high prevalence of postoperative pain, independent of the type of dental procedure performed and the preoperative administration of acetaminophen. There is a trend toward reduced postoperative pain in the acetaminophen pretreatment groups. A greater sample size, with more reliable pain-assessment methods, may help to further elucidate the efficacy of preoperative analgesic administration in children. The clinician should be alerted to the potential for pain-related behaviors to occur following routine pediatric dental care. To compare the analgesic benefit of preoperative skin traction with the placement of a pillow under the injured extremity in patients with hip fractures.
                Prospective, randomized clinical study.
                University-affiliated teaching institution.
                One hundred consecutive patients with hip fractures admitted to the authors' institution who met inclusion criteria were enrolled. Fifty-five patients had femoral neck fractures, and forty-five patients had intertrochanteric fractures. The average patient age was seventy-eight years.
                All patients were preoperatively randomized into two intervention groups. One group underwent placement of five pounds of skin traction on the injured extremity, whereas the second underwent placement of a pillow under the injured extremity. Fifty patients were enrolled in each intervention group.
                With respect to immediate postintervention pain levels, patients treated with a pillow showed a trend toward better pain relief, as compared with patients treated with skin traction; however, this was not statistically significant. On the morning after admission, patients treated with a pillow had a statistically significant greater reduction in pain (p = 0.04). These patients also requested a statistically significant lower amount of pain medication (p < 0.01).
                The authors think that preoperative skin traction in patients with hip fractures does not provide significant pain relief, as compared with pillow placement under the injured extremity, and thus should not be routinely performed in this patient population for analgesia. To study the influence on pain and handling of different preoperative immobilization procedures for hip fractures.
                123 consecutive patients with displaced cervical and trochanteric hip fractures were randomized to skin traction, placement in a special foam pillow (Lasse pillow), and comfortable placement with an ordinary pillow under the hip from admission to operation. The effect on pain alleviation was evaluated with a Visual Analogue Scale and by the number of doses of analgesics administered. The processing time through the emergency department, X-ray department and to the ward as well as time to operation was registered.
                No clinically significant difference in the VAS pain evaluation was found. There was no difference in the total consumption of analgesics in the emergency department or on the ward and no effect of immobilization type on the processing time or time to operation. Fracture type did not affect the outcome. Approximately one third of the patients found placement on a regular pillow or the application of skin traction uncomfortable as opposed to only one of 19 of the patients lying in the special Lasse pillow. There was no other difference in processing time with regard to different forms of pillow nursing and skin traction.
                The most convenient immobilization should be chosen as there is no significant difference concerning pain and handling time. Increased attention to analgesic medication and rapid handling to be operated are of importance to promote the rehabilitation process. Tonsillectomy is a common procedure in childhood resulting in significant morbidity due to pain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of a single dose of ketorolac i.v. given before or after tonsillectomy, compared to placebo.
                A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed in 60 children, 5 to 15 years of age, admitted for tonsillectomy. Patients were allocated to receive ketorolac 1 mg.kg-1 i.v. or placebo. Postoperative pain was assessed by self-report 1.5, 3, 5, and 24 h after surgery.
                Pain scores were significantly lower for both ketorolac groups compared to the placebo group 1.5, 3, and 5 h after surgery (P = 0.05). Pain scores were lowest in the preoperative ketorolac group 1.5 to 5 h after surgery, and significantly fewer children in this group had fentanyl 0 to 1.5 hr after surgery. But no significant differences were found between pain scores of the preoperative and postoperative ketorolac groups in the first 24 h after surgery. Acetaminophen consumption during the first 5 h after surgery was significantly less in patients receiving ketorolac (P < 0.05). Patients in the preoperative ketorolac group had a significantly lower incidence of postoperative vomiting (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative bleeding between groups. Three children in the preoperative, 5 children in the postoperative ketorolac group and 5 children in the placebo group experienced postoperative haemorrhage.
                This study indicates that a single dose of ketorolac 1 mg.kg-1 i.v. administered either before or immediately after surgery improves postoperative analgesia in children after tonsillectomy without evidence of increased incidence of bleeding. Orthodontic thermoelastic archwires produce lighter and more biologic forces than superelastic archwires and could therefore offer the possibility of reducing initial orthodontic pain. Nevertheless, evidence concerning this issue is scarce. The aim of this study was to compare pain perception following first archwire placement in patients with thermal heat-activated (HANT) and superelastic (SE) nickel-titanium archwires.
                Thirty subjects (11 males, 19 females; range, 11 to 26 years of age) were recruited. Metal brackets were bonded in the maxillary or mandibular arch. Round 0.016-inch HANT or 0.016-inch SE archwires were randomly placed and tied with elastic ligatures. Each patient was invited to score tooth pain for 7 days at different time points (8:00, 12:00, 16:00, 20:00, and 24:00) using the visual analog scale (VAS).
                In both groups, pain was highest at day 2 and lowest at day 7. Patients with HANT archwires had significantly lower VAS scores (P < .005) at days 2, 3, and 4 than subjects with SE archwires. This was also the case after adjusting for analgesic consumption, sports practicing, overlapping pain of different origin, and the concomitance of stressful events. The frequency of analgesic consumption was higher in the SE than in HANT group at day 3 (P < .05). No differences in pain perception were found between time points, nor was any correlation found between dental crowding and pain. No difference in pain perception was found between the maxillary and mandibular dental arches.
                Initial orthodontic pain is reduced when using HANT orthodontic archwires. The control of pain during orthodontic treatment is of vital interest to both clinicians and patients. Surprisingly, there has been limited research into the control of orthodontic pain, and there is no standard of care for controlling this discomfort. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of preemptive ibuprofen therapy, postoperative ibuprofen therapy, and a combination of the 2 therapies. Forty-one orthodontic patients aged 9 years 3 months to 16 years 11 months who were to undergo separator placement were enrolled in this prospective study. Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 experimental conditions: (1) 400 mg ibuprofen taken orally 1 hour before separator placement and 400 mg ibuprofen taken orally 6 hours after the initial dose, (2) 400 mg ibuprofen taken orally 1 hour before separator placement and a lactose capsule taken orally 6 hours after the initial dose, or (3) a lactose capsule taken orally 1 hour before separator placement and 400 mg ibuprofen taken 6 hours after the initial placebo. The results revealed that preemptive ibuprofen therapy significantly decreased pain that was experienced 2 hours after separator placement and at bedtime. Beginning on day 2, there was a trend for patients who had taken both preemptive and postoperative ibuprofen doses to have lower pain scores compared with the other 2 groups. In conclusion, these data indicate that ibuprofen taken 60 minutes before separator placement alleviates pain at 2 hours and at bedtime after treatment. Further study with the use of additional postoperative doses is warranted. We evaluated the efficacy of granisetron, 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor antagonist, given orally, preoperatively, for the prevention of postoperative vomiting in children undergoing general anaesthesia for surgery (inguinal hernia, phimosis-circumcision).
                In a randomized, double-blinded manner, 100 children, ASA physical status I, aged 4-11 years, received orally placebo or granisetron at three different doses (20 microg x kg(-1), 40 microg x kg(-1), 80 microg x kg(-1)) 60 min before surgery (n=25 of each). The same standard general anaesthetic technique was used.
                The percentage of patients being emesis-free during 0-6 h after anaesthesia was 56% with placebo, 64% with graniseron 20 microg x kg(-1) (P=0.773), 88% with granisetron 40 microg x kg(-1) (P=0.027) and 92% with granisetron 80 microg x kg(-1) (P=0.01); the corresponding rate during 6-24 h after anaesthesia was 60%, 68% (P=0.768), 92% (P=0.02) and 92% (P=0.02) (P-values versus placebo). No clinically serious adverse events were observed in any of the groups.
                In summary, preoperative oral granisetron 40 microg x kg(-1) is effective for the prevention of vomiting following paediatric surgery (inguinal hernia, phimosis-circumcision). Increasing the doses to 80 microg x kg(-1) provides no demonstrable additional benefit. Previous investigations demonstrated that administering a preoperative analgesic can reduce postextraction pain in adults. Studies also have shown that ibuprofen was superior in alleviating postextraction pain when compared with acetaminophen. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of the preoperative administration of ibuprofen, acetaminophen, and placebo in reducing postextraction pain in children. Sixty children, aged 2-10 years, requiring primary teeth extractions, were selected to participate in the study. Patients were assigned in a blind, random fashion to one of the three pretreatment drug groups. Parental report of their child's pain and use of analgesics during the immediate 7-hr postoperative period was elicited by telephone the day after the extraction procedure. Thirty-five percent of the patients were reported by their parents to experience postextraction pain. Of those patients, 52% received postoperative analgesics for pain relief (18% of the total). Although there was a trend toward reduced postextraction pain reported by the parents, the preoperative administration of neither analgesic was found to be statistically superior by chi-square analysis to placebo administration. Postoperative conditions in hospital and at home were evaluated in 200 paediatric daycase patients by using questionnaires and telephone interviews. Pain was assessed by behaviour observation or a faces rating scale depending on age. Anaesthetic methods, nausea/vomiting, analgesics and parents' aspects were also recorded. Seventy per cent of the patients received regional anaesthesia. Immediate postoperative analgesia was satisfactory in 75% of the children. When the effects of intraoperatively administered analgesics wore off at home almost half the children rated higher than mild pain. The increased degree of pain at home was especially pronounced after regional anaesthesia. The total incidence of nausea/vomiting was 28% and fentanyl caused nausea and vomiting in a significantly higher proportion of cases. The study points out that immediate postoperative comfort obtained by prophylactic analgesia needs to be followed by analgesics given on a continuous basis for the first days after surgery.
From the available evidence we cannot determine whether or not preoperative analgesics are of benefit in paediatric dentistry for procedures under local anaesthetic. There is probably a benefit in prescribing preoperative analgesics prior to orthodontic separator placement.