A comparative study of internal fixation and prosthesis replacement for radial head fractures of Mason type III. Biodegradable implants versus standard metal fixation for displaced radial head fractures. A prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Comparison between radial head replacement and open reduction and internal fixation in clinical treatment of unstable, multi-fragmented radial head fractures. The non-operative management of radial head fractures: a randomized trial of three treatments. Seven-year outcome following Colles' type distal radial fracture. A comparison of two treatment methods. Biodegradable rods versus Kirschner wire fixation of wrist fractures. A randomised trial. A comparison of supination/flexion to hyperpronation in the reduction of radial head subluxations. Trans-styloid fixation of fractures of the distal radius. A prospective randomized comparison between 6- and 1-week postoperative immobilization in 60 fractures. A multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial of open reduction--internal fixation versus total elbow arthroplasty for displaced intra-articular distal humeral fractures in elderly patients. [Prosthetic humeral head replacement in dislocated humerus multi-fragment fracture in the elderly--an alternative to minimal osteosynthesis?]. [Osteosynthesis of per- and subtrochanteric fractures by blade plate versus gamma nail. A randomized prospective study].
Although several treatment options for radial head fractures are available, no clear solutions exist. In this study we therefore compare open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with bipolar radial head prosthesis replacement in treatment of radial head fractures of Mason type III. Cement stem and bipolar radial prosthesis were used to treat 12 fresh cases and two old cases of Mason type III radial head fracture. As a control group, another eight cases of radial head type III fracture were treated with ORIF with cannulated screws and Kirschner (K) wires. The 14 patients who received radial head prosthesis replacement were followed-up for 15.9 months (range 10-27 months). According to elbow functional evaluation criteria by Broberg and Morrey, we found excellent results in nine cases, good in four, and fair in one. Mean follow-up of the eight cases in the ORIF group was 14 months (range 10-21 months), with good results in one case, fair in four, and poor in three. The result was good or excellent in 92.9% of prosthesis replacement patients and in 12.5% of ORIF patients. This difference is statistically significant (P = 0.0004; Fisher's exact test). We concluded that bipolar radial head prosthesis replacement is better than ORIF in treatment of Mason type III radial head fracture. This multicenter, prospective, randomized study compares the use of biodegradable polylactide pins with standard metal mini-fragment implants for the treatment of displaced radial head fractures. It compares complication rates and clinical outcomes of both treatment methods. At 2 years, 135 (82%) of 164 patients were available for evaluation. Equivalence of treatment method was defined as a difference of 10% or less in the number of complication-free patients. Functional status was assessed by using the Broberg and Morrey Elbow Score and compared by an unpaired t test. Good or excellent clinical results were achieved by 92% (56/61) of the control patients and 96% (71/74) of the polylactide patients. The incidence of complication-free patients was 3.7% less in the polylactide group than in the control group. The 1-sided 95% confidence interval for the treatment difference between the 2 groups was more than -6.1%. Biodegradable polylactide pins have at least comparable outcomes as standard metal implants for the internal fixation of reconstructable displaced radial head fractures. The objective of this study was to compare replacement of the radial head by metal prostheses with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for the treatment of unstable, multi-fragmented radial head fractures. A prospective randomised controlled trial was employed to investigate 45 patients with unstable, multi-fragmented fractures of the radial head, from January 2004 to June 2007. The patients were randomised to two groups: the ORIF group and the radial head replacement group. Over the next two years, follow-up assessments recorded Broberg and Morrey scores and postoperative complication rate. Statistical analysis was performed. According to Broberg and Morrey scores, patients receiving radial head replacement achieved significantly better clinical results with 91% (20/22) good or excellent compared to patients assigned to the ORIF group with 65.2% (15/23) good or excellent results (P < 0.01). Postoperative complication rate of the radial head replacement group (13.6%) was significantly lower than that of the ORIF group (47.9%; P < 0.01). Compared with open reduction and internal fixation, radial head replacement with a metal prostheses resulted in favourable joint function for the unstable, multi-fragmented fractures of the radial head. Ninety-eight consecutive patients with Mason type 1 and 2 radial head fractures were randomized into three treatment groups to compare early mobilization with immobilization in flexion and extension. Eighty-one patients were reviewed on average 25 months following fracture and assessed for pain, disability and range of movement. Loss of full extension was the most frequent restriction of movement and was found in 17 patients. Two patients had restricted flexion without limited extension. Patients immobilized in a flexion cast had a significantly reduced range of movement compared with patients immobilized in extension (P = 0.02). Nineteen patients had residual pain and again the flexion group fared worse than the extension group (P = 0.06). Results from early mobilization in a sling were not significantly different from the other two groups. Treatment of radial head fractures in flexion casts should be avoided. Eighty-five patients were reviewed 7 years after prospective randomization to bridging external fixation or plaster immobilization for treatment of a Colles' type distal radial fracture. The Gartland and Werley score showed that most patients in each group had an excellent or good outcome and patient satisfaction was comparable and high in both groups. The fixator group had significantly less radial shortening (P<0.05). Despite a high level of radiographic malunion (50%) overall function, range of movement and activities of daily living were not limited. Twenty-five per cent of patients had minor radiological signs of post-traumatic arthritis although only one patient was symptomatic. We conclude that, in the long term, external fixation of distal radius fractures does not confer an improved outcome when compared to plaster immobilization. In a prospective trial, biodegradable polyglycolic acid rods were compared with Kirschner wires for fixation of wrist fractures (Frykman types I, II, V and VI). Fifteen patients were randomly assigned to each treatment group. There was no significant difference between the groups with regard to age, sex ratio and fracture type. Kapandji's pinning technique was used in all cases. There were no significant differences in the results obtained in both groups at final follow-up. At three months and six months the functional results of the Kirschner-wire group were, however, significantly better (p < 0.05), due to numerous transient complications from foreign-body reactions to the polyglycolic acid rods. The use of polyglycolic acid rods is therefore not recommended for the fixation of distal radial fractures. To compare supination at the wrist followed by flexion at the elbow (the traditional reduction technique) to hyperpronation at the wrist in the reduction of radial head subluxations (nursemaid's elbow).
                This prospective, randomized study involved a consecutive sampling of children younger than 6 years of age who presented to one of two urban pediatric emergency departments and two suburban pediatric ambulatory care centers with a clinical diagnosis of radial head subluxation. Patients were randomized to undergo reduction by one of the two methods and were followed every 5 minutes for return of elbow function. The initial procedure was repeated if baseline functioning did not return 15 minutes after the initial reduction attempt. Failure of that technique 30 minutes after the initial reduction attempt resulted in a cross-over to the alternate method of reduction. The alternate procedure was repeated if baseline functioning did not return 15 minutes after the alternate procedure was attempted. If the patient failed both techniques, radiography of the elbow was performed.
                A total of 90 patients were enrolled in the study. Five patients were removed from further analysis secondary to a final diagnosis of fracture, 84 were reduced successfully, and 1 failed both techniques. Demographic characteristics of each group were similar. Thirty-nine of 41 patients (95%) randomized to hyper-pronation were reduced successfully on the first attempt versus 34 of 44 patients (77%) randomized to supination. Two patients in the hyperpronation group required two attempts versus 10 patients in the supination group. Hyperpronation was more successful; 40 of 41 patients (97.5%) in the hyperpronation group were reduced successfully versus 38 of 44 patients (86%) in the supination group. Of the 6 patients who crossed over from supination to hyperpronation, 5 were reduced on the first attempt and 1 was reduced on the second attempt.
                In the reduction of radial head subluxations, the hyperpronation technique required fewer attempts at reduction compared with supination, was successful more often than supination, and was often successful when supination failed. We performed a prospective randomized study on 60 patients with dorsally displaced extra-articular or noncomminuted intraarticular fractures of the distal radius. All 60 fractures were treated by closed reduction and Kirchner wire trans-styloid fixation. 30 patients had 1 weeks' postoperative immobilization and 30 patients had 6 weeks' immobilization. All patients had a clinical and radiographic review at 6 weeks and at 1 year after the operation. Pain, range of movement and grip strength were tested clinically, and changes in dorsal tilt, frontal radial deviation, ulnar variance, and radial shortening were assessed radiographically. Rates of complications were the same in both groups. At follow-up, pain was similar in both groups and range of motion and grip strength were somewhat better after early mobilization--in comparison with the opposite wrist--but this was statistically significant only for ulnar deviation. The postoperative radiographic reductions were similar in both groups, with no differences in loss of reduction after bone healing. Therefore, in Colles' fractures, trans-styloid fixation with two K-wires seems to give a stable osteosynthesis, which does not need additional immobilization with a plaster cast. We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled trial to compare functional outcomes, complications, and reoperation rates in elderly patients with displaced intra-articular, distal humeral fractures treated with open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF) or primary semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). Forty-two patients were randomized by sealed envelope. Inclusion criteria were age greater than 65 years; displaced, comminuted, intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus (Orthopaedic Trauma Association type 13C); and closed or Gustilo grade I open fractures treated within 12 hours of injury. Both ORIF and TEA were performed following a standardized protocol. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score were determined at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 2 years. Complication type, duration, management, and treatment requiring reoperation were recorded. An intention-to-treat analysis and an on-treatment analysis were conducted to address patients randomized to ORIF but converted to TEA intraoperatively. Twenty-one patients were randomized to each treatment group. Two died before follow-up and were excluded from the study. Five patients randomized to ORIF were converted to TEA intraoperatively because of extensive comminution and inability to obtain fixation stable enough to allow early range of motion. This resulted in 15 patients (3 men and 12 women) with a mean age of 77 years in the ORIF group and 25 patients (2 men and 23 women) with a mean age of 78 years in the TEA group. Baseline demographics for mechanism, classification, comorbidities, fracture type, activity level, and ipsilateral injuries were similar between the 2 groups. Operative time averaged 32 minutes less in the TEA group (P = .001). Patients who underwent TEA had significantly better MEPSs at 3 months (83 vs 65, P = .01), 6 months (86 vs 68, P = .003), 12 months (88 vs 72, P = .007), and 2 years (86 vs 73, P = .015) compared with the ORIF group. Patients who underwent TEA had significantly better DASH scores at 6 weeks (43 vs 77, P = .02) and 6 months (31 vs 50, P = .01) but not at 12 months (32 vs 47, P = .1) or 2 years (34 vs 38, P = .6). The mean flexion-extension arc was 107 degrees (range, 42 degrees -145 degrees) in the TEA group and 95 degrees (range, 30 degrees -140 degrees) in the ORIF group (P = .19). Reoperation rates for TEA (3/25 [12%]) and ORIF (4/15 [27%]) were not statistically different (P = .2). TEA for the treatment of comminuted intra-articular distal humeral fractures resulted in more predictable and improved 2-year functional outcomes compared with ORIF, based on the MEPS. DASH scores were better in the TEA group in the short term but were not statistically different at 2 years' follow-up. TEA may result in decreased reoperation rates, considering that 25% of fractures randomized to ORIF were not amenable to internal fixation. TEA is a preferred alternative for ORIF in elderly patients with complex distal humeral fractures that are not amenable to stable fixation. Elderly patients have an increased baseline DASH score and appear to accommodate to objective limitations in function with time. In a prospective randomised study, comprising 30 aged patients with fractures of the proximal humerus (4-fragment fractures according to Neer) minimal osteosynthesis was compared to primary endoprosthetic replacement. The Constant score was used for evaluation during follow-up. After one year the results were similar in both groups. There were two complications necessitating revision surgery among the patients with minimal osteosynthesis and in four cases the implants had to be removed. In the group with primary endoprosthetic repair neither complications nor revision surgery occurred. Primary endoprosthetic replacement for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures appears as a therapeutic option with a low complication rate and a satisfying functional outcome. In older patients we need a safe mode of therapy permitting early mobilization and quick discharge from the hospital back to the patient's home. Endoprosthetic replacement fulfils these demands since it resembles a "one time surgery" without the risk of revision surgery for implant loosening, pseudarthrosis or ischemic necrosis of the humeral head. To compare clinical and radiological results in per- and subtrochanteric fractures' management with 90 degrees blade plate or Gamma nail fixation; an implant allowing early weight-bearing and fracture healing in correct position remains still difficult.
                Between 1993 and 1995, 26 patients addressed to our Center for a Kyle IV [1] fracture were divided into 2 groups, one fixed with blade plate and the other with Gamma nail. The follow-up for all patients is 12 months.
                Gamma nail allows early weight-bearing in all patients, fracture healing is acquired at 4.2 months; an operative diaphyseal fracture needed conversion to a long Gamma nail. We observed a slight cut-out that didn't need reoperation. In the blade plate group, we noticed three femoral head necrosis without major flattening, two non-unions, one plate's breakage and two malunions; fracture healing is acquired at 6.3 months. The two non-unions and the plate's breakage didn't need reoperation because of low functional demand.
                We prefer Gamma nail in per- and subtrochanteric femoral fractures' management, it allows early and fast weight-bearing and fracture healing is acquired in all cases.
Only tentative conclusions can be drawn from the available evidence in this review. Compared with ORIF, there was some evidence that radial head replacement had better elbow function and fewer adverse events for Mason type III radial head fractures in the short term. However, the evidence is of low quality and it is unknown whether these results would apply in the longer term or more generally. Using biodegradable implants may be as good as metallic implants for fixation of some usually more stable fractures but more evidence is needed to confirm this. There is a need for good quality evidence for addressing the areas of uncertainty for the surgical treatment of radial head fractures.