A randomized controlled trial of a bedside partogram in the active management of primiparous labour. Active management of labour in a district hospital setting. Role of prostaglandin in the management of prelabour rupture of the membranes at term. Dysfunctional labour: a randomised trial. A comparison of active management and expectant management of the third stage of labour: a Swedish randomised controlled trial. Partogram action line study: a randomised trial. A randomised controlled trial of early versus delayed use of amniotomy and oxytocin infusion in nulliparous labour. Active management of term prelabour rupture of membranes with oral misoprostol. The Bristol third stage trial: active versus physiological management of third stage of labour. A randomised controlled trial and meta-analysis of active management of labour. Prolonged pregnancy: the management debate.
The partogram is a pictorial representation of the progress of labour, used in an effort to enhance early recognition of dystocia and help avoid Caesarean section (CS). The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of partogram use on the CS and obstetric intervention rates.
                We conducted a randomized controlled trial of use of the partogram in 1932 primiparous women with uncomplicated pregnancies at term. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: the standard group, who had the progress of labour charted in written notes, or the partogram group, whose progress in labour was recorded using a bedside graphical partogram as well as in written notes. Outcomes were stratified according to whether labour was spontaneous or induced and whether membranes were initially intact or ruptured. The primary outcome was the rate of CS; secondary outcome measures were rates of obstetric intervention for dystocia.
                There was no significant difference between the groups in rates of CS (partogram 24%, standard notes 25%), rates of other interventions, amniotomy, oxytocin use, or the mean cervical dilatation in labour.
                In this study, the use of a partogram without a mandatory management of labour protocol had no effect on rates of CS or other intrapartum interventions in healthy primiparous women at term. The aim of this randomised trial was to determine the effect of the policy of active management of labour in all its components on the rate of caesarean section in a Nigerian district hospital setting. Two hundred and twenty-one nulliparous women fulfilling selected inclusion criteria were randomised to receive active management of labour, and 227 control women received routine labour management. Labour was significantly shortened by over 2 hours with active management of labour, and caesarean section reduced (9% vs. 16%, RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.34-0.95). There were no significant differences in maternal infectious morbidity, uterine hyperstimulation syndromes, ruptured uterus or neonatal Apgar scores between the two groups. We conclude that active management of labour shortens primigravid labour and reduces caesarean risk. To compare conservative versus prostaglandin management of prelabour rupture of the membranes (PROM) in healthy primigravid women at term.
                A prospective randomized study.
                Labour Ward, Aberdeen Maternity Hospital.
                230 primigravidae at terms with PROM, 115 allocated to be treated conservatively and 115 to be managed with prostaglandin treatment.
                In the conservatively managed group the women were observed for up to 24 h after hospital admission with PROM. The actively managed group had PGE2 gel (2 mg) instilled into the posterior fornix and if contractions had not commenced, a further dose of PGE2 gel (1 mg) was instilled 6 h later. In both groups, if labour had not established 24 h after admission, intravenous oxytocin was given in escalating doses.
                PROM to delivery interval, oxytocin augmentation, mode of delivery, maternal and neonatal infective morbidity.
                There was a significant reduction in the PROM to delivery interval in the women managed actively with PGE2 gel and fewer women in the PGE2 group required oxytocin augmentation (31% vs 51%). The two managements groups were comparable for intrapartum analgesia, antibiotic treatment, babies requiring admission to the special care nursery unit and delivery by caesarean section.
                The early use of prostaglandin is associated with a significant reduction in PROM to delivery interval without a significant increase in infective morbidity or caesarean section rate. However, the advantages of the conservative approach should not be overlooked. More work is still needed in the management of those women where uterine activity fails to establish within 24 h after PROM. Sixty-one women making slow progress in the active phase of spontaneous labour with intact membranes were randomised to oxytocin and amniotomy, amniotomy only or expectant management. The data show that oxytocin significantly increases the rate of cervical dilatation and shortens prolonged labour, when compared with amniotomy alone and expectant management (P = 0.0144 and 0.0006, respectively). The impact on the operative delivery rate and neonatal outcome is difficult to assess due to the small number of relevant adverse outcomes. Women reported higher satisfaction score in the two groups where intervention followed the diagnosis of dysfunctional labour. to compare blood loss in women actively and expectantly managed in the third stage of labour.
                randomised controlled trial (RCT).
                two delivery units at a Swedish university hospital.
                healthy women with normal pregnancies, at gestational age 34-43 weeks, with singleton cephalic presentation and expected vaginal delivery.
                the women were randomly allocated to either active (n = 903) or expectant (n = 899) management of the third stage of labour.
                the primary outcome was blood loss > 1000 ml, and secondary outcomes were mean blood loss, duration of third stage, retained placenta, haemoglobin level and blood transfusion.
                blood loss > 1000 ml occurred in 10% of the actively managed group and 16.8% of the expectantly managed group (P < 0.001). Mean blood loss was 535 ml in the actively managed group and 680 ml in the expectantly managed group (P < 0.001). A prolonged duration of the third stage was associated with increased blood loss. Increased placenta weight was associated with increased blood loss. The haemoglobin level was 118 g/dl in actively managed women and 115/dl in expectantly managed women (P < 0.001) the day after childbirth. The occurrence of retained placenta and the number of blood transfusions did not differ between the groups.
                active management of the third stage of labour was associated with less blood loss compared with expectant management. It is reasonable to advocate this regime, especially in primiparous women. To assess the effect of three different partograms on caesarean section and maternal satisfaction.
                Prospective randomised clinical trial.
                Regional teaching hospital in North West of England.
                Nine hundred and twenty-eight primigravid women with uncomplicated pregnancies who presented in spontaneous labour at term.
                The women were randomised to have their progress of labour recorded on a partogram with an action line 2, 3 or 4 hours to the right of the alert line. If the progress reached the action line, a diagnosis of prolonged labour was made. Prolonged labour was managed according to the standard ward protocol.
                Primary: Caesarean section rate and maternal satisfaction; secondary: need for augmentation, duration of labour, analgesia, cord blood gas analysis, postpartum haemorrhage, number of vaginal examinations, Apgar score and admission to special care baby unit.
                Caesarean section rate was lowest when labour was managed using a partogram with a 4-hour action line. The difference between the 3- and 4-hour partograms was statistically significant (OR 1 8, 95% CI 1.1-3.2), but the difference between 2 and 4 hours was not (OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.8-2.4). The women in the 2-hour arm were more satisfied with their labour when compared to the women in the 3-hour (P < 00001) and 4-hour (P <00001) arm.
                Our data suggest that women prefer active management of labour. It is possible that partograms which favour earlier intervention are associated with higher caesarean section rate. As the evidence on which to base the choice of partograms remains inconclusive further research is required. To compare routine amniotomy and early intravenous oxytocin (active management of labour) with a more selective use of amniotomy and oxytocin in women in true labour who received comparable continuous supportive midwifery care.
                Randomised controlled trial of nulliparous clinic patients in spontaneous labour at term.
                Labour and delivery ward of a university teaching hospital.
                Three hundred and six parturients: 152 received active management of labour; 154 were more selectively managed.
                1. Active management: early amniotomy, early use of oxytocin. 2. Selective intervention management: no routine amniotomy and more selective use of oxytocin.
                Use of oxytocin and amniotomy. Labour duration, mode of delivery.
                Maternal characteristics were comparable in both groups. Amniotomy was more often performed (91% versus 57%, P <0.01) and oxytocin more often used (53% versus 27%, P < 0.01) in the active management group. The first stage of labour, however, was only shortened by half an hour in the active management group (254 min versus 283 min, P = 0.087). Caesarean section rate (3.9% versus 2.6%), spontaneous vaginal delivery rate (78% versus 79%) and neonatal outcome were not significantly different between groups.
                Within a set-up of strict labour diagnosis and supportive midwifery care, routine amniotomy and early use of oxytocin offered no advantage over a more selective use of amniotomy and oxytocin in terms of mode of delivery and labour duration. To compare the active management of term prelabour rupture of membranes with oral misoprostol with conservative management for 24 hours followed by induction with oxytocin or prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) gel.
                A non-blinded randomised controlled trial.
                Induction and labour wards, Aberdeen Maternity Hospital.
                Sixty-one women with confirmed prelabour rupture of the membranes at > or =36 weeks of gestation.
                The women were randomised to 50 microg of oral misoprostol repeated every 4 hours, if required, to a maximum of five doses (active group), or to induction of labour with PGE(2) gel or oxytocin only if not in spontaneous labour 24 hours after prelabour rupture of membranes (conservative group).
                Number of women in active labour within 24 hours of the prelabour rupture of membranes, preference of women for any one particular method of management in any subsequent pregnancy with prelabour rupture of membranes.
                93.3% of the active group and 54.8% of the conservative group were in spontaneous labour within 24 hours of the prelabour rupture of membranes (RR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.4). Of those achieving a vaginal delivery, 72% of the active group did so within 24 hours of the prelabour rupture of membranes as compared with 26.9% of the conservative group (RR 2.7, 95% CI 1.4 to 5.3, P = 0.002). There were no significant differences in the neonatal or maternal outcomes. In the active group, 78% felt they would have the same method of induction as compared with 40% in the conservative group (RR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.3, P = 0.03).
                Active management with oral misoprostol resulted in more women going into labour and delivering within 24 hours of the prelabour rupture of membranes with no increase in maternal or neonatal complications. Women tended to view active management of prelabour rupture of membranes more positively. Oral misoprostol might be an option to consider in those wishing active management. To compare the effects on fetal and maternal morbidity of routine active management of third stage of labour and expectant (physiological) management, in particular to determine whether active management reduced incidence of postpartum haemorrhage.
                Randomised trial of active versus physiological management. Women entered trial on admission to labour ward with allocation revealed just before vaginal delivery. Five months into trial high rate of postpartum haemorrhage in physiological group (16.5% v 3.8%) prompted modification of protocol to exclude more women and allow those allocated to physiological group who needed some active management to be switched to fully active management. Sample size of 3900 was planned, but even after protocol modification a planned interim analysis after first 1500 deliveries showed continuing high postpartum haemorrhage rate in physiological group and study was stopped.
                Maternity hospital.
                Of 4709 women delivered from 1 January 1986 to 31 January 1987, 1695 were admitted to trial and allocated randomly to physiological (849) or active (846) management. Reasons for exclusion were: refusal, antepartum haemorrhage, cardiac disease, breech presentation, multiple pregnancy, intrauterine death, and, after May 1986, ritodrine given two hours before delivery, anticoagulant treatment, and any condition needing a particular management of third stage.
                All but six women allocated to active management actually received it, having prophylactic oxytocic, cord clamping before placental delivery, and cord traction; whereas just under half those allocated to physiological management achieved it. A fifth of physiological group received prophylactic oxytocic, two fifths underwent cord traction and just over half clamping of the cord before placental delivery.
                Reduction in incidence of postpartum haemorrhage from 7.5% under physiological management to 5.0% under active management.
                Incidence of postpartum haemorrhage was 5.9% in active management group and 17.9% in physiological group (odds ratio 3.13; 95% confidence interval 2.3 to 4.2), a contrast reflected in other indices of blood loss. In physiological group third stage was longer (median 15 min v 5 min) and more women needed therapeutic oxytocics (29.7% v 6.4%). Apgar scores at one and five minutes and incidence of neonatal respiratory problems were not significantly different between groups. Babies in physiological group weighed mean of 85 g more than those in active group. When women allocated to and receiving active management (840) were compared with those who actually received physiological management (403) active management still produced lower rate of postpartum haemorrhage (odds ratio 2.4;95% CI1.6 to 3.7).
                Policy of active management practised in this trial reduces incidence of postpartum haemorrhage, shortens third stage, and results in reduced neonatal packed cell volume. To test whether a policy of active management of nulliparous labour would reduce the rate of caesarean section and prolonged labour without influencing maternal satisfaction.
                Randomised controlled trial.
                Tertiary referral obstetric unit, Auckland, New Zealand.
                Nulliparous women in spontaneous labour at term with singleton pregnancy and cephalic presentation and without fetal distress.
                After the onset of active labour, previously consented women were randomly assigned to active management (n = 320) or to routine care (n = 331). Active labour was defined as regular painful contractions, occurring at least once in five minutes, lasting at least 40 seconds, accompanied by either spontaneous rupture of the membranes, or full cervical effacement and dilatation of at least two centimetres. Active management included early amniotomy, two-hourly vaginal assessments, and early use of high dose oxytocin for slow progress in labour. Routine care was not prespecified. Prolonged labour was > 12 hours duration. Maternal satisfaction with labour care was assessed by postal questionnaire at six weeks postpartum.
                Mode of delivery, duration of labour, and maternal satisfaction.
                Active management of labour did not reduce the rate of caesarean section 30/320 (9.4%), compared with 32/331 (9.7%) for routine care, but did shorten the length of first stage of labour (median 240 min vs 290 min; P = 0.02), and reduce the relative risk of prolonged labour (RR 0.39; 95% CI 0.22, 0.71). There were no differences between groups in the rates of newborn nursery admission, neonatal acidosis, low Apgar scores, or postpartum haemorrhage. Satisfaction with labour care was high (77%) and did not differ between groups.
                Active management of labour reduced the duration of the first stage of labour without affecting the rate of caesarean section, maternal satisfaction, or other maternal or newborn morbidity. A prospective trial was conducted to compare the effects of conservative management of prolonged pregnancy (conservative group) with routine induction of labour at 42 weeks' gestation (active group) in otherwise uncomplicated pregnancies. Of the 402 pregnancies studied, 207 (51%) were allocated to conservative management and 195 (49%) were allocated to have labour induced. The groups were well matched for age, parity, and smoking habits. One hundred and sixty six (80%) of the patients in the conservative group went into spontaneous labour. Of the remainder, two underwent elective caesarean section, 19 had labour induced because of clinical concern, and the remaining 20 had labour induced at the patient's own request. One hundred and twenty five (64%) of the patients in the planned active group underwent induction of labour. Of the remaining 70, 49 went into spontaneous labour and 21 (11%) asked that they should not have labour induced. Comparison of the two groups showed no difference in the length of the first stage of labour but a trend towards an increased need for intervention for fetal distress (p less than 0.06) in the active group. There were no differences in the length of the second stage, the need for intervention, or the mode of delivery. In terms of Apgar scores the neonatal outcome was not significantly different between the two groups, but a greater proportion of the babies (15% v 8%) in the active group required intubation. Umbilical cord venous pH estimated in the last 183 consecutive deliveries in the study showed a significantly lower mean value in the active group (p less than 0.05). There was no difference in birth weight between the two groups. Two deaths occurred in the study. There was a stillbirth in the conservative group at 292 days after massive abruption, and one neonatal death in the active group owing to multiple congenital abnormalities. The outcome for mother and baby in patients from both groups who went into spontaneous labour was generally good. The outcome for patients for whom conservative management was planned but induction became necessary was no different from that of patients who underwent planned induction at term. Thus from our results we can find no evidence to support the view that women with normal prolonged pregnancy should undergo routine induction of labour at 42 weeks' gestation.
Active management is associated with small reductions in the CS rate, but it is highly prescriptive and interventional. It is possible that some components of the active management package are more effective than others. Further work is required to determine the acceptability of active management to women in labour.