Comparative antihypertensive effects of losartan 50 mg and losartan 50 mg titrated to 100 mg in patients with essential hypertension. Verapamil SR and trandolapril combination therapy in hypertension--a clinical trial of factorial design. German Hypertension Study Group. Effect of spironolactone on systemic blood pressure, limb blood flow and response to sympathetic stimulation in hypertensive patients. A comparison of the angiotensin II antagonists valsartan and losartan in the treatment of essential hypertension. Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension. Final results of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). SHEP Cooperative Research Group. The efficacy and safety of valsartan compared with placebo in the treatment of patients with essential hypertension. Nutritional dose of magnesium in hypertensive patients on beta blockers lowers systolic blood pressure: a double-blind, cross-over study. Valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide in patients with essential hypertension. A multiple dose, double-blind, placebo controlled trial comparing combination therapy with monotherapy. Lisinopril dose-response relationship in essential hypertension. Administration time-dependent effects of aspirin in women at differing risk for preeclampsia. Effects of benazepril and hydrochlorothiazide, given alone and in low- and high-dose combinations, on blood pressure in patients with hypertension.
The antihypertensive activity of losartan potassium (losartan, Cozaar), an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, was evaluated in a parallel 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in hypertensive patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. After a 4-week, single-blind, placebo lead-in period, which included monitoring of baseline variables, 366 patients with a group mean sitting diastolic blood pressure of 101 +/- 5 (s.d.) mmHg were assigned randomly to one of three treatment groups: placebo, losartan 50 mg, or losartan 50 mg with the option to titrate to 100 mg after the first 6 weeks if the target sitting diastolic blood pressure (< 90 mmHg) was not reached. To assess the potential blood pressure response associated with the act of titration, patients in the placebo and losartan 50 mg treatment groups with a sitting diastolic blood pressure of > or = 90 mmHg at week 6 were mock titrated (changed to a new tablet containing the same study medication and dose). Sitting diastolic blood pressure was also evaluated at the end of the trial during a 1-week off-drug period to assess for rebound hypertension. At week 6, patients in the active-drug-treatment arms experienced significantly greater peak (6 h post-dose) and trough (24 h post-dose) reduction in systolic and diastolic sitting blood pressures compared with placebo (p < or = 0.01). Based on trough blood pressures at week 12, active drug (both arms) was more effective than placebo in lowering sitting diastolic blood pressure, with a very small additional benefit associated with increasing the dose of losartan to 100 mg in patients who did not reach the target blood pressure after the first 6 weeks on losartan 50 mg. There was no evidence of rebound hypertension during 1 week after withdrawal of losartan. The correlation between baseline plasma renin activity and reduction in peak and trough blood pressure at week 12, although statistically significant, was generally poor in the active treatment groups. In this trial, losartan was efficacious and well tolerated, and was similar to placebo with regard to adverse-experience profile. Adverse experiences that could reasonably be related to excessive lowering of blood pressure were not common and there was no evidence of rebound hypertension. To investigate the dose-response relationship and contribution of verapamil SR and trandolapril given in combination once a day for the treatment of essential hypertension.
                A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, factorial, 12 arm parallel group comparison with placebo, verapamil SR (120, 180 mg), trandolapril (0.5, 1.0, 2.0 mg) covering all combinations of both drugs. A 4 week placebo run-in period followed by 6 weeks of treatment. Four hundred and fifty-six patients from office practice (22 centres) with mild to moderate hypertension enrolled and 426 with diastolic pressure > or = 100 mm Hg at the end of run-in period were randomized. Main outcome measures were reduction in sitting systolic (SBP) and sitting diastolic (DBP) blood pressure.
                The combination of verapamil SR and trandolapril, particularly verapamil SR 180 mg and trandolapril 0.5 or 1.0 mg was significantly superior to both monocomponents at the same dose (P<0.05). For these combinations, the adjusted mean reductions in DBP from baseline to last visit were 14.1 and 16.0 mm Hg, respectively. Response surface analysis provided further evidence that these combinations were optimal for antihypertensive efficacy. All treatments were well tolerated. The incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between treatment groups; the profile of adverse events on combination therapy was mild and consistent with that of each monocomponent.
                All dosage combinations of verapamil SR and trandolapril produced significantly greater reduction of blood pressure than the monotherapy at the same dosage. However, verapamil SR 180 mg in combination with trandolapril 1.0 mg was the dosage with the greatest blood pressure reduction and had the greatest effects compared with the monocomponents. Since there is only scanty, indirect information about the mechanism of the hypotensive effect of spironolactone, 9 patients with essential hypertension were studied according to a randomised double-blind, cross-over protocol. Spironolactone 100mg b.i.d. and placebo were each given for one month and the following parameters were studied: blood pressure, heart rate, response to cold pressure and handgrip tests, as well as blood flow in the calf and finger vessels. Flow in the calf and fingers representing muscle and skin arteries, respectively, was measured semicontinuously with an ECG-triggered venous occlusion plethysmograph. After spironolactone there was a significant decrease in the systolic and diastolic blood pressures in the supine, sitting and standing positions; the sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased by (mean +/- SE) 27 +/- 4mm Hg (p less than 0.001) and 11 +/- 4mm Hg (p less than 0.02), respectively. No orthostatic response was observed. Heart rate remained unchanged. Blood flow through muscle and skin vessels increased in 6 out of 9 patients, and in these patients calculated vascular resistance in these areas decreased. Spironolactone did not significantly change the response of systemic blood pressure to the handgrip and cold pressure tests. The present data confirm the hypotensive properties of spironolactone and show that this effect is associated with dilatation of muscle and skin arteries in many but not in all the patients. The data do not support the hypothesis that spironolactone decreases the responsiveness of systemic blood pressure to orthosympathetic stimulation. We compared the angiotensin II receptor antagonist valsartan to losartan as an antihypertensive agent in an 8-week trial. Adults with uncomplicated essential hypertension (baseline seated diastolic blood pressure < 115 mm Hg and > or = 95 mm Hg) were randomized to receive 80 mg valsartan, 50 mg losartan, or placebo once daily. After 4 weeks doses of active medication and placebo were doubled. Seated systolic and diastolic blood pressures were measured and the response rate evaluated. Tolerability was assessed by the incidence of adverse events. Both angiotensin II receptor antagonists produced similar significant reductions in mean blood pressures at 4 and 8 weeks compared to placebo. Valsartan produced a significantly higher number of responders (62%) than losartan (55%, P = .02) at the 8 week treatment endpoint. The incidence of adverse experiences (AE) was similar in all three groups, with headache and dizziness reported most often. Valsartan (80/160 mg) monotherapy in this trial was as effective and well tolerated as 50/100 mg losartan in treating mild to moderate essential hypertension, and at 160 mg has a significantly higher responder rate than 100 mg losartan. To assess the ability of antihypertensive drug treatment to reduce the risk of nonfatal and fatal (total) stroke in isolated systolic hypertension.
                Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled.
                Community-based ambulatory population in tertiary care centers.
                4736 persons (1.06%) from 447,921 screenees aged 60 years and above were randomized (2365 to active treatment, 2371 to placebo). Systolic blood pressure ranged from 160 to 219 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure was less than 90 mm Hg. Of the participants, 3161 were not receiving antihypertensive medication at initial contact, and 1575 were. The average systolic blood pressure was 170 mm Hg; average diastolic blood pressure, 77 mm Hg. The mean age was 72 years, 57% were women, and 14% were black.
                --Participants were stratified by clinical center and by antihypertensive medication status at initial contact. For step 1 of the trial, dose 1 was chlorthalidone, 12.5 mg/d, or matching placebo; dose 2 was 25 mg/d. For step 2, dose 1 was atenolol, 25 mg/d, or matching placebo; dose 2 was 50 mg/d.
                Primary. Nonfatal and fatal (total) stroke. Secondary. Cardiovascular and coronary morbidity and mortality, all-cause mortality, and quality of life measures.
                Average follow-up was 4.5 years. The 5-year average systolic blood pressure was 155 mm Hg for the placebo group and 143 mm Hg for the active treatment group, and the 5-year average diastolic blood pressure was 72 and 68 mm Hg, respectively. The 5-year incidence of total stroke was 5.2 per 100 participants for active treatment and 8.2 per 100 for placebo. The relative risk by proportional hazards regression analysis was 0.64 (P = .0003). For the secondary end point of clinical nonfatal myocardial infarction plus coronary death, the relative risk was 0.73. Major cardiovascular events were reduced (relative risk, 0.68). For deaths from all causes, the relative risk was 0.87.
                In persons aged 60 years and over with isolated systolic hypertension, antihypertensive stepped-care drug treatment with low-dose chlorthalidone as step 1 medication reduced the incidence of total stroke by 36%, with 5-year absolute benefit of 30 events per 1000 participants. Major cardiovascular events were reduced, with 5-year absolute benefit of 55 events per 1000. A multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked, parallel-group study was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of valsartan 20, 80, 160, and 320 mg with placebo in the treatment of patients with essential hypertension. A total of 736 adults with uncomplicated essential hypertension stages 1 to 3 were randomized to receive placebo or valsartan 20, 80, 160, or 320 mg daily for 8 weeks. Assessments were made at baseline, after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment, and 2 to 3 days after stopping treatment. The primary efficacy variable was change from baseline in mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (MSDBP). Other variables included change from baseline in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) and responder rates (ie, MSDBP < 90 mm Hg or decrease of > or = 10 mm Hg from baseline). All doses of valsartan produced statistically significant reductions in both MSDBP and MSSBP at end point compared with placebo. A dose-response effect was seen, although the incremental reduction in blood pressure with doses of valsartan > 80 mg was relatively small. Statistically significant differences in responder rates at end point were seen for doses of valsartan of 80 mg and above compared with placebo, whereas the responder rates for valsartan 20 mg was not significantly different from that for placebo. Safety and tolerability variables included data on adverse experiences, rebound hypertension, and clinical laboratory evaluations. Tolerability was good, with headache being the most common complaint and occurring most frequently in placebo patients. The incidence of dizziness was similar among the placebo (5.4%) and valsartan 20-mg to 160-mg groups (2.1% to 3.4%); there was an increase in the incidence of dizziness in the 320-mg group (9.3%). No cases of symptomatic orthostatic hypotension occurred. Analysis of rebound showed that 11.6% of patients receiving placebo and 16.6% receiving valsartan had an increase in MSDBP to baseline levels or above 2 to 3 days after stopping treatment. No clinically significant adverse experiences were noted after stopping treatment. There were no clinically or statistically significant changes in laboratory values during treatment. Thus valsartan proved to be both effective and safe in reducing blood pressure in adults with essential hypertension. The optimal dose range is 80 to 160 mg, given once daily. To evaluate if magnesium alters blood pressure in hypertensive patients treated with beta blockers and if such effect can be coupled to a change in potassium and magnesium levels in muscle, serum and urine.
                A randomized double-blind, cross-over study with magnesium and placebo taken orally, each for 8 weeks.
                Outpatient clinic, University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden.
                Thirty-nine patients aged 26-69 years with moderate essential hypertension, treated before entry and during the study with continuous, unchanged beta blockers completed the study.
                Random allocation to receive magnesium aspartate or placebo. Daily magnesium dose was 15 mmol (365 mg) distributed three times a day over 8 weeks.
                Blood pressure, serum, urine and muscle magnesium and potassium. Measurements performed at the start, after 8 and 16 weeks.
                Systolic supine and standing blood pressure significantly decreased when magnesium was supplemented following placebo but not when magnesium was given at start. When magnesium and placebo groups were independently compared there was no significant change in supine and standing systolic and diastolic pressure. Serum and urine magnesium and serum potassium were significantly higher after magnesium treatment, whilst no change was present in urine potassium or in muscle magnesium and potassium.
                This study showed that 15 mmol magnesium day-1 given to mild to moderate hypertensive patients treated with beta blockers could be the cause of a significant decrease in supine and standing systolic blood pressure. This study compares the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of valsartan, a novel angiotensin II antagonist, given with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) vs placebo or vs valsartan or HCTZ alone.
                871 adult out-patients with essential hypertension participated in this double-blind study. Patients were randomised in equal number to receive either combination therapy of valsartan (80 mg or 160 mg) and HCTZ (12.5 mg or 25 mg), or valsartan (80 mg or 160 mg) or HCTZ (12.5 mg or 25 mg) alone, or placebo. Patients were treated once daily for 8 weeks and assessed at 2, 4 and 8 weeks after randomisation.
                The primary efficacy variable was change from baseline in mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (MSDBP) at end-point. The secondary variable was change in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) from baseline to end-point.
                All active treatments produced a statistically significant difference in MSDBP (P < 0.001) from baseline to end-point compared with placebo. Similar results were obtained for MSSBP. All combination regimens produced a statistically significantly greater reduction in MSDPB and MSSBP than the corresponding monotherapies. Dizziness and headache were the most common treatment-related adverse experiences reported. Hypokalaemia, associated with the use of thiazide diuretics, was more commonly reported in the higher dose HCTZ 25 mg groups.
                Valsartan 80 mg and 160 mg act additively with HCTZ 12.5 mg or 25 mg to lower MSDBP and MSSBP in patients with essential hypertension. The addition of HCTZ to valsartan 80 mg or 160 mg was well tolerated. 1. This was a multicentre, double-blind, parallel study in 216 patients with mild to moderate (supine diastolic blood pressure = 95-115 mm Hg) essential hypertension. 2. After a 4-week placebo washout, patients were randomized to placebo or lisinopril 1.25, 5.20 or 80 mg once daily for 6 consecutive weeks. Supine and erect blood pressure was measured 24 h postdose at the end of weeks -2, 0, 2, 4, and 6. 3. There was a linear dose-response relationship for both supine and erect blood pressure. Diastolic blood pressure reductions in the lisinopril 20 and 80 mg day-1 groups were significantly greater than in the placebo or lisinopril 1.25 and 5 mg day-1 groups. 4. Lisinopril, at doses up to 80 mg day-1, was well tolerated. This study extends previous results on the effects of low-dose aspirin on blood pressure in pregnant women at differing risk of developing hypertension in pregnancy and who received aspirin at different times according to their rest-activity cycle. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 240 pregnant women randomly assigned to 1 of 6 groups according to treatment (placebo or aspirin, 100 mg/d, starting at 12 to 16 weeks of gestation) and the time of treatment: on awakening (time 1), 8 hours after awakening (time 2), or before bedtime (time 3). Blood pressure and heart rate for each subject were automatically monitored for 2 days every 4 weeks from the day of recruitment until delivery, as well as at puerperium (6 to 8 weeks after delivery). Subjects were further divided for comparative purposes according to the results of the tolerance-hyperbaric test for early identification of those with a higher risk for developing hypertensive complications in pregnancy. Results indicated that there was no effect of aspirin on blood pressure at time 1 (compared with placebo). A blood pressure reduction was, however, highly statistically significant at time 2 and, to a greater extent, at time 3 (mean reductions of 14.2 and 9.6 mm Hg in 24-hour means for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively, at the time of delivery compared with placebo given at the same time). Effects of aspirin on blood pressure were significantly larger for women with a positive test at the time of recruitment (P<0.001). Differences in blood pressure among pregnant women receiving aspirin at different times in the circadian cycle disappeared at puerperium (P>0.212). There was no effect of aspirin or placebo on heart rate. This study corroborates the statistically significant, time-dependent effect of low-dose aspirin on blood pressure in pregnant women with differing risk of developing hypertensive complications in pregnancy. Although the mechanism involved in the administration-time-dependent responsiveness of blood pressure to aspirin still remains uncertain, the use of doses of aspirin <80 mg/d that do not affect placental thromboxane, initiation of the use of aspirin after 16 weeks' gestation, and the lack of circadian timing for aspirin administration could all explain the lack of positive results in previous clinical trials. To assess the efficacy and safety of several combinations of benazepril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, and hydrochlorothiazide, as compared with placebo, in the treatment of patients with essential hypertension.
                A 6-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel study conducted at 24 centers. A placebo run-in period of 1 to 4 weeks preceded the double-blind phase.
                Male and female outpatients, aged 18 years and older, were eligible to participate if their sitting diastolic blood pressure was between 95 and 114 mm Hg at the last two consecutive visits during the placebo phase. Among the 334 patients who entered the double-blind phase, 17% were aged 65 years or older and 26% were black. Eleven patients withdrew because of adverse experiences, including two patients receiving placebo.
                Patients received placebo; benazepril, 20 mg; hydrochlorothiazide, 25 mg; or combination therapy with benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide, 5/6.25 mg, 10/12.5 mg, 20/25 mg, 20/6.25 mg, or 5/25 mg, once daily for 6 weeks.
                The mean change from baseline in sitting diastolic blood pressure at end point (last postrandomization measurement carried forward) in the double-blind phase. Combination therapy with benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide, 20/25 mg, was compared with benazepril, 20 mg alone, and hydrochlorothiazide, 25 mg alone. Sitting systolic blood pressure and the effect of race and age on treatment efficacy were also evaluated.
                Compared with placebo, all benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide combinations produced statistically significant reductions from baseline in sitting diastolic and systolic blood pressures at study end point. In the benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide, 20/25 mg, group, the adjusted mean changes in sitting diastolic blood pressure at end point were statistically significantly greater than those in the monotherapy treatment groups (benazepril, 20 mg, P < or = .05; hydrochlorothiazide, 25 mg, P < or = .001) alone. All therapies were generally well tolerated. Decreases in mean serum potassium level with hydrochlorothiazide monotherapy were reduced or eliminated with combination therapy.
                Benazepril in combination with hydrochlorothiazide, including a low-dose combination of 5/6.25 mg, is effective in reducing sitting diastolic and systolic blood pressure in patients with hypertension.
From the limited available evidence, spironolactone appears to lower blood pressure compared to placebo to a similar degree in patients with primary (essential) hypertension when doses of 100-500 mg/day are given. A dose of 25 mg/day did not statistically significantly reduce systolic or diastolic blood pressure, compared to placebo. Given the lack of a dose-response, coupled with a possible increased risk in adverse events with higher doses, doses of 25 to 100 mg/day are reasonable. There is no evidence of the effect of spironolactone on clinical outcomes in hypertensive patients.