Delta: a randomised double-blind controlled trial comparing combinations of zidovudine plus didanosine or zalcitabine with zidovudine alone in HIV-infected individuals. Delta Coordinating Committee. Randomized, open-label, comparative trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three antiretroviral drug combinations including two nucleoside analogues and nevirapine for previously untreated HIV-1 Infection: the OzCombo 2 study. [Clinical trial comparing efficacy and safety of four highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in antiretroviral-naive treatment with advanced HIV infection]. Three generic nevirapine-based antiretroviral treatments in Chinese HIV/AIDS patients: multicentric observation cohort. The safety and efficacy of zidovudine (AZT) in the treatment of subjects with mildly symptomatic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV) infection. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The AIDS Clinical Trials Group. Effect of isoniazid prophylaxis on incidence of active tuberculosis and progression of HIV infection. Effect of tuberculosis preventive therapy on HIV disease progression and survival in HIV-infected adults. Selegiline treatment and the extent of degenerative changes in brain tissue of patients with Alzheimer's disease. Zidovudine alone or in combination with didanosine or zalcitabine in HIV-infected patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome or fewer than 200 CD4 cells per cubic millimeter. Investigators for the Terry Beirn Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS. Zidovudine twice daily in asymptomatic subjects with HIV infection and a high risk of progression to AIDS: a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study. The European-Australian Collaborative Group (Study 017) A randomised, open-label comparison of three highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens including two nucleoside analogues and indinavir for previously untreated HIV-1 infection: the OzCombo1 study.
Because the benefits of zidovudine (AZT) in HIV-infected individuals are small and do not last long the Delta trial was designed to test whether combinations of zidovudine with didanosine (ddl) or zalcitabine (ddC) were more effective than AZT alone in extending survival and delaying disease progression.
                The trial was randomised, double blind, and international. 3207 participants were allocated to either AZT (600 mg per day) alone (1055), AZT plus ddl (400 mg per day) (1080), or AZT plus ddC (2.25 mg per day) (1072). Participants either had symptoms of HIV disease (if AIDS, with a CD4 cell count of > 50 x 10(6)/L) or a CD4 count of less than 350 x 10(6)/L; 2124 had not had zidovudine before (Delta 1) and 1083 had for at least 3 months (Delta 2).
                Over a median follow-up of 30 months, 699 participants died, and 936 of the 2765 without AIDS at entry developed AIDS or died. In participants who had not had AZT before, both combination regimens had substantial benefits in terms of survival (regardless of disease stage at entry); a relative reduction in mortality of 42%, compared to AZT alone (95% Cl 25% to 55%), for AZT plus ddl and of 32% (95% Cl 22% to 47%) for AZT plus ddC. In participants who had had AZT before, the addition of ddl improved survival (p = 0.05; relative reduction 23% [95% Cl 0% to 41%]) but there was no direct evidence of benefit from the addition of ddC (p = 0.47; relative reduction 9% [95% Cl--17% to 29%]). The overall difference in survival between the treatment groups was significant (p < 0.0001; a relative reduction in mortality, compared to AZT alone, of 33% (95% Cl 20% to 44%) for AZT plus ddl and 21% (95% Cl 6% to 34%) for AZT plus ddC). Benefit in terms of disease progression was seen mainly in participants not previously treated with AZT and overall. There was no unexpected toxicity from the combination treatments.
                Initiation of treatment with combinations of AZT plus ddl or ddC prolongs life and delays disease progression compared with AZT alone. The addition of ddl to participants already treated with AZT also improves survival, although the benefit appears less. To assess and compare the efficacy and safety of three triple combination antiretroviral therapies in HIV-1-infected treatment-naive patients.
                Seventy treatment-naive HIV-infected adults with CD4+ T-cell counts >50/microL were randomized to receive either zidovudine + lamivudine + nevirapine (AZT + 3TC + NVP), stavudine + didanosine + nevirapine (d4T+ddI+NVP), or stavudine + lamivudine + nevirapine (d4T+3TC+NVP) for 52 weeks. Patient assessments were conducted monthly and included measurement of plasma HIV RNA levels and CD4+ T-cell counts and evaluations for drug toxicity.
                The mean time-weighted reductions in plasma HIV RNA in the AZT+3TC+NVP, d4T+3TC+NVP, and d4T+ddI+NVP groups were 1.29, 2.13, and 1.78 log(10) copies/mL, respectively (p =.389). The proportions of patients with HIV RNA <50 copies/mL in the AZT+3TC+NVP, d4T+3TC+NVP, and d4T+ddI+NVP groups were 73%, 68%, and 80%, respectively (p =.71). The mean time-weighted increases in CD4+ T-cell counts in the AZT+3TC+NVP, d4T+3TC+NVP, and d4T+ddI+NVP groups were 139, 113, and 174 cells/microL, respectively (p =.30). Three patients ceased assigned treatment due to rash (one from each treatment arm), and 5 of the 45 patients on d4T (3 from the d4T+3TC+NVP arm and 2 from the d4T+ddI+NVP arm) ceased assigned treatment due to neuropathy.
                All three-drug combinations were equally effective at suppressing viral load and increasing CD4+ T-cell counts. No significant differences were detected between the treatment groups in virological or immunological response or cessation of study drugs due to adverse events, although it is possible that the study was underpowered to detect differences. NVP was safe and efficacious in this setting, and efficacy was not influenced by nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor backbone. Comparison of efficacy and safety of four highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens (HAART) including two nucleoside analogues (NA) and a protease inhibitor (PI) in HIV positive patients with advanced infection and antiretroviral naive.
                Multicenter, randomized and open labeled clinical trial in ten community hospitals of Castilla-La Mancha and Madrid. Regimen 1 contains zidovudine (AZT), lamivudine (3TC) and indinavir (IDV) regimen 2 includes AZT, 3TC and ritonavir (RTV), regimen 3 was didanosine (DDI), estavudine (D4T) and IDV, and regimen 4 included DDI, D4T and RTV. Decrease in viral load of HIV (VC) has been assessed as primary endpoint and as secondary one, the increase of the numbers of CD4 lymphocytes, percentage of disease progression, adverse reactions and adherence. Measurements were made at baseline visit and at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks.
                A total of 98 patients with a mean baseline CD4 count of 122 x 10(6)/l (range of 5-340) and a baseline viral load of 5.1 log copies/ml were included. At 48 weeks, a mean increase of the CD4 and decrease of the viral load without significant difference between the 4 regimens (103 cells/2.62 log in regimen 1; 169 cells/2.86 log in regimen 2; 171 cells/2.56 log in regimen 3 and 141 cells/1.71 log in regimen 4) were observed in the analysis of the patients in treatment. Treatment was discontinued due to adverse reactions: 24% in regimen 1, 48% in regimen 2, 26% in regimen 3 and 32% in regimen 4, without significant difference. Analyzing by PI groups, 41% of the patients with RTV and 25% of those with IDV discontinued treatment due to adverse effects. There was withdrawal from treatment due to disease progression in 7% of the RTV patients and in 9% of IDV patients.
                In the HIV positive patients with advanced infection, efficacy between the four regimens of HAART is similar, but there is a tendency to require more withdrawal due to adverse effects in the RTV group than in those of IDV, the two used as single PI. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three nevirapine-based antiretroviral treatments for adult antiretroviral-naïve Chinese patients with HIV-1 infection.
                This was a prospective, multicenter study. 198 antiretroviral-naïve HIV-1 positive subjects with CD4 lymphocyte counts between 100/ul and 350/ul and plasma HIV-1 RNA levels more than 500 copies/ml were randomized to start three NVP-based antiretroviral treatments: group A, NVP+AZT+ddI; group B, NVP+3TC+d4T; group C, NVP+AZT+3TC. Viral responses, immunologic responses, adverse events and drug resistance were monitored at baseline and the end of week 4, 12, 24, 36, 52. Viralogical response and immunological response were also compared in different strata of baseline CD4 T lymphocyte counts and plasma HIV-1 RNA concentrations. At baseline, the plasma HIV-1 RNA was 4.44+/-0.68, 4.52+/-0.71 and 4.41+/-0.63 lg copies/ml in group A, B and C respectively (p = 0.628). At the end of the study, the plasma viral load reached 2.54+/-1.11, 1.89+/-0.46 and 1.92+/-0.58 lg copies/ml in group A, B and C respectively (p<0.001). At week 52, suppression of plasma HIV-1 RNA to less than 50 copies/ml was achieved in more patients in group B and C than in group A (68.2%, 69% vs. 39.7%; p<0.001). In planned subgroup analyses, the decrease of viral response rate was seen in group A when CD4 cell count >200/ul (subgroup H). But in subgroup L, viral response rate of three groups has no significant statistic difference. There were no statistically significant differences among three groups in immunological response within any of the CD4 or pVL strata. 3 out of 193 patients with available genotype at baseline showed primary drug resistant. Of 26 patients with virologic failure, 17 patients showed secondary drug resistant, 16 subjects in group A and 1 subject in group B. Logistic regression analysis indicated that presence of hepatotoxicity was associated with HCV-Ab positive (OR = 2.096, 95%CI: 1.106-3.973, P = 0.023) and higher CD4 baseline (CD4 count >250/ul) (OR = 2.096, 95%CI: 1.07-4.107, P = 0.031).
                Our findings strongly support the use of 3TC+d4T and 3TC+AZT as the nucleoside analogue combination in NVP-based antiretroviral therapy. The regimen of AZT+ddI+NVP produced poor virological response especially in the stratum of CD4 count more than 200/ul. More patients showed secondary drug resistant in this arm too. Patients with HCV-Ab+ and CD4 count >250/ul appear to have significantly high risk of hepatoxicity.
                ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00618176. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of zidovudine early in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV) infection.
                A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial with subject stratification by pretreatment CD4 T lymphocyte counts.
                Multicenter trial at AIDS Clinical Trial units.
                Seven hundred eleven subjects with mildly symptomatic HIV infection.
                Three hundred fifty-one subjects were assigned to placebo and 360 to zidovudine, 200 mg orally every 4 hours. The median duration of follow-up was 11 months.
                Fifty-one subjects developed the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), advanced AIDS-related complex, or death as a first critical event. For the stratum of subjects with more than 200 but less than 500 CD4 T lymphocytes/mm3 before treatment, 34 events occurred in placebo recipients and 12 in zidovudine recipients (P = 0.0002; relative risk [RR] estimate, 3.23 [95% CI, 1.67 to 6.24]). For the stratum of subjects with 500 to 799 CD4 T lymphocytes/mm3 before treatment, 2 events occurred in placebo recipients and 3 in zidovudine recipients. Candidiasis at study entry independently increased the risk for having an event (P = 0.005; RR estimate, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.29 to 4.12]); HIV antigenemia at study entry also increased this risk (P = 0.01; RR estimate, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.2 to 3.8]). Significant differences between the treatment groups in CD4 T-lymphocyte counts occurred in subjects with more than 200 but less than 500 CD4 T lymphocytes/mm3 after 4 weeks of therapy (P = 0.002). Differences persisted through week 52. Less prominent changes occurred in subjects with 500 or more CD4 T lymphocytes/mm3. Serum levels of HIV antigen decreased significantly in zidovudine recipients. Serious anemia and neutropenia occurred in 5% and 4% of zidovudine recipients, respectively, and in 0% and 1% of placebo recipients, respectively.
                Zidovudine delayed progression of HIV disease and produced little toxicity in subjects with mildly symptomatic HIV disease and less than 500 CD4 T lymphocytes/mm3. Tuberculosis occurring with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is a serious and growing public health problem. We have carried out a randomised clinical trial of a 12-month course of isoniazid plus vitamin B6 versus vitamin B6 alone in Port-au-Prince, Haiti, to assess the efficacy of isoniazid in preventing active tuberculosis in symptom-free HIV-infected individuals. The effect of prophylaxis on the development of HIV disease, AIDS, and death was also investigated. 118 subjects were assigned treatment with isoniazid plus B6 (n = 58) or B6 alone (n = 60) between 1986 and 1989. The treatment groups were similar at study entry in demographic, clinical, and immunological characteristics. Interim analysis in 1990 revealed no significant difference in tuberculosis outcome measures. Follow-up was continued until 1992, at which time significant protection by isoniazid against the development of tuberculosis was apparent, both for the whole study population and for subjects positive for purified protein derivative of tuberculin (PPD). The incidence of tuberculosis was lower in isoniazid recipients than in patients who received B6 alone (2.2 vs 7.5 per 100 person-years). The relative risk of tuberculosis was 3.4 (95% CI 1.1-10.6) for B6 alone versus isoniazid plus B6 (p < 0.05). Isoniazid also delayed progression to HIV disease and AIDS and death. Thus isoniazid effectively decreases the incidence of tuberculosis and delays the onset of HIV-related disease in symptom-free HIV-seropositive individuals. Isoniazid prophylaxis should be considered for HIV-seropositive, PPD-positive subjects, and may also be appropriate for PPD-negative patients in areas where tuberculosis is highly endemic. To determine whether tuberculosis (TB) preventive therapies alter the rate of disease progression to AIDS or death and to identify significant prognostic factors for HIV disease progression to AIDS.
                In a randomized placebo-controlled trial in Kampala, Uganda, 2,736 purified protein derivative (PPD)-positive and anergic HIV-infected adults were randomly assigned to four and two regimens, respectively. PPD-positive patients were treated with isoniazid (INH) for 6 months (6H; n = 536), INH plus rifampicin for 3 months (3HR; n = 556), INH plus rifampicin plus pyrazinamide for 3 months (3HRZ; n = 462), or placebo for 6 months (n = 464). Anergic participants were treated with 6H (n = 395) or placebo (n = 323).
                During follow-up, 404 cases progressed to AIDS and 577 deaths occurred. The cumulative incidence of the AIDS progression was greater in the anergic cohort compared to the PPD-positive cohort (p < .0001). Among PPD-positive patients, the relative risk of the AIDS progression with INH alone was 0.95 (95% CI 0.68-1.32); with 3HR it was 0.83 (95% CI 0.59-1.17); and with 3HRZ it was 0.76 (95% CI 0.52-1.08), controlling for significant baseline predictors. Among anergic patients, the relative risk of the AIDS progression was 0.81 (95% CI 0.56-1.15). Survival was greater in the PPD-positive cohort compared to the anergic cohort (p = .0001).
                The number of signs or symptoms at baseline and anergic status are associated with increasing morbidity and mortality. Even though the tuberculosis preventive therapies were effective in reducing the incidence of TB for HIV-infected adults, their benefit of delaying HIV disease progression to AIDS was not observed. A beneficial effect of selegiline (L-deprenyl) in Alzheimer's disease (AD) has been reported in several clinical studies.
                The brain tissue from 17 deceased patients, members of a double-blind clinical trial to assess the potential benefit of selegiline in AD, were analysed.
                In our study, the decrease in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores during the progress of the disease had been significantly influenced by selegiline treatment. Prior to death, the MMSE scores were significantly higher in those patients receiving selegiline than in those receiving placebo. However, according to our results, none of the lesions critical for AD diagnosis, such as counts of senile/neuritic plaques, neurofibrillary tangles or beta-A4 load, were influenced by the selegiline treatment.
                In conclusion, according to our study, mechanisms other than neuronal degeneration seen as lesions critical for AD diagnosis are influenced by selegiline treatment, leading to the functional benefit found in AD. We compared two combinations of nucleosides with zidovudine alone in patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
                A total of 1102 patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome or fewer than 200 CD4 cells per cubic millimeter were randomly assigned to receive zidovudine alone or zidovudine combined with either didanosine or zalcitabine. Disease progression, survival, toxic effects, and the CD4 cell response were assessed.
                After a median follow-up of 35 months, disease progression or death occurred in 62 percent of the 363 patients assigned to zidovudine plus didanosine, 63 percent of the 367 assigned to zidovudine plus zalcitabine, and 66 percent of the 372 assigned to zidovudine only (P=0.24). As compared with zidovudine therapy, treatment with zidovudine plus didanosine was associated with a relative risk of disease progression or death of 0.86 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.71 to 1.03), and treatment with zidovudine plus zalcitabine was associated with a relative risk of 0.92 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.76 to 1.10). Survival was similar in the three groups. In a subgroup analysis, combination therapy delayed disease progression or death in patients who had previously received zidovudine for 12 months or less. Therapy with zidovudine plus didanosine resulted in more gastrointestinal adverse effects, and treatment with zidovudine plus zalcitabine, more neuropathy. The mean increases in CD4 cell counts at two months were higher with combination therapy than with zidovudine alone.
                In patients with advanced HIV infection, combination therapy with zidovudine and either didanosine or zalcitabine is not superior to zidovudine therapy alone. However, these combinations may be more effective than zidovudine monotherapy in patients with little or no previous zidovudine treatment. To evaluate the efficacy of zidovudine given twice daily in subjects with asymptomatic HIV-1 infection and a high risk of progression to AIDS.
                Randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial.
                Multicentre study in five European countries and Australia.
                Asymptomatic subjects (n = 329) with CD4 cell counts between 200 and 400 x 10(6)/l, or if > 400 x 10(6)/l, subjects with HIV p24 antigenaemia (> 10 pg/ml).
                Patients were randomly assigned to receive zidovudine 500 mg or placebo twice daily for 104 weeks, following a 250 mg four times daily dose regimen for the first 4 weeks.
                The primary end-point was the development of AIDS or severe AIDS-related complex (ARC). Before unblinding the study other end-points were defined: the development of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) group IV disease (AIDS, severe ARC and other CDC stage IV disease) and the development of symptomatic HIV disease (AIDS, severe ARC, other CDC stage IV disease and minor HIV disease). Changes in CD4+ cell counts, p24 antigenaemia and toxicity were also reviewed.
                Median treatment duration was 57 weeks for the placebo and 60 weeks for the zidovudine group, respectively. Progression to AIDS or severe ARC occurred in 17 placebo and 12 zidovudine recipients (log-rank P = 0.26). However, in the first of the 2 study years the rate of progression to AIDS or severe ARC was significantly higher in the placebo than in the zidovudine group. Zidovudine delayed progression to symptomatic HIV disease (P = 0.01); a trend in a delay in progression to CDC stage IV disease was observed (P = 0.08). Zidovudine recipients maintained CD4+ cell counts at or above baseline levels for longer than placebo recipients (P = 0.04). HIV p24-antigen levels decreased in the zidovudine group and returned to pretreatment levels by week 36. Substantial toxicity was not observed.
                Zidovudine twice daily is effective in delaying progression to symptomatic HIV disease in high-risk, asymptomatic HIV-infected subjects. Modified definitions of clinical end-points may be useful for evaluating Phase III trials in comparable patient groups in the light of changes in the definition of AIDS and the increasing use of primary prophylaxis against opportunistic infections. Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) including two nucleoside analogues and a potent protease inhibitor is standard of care initial therapy for HIV-infected adults. The best-tolerated and most potent initial HAART regimen is unknown and was investigated in this study.
                One hundred and nine HIV-infected adults with no prior antiretroviral therapy, and CD4 lymphocyte counts < 500 x 10(6) cells/l or plasma HIV RNA > 30,000 copies/ml were randomized to zidovudine-lamivudine-indinavir (ZDV-3TC-IDV), stavudine-lamivudine-indinavir (d4T-3TC-IDV) or stavudine-didanosine-indinavir (d4T-ddI-IDV) for 52 weeks. The primary endpoints were plasma HIV RNA and drug-related adverse events. Other assessments were overall safety, adherence and adverse events, CD4 lymphocyte counts, cutaneous delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses and quality of life (Euroqol).
                Only 58% patients had HIV RNA < 50 copies/ml plasma at 12 months, with no significant difference between the three regimes (P = 0.34). Drug-related adverse events sufficiently severe to warrant drug discontinuation were less common (P = 0.06) in patients receiving d4T-3TC-IDV (18%) than in those receiving ZDV-3TC-IDV (34%) or d4T-ddI-IDV (41%). The percentages of patients who remained on their assigned therapy with plasma HIV RNA < 50 copies/ml at 52 weeks were 60% with d4T-3TC-IDV, 53% with ZDV-3TC-IDV and 35% with d4T-ddI-IDV. Virological failure at 52 weeks was more likely in those whose adherence was estimated to be < 100% in the first 4 weeks of therapy (P = 0.02), but not in those who developed grade 3 or 4 drug-related adverse events. At 52 weeks, the mean CD4 lymphocyte count increase was 200 x 10(6) cells/l with only 7% of patients having counts lower than at baseline; DTH responses improved but remained clinically impaired in most patients. Quality of life improved significantly in all groups.
                Initial HAART regimens including IDV failed to suppress plasma HIV RNA to < 50 copies/ml in > 40% patients after only 12 months of therapy although there was significant overall improvement immunologically and in quality of life. The type of dual nucleoside combination used was less important in predicting virological failure than was imperfect adherence early in therapy. Consideration should be given to modifying a HAART regimen relatively early in non-adherent patients.
The use of ddI and, to a lesser extent, ddC delayed both HIV disease progression and death, at least when added to AZT.