The evolving role of topiramate among other mood stabilizers in the management of bipolar disorder. A double-blind, randomized trial of topiramate in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Topiramate YL Study Group. Omega-3 fatty acids in bipolar disorder: clinical and research considerations. Adjunctive treatment of manic agitation with lorazepam versus haloperidol: a double-blind study. Effects of topiramate on smoking in patients with schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type. A double-blind, randomized trial of topiramate as adjunctive therapy for partial-onset seizures in children. Topiramate YP Study Group. Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of ethyl-eicosapentanoate in the treatment of bipolar depression and rapid cycling bipolar disorder. Family-focused treatment of bipolar disorder: 1-year effects of a psychoeducational program in conjunction with pharmacotherapy. Low-dose topiramate in adults with treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures. Topiramate placebo-controlled dose-ranging trial in refractory partial epilepsy using 200-, 400-, and 600-mg daily dosages. Topiramate YD Study Group. Cessation versus continuation of 6-month migraine preventive therapy with topiramate (PROMPT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Topiramate, a structurally novel anticonvulsant, is being evaluated for other neurological conditions such as migraine, neuropathic pain, and essential tremor, and also for psychiatric conditions such as bipolar disorder, bulimia, post-traumatic stress disorder, and schizoaffective disorder, in addition to obesity. This article will focus on the use of topiramate for bipolar disorder.
                The pharmacological profile of topiramate is compared to other established and putative mood stabilizers, and a rationale for its use in bipolar disorder is presented. Data from open clinical trials of topiramate for depression, mania, and rapid-cycling bipolar disorder are summarized. Preliminary data from one pilot dose-finding, double-blind, random-assignment, placebo-controlled, 3-week parallel group study of two doses of topiramate for acute bipolar I mania is reported. Safety data regarding topiramate was reviewed. Finally, the potential place of this agent in bipolar illness is considered.
                The pharmacological advantages for topiramate are low protein binding, minimal hepatic metabolism and mainly unchanged renal excretion, a 24-h half-life, and minimal drug interactions. Open clinical studies suggest a 50-65% response for refractory bipolar mania, and a 40-56% response for refractory bipolar depression in mainly add-on treatment. Open clinical studies of topiramate for rapid-cycling subjects and those for comorbid bulimia, substance abuse, post-traumatic stress, migraine, and obesity report effectiveness. The primary efficacy endpoint data (change from baseline Y-MRS total scores) of the placebo-controlled, random assignment parallel group phase II dose-finding study were not statistically significant. However, once the antidepressant-associated manias (28 of the sample, of 97 subjects) were excluded from the controlled study, the post-hoc analyses indicated the higher dose (512 mg/day) topiramate treatment group showed a statistically significant reduction in endpoint Y-MRS change scores as compared to placebo (p < 0.03). Adverse effects of topiramate in bipolar subjects include attention, concentration and memory problems, fatigue, sedation, transient paraesthesias, nausea, and anorexia. Some subjects experience word-finding difficulty. Weight loss may be seen in several topiramate-treated subjects with bipolar disorder.
                Topiramate appears to show promise as an addition to the agents available to treat bipolar disorder. More definitive controlled data on the efficacy of topiramate in the acute and continuation phases as well as for the prophylaxis either as monotherapy or as combination treatment of bipolar disorder are ongoing, and the results are awaited. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of topiramate as adjunctive therapy for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome in a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
                Conventional antiepileptic drugs are frequently ineffective against multiple-seizure types of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.
                Ninety-eight patients >1 year to <30 years of age, with slow spike-and-wave patterns on EEG, seizure types including drop attacks, and either a history of or active atypical absence seizures, were assigned to an 11-week, double-blind treatment phase with either topiramate or placebo. Topiramate was titrated to target doses of approximately 6 mg/kg/d.
                For drop attacks, the most severe seizures associated with this syndrome, the median percentage reduction from baseline in average monthly seizure rate was 14.8% for the topiramate group and -5.1% (an increase) for the placebo group (p = 0.041). Topiramate-treated patients demonstrated greater improvement in seizure severity than did placebo-treated patients based on parental global evaluations (p = 0.037). The percentage of patients with a > or = 50% reduction from baseline in major seizures (drop attacks and tonic-clonic seizures) was greater in the topiramate group (15/46 or 33%) than in the control group (4/50 or 8%; p = 0.002). The most common adverse events in both groups were CNS related; there were no discontinuations from topiramate therapy due to adverse events.
                Topiramate adjunctive therapy was effective in reducing the number of drop attacks and major motor seizures and in improving seizure severity as determined by parental global evaluation. Several lines of evidence suggest that omega-3 fatty acids may be important in the pathophysiology, treatment or prevention of bipolar disorder (BD). Electronic and manual searches were conducted in order to review the literature relevant to the etiology and treatment of BDs with omega-3 fatty acids. We also present data from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study conducted at three sites (N = 10) comparing an omega-3 fatty acid (docosahexaenoic acid, DHA) versus placebo, added to psychosocial treatment for women with BD who chose to discontinue standard pharmacologic treatment while attempting to conceive. While some epidemiologic and preclinical data support the role of omega-3 fatty acids in BD, clinical trials to date have yielded conflicting results. In our pilot study of 10 Caucasian women taking DHA while attempting to conceive (BP1 = 9, BPII = 1), age 27-42 years, DHA was well tolerated and suggests that a larger study would be feasible. The elucidation of the potential role of omega-3 fatty acids as a treatment for BD requires further study. The current data are not sufficient to support a recommendation of monotherapy treatment as a substitute for standard pharmacologic treatments. However, judicious monotherapy in selected clinical situations, or adjunctive use, may be warranted pending further data from adequately powered controlled clinical trials. Our pilot trial of DHA in women who plan to stop conventional psychotropics in order to conceive suggests that such trials are feasible. While lithium is effective in treating the majority of bipolar patients during a manic episode, the addition of neuroleptic during the early phase of treatment has been common clinical practice in inpatient settings. In an earlier open study, we demonstrated the utility of the short-acting benzodiazepine lorazepam as an adjunct to lithium for the clinical management of manic agitation.
                We now present data from a randomized, double-blind clinical study of lorazepam versus haloperidol in 20 hospitalized patients with a DSM-III-R diagnosis of bipolar disorder who were being treated concomitantly with lithium. Patients were rated using the Mania Rating Scale, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Physician Global Impression Scale, and side effects scales. Data were analyzed using standard group comparisons and survival analysis.
                There was no evidence for a significant difference between the two treatment groups in the magnitude of or time to response (5.0 +/- .82 days for haloperidol; 6.5 +/- .93 days for lorazepam). Of the patients who were terminated from the protocol early, nonresponse was the primary reason in the lorazepam group while side effects were the reason in the haloperidol group.
                Lorazepam may offer an efficacious and safe alternative to haloperidol as an adjunctive treatment to lithium in the clinical management of the early phase of manic agitation in a subgroup of bipolar patients. nan To evaluate the efficacy and safety of topiramate 6 mg/kg/day in children (age 2 to 16 years) as adjunctive therapy for uncontrolled partial-onset seizures with or without secondarily generalized seizures in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
                Patients with at least six partial-onset seizures during the 8-week baseline phase were treated with either topiramate (n = 41) or placebo (n = 45) for 16 weeks.
                Topiramate-treated patients had a greater median percent reduction from baseline in average monthly partial-onset seizure rate than placebo-treated patients (33.1% versus 10.5%, p = 0.034), a greater proportion of treatment responders (i.e., patients with a > or = 50% seizure rate reduction; 16 of 41 [39%] versus 9 of 45 [20%], p = 0.080), and patients with a > or = 75% seizure rate reduction (7 of 41 [17%] versus 1 of 45 [2%], p = 0.019), and better parental global evaluations of improvement in seizure severity (p = 0.019). Emotional lability (12% versus 4%), fatigue (15% versus 7%), difficulty with concentration or attention (12% versus 2%), and forgetfulness/impaired memory (7% versus 0%) were more frequent among topiramate-treated than placebo-treated patients. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. No topiramate-treated patients discontinued the study due to adverse events.
                Topiramate was safe and effective in the treatment of partial-onset seizures in children. The results of pilot trials suggest that omega-3 fatty acids may have efficacy in the treatment of mood symptoms in bipolar disorder.
                We conducted a 4-month, randomized, placebo-controlled, adjunctive trial of ethyl-eicosapentanoate (EPA) 6 g/day in the treatment of bipolar depression and rapid cycling bipolar disorder. Subjects were receiving mood-stabilizing medications at therapeutic doses or plasma concentrations. The measures of efficacy were early study discontinuation, changes from baseline in depressive symptoms (Inventory for Depressive Symptomology total score) and in manic symptoms (Young Mania Rating Scale total score), and manic exacerbations ("switches"). We also measured side effects and bleeding time, a biomarker of drug action.
                Overall, there were no significant differences on any outcome measure between the EPA and placebo groups.
                This study did not find overall evidence of efficacy for adjunctive treatment with EPA 6 g/day in outpatients with bipolar depression or rapid cycling bipolar disorder. Few studies have examined the combined effects of psychosocial treatment and pharmacotherapy for bipolar disorder. This study used a randomized, controlled design to examine a 9-month, manual-based program of family-focused psychoeducational treatment (FFT).
                Bipolar patients (N = 101) were recruited shortly after an illness episode and randomly assigned to 21 sessions of FFT (n = 31) or to a comparison treatment involving two family education sessions and follow-up crisis management (CM; n = 70). Both treatments were delivered over 9 months; patients were simultaneously maintained on mood stabilizing medications. Patients were evaluated every 3 months for 1 year as to relapse status, symptom severity, and medication compliance.
                Patients assigned to FFT had fewer relapses and longer delays before relapses during the study year than did patients in CM. Patients in FFT also showed greater improvements in depressive (but not manic) symptoms. The most dramatic improvements were among FFT patients whose families were high in expressed emotion. The efficacy of FFT could not be explained by differences among patients in medication regimes or compliance.
                Family-focused psychoeducational treatment appears to be an efficacious adjunct to pharmacotherapy for bipolar disorder. Future studies should evaluate family treatment against other forms of psychotherapy matched in amount of therapist-patient contact. Based on dose predictions from animal and human volunteer studies, most patients enrolled in initial randomized controlled trials of topiramate as adjunctive therapy in adults with partial-onset seizures were randomized to >or= 600 mg/day topiramate. Subsequent experience suggests that dosage needs were overestimated. This double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated 200 mg/day topiramate in adults with treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures receiving a concurrent enzyme-inducing antiepileptic agent (carbamazepine).
                After a 4-week baseline, 263 adults receiving carbamazepine who had at least three partial-onset seizures during the baseline period were randomized to placebo or one of two topiramate 200 mg/day treatment arms: topiramate escalated weekly 25 mg/day(8-week escalation) or 50 mg/day(4-week escalation). Therapy was then maintained for the remainder of the 12-week double-blind study.
                Median percent reduction in seizure frequency from baseline to study end was 44% with topiramate and 20% with placebo (P <or= 0.001). A significant therapeutic effect was present at 2 weeks with a dose of 100 mg/day. The most common adverse events (>or=10% incidence in topiramate-treated patients) were somnolence, fatigue, paresthesia, nervousness and anorexia; 8% of topiramate-treated patients and 2% of placebo-treated patients discontinued because of adverse events. As a result of the low incidence of adverse events, differences between titration rates in terms of tolerability were not detected.
                Topiramate 200 mg/day is an appropriate target dose as adjunctive therapy in adults with treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures, even when receiving an enzyme-inducing agent; 100 mg/day also appears to be effective. A significant therapeutic effect may be seen in the second week of treatment with a dose of 100 mg/day. We conducted a randomized double-blind comparison of three doses of the novel antiepileptic drug (AED) topiramate (200, 400, and 600 mg/day) and placebo as adjunctive therapy in patients with refractory partial onset epilepsy receiving one or two other AEDs at therapeutic concentrations. A total of 181 patients completed the 12-week baseline phase and were randomized to double-blind therapy. Median percent reductions from baseline in average monthly seizure rate, the principal efficacy evaluation, were 13% for placebo, 30% for topiramate 200 mg/day, 48% for topiramate 400 mg/day, and 45% for topiramate 600 mg/day. For the seizure rate comparison of active drug to placebo p values were: topiramate 200 mg/day, p = 0.051; topiramate 400 mg/day, p = 0.007; topiramate 600 mg/day, p < 0.001. Percent responders ( > or = 50% reduction in seizure rates) were 18% for placebo, 27% for topiramate 200 mg/day, 47% for topiramate 400 mg/day (p = 0.013), and 46% for topiramate 600 mg/day (p = 0.027). A significant (p = 0.003) reduction in secondarily generalized seizures compared with placebo treatment was also documented with topiramate. Topiramate plasma concentrations were closely related to dosage, and there were no significant interactions between topiramate and other AEDs. The minimal effective dose of topiramate in this study population was approximately 200 mg/day. Mild or moderate CNS symptoms were the primary treatment-emergent adverse events, but treatment-limiting adverse events occurred in only 9% of patients given topiramate compared with 7% given placebo. Results of this initial well-controlled study in patients indicate that topiramate is a very promising new AED. Use of preventive therapy for migraine is often recommended for only 6-9 months, but no randomised, placebo-controlled trials have investigated migraine frequency after the end of prophylaxis. We assessed the effects of discontinuation of topiramate after a treatment period of 6 months.
                818 patients who have migraines were enrolled from 88 clinics in 21 countries. After a 4-8-week lead-in period, patients received topiramate in a 26-week open-label phase. Daily dose was increased from 25 mg to 100 mg in steps of 25 mg every week; the dose could be adjusted further in the range 50-200 mg/day, but was stable for the final 4 weeks. Patients were randomly assigned to continue this dose or switch to placebo for a 26-week double-blind phase. The primary endpoint was the difference in number of days with migraine during the last 4 weeks of the double-blind phase compared with the last 4 weeks of the open-label phase. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with EudraCT, number 2005-000321-29.
                559 patients (68.3%) completed the open-label phase; 514 entered the double-blind phase and were assigned to topiramate (n=255) or placebo (n=259). The mean increase in number of migraine days was greater in the placebo group (1.19 days in 4 weeks, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.66; p<0.0001) than in the topiramate group (0.10, -0.36 to 0.56; p=0.5756; mean difference between groups -1.09, -1.75 to -0.43; p=0.0011) [corrected] Patients in the placebo group had a greater number of days on acute medication than did those in the topiramate group (mean difference between groups -0.95, -1.49 to -0.41; p=0.0007). Quality of life, as assessed by the MIDAS questionnaire, fell in the placebo group but remained stable in the topiramate group. Patients were more satisfied with the efficacy of topiramate than with that of placebo, whereas satisfaction with tolerability was similar in both treatment groups.
                Sustained benefit was reported after discontinuation of topiramate, although number of migraine days did increase. These findings suggest that patients should be treated for 6 months, with the option to continue to 12 months in some patients.
There is insufficient evidence on which to base any recommendations regarding the use of topiramate in any phase of bipolar illness, either in monotherapy or as an adjunctive treatment.