Moderate dietary salt restriction does not alter insulin resistance or serum lipids in normal men. Double-blind randomised trial of modest salt restriction in older people. Angiotensinogen M235T variant and salt sensitivity in young normotensive Caucasians. Sodium sensitivity in essential hypertension: role of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and predictive value of an intravenous frusemide test. High dietary salt intake increases carotid blood pressure and wave reflection in normotensive healthy young men. Salt restriction among hypertensive patients: modest blood pressure effect and no adverse effects. Enhanced blood pressure response to dietary salt in elderly women, especially those with small waist: hip ratio. Adjunctive effect of salt restriction on antihypertensive efficacy. Salt sensitivity in young normotensive subjects is associated with a hyperinsulinemic response to oral glucose. Moderate dietary salt restriction increases vascular and systemic insulin resistance. Effects of dietary sodium reduction on blood pressure in subjects with resistant hypertension: results from a randomized trial.
Dietary salt restriction lowers blood pressure and has been advocated as a population-based strategy to reduce the cardiovascular morbidity associated with hypertension. However, the effect of lowering salt intake on metabolic vascular risk factors such as insulin resistance and levels of atherogenic lipids and fasting insulin is uncertain. We have studied the short-term effect of moderate dietary salt restriction on insulin resistance and serum lipids in 34 nonobese (body mass index [mean +/- SD] 23.4 +/- 1.8 kg/m2), normotensive young white men. Subjects were maintained on a low salt diet ( < 80 mmol/day) for the 2-week study period. In a randomized, cross-over, double-blind fashion, each subject also received 120 mmol of sodium chloride per day during one of the study weeks, and a matching placebo during the other. Insulin resistance, serum insulin, lipids, and blood pressure were measured in the fasting state at the end of each study week. Urinary sodium excretion (185 +/- 46 v 52 +/- 25 mmol/day, P < .001), serum sodium (141.2 +/- 1.2 v 140.1 +/- 1.3 mmol/L, P < .001) and body weight (75.4 +/- 9.1 v 75.0 +/- 9.3 kg, P < .05) were higher during the high salt than the low salt period. Serum creatinine was higher during the low salt period (100 +/- 8 v 90 +/- 9 mumols/L, P < .01). There was no difference in blood pressure, insulin resistance, serum insulin, C-peptide, total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol or its subfractions, triglycerides, apolipoprotein A1, or apolipoprotein B between the high salt and low salt periods. We conclude that short-term, moderate dietary salt restriction does not adversely affect insulin sensitivity or levels of atherogenic lipids in normotensive nonobese men. Stroke is directly related to blood pressure and treatment trials in older hypertensive individuals show a reduction in strokes. However, the majority of strokes occur in normotensive individuals in whom no attempt is made to lower blood pressure. We compared the effects of modest salt restriction on blood pressure in older hypertensive and normotensive people.
                47 untreated elderly people (24 men, age range 60-78 years; blood-pressure range 123-205 mm Hg systolic and 64-112 mm Hg diastolic) completed a 2-month double-blind randomised placebo-controlled crossover study of modest salt restriction with slow sodium and placebo to give a salt intake of either 10 g (equivalent to the normal amount for the UK population) or 5 g.
                On the normal salt intake for the UK population, supine blood pressure was 163/90 (SD 21/10) mm Hg with urinary sodium excretion of 177 (49) mmol/day. With modest sodium restriction, blood pressure fell to 156/87 (22/9) mm Hg (p < 0.001/0.004) with a urinary sodium excretion of 94 (50) mmol/day. A reduction in sodium intake of 83 mmol/day was associated with a reduction of 7.2/3.2 mm Hg. There was no significant difference in the blood-pressure fall between 18 normotensive and 29 hypertensive participants (8.2/3.9 vs 6.6/2.7 mm Hg).
                A modest reduction in salt intake leads to a fall in blood pressure in both normotensive and hypertensive older people similar to that in outcome trials of thiazide-based treatment. Since the majority of strokes in older people occur below the current definition of hypertension, our results have important implications for the prevention of stroke. A single-nucleotide variant of the angiotensinogen gene (AGT 235T) has been associated with essential hypertension and increased plasma levels of angiotensinogen. This variant may also serve as a genetic marker for the increased blood pressure response to dietary salt intake, but the relationship between AGT genotype and salt sensitivity has not been studied until now. We therefore examined the relationship between the AGT 235T genotype and the blood pressure response to short-term dietary salt restriction in young normotensive men.
                A total of 187 young normotensive men were characterized for family history of hypertension, salt sensitivity, plasma parameters of the renin-angiotensin system under high- and low-salt diets, and the AGT 235T genotype.
                While the T allele was significantly associated with a positive family history of hypertension (chi2 = 7.0; P< 0.03) and higher plasma angiotensinogen levels (P< 0.015) and renin activity (P < 0.037), blood pressure under both diets was not significantly affected by the AGT genotype. When the subjects were classified into salt-resistant and salt-sensitive groups, genotypic distribution was nearly identical between both groups (frequency of T allele: 0.45 versus 0.46).
                Our findings demonstrate that the AGT 235T allele is significantly associated with a positive family history of hypertension, but is not an important determinant of the blood pressure response to dietary salt intake in young normotensive subjects. It is therefore unlikely that the AGT 235T genotype can serve as an early genetic marker of salt sensitivity. In order to determine factors contributing to sodium induced changes of blood pressure, 20 patients with essential hypertension were studied when on their regular sodium intake and after two weeks of a low sodium diet (50 mmol daily) and two weeks of a high sodium diet (300 mmol daily). There were two periods of regular sodium intake, one of four weeks at the beginning and one of two weeks at the end of the study. The change in mean arterial pressure between the high and low salt diets (delta MAP) was regarded as a measure of sodium sensitivity, and was directly correlated with age and initial blood pressure. Compared with non-responders, responders (delta MAP 10 mmHg or more) showed a lesser activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system during the low salt period. The response to the administration of intravenous frusemide was not helpful in predicting sodium sensitivity. A significant but relatively small (4.2 mmHg) reduction in MAP was obtained during low salt period compared with the first period of regular sodium intake. The data suggest that moderate dietary sodium restriction can help to reduce the blood pressure of the relatively older patient with hypertension. Dietary salt intake is associated with high brachial blood pressure (BP) and increased risk of cardiovascular disease. We investigated whether changes in dietary salt intake are associated with changes in central BP and wave reflection in healthy volunteers. Ten healthy normotensive male volunteers (22-40 yr) participated in a 6-wk double-blind randomized crossover study to compare a low-dietary salt intake (60-80 mmol sodium/day) with a high-salt intake (low salt intake supplemented with 128 mmol sodium/day) on central BP and wave reflection. Brachial and carotid BP, carotid blood flow velocity, forward (P(f)) and backward (P(b)) pressure, wave intensity, body weight, and urinary electrolyte excretion were measured at the end of each crossover period. High salt intake significantly increased carotid systolic BP [98 (SD 11) vs. 91 mmHg (SD 13), P < 0.01] and increased wave reflection [ratio of backward to forward pressure (P(b)/P(f)) 0.13 (SD 0.02) vs. 0.11 (SD 0.03), P = 0.04] despite only small effects on brachial BP [114 (SD 9) vs. 112 mmHg (SD 6), P = 0.1]. Urinary sodium excretion and body weight were also increased following high salt intake. High salt intake disproportionately increases central BP compared with brachial BP as a result of enhanced wave reflection. These effects may contribute to the adverse effect of high dietary salt intake on the risk of cardiovascular disease. Previous studies, mainly evaluating short-term very low salt diets, suggest that salt restriction may influence glucose and insulin metabolism, catecholamines, renin, aldosterone, and lipid levels adversely. The authors wanted to explore whether sodium restriction for eight weeks influenced insulin secretion unfavourably, and evaluate the efficacy and safety of such treatment also in terms of other parameters important in the management of hypertensive patients.
                A double-blind randomized controlled parallel group designed trial. All participants received dietary advice aimed at a moderate salt-restricted diet. Half of the participants received salt capsules, the others received identical placebo capsules.
                General practice.
                Forty-six hypertensive patients inadequately controlled by drug treatment.
                Fasting serum insulin C-peptide and glucose and levels of these measures after oral glucose, blood pressure, serum aldosterone and lipids, peripheral resistance, and skin conductance.
                Salt restriction did not influence glucose and insulin metabolism, aldosterone, or lipid levels adversely. We observed better blood pressure regulation in the low salt group than in the high salt group, with a systolic and diastolic blood pressure difference of 5/5 mmHg after eight weeks. The difference was only statistically significant for diastolic blood pressure, p 0.02.
                This study revealed a modest diastolic blood pressure reducing effect of moderate sodium restriction. This reduction was obtained without any apparent unfavourable side effects such as increased insulin secretion, impaired glucose tolerance or dyslipidaemia. To determine the blood pressure responses in elderly normotensive men and women to dietary sodium and to the diunsaturated fatty acid dihomogammalinolenic acid (DGLA), which is derived from linoleic acid.
                Blood pressure responses were assessed in 66 subjects (36 male, 30 female; mean age 65 years) on two diets differing by approximately 70 mmol/day sodium, combined with daily supplements of either 1 g DGLA or 1 g safflower oil, giving a four-group parallel design. After a common period of salt restriction and salt supplementation, two sets of parallel groups continued with either salt or placebo tablets. The study was blinded, except for dietary adjustments based on 24-h urinary sodium excretion values measured once every 2 weeks. Blood pressures were also measured automatically once every 2 weeks.
                Urinary sodium excretion (sodium intake) correlated significantly with systolic and diastolic blood pressures. A strong interaction with sex (P < 0.001 for systolic blood pressure) reflected greater responsiveness in women to changing sodium intake. A second major determinant of blood pressure responsiveness was the waist: hip ratio, an index of central obesity; this correlation was independent of the initial sodium intake, initial blood pressure or body mass index. The waist: hip ratio was a powerful predictor of blood pressure changes with sodium intake in women only; women with android fat distribution were, similarly to men, less sensitive to dietary sodium. Daily supplements of 1 g DGLA doubled the concentration of DGLA in plasma but did not influence blood pressure.
                Among elderly normotensive subjects, women responded to changes in sodium intake with greater changes in blood pressure than men did. Furthermore, this response was strongly related to the gynaecoid distribution of body fat. The effect of dietary salt restriction on blood pressure was measured in patients with moderate hypertension receiving antihypertensive medication. Patients were studied during a randomly allocated 6 week period of moderate dietary salt restriction and during a 6 week period of normal diet. Twenty-four of twenty-eight patients achieved a reduction of salt excretion exceeding 20%. In these patients mean urinary sodium excretion fell from 169 (s.e.m. = 13) mmol/24 h to 92 (s.e.m. = 7) mmol/24 h. Potassium excretion and body weight did not change, and with the exception of the erect systolic pressure, there was no overall change in blood pressure. When the data were grouped according to the patient medication, mean supine systolic pressure fell from 148.9 (s.e.m. = 4.4) to 140.3 (s.e.m. = 5.0) mmHg (n = 14, P greater than 0.05) and mean supine diastolic pressure fell from 100.8 (s.e.m. = 2.9) to 97.0 (s.e.m. = 2.8) mmHg (n = 14, P greater than 0.05) in patients taking diuretics. Blood pressure did not change in patients whose medication did not include diuretics. Moderate dietary salt restriction may be therapeutically useful in patients with moderate hypertension treated with diuretics but is of little value in those not receiving diuretics. Insulin resistance associated with a hyperinsulinemic response to oral glucose intake has been found in patients with essential hypertension and is believed to play a role in inducing hypertension by causing renal sodium and water retention. We therefore examined whether salt-sensitive, young normotensives, assumed to be predisposed to essential hypertension, exhibit impaired glucose tolerance in a similar way. The plasma insulin and glucose response to oral glucose intake (75 g) was assessed in 23 healthy, lean, male volunteers ingesting either 20 mmol or 260 mmol NaCl/day for 6 days each in a single-blind randomized crossover study. Salt sensitivity was defined as a significant drop in mean arterial blood pressure greater than 3 mmHg (means of 30 readings in the supine subject; P less than 0.05) under the low-salt diet. Following the glucose load, plasma levels of both glucose and insulin were significantly higher (P less than 0.01) in the salt-sensitive (n = 10) compared with the salt-resistant subjects (n = 13) during the high-salt diet but not during the low-salt diet. Whereas in the salt-sensitive group glucose tolerance improved with dietary salt restriction (P less than 0.01), it deteriorated in the salt-resistant group (P less than 0.05). Following the glucose load under the high-salt diet, there was a significant drop in blood pressure in the salt-sensitive (P less than 0.005) but not the salt-resistant subjects. The hyperglycemic and hyperinsulinemic response in salt-sensitive subjects suggests that insulin resistance is present in these subjects prior to the development of hypertension and that it can be ameliorated by salt restriction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Our recent studies have indicated that severe salt restriction aggravates vascular insulin resistance in younger normotensive and hypertensive subjects. However, whether the extent of dietary salt restriction commonly advocated adversely affects vascular insulin resistance is unknown. To determine whether moderate dietary salt restriction might affect vascular and systemic sensitivity to insulin, we studied eight subjects after 1 week of a normal sodium diet (235 mEq/day) and 1 week of a moderate salt restriction (75 meq/day). Systemic insulin resistance as assessed by the fasting plasma glucose-to-insulin ratio was aggravated by dietary sodium restriction (normal sodium: 1.2 +/- 0.1 mmol/mIU; low sodium 0.6 +/- 0.1, P < .05). Salt restriction significantly reduced maximal insulin-mediated vasodilation (normal sodium: 51% +/- 5% of maximum nitroglycerin-mediated response; low sodium: 28% +/- 6%, P < .01). In contrast, no alterations in nitroglycerin-mediated vasodilation nor phenylephrine-mediated vasoconstriction were noted. These studies demonstrate that moderate salt restriction aggravates both systemic and vascular insulin resistance. This impairment of the vasodilating effect of insulin could be a factor attenuating the blood pressure lowering effect of a low sodium diet. Observational studies indicate a significant relation between dietary sodium and level of blood pressure. However, the role of salt sensitivity in the development of resistant hypertension is unknown. The present study examined the effects of dietary salt restriction on office and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure in subjects with resistant hypertension. Twelve subjects with resistant hypertension entered into a randomized crossover evaluation of low (50 mmol/24 hours x 7 days) and high sodium diets (250 mmol/24 hours x 7 days) separated by a 2-week washout period. Brain natriuretic peptide; plasma renin activity; 24-hour urinary aldosterone, sodium, and potassium; 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; aortic pulse wave velocity; and augmentation index were compared between dietary treatment periods. At baseline, subjects were on an average of 3.4+/-0.5 antihypertensive medications with a mean office BP of 145.8+/-10.8/83.9+/-11.2 mm Hg. Mean urinary sodium excretion was 46.1+/-26.8 versus 252.2+/-64.6 mmol/24 hours during low- versus high-salt intake. Low- compared to high-salt diet decreased office systolic and diastolic blood pressure by 22.7 and 9.1 mm Hg, respectively. Plasma renin activity increased whereas brain natriuretic peptide and creatinine clearance decreased during low-salt intake, indicative of intravascular volume reduction. These results indicate that excessive dietary sodium ingestion contributes importantly to resistance to antihypertensive treatment. Strategies to substantially reduce dietary salt intake should be part of the overall treatment of resistant hypertension.
Despite collating more event data than previous systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials (665 deaths in some 6,250 participants), there is still insufficient power to exclude clinically important effects of reduced dietary salt on mortality or cardiovascular morbidity in normotensive or hypertensive populations. Our estimates of benefits from dietary salt restriction are consistent with the predicted small effects on clinical events attributable to the small blood pressure reduction achieved.