Infusion of iloprost, a prostacyclin analogue, for treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon in systemic sclerosis. Intravenous iloprost treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon and ischemic ulcers secondary to systemic sclerosis. Placebo controlled study showing therapeutic benefit of iloprost in the treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon. Effects of resident-oriented care on quality of care, wellbeing and satisfaction with care. The quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in solid organ transplantation. A double-blind placebo-controlled comparison of phenelzine and imipramine in the treatment of bulimia in atypical depressives. Double-blind placebo-controlled trial of buflomedil in the treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon: six-month follow-up. Subjective and objective assessment of enalapril in primary Raynaud's phenomenon. The effect of captopril on cutaneous blood flow in patients with primary Raynaud's phenomenon. Association between industry funding and statistically significant pro-industry findings in medical and surgical randomized trials. Controlled double-blind trial of dazoxiben and nifedipine in the treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon.
Iloprost, a stable prostacyclin analogue, was given by intravenous infusion to 29 patients with severe Raynaud's phenomenon, 26 of whom had systemic sclerosis (SS), and compared with placebo infusion in a double blind crossover trial. Iloprost significantly lessened the number and the severity of attacks compared with placebo. Nine patients expressed a preference for effectiveness of treatment, eight of these in favour of Iloprost. Thermography failed to show any long term effect of Iloprost. Side effects of headache, flushing, nausea, and vomiting were common, and the inconvenience of intravenous administration may limit its routine use. We conducted this study to assess the clinical usefulness and physiologic effects of intravenous iloprost in patients with Raynaud's phenomenon secondary to systemic sclerosis.
                Thirty-five patients with Raynaud's phenomenon secondary to systemic sclerosis, including 11 with digital ischemic ulcerations, were enrolled in a double blind placebo controlled parallel study in 2 centers. Following a 2 week washout, subjects received intravenous iloprost (0.5-2.0 ng/kg/min) or saline by continuous infusion for 6 h on 5 consecutive days. Clinical assessments, status of digital ulcers, measures of in vivo platelet activation and detailed studies of peripheral vascular response to cold challenge, were performed at entry, at 5 days of therapy and at biweekly intervals for 10 weeks.
                Complete healing of all cutaneous lesions (ulcers, fissures, and paronychia) was observed 10 weeks after treatment in 6 of 7 patients receiving iloprost versus none of 4 receiving placebo (p = 0.015). Ischemic digital tip ulcers completely healed in all 4 patients with ulcers in the iloprost group, but none in the placebo group (p = 0.029). Patient diaries of frequency, duration and symptoms of Raynaud's phenomenon showed improvement in both groups. Critical ischemic temperature (finger temperature during controlled cold challenge at which Raynaud's or loss of detectable digital blood flow occurred) progressively decreased in the iloprost group from 21.3 +/- 7.3 degrees C at baseline to a minimum of 16.1 +/- 3.2 degrees C at 8 weeks after treatment (p = 0.076), whereas no consistent changes were observed in the placebo group. Treatment was associated with improvement in the rate of skin temperature recovery following cold challenge. No changes were noted in ambient digital skin temperature, total digital blood flow, finger systolic pressure or in measures of in vivo platelet activation. One subject dropped out with chest pain, but adverse effects of nausea, vomiting, headache and jaw pain were otherwise limited to the 5 days of drug infusion.
                Iloprost appears useful for the treatment of digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis and is associated with evidence of prolonged physiologic improvement although the mechanism of this effect remains unclear. Iloprost is a chemically stable analog of prostaglandin I2 showing the same properties as the naturally occurring substance, but with advantages of ease of handling and administration to patients. A double blind within patient comparison of intravenous iloprost and placebo was undertaken in 13 patients with Raynaud's phenomenon severe enough to warrant short term hospitalization for intravenous dilator therapy; thermography was used as one form of assessment. Our results, while showing improvements in frequency of Raynaud's attacks after iloprost compared with placebo, show no significant effects on other variables. In a resident-oriented care model applied in nursing homes, the residents are assigned to primary nurses. These primary nurses are responsible for the total care of the residents assigned to them. The purpose of the present study, using a pretest, post-test and control group quasi-experimental design, was to evaluate the effects of the implementation of resident-oriented care on the following aspects of quality of care: coordination of care, instrumental aspects, expressive aspects, resident wellbeing and satisfaction with care, and family satisfaction with care. The study was carried out on somatic and psycho-geriatric wards in three nursing homes in the Netherlands. Data were collected by questionnaires, interviews and observations. The results of the study showed that the intervention was partly successful in the experimental group. Some aspects of the resident-oriented care model were not clearly evident. Moreover, the effects on quality-of-care aspects were limited. The results revealed that the 'coordination of care' increased on half of the experimental wards. Furthermore, there was an indication that 'expressive aspects' changed in favour of the experimental wards. The implementation of resident-oriented care had no effect on resident wellbeing and satisfaction or on family satisfaction. Finally, the results are discussed in the light of some methodological limitations that often go together with intervention studies in the real world. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions provide the highest level of evidence about efficacy but their value either alone or within a meta-analysis is dependent on its methodological quality. For this reason recent RCTs in organ transplantation were assessed for quality. RCTs published between 2004 and 2006 (n = 332) were assessed, after excluding duplicate and nonEnglish reports. Quality was evaluated using the Jadad score plus allocation concealment and intention to treat analysis. We noted journal type, journal author instructions, funding source, sample size and number and location of study centres. Around one-third of RCTs had a Jadad score of 3 or greater (indication of a methodologically good quality trial) and the other two parameters were satisfied in just over one third. Although the majority of trials were published in speciality journals the quality of those published in general journals was superior. Commercially sponsored trials were of better quality as were multicentre trials in contrast to single centre trials. Overall quality of reporting of RCTs in organ transplantation is poor and as RCTs provide the highest level of evidence in evaluations of interventions there needs to be a concerted effort within the transplant community to improve the standards of RCTs. Although antidepressants have been found to be superior to placebo in 12 of 14 studies, the relationship between improvement in the depressive diathesis and bulimia is unclear. In this study, the efficacy of placebo, imipramine, and phenelzine is examined in patients comorbid for atypical depression and bulimia. Greater improvement was observed for both depressive and bulimic symptoms with phenelzine than with either imipramine or placebo. Consistent with its poor antidepressant effects in atypical depression, imipramine seemed to have minimal efficacy for the bulimic symptoms of atypical depressives. These data suggest that the presence of bulimia does not alter the treatment response of atypically depressed patients. Furthermore, the data may suggest a link between depression and bulimia in atypical depressives. Demonstrating a statistical difference with a small sample suggests the effect size is robust, however conclusions are limited by a small sample size. The efficacy of buflomedil in reducing the mean daily frequency and severity of winter ischemic attacks has been shown in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial including 31 patients (16 in the buflomedil group, 15 in the placebo group) suffering from idiopathic Raynaud's phenomenon and followed up for six months. The efficacy was confirmed by nail fold capillaroscopy, which showed a significant alleviation of hemodymanic disturbances and background pallor in comparison with the placebo. Results in terms of clinical and laboratory safety parameters assessed over a six-month period were satisfactory, thus demonstrating the possibility of a long-term treatment. 1. The efficacy and acceptability of enalapril were assessed in a double-blind, randomised, placebo controlled cross-over study in 21 patients with primary Raynaud's phenomenon. 2. Skin temperature was assessed by thermocouples in response to a 15 degrees C cold water challenge as an index of digital blood flow. 3. Following enalapril there were no significant changes in the number and severity of Raynaud's attacks, and no subjective benefit from treatment as measured by visual analogue scales, 5 point rating scales, and skin temperature response to cold challenge when compared with placebo. 4. Enalapril in a dose of 20 mg daily is ineffective in the management of primary Raynaud's phenomenon. Fifteen patients with primary Raynaud's phenomenon received captopril 25 mg or placebo, three times daily for 6 weeks, in a randomized double-blind cross-over study. Compared with placebo, captopril produced a significant improvement in cutaneous blood flow but did not alter the frequency or severity of attacks of Raynaud's phenomenon. Conflicting reports exist in the medical literature regarding the association between industry funding and published research findings. In this study, we examine the association between industry funding and the statistical significance of results in recently published medical and surgical trials.
                We examined a consecutive series of 332 randomized trials published between January 1999 and June 2001 in 8 leading surgical journals and 5 medical journals. Each eligible study was independently reviewed for methodological quality using a 21-point index with 5 domains: randomization, outcomes, eligibility criteria, interventions and statistical issues. Our primary analysis included studies that explicitly identified the primary outcome and reported it as statistically significant. For studies that did not explicitly identify a primary outcome, we defined a "positive" study as one with at least 1 statistically significant outcome measure. We used multivariable regression analysis to determine whether there was an association between reported industry funding and trial results, while controlling for study quality and sample size.
                Among the 332 randomized trials, there were 158 drug trials, 87 surgical trials and 87 trials of other therapies. In 122 (37%) of the trials, authors declared industry funding. An unadjusted analysis of this sample of trials revealed that industry funding was associated with a statistically significant result in favour of the new industry product (odds ratio [OR] 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-3.5). The association remained significant after adjustment for study quality and sample size (adjusted OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-3.0). There was a nonsignificant difference between surgical trials (OR 8.0, 95% CI 1.1-53.2) and drug trials (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.8), both of which were likely to have a pro-industry result (relative OR 5.0, 95% CI 0.7-37.5, p = 0.14).
                Industry-funded trials are more likely to be associated with statistically significant pro-industry findings, both in medical trials and surgical interventions. The prostaglandin thromboxane A2 causes platelet aggregation and vasoconstriction and may be important in the pathogenesis of Raynaud's phenomenon. Therefore, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted to assess the effectiveness of dazoxiben, a selective thromboxane synthetase inhibitor, in the treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon and to compare it with nifedipine, a calcium channel blocker. Twenty-two subjects who had at least one episode of Raynaud's phenomenon per day entered the study. Three patients withdrew from the study because of side effects while taking nifedipine. There was no difference among the subjects' subjective evaluation of the three treatments. Seven of 19 (44 percent) reported a moderate to marked improvement while taking placebo compared with 12 of 19 (63 percent) taking nifedipine and five of 19 (26 percent) taking dazoxiben (p = NS). Similarly, there was no difference in the mean two-week episode rate among the three treatments: placebo 30.4 +/- 4.5, nifedipine 24.7 +/- 5.6, dazoxiben 32.0 +/- 4.9 (p = NS). Twelve of 22 subjects experienced side effects while taking nifedipine as compared with two of 21 taking placebo and eight of 21 taking dazoxiben (p less than 0.005). These data show that dazoxiben is not effective in the treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon and suggest that thromboxane does not cause the vasoconstriction that characterizes this disorder.
Poor methodological quality, small sample sizes and the limited data available resulted in low precision of the statistical results and limited value of the overall results .The overall results show that there is no evidence for an effect of vasodilator drugs on primary Raynaud's phenomenon.