Severe nasal polyposis and its impact on quality of life. The effect of a short course of oral steroids followed by long-term intranasal steroid treatment. A pilot study of a supervised group exercise programme as a rehabilitation treatment for women with breast cancer receiving adjuvant treatment. A prospective treatment trial of nasal polyps in adults with cystic fibrosis. Evaluation of the medical and surgical treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial. Effect of corticosteroids on wound healing after endoscopic sinus surgery. The efficacy and safety of once-daily mometasone furoate nasal spray in nasal polyposis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Treatment of nasal polyposis and chronic rhinosinusitis with fluticasone propionate nasal drops reduces need for sinus surgery. Treatment of nasal polyps with intranasal beclomethasone dipropionate aerosol. Oral steroids and doxycycline: two different approaches to treat nasal polyps. Prevention of relapses of nasal polyposis with intranasal triamcinolone acetonide after polyp surgery: a prospective double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised study with a 9-month follow-up. Tailoring systematic reviews to meet critical priorities in maternal health in the intrapartum period.
Nasal polyposis is not a life-threatening disorder but has a great impact on the quality of life. Steroids constitute the first line of treatment of nasal polyps. The aims of this study were to evaluate the quality of life in nasal polyp patients after: (1) a short course of oral steroids; and (2) a long-term treatment with intranasal steroids.
                Patients with severe nasal polyps received either oral prednisone (n = 60) or no steroid treatment (control group, n = 18) for 2 weeks. Patients treated with steroids were also followed-up and evaluated after 12, 24, and 48 additional weeks with intranasal budesonide treatment.
                Patients with nasal polyps showed worse scores on all SF-36 domains, except for physical functioning, compared to the Spanish general population. After two weeks, patients treated with oral prednisone demonstrated a significant improvement (p < 0.05) in all impaired QoL domains compared to both control group and baseline. The mental component summary (51.0 +/- 1.2, p < 0.05) and physical component summary (51.0 +/- 0.9, p < 0.05) were improved compared to both control group and baseline. The improvement of all SF-36 domains was sustained by intranasal budesonida (p < 0.05) after 12, 24, and 48 weeks. Nasal obstruction, sense of smell, and polyp size also improved after both the oral short course and the intranasal long-term steroids treatment (p < 0.05).
                These results suggest that the treatment with a short-course of oral steroids improves the quality of life of patients with severe nasal polyps and that this effect is maintained by a long-term treatment with intranasal steroids. This pilot study examined whether exercise as an adjunctive rehabilitation therapy could benefit women who have early stage breast cancer and are currently receiving chemotherapy/radiotherapy. The study was designed as a randomised controlled trial (RCT). Physical functioning, fatigue and Quality of Life (QoL) outcomes were evaluated pre and post a 12-week intervention. The results showed that after 12 weeks the women who participated in the exercise programme (n = 12) displayed significantly higher levels of physical functioning and reported higher QoL scores than the controls (n = 10). Changes in fatigue and satisfaction with life favoured the intervention group but did not reach significance. These results are encouraging and suggest that a structured group exercise programme during adjuvant treatment is a safe, well tolerated and effective way of providing physical and psychological health benefits to women during treatment for early stage breast cancer. Since this was a pilot study the numbers did not allow appropriately powered analyses of some variables of interest and favoured relatively young and socio-economically advantaged women. Future studies need to address these issues and determine if these short-term benefits can be sustained. This is the first prospective, randomised, double-blind trial of the treatment of nasal polyps in cystic fibrosis. We found that betamethasone nasal drops showed a statistically significant reduction in polyp size in comparison to placebo. To conduct the first prospective, randomized, controlled trial evaluating and comparing the medical and surgical treatment of polypoid and nonpolypoid chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).
                Ninety patients with CRS were equally randomized either to medical or surgical therapy. All patients underwent pre- and posttreatment assessments of visual analogue score (VAS), the Sinonasal Outcome Test-20 (SNOT-20), the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36), nitric oxide (NO), acoustic rhinometry, saccharine clearance time (SCT), and nasal endoscopy. Each patient had three assessments: before starting the treatment, after 6 months, and, finally, after 1 year.
                Both the medical and surgical treatment of CRS significantly improved almost all the subjective and objective parameters of CRS (P <.01), with no significant difference being found between the medical and surgical groups (P >.05), except for the total nasal volume in CRS (P <.01) and CRS without polyposis (P <.01) groups, in which the surgical treatment demonstrated greater changes.
                CRS should be initially targeted with maximal medical therapy (e.g., a 3 month course of a macrolide antibiotic, douche, and topical steroid), with surgical treatment being reserved for cases refractory to medical therapy. The presence of nasal polyps is not a poor prognostic factor for the efficacy of CRS therapy, either surgical or medical. Approximately 20% patients with chronic rhinosinusitis undergoing Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS) experience impaired wound healing, leading to recurrences of sinusitis and polyps.
                We investigated the efficacy of oral+ local steroids in wound healing, following FESS in subjects with a chronic rhinosinusitis with/without nasal polyps. Ninety-nine subjects were randomised to receive 6 months' treatment with mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) 200 microg bid or placebo in double-blind manner approximately 2 weeks after FESS. Postoperative mean total score for several endoscopic parameters scores assessed at 6 months was calculated as the primary efficacy end-point. An endoscopic combination score (for inflammation, oedema, and polyps), a total symptoms score, and percent subjects requiring rescue medication, were assessed as secondary end-points.
                MFNS led to greater, although not significant, reductions in total endoscopic scores in all subjects, compared with placebo. The combination scores, however, indicated significantly improved healing with MFNS than with placebo for all subjects (median scores: 0.0 vs 2.0, p = 0.02), and particularly for subjects with nasal polyps (median scores: 2.0 vs 4.0, p = 0.03). The total symptom scores and percent subjects requiring rescue medication were similar in the two groups. MFNS was well tolerated.
                These results suggest that treatment with MFNS following sinus surgery may improve wound healing, particularly in subjects with nasal polyps. In subjects with mild-to-moderate nasal polyposis, treatment with mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) 200 microg once daily (QD) significantly decreases nasal congestion, reduces polyp size, and improves quality of life.
                To evaluate the efficacy and safety of MFNS, administered QD in the morning, in subjects with mild-to-moderate nasal polyposis.
                This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled clinical trial enrolled subjects with mild-to-moderate nasal polyposis at 12 centers in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. Inclusion criteria were: age > or = 18 years, a diagnosis of bilateral nasal polyps, and clinically significant nasal congestion. Following a 2-4-week run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive MFNS 200 microg QD or matching placebo for 16 weeks.
                A total of 298 subjects were randomized to treatment. Of those subjects included in the intent-to-treat efficacy analysis (n = 291), a statistically greater proportion of the MFNS group than the placebo group had improvements in investigator-assessed nasal congestion score between baseline and end point (the primary outcome) (74.3% vs 46.8%; p < 0.001). Significant benefits of MFNS were also seen for secondary end points, including polyp size, sense of smell, peak nasal inspiratory flow, therapeutic improvement, and quality-of-life measures. MFNS was well tolerated, with no unusual or unexpected adverse events. Steroid treatment is the mainstay of therapy for nasal polyps and rhinosinusitis. Oral steroids have considerable systemic side effects, and nasal sprays do not sufficiently reach the middle meatus, where polyps originate. Nasal drops might be a more useful formula to deliver steroids into the middle meatus.
                We sought to investigate whether treatment with fluticasone propionate nasal drops (FPNDs) can reduce the need for surgery, as measured by signs and symptoms of nasal polyposis and chronic rhinosinusitis, in patients who are on the waiting list for functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS).
                Fifty-four patients (28 male) with severe nasal polyposis, chronic rhinosinusitis, or both indicated for FESS were included in a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Use of intranasal steroid spray was stopped at least 4 weeks before randomization. Signs and symptoms were recorded before, during, and at the end of the study period. At the end of the study, a computed tomographic scan was performed, and the need for operation was reassessed by using a standardized scoring method.
                FESS was no longer required in 13 of 27 patients treated with FPNDs versus 6 of 27 in the placebo group (P < .05). Six patients from the placebo group dropped out versus 1 from the FPND group. Symptoms of nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, postnasal drip, and loss of smell were reduced in the FPND group (P < .05). Peak nasal inspiratory flow scores increased significantly (P < .01). Polyp volume decreased in the FPND group (P < .05), and computed tomographic scores improved in both groups (P < .05).
                Treatment with FPNDs in patients indicated for FESS can reduce the need for surgery. In a double-blind trial thirty-five patients with moderately-severe nasal polyposis were treated with intranasal beclomethasone dipropionate aerosol for 3 weeks. The dose given (400 mug/day) had only local effect on the symptoms. Judged by diary card scores the nasal symptoms were reduced to 52% of the pre-trial level for the whole group. Corrected for the placebo effect the percentage was 68. The reduction of symptoms was equally apportioned to the three symptoms, sneezing, nasal secretion and blockage. The treatment was tolerated well, and it is concluded that intranasal treatment with beclomethasone dipropionate aerosol offers most patients with nasal polyps a good response without any risk of systemic steroid side-effects. There is little scientific evidence to support the current practice of using oral glucocorticosteroids and antibiotics to treat patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps.
                We evaluated the effects of oral glucocorticoids and doxycycline on symptoms and objective clinical and biological parameters in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps.
                In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial, we randomly assigned 47 participants with bilateral nasal polyps to receive either methylprednisolone in decreasing doses (32-8 mg once daily), doxycycline (200 mg on the first day, followed by 100 mg once daily), or placebo for 20 days. Participants were followed for 12 weeks. Patients were assessed for nasal peak inspiratory flow and symptoms and by nasal endoscopy. Markers of inflammation such as eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP), IL-5, myeloperoxidase, matrix metalloproteinase 9, and IgE were measured in nasal secretions. Concentrations of eosinophils, ECP, and soluble IL-5 receptor alpha were measured in peripheral blood samples.
                Methylprednisolone and doxycycline each significantly decreased nasal polyp size compared with placebo. The effect of methylprednisolone was maximal at week 3 and lasted until week 8, whereas the effect of doxycycline was moderate but present for 12 weeks. Methylprednisolone significantly reduced levels of ECP, IL-5, and IgE in nasal secretions, whereas doxycycline significantly reduced levels of myeloperoxidase, ECP, and matrix metalloproteinase 9 in nasal secretions.
                This is the first double-blind, placebo-controlled study to show a significant effect of oral methylprednisolone and doxycycline on size of nasal polyps, nasal symptoms, and mucosal and systemic markers of inflammation.
                Copyright 2010 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved. To determine whether intranasal triamcinolone acetonide prevents the regrowth of nasal polyps after polyp surgery.
                Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, prospective study.
                Helsinki University Central Hospital.
                Sixty patients with nasal polyps entered the study. Patients were included upon arrival for elective polyp operations determined according to our standard clinical criteria. The recurrence of nasal polyposis was followed up for 9 months after surgical treatment at 3-month intervals.
                Anterior rhinoscopy, nasal endoscopy, olfactory threshold measurement, active anterior rhinomanometry and acoustic rhinometry were performed at every follow-up visit.
                On the whole, there was a significant inter-group difference in the change in polyp size of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA)-tolerant patients during the follow-up. In patients with acetylsalicylic acid intolerance, there was no inter-group difference (P = 0.28). No significant differences were noted for nasal resistance, nasal cavity volume, sense of smell and nasal symptoms.
                Triamcinolone acetonide prevents regrowth of nasal polyps after polyp surgery in acetylsalicylic acid-tolerant patients, but not in acetylsalicylic acid-intolerant patients.
                © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Health care practitioners and researchers commonly call for greater reliance on evidence as a means to achieve improvement in quality of care. Systematic reviews provide a means to accelerate the use of evidence-based clinical interventions and public health practices. The extent to which these time- and resource-intensive systematic reviews currently address critical maternal health priorities in the intrapartum period is unclear. This analysis summarises key maternal health and research priorities, maps these priorities to existing reviews, identifies gaps in the literature that can be addressed with systematic reviews, and highlights key methodological concerns in conducting systematic reviews. The analysis draws on published data on maternal morbidities and an overview of 108 systematic reviews in Medline in the past 5 years using the MeSH terms 'Delivery, Obstetric,' to draw the links between health priorities, research priorities, existing evidence and missing evidence. Key causes of morbidity during labour and delivery in the United States include haemorrhage, pre-eclampsia and eclampsia, obstetric trauma and infection. Analyses of maternal morbidity and mortality suggest that key concerns include racial and ethnic disparities in health outcomes and the prevention of adverse events. Systematic reviews, however, generally tend to focus on the reduction of harms associated with interventions, are frequently limited to randomised designs, and do not address issues of health disparities. The results suggest that advances in evidence-based care in maternal health require that systematic reviews address issues of prevention of adverse events, include a larger variety of study designs when necessary and pay closer attention to health disparities.
The authors found three randomised controlled trials, albeit of moderate to poor quality, that suggest a short-term benefit of oral steroids in patients with multiple nasal polyps. To address the issue more thoroughly well-designed, prospective, randomised controlled trials are still needed.