Mucus clearance and lung function in cystic fibrosis with hypertonic saline. Effects of the flutter device on pulmonary function studies among pediatric cystic fibrosis patients. Chest physiotherapy in cystic fibrosis: a comparative study of autogenic drainage and the active cycle of breathing techniques with postural drainage. The effect of inhaled mannitol on bronchial mucus clearance in cystic fibrosis patients: a pilot study. Effect of positive expiratory pressure breathing in patients with cystic fibrosis.
Abnormal homeostasis of the volume of airway surface liquid in patients with cystic fibrosis is thought to produce defects in mucus clearance and airway defense. Through osmotic forces, hypertonic saline may increase the volume of airway surface liquid, restore mucus clearance, and improve lung function.
                A total of 24 patients with cystic fibrosis were randomly assigned to receive treatment with inhaled hypertonic saline (5 ml of 7 percent sodium chloride) four times daily with or without pretreatment with amiloride. Mucus clearance and lung function were measured during 14-day baseline and treatment periods.
                Long-term inhalation of hypertonic saline without pretreatment with amiloride (i.e., with placebo pretreatment) resulted in a sustained (> or =8 hours) increase in 1-hour rates of mucus clearance, as compared with those with amiloride pretreatment (14.0+/-2.0 vs. 7.0+/-1.5 percent, respectively; P=0.02) and increased 24-hour rates of mucus clearance over baseline. Furthermore, inhalation of hypertonic saline with placebo improved the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) between the baseline period and the treatment period (mean difference, 6.62 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.6 to 11.7; P=0.02), whereas hypertonic saline with amiloride did not improve FEV1 (mean difference, 2.9 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, -2.2 to 8.0; P=0.23). Forced vital capacity (FVC), the forced expiratory flow between 25 and 75 percent of FVC (FEF25-75), and respiratory symptoms also significantly improved in patients treated with hypertonic saline and placebo, whereas the residual volume as a proportion of total lung capacity (RV:TLC) did not change in either group. A comparison of the changes in lung function in the two groups showed no significant difference. In vitro data suggested that sustained hydration of airway surfaces was responsible for the sustained improvement in mucus clearance, whereas inhibition of osmotically driven water transport by amiloride accounted for the observed loss of clinical benefit.
                In patients with cystic fibrosis, inhalation of hypertonic saline produced a sustained acceleration of mucus clearance and improved lung function. This treatment may protect the lung from insults that reduce mucus clearance and produce lung disease.
                Copyright 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society. Previous studies have shown that the Scandipharm Flutter airway clearance device has increased the ability of cystic fibrosis patients to expectorate mucus. Studies that show the effects of the Flutter on pulmonary function among the pediatric cystic fibrosis patients are limited. Thus, we embarked on a study to assess the device's effectiveness.
                The long-term effect of the Flutter on pulmonary function tests (PFTs) was studied and compared with other airway clearance techniques, such as chest physiotherapy (CPT) and Vital Signs, Inc. 9000 PEP positive expiratory pressure (PEP) therapy for cystic fibrosis patients of five to 17 years of age with mild to moderate disease. Of the 15 patients who qualified, six completed the study. The patients were evaluated using PFTs and a respiratory assessment at the beginning and end of each new therapy. Duration of each therapy was one month.
                No respiratory assessment parameters changed between the therapies studied. All patients who used the Flutter preferred it over the other two therapies. The patients stated they felt better clinically, were able to expectorate mucus more easily, and felt more in control of their therapies. Paired t-test statistical analysis from the PFT data indicated no significant changes in forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration (FEV1), forced expiratory flow from 25 percent to 75 percent of the loop (FEF25-75), airway resistance (Raw), or specific airway conductance (sGaw) among the three therapies studied.
                This study has shown no significant change in respiratory assessment parameters or pulmonary function. Further studies involving multicenter trials are warranted to evaluate the effects of the Flutter on pulmonary function. BACKGROUND--Autogenic drainage has been suggested as an alternative method of chest physiotherapy in patients with cystic fibrosis. In this study autogenic drainage was compared with the active cycle of breathing techniques (ACBT) together with postural drainage. METHODS--Eighteen patients with cystic fibrosis took part in a randomised two-day crossover trial. There were two sessions of one method of physiotherapy on each day, either autogenic drainage or ACBT. The study days were one week apart. On each day the patients were monitored for six hours. Mucus movement was quantified by a radioaerosol technique. Airway clearance was studied qualitatively using xenon-133 scintigraphic studies at the start and end of each day. Expectorated sputum was collected during and for one hour after each session of physiotherapy. Pulmonary functions tests were performed before and after each session. Oxygen saturation (SaO2) and heart rate were measured before, during, and after each session. RESULTS--Autogenic drainage cleared mucus from the lungs faster than ACBT over the whole day. Both methods improved ventilation, as assessed by the xenon-133 ventilation studies. No overall differences were found in the pulmonary function test results, but more patients had an improved forced expiratory flow from 25% to 75% with autogenic drainage, while more showed an improved forced vital capacity with ACBT. No differences were found in sputum weight and heart rate, nor in mean SaO2 over the series, but four patients desaturated during ACBT. CONCLUSIONS--Autogenic drainage was found to be as good as ACBT at clearing mucus in patients with cystic fibrosis and is therefore an effective method of home physiotherapy. Patients with cystic fibrosis should be assessed as to which method suits them best. It has been postulated that hypertonic saline (HS) might impair the antimicrobial effects of defensins within the airways. Alternative non-ionic osmotic agents such as mannitol may thus be preferable to HS in promoting bronchial mucus clearance (BMC) in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). This study reports the effect of inhalation of another osmotic agent, dry powder Mannitol (300 mg), compared with its control (empty capsules plus matched voluntary cough) and a 6% solution of HS on BMC in 12 patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Mucus clearance was measured using a radioaerosol/gamma camera technique. Post-intervention clearance was measured for 60 min, followed by cough clearance for 30 min. Neither mannitol nor HS improved BMC during the actual intervention period compared with their respective controls. However during the post-intervention measurement there was a significant improvement in BMC for both the mannitol (8.7+/-3.3% versus 2.8+/-0.7%) and HS (10.0+/-2.3% versus 3.5+/-0.8%). There was also a significant improvement in cough clearance with the Mannitol (9.7+/-2.4%) compared with its control (2.5+/-0.8%). Despite premedication with a bronchodilator, a small fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was seen immediately after administration of both the mannitol (7.3+/-2.5%) and HS (5.8+/-1.2%). Values of FEV1 returned to baseline by the end of the study. Inhaled mannitol is a potential mucoactive agent in cystic fibrosis patients. Further studies are required to establish the optimal dose and the long-term effectiveness of mannitol. The effect of positive expiratory pressure breathing, alone and in combination with coughing, was investigated in eight patients with cystic fibrosis. Functional residual capacity and total lung capacity was measured with a body plethysmograph before, during, and immediately after breathing with expiratory pressure of 5 and 15 cm H2O, and after a coughing period. The positive expiratory pressure breathing was carried out five times for two minutes with a two minute interval between each period. Mucus transport was measured in a peripheral lung region and over the whole lung by a radioactive aerosol tracer technique. Clearance measurements were carried out continuously during positive expiratory pressure breathing and during a control period. Two minutes' breathing with an expiratory pressure of 5 and 15 cm H2O caused an increase in mean (SEM) functional residual capacity from 2.6 (0.1) to 3.6 (0.3) and 4.4 (0.5) 1 and an increase in total lung capacity from 5.1 (0.2) to 5.9 (0.3) and 6.9 (0.4) 1. Lung volumes were higher during breathing with an expiratory pressure of 15 cm H2O than with 5 cm H2O; both returned to baseline values immediately after positive expiratory pressure breathing. Spontaneous mucus clearance and mucus clearance by coughing were not influenced by positive expiratory pressure breathing at either expiratory pressure. Thus in patients with cystic fibrosis positive expiratory pressure breathing increases lung volumes in relation to the expiratory pressure imposed; these changes in lung volume did not, however, lead to an improvement of mucus transport.
The results of this review show that airway clearance techniques have short-term effects in the terms of increasing mucus transport. No evidence was found on which to draw conclusions concerning the long-term effects.