[The effect of hypertonic saline infusion on lumbar epidural anesthesia]. The comparison of hypertonic saline (7.5%) and normal saline (0.9%) for initial fluid administration before spinal anesthesia. Hypertonic saline fluid therapy following surgery: a prospective study. Hypertonic saline for intraoperative fluid therapy in transurethral resection of the prostate. Comparison of hypertonic saline (5%), isotonic saline and Ringer's lactate solutions for fluid preloading before lumbar extradural anaesthesia. Effects of hypertonic saline (7.5%) on extracellular fluid volumes compared with normal saline (0.9%) and 6% hydroxyethyl starch after aortocoronary bypass graft surgery. Intraoperative colloid administration reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting and improves postoperative outcomes compared with crystalloid administration. Cardiac compliance and effects of hypertonic saline. Hypertonic saline (7.5%) decreases perioperative weight gain following cardiac surgery. Out-of-hospital hypertonic resuscitation after traumatic hypovolemic shock: a randomized, placebo controlled trial. A prospective, randomized comparison of thromboelastographic coagulation profile in patients receiving lactated Ringer's solution, 6% hetastarch in a balanced-saline vehicle, or 6% hetastarch in saline during major surgery. Adrenergic activity and peripheral hemodynamics in relation to sodium sensitivity in patients with essential hypertension. Deficiency of renal dopaminergic-dependent natriuretic response to acute sodium load in black salt-sensitive subjects in contrast to salt-resistant subjects. Hypertonic sodium lactate versus lactated ringer's solution for intravenous fluid therapy in operations on the abdominal aorta. Comparison of the acute hemodynamic effects of hypertonic or colloid infusions immediately after mitral valve repair.
The author compared hemodynamic effects of fluid loading during epidural anesthesia with 7.2% hypertonic saline (HS), lactate Ringer's (LR) or isotonic saline solutions in 24 ASA 1 patients undergoing elective lower abdominal or pelvic surgery, allocated randomly into three groups. The first two groups, patients received equal amounts of sodium (2.2 mmol.kg-1), and the latter group, isotonic saline solutions for 1-2 ml.kg-1.h-1 as control. After epidural injection (2%mepivacaine 0.1 ml.cm(Height)-1), fluid loading was performed for 20 minutes. The volume of fluid loading was significantly larger in group LR (979.3 +/- 154.7 ml) than the other two groups (HS: 104.5 +/- 20.0 ml, NS: 48.8 +/- 8.3 ml) (P < 0.05). The number of blocked segments was similar in three groups. Magnitude of hypotension was no significantly different among the groups 20 minutes after fluid loading, but recovered to the control level in group HS. In all groups heart rate decreased but the decrease was significant only in group HS. But, in group HS, stroke index increased after fluid loading and remained elevated. Increase of extracellular volume in group HS was observed by bioelectrical impedance analysis as in group LR. The author concludes that HS may be useful especially in the case not requiring a large volume of fluid loading. Finding ideal concentration, volume, and speed of infusion of intravenous fluids would be clinically useful. Hypertonic saline can be used for initial fluid administration before spinal anesthesia. It is effective in small-volume fluid resuscitation. This randomized double-blinded study compared the effects of 7.5% hypertonic saline (HS) and 0.9% normal saline (NS) in doses containing 2 mmol/kg of sodium in 40 ASA physical status I-II patients undergoing arthroscopy or other lower limb surgery under spinal anesthesia. We infused 1.6 mL/kg of HS or 13 mL/kg of NS for initial fluid administration before spinal anesthesia induced with a 10-mg dose of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Etilefrine was administered to maintain mean arterial pressure at > or =80% of its control value. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, and cardiac index did not differ between the groups, and the amount of etilefrine administered was similar in the treatment groups. In all our patients, the plasma sodium concentrations were within the normal range after surgery and serum osmolality was within the normal range after spinal anesthesia. The time and the volume of the first micturition were similar in both groups, despite the much smaller amount of infused free water in the HS group. We conclude that 7.5% HS was as good as NS for the initial fluid administration before spinal anesthesia when the amount of sodium was kept unchanged. Successful resuscitation of the injured may be achieved more rapidly and with less fluid using hypertonic crystalloid solutions than with isotonic solutions. This randomized, double-blind study compared 0.9% normal saline (NS) to 1.8% hypertonic saline (HS) in 20 postoperative coronary artery bypass patients suffering uniform injury. Study solutions were administered to maintain physiologic endpoints: heart rate, blood pressure, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. The groups were similar with respect to age, body surface area, operative procedure, intraoperative fluid status, and intraoperative and postoperative red cell transfusion requirements. HS patients required 30% less fluid than NS patients and were in negative fluid balance during the study (-1,715 +/- 732 ml/24 hr, HS, vs. +266 +/- 825 ml/24 hr, NS; p less than 0.01). In contrast, NS patients were in positive fluid balance after 8 hours. Moreover, HS patients experienced less chest tube drainage than NS patients (981 +/- 88 ml, HS, vs. 1,700 +/- 285 ml, NS; p less than 0.01). Systemic and pulmonary hemodynamic measurements, oxygen delivery, oxygen consumption, and shunt fraction did not differ between the two groups. Serum sodium and osmolality increased in the HS group and peaked at 12 hours (145.4 +/- 1.4 mEq/L and 308.7 +/- 2.0 mOsm/kg, respectively) and correlated with the volume of HS infused (correlation coefficient = 0.81). No deaths occurred and no complication was attributed the hypertonicity of the solution. We conclude that 1.8% hypertonic saline is a safe alternative to isotonic crystalloid therapy in the fluid management of postoperative patients. Decreased third-space losses may occur with HS as suggested by the lower thoracic losses in the HS group; 1.8% NaCl may be the preferred solution in situations where excess free water administration is not desired, and where interstitial edema is detrimental to function and/or survival. We tested hypertonic saline solution (HS) to determine its effectiveness in surgical procedures for prostatic hypertrophy. We randomly selected 40 patients undergoing elective transurethral resection of the prostate for either infusion of HS (3% NaCl) at 4ml·kg(-1)·min(-1) (HS group) or lactated Ringer's solution (LR) at 8 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1) (LR group). Anesthesiologists regulated the intraoperative infusion rate as needed to maintain blood pressure. There were no differences in systolic blood pressure, heart rate, central venous pressure, or arterial blood oxygenation between the two groups. In the HS group, plasma sodium, chloride, and osmolality, measured in the recovery room, were significantly increased; however, they returned to preanesthetic levels the day after surgery. In the LR group, in contrast, plasma sodium decreased significantly and this lower value persisted for 1 day. An osmolar gap exceeding 10mOsm·kg(-1) was observed in 2 patients in the HS group, but plasma sodium remained at normal values. However, in the 1 patient in the LR group whose osmolar gap exceeded 10mOsm·kg(-1), plasma sodium was 115 mEq·I(-1). HS, at a low dose, is useful in the intraoperative management of transurethral resection of the prostate. We have compared the haemodynamic effects of fluid preloading performed before lumbar extradural anaesthesia with isotonic saline (NS), 5% hypertonic saline (HS) and Ringer's lactate (RL) solutions in 30 ASA I patients undergoing minor orthopaedic surgery, allocated randomly to the three groups. All patients received an equal amount of sodium (2 mmol kg-1). After fluid preloading, lumber extradural anaesthesia was performed (2% lignocaine 6 mg kg-1) and ephedrine was administered in order to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) > 80% of its control value. Both volume and duration of fluid preload were significantly less in group HS (160 (SD 25) ml, 8.8 (SD 2.9) min) than in the two other groups (NS: 903 (144) ml, 17.7 (3.3) min; RL: 932 (166) ml, 212 (6.0) min) (P < 0.05). The number of blocked segments and the total amount of ephedrine administered were similar in the three groups. Heart rate increased significantly in all groups immediately after the fluid preload and remained increased until the end of the study (90 min). MAP was not affected by any fluid preload and its maximal decrease after lumbar extradural anaesthesia was similar in all groups. Infusion of 5% HS 2.3 ml kg-1 was tolerated well and produced a significant (P < 0.05) but moderate hypernatraemia lasting 90 min after the end of fluid preloading. We conclude that HS may be useful when rapid fluid preloading is desired, in situations where excess free water administration is not desired. To compare the effects of hypertonic (7.5%) saline (HS), normal (0.9%) saline (NS), and 6% hydroxyethyl starch (HES) on extracellular fluid volumes in the early postoperative period after cardiopulmonary bypass.
                A prospective, randomized, double-blind study.
                University teaching hospital.
                Forty-eight patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
                Patients were randomly allocated to receive 4 mL/kg of HS, NS, or HES during 30 minutes when volume loading was needed during the postoperative rewarming period in the intensive care unit. Plasma volume was measured using a dilution of iodine-125-labeled human serum albumin. Extracellular water and cardiac output were measured by whole-body impedance cardiography.
                Plasma volume had increased by 19 +/- 7% in the HS group and by 10 +/- 3% in the NS group (p = 0.001) at the end of the study fluid infusion. After 1-hour follow-up time, the plasma volume increase was greatest (23 +/- 8%) in the group receiving HES (p < 0.001). The increase of extracellular water was greater than the infused volume in the HS and HES groups at the end of the infusion. One-hour diuresis after the study infusion was greater in the HS group (536 +/- 280 mL) than in the NS (267 +/- 154 mL, p = 0.006) and HES groups (311 +/- 238 mL, p = 0.025).
                The effect of HS on plasma volume was short-lasting, but it stimulated excretion of excess body fluid accumulated during cardiopulmonary bypass and cardiac surgery. HS may be used in situations in which excess free water administration is to be avoided but the intravascular volume needs correction.
                Copyright 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company The debate over colloid versus crystalloid as the best solution for intraoperative fluid resuscitation is not resolved. Published studies have shown that mortality is not related to the specific fluid used for resuscitation. In addition, the quality of postoperative recovery between colloid and crystalloid has not been well investigated. In a prospective, blinded fashion, we investigated the effects of colloid and crystalloid resuscitation on nausea and vomiting and on the postoperative patient recovery profile. Patients undergoing major elective noncardiac surgery were randomized to receive 6% hetastarch in saline (HS-NS), 6% hetastarch in balanced salt (HS-BS), or lactated Ringer's solution (LR) on the basis of a fluid administration algorithm. The anesthetic was standardized. Hemodynamic targets included maintenance of arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and urine output within a predefined range. A postoperative morbidity survey was performed at baseline and daily after surgery. Ninety patients participated in the study, with 30 patients in each group. The amounts of study fluid (mean +/- SD) administered were 1301 +/- 1079 mL, 1448 +/- 759 mL, and 5946 +/- 1909 mL for the HS-NS, HS-BS, and LR groups, respectively (P < 0.05, HS-NS and HS-BS versus LR). Both the HS-NS and HS-BS (colloid) groups had a significantly less frequent incidence of nausea and vomiting, use of rescue antiemetics, severe pain, periorbital edema, and double vision. We concluded that intraoperative fluid resuscitation with colloid, when compared with crystalloid administration, is associated with an improvement in the quality of postoperative recovery. To demonstrate the advantages of a 1.8% hypertonic saline solution (HS) over a Ringer's lactate solution (RL) during and after major intra-abdominal surgery, 28 patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups as follows: 13 patients received RL and 15 patients received HS. All patients were studied preoperatively, peroperatively and postoperatively for 72 hours. Peroperatively RL or HS were infused at a rate sufficient to maintain a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) and central venous pressure (CVP) within 3 mm Hg of the initial value. The left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI) was calculated from determination of stroke index and ejection fraction with a mobile gamma camera. Biopsy specimens were taken from the rectus abdominis muscle for evaluation of edema. The two groups of patients were comparable for age, length of surgery and length of aortic cross-clamping. Preoperatively natremia, serum osmolarity, PCWP and LVEDVI were similar in both groups. A significant (p = 0.01) difference was noted, during and after surgery, between the sodium levels in the two groups, but the levels remained within normal limits. Serum osmolarity remained similar for the two groups (p = 0.49). During and after surgery, PCWP (p = 0.1) and CVP (p = 0.7) remained within 3 mm Hg of the initial values with no significant difference between the two groups. The HS group received significantly (p = 0.002) less liquid than the RL group. At the end of surgery, the LVEDVI dropped in both groups. This drop was significantly (p = 0.04) more important in the RL group than in the HS group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) To compare the effects of 7.5% hypertonic saline (HS) and 0.9% normal saline (NS) on perioperative weight gain in cardiac surgical patients.
                Prospective, randomized study.
                University teaching hospital.
                Patients (n = 72) scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
                Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 7.5% HS (36 patients) or 0.9% NS (36 patients) as a single dose of 4 mL/kg over 30 minutes during the postoperative rewarming phase in the intensive care unit.
                Weight gain until the first postoperative morning was significantly greater in the NS group than in the HS group (1.9 plus minus 1.4 kg, median, 2.1 kg; 0.8 plus minus 1.5 kg, median, 0.8 kg; p = 0.005). One-hour diuresis after the fluid infusion was significantly greater in the HS group compared with the NS group (501 plus minus 282 mL and 237 plus minus 173 mL; p < 0.001). In the linear regression model, the 2 most important factors affecting the perioperative weight gain were the volume of fluid infused postoperatively in the intensive care unit (4,098 plus minus 916 mL in the HS group and 4,589 plus minus 1,344 mL in the NS group) and the total diuresis after surgery (3,351 plus minus 1,035 mL in the HS group and 2,942 plus minus 846 mL in the NS group).
                HS had an intense diuretic effect, which reduced intraoperative fluid retention. This effect was confirmed by the lesser increase in body weight measured on the first postoperative morning.
                Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved. To determine whether out-of-hospital administration of hypertonic fluids would improve survival after severe injury with hemorrhagic shock.
                Hypertonic fluids have potential benefit in the resuscitation of severely injured patients because of rapid restoration of tissue perfusion, with a smaller volume, and modulation of the inflammatory response, to reduce subsequent organ injury.
                Multicenter, randomized, blinded clinical trial, May 2006 to August 2008, 114 emergency medical services agencies in North America within the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium. Inclusion criteria: injured patients, age ≥ 15 years with hypovolemic shock (systolic blood pressure ≤ 70 mm Hg or systolic blood pressure 71-90 mm Hg with heart rate ≥ 108 beats per minute). Initial resuscitation fluid, 250 mL of either 7.5% saline per 6% dextran 70 (hypertonic saline/dextran, HSD), 7.5% saline (hypertonic saline, HS), or 0.9% saline (normal saline, NS) administered by out-of-hospital providers. Primary outcome was 28-day survival. On the recommendation of the data and safety monitoring board, the study was stopped early (23% of proposed sample size) for futility and potential safety concern.
                 : A total of 853 treated patients were enrolled, among whom 62% were with blunt trauma, 38% with penetrating. There was no difference in 28-day survival-HSD: 74.5% (0.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], -7.5 to 7.8); HS: 73.0% (-1.4; 95% CI, -8.7-6.0); and NS: 74.4%, P = 0.91. There was a higher mortality for the postrandomization subgroup of patients who did not receive blood transfusions in the first 24 hours, who received hypertonic fluids compared to NS [28-day mortality-HSD: 10% (5.2; 95% CI, 0.4-10.1); HS: 12.2% (7.4; 95% CI, 2.5-12.2); and NS: 4.8%, P < 0.01].
                Among injured patients with hypovolemic shock, initial resuscitation fluid treatment with either HS or HSD compared with NS, did not result in superior 28-day survival. However, interpretation of these findings is limited by the early stopping of the trial. Clinical Trial Registration: Clinical Trials.gov, NCT00316017. To compare the effects of lactated Ringer's solution (LR), 6% hetastarch in a balanced-saline vehicle (HS-BS), and 6% hetastarch in normal saline (HS-NS) on coagulation using thromboelastography.
                Prospective, randomized double-blinded evaluation of previously published clinical trial.
                Tertiary-care medical center.
                Patients undergoing elective noncardiac surgery with an anticipated blood loss >500 mL. A total of 90 patients were enrolled with 30 patients in each group.
                Patients received a standardized anesthetic. LR, HS-BS, and HS-NS were administered intraoperatively based on a fluid administration algorithm. Hemodynamic targets included maintenance of arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and urine output within a predefined range.
                Thromboelastography variables for r time, k time, maximum amplitude, and alpha angle (mean +/- SD) were recorded at induction of anesthesia, at the end of surgery, and 24 hours postoperatively. Patients in the LR group showed a state of hypercoagulation at the end of surgery with reductions (p < 0.005) in r time (-3.8 +/- 6.7 mm) and k time (-1.7 +/- 2.5 mm). This state of hypercoagulation continued into the postoperative period. Patients in the HS-NS group showed a state of hypocoagulation with increases (p < 0.05) in r time (+6.2 +/- 8.5 mm) and k time (+1.7 +/- 3.9 mm) and a reduction in maximum amplitude (-8.0 +/- 9.8 mm) at the end of surgery. This state of hypocoagulation was reduced in the postoperative period. Patients in the HS-BS group showed no significant changes in coagulation status at end of surgery, with the smallest changes in r time (-0.3 +/- 4.1 mm), k time (+0.1 +/- 3.1 mm), maximum amplitude (-5.4 +/- 12.3 mm), and alpha angle (0.3 +/- 12.5 degrees ).
                LR-treated patients exhibited a hypercoagulative profile that persisted into the postoperative period. HS-BS administration was associated with a lesser change in the coagulation profile compared with HS-NS, which was associated with a hypocoagulative state.
                Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved. In 25 outpatients with essential hypertension, sodium sensitivity, defined as the difference in mean arterial pressure (delta MAP) between 2 weeks of high-sodium (300 mmol per day) and 2 weeks of low-sodium (LS) intake (50-100 mmol per day), was studied in relation to the plasma norepinephrine (NE) level, NE release, and pressor response to intravenous NE. In addition, forearm blood flow (FBF) was measured by plethysmography. There were two control periods of regular sodium intake, one of 4 weeks' duration at the beginning of the study and one of 2 weeks' duration at the end. The delta MAP ranged from +18 to -8 mm Hg. The eight patients in whom delta MAP was greater than 10 mm Hg were regarded as salt-sensitive. When compared with salt-insensitive subjects, salt-sensitive patients had higher plasma NE levels in the control period (p less than 0.05) and after 2 weeks of HS intake (p less than 0.01). Sodium sensitivity was directly related to the change in plasma NE between the HS and LS periods (p less than 0.001). The NE release decreased in salt-insensitive subjects whereas it increased in salt-sensitive patients between the LS and HS periods. Changes in NE release were directly related to sodium sensitivity (p less than 0.05). The pressor response to NE was not significantly influenced by changes in sodium intake. The FBF fell in salt-sensitive patients and increased in salt-insensitive subjects between the LS and HS periods. Sodium sensitivity was directly related to the change in forearm vascular resistance (p less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) To evaluate the involvement of the renal dopaminergic system in the natriuretic responses to acute saline load in salt-resistant (SR) and salt-sensitive (SS) black normotensive (NT) and hypertensive (HT) subjects.
                We studied the relationship between the urinary excretion of dopa, dopamine (DA) and its metabolite DOPAC and the natriuretic responses to acute volume expansion (2 l NaCl 0.9% over 2 h) in 20 black NT subjects (12 SR and 8 SS) and 19 black HT subjects (10 SS and 9 SR). Subjects received a low salt (LS) diet (40 mmol sodium/day) for 1 week and a high salt (HS) diet (300 mmol sodium/day) for 1 week; the sequence of the dietary regimens was randomized. Comparisons were made between the results before the saline infusion (baseline) and the results 2 h after the infusion.
                In all the groups saline infusion induced significant increases in urinary volume (ml/4 h) of two- to three-fold and in urinary sodium excretion (mmol/4 h) of three- to ten-fold; these increases were significantly greater during the HS diet than during the LS diet. Saline infusion significantly increased the mean arterial pressure (MAP) by 5 mmHg in HT-SS subjects and by 4-5 mmHg in NT-SS subjects, but the MAP did not changed in the NT-SR and HT-SR groups. Under the LS diet, saline infusion changed the DA excretion (in nmol/4 h) by -49+/-89 in HT-SS subjects, by 17+/-52 in NT-SS subjects, by 235+/-72 in HT-SR subjects and by 220+/-86 in NT-SR subjects (P < 0.05 between SR and SS subjects). The saline infusion-induced changes in DA excretion correlated significantly with the increases in urinary sodium excretion (r = 0.71, P < 0.01) in the NT-SR and HT-SR subjects under the LS diet, but not in the SR groups on the HS diet nor in the SS groups (HT and NT) on either diet. Saline infusion significantly reduced the DA/dopa ratio in SS (NT and HT) but not SR (NT and HT) subjects, whereas the DA/DOPAC (dihydroxyphenylacetic acid) ratios were similar in all the groups.
                The urinary dopaminergic system may participate in the natriuretic responses to acute sodium load only in SR subjects (NT and HT) and only under LS diets, but not in SS subjects (NT and HT). This strongly suggests that black NT- and HT-SS subjects have an underlying impairment in the activity of the renal dopaminergic system which may be associated with a reduced decarboxylation of dopa into DA. Fifty-eight patients who were to undergo aortic reconstruction were prospectively randomized into two groups to compare the effects of perioperative fluid replacement with isotonic and hypertonic crystalloid solutions. Blood loss was replaced with packed red blood cells, and additional fluid was given as either Ringer's lactate solution (RL, 130 mEq sodium/L, 274 mOsm/L) or a hypertonic balanced salt solution (HSL, 250 mEq sodium/L, 514 mOsm/L). Fluid was administered to maintain the cardiac filling pressure within 3 torr of the preoperative level and the cardiac output (CO) at or above the preoperative level. The groups were similar with respect to age, preexisting disease, duration of operation, and operative blood loss. During the operation, the RL group required 9.5 +/- 0.8 L of fluid, whereas the HSL group required 4.5 +/- 0.3 L (P less than 0.001). Pulmonary, cardiac, and renal functions were adequately maintained in both groups. There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to CO, urine output, or creatinine clearance during the operation and early postoperative period. Postoperatively, the intrapulmonary shunt was 20 +/- 1% in the RL group and it was 16 +/- 1% in the HSL group (P less than 0.05). The amount of sodium infused and the cumulative sodium balance at the completion of the study period were similar in both groups. Serum sodium and osmolarity were significantly greater in the HSL group (P less than 0.001), reaching a maximum of 151 +/- 1 mEq/L and 305 +/- 2 mOsm/L, respectively. Two patients in the HSL group had a persistent elevation in serum osmolarity (greater than 320 mOsm/L) during operation, for which they received RL for the balance of the resuscitation. There were no complications that could be attributed to the hypertonicity of the solution. HSL is effective for resuscitation of patients with extracellular fluid deficit and is safe provided that the serum sodium and osmolarity are monitored during periods of large volume administration. To determine the acute hemodynamic effect of hypertonic saline and/or colloid solutions as volume resuscitation in postoperative mitral valve repair patients.
                Prospective, randomized trial.
                Postoperative cardiac intensive care unit of Broussais Hospital.
                Twenty-six patients who underwent mitral valve repair were prospectively studied. Two patients were excluded during the study.
                During the immediate postoperative period, when wedge pressure decreases to <8 mm Hg, patients were randomly assigned to receive 250 mL of either hypertonic saline 7.2%-hydroxyethyl starch 6% (molecular weight, 200,000; hydroxyethylation ratio, 0.5) solution (HS-HES group), hypertonic saline 7.2% solution (HS group), or hydroxyethyl starch 6% solution (HES group). The infusion was completed within 15 mins. No additional volume was infused throughout the study.
                Standard hemodynamic measurements and echocardiographic data demonstrated that HS-HES and HS induced a higher increase in left ventricular end-diastolic area than HES. In the HS-HES and HS groups, systemic vascular resistances decreased significantly and end-systolic area tended to decrease. In the HES group, systemic vascular resistances did not change and end-systolic area tended to increase. Accordingly, ejection fraction increased significantly by 21% and 18% with HS-HES (from 50.5 +/- 5.5 to 61.2 +/- 4.8) and HS (from 49.7 +/- 3.6 to 58.8 +/- 3.3), respectively, and did not change with HES. A major increase in cardiac index was observed after hypertonic solutions infusion, from 2.9 +/- 0.3 to 4.1 +/- 0.4 L/min/m2 in the HS-HES group and from 2.7 +/- 0.3 to 3.8 +/- 0.4 L/min/m2 in the HS group. Then, cardiac index progressively returned to baseline values within the 3 hrs after the infusion. No significant difference was observed between HS-HES and HS. In these groups, plasma sodium increased significantly after the infusion and remained higher than baseline values throughout the study. Adverse events were observed only with hypertonic solution administration: hypotensive episodes, sudden increases in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, and ventricular arrhythmias. These side effects are likely attributable to a too-high dose and/or rate of infusion. All patients included in the study were discharged from the hospital before the 10th postoperative day.
                We conclude that in patients who have undergone mitral valve repair, postoperative infusion of hypertonic saline solutions increases left ventricular preload and left ventricular ejection fraction. The use of these hypertonic solutions may be of interest in patients with valvular cardiomyopathy. A titrated dose and a low rate of infusion may substantially improve the safety.
HS reduces the volume of intravenous fluid required to maintain patients undergoing surgery but transiently increases serum sodium. It is not known if HS effects patient survival and morbidity but it should be tested in randomized clinical trials that are designed and powered to test these outcomes.