Double-blind comparison of intracervical and intravaginal prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and induction of labor. Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel (Prepidil gel): randomized comparison. A randomized, double-blind trial of prostaglandin E2 gel for cervical ripening and meta-analysis. Induction of labor by prostaglandin E(2) in relation to the Bishop score. Intravaginal versus intracervical application of prostaglandin E2 in viscous gel for cervical priming and induction of labor at term in patients with an unfavorable cervical state. Local administration of prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and labor induction: the appropriate route and dose. Preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized prospective comparison of the efficacy and safety of intravaginal and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel. A randomized trial comparing vaginal and cervical prostaglandin gel for cervical ripening and labor induction. Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction. Cervical ripening before induction of labour in patients with an unfavourable cervix: a comparative randomized study of the Atad Ripener Device, prostaglandin E2 vaginal pessary, and prostaglandin E2 intracervical gel. A comparison of osmotic dilators, Lamicel and Dilapan, and a prostaglandin E1 analogue, gemeprost, for ripening the cervix before legal abortion. Influence of misoprostol or prostaglandin E(2) for induction of labor on the incidence of pathological CTG tracing: a randomized trial. Preoperative administration of prostaglandin to avoid dilatation-induced damage in first-trimester pregnancy terminations. [Cervical ripening and induction of labor in term pregnancy using prostaglandin E2. Controlled clinical study comparing the intracervical and intravaginal routes]. Prelabour rupture of the membranes at term and unfavourable cervix; a randomized placebo-controlled trial on early intervention with intravaginal prostaglandin E2 gel. Open randomized comparison of prostaglandin E2 given by intracervical gel or vagitory for preinduction cervical ripening and induction of labor. Cervical ripening with intravaginal prostaglandin E2 gel. A randomized trial of intracervical prostaglandin gel and intravenous oxytocin in prelabor rupture of membranes with unripe cervix at term. Preinduction cervical ripening: a comparison of intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel versus the Foley catheter. A randomized clinical trial of prostaglandin E2 intracervical gel and a slow release vaginal pessary for preinduction cervical ripening. A comparison of Lamicel and prostaglandin E2 vaginal gel for cervical ripening before induction of labor. Intracervical Foley catheter balloon vs. prostaglandin in preinduction cervical ripening. Preinduction cervical ripening techniques compared. Intracervical prostaglandin in postdate pregnancy. A randomized trial. Oral misoprostol vs. intravaginal prostaglandin E2 for preinduction cervical ripening. A randomized trial. A comparison of misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction. Induction of labour: a comparison of two methods with particular concern to patient acceptability. A prospective, randomized comparison of Foley catheter insertion versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening. Cervical ripening with intravaginal prostaglandin E2 gel. Preinduction cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 intracervical gel. Cervical ripening and labor induction with intracervical triacetin base prostaglandin E2 gel: a placebo-controlled study. A double-blind comparison of the safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 to induce labor. Cervical ripening with prostaglandin gel and hygroscopic dilators. Randomized, double-blind trial of prostaglandin E2 intravaginal gel versus low-dose oxytocin for cervical ripening before induction of labor. Double-blind comparison of intravaginal prostaglandin E2 gel and "chip" for preinduction cervical ripening. Second-trimester uterine evacuation: A comparison of intra-amniotic (15S)-15-methyl-prostaglandin F2alpha and intravaginal misoprostol. Antepartum cervical ripening: applying prostaglandin E2 gel in conjunction with scheduled nonstress tests in postdate pregnancies. Efficacy of outpatient induction with low-dose intravaginal prostaglandin E2: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. A comparison of four methods of ripening the unfavourable cervix. A clinical trial of induction of labor versus expectant management in postterm pregnancy. The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units. Second-trimester termination of pregnancy by extra-amniotic prostaglandin F2alpha or endocervical misoprostol. A comparative study. A comparison of oral and intracervical prostaglandin E2 for ripening of the unfavourable cervix prior to induction of labour. The efficiency of prostaglandin E2 vaginal suppositories versus intracervical prostaglandin gel for induction of labor in patients with unfavorable inducibility prospects. Cervical ripening and labor outcome with preinduction intracervical prostaglandin E2 (Prepidil) gel. The induction of labour with prostaglandin E2 tablets administered intravaginally.
Our purpose was to compare the safety and effectiveness of prostaglandin E2 delivered sequentially as an intracervical (0.5 mg) or intravaginal (2.5 mg) gel.
                Hospitalized patients with an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score < or = 4) at > or = 35 weeks and requiring induction of labor were assigned to receive two 2.5 ml doses of gel intracervically and intravaginally in a double-blind, placebo-controlled manner. Second and third doses were given at 6-hour intervals until there were either regular uterine contractions or a Bishop score change > 3 points.
                The 100 evaluable cases received prostaglandin E2 either intracervically (n = 52) or intravaginally (n = 48). Difficulty with exact gel instillation was present with intracervical gel only, where spillage occurred in 85% of cases. Compared with intracervical therapy prostaglandin E2 given intravaginally was more likely to significantly change the Bishop score (60.4% vs 40.4%, p = 0.04) and stimulate regular contractions (72.9% vs 48.1%, p = 0.01). Uterine hyperstimulation was present in one case in each group.
                Although each was safe, instillation of prostaglandin E2 gel was better at a higher intravaginal dose than a lower intracervical dose because of its greater ease of administration and higher likelihood of cervical change. Our purpose was to compare the safety and efficacy of intravaginal prostaglandin E1, misoprostol, with that of intracervical prostaglandin E2 (Prepidil gel) for labor induction.
                One hundred three patients with an indication for induction of labor were randomly assigned to induction with prostaglandin E1, 50 micrograms intravaginally, or with Prepidil gel, 0.5 mg intracervically, every 4 hours until active labor.
                Four patients were excluded, leaving 49 patients who received prostaglandin E1 and 50 who received prostaglandin E2. The time from start of induction to vaginal delivery was significantly shorter in the prostaglandin E1 group (11.4 vs 18.9 hours, p < 0.001), and fewer patients in the prostaglandin E1 group required oxytocin augmentation (23% vs 55%, p < 0.005). No significant differences were noted in mode of delivery or in adverse maternal, fetal, or neonatal effects.
                Intravaginal prostaglandin E1 is a more effective, lower-cost agent for induction of labor than is intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel and is comparable in safety. The ability of prostaglandin E2 to prepare the unripe cervix before an indicated labor induction is controversial. We therefore tested 100 pregnant women in a randomized, double-blind trial with intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel, 0.5 mg. The 53 women who received the placebo gel had an outcome similar to that of the 47 women who received the prostaglandin E2 gel. The mean change in cervical score, mean application-to-delivery interval, incidence of uncomplicated spontaneous labor, incidence of cesarean delivery for a failed induction, and the overall cesarean section rate were not significantly different for the two groups. A meta-analysis, incorporating 18 studies of 1811 patients who received a single application of at least 5 mg prostaglandin E2 gel intravaginally or 0.5 mg intracervically, demonstrated no significant decrease in the overall cesarean delivery rate (p = 0.85). We conclude that the use of single-dose intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for cervical ripening has little effect on labor induction. Moreover, the use of single-dose intracervical or intravaginal prostaglandin E2 gel does not alter the incidence of cesarean delivery, even when large numbers of patients are analyzed by combining the results of similar reports. To compare the effectiveness of prostaglandin E(2) intravaginal gel with the intracervical gel in patients with an unfavorable cervix.
                In a prospective multicenter trial 470 patients with unfavorable Bishop scores (3-4) were randomized to receive prostaglandin vaginal gel (2 mg) or intracervical gel (0.5 mg).
                In patients with unfavorable Bishop scores the intravaginal application route resulted in a better cervical ripening, a shorter induction to delivery interval and a higher cumulative rate of deliveries during 24 h (P=0.01).
                Intravaginal instillation of prostaglandin E(2) gel for induction of labor is effective in patients with an unfavorable Bishop score of 3-4. Sixty term pregnant women with unripe cervix were randomly given either 0.5 mg of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in 2 ml of gel intracervically or 4 mg of PGE2 in 3 ml of gel intravaginally to prime the cervix and/or to induce labor. In patients with a highly unfavorable cervix (cervical score less than or equal to 3), the intracervical application was significantly more effective than the intravaginal. In patients with a more favorable cervical state (cervical score 4 or 5), the two routes of application were equipotent. Gastrointestinal side effects were registered after intravaginal but not after intracervical application. Myometrial activity was significantly more increased after intravaginal than after intracervical gel application. All children were born in good condition with an Apgar score greater than 7 within 5 minutes. Although there are many comparative studies concerning the local administration of prostaglandin E2 gel for cervical ripening and labor induction, the safety, efficacy and the appropriate route and dose of the gel are still debated.
                One hundred and ten women with high-risk pregnancy and unripe cervix received prostaglandin E2 gel 1 mg intravaginally (n=35), 2 mg intravaginally (n=36) and 0.5 mg intracervically (n=39), maximally three times at 6-hour intervals for cervical ripening prior to labor induction. The safety, efficacy and optimal dose were assessed.
                The 2 mg intravaginal gel and the 0.5 mg intracervical gel were equally effective and more effective than the 1 mg intravaginal gel in labor characteristics such as ripening time and cesarean section rate, but not in labor time. However, the failure rate (labor could not be induced) was highest in the intracervical group (10.3%) compared to the intravaginal groups (2.9% and 2.8%), although the differences were not statistically significant. In the two intravaginal groups three and five patients received the third gel application and one patient in both groups could not be induced. In the intracervical group the ripening of the cervix failed in all patients, who received the third gel. The neonatal outcome was uneventful in all groups. There were two cases of uterine hypertonus associated with fetal bradycardia, one in the intracervical and one in the 2 mg intravaginal group. Thus careful fetal monitoring is necessary. Furthermore, the vaginal route has the advantage of an easier technique of administration and obviously lower risk for inadvertent extraamnial instillation.
                We recommend the use of multiple applications of 2 mg intravaginal prostaglandin E2 gel as a safe, effective and easy method for preinduction cervical ripening in high-risk pregnancies. More than three gel applications hardly increase the efficacy. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of vaginally administered 5 mg prostaglandin E2 gel prepared in our hospital pharmacy with a commercially available 0.5 mg intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel.
                Eighty-three patients undergoing labor induction were randomly assigned to one of two groups for cervical ripening. Either a preparation of 5 mg of prostaglandin E2 was placed vaginally or a commercially available 0.5 mg of prostaglandin E2 was placed intracervically. A maximum of three doses at 6-hour intervals was administered before oxytocin was begun.
                Among the 83 patients evaluated, 44 were given vaginal gel and 39 were given intracervical gel. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two treatment groups with respect to the incidence of spontaneous versus induced labor, need for oxytocin augmentation, gel-to-induction interval, Bishop score change, maximum oxytocin dose, maximum dilatation rate, length of labor, cesarean section rate, fetal Apgar scores, fetal umbilical vein pH, or fetal umbilical artery pH.
                The two prostaglandin E2 formulations appear equivalent in efficacy and safety. Constraints placed on intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel make the vaginal preparation a desirable choice. To compare the effectiveness of intravaginal and intracervical prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) gel for cervical ripening, defined as an increase of 3 or greater in the Bishop score, and for induction of labor.
                Women with Bishop score 4 or less were assigned randomly to receive either 2 mg PGE2 intravaginally (n = 125) or 0.5 mg intracervically (n = 122). If the Bishop score was 4 or less, another dose of PGE2 was given after 6 hours, and up to two additional doses were given 6 hours apart on the second day. An oxytocin infusion was begun when the Bishop score was 5 or greater in absence of spontaneous labor, or if labor had not begun on the third day.
                Baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar. Survival analysis showed that time from PGE2 application, to obtain an increase of 3 or greater in the Bishop score, to vaginal delivery was significantly shorter with intravaginal PGE2 (logrank test: P = .003 and < .001 after stratification for parity, respectively). Thirty-one percent of women in the intravaginal gel group required oxytocin for labor induction compared with 63% in the intracervical group (P < .001). There were no significant differences in relation to cesarean delivery rate, Apgar scores at 5 minutes, and arterial umbilical cord pH, although the power of our study was limited to detect differences in proportions of adverse outcomes.
                Vaginal PGE2 gel is more effective than intracervical gel for cervical ripening and labor induction. Our purpose was to compare the safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel (dinoprostone) for preinduction cervical ripening and induction of labor.
                Two hundred seventy-six patients with indications for induction of labor and unfavorable cervices were randomly assigned to receive either intravaginal misoprostol or intracervical dinoprostone. Twenty-five micrograms of misoprostol were placed in the posterior vaginal fornix every 3 hours, with a potential maximum of eight doses. Prostaglandin E2 in gel form, 0.5 mg, was placed in the endocervix every 6 hours, with a maximum of three doses. Further medication was withheld with the occurrence of spontaneous rupture of membranes, entry into active phase of labor, or a "prolonged contraction response."
                Among those evaluated, 138 received misoprostol and 137 received dinoprostone. The average interval from start of induction to vaginal delivery was shorter in the misoprostol group (1323.0 +/- 844.4 minutes) than in the dinoprostone group (1532.4 +/- 706.5 minutes) (p < 0.05). Need for oxytocin augmentation of labor occurred more commonly in the dinoprostone group (72.6%) than in the misoprostol group (45.7%) (p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in the routes of delivery. Twenty-eight of the misoprostol-treated patients (20.3%) and thirty-eight of the dinoprostone-treated patients (27.7%) required abdominal delivery. Complications such as uterine tachysystole and thick meconium passage occurred with similar frequency in the two treatment groups.
                Intravaginal administration of misoprostol appears to be as effective as intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction. Complications associated with prostaglandin administration were not statistically different between the two treatment groups. The cost of misoprostol ($0.36/100 micrograms) is much less than that of dinoprostone ($75/0.5 mg). One hundred and nineteen women with singleton pregnancy and cephalic presentation requiring induction of labour in the presence of an unfavourable cervix (Bishop score < or = 4) were studied. Five patients were excluded because of failure to comply with the protocol. Cervical ripening was carried out using 3 different methods; 36 used the Atad Ripener Device, 39 received 0.5 mg PGE2 intracervical gel and 39 received at least one 3 mg PGE2 intravaginal pessary. There were no differences in the demographic characteristics and the indications for induction. Five patients developed complications during the ripening period necessitating intervention; 3 required emergency Caesarean section and 2 delivered vaginally. Although statistically there were no differences among the 3 methods of cervical ripening, the power of the study is probably not large enough to show the differences. The PGE2 pessary appears to be more effective with 68% of patients either going into labour during cervical ripening or succeeding in the cervical ripening compared to around 50% in the Atad and PGE2 gel groups. The vaginal delivery rate was 87.2% in the pessary group compared to 72.2% in the Atad group and 84.6% in the gel group. The duration of labour was also shorter in the pessary group with 73.5% delivered within 24 hours compared to 57.7% in the Atad group and 57.6% in the gel group. Although the results of the Atad device seem to be inferior, the risk of uterine hyperstimulation from the use of the device is probably lower than that of the PGE2 and may therefore be preferable in women with fetuses at high risk of fetal hypoxia. 66 primigravid women were allocated at random to receive either intravaginal application of the prostaglandin El analogue, gemeprost, or intracervical insertion of 1 of 2 osmotic dilators, Lamicel or Dilapan, 3 hours before legal abortion at 7-14 weeks gestation. Insertion of the dilators was not possible in 5 patients. All 3 methods were otherwise equally effective in achieving cervical dilatation and there was no difference in the need for or resistance to further dilatation between the 3 groups. Gemeprost was the most easily administered, and would be the most appropriate for routine preoperative use. To compare the efficacy and safety of misoprostol (prostaglandin E(1) (PGE(1))) with dinoprostone (prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2))) for third trimester cervical ripening and labor induction.
                Patients requiring induction of labor were randomly assigned to receive either 50 microg of intravaginal misoprostol every 4 h or 0.5 mg of intracervical dinoprostone gel every 6 h. Eligibility criteria included gestation = 36 weeks. Primary outcome was the time interval from induction to delivery; secondary outcomes were mode of delivery, perinatal outcome, and interpretation of cardiotocogram (CTG) records.
                Two hundred women were randomly enrolled to receive either misoprostol (n = 100) or dinoprostone (n = 100). Time induction-to-delivery at 12, 24 and 48 h and the need for oxytocin were reduced with misoprostol (P < 0.05). Pathological CTG tracing according to FIGO and Melchior scores were more frequent in the misoprostol-treated group (P < 0.001).
                Misoprostol shortened the induction-to-delivery interval, but is associated with a higher incidence of abnormal CTG than prostaglandin E(2). A prospective, randomized, controlled study was carried out to investigate the dilating and softening effect on the cervix of prostaglandin F2-alpha gel administered intracervically and of prostaglandin E2 tablets administered orally. A total of 581 patients were included in the study: 149 received 2.5 mg prostaglandin F2-alpha in gel form intracervically, 150 received 1 mg prostaglandin E2 in tablet form orally, 138 were given placebo gel and 144 no medication at all. In the group given prostaglandin F2-alpha gel intracervically, success was achieved in 85.8% of patients and partial success in 8.8%. In the group given prostaglandin E2 tablets orally, the results were successful in 29.4% and partially successful in 40.6%. The incidence of side effects in the group given prostaglandin F2-alpha gel was rather high - 53%. The results show that prostaglandin can bring about a certain softening of the cervix, but side effects cannot be ruled out. Nevertheless, priming of the cervix is to be recommended in young primigravidas. 106 term pregnant patients with unfavorable local condition (B.S. less than or equal to 5) and indication to induction of labour because of mother or fetus problems, were randomized for a controlled clinical trial. 52 patients (group A) received 0.5 mg. of PGE2 in 2 ml of tylose gel intracervically. 48 patients (group B) received 3.0 mg. of PGE2 in 5 ml of tylose gel intravaginally. 6 patients were excluded because of violation of protocol. The aim of our study was to evaluate the best method of cervical ripening before a classical induction with amniotomy and oxytocin. Our results show that intracervical PGE2 gel seems to have a better effect on the ripening of the cervix than the intravaginal one if we only consider the proposition of softening success (group A 14/52; group B 6/48). If the evaluation of the effect on the cervical ripening is made according to modification of Bishop's score after gel application, the situation seems inverted because the medians values of the modifications have obtained respectively for group A and B a variation of 2.0 and 3.0 points. Moreover the intravaginal way showed a significantly higher incidence of collateral effects. Fifty nine women with prelabour rupture of membranes, unfavourable cervix and no evidence of infection or fetal distress were randomized formally to receive prostaglandin E2 (3mg) gel or sterile K-Y Jelly intravaginally. Conservative expectant management was followed for the next 24 hours. The subsequent management of the labour followed departmental protocol. The women who received prostaglandin went into labour sooner and were delivered earlier but the duration of labour was not significantly different. There were no significant differences in other clinical outcomes. There was 1 case of uterine rupture in the prostaglandin group. We conclude that early intervention with prostaglandin E2 gel intravaginally confers no advantage compared with conservative management except for earlier confinement in this group of patients. Intracervical application of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in a viscous gel was compared with conventional wax-based PGE2 vagitories (pessaries) for ripening of the cervix prior to induction of labor. A total of 226 healthy pregnant women at term were randomly allocated to receive intracervical gel with an effective dose of 0.5 mg (n = 116) or vagitories containing 2.5 mg PGE2 (n = 110). All women had a modified cervical score of less than or equal to 4. The numbers of cases contributed by each of the three centers were similar. There was no significant difference in parity, gestational length, maternal characteristics, indications for induction or preinduction cervical scores between the treatment groups. The rate of spontaneous birth was 71% in the gel group, compared with 69% in the vagitory group. Successful treatment was defined as active labor within 24 h or a change in cervical dilatation allowing artificial rupture of the membranes with subsequent progressive labor. The success rate was not significantly different in the gel group (82%) compared with the vagitory group (80%). There were no differences in the frequency of fetal distress, outcome of labor, assisted delivery rates or maternal side effects. The cervical scores were not different at 12 and 24 h after application. Intracervical gel and intravaginal application of PGE2 were similar in their efficacy and safety for ripening of the cervix and inducing labor at term. Fifty-four patients were randomized in a double blind fashion into either a placebo group or a group treated with a 3 mg dose of an intravaginal prostaglandin E2 gel. The group receiving the prostaglandin E2 gel had a mean change in cervical score of 2.7 while the patients in the placebo group had no significant change. Even though a significantly higher number of patients in the prostaglandin group went into spontaneous labor, the incidence of cesarean section was not different between the two groups. Upon comparing the conflicting reports of various studies on the subject, it is concluded that the method of product preparation, particularly the source of prostaglandin E2 utilized and the choice of drug vehicle, may be important variables in determining treatment success, as measured in terms of decreased cesarean section rate. In order to compare the efficacy of immediate intravenous oxytocin administration and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel application in premature rupture of membranes with unfavorable cervices at term, 45 term pregnant patients with premature rupture of membranes were randomized into two groups. Twenty women received immediate intravenous oxytocin after cleansing enema while the rest were treated with intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel. Means of maternal age, gestational age, Bishop score at admission and the rates of nulliparity did not show any significant differences between the two groups (p > 0.05). The mean rupture to delivery time was 12.6 +/- 4.4 hours in the oxytocin group and 16.5 +/- 4.5 hours in the prostaglandin group (p < 0.01). Mean birth weights and Apgar scores were insignificant. Cesarean section rates were 24% in the oxytocin group and 5% in the other (p < 0.05). No infectious morbidity was seen in any case. In conclusion, although delivery is delayed with the intracervical prostaglandin approach, cesarean section rate is lowered without an increase in infectious morbidity. Both prostaglandin E2 gel and an intracervical balloon catheter have been shown to be effective for cervical ripening. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel with an intracervical Foley catheter for preinduction cervical ripening.
                A randomized, prospective study was conducted in the Maternity Care Center at the Foothills Hospital at Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Patients with a Bishop score < or = 4 and meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria were included. Thirty patients were randomized to receive prostaglandin E2 gel and 36 to receive an intracervical Foley catheter on the evening before induction. Induction then proceeded the following morning by the preferred method of the attending physician.
                The groups were comparable with respect to maternal age, parity, gestational age, reason for induction, and initial Bishop scores. Both groups had a significant change in Bishop score (4.1 +/- 0.4 and 4.8 +/- 0.5, respectively, p < 0.001); however, there was no significant difference between the groups. There was no significant difference in side effect profile, intrapartum complications, or delivery mode. Six cesarean sections (17.6%) were performed in the Foley group and seven (25%) in the prostaglandin E2 gel group (not significant). The induction-to-delivery interval was 16.0 +/- 1.7 hours in the Foley group and 21.5 +/- 3.2 hours in the prostaglandin E2 gel group (p = 0.014). Apgar scores, cord gases, and neonatal birth weight showed no difference between the groups.
                This study has shown that for preinduction cervical ripening there is no difference in efficacy between intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel or an intracervical Foley catheter. Our purpose was to compare the efficacy of 2 different prostaglandin E2 delivery methods for preinduction cervical ripening.
                Ninety patients admitted for labor induction with a Bishop score <8 were randomized to either 0.5 mg prostaglandin E2 intracervical gel (Prepidil) every 6 hours for 2 doses or 10 mg prostaglandin E2 slow release vaginal pessary (Cervidil). Oxytocin induction was begun after 12 hours. It was estimated that enrollment of 90 women would be required to identify a 30% difference in the percent delivered in <24 hours (1 - beta = .80, alpha = .05). Data were analyzed with use of chi2 analysis or the Student t test.
                There were 45 subjects in each treatment arm. The percent delivered by 24 hours was 53% with intracervical gel and 63% with vaginal pessary (P = .28). Mean change in Bishop score was 1.8 +/- 1.9 for the intracervical gel versus 3.2 +/- 3.1 for the vaginal pessary (P = .01). No difference was demonstrated in mean time to delivery, 28.3 versus 24.0 hours (P = .19) or percent requiring cesarean section.
                Preinduction cervical ripening with a slow release prostaglandin E2 vaginal pessary resulted in greater change in Bishop score than with intracervical prostaglandin E2. There was a trend toward shorter time to delivery with the pessary. There was no statistically significant difference in percent delivered in <24 hours. The efficiency and safety of Lamicel, a new synthetic cervical ripening agent, were compared with those of intravaginal prostaglandin E2 gel in a group of 80 primigravid women about to undergo induction of labor. Lamicel caused less uterine activity and fetal distress than prostaglandin gel, although the induction-delivery intervals were similar in both groups. More normal deliveries occurred in the Lamicel group than in the prostaglandin group. It is suggested that Lamicel is a useful, efficient preinduction ripening agent that is safer than intravaginal prostaglandin gel. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of the intracervical Foley balloon catheter and 3 mg prostaglandin E(2) tablet(s) in preinduction cervical ripening.
                Ninety women referred to the maternity clinic for induction of labor with a Bishop score of less than or equal to 5 were randomized to receive an intracervical Foley catheter or prostaglandin E(2) tablets. The primary measured outcome was ripening of the cervix as measured with the Bishop score.
                There were no differences in mean Bishop scores between the prostaglandin and the Foley catheter groups. Bishop scores (mean+/-S.D.) after ripening were 6.6+/-0.80 and 6.7+/-0.86 for the Foley catheter and prostaglandin groups, respectively (P=0.54). The Foley catheter group showed a statistically shorter time to ripening compared with the prostaglandin group (3.4+/-2.1 and 6.5+/-3.2 h, respectively (P=0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in induction time (4.8+/-1.8 h and 5.3+/-2.4 h, respectively (P=0.36).
                There are no differences in preinduction cervical ripening efficacy between prostaglandin E(2) and the Foley catheter, but the Foley catheter has the advantage of ripening an unfavorable cervix in a shorter time. To assess the clinical efficacy of pharmacologic, mechanical and combination techniques of cervical ripening.
                From March 1997 to August 1998, all cervical-ripening patients at Lehigh Valley Hospital were randomly assigned to three groups: intravaginal misoprostol, intracervical Foley catheter, or combination prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) gel and Foley catheter. Inclusion criteria included Bishop score < or = 5 and no contraindication to labor. The remaining delivery process was actively managed according to established guidelines. Multiple variables in perinatal outcome were analyzed, with the cesarean section rate and time from ripening to delivery as the main outcome variables.
                Of the 205 patients, 65 were randomized to the misoprostol group, 71 to the Foley group and 69 to the catheter-and-gel group. There were no differences between groups in delivery indications, maternal demographics, ultrasound findings, labor interventions, intrapartum times, mode of delivery, postpartum complications or neonatal outcomes. The misoprostol group demonstrated a higher rate of uterine tachysystole and required oxytocin less when compared to the two catheter groups.
                The higher rate of uterine tachysystole with misoprostol did not increase the cesarean section rate. The higher rate of oxytocin required by the two catheter groups did not increase the delivery time intervals. There appears to be no benefit to adding intracervical or intravaginal PGE2 gel to the intracervical Foley balloon. The misoprostol and catheter ripening techniques have similar safety and efficacy. A study was designed to see if incorporating intracervical administration of prostaglandin could affect the outcome of postdate pregnancies. All patients with verified dates, at least 41 6/7 weeks pregnant and enrolled in an antepartum testing schedule were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive either 0.5 mg of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) suspended in methylcellulose or a placebo of the gel alone. The gel was inserted directly into the cervical canal after the patient had a reactive/negative contraction stress test. The patient was then observed on an external fetal monitor for an hour before going home. A total of 23 patients received PGE2, and 20 received the placebo. Results were analyzed for the following: change in the Bishop score, lag time from dosage to delivery, spontaneous versus induced labor, cesarean section rate, length of labor and neonatal outcome. There were no significant differences between the groups except in the incidence of patients going into labor within 72 hours. The results indicate that, in general, 0.5 mg of intracervical PGE administered at greater than or equal to 41 6/7 weeks without subsequent oxytocin induction of labor did not appear to significantly alter the obstetric outcome. To compare orally administered misoprostol with intravaginal prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and labor induction.
                Patients presenting with medical or obstetric indications for labor induction whose Bishop's score was < or = 6 were randomly allocated to receive either 50 micrograms of oral misoprostol or 4 mg of intravaginal prostaglandin E2. If adequate cervical ripening (Bishop score of 9 or cervical dilatation of 3) or active labor did not ensue, repeat doses of each medication were administered every four hours. A maximum of six doses of either oral misoprostol or intravaginal prostaglandin E2 was permitted. Intravenous oxytocin was subsequently administered according to a standardized infusion protocol.
                Sixty patients were enrolled, with 29 randomized to the oral misoprostol arm and 31 to the prostaglandin E2 group. The data on 58 patients were eligible for analysis. Delivery occurred within 48 hours in 96.4% (27/28) of those administered oral misoprostol as compared to 76.7% (23/30) of those who received intravaginal prostaglandin E2 (P = .03). The mean time intervals from the start of induction to delivery were similar between the two groups (1,496 +/- 120 vs. 1,723 +/- 230 minutes, P = .40). No statistically significant differences existed between the two groups with respect to intrapartum complications, tachysystole, uterine hyperstimulation or adverse neonatal outcomes.
                Oral administration of misoprostol is an effective alternative to intravaginal prostaglandin E2 for preinduction cervical ripening. Our purpose was to compare the safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 (dinoprostone) gel for preinduction cervical ripening and induction of labor.
                One hundred thirty-five patients with indications for induction of labor and unfavorable cervices were randomly assigned to receive either intravaginal misoprostol or intracervical dinoprostone. Fifty microgram tablets of misoprostol were placed in the posterior vaginal fornix every 3 hours for a maximum of six doses. Prostaglandin E2 in gel form, 0.5 mg, was placed into the endocervix every 6 hours for a maximum of three doses. Medication was not given after either spontaneous rupture of membranes or beginning of active labor.
                Among 135 patients enrolled, 68 received misoprostol and 67 received dinoprostone. The average interval from start of induction to vaginal delivery was shorter in the misoprostol group (903.3 +/- 482.1 minutes) than in the dinoprostone group (1410.9 +/- 869.1 minutes) (p < 0.001). Oxytocin augmentation of labor occurred more often in the dinoprostone group (65.7%) than in the misoprostol group (33.8%) (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between routes of delivery. Ten of the misoprostol-treated patients (14.7%) and 13 of the dinoprostone-treated patients (19.4%) had cesarean deliveries. There was a higher prevalence of tachysystole (six or more uterine contractions in a 10-minute window for two consecutive 10-minute periods) in the misoprostol group (36.7%) than in the dinoprostone group (11.9%) (p < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in frequency of uterine hyperstimulation or hypertonus. There was a higher prevalence of meconium passage in the misoprostol group (27.9%) than in the dinoprostone group (10.5%) (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in frequency of abnormal fetal heart rate tracings, 1- or 5-minute Apgar scores < 7, neonatal resuscitations, or admissions to the neonatal intensive care unit between the two groups.
                Vaginally administered misoprostol is an effective agent for cervical ripening and induction of labor; however when given at this dosage, it is associated with a higher prevalence of tachysystole and meconium passage than is dinoprostone. Further studies to compare the safety of misoprostol to that of dinoprostone and to delineate an optimal dosing regimen for misoprostol are needed. Induction of labour is a common obstetric intervention. When the cervix is unfavourable ripening agents are used, commonly prostaglandin E2. There are several methods of administration of prostaglandin E2 and little comparative work has been performed as to their acceptability by patients. Patients undergoing induction of labour by prostaglandin E2 were randomised to receive either intravaginal gel or an intravaginal slow-release pessary. Patient satisfaction with the method received was then assessed. Sixty-nine patients were randomised, 34 to receive gel and 35 to receive a pessary. Median scores for satisfaction of the induction process were the same for both methods; however, satisfaction with the labour was increased with those who had been randomised to the pessary group (median pessary=5, gel=4). There may be a marginal improvement in patient satisfaction when a slow-release intravaginal prostaglandin E2 pessary is used for the induction of labour. The objective of this study was to compare intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel with insertion of a Foley bulb for efficacy in preinduction cervical ripening.
                Women who came to the hospital for induction of labor with a Bishop score </=5 were randomly assigned to treatment with either prostaglandin E2 gel or a Foley bulb. Prostaglandin E2 gel was used according to the manufacturer's recommendation. The Foley group had a number 14 Foley catheter inserted, inflated, and placed on traction. Immediately after Foley bulb extrusion or 6 hours after prostaglandin E2 gel course completion, a dilute oxytocin solution was started if the patient was not in labor.
                Seventy-seven women were entered into the Foley group and 72 were entered into the prostaglandin E2 gel group. Both the Bishop score after preinduction ripening (6.5 vs 5.1, P <.001) and the change in Bishop score (3.5 vs 2.7, P =.015) were significantly higher in the Foley group. There were no differences between the groups in mode of delivery, infant weight, rate of hyperstimulation, shoulder dystocia, patient discomfort, epidural use, oxytocin use, or nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns. The preinduction time (9.9 vs 17.2 hours, P <.001) and the total induction time (22.4 vs 30.4 hours, P <.001) were significantly shorter in the Foley group. Patient charges were 31% lower in the Foley group (P <.001).
                Use of the Foley catheter resulted in a higher postinduction Bishop score, a greater change in Bishop score, a shorter induction time, and lower patient charges than did intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel. Ripening of the cervix by intravaginal application of a prostaglandin-containing gel is evaluated. Thirty patients with an unfavorable cervix needing labor induction were studied in a double-blind, prospective fashion. The prostaglandin gel proved superior to placebo in ripening the cervix (P less than .05), reducing induction failures (P less than .025), diminishing the oxytocin dosage necessary for induction (P less than .05), and lowering the rate of cesarean section (.05 less than P less than .1). One hundred fifty additional patients with varying Bishop scores and differing clinical situations were also studied. There were 35 cesarean sections (23.3%), nine failed inductions (6%), a spontaneous labor rate of 46%, and an average Bishop score change of 2.5. Twenty patients with premature rupture of the membranes and an unfavorable cervix received a modified gel containing 2.5 mg of prostaglandin E2. Average Bishop score change was 2.9, and there was a 55% incidence of spontaneous labor. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of two doses of intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel in patients with unfavorable Bishop scores. Mean change in Bishop score, success of softening, time to labor, and time to delivery were all significantly different in the two treatment groups as compared with the placebo group. Twenty-three of 30 treated patients had uterine contractions lasting greater than four hours and eight patients delivered during the observation period. Moreover, one case of uterine hyperactivity and five cases of severe fetal heart rate decelerations were noted in the treatment groups. Although efficacious for cervical ripening, caution is warranted when using this technique in patients at risk for placental insufficiency. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of a single-dose, shelf-stable preparation of prostaglandin E2 gel (PGE2) when used intracervically in patients with low Bishop scores. Two different preparations (0.5 and 0.25 mg) of PGE2 were used and a total of 45 patients were studied. Both preparations of PGE2 demonstrated a statistically significant increase in the spontaneous labor rate as compared with the placebo gel. Bishop scores were altered in all patients not proceeding to labor spontaneously, but the changes were most significant in the low- and high-dose groups. No significant deleterious affects were noted. The efficacy and safety of this new, sterile, and stable preparation makes it suitable for clinical use. Our purpose was to compare the safety and efficacy of intravaginally administered misoprostol versus prostaglandin E2 for labor induction in a double-blind, randomized trial.
                One hundred three patients with indications for labor induction (including prelabor rupture of membranes) were randomized and received either misoprostol 50 micrograms or prostaglandin E2 (dinoprostone) 3 mg intravaginally. The dose was repeated 6, 24, and 30 hours after the first dose until active labor was achieved. For proper blinding, the drugs were prepared as identical-looking vaginal tablets.
                With use of a random number-generated table 52 patients were allocated to the misoprostol group and 51 to the prostaglandin E2 group. After exclusion of 3 patients, 50 in each group were evaluated. Delivery within 24 hours after administration occurred more often in the misoprostol group (70% vs 46% in the prostaglandin E2 group, p = 0.009), and fewer patients in this group needed more than two doses (12% vs 30%, p = 0.027). No difference in cesarean section rate (12% vs 14%, p = 0.67), fetal heart rate anomalies (33% vs 34%, p = 0.89), tachysystole (8% vs 14%, p = 0.37), hyperstimulation syndrome (0% vs 2%, not significant), meconium passage (28% vs 18%, p = 0.22), and fetal outcome (Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes, arterial and venous umbilical cord blood pH, transfer to neonatal intensive care unit) was noted between the two groups.
                Intravaginal misoprostol is a safe drug for labor induction with superior effectiveness compared with intravaginal prostaglandin E2. To study the effectiveness and morbidity of adding hygroscopic cervical dilators to prostaglandin gel for cervical ripening and labor induction.
                Patients of at least 34 weeks' gestation with a medical indication for induction of labor and with a modified Bishop score of 5 or less were randomized to receive either prostaglandin gel or prostaglandin gel with hygroscopic cervical dilators. Primary outcomes were time to delivery, change in cervical score, and infection. Secondary outcomes included cesarean delivery rate and deliveries before 24 hours of induction. Continuous variables were analyzed by Wilcoxon sum rank test and categorical data by chi-square or Fisher exact test, with P < 0.05 being significant.
                Seventeen patients were randomized to intracervical prostaglandin alone and 23 patients received intracervical prostaglandin plus hygroscopic dilators. No demographic differences were noted between the groups. After six hours of ripening, the combined group achieved a greater change in Bishop score (3.6 vs. 2.1, P = 0.007) and tended to have a shorter induction time (21.7 vs. 26.4 hours, P = 0.085). The combined therapy group had a higher infection rate than the prostaglandin-only group (59% vs. 12%, P = 0.003).
                Combining cervical dilators with prostaglandin gel provides more effective cervical ripening and a more rapid induction to delivery interval than prostaglandin alone but with a significant and prohibitive rate of infection. Our purpose was to compare two methods of preinduction cervical ripening in a randomized, double-blind clinical trial.
                Two intravaginal, 4 mg prostaglandin E2 gel applications administered 4 hours apart were compared with 10 hours of low-dose oxytocin (2 mU/min) in 200 patients undergoing preinduction cervical ripening.
                There were no differences in parity, initial Bishop scores, estimated gestational ages, indications for induction, or birth weights. Prostaglandin E2 gel was significantly better (p < 0.0001) at achieving a change in the Bishop score of 3 or more. The number of successful inductions was significantly greater (p < 0.0003) and the mean time to active labor was significantly shorter (p < 0.0002) in the prostaglandin E2 group than in the oxytocin group. More multiple-day inductions (p < 0.01) occurred in the oxytocin group, and fewer discharged patients who did not deliver infants (p < 0.03) were seen in the prostaglandin E2 gel group. There were no differences between patient groups in the cesarean section rate, meconium staining, hyperstimulation, and Apgar scores.
                Two 4 mg doses of prostaglandin E2 intravaginal gel applied 4 hours apart are superior to low-dose oxytocin in producing cervical ripening and preparing for successful induction. The intravaginal application of prostaglandin E2 for preinduction cervical ripening has proved to be advantageous in the management of patients with an unfavorable cervix. The purpose of this double-blind randomized investigation was to compare the efficacy and safety of two methods of prostaglandin E2 delivery. Patients who were to have preinduction cervical ripening because of an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score less than or equal to 4) were randomly assigned to be given a single dose of prostaglandin E2 as either 2.5 mg of gel or a 3.0 mg "chip" intravaginally in a placebo-controlled manner. Sixty-nine patients received the active prostaglandin E2, 34 in the gel group and 35 in the "chip" group. The groups were similar in maternal age, race, parity, gestational age, and initial Bishop score. Both forms of prostaglandin E2 were easy to administer and helpful in priming an unfavorable cervix. The need for, duration of, and maximum dose of oxytocin were similar in both groups. Cesarean delivery because of failed induction occurred in 5 of 35 (14.3%) patients receiving a "chip" and 4 of 34 (11.8%) receiving the gel. However, patients receiving a "chip" experienced a 20% (7/35) incidence of hyperstimulation, compared with 2.9% (1/36) in those receiving the gel (p less than 0.05). The only case requiring immediate cesarean delivery because of intractable uterine hyperstimulation received a "chip." We conclude that both methods were effective for cervical ripening, but the lower incidence of uterine hyperstimulation seen with the gel would suggest that it is preferable to the "chip." Our purpose was to compare the efficacy, safety, and adverse effects of intra-amniotically administered (15S)-15-methyl-prostaglandin F(2alpha) and intravaginally administered misoprostol for second-trimester uterine evacuation.
                Fifty-one patients were randomly assigned to receive either a single 2.5-mg intra-amniotic injection of (15S)-15-methyl-prostaglandin F(2)(alpha) (n = 26) or two 200-microg intravaginal doses of misoprostol (n = 25) at 12-hour intervals. The primary outcome measured was evacuation of the uterus within 24 hours.
                The mean time from initiation of termination to uterine evacuation was less in the prostaglandin group than in the misoprostol group (17.5 +/- 8.6 hours vs 22.3 +/- 12.5 hours), but this was not statistically significant (P >.05). The rate of successful fetal evacuation at 24 hours was significantly higher in the prostaglandin group than in the misoprostol group (88% vs 60%, P =.02). The complete-abortion rate and the incidence of adverse effects were similar in both groups.
                The use of an intra-amniotic injection of (15S)-15-methyl-prostaglandin F(2alpha) for midtrimester pregnancy termination is safe and is associated with a greater number of successful uterine evacuations within 24 hours, without an increase in adverse effects, than intravaginal administration of misoprostol. Our purpose was to evaluate whether inserting prostaglandin E2 gel at the time of scheduled nonstress tests in patients with postdate pregnancies can decrease rates of intervention.
                A multicenter pilot study enrolled women with postdate pregnancies with Bishop score < or = 6 who were undergoing antepartum fetal heart rate testing. Patients were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive either a prostaglandin E2 intracervical gel (Prepidil) or a placebo gel after each of their scheduled nonstress tests.
                There were no significant differences in the number of antepartum tests, labor inductions, or cesarean sections, the maximum oxytocin dosage, or the interval from admission to delivery in the prostaglandin E2 gel and placebo gel groups (n = 90). In the subset of patients with a Bishop score between 3 and 6 (63 patients), there were fewer inductions in the prostaglandin E2 group (30% vs 55%, P < .05).
                Application of prostaglandin E2 gel at the time of scheduled antepartum testing in patients with postdate pregnancies with unfavorable cervices decreased the induction rate only among patients with intermediate Bishop scores. Our purpose was to determine whether a protocol for outpatient induction is safe and effective for initiating labor.
                A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed with 100 low-risk patients having well-dated pregnancies. Women with a Bishop score < or = 6 at 38 to 40 weeks' gestation were administered either 2 mg of intravaginal prostaglandin E2 gel or placebo for 5 consecutive days as outpatients while undergoing fetal monitoring.
                The median interval from randomization to delivery was 4 days in the prostaglandin E2 group (range 0 to 28 days) versus 10 days in the placebo group (range 0 to 26 days, p = 0.002). Twenty-seven of 50 patients (54%) in the prostaglandin E2 group were admitted for labor during the dosing interval compared with 10 placebo-treated patients (20%, p = 0.001). The mean gestational age at delivery was significantly reduced in the treatment group (39.9 +/- 1.0 weeks vs 40.5 +/- 0.99 weeks, p = 0.003) as was the incidence of postdates pregnancy (40% vs 66%, p = 0.016). Hyperstimulation was observed in one prostaglandin E2-treated patient, but no intervention was required.
                Outpatient low-dose prostaglandin E2 gel administration is effective for initiating labor in patients with an unfavorable cervix and appears safe if performed with adequate monitoring. A comparison was made between four methods of ripening the unfavourable cervix (extra-amniotic prostaglandin E2 gel, oral prostaglandin E2, intravaginal prostaglandin E2 and intravenous oxytocin) in a clinical trial involving 60 primigravidae. In all groups there was an improvement in cervical status. This was significantly greater in those patients who received extra-amniotic prostaglandin gel and they also showed significant decreases in the mean induction-delivery interval and in the incidence of Caesarean section. Management of the uncomplicated pregnancy prolonged beyond the estimated date of confinement is controversial, particularly when the cervix is unfavorable for induction. The benefit of reducing potential fetal risk with induction of labor must be balanced against the morbidity associated with this procedure. The objective of this study was to compare two strategies for managing postterm pregnancy (i.e., immediate induction and expectant management).
                Four hundred forty patients with uncomplicated pregnancies at 41 weeks' gestation were randomized to either immediate induction of labor (n = 265) or expectant management (n = 175). Patients with expectant management underwent nonstress testing and amniotic fluid volume assessment twice per week. Patients in the induction group underwent induction within 24 hours of randomization. To evaluate the efficacy of intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel, patients in the induction group were randomized in a 2:1 scheme to receive either 0.5 mg prostaglandin E2 gel or placebo gel intracervically 12 hours before induction of labor with oxytocin.
                The incidence of adverse perinatal outcome (neonatal seizures, intracranial hemorrhage, the need for mechanical ventilation, or nerve injury) was 1.5% in the induction group and 1% in the expectant management group (p > 0.05). There were no fetal deaths in either group. There were no differences in mean birth weight or the frequency of macrosomia (birth weight > or = 4000 gm) between the two groups (p > 0.05). Regardless of parity, prostaglandin E2 intracervical gel was not more effective than placebo in ripening the cervix. The cesarean delivery rate was not significantly different in the expectant (18%), prostaglandin E2 gel (23%), or placebo gel (18%) groups.
                Adverse perinatal outcome in otherwise uncomplicated pregnancies of > or = 41 weeks is very low with either of the management schemes described. Thus from the perspective of perinatal morbidity or mortality either management scheme is acceptable. To compare the efficacy and side effects of extra-amniotic prostaglandin F2alpha with intracervical misoprostol for midtrimester termination of pregnancy
                Forty women were randomized to receive either intracervical misoprostol or extra-amniotic prostaglandin F2alpha for termination of pregnancy for congenital abnormalities or intrauterine fetal death. Induction-abortion interval and the incidence of side effects were analyzed for both groups.
                All women in the PGF2alpha group; aborted within 28 hours, 16 (80%) of which aborted within 20 hours. Medical termination of pregnancy was complete in 13 cases (65%). In the misoprostol group; all women aborted within 20 hours, 18 (90%) of which aborted within 13 hours. Medical termination of pregnancy was complete in 17 cases (85%). The induction to abortion intervals for the extra-amniotic PGF2alpha and intracervical misoprostol were 16+/-5.9 hours, and 10.3+/-4 hours (mean+/-s.d.) respectively. This was statistically significant (p=0.001). The incidence of prostaglandin-associated pyrexia, vomiting and diarrhea were significantly increased in the PGF2alpha group (p<0.05). Abdominal pain was similar in both groups. There was no post-abortive hemorrhage or infection.
                Misoprostol is an effective, easy to use, safe and cheap drug for termination of second trimester pregnancy. Intracervical administration of misoprostol appears to be effective and well-tolerated with less side effects and no complications. Larger, randomized comparative studies should be carried out to assess its potential advantages. nan Two different applications of prostaglandin E2 for induction of labor were randomly used in 113 women with an unripe cervix; 57 women were given prostaglandin suppositories each containing 2.5 mg PGE2 in a basis of Witepsol S55 (Dynamit Nobel), another 56 women were treated with intracervical gel containing 1 mg PGE2 in 5 g hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose. The treatment was repeated after 4 h if the cervix was still unripe, and the procedure was repeated the following day if the cervix was still unfavorable. Cesarean sections was performed within 48 h after the start of induction and before the second stage of labor in 8 women in the suppository group and 7 women in the intracervical gel group. Of the remaining 98 women, 73% (34/48 women) in the suppository group and 36% (18/50 women) in the cervical gel group had delivered within 24 h (p less than 0.01). After 48 h, 88% (42/48 women) in the suppository group and 74% of the women (37/50 women) in the cervical gel group had delivered (p greater than 0.05). The induction-delivery interval in the suppository group was half that found in the cervical gel group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the use of instrumental vaginal deliveries and cesarean sections nor was there any difference with regard to fetal distress. The post-delivery condition of the newborn was similar in the two groups. No side-effects were reported in either of the two groups. Delivery with an unfavorable cervix using oxytocin is frequently unsuccessful. Used widely in Europe and increasingly in this country, locally applied prostaglandin E2 appears to improve labor induction. The present study prospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of a prostaglandin gel (0.5 mg) placed intracervically. The use of the gel, when compared to a control group who received no pretreatment prior to labor induction, resulted in improved Bishop scores (7.5 +/- 1.0 vs. 1.8 +/- 0.3, P less than 0.0001), reduced induction to delivery intervals (10.1 +/- 2.1 vs. 20.6 +/- 2.0 hours), reduced oxytocin infusion duration (10.0 +/- 2.1 vs. 20.0 +/- 2.3 hours. P less than 0.0001) resulting in a lower cesarean delivery rate, 26 vs. 47 per cent (P greater than 0.05). Thirty-two per cent of patients receiving the prostaglandin gel labored and delivered within 12 hours and required no oxytocin. In addition, the use of prostaglandin E2 gel appeared safe in that no patient experienced an untoward reaction. Two cases of uterine hyperstimulation occurred that required uterine tocolysis but were not associated with fetal distress. The use of prostaglandin gel appears to be a safe and effective method to improve cervical inducibility in patients undergoing induction for a variety of maternal and fetal indications. Prostaglandin E2 tablets administered vaginally succesfully induced labour in 64% of patients. There were no maternal or fetal complications. Comparison of the Bishop score failed to identify any factors which significantly influenced the success rate.
Intracervical prostaglandins are effective compared to placebo, but appear inferior when compared to intravaginal prostaglandins.