Tandem high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous transplantation in patients with locally advanced or metastatic sarcoma. High-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in adult patients with high-risk or advanced Ewing and soft tissue sarcoma. Up-front tandem high-dose chemotherapy compared with standard chemotherapy with doxorubicin and paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer: results of a randomized trial.
Patients with locally advanced or metastatic/recurrent soft tissue and Ewing's sarcoma (EWS) have few treatment options. The purpose of our phase II study was to assess the feasibility, safety and efficacy of tandem high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in such patients.
                Thirteen patients were enrolled onto this study. The first cycle of HDCT consisted of doxorubicin (150 mg/m(2)) and ifosfamide (14 g/m(2)) mixed with mesna (14 g/m(2)), while the second cycle consisted of melphalan (150 mg/m(2)) and cisplatin (200 mg/m(2)).
                Eleven out of 13 patients were able to complete both cycles of HDCT. No treatment-related mortality occurred and grade 3 or 4 toxicity was clinically tolerable. The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for all patients was 23% (confidence interval, CI: 0-46%) and 31% (CI: 14-70%), respectively. Out of the four patients still alive, two had EWS and measurable disease at the time of ASCT and achieved a complete remission, remaining progression free 126 and 155 months after ASCT.
                Our study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of tandem HDCT in patients with high-risk or metastatic/recurrent sarcoma, with some patients achieving long-term PFS and OS. Despite the availability of combined-modality treatment for Ewing sarcoma (ES) and soft tissue sarcomas (STS), results from independent groups still indicate a poor prognosis for high-risk and metastasized patients. The benefit of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (ASCT) as compared to standard treatment is not defined.
                Here, we report of HDCT in 35 consecutive adult patients with poor-risk ES or rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 11) and STS (n = 24) undergoing ASCT between July 1992 and March 2003. At a median follow-up of 100.6 months after ASCT, 11 patients are alive, with nine in sustained complete remission (CR) and each one in partial remission (PR) and stable disease. Median overall survival (OS) from ASCT was 17.1 months. Response to pretreatment, Karnofsky index > 80%, R (0) resection and first-line ASCT were associated with long-term OS (p < 0.05).
                These data indicate that (1) patients achieving a CR or PR following induction, with preserved performance status and R (0) resection may benefit from ASCT and (2) that this can be an useful therapeutic modality in a subset of patients, in some achieving remarkable responses. The role of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) in metastatic breast cancer remains controversial. Trials with late intensification HDCT have failed to show an advantage in overall survival. This study was initiated to compare up-front tandem HDCT and standard combination therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
                Patients without prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease were randomly assigned to standard combination therapy with doxorubicin and paclitaxel (AT) or double HDCT with cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, and etoposide followed by peripheral-blood stem-cell transplantation. HDCT was repeated after 6 weeks. Patients were stratified by menopausal and hormone-receptor status. The primary objective was to compare complete response (CR) rates.
                A total of 93 patients were enrolled onto the trial. Intent-to-treat CR rates for patients randomized to HDCT and AT were 12.5% and 11.1%, respectively (P = .84). Objective response rates were 66.7% for patients in the high-dose group and 64.4% for patients in the AT arm (P = .82). In an intent-to-treat analysis, there were no significant differences between the two treatments in median time to progression (HDCT, 11.1 months; AT, 10.6 months; P = .67), duration of response (HDCT, 13.9 months; AT, 14.3 months; P = .98), and overall survival (HDCT, 26.9 months; AT, 23.4 months; P = .60). HDCT was associated with significantly more myelosuppression, infection, diarrhea, stomatitis, and nausea and vomiting, whereas patients treated with AT developed more neurotoxicity.
                This trial failed to show a benefit for up-front tandem HDCT compared with standard combination therapy. HDCT was associated with more acute adverse effects.
The currently available evidence suggests a PFS benefit for patients with relapsed or refractory HL after first-line therapy, who are treated with HDCT followed by ASCT compared to patients treated with conventional chemotherapy. In addition, data showes a positive trend regarding OS, but more trials are needed to detect a significant effect.
Intensifying the HDCT regime before HDCT followed by ASCT did not show a difference as compared to HDCT followed by ASCT, but was associated with increased adverse events.