A comparison of the side effects of prilocaine with felypressin and lignocaine with adrenaline in large loop excision of the transformation zone of the cervix: results of a randomised trial. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of prilocaine and felypressin (Citanest and Octapressin) for the relief of pain associated with cervical biopsy and treatment with the Semm coagulator. Randomised control trial of pH buffered lignocaine with adrenaline in outpatient operations. Topical anaesthesia for children's lacerations: an acceptable approach? Evaluation of two local anaesthetic sprays for the relief of post-episiotomy pain. Alkalisation of lignocaine-adrenaline reduces the amount of pain during subcutaneous injection of local anaesthetic. Onset of acetaminophen analgesia: comparison of oral and intravenous routes after third molar surgery. Reducing postnatal pain from perineal tears by using lignocaine gel: a double-blind randomized trial. Is transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation of any value during cervical laser treatment? Efficacy and quality of ibuprofen and acetaminophen plus codeine analgesia. The effect of local anaesthetic spray on the pain associated with local anaesthetic injection, prior to biopsy or loop diathermy to the cervix in the outpatient colposcopy clinic. A randomized comparison of different methods of analgesia in abortion using manual vacuum aspiration.
To test the hypothesis that prilocaine with felypressin causes fewer side effects than lignocaine with adrenaline when performing large loop excision of the transformation zone of the cervix.
                Randomised trial.
                Colposcopy clinic in a large district general hospital.
                Two hundred consecutive women undergoing large loop excision of the transformation zone of the cervix.
                Two different local anaesthetic combinations (prilocaine with felypressin and lignocaine with adrenaline) were compared in women undergoing large loop excision of the transformation zone. Prospective collection of clinical and treatment data was undertaken with scoring using an ordinal scale of pain experienced by the women during the procedure. Peri-operative blood loss and any side effects were also recorded.
                Side effects associated with the local anaesthetic agents.
                Lignocaine with adrenaline resulted in less blood loss (P = 0.006) but was more likely to cause side effects, such as feeling faint (P = 0.017) and shaking (P < 0.001).
                Prilocaine with felypressin causes fewer side effects than lignocaine with adrenaline and is therefore the preferred local anaesthetic combination for large loop excision of the transformation zone. To quantify the anticipated and actual pain experienced in association with preliminary cervical punch biopsies and subsequent ablative treatment with the Semm coagulator, and to test the hypothesis that the intracervical injection of prilocaine with felypressin reduces the intensity of the pain experienced.
                One hundred consecutive women referred with abnormal cervical smears for colposcopic assessment and considered suitable for treatment with the Semm coagulator were recruited to a double-blind, randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled trial conducted in a colposcopy clinic in a university teaching hospital. Personal particulars were taken and anticipated pain scored. The patients were injected with randomized externally identical vials of prilocaine and felypressin (Citanest and Octapressin) or placebo. After biopsy and treatment, patients scored their actual pain experienced. Pain scores were compared as the main outcome measure. Relative risks with 95% CIs were calculated and compared using the CI Analysis computer programme (Professor Martin J Gardner and the British Medical Journal Version 1.1, copyright 1991).
                Anticipated pain was greater than the actual pain experienced in both groups. Women receiving the local anesthesia experienced a significantly greater reduction in pain (p < .05) with only 4.3% and 6.7% experiencing moderate pain during biopsy and treatment, respectively. The active drug abolished severe pain. In the placebo group, 44.7% felt mild pain at the most.
                Intracervical injection of prilocaine and felypressin reduces the intensity of pain experienced in women undergoing cervical biopsy and treatment with the Semm coagulator. Its use is commendable but is not absolutely necessary in all cases. Bicarbonate buffering of local anaesthetics is known to significantly decrease the pain of their administration and yet few practising surgeons do so. A double-blind randomised cross-over clinical trial was conducted to confirm the practicality and efficacy of bicarbonate buffering of lignocaine with adrenaline in the setting of a busy local anaesthetic operating theatre. 40 patients received either buffered or control local anaesthetic solutions in equivalent sites on opposite sides of the body. The pain of each injection was rated from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain). The mean pain score for the buffered solution was significantly lower than the control solution (3.06 vs 4.34, P = 0.002). Bicarbonate buffering of lignocaine with adrenaline is effective, inexpensive and simple; its widespread use should be encouraged. To compare the anaesthetic properties of conventional intradermal 1% plain lignocaine with a topical gel preparation of adrenaline (1:2000) and cocaine (4.7%) for use in treatment of children's lacerations.
                Children aged 3-16 years with lacerations (not of the digits or mucous membranes) were consecutively assigned to receive either adrenaline and cocaine (AC) or lignocaine. Pain scores, as perceived by patients, parents, and staff, were measured conventionally using Wong Baker faces and visual analogue scales on administration of the local anaesthetic and on suturing the wound in the AC group (n = 56) and the lignocaine group (n = 51).
                Mean and median pain scores on administration of the anaesthetic in the AC group were significantly lower than in the lignocaine group as perceived by patient (P < 0.001), parent (P < 0.001), and staff (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in mean and median pain scores between the two groups on suturing the wounds, as perceived by patient, parent and staff. There was a significantly higher number of "failed" anaesthetics (pain scores 8-10) in the lignocaine group (P < 0.01). On direct questioning the overall procedure was considered acceptable by 84.5% of parents in the AC group compared with 61% of parents in the lignocaine group (P < 0.01). There were no significant complications in either group.
                Topical AC should be considered the local anaesthetic of first choice for suturing appropriate children's lacerations. Aerosol formulations of lignocaine (5%) and cinchocaine (2%) were compared with a water-only placebo spray in a single-dose study in 76 primiparous patients complaining of moderate or severe post-episiotomy pain. In comparison with a water-only placebo, both local anaesthetic formulations gave significant relief when administered to the perineal wound but the lignocaine spray proved to be the more effective. The only side-effect reported was slight stinging occurring immediately after administration of the lignocaine spray in 2 cases. Serum concentrations of local anaesthetic post-administration were negligible. An interesting finding was that breast-feeding patients responded less well to this form of analgesia than patients in whom lactation had been suppressed with frusemide. A double blind, randomised controlled trial was performed to compare the amount of pain experienced after subcutaneous infiltration of lignocaine with adrenaline, and the same anaesthetic buffered to pH 7.1-7.3, in patients undergoing liposuction (n = 8), blepharoplasty (n = 7), mammaplasty (n = 6), and in volunteers (n = 10). A linear analogue pain scale was used to access pain. In all four groups the buffered solution caused significantly less pain (p < 0.001 except for mammaplasty--p = 0.02). The purpose of this randomized double-blind study was to compare the efficacy and safety of propacetamol 2 g (an i.v. acetaminophen 1 g formulation) administered as a 2-min bolus injection (n=50) or a 15-min infusion (n=50) with oral acetaminophen 1 g (n=50) or placebo (n=25) for analgesia after third molar surgery in patients with moderate to severe pain after impacted third molar removal.
                All patients were evaluated for efficacy during the initial 6 h period after treatment administration (T(0)) and for safety during the entire week after T(0).
                The onset of analgesia after propacetamol was shorter (3 min for bolus administration, 5 min for 15-min infusion) than after oral acetaminophen (11 min). Active treatments were significantly better for all parameters (pain relief, pain intensity, patient's global evaluation, duration of analgesia) than placebo (P<0.05). Adverse events were more frequent after propacetamol, especially pain at the injection site. Propacetamol bolus resulted in a much higher incidence of local adverse events than the infusion (propacetamol bolus 90% vs propacetamol infusion 52%) with no clinically significant benefits in terms of analgesic efficacy.
                I.V. propacetamol, administered as a 15-min infusion, is a fast-acting analgesic agent. It is more effective in terms of onset of analgesia than a similar dose of oral acetaminophen. Perineal pain is one of the most common causes of maternal morbidity in the early puerperium. Several randomized trials have shown that topical application of local anesthetics is effective in reducing postepisiotomy pain, but no randomized study has assessed the efficacy of local anesthetics for other perineal trauma. This study investigated if topically applied 2 percent lignocaine gel was an effective treatment for this group of women.
                A double-blind placebo controlled trial was conducted in a regional teaching hospital in the northwest of England. One hundred and forty-nine women who had sustained a first- or second-degree tear were allocated by sealed envelopes to the lignocaine gel or placebo group. The primary outcome was self-reported pain at 24 hours postdelivery as measured on a numerical rating scale (pain score). Secondary outcomes included pain scores at 48 hours, the need for oral analgesia, and maternal satisfaction. Based on a pilot study, we calculated that 128 women were required to detect a 25 percent difference in pain scores between the two groups with 80 percent power (alpha = 0.05). The pain scores of women in each trial arm were compared using the unpaired t test and 95 percent confidence intervals.
                Women using lignocaine gel had lower average pain scores, although this only reached statistical significance at 48 hours after delivery (p = 0.023). In general, women liked using the study gel. No difference was found in consumption of oral analgesia.
                This study suggested that lignocaine gel may be effective on the second postnatal day. Further research is required to assess the optimum timing of this intervention and the population that would most benefit from its use. To assess the value of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) during cervical laser therapy.
                Randomized three arm controlled clinical trial comparing (i) TENS, (ii) local anaesthetic and (iii) TENS plus local anaesthetic (direct infiltration of 2% lignocaine and 0.03 iu/ml octopressin).
                Colposcopy Unit adapted to run randomized trials.
                100 women with CIN and no previous experience of cervical surgery.
                Visual linear analogue pain scores.
                The median pain score associated with TENS was greater than the score associated with local anaesthesia (23% compared with 17%; P = 0.1). Combining TENS with local anaesthesia did not further reduce pain scores.
                Although there was considerable consumer satisfaction with TENS it provided no additional pain relieving effect in addition to direct infiltration of lignocaine and it is inferior to lignocaine alone. We are unable to advocate the use of TENS for laser treatment of the cervix. Ibuprofen, 400 mg, was compared with 300 mg acetaminophen plus 30 mg of codeine and placebo in 120 post-orthopedic surgery patients with moderate to severe pain. The study was designed as a double-blind, single-dose, parallel-group analgesic efficacy assay. Estimates of analgesia were obtained up to 6 h using categorical and visual analog measures of pain intensity and pain relief. Estimates of selected elements of mood and of sensory and affective components of pain were obtained at 0 and 2 h using contrasting mood word/phrase pairs and a portion of the McGill Pain Questionnaire, respectively. Drugs were distinguishable from placebo in total analgesic effect, and ibuprofen was more effective than acetaminophen plus codeine, especially in terms of duration. While peak effects were comparable, they occurred 1 h later following ibuprofen. Differences among treatments were more discernible using visual analog measures. Side effects were minimal. Ibuprofen provided greater improvement in selected elements of mood than acetaminophen plus codeine at comparable levels of pain relief. While decreases in the sensory component of pain were most highly associated with pain relief provided by ibuprofen, decreases in the affective component were most highly associated with pain relief following acetaminophen plus codeine. These latter results indicate that mood assessment and the discrimination between sensory and affective components of pain could be particularly useful within analgesic drug assays, especially when comparing analgesics of differing pharmacologic class and when comparing the results of such assays in pain syndromes characterized by differing pain quality. We evaluated the effectiveness of local anaesthetic spray prior to injection of local anaesthetic before biopsy or large loop excision of the transformation zone of the cervix at colposcopy. This was a prospective, randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled study involving 51 women. Pain or discomfort was measured using a four-point categorical scale and a visual analogue score. Our results show that the use of local anaesthetic spray has no effect on the pain or discomfort experienced by patients having local anaesthetic injections to the cervix, and cannot be recommended. To estimate the effectiveness of different methods of analgesia among women treated with manual vacuum aspiration for spontaneous abortion.
                The 113 patients diagnosed with incomplete abortion and considered candidates for manual vacuum aspiration were randomly assigned to 3 groups of analgesic administration: diclofenac plus paracervical block; meperidine plus diclofenac; and meperidine alone. Pain levels were evaluated using the Wong Scale of Pain.
                The mean pain scores for the three groups were: diclofenac and paracervical block 5.4; meperidine plus diclofenac 5.0; meperidine 5.7 (P=0.57). Analysis of pain using the levels mild (0-3), moderate (4-6), and severe (7-10) showed no statistical significance among the 3 groups of analgesics. Adverse effects were more common in the groups using analgesia containing meperidine.
                There was no significant difference between the analgesics used among the 3 groups. Most of the patients, regardless of the analgesic used, reported moderate pain.
Based on two small trials, there was no significant difference in pain relief in women receiving oral analgesics compared with placebo or no treatment (129 women; MD -3.51; 95% CI -10.03 to 3.01). We consider this evidence to be of a low to moderate quality. In routine clinical practice, intracervical injection of local anaesthetic with a vasoconstrictor (lignocaine plus adrenaline or prilocaine plus felypressin) appears to be the optimum analgesia for treatment. However, further high-quality, adequately powered trials should be undertaken in order to provide the data necessary to estimate the efficacy of oral analgesics, the optimal route of administration and dose of local anaesthetics.