Comparison of the efficacy of formoterol and salmeterol in patients with reversible obstructive airway disease: a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial. Effect of long-term salmeterol therapy compared with as-needed albuterol use on airway hyperresponsiveness. Efficacy of inhaled salmeterol in the management of smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a single centre randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, crossover study. Effects of the long acting beta agonist formoterol on asthma control in asthmatic patients using inhaled corticosteroids. The Netherlands and Canadian Formoterol Study Investigators. Long-term effects of a long-acting beta 2-adrenoceptor agonist, salmeterol, on airway hyperresponsiveness in patients with mild asthma. [Efficacy of and tolerance to salmeterol compared to salbutamol in patients with bronchial asthma]. An inhaled glucocorticoid does not prevent tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect of a long-acting inhaled beta 2-agonist. Added salmeterol versus higher-dose corticosteroid in asthma patients with symptoms on existing inhaled corticosteroid. Allen & Hanburys Limited UK Study Group. Use of a long-acting inhaled beta2-adrenergic agonist, salmeterol xinafoate, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Salmeterol xinafoate in children on high dose inhaled steroids.
Beta2-adrenergic agonists are frequently used for the prevention and relief of bronchospasm in patients with reversible obstructive airway disease. Formoterol and salmeterol are long-acting beta2-agonists. In addition to its long duration of action, formoterol has been reported to have an onset of action similar to that of albuterol.
                This study compared the effects on lung function of regular twice-daily inhalation of formoterol or salmeterol in adults with moderate to moderately severe persistent asthma who were receiving daily inhaled corticosteroids.
                In this 6-month, multicenter, open-label, parallel-group study, patients with moderate or moderately severe asthma were randomized to receive either formoterol 12 microg BID or salmeterol 50 microg BID. The primary end point was mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) measured 5 minutes after dosing and entered in a patient diary each day during the first 4 weeks of treatment. Secondary end points included mean morning and evening predose PEF and number of episode-free days recorded in the patient diaries during the first 4 weeks of treatment, use and time of rescue medication, symptom scores, and overall mean morning predose PEF (spirometric measurements made by the physician during scheduled visits) for the entire treatment period. Safety assessments included spontaneously reported adverse events and vital signs.
                A total of 528 patients were randomized to study treatment, 262 to formoterol and 266 to salmeterol. There were no significant differences in demographic or baseline characteristics between treatment groups, except in the proportion of current smokers in the formoterol group (4.6%) compared with the salmeterol group (1.5%; P = 0.039). Based on the information recorded in patients' diaries, those receiving formoterol showed significant improvement in mean morning PEF measured 5 minutes after dosing (P < 0.001), reduced use of rescue medication (P < 0.03), and an increased number of episode-free days (P < 0.04) compared with patients receiving salmeterol. Mean predose morning and evening PEF and symptom scores based on diary data and mean morning predose PEF based on measurements obtained during office visits were comparable between the 2 treatment groups throughout the study.
                In this open-label trial, patients randomized to formoterol treatment had greater improvement in mean PEF 5 minutes after dosing, required significantly less rescue medication (fewer actuations of albuterol), and experienced more episode-free days compared with patients receiving salmeterol. Thus, although both formoterol and salmeterol are long-acting beta2-agonists, formoterol had a more rapid onset of action. To determine the effect of long-term salmeterol aerosol therapy on airway hyperresponsiveness measured by methacholine challenge.
                Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study.
                Thirty-one clinical centers in the United States.
                Four hundred eight asthmatic patients > or = 12 years of age with baseline FEV1 of > or = 70% of predicted values. Patients were not using inhaled corticosteroids.
                Twice-daily salmeterol aerosol, 42 microg, or placebo via metered-dose inhaler for 24 weeks. Backup albuterol was available.
                Pulmonary function tests were performed before, during, and after treatment. Subjects recorded asthma-related symptoms, morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) levels, and use of supplemental albuterol daily on diary cards. Methacholine challenges were performed 10 to 14 h postdose at weeks 4, 12, and 24, and 3 and 7 days posttreatment. Over 24 weeks of treatment, salmeterol provided significant (p < 0.001) protection against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction of approximately one doubling dose of methacholine when compared to placebo with no evidence for a progressive decrease in protection. A rebound increase in airway hyperresponsiveness was not observed 3 and 7 days after cessation of salmeterol therapy. Salmeterol treatment resulted in sustained improvements of 0.21 to 0.26 L in morning premedication FEV1 and an improvement of 26.2 L/min in morning PEF when compared to placebo (p < 0.001). The use of salmeterol significantly reduced combined daytime asthma symptoms by 20% when compared to placebo (p = 0.005). A total of 34 and 48 exacerbations, respectively, were reported in the Salmeterol and placebo groups, and no evidence was present for a difference in the severity of asthma exacerbations between groups. Adverse event profiles were similar for the salmeterol and placebo groups.
                Regular long-term use of salmeterol aerosol resulted in sustained improvements in pulmonary function and asthma symptom control over the 24-week treatment period. There was no increase in bronchial hyperresponsiveness or loss of bronchoprotection at 24 weeks from that seen following 4 weeks of therapy. There was no evidence of rebound airway hyperresponsiveness after cessation of salmeterol treatment. Regular treatment with the long-acting beta-agonist salmeterol does not lead to clinical instability or vulnerability to unpredictable asthma attacks. The acute response to bronchodilators in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is modest; it has, however, been suggested that these patients may benefit from long term treatment.
                To investigate the efficacy of salmeterol in smokers with moderate to severe COPD a double blind, randomised, crossover comparison was performed between salmeterol (50 micrograms twice daily) and placebo in 63 patients with stable COPD (mean age 65 years). Prior to inclusion, all patients had a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of < 60% of predicted and an improvement in FEV1 of < 15% following 400 micrograms inhaled salbutamol. Patients received four weeks of therapy with each of the treatment regimens. Assessment of efficacy was made with recording of morning and evening peak expiratory flow rates (PEF), respiratory symptoms, and use of rescue salbutamol. FEV1 was measured before and after nebulised salbutamol prior to randomisation and at the end of each treatment period.
                Morning PEF values were higher during the salmeterol than during the placebo period, although the mean treatment difference was small (12 l/min (95% confidence limits 6 to 17)). No difference in mean evening PEF values was found. Diurnal variation in PEF, assessed as the difference between the morning PEF and that of the previous evening, was more pronounced during the placebo than during the salmeterol period. The mean spirometric values (including reversibility in FEV1) obtained at the end of the two treatment periods were similar. Compared with placebo, treatment with salmeterol was associated with lower daytime and night time symptom scores and less use of rescue salbutamol both during the day and the night. The patients rated the treatment with salmeterol better than treatment with placebo.
                This study shows that, compared with placebo, treatment with salmeterol produces an improvement in respiratory symptoms and morning PEF values in patients with moderate to severe COPD. Treatment with long acting beta agonists may therefore result in an improvement in functional status, even in patients suffering from apparently nonreversible obstructive pulmonary disease. The long acting beta 2 agonist formoterol has proved to be an effective bronchodilator with a prolonged action of 12-14 hours. However, the precise role of formoterol in the maintenance treatment of asthma is still under debate. A study was performed to investigate the efficacy and safety of treatment with formoterol for six months in subjects with asthma.
                In a multicentre double blind, placebo controlled, parallel group study 239 subjects with mild to moderate asthma were randomly assigned to treatment with either inhaled formoterol 24 micrograms twice daily (n = 125) or placebo (n = 114) during eight months. The study consisted of a four week run in period, a 24 week treatment period, and a four week washout period. All subjects were using regular inhaled corticosteroids (100-3200 micrograms daily) but were still needing at least five inhalations of short acting beta 2 agonist per week for symptom relief. The study was performed in 10 outpatient clinics in Canada, and five outpatient clinics and one coordinating centre for 44 Dutch general practitioners in The Netherlands. Twice daily self-reported peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements, symptom scores, and rescue beta 2 agonist use during the last 28 treatment days compared with baseline values were used as main outcome measures. Spirometric values were measured at entry, at the start of treatment, after four, 12 and 24 weeks of treatment, and after four weeks washout.
                One hundred and twenty five subjects received formoterol 24 micrograms twice daily via Turbohaler and 114 received placebo. Baseline FEV1 was 67.1% predicted and mean bronchodilator reversibility was 26%. The mean total asthma symptom score was 3.6 (maximum possible 21). A significant decrease in symptoms in favour of formoterol (difference from placebo -0.64, 95% CI -0.04 to -1.23, p = 0.04) was observed. Compared with placebo, morning PEF increased (difference from placebo 28 l/min, 95% CI 18.3 to 37.7, p = 0.0001) and the use of short acting beta 1 agonists decreased (daytime difference from placebo -1.1 inhalation, 95% CI -1.4 to -0.7, p = 0.0001) in the formoterol group. PEF returned to baseline following discontinuation of formoterol, as did asthma symptom scores. Thirty three patients treated with formoterol and 32 treated with placebo required treatment with prednisolone during the study (58 and 55 courses, respectively).
                Adding formoterol 24 micrograms twice daily by Turbohaler to inhaled corticosteroids was effective in improving symptom scores and morning PEF, and decreasing the use of rescue beta 2 agonists. There was no apparent loss of asthma control during 24 weeks of treatment with formoterol. Asthma is characterized by hyperresponsiveness of the airways to bronchoconstrictive stimuli. Long-acting beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists have been introduced as a new therapeutic approach, but there is growing concern about whether control of asthma may deteriorate with the regular use of these agents. We investigated the long-term effects of the beta 2 agonist salmeterol on bronchodilation and on airway hyperresponsiveness to the bronchoconstrictive agent methacholine in mild asthma.
                In a parallel, double-blind study, 24 patients with mild asthma were randomly assigned to treatment with either inhaled salmeterol (50 micrograms, twice daily) (n = 12) or placebo (n = 12) during an eight-week trial. Methacholine challenge was performed before, during, and after the treatment period. Methacholine responsiveness was measured as the provocative concentration (PC20) that caused a 20 percent decrease in the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1).
                There was a significant increase in FEV1 one hour after the inhalation of salmeterol (P = 0.006), which did not differ significantly on days 0, 28, and 56 of the treatment period (increase, 9.8, 9.4, and 8.8 percent of predicted FEV1, respectively; P = 0.91). On the first treatment day, salmeterol afforded significant protection against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction, as shown by a 10-fold increase in the PC20 as compared with the value at entry (P less than 0.001). After four and eight weeks of treatment, however, the salmeterol-induced change in the PC20 was significantly attenuated (P less than 0.001) to only a twofold increase. Two and four days after treatment ended, the PC20 was not significantly different from the value before treatment (P = 0.15).
                Regular treatment of patients with mild asthma with salmeterol leads to tolerance to its protective effects against a bronchoconstrictor stimulus, in this case inhaled methacholine, despite well-maintained bronchodilation. This finding raises concern about the effectiveness of prolonged therapy with long-acting beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists in asthma. Beta 2-agonists are considered one of the cornerstones of the asthma therapy, but their short action requires frequent administration and an association with other broncodilators. The development of long-acting beta 2-agonists may represent an important improvement in asthma treatment.
                The present study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of inhaled salmeterol compared to salbutamol in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma.
                After the two run-in weeks, the patients received either salmeterol 50 mg twice a day or salbutamol 200 mg four times a day, over a four week period, following a double blind, parallel group study. Sixty patients had the following inclusion criteria: FEV1 > 50% or PEFR over the past seven days > 50% of predicted normal; reversibility of FEV1 > 15%; symptoms scores > 2 (score 0 and 5) in 4 of the last seven days or PEFR variation > 15%.
                Seven patients discontinued the protocol (see methods). Of the 53 analyzable patients, 25 were of the salmeterol group and 28 of the salbutamol group. Our results showed that in the run-in period there were not differences among the groups comparing the values of FEV1 in % predicted, morning PEFR and asthma symptoms scores. The improvement rate of morning FEV1 and PEFR in patients who received salmeterol was significantly higher (p < 0.05) compared to the patients who received salbutamol, for two and four weeks of treatment. Also, the salmeterol group have shown reduction of the symptoms in the nocturnal period(significantly in the first fortnight of treatment) demonstrated by the significative increase in the symptoms improvement rate when compared salmeterol and to salbutamol groups. The number of rescue medication inhaled, side effects, heart rate, blood pressure, serum potassium dosage and electrocardiograms, did no show significative differences between the groups.
                This study showed that in mild to moderate asthmatic patients, salmeterol in the dosage of 100 mg/day raised the FEV1 and the morning PEF and led to pronounced decrease in the nocturnal symptoms as compared to salbutamol. The side effects were similar. There is increasing evidence for the development of tolerance to the protective effects of inhaled beta 2-agonists against bronchoconstrictor stimuli. Animal studies have suggested that glucocorticoids protect against the down-regulation of beta 2-receptors after chronic exposure to beta 2-agonists. In a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study in 12 patients with mild asthma, we investigated the effect of inhaled budesonide or identical placebo on the protection conferred by albuterol (200 micrograms) against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction before and after treatment with the long-acting beta 2-agonist salmeterol. Patients were randomized to be treated for 3 wk with inhaled budesonide (800 micrograms twice a day) or placebo; salmeterol (50 micrograms twice a day) was added during the third week. Airway responsiveness to methacholine was measured 15 min after albuterol, both before and exactly 12 h [corrected] after the last salmeterol dose. Mean FEV1 increased significantly after 2 wk of budesonide (p < 0.05) and increased further after salmeterol (p < 0.05) compared with placebo. After 2 wk, the bronchoprotective effect of albuterol against methacholine was significantly greater with budesonide than with placebo (3.4 versus 2.4 doubling dilutions; p < 0.05), consistent with an improvement in airway hyperresponsiveness with budesonide therapy. However, regular salmeterol treatment for 1 wk significantly diminished the protection conferred by albuterol against methacholine challenge, both with budesonide and with placebo (-1.1 +/- 0.42 and -1.41 +/- 0.30 doubling dilutions, respectively). There was no significant difference in the loss of bronchoprotection seen with salmeterol between budesonide and placebo treatment periods. Our study suggests that even a high dose of an inhaled glucocorticoid fails to prevent the loss of bronchoprotection produced by regular beta 2-agonist therapy. Guidelines on asthma management recommend that in patients who still have symptoms on treatment with low-dose inhaled corticosteroids the first step should be an increase in inhaled corticosteroid dose. The addition of long-acting inhaled beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists is another option. We have compared these two strategies in a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group trial. We studied 429 adult asthmatic patients who still had symptoms despite maintenance treatment with 200 micrograms twice daily inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP). 3 did not provide verifiable data. Of the others, 220 were assigned salmeterol xinafoate (50 micrograms twice daily) plus BDP and 206 were assigned higher-dose BDP (500 micrograms twice daily) for 6 months. The mean morning peak expiratory flow increased from baseline in both groups, but the increase was greater in the salmeterol/BDP group than in the higher-dose BDP group at all time points (differences 16-21 L/min, p < 0.05). Mean evening PEF also increased with salmeterol/BDP but not with higher-dose BDP. There were significant differences in favour of salmeterol/BDP in diurnal variation of PEF (all time points) and in use of rescue bronchodilator (salbutamol) and daytime and night-time symptoms (some time points). There was no significant difference between the groups in adverse effects or exacerbations of asthma, indicating that in this group of patients regular beta 2-agonist therapy was not associated with any risk of deteriorating asthma control over 6 months. This study suggests a need for a flexible approach to asthma management. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a condition in which continuous bronchodilation may have clinical advantages. This study evaluated salmeterol, a beta-agonist bronchodilator with a duration of action substantially longer than that of short-acting beta-agonists, compared with ipratropium, an anticholinergic bronchodilator, and placebo in patients with COPD. Four hundred and five patients with COPD received either salmeterol 42 microg twice daily, ipratropium bromide 36 microg four times daily, or placebo for 12 wk in this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. Patients were stratified on the basis of bronchodilator response to albuterol (> 12% and > 200-ml improvement) and were randomized within each stratum. Bronchodilator response was measured over 12 h four times during the treatment period. Salmeterol provided similar maximal bronchodilatation to ipratropium but had a longer duration of action and a more constant bronchodilatory effect with no evidence of bronchodilator tolerance. Both active treatments were well tolerated. Salmeterol was an effective bronchodilator with a consistent effect over this 12-wk study in patients with COPD, including those "unresponsive" to albuterol. The long duration of action of salmeterol offers the advantage of twice daily dosing compared with the required four times a day dosing with ipratropium. Current UK and international guidelines on asthma management recommend that, in pediatric patients still symptomatic on treatment with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids, consideration should be given to the introduction of regular twice daily long-acting beta 2-agonists.
                The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of inhaled salmeterol xinafoate 50 micrograms bid via the Diskhaler when added to the existing treatment of children with moderate to severe asthma.
                A 12-week multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study was conducted at 78 hospital centers throughout the United Kingdom, involving 210 asthmatic children aged between 4 and 16 years of age. Morning peak expiratory flow (PEF), evening PEF, night-time and daytime symptoms and relief medication usage were recorded daily by the patient or parent over a 12-week treatment period.
                Compared with placebo, the addition of salmeterol xinafoate to existing high dose inhaled corticosteroid treatment significantly improved mean morning PEF expressed as percent predicted (PEF-PP) during the first 4 weeks of treatment (median increase 6.5 percentage points P < .001). This effect persisted throughout the 12-week treatment period (P < .05). Both groups demonstrated an overall improvement in mean morning PEF-PP, 7.5 percentage points for salmeterol xinafoate and 4 percentage points for placebo. The mean evening PEF-PP followed a similar although less pronounced trend which was significant only during the first 4 weeks of treatment (P = .014). Daytime relief medication and recorded symptoms were reduced significantly in both groups. There was a greater improvement in the number of symptom-free days during the first 4 weeks (P < .01) and the last 4 weeks (P < .05) of treatment for salmeterol xinafoate. The overall incidence and nature of minor adverse events was similar in both groups.
                This study demonstrates that the addition of salmeterol xinafoate to inhaled corticosteroid therapy in symptomatic asthmatic children significantly improves morning PEF-PP, and reduces their symptoms and use of relief medication.
Long-acting beta-2 agonists, particularly salmeterol, are more effective than theophylline in improving morning and evening PEF, but are not significantly different in their effect on FEV1. There is evidence of decreased daytime and nighttime short-acting beta-2 agonist requirement with salmeterol. Fewer adverse events occurred in participants using long-acting beta-2 agonists (salmeterol and formoterol) as compared to theophylline.