A randomized clinical trial of 4-hydroxyphenylretinamide for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix. Clinical performance of human papillomavirus E6 and E7 mRNA testing for high-grade lesions of the cervix. The efficacy of 9-cis-retinoic acid (aliretinoin) as a chemopreventive agent for cervical dysplasia: results of a randomized double-blind clinical trial. Oral liarozole in the treatment of palmoplantar pustular psoriasis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. HPV triage of women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: a 3-year experience in an Italian organized programme.
Previous trials of topical trans-retinoic acid treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grades 2 and 3 led to a statistically significant regression of CIN 2, but not CIN 3. We tested N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide (4-HPR), a promising oral retinoid that has been shown to induce apoptosis through nonretinoic receptor acid-mediated pathways, for its toxicity and efficacy against CIN 2/3.
                In a blinded randomized trial, 4-HPR at 200 mg/day for 6 months (with a 3-day/month drug holiday) was compared with placebo in patients with biopsy-proven CIN-2/3 [high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HGSILs)]. Patients were treated with placebo or 4-HPR for 6 months, biopsied, and then followed for an additional 6 months. At the 12-month end point, they underwent either loop excision if a histological lesion was present or a biopsy from the original area of the lesion if no lesion was present.
                An interim analysis of blinded data showed a significantly worse prognosis at 12 months for one group. When the code was broken because of the poorer outcomes, we discovered that the 4-HPR treatment arm was performing more poorly than was the placebo at 6 and 12 months (25 versus 44% response rates at 6 months; 14 versus 50% at 12 months). Toxicity was not significant in either arm.
                4-HPR at 200 mg/day with a 3-day/month drug holiday is not active compared with placebo in the treatment of HGSIL. Because 4-HPR is active in the laboratory, the lack of effect in our trial may indicate that higher doses are needed in patients to achieve comparable results. Infection with high-risk (HR) human papillomavirus (HPV) is the major cause of cervical cancer. However, relatively few infections progress to malignant disease. Progression to malignancy requires the overexpression of the E6 and E7 genes in the integrated HPV genome. It follows that the E6 and E7 transcripts could be useful markers of disease progression. The study presented here tests this possibility, using data from colposcopy and from cytological and histological tests to compare RNA assays for the E6 and E7 genes with DNA testing. A total of 180 women underwent colposcopy, cytology, and biopsy of suspected lesions (143 cases). Cervical brush specimens were analyzed for HPV DNA and for E6 and E7 mRNA. DNA from HR HPV was found in 57.8% of the specimens; E6 and E7 transcripts were found in 45%. The rates of detection of HPV DNA and of E6 and E7 transcripts were 33.3% and 25%, respectively, for specimens with normal findings; 51.4% and 31.9%, respectively, for specimens with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 (CIN1); and 61.1% and 44.2% for specimens with CIN2, respectively. All specimens with CIN3 and 95.5% of specimens from patients with squamous cell carcinoma were positive by both assays. Thirty-seven patients with normal colposcopy findings did not undergo biopsy. HPV DNA and mRNA transcripts were found in 32.4% and 18.9% of these cases, respectively. Comparisons with cytological tests produced similar results. Overall, the mRNA tests showed a higher specificity than the DNA tests for high-grade lesions (72.7% and 56.2%, respectively) and a higher positive predictive value (59.3% and 49.0%, respectively). These findings suggest that mRNA assays could be more powerful than DNA testing for predicting the risk of progression and offer a strong potential as a tool for triage and patient follow-up. 9-Cis-retinoic acid (aliretinoin) is a pan-retinoid receptor agonist and has been demonstrated in preclinical models to have potent chemoprevention effects. The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of using aliretinoin as a chemoprevention agent in cervical dysplasia. Patients with histological evidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2/3 were randomized in a double-blind manner to receive high-dose aliretinoin (50 mg), low-dose of aliretinoin (25 mg), or placebo daily for 12 weeks. Compliance and side effects were monitored at various time points during therapy. At the completion of therapy, all of the patients underwent a loop procedure. Histology of pretreatment biopsies was compared with that of loop specimens. One-hundred and fourteen patients with CIN 2/3 were enrolled in the study. In the 112 patients evaluable for toxicity, headache was the most common clinical side effect and was experienced more frequently (74%) in the high-dose aliretinoin group. Eight patients withdrew from the study before completion of study medication because of unacceptable side effects. In the 104 patients evaluable for efficacy, there was no statistical difference in the rate of regression among the placebo (32%), the low-dose aliretinoin (32%), and the high-dose aliretinoin (36%) groups. (P = not significant; power 0.06). Aliretinoin at these dosages and this schedule does not appear to result in significant regression rates in CIN 2/3 patients when compared with placebo. Headache is encountered frequently and may thwart efforts to increase the dose or duration of aliretinoin in future cervical cancer chemoprevention studies. The rate of histological regression in biopsied CIN 2/3 patients is high even over a short time interval, and emphasizes the importance of having a placebo arm and an adequate sample size in cervical dysplasia chemoprevention studies. Palmoplantar pustular psoriasis (PPP) is a chronic, relapsing condition often recalcitrant to therapy. Synthetic retinoids have been found to be efficacious in the treatment of PPP, but their use is limited by side-effects. Liarozole is an imidazole-like compound that inhibits the retinoic acid (RA) 4-hydroxylase-mediated breakdown of all-trans RA, causing elevation of plasma and cutaneous levels of RA. Thus liarozole acts as a retinoid-mimetic drug. Liarozole has already been found to be effective in the treatment of retinoid-responsive conditions such as chronic plaque psoriasis and ichthyoses.
                To assess the efficacy and side-effect profile of liarozole in the treatment of PPP.
                We performed a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of oral liarozole 75 mg twice daily for 12 weeks in the treatment of PPP. The trial was conducted at two centres and involved 15 patients.
                Using the PPP Area and Severity Index we found a statistically significant (P = 0.02) improvement in PPP in subjects on liarozole (median 3, range 1.8-14.1) as compared with placebo (median 12.1, range 5-18) by the end of the treatment phase. There was also a statistically significant difference (P = 0.006) in the number of fresh pustules after treatment for the two study groups (liarozole median 2, range 0-18; placebo median 38, range 2-75). The severity of disease (on a scale of 0-8) between the two groups was significantly different at the end of treatment (liarozole median 1, range 1-5; placebo median 3, range 2-6; P = 0.04). No patients withdrew from the trial because of adverse events. The most commonly reported side-effects were pruritus, cheilitis and xerosis but these were rarely severe and resolved rapidly on discontinuation of treatment. Laboratory results, including haematology, liver function tests and serum cholesterol and triglycerides were not significantly different between the liarozole and placebo groups.
                The results of this pilot study suggest that liarozole 75 mg twice daily is an effective and well-tolerated therapy for PPP. In addition, the pharmacokinetics of liarozole may help to circumvent side-effects associated with synthetic retinoids and allow its use in premenopausal women. The purpose of our study was to determine if Hybrid Capture II assay (HCII) on Liquid Based Cytology (LCB) improves the accuracy (higher sensitivity, similar specificity) than the repeat conventional Pap smear in smears with Atypical Squamous Cell (ASC) of Undetermined Significance diagnosis.
                HPV testing was used to manage women, especially the older ones, with cervical abnormalities detected through our triennial organized screening in order to avoid unnecessary colposcopy and excessive follow-up if the woman is HPV negative. The HPV DNA Triage was offered without any charge to 909 women with ASC. The Bethesda System was used for the classification of these equivocal cytological findings and more precisely the 1991 version (ASCUS) until the summer 2001 (315 cases) and the new one 2001 classification (ASC-US and ASC-H) after this date (594 cases). The presence or absence of a cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade I or worse [CIN1+], and of grade II or worse [CIN2+], was confirmed by biopsy.
                The HPV DNA Triage showed a good accuracy (specificity over 94%, sensitivity of 37% and PPV for CIN2+ lesions around 30%). The higher values of ASC-H lesions (.462) for the sensitivity for CIN 2+ probably signify that this lesion is already a SIL.
                Our data were comparable with those recently published on the meta-analysis by Arbyn et al., confirming the promising approach of our guidelines for the treatment of these patients even in terms of Health Technology Assessment (HTA).
The retinoids studied are not effective in causing regression of CIN3 but may have some effect on CIN2. The data on CIN1 are inadequate. Retinoids are not effective in preventing progression of CIN of any grade. At the doses given for the duration of treatment studied, the retinoids were reasonably well tolerated.