CAPD bag changing with integrated disconnect system gives lower incidence of peritonitis than with UV-box system. Prevention of peritonitis with disconnect systems in CAPD: a randomized controlled trial. The Mexican Nephrology Collaborative Study Group. Twin- versus single-bag disconnect systems: infection rates and cost of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Does catheter immobilization reduce exit-site infections in CAPD patients? Comparison of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis-related infections with different "Y-tubing" exchange systems. Randomized study of peritonitis with conventional versus O-set techniques in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Comparison of double-bag and Y-set disconnect systems in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: a randomized prospective multicenter study. Comparative evaluation of CAPD and PD-plus effectiveness.
The use of a UV-box disconnect system reduces the incidence of peritonitis as compared with manual exchanges. An integrated disconnect system (IDS) also gives good results. See Figure 1. From 1988-1991, we prospectively compared two groups of patients using either a UV-box disconnect system (Baxter, n = 18, mean age 64, range 28-75 yrs) or an IDS (Baxter, n = 25, mean age 53, range 30-78). The Tenckhoff catheter had been inserted by the same technique in all patients, and the training program and nursing care were also identical. Since many younger patients preferred IDS and refused randomization, age was significantly lower in the IDS group. All peritonitis episodes (PER) were registered. Excluded from calculations of PER were episodes most probably not due to failure in connective device: PER after incidental penetration of the dialysis bags, deep penetrating tunnel infections and in the direct course of abdominal surgery. Results: There were significantly fewer months with PER (one month = 1 PER; Chi-2 = 6.45, p < 0.05) in patients using the IDS (3 PER/269 months) compared with those using the UV-box system (15 PER/355 months). The IDS was requested mainly by younger patients, while some older patients found it to be too complicated. Conclusion: The integrated disconnect system is especially acceptable by younger patients, and patients using the IDS show a low incidence of peritonitis. Recently, disconnect systems for CAPD that are associated with a reduced frequency of peritonitis have been introduced. Our objective was to compare the incidence of peritonitis using three current CAPD systems in a high-risk population with low educational and socioeconomic levels, and high prevalence of malnutrition.
                In a prospective controlled trial, 147 patients commencing CAPD were randomly assigned to one of three groups: 29 to the conventional, 57 to the Y-set, and 61 to the twin bag systems. The number of peritonitis episodes was registered, and patients were followed up for an average of 11.3 months.
                The average peritonitis-free interval for the conventional group was 6.1 months, for the Y system was 12.0 months, and for the twin bag was 24.8 months (P < 0.001). By multivariate analysis, the only factor associated with peritonitis was the CAPD system. Peritonitis-related hospitalization was 5.3 +/- 2.0, 2.7 +/- 1.0, and 1.5 +/- 0.9 days/patient/year in the conventional, Y system, and twin bag groups, respectively. The cost per bag was similar for the conventional and Y system, but higher for the twin bag. However, the total costs of treatment (pesos/patient/year) were lower for twin bag (62,159 for the conventional, 70,275 for the Y system, and 54,387 for the twin bag), due to the lower peritonitis incidence and associated hospitalizations.
                Y system and twin bag use was associated with a reduction of 50 and 75% peritonitis incidence, respectively, in patients on CAPD. The cost of the twin bag was actually lower, because of savings from a decreased usage of antibiotics and fewer hospitalizations. Although twin-bag disconnect fluid-transfer systems for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) have a lower rate of catheter-related infection than single-bag systems, their greater monetary purchase cost has prevented universal adoption. Therefore, a single-center randomized study was performed in 63 adult patients to compare the efficiency and total cost of Freeline Solo (FS, twin-bag) and Basic Y (BY, single-bag) systems. Patients were new to CAPD (N = 39), or had a new CAPD catheter, or had had no episodes of peritonitis or exit-site infection in the previous 12 months (N = 24). Total follow-up was 631 patient months (pt.mon), and 53 patients were still on the trial at its termination. Patients rated FS as easier to use than BY (P < 0.001). Peritonitis occurred on 23 occasions in 12 out of 30 patients using BY, and on seven occasions in five of 33 patients using FS. Time to first infection was less with BY than FS (hazard ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.0 to 5.3; P < 0.04). Cumulative incidence of peritonitis was 1 per 14.0 pt.mon with BY and 1 per 46.5 pt.mon with FS (odds ratio, 3.6; 95% CI 1.5 to 8.5; P = 0.004). Length of hospitalization for peritonitis or exit-site infection was 98 days in six patients with BY, versus 17 days in two patients with FS. With BY, four catheters were removed because of infection, but none with FS (P < 0.05). With BY, the total cost of infection was $AUD127,079 ($5033 per pt.yr) versus $19,250 ($704 per pt.yr) with FS, which offset the higher purchase cost of FS. The total cost of CAPD was $AUD956 per pt.yr less with FS than BY. In conclusion, the higher purchase cost of the FS twin-bag system is more than offset by savings from its lower incidence of peritonitis. This study was undertaken to ascertain the effectiveness of an immobilization device in reducing exit site infections (ESI) in CAPD patients, and whether immuno-suppressive therapy, diabetes, disconnect system and Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage had any bearing on the incidence of ESI. Sixty-six patients having a Tenckhoff catheter placement were randomly allocated into one of three groups; immobilizer, tape and non-immobilized group. The groups were monitored for the incidence of ESI over a total period of 347 patient months. The results show no significant difference in infection rates between the three groups, nor do the factors mentioned have any bearing on ESI rate. Whilst immobilization is important, the ineffectiveness of this device was probably related to its design problem. Despite several modifications of the continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) technique over the last decade, peritonitis remains a major source of morbidity and is the leading cause of dropout for patients maintained on CAPD therapy. Recently, Baxter Healthcare introduced the Ultra Twin bag system, which uses drainage and infusion bags both secured to Y connecting tubing. Previous nonrandomized studies comparing the Ultra Twin bag system with other systems have indicated an improvement in the peritonitis rate with the Ultra Twin bag system. In this study, 82 patients were randomized to use the Ultra Twin bag system or the Ultra Y-set system, which uses only the drainage bag already attached to the Y connecting tubing. Peritonitis rates were significantly lower with the Ultra Twin bag system, one episode per 33.9 patient months, compared with the Ultra Y-set system, one episode per 11.7 patient months (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the 1-yr infection-free survival rates with the Ultra Twin bag system and the Ultra Y-set system were 71 and 40%, respectively. Exit-site infections were lower with the Ultra Twin bag system, one episode per 12.5 patient months, compared with the Ultra Y-set system, one episode per 28.3 patient months, although this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.084). The effect of the reduction in the infection rate on patient dropout with the Ultra Twin bag system remains to be addressed. We performed a prospective randomized trial, comparing the incidence of peritonitis between a flush-disconnect (O-System, Baxter, Deerfield, IL) (OS) and a conventional (System II, Baxter) (CS) continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) method. Sixty consenting patients with no significant physical disabilities who commenced CAPD after May 1987 were entered and followed for a minimum of 12 months. Thirty were placed on the OS system and 30 were placed on CS. Age, gender, and time for training did not differ significantly. The period of observation for OS was 375 months; CS was observed for 430 months. OS patients experienced 28 episodes of peritonitis (13.4 months/patient/episode) compared with 88 (4.9 months/patient/episode) in CS (p less than 0.005). By 6 months, 32% of OS patients had had at least one episode of peritonitis, compared with 62% of CS patients; at 12 months, these figures rose to 48% for OS and 91% for CS (p less than 0.01) patients (Life Table Analysis). The median survival time to first peritonitis episode was 5.1 months in CS and 9.7 months in OS (p less than 0.01). Exit-site infections occurred in 14/30 (46%) of patients on OS and in 13/30 (43%) of CS patients. We conclude that the OS was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of peritonitis. We performed a multicenter, single-blinded, prospective randomized study on the use of a double-bag disconnect system (B) versus a Y-set disconnect system (Y). The peritonitis rate, exit site infection, clinical outcome, and patients' acceptance to the procedure were assessed. A total of 120 new end-stage renal failure patients of three regional hospitals were randomized: 60 each to the B and the Y systems. The results of 60 patients on the B system and 51 on the Y system were analyzable. They were followed up for a median of 16 months. Peritonitis rates for the B and the Y systems were 33.5 and 29.4 patient-months per episode, respectively. Exit site infection rates for the B and Y systems were 17.4 and 16.0 patient-months per episode, respectively. Four catheters were removed in each group. Patients on the B system were hospitalized for 2.1 days per patient per year related to peritonitis and exit site infection, and those on the Y system were hospitalized for 1.2 days. There was no significant difference between the B and Y systems in the incidences of peritonitis (all causes and those due to coagulase-negative staphylococci), exit site infection, and in hospitalization days. However, there was a higher percentage of gram-positive infections in the Y system (52%) than in the B system (32%) and a lower percentage of gram-negative infections in the Y system (16%) than in the B system (32%). Patients on the B system had a better acceptance of the procedure than patients on the Y system, as assessed by a six-item, 10-point questionnaire (total score, 43.1 +/- 10.2 v 37.6 +/- 9.4; P < 0.005 at 1 month; 44.6 +/- 9.1 v 39.8 +/- 8.6; P < 0.01 at 6 months). From this study, it is concluded that the B and Y systems are similar in the incidences of peritonitis and exit site infection, although the B system is better accepted by patients. This is probably the first multicenter randomized study comparing the double-bag and Y-set disconnect system using only new patients who had never used other systems of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Decline in residual renal function in CAPD patients often leads to reduced overall solute clearances. Inadequate dialysis has been linked to malnutrition and increased morbidity and mortality rates. Achieving dialysis adequacy targets is often difficult by the conventional method of increasing CAPD exchange volumes. In comparison, substantial increases in solute clearances can be achieved with the use of automated peritoneal dialysis with large fill volumes and an extra daytime exchange.
Disconnect systems should be the preferred exchange systems in CAPD.