Two trials of antenatal thyrotrophin-releasing hormone for fetal maturation: stopping before the due date. Antenatal TRH Trial and the Thyroneth Trial Groups. Respiratory disease in very-low-birthweight infants after prenatal thyrotropin-releasing hormone and glucocorticoid. TRH Study Group. Improved birth outcomes associated with enhanced Medicaid prenatal care in drug-using women infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. A randomized trial of psychosocial support during high-risk pregnancies. The Latin American Network for Perinatal and Reproductive Research. A randomized trial of nurse specialist home care for women with high-risk pregnancies: outcomes and costs. Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome after repeat exposure to antenatal corticosteroids: a randomised controlled trial. Multiple courses of antenatal corticosteroids for preterm birth (MACS): a randomised controlled trial.
To determine whether the addition of antenatal thyrotrophin-releasing hormone (TRH) to corticosteroids, given to women at risk of preterm delivery, would decrease the risk of death and severe morbidity associated with prematurity.
                Two concurrent multicentre, double blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trials were designed with a common core dataset to be analysed as a single large pragmatic trial.
                Hospital maternity units.
                Pregnant women at risk of preterm delivery who had been prescribed a course of corticosteroids to enhance fetal maturation.
                Antenatal administration of TRH 400 microg every eight hours for four doses versus matching placebo.
                Primary: death of the baby or chronic lung disease (defined as oxygen dependency at 28 days after birth). Secondary: other measures of respiratory morbidity, in particular respiratory distress syndrome. Other measures of short term neonatal morbidity including intraventricular haemorrhage and necrotising enterocolitis. Measures of maternal side effects.
                The antenatal TRH trial was halted early on the basis of external evidence. Overall a total of 225 women were recruited who delivered 275 babies. The primary outcome of death or chronic lung disease occurred in 33 babies in the TRH group and 43 babies in the placebo group (RR 0.8, 95% CI 0.5-1.2). There were no other differences between the two groups. Stratified analysis did not reveal any differences between the two groups depending on how long before the time of delivery the mother had received the TRH or placebo.
                These trials are too small to provide convincing evidence of the effect of antenatal TRH on neonatal outcome. When added to the existing systematic review and meta-analysis, however, these data should provide evidence on which subsequent practice can be based. The process by which the trials were monitored and stopped is of relevance to future trials. Although prenatal glucocorticoid treatment reduces neonatal respiratory morbidity, respiratory distress syndrome and chronic lung disease (CLD) develop in many very-low-birthweight infants despite therapy. To investigate the effect of additional prenatal treatment with thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH), we did a multicentre, blinded, randomised trial. 404 women with threatened preterm delivery at less than 32 weeks' gestation received betamethasone plus TRH (4 doses of 400 micrograms 8-hourly) or betamethasone plus placebo. 103 infants who were fully treated and of less than 1500 g birthweight were evaluated during the neonatal period. TRH treatment (55 infants) did not affect the total incidence of respiratory distress syndrome (47% vs 58% in controls) or of severe respiratory distress syndrome (13% vs 25% in controls, p = 0.11). CLD (defined as requirement for supplemental oxygen at 28 days after birth) developed in significantly fewer TRH-treated infants (18% vs 44% of controls, p less than 0.01). The unadjusted relative risk of CLD with TRH therapy was 0.40 (95% CI 0.26-0.80, p less than 0.05), and this was not materially changed after adjustment for potentially modifying variables. There were significantly fewer adverse outcomes, defined as death or continuing oxygen requirement, in the TRH group than in the steroid-alone group both at 28 days and when infants reached 36 weeks' postconceptional age. The incidence of other complications of prematurity was similar in the two groups. Prenatal TRH reduces the incidence of chronic lung disease among betamethasone-treated infants. To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention designed to enhance Medicaid prenatal care in improving birth outcomes of drug-using women infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
                Medicaid and vital statistics records were linked for 353 HIV-infected drug-using women delivering in 1993 and 1994 while enrolled in New York State Medicaid. Of these, 68% were treated by providers participating in the Prenatal Care Assistance Program, designed to provide case management, improved continuity, referral services, and behavioral risk reduction counseling. In a series of logistic models, we estimated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of low birth weight (less than 2500 g) and preterm delivery (before 37 weeks), comparing women using and not using the program.
                Women using the Prenatal Care Assistance Program were significantly less likely, after adjustments were made for maternal characteristics, to have low birth weight infants and preterm deliveries (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.31, 0.89; and OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.34, 0.97, respectively). Adding measures of greater adequacy and continuity of prenatal care to the models explained just over 20% of the Prenatal Care Assistance Program's protective effect. The addition of maternal high-risk behavior, HIV-focused care, and drug use treatment variables altered program effect estimates less profoundly (together accounting for 4 and 9% of the program's protection against low birth weight and preterm delivery, respectively).
                The Prenatal Care Assistance Program appeared to be successful in reducing the incidence of low birth weight and preterm delivery in this high-risk population. The program's success can be attributed, in part, to increased adequacy and continuity of prenatal care and, to a lesser extent, to more frequent receipt of special services and reduced maternal high-risk behaviors. It is often suggested that psychological and social support and health education for women at high risk for delivering a low-birth-weight infant can improve the outcomes of pregnancy, but the evidence is inconclusive. We undertook this prospective trial to evaluate a program of home visits designed to provide psychosocial support during pregnancy.
                At four centers in Latin America, 2235 women at higher-than-average risk for delivering a low-birth-weight infant were recruited before the 20th week of pregnancy. The women were randomly assigned either to an intervention group (n = 1115) that received four to six home visits from a nurse or social worker in addition to routine prenatal care or to a control group (n = 1120) that received only routine prenatal care (with a mean of eight prenatal visits). The principal measures of outcome were low birth weight (< 2500 g), preterm delivery (< 37 weeks of gestation), and specified categories of maternal and neonatal morbidity.
                The women who received the home visits as well as routine prenatal care had outcomes that differed little from those of the women who received only routine care. The risks of low birth weight (odds ratio for the intervention group as compared with the control group, 0.93; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.68 to 1.28), preterm delivery (odds ratio, 0.88; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.67 to 1.16), and intrauterine growth retardation (odds ratio, 1.08; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.83 to 1.40) were similar in the two groups. There was no evidence that the intervention had any significant effect on the type of delivery, the length of hospital stay, perinatal mortality, or neonatal morbidity in the first 40 days. There was no protective effect of the psychosocial-support program even among the mothers at highest risk.
                Interventions designed to provide psychosocial support and health education during high-risk pregnancies are unlikely to improve maternal health or to reduce the incidence of low birth weight among infants. To examine prenatal, maternal, and infant outcomes and costs through 1 year after delivery using a model of prenatal care for women at high risk of delivering low-birth-weight infants in which half of the prenatal care was provided in women's homes by nurse specialists with master's degrees.
                Randomized clinical trial.
                A sample of 173 women (and 194 infants) with high-risk pregnancies (gestational or pregestational diabetes mellitus, chronic hypertension, preterm labor, or high risk of preterm labor) were randomly assigned to the intervention group (85 women and 94 infants) or the control group (88 women and 100 infants). Control women received usual prenatal care. Intervention women received half of their prenatal care in their homes, with teaching, counseling, telephone outreach, daily telephone availability, and a postpartum home visit by nurse specialists with physician backup.
                For the full sample, mean maternal age was 27 years; 85.5% of women were single mothers, 36.4% had less than a high school education, 93.6% were African American, and 93.6% had public health insurance, with no differences between groups on these variables. The intervention group had lower fetal/infant mortality vs the control group (2 vs 9), 11 fewer preterm infants, more twin pregnancies carried to term (77.7% vs 33.3%), fewer prenatal hospitalizations (41 vs 49), fewer infant rehospitalizations (18 vs 24), and a savings of more than 750 total hospital days and $2,496,145 [corrected].
                This model of care provides a reasoned solution to improving pregnancy and infant outcomes while reducing healthcare costs. The efficacy and safety of repeat doses of prenatal corticosteroids remains uncertain. Our aim was to establish whether repeat prenatal corticosteroids given to women at risk of preterm birth can reduce neonatal morbidity without harm.
                In this hospital-based study, 982 women who remained at risk of preterm birth at less than 32 weeks' gestation, 7 or more days after receiving a first course of prenatal corticosteroids, were randomly assigned to receive a repeat intramuscular dose of either 11.4 mg betamethasone (as Celestone Chronodose), or saline placebo. This was repeated every week the woman remained undelivered, at less than 32 weeks' gestation, and at risk of preterm birth. Primary outcomes were occurrence and severity of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, use and duration of oxygen and mechanical ventilation, and weight, length, and head circumference at birth and hospital discharge. Statistical analyses were on an intention to treat basis. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN48656428.
                Fewer babies exposed to repeat corticosteroids had respiratory distress syndrome (33%vs 41%; relative risk 0.82, 95% CI 0.71-0.95, p=0.01) and fewer had severe lung disease (12%vs 20%; relative risk 0.60, 95% CI 0.46-0.79, p=0.0003) than those in the placebo group. In keeping with these benefits, babies exposed to repeat corticosteroids needed less oxygen therapy (p=0.03), and shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (p=0.01). Mean weight, length, and head circumference at birth and hospital discharge did not differ between treatment groups. Z-scores for weight (p=0.04) and head circumference (p=0.03) at birth were lower in the babies who received repeat corticosteroids although at the time of hospital discharge Z-scores did not differ between treatment groups (p=0.29 for weight, p=0.48 for head circumference).
                Exposure to repeat doses of antenatal corticosteroids reduces neonatal morbidity. Pending long-term outcome results, the short-term benefits for the babies in our study support the use of repeat doses of corticosteroids in women who remain at risk of very preterm birth 7 or more days after an initial course. One course of antenatal corticosteroids reduces the risk of respiratory distress syndrome and neonatal death. Weekly doses given to women who remain undelivered after a single course may have benefits (less respiratory morbidity) or cause harm (reduced growth in utero). We aimed to find out whether multiple courses of antenatal corticosteroids would reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality without adversely affecting fetal growth.
                1858 women at 25-32 weeks' gestation who remained undelivered 14-21 days after an initial course of antenatal corticosteroids and continued to be at high risk of preterm birth were randomly assigned to multiple courses of antenatal corticosteroids (n=937) or placebo (n=921), every 14 days until week 33 or delivery, whichever came first. The primary outcome was a composite of perinatal or neonatal mortality, severe respiratory distress syndrome, intraventricular haemorrhage (grade III or IV), periventricular leucomalacia, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, or necrotising enterocolitis. Analysis was by intention to treat. All patients and caregivers were unaware of the treatment given. This trial is registered as number ISRCTN2654148.
                Infants exposed to multiple courses of antenatal corticosteroids had similar morbidity and mortality to those exposed to placebo (150 [12.9%] vs 143 [12.5%]). Those receiving multiple doses of corticosteroids also weighed less at birth than those exposed to placebo (2216 g vs 2330 g, p=0.0026), were shorter (44.5 cm vs 45.4 cm, p<0.001), and had a smaller head circumference (31.1 cm vs 31.7 cm, p<0.001).
                Multiple courses of antenatal corticosteroids, every 14 days, do not improve preterm-birth outcomes, and are associated with a decreased weight, length, and head circumference at birth. Therefore, this treatment schedule is not recommended.
                Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Prenatal TRH, in addition to corticosteroids, given to women at risk of very preterm birth do not improve infant outcomes and can cause maternal side-effects.