Postpartum insertion of modified intrauterine devices. Postpartum IUD insertions in Manila, Philippines. Performance of the frameless GyneFix and the TCu380A IUDs in a 3-year multicenter, randomized, comparative trial in parous women. A randomized comparative study of the TCu380A and Cu-Safe 300 IUDs. Immediate postpartum insertion: performance of the Nova-T-PP and randomized comparison with the Nova-T. A comparative study of two techniques used in immediate postplacental insertion (IPPI) of the Copper T-380A IUD in Shanghai, People's Republic of China. The TCu 380A IUD and the frameless IUD "the FlexiGard": interim three-year data from an international multicenter trial. UNDP, UNFPA, and WHO Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, World Bank: IUD Research Group. Contraceptive efficacy of the Copper T 380A and Copper T 200 intrauterine devices: results from a comparative clinical trial in six developing countries. Comparative multicentre trial of three IUDs inserted immediately following delivery of the placenta.
The immediate postpartum insertion of standard intrauterine devices (IUDs) and those specially modified for postpartum use was evaluated in a multicenter clinical trial. The immediate postpartum insertion of IUDs was not associated with any increased risk of perforation or infection, although expulsion rates were higher than with interval insertions. The expulsion rate varied widely between centers using similar devices, suggesting that training in insertion is essential. Postpartum IUD insertions can be a practical contraceptive option for patients and providers of medical services. In comparative IUD trials conducted in the Philippines, IUDs were inserted immediately postpartum (within ten minutes postplacenta). The first study was designed to compare the IPCS-52 mg (Intrauterine Progestasert Contraceptive System) IUD with the TCu200 when inserted either by hand or with an inserter. Follow-up continued for three years because the IPCS model was designed to release progesterone for this length of time. There was one suspected pregnancy for which the IUD was removed during the study period. The expulsion rates were higher in the IPCS groups than in the TCu groups (p less than or equal to 0.05) and they were higher in the hand insertion groups than in the inserter groups (p less than or equal to 0.05). The second study was a comparison of the Lippes Loop D and a Delta Loop, modified by the addition of three biodegradable suture projections (made of Ethicon #2 chromic material) on the upper arms of the device. The purpose of this modification was to lower the expulsion rates associated with postpartum insertions. The expulsion rates for these two devices were comparable. There were no difficulties during insertion in either study, and few complaints were reported at follow-up. These two studies demonstrated that immediate postpartum IUD insertion proved a safe, effective means of postpartum contraception. This study was conducted to evaluate a new and improved inserter (GyneFix) for the anchoring of the Frameless IUD in the uterine cavity. Previous studies conducted with a prototype inserter (Flexigard) did not show fully the advantages of the new anchoring concept because of the shortcomings of the Flexigard inserter and the complexity of the insertion technique. The GyneFix IUD was compared with the TCu380A IUD in six centers in China in approximately 300 women in each group. Only parous women were included in the study. The data from this 3-year, ongoing study demonstrate that the shortcomings of the inserter have been corrected, resulting in better performance and a much reduced rate of failed insertion/expulsion of the frameless and anchored device. The cumulative expulsion rate with the GyneFix IUD was 3.0 at 3 years (annual rates 2.67, 0.33, and 0.0, respectively) compared with a cumulative expulsion rate of 7.38 at 3 years with TCu380A (annual rates 4.63, 1.76, and 1.04, respectively). This difference is statistically significant. The majority of the expulsions with the anchored IUD occurred early in the study, indicating improper anchoring technique. The study also shows that both devices are highly efficacious. No pregnancies occurred with the GyneFix IUD (cumulative pregnancy rate 0.0 at 3 years) versus one pregnancy with TCu380A (cumulative pregnancy rate 0.34 at 3 years). The total use-related discontinuation rate at 3 years was significantly lower with the GyneFix IUD (8.34) than with the TCu380A IUD (14.13) and results in a higher rate of continuation with the GyneFix IUD compared to the TCu380A IUD (90.73 vs 85.25). Neither perforations nor pelvic inflammatory disease cases were encountered with either device in this study, demonstrating the safety of the anchoring system. The Cu-Safe 300 is one of the latest additions to the array of available IUDs. It was specifically designed to decrease unwanted side-effects (e.g. bleeding, pain and expulsion) while providing simplicity of insertion, ease of removal and fair contraceptive protection. For comparison, the TCu380A was chosen. Both types were inserted at random in 600 recipients by a group of independent physicians with a long standing experience in intrauterine contraception. Life table analysis was used for comparison over a period of three years. The Cu-Safe 300 produced a slightly but not statistically significant higher pregnancy rate and more expulsions. Removals for bleeding and pain, however, were significantly less frequent. All inserting physicians agreed that insertion and removal of this new device was remarkably easy. Clinical evaluation of the Postpartum Nova-T or Nova-T-PP (a Nova-T IUD adapted for postpartum insertion) was based on 412 insertions and showed that this model--besides being effective and safe--had a low expulsion rate (7.2% at 1 year). To prove that the Nova-T-PP's low expulsion rate is indeed the result of its special design, a randomized trial was conducted to compare the Nova-T-PP with the parent model (Nova-T) when inserted within 10 minutes of delivery of the placenta. The result of this study (408 insertions, 203 of them Nova-T) indicate that there is no significant difference in expulsion rate between the two IUD models, suggesting that the addition of two extra arms to the original Nova-T model does not improve the retention of the adapted IUD model. Chinese women in Shanghai who delivered vaginally and who chose to use an IUD for contraception received a Copper T-380A IUD inserted vaginally within 10 minutes after delivery of the placenta (i.e., immediate postplacental insertion, IPPI). Among them, 97.7% were primipara. The women were randomly divided into two groups: IUD inserted by hand and IUD via ring forceps. The follow-up rate of six months was 95.2%. Using Tietze's life table method and log rank test, the expulsion and other discontinuation rates were compared at three and six months postinsertion between these two different insertion techniques. Expulsions were the main reason for discontinuation. The six-month gross cumulative expulsion rates were 13.3 and 12.7 per 100 women in the hand-insertion group and ring forceps-insertion group, respectively. Discontinuation rates for medical removals (bleeding/pain) were 2.1 and 1.0 in these two groups, respectively. Neither of the differences was statistically significant (p > 0.05). No uterine perforation, infection or pregnancy occurred. The results suggest that these two different insertion techniques do not significantly affect discontinuation rates in vaginal IPPI using the TCu 380A, and the TCu 380A appears to be suitable for postpartum insertion in Chinese women. Other relevant issues, such as breastfeeding and IUD placement in uterine cavity, are also analyzed and discussed in this report. The TCu 380A and FlexiGard IUDs were compared in a randomized multicenter trial including 28 institutes in 13 countries. There were 53 insertion failures with the FlexiGard and one with the TCu 380A. There were 2184 successful insertions of the TCu380A and 2102 of the FlexiGard device. The three-year pregnancy rates for the TCu 380A and FlexiGard were similar (1.6 and 1.9 per 100 women, respectively) but the FlexiGard three-year expulsion rate (7.4 per 100 women) was significantly higher than that of the TCu 380A (4.4 per 100 women). The insertion technique for the FlexiGard needs to be improved in order to lower the expulsion rate. The clinical performance of the Copper T 380A (TCu 380A) and the Copper T 200 (TCu 200) intrauterine devices (IUDs) was evaluated for 12 months in a group of women who had one of the two IUDs inserted. Results are from a multicenter randomized clinical trial at one site in each of six developing countries. The pregnancy rate with the TCu 380A IUD was significantly lower than the pregnancy rate with the TCu 200 IUD at 12 months (0.5 and 2.6 per 100 women, respectively, p < 0.01). No statistically significant differences between the two study IUDs were found with regards to expulsion or removals due to bleeding/pain, personal, medical, or planned pregnancy. The TCu 380A IUD did not have a disproportionately higher incidence of side effects such as intermenstrual bleeding or pain, inflammations or infections, or insertion-related events compared to the TCu 200 IUD. TCu 380A IUD users, however, were significantly more likely to report increased dysmenorrhea than were TCu 200 IUD users. The performance of the TCu 380A IUD in preventing pregnancy during this trial indicates that this IUD may be a better option than the TCu 200 IUD for women wishing to practice effective, long-term, reversible birth control without having to resort to hormonal methods. A multinational comparative trial of three IUDs (Copper 7, Lippes loop size D and the Postpartum T) randomly inserted immediately following delivery of the placenta was conducted in six centres. A total of 841 women entered the study. As the predetermined termination indices for expulsions were exceeded at six months the trial was prematurely closed. An excess of expulsions during the first 48 hours following insertion was observed for the Lippes loop compared to the other devices. At six months the expulsion rate for the Lippes loop was significantly higher than that for the Copper 7. In addition, the discontinuation rate for the Lippes loop at 12 months was significantly higher than that for the Copper 7. There were no significant differences in either the expulsion rates or the discontinuation rate at six or twelve months between the postpartum T and the other devices. At 12 months the pregnancy rates with all three devices was high; there were no ectopic pregnancies. Considerable between-centre differences were observed, particularly for expulsion rates. Possible reasons for this are discussed and future research lines are suggested.
Insertion of an IUD immediately after abortion is safe and practical. IUD expulsion rates appear higher than after interval insertions. However, IUD use is higher at six months with immediate than with interval insertion.