Effects of the flutter device on pulmonary function studies among pediatric cystic fibrosis patients. Comparison of high-frequency chest wall oscillation and oscillating positive expiratory pressure in the home management of cystic fibrosis: a pilot study. Timing of dornase alpha inhalation does not affect the efficacy of an airway clearance regimen in adults with cystic fibrosis: a randomised crossover trial. Flutter valve improves respiratory mechanics and sputum production in patients with bronchiectasis. Short-term comparative study of high frequency chest wall oscillation and European airway clearance techniques in patients with cystic fibrosis. [Long-term evaluation of effectiveness for selected chest physiotherapy methods used in the treatment of cystic fibrosis]. Self-administered chest physiotherapy in cystic fibrosis: a comparative study of high-pressure PEP and autogenic drainage. Mucus clearance and lung function in cystic fibrosis with hypertonic saline. A comparison of the therapeutic effectiveness of and preference for postural drainage and percussion, intrapulmonary percussive ventilation, and high-frequency chest wall compression in hospitalized cystic fibrosis patients.
Previous studies have shown that the Scandipharm Flutter airway clearance device has increased the ability of cystic fibrosis patients to expectorate mucus. Studies that show the effects of the Flutter on pulmonary function among the pediatric cystic fibrosis patients are limited. Thus, we embarked on a study to assess the device's effectiveness.
                The long-term effect of the Flutter on pulmonary function tests (PFTs) was studied and compared with other airway clearance techniques, such as chest physiotherapy (CPT) and Vital Signs, Inc. 9000 PEP positive expiratory pressure (PEP) therapy for cystic fibrosis patients of five to 17 years of age with mild to moderate disease. Of the 15 patients who qualified, six completed the study. The patients were evaluated using PFTs and a respiratory assessment at the beginning and end of each new therapy. Duration of each therapy was one month.
                No respiratory assessment parameters changed between the therapies studied. All patients who used the Flutter preferred it over the other two therapies. The patients stated they felt better clinically, were able to expectorate mucus more easily, and felt more in control of their therapies. Paired t-test statistical analysis from the PFT data indicated no significant changes in forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration (FEV1), forced expiratory flow from 25 percent to 75 percent of the loop (FEF25-75), airway resistance (Raw), or specific airway conductance (sGaw) among the three therapies studied.
                This study has shown no significant change in respiratory assessment parameters or pulmonary function. Further studies involving multicenter trials are warranted to evaluate the effects of the Flutter on pulmonary function. Enhanced airway clearance is thought to result in better-maintained pulmonary function in cystic fibrosis (CF). Postural drainage, percussion, and vibration (PDPV) have been the primary airway clearance technique (ACT) employed in CF for over 40 years. Two new airway clearance modalities are high-frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO) and oscillating positive expiratory pressure (OPEP). This pilot study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of these techniques during home use, assess patient satisfaction with them as compared to PDPV, and assess the feasibility of performing a definitive comparative trial. The prospective, randomized, multicenter crossover trial was conducted at three urban academic CF Care Centers. Twenty-nine CF patients, 9-39 years of age, participated. Subjects performed 4 weeks each of HFCWO and OPEP following 2-week lead-in/washout periods. Spirometry, lung volumes, National Institutes of Health and Petty Scores, and a satisfaction survey were performed at baseline and after each treatment period. An ACT preference survey was completed at the conclusion of the study. Twenty-four subjects completed both therapies. There were no statistically significant differences between therapies for spirometry, lung volumes, or clinical scores. No significant safety issues arose during the study period. Compliance between therapies was similar. Significant differences among therapies existed in patient satisfaction. Given a choice of therapy, 50% of subjects chose HFCWO, 37% OPEP, and 13% PDPV. This study suggests that HFCWO and OPEP are safe and as effective as patients' routine therapies when used for airway clearance in a home setting. Patient satisfaction and preference differ among ACTs and should be considered when prescribing home therapy. A definitive, multi-center, comparative study evaluating long-term efficacy of these techniques is feasible.
                Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Does the timing of inhalation of dornase alpha in relation to physical airway clearance techniques influence the effect of the entire airway clearance regimen?.
                A randomised crossover trial with concealed allocation, intention-to-treat analysis and blinding of patients, therapists, and assessors.
                Twenty adults with cystic fibrosis who were not taking dornase alpha were recruited, of whom 17 were randomised and completed the trial.
                Participants performed an individually tailored session of physical airway clearance techniques for at least 15 minutes per day for 28 days. For 14 days, dornase alpha was inhaled before each session of airway clearance techniques and a placebo was inhaled after. For the other 14 days, placebo was inhaled before and dornase alpha after airway clearance techniques. The order of the two 14-day periods was randomised.
                The primary outcome was the forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV(1)). Secondary outcomes were forced vital capacity, 24-hour sputum production, sputum production during the airway clearance regimen, oxygen saturation, peak oxygen consumption during an incremental exercise test, oxygen desaturation during exercise, and quality of life.
                Inhalation of dornase alpha after airway clearance techniques did not significantly affect the change in FEV(1) compared with inhalation before airway clearance techniques, mean difference 0.04 L, 95% CI -0.14 to 0.23. None of the secondary outcomes differed significantly between the study arms. There was good correlation between the change in FEV(1) and the change in quality of life scores.
                Timing of dornase alpha can be selected according to convenience, patient preference, or to accommodate the timing of other medications in the treatment regimen.
                ACTRN12611001041943.
                Copyright © 2011 Australian Physiotherapy Association. Published by .. All rights reserved. Although the application of airway clearance techniques is considered an important component in the treatment of several obstructive pulmonary diseases, there is no scientific evidence supporting the use of Flutter Valve™ in the management of patients with bronchiectasis. Moreover, the consequences of respiratory physiotherapy techniques on respiratory mechanics have not been fully studied. Therefore, we investigated the acute, short-term effects of Flutter Valve™ on respiratory mechanics and sputum production in bronchiectatic patients. 
                EIGHT patients were evaluated in a randomized, blinded, cross-over trial. Impedance at 5 Hz (R5), resistance as a function of oscillation frequency (dR/dF), reactance at 5 Hz (X5), resonant frequency (f(0) ) and integral of reactance between 5 Hz and resonant frequency (AX) were recorded. 
                Flutter Valve™ cleared 8.4 mL more secretions than the Sham Flutter intervention (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 3.4-13.4). There was a higher percentage decrease in R5 (-11.2%; 95% CI, -4.4 to -18.2), dR/dF (-20.8%; 95% CI, -32.4 to -9) and AX (-7.8%; 95% CI, -11.9 to -3.7) under Flutter Valve™. X5 and f(0) variation did not differ between interventions. 
                 Flutter Valve™ increases sputum removal during treatment and diminishes total and peripheral airway resistance in hypersecretive patients with bronchiectasis. Impulse oscillometry is a user-friendly tool to evaluate the effects of airway clearance techniques on respiratory mechanics.
                Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. High frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO) is standard treatment for airway clearance in the USA and has recently been introduced in the UK and Europe. There is little published research comparing HFCWO with airway clearance techniques (ACTs) frequently used in the UK and Europe. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term effects of HFCWO with usual ACTs in patients with cystic fibrosis hospitalised with an infective pulmonary exacerbation.
                A 4-day randomised crossover design was used. Patients received either HFCWO on days 1 and 3 and usual ACTs on days 2 and 4 or vice versa. Wet weight of sputum, spirometry and oxygen saturation were measured. Perceived efficacy, comfort, incidence of urinary leakage and preference were assessed. Data were analysed by mixed model analysis.
                29 patients (72% male) of mean (SD) age 29.4 (8.4) years and mean (SD) forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) percentage predicted (FEV(1)%) 38 (16.7) completed the study. Significantly more sputum was expectorated during a single treatment session and over a 24 h period (mean difference 4.4 g and 6.9 g, respectively) with usual ACTs than with HFCWO (p<0.001). No statistically significant change in FEV(1)% or oxygen saturation was observed after either HFCWO or usual ACTs compared with baseline. 17 patients (55%) expressed a preference for their usual ACT.
                During both a finite treatment period and over 24 h, less sputum was cleared using HFCWO than usual ACT. HFCWO does not appear to cause any adverse physiological effects and may influence adherence. The aim of this study was a long-term analysis of efficiency of selected chest physiotherapy methods used in the treatment of children with CF. We studied 80 CF children (39 male, 41 female), mean age ll.44yrs (range 6-18 yrs), with varying degree of severity. The study was carried out during 7 months. The subjects were assigned into four groups. Group had conventional postural drainage with clapping (33 patients, age x-11.12), group II- conventional postural drainage with clapping and vibration (16 patients, age x-11.25), group III - active cycle of breathing technique (18 patients, age x-10.5), group IV Flutter (13 patients, age x- 13.77). All patients had three physiotherapy sessions a day. We measured: FEV1 FVC, FEV1/FVC, MEF 25-7 %, PEF, before and after the study. In the group with postural drainage with clapping we observed statistically significant decrease of all studied parameters. The use of additional vibration improved FVC and FEV1/FVC values but the improvement was not statistically significant. FEV1, PEF and MEF 25 %, were significantly lower. Statistically significant increase of all studied parameters was observed in patients using ACBT. In the Flutter group we observed increase of FEV1 and FVC values. The other parameters were decreased without statistical significance. Analysis of variance of pulmonary function parameters between groups demonstrated significant differences in FEV1, PEF and MEF 50% between postural drainage with vibration and active cycle of breathing technique. Significant differences have also been shown in PEF between postural drainage with clapping and active cycle of breathing technique. We conclude that: 1) postural drainage with clapping is less effective compared with the other studied techniques.2) The use of additional vibration did not bring about improvement of drainage efficiency. Vibration increased airways resistance. 3) Flatter device may be less effective in peripheral airways clearance. Fourteen patients with cystic fibrosis were trained in 2 self-administered chest physiotherapy (PT) techniques: high-pressure PEP-mask physiotherapy (PEP), and autogenic drainage (AD). They then visited the clinic on 5 consecutive days, and, in a random order, performed 1 of the following: PEP, AD, PEP followed by AD (PEP-AD), AD followed by PEP (AD-PEP), and, no PT except for spontaneous coughing. Lung function was measured repeatedly before, during, and after PT; time needed for and sputum produced by each form of PT was recorded. PEP produced the highest amount of sputum, followed by PEP-AD, AD-PEP, and AD; all 4 forms of PT produced significantly more sputum than coughing. Lung function improved significantly after PEP, AD, and PEP-AD, but PEP-induced changes did not exceed those after AD. Within the investigated group, the PEP-induced lung function improvement per milliliter of sputum produced was significantly lower for those patients with airway hyperreactivity. The fact that the highest sputum yield with PEP was not reflected in higher PEP-effected lung function changes might thus be explained by PEP-induced bronchospasm in patients with airway hyperreactivity. PEP clears more sputum than AD or combined techniques; patients with airway hyperreactivity, however, should either prefer AD or should take a bronchodilator premedication before PEP. Abnormal homeostasis of the volume of airway surface liquid in patients with cystic fibrosis is thought to produce defects in mucus clearance and airway defense. Through osmotic forces, hypertonic saline may increase the volume of airway surface liquid, restore mucus clearance, and improve lung function.
                A total of 24 patients with cystic fibrosis were randomly assigned to receive treatment with inhaled hypertonic saline (5 ml of 7 percent sodium chloride) four times daily with or without pretreatment with amiloride. Mucus clearance and lung function were measured during 14-day baseline and treatment periods.
                Long-term inhalation of hypertonic saline without pretreatment with amiloride (i.e., with placebo pretreatment) resulted in a sustained (> or =8 hours) increase in 1-hour rates of mucus clearance, as compared with those with amiloride pretreatment (14.0+/-2.0 vs. 7.0+/-1.5 percent, respectively; P=0.02) and increased 24-hour rates of mucus clearance over baseline. Furthermore, inhalation of hypertonic saline with placebo improved the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) between the baseline period and the treatment period (mean difference, 6.62 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.6 to 11.7; P=0.02), whereas hypertonic saline with amiloride did not improve FEV1 (mean difference, 2.9 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, -2.2 to 8.0; P=0.23). Forced vital capacity (FVC), the forced expiratory flow between 25 and 75 percent of FVC (FEF25-75), and respiratory symptoms also significantly improved in patients treated with hypertonic saline and placebo, whereas the residual volume as a proportion of total lung capacity (RV:TLC) did not change in either group. A comparison of the changes in lung function in the two groups showed no significant difference. In vitro data suggested that sustained hydration of airway surfaces was responsible for the sustained improvement in mucus clearance, whereas inhibition of osmotically driven water transport by amiloride accounted for the observed loss of clinical benefit.
                In patients with cystic fibrosis, inhalation of hypertonic saline produced a sustained acceleration of mucus clearance and improved lung function. This treatment may protect the lung from insults that reduce mucus clearance and produce lung disease.
                Copyright 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society. Cystic fibrosis (CF) patients have abnormally viscid bronchial secretions that cause airway obstruction, inflammation, and infection that leads to lung damage. To enhance airway clearance and reduce airway obstruction, daily bronchopulmonary hygiene therapy is considered essential.
                Compare the effectiveness of and patient preferences regarding 3 airway clearance methods: postural drainage and percussion (PD&P), intrapulmonary percussive ventilation (IPV), and high-frequency chest wall compression (HFCWC).
                The participants were hospitalized CF patients >or= 12 years old. Effectiveness was evaluated by measuring the wet and dry weights of sputum obtained with each method. In random order, each patient received 2 consecutive days of each therapy, delivered 3 times daily for 30 minutes. Sputum was collected during and for 15 minutes after each treatment, weighed wet, then dried and weighed again. Participants rated their preferences using a Likert-type scale. Mean weights and preferences were compared using analysis of variance with repeated measures. Patient preferences were compared using Freidman's test.
                Twenty-four patients were studied. The mean +/- SD wet sputum weights were 5.53 +/- 5.69 g with PD&P, 6.84 +/- 5.41 g with IPV, and 4.77 +/- 3.29 g with HFCWC. The mean wet sputum weights differed significantly (p = 0.035). Wet sputum weights from IPV were significantly greater than those from HFCWC (p < 0.05). The mean dry sputum weights were not significantly different. With regard to overall preference and to the subcomponents of preference, none of the 3 methods was preferred over the others.
                HFCWC and IPV are at least as effective as vigorous, professionally administered PD&P for hospitalized CF patients, and the 3 modalities were equally acceptable to them. A hospitalized CF patient should try each therapy and choose his or her preferred modality.
This review was unable to demonstrate any advantage of CCPT over other airway clearance techniques in terms of respiratory function, but this may have reflected insufficient evidence rather than real equivalence between methods. There was a trend for participants to prefer self-administered airway clearance techniques. Limitations of this review included a paucity of well-designed, adequately-powered, long-term trials.