Lack of radiological and clinical benefit over two years of low dose prednisolone for rheumatoid arthritis: results of a randomised controlled trial. A randomized study of two long-course prednisolone regimens for nephrotic syndrome in children. Auranofin in the treatment of steroid dependent asthma: a double blind study.
Evidence for disease modifying activity of low dose corticosteroid treatment in rheumatoid arthritis is contradictory. Studies showing radiological benefit suggest that continued treatment is required to sustain the effect.
                To evaluate the effect of low dose oral prednisolone in early rheumatoid arthritis on disease activity over two years.
                Double blind placebo controlled trial.
                Patients with rheumatoid arthritis, duration <3 years (n = 167), were started on a disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD; sulphasalazine) and allocated by stratified randomisation to prednisolone 7 mg/day or placebo. Primary outcome measure was radiological damage, assessed by the modified Sharp method. Clinical benefit was a secondary outcome. A proactive approach to identifying and treating corticosteroid adverse events was adopted. Patients who discontinued sulphasalazine were offered an alternative DMARD.
                90 of 257 patients eligible for the study refused to participate (more women than men). Of those enrolled, 84% were seropositive for rheumatoid factor, median age 56 years, median disease duration 12 months, female to male ratio 1.8:1. Prednisolone was given to 84 patients; of these 73% continued prednisolone and 70% sulphasalazine at 2 years. Of the 83 patients on placebo, 80% continued placebo and 64% sulphasalazine at 2 years. There were no significant differences in radiological score or clinical and laboratory measures at 0 and 2 years.
                Low dose prednisolone conferred no radiological or clinical benefit on patients maintained on a DMARD over two years. Low dose corticosteroids have no role in the routine management of rheumatoid arthritis treated with conventional disease modifying drugs. Long-course prednisolone regimens have been shown to be more effective than short-course regimens in sustaining remission of nephrotic syndrome in children. However, the most beneficial approach among the long-course regimens remains unknown.
                Seventy-three children with new-onset nephrotic syndrome were allocated at random to the two long-course regimens and followed up for 2 years. Group A was administered prednisolone at a daily dose of 60 mg/m2 for 6 weeks, followed by an alternate-day dose of 40 mg/m2 for 6 weeks (the long daily regimen). Group B was administered the same daily dose for 4 weeks, followed by an alternate-day dose of 60 mg/m2 for 4 weeks, and doses were tapered by 10 mg/m2 every 4 weeks (the long alternate-day regimen).
                Group B had a lower incidence of corticosteroid toxicities than group A during the initial treatment. Kaplan-Meier analysis of the sustained remission rate of the two treatment groups showed a marginally significant difference (P = 0.069) and showed a significant difference when patients were stratified for age of disease onset (P = 0.048). In a subgroup of younger children (<4 years at onset), group B had a greater rate of sustained remission (P < 0.01) and fewer children with frequent relapses (P < 0.05) than group A, whereas in older children (> or =4 years at onset), both groups had similar good sustained remission rates.
                These findings collectively indicate that the long alternate-day regimen may be more beneficial, with less corticosteroid toxicities, than the long daily regimen, and children with younger age at disease onset may be susceptible to relapse and especially benefit from the long alternate-day regimen for sustaining remission of the disease. Long term administration of oral corticosteroids in patients with asthma may be associated with serious side effects. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, including gold salts, have been shown to reduce the need for systemic corticosteroid treatment in uncontrolled studies. The effect of oral gold (auranofin) on asthma symptoms, lung function, and the need for oral prednisone treatment was investigated.
                A 26 week randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, parallel group trial of auranofin was performed in 32 patients with moderately severe chronic asthma who required an oral corticosteroid dose of at least 5 mg prednisone a day (or equivalent) or 2.5 mg/day prednisone plus more than 800 micrograms/day inhaled corticosteroids. Auranofin was given orally in a dose of 3 mg twice daily. Asthma symptoms, lung function, and adverse effects were assessed at regular intervals. After 12 weeks of treatment prednisone dosage was tapered down by 2.5 mg every two weeks if the patient was clinically stable. Asthma exacerbations were treated with short courses of high doses of oral steroids.
                Twenty eight of the 32 patients, 13 in the placebo group and 15 in the auranofin group, completed the study. The total corticosteroid reduction achieved after 26 weeks of treatment was significantly greater (4 mg) in the auranofin group than in the placebo group (0.3 mg). The number of exacerbations requiring an increase of steroids was greater in the placebo group (2.1) than in the active group (0.9). A significant increase in FEV1 of 6.4% predicted occurred in the auranofin group during the study and there was a reduction of asthma symptoms such as wheezing and cough. There was no difference between the groups in peak flow measurements or in the number of asthma attacks. The incidence of side effects of auranofin was low, but exacerbations of constitutional eczema were noticeable.
                Auranofin provides an effective adjunct to treatment for steroid dependent asthma, leading to a reduction of oral steroid dose.
Oral corticosteroids at prednisolone-equivalent dose of 1 to 2 mg/kg alternate days appear to slow progression of lung disease in CF; benefit should be weighed against occurrence of adverse events. Risk-benefit analysis of low-dose alternate days corticosteroids is important and the short-term use of oral corticosteroids should be better evaluated.