Comparison between desferrioxamine and combined therapy with desferrioxamine and deferiprone in iron overloaded thalassaemia patients. Heroin-assisted treatment for opioid dependence: randomised controlled trial. Measuring the saving attributable to an antibiotic prescribing policy. Comparison of oral iron chelator L1 and desferrioxamine in iron-loaded patients. Intramuscular desferrioxamine in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Perioperative blood transfusion does not increase the risk of colorectal cancer recurrence.
Desferrioxamine (DFX) alone (40-50 mg/kg/d s.c. over 8-12 h, five times weekly) was compared with combined DFX twice weekly and deferiprone (75 mg/kg/d) over 12 months in previously poorly chelated thalassaemia patients. Serum ferritin fell from 5506 +/- 635 microg/l (mean +/- SEM) to 3998 +/- 604 microg/l (P < 0.001; n = 14) in the DFX group and from 4153 +/- 517 microg/l to 2805 +/- 327 microg/l in the combined group (P < 0.01; n = 11). Deferiprone plus DFX produced a greater mean urine iron excretion (1.01 mg/kg/24 h) than iron intake from blood transfusion in each patient. Main side-effects were skin reactions (DFX alone), nausea and arthralgia (combined therapy). As chelation therapy, the combined protocol was as effective as DFX five times weekly. Heroin-assisted treatment has been found to be effective for people with severe opioid dependence who are not interested in or do poorly on methadone maintenance.
                To study heroin-assisted treatment in people on methadone who continue intravenous heroin and in those who are heroin dependent but currently not in treatment.
                In an open-label multicentre randomised controlled trial, 1015 people with heroin dependence received a variable dose of injectable heroin (n=515) or oral methadone (n=500) for 12 months. Two response criteria, improvement of physical and/or mental health and decrease in illicit drug use, were evaluated in an intent-to-treat analysis.
                Retention was higher in the heroin (67.2%) than in the methadone group (40.0%) and the heroin group showed a significantly greater response on both primary outcome measures. More serious adverse events were found in the heroin group, and were mainly associated with intravenous use.
                Heroin-assisted treatment is more effective for people with opioid dependence who continue intravenous heroin while on methadone maintenance or who are not enrolled in treatment. Despite a higher risk, it should be considered for treatment resistance under medical supervision. An analytical framework is suggested for the economic evaluation of policies to improve the management of hospital infection. Consideration of the costs and benefits to be expected from improved policies implies the existence of an optimal infection rate which is higher than the minimum attainable. It follows that hospitals can and probably do spend too much on infection control in, at least, some areas. This optimal approach is not operational at present but its data requirements might be thought of as an agenda for future research. In the meantime, progress in infection control economics depends on a piecemeal approach. An example is given in the estimation of the cost savings attributable to an improved antibiotic prescribing policy at the Royal Liverpool Hospital. The efficacy of the oral iron chelator 1,2-dimethyl-3-hydroxypyrid-4-one (L1) was compared with that of subcutaneous desferrioxamine in 26 patients with transfusional iron overload. Immediately after red-cell transfusion, 20 patients were randomised to receive either desferrioxamine (50 mg/kg daily as a 12 h subcutaneous infusion), or L1 (50 mg/kg daily by mouth). Patients were evaluated during treatment with the other drug after transfusion the next month. Mean (SD) daily urinary iron excretion was lower during L1 than during desferrioxamine (12.3 [6.7] vs 18.2 [15.3] mg/day). In 5 patients the dose of L1 was raised from 50 to 75 mg/kg daily; mean urinary iron excretion rose from 13.8 (7.0) mg/day to 26.7 (17.8) mg/day, comparable with that during desferrioxamine (24.9 [24.3] mg/day). Faecal iron excretion rose slightly over baseline in 6 patients studied during L1 administration (from 8.5 [0.9] mg/day to 12.2 [0.9] mg/day). Pharmacokinetic studies showed an elimination half-life for L1 of 117-237 min. Studies in dogs and in volunteers showed no absorption of the L1-iron complex, excluding a contribution of absorption of intraluminal complexes of L1 and food iron to urinary iron excretion. Further animal toxicity testing is needed before L1 can be studied in a broader group of patients. Although epidemiological and biochemical evidence suggests that aluminium may be associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD), there is no convincing proof of a causal link for aluminium in disease progression. We have completed a two year, single-blind study to investigate whether the progression of dementia could be slowed by the trivalent ion chelator, desferrioxamine. 48 patients with probable AD were randomly assigned to receive desferrioxamine (125 mg intramuscularly twice daily, 5 days per week, for 24 months), oral placebo (lecithin), or no treatment. No significant differences in baseline measures of intelligence, memory, or speech ability existed between groups. Activities of daily living were assessed and videorecorded at 6, 12, 18, and 24 month intervals. There were no differences in the rate of deterioration of patients receiving either placebo or no treatment. Desferrioxamine treatment led to significant reduction in the rate of decline of daily living skills as assessed by both group means (p = 0.03) and variances (p less than 0.04). The mean rate of decline was twice as rapid for the no-treatment group. Appetite (n = 4) and weight (n = 1) loss were the only reported side-effects. We conclude that sustained administration of desferrioxamine may slow the clinical progression of the dementia associated with AD. An adverse relationship between perioperative blood transfusions and the risk of subsequent recurrence of cancer was reported recently. We reviewed retrospectively the records of 171 patients who received initial therapy for colorectal adenocarcinoma from 1977 to 1979 at the Virginia Mason Medical Center. One hundred three patients (60%) received transfusions within 1 month of surgery and 37 patients (22%) developed recurrent cancer. No overall relationship between transfusion status (yes or no) and tumor recurrence or patient survival was found, although among subsets of patients (those with colon cancer or Dukes' Stage C2 disease), patients who had received transfusions were less likely to develop recurrent cancer than patients who had not (P = 0.01). No effect of transfusion on patient survival was found, even after consideration of potential confounding variables. The conflicting data regarding blood transfusion and cancer recurrence are reviewed, but it would appear to be premature to alter radically current blood transfusion practices based on the possibility that transfusion may adversely influence the risk of cancer recurrence.
We found no reason to change current treatment recommendations. However, considerable uncertainty continues to exist about the optimal schedule for desferrioxamine in people with transfusion-dependent thalassaemia.