A randomized clinical trial of early invasive intervention for atrial fibrillation (EARLY-AF) - methods and rationale. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with atrial septal defect: long-term follow-up results Atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure: Role of catheter ablation therapies. Pulmonary vein isolation for the treatment of drug-refractory atrial fibrillation in adults with congenital heart disease. Catheter ablation versus standard conventional treatment in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and atrial fibrillation (CASTLE-AF) - study design. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2: results from a randomized study comparing pulmonary vein isolation versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Antiarrhythmics After Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation (5A Study) Catheter ablation vs. antiarrhythmic drug treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation: a multicentre, randomized, controlled trial (SARA study) 2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. Catheter ablation treatment in patients with drug-refractory atrial fibrillation: a prospective, multi-centre, randomized, controlled study (Catheter Ablation For The Cure Of Atrial Fibrillation Study). Long-term efficacy and safety of two different rhythm control strategies in elderly patients with symptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy after radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Radiofrequency ablation vs antiarrhythmic drugs as first-line treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (RAAFT-2): a randomized trial. Atrial fibrillation and heart failure in cardiology practice: reciprocal impact and combined management from the perspective of atrial fibrillation: results of the Euro Heart Survey on atrial fibrillation. A randomized assessment of the incremental role of ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms after antral pulmonary vein isolation for long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Catheter Ablation Versus Medical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure (The CAMTAF Trial) Catheter Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drugs for Atrial Fibrillation: The A4 Study
BACKGROUND The ideal management of patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic atrial fibrillation ( AF ) remains unknown . Current practice guidelines recommend a trial of antiarrhythmic drugs ( AAD ) prior to considering an invasive ablation procedure . However , earlier ablation offers an opportunity to halt the progressive patho-anatomical changes associated with AF , as well as impart other important clinical benefits . OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to determine the optimal initial management strategy for patients with newly diagnosed , symptomatic atrial fibrillation . METHODS / DESIGN The EARLY-AF study ( Clinical Trials.govNCT02825979 ) is a prospect i ve , open label , multicenter , r and omized trial with a blinded assessment of outcomes . A total of 298 patients will be r and omized in a 1:1 fashion to first-line AAD therapy , or first-line cryoballoon-based pulmonary vein isolation .  Patients with symptomatic treatment naïve AF will be included . Arrhythmia outcomes will be assessed by implantable cardiac monitor ( ICM ) . The primary outcome is time to first recurrence of AF , atrial flutter , or atrial tachycardia ( AF/AFL/AT ) between days 91 and 365 following AAD initiation or AF ablation . Secondary outcomes include arrhythmia burden , quality of life , and healthcare utilization . DISCUSSION The EARLY-AF study is a r and omized trial design ed to evaluate the optimal first management approach for patients with AF . We hypothesize that catheter ablation will be superior to drug therapy in prevention of AF recurrence Introduction Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is commonly found in patients with structural heart disease ( SHD ) , including atrial septal defect ( ASD ) . The feasibility and safety of ablation for AF in patients with unrepaired ASD is seldom reported . Objectives This study aims to evaluate and compare the long-term efficacy of  AF ablation  in patients with and without ASD . Methods From January 2008 to December 2012 , 18 consecutive patients were identified with medically refractory AF and an unrepaired ASD under catheter ablation .  For each ASD patient , four control subjects were matched from our data base . Results There were no significant differences between groups in terms of age , sex , type of AF , LA diameter , LVIDD , and EF . The mean procedural and fluoroscopy times were not different between the groups ( p = NS ) . After a median follow-up of 20 months , the patients in the ASD group had 44.4 % AF recurrence after a single procedure compared with 34.7 % in the control group ( p = 0.11 ) . The mean LA diameter in non-recurrent patients was smaller than in recurrent patients ( p = 0.03 ) . In univariate Cox proportional hazards analyses , the factor found to have a significant association with arrhythmia recurrences was left atrial diameter ( hazard ratio 1.059 , 95 % confidence interval 1.002 to 1.120 , p = 0.03 ) . Conclusions These results indicate that in patients with AF and an ASD amenable to percutaneous closure , a staged approach with radiofrequency ablation of AF preceding closure is a rational strategy Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) represents the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia in patients with heart failure ( HF ) . AF in HF patients is associated with worsening of symptoms and also results in a substantial increase in mortality . Although HF patients in sinus rhythm have a better outcome than patients with AF , several r and omized studies investigating pharmacological rhythm control versus rate control have shown no advantage of one strategy over the other in terms of patient outcomes . Catheter-based ablation therapy is a newer therapeutic option with a rapidly evolving and changing role in the management of this arrhythmia . In the present review , the authors discuss the epidemiology , pathophysiology and prognostic significance of AF in patients with HF . Exclusively addressed are studies investigating catheter-based ablation for rhythm-control and rate-control therapies in the management of AF in HF patients BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a common arrhythmia in adults with congenital heart disease ( CHD ) .  Long-term antiarrhythmic therapy ( AAT ) in these patients has significant shortcomings . The safety and efficacy of pulmonary vein antrum isolation ( PVAI ) for the treatment of AF in CHD is presently unknown . HYPOTHESIS We hypothesized that PVAI for AF in patients with CHD is effective and safe . METHODS We review ed a prospect i ve cohort of 4315 patients ( age ≥ 18 ) undergoing PVAI for drug refractory AF at a single institution and identified 36 consecutive patients with CHD ( single ventricle physiology , tetralogy of Fallot , coa rct ation of the aorta , ventricular septal defects , atrial septal defects ( ASD ) and cardiomyopathy result ing from anomalous origin of the left main coronary from the pulmonary artery ) . A second cohort of 355 consecutive patients with noncongenital structural heart disease ( NSHD ) ( coronary artery disease , valvular heart disease , ejection fraction < 50 % , or prior noncongenital cardiac surgery ) undergoing PVAI during the same time period was used as a control . Success was defined as freedom from AF starting two months after PVAI in the absence AAT until the end of follow-up . Partial success was defined as freedom from AF in the presence of AAT until the end of follow-up . Combined success was defined as the sum of success and partial success . We compared the outcomes with the use of propensity-score matching in the overall cohort . RESULTS Patients with NSHD were older and had higher prevalence of hypertension ( P < .01 ) , diabetes ( P < .01 ) and hyperlipidemia ( P < .01 ) . The most common CHD lesion was ASD ( 61 % ) and the most common NSHD lesion was valvular heart disease ( 57 % ) . After one PVAI , success was achieved in 42 % and 53 % at 300 days in the CHD and NSHD groups respectively . Four-year success was achieved in 27 % and 36 % in the CHD and NSHD groups , respectively . There were no significant differences in the success rates between patients groups ( P= .46 ) , nor were there any differences in left atrial size or changes in ejection fraction after one or two PVAI in the respective groups . Complication rates between the CHD and NSHD groups were similar ( 15 % vs. 11 % , P= .42 ) except for a higher risk of vascular site complications in patients with CHD ( 8 % vs. 1 % , P < .05 ) . CONCLUSION PVAI is an attractive treatment modality in drug refractory AF in CHD , with combined success rates in excess of 60 % . The maintenance of sinus rhythm after PVAI in CHD appears similar to that of NSHD and warrants prospect i ve validation BACKGROUND Electrical isolation of the pulmonary veins by catheter ablation is an emerging treatment modality for the treatment of atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and is increasingly used in patients with heart failure . METHODS The catheter ablation versus st and ard conventional treatment in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and atrial fibrillation trial ( CASTLE-AF ) is a r and omized evaluation of ablative treatment of atrial fibrillation in patients with left ventricular dysfunction . The primary endpoint is the composite of all-cause mortality or worsening of heart failure requiring unplanned hospitalization using a time to first event analysis . Secondary endpoints are all-cause mortality , cardiovascular mortality , cerebrovascular accidents , worsening of heart failure requiring unplanned hospitalization , unplanned hospitalization due to cardiovascular reason , all-cause hospitalization , quality of life , number of therapies ( shock and antitachycardia pacing ) delivered by the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator ( ICD ) , time to first ICD therapy , number of device-detected ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation episodes , AF burden , AF free interval , left ventricular function , exercise tolerance , and percentage of right ventricular pacing . CASTLE-AF will r and omize 420 patients for a minimum of 3 years at 48 sites in the United States , Europe , Australia , and South America INTRODUCTION Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and diabetes mellitus type 2 ( DM2 ) often coexist ; however , a small number of patients with DM2 undergoing catheter ablation ( CA ) of AF  have been included in previous studies . The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of ablation therapy in DM2 patients with drug refractory AF . METHODS AND RESULTS From January 2005 to September 2006 , 70 patients with a diagnosis of DM2 and paroxysmal ( n = 29 ) or persistent ( n = 41 ) AF were r and omized to receive either pulmonary vein isolation or a new antiarrhythmic drug treatment ( ADT ) with a 1-year follow-up . The primary endpoint was the time to first AF recurrence . By Kaplan-Meier analysis , at the end of follow-up , 42.9 % of patients in the ADT group and 80 % of patients who received a single ablation procedure and were without medications were free of AF ( P = 0.001 ) . In the ablation group , a significant improvement in quality -of-life ( QoL ) scores as compared with ADT group was observed . Six patients in the ADT group ( 17.1 % ) developed significant adverse drug effects . Hospitalization rate during follow-up was higher in the ADT group ( P = 0.01 ) . The only complication attributable to ablation was one significant access-site hematoma . CONCLUSION In patients with DM2 , CA of AF provides significant clinical benefits over the ADT and appears to be a reasonable approach regarding feasibility , effectiveness , and low procedural risk Background — Atrial arrhythmias are common early after atrial fibrillation ( AF ) ablation . We hypothesized that empirical antiarrhythmic drug ( AAD ) therapy for 6 weeks after AF ablation would reduce the occurrence of atrial arrhythmias . Methods and Results — We r and omized consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing ablation to empirical antiarrhythmic therapy ( AAD group ) or no antiarrhythmic therapy ( no-AAD group ) for the first 6 weeks after ablation . In the no-AAD group , only atrioventricular nodal blocking agents were prescribed . All patients wore a transtelephonic monitor for 4 weeks after discharge and were reevaluated at 6 weeks . The primary end point of the study was a composite of ( 1 ) atrial arrhythmias lasting more than 24 hours ; ( 2 ) atrial arrhythmias associated with severe symptoms requiring hospital admission , cardioversion , or initiation/change of antiarrhythmic drug therapy ; and ( 3 ) intolerance to antiarrhythmic agent requiring drug cessation .  Of 110 enrolled patients ( age 55±9 years , 71 % male ) , 53 were r and omized to AAD and 57 to no-AAD . There was no difference in baseline characteristics between groups . During the 6 weeks after ablation , fewer patients reached the primary end point in the AAD compared with the no-AAD group ( 19 % versus 42 % ; P=0.005 ) . There remained fewer events in the AAD group ( 13 % versus 28 % ; P=0.05 ) when only end points of AF > 24 hours , arrhythmia-related hospitalization , or electrical cardioversion were compared . Conclusions — AAD treatment during the first 6 weeks after AF ablation is well tolerated and reduces the incidence of clinical ly significant atrial arrhythmias and need for cardioversion/hospitalization for arrhythmia management Background Catheter ablation ( CA ) is a highly effective therapy for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( AF ) when compared with antiarrhythmic drug therapy ( ADT ) . No r and omized studies have compared the two strategies in persistent AF . The present r and omized trial aim ed to compare the effectiveness of CA vs. ADT in treating persistent AF . Methods and results Patients with persistent AF were r and omly assigned to CA or ADT ( excluding patients with long-st and ing persistent AF ) . Primary endpoint at 12-month follow-up was defined as any episode of AF or atrial flutter lasting > 24 h that occurred after a 3-month blanking period . Secondary endpoints were any atrial tachyarrhythmia lasting > 30 s , hospitalization , and electrical cardioversion . In total , 146 patients were included ( aged 55 ± 9 years , 77 % male ) . The ADT group received class Ic ( 43.8 % ) or class III drugs ( 56.3 % ) . In an intention-to-treat analysis , 69 of 98 patients ( 70.4 % ) in the CA group and 21 of 48 patients ( 43.7 % ) in the ADT group were free of the primary endpoint ( P = 0.002 ) , implying an absolute risk difference of 26.6 % ( 95 % CI 10.0–43.3 ) in favour of CA . The proportion of patients free of any recurrence ( > 30 s ) was higher in the CA group than in the ADT group ( 60.2 vs. 29.2 % ; P < 0.001 ) and cardioversion was less frequent ( 34.7 vs. 50 % , respectively ; P = 0.018 ) . Conclusion Catheter ablation is superior to medical therapy for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with persistent AF at 12-month follow-up . Clinical Trial Registration Information NCT00863213 ( http:// clinical trials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00863213 ) ACCF : American College of Cardiology Foundation ACCP : American College of Chest Physicians ACS : acute coronary syndrome ACT : Atrial arrhythmia Conversion Trial ADONIS : American – Australian – African trial with DronedarONe In atrial fibrillation or flutter for the maintenance of Sinus rhythm AF : atrial fibrillation AHA : American Heart Association AND ROMEDA : ANtiarrhythmic trial with DROnedarone in Moderate-to-severe congestive heart failure Evaluating morbidity DecreAse APHRS : Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society aPTT : activated partial thromboplastin time ARB : angiotensin-receptor blocker ARISTOTLE : Apixaban for Reduction In STroke and Other ThromboemboLic Events in atrial fibrillation ATHENA : A placebo-controlled , double-blind , parallel arm Trial to assess the efficacy of dronedarone 400 mg b.i.d . for the prevention of cardiovascular Hospitalization or death from any cause in patiENts with Atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter ATRIA : AnTicoagulation and Risk factors In Atrial fibrillation AVERROES : Apixaban VErsus acetylsalicylic acid ( ASA ) to Reduce the Rate Of Embolic Stroke in atrial fibrillation patients who have failed or are unsuitable for vitamin K antagonist treatment AVRO : A prospect i ve , r and omized , double-blind , Active-controlled , superiority study of Vernakalant vs. amiodarone in Recent Onset atrial fibrillation b.i.d : bis in die ( twice daily ) b.p.m . : beats per minute CABANA : Catheter ABlation vs . ANtiarrhythmic drug therapy for Atrial fibrillation CABG : coronary artery bypass graft CAP : Continued Access to Protect AF CHA2DS2-VASc : Congestive heart failure or left ventricular dysfunction Hypertension , Age ≥75 ( doubled ) , Diabetes , Stroke (doubled)-Vascular disease , Age 65–74 , Sex category ( female ) CHADS2 : Congestive heart failure , Hypertension , Age ≥75 , Diabetes , Stroke ( doubled ) CI : confidence interval CRAFT : Controlled R and omized Atrial Fibrillation Trial CrCl : creatinine clearance DAFNE : Dronedarone Atrial FibrillatioN study after Electrical cardioversion DIONYSOS : R and omized Double blind trIal to evaluate efficacy and safety of drOnedarone ( 400 mg b.i.d . ) vs . amiodaroNe ( 600 mg q.d . for 28 daYS , then 200 mg qd thereafter ) for at least 6 mOnths for the maintenance of Sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation EAST : Early treatment of Atrial fibrillation for Stroke prevention Trial EHRA : European Heart Rhythm Association ECG : electrocardiogram EMA : European Medicines Agency ERATO : Efficacy and safety of dRonedArone for The cOntrol of ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation EURIDIS : EURopean trial In atrial fibrillation or flutter patients receiving Dronedarone for the maIntenance of Sinus rhythm FAST : atrial Fibrillation catheter Ablation vs . Surgical ablation Treatment FDA : Food and Drug Administration Flec-SL : Flecainide Short-Long trial HAS-BLED : Hypertension , Abnormal renal/liver function , Stroke , Bleeding history or predisposition , Labile INR , Elderly , Drugs/alcohol concomitantly HF-PEF : heart failure with preserved ejection fraction HF-REF : heart failure with reduced ejection fraction HR : hazard ratio HRS : Heart Rhythm Society ICH : intracranial haemorrhage INR : international normalized ratio i.v . : intravenous J-RHYTHM : Japanese RHYTHM management trial for atrial fibrillation LAA : left atrial appendage LoE : level of evidence LVEF : left ventricular ejection fraction MANTRA-PAF : Medical ANtiarrhythmic Treatment or Radiofrequency Ablation in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation NICE : National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence NOAC : novel oral anticoagulant NSAID : non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug NYHA : New York Heart Association OAC : oral anticoagulant or oral anticoagulation o.d . : omni die ( every day ) PALLAS : Permanent Atrial fibriLLAtion outcome Study using dronedarone on top of st and ard therapy PCI : percutaneous coronary intervention PREVAIL : Prospect i ve R and omized EVAluation of the LAA closure device In patients with atrial fibrillation v s. Long-term warfarin therapy PROTECT AF : WATCHMAN LAA system for embolic PROTECTion in patients with Atrial Fibrillation PT : prothrombin time RAAFT : Radio frequency Ablation Atrial Fibrillation Trial RE-LY : R and omized Evaluation of Long-term anticoagulant therapY with dabigatran etexilate ROCKET-AF : Rivaroxaban Once daily oral direct factor Xa inhibition Compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and Embolism Trial in atrial fibrillation RRR : relative risk reduction TE : thromboembolism TIA : transient ischaemic attack t.i.d . : ter in die ( three times daily ) TOE : transoesophageal echocardiogram TTR : time in therapeutic range VKA : vitamin K antagonist Guidelines summarize and evaluate all currently available evidence on a particular issue with the aim of assisting physicians in selecting the best management strategy for an individual patient suffering from a given condition , taking into account the impact on AIMS We conducted a multi-centre , prospect i ve , controlled , r and omized trial to investigate the adjunctive role of ablation therapy to antiarrhythmic drug therapy in preventing  atrial fibrillation ( AF )  relapses in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF in whom antiarrhythmic drug therapy had already failed . METHODS AND RESULTS One hundred and thirty seven patients were r and omized to ablation and antiarrhythmic drug therapy ( ablation group ) or antiarrhythmic drug therapy alone ( control group ) . In the ablation group , patients underwent cavo-tricuspid and left inferior pulmonary vein (PV)-mitral isthmus ablation plus circumferential PV ablation . The primary end-point of the study was the absence of any recurrence of atrial arrhythmia lasting > 30 s in the 1-year follow-up period , after 1-month blanking period . Three ( 4.4 % ) major complications were related to ablation : one patient had a stroke during left atrium ablation , another suffered transient phrenic paralysis , and the third had a pericardial effusion which required pericardiocentesis . After 12 months of follow-up , 63/69 ( 91.3 % ) control group patients had at least one AF recurrence , whereas 30/68 ( 44.1 % ) ( P<0.001 ) ablation group patients had atrial arrhythmia recurrence ( four patients had atrial flutter , 26 patients AF ) . CONCLUSION Ablation therapy combined with antiarrhythmic drug therapy is superior to antiarrhythmic drug therapy alone in preventing atrial arrhythmia recurrences in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF in whom antiarrhythmic drug therapy has already failed BACKGROUND We prospect ively compared the efficacy , safety , and quality of life ( QoL ) impact of catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs ( AAD ) in elderly patients with persistent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . METHODS AND RESULTS Four hundred and twelve consecutive patients , aged ≥ 70 years , underwent ablation ( Group A , 153 patients ) or AAD ( Group B , 259 patients ) . Study endpoints : treatment failure ( any AF/AT lasting > 30 seconds ) and treatment-related adverse events ( acute when ≤1 month of procedure and long term when > 1 month ) . At a follow-up of 60 ± 17 months , 43 % and 46 % patients in Group B versus 58 % and 76 % in Group A were in sinus rhythm ( SR ) , respectively , after one ( P = 0.003 ) and 2 procedures ( P < 0.001 ) . Fifteen acute adverse events occurred ( 6.7 % in Group A vs 1 % in Group B , P < 0.001 ) , mainly periprocedural cerebral thromboembolism ( 3.3 % in Group A vs 0.7 % in Group B , P = 0.058 ) . Previous TIA/stroke result ed the only independent predictor of periprocedural cerebrovascular accidents ( OR 1.2 , 95%IC 1.1 - 1.3 ) . At follow-up , 74 long-term adverse events occurred ( 7.7 % in Group A vs 23.9 % in Group B , P < 0.001 ) with Group B patients more often experiencing  AAD-related  adverse events ( 12.7 % vs 2.6 % , P < 0.001 ) . Group A and absence of AF/AT recurrences significantly improved QoL scores ( P < 0.001 ) . CONCLUSIONS In elderly persistent AF patients  , catheter ablation is more effective in maintaining SR and in improving QoL  than AAD but is affected by a higher risk of embolic complications , particularly in patients with previous TIA/stroke . Over time , Group A patients more likely discontinued AAD with a reduction of long-term adverse events OBJECTIVES The use of antiarrhythmic drugs after ablation is a controversial issue when evaluating the efficacy of atrial fibrillation ( AF ) ablation . This study compares in a prospect i ve and r and omized fashion the impact of an antiarrhythmic drug in preventing AF recurrence after AF ablation . METHODS From February 2004 to May 2005 , 107 consecutive patients ( mean age 57 + /- 10 years , 69 men ) , with paroxysmal ( 60 % ) or persistent ( 40 % ) drug refractory AF , were r and omly assigned to ablation alone ( Group A , 53 patients ) or combined with the best antiarrhythmic therapy , preferably amiodarone ( Group B , 54 patients ) . All patients underwent cavo-tricuspid and left inferior pulmonary vein (PV)-mitral isthmus ablation plus circumferential PV ablation , using a guided electro-anatomical approach . St and ard electrocardiograms ( ECG ) , and ambulatory and transtelephonic ECG monitoring  were used to assess AF recurrences . Recurrences during the first month after ablation were excluded from this analysis . RESULTS At 12 months of follow-up , no significant difference was observed in the rates of AF recurrences between Group A ( 18/53 patients , 34 % ) and Group B ( 16/54 patients , 30 % ) . The percentage of patients with > /= 1 asymptomatic AF episode was higher in Group B than in Group A ( 10/16 patients , 63 % , vs 5/18 patients , 28 % , P = 0.04 ) . CONCLUSIONS Continuing antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients who undergo catheter ablation for AF did not lower the rate of AF recurrences . Antiarrhythmic drugs increased the proportion of patients with asymptomatic AF episodes IMPORTANCE Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common rhythm disorder seen in clinical practice . Antiarrhythmic drugs are effective for reduction of recurrence in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF .  Radiofrequency ablation is an accepted therapy in patients for whom antiarrhythmic drugs have failed ; however , its role as a first-line therapy needs further investigation . OBJECTIVE To compare radiofrequency ablation with antiarrhythmic drugs ( st and ard therapy ) in treating patients with paroxysmal AF as a first-line therapy . DESIGN , SETTING , AND PATIENTS A r and omized clinical trial involving 127 treatment-naive patients with paroxysmal AF were r and omized at 16 centers in Europe and North America to received either antiarrhythmic therapy or ablation .  The first patient was enrolled July 27 , 2006 ; the last patient , January 29 , 2010 . The last follow-up was February 16 , 2012 . INTERVENTIONS Sixty-one patients in the antiarrhythmic drug group and 66 in the radiofrequency ablation group were followed up for 24 months . MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The time to the first documented atrial tachyarrhythmia of more than 30 seconds ( symptomatic or asymptomatic AF , atrial flutter , or atrial tachycardia ) , detected by either scheduled or unscheduled electrocardiogram , Holter , transtelephonic monitor , or rhythm strip , was the primary outcome . Secondary outcomes included symptomatic recurrences of atrial tachyarrhythmias and quality of life measures assessed by the EQ-5D tool . RESULTS Forty-four patients ( 72.1 % ) in the antiarrhythmic group and in 36 patients ( 54.5 % ) in the ablation group experienced the primary efficacy outcome ( hazard ratio [ HR ] , 0.56 [ 95 % CI , 0.35 - 0.90 ] ; P = .02 ) . For the secondary outcomes , 59 % in the drug group and 47 % in the ablation group experienced the first recurrence of symptomatic AF , atrial flutter , atrial tachycardia ( HR , 0.56 [ 95 % CI , 0.33 - 0.95 ] ; P = .03 ) . No deaths or strokes were reported in either group ; 4 cases of cardiac tamponade were reported in the ablation group . In the st and ard treatment group , 26 patients ( 43 % ) underwent ablation after 1-year . Quality of life was moderately impaired at baseline in both groups and improved at the 1 year follow-up . However , improvement was not significantly different among groups . CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients with paroxysmal AF without previous antiarrhythmic drug treatment , radiofrequency ablation compared with antiarrhythmic drugs result ed in a lower rate of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias at 2 years . However , recurrence was frequent in both groups . TRIAL REGISTRATION clinical trials.gov Identifier : NCT00392054 OBJECTIVES Our aim was to identify shortcomings in the management of patients with both atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and heart failure ( HF ) . BACKGROUND AF and HF often coincide in cardiology practice , and they are known to worsen each other 's prognosis , but little is known about the quality of care of this combination . METHODS In the observational Euro Heart Survey on AF , 5,333 AF patients were enrolled in 182 centers across 35 European Society of Cardiology member countries in 2003 and 2004 . A follow-up survey was performed after 1 year . RESULTS At baseline , 1,816 patients ( 34 % ) had HF .  Recommended therapy for HF with left ventricular systolic dysfunction ( LVSD ) with a beta-blocker and either an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor ( ACEI ) or angiotensin II receptor blocker was prescribed in 40 % of HF patients , while 29 % received the recommended drug therapy for both LVSD-HF and AF , consisting of the combination of a beta-blocker , either ACEI or angiotensin II receptor blocker , and oral anticoagulation .  Rate control was insufficient with 40 % of all HF patients with permanent AF having a heart rate < or = 80 beats/min . In the total cohort , HF patients had a higher risk for mortality ( 9.5 % vs. 3.3 % ; p < 0.001 ) , ( progression of ) HF ( 24.8 % vs. 5.0 % ; p < 0.001 ) , and AF progression ( 35 % vs. 19 % ; p < 0.001 ) during 1-year follow-up . Of all recommended drugs for AF and LVSD-HF , only ACEI prescription was associated with improved survival during 1-year follow-up ( odds ratio : 0.51 [ 95 % confidence interval : 0.31 to 0.85 ] ; p = 0.011 ) . CONCLUSIONS The prescription rate of guideline -recommended drug therapy for AF and LVSD-HF is low . R and omized controlled trials targeting this highly prevalent subgroup with AF and HF are warranted OBJECTIVES This study sought to determine whether ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms ( CFAEs ) after antral pulmonary vein isolation ( APVI ) further improves the clinical outcome of APVI in patients with long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . BACKGROUND Ablation of CFAEs has been reported to eliminate persistent AF . However , residual pulmonary vein arrhythmogenicity is a common mechanism of recurrence . METHODS In this r and omized study , 119 consecutive patients ( mean age 60 + /- 9 years ) with long-lasting persistent AF underwent APVI with an irrigated-tip radiofrequency ablation catheter . Antral pulmonary vein isolation result ed in termination of AF in 19 of 119 patients ( Group A , 16 % ) . The remaining 100 patients who still were in AF were r and omized to no further ablation and underwent cardioversion ( Group B , n = 50 ) or to ablation of CFAEs in the left atrium or coronary sinus for up to 2 additional hours of procedure duration ( Group C , n = 50 ) . RESULTS Atrial fibrillation terminated during ablation of CFAEs in 9 of 50 patients ( 18 % ) in Group C. At 10 + /- 3 months after a single ablation procedure , 18 of 50 ( 36 % ) in Group B and 17 of 50 ( 34 % ) in Group C were in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic drugs ( p = 0.84 ) . In Group A , 15 of 19 patients ( 79 % ) were in sinus rhythm . A repeat ablation procedure was performed in 34 of 100 r and omized patients ( for AF in 30 and atrial flutter in 4 ) . At 9 + /- 4 months after the final procedure , 34 of 50 ( 68 % ) in Group B and 30 of 50 ( 60 % ) in Group C were in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic drugs ( p = 0.40 ) . CONCLUSIONS Up to 2 h of additional ablation of CFAEs after APVI does not appear to improve clinical outcomes in patients with long-lasting persistent AF Background —Restoring sinus rhythm in patients with heart failure ( HF ) and atrial fibrillation ( AF ) may improve left ventricular ( LV ) function and HF symptoms . We sought to compare the effect of a catheter ablation strategy with that of a medical rate control strategy in patients with persistent AF and HF . Methods and Results — Patients with persistent AF , symptomatic HF , and LV ejection fraction < 50 % were r and omized to catheter ablation or medical rate control . The primary end-point was the difference between groups in LV ejection fraction at 6 months . Baseline LV ejection fraction was 32±8 % in the ablation group and 34±12 % in the medical group . Twenty-six patients underwent catheter ablation  , and 24 patients were rate controlled .  Freedom from AF was achieved in 21/26 ( 81 % ) at 6 months off antiarrhythmic drugs . LV ejection fraction at 6 months in the ablation group was 40±12 % compared with 31±13 % in the rate control group ( P=0.015 ) . Ablation was associated with better peak oxygen consumption ( 22±6 versus 18±6 mL/kg per minute ; P=0.014 ) and Minnesota living with HF question naire score ( 24±22 versus 47±22 ; P=0.001 ) compared with rate control . Conclusions —Catheter ablation is effective in restoring sinus rhythm in selected patients with persistent AF and HF , and can improve LV function , functional capacity , and HF symptoms compared with rate control . Clinical Trial Registration —URL : http://www . clinical trials.gov . Unique identifier : Background — The mainstay of treatment for atrial fibrillation ( AF ) remains pharmacological ; however , catheter ablation has increasingly been used over the last decade . The relative merits of each strategy have not been extensively studied . Methods and Results — We conducted a r and omized multicenter comparison of these 2 treatment strategies in patients with paroxysmal AF resistant to at least 1 antiarrhythmic drug . The primary end point was absence of recurrent AF between months 3 and 12 , absence of recurrent AF after up to 3 ablation procedures , or changes in antiarrhythmic drugs during the first 3 months . Ablation consisted of pulmonary vein isolation in all cases , whereas additional extrapulmonary vein lesions were at the discretion of the physician . Crossover was permitted at 3 months in case of failure . Echocardiographic data , symptom score , exercise capacity , quality of life , and AF burden were evaluated at 3 , 6 , and 12 months by the supervising committee . Of 149 eligible patients , 112 ( 18 women [ 16 % ] ; age , 51.1±11.1 years ) were enrolled and r and omized to ablation ( n=53 ) or “ new ” antiarrhythmic drugs alone or in combination ( n=59 ) . Crossover from the antiarrhythmic drugs and ablation groups occurred in 37 ( 63 % ) and 5 patients ( 9 % ) , respectively ( P=0.0001 ) . At the 1-year follow-up , 13 of 55 patients ( 23 % ) and 46 of 52 patients ( 89 % ) had no recurrence of AF in the antiarrhythmic drug and ablation groups , respectively ( P<0.0001 ) . Symptom score , exercise capacity , and quality of life were significantly higher in the ablation group . Conclusion — This r and omized multicenter study demonstrates the superiority of catheter ablation over antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with AF with regard to maintenance of sinus rhythm and improvement in symptoms , exercise capacity , and quality of life
The complexity of CHD appears to have a significant effect on a study but not in others .
Catheter ablation in ASD and persistent left superior vena cava had a high success rate .
Overall , catheter ablation is safe whichever the type of CHD is .
Conclusion Catheter ablation for AF in CHD had modest efficacy that can be increased by subsequent/repeat ablation and it also has an excellent safety profile .
Abstract Background Prevalence of atrial fibrillation ( AF ) in patients with congenital heart disease ( CHD ) is on the rise .
Anti-arrhythmic drugs are usually the first line of treatment in CHD , however , it is often ineffective and poorly tolerated .
We aim ed to perform a systematic review to assess the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation for AF in CHD .