Effect of a nurse-coordinated prevention programme on cardiovascular risk after an acute coronary syndrome: main results of the RESPONSE randomised trial Secondary prevention in coronary heart disease: a randomised trial of nurse led clinics in primary care Secondary prevention clinics for coronary heart disease: four year follow up of a randomised controlled trial in primary care The SPHERE Study. Secondary prevention of heart disease in general practice: protocol of a randomised controlled trial of tailored practice and patient care plans with parallel qualitative, economic and policy analyses. [ISRCTN24081411] Adherence to a guideline on cardiovascular prevention: a comparison between general practitioners and practice nurses. Secondary Prevention Risk Interventions Via Telemedicine and Tailored Patient Education (SPRITE): A Randomized Trial to Improve Postmyocardial Infarction Management A Multimethod Quality Improvement Intervention To Improve Preventive Cardiovascular Care Effectiveness of nurse-delivered cardiovascular risk management in primary care: a randomised trial. Effectiveness of a shared team approach between nurses and doctors for improved risk factor management in survivors of stroke: a cluster randomized controlled trial A randomized clinical trial of secondary prevention among women hospitalized with coronary heart disease. Improving patient adherence to lifestyle advice (IMPALA): a cluster-randomised controlled trial on the implementation of a nurse-led intervention for cardiovascular risk management in primary care (protocol) [Evaluation of the efficacy of a comprehensive programme of secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in primary care: the PREseAP Study]. Cost effectiveness of nurse led secondary prevention clinics for coronary heart disease in primary care: follow up of a randomised controlled trial Development of a complex intervention for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in primary care using the UK Medical Research Council framework. Individualised multifactorial lifestyle intervention trial for high-risk cardiovascular patients in primary care. Randomised controlled trial of a secondary prevention program for myocardial infarction patients ('ProActive Heart'): study protocol. Secondary prevention program for myocardial infarction patients The NAILED stroke risk factor trial (Nurse based Age independent Intervention to Limit Evolution of Disease after stroke): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Objective To quantify the impact of a practical , hospital-based nurse-coordinated prevention programme on cardiovascular risk , integrated into the routine clinical care of patients discharged after an acute coronary syndrome , as compared with usual care only . Design RESPONSE ( R and omised Evaluation of Secondary Prevention by Outpatient Nurse SpEcialists ) was a r and omised clinical trial . Setting Multicentre trial in secondary and tertiary healthcare setting s. Participants 754 patients admitted for acute coronary syndrome . Intervention A nurse-coordinated prevention programme , consisting of four outpatient nurse clinic visits , focusing on healthy lifestyles , biometric risk factors and medication adherence , in addition to usual care . Main outcome measures The main outcome was 10-year cardiovascular mortality risk as estimated by Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation at 12 months follow-up . Secondary outcomes included Framingham Coronary Risk Score at 12 months , in addition to changes in individual risk factors . Risk factor control was classified as ‘ poor ’ if 0 to 3 factors were on target , ‘ fair ’ if 4 to 6 factors were on target , and ‘ good ’ if 7 to 9 were on target . Results The mean Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation at 12 months was 4.4 per cent ( SD 4.5 ) in the intervention group and 5.4 per cent ( SD 6.2 ) in the control group ( p=0.021 ) , representing a 17.4 % relative risk reduction . At 12 months , risk factor control classified as ‘ good ’ was achieved in 35 % of patients in the intervention group compared with 25 % in the control group ( p=0.003 ) . Attendance to the nurse-coordinated prevention programme was 92 % . In the intervention group , 86 rehospitalisations were observed against 132 in the control group ( relative risk reduction 34.8 % , p=0.023 ) . Conclusions The nurse-coordinated hospital-based prevention programme in addition to usual care is a practical , yet effective method for reduction of cardiovascular risk in patients with coronary disease . Our data suggest that the counselling component of the programme may lead to a reduction in hospital readmissions . Trial Registration trialregister.nl Identifier TC1290 Objective To evaluate whether  nurse run clinics in general practice improve secondary prevention in patients with coronary heart disease . Design R and omised controlled trial . Setting A r and om sample of 19 general practice s in northeast Scotl and . Patients 1173 patients ( 685 men and 488 women ) under 80 years with working diagnoses of coronary heart disease , but without terminal illness or dementia and not housebound .  Intervention Nurse run clinics promoted medical and lifestyle aspects of secondary prevention and offered regular follow up . Main outcome measures Components of secondary prevention assessed at baseline and one year were : aspirin use ; blood pressure management ; lipid management ; physical activity ; dietary fat ; and smoking status . A cumulative score was generated by counting the number of appropriate components of secondary prevention for each patient . Results There were significant improvements in aspirin management ( odds ratio 3.22 , 95 % confidence interval 2.15 to 4.80 ) , blood pressure management ( 5.32 , 3.01 to 9.41 ) , lipid management ( 3.19 , 2.39 to 4.26 ) , physical activity ( 1.67 , 1.23 to 2.26 ) and diet ( 1.47 , 1.10 to 1.96 ) . There was no effect on smoking cessation ( 0.78 , 0.47 to 1.28 ) . Of six possible components of secondary prevention , the baseline mean was 3.27 . The adjusted mean improvement attributable to intervention was 0.55 of a component ( 0.44 to 0.67 ) . Improvement was found regardless of practice baseline performance . Conclusions  Nurse run clinics proved practical to implement in general practice and effectively increased secondary prevention in coronary heart disease . Most patients gained at least one effective component of secondary prevention and , for them , future cardiovascular events and mortality could be reduced by up to a third Abstract Objectives : To evaluate the effects of nurse led clinics in primary care on secondary prevention , total mortality , and coronary event rates after four years . Design : Follow up of a r and omised controlled trial by postal question naires and review of case notes and national data sets . Setting : Stratified , r and om sample of 19 general practice s in north east Scotl and . Participants : 1343 patients ( 673 intervention and 670 control ) under 80 years with a working diagnosis of coronary heart disease but without terminal illness or dementia and not housebound . Intervention : Nurse led secondary prevention clinics promoted medical and lifestyle components of secondary prevention and offered regular follow up for one year . Main outcome measures : Components of secondary prevention ( aspirin , blood pressure management , lipid management , healthy diet , exercise , non-smoking ) , total mortality , and coronary events ( non-fatal myocardial infa rct ions and coronary deaths ) . Results : Mean follow up was at 4.7 years . Significant improvements were shown in the intervention group in all components of secondary prevention except smoking at one year , and these were sustained after four years except for exercise . The control group , most of whom attended clinics after the initial year , caught up before final follow up , and differences between groups were no longer significant . At 4.7 years , 100 patients in the intervention group and 128 in the control group had died : cumulative death rates were 14.5 % and 18.9 % , respectively ( P=0.038 ) . 100 coronary events occurred in the intervention group and 125 in the control group : cumulative event rates were 14.2 % and 18.2 % , respectively ( P=0.052 ) . Adjusting for age , sex , general practice , and baseline secondary prevention , proportional hazard ratios were 0.75 for all deaths ( 95 % confidence intervals 0.58 to 0.98 ; P=0.036 ) and 0.76 for coronary events ( 0.58 to 1.00 ; P=0.049 ) Conclusions : Nurse led secondary prevention improved medical and lifestyle components of secondary prevention and this seemed to lead to significantly fewer total deaths and probably fewer coronary events .  Secondary prevention clinics should be started sooner rather than later . What is already known on this topic Several effective interventions exist for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease , but implementing them in practice has proved difficult Secondary prevention programmes for coronary heart disease have improved short term outcomes such as processes of care and quality of life What this study adds Short term improvements in uptake of secondary prevention produced by nurse led clinics are maintained in the longer term Improved medical and lifestyle components of secondary prevention produced by nurse led clinics seem to lead to fewer total deaths and coronary Background The aim of the SPHERE study is to design , implement and evaluate tailored practice and personal care plans to improve the process of care and objective clinical outcomes for patients with established coronary heart disease ( CHD ) in general practice across two different health systems on the isl and of Irel and .CHD is a common cause of death and a significant cause of morbidity in Irel and . Secondary prevention has been recommended as a key strategy for reducing levels of CHD mortality and general practice has been highlighted as an ideal setting for secondary prevention initiatives . Current indications suggest that there is considerable room for improvement in the provision of secondary prevention for patients with established heart disease on the isl and of Irel and . The review literature recommends structured programmes with continued support and follow-up of patients ; the provision of training , tailored to practice needs of access to evidence of effectiveness of secondary prevention ; structured recall programmes that also take account of individual practice needs ; and patient-centred consultations accompanied by attention to disease management guidelines . Methods SPHERE is a cluster r and omised controlled trial , with practice -level r and omisation to intervention and control groups , recruiting 960 patients from 48 practice s in three study centres ( Belfast , Dublin and Galway ) . Primary outcomes are blood pressure , total cholesterol , physical and mental health status ( SF-12 ) and hospital re-admissions . The intervention takes place over two years and data is collected at baseline , one-year and two-year follow-up . Data is obtained from medical charts , consultations with practitioners , and patient postal question naires . The SPHERE intervention involves the implementation of a structured systematic programme of care for patients with CHD attending general practice . It is a multi-faceted intervention that has been developed to respond to barriers and solutions to optimal secondary prevention identified in preliminary qualitative research with practitioners and patients . General practitioners and practice nurses attend training sessions in facilitating behaviour change and medication prescribing guidelines for secondary prevention of CHD . Patients are invited to attend regular four-monthly consultations over two years , during which targets and goals for secondary prevention are set and review ed . The analysis will be strengthened by economic , policy and qualitative components BACKGROUND Patient non-compliance with prescribed treatment is an important factor in the lack of success in cardiovascular prevention . Another important cause is non-adherence of caregivers to the guidelines . It is not known how doctors and nurses differ in the application of guidelines . Patient compliance to treatment may vary according to the type of caregiver . OBJECTIVE To compare adherence to cardiovascular prevention delivered by practice nurses and by general practitioners . SETTING Six primary health care centres in the Netherl and s ( 25 general practitioners , six practice nurses ) . METHODS 701 high risk patients were included in a r and omised trial . Half of the patients received nurse-delivered care  and half received care by general practitioners . For 91 % of the patients treatment concerned secondary prevention . The Dutch guideline on cardiovascular prevention was used as protocol . A structured self-administered question naire was sent by post to patients . Data were extracted from the practice data base and the question naire . RESULTS Intervention was received by 77 % of respondents who visited the practice nurse compared to 57 % from the general practitioner group ( OR = 2.56 , p < 0.01 ) . More  lifestyle intervention  was given by the practice nurse ; 46 % of patients received at least one lifestyle intervention ( weight , diet , exercise , and smoking ) compared to 13 % in general practitioner group ( OR = 3.24 , p < 0.001 ) . In addition , after one year more patients from the practice nurse group used cardiovascular drugs ( OR = 1.9 , p = 0.03 ) . Nurses inquired more frequently about patient compliance to medical treatment ( OR = 2.1 , p < 0.01 ) . Regarding patient compliance , no statistical difference between study groups in this trial was found . CONCLUSION Practice nurses adhered better to the Dutch guideline on cardiovascular prevention than general practitioners did . Lifestyle intervention advice was more frequently given by practice nurses . Improvement of cardiovascular prevention is still necessary . Both caregivers should inquire about patient adherence on a regular basis Background — Secondary prevention by risk factor modification improves patient outcomes , yet it is often not achieved in clinical practice . Reasons for failure stem from challenges of prioritizing risk factor reduction and engaging patients in changing their behaviors . We hypothesize that a novel telemedicine intervention with tailored patient education could improve cardiovascular risk factors . Methods — To evaluate this intervention , we propose enrolling 450 patients with a recent myocardial infa rct ion and hypertension into a 3-arm r and omized , controlled trial . The first arm ( n=150 ) will receive home blood pressure ( BP ) monitors plus a nurse-delivered , telephone-based tailored patient education intervention and will be enrolled into HealthVault , a Microsoft electronic health record platform . The second arm ( n=150 ) will also receive BP monitors plus a tailored patient education intervention and be enrolled in HeartVault . However , the patient education intervention will be delivered by a Web-based program and will cover topics identical to those in the nurse-delivered intervention . Both arms will be compared with a control group receiving st and ard care ( n=150 ) . All participants will have an in-person assessment at baseline and at completion of the study , including st and ardized measurements of BP , LDL cholesterol , and glycosylated hemoglobin ( in diabetic subjects ) . The study design will allow assessment of a telephone-based , nurse-administered disease management program versus st and ard care . The main outcome of interest is the reduction in systolic BP in each intervention group compared with the control group at 12 months . Secondary outcomes assessed will include reductions in LDL cholesterol , body weight , and glycosylated hemoglobin , as well as adherence to evidence -based therapies and improvement in health behaviors . Conclusion — If successful in optimizing BP control , managing other coronary heart disease risk factors , and demonstrating a lower cost , the Web-based disease management tool has the potential to enhance coronary artery disease management , quality of care , and ultimately , patient outcomes . Clinical Trial Registration — URL : http://www . clinical trials.gov . Unique identifier : NCT00901277 Context Interventions to promote guideline -recommended care have met with limited success . Quality improvement experts believe that multicomponent interventions are more effective than simpler strategies , but this belief rests on limited evidence . Contribution In this r and omized trial of 20 primary care practice s , intervention practice s received quarterly site visits and 2 network meetings about quality improvement in addition to copies of practice guidelines and quarterly performance reports . Intervention practice s had greater improvement in providing guideline -recommended care for cardiovascular disease prevention and treatment than practice s that received only the guidelines and performance reports . Caution s The study involved a small number of practice s. The Editors Widespread evidence reveals inadequate implementation of evidence -based clinical practice guidelines for prevention and management of cardiovascular disease and stroke in primary care setting s ( 1 - 3 ) . Primary prevention deficiencies exist in the screening and management of dyslipidemia ( 4 ) and hypertension ( 5 ) . Secondary prevention deficiencies include inadequate treatment of dyslipidemia in patients with coronary heart disease ( CHD ) ( 6 ) and inadequate use of antiplatelet therapy in patients with CHD or cerebrovascular disease ( 7 ) , inadequate use of -blockers after myocardial infa rct ion ( 8) , inadequate use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-receptor blockers in patients with heart failure ( 9 ) , and inadequate use of oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation ( 10 ) . Finally , patients with diabetes mellitus who are at high risk for cardiovascular disease as well as microvascular disease infrequently receive recommended screening and adequate treatment for elevated glycosylated hemoglobin levels , hypertension , and dyslipidemia ( 11 ) . Published systematic review s point to the importance of multifaceted interventions in increasing adherence to practice guidelines and improving disease control ( 12 , 13 ) . Little is known , however , about the relative effectiveness of different implementation strategies . More research is needed to develop and vali date effective , theoretically sound , and practical strategies for improving the provision of evidence -based medicine in primary care . Particularly important are studies that address multiple common , chronic conditions , which together reflect a large proportion of the work of primary care providers ( 14 ) . This study was design ed as a pragmatic clinical trial ( 15 ) , intended to assess whether a  multi method quality improvement intervention  was more effective than a less intensive intervention  for improving adherence to 21 quality indicators relevant to the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease and stroke . The multi method quality improvement intervention added practice site visits ( for academic detailing and quality improvement facilitation ) and network meetings ( for sharing best practice s ) to the approach of guideline dissemination and audit and feedback used in the less intensive intervention . The study was conducted in a practice -based research network ( PPRNet ) among users of a common electronic medical record ( Practice Partner Patient Records , Seattle , Washington ) , which historically provided audit and feedback to its practice members . Audit and feedback have already been shown to improve the practice of health care professionals , particularly in prescribing and test ordering ( 16 ) . Additional research is needed to assess the effect of audit and feedback in combination with other interventions . Methods Design The design was a cluster r and omized , controlled clinical trial , with the practice as the unit of r and omization . Twenty-three office-based primary care practice s in 15 states agreed to participate . The institutional review board at the Medical University of South Carolina approved the study . Study Indicators We derived the study indicators ( Table 1 ) from published sources ( 17 - 22 ) . Fourteen were process measures , which reflected whether recommended tests were done , appropriate diagnoses made , or appropriate medication prescribed . Seven were outcome measures , which reflected whether patients achieved recommended treatment goals . Some of the measures represented primary prevention , for example , screening for hypertension or dyslipidemia . Others represented secondary prevention , for example , reaching treatment goals for glycosylated hemoglobin levels , low-density lipoprotein ( LDL ) cholesterol levels , and blood pressure in patients with diabetes . An additional indicator , hormone replacement therapy for postmenopausal women , was included at the beginning of the study but was withdrawn in July 2002 when the results from the Women 's Health Initiative trial were published ( 23 ) . Table 1 . Study Indicators We determined practice performance for each study indicator at baseline and quarterly throughout the study . To determine performance , participating practice s ran a computer program to extract patient activity during the previous quarter from their electronic medical record . To protect patient confidentiality , the extract program assigned a unique , anonymous numerical identifier to each patient . The extract program obtained demographic information , such as age , race , and sex ; diagnoses ; medications ; laboratory data ; and vital signs . Text of progress notes , consultation reports , and discharge summaries were not extracted . The data were copied to a diskette and mailed to PPRNet or sent electronically via a secure server . In the PPRNet offices , the data were bridged to st and ard data dictionaries and converted to SAS data sets ( SAS Institute , Inc. , Cary , North Carolina ) on st and ard microcomputers for analyses . Interventions The intervention began on 1 January 2001 and was completed on 1 January 2003 . During the first quarter of 2001 , the medical director of each practice was sent printed copies of each practice guideline referenced in the study . Beginning in the first quarter of 2001 , the medical director was sent quarterly performance reports documenting the practice 's adherence to each of the 21 study indicators . Each report contained the practice 's current performance , calculated as the percentage of eligible patients who had received the recommended service , the number of patients who were receiving the recommended medication , or the number of patients who had achieved the treatment goal . The report also presented data on the practice s ' previous performance since the beginning of the study and the performance target , calculated as the 90th percentile at baseline among all practice s. In practice s with more than 1 clinician , individual provider data were not given because the study emphasized improvement at the practice level . The medical director was encouraged to share the reports with others in the practice in order to stimulate motivation for improvement . The 90th percentile was selected as the performance target because it reflected a bold but achievable goal ( at least 2 practice s were at this level of performance at baseline ) . Practice s in the control group received no other interventions during the study . An example of 1 page of a practice report is available in the Appendix Figure . Appendix Figure . Sample practice report for blood pressure in coronary heart disease .  Practice s in the intervention group also participated in practice site visits and network meetings . Six or seven 1- or 2-day site visits were held at each practice approximately every 3 months during 2001 and 2002 . The practice site visit was led by 1 of the physician co authors , assisted during the first few visits in 2001 by a clinical pharmacist with expertise in academic detailing ( 24 ) , and at later visits by other co authors with expertise in quality improvement . Initial site visits focused on engaging clinicians and staff members in the project , through a formal presentation by the site visitors and group discussion with all members of the practice team , including providers , nurses , medical assistants , and reception and administrative personnel . Because of vacation or hospital coverage responsibilities , 1 or 2 providers were occasionally absent in the multiprovider practice s , and 1 practice involved only a few members of their staff . We placed detailed attention on the scientific justification for the chosen study indicators and on published frameworks for clinician behavior change ( 25 , 26 ) . Baseline practice performance on each study indicator was discussed , and previous evidence of the ability of PPRNet practice s to improve care was presented ( 27 ) . Practice s were encouraged to increase the use of quality improvement tools available in the electronic medical record , such as note templates with embedded practice guidelines , query functions , prompts , reminders , and messaging . At each visit , a participatory planning session was held in which practice members identified specific clinical indicators they wished to work on and improvement activities to conduct before the next site visit . Lessons from complexity theory were used in this exercisethe influence of each practice member on the system , the importance of replicating successful approaches and focusing on motivators for patients and staff , and the notion that simple changes are easiest to adopt and can have profound effects . In subsequent site visits , we focused on discussing the practice 's success in adopting its planned improvement activities , presenting up date d performance data , and planning additional practice -level interventions . The site visitors presented results from recently published studies relevant to the study indicators . Successful and unsuccessful approaches to improvement by other intervention sites were also presented . Two-day network meetings were held in Charleston , South Carolina , in May 2001 and May 2002 . The lead clinician from each intervention practice and the research team attended the first meeting . At this BACKGROUND A substantial part of cardiovascular disease prevention is delivered in primary care . Special attention should be paid to the assessment of cardiovascular risk factors . According to the Dutch guideline for cardiovascular risk management , the heavy workload of cardiovascular risk management for GPs could be shared with advanced practice nurses . AIM To investigate the clinical effectiveness of practice nurses acting as substitutes for GPs in cardiovascular risk management after 1 year of follow-up . DESIGN OF STUDY Prospect i ve pragmatic r and omised trial . SETTING Primary care in the south of the Netherl and s. Six centres ( 25 GPs , six nurses ) participated . METHOD A total of 1626 potentially eligible patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease were r and omised to a practice nurse group ( n = 808 ) or a GP group ( n = 818 ) in 2006 . In total , 701 patients were included in the trial . The Dutch guideline for cardiovascular risk management was used as the protocol , with st and ardised techniques for risk assessment . Changes in the following risk factors after 1 year were measured : lipids , systolic blood pressure , and body mass index . In addition , patients in the GP group received a brief question naire . RESULTS A larger decrease in the mean level of risk factors was observed in the practice nurse group compared with the GP group . After controlling for confounders , only the larger decrease in total cholesterol in the practice nurse group was statistically significant ( P = 0.01 , two-sided ) . CONCLUSION Advanced practice nurses are achieving results , equal to or better than GPs for the management of risk factors . The findings of this study support the involvement of practice nurses in cardiovascular risk management in Dutch primary care BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Limited evidence exists on the benefits of organized care for improving risk factor control in patients with stroke or transient ischaemic attack . The effectiveness of an individualized management programme in reducing absolute cardiovascular disease risk in this high-risk population was determined . METHODS This was a prospect i ve , multicentre , cluster-r and omized controlled trial with blinded assessment of outcomes and intention-to-treat analysis . Patients hospitalized for stroke/transient ischaemic attack and aged ≥18 years were recruited from four hospitals . General practice s treating recruited patients were r and omized to provide either usual care or an individualized management programme comprising nurse-led education and review of care plans by stroke specialists in addition to usual care . The primary outcome was a change in cardiovascular Framingham Risk Score between baseline and 12 months . RESULTS From January 2010 to November 2013 , 156 general practice s ( 280 patients ) were r and omly assigned to usual care ( control ) and 159 ( 283 patients ) to the intervention . The median age was 70.1 years ; 65 % were male . Overall , > 80 % of participants were prescribed recommended secondary prevention therapies at baseline . The primary efficacy analysis comprised 533 participants , with 30 either dying or lost to follow-up . In adjusted analyses , no significant between-group difference was found in the cardiovascular risk score at 12 months ( 0.04 , 95 % confidence interval -1.7 , 1.8 ) . CONCLUSIONS The effectiveness of an organized secondary prevention programme for stroke may be limited in patients from high-performing hospitals with regular post-discharge follow-up and communication with general practice BACKGROUND Secondary prevention improves survival , yet implementation is suboptimal . We tested the impact of a systematic hospital-based educational intervention vs. usual care to improve rates of adherence to secondary prevention guidelines among women hospitalized with coronary heart disease ( CHD ) , according to their ethnic status . METHODS Women ( n = 304 , 52 % minorities ) hospitalized with CHD were r and omly assigned to a systematic secondary prevention educational intervention vs. usual care . Adherence to goals for smoking cessation , weight management , physical activity , blood pressure < 140/90 mm Hg , low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ( LDL-C ) < 100 mg/dL ( 2.59 mmol/L ) , and use of aspirin/anticoagulants , beta-blockers , and angiotensin-converting enzyme ( ACE ) inhibitors were assessed at 6 months . RESULTS On admission , minority women were less likely than white women to meet the goals for blood pressure ( OR = 0.46 , 95 % CI 0.26 - 0.80 ) , LDL-C ( OR = 0.57 , CI 0.33 - 0.94 ) , and weight management ( OR = 0.40 , 95 % CI 0.20 - 0.82 ) . There was no difference between the intervention and usual care groups in a summary score of goals met at study completion ; however , minority women in the intervention group were 2.4 times more likely ( 95 % CI 1.13 - 5.03 ) to reach the blood pressure goal at 6 months compared with minority women in usual care . White women in the intervention group were 2.86 times more likely ( 95 % CI 1.06 - 7.68 ) to report use of beta-blockers at 6 months compared with white women in usual care . In a logistic regression model , the interaction term for ethnic status and group assignment was significant for achieving the blood pressure goal ( p = 0.009 ) . CONCLUSIONS A healthcare systems approach to educate women about secondary prevention and blood pressure control may differentially benefit ethnic minority women compared with white women Background Many patients at high risk of cardiovascular diseases are managed and monitored in general practice . Recommendations for cardiovascular risk management , including lifestyle change , are clearly described in the Dutch national guideline . Although lifestyle interventions , such as advice on diet , physical exercise , smoking and alcohol , have moderate , but potentially relevant effects in these patients , adherence to lifestyle advice in general practice is not optimal . The IMPALA study intends to improve adherence to lifestyle advice by involving patients in decision making on cardiovascular prevention by nurse-led clinics . The aim of this paper is to describe the design and methods of a study to evaluate an intervention aim ed at involving patients in cardiovascular risk management . Methods A cluster-r and omised controlled trial in 20 general practice s , 10 practice s in the intervention arm and 10 in the control arm , starting on October 2005 . A total of 720 patients without existing cardiovascular diseases but eligible for cardiovascular risk assessment will be recruited . In both arms , the general practitioners and nurses will be trained to apply the national guideline for cardiovascular risk management . Nurses in the intervention arm will receive an extended training in risk assessment , risk communication , the use of a decision aid and adapted motivational interviewing . This communication technique will be used to support the shared decision-making process about risk reduction . The intervention comprises 2 consultations and 1 follow-up telephone call . The nurses in the control arm will give usual care after the risk estimation , according to the national guideline . Primary outcome measures are self-reported adherence to lifestyle advice and drug treatment . Secondary outcome measures are the patients ' perception of risk and their motivation to change their behaviour . The measurements will take place at baseline and after 12 and 52 weeks . Clinical endpoints will not be measured , but the absolute 10-year risk of cardiovascular events will be estimated for each patient from medical records at baseline and after 1 year . Discussion The combined use of risk communication , a decision aid and motivational interviewing to enhance patient involvement in decision making is an innovative aspect of the intervention . Trial registration Current Controlled Trials IS RCT OBJECTIVES To assess the efficacy of a comprehensive secondary prevention programme to reduce morbidity and mortality in patients who have suffered a cardiovascular ( CV ) event ; to control CV risk factors and prophylactic treatment in order to prevent recurrence ; and to improve the quality of life of patients with cardiovascular disease . DESIGN R and omised , pragmatic , open clinical trial in primary care . SETTING A total of 42 primary care centres of 8 different areas in Spain . PARTICIPANTS Men and women below 86 years old , diagnosed with coronary disease and /or stroke and /or peripheral vascular disease in the preceding year , and who have no serious or terminal disease . INTERVENTION Primary care centres will be r and omised to following usual care ( control group ) , or to following a comprehensive programme of secondary prevention ( intervention group ) . MAIN MEASUREMENTS Cardiovascular fatal events , cardiovascular non-fatal events , total mortality and health-related quality of life ( SF-36 ) Abstract Objective To establish the cost effectiveness of  nurse led secondary prevention clinics for coronary heart disease based on four years ' follow up of a r and omised controlled trial . Design Cost effectiveness analysis . Setting 19 general practice s in north east Scotl and . Participants 1343 patients ( 673 in intervention group and 670 in control group , as originally r and omised ) aged under 80 years with a diagnosis of coronary heart disease but without terminal illness or dementia and not housebound . Intervention Nurse led clinics to promote medical and lifestyle components of secondary prevention . Main outcome measures Costs of clinics ; overall costs to health service ; and cost per life year and per quality adjusted life year ( QALY ) gained , expressed as incremental gain in intervention group compared with control group . Results The cost of the intervention ( clinics and drugs ) was £ 136 ( $ 254 ; € 195 ) per patient higher ( 1998 - 9 prices ) in the intervention group , but the difference in other NHS costs , although lower for the intervention group , was not statistically significant . Overall , 28 fewer deaths occurred in the intervention group leading to a gain in mean life years per patient of 0.110 and of 0.124 QALYs . The incremental cost per life year saved was £ 1236 and that per QALY was £ 1097 . Conclusion Nurse led clinics for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in primary care seem to be cost effective compared with most interventions in health care , with the main gains in life years saved OBJECTIVE To apply the UK Medical Research Council ( MRC ) framework for development and evaluation of trials of complex interventions to a primary healthcare intervention to promote secondary prevention of coronary heart disease . STUDY DESIGN Case report of intervention development . METHODS First , literature relating to secondary prevention and lifestyle change was review ed . Second , a preliminary intervention was modeled , based on literature findings and focus group interviews with patients ( n = 23 ) and staff ( n = 29 ) from 4 general practice s. Participants ' experiences of and attitudes toward key intervention components were explored . Third , the preliminary intervention was pilot-tested in 4 general practice s. After delivery of the pilot intervention , practitioners evaluated the training sessions , and qualitative data relating to experiences of the intervention were collected using semistructured interviews with staff ( n = 10 ) and patient focus groups ( n = 17 ) . RESULTS Literature review identified 3 intervention components : a structured recall system , practitioner training , and patient information .  Initial qualitative data identified variations in recall system design , training requirements ( medication prescribing , facilitating behavior change ) , and information appropriate to the prospect i ve study participants . Identifying detailed structures within intervention components clarified how the intervention could be tailored to individual practice , practitioner , and patient needs while preserving the theoretical functions of the components . Findings from the pilot phase informed further modeling of the intervention , reducing administrative time , increasing practical content of training , and omitting unhelpful patient information . CONCLUSION Application of the MRC framework helped to determine the feasibility and development of a complex intervention for primary care research BACKGROUND The multiprofessional teams in Finnish health centres are well placed to carry out interventions aim ed at the prevention of cardiovascular diseases . AIM To evaluate the effectiveness of an individually tailored multifactorial lifestyle intervention in primary care for individuals at high risk for cardiovascular disease . DESIGN OF STUDY A r and omised controlled trial was conducted over 24 months with interim assessment s at six and 12 months . SETTING A health centre in Finl and with a patient population of 11,000 . METHOD One hundred and fifty adults aged 18 to 65 years old with existing cardiovascular disease or multiple risk factors were r and omised to active multiprofessional risk factor intervention or to st and ard care . The main outcome measure was a change in cardiovascular risk-factor score . Secondary outcomes were changes in blood pressure , weight , body-mass index , serum cholesterol , blood glucose , smoking cessation , and exercise habits . RESULTS The cardiovascular risk score decreased by 28 % in the intervention group ( 23 % in the control group ) , body weight decreased by 3.7 % ( 2 % ) and total cholesterol decreased by 10.8 % ( 6.5 % ) , while time engaged in exercise increased by 39 % ( 43 % ) . Differences were not significant . CONCLUSIONS Cardiovascular risk levels of high-risk individuals decreased in both intervention and control groups . Primary care prevention should be targeted to high-risk persons . Long-term follow-up studies are needed Background Coronary heart disease ( CHD ) is a significant cause of health and economic burden . Secondary prevention programs play a pivotal role in the treatment and management of those affected by CHD although participation rates are poor due to patient , provider , health system and societal-level barriers . As such , there is a need to develop innovative secondary prevention programs to address the treatment gap . Telephone-delivered care is convenient , flexible and has been shown to improve behavioural and clinical outcomes following myocardial infa rct ion ( MI ) . This paper presents the design of a r and omised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of a six-month telephone-delivered secondary prevention program for  MI patients ( ProActive Heart ) . Methods 550 adult MI patients have been recruited over a 14 month period ( December 2007 to January 2009 ) through two Brisbane metropolitan hospitals , and r and omised to an intervention or control group ( n = 225 per group ) . The intervention commences within two weeks of hospital discharge delivered by study -trained health professionals ( ' health coaches ' ) during up to 10 × 30 minute scripted telephone health coaching sessions . Participants also receive a ProActive Heart h and book and an educational re source to use during the health coaching sessions . The intervention focuses on appropriate modification of CHD risk factors , compliance with pharmacological management , and management of psychosocial issues . Data collection occurs at baseline or prior to commencement of the intervention ( Time 1 ) , six months follow-up or the completion of the intervention ( Time 2 ) , and at 12 months follow-up for longer term outcomes ( Time 3 ) . Primary outcome measures include quality of life ( Short Form-36 ) and physical activity ( Active Australia Survey ) . A cost-effective analysis of the costs and outcomes for patients in the intervention and control groups is being conducted from the perspective of health care costs to the government . Discussion The results of this study will provide valuable new information about an innovative telephone-delivered cost-effective secondary prevention program for MI patients .Trial Registration Background Secondary prevention after stroke and transient ischemic attack ( TIA ) is essential in order to reduce morbidity and mortality . Secondary stroke prevention studies have , however , been fairly small , or performed as clinical trials with non-representative patient selection . Long-term follow-up data is also limited . A nurse-led follow-up for risk factor improvement may be effective but the evidence is limited . The aims of this study are to perform an adequately sized , nurse-led , long-term secondary preventive follow-up with a population -based inclusion of stroke and TIA patients . The focus will be on blood pressure and lipid control as well as tobacco use and physical activity . Methods A r and omized , controlled , long-term , population -based trial with two parallel groups . The patients will be included during the initial hospital stay . Important outcome variables are sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressure , LDL cholesterol and total cholesterol . Outcomes will be measured after 12 , 24 and 36 months of follow-up . Trained nurses will manage the intervention group with a focus on reaching set treatment goals as soon as possible . The control group will receive usual care .  At least 200 patients will be included in each group , in order to reliably detect a difference in mean systolic blood pressure of 5 mmHg . This sample size is also adequate for detection of clinical ly meaningful group differences in the other outcomes . Discussion This study will test the hypothesis that a nurse-led , long-term follow-up after stroke with a focus on reaching set treatment goals as soon as possible , is an effective secondary preventive method . If proven effective , this method could be implemented in general practice at a low cost . Trial registration Current Controlled Trials IS RCT
NCC demonstrated to have an effect on a small number of outcomes .
NCC that incorporated blood pressure monitoring , cholesterol control and smoking cessation has an impact on the improvement of secondary prevention .
Current guidelines on secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease recommend nurse-coordinated care ( NCC ) as an effective intervention .
However , NCC programmes differ widely and the efficacy of NCC components has not been studied .