Unexpected low prevalence of atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic ischemic stroke: a prospective study Risk factors for stroke in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation: a case-control study. Asymptomatic or "silent" atrial fibrillation: frequency in untreated patients and patients receiving azimilide. Atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke. Atrial fibrillation: an observational study with outpatients. Multicenter randomized study of anticoagulation guided by remote rhythm monitoring in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and CRT-D devices: Rationale, design, and clinical characteristics of the initially enrolled cohort The IMPACT study. Management of Newly Detected Atrial Fibrillation: A Clinical Practice Guideline from the American Academy of Family Physicians and the American College of Physicians Effect of Age on Stroke Prevention Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: The Atrial Fibrillation Investigators Detection of atrial fibrillation in patients with acute stroke. Cryptogenic stroke and underlying atrial fibrillation. Acute stroke with atrial fibrillation. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Screening for atrial fibrillation in general practice: a national, cross-sectional study of an innovative technology. Opportunistic screening for atrial fibrillation versus detecting symptomatic patients aged 65 years and older: A cluster-controlled clinical trial. Diagnostic accuracy and yield of screening tests for atrial fibrillation in the family practice setting: a multicentre cohort study. Is screening for AF worthwhile? Stroke risk in a screened population from the SAFE study. Prevalence of atrial fibrillation in an urban population in India: the Nagpur pilot study 2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association.
Purpose Ischemic stroke is a frequent pathology with high rate of recurrence and significant morbidity and mortality . There are several causes of stroke , affecting prognosis , outcomes , and management , but in many cases , the etiology remains undetermined . We hypothesized that atrial fibrillation was involved in this pathology but underdiagnosed by st and ard methods . The aim of the study was to determine the incidence of atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic ischemic stroke by using continuous monitoring of the heart rate over several months . The secondary objective was to test the value of atrial vulnerability assessment in predicting spontaneous atrial fibrillation . Methods and results We prospect ively enrolled 24 patients under 75 years of age , 15 men and 9 women of mean age 49 years , who within the last 4 months had experienced cryptogenic stroke diagnosed by clinical presentation and brain imaging and presumed to be of cardioembolic mechanism . All causes of stroke were excluded by normal 12-lead ECG , 24-h Holter monitoring , echocardiography , cervical Doppler , hematological , and inflammatory tests . All patients underwent electrophysiological study . Of the patients , 37.5 % had latent atrial vulnerability , and 33.3 % had inducible sustained arrhythmia . Patients were secondarily implanted with an implantable loop recorder to look for spontaneous atrial fibrillation over a mean follow-up interval of 14.5 months . No sustained arrhythmia was found . Only one patient had non-significant episodes of atrial fibrillation . Conclusion In this study , symptomatic atrial fibrillation or AF with fast ventricular rate has not been demonstrated by the implantable loop recorder  in patients under 75 years with unexplained cerebral ischemia . The use of this device should not be generalized in the systematic evaluation of these patients . In addition , this study attests that the assessment of atrial vulnerability is poor at predicting spontaneous arrhythmia in such patients PURPOSE R and omized controlled trials have demonstrated that anticoagulant therapy is very effective at preventing stroke among patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation . However , these trials have reported too few strokes for powerful risk factor analysis . Observational studies may provide additional information . The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors in a larger number of patients with stroke and nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation , using case-control methodology . PATIENTS AND METHODS We identified all patients discharged from one hospital over an 8-year period who met our case definition of nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation and ischemic stroke ( n = 134 ) , and compared them with contemporaneous control subjects who were discharged with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation without stroke ( n = 131 ) . RESULTS Cases and controls were similar in terms of duration of atrial fibrillation ; proportion with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ; percentage with a past medical history of angina , myocardial infa rct ion , congestive heart failure , diabetes , or smoking ; and mean left atrial size . In contrast , cases were significantly older than controls ( 78.5 versus 74.8 years , p = 0.002 ) and more likely to have a history of hypertension ( 55 % versus 38 % , p = 0.0093 ) . The relative odds for stroke was 1.91 for patients with hypertension , 1.73 for patients older than 75 years , and 3.26 for patients with both factors . CONCLUSIONS Our analysis suggests that age and hypertension should be considered when deciding upon long-term anticoagulant therapy to prevent stroke in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation BACKGROUND Asymptomatic , or " silent " atrial fibrillation could increase the risk of stroke . Little is known about the frequency of asymptomatic atrial fibrillation in patients who also have symptomatic atrial fibrillation ; similarly , little is known about the effect of antiarrhythmic drug therapy on asymptomatic atrial fibrillation . METHODS AND RESULTS Patients in sinus rhythm with a history of symptomatic atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter received placebo or azimilide ( 35 to 125 mg ) once daily for 6 or 9 months in 4 similar double-blind trials . The end point was the first recurrence of a symptomatic ECG-documented supraventricular arrhythmia . Routine transtelephonic electrocardiograms , in the absence of symptoms , were recorded for 30 seconds every 2 weeks until patients completed follow-up or documented a symptomatic supraventricular arrhythmia . Of the 1380 patients , 489 received placebo .  Among these patients receiving placebo , 303 transmitted at least one routine ECG while asymptomatic . Asymptomatic atrial fibrillation was recorded in 50 ( 17 % ) within 6 months and before recurrence of symptomatic supraventricular arrhythmia . In the 3 trials evaluating azimilide in therapeutic doses ( 100 and 125 mg ) , asymptomatic atrial fibrillation occurred in 49 of 382 ( 13 % ) receiving azimilide and 43 of 233 ( 18 % ) receiving placebo . Although drug effect on time to first asymptomatic event was not statistically significant ( hazard ratio , 0.70 ; P=0.09 ) , there was a 40 % reduction in asymptomatic atrial fibrillation on azimilide compared with placebo ( P=0.03 ) when repeated observations were considered . CONCLUSIONS Asymptomatic atrial fibrillation is common in untreated patients with a history of symptomatic atrial fibrillation ( and is likely underestimated by this analysis ) . Azimilide may reduce the occurrence of this silent arrhythmia BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation is a leading preventable cause of recurrent stroke for which early detection and treatment are critical . However , paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is often asymptomatic and likely to go undetected and untreated in the routine care of patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack ( TIA ) . METHODS We r and omly assigned 572 patients 55 years of age or older , without known atrial fibrillation , who had had a cryptogenic ischemic stroke or TIA within the previous 6 months ( cause undetermined after st and ard tests , including 24-hour electrocardiography [ ECG ] ) , to undergo additional noninvasive ambulatory ECG monitoring with either a 30-day event-triggered recorder ( intervention group ) or a conventional 24-hour monitor ( control group ) . The primary outcome was newly detected atrial fibrillation lasting 30 seconds or longer within 90 days after r and omization . Secondary outcomes included episodes of atrial fibrillation lasting 2.5 minutes or longer and anticoagulation status at 90 days . RESULTS Atrial fibrillation lasting 30 seconds or longer was detected in 45 of 280 patients ( 16.1 % ) in the intervention group , as compared with 9 of 277 ( 3.2 % ) in the control group ( absolute difference , 12.9 percentage points ; 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] , 8.0 to 17.6 ; P<0.001 ; number needed to screen , 8) . Atrial fibrillation lasting 2.5 minutes or longer was present in 28 of 284 patients ( 9.9 % ) in the intervention group , as compared with 7 of 277 ( 2.5 % ) in the control group ( absolute difference , 7.4 percentage points ; 95 % CI , 3.4 to 11.3 ; P<0.001 ) . By 90 days , oral anticoagulant therapy had been prescribed for more patients in the intervention group than in the control group ( 52 of 280 patients [ 18.6 % ] vs. 31 of 279 [ 11.1 % ] ; absolute difference , 7.5 percentage points ; 95 % CI , 1.6 to 13.3 ; P=0.01 ) . CONCLUSIONS Among patients with a recent cryptogenic stroke or TIA who were 55 years of age or older , paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was common . Noninvasive ambulatory ECG monitoring for a target of 30 days significantly improved the detection of atrial fibrillation by a factor of more than five and nearly doubled the rate of anticoagulant treatment , as compared with the st and ard practice of short- duration ECG monitoring . ( Funded by the Canadian Stroke Network and others ; EMBRACE Clinical Trials.gov number , NCT00846924 . ) BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common sustained arrhythmia with serious clinical consequences in the absence of treatment . However , there are limited data on the treatment of these patients in Argentina . The objective was to describe the therapeutic management of patients with nonacute AF by Argentinean cardiologists and to determine the incidence of clinical events after 12 months follow-up . METHODS The Atrial Fibrillation study in Argentina ( FARAON ) was an observational , descriptive , prospect i ve , national , and multicentric study that included out patients with AF , followed for 12 months . The study included 38 sites in Argentina . Each research er included the first 10 patients who met the inclusion criteria of being over 21 and also being an AF carrier documented by electrocardiogram or Holter within 12 months prior to or at the time of enrollment . RESULTS A total of 373 patients were included , mean age 70 ± 11.5 years , 40 % women ; 65 % had AF rhythm at the time of inclusion , 57 % had permanent AF , and 56 % were asymptomatic . At the time of enrollment , 40 % of physicians opted for rhythm control strategy . β-blockers and amiodarone were the most used drugs . Patients with rhythm control drugs had higher success rate than those with frequency control drug therapy ( 80 % vs 57 % ) . CONCLUSION Cardiologists in Argentina receive patients with AF that are mostly permanent AF . More than half of the patients are asymptomatic . They opt primarily by controlling the pace . When choosing antiarrhythmic drugs , nearly half of them indicated amiodarone Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter are common cardiac arrhythmias associated with an increased risk of stroke in patients with additional risk factors .  Anticoagulation ameliorates stroke risk , but because these arrhythmias may occur intermittently without symptoms , initiation of prophylactic therapy is often delayed until electrocardiographic documentation is obtained . The IMPACT study is a multicenter , r and omized trial of remote surveillance technology in patients with implanted dual-chamber cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator ( CRT-D ) devices design ed to test the hypothesis that initiation and withdrawal of oral anticoagulant therapy guided by continuous ambulatory monitoring of the atrial electrogram improve clinical outcomes by reducing the combined rate of stroke , systemic embolism , and major bleeding compared with conventional clinical management . For those in the intervention group , early detection of atrial high-rate episodes ( AHRE ) generates an automatic alert to initiate anticoagulation based on patient-specific stroke risk stratification . Subsequently , freedom from AHRE for predefined periods prompts withdrawal of anticoagulation to avoid bleeding . Patients in the control arm are managed conventionally , the anticoagulation decision prompted by incidental detection of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter during routine clinical follow-up . The results will help define the clinical utility of wireless remote cardiac rhythm surveillance and help establish the critical threshold of AHRE burden warranting anticoagulant therapy in patients at risk of stroke . In this report , we describe the study design and baseline demographic and clinical features of the initial cohort ( 227 patients ) Atrial fibrillation is the most common type of arrhythmia in adults . It is more common as patients age ; the prevalence is 1 % among those younger than age 60 years and increases to more than 8 % in those older than age 80 years . When data are adjusted for age , men are affected more often than women . Cardiac conditions associated with the development of atrial fibrillation are hypertension , rheumatic mitral valve disease , coronary artery disease , and congestive heart failure . Noncardiac causes include hyperthyroidism , hypoxic pulmonary conditions , surgery , and alcohol intoxication . Patients with atrial fibrillation may have symptoms of hemodynamic compromise , such as irregular palpitations and lightheadedness , or more vague symptoms , such as malaise , but may be asymptomatic . Patients with atrial fibrillation are at increased risk for thromboembolic disease . The purpose of this guideline is to make recommendations on the pharmacologic management of newly detected atrial fibrillation in primary care . The target patient population is adult patients with first-detected atrial fibrillation , defined as the presence of symptoms or electrocardiographic evidence of atrial fibrillation . The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association has recommended using first-detected atrial fibrillation regardless of whether it is symptomatic or self-limited , recognizing that there can be uncertainty about the duration of the episode and about previous undetected episodes ( 1 ) . This guideline does not apply to patients with postoperative or postmyocardial infa rct ion atrial fibrillation , patients with class IV heart failure , patients already taking antiarrhythmic drugs , or patients with valvular disease . The target physician audience is internists and family physicians dedicated to primary care . This guideline is based on the accompanying background paper by McNamara and colleagues ( 2 ) and on the evidence report Management of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation ( 3 ) , which was produced by the Johns Hopkins Evidence -based Practice Center under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality ( AHRQ ) , Rockville , Maryl and . The American Academy of Family Physicians ( AAFP ) and the American College of Physicians ( ACP ) created this guideline in collaboration . The Joint AAFP/ACP Panel review ed the evidence and developed and grade d the recommendations ( Table 1 ) . The guideline was then approved by both organizations . The guideline makes recommendations in the following areas : rate control versus rhythm control , stroke prevention and anticoagulation , electrical cardioversion versus pharmacologic cardioversion , the role of transesophageal echocardiography in guiding therapy , and maintenance therapy . Table 1 . The Guyatt Approach to Grading Recommendations * Section 1 : Rate Control versus Rhythm Control One of the fundamental questions in the management of atrial fibrillation is whether to attempt cardioversion . The answer to this question depends on whether rate control or rhythm control provides more effective protection from thromboembolic events , improved mortality , better relief of symptoms , or improved quality of life . Another significant clinical question is whether certain population s , such as women , patients with hypertension or congestive heart failure , or young people with structurally healthy hearts , have better outcomes with one or the other strategy . Four studies have compared rate control with rhythm control . The study sample s have generally involved older patients ( > 65 years of age ) , and women and younger patients with healthy hearts and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation have not been well represented ( 5 ) . The Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management ( AFFIRM ) trial compared rhythm control versus rate control , and use of anticoagulation was recommended in both arms ( 6 ) . More than 4000 patients who were at least 65 years of age or who had at least 1 risk factor for stroke or death , such as hypertension , diabetes , previous stroke , or poor ventricular function , were followed for a mean of 3.5 years . Slightly more than one third of the patients were enrolled after their first episode of atrial fibrillation , and more than 90 % had had their qualifying episode within the previous 6 weeks . In more than two thirds of patients , the qualifying episode lasted at least 2 days . The average patient age was 70 years . Sixty-one percent of patients were men , and 89 % were white . Seventy-one percent of patients had hypertension , 38 % had coronary heart disease , 18 % had previously had failure of antiarrhythmic therapy , and 12 % had no apparent heart disease ( lone atrial fibrillation ) . Patients were r and omly assigned to rate or rhythm control , and their physicians chose the specific therapies ( pharmacologic first , then nonpharmacologic if needed ) . Anticoagulation was continued indefinitely in the rate-control group and was encouraged in the rhythm-control group but could be stopped at the physician 's discretion if sinus rhythm had been maintained for at least 4 , and preferably 12 , consecutive weeks with antiarrhythmic therapy . The prevalence of sinus rhythm in the rhythm-control group was 82 % , 73 % , and 63 % at 1 , 3 , and 5 years , respectively . The prevalence of sinus rhythm in the rate-control group was 34.6 % at 5 years . The primary end point in the AFFIRM trial , overall mortality , was not statistically significantly different between the groups . However , the rhythm-control strategy was associated with a higher risk for death than the rate-control strategy among older patients , those without congestive heart failure , and those with coronary disease .  Rates of stroke also did not differ between groups ; 70 % of all strokes occurred in patients who had stopped receiving anticoagulation or who had subtherapeutic international normalized ratios ( < 2.0 ) . More hospitalizations were reported in the rhythm-control group ( P < 0.001 ) . Another recent study , the RAte Control versus Electrical cardioversion for persistent atrial fibrillation ( RACE ) study , r and omly assigned patients to receive aggressive rhythm control or rate control ( 7 ) . This was a smaller study , involving 522 patients ( mean age , 68 years ) . Sixty-four percent of patients were men , 49 % had hypertension , and 27 % had coronary artery disease . All patients had persistent atrial fibrillation lasting less than 1 year and had had at least 1 previous electrical cardioversion ( a maximum of 2 previous cardioversions was permitted for study inclusion ) . The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular mortality , heart failure , thromboembolic complications , bleeding , pacemaker implantation , and severe side effects of antiarrhythmic drugs . Again , no difference was seen between groups in the primary composite end point . As in the AFFIRM study , most of the strokes occurred in patients whose anticoagulation had been halted or patients whose international normalized ratio was subtherapeutic ( < 2.0 ) . In post hoc analysis , a benefit for rate control over rhythm control was seen in patients with hypertension and in women . Since this was a post hoc analysis , these results will need to be confirmed by further studies . Of note , despite an aggressive treatment protocol , at the end of follow-up only 39 % of the patients in the rhythm-control group were in sinus rhythm . The Pharmacological Intervention in Atrial Fibrillation ( PIAF ) trial r and omly assigned 252 patients 18 to 75 years of age with new-onset or permanent symptomatic atrial fibrillation ( mean duration of atrial fibrillation , approximately 4 months ) to rate control with diltiazem or aggressive conversion ( many times if necessary ) and maintenance therapy with amiodarone ( 8) . The primary end point of the study was improvement in symptoms related to atrial fibrillation . After 1 year of follow-up , relief of symptoms was similar in both groups , as were quality -of-life measures . Walking distance was improved in the rhythm-control group , but hospital admissions were more frequent in this group . Although final results are not yet available , preliminary reports of the Strategies of Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation ( STAF ) trial have been presented ( 9 ) . Patients were r and omly assigned to receive anticoagulation for 3 weeks before conversion and for 4 weeks after attempted conversion , with antiarrhythmic therapy to maintain sinus rhythm , or to long-term anticoagulation and rate control . ( Patients included in this study had at least 1 previous conversion attempt . ) After more than 1.5 years of follow-up , no difference was seen between the groups in rates of the primary end points of death , stroke , transient ischemic attacks , cardiopulmonary resuscitation , or thromboembolism . Of interest , only 40 % of patients in the rhythm-control group were still in sinus rhythm at 1 year , and all primary end points occurred in patients in atrial fibrillation , even in the rhythm-control group . This result has created speculation about whether fewer events would have occurred if anticoagulation had been continued indefinitely in the conversion group . It also suggests that despite aggressive rhythm management , a substantial number of patients can not maintain sinus rhythm . In general , the trial sample s were older and male and had risk factors for stroke , such as hypertension , congestive heart failure , and coronary disease . Certain subgroups of patients with atrial fibrillation , such as younger patients with healthy hearts or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation , were not well represented in the trials . Therefore , it is not certain whether these subgroups of patients may benefit from more aggressive rhythm control or rate control . Recommendation 1 : Rate control with chronic anticoagulation is the recommended strategy for the majority of patients with atrial fibrillation . Rhythm control has not been shown to be superior to rate control ( with chronic anticoagulation ) in reducing morbidity and mortality and may be inferior in some patient subgroups to rate control . Rhythm Background and Purpose — Stroke risk increases with age in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation . It is uncertain whether the efficacy of stroke prevention therapies in atrial fibrillation changes as patients age . The objective of this study was to determine the effect of age on the relative efficacy of oral anticoagulants ( OAC ) and antiplatelet ( AP ) therapy ( including acetylsalicylic acid and triflusal ) on ischemic stroke , serious bleeding , and vascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation . Methods — This is an analysis of the Atrial Fibrillation Investigators data base , which contains patient level- data from r and omized trials of stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation . We used Cox regression models with age as a continuous variable that controlled for sex , year of r and omization , and history of cerebrovascular disease , diabetes , hypertension , and congestive heart failure . Outcomes included ischemic stroke , serious bleeding ( intracranial hemorrhage or systemic bleeding requiring hospitalization , transfusion , or surgery ) , and cardiovascular events ( ischemic stroke , myocardial infa rct ion , systemic embolism , or vascular death ) . Results — The analysis included 8932 patients and 17 685 years of observation from 12 trials . Patient age increased risk of ischemic stroke ( adjusted hazard ratio per decade increase 1.45 ; 95 % CI , 1.26 to 1.66 ) , serious bleeding ( 1.61 ; 1.47 to 1.77 ) , and cardiovascular events ( 1.43 ; 1.33 to 1.53 ) . Compared with placebo , OAC and AP significantly reduced the risk of ischemic stroke ( OAC , 0.36 ; 0.29 to 0.45 ; AP , 0.81 ; 0.72 to 0.90 ) and cardiovascular outcomes ( OAC , 0.59 ; 0.52 to 0.66 ; AP , 0.81 ; 0.75 to 0.88 ) , whereas OAC increased risk of serious bleeding ( 1.56 ; 1.03 to 2.37 ) . The relative benefit of OAC versus placebo or AP did not vary by patient age for any outcome . Compared with placebo , the relative benefit of AP  for preventing ischemic stroke decreased significantly as patients aged ( P=0.01 ) . Conclusions — As patients with atrial fibrillation age , the relative efficacy of AP to prevent ischemic stroke appears to decrease , whereas it does not change for OAC . Because stroke risk increases with age , the absolute benefit of OAC increases as patients get older Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and paroxysmal AF ( PAF ) are common causes of stroke which may not be detected by a single electrocardiogram ( EKG ) . We conducted a prospect i ve study to determine if 48 hours of telemetry monitoring increased the rate of detection of AF in patients with acute stroke and thus identified patients requiring anticoagulation . One hundred and fifty consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke were placed on telemetry monitoring for 48 hours . Thirty-five patients had AF related strokes . There were 12 patients with AF related stroke who did not have a previous history of AF and were found to have AF following the stroke . Six of these 12 patients were found to have AF on their admission EKG . The remaining six patients had normal admission EKGs and were diagnosed with AF only during telemetry monitoring for 48 hrs . Patients with AF were older , had larger strokes , which were more likely to be non-lacunar , than patients without AF . Our study suggests that AF is sometimes undiagnosed until a stroke occurs . Improved methods of detection of AF are needed in high-risk patients for primary stroke prevention . Patients older than 65 years of age with non-lacunar strokes should have 48 hours of telemetry monitoring to detect previously undiagnosed AF BACKGROUND Current guidelines recommend at least 24 hours of electrocardiographic ( ECG ) monitoring after an ischemic stroke to rule out atrial fibrillation . However , the most effective duration and type of monitoring have not been established , and the cause of ischemic stroke remains uncertain despite a complete diagnostic evaluation in 20 to 40 % of cases ( cryptogenic stroke ) . Detection of atrial fibrillation after cryptogenic stroke has therapeutic implication s. METHODS We conducted a r and omized , controlled study of 441 patients to assess whether long-term monitoring with an insertable cardiac monitor ( ICM ) is more effective than conventional follow-up ( control ) for detecting atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke . Patients 40 years of age or older with no evidence of atrial fibrillation during at least 24 hours of ECG monitoring  underwent r and omization within 90 days after the index event . The primary end point was the time to first detection of atrial fibrillation ( lasting > 30 seconds ) within 6 months . Among the secondary end points was the time to first detection of atrial fibrillation within 12 months . Data were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle . RESULTS By 6 months , atrial fibrillation had been detected in 8.9 % of patients in the ICM group ( 19 patients ) versus 1.4 % of patients in the control group ( 3 patients ) ( hazard ratio , 6.4 ; 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] , 1.9 to 21.7 ; P<0.001 ) . By 12 months , atrial fibrillation had been detected in 12.4 % of patients in the ICM group ( 29 patients ) versus 2.0 % of patients in the control group ( 4 patients ) ( hazard ratio , 7.3 ; 95 % CI , 2.6 to 20.8 ; P<0.001 ) . CONCLUSIONS ECG monitoring with an ICM was superior to conventional follow-up for detecting atrial fibrillation after cryptogenic stroke . ( Funded by Medtronic ; CRYSTAL AF Clinical Trials.gov number , NCT00924638 . ) BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a common arrhythmia and a major risk factor for stroke . Many physicians remain reluctant to provide stroke prevention by anticoagulant therapy especially for elderly individuals with AF . Using multivariate regression analyses , we studied the characteristics and the prognosis of stroke in patients with AF . METHODS The study is part of the Copenhagen Stroke Study , a prospect i ve , community-based study of 1197 patients with acute stroke treated on a stroke unit from the time of acute admission to the end of rehabilitation .  Initial stroke severity was measured by the Sc and inavian Neurological Stroke Scale ( SSS ) . Neurological and functional outcomes were evaluated by the SSS and the Barthel Index . RESULTS AF was diagnosed in 18 % of the patients . AF increased steeply with age in the stroke population , from 2 % in patients < 50 years old , 15 % in patients in their 70s , and 28 % in patients in their 80s , to 40 % in patients > or = 90 years of age . In a multivariate analysis AF was associated with age ( odds ratio [ OR ] , 2.0 per 10-year increase ; 95 % confidence ratio [ CI ] , 1.6 to 2.6 ) , ischemic heart disease ( OR , 3.4 ; 95 % CI , 2.4 to 4.8 ) , previous stroke ( OR , 1.8 ; 95 % CI , 1.2 to 2.6 ) , and systolic blood pressure ( OR , 0.93 per 10-mm Hg increases ; 95 % CI , 0.88 to 0.99 ) , but not with sex , diabetes , hypertension , previous transient ischemic attack , or silent infa rct ion on computed tomography . Patients with AF had a higher mortality rate ( OR , 1.7 ; 95 % CI , 1.2 to 2.5 ) , longer hospital stays ( 50 days versus 40 days , P < .001 ) , and a lower discharge rate to their own homes ( OR , 0.60 ; 95 % CI , 0.44 to 0.85 ) . Neurological and functional outcomes were markedly poorer in patients with AF . Poorer outcome was exclusively explained by initially more-severe strokes . CONCLUSIONS Stroke in patients with AF is generally more severe and outcome markedly poorer than in patients with sinus rhythm . This accentuates the importance of anticoagulant treatment of individuals with AF . A lower blood pressure in the acute stage of stroke may contribute to the increased stroke severity in patients with AF BACKGROUND To test the use of three lead monitoring as a screening tool for  atrial fibrillation ( AF )  in general practice . AF is responsible for up to a quarter of all strokes and is often asymptomatic until a stroke occurs . METHODS 26 r and omly selected general practice s identified 80 r and omly selected patients aged 70 or older from their data base and excluded those known to have AF , those with clinical issues or who had not attended for three years . Up to 40 eligible patients / practice were invited to attend for screening . A 2min three-lead ECG was recorded and collected central ly for expert cardiology assessment . Risk factor data was gathered . OUTCOMES ( i ) point prevalence of AF , ( ii ) proportion of ECG tracings which were adequate for interpretation , ( iii ) uptake rate by patients and ( iv ) acceptability of the screening process to patients and staff ( reported separately ) . RESULTS Of 1447 current patients , 1003 were eligible for inclusion , 639 ( 64 % ) agreed to take part in screening and 566 ( 56 % ) completed screening . The point prevalence rate for AF was 10.3%-2.1 % new cases ( 12 of 566 who were screened ) and 9.5 % existing cases ( 137 of 1447 eligible patients ) . Only four of 570 ( 0.7 % ) screening visits did not record a usable ECG and 11 ( 2.6 % ) three lead ECGs required a clarifying 12 lead ECG . CONCLUSIONS Three lead screening for AF is feasible , effective and offers an alternative to pulse taking or 12 lead ECGs . The availability of this technology may facilitate more effective screening , leading to reduced stroke incidence OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to assess the effectiveness of opportunistic screening through pulse palpation in the early detection of  atrial fibrillation in subjects aged≥65 years versus detection through an active search for patients with symptoms and /or complications and sequelae associated . MATERIAL AND METHODS This was a cluster r and omized controlled trial performed in 48 primary care centers of the Spanish National Healthcare System . A total of 368 physicians and nurses were r and omized . The research ers in the experimental group ( EG ) performed opportunistic screening for auricular fibrillation , whereas the research ers in the control group ( CG ) actively search ed for symptomatic patients . An  ECG  was performed on patients found to have an irregular heartbeat to confirm the diagnosis of auricular fibrillation . RESULTS A total of 5,465 patients with a mean age of 75.61 years were recruited for the EG , and 1,525 patients with a mean age of 74.07 years were recruited for the CG . Of these , 58.6 % were female , without significant differences between groups . Pulse was irregular in 4.3 and 15.0 % of the patients in the EG and the CG , respectively ( P<.001 ) . A total of 164 new cases of atrial fibrillation were detected ( 2.3 % ) , 1.1 % in the EG and 6.7 % in the CG ( adjusted OR : 0.29 ; 95 % CI 0.18 - 0.45 ) . CONCLUSIONS Case finding for atrial fibrillation in patients aged≥65 years with symptoms or signs suggestive of atrial fibrillation is a more effective strategy than opportunistic screening through pulse palpation in asymptomatic patients . TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial is registered in Clinical Trials.gov ( NCT01291953 ; February 8 , 2011 ) BACKGROUND Detection of undiagnosed or undertreated ( " actionable " ) atrial fibrillation could increase the use of appropriate oral anticoagulant therapy and reduce the risk of stroke . We sought to compare newer screening technologies with a pulse-check for the detection of atrial fibrillation and to determine whether the detection of actionable atrial fibrillation increases the use of oral anticoagulant agents . METHODS This prospect i ve multicentre cohort study involved 22 primary care clinics . We recruited participants aged 65 years and older who were attending routine appointments . Each participant underwent 3 methods of screening : a 30-second radial pulse-check ; single-lead electrocardiogram ; and screening by blood pressure machine with atrial fibrillation detection algorithms . Participants who received a positive result on 1 or more test underwent 12-lead electrocardiogram with or withour 24-hour Holter . Screening tests were compared using the McNemar test . Participants with confirmed atrial fibrillation received follow-up at 90 days . RESULTS The mean age of participants was 73.7 ( ± 6.9 ) years , and 53.4 % of participants were female . Of 2171 patients , we had data from all 3 screening tests for 2054 patients . Both single-lead electrocardiogram and the blood pressure device showed superior specificity compared with pulse-check ( p < 0.001 for each ) . Fifty-six patients ( 2.7 % ) had confirmed atrial fibrillation : 12 patients had newly detected atrial fibrillation ( none of the patients were using anticoagulation agents ) , and 44 patients had previously diagnosed atrial fibrillation ( 42 patients were receiving anticoagulant therapy , 2 were not ) . Thus , 14 patients had actionable atrial fibrillation ( 0.7 % ) . By 90 days , 77 % of patients with actionable atrial fibrillation had started anticoagulant therapy . INTERPRETATION Newer screening technologies showed superior specificity compared with a pulse-check . Screening detected undiagnosed or undertreated atrial fibrillation in 0.7 % of participants , and 77 % started appropriate anticoagulant therapy . TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical Trials.gov , no. NCT02262351 INTRODUCTION Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is an important independent risk factor for stroke and oral anticoagulation therapy provides a highly effective treatment to reduce this risk . Active screening strategies improve detection of AF in comparison with routine care ; however , whether screen-detected patients have stroke risk profiles favouring anticoagulation is unclear . Using data derived from the screening for AF in the elderly ( SAFE ) study , the aim of this article was to determine if patients with AF detected via active screening  have stroke risk profiles that warrant prophylactic anticoagulation . METHODS Secondary analysis of data derived from 25 general practice s within which cohorts of 200 patients were r and omly allocated to opportunistic [ pulse and electrocardiogram ( ECG ) ] or systematic screening ( postal invitation for ECG ) .  Stroke risk assessment was undertaken using baseline data extracted from medical records and CHADS2 criteria . CHADS2 scores were compared between the screening groups . RESULTS One hundred and forty-nine new cases of AF were detected , 75 via opportunistic screening and 74 via systematic screening . CHADS2 scores were ≥1 in 83 % [ 95 % confidence interval ( CI ) 72.6 - 89.6 ] of patients detected via opportunistic screening and 78 % ( 95 % CI 67.7 - 86.2 ) detected via systematic screening . There were no significant differences in stroke risk profiles of patients detected via opportunistic and systematic screenings . CONCLUSION Stroke risk profiles of patients detected via opportunistic and systematic screenings were similar . Data derived from the SAFE study suggest that active screening for AF in patients aged ≥65 years in primary care is a useful screening programme with 78 - 83 % of patients identified eligible for anticoagulation treatment according to the CHADS2 criteria Objectives Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common sustained arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice with major public health impact mainly due to the increased risk of stroke . The recent Global Burden of Disease Study reported a lack of prevalence data from India . Our goal was to conduct a pilot study to evaluate the feasibility of assessing AF prevalence and stroke prophylaxis in an urban Indian community . Methods A screening camp was conducted in Nagpur , India , that evaluated adults aged ≥18 years . We collected  demographics , recorded blood pressure , height , weight and the 12-lead electrocardiogram ( ECG ) .  The presence of diabetes and hypertension was recorded by self-reported history . Patients diagnosed with AF were evaluated further to assess aetiology and management . Results Of the total 4077 r and omly selected , community-dwelling adults studied , 0.196 % ( eight patients ) were found to have AF . Mean age of the population was 43.9±14.8 , and 44.5 % were female . The mean age of the patients with AF was 60.5±15.8 years ( five females )  . Rheumatic heart disease was found in five patients with AF . Three patients had history of stroke ( 37.5 % ) and one had peripheral arterial thrombosis . Three patients were on warfarin , but without routine international normalised ratio ( INR ) monitoring . One patient was on aspirin . Five patients were on β-blockers and one on both β-blocker and digoxin . Conclusions The prevalence of AF was low compared with other regions of the world and stroke prophylaxis was underused . A larger study is needed to confirm these findings . This study demonstrates that larger evaluations would be feasible using the community-based techniques employed here ACCF : American College of Cardiology Foundation ACCP : American College of Chest Physicians ACS : acute coronary syndrome ACT : Atrial arrhythmia Conversion Trial ADONIS : American – Australian – African trial with DronedarONe In atrial fibrillation or flutter for the maintenance of Sinus rhythm AF : atrial fibrillation AHA : American Heart Association AND ROMEDA : ANtiarrhythmic trial with DROnedarone in Moderate-to-severe congestive heart failure Evaluating morbidity DecreAse APHRS : Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society aPTT : activated partial thromboplastin time ARB : angiotensin-receptor blocker ARISTOTLE : Apixaban for Reduction In STroke and Other ThromboemboLic Events in atrial fibrillation ATHENA : A placebo-controlled , double-blind , parallel arm Trial to assess the efficacy of dronedarone 400 mg b.i.d . for the prevention of cardiovascular Hospitalization or death from any cause in patiENts with Atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter ATRIA : AnTicoagulation and Risk factors In Atrial fibrillation AVERROES : Apixaban VErsus acetylsalicylic acid ( ASA ) to Reduce the Rate Of Embolic Stroke in atrial fibrillation patients who have failed or are unsuitable for vitamin K antagonist treatment AVRO : A prospect i ve , r and omized , double-blind , Active-controlled , superiority study of Vernakalant vs. amiodarone in Recent Onset atrial fibrillation b.i.d : bis in die ( twice daily ) b.p.m . : beats per minute CABANA : Catheter ABlation vs . ANtiarrhythmic drug therapy for Atrial fibrillation CABG : coronary artery bypass graft CAP : Continued Access to Protect AF CHA2DS2-VASc : Congestive heart failure or left ventricular dysfunction Hypertension , Age ≥75 ( doubled ) , Diabetes , Stroke (doubled)-Vascular disease , Age 65–74 , Sex category ( female ) CHADS2 : Congestive heart failure , Hypertension , Age ≥75 , Diabetes , Stroke ( doubled ) CI : confidence interval CRAFT : Controlled R and omized Atrial Fibrillation Trial CrCl : creatinine clearance DAFNE : Dronedarone Atrial FibrillatioN study after Electrical cardioversion DIONYSOS : R and omized Double blind trIal to evaluate efficacy and safety of drOnedarone ( 400 mg b.i.d . ) vs . amiodaroNe ( 600 mg q.d . for 28 daYS , then 200 mg qd thereafter ) for at least 6 mOnths for the maintenance of Sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation EAST : Early treatment of Atrial fibrillation for Stroke prevention Trial EHRA : European Heart Rhythm Association ECG : electrocardiogram EMA : European Medicines Agency ERATO : Efficacy and safety of dRonedArone for The cOntrol of ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation EURIDIS : EURopean trial In atrial fibrillation or flutter patients receiving Dronedarone for the maIntenance of Sinus rhythm FAST : atrial Fibrillation catheter Ablation vs . Surgical ablation Treatment FDA : Food and Drug Administration Flec-SL : Flecainide Short-Long trial HAS-BLED : Hypertension , Abnormal renal/liver function , Stroke , Bleeding history or predisposition , Labile INR , Elderly , Drugs/alcohol concomitantly HF-PEF : heart failure with preserved ejection fraction HF-REF : heart failure with reduced ejection fraction HR : hazard ratio HRS : Heart Rhythm Society ICH : intracranial haemorrhage INR : international normalized ratio i.v . : intravenous J-RHYTHM : Japanese RHYTHM management trial for atrial fibrillation LAA : left atrial appendage LoE : level of evidence LVEF : left ventricular ejection fraction MANTRA-PAF : Medical ANtiarrhythmic Treatment or Radiofrequency Ablation in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation NICE : National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence NOAC : novel oral anticoagulant NSAID : non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug NYHA : New York Heart Association OAC : oral anticoagulant or oral anticoagulation o.d . : omni die ( every day ) PALLAS : Permanent Atrial fibriLLAtion outcome Study using dronedarone on top of st and ard therapy PCI : percutaneous coronary intervention PREVAIL : Prospect i ve R and omized EVAluation of the LAA closure device In patients with atrial fibrillation v s. Long-term warfarin therapy PROTECT AF : WATCHMAN LAA system for embolic PROTECTion in patients with Atrial Fibrillation PT : prothrombin time RAAFT : Radio frequency Ablation Atrial Fibrillation Trial RE-LY : R and omized Evaluation of Long-term anticoagulant therapY with dabigatran etexilate ROCKET-AF : Rivaroxaban Once daily oral direct factor Xa inhibition Compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and Embolism Trial in atrial fibrillation RRR : relative risk reduction TE : thromboembolism TIA : transient ischaemic attack t.i.d . : ter in die ( three times daily ) TOE : transoesophageal echocardiogram TTR : time in therapeutic range VKA : vitamin K antagonist Guidelines summarize and evaluate all currently available evidence on a particular issue with the aim of assisting physicians in selecting the best management strategy for an individual patient suffering from a given condition , taking into account the impact on
Conclusions and Relevance Although screening with ECG can detect previously unknown cases of atrial fibrillation , it has not been shown to detect more cases than screening focused on pulse palpation .
Treatments for atrial fibrillation reduce the risk of stroke and all-cause mortality and increase the risk of bleeding , but trials have not assessed whether treatment of screen-detected asymptomatic older adults results in better health outcomes than treatment after detection by usual care or after symptoms develop
Importance Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia and increases the risk of stroke .
Objective To review the evidence on screening for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation with electrocardiography ( ECG ) and stroke prevention treatment in asymptomatic adults 65 years or older to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force .