Effects of progressive resistance training on body composition in frail older adults: results of a randomized, controlled trial. High-Intensity Resistance Training Improves Muscle Strength, Self-Reported Function, and Disability in Long-Term Stroke Survivors Effect of progressive resistance training on muscle performance after chronic stroke. The effect of single set resistance training on strength and functional fitness in pulmonary rehabilitation patients. Does an early home-based progressive resistance training program improve function following total hip replacement? Results of a randomized controlled study A randomized controlled trial of progressive resistance training in depressed elders. Resistance training improves muscle strength and functional capacity in multiple sclerosis Effects of progressive resistance training on body composition, physical fitness and quality of life of patients on hemodialysis. Regenerate: assessing the feasibility of a strength-training program to enhance the physical and mental health of chronic post stroke patients with depression. Progressive resistance training did not improve walking but can improve muscle performance, quality of life and fatigue in adults with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial High-intensity progressive resistance training improves flat-ground walking in older adults with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. Progression of Resistance Training Intensity among Older COPD Patients: A Comparison of 2 Resistance Training Studies Strength improvements with 1 yr of progressive resistance training in older women. Efficacy and feasibility of a novel tri-modal robust exercise prescription in a retirement community: a randomized, controlled trial. Progressive resistance training improves gait initiation in individuals with Parkinson's disease. A randomized controlled trial of high versus low intensity weight training versus general practitioner care for clinical depression in older adults. Progressive Resistance Muscle Strength Training of Hospitalized Frail Elderly
BACKGROUND Progressive resistance exercise training ( PRT ) has been shown to increase muscle strength and fat-free mass ( FFM ) in elderly persons . Limited information is available regarding the effects of PRT on lean and fat mass in frail elderly persons . METHODS Ninety-one community-dwelling sedentary men and women , 78 years and older with physical frailty ( defined using st and ardized objective criteria ) were enrolled in a 9-month trial of exercise training ( ET ) . Physical frailty was defined as having 2 of the 3 following criteria : modified Physical Performance Test score between 18 and 32 , peak aerobic power between 10 and 18 ml/kg/min , or self-report of difficulty or assistance with two instrumental activities of daily living or one basic activity of daily living . Participants were r and omly assigned to either a control ( CTL ) group that performed a low intensity home exercise program or a supervised ET group that performed 3 months of low intensity exercise and 3 months of PRT . RESULTS After completion of PRT , ET participants had greater improvements than did CTL participants in maximal voluntary force production for knee extension ( mean Delta + 5.3 + /- 13 ft/lb vs + 1.1 + /- 11 ft/lb , p = .05 ) , measured using isokinetic dynamometry . Total body FFM ( measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry ) increased in the ET group , but not in the CTL group ( mean Delta + 0.84 + /- 1.4 kg vs + 0.01 + /- 1.5 kg , p = .005 ) . Total , trunk , intra-abdominal , and subcutaneous fat mass ( measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and (1)H-magnetic resonance imaging ) did not change in response to PRT . CONCLUSIONS Three months of supervised PRT induced improvements in maximal voluntary thigh muscle strength and whole body FFM in frail , community-dwelling elderly women and men . This supervised exercise program may not be sufficient to reduce whole-body or intra-abdominal fat area in this population Background and Purpose — To evaluate the efficacy of supervised high-intensity progressive resistance training ( PRT ) on lower extremity strength , function , and disability in older , long-term stroke survivors . Methods — Forty-two volunteers aged 50 years and above , 6 months to 6 years after a single mild to moderate stroke , were r and omized into either a control group of upper extremity stretching or a PRT group that received a 12-week supervised high-intensity resistance training program consisting of bilateral leg press ( LP ) , unilateral paretic and nonparetic knee extension ( KE ) , ankle dorsiflexion ( DF ) , and plantarflexion ( PF ) exercises .  Functional performance was assessed using the 6-minute walk , stair-climb time , repeated chair-rise time , and habitual and maximal gait velocities . Self-reported changes in function and disability were evaluated using the Late Life Function and Disability Instrument ( LLFDI ) . Results — Single-repetition maximum strength significantly improved in the PRT group for LP ( 16.2 % ) , paretic KE ( 31.4 % ) , and nonparetic KE ( 38.2 % ) with no change in the control group . Paretic ankle DF ( 66.7 % versus −24.0 % ) , paretic ankle PF ( 35.5 % versus −20.3 % ) , and nonparetic ankle PF ( 14.7 % versus −13.8 % ) significantly improved in the PRT group compared with the control . The PRT group showed significant improvement in self-reported function and disability with no change in the control . There was no significant difference between groups for any performance-based measure of function . Conclusions — High-intensity PRT improves both paretic and nonparetic lower extremity strength after stroke , and results in reductions in functional limitations and disability PURPOSE This study investigated the effects of high-intensity progressive resistance training ( PRT ) and high-intensity cycling ( cycling ) on muscle performance and the time course of strength gains in a chronic stroke population . METHODS Forty-eight individuals with chronic stroke sequelae ( mean + /- SD ; age = 63 + /- 9 yr , time since stroke = 57 + /- 54 months ) were r and omly allocated to one of four treatment groups : PRT + cycling , PRT + sham cycling , sham PRT + cycling , or sham PRT + sham cycling groups in a fully factorial clinical trial . Thirty exercise sessions were conducted over a 10- to 12-wk period . The main outcomes investigated were measures of unilateral muscle strength , peak power , and muscle endurance . RESULTS Those undergoing PRT improved their lower limb muscle strength , peak power , and endurance compared with participants receiving sham PRT or cycling only ( P < 0.05 ) , and combined exercise was not superior to PRT alone . Strength improvements occurred primarily during the first 6 to 8 wk ( 98%-100 % of total gain ) and then reached a plateau during the final 2 to 4 wk . CONCLUSION We have shown for the first time in a direct comparison study that high-intensity PRT , but not cycling or sham exercise , can improve muscle strength , peak power , and muscle endurance in both affected and unaffected lower limbs after chronic stroke by a significant and clinical ly meaningful amount . Although strength gains plateaued earlier than anticipated , adherence to the intended continuous high-intensity progressive overload protocol was largely achieved ( average load of 84 % + /- 4 % of one repetition maximum ) PURPOSE The primary goal of pulmonary rehabilitation ( PR ) is for patients to achieve and maintain their maximum level of independence and functioning in the community . Traditional PR uses a predominantly aerobic/endurance approach to rehabilitation with little or no inclusion of exercises to increase strength . Few studies have investigated the impact of resistance training on PR despite growing evidence supporting its efficacy to improve physical function ( functional fitness ) in both healthy individuals and those with chronic disease . The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of single-set resistance training on strength and functional fitness outcomes in PR patients . METHODS Twenty PR patients , 60 to 81 years old , were r and omly assigned to an 8-week endurance-based PR program ( ET ) or an ET plus resistance training program ( RT ) . RESULTS Strength increased in RT ( P < .05 ) and decreased in  ET for both upper and lower body . Functional fitness improved ( P < .05 ) in 5 of 7 tests for RT compared with 2 tests for ET . CONCLUSIONS Single set RT can elicit significant improvements in both strength and functional fitness , which is not obtained by traditional PR alone . Our results are comparable to other studies with similar outcomes using multiple-set RT protocol s. These findings may have important implication s for program design , application , and adherence in PR Background In-hospital progressive resistance training ( PRT ) has been shown to be an effective method of rehabilitation following hip surgery . The aim of this study was to assess whether a home-based PRT program would be beneficial in improving patients ’ muscle strength and physical function compared to st and ard rehabilitation .  Methods Subjects ( n = 49 ) either received home-based PRT rehabilitation  ( n = 25 ) or  st and ard rehabilitation  ( n = 24 ) in a prospect i ve single blinded r and omized trial carried out over a two-year period . The primary outcome measure was the maximal voluntary contraction of the operated leg quadriceps ( MVCOLQ ) with secondary measures of outcome being the sit to st and score ( ST ) , timed up and go ( TUG ) , stair climb performance ( SCP ) , the 6 min walk test ( 6MWT ) , and lean mass of the operated leg ( LM ) . Results Twenty-six patients completed follow up at 1 year ( n = 13 per group ) for the final comparative analysis . All the outcome measures showed marked progressive improvements from the baseline measures at 9–12 months post op ( Estimated effect ( std error ) ; p value)- MVCOLQ 26.50 ( 8.71 ) N p = 0.001 ; ST 1.37 ( 0.33 ) p = 0.0001 ; TUG −1.44 ( 0.45 ) s p = 0.0001 ; SCP −3.41(0.80)s p = 0.0001 ; 6MWT 45.61 (6.10)m p = 0.0001 ; LM 20 (204)g p = 0.326 ) following surgery for both groups . Overall , there was no significant effect for participation in the exercise regime compared with st and ard care for all outcomes assessed . Conclusions Overall , this study demonstrated that there is no significant difference between the two groups for participation in the home-based PRT exercise programme when compared to st and ard care for all outcomes .Trial registration IS RCT N 1309951 . Registered February 2011 BACKGROUND Depression in elderly people may be contributed to by the multiple losses of aging . Exercise has the potential to positively impact many of these losses simultaneously . We tested the hypothesis that progressive resistance training ( PRT ) would reduce depression while improving physiologic capacity , quality of life , morale , function and self-efficacy without adverse events in an older , significantly depressed population . METHODS We conducted a 10-week r and omized controlled trial of volunteers aged 60 and above with major or minor depression or dysthymia . Subjects were r and omized for 10 weeks to either a supervised PRT program three times a week or an attention-control group . RESULTS A total of 32 subjects aged 60 - 84 , mean age 71.3 + /- 1.2 yr , were r and omized and completed the study . No significant adverse events occurred . Median compliance was 95 % . PRT significantly reduced all depression measures ( Beck Depression Inventory in exercisers 21.3 + /- 1.8 to 9.8 + /- 2.4 versus controls 18.4 + /- 1.7 to 13.8 + /- 2 , p = .002 ; Hamilton Rating Scale of Depression in exercisers 12.3 + /- 0.9 to 5.3 + /- 1.3 versus controls 11.4 + /- 1.0 to 8.9 + /- 1.3 , p = .008 ) . Quality of life subscales of bodily pain ( p = .001 ) , vitality ( p = .002 ) , social functioning ( p = .008 ) , and role emotional ( p = .02 ) were all significantly improved by exercise compared to controls . Strength increased a mean of 33 % + /- 4 % in exercisers and decreased 2 % + /- 2 % in controls ( p < .0001 ) . In a multiple stepwise regression model , intensity of training was a significant independent predictor of decrease in depression scores ( r2 = .617 , p = .0002 ) . CONCLUSIONS PRT is an effective antidepressant in depressed elders , while also improving strength , morale , and quality of life Objective : To test the hypothesis that lower extremity progressive resistance training ( PRT ) can improve muscle strength and functional capacity in patients with multiple sclerosis ( MS ) and to evaluate whether the improvements are maintained after the trial . Methods : The present study was a 2-arm , 12-week , r and omized controlled trial including a post study follow-up period of 12 weeks . Thirty-eight moderately impaired patients with MS were r and omized to a PRT exercise group ( n = 19 ) or a control group ( n = 19 ) . The exercise group completed a biweekly 12-week lower extremity PRT program and was afterward encouraged to continue training . After the trial , the control group completed the PRT intervention . Both groups were tested before and after 12 weeks of the trial and at 24 weeks ( follow-up ) , where isometric muscle strength of the knee extensors ( KE MVC ) and functional capacity ( FS ; combined score of 4 tests ) were evaluated . Results : KE MVC and FS improved after 12 weeks of PRT in the exercise group ( KE MVC : 15.7 % [ 95 % confidence interval 4.3–27.0 ] , FS : 21.5 % [ 95 % confidence interval 17.0–26.1 ] ; p < 0.05 ) , and the improvements were better than in the control group ( p < 0.05 ) . The improvements of KE and FS in the exercise group persisted at follow-up after 24 weeks . Also , the exercise effects were reproduced in the control group during the 12-week posttrial PRT period . Conclusions : Twelve weeks of intense progressive resistance training of the lower extremities leads to improvements of muscle strength and functional capacity in patients with multiple sclerosis , the effects persisting after 12 weeks of self-guided physical activity . Level of evidence : The present study provides level III evidence supporting the hypothesis that lower extremity progressive resistance training can improve muscle strength and functional capacity in patients with multiple sclerosis PURPOSE To investigate the effect of progressive resistance training ( PRT ) on body composition , physical fitness , quality of life , lipid and nutritional profile of patients on hemodialysis ( HD ) . METHODS A non equivalent comparison group pretest and posttest design study was used with 40 participants who were r and omly assigned to the exercise group ( 20 participants ) and the comparison group ( 20 participants ) . The exercise group received PRT for 30 minutes per session , 3 sessions a week , for 12 weeks , while the comparison group received usual care . The PRT consisted of upper and lower body exercises using elastic b and s and s and bags . Outcome measures evaluated were : body composition , physical fitness , quality of life , and lipid profile . RESULTS Skeletal muscle mass , grip , leg muscle strength , and quality of life all improved significantly in the exercise group . Body fat rate , total cholesterol and triglyceride rate decreased significantly in the exercise group . CONCLUSION These results suggest that PRT improves body composition , physical fitness , quality of life , and lipid profile of patients on HD .  PRT using elastic b and s and s and bags can be utilized as part of a regular care plan for these patients OBJECTIVE The Regenerate pilot study explored whether a 10-week , community-based progressive resistance training ( PRT ) program could reduce depressive symptoms in depressed chronic stroke survivors . METHODS Participants were screened for depressive status using the PHQ-9 and confirmed by psychiatric assessment . Eligible people ( n = 45 ) were r and omised to PRT or a waiting-list comparison group .  The PRT program included two high intensity sessions/week for 10 weeks at a community-based gymnasium . Depressive status , physical and mental health and quality of life were measured at baseline , 10 weeks and 6 months . Muscle strength was assessed using 1 repetition maximum ( 1-RM ) for upper and lower limbs . RESULTS The participants ' median age was 69 years : 27 were male . The intervention group had lower depression scores than the comparison group at all time points . At 6-month follow-up , there was a trend for PRT participants to be more likely to be no longer depressed than the comparison group , but the difference was not significant after adjusting for baseline scores . There were modest improvements in health and wellbeing over time , but many scores were lower than reported in non-depressed people . Intervention participants demonstrated significant improvements in strength . Program adherence was good : on average 75 % of the 10-week program was completed . CONCLUSIONS The intervention appeared to be feasible within a community-based setting . To optimize stroke recovery and improve the quality of life of stroke survivors , health professionals should continue to focus on helping survivors ' mental health recovery as well their physical rehabilitation Background : Few high- quality trials have examined the effects of progressive resistance training ( PRT ) on people with multiple sclerosis ( MS ) . Objective : To determine the effectiveness of PRT for people with MS , focusing on improving the gait deficits common in this population . Methods : Using a single blind r and omized controlled trial , people with relapsing – remitting MS were r and omly allocated to either a PRT program targeting the lower limb muscles twice a week for 10 weeks ( n = 36 ) , or usual care plus an attention and social program conducted once a week for 10 weeks ( n = 35 ) . Outcomes were recorded at baseline , week 10 and week 22 . Results : Participants attended 92 % of training sessions , with no serious adverse events . At 10 weeks , no differences were detected in walking performance . However , compared with the comparison group PRT demonstrated increased leg press strength ( 16.8 % , SD 4.5 ) , increased reverse leg press strength ( 29.8 % , SD 12.7 ) , and increased muscle endurance of the reverse leg press ( 38.7 % , SD 32.8 ) . Improvements in favor of PRT were also found for physical fatigue ( Mean difference −3.9 units , 95%CI −6.6 to −1.3 ) , and the physical health domain of quality of life ( Mean difference 1.5 units , 95%CI 0.1 to 2.9 ) . At week 22 almost no between-group differences remained . Conclusion : PRT is a relatively safe intervention that can have short-term effects on reducing physical fatigue , increasing muscle endurance and can lead to small improvements in muscle strength and quality of life in people with relapsing – remitting MS . However , no improvements in walking performance were observed and benefits do not appear to persist if training is completely stopped OBJECTIVES To assess the efficacy of whole-body progressive resistance training ( PRT ) as a treatment for the symptoms of peripheral arterial disease ( PAD ) in older adults . DESIGN R and omized controlled pilot trial . SETTING University clinical weight training facility in Sydney , Australia . PARTICIPANTS Twenty-two older adults with symptomatic PAD . INTERVENTIONS The efficacy of supervised whole-body high-intensity PRT ( H-PRT ) with low-intensity nonprogressive resistance training ( L-RT ) and a usual care control group that performed unsupervised walking for 6 months was compared . MEASUREMENTS Pilot outcome measures included 6-minute walk ( 6 MW ) outcomes , body composition , dynamic muscle strength and endurance , and performance-based tests of function . RESULTS Mean age was 71.1 ± 7.2 . Mean ankle brachial index was 0.55 ± 0.13 .  Exercise adherence was similar in all groups ( P = .29 ) . H-PRT ( n = 8) improved total 6MW distance ( mean difference ( MD ) 62.6 ± 58.0 m , P = .02 ) significantly more than L-RT ( n = 7 ; MD=-48.2 ± 67.6 m ) and controls ( n = 7 ; MD=-9.9 ± 52.9 m ) . Change in 6MW onset of claudication was significantly and independently related to change in bilateral calf endurance ( correlation coefficient ( r ) = 0.65 , P = .03 ) , and change in 6MW distance was significantly and independently related to change in bilateral hip extensor endurance ( r = 0.71 , P = .02 ) in all groups . CONCLUSION H-PRT  significantly improved 6MW ability in older adults with intermittent claudication from PAD , whereas L-RT and unsupervised walking did not . Improvement in walking ability was significantly related to improvements in bilateral calf and hip extensor endurance , supporting further investigations targeted at musculoskeletal impairment in this cohort Abstract Objective : This comparison study examined strength and functional fitness ( FF ) outcomes between 2 single-set resistance training ( SSRT ) studies of differing intensity progressions ( rapid progression [ RP ] versus delayed progression [ DP ] ) among elderly pulmonary rehabilitation ( PR ) patients to determine if there is a threshold effect for training intensity . Methods : Twenty PR patients participating in identical hospital-based PR programs , which met twice a week for 8 weeks , were r and omly assigned to SSRT programs  , which differed in intensity progression ( RP : n = 10 , mean age = 71.0 ± 3.7 years ; DP : n = 10 , mean age = 65.4 ± 7.8 years ) . The SSRT consisted of 1 set of 8 to 15 repetitions of 5 exercises . For both studies , training loads were determined equally . Load increases in the RP study consisted of 5 % to 10 % immediately following a session where 10 repetitions were completed . Load increases for the DP study consisted of 3 to 5 lbs following 2 consecutive sessions wherein 12 repetitions were completed . Results of the primary outcomes data from both SSRT studies were compared to determine the presence of a threshold effect for intensity progression . The outcomes evaluated in both studies were upper and lower body strength and various FF measures . Repeated measures controlling for age , pulmonary function , and body mass index ( BMI ) were used to assess the presence of significant differences . To determine statistical significance , alpha was set at p < 0.05 . Results : Rapid progression result ed in greater increases in upper body strength ( chest press ; P = 0.021 ) and FF ( arm curl test , p = 0.001 ; lift and reach test , P = 0.003 ) than DP . Conclusions : Rapid progression of training intensity in a SSRT involving elderly PR patients appears superior to delayed progression Thirty-nine healthy women ( 59.5 + /- 0.9 yr ) were r and omized to either a control group ( CON ) or a progressive resistance training group ( PRT ) that trained twice weekly for 12 months . PRT trained at 80 % or more ( average of 84 % ) of their most recent one repetition maximum ( 1RM ) on the lateral pull-down ( LPD ) , knee extensor ( KE ) , and double leg press ( DLP ) apparatus . One RM was measured for each exercise once monthly in PRT and at baseline , mid study , and end of study in CON . One RM significantly increased in PRT for all muscle groups trained compared to CON ( P < 0.0001 ) . Increases of 73.7 + /- 12 % , 35.1 + /- 3 % , and 77.0 + /- 5 % , respectively , for KE , DLP , and LPD in PRT and 12.7 % + /- 8 % , 3.7 % + /- 3 % , and 18.4 % + /- 4 % , respectively , in CON were observed . Approximately 50 % of the gains in KE and LPD and 40 % in the DLP were seen in the first 3 months of the study . In all three exercises , strength gains in PRT continued over the entire 12-month period . These data indicate that high-intensity strength training results in substantial , continual increases in strength in postmenopausal women for at least 12 months , with the greatest gains seen in the first 3 months of training OBJECTIVES To test the feasibility and efficacy of current guidelines for multimodal exercise programs in older adults . DESIGN R and omized , controlled trial . SETTING Retirement village . PARTICIPANTS Thirty-eight subjects ( 14 men and 24 women ) aged 76.6 + /- 6.1 . INTERVENTION A wait list control or 10 weeks of supervised exercise consisting of high-intensity ( 80 % of one-repetition maximum ( 1RM ) ) progressive resistance training ( PRT ) 3 days per week , moderate-intensity ( rating of perceived exertion 11 to 14/20 ) aerobic training 2 days per week , and progressive balance training 1 day per week . MEASUREMENTS Blinded assessment s of dynamic muscle strength ( 1RM ) , balance , 6-minute walk , gait velocity , chair st and , stair climb , depressive symptoms , self-efficacy , and habitual physical activity level . RESULTS Higher baseline strength and psychological well-being were associated with better functional performance . Strength gains over 10 weeks averaged 39+/-31 % in exercise , versus 21+/-24 % in controls ( P=.10 ) , with greater improvements in hip flexion ( P=.01 ) , hip abduction ( P=.02 ) , and chest press ( P=.04 ) in the exercise group . Strength adaptations were greatest in exercises in which the intended continuous progressive overload was achieved . Stair climb power ( 12.3+/-15 % , P=.002 ) and chair st and time ( -7.1+/-15 % , P=.006 ) improved significantly and similarly in both groups . Reduction in depressive symptoms was significantly related to compliance ( attendance rate r=-0.568 , P=.009 , PRT progression in loading r=-0.587 , P=.02 , and total volume of aerobic training r=-0.541 , P=.01 ) , as well as improvements in muscle strength ( r=-0.498 , P=.002 ) . CONCLUSION Robust physical and psychological adaptations to exercise are linked , although volumes and intensities of multiple exercise modalities sufficient to cause significant adaptation appear difficult to prescribe and adhere to simultaneously in older adults An impaired ability to initiate walking is a common feature of postural instability and gait impairment in Parkinson 's disease . While progressive resistance training ( PRT ) has been proposed to be an effective modality to improve balance and gait function in people with Parkinson 's disease , there are a limited number of r and omized trials and no studies have evaluated gait initiation performance . Thus , the purpose of this study was to examine the potential benefits PRT on GI performance in people with Parkinson 's disease . Eighteen individuals with idiopathic PD were r and omly assigned to either a twice weekly PRT program or a non-contact control group for 10 weeks . Biomechanical analysis of GI was performed pre- and post-intervention . Dependent variables of interest included the displacement of the center-of-pressure ( COP ) during the anticipatory postural phase of GI as well as the initial stride length and velocity . The PRT group demonstrated improvements in the posterior displacement of the COP and the initial stride length and velocity . There were no improvements in any variables for the control subjects . These results suggest that PRT may be an effective non-pharmacological and nonsurgical treatment to improve GI performance in PWP BACKGROUND Although exercise has been shown to relieve depression , little is known about its mechanism or dose-response characteristics . We hypothesized that high intensity progressive resistance training ( PRT ) would be more effective than either low intensity PRT or st and ard care by a general practitioner ( GP ) in depressed elderly persons , and that high intensity PRT would provide superior benefits in quality of life , sleep quality , and self-efficacy . METHODS Sixty community-dwelling adults > 60 years with major or minor depression were r and omized to supervised high intensity PRT ( 80 % maximum load ) or low intensity PRT ( 20 % maximum load ) 3 days per week for 8 weeks , or GP care . RESULTS A 50 % reduction in the Hamilton Rating Scale of Depression score was achieved in 61 % of the high intensity , 29 % of the low intensity , and 21 % of the GP care group ( p = .03 ) . Strength gain was directly associated with reduction in depressive symptoms ( r = 0.40 , p = .004 ) , as was baseline social support network type ( F = 3.52 , p = .015 ) , whereas personality type , self-efficacy , and locus of control were unrelated to the antidepressant effect . Vitality quality -of-life scale improved more in the high intensity group than in the others ( p = .04 ) . Sleep quality improved significantly in all participants ( p < .0001 ) , with the greatest relative change in high intensity PRT ( p = .05 ) . CONCLUSIONS High intensity PRT is more effective than is low intensity PRT or GP care for the treatment of older depressed patients Sullivan DH , Wall PT , Bariola JR , Bopp MM , Frost YM : Progressive resistance muscle strength training of hospitalized frail elderly . Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001;80:503–509 . Objective To determine whether frail elderly patients recuperating from acute illnesses could safely participate in and gain appreciable improvement in muscle strength from progressive resistance muscle strength training . Design Muscle strength ( one repetition maximum ) , functional abilities ( sit-to-st and maneuver and 20-sec maximal safe gait speed ) , and body composition were measured before and at the conclusion of a 10-wk program of lower limb progressive resistance muscle strength training . The nonr and omized study was conducted in a 30-bed geriatric rehabilitation unit of a university-affiliated Veterans Affairs hospital and a 28-bed transitional care unit of a community nursing home . Participants included 19 recuperating elderly subjects ( 14 male , 5 female ; 13 ambulatory , 6 nonambulatory ) > 64 yr ( mean age , 82.8 ± 7.9 yr ) . Results The one repetition maximum increased an average of 74 % ± 49 % ( median , 70 % ; interquartile range , 38%–95 % , and an average of 20 ± 13 kg ( P = 0.0001 ) . Sit-to-st and maneuver times improved in 15 of 19 cases ( 79 % ) . Maximum safe gait speeds improved in 10 of 19 cases ( 53 % ) . Four of the six nonambulatory subjects progressed to ambulatory status . No subject experienced a complication . Conclusions A carefully monitored program of progressive resistance muscle strength training to regain muscle strength is a safe and possibly effective method for frail elderly recuperating from acute illnesses . A r and omized control study is needed to examine the degree to which progressive resistance muscle strength training offers advantages , if any , over routine posthospital care that includes traditional low-intensity physical therapy
PRT results in improvements to muscle strength and some aspects of functional limitation , such as gait speed , in older adults .
However , based on current data , the effect of PRT on physical disability remains unclear .
Further , due to the poor reporting of adverse events in trials , it is difficult to evaluate the risks associated with PRT
BACKGROUND The aim of this systematic review was to quantify the effectiveness of progressive resistance strength training ( PRT ) to reduce  physical disability in older people .