Robot‐assisted total hip arthroplasty: Clinical outcomes and complication rate A Comparison between Robotic-assisted and Manual Implantation of Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty Robot-assisted primary cementless total hip arthroplasty with a short femoral stem: a prospective randomized short-term outcome study. Robot-assisted primary cementless total hip arthroplasty with a short femoral stem: a prospective randomized short-term outcome study [Clinical outcome following robotic assisted versus conventional total hip arthroplasty: a controlled and prospective study of seventy-one patients]. Comparison of Robotic-assisted and Conventional Acetabular Cup Placement in THA: A Matched-pair Controlled Study Minimally Invasive versus Classic Procedures in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed Through Direct Anterior Approach Provides Superior Early Outcome: Results of a Randomized, Prospective Study. Are Hip Precautions Necessary Post Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review Total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive lateral approach--our experience and early results. Robot-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Rehabilitation following total hip arthroplasty evaluation over short follow-up time: randomized clinical trial. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled prospective trial Early experiences with robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty using the DigiMatch™ ROBODOC® surgical system. Effect of preoperative exercise on measures of functional status in men and women undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty. [Minimally invasive posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty]. Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty accurately restores the joint line and mechanical axis. A prospective randomised study.
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to report minimum 2-year outcomes and complications for robotic-arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty ( THA )  . METHODS Data were prospect ively collected and retrospectively review ed between June 2011 and April 2014 . Inclusion criteria were primary robotic-arm-assisted THAs treating idiopathic osteoarthritis with ≥ 2-year follow-up .  Demographics , operating time , complications , 2-year outcome scores and satisfaction , and subsequent surgeries were recorded . RESULTS There were 181 cases eligible for inclusion , of which 162 ( 89.5 % ) had minimum 2-year follow-up . At the latest follow-up , the mean visual analogue scale was 0.7 , satisfaction was 9.3 , Harris hip score was 91.1 and forgotten joint score was 83.1 . Six ( 3.7 % ) intraoperative complications and six ( 3.7 % ) postoperative complications were reported . No leg length discrepancies ( LLDs ) or dislocations were reported . CONCLUSIONS Robotic-arm-assisted THA demonstrates favourable short-term outcomes and does not result in a higher complication rate compared to non-robotic THA as reported by the literature Background The benefits of robotic techniques for implanting femoral components during THA are still controversial . Questions / Purpose sThe purpose of this study was to prospect ively compare the results and complications of robotic-assisted and h and -rasping stem implantation techniques . Method The minimum followup was 5 years ( mean , 67 months ; range , 60–85 months ) . One hundred forty-six primary THAs on 130 patients were included in this study .  Robot-assisted primary THA was performed on 75 hips and a h and -rasping technique was used on 71 hips . Results At 2 and 3 years postoperatively , the Japanese Orthopaedic Association ( JOA ) clinical score was slightly better in the robotic-assisted group . At 5 years followup , however , the differences were not significant . Postoperative limb lengths of the robotic-milling group had significantly less variance than the h and -rasping group . At 2 years postoperatively , there was significantly more stress shielding of the proximal femur in the h and -rasping group ; this difference was more significant 5 years postoperatively . Conclusions Substantially more precise implant positioning seems to have led to less variance in limb-length ine quality and less stress shielding of the proximal femur 5 years postoperatively . Level of Evidence Level II , therapeutic study . See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence BACKGROUND Recently , two topical issues in total hip arthroplasty ( THA ) have been robot-assisted surgery and use of a short stem . The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of robotic milling on the accuracy of short femoral stem positioning and on the short-term clinical outcome in THA using a prospect i ve , r and omized design . METHODS We r and omized 54 patients into two groups , either robotic milling group or manual rasping group .  The patients were assessed clinical ly and radiographically at 8 weeks , 5 months , 12 months , and 24 months . RESULTS Robotic milling group had a significantly longer operation time , requiring on average 8.9 min for registration and 11.2 min for milling . On the other h and , robotic milling group showed superior results in terms of stem alignment and leg length e quality . Two intraoperative femoral fractures occurred only in manual rasping group . Harris hip scores and WOMAC scores at 24 months postoperatively were similar in both groups . No complications including stem loosening , infection , nerve palsy , or dislocation were encountered in either group during the follow-up period . CONCLUSIONS The present study suggested that robot-assisted short stem THA could increase the accuracy of stem alignment , improve leg length e quality , and help reduce the risk of intraoperative femoral fracture as compared with manual rasping . However , the clinical outcome scores did not differ between the two groups at the time of short-term follow-up . Long-term follow-up is needed to determine whether there will be a long-term clinical relevance of robot-assisted implantation of short femoral stems in THA Abstract Background : Recently , two topical issues in total hip arthroplasty ( THA ) have been robot-assisted surgery and use of a short stem . The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of robotic milling on the accuracy of short femoral stem positioning and on the short-term clinical outcome in THA using a prospect i ve , r and omized design . Methods : We r and omized 54 patients into two groups , either robotic milling group or manual rasping group .  The patients were assessed clinical ly and radiographically at 8 weeks , 5 months , 12 months , and 24 months . Results : Robotic milling group had a significantly longer operation time , requiring on average 8.9 min for registration and 11.2 min for milling . On the other h and , robotic milling group showed superior results in terms of stem alignment and leg length e quality . Two intraoperative femoral fractures occurred only in manual rasping group . Harris hip scores and WOMAC scores at 24 months postoperatively were similar in both groups . No complications including stem loosening , infection , nerve palsy , or dislocation were encountered in either group during the follow-up period . Conclusions : The present study suggested that robot-assisted short stem THA could increase the accuracy of stem alignment , improve leg length e quality , and help reduce the risk of intraoperative femoral fracture as compared with manual rasping . However , the clinical outcome scores did not differ between the two groups at the time of short-term follow-up . Long-term follow-up is needed to determine whether there will be a long-term clinical relevance of robot-assisted implantation of short femoral stems in THA AIM Robotic assisted total hip arthroplasty  remains controversial , since wider exposure of the proximal femur and placement of the leg in maximal hip adduction and external rotation using a rigid leg-holder apparatus may impair significantly the hip abductors . Consequently , it is the purpose of this study to analyse and report both clinical outcome and hip abductor function following robotic assisted versus conventional total hip arthroplasty . MATERIAL AND METHODS 36 robotic-assisted ( CASPAR , Orto-Maquet , Rastatt , Germany ) and 35 conventional cementless total hip arthroplasties  were followed on average for 18 months regarding incidence of complications , Harris hip score , the scoring system according to Merle d'Aubigné and Postel , hip abductor function ( using a spring-balance ) , and incidence of Trendelenburg 's sign ( according to the Kuhfuss-classification ) . Statistical analysis was performed in case of continuous data using the t test and the Mann-Whitney test , respectively , and in case of categorical data using Fisher 's exact test and the chi-squared test , respectively . The level of significance was set as p < 0.05 . RESULTS Average duration of surgery ( CASPAR : 100.6 min ; conventional : 51.5 min ; p < 0.0001 ) as well as average loss of haemoglobin ( CASPAR : 4.5 mg/dL ; conventional : 3.3 mg/dL ; p = 0.0002 ) differed significantly , whereas the incidence of complications ( CASPAR : two dislocations , one sciatic paresis , one deep infection ; conventional : one dislocation , two fissures ) , revision rate ( CASPAR : 5.6 % ; conventional : 2.9 % ) , and incidence of heterotopic ossifications ( CASPAR : 30.6 % ; conventional : 17.1 % ) was comparable following both procedures ( p > 0.05 ) . Improvement of the Harris hip score also was comparable in both groups ( CASPAR : 40.9 to 86.1 points ; conventional : 39.5 to 88.0 points ; p = 0.21 ) , whereas improvement of the score according to Merle d'Aubigné and Postel was significantly greater following the manual procedure ( CASPAR : 10.1 to 16.0 points ; conventional : 8.3 to 16.6 points ; p < 0.0001 ) . Differences between the two groups were also significant regarding hip abductor function ( CASPAR : 76.1 % ; conventional : 93.8 % of the contralateral hip ; p < 0.0001 ) and incidence of Trendelenburg 's sign ( CASPAR : 61.1 % ; conventional : 25.7 % ; p = 0.0014 ) . CONCLUSION The significant functional impairment following robotic assisted THA should be taken critically into consideration prior to initiating such procedure Background Improper acetabular component orientation in THA has been associated with increased dislocation rates , component impingement , bearing surface wear , and a greater likelihood of revision . Therefore , any reasonable steps to improve acetabular component orientation should be considered and explored . Questions / purpose sWe therefore sought to compare THA with a robotic-assisted posterior approach with manual alignment techniques through a posterior approach , using a matched-pair controlled study design , to assess whether the use of the robot made it more likely for the acetabular cup to be positioned in the safe zones described by Lewinnek et al. and Callanan et al. Methods Between September 2008 and September 2012 , 160 THAs were performed by the senior surgeon . Sixty-two patients ( 38.8 % ) underwent THA using a conventional posterior approach , 69 ( 43.1 % ) underwent robotic-assisted THA using the posterior approach , and 29 ( 18.1 % ) underwent radiographic-guided anterior-approach THAs .  From September 2008 to June 2011 , all patients were offered anterior or posterior approaches regardless of BMI and anatomy . Since introduction of the robot in June 2011 , all THAs were performed using the robotic technique through the posterior approach , unless a patient specifically requested otherwise . The radiographic cup positioning of the robotic-assisted THAs was compared with a matched-pair control group of conventional THAs performed by the same surgeon through the same posterior approach . The safe zone ( inclination , 30 ° –50 ° ; anteversion , 5 ° –25 ° ) described by Lewinnek et al. and the modified safe zone ( inclination , 30 ° –45 ° ; anteversion , 5 ° –25 ° ) of Callanan et al. were used for cup placement assessment . Matching criteria were gender , age ± 5 years , and ( BMI ) ± 7 units . After exclusions , a total of 50 THAs were included in each group . Strong interobserver and intraobserver correlations were found for all radiographic measurements ( r > 0.82 ; p < 0.001 ) . Results One hundred percent ( 50/50 ) of the robotic-assisted THAs were within the safe zone described by Lewinnek et al. compared with 80 % ( 40/50 ) of the conventional THAs ( p = 0.001 ) . Ninety-two percent ( 46/50 ) of robotic-assisted THAs were within the modified safe zone described by Callanan et al. compared with 62 % ( 31/50 ) of conventional THAs p ( p = 0.001 ) . The odds ratios for an implanted cup out of the safe zones of Lewinnek et al. and Callanan et al. were zero and 0.142 , respectively ( 95 % CI , 0.044 , 0.457 ) . Conclusions Use of the robot allowed for improvement in placement of the cup in both safe zones , an important parameter that plays a significant role in long-term success of THA . However , whether the radiographic improvements we observed will translate into clinical benefits for patients —such as reductions in component impingement , acetabular wear , and prosthetic dislocations , or in terms of improved longevity — remains unproven . Level of Evidence Level III , therapeutic study . See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence Background For total hip arthroplasty ( THA ) , minimally invasive surgery ( MIS ) uses a smaller incision and less muscle dissection than the classic approach ( CLASS ) , and may lead to faster rehabilitation . Questions / purpose sDoes minimally invasive hip arthroplasty result in superior clinical outcomes ? Patients and Methods In this double-blind r and omized controlled trial , 120 consecutive primary noncemented THAs in 120 patients were assigned to one of two groups ( MIS or CLASS ) . The r and omization sequence was stratified for two groups of surgeons , ie , those using a posterolateral approach ( PL-CLASS or PL-MIS ) and those using an anterolateral approach ( AL-CLASS or AL-MIS ) . Length of the incisions was 18 cm for the CLASS procedures . MIS incisions were extended at the skin level to 18 cm at the end of the procedure . The primary end point was the Harris hip score ( HHS ) at 6 weeks postoperatively . Patient-centered question naires were obtained preoperatively and after 6 weeks and 1 year . Results For the patients in the MIS group ( average 7.8 cm incision length ) , statistically significant increased mean HHSs were seen compared with the CLASS group at 6 weeks and 1 year . This difference was small and mainly caused by the favorable results of the PL-MIS . In the MIS group , surgical time was longer . A learning curve was observed based on operation time and complication rate . Although not statistically significant , the perioperative complication rate was rather high in the ( anterolateral ) MIS group . Conclusions The minimal invasive approach in THA did not show a clinical ly relevant superior outcome in the first postoperative year . Level of Evidence Level I , therapeutic study . See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence Studies suggest that  total hip arthroplasty ( THA )  performed through direct anterior ( DA ) approach has better functional outcomes than other surgical approaches . The immediate to very early outcomes of DA THA are not known . A prospect i ve , r and omized study examined the very early outcome of THA performed through DA versus direct lateral approach . The functional outcomes on day 1 , day 2 , week 6 , week 12 , 6 months , and 1 year were measured . Patients receiving DA THA  had significantly higher functional scores during the early period following surgery . The difference in functional scores leveled out at 6 months Purpose : Total hip arthroplasty ( THA ) is a common and effective treatment of hip osteoarthritis . Activity restrictions known as hip pre caution s are widely practice d in rehabilitation post THA , aim ing to foster healing and prevent hip dislocation . The focused clinical question was : Does the application of hip pre caution s in patients post THA versus unrestricted activities significantly decrease the risk of prosthetic dislocation ? Methods : A comprehensive literature search was conducted for r and omized controlled trials or cohort studies with a comparative group and minimum 6 months follow-up , with dislocation as an end point . Retrieved titles were assessed independently by 2 review ers for inclusion and underwent st and ardized data extraction . Results : Title search produced 80 potentially relevant articles . Five articles were retrieved for data extraction of which 2 met a prior eligibility criteria . No eligible studies were found that concerned posterior approaches to hip arthroplasty , so the results of this review concern only anterolateral approaches . Neither included study showed any benefit of hip pre caution s in preventing dislocation . Conclusion : The rate of dislocation after anterolateral THA is low and is not improved by hip pre caution s. Hip pre caution s are associated with a slower return to activities , significant expense , and decreased patient satisfaction . Existing studies risk being compromised by a type II error , but a definitive study may be prohibitively large and expensive BACKGROUND AIMS Evaluation of : 1 . early clinical and radiographic results of  total hip arthroplasty ( THA ) through a st and ard lateral direct approach , 2 . early clinical and radiographic results of THA through a minimal lateral approach , 3 . comparison of the results of THA in these two groups . MATERIAL AND METHODS 120 THAs ( 60 cementless and 60 cemented ) done in 120 patients due to degenerative changes were evaluated prospect ively . 60 THAs were done through a minimal lateral approach and constituted a study group . 60 THAs were done through a direct lateral approach and constituted a control group . The mean age of the 120 patients ( 98 women and 22 men ) was 45 y.o . ( range : 32 - 67 y.o . ) . The duration of follow-up in the study group was from 6 to 12 months ( mean : 8.5 months ) . The duration of follow-up in the control group was from 10 to 16 months ( mean : 10.5 months ) . Mean preoperative functional status of the study group was 44.5 points according to the Harris hip score . Radiographic evaluation of the results was done according to the criteria of the Joint Committee of the Hip Society , AAOS and SICOT . RESULTS 6 months after THA , clinical results were 92 pts in the study group and 88 pts in the control group . Radiographic outcomes were very good in all 120 patients from both arms : there were no differences between the control and study group . The incidence of complications was similar in both groups . CONCLUSIONS Minimally invasive THA demonstrated its value in the treatment of  degenerative changes of the hip joint  with regard to short-term outcomes . The clinical and radiographic outcomes were comparable between the st and ard and minimally invasive approaches . Success with THA using a minimally invasive approach depends on excellent operative technique and experience with st and ard hip approaches rather than on the use of special instruments Increasing evidence suggests performing  total knee arthroplasty  using computer navigation can lead to more accurate surgical positioning of the components and knee alignment compared to a conventional operating technique without computer assistance . The use of robotic technology could theoretically take this accuracy one level further because it uses navigation in combination with ultimate mechanical precision , which could eliminate or reduce the inevitable margin of error during mechanical preparation of the bony cuts of total knee arthroplasty by the surgeon . We prospect ively followed 25 consecutive cases using an active surgical robot . The minimum followup was 5.1 years ( mean , 5.5 years ; range , 5.1 - 5.8 years ) . Our results demonstrate excellent implant positioning and alignment was achieved within the 1 ° error of neutral alignment in all three planes in all cases . Despite this technical precision , the excessive operating time required for the robotic implantation , the technical complexity of the system , and the extremely high operational costs have led us to ab and on this procedure and direct our interest more toward smart semiactive robotic systems . Level of Evidence : Level IV , therapeutic study . See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence UNLABELLED Hip osteoarthritis ( OA ) is a degenerative disease , and total hip arthroplasty ( THA ) is one of the surgical procedures of choice to improve the OA patient 's quality of life . Without a rehabilitation program , THA patients will develop functional limitations . A r and omized double-blind trial was performed between July 2009 and October 2011 to compare in a short follow-up time two groups of patients who underwent THA for OA . The THA protocol ( THAP ) group received verbal instructions and physiotherapy exercise demonstrations , and the THA physiotherapy care protocol ( THAPCP ) group received the same verbal instructions and demonstrations associated with daily exercise practice guided by a physiotherapist . The outcomes that were assessed preoperatively and 15 d postoperatively in 106 patients were muscle strength force , goniometry , Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey , and Merle d'Aubigné and Postel score . Higher muscle strength force scores and degrees in range of motion were found in the THAPCP group . Higher improvements were also observed for the THAPCP group compared with the THAP group in the Merle d'Aubigné and Postel score . At the end of the follow-up period , the intervention in the THAPCP group improved functional capacity , quality of life , mobility , muscle strength , goniometry , and pain . It appears to be a safe tool for accelerating recovery in THA patients . CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical Trials.gov ; NCT01491048 Introduction Advantages of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty ( THA )  are controversially discussed . Method In this prospect i ve study 51 patients ( 52 hips ) were r and omly allocated to a classical lateral or a minimally invasive approach ( modification of the Hardinge-approach ) . Operating time , intraoperative blood loss , postoperative hemoglobin , muscle enzymes CK and myoglobin were recorded . Radiologically the positioning of the prosthesis was analyzed . WOMAC- and Harris Hip Score ( HHS ) were assessed preoperatively , at discharge , at 6 weeks and 3 months . Results In the minimally invasive group there was a shorter length of surgery , the scores in the WOMAC and HHS were slightly better at discharge and at the 3 months- examination , myoglobin-rise was slightly less . The positioning of the prosthesis was good in both groups . Minimally invasive THA led to a quicker recovery , at 3 months postoperative there was still a slight difference to the st and ard group . Conclusion If these slight differences subside has to be examined in studies with a longer follow-up INTRODUCTION The use of robotics in total knee arthroplasty ( TKA ) has been shown to minimise human error , as well as improve the accuracy and precision of component implantation and mechanical axis alignment . The present study aim ed to demonstrate that robot-assisted TKA using ROBODOC ® is safe and capable of producing a consistent and accurate postoperative mechanical axis . METHODS We prospect ively recruited 27 consecutive patients who underwent robot-assisted TKA between May and December 2012 . Two patients were excluded from the study due to intraoperative technical problems with the robot .  Long-leg radiography and computed tomography were performed prior to surgery , and used for mechanical axis measurements and component sizing . DigiMatch ™ ROBODOC ® Surgical System software version 4.3.6 ( Curexo Technology Corp , Fremont , CA , USA ) was used in all cases to perform bone cuts in accordance with the preoperative plan . RESULTS The postoperative coronal mechanical alignment was within 3 degrees , with a mean alignment of -0.4 ± 1.7 degrees , confirming the accuracy of the preoperative surgical plan and bone cuts . The mean operating time was 96 ± 15 min , and preoperative planning yielded 100 % implant sizing accuracy . CONCLUSION Robotics has the potential to enable surgeons to consistently attain ideal postoperative alignment . The use of bone movement monitors and an integrated navigation system enhances the safety profile of ROBODOC ® by minimising errors . However , the role of the surgeon in TKA is still vital , as the surgeon is ultimately in charge of planning the surgery , its execution and ensuring soft tissue balance during TKA OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of a short preoperative exercise intervention on the functional status , pain , and muscle strength of patients before and after total joint arthroplasty . METHODS A total of 108 men and women scheduled for total hip arthroplasty ( THA ) or total knee arthroplasty ( TKA ) were r and omized to a 6-week exercise or education ( control ) intervention immediately prior to surgery . We assessed outcomes through question naires and performance measures . Analyses examined differences between groups over the preoperative and immediate postoperative periods and at 8 and 26 weeks postsurgery . RESULTS Among THA patients , the exercise intervention was associated with improvements in preoperative Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index function score ( improvement of 2.2 in exercisers versus decline of 3.9 in controls ; P = 0.02 ) and Short Form 36 physical function score ( decline of 0.4 in exercisers versus decline of 14.3 in controls ; P = 0.003 ) . No significant differences were seen in TKA patients . Exercise participation increased muscle strength preoperatively ( 18 % in THA patients and 20 % in TKA patients ) , whereas the control patients had essentially no change in strength ( P > 0.05 for exercise versus education in both THA and TKA groups ) . Exercise participation prior to total joint arthroplasty substantially reduced the risk of discharge to a rehabilitation facility in THA and TKA patients ( adjusted odds ratio 0.27 , 95 % confidence interval 0.074 - 0.998 ) . The intervention had no effects on outcomes 8 and 26 weeks postoperatively . CONCLUSION A 6-week presurgical exercise program can safely improve preoperative functional status and muscle strength levels in persons undergoing THA . Additionally , exercise participation prior to total joint arthroplasty dramatically reduces the odds of inpatient rehabilitation The mini-posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty ( THA )  belongs to the mini-incision approaches . In comparison to st and ard approaches , less muscle trauma result ing in less pain , less blood loss and faster rehabilitation in the early postoperative period are attributed to this approach , as known for all other minimally invasive approaches . In a prospect i ve study of 100 cases of THA it could be shown that this is true when comparing the mini-posterior approach with the posterolateral approach . Lower levels of muscle enzymes as a parameter for muscle trauma , could not be seen Robot-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty ( TKA ) improves the accuracy and precision of component implantation and mechanical axis ( MA ) alignment . Joint-line restoration in robot-assisted TKA is not widely described and joint-line deviation of>5 mm results in mid-flexion instability and poor outcomes . We prospect ively r and omised 60 patients into two groups : 31 patients ( robot-assisted ) , 29 patients ( conventional ) .  No MA outliers ( > ±3 ° from neutral ) or notching was noted in the robot-assisted group as compared with 19.4 % ( P=0.049 ) and 10.3 % ( P=0.238 ) respectively in the conventional group . The robot-assisted group had 3.23 % joint-line outliers ( > 5 mm ) as compared to 20.6 % in the conventional group ( P=0.049 ) . Robot-assisted TKA produces similar short-term clinical outcomes when compared to conventional methods with reduction of MA alignment and joint-line deviation outliers
Conclusion The results of this meta- analysis suggest that robotic-assisted THA has certain advantages over conventional THA , including the results of component positioning and rates of intraoperative complications .
Background Robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty ( THA ) allows for accurate preoperative planning and component positioning , potentially enhancing implant survival and long-term outcomes .
The relative efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted and conventional THA , however , are unclear .
This systematic review and meta- analysis compared the safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted and conventional THA .