Survival Rate of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) Restorations Using a Glass Ionomer Bilayer Technique with a Nanofilled Coating: A Bi-center Randomized Clinical Trial. Provision of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) restorations to Chinese pre-school children--a 30-month evaluation. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): a three-year clinical study in Malawi--comparison of conventional amalgam and ART restorations. Survival of glass ionomer restorations placed in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2-year results. One-year follow-up of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment(ART) for dental caries in children undergoing oncohematological treatment: a pragmatic trial Two-year survival of ART restorations placed in elderly patients: A randomised controlled clinical trial. Survival rates of two atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) types in occlusal carious permanent teeth after two years. The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach to restoring primary teeth in a standard dental clinic. Clinical Investigation of Two Glass–Ionomer Restoratives Used with the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Approach in China: Two–Years Results An atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique: evaluation after one year. ART and Conventional Root Restorations in Elders after 12 Months Amalgam and ART restorations in children: a controlled clinical trial 3-year survival rates of retained composite resin and ART sealants using two assessment criteria. Performance of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) depending on operator-experience. Influence of the cavity-size on the survival rate of proximal ART restorations in primary molars. One-year evaluation of atraumatic restorative treatment and minimum intervention techniques on primary teeth. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
PURPOSE The high-viscosity consistency of glass ionomer cement ( GIC ) contributes to its inappropriate adaptation , while the material 's premature exposure to humidity decreases its mechanical properties . This study 's purpose s were to : ( 1 ) investigate approximal atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) restorations ' survival in primary molars using two different insertion techniques and two surface protection material s ; and ( 2 ) compare the results of cities where treatments were performed . METHODS A total of 389 six- to seven-year-olds were selected from two cities in Brazil and r and omly assigned into four groups : ( 1 ) ART restorations plus petroleum jelly ( PJ ) ; ( 2 ) bilayer-ART restorations plus PJ ; ( 3 ) ART restorations plus nanofilled coating for GIC ( NC ) ; ( 4 ) bilayer-ART restorations plus NC . Restorations were evaluated after one , six , 12 , 18 , and 24 months . Kaplan-Meier survival analysis , log-rank test , and Cox regression analysis were performed . RESULTS Restorations ' cumulative survival was 46.4 percent . There was a higher survival of bilayer-ART restorations ( P=0.03 ) . No difference was observed between surface protection material s ( P=0.57 ) . Restorations made in Barueri were almost 2.5-fold more likely to survive than those from Recife ( P<0.001 ) . CONCLUSIONS The bilayer technique improves approximal ART restorations ' survival in primary molars . The nanofilled coating does not influence restorations ' survival rate , and the city where treatments were performed influences restoration survival OBJECTIVES The objectives of this study were : to provide restorations using the ART approach to pre-school children in Southern China in a kindergarten environment , using a high-strength glass-ionomer restorative material ; to assess the acceptability of this approach and to evaluate on a longitudinal basis the restorations placed . SAMPLE AND METHODS A total of 170 ART restorations were placed in 95 children , aged 5.1 + /- 0.7 years , by seven final-year dental students using st and ard ART procedures and h and instruments . The restorations were evaluated every six months thereafter by two calibrated independent examiners using explorers and mouth-mirrors . RESULTS 93 % of the children reported that they did not feel pain during treatment and 86 % were willing to receive ART restorations again . The cumulative 12- and 30-month survival rates of Class I restorations were 91 % and 79 % , respectively . The corresponding figures for Class V restorations were 79 % and 70 % , while those for Class II restorations were 75 % and 51 % . The failure rates of Class III and IV restorations were high with more than half of them scored as missing within the first year . CONCLUSIONS The ART approach was shown to be acceptable to Chinese pre-school children for providing restorative dental care outside the traditional clinical setting . The success rates were high for Class I and V restorations in primary teeth , modest for Class II , and low for Class III and IV restorations OBJECTIVE This study compares the quality of class I restorations  made with the atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) technique and conventional class I amalgam restorations . METHODS The study was carried out among secondary school students in Mzuzu , Malawi . First-year students in 1987 who needed at least two class I restorations were selected . Based on a split-mouth design , each participant received both ART and conventional restorations . The 89 pairs of class I cavities were divided r and omly into two groups , since two different cermet ionomer cement ( CIC ) filling material s were used . Impressions of the restorations and subsequent models were made shortly after restoration , after six months , one year , two years , and three years . The quality of the restorations was determined on the models following the US Public Health Service criteria . Bulk fracture , contour , marginal integrity , and surface texture of the restorations were recorded and evaluated separately . Survival rates were determined by the result ant score of all criteria . RESULTS Though conventional amalgam restorations performed better on all criteria , this difference was significant only for the contour criterion . The survival rates of ART restorations after three years ( 81.0 % ) were lower than those of amalgam restorations ( 90.4 % ) ( P=.067 ) . CONCLUSIONS The quality of ART class I restorations is competitive with that of conventional amalgam restorations OBJECTIVE To compare the survival of  glass ionomer cement ( GIC ) restorations placed in a dental clinic setting using both the atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) approach with h and instruments , and conventional cavity preparation with rotary instruments . METHOD AND MATERIAL S Two encapsulated high-strength conventional GICs ( Fuji IX GP , Ketac-Molar Aplicap ) were placed in 82 Class I and 53 Class II preparations and one encapsulated non-gamma 2 amalgam alloy ( GK-amalgam ) was placed in 32 Class I preparations , in the primary molars of 60 Chinese children with a mean age of 7.40 + /- 1.24 ( SD ) years . Thus , 9 treatment groups were formed . RESULTS After two years , there were no significant survival differences found among 7 of the 9 treatment groups ( p = 0.99 ) . However , two groups comprising Fuji IX GP and Ketac-Molar Aplicap placed in Class II cavities prepared using the ART approach showed significantly lower restoration survivals ( p < 0.001 ) . Only 3 of the 72 initially sealed fissures adjacent to the restorations appeared to retain any GIC material . CONCLUSIONS In a clinic setting , both the ART h and instrument and conventional rotary instrument methods were equally suitable for high Class I restoration survival , but not for Class II restoration survival where the conventional cavity preparation method was preferable Background The oral condition in children undergoing oncohematological treatment can have a negative impact on the course of disease . Little is known about survival of tooth restorations in these patients . The aim of this study was to evaluate the longevity of restorations and sealants performed by Atraumatic Restoration Treatment ( ART ) in patients undergoing oncohematological treatment . Methods ART single surface restorations and sealants were performed in the experimental group ( E ) , which comprised children ( 2–13 years old ) undergoing oncohematological treatment , and in the control group ( C ) , in which  patients did not undergo such treatment .  The same examiner evaluated the  ART  at 1 , 3 , 6 and 12 months after preparation , using the same criteria for restorations and sealants . ART was successful if the sealant or restoration did not need a repair in the follow-up assessment . Descriptive , bivariate and Cox ’s proportional hazard analyses were performed at a significance level of 5 % . Results The two groups , one including 24 children ( E ) and the other 14 children ( C ) , received 101 and 52 ART procedures , respectively . The success rates were 95.0 % ( E ) and 100 % ( C ) at 1 month ( P = 0.233 ) ; 81.2 % ( E ) and 92.3 % ( C ) at 3 months ( P = 0.009 ) ; 72.2 % ( E ) and 80.8 % ( C ) at 6 months ( P = 0.050 ) and 48.5 % ( E ) and 73.1 % ( C ) at 12 months ( P = 0.001 ) . The final Cox ’s regression model for occurrence of ART failure needing repair did not show differences between groups ( E : OR = 1.6 , 95 % CI 0.8–2.9 ) ; primary teeth had a shorter survival than permanent teeth ( OR = 2.1 , 95 % CI 1.2–3.7 ) . Conclusions Oncohematological treatment did not interfere with the longevity of  ART restorations and sealants , which suggests the potential use of this technique in children undergoing chemotherapy . Trial registration Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry ( REBEC ) RBR-2c3c52 . Registered 5 June 2014 . OBJECTIVES Older dentate adults are a high caries risk group who could potentially benefit from the use of the atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) . This study aim ed to compare the survival of ART and a conventional restorative technique ( CT ) using rotary instruments and a resin-modified glass-ionomer for restoring carious lesions as part of a preventive and restorative programme for older adults after 2 years . METHODS In this r and omised controlled clinical trial , 99 independently living adults ( 65 - 90 years ) with carious lesions were r and omly allocated to receive either ART or conventional restorations . The survival of restorations was assessed by an independent and blinded examiner 6 months , 1 year and 2 years after restoration placement . RESULTS Ninety-six ( 67.6 % ) and 121 ( 76.6 % ) restorations were assessed in the ART and CT groups , respectively , after 2 years . The cumulative restoration survival percentages after 2 years were 85.4 % in the ART and 90.9 % in the CT group . No statistically significant between group differences were detected ( p=0.2050 , logistic regression analysis ) . CONCLUSIONS In terms of restoration survival , ART was as effective as a conventional restorative approach to treat older adults after 2 years . This technique could be a useful tool to provide dental care for older adults particularly in the non- clinical setting . ( TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER IS RCT N 76299321 ) . CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE The results of this study show that ART presented survival rates similar to conventional restorations in older adults . ART appears to be a cost-effective way to provide dental care to elderly patients , particularly in out of surgery facilities , such as nursing homes OBJECTIVE To compare survival rates of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ( ART ) restorations placed with and without conditioners in occlusal cariouspermanent teeth after two years . MATERIAL AND METHODS The study was an experimental study among children , mean age 13.1 + /- 3.0 years . Two types of ART restorations  were r and omly placed on 186 occlusal carious permanent teeth on contralateral sides using split mouth design . Ethical clearance to conduct the study was obtained from the UI/UCH Review Committee . ART was performed using GC Fuji IX GP and teeth that were conditioned with GC Dentine Conditioner .  Time taken to place restorations and average material cost were recorded . Follow-up of subjects to evaluate integrity of restorations was conducted at 6 monthly intervals by one independent examiner . Proportions and percentages were generated ; student t-test was used to compare means . Cumulative survival rates were determined by the coded scores and st and ard criteria for evaluating ART restorations . RESULTS There was no significant difference in the mean time for placing ART restorations  with or without conditioners and in the cumulative survival rates of both treatment types after 2 years ( p > 0.05 ) . CONCLUSION ART restorations placed without tooth conditioners can achieve similar result as those placed with conditioners OBJECTIVES The aims of this study are to assess the feasibility of the  Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ( ART ) approach in primary teeth and to compare the ART approach with traditional amalgam restorations in primary molars . METHODS This study was conducted in a paediatric dentistry clinic in Kuwait between April 1999 and December 2001 . The ART and amalgam restorations were placed r and omly on comparable pairs of primary molars , if available . In addition , the ART approach was used for other primary teeth that had no pulpal involvement and no perceived pain before treatment . The restorations were assessed by both the ART evaluation criteria and USPHS criteria in August-September 2000 and in August-December 2001 . The mean follow-up period for the restorations was 8.3 months in the first assessment ( 2000 ) and 22 months in the second assessment ( 2001 ) . The assessment was possible for 35 children ( mean age = 5.7 years ) , 18 of whom had comparable pairs ( n = 35 pairs ) of restorations in their primary molars . In addition , 48 other ART restorations  were assessed in 2000 and 42 in 2001 . RESULTS In a 2-year follow-up , 89.6 % of all ART restorations were considered successful . The failure rate of the comparable pairs of ART and amalgam restorations was 5.7 % . There was no significant difference in success rate between ART and amalgam techniques . CONCLUSIONS Based on a 2-year follow-up evaluation , the class I ART restorations seemed to have a high success rate , indicating the appropriateness of the ART approach in primary teeth Objective : To compare the clinical performance of two glass – ionomer cements , ChemFlex ( Dentsply DeTrey ) and Fuji IX GP ( GC ) , when used with the atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) approach in China . Methods : Eighty – nine school children aged between 6 and 14 years who had bilateral matched pairs of carious posterior teeth were included . A split – mouth design was used in which the two material s were r and omly placed on contralateral sides . The performance of the restorations was assessed directly and also indirectly from die – stone replicas at baseline and after 6 , 12 , and 24 months . Results : The 24–month cumulative survival rates of ART restorations  in the primary teeth were 93 and 90 % for the ChemFlex and Fuji IX GP class I restorations , respectively , while 40 and 46 % of class II restorations placed with the respective material s were satisfactory . In the permanent dentition , only class I restorations were involved and the cumulative survival rates were 95 and 96 % for ChemFlex and Fuji IX GP . For the primary teeth after 24 months , net mean occlusal wear was 87 µm for ChemFlex and 85 µm for Fuji IX GP . The occlusal wear in the permanent teeth was 75 µm for ChemFlex and 79 µm for Fuji IX GP . Conclusion : The clinical performance of both material s over a 24–month period was similar and the survival rates of class I ART restorations  in both primary and permanent teeth were high Extraction is the most common dental treatment provided for people in rural and suburban areas in many less-industrialised countries . By comparison , restorative care is rarely provided . In order to improve such situations , a treatment technique has been developed based only on h and excavation of carious lesions and using glass-ionomer cement as a filling material and a sealant . This Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ( ART ) technique follows the concept of minimal intervention and does not require electrically driven equipment . This paper reports on the longevity of fillings and sealants placed using the technique under field conditions in rural Thail and .  Dental caries was treated using the ART technique in one village , whilst the population in a second village received restorative care ( amalgam fillings ) through mobile dental units . A third village was the control . After one year , 79 per cent of single surface ART fillings and 55 per cent of ART fillings of greater than one surface placed in deciduous teeth were judged successful . The success rate of ART fillings  in the permanent dentition ( mainly single surface fillings ) was 93 per cent and the retention rate for sealants was 78 per cent . Children were pleased at having received treatment by this technique and showed little fear . The ART technique is a promising caries treatment procedure for use in rural and sub-urban areas in less-industrialised countries Successful use of atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) in children has been reported , but little information is available regarding its use in older adults . The hypothesis of this study was that survival rates of root restorations placed by both ART and the conventional technique were similar . Root-surface caries lesions in 103 institutionalized elders in Hong Kong were treated r and omly by either : ( 1 ) the conventional approach — caries removed by dental burs , and the cavity filled with light-cured resin-modified glass ionomer ; or ( 2 ) the ART approach — caries removed by h and instruments , and the cavity filled with chemically cured high-strength glass ionomer . In total , 84 conventional and 78 ART restorations were placed . After 12 months , 63 conventional and 59 ART restorations were review ed , and the respective 12-month survival rates were 91.7 % and 87.0 % ( p > 0.05 ) . It is concluded that the survival rates of both types of root restorations were high and similar Objectives The aims of this study were to compare 2-year cumulative survival rates of  amalgam and atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) restorations in primary molars and to investigate the determinants of the survival rate of restorations . Material s and methods A controlled clinical trial using a parallel group design was carried out on 258 children aged 6–7 years old , allocated to two treatment groups : conventional restorative treatment using amalgam and ART using high-viscosity glass ionomer . A total of 364 amalgam restorations and 386 ART restorations were placed by three pedodontists in 126 and 158 children , respectively , and were evaluated after 0.5 , 1 , and 2 years . Restorations were placed in vital primary molars with neither pain nor signs of pulp involvement . The survival analysis was conducted using the proportional hazard rate regression model with frailty correction . Results The 2-year cumulative survival rates for all amalgam ( 77.3 % ) and ART ( 73.5 % ) restorations were not statistically significantly different , but there was an effect of “ type of surface ” ( single/multiple ) and “ cavity filling time ” on the survival rates . Both amalgam and ART single-surface restorations had higher survival rates than multiple-surface restorations of the same material . Secondary caries was responsible for 36 and 38 % of failures in amalgam and ART restorations , respectively . Mean time for restoring all type of cavities with amalgam and ART restorations was 13.6 and 13.7 min , respectively . Conclusions Amalgam and ART restorations presented similar survival rates over a 2-year period for all , single-surface , and multiple-surface restorations . Clinical relevance In the cause of finding alternatives to amalgam , ART restorations using high-viscosity glass ionomer might be a suitable option for managing cavitated dentine carious lesions in vital primary molars The aim was to test the null-hypothesis that there is no difference in the cumulative survival rate of retained composite resin ( CR ) sealants and a high-viscosity glass-ionomer Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ( ART ) sealant in first permanent molars calculated according to the traditional and the modified retention assessment criteria over a period of 3 years . This cluster-r and omized controlled clinical trial consisted of 123 schoolchildren , 6 - 7-years-old . At baseline , high-caries risk pits and fissures of fully erupted first permanent molars were treated with CR and ART sealants . Evaluations were performed after 0.5 , 1 , 2 and 3 years . Retention was scored for free-smooth surface and for each of three sections into which the occlusal surface had been divided . The modified criterion differed from the traditional in that it determined an occlusal sealant to be a failure when at least one section contained no visible sealant material . Data were analysed according to the PHREG model with frailty correction , Wald-test , ANOVA and t-test , using the Jackknife procedure . The cumulative survival rates for retained CR and ART sealants in free-smooth and occlusal surfaces for both criteria were not statistically significantly different over the 3 years . A higher percentage of retained CR sealants on occlusal surfaces was observed at longer evaluations . Cumulative survival rates were statistically significantly lower for the modified criterion in comparison to the traditional . The modified retention assessment criterion should be used in future sealant-retention studies OBJECTIVES Oral health care is not of major interest in developing countries because of lack of infrastructure and professional manpower . Therefore , atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) was introduced by the World Health Organization to be performed by dental auxiliary personnel . The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of ART depending on operator-experience in The Republic of The Gambia . METHODS One hundred twenty-eight newly inserted restorations  were followed up for 12 months using the clinical ART index in a prospect i ve and blinded study design . The patients were r and omly assigned to operators . The clinical performance was compared among three groups : trainees , experienced Community Oral Health Workers ( COHW ) , and professional dentists . The difference in success rates was calculated at a 95 percent confidence interval . RESULTS There was a statistically significant difference between trainees and dentists in performing leakage/gap-free one-surface restorations ( P < 0.05 ) . No significant differences were found between the two groups of auxiliaries ( trainees versus experienced COHWs , P > 0.05 ) . Finally , both groups -- experienced COHWs and dentists -- performed restorations not showing statistically significant differences ( P > 0.05 ) . CONCLUSIONS For The Republic of The Gambia -- especially for areas with underdeveloped medical infrastructure -- training and assignment to perform ART can be recommended for auxiliary dental staff of Community Oral Health Workers AIM To evaluate the influence of the size of proximal cavities on the survival rate of the  atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) restorations . DESIGN A total of 804 children , aged 6 - 8 years , from a low socio-economic community , with an ART restorable proximal carious lesion in their primary molars , participated . Over a 3-week period , three ' experienced ' and four ' inexperienced ' operators r and omly paired with four ' experienced ' and four ' inexperienced ' assistants , made the restorations at site using h and instruments . They r and omly used Fuji IX , Ketac Molar Easymix and Ketac Molar Aplicap glass ionomer cements to restore the cavities , under r and omly selected rubber dam and cotton roll isolation methods . The fillings were independently evaluated by nine trained and calibrated evaluators . RESULTS After 1 year , the survival rate of the fillings evaluated in the study was 44.8 % . Irrespective of the other factors involved , restorations with the highest survival rate were of size between 2 and 3 mm ( mesio-distal , bucco-lingual , and depth ) or volumes 10.0 - 19.9 mm(3 ) ( Chi-square , P = 0.002 , KM mean survival of 345 days ) . CONCLUSIONS While the survival rates for class II ART restorations were still low , the choice of medium-sized proximal cavities gave better survival rates for this technique Atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) and minimal intervention treatment ( MIT ) techniques were evaluated under field conditions in 5 regions of the Western Cape Province of South Africa , where caries prevalence exceeds 60 % and remains mostly untreated . The purpose of the study was to compare and evaluate results of  ART and MIT techniques in the primary dentition of 6 - 9 year-old schoolchildren using  glass-ionomer ( GI ) ( Fuji IX ) and compomer ( Dyract AP ) material s. At baseline 401 children were treated , and 1,119 restorations  placed by 5 calibrated dentists , 53 % with ART ( using h and instruments only ) and 47 % with MIT ( minimal use of slow h and -piece ) techniques . Evaluations were done with a CPI periodontal probe to measure marginal defects and to detect decay . A pain assessment for the restoration procedures indicated that 80 % of subjects experienced no pain , 18 % discomfort and slight pain , and 2 % required local anaesthetic . After one year 90.5 % of subjects and 80 % of restorations were followed up ( 11.1 % lost as a result of exfoliation ) ; of these restorations 86 % were clinical ly acceptable ( 84.1 % of the ART and 88 % of the MIT ) . With the art technique 82.7 % of GI restorations and 85.6 % , of compomer restorations were acceptable . With the MIT technique 86.5 % of GI restorations and 89.9 % of compomer restorations were acceptable . Success of restorations per region varied significantly : regions 1 and 2 - 90 % , region 3 - 80 % , region 4 - 70 % and region 5 - 95 % . There were no significant statistical differences in respect of material s or methods employed . ART and MIT techniques were well accepted as complementary caries approaches by operators . One-year results show that ART and MIT techniques were successful , substantiating its use for the primary dentition in areas with high caries prevalence . Longer-term assessment s are required OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to compare the success rates of  glass-ionomer cement restorations placed with the atraumatic restorative treatment approach and conventional cavity preparation methods . METHOD AND MATERIAL S Two encapsulated , high-strength , esthetic conventional glass-ionomer cements were placed in 82 Class I and 53 Class II atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations  , and an encapsulated amalgam alloy was placed in 32 Class I conventional preparations , in vital primary molars of 60 Chinese children aged 7 to 9 years . RESULTS The atraumatic restorative treatment preparations , made with h and instruments only , took approximately 50 % longer to complete than did the preparations completed with conventional rotary instrumentation . After 1 year , there were no amalgam failures . For the glass-ionomer cement restorations , when the atraumatic restorative treatment method was used , significantly better survival rates were found for Class I ( 92.9 % ) than for Class II ( 64.7 % ) cavity preparations . There was also a strong trend for relatively better survival rates for the conventional cavity preparation method ( 86.7 % ) than for the atraumatic restorative treatment ( 64.7 % ) method for Class II cavity preparations . However , both the atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional methods appeared equally effective for Class I preparations . CONCLUSION In a clinic setting , the use of atraumatic restorative treatment h and instruments for cavity preparation is more time consuming , and the method may also provide less mechanical retention and /or bulk of glass-ionomer cement for some Class II preparations in primary molars than does the use of conventional rotary instruments
Conclusions ART single-surface restorations  presented high survival percentages in both primary and permanent posterior teeth , whilst ART multiple-surface restorations presented lower survival percentages .
ART sealants presented a high-caries-preventive effect .
Clinical relevance ART is an effective evidence -based option for treating and preventing carious lesions in primary and permanent posterior teeth
Objective The aim of the present study is to up date the results of two previous meta-analyses , published in 2006 and 2012 , on the survival percentages of  atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) restorations and ART sealants .
The current meta- analysis includes Chinese publications not investigated before .