A randomised controlled trial and cost effectiveness study of systematic screening (targeted and total population screening) versus routine practice for the detection of atrial fibrillation in the over 65s: (SAFE) [ISRCTN19633732] A randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness study of systematic screening (targeted and total population screening) versus routine practice for the detection of atrial fibrillation in people aged 65 and over. The SAFE study. Screening for atrial fibrillation in the community: a multicenter validation trial. Screening for atrial fibrillation in general practice: a national, cross-sectional study of an innovative technology. Is screening for AF worthwhile? Stroke risk in a screened population from the SAFE study. A randomized clinical trial of early invasive intervention for atrial fibrillation (EARLY-AF) - methods and rationale. Symptomatic and asymptomatic atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein ablation and the impact on quality of life. Randomised trial of two approaches to screening for atrial fibrillation in UK general practice. Multicenter randomized study of anticoagulation guided by remote rhythm monitoring in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and CRT-D devices: Rationale, design, and clinical characteristics of the initially enrolled cohort The IMPACT study. Cost-Effectiveness of a National Opportunistic Screening Program for Atrial Fibrillation in Ireland. Screening versus routine practice in detection of atrial fibrillation in patients aged 65 or over: cluster randomised controlled trial Screening for asymptomatic atrial fibrillation while monitoring the blood pressure at home: trial of regular versus irregular pulse for prevention of stroke (TRIPPS 2.0). Perception of Atrial Fibrillation Before and After Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation: Relevance of Asymptomatic Arrhythmia Recurrence Performance of a New Leadless Implantable Cardiac Monitor in Detecting and Quantifying Atrial Fibrillation Results of the XPECT Trial EARLY: a pilot study on early diagnosis of atrial fibrillation in a primary healthcare centre. Self-detection of atrial fibrillation in an aged population: the LietoAF Study Diagnostic accuracy and yield of screening tests for atrial fibrillation in the family practice setting: a multicentre cohort study.
Background Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) has been recognised as an important independent risk factor for thromboembolic disease , particularly stroke for which it provides a five-fold increase in risk . This study aim ed to determine the baseline prevalence and the incidence of AF based on a variety of screening strategies and in doing so to evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies , including targeted or whole population screening , compared with routine clinical practice , for detection of AF in people aged 65 and over . The value of clinical assessment and echocardiography as additional methods of risk stratification for thromboembolic disease in patients with AF were also evaluated . Methods The study design was a multi-centre r and omised controlled trial with a study population of patients aged 65 and over from 50 General Practice s in the West Midl and s. These purpose fully selected general practice s were r and omly allocated to 25 intervention practice s and 25 control practice s. GPs and practice nurses within the intervention practice s received education on the importance of AF detection and ECG interpretation . Patients in the intervention practice s were r and omly allocated to systematic ( n = 5000 ) or opportunistic screening ( n = 5000 ) . Prospect i ve identification of pre-existing risk factors for AF within the screened population enabled comparison between high risk targeted screening and total population screening . AF detection rates in systematic ally screened and opportunistically screened population s in the intervention practice s were compared to AF detection rate in 5,000 patients in the control practice OBJECTIVES To determine the most cost-effective method of screening for  atrial fibrillation ( AF ) in the population aged 65 years and over , as well as its prevalence and incidence in this age group . Also to evaluate the relative cost-effectiveness of different methods of recording and interpreting the electrocardiogram ( ECG ) within a screening programme . DESIGN Multicentred r and omised controlled trial . Purpose fully selected general practice s were r and omly allocated to 25 intervention practice s and 25 control practice s. SETTING Fifty primary care centres across the West Midl and s , UK . PARTICIPANTS Patients aged 65 years and over . INTERVENTIONS GPs and practice nurses in the intervention practice s received education on the importance of AF detection and ECG interpretation . Patients in the intervention practice s were r and omly allocated to systematic ( n = 5000 ) or opportunistic screening ( n = 5000 ) . Prospect i ve identification of pre-existing risk factors for AF within the screened population enabled comparison between targeted screening of people at higher risk of AF and total population screening . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AF detection rates in systematic ally screened and opportunistically screened population s in the intervention practice s were compared with AF detection rate in 5000 patients in the control practice s. The screening period was 12 months . RESULTS Baseline prevalence of AF was 7.2 % , with a higher prevalence in males ( 7.8 % ) and patients aged 75 years and over ( 10.3 % ) . The control population demonstrated higher baseline prevalence ( 7.9 % ) than either the systematic ( 6.9 % ) or opportunistic ( 6.9 % ) intervention population . In the control population 47 new cases were detected ( incidence 1.04 % per year ) . In the opportunistic arm 243 patients without a baseline diagnosis of AF were found to have an irregular pulse , with 177 having an ECG , yielding 31 new cases ( incidence 0.69 % per year ) . A further 44 cases were detected outside the screening programme ( overall incidence 1.64 % per year ) . In the systematic arm 2357 patients had an ECG yielding 52 new cases ( incidence 1.1 % per year ) . Of these , 31 were detected by targeted screening and a further 21 by total population screening . A further 22 cases were detected outside the screening programme ( overall incidence 1.62 % per year ) . In terms of ECG interpretation , computerised decision support software ( CDSS ) gave a sensitivity of 87.3 % , a specificity of 99.1 % and a positive predictive value ( PPV ) of 89.5 % compared with the gold st and ard ( cardiologist reporting ) . GPs and practice nurses performed less well . The only difference in performance between intervention population s and controls was that practice nurses from the control arm performed less well than with intervention practice nurses on interpretation of limb-lead ( PPV 38.8 % versus 20.8 % ) and single-lead ( PPV 37.7 % versus 24.0 % ) ECGs . The within-trial economic evaluation results showed the lowest incremental cost to be for the opportunistic arm , with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 337 pounds Sterling for each additional case detected compared to the control arm . Opportunistic screening dominated both more intensive screening strategies . Model-based analyses showed small differences in cost and quality -adjusted life-years for different methods and intensities of screening , but annual opportunistic screening result ed in the lowest number of ischaemic strokes and greatest proportion of cases of AF diagnosed . Probabilistic sensitivity results indicated that there was a probability of approximately 60 % that screening from the age of 65 years was cost-effective in both men and women . CONCLUSIONS The results of the study indicated that in terms of a screening programme for atrial fibrillation in patients 65 and over , the only strategy that improved on routine practice was opportunistic screening , model-based analyses indicated that there was a probability of approximately 60 % of annual opportunistic screening being cost effective . It is suggested that the following topics are worthy of further investigation : the effect of the implementation of a screening programme for AF on the uptake and maintenance of anticoagulation in patients aged 65 years and over ; an evaluation of the role of CDSS in the diagnosis of cardiac arrythmias ; the best method for routinely detecting paroxysmal AF ; ways of improving healthcare professionals ' performance in ECG interpretation ; development of a robust economic model to incorporate data on new therapeutic agents for use as thromboprophylactic agents for patients with AF , and an evaluation of the relative risk of stroke for patients with incident as opposed to prevalent AF BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is an important public health problem . This arrhythmia is common and associated with a high risk of stroke . Further , appropriate interventions in AF can reduce the risk of stroke by approximately 68 % . Population studies show that a large group of patients have intermittent or chronic AF that remains unrecognized . If a simple screening test for this arrhythmia could be developed and vali date d , application of the technique across population s might identify AF patients for early treatment , potentially reducing the incidence of stroke . In this study , we sought to determine whether individuals taken from the general community could be taught to find and classify the pulse of another as very irregular , implying AF , or regular , implying normal sinus rhythm ( NSR ) . The aim was to establish that pulse examination for potential AF could be performed by individuals with sufficient sensitivity and specificity to be effectively used as a screening procedure for this medically important arrhythmia . METHODS We enrolled 178 subjects selected from the general community from four centers . Subjects received st and ardized education on the medical importance of AF and its signature , a very irregular pulse . A technique for palpating and characterizing the rhythm of the radial pulse was also taught . Without further coaching , subjects were then asked to find their pulse and then to find and classify the pulse of two models r and omly presented who may or may not have had AF . RESULTS Of the 178 subjects tested , 92 % were able to find their own pulse ; 17 ( 9.6 % ) were unable to find the pulse of one or both patient models and were , therefore , excluded from the study . Of the remaining 161 subjects , 76 % ( 122 of 161 ) correctly identified the pulse in an AF model , and 86 % ( 139 of 161 ) correctly identified the pulse in an NSR model . Results did not statistically differ as a function of age , educational status , or location . DISCUSSION This multicenter trial established that given minimal st and ardized instructions , subjects from the general community can reliably and consistently find both their pulse as well as the pulse of another and to differentiate a regular pulse from a very irregular pulse . If similar educational programs were widely applied across large population s , periodic screening for AF might lead to earlier diagnosis and appropriate treatment for patients who have this major risk factor for stroke . These screening programs should be focused on the population over the age of 55 where the risk of stroke in AF increases with each decade BACKGROUND To test the use of three lead monitoring as a screening tool for  atrial fibrillation ( AF )  in general practice . AF is responsible for up to a quarter of all strokes and is often asymptomatic until a stroke occurs . METHODS 26 r and omly selected general practice s identified 80 r and omly selected patients aged 70 or older from their data base and excluded those known to have AF , those with clinical issues or who had not attended for three years . Up to 40 eligible patients / practice were invited to attend for screening . A 2min three-lead ECG was recorded and collected central ly for expert cardiology assessment . Risk factor data was gathered . OUTCOMES ( i ) point prevalence of AF , ( ii ) proportion of ECG tracings which were adequate for interpretation , ( iii ) uptake rate by patients and ( iv ) acceptability of the screening process to patients and staff ( reported separately ) . RESULTS Of 1447 current patients , 1003 were eligible for inclusion , 639 ( 64 % ) agreed to take part in screening and 566 ( 56 % ) completed screening . The point prevalence rate for AF was 10.3%-2.1 % new cases ( 12 of 566 who were screened ) and 9.5 % existing cases ( 137 of 1447 eligible patients ) . Only four of 570 ( 0.7 % ) screening visits did not record a usable ECG and 11 ( 2.6 % ) three lead ECGs required a clarifying 12 lead ECG . CONCLUSIONS Three lead screening for AF is feasible , effective and offers an alternative to pulse taking or 12 lead ECGs . The availability of this technology may facilitate more effective screening , leading to reduced stroke incidence INTRODUCTION Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is an important independent risk factor for stroke and oral anticoagulation therapy provides a highly effective treatment to reduce this risk . Active screening strategies improve detection of AF in comparison with routine care ; however , whether screen-detected patients have stroke risk profiles favouring anticoagulation is unclear . Using data derived from the screening for AF in the elderly ( SAFE ) study , the aim of this article was to determine if patients with AF detected via active screening  have stroke risk profiles that warrant prophylactic anticoagulation . METHODS Secondary analysis of data derived from 25 general practice s within which cohorts of 200 patients were r and omly allocated to opportunistic [ pulse and electrocardiogram ( ECG ) ] or systematic screening ( postal invitation for ECG ) .  Stroke risk assessment was undertaken using baseline data extracted from medical records and CHADS2 criteria . CHADS2 scores were compared between the screening groups . RESULTS One hundred and forty-nine new cases of AF were detected , 75 via opportunistic screening and 74 via systematic screening . CHADS2 scores were ≥1 in 83 % [ 95 % confidence interval ( CI ) 72.6 - 89.6 ] of patients detected via opportunistic screening and 78 % ( 95 % CI 67.7 - 86.2 ) detected via systematic screening . There were no significant differences in stroke risk profiles of patients detected via opportunistic and systematic screenings . CONCLUSION Stroke risk profiles of patients detected via opportunistic and systematic screenings were similar . Data derived from the SAFE study suggest that active screening for AF in patients aged ≥65 years in primary care is a useful screening programme with 78 - 83 % of patients identified eligible for anticoagulation treatment according to the CHADS2 criteria BACKGROUND The ideal management of patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic atrial fibrillation ( AF ) remains unknown . Current practice guidelines recommend a trial of antiarrhythmic drugs ( AAD ) prior to considering an invasive ablation procedure . However , earlier ablation offers an opportunity to halt the progressive patho-anatomical changes associated with AF , as well as impart other important clinical benefits . OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to determine the optimal initial management strategy for patients with newly diagnosed , symptomatic atrial fibrillation . METHODS / DESIGN The EARLY-AF study ( Clinical Trials.govNCT02825979 ) is a prospect i ve , open label , multicenter , r and omized trial with a blinded assessment of outcomes . A total of 298 patients will be r and omized in a 1:1 fashion to first-line AAD therapy , or first-line cryoballoon-based pulmonary vein isolation .  Patients with symptomatic treatment naïve AF will be included . Arrhythmia outcomes will be assessed by implantable cardiac monitor ( ICM ) . The primary outcome is time to first recurrence of AF , atrial flutter , or atrial tachycardia ( AF/AFL/AT ) between days 91 and 365 following AAD initiation or AF ablation . Secondary outcomes include arrhythmia burden , quality of life , and healthcare utilization . DISCUSSION The EARLY-AF study is a r and omized trial design ed to evaluate the optimal first management approach for patients with AF . We hypothesize that catheter ablation will be superior to drug therapy in prevention of AF recurrence BACKGROUND The aim of this prospect i ve study was to evaluate the recurrences of atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and flutter ( AFL ) after circumferential pulmonary vein ablation ( CPVA )  using repetitive long-term Holter recordings , and to evaluate the change in quality of life ( QoL ) , especially in patients with asymptomatic AF recurrences . METHODS A total of 149 patients with AF were followed up with 7-day Holter monitoring at 3 , 6 , and 12 months after CPVA .  We calculated the burden of AF/AFL defined as the percentage of time in AF/AFL , and patients with documented arrhythmia were divided into isolated symptomatic episodes of arrhythmia , mixed symptomatic/asymptomatic arrhythmia , or isolated asymptomatic arrhythmia . The QoL was analyzed with SF-36 question naires in patients with sinus rhythm after CPVA , and in patients with recurrence of symptomatic and asymptomatic arrhythmia , respectively . RESULTS Asymptomatic arrhythmia was observed in 44 % of the patients with documented arrhythmia at 12 months of follow-up . In patients with persistent AF , 63 % of the documented arrhythmia at 12 months of follow-up was asymptomatic and often persistent . In the subgroup of patients with asymptomatic arrhythmia , the QoL improved significantly in the physical scores , in contrast to patients with symptomatic arrhythmia who had unchanged or worsened QoL scores . CONCLUSIONS Asymptomatic arrhythmia is very common after AF ablation . Our data indicate that these patients improve their physical component of the QoL significantly , which may be considered a palliative success of treatment . We suggest that patients with asymptomatic AF recurrences are carefully evaluated before considering reablation . Repetitive rhythm monitoring after AF ablation is very important considering the postablation management of anticoagulant therapy BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation is a common and treatable cause of stroke that often remains unrecognised . Screening has been suggested but there is very little evidence concerning the uptake of screening in the elderly population at risk , nor of the optimal method of screening in a general practice setting AIM To compare the uptake and effectiveness of two methods of screening for atrial fibrillation in general practice -- systematic nurse-led screening and prompted opportunistic case finding . DESIGN OF STUDY R and omised controlled trial . SETTING Patients aged 65 to 100 years ( n = 3,001 ) from four general practice s within the MRC general practice framework . METHOD Each of the four study practice s were selected from one quartile , after ranking all framework practice s according to the small area st and ardised mortality ratio of the geographical area served . Patients were r and omised either to nurse-led screening or to prompted opportunistic casefinding . The proportion of patients assessed and the proportion found to have atrial fibrillation were compared . The sensitivity and specificity of clinical assessment of pulse are also reported . RESULTS Substantially more patients had their pulse assessed through systematic screening by invitation ( 1,099/1,499 [ 73 % ] ) than through opportunistic case finding ( 439/1,502 [ 29 % ] , difference = 44 % , 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] = 41 % to 47 % ) . Atrial fibrillation was detected in 67 ( 4.5 % ) and 19 ( 1.3 % ) patients respectively ( difference = 3.2 % , 95 % CI= 2.0 to 4.4 ) . Invitation to nurse-led screening achieved significantly higher assessment rates than case finding in all practice s ; however , the proportion of patients assessed in the case-finding arm varied markedly between practice s ( range = 8 % to 52 % ) . The number needed to screen to identify one additional patient with atrial fibrillation was 31 ( 95 % CI = 23 to 50 ) . The proportion of screened patients with atrial fibrillation receiving anticoagulation treatment was 25 % , although in the majority ( 53/65 [ 82 % ] ) atrial fibrillation had been previously recorded somewhere on their medical record . If the nurse used any irregularity of the pulse as the screening criterion , the sensitivity of screening was 91 % and the specificity was 74 % ; sensitivity fell to 54 % but specificity increased to 98 % if the criterion used was continuous irregularity . CONCLUSIONS Nurse-led screening for atrial fibrillation in UK general practice is both feasible and effective and will identify a substantial number of patients who could benefit from antithrombotic therapy . Although the majority of patients detected at first screening could be identified by careful scrutiny of medical records , review of record summaries was insufficient in the practice s involved in this study and screening may be a more cost-effective option Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter are common cardiac arrhythmias associated with an increased risk of stroke in patients with additional risk factors .  Anticoagulation ameliorates stroke risk , but because these arrhythmias may occur intermittently without symptoms , initiation of prophylactic therapy is often delayed until electrocardiographic documentation is obtained . The IMPACT study is a multicenter , r and omized trial of remote surveillance technology in patients with implanted dual-chamber cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator ( CRT-D ) devices design ed to test the hypothesis that initiation and withdrawal of oral anticoagulant therapy guided by continuous ambulatory monitoring of the atrial electrogram improve clinical outcomes by reducing the combined rate of stroke , systemic embolism , and major bleeding compared with conventional clinical management . For those in the intervention group , early detection of atrial high-rate episodes ( AHRE ) generates an automatic alert to initiate anticoagulation based on patient-specific stroke risk stratification . Subsequently , freedom from AHRE for predefined periods prompts withdrawal of anticoagulation to avoid bleeding . Patients in the control arm are managed conventionally , the anticoagulation decision prompted by incidental detection of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter during routine clinical follow-up . The results will help define the clinical utility of wireless remote cardiac rhythm surveillance and help establish the critical threshold of AHRE burden warranting anticoagulant therapy in patients at risk of stroke . In this report , we describe the study design and baseline demographic and clinical features of the initial cohort ( 227 patients ) OBJECTIVES To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a  national atrial fibrillation screening program in Irel and involving annual opportunistic pulse palpation of all those older than 65 years during general practitioner consultations , with an electrocardiogram being performed if an irregular pulse is detected . METHODS A probabilistic Markov model was used to simulate costs and clinical outcomes in a hypothetical cohort of men and women with and without screening over the course of 25 years , using a societal perspective . RESULTS Screening was associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of € 23,004/ quality -adjusted life-year compared with routine care . Nevertheless , if the relative risk of stroke and systematic embolism in screen-detected patients is more than 12 % lower than that in patients with atrial fibrillation identified through routine practice , then screening would not be considered cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of € 45,000/ quality -adjusted life-year . An analysis comparing alternative combinations of start age and screening interval found that less frequent screening with a later start age may be more cost-effective than an annual screening from age 65 years . CONCLUSIONS Annual opportunistic screening of men and women aged 65 years and older in primary care in Irel and is likely to be cost-effective using conventional willingness-to-pay thresholds , assuming that those detected through screening have a comparable stroke risk profile as those detected through routine practice . Raising the start age of screening or increasing the screening interval may improve the cost-effectiveness of a prospect i ve screening program Objectives To assess whether screening improves the detection of atrial fibrillation  ( cluster r and omisation ) and to compare systematic and opportunistic screening . Design Multicentred cluster r and omised controlled trial , with subsidiary trial embedded within the intervention arm . Setting 50 primary care centres in Engl and , with further individual r and omisation of patients in the intervention practice s. Participants 14 802 patients aged 65 or over in 25 intervention and 25 control practice s. Interventions Patients in intervention practice s were r and omly allocated to systematic screening ( invitation for electrocardiography ) or opportunistic screening ( pulse taking and invitation for electrocardiography if the pulse was irregular ) . Screening took place over 12 months in each practice from October 2001 to February 2003 . No active screening took place in control practice s. Main outcome measure Newly identified atrial fibrillation . Results The detection rate of new cases of atrial fibrillation was 1.63 % a year in the intervention practice s and 1.04 % in control practice s ( difference 0.59 % , 95 % confidence interval 0.20 % to 0.98 % ) . Systematic and opportunistic screening detected similar numbers of new cases ( 1.62 % v 1.64 % , difference 0.02 % , −0.5 % to 0.5 % ) . Conclusion Active screening for atrial fibrillation detects additional cases over current practice . The preferred method of screening in patients aged 65 or over in primary care is opportunistic pulse taking with follow-up electrocardiography . Trial registration Current Controlled Trials IS RCT N19633732 Asymptomatic atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a common cause of strokes . Physician screening for AF has been recommended . Home screening for AF may increase the likelihood of detecting asymptomatic AF in patients at risk for stroke because of AF . The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and accuracy of screening for AF when taking home blood pressure ( BP ) measurements using an automatic AF-detecting BP monitor .  Subjects aged > 64 years or those with hypertension , diabetes , congestive heart failure , or previous stroke were enrolled by their primary physicians and given the AF-BP monitor and an electrocardiographic event monitor to use at home for 30 days . The AF-BP monitor reading was compared with the electrocardiographic reading to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of the device for detecting AF . A total of 160 subjects were enrolled , with 10 withdrawing , 1 excluded , and 10 with no AF-BP monitor logs or electrocardiographic recordings . Of the 139 subjects included , 14 had known AF . There was a total of 3,316 days with AF-BP monitor readings and electrocardiographic readings . On the basis of the initial daily AF-BP monitor readings , the AF-BP monitor demonstrated sensitivity of 99.2 % and specificity of 92.9 % for detecting AF . Two subjects with no histories of AF had AF-BP monitor readings of AF that were confirmed by the electrocardiographic monitor . One of these subjects was started on warfarin . In conclusion , home screening for asymptomatic AF while taking BP measurements can be performed accurately . This can be used to detect new AF , allowing treatment with anticoagulation to reduce the future risk for stroke Background —The objective of this study was to assess the incidence and impact of asymptomatic arrhythmia in patients with highly symptomatic atrial fibrillation ( AF ) who qualified for radiofrequency ( RF ) catheter ablation .  Methods and Results —In this prospect i ve study , 114 patients with at least 3 documented AF episodes together with corresponding symptoms and an ineffective trial of at least 1 antiarrhythmic drug were selected for  RF ablation .  With the use of CARTO , circumferential lesions around the pulmonary veins and linear lesions at the roof of the left atrium and along the left atrial isthmus were placed . A continuous , 7-day , Holter session was recorded before ablation , right after ablation , and after 3 , 6 , and 12 months of follow-up . During each 7-day Holter monitoring , the patients recorded quality and duration of any complaints by using a detailed symptom log . More than 70 000 hours of ECG recording were analyzed . In the 7-day Holter records before ablation , 92 of 114 patients ( 81 % ) had documented AF episodes . All episodes were symptomatic in 35 patients ( 38 % ) . In 52 patients ( 57 % ) , both symptomatic and asymptomatic episodes were recorded , whereas in 5 patients ( 5 % ) , all documented AF episodes were asymptomatic . After ablation , the percentage of patients with only asymptomatic AF recurrences increased to 37 % ( P<0.05 ) at the 6-month follow-up . An analysis of patient characteristics and arrhythmia patterns failed to identify a specific subset who were at high risk for the development of asymptomatic AF . Conclusions —Even in patients presenting with highly symptomatic AF , asymptomatic episodes may occur and significantly increase after catheter ablation . A symptom-only – based follow-up would substantially overestimate the success rate . Objective measures such as long-term Holter monitoring are needed to identify asymptomatic AF recurrences after ablation Background —Current methods for detecting atrial fibrillation ( AF ) have limited diagnostic yield . Continuous monitoring with automatic arrhythmia detection and classification may improve detection of symptomatic and asymptomatic AF and subsequent patient treatment . The study purpose was to quantify the performance of the first implantable leadless cardiac monitor ( ICM ) with dedicated AF detection capabilities . Methods and Results — Patients ( n=247 ) with an implanted ICM ( Reveal XT , Medtronic Inc , Minneapolis , Minn ) who were likely to present with paroxysmal AF were selected . A special Holter device stored 46 hours of subcutaneously recorded ECG , ICM markers , and 2 surface ECG leads . The ICM  automatic arrhythmia classification was compared with the core laboratory classification of the surface ECG . Of the 206 analyzable Holter recordings collected , 76 ( 37 % ) contained at least 1 episode of core laboratory classified AF . The sensitivity , specificity , positive predictive value , and negative predictive value for identifying patients with any AF were 96.1 % , 85.4 % , 79.3 % , and 97.4 % , respectively . The AF burden measured with the ICM was very well correlated with the reference value derived from the Holter ( Pearson coefficient=0.97 ) . The overall accuracy of the ICM for detecting AF was 98.5 % . Conclusions —In this ICM validation study , the dedicated AF detection algorithm reliably detected the presence or absence of AF and the AF burden was accurately quantified . The ICM is a promising new diagnostic and monitoring tool for the clinician to treat AF patients independently of symptoms . Long-term studies are needed to evaluate the clinical benefits of the technology . Clinical Trial Registration — clinical trials.gov Identifier NCT00680927 AIM Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is associated with high morbidity and mortality . Early diagnosis is likely to improve therapy and prognosis . The study objective was to evaluate the usefulness of a programme for early diagnosis of AF in patients from an urban primary care centre . METHODS AND RESULTS Participants were recruited from a r and omized sample of patients not diagnosed with AF but having relevant risk factors : age ≥ 65 years , ischaemic and /or valvular heart disease , congestive heart failure , hypertension , and /or diabetes . Patients were r and omly assigned to the intervention group ( IG ) or control group ( CG ) . The intervention included ( i ) initial visit with clinical history , electrocardiogram , and instruction about pulse palpation and warning signs and ( ii ) electrocardiogram every 6 months during a 2-year follow-up . The main endpoint of the study was the proportion of new cases diagnosed at 6 months . Secondary endpoints were number of new AF diagnoses and complications associated with the arrhythmia in both groups . A total of 928 patients were included ( 463 IG and 465 CG ) . At 6 months , AF was diagnosed in 8 IG patients and 1 CG patient ( 1.7 vs. 0.2 % , respectively , P = 0.018 ) . After 2 years of follow-up , 11 IG patients and 6 CG patients had newly diagnosed AF ( 2.5 vs. 1.3 % , respectively , P = 0.132 ) . Time to first diagnosis of AF was shorter in IG patients [ median ( inter-quartile range ) : 7 ( 192 ) days vs. 227 ( 188.5 ) days in CG , P = 0.029 ] . CONCLUSION The simple screening proposed could be useful for the early detection of AF in primary care Background Early detection of atrial fibrillation ( AF ) in older people is important because AF is often asymptomatic and its first manifestation may be a disabling stroke . The objective of the LietoAF Study is to assess the motivation and capability of older people to learn pulse palpation and continue regular pulse measurements , and whether this self- assessment is helpful in the detection of new AF . Design and method The LietoAF Study is an intervention study . A total of 205 people aged ≥75 years were r and omly selected to participate in the programme where a trained nurse gave individual education on pulse palpation . At 1 month , the eligible participants came to the first follow-up visit to assess the success of pulse self-monitoring . Results A total of 139 participants ( 68 % ) learned pulse palpation and performed regular measurements during the early follow-up period . The significant independent predictors for learning and motivation were high Mini-Mental State Examination score ( > 24 ) ( OR 7.5 , 95 % CI 1.5–37.3 , p = 0.014 ) , computer use at home ( OR 4.7 , 95 % CI 1.9–11.5 , p = 0.001 ) , independence at daily activities ( OR 4.2 , 95 % CI 1.4–13.6 , p = 0.013 ) and low heart rate ( OR 1.04 , 95 % CI 1.0–1.08 , p = 0.037 ) . Education did not cause extra visits to local healthcare centres and did not affect quality of life . Four participants observed a new asymptomatic AF during the 1-month follow-up . Conclusion Active older people are motivated and seem to learn pulse palpation . Our early experience suggests that simple nurse-based education is effective and useful in the early detection of asymptomatic AF BACKGROUND Detection of undiagnosed or undertreated ( " actionable " ) atrial fibrillation could increase the use of appropriate oral anticoagulant therapy and reduce the risk of stroke . We sought to compare newer screening technologies with a pulse-check for the detection of atrial fibrillation and to determine whether the detection of actionable atrial fibrillation increases the use of oral anticoagulant agents . METHODS This prospect i ve multicentre cohort study involved 22 primary care clinics . We recruited participants aged 65 years and older who were attending routine appointments . Each participant underwent 3 methods of screening : a 30-second radial pulse-check ; single-lead electrocardiogram ; and screening by blood pressure machine with atrial fibrillation detection algorithms . Participants who received a positive result on 1 or more test underwent 12-lead electrocardiogram with or withour 24-hour Holter . Screening tests were compared using the McNemar test . Participants with confirmed atrial fibrillation received follow-up at 90 days . RESULTS The mean age of participants was 73.7 ( ± 6.9 ) years , and 53.4 % of participants were female . Of 2171 patients , we had data from all 3 screening tests for 2054 patients . Both single-lead electrocardiogram and the blood pressure device showed superior specificity compared with pulse-check ( p < 0.001 for each ) . Fifty-six patients ( 2.7 % ) had confirmed atrial fibrillation : 12 patients had newly detected atrial fibrillation ( none of the patients were using anticoagulation agents ) , and 44 patients had previously diagnosed atrial fibrillation ( 42 patients were receiving anticoagulant therapy , 2 were not ) . Thus , 14 patients had actionable atrial fibrillation ( 0.7 % ) . By 90 days , 77 % of patients with actionable atrial fibrillation had started anticoagulant therapy . INTERPRETATION Newer screening technologies showed superior specificity compared with a pulse-check . Screening detected undiagnosed or undertreated atrial fibrillation in 0.7 % of participants , and 77 % started appropriate anticoagulant therapy . TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical Trials.gov , no. NCT02262351
Evidence suggests that systematic screening and opportunistic screening for AF increase the rate of detection of new cases compared with routine practice .
Although these approaches have comparable effects on the overall AF diagnosis rate , the cost of systematic screening is significantly greater than the cost of opportunistic screening from the perspective of the health service provider .
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) , the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice , is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality .
Screening for AF in asymptomatic patients has been proposed as a way of reducing the burden of the disease by detecting people who would benefit from prophylactic anticoagulation therapy before the onset of symptoms .
However , for screening to be an effective intervention , it must improve the detection of AF and provide benefit for those detected earlier as a result of screening .
OBJECTIVES This review aims to answer the following questions .Does systematic screening increase the detection of AF compared with routine practice ?
Which combination of screening population , strategy and test is most effective for detecting AF compared with routine practice ?
What safety issues and adverse events may be associated with individual screening programmes ?
How acceptable is the intervention to the target population ?
What costs are associated with systematic screening for AF ?