Effect of multi-strain probiotics (multi-strain microbial cell preparation) on glycemic control and other diabetes-related outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial Effect of alive probiotic on insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes patients: Randomized clinical trial. Probiotics for the Prevention of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Overweight and Obese Women: Findings From the SPRING Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Effect of Probiotics on Lipid Profile, Glycemic Control, Insulin Action, Oxidative Stress, and Inflammatory Markers in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Clinical Trial Effects of probiotic supplements on insulin resistance in gestational diabetes mellitus: A double‐blind randomized controlled trial Effects of probiotic supplementation on glycaemic control and lipid profiles in gestational diabetes: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Is there a value for probiotic supplements in gestational diabetes mellitus? A randomized clinical trial Effects of Probiotic and Prebiotic Supplementation on Leptin, Adiponectin, and Glycemic Parameters in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial Probiotics and dietary counselling contribute to glucose regulation during and after pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. The effects of probiotic bacteria on glycaemic control in overweight men and women: a randomised controlled trial Probiotics in obese pregnancy do not reduce maternal fasting glucose: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial (Probiotics in Pregnancy Study). Probiotic treatment reduces blood glucose levels and increases systemic absorption of gliclazide in diabetic rats Probiotic yogurt improves antioxidant status in type 2 diabetic patients. Effects of a Multispecies Probiotic Mixture on Glycemic Control and Inflammatory Status in Women with Gestational Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Probiotic B420 and prebiotic polydextrose improve efficacy of antidiabetic drugs in mice Combined effects of oligofructose and Bifidobacterium animalis on gut microbiota and glycemia in obese rats. Probiotic supplementation and the effects on weight loss, glycaemia and lipid profiles in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Aim Evidence of a possible connection between gut microbiota and several physiological processes linked to type 2 diabetes is increasing . However , the effect of multi-strain probiotics in people with type 2 diabetes remains unclear . This study investigated the effect of multi-strain microbial cell preparation — also refers to multi-strain probiotics — on glycemic control and other diabetes-related outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes . Design A r and omized , double-blind , parallel-group , controlled clinical trial . Setting Diabetes clinic of a teaching hospital in Kuala Lumpur , Malaysia . Participants A total of 136 participants with type 2 diabetes , aged 30–70 years , were recruited and r and omly assigned to receive either probiotics ( n = 68 ) or placebo ( n = 68 ) for 12 weeks . Outcomes Primary outcomes were glycemic control-related parameters , and secondary outcomes were anthropomorphic variables , lipid profile , blood pressure and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein . The Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium quantities were measured before and after intervention as an indicator of successful passage of the supplement through gastrointestinal tract . Statistical analysis Intention-to-treat ( ITT ) analysis was performed on all participants , while per- protocol ( PP ) analysis was performed on those participants who had successfully completed the trial with good compliance rate . Results With respect to primary outcomes , glycated hemoglobin decreased by 0.14 % in the probiotics and increased by 0.02 % in the placebo group in PP analysis ( p < 0.05 , small effect size of 0.050 ) , while these changes were not significant in ITT analysis . Fasting insulin increased by 1.8 µU/mL in placebo group and decreased by 2.9 µU/mL in probiotics group in PP analysis . These changes were significant between groups at both analyses ( p < 0.05 , medium effect size of 0.062 in PP analysis and small effect size of 0.033 in ITT analysis ) . Secondary outcomes did not change  significantly . Probiotics successfully passed through the gastrointestinal tract . Conclusion Probiotics modestly improved HbA1c and fasting insulin in people with type 2 diabetes BACKGROUND Probiotics have beneficial effect on obesity related disorders in animal models . Despite a large number of animal data , r and omized placebo-controlled trials ( RCT ) concluded that probiotics have a moderate effect on glycemic control-related parameters . However , effect of probiotics on insulin resistance are inconsistent . AIM In a double-blind single center RCT , effect of alive multistrain probiotic vs. placebo on insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes patient were assessed . METHODS A total of 53 patients met the criteria for inclusion . They were r and omly assigned to receive multiprobiotic " Symbiter " ( concentrated biomass of 14 probiotic bacteria genera Bifidobacterium , Lactobacillus , Lactococcus , Propionibacterium ) or placebo for 8-weeks administered as a sachet formulation . The primary main outcome was the change HOMA-IR ( homeostasis model assessment -estimated insulin resistance ) which calculated using Matthews et al. 's equation . Secondary outcomes were the changes in glycemic control-related parameters , anthropomorphic variables and cytokines . RESULTS Supplementation with alive multiprobiotic for 8 weeks was associated with significant reduction of HOMA-IR from 6.85 ± 0.76 to 5.13 ± 0.49 ( p = 0.047 ) , but remained static in the placebo group . With respect to our secondary outcomes , HbA1c insignificant decreased by 0.09 % ( p = 0.383 ) and 0.24 % ( p = 0.068 ) respectively in placebo and probiotics groups . However , in probiotic responders ( n = 22 , patient with decrease in HOMA-IR ) after supplementation a significant reduction in HbA1c by 0.39 % ( p = 0.022 ) as compared to non-responders was observed . In addition , from markers of chronic systemic inflammatory state only TNF-α and IL-1β changes significantly after treatment with probiotics . CONCLUSION Probiotic therapies modestly improved insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes OBJECTIVE Given the role of gut microbiota in regulating metabolism , probiotics administered during pregnancy might prevent gestational diabetes mellitus ( GDM ) . This question has not previously been studied in high-risk overweight and obese pregnant women . We aim ed to determine whether probiotics ( Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Bifidobacterium animalis subspecies lactis ) administered from the second trimester in overweight and obese women prevent GDM as assessed by an oral glucose tolerance test ( OGTT ) at 28 weeks ’ gestation . Secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal complications , maternal blood pressure and BMI , and infant body composition . RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This was a double-blind r and omized controlled trial of probiotic versus placebo in overweight and obese pregnant women in Brisbane , Australia . RESULTS The study was completed in 411 women .  GDM occurred in 12.3 % ( 25 of 204 ) in the placebo arm and 18.4 % ( 38 of 207 ) in the probiotics arm ( P = 0.10 ) . At OGTT , mean fasting glucose was higher in women r and omized to probiotics ( 79.3 mg/dL ) compared with placebo ( 77.5 mg/dL ) ( P = 0.049 ) . One- and two-hour glucose measures were similar . Preeclampsia occurred in 9.2 % of women r and omized to probiotics compared with 4.9 % in the placebo arm ( P = 0.09 ) . Excessive weight gain occurred in 32.5 % of women in the probiotics arm ( 55 of 169 ) compared with 46 % in the placebo arm ( 81 of 176 ) ( P = 0.01 ) . Rates of small for gestational age ( < 10th percentile ) were 2.4 % in the probiotics arm ( 5 of 205 ) and 6.5 % in the placebo arm ( 13 of 199 ) ( P = 0.042 ) . There were no differences in other secondary outcomes . CONCLUSIONS The probiotics used in this study did not prevent GDM in overweight and obese pregnant women Background : The dramatic increase in the incidence of diabetes and its associated complications require a natural and safe solution to control and delay such complications . The present study tested the hypothesis that probiotics may affect biochemical indices of diabetic patients Methods : Thirty four types 2 diabetic patients aged between 25 to 65 years , and diagnosed with diabetes for less than 15 years were selected for this single- blinded clinical trial . Using balanced block r and om sampling , the patients were divided into two groups of intervention ( probiotics ) and placebo . Blood sample s tested for baseline glucose , insulin , TG , total cholesterol , LDL-C , HDL-C , malondialdehyde , high sensitive CRP ( hs-CRP ) and IL-6 . After six weeks of experiment , fasting blood sample s were re-tested and the data obtained were analyzed using SPSS software . Results : There were no significant differences between anthropometric data including body mass index and waist to hip ratio in placebo and treatment groups . There was no significant difference in FBS , Serum TG concentration total cholesterol and LDL-C levels between placebo and treatment groups . HDL-C levels were slightly elevated after probiotic treatment , which were not statistically significant . Insulin , MDA and IL-6 levels were reduced and high sensitive CRP hs . CRP levels were elevated , although , not statistically significant . Conclusion : The result of this study indicates a non- significant declining trend in the level of TG , MDA and IL-6 and insulin resistance after consumption of probiotics Abstract Aims / Introduction To evaluate the effect of probiotic supplements on insulin resistance in pregnant women with diet‐controlled gestational diabetes mellitus . Material s and Methods A r and omized , double‐blind , placebo‐controlled trial was carried out between June 2016 and February 2017 . Pregnant women with diet‐controlled gestational diabetes mellitus were enrolled in the study at 24–28 weeks‐of‐gestation and r and omized to receive either probiotic supplements containing Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus or a placebo daily for four consecutive weeks . Primary outcomes were mean differences in insulin resistance ( homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance ) , fasting insulin and fasting plasma glucose between the two groups . Secondary outcomes were changes in maternal weight after the intervention . Results Data from 28 patients in the probiotic group and 29 in the placebo group were analyzed . The changes in metabolic parameters after r and omization showed significant improvement in glucose metabolism in the probiotic group compared with the placebo group , including fasting plasma glucose ( 0.68 ± 5.88 vs 4.620 ± 7.78 mg/dL , mean difference −3.94 mg/dL , 95 % confidence interval −7.62 , −0.27 , P = 0.034 ) , fasting plasma insulin ( 1.11 ± 1.71 vs 3.77 ± 1.70 mIU/L , mean difference −2.67 mIU/L , 95 % confidence interval −3.57 , −1.76 , P = 0.001 ) and homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance ( 0.25 ± 0.37 vs 0.89 ± 0.46 , mean difference −0.63 , 95 % confidence interval −0.86 , −0.41 , P = 0.001 ) . Weight gain during r and omization was similar between the two groups . Conclusions Four weeks of probiotic supplements  in women with diet‐controlled gestational diabetes in the late second and early third trimester lowered fasting glucose and increased insulin sensitivity  . Probiotic supplements may be considered as an adjunct treatment for glycemic control in these patients BACKGROUND To our knowledge , data on the effects of probiotic supplementation on glycaemic control and lipid concentrations in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus ( GDM ) are scarce . AIM The aim of the present study was to determine the effects of probiotic supplementation on glycaemic control and lipid profiles in GDM patients . METHODS Sixty pregnant women with GDM , primigravida and aged 18 - 40years , were divided into two groups to receive either probiotic capsules ( n=30 ) or a matching placebo ( n=30 ) in this r and omized double-blind , placebo-controlled trial . The patients in the probiotic group took a daily capsule that contained three viable freeze-dried strains : Lactobacillus acidophilus ( 2 × 10(9)CFU/g ) , L. casei ( 2 × 10(9)CFU/g ) and Bifidobacterium bifidum ( 2 × 10(9)CFU/g ) for 6weeks . The placebo group took capsules filled with cellulose for the same time period . Fasting blood sample s were taken at the beginning and end of the study to quantify the relevant markers . RESULTS After 6weeks of intervention , probiotic supplementation vs a placebo result ed in significant decreases in fasting plasma glucose ( -9.2±9.2mg/dL vs + 1.1±12.2mg/dL , P<0.001 ) , serum insulin levels ( -0.8±3.1μIU/mL vs + 4.5±10.6μIU/mL , P=0.01 ) , homoeostasis model assessment ( HOMA ) for insulin resistance ( -0.4±0.9 vs + 1.1±2.5 , P=0.003 ) and HOMA for β-cell function ( + 1.1±9.8 vs + 18.0±42.5 , P=0.03 ) , and a significant increase in the quantitative insulin sensitivity check index ( + 0.007±0.01 vs -0.01±0.02 , P=0.007 ) . In addition , significant decreases in serum triglycerides ( -1.6±59.4mg/dL vs + 27.1±37.9mg/dL , P=0.03 ) and VLDL cholesterol concentrations ( -0.3±11.9mg/dL vs + 5.4±7.6mg/dL , P=0.03 ) were seen following supplementation with the probiotics compared with the placebo . However , no significant changes in other lipid profiles were seen with the intervention . CONCLUSION Overall , the results of our study have demonstrated that taking probiotic supplements for 6weeks in patients with GDM had beneficial effects on glycaemic control , triglycerides and VLDL cholesterol concentrations , although there was no effect on other lipid profiles Background Although several studies have found probiotics encouraging in prevention of gestational diabetes mellitus ( GDM ) , the evidence for the use of probiotics in diagnosed GDM is largely limited . The aim of this study was to assess the effect of a probiotic supplement capsule containing four bacterial strains on glucose metabolism indices and weight changes in women with newly diagnosed GDM . Methods Sixty-four pregnant women with GDM were enrolled into a double-blind placebo-controlled r and omized clinical trial . They were r and omly assigned to receive either a probiotic or placebo capsule along with dietary advice for eight consecutive weeks . The trend of weight gain along with glucose metabolism indices was assayed . Results During the first 6 weeks of the study , the weight gain trend was similar between the groups . However , in the last 2 weeks of the study , the weight gain in the probiotic group was significantly lower than in the placebo group ( p < 0.05 ) . Fasting blood sugar ( FBS ) decreased in both intervention ( from 103.7 to 88.4 mg/dl ) and control ( from 100.9 to 93.6 mg/dl ) groups significantly , and the decrease in the probiotic group was significantly higher than in the placebo group ( p < 0.05 ) . Insulin resistance index in the probiotic group had 6.74 % reduction over the study period ( p < 0.05 ) . In the placebo group , however , there was an increase in insulin resistance index ( 6.45 % ) , but the observed change in insulin resistance was not statistically significant . Insulin sensitivity index was increased in both groups . The post-intervention insulin sensitivity index in the probiotic group was not significantly different from placebo when adjusted for the baseline levels . Conclusions The probiotic supplement appeared to affect glucose metabolism and weight gain among pregnant women with GDM . This needs to be confirmed in other setting s before a therapeutic value could be approved BACKGROUND According to previous studies , probiotic and prebiotic supplementation have desirable effects on glycemic parameters . Thus far , the effect of supplementation on the glycemic parameters and adipokines in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease ( NAFLD ) has not been assessed . Therefore , the aim of this study was to determine the effects of supplementation with probiotic and prebiotic on adiokines and glycemic parameters in the patients with NAFLD . METHODS In the present r and omized , double-blind , placebo-controlled trial , 89 patients with NAFLD were r and omly divided into three groups to receive one probiotic capsule + 16 g/d maltodextrin ( probiotic group ) or 16 g/d oligofructose powder + one placebo capsule ( prebiotic group ) , and one placebo capsule + 16 g/d maltodextrin ( control group ) for 12 weeks . All the subjects in the study were advised to follow the weight loss diet and physical activity recommendations during the intervention . Fasting blood sample s were taken at baseline and after the intervention to measure leptin , adiponectin , insulin , and fasting blood sugar . RESULTS At the end of the study , serum concentrations of leptin , insulin , and HOMA-IR decreased significantly in the probiotic and prebiotic groups compared with the control group . Despite the changes within the groups , serum concentrations of adiponectin did not change significantly between the three groups . Also , fasting blood sugar did not change between the groups , but decreased in the prebiotic group . Quantitative insulin-sensitivity check index ( QUICKI ) increased significantly in probiotic and prebiotic groups compared with the control group . CONCLUSION Probiotic and prebiotic supplementation along with lifestyle intervention has a favorable impact on glycemic parameters and leptin levels compared with lifestyle intervention alone Balanced glucose metabolism ensures optimal fetal growth with long-term health implication s conferred on both mother and child . We examined whether supplementation of probiotics with dietary counselling affects glucose metabolism in normoglycaemic pregnant women . At the first trimester of pregnancy 256 women were r and omised to receive nutrition counselling to modify dietary intake according to current recommendations or as controls ; the dietary intervention group was further r and omised to receive probiotics ( Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12 ; diet/probiotics ) or placebo ( diet/placebo ) in a double-blind manner , whilst the control group received placebo ( control/placebo ) . Blood glucose concentrations were lowest in the diet/probiotics group during pregnancy ( baseline-adjusted means 4.45 , 4.60 and 4.56 mmol/l in diet/probiotics , diet/placebo and control/placebo , respectively ; P = 0.025 ) and over the 12 months ' postpartum period ( baseline-adjusted means 4.87 , 5.01 and 5.02 mmol/l ; P = 0.025 ) . Better glucose tolerance in the diet/probiotics group was confirmed by a reduced risk of elevated glucose concentration compared with the control/placebo group ( OR 0.31 ( 95 % CI 0.12 , 0.78 ) ; P = 0.013 ) as well as by the lowest insulin concentration ( adjusted means 7.55 , 9.32 and 9.27 mU/l ; P = 0.032 ) and homeostasis model assessment ( adjusted means 1.49 , 1.90 and 1.88 ; P = 0.028 ) and the highest quantitative insulin sensitivity check index ( adjusted means 0.37 , 0.35 and 0.35 ; P = 0.028 ) during the last trimester of pregnancy . The effects observed extended over the 12-month postpartum period . The present study demonstrated that improved blood glucose control can be achieved by dietary counselling with probiotics even in a normoglycaemic population and thus may provide potential novel means for the prophylactic and therapeutic management of glucose disorders Background / Objectives : Evidence from animal and in vitro models suggest a role of probiotic bacteria in improving glycaemic control and delaying the onset of  type 2 diabetes .  However , the evidence from controlled trials in humans is limited . The objective was to determine if the probiotic bacteria L. acidophilus La5 and B. animalis subsp lactis Bb12 , supplemented in a whole food ( yoghurt ) or isolated ( capsules ) form , can improve biomarkers of glycaemic control . Subjects/ methods : Following a 3-week washout period , 156 overweight men and women over 55 years ( mean age : 67±8 years ; mean body mass index ( 31±4 kg/m2 ) were r and omized to a 6-week double-blinded parallel study . The four intervention groups were : ( A ) probiotic yoghurt plus probiotic capsules ; ( B ) probiotic yoghurt plus placebo capsules ; ( C ) control milk plus probiotic capsules ; and ( D ) control milk plus placebo capsules . Outcome measurements , including fasting glucose , insulin , glycated haemoglobin and Homoeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance ( HOMA-IR ) , were performed at baseline and week 6 . Results : Relative to the milk-control group , probiotic yoghurt result ed in a significantly higher HOMA-IR ( 0.32±0.15 , P=0.038 ) , but did not have a significant effect on the other three measures of glycaemic control ( P>0.05 ) . Relative to placebo capsules , probiotic capsules result ed in a significantly higher fasting glucose ( 0.15±0.07 mmol/l , P=0.037 ) , with no significant effect on the other three measures of glycaemic control ( P>0.05 ) . Further analyses did not identify other variables as contributing to these adverse findings . Conclusions : Data from this study does not support the hypothesis that L. acidophilus La5 and B. animalis subsp lactis Bb12 , either in isolated form or as part of a whole food , benefit short-term glycaemic control . Indeed , there is weak data for an adverse effect of these strains on glucose homoeostasis BACKGROUND Recent studies have reported beneficial effects of probiotics on maternal glycemia in healthy pregnant women . Obesity significantly increases risk of impaired glucose tolerance in pregnancy , but glycemic effects of probiotics in this specific obstetric group require additional investigation . OBJECTIVE The aim of the Probiotics in Pregnancy Study was to investigate the effect of a probiotic capsule on maternal fasting glucose in obese pregnant women . DESIGN In this placebo-controlled , double-blind , r and omized trial , 175 pregnant women with an early pregnancy body mass index ( BMI ; in kg/m² ) from 30.0 to 39.9 were recruited from antenatal clinics at the National Maternity Hospital , Dublin , Irel and . Exclusion criteria were BMI < 30.0 or > 39.9 , prepregnancy or gestational diabetes , age < 18 y , multiple pregnancy , and fetal anomaly . Women were r and omly assigned to receive either a daily probiotic or a placebo capsule from 24 to 28 wk of gestation in addition to routine antenatal care . The primary outcome was the change in fasting glucose between groups from preintervention to postintervention . Secondary outcomes were the incidence of gestational diabetes and neonatal anthropometric measures . RESULTS In 138 women who completed the study ( 63 women in the probiotic group ; 75 women in the placebo group ) , mean ( ±SD ) early pregnancy BMI was 33.6 ± 2.6 , which differed significantly between probiotic ( 32.9 ± 2.4 ) and placebo ( 34.1 ± 2.7 ) groups . With adjustment for BMI , the change in maternal fasting glucose did not differ significantly between treated and control groups [ -0.09 ± 0.27 compared with -0.07 ± 0.39 mmol/L ; P = 0.391 ; B = -0.05 ( 95 % CI : -0.17 , 0.07 ) ] . There were also no differences in the incidence of impaired glycemia ( 16 % in the probiotic group compared with 15 % in the placebo group ; P = 0.561 ) , birth weight ( 3.70 kg in the probiotic group compared with 3.68 kg in the placebo group ; P = 0.723 ) , or other metabolic variables or pregnancy outcomes . A secondary analysis of 110 women , excluding antibiotic users and poor compliers , also revealed no differences in maternal glucose or other outcomes between groups . CONCLUSION Probiotic treatment of 4 wk during pregnancy did not influence maternal fasting glucose , the metabolic profile , or pregnancy outcomes in obese women Summary The action of gliclazide , a sulphonylurea with beneficial extrapancreatic effects in diabetes , may be enhanced by administering probiotics . The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of probiotics on gliclazide pharmacokinetics and the effect of both probiotics and gliclazide on blood glucose levels in healthy and diabetic rats . Male Wistar rats ( 2 to 3 months , weight 350 ± 50 g ) were r and omly allocated to 4 groups ( n = 10 ) , two of which were treated with alloxan i.v . 30 mg/kg to induce diabetes . One group of healthy and one group of diabetic rats were then gavaged with probiotics ( 75 mg/kg ) for three days after which a gliclazide suspension ( 20 mg/kg ) was administered by gavage to all groups . Blood sample s were collected from the tail vein at various time points for 10 hours post-administration for the determination of blood glucose and gliclazide serum concentrations . It was found that probiotic treatment had no effect on blood glucose levels in healthy rats , but it reduced them ( up to 2-fold;p < 0.01 ) in diabetic rats . Probiotic treatment reduced gliclazide bioavailability in healthy rats ( 3-fold ) whereas it increased gliclazide bioavailability in diabetic rats ( 2-fold;p < 0.01 ) . Gliclazide had no effect on blood glucose levels in either healthy or diabetic rats despite the changes in its bioavailability . In conclusion , the probiotic treatment of diabetic rats  increases gliclazide bioavailability and lowers blood glucose levels by insulin-independent mechanisms , suggesting that the administration of probiotics may be beneficial as adjunct therapy in the treatment of diabetes OBJECTIVE Oxidative stress plays a major role in the pathogenesis and progression of diabetes . Among various functional foods with an antioxidant effect , probiotic foods have been reported to repress oxidative stress . The objective of this clinical trial was to assess the effects of probiotic and conventional yogurt on blood glucose and antioxidant status in type 2 diabetic patients . METHODS Sixty-four patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus , 30 to 60 y old , were assigned to two groups in this r and omized , double-blind , controlled clinical trial . The patients in the intervention group consumed 300 g/d of probiotic yogurt containing Lactobacillus acidophilus La5 and Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12 and those in the control group consumed 300 g/d of conventional yogurt for 6 wk .  Fasting blood sample s , 24-h dietary recalls , and anthropometric measurements were collected at the baseline and at the end of the trial . RESULTS Probiotic yogurt significantly decreased fasting blood glucose ( P < 0.01 ) and hemoglobin A1c ( P < 0.05 ) and increased erythrocyte superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase activities and total antioxidant status ( P < 0.05 ) compared with the control group . In addition , the serum malondialdehyde concentration significantly decreased compared with the baseline value in both groups ( P < 0.05 ) . No significant changes from baseline were shown in insulin concentration and erythrocyte catalase activity within either group ( P > 0.05 ) . CONCLUSION The consumption of probiotic yogurt improved fasting blood glucose and antioxidant status in type 2 diabetic patients . These results suggest that probiotic yogurt is a promising agent for diabetes management Objective . This trial aims to examine the effects of a Probiotic Mixture ( VSL#3 ) on glycemic status and inflammatory markers , in women with GDM . Material s and Methods . Over a period of 8 weeks , 82 women with gestational diabetes were r and omly assigned to either an intervention group ( n = 41 ) which were given VSL#3 capsule or to a control group which were given placebo capsule ( n = 41 ) . Fasting plasma glucose , homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance , glycosylated hemoglobin , high-sensitivity C-reactive protein , tumor necrosis factor-α , interleukin-6 , Interferon gamma , and interleukin-10 were measured before and after the intervention . Results . After 8 wk of supplementation FPG , HbA1c , HOMA-IR , and insulin levels remained unchanged in the probiotic and placebo groups . The comparison between the two groups showed no significant differences with FPG and HbA1c , but there were significant differences in insulin levels and HOMA-IR ( 16.6 ± 5.9 ; 3.7 ± 1.5 , resp . ) . Unlike the levels of IFN-g ( 19.21 ± 16.6 ) , there was a significant decrease in levels of IL-6 ( 3.81 ± 0.7 ) , TNF-α ( 3.10 ± 1.1 ) , and hs-CRP ( 4927.4 ± 924.6 ) . No significant increase was observed in IL-10 ( 3.11 ± 5.7 ) in the intervention group as compared with the control group . Conclusions . In women with GDM , supplementation with probiotics ( VSL#3 ) may help to modulate some inflammatory markers and may have benefits on glycemic control Background Gut microbiota is now known to control glucose metabolism . Previous studies have shown that probiotics and prebiotics may improve glucose metabolism , but their effects have not been studied in combination with drug therapy . The aim of this study was to investigate whether probiotics and prebiotics combined with drug therapy affect diabetic outcomes . Methods Two different study design s were used to test gut microbiota modulating treatments with metformin ( MET ) or sitagliptin ( SITA ) in male C57Bl/6J mice . In Design 1 , diabetes was induced with four-week feeding with a ketogenic , 72 kcal% fat diet with virtually no carbohydrates . Mice were then r and omly divided into four groups ( n = 10 in each group ) : ( 1 ) vehicle , ( 2 ) Bifidobacterium animalis ssp . lactis 420 ( B420 ) ( 109 CFU/day ) , ( 3 ) MET ( 2 mg/mL in drinking water ) , or ( 4 ) MET + B420 ( same doses as in the MET and B420 groups ) . After another 4 weeks , glucose metabolism was assessed with a glucose tolerance test . Fasting glucose , fasting insulin and HOMA-IR were also assessed . In Design 2 , mice were fed the same 72 kcal% fat diet to induce diabetes , but they were simultaneously treated within their respective groups ( n = 8 in each group ) : ( 1 ) non-diabetic healthy control , ( 2 ) vehicle , ( 3 ) SITA [ 3 mg/(kg*day ) ] ( 4 ) SITA with prebiotic polydextrose ( PDX ) ( 0.25 g/day ) , ( 5 ) SITA with B420 ( 109 CFU/day ) , and ( 6 ) SITA + PDX + B420 . Glucose metabolism was assessed at 4 weeks , and weight development was monitored for 6 weeks . Results In Design 1 , with low-dose metformin , mice treated with B420 had a significantly lower glycemic response ( area under the curve ) ( factorial experiment , P = 0.002 ) and plasma glucose concentration ( P = 0.02 ) compared to mice not treated with B420 . In Design 2 , SITA + PDX  reduced glycaemia in the oral glucose tolerance test significantly more than SITA only ( area under the curve reduced 28 % , P < 0.0001 ) . In addition , B420 , PDX or B420+PDX , together with SITA , further decreased fasting glucose concentrations compared to SITA only ( −19.5 , −40 and −49 % , respectively , P < 0.01 for each comparison ) . The effect of PDX may be due to its ability to increase portal vein GLP-1 concentrations together with SITA ( P = 0.0001 compared to vehicle ) whereas SITA alone had no statistically significant effect compared to vehicle ( P = 0.14 ) . Conclusions This study proposes that combining probiotics and /or prebiotics with antidiabetic drugs  improves glycemic control and insulin sensitivity in mice . Mechanisms could be related to incretin secretion OBJECTIVE Prebiotics and probiotics may be able to modify an obesity-associated gut microbiota . The aim of this study was to examine the individual and combined effects of the prebiotic oligofructose ( OFS ) and the probiotic Bifidobacterium animalis subsp . lactis BB-12 ( BB-12 ) on gut microbiota and host metabolism in obese rats . METHODS Adult male , diet-induced obese Sprague Dawley rats were r and omized to : ( 1 ) Control ( C ) ; ( 2 ) 10 % OFS ; ( 3 ) BB-12 ; ( 4 ) OFS + BB-12 for 8 weeks ( n = 9 - 10 rats/group ) . Body composition , glycemia , gut permeability , satiety hormones , cytokines , and gut microbiota were examined . RESULTS Prebiotic , but not probiotic  reduced energy intake , weight gain , and fat mass ( P < 0.01 ) . OFS , BB-12 , and the combined OFS + BB-12  improved glycemia ( P < 0.05 ) . Individually , OFS and BB-12  reduced insulin levels ( P < 0.05 ) . Portal GLP-1 was increased with OFS , whereas probiotic increased GLP-2 ( P < 0.05 ) . There was a marked increase in bifidobacteria and lactobacilli ( P < 0.01 ) with OFS that was not observed with probiotic alone . CONCLUSIONS The impact of prebiotic intake on body composition and gut microbiota was of greater magnitude than the probiotic BB-12 . Despite this , an improvement in glucose AUC with both prebiotic or probiotic demonstrates the beneficial role of each of these " biotic " agents in glycemic control Abstract The aim of the current study was to assess the effects of probiotic supplementation on weight loss , glycaemia and lipid profiles in women with polycystic ovary syndrome ( PCOS ) . In a r and omized , double-blind , placebo-controlled trial , 60 women with PCOS were r and omized to receive probiotic capsule ( n = 30 ) or placebo ( n = 30 ) for 12 weeks . Consumption of probiotic supplements result ed in a significant reduction in weight ( −0.5 ± 0.4 vs. + 0.1 ± 1.0 kg , p = 0.004 ) and BMI ( −0.2 ± 0.2 vs. + 0.03 ± 0.4 kg/m2 , p = 0.004 ) compared with the placebo . In addition , compared with the placebo , probiotic administration was associated with a significant decrease in fasting plasma glucose ( −2.4 ± 8.4 vs. + 2.1 ± 7.0 mg/dL , p = 0.02 ) , serum insulin concentrations ( −2.0 ± 5.8 vs. + 1.6 ± 5.0 μIU/mL , p = 0.01 ) , homoeostasis model of assessment -insulin resistance ( −0.5 ± 1.4 vs. + 0.3 ± 1.1 , p = 0.01 ) , homoeostatic model assessment -beta cell function ( −7.5 ± 22.3 vs. + 6.3 ± 21.7 , p = 0.01 ) , serum triglycerides ( −13.3 ± 51.3 vs. + 13.6 ± 37.1 mg/dL , p= 0.02 ) and a significant increase in quantitative insulin sensitivity check index ( QUICKI ) ( + 0.006 ± 0.01 vs. −0.005 ± 0.02 , p = 0.01 ) . When we adjusted the analysis for baseline values of biochemical parameters , age and baseline BMI , except for QUICKI ( p = 0.08 ) , other findings did not alter . We found that probiotic supplementation among PCOS women for 12 weeks had favourable effects on weight loss , markers of insulin resistance , triglycerides and VLDL-cholesterol concentrations
CONCLUSIONS Probiotic consumption may improve glycemic control modestly .
Modification of gut microbiota by probiotic supplementation may be a method for preventing and control hyperglycemia in clinical practice
BACKGROUND Previous clinical trials indicate that probiotic consumption may improve blood glucose control , however , results from r and omized trials on glycemic control have been inconsistent .
OBJECTIVE To investigate the effects of probiotics on glycemic control in a systematic review and meta- analysis of r and omized controlled trials .