Multicenter randomized study of anticoagulation guided by remote rhythm monitoring in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and CRT-D devices: Rationale, design, and clinical characteristics of the initially enrolled cohort The IMPACT study. 2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. Does left atrial appendage closure with a cardiac plug system reduce the stroke risk in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients? A single-center case series. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy and cardiac mortality in atrial fibrillation. The Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. An evaluation of the strategy of maintenance of sinus rhythm by antiarrhythmic drug therapy after ablation and pacing therapy in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure: Role of catheter ablation therapies. Transesophageal echocardiographic correlates of thromboembolism in high-risk patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators Committee on Echocardiography. Rhythm control versus rate control for atrial fibrillation and heart failure. Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk for mortality and heart failure progression in patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a retrospective analysis of the SOLVD trials. Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction. Efficacy and safety of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure to prevent thromboembolic events in atrial fibrillation patients with high stroke and bleeding risk Comparison of rate and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation and nonischemic heart failure. Rate control versus rhythm control for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation with mild to moderate heart failure: results from the RAte Control versus Electrical cardioversion (RACE) study. Outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with intermittent atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter in the COMPANION trial. Optimal heart failure therapy and successful cardioversion in heart failure patients with atrial fibrillation. Atrial fibrillation and risk of clinical events in chronic heart failure with and without left ventricular systolic dysfunction: results from the Candesartan in Heart failure-Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program.
Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter are common cardiac arrhythmias associated with an increased risk of stroke in patients with additional risk factors .  Anticoagulation ameliorates stroke risk , but because these arrhythmias may occur intermittently without symptoms , initiation of prophylactic therapy is often delayed until electrocardiographic documentation is obtained . The IMPACT study is a multicenter , r and omized trial of remote surveillance technology in patients with implanted dual-chamber cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator ( CRT-D ) devices design ed to test the hypothesis that initiation and withdrawal of oral anticoagulant therapy guided by continuous ambulatory monitoring of the atrial electrogram improve clinical outcomes by reducing the combined rate of stroke , systemic embolism , and major bleeding compared with conventional clinical management . For those in the intervention group , early detection of atrial high-rate episodes ( AHRE ) generates an automatic alert to initiate anticoagulation based on patient-specific stroke risk stratification . Subsequently , freedom from AHRE for predefined periods prompts withdrawal of anticoagulation to avoid bleeding . Patients in the control arm are managed conventionally , the anticoagulation decision prompted by incidental detection of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter during routine clinical follow-up . The results will help define the clinical utility of wireless remote cardiac rhythm surveillance and help establish the critical threshold of AHRE burden warranting anticoagulant therapy in patients at risk of stroke . In this report , we describe the study design and baseline demographic and clinical features of the initial cohort ( 227 patients ) ACCF : American College of Cardiology Foundation ACCP : American College of Chest Physicians ACS : acute coronary syndrome ACT : Atrial arrhythmia Conversion Trial ADONIS : American – Australian – African trial with DronedarONe In atrial fibrillation or flutter for the maintenance of Sinus rhythm AF : atrial fibrillation AHA : American Heart Association AND ROMEDA : ANtiarrhythmic trial with DROnedarone in Moderate-to-severe congestive heart failure Evaluating morbidity DecreAse APHRS : Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society aPTT : activated partial thromboplastin time ARB : angiotensin-receptor blocker ARISTOTLE : Apixaban for Reduction In STroke and Other ThromboemboLic Events in atrial fibrillation ATHENA : A placebo-controlled , double-blind , parallel arm Trial to assess the efficacy of dronedarone 400 mg b.i.d . for the prevention of cardiovascular Hospitalization or death from any cause in patiENts with Atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter ATRIA : AnTicoagulation and Risk factors In Atrial fibrillation AVERROES : Apixaban VErsus acetylsalicylic acid ( ASA ) to Reduce the Rate Of Embolic Stroke in atrial fibrillation patients who have failed or are unsuitable for vitamin K antagonist treatment AVRO : A prospect i ve , r and omized , double-blind , Active-controlled , superiority study of Vernakalant vs. amiodarone in Recent Onset atrial fibrillation b.i.d : bis in die ( twice daily ) b.p.m . : beats per minute CABANA : Catheter ABlation vs . ANtiarrhythmic drug therapy for Atrial fibrillation CABG : coronary artery bypass graft CAP : Continued Access to Protect AF CHA2DS2-VASc : Congestive heart failure or left ventricular dysfunction Hypertension , Age ≥75 ( doubled ) , Diabetes , Stroke (doubled)-Vascular disease , Age 65–74 , Sex category ( female ) CHADS2 : Congestive heart failure , Hypertension , Age ≥75 , Diabetes , Stroke ( doubled ) CI : confidence interval CRAFT : Controlled R and omized Atrial Fibrillation Trial CrCl : creatinine clearance DAFNE : Dronedarone Atrial FibrillatioN study after Electrical cardioversion DIONYSOS : R and omized Double blind trIal to evaluate efficacy and safety of drOnedarone ( 400 mg b.i.d . ) vs . amiodaroNe ( 600 mg q.d . for 28 daYS , then 200 mg qd thereafter ) for at least 6 mOnths for the maintenance of Sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation EAST : Early treatment of Atrial fibrillation for Stroke prevention Trial EHRA : European Heart Rhythm Association ECG : electrocardiogram EMA : European Medicines Agency ERATO : Efficacy and safety of dRonedArone for The cOntrol of ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation EURIDIS : EURopean trial In atrial fibrillation or flutter patients receiving Dronedarone for the maIntenance of Sinus rhythm FAST : atrial Fibrillation catheter Ablation vs . Surgical ablation Treatment FDA : Food and Drug Administration Flec-SL : Flecainide Short-Long trial HAS-BLED : Hypertension , Abnormal renal/liver function , Stroke , Bleeding history or predisposition , Labile INR , Elderly , Drugs/alcohol concomitantly HF-PEF : heart failure with preserved ejection fraction HF-REF : heart failure with reduced ejection fraction HR : hazard ratio HRS : Heart Rhythm Society ICH : intracranial haemorrhage INR : international normalized ratio i.v . : intravenous J-RHYTHM : Japanese RHYTHM management trial for atrial fibrillation LAA : left atrial appendage LoE : level of evidence LVEF : left ventricular ejection fraction MANTRA-PAF : Medical ANtiarrhythmic Treatment or Radiofrequency Ablation in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation NICE : National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence NOAC : novel oral anticoagulant NSAID : non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug NYHA : New York Heart Association OAC : oral anticoagulant or oral anticoagulation o.d . : omni die ( every day ) PALLAS : Permanent Atrial fibriLLAtion outcome Study using dronedarone on top of st and ard therapy PCI : percutaneous coronary intervention PREVAIL : Prospect i ve R and omized EVAluation of the LAA closure device In patients with atrial fibrillation v s. Long-term warfarin therapy PROTECT AF : WATCHMAN LAA system for embolic PROTECTion in patients with Atrial Fibrillation PT : prothrombin time RAAFT : Radio frequency Ablation Atrial Fibrillation Trial RE-LY : R and omized Evaluation of Long-term anticoagulant therapY with dabigatran etexilate ROCKET-AF : Rivaroxaban Once daily oral direct factor Xa inhibition Compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and Embolism Trial in atrial fibrillation RRR : relative risk reduction TE : thromboembolism TIA : transient ischaemic attack t.i.d . : ter in die ( three times daily ) TOE : transoesophageal echocardiogram TTR : time in therapeutic range VKA : vitamin K antagonist Guidelines summarize and evaluate all currently available evidence on a particular issue with the aim of assisting physicians in selecting the best management strategy for an individual patient suffering from a given condition , taking into account the impact on BACKGROUND There are two approaches to the treatment of atrial fibrillation : one is cardioversion and treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs to maintain sinus rhythm , and the other is the use of rate-controlling drugs , allowing atrial fibrillation to persist . In both approaches , the use of anticoagulant drugs is recommended . METHODS We conducted a r and omized , multicenter comparison of these two treatment strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation and a high risk of stroke or death . The primary end point was overall mortality . RESULTS A total of 4060 patients ( mean [ + /-SD ] age , 69.7+/-9.0 years ) were enrolled in the study ; 70.8 percent had a history of hypertension , and 38.2 percent had coronary artery disease . Of the 3311 patients with echocardiograms , the left atrium was enlarged in 64.7 percent and left ventricular function was depressed in 26.0 percent . There were 356 deaths among the patients assigned to rhythm-control therapy and 310 deaths among those assigned to rate-control therapy ( mortality at five years , 23.8 percent and 21.3 percent , respectively ; hazard ratio , 1.15 [ 95 percent confidence interval , 0.99 to 1.34 ] ; P=0.08 ) . More patients in the rhythm-control group than in the rate-control group were hospitalized , and there were more adverse drug effects in the rhythm-control group as well . In both groups , the majority of strokes occurred after warfarin had been stopped or when the international normalized ratio was subtherapeutic . CONCLUSIONS Management of atrial fibrillation with the rhythm-control strategy offers no survival advantage over the rate-control strategy , and there are potential advantages , such as a lower risk of adverse drug effects , with the rate-control strategy . Anticoagulation should be continued in this group of high-risk patients BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia and it is associated with an increased stroke risk , due mainly to cardiac embolism from the left atrial appendage ( LAA ) . Percutaneous LAA closure is a method to reduce stroke risk in AF without using anticoagulant agents . In this study we report data from an Italian experience with the LAA occluder Amplatzer Cardiac Plug ( ACP ) device ( Aga Medical Corporation , Plymouth , MN , USA ) . METHODS The study was design ed to evaluate the safety of LAA closure using ACP and the efficacy of the procedure in preventing strokes during a 1-year follow-up . Patients with permanent or paroxysmal AF , high stroke risk , and contraindication to warfarin therapy were selected for the procedure . RESULTS The LAA closure was attempted in 37 patients and succeeded in 34 cases ( 91.9 % ) . Four patients experienced serious complications ( one cardiac tamponade requiring pericardiocentesis , two device embolizations , one low-rate response AF requiring artificial pacing ) . During a 1-year follow-up , ischemic stroke occurred in one of 34 patients , result ing in a stroke rate of 2.94 % ; thus there was a stroke rate reduction of 50.2 % and 26.5 % compared to the expected stroke rate , according to CHADS2 and CHA2 DS2 VASc score . None of the patients who received ACP experienced major bleeding during the follow-up . CONCLUSION LAA closure using ACP is a relatively feasible procedure which can be performed by highly experienced operators to reduce stroke rate in patients with AF , high stroke risk , and contraindication to oral anticoagulants BACKGROUND Maintenance of sinus rhythm is the main therapeutic goal in patients with atrial fibrillation . However , recurrences of atrial fibrillation and side effects of antiarrhythmic drugs offset the benefits of sinus rhythm . We hypothesized that ventricular rate control is not inferior to the maintenance of sinus rhythm for the treatment of atrial fibrillation . METHODS We r and omly assigned 522 patients who had persistent atrial fibrillation after a previous electrical cardioversion to receive treatment aim ed at rate control or rhythm control . Patients in the rate-control group received oral anticoagulant drugs and rate-slowing medication . Patients in the rhythm-control group underwent serial cardioversions and received antiarrhythmic drugs and oral anticoagulant drugs . The end point was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes , heart failure , thromboembolic complications , bleeding , implantation of a pacemaker , and severe adverse effects of drugs . RESULTS After a mean ( + /-SD ) of 2.3+/-0.6 years , 39 percent of the 266 patients in the rhythm-control group had sinus rhythm , as compared with 10 percent of the 256 patients in the rate-control group . The primary end point occurred in 44 patients ( 17.2 percent ) in the rate-control group and in 60 ( 22.6 percent ) in the rhythm-control group . The 90 percent ( two-sided ) upper boundary of the absolute difference in the primary end point was 0.4 percent ( the prespecified criterion for noninferiority was 10 percent or less ) . The distribution of the various components of the primary end point was similar in the rate-control and rhythm-control groups . CONCLUSIONS Rate control is not inferior to rhythm control for the prevention of death and morbidity from cardiovascular causes and may be appropriate therapy in patients with a recurrence of persistent atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The relation between cardiac mortality and antiarrhythmic drug administration has not been fully determined . This relation was analyzed in 1,330 patients enrolled in the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Study , a r and omized clinical trial comparing warfarin , aspirin and placebo for the prevention of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation . METHODS Patients who received antiarrhythmic drug therapy for atrial fibrillation in this study were compared with patients not receiving antiarrhythmic agents . The relative risk of cardiac mortality , including arrhythmic death , in patients receiving antiarrhythmic drug therapy  was determined and adjusted for other cardiac risk factors . RESULTS In patients receiving antiarrhythmic drug therapy , cardiac mortality was increased 2.5-fold ( p = 0.006 , 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] 1.3 to 4.9 ) and arrhythmic death was increased 2.6-fold ( p = 0.02 , 95 % CI 1.2 to 5.6 ) . Among patients with a history of congestive heart failure , those given antiarrhythmic medications had a relative risk of cardiac death of 4.7 ( p less than 0.001 , 95 % CI 1.9 to 11.6 ) compared with that of patients not so treated ; the relative risk of arrhythmic death in the treated group was 3.7 ( p = 0.01 , 95 % CI 1.3 to 10.4 ) . Patients without a history of congestive heart failure had no increased risk of cardiac mortality ( relative risk 0.70 , 95 % CI 0.2 to 3.1 ) during antiarrhythmic drug therapy . After exclusion of 23 patients with documented ventricular arrhythmias and adjustment for other variables predictive of cardiac death , patients receiving antiarrhythmic drugs were not at increased risk of cardiac death or arrhythmic death . However , in patients with a history of heart failure who received antiarrhythmic drug therapy , the relative risk of cardiac death was 3.3 ( p = 0.05 , 95 % CI 0.99 to 11.1 ) and that of arrhythmic death was 5.8 ( p = 0.009 , 95 % CI 1.5 to 21.7 ) compared with the risk in patients not taking antiarrhythmic medications . CONCLUSIONS Although antiarrhythmic drug therapy was not r and omly determined in this trial , the data suggest that in patients with atrial fibrillation and a history of congestive heart failure , the risk of such therapy may outweigh the potential benefit of maintaining sinus rhythm AIMS Permanent atrial fibrillation develops in many patients after ablation and pacing therapy .  We compared a strategy that initially allowed patients to remain in atrial fibrillation with a strategy that initially attempted to restore and maintain sinus rhythm . METHODS AND RESULTS In this multicentre r and omized controlled trial , 68 patients affected by severely symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were assigned , after successful atrioventricular junction ablation and pacing treatment  , to antiarrhythmic drug therapy with amiodarone , propafenone , flecainide or sotalol and were compared with 69 patients assigned , after successful AV junction ablation and pacing treatment , to no antiarrhythmic drug therapy . The patients were followed-up for 12 to 24 months ( mean 16+/-4 ) . The drug arm patients had a 57 % reduction in the risk of developing permanent atrial fibrillation ( 21 % vs 37 % , P=0.02 ) . Evaluation after 12 months revealed similar quality of life scores and echocardiographic parameters in the two groups , but the drug arm patients had more episodes of heart failure and hospitalizations ( P=0.05 ) . The outcome was similar between the 40 patients who developed permanent atrial fibrillation and the 97 who did not . CONCLUSION Conventional antiarrhythmic therapy reduces the risk of development of permanent atrial fibrillation after ablation and pacing therapy . The present data do not support the concept that the development of permanent atrial fibrillation is related to an adverse outcome when a perfect control of heart rate is obtained by ablation and pacing Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) represents the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia in patients with heart failure ( HF ) . AF in HF patients is associated with worsening of symptoms and also results in a substantial increase in mortality . Although HF patients in sinus rhythm have a better outcome than patients with AF , several r and omized studies investigating pharmacological rhythm control versus rate control have shown no advantage of one strategy over the other in terms of patient outcomes . Catheter-based ablation therapy is a newer therapeutic option with a rapidly evolving and changing role in the management of this arrhythmia . In the present review , the authors discuss the epidemiology , pathophysiology and prognostic significance of AF in patients with HF . Exclusively addressed are studies investigating catheter-based ablation for rhythm-control and rate-control therapies in the management of AF in HF patients The risk for ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation is related to underlying structural heart disease [ 1 - 3 ] . Although most strokes are believed to arise from embolism of left atrial thrombi [ 4 , 5 ] , other mechanisms may contribute . Transesophageal echocardiography ( TEE ) provides a unique diagnostic window for evaluating the left atrium , left atrial appendage , and thoracic aorta , but the manner in which specific TEE findings in patients with atrial fibrillation correlate with thromboembolic risk and response to therapy has not been fully established [ 6 - 13 ] . We performed TEE in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who were at high intrinsic risk for thromboembolism and were participating in the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation ( SPAF-III ) study , a r and omized clinical trial . In that study , adjusted-dose warfarin ( target international normalized ratio [ INR ] , 2 to 3 ) was compared with combination therapy consisting of low-intensity warfarin ( INR , 1.2 to 1.5 ) plus aspirin , 325 mg/d . The trial was stopped after an interim analysis indicated that the efficacy of adjusted-dose warfarin therapy was superior to that of combination therapy . Low anticoagulation intensity in the combination therapy group yielded high stroke rates that were similar to those expected during treatment with aspirin alone [ 14 , 15 ] . In the current analysis , we 1 ) correlate TEE observations among patients with atrial fibrillation at high risk for thromboembolism with rate of subsequent stroke and 2 ) compare treatment responses . Methods Patients Patients were recruited from the SPAF-III multicenter trial , which was design ed to compare two antithrombotic medication regimens for prevention of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism ( primary events ) . The study , whose design is described else-where in detail [ 14 ] , involved patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who were stratified for risk on the basis of clinical and transthoracic echocardiographic criteria derived from previous analyses [ 15 ] . Women older than 75 years of age and patients of any age and either sex with systolic hypertension ( systolic blood pressure > 160 mm Hg ) , previous thromboembolism , or impaired left ventricular function ( M-mode echocardiographic fractional shortening of 0.25 or recent clinical congestive heart failure ) were r and omly assigned to receive adjusted-dose warfarin ( target INR , 2.0 to 3.0 ) or a combination of low-intensity warfarin ( 0.5 to 3.0 mg/d ; dose was initially adjusted to cause deviation of the INR to 1.2 to 1.5 and was then fixed ) and aspirin . Seventy-three percent of the patients were receiving warfarin at various dose intensities before trial entry ; these patients were equally distributed between assigned treatment groups . Antithrombotic treatment was assigned before performance of TEE and was not influenced by TEE findings . Patients were followed monthly by telephone and in clinic every 3 months , and a st and ard question naire on stroke symptoms was administered annually . All patients whose responses to the question naire suggested the occurrence of stroke were referred for clinical examination by a local affiliated neurologist who was blinded to treatment , and all events were adjudicated by a blinded event verification committee [ 14 ] . This project was design ed to supplement the SPAF-III clinical trial on the basis of the hypothesis that spontaneous echocardiographic contrast detected by TEE identifies patients at high risk for thromboembolism for whom adjusted-dose warfarin  would prove superior to  combination therapy . All participants in the parent study were encouraged , but not required , to provide separate , written informed consent for TEE after r and om assignment to antithrombotic treatment . This was done to prevent the results of TEE from influencing recruitment of patients into the trial or from altering treatment . The intended sample size of 412 TEE examinations was selected to detect an absolute difference in event rates of 3.9 % per year ( based on projected event rates of 5.4 % per year in patients with spontaneous echocardiographic contrast and 1.5 % per year in patients without contrast ) over a mean observation period of 2.5 years . Secondary objectives were to correlate clinical thromboembolic events with function of the left atrial appendage , thrombus of the left atrium and left atrial appendage , and atherosclerotic lesions in the thoracic aorta imaged by TEE . Transesophageal Echocardiography Transesophageal echocardiography was performed within 3 months of enrollment with patients under light sedation and topical anesthesia , according to specific protocol s for acquisition and interpretation [ 16 ] . Commercially available ultrasonography equipment incorporated biplane or multiplane transducers with at least 48 crystals operating at a st and ard frequency of 5 MHz with gray-scale imaging . Signal processing , log compression , and persistence values were established for each manufacturer . Images were interpreted locally , and data were entered into st and ardized forms by echocardiographers who were blinded to antithrombotic treatment assignment but not to patient demographic or clinical features . Original videotaped recordings were collected in a central echocardiographic registry for validation and quality control . To assure generalizability of the results to laboratories used in clinical practice , the analyses reported here are based on image interpretation at the local laboratories . The following features were specifically assessed : left atrial appendage size , peak ante grade ( emptying ) velocity of blood flow in the left atrial appendage , spontaneous echocardiographic contrast in the left atrium or left atrial appendage , thrombus of the left atrium or left atrial appendage , and atherosclerotic disease of the thoracic aorta . Spontaneous echocardiographic contrast was defined as a pattern of slowly swirling intracavitary echodensities imaged with gain setting s adjusted to distinguish background noise . Contrast was classified as faint when visualized intermittently during the cardiac cycle or when enhanced gain setting s were required for detection and was classified as dense when continuously present at st and ard gain . Aortic plaque was classified by location and as either simple or complex according to mobility , ulceration , pedunculation , or thickness greater than 4 mm [ 16 ] . We postulated that reduced emptying velocity from the left atrial appendage , which reflects stasis , would be associated with dense spontaneous echocardiographic contrast and thrombus formation , whereas complex aortic plaque would be a consequence of atherosclerotic vascular abnormality . We also postulated that these findings would predispose patients to ischemic stroke through separate pathogenic mechanisms . Statistical Analysis The analyses reported here were limited to variables accessible only by TEE and were hypothesized a priori to have potential predictive relations to clinical thromboembolism . Baseline comparisons between groups were done by using the chi-square test for categorical data and the Student t-test for continuous variables . The Cox proportional-hazards regression model was used to estimate the univariate relative risk associated with TEE characteristics . The primary analysis compared rates of cerebral ischemic events and systemic embolism among patients who had dense spontaneous echocardiographic contrast detected in the left atrium or left atrial appendage with rates in patients who did not have dense contrast ; the log-rank statistic was used to compare the times to events between these groups . Secondary analyses , conducted similarly , compared event rates in groups that were identified by left atrial appendage size , flow velocity , thrombus , and aortic plaque . For these comparisons , the area of the left atrial appendage was dichotomized at the upper quartile ; flow velocity was dichotomized at the lower quartile . When interaction was seen between treatment and TEE characteristics , analysis of the relation of TEE findings to events was confined to the combination therapy group and treatment effect was described separately ; when no interaction was seen , the analysis was stratified by therapy . The relative reduction in event rate associated with adjusted-dose warfarin therapy was computed as the difference between unity and the rate ratio determined by a Poisson regression model [ 17 ] . A Cox proportional-hazards regression model was fit to confirm the independence of TEE characteristics identified as univariate thromboembolic risk factors . Confidence intervals for event rates were calculated by using a Poisson regression model ; tests of significance were two-sided and were not adjusted for multiple comparisons . All analyses were done according to the intention-to-treat principle . Results Of 1044 high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation enrolled in the r and omized trial , 382 ( 37 % ) volunteered for TEE ( range , 10 % to 80 % of SPAF-III participants recruited at 18 clinical centers offering TEE ) . Salient features of these 382 patients were similar to those of the 662 participants who did not undergo transesophageal imaging ( Table 1 ) . The mean patient age was 71 years , 36 % of patients had clinical ischemic heart disease , and almost half had a history of congestive heart failure . Balanced proportions of patients were assigned to therapy with adjusted-dose warfarin ( n = 190 ) or fixed-dose warfarin and aspirin ( n = 192 ) . Time from r and om assignment of treatment to TEE was similar in the two groups ( mean , 23 days ) . The trial was stopped after a mean observation period of 1.1 years because an interim analysis indicated the lack of efficacy of the combination regimen [ 18 ] . Up to that point , 23 primary events ( all of which were ischemic strokes ) occurred in the subset of participants who had undergone TEE ( event rate , 3.1 % per year in patients assigned to adjusted-dose warfarin compared with 7.8 % per year in those assigned to combination therapy ; P = 0.04 ) . BACKGROUND It is common practice to restore and maintain sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure . This approach is based in part on data indicating that atrial fibrillation is a predictor of death in patients with heart failure and suggesting that the suppression of atrial fibrillation may favorably affect the outcome . However , the benefits and risks of this approach have not been adequately studied . METHODS We conducted a multicenter , r and omized trial comparing the maintenance of sinus rhythm ( rhythm control ) with control of the ventricular rate ( rate control ) in patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 35 % or less , symptoms of congestive heart failure , and a history of atrial fibrillation . The primary outcome was the time to death from cardiovascular causes . RESULTS A total of 1376 patients were enrolled ( 682 in the rhythm-control group and 694 in the rate-control group ) and were followed for a mean of 37 months . Of these patients , 182 ( 27 % ) in the rhythm-control group died from cardiovascular causes , as compared with 175 ( 25 % ) in the rate-control group ( hazard ratio in the rhythm-control group , 1.06 ; 95 % confidence interval , 0.86 to 1.30 ; P=0.59 by the log-rank test ) . Secondary outcomes were similar in the two groups , including death from any cause ( 32 % in the rhythm-control group and 33 % in the rate-control group ) , stroke ( 3 % and 4 % , respectively ) , worsening heart failure ( 28 % and 31 % ) , and the composite of death from cardiovascular causes , stroke , or worsening heart failure ( 43 % and 46 % ) . There were also no significant differences favoring either strategy in any predefined subgroup . CONCLUSIONS In patients with atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure , a routine strategy of rhythm control does not reduce the rate of death from cardiovascular causes , as compared with a rate-control strategy . ( Clinical Trials.gov number , NCT00597077 . OBJECTIVE This study undertook to determine if the presence of atrial fibrillation in patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic left ventricular dysfunction was associated with increased mortality and , if so , whether the increase could be attributed to progressive heart failure or arrhythmic death . BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation is a common condition in heart failure with the potential to impact hemodynamics and progression of left ventricular systolic dysfunction as well as the electrophysiologic substrate for arrhythmias . The available data do not conclusively define the effect of atrial fibrillation on prognosis in heart failure . METHODS A retrospective analysis of the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction Prevention and Treatment Trials was conducted that compared patients with atrial fibrillation to those in sinus rhythm at baseline  for the risk of all-cause mortality , progressive pump-failure death and arrhythmic death . RESULTS The patients with atrial fibrillation at baseline , compared to those in sinus rhythm , had greater all-cause mortality ( 34 % vs. 23 % , p < 0.001 ) , death attributed to pump-failure ( 16.7 % vs. 9.4 % , p < 0.001 ) and were more likely to reach the composite end point of death or hospitalization for heart failure ( 45 % vs. 33 % , p < 0.001 ) , but there was no significant difference between the groups in arrhythmic deaths . After multivariate analysis , atrial fibrillation remained significantly associated with all-cause mortality ( relative risk [ RR ] 1.34 , 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] 1.12 to 1.62 , p=0.002 ) , progressive pump-failure death ( RR 1.42 , 95 % CI 1.09 to 1.85 , p=0.01 ) , the composite end point of death or hospitalization for heart failure ( RR 1.26 , 95 % CI 1.03 to 1.42 , p=0.02 ) , but not arrhythmic death ( RR 1.13 ; 95 % CI 0.75 to 1.71 ; p=0.55 ) . CONCLUSIONS The presence of atrial fibrillation in patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction is associated with an increased risk for all-cause mortality , largely explained by an increased risk for pump-failure death . These data suggest that atrial fibrillation is associated with progression of left ventricular systolic dysfunction Aims The r and omized PROTECT AF trial demonstrated non-inferiority of left atrial appendage ( LAA ) closure to oral anticoagulation with warfarin . Current guidelines give a class IIb recommendation for LAA closure . We evaluated the efficacy and safety of LAA closure in a consecutive series of non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients with contraindications to long-term oral anticoagulation or at high bleeding risk . Methods and results 101 consecutive non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients ( age 74.7 ± 7.5 years ) at high risk for stroke ( CHA2DS2-VASc Score 4.4 ± 1.6 ) and high bleeding risk ( HAS-BLED Score 4.2 ± 1.3 ) received LAA closure with either the Watchman closure device ( n = 38 ) or the Amplatzer cardiac plug ( n = 63 ) . Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel was recommended for 3–6 months after device implantation , followed by long-term antiplatelet therapy with aspirin . No anticoagulation was given after device implantation . Mean follow-up was 400 days . One patient ( 1 % ) experienced a transient ischemic attack , and two patients ( 2 % ) suffered from ischemic stroke . While on recommended antiplatelet therapy , bleeding occurred in 12/101 patients ( 12 % ) . Bleeding was significantly reduced with 3 compared with 6 months dual antiplatelet therapy ( 3.0 vs. 16.2 % , p < 0.05 ) while ischemic or thrombotic events were similar . Conclusion Left atrial appendage closure in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and high risk for stroke and bleeding events effectively prevented stroke and reduced cerebral ischemic events compared to expected stroke rate according to CHA2DS2-VASc Score . Dual antiplatelet therapy for 3 months reduced the rate of bleeding events compared to 6 months therapy with no increase of thrombotic events Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a very common cardiac arrhythmia with an increased mortality in patients with heart failure . Whether the best therapeutic approach to these patients is to restore sinus rhythm or to adequately control the ventricular rate is still controversial . The aim of this study was to compare both strategies in patients with AF and nonischemic heart failure . One hundred and fifty-four patients with AF duration greater than 48 hours and nonischemic left ventricular dysfunction were r and omized either to a rhythm ( n = 84 ) or rate ( n = 74 ) control group . The composite end points of the study were embolism , death , and exercise capacity .  The average age of the patients was 61 + /- 10 years in the rhythm control group and 58 + /- 12 years in the rate control group ( P = NS ) . The average follow-up period was 35 + /- 21 months in the rhythm control group and 37 + /- 19 months in the rate control group ( P = NS ) . In the first year of the study , exercise capacity and left ventricular ejection fraction ( LVEF ) were improved in the rhythm control group compared to the exercise capacity and LVEF of the rate control group ( P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0005 , respectively ) . There were no statistically significant differences in the embolic event rate between the two groups ( P = NS ) . The mortality rate , especially for death due to pump failure , was significantly higher in the rate control group at the end of the study ( P < 0.0001 ) . Restoring and maintaining sinus rhythm had a beneficial effect on mortality and exercise capacity in patients with nonischemic heart failure and AF BACKGROUND This study was conducted to compare rate- and rhythm-control therapy in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and mild to moderate chronic heart failure ( CHF ) .  Rate control is not inferior to rhythm control in preventing mortality and morbidity in patients with AF . In CHF , this issue is still unsettled . METHODS In this predefined analysis of the RACE study , a total of 261 patients were in New York Heart Association ( NYHA ) classes II and III at baseline . These patients were analyzed . The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular mortality , hospitalization for CHF , thromboembolic complications , bleeding , pacemaker implantation , and life-threatening drug side effects . Furthermore , quality of life was compared . RESULTS After 2.3 + /- 0.6 years , the primary end point occurred in 29 ( 22.3 % ) of the 130 rate-control patients and in 32 ( 24.4 % ) of the 131 rhythm-control patients . More cardiovascular deaths , hospitalization for CHF , and bleeding occurred under rate control . Thromboembolic complications , drug side effects , and pacemaker implantation were more frequent under rhythm control . Quality of life did not differ between strategies . In patients successfully treated with rhythm control , the prevalence of end points was not different from those who were in AF at study end . However , the type of end point was different : mortality , bleeding , hospitalization for heart failure , and pacemaker implantation occurred less frequently . CONCLUSIONS In patients with mild to moderate CHF , rate control is not inferior to rhythm control . However , if sinus rhythm can be maintained , outcome may be improved . A prospect i ve r and omized trial is necessary to confirm these results BACKGROUND Controlled clinical trial data are lacking for cardiac resynchronization therapy ( CRT ) outcomes in patients with advanced heart failure ( HF ) from reduced left ventricular ejection fraction ( HFrEF ) and intermittent atrial fibrillation or flutter ( IAF/AFL ) . OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to describe CRT outcomes in patients with IAF/AFL and advanced HF . METHODS HF outcomes in patients in the COMPANION ( Comparison of Medical Therapy , Pacing , and Defibrillation in Heart Failure ) trial with New York Heart Association class III or IV HFrEF , left ventricular ejection fraction ≤0.35 , sinus rhythm at r and omization , and no history of baseline arrhythmia were compared with those with a history of IAF/AFL . RESULTS In those with no history of baseline arrhythmia ( n = 887 ) , compared with optimal pharmacological therapy ( OPT ) with no CRT , the CRT + OPT arms exhibited a significant reduction in the end points of death or any hospitalization ( hazard ratio [ HR ] 0.73 [ 95 % Confidence Interval ( CI ) : 0.60 to 0.89 ] ; P = .002 ) and death or HF hospitalization ( HR 0.53 [ 95 % CI : 0.41 to 0.68 ] ; P < .001 ) . In contrast , in the IAF/AFL subgroup ( n = 293 ) , CRT did not result in improved outcomes compared with OPT ( death or any hospitalization : HR 1.16 [ 95 % CI : 0.83 to 1.63 ] ; P = .38 ; death or HF hospitalization : HR 0.97 [ 95 % CI : 0.64 to 1.46 ] ; P = .88 ) . The interaction between history of AF/AFL and CRT was statistically significant for both outcomes ( P < .05 ) . CONCLUSION In the COMPANION trial , patients with moderate to severe HFrEF and a history of IAF/AFL had no benefit from CRT BACKGROUND Effectiveness , safety , and other factors associated with success of cardioversion ( CV ) of atrial fibrillation ( AF )  have not yet been evaluated in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction . We studied 148 consecutive patients with left ventricular dysfunction ( ejection fraction < or = 45 % ) , who underwent electrical CV for AF in our department . The patients had New York Heart Association heart failure ranging from class II to IV . The overall CV success rate was 71 % . We relied on univariate and multivariate regression and sought variables influencing success rate . Conversion success did not correlate with New York Heart Association class . Instead , we found that the greatest predictor was the degree of heart failure treatment . Patients receiving beta-blockers , angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotension receptor blockers , plus mineralocorticoid receptor blockers had the greatest chance for conversion success . Success was more likely in patients with coronary artery disease ( 91 % ) than in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy . CONCLUSIONS Cardioversion is a safe and effective method for the restoration of sinus rhythm in patients with AF and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction . Our findings underscore the value of aggressive heart failure treatment before CV in patients with AF OBJECTIVES We assessed the risk of adverse cardiovascular ( CV ) outcomes associated with atrial fibrillation ( AF ) in the C and esartan in Heart failure- Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity ( CHARM ) program , which enrolled patients with chronic heart failure ( CHF ) and a broad range of ejection fractions ( EFs ) . BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of adverse CV outcomes in patients with CHF and reduced EF . The risk of AF in patients with CHF and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction ( PEF ) is unknown . METHODS A total of 7,599 patients with symptomatic CHF were r and omized to c and esartan or placebo . Patients were divided by baseline EF ( < or = 40 % or > 40 % ) in low or preserved EF groups . Major outcomes were cardiovascular death or hospitalization for worsening heart failure , and all-cause mortality . Median follow-up was 37.7 months . RESULTS A total of 670 ( 17 % ) patients in the low EF group and 478 ( 19 % ) in the PEF group had AF at baseline . Atrial fibrillation predicted a high risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality regardless of baseline EF . Patients with AF and low EF had the highest absolute risk for adverse CV outcomes . However , AF was associated with greater relative increased risk of the major outcomes in patients with PEF than in patients with low EF : hazard ratio 1.72 ( 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] 1.45 to 2.06 ) versus 1.29 ( 95 % CI 1.14 to 1.46 ) , respectively . The same was true for the risk of all-cause mortality . C and esartan was associated with similar treatment effects regardless of baseline rhythm . CONCLUSIONS Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of CV outcomes in patients with CHF and either reduced EF or PEF . C and esartan improved outcomes similarly regardless of baseline rhythm
RECENT FINDINGS Several r and omized control trials and systematic review s demonstrate the safety and efficacy of atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction .
In multiple trials , these patients have shown clinical benefit from atrial fibrillation ablation including improved left ventricular systolic function , quality of life , and clinical heart failure symptoms .
SUMMARY Atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure patients remains well tolerated with an overall efficacy comparable to atrial fibrillation ablation in patients without heart failure .
There is consistent evidence for the clinical benefit of atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and limited evidence for atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction .
Currently , there is insufficient data regarding the safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage closure devices in heart failure patients
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure experience an increased morbidity and mortality from the hemodynamic consequences of atrial fibrillation and an increased stroke risk .
Consequently , there has been increased attention to procedural alternatives to pharmacologic rhythm control and anticoagulation for stroke prevention .
This review aims to evaluate the evidence for atrial fibrillation ablation and left atrial appendage closure in heart failure patients .