Effectiveness of workplace interventions in rehabilitating musculoskeletal disorders and preventing its consequences among workers with physical and sedentary employment: systematic review protocol Reducing musculoskeletal disorders among computer operators: comparison between ergonomics interventions at the workplace Early Workplace Intervention for Employees With Musculoskeletal-Related Absenteeism: A Prospective Controlled Intervention Study Musculoskeletal work disability for clinicians: time course and effectiveness of a specialized intervention program by diagnosis. Workplace Prevention and Musculoskeletal Injuries in Nurses The effect of workplace intervention on pain and sickness absence caused by upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Effectiveness of participatory training for prevention of musculoskeletal disorders: a randomized controlled trial Musculoskeletal disorders and occupational exposures: How should we judge the evidence concerning the causal association? Musculoskeletal symptoms and job satisfaction among office-workers: a cross-sectional study from Iran. Epidemiologic surveillance of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders in the working population. Effects of ergonomic intervention on work-related upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders among computer workers: a randomized controlled trial A pilot randomised control trial of the effectiveness of a biofeedback mouse in reducing self-reported pain among office workers Multi dimensional system for evaluating preventive program for upper extremity disorders among computer operators. A comprehensive work injury prevention program with clerical and office workers: phase I. Job task and psychosocial risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders among newspaper employees. Are Work Disability Prevention Interventions Effective for the Management of Neck Pain or Upper Extremity Disorders? A Systematic Review by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration A Tailored Workplace Exercise Program for Women at Risk for Neck and Upper Limb Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Background Musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) are the leading cause of work disability and sickness absence worldwide . The prevalence of MSDs increases with age , consequently challenging sustainable employability among the growing ageing workforce . Knowledge of feasible and efficient workplace-based interventions to rehabilitate MSD or prevent its consequences is therefore warranted . This systematic review will evaluate the effectiveness of workplace-based interventions on MSDs and its consequences among adult workers with physical and sedentary work tasks , respectively . Methods We will search the following bibliographic data bases : PubMed ( including the data base ‘ MEDLINE ’ ) and Web of Science Core Collection ( including the data bases ‘ Science Citation Index Exp and ed ’ , ‘ Social Sciences Citation Index ’ and ‘ Arts & Humanities Citation Index ’ ) . Manual search es will also be performed . We will include r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) and non- RCTs reported in English in which ( 1 ) participants are adult workers with MSD , ( 2 ) interventions are aim ing at rehabilitating pain symptoms of MSD or preventing the consequences of MSD and ( 3 ) interventions are initiated and /or carried out at the workplace . The review will adhere to the ‘ Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review s and Meta-Analyses ’ ( PRISMA ) guidelines for reporting systematic review s and the Institute for Work and Health ( IWH ) guidelines for workplace-based interventions . For the primary evaluation of the review , the quality assessment and evidence synthesis will conform to the IWH guidelines . Secondary evaluation will include a meta- analysis ( unless the included studies do not allow this due to heterogeneity ) and employ the risk of bias domains recommended by Cochrane along with the Grading of Recommendations , Assessment , Development and Evaluations ( GRADE ) approach on the studies with pain intensity as an outcome . Discussion This systematic review will provide knowledge on effective workplace-based interventions among physical and sedentary workers with MSD . RCTs are considered the most powerful experimental design in clinical trials , but solely including these may be too restrictive to underst and effective workplace-based interventions where r and omised and carefully controlled trials ( RCTs ) are not always possible . In order to maximize practical relevance , the selection process will , therefore , include both RCTs and non- RCTs and the quality assessment and evidence synthesis will conform to IWH guidelines focusing on developing practical guidelines for stakeholders . The result of this work will form the basis for industry-specific evidence -based recommendations on effective workplace-based interventions for rehabilitation of MSDs and its consequences that will later be operationalised into concrete and user-friendly practical tools for workplaces . Systematic review registration International Prospect i ve Register of Systematic Review s ( PROSPERO ) number CRD42018116752 Typing is associated with musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) caused by multiple risk factors . This control study aim ed to evaluate the efficacy of a workplace intervention for reducing  MSDs among computer workers . Sixty-six subjects with and without MSD were assigned consecutively to one of three groups : ergonomics intervention ( work site and body posture adjustments , muscle activity training and exercises ) accompanied with biofeedback training , the same ergonomics intervention without biofeedback and a control group . Evaluation of MSDs , body posture , psychosocial status , upper extremity ( UE ) kinematics and muscle surface electromyography were carried out before and after the intervention in the workplace and the motion lab . Our main hypothesis that significant differences in the reduction of MSDs will exist between subjects in the study groups and controls was confirmed ( χ2 = 13.3 ; p = 0.001 ) . Significant changes were found in UE kinematics and posture as well . Both ergonomics interventions effectively reduced MSD and improved body posture . Practitioner Summary : This study aim ed to test the efficacy of an individual workplace intervention programme among computer workers by evaluating musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) , body posture , upper extremity kinematics , muscle activity and psychosocial factors were tested . The proposed ergonomics interventions effectively reduced MSDs and improved body posture Sickness absenteeism caused by musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) is a persistent and costly occupational health challenge . In a prospect i ve controlled trial , we compared the effects on sickness absenteeism of a more proactive role for insurance case managers as well as workplace ergonomic interventions with that of traditional case management .  Patients with physician-diagnosed MSDs were r and omized either to the  intervention group or  the reference group offered the traditional case management routines . Participants filled out a comprehensive question naire at the initiation of the study and after 6 months . In addition , administrative data were collected at 0 , 6 , and 12 months after the initiation of the project . For the entire 12-month period , the total mean number of sick days for the intervention group was 144.9 ( SEM 11.8 ) days/person as compared to 197.9 ( 14.0 ) days in the reference group ( P < 0.01 ) . Compared with the reference group , employees in the intervention group significantly more often received a complete rehabilitation investigation ( 84 % versus 27 % ) . The time for doing this was reduced by half ( 59.4 ( 5.2 ) days versus 126.8 ( 19.2 ) , P < .01 ) . The odds ratio for returning to work in the intervention group was 2.5 ( 95 % confidence interval 1.2–5.1 ) as compared with the reference group . The direct cost savings were USD 1195 per case , yielding a direct benefit-to-cost ratio of 6.8 . It is suggested that the management of MSDs should to a greater degree focus on early return to work and building on functional capacity and employee ability . Allowing the case managers a more active role as well as involving an ergonomist in workplace adaptation meetings might also be beneficial OBJECTIVE To evaluate how an intervention program modifies the clinical course of work disability in musculoskeletal diagnoses . METHODS All patients with temporary work disability related to musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) in 3 health districts of Madrid , Spain were r and omized into st and ard care ( control group ) or the intervention group . Intervention consisted of a specific program , run by rheumatologists , following detailed proceedings . Inclusion and followup lasted 12 months each . According to the cause , every temporary work disability episode was classified into 11 syndrome categories . For each we calculated efficacy , as the difference between groups in the number of days on sick leave per temporary work disability episode ; relative efficacy , or the percentage of days saved in the intervention group ; and time of maximum program effect . Analyses were performed on an intent-to-treat basis . Survival techniques were run and results were expressed as the hazard ratio ( HR ) in the intervention versus control group . RESULTS A total of 13,077 patients were included , generating 16,297 temporary work disability episodes .  The most frequent cause was back pain . Temporary work disability episodes were significantly shorter in the intervention group than in the controls in all syndrome categories except knee pain ( excluding osteoarthritis ) . Program relative efficacy varied from 28 - 72 % . The program was highly efficacious in carpal tunnel syndrome ( HR 2.09 , 95 % confidence interval [ 95 % CI ] 1.17 - 3.75 ) , peripheral osteoarthritis ( HR 1.58 , 95 % CI 1.14 - 2.19 ) , and inflammatory diseases ( HR 1.52 , 95 % CI 1.09 - 2.12 ) . The maximum effect of the program always took place within the first 2 months . CONCLUSION The implementation of this type of specialist-run , protocol -based early intervention program would be very beneficial in the treatment of patients with work disability related to MSDs , except for those with knee pain ( excluding osteoarthritis ) Objective The purpose of this study was to describe the availability of preventive devices and training in relation to neck , shoulder , and back musculoskeletal injuries/disorders ( MSD ) in registered nurses . Summary background data Nurses have one of the highest rates of MSD of any occupation . Studies have shown that mechanical lifting devices and lifting teams can reduce MSD rates and associated costs . Methods Data from 1163 r and omly selected currently working nurses ( 1 + years on the current job ) were collected in anonymous mailed surveys ( 74 % response rate ) . MSD cases had neck , shoulder , and /or back symptoms for at least 1 week , or at least monthly , and moderate or more pain , in the past year . Results Nurses with mechanical lifting devices available were significantly less likely to have neck or back MSDs . Back injury was less likely when lifting teams were available . However , adjustable beds and transfer sheets were associated with greater odds of back MSD . Training in workstation adjustment was associated with significantly lower MSD prevalence , though postural training was not . Conclusions Though use of mechanical devices and lifting teams was limited in nursing workplaces , these prevention strategies were related to reduced odds of MSD . Nursing administrators can use these findings to consider workplace changes OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess the effect of an ergonomic intervention on pain and sickness absence caused by upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders . METHODS In this r and omized controlled study , subjects aged 18 - 60 years ( N=177 ) seeking medical advice due to upper-extremity symptoms were included if their symptoms , or the exacerbation of symptoms , had started < 30 days prior to the medical consultation and immediate sick leave was not required .  Workplace ergonomic improvements were made in the intervention group . Data on symptoms and sickness absences were gathered during one-year follow-up . RESULTS Pain intensity , pain interference with work , leisure time , or sleep did not differ between the intervention and control group during the one-year follow-up . During the first three months of follow-up , the percentage of employees with sickness absence due to upper-extremity or other musculoskeletal disorders did not differ between the intervention ( N=89 ) and control ( N=84 ) group , but the total number of sickness absence days in the intervention group was about half of that in the control group ( mean 6.2 versus 9.8 days for upper-extremity disorder and 6.0 versus 11.5 days for upper-extremity and other musculoskeletal disorders combined ) . During 4 - 12 months of follow-up , the percentage of employees with sickness absence due to upper-extremity disorder ( 10.1 % versus 16.7 % , P=0.20 ) or upper-extremity and other musculoskeletal disorders combined ( 20.2 % versus 32.1 % , P=0.07 ) was lower in the intervention than the control group . CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that an early ergonomic intervention reduces sickness absence due to upper-extremity or other musculoskeletal disorders Purpose Health and safety training program has been applied to prevent work-related  musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) in workplace . We evaluated the effectiveness of participatory training and didactic training programs on MSD prevention among frontline workers in Shenzhen , China . Methods The authors r and omly assigned 918 workers from intervention factories to receive participatory training ( intervention group ) , and 907 workers from intervention factories and 1,654 workers from control factories to receive didactic training ( control_1 group , control_2 group , respectively ) from June 1 , 2008 to November 30 , 2009 . Participants were asked to report experience of ache , pain or discomfort in 10 body parts at baseline and 1 year after training . Data were analyzed to compare the MSD prevalence 1 year before and 1 year after training in different groups from 2009 to 2010 . Results The follow-up rate was 61 % ( 2,120/3,479 ) at 1 year after training . In the year after training , there were no statistically significant changes in the proportion of workers who reported MSD in any body part . MSD prevalence rates in the intervention group reduced from 16.8 to 9.9 % for lower extremities ( χ2 = 13.102 , p < 0.001 ) and from 12.9 to 8.3 % ( χ2 = 9.433 , p = 0.002 ) for wrist and finger at 1 year after training . However , the rates did not change significantly for upper back , lower back , neck , shoulder and elbow in the intervention group and for all 10 body parts in two control groups . Conclusions Overall , the training programs did not seem to prevent the occurrence of MSD among frontline workers . However , participatory training might be effective to reduce MSD in the lower extremities and wrist and finger Musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) affecting the back , upper and lower extremities are widespread in the general population , implying a variety of causal factors . Multiple causes are not mutually exclusive , and a high background rate does not preclude associations with specific factors that are uncommon in the general population . MSDs have well-documented associations with occupational ergonomic stressors such as repetitive motion , heavy lifting , non-neutral postures , and vibration . Organizational features of the work environment , such as time pressure and low decision latitude , may also play a role , at least by potentiating the effects of physical loading . Numerous systematic review s have mostly concurred with these overall findings . Nevertheless , some continue to debate whether MSDs are sometimes work-related , even for those performing jobs with repetitive and routinized tasks , heavy lifting , and /or pronounced postural strain . This article discusses ( 1 ) some epidemiologic features of MSDs that underlie that debate ; and ( 2 ) the question of what should appropriately be considered a gold st and ard for scientific evidence on an etiological question such as the health effects of a non-voluntary exposure , such as an occupational or environmental agent . In particular , r and omized clinical trials have little relevance for determining the health effects of non-therapeutic risk factors OBJECTIVE Office-work poses a high-risk for musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) , with consequences for workers , employers and society . The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms in a sample of Iranian office workers , to investigate the association between pain severity and job satisfaction and to investigate the association between MSDs and job satisfaction . MATERIAL S AND METHODS Iranian office workers from a university setting ( n=91 ) were r and omly selected and included in this cross-sectional study . The  Nordic musculoskeletal question naire plus visual analogue scale of pain  , and the Brayfield-Rothe Job Satisfaction Index  were used to study the prevalence of MSDs , pain intensity and job satisfaction , respectively . Descriptive analysis , Pearson 's correlation , and multiple regression analysis were performed for statistical assessment . RESULTS Eighty-nine percent of participants reported musculoskeletal symptoms during the past 12 months , most commonly in the neck ( 69.2 % ) , low back ( 58.2 % ) , knees ( 41.8 % ) , shoulders ( 35.2 % ) , and upper back ( 34.1 % ) . There was a significant negative correlation between pain intensity and job satisfaction . Pain intensity , low-back pain in the last week , wrist pain in the past 12 months and shoulder pain were significantly associated with job satisfaction ( p<0.05 ) . CONCLUSION This study provides evidence that musculoskeletal symptoms are common in Iranian office workers , associated with low job satisfaction . These findings indicate the need for more attention to MSDs among office workers and design ing effective preventive interventions OBJECTIVE Since 2002 , an epidemiologic surveillance system of work-related , upper-limb musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) has been implemented in France 's Pays de la Loire region to assess the prevalence of MSDs and their risk factors in the working population . METHODS The surveillance was based on a network of occupational physicians ( OPs ) and used the recommendations of a group of European experts ( criteria document consensus ) . In 2002 - 2003 , 80 of 400 OPs volunteered to participate . All underwent a training program to st and ardize the physical examination .  Health status was assessed by self-administered question naire and physical examination . Occupational risk factors were assessed by self-administered question naire .  Exposure scores were computed for each anatomic zone by summing the risk factors taken into account by the criteria document . RESULTS More than 50 % of the 2,685 men and women r and omly included in 2002 - 2003 experienced nonspecific musculoskeletal symptoms during the preceeding 12 months and approximately 30 % experienced them in the preceeding week . The prevalence of clinical ly diagnosed MSDs was high : approximately 13 % of workers experienced at least 1 of the MSDs . The most frequent disorder was rotator cuff syndrome followed by carpal tunnel syndrome and lateral epicondylitis . The prevalence of MSDs increased with age and varied widely across economic sectors and occupations . More than half of the workers were exposed to at least 2 risk factors of MSDs . Exposure varied according to industrial activity and occupation . According to the criteria document , a high percentage of MSD cases could be classified as probably work related ( 95 % in men and 89 % in women age < 50 , and 87 % in men and 69 % in women age > 50 ) . CONCLUSION Nonspecific upper-limb symptoms and specific upper-limb MSDs are common in the working population . These results show the need to implement prevention programs in most sectors to reduce the prevalence of MSDs Purpose The aim of the study was to determine effects of ergonomic intervention on work-related upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders ( WUEMSDs )  among computer workers . Methods Four hundred computer workers answered a question naire on work-related upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms ( WUEMSS ) . Ninety-four subjects with WUEMSS using computers at least 3 h a day participated in a prospect i ve , r and omized controlled 6-month intervention . Body posture and workstation layouts were assessed by the Ergonomic Question naire . We used the Visual Analogue Scale to assess the intensity of WUEMSS . The Upper Extremity Function Scale was used to evaluate functional limitations at the neck and upper extremities . Health-related quality of life was assessed with the Short Form-36 . After baseline assessment , those in the intervention group participated in a multicomponent ergonomic intervention program including a comprehensive ergonomic training consisting of two interactive sessions , an ergonomic training brochure , and workplace visits with workstation adjustments . Follow-up assessment was conducted after 6 months . Results In the intervention group , body posture ( p < 0.001 ) and workstation layout ( p = 0.002 ) improved over 6 months ; furthermore , intensity ( p < 0.001 ) , duration ( p < 0.001 ) , and frequency ( p = 0.009 ) of WUEMSS decreased significantly in the intervention group compared with the control group . Additionally , the functional status ( p = 0.001 ) , and physical ( p < 0.001 ) , and mental ( p = 0.035 ) health-related quality of life improved significantly compared with the controls . There was no improvement of work day loss due to WUEMSS ( p > 0.05 ) . Conclusions Ergonomic intervention programs may be effective in reducing ergonomic risk factors among computer workers and consequently in the secondary prevention of WUEMSDs A pilot study examined the effectiveness of a biofeedback mouse in reducing  upper extremity pain and discomfort in office workers ; in addition , relative mouse use ( RMU ) , satisfaction and the feasibility of running a r and omised controlled trial ( RCT ) in a workplace setting were evaluated . The mouse would gently vibrate if the h and was idle for more than 12 s. The feedback reminded users to rest the arm in neutral , supported postures . Analysis showed a statistically significant reduction in shoulder pain and discomfort for the intervention group at T2 ( 38.7 % lower than controls ) . Statistically significant differences in RMU time between groups were seen post intervention ( −7 % at T1 and + 15 % at T2 for the intervention group ) . Fifty-five percent of the intervention group was willing to continue using the mouse . It appears feasible to perform an RCT for this type of intervention in a workplace setting . Further study including more participants is suggested . Practitioner Summary : The study findings support the feasibility of conducting r and omised control trials in office setting s to evaluate ergonomics interventions . The intervention result ed in reduced pain and discomfort in the shoulder . The intervention could be a relevant tool in the reduction of upper extremity musculoskeletal disorder . Further research will better explain the study 's preliminary findings Typing is associated with musculoskeletal complaints ( MSCs ) , caused by multiple risk factors . Although a wide variety of ergonomic intervention programs were conducted to reduce risk factors and MSC 's , only few of them were found evidence based . This study aim ed to test the efficacy of a workplace intervention in reducing MSC 's among computer workers . 66 computer workers were assigned r and omly to one of three intervention programs : ergonomic intervention including biofeedback , intervention without biofeedback and control group without intervention . The efficacy was tested by advanced assessment including ; pain location and severity , posture at work , upper extremity 3D kinematics , muscle activity and psychosocial status . Working hypothesis ; significant score differences will be found between the study groups which underwent ergonomic intervention and the control group on the following measures : pain complaints , upper extremity kinematics , muscle activity and psychosocial status . Significant differences were found between pre and post intervention and between research groups and the control group in pain , posture and motion . The ergonomic intervention with biofeedback had no unique contribution in comparison to other interventions . In conclusion ; the proposed intervention program was found efficient for reducing pain among computer workers The risk for the development of musculoskeletal disorders and associated conditions in clerical and office workers is well documented . The majority of work injury prevention programs for this population were single-faceted ( education , workstation re design , or task modification ) and yielded both positive and negative findings . This pilot study was conducted with 16 full-time clerical and office workers at a small private college . In a r and omized control trial , the intervention group received four hours of individualized training through a multi-faceted injury prevention program . Between group differences in musculoskeletal symptom frequency and intensity and perceived stress and energy levels existed , although were statistically insignificant . There was a statistically significant decrease in Lower Back ache/pain from pre to post measures for the intervention group OBJECTIVES A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the association of upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders and work-related factors among employees using video display terminals at a large metropolitan newspaper . METHODS The study included 1050 r and omly selected workers from four departments . The workers were asked to complete question naires on symptoms , job tasks , and psychosocial and work organization conditions . Musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremities were defined by frequency , duration , and intensity of symptoms not attributable to acute injury . Data were analyzed with the use of logistic regression . RESULTS A total of 973 workers completed the survey . The one-year period prevalence rate for any musculoskeletal disorder of the upper extremities was 41 % . Neck symptoms ( 26 % ) were the most frequently reported , followed by h and or wrist ( 22 % ) , shoulder ( 17 % ) , and elbow ( 10 % ) symptoms . Greater time working at the video display station was associated with increased h and or wrist symptoms in a dose-response relationship . In addition , variables corresponding to increased work-load dem and s ( eg , increased time working under deadline and increased job pressure ) were associated with increased neck , shoulder , and h and or wrist disorders . Women were more likely to report symptoms in several areas , but this finding may reflect the concentration of women in jobs involving more risk factors . CONCLUSIONS The results suggest a high prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremities among newspaper employees , and they provide additional evidence that increased work load , time pressure , and greater hours of computer use are related to the occurrence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among these workers , particularly for disorders in the h and or wrist area Abstract Purpose We conducted a systematic review to critically appraise and synthesize literature on the effectiveness of work disability prevention ( WDP ) interventions in workers with neck pain , whiplash-associated disorders ( WAD ) , or upper extremity disorders . Methods We search ed electronic data bases from 1990 to 2012 . R and om pairs of independent review ers critically appraised eligible studies using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria . Scientifically admissible studies were summarized and synthesized following best- evidence synthesis methodology . Results Of the 6,359 articles retrieved , 16 r and omized controlled trials were eligible for critical appraisal and five were admissible . We found that a return-to-work coordination program ( including workplace-based work hardening ) was superior to clinic-based work hardening for persistent rotator cuff tendinitis . Workplace high-intensity strength training and workplace advice had similar outcomes for neck and shoulder pain . Mensendieck/Cesar postural exercises and strength and fitness exercises had similar outcomes for non-specific work-related upper limb complaints . Adding a brief job stress education program to a workplace ergonomic intervention was not beneficial for persistent upper extremity symptoms . Adding computer-prompted work breaks to ergonomic adjustments and workplace education benefited workers ’ recovery from recent work-related neck and upper extremity complaints . Conclusions At present , no firm conclusions can be drawn regarding the effectiveness of WDP interventions for managing neck pain , WAD , and upper extremity disorders . Our review suggests a return-to-work coordination program is more effective than clinic-based work hardening . Also , adding computer-prompted breaks to ergonomic and workplace interventions benefits workers ’ recovery . The current quality of evidence does not allow for a definitive evaluation of the effectiveness of ergonomic interventions Objective : The aim of this study was to evaluate a tailored physical activity protocol performed in a work environment with a group of female workers employed in manual precision tasks to reduce upper limb pain . Methods : Sixty female subjects were r and omly assigned to an intervention group or a control group . The IG was administered of a 6-month , twice-a-week , tailored exercise program , whereas the CG received no intervention . Results : The IG showed a reduction on shoulder pain accompanied by increases on the range of motion measures . In addition , reductions in upper limb pain and neck disability were detected with concomitant increases in grip strength . Conclusions : This study indicated positive effects of a tailored workplace exercise protocol in female workers exposed to moderate risk for work-related musculoskeletal disorders , showing clinical ly meaningful reductions of pain symptoms and disability on upper limb and neck regions
There was strong evidence for one intervention category , resistance training , leading to the recommendation : Implementing a workplace-based resistance training exercise programme can help prevent and manage UEMSD and symptoms .
The synthesis also revealed moderate evidence for stretching programmes , mouse use feedback and forearm supports in preventing UEMSD or symptoms .
There was also moderate evidence for no benefit for EMG biofeedback , job stress management training , and office workstation adjustment for UEMSD and symptoms .
The burden of disabling musculoskeletal pain and injuries ( musculoskeletal disorders , MSDs ) arising from work-related causes in many workplaces remains substantial .
There is little consensus on the most appropriate interventions for MSDs .
Our objective was to up date a systematic review of workplace-based interventions for preventing and managing  upper extremity MSD ( UEMSD ) .