Is neurofeedback an efficacious treatment for ADHD? A randomised controlled clinical trial. Neurofeedback in ADHD: a single-blind randomized controlled trial Neurofeedback training in children with ADHD: 6-month follow-up of a randomised controlled trial Neurofeedback and Cognitive Attention Training for Children with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Schools A Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating the Effects of Neurofeedback, Methylphenidate, and Physical Activity on Event-Related Potentials in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. A Proposed Multisite Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial of Neurofeedback for ADHD Neurofeedback in children with ADHD: Specific event-related potential findings of a randomized controlled trial A randomized controlled trial into the effects of neurofeedback, methylphenidate, and physical activity on EEG power spectra in children with ADHD. Neurofeedback, sham neurofeedback, and cognitive-behavioural group therapy in adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a triple-blind, randomised, controlled trial. What future research should bring to help resolving the debate about the efficacy of EEG-neurofeedback in children with ADHD Real‐time fMRI neurofeedback in adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder fMRI Neurofeedback Training for Increasing Anterior Cingulate Cortex Activation in Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. An Exploratory Randomized, Single-Blinded Study In-School Neurofeedback Training for ADHD: Sustained Improvements From a Randomized Control Trial 1-year follow-up of neurofeedback treatment in adolescents with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: randomised controlled trial EEG Neurofeedback for ADHD An RCT into the effects of neurofeedback on neurocognitive functioning compared to stimulant medication and physical activity in children with ADHD Distinct EEG effects related to neurofeedback training in children with ADHD: a randomized controlled trial.
BACKGROUND For children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) , a reduction of inattention , impulsivity and hyperactivity by neurofeedback ( NF ) has been reported in several studies . But so far , unspecific training effects have not been adequately controlled for and /or studies do not provide sufficient statistical power . To overcome these method ological shortcomings we evaluated the clinical efficacy of neurofeedback in children with ADHD in a multisite r and omised controlled study using a computerised attention skills training as a control condition . METHODS 102 children with ADHD , aged 8 to 12 years , participated in the study . Children performed either 36 sessions of NF training or a computerised attention skills training within two blocks of about four weeks each ( r and omised group assignment ) . The combined NF treatment consisted of one block of theta/beta training and one block of slow cortical potential ( SCP ) training . Pre-training , intermediate and post-training assessment encompassed several behaviour rating scales ( e.g. , the German ADHD rating scale , FBB-HKS ) completed by parents and teachers . Evaluation ( ' placebo ' ) scales were applied to control for parental expectations and satisfaction with the treatment . RESULTS For parent and teacher ratings , improvements in the NF group were superior to those of the control group . For the parent-rated FBB-HKS total score ( primary outcome measure ) , the effect size was .60 . Comparable effects were obtained for the two NF protocol s ( theta/beta training , SCP training ) . Parental attitude towards the treatment did not differ between NF and control group . CONCLUSIONS Superiority of the combined NF training indicates clinical efficacy of NF in children with ADHD . Future studies should further address the specificity of effects and how to optimise the benefit of NF as treatment module for ADHD Neurofeedback treatment has been demonstrated to reduce inattention , impulsivity and hyperactivity in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) . However , previous studies did not adequately control confounding variables or did not employ a r and omized reinforcer-controlled design . This study addresses those method ological shortcomings by comparing the effects of the following two matched biofeedback training variants on the primary symptoms of ADHD : EEG neurofeedback ( NF ) aim ing at theta/beta ratio reduction and EMG biofeedback ( BF ) aim ing at forehead muscle relaxation . Thirty-five children with ADHD ( 26 boys , 9 girls ; 6–14 years old ) were r and omly assigned to either the therapy group ( NF ; n = 18 ) or the control group ( BF ; n = 17 ) . Treatment for both groups consisted of 30 sessions . Pre- and post-treatment assessment consisted of psychophysiological measures , behavioural rating scales completed by parents and teachers , as well as psychometric measures . Training effectively reduced theta/beta ratios and EMG levels in the NF and BF groups , respectively . Parents reported significant reductions in primary ADHD symptoms , and inattention improvements in the NF group were higher compared to the control intervention ( BF , dcorr = −.94 ) . NF training also improved attention and reaction times on the psychometric measures . The results indicate that NF effectively reduced inattention symptoms on parent rating scales and reaction time in neuropsychological tests . However , regarding hyperactivity and impulsivity symptoms , the results imply that non-specific factors , such as behavioural contingencies , self-efficacy , structured learning environment and feed-forward processes , may also contribute to the positive behavioural effects induced by neurofeedback training Neurofeedback ( NF ) could help to improve attentional and self-management capabilities in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) . In a r and omised controlled trial , NF training was found to be superior to a computerised attention skills training ( AST ) ( Gevensleben et al. in J Child Psychol Psychiatry 50(7):780–789 , 2009 ) . In the present paper , treatment effects at 6-month follow-up were studied . 94 children with ADHD , aged 8–12 years , completed either 36 sessions of NF training ( n = 59 ) or a computerised AST ( n = 35 ) . Pre-training , post-training and follow-up assessment encompassed several behaviour rating scales ( e.g. , the German ADHD rating scale , FBB-HKS ) completed by parents . Follow-up information was analysed in 61 children ( ca . 65 % ) on a per- protocol basis . 17 children ( of 33 dropouts ) had started a medication after the end of the training or early in the follow-up period . Improvements in the NF group ( n = 38 ) at follow-up were superior to those of the control group ( n = 23 ) and comparable to the effects at the end of the training . For the FBB-HKS total score ( primary outcome measure ) , a medium effect size of 0.71 was obtained at follow-up . A reduction of at least 25 % in the primary outcome measure ( responder criterion ) was observed in 50 % of the children in the NF group . In conclusion , behavioural improvements induced by NF training in children with ADHD were maintained at a 6-month follow-up . Though treatment effects appear to be limited , the results confirm the notion that NF is a clinical ly efficacious module in the treatment of children with ADHD Objective : To evaluate the efficacy of 2 computer attention training systems administered in school for children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) . Method : Children in second and fourth grade with a diagnosis of ADHD ( n = 104 ) were r and omly assigned to neurofeedback ( NF ) ( n = 34 ) , cognitive training ( CT ) ( n = 34 ) , or control ( n = 36 ) conditions . A 2-point growth model assessed change from pre-post intervention on parent reports ( Conners 3-Parent [ Conners 3-P ] ; Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function [ BRIEF ] rating scale ) , teacher reports ( Swanson , Kotkin , Agler , M-Flynn and Pelham scale [ SKAMP ] ; Conners 3-Teacher [ Conners 3-T ] ) , and systematic classroom observations ( Behavioral Observation of Students in Schools [ BOSS ] ) . Paired t tests and an analysis of covariance assessed change in medication . Results : Children who received NF showed significant improvement compared with those in the control condition on the Conners 3-P Attention , Executive Functioning and Global Index , on all BRIEF summary indices , and on BOSS motor/verbal off-task behavior . Children who received CT showed no improvement compared to the control condition . Children in the NF condition showed significant improvements compared to those in the CT condition on Conners 3-P Executive Functioning , all BRIEF summary indices , SKAMP Attention , and Conners 3-T Inattention subscales . Stimulant medication dosage in methylpheni date equivalencies significantly increased for children in the CT ( 8.54 mg ) and control ( 7.05 mg ) conditions but not for those in the NF condition ( 0.29 mg ) . Conclusion : Neurofeedback made greater improvements in ADHD symptoms compared to both the control and CT conditions . Thus , NF is a promising attention training treatment intervention for children with ADHD OBJECTIVE Electroencephalographic ( EEG ) neurofeedback ( NF ) is considered a nonpharmacological alternative for medication in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) . Comparisons of the behavioral efficacy of NF and medication have produced inconsistent results . EEG measures can provide insight into treatment mechanisms , but have received little consideration . In this r and omized controlled trial ( RCT ) , effects of NF were compared with methylpheni date ( MPH ) , and physical activity ( PA ) in children with ADHD on event-related potential ( ERP ) indices of response inhibition , which are involved in ADHD psychopathology . METHODS Using a multicenter three way parallel group RCT design , 112 children with a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , 4th ed . ( DSM-IV ) ( American Psychiatric Association 1994 ) diagnosis of ADHD , between 7 and 13 years of age , were initially included .  NF training consisted of 30 sessions of theta/beta training at Cz over a 10 week period . PA training was a semiactive control group , matched in frequency and duration . MPH was titrated using a double-blind placebo controlled procedure in 6 weeks , followed by a stable dose for 4 weeks . ERP measures of response inhibition , N2 and P3 , were available for 81 children at pre- and postintervention ( n = 32 NF , n = 25 MPH , n = 24 PA ) . RESULTS Only the medication group showed a specific increase in P3 amplitude compared with NF ( partial eta-squared [ ηp(2 ) ] = 0.121 ) and PA ( ηp(2 ) = 0.283 ) , which was related to improved response inhibition . Source localization of medication effects on P3 amplitude indicated increased activation primarily in thalamic and striatal nuclei . CONCLUSIONS This is the first study that simultaneously compared NF with stimulant treatment and a semiactive control group . Only stimulant treatment demonstrated specific improvements in brain function related to response inhibition . These results are in line with recent doubts on the efficacy and specificity of NF as treatment for ADHD . CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION Train Your Brain ? Exercise and Neurofeedback Intervention for ADHD , https:// clinical trials.gov/show/NCT01363544 , Ref . No. NCT01363544 Objective : Additional treatments with persisting benefit are needed for ADHD . Because ADHD often shows excessive theta electroencephalogram ( EEG ) power , low beta , and excessive theta-beta ratio ( TBR ) , a promising treatment is neurofeedback ( NF ) downtraining TBR . Although several nonblind r and omized clinical trials ( RCTs ) show a medium-large benefit for NF , a well-blinded , sham-controlled RCT is needed to differentiate specific from nonspecific effects . Method : Experts in NF , ADHD , clinical trials , and statistics collaborated to design a double-blind multisite RCT . Results / Conclusion : At four sites , 180 children aged 7 to 10 years with rigorously diagnosed ADHD and TBR ≥ 5 will be r and omized to active TBR-NF versus sham NF of equal duration , intensity , and appearance . Sham , utilizing prerecorded EEGs with participant artifacts superimposed , will keep participants and staff blind . Treatment fidelity will be trained/monitored by acknowledged NF leaders . Multidomain assessment s before , during , and after treatment ( follow-up to 2 years ) will also include tests of blinding and sham inertness OBJECTIVE In a r and omized controlled trial , we could demonstrate clinical efficacy of neurofeedback ( NF ) training for children with ADHD ( Gevensleben et al. , 2009a ) . The present investigation aim ed at learning more about the neuronal mechanisms of NF training . METHODS Children with ADHD either completed a NF training or a computerized attention skills training ( ratio 3:2 ) . NF training consisted of one block of theta/beta training and one block of slow cortical potential ( SCP ) training , each comprising 18 training units . At three times ( pre-training , between the two training blocks and at post-training ) , event-related potentials ( ERP ) were recorded during the Attention Network Test . ERP analysis focused on the P3 , reflecting inter alia attentional re sources for stimulus evaluation , and the contingent negative variation ( CNV ) , primarily related to cognitive preparation . RESULTS After NF training , an increase of the CNV in cue trials could be observed , which was specific for the SCP training . A larger pre-training CNV was associated with a larger reduction of ADHD symptomatology for SCP training . CONCLUSIONS CNV effects reflect neuronal circuits underlying re source allocation during cognitive preparation . These distinct ERP effects are closely related to a successful NF training in children with ADHD . In future studies , neurophysiological recordings could help to optimize and individualize NF training . SIGNIFICANCE The findings contribute to a better underst and ing of the mechanisms underlying NF training in children with ADHD BACKGROUND The clinical and neurophysiological effects of neurofeedback ( NF ) as treatment for children with ADHD are still unclear . This r and omized controlled trial ( RCT ) examined electroencephalogram ( EEG ) power spectra before and after NF compared to methylpheni date ( MPH ) treatment and physical activity ( PA ) - as semi-active control group - during resting and active ( effortful ) task conditions to determine whether NF can induce sustained alterations in brain function . METHODS Using a multicentre three-way parallel group RCT design , 112 children with a DSM-IV diagnosis of ADHD , aged between 7 and 13 years , were initially included . NF training consisted of 30 sessions of theta/beta training at Cz over a 10-week period . PA training was a semi-active control group , matched in frequency and duration . Methylpheni date was titrated using a double-blind placebo controlled procedure in 6 weeks , followed by a stable dose for 4 weeks . EEG power spectra measures during eyes open ( EO ) , eyes closed ( EC ) and task ( effortful ) conditions were available for 81 children at pre- and postintervention ( n = 29 NF , n = 25 MPH , n = 27 PA ) . CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION Train Your Brain ? Exercise and Neurofeedback Intervention for ADHD , https:// clinical trials.gov/show/;NCT01363544 , Ref . No. NCT01363544 . RESULTS Both NF and MPH result ed in comparable reductions in theta power from pre- to postintervention during the EO condition compared to PA ( ηp ( 2 ) = .08 and .12 ) . For NF , greater reductions in theta were related to greater reductions in ADHD symptoms . During the task condition , only MPH showed reductions in theta and alpha power compared to PA ( ηp ( 2 ) = .10 and .12 ) . CONCLUSIONS This study provides evidence for specific neurophysiological effects after theta/beta NF and MPH treatment in children with ADHD . However , for NF these effects did not generalize to an active task condition , potentially explaining reduced behavioural effects of NF in the classroom BACKGROUND Many studies suggest that electroencephalographic ( EEG ) neurofeedback might be beneficial in the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) . However , numbers of well controlled studies are low and neurofeedback techniques are regarded as highly controversial . The present trial examined the efficacy ( compared with sham neurofeedback ) and efficiency ( compared with meta-cognitive therapy ) of a st and ard EEG neurofeedback protocol in adults with ADHD . METHODS We did a concurrent , triple-blind , r and omised , controlled trial using authorised deception in adults with ADHD from one centre ( University of Tübingen ) in Tübingen , Germany . Participants were eligible if they fulfilled the DSM-IV-TR criteria for ADHD , were aged between 18 years and 60 years , and had no or stable use of medication for at least 2 months with no intention to change . We excluded participants who had comorbid schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder , bipolar disorder , borderline personality disorder , epilepsy , or traumatic brain injury ; substance abuse or dependence ; or current or planned other psychological treatment . Those eligible were r and omly assigned to three groups : a neurofeedback group which received 30 verum θ-to-β neurofeedback sessions over 15 weeks , a sham neurofeedback group which received 15 sham followed by 15 verum θ-to-β neurofeedback sessions over 15 weeks , or a meta-cognitive group therapy group which received 12 sessions over 12 weeks . Participants were assigned equally to one of the three interventions through a computerised minimisation r and omisation procedure stratified by sex , age , and baseline symptom severity of ADHD . Participants were masked as to whether they were receiving neurofeedback or sham neurofeedback , but those receiving meta-cognitive therapy were aware of their treatment . Clinical assessors ( ie , those assessing outcomes ) and research staff who did the neurofeedback training were masked to participants ' r and omisation status only for neurofeedback and sham neurofeedback . The primary outcome was symptom score on the Conners ' adult ADHD rating scale , assessed before treatment , at midtreatment ( after 8 weeks ) , after treatment ( after 16 weeks ) , and 6 months later . All individuals with at least one observation after r and omisation were included in the analyses . This trial is registered with Clinical Trials.gov , number NCT01883765 . FINDINGS Between Feb 1 , 2013 , and Dec 1 , 2015 , 761 people were assessed for eligibility . 656 ( 86 % ) were excluded and 118 ( 15 % ) were eligible for participation in this study . Eligible participants were r and omly assigned to neurofeedback ( 38 [ 32 % ] ) , sham neurofeedback ( 39 [ 33 % ] ) , or meta-cognitive therapy ( 41 [ 35 % ] ) . 37 ( 97 % ) individuals for neurofeedback , 38 ( 97 % ) for sham neurofeedback , and 38 ( 93 % ) for meta-cognitive therapy were included in analyses . Self-reported ADHD symptoms decreased substantially for all treatment groups ( B=-2·58 [ 95 % CI -3·48 to -1·68 ] ; p<0·0001 ) between pretreatment and the end of 6 month follow-up , independent of treatment condition ( neurofeedback vs sham neurofeedback B=-0·89 [ 95 % CI -2·14 to 0·37 ] , p=0·168 ; neurofeedback vs meta-cognitive therapy -0·30 [ -1·55 to 0·95 ] , p=0·639 ) . No treatment-related or trial-related serious adverse events were reported . INTERPRETATION Our findings suggest that neurofeedback training is not superior to a sham condition or group psychotherapy . All three treatments were equivalently effective in reducing ADHD symptoms . This first r and omised , sham-controlled trial did not show any specific effects  of neurofeedback  on ADHD symptoms in adults . FUNDING German Research Foundation In recent years a rising amount of r and omized controlled trials , review s , and meta-analyses relating to the efficacy of electroencephalographic-neurofeedback ( EEG-NF ) in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) have been published . Although clinical reports and open treatment studies suggest EEG-NF to be effective , double blind placebo-controlled studies as well as a rigorous meta- analysis failed to find support for the efficacy of EEG-NF . Since absence of evidence does not equate with evidence of absence , we will outline how future research might overcome the present method ological limitations . To provide conclusive evidence for the presence or absence of the efficacy of EEG-NF  in the treatment of ADHD , there is a need to set up a well- design ed study that ensures optimal implementation and embedding of the training , and possibly incorporates different forms of neurofeedback Abstract Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder ( ADHD ) is associated with poor self‐control , underpinned by inferior fronto‐striatal deficits . Real‐time functional magnetic resonance neurofeedback ( rtfMRI‐NF ) allows participants to gain self‐control over dysregulated brain regions . Despite evidence for beneficial effects of electrophysiological‐NF on ADHD symptoms , no study has applied the spatially superior rtfMRI‐NF neurotherapy to ADHD . A r and omized controlled trial tested the efficacy of rtfMRI‐NF of right inferior prefrontal cortex ( rIFG ) , a key region that is compromised in ADHD and upregulated with psychostimulants , on improvement of ADHD symptoms , cognition , and inhibitory fMRI activation . To control for region‐specificity , an active control group received rtfMRI‐NF of the left parahippocampal gyrus ( lPHG ) . Thirty‐one ADHD boys were r and omly allocated and had to learn to upregulate their target brain region in an average of 11 rtfMRI‐NF runs over 2 weeks . Feedback was provided through a video‐clip of a rocket that had to be moved up into space . A transfer session without feedback tested learning retention as a proximal measure of transfer to everyday life . Both NF groups showed significant linear activation increases with increasing number of runs in their respective target regions and significant reduction in ADHD symptoms after neurotherapy and at 11‐month follow‐up . Only the group targeting rIFG , however , showed a transfer effect , which correlated with ADHD symptom reductions , improved at trend level in sustained attention , and showed increased IFG activation during an inhibitory fMRI task . This proof‐of‐concept study demonstrates for the first time feasibility , safety , and shorter‐ and longer‐term efficacy  of rtfMRI‐NF of rIFG in adolescents with ADHD . Hum Brain Mapp 38:3190–3209 , 2017 . © 2017 The Authors Human Brain Mapping Published by Wiley Periodicals , Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder ( ADHD ) is characterized by poor cognitive control/attention and hypofunctioning of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex ( dACC ) . In the current study , we investigated for the first time whether real-time fMRI neurofeedback ( rt-fMRI ) training targeted at increasing activation levels within dACC in adults with ADHD leads to a reduction of clinical symptoms and improved cognitive functioning . An exploratory r and omized controlled treatment study with blinding of the participants was conducted . Participants with ADHD ( n = 7 in the neurofeedback group , and n = 6 in the control group ) attended four weekly MRI training sessions ( 60-min training time/session ) , during which they performed a mental calculation task at varying levels of difficulty , in order to learn how to up-regulate dACC activation . Only neurofeedback participants received continuous feedback information on actual brain activation levels within dACC . Before and after the training , ADHD symptoms and relevant cognitive functioning was assessed . Results showed that both groups achieved a significant increase in dACC activation levels over sessions . While there was no significant difference between the neurofeedback and control group in clinical outcome , neurofeedback participants showed stronger improvement on cognitive functioning . The current study demonstrates the general feasibility of the suggested rt-fMRI neurofeedback training approach as a potential novel treatment option for ADHD patients . Due to the study ’s small sample size , potential clinical benefits need to be further investigated in future studies . Trial Registration : IS RCT OBJECTIVE : To evaluate sustained improvements 6 months after a 40-session , in-school computer attention training intervention using neurofeedback or cognitive training ( CT ) administered to 7- to 11-year-olds with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) . METHODS : One hundred four children were r and omly assigned to receive neurofeedback , CT , or a control condition and were evaluated 6 months postintervention . A 3-point growth model assessed change over time across the conditions on the Conners 3–Parent Assessment Report ( Conners 3-P ) , the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function Parent Form ( BRIEF ) , and a systematic double-blinded classroom observation ( Behavioral Observation of Students in Schools ) . Analysis of variance assessed community-initiated changes in stimulant medication . RESULTS : Parent response rates were 90 % at the 6-month follow-up . Six months postintervention , neurofeedback participants maintained significant gains on Conners 3-P ( Inattention effect size [ ES ] = 0.34 , Executive Functioning ES = 0.25 , Hyperactivity/Impulsivity ES = 0.23 ) and BRIEF subscales including the Global Executive Composite ( ES = 0.31 ) , which remained significantly greater than gains found among children in CT and control conditions . Children in the CT condition showed delayed improvement over immediate postintervention ratings only on Conners 3-P Executive Functioning ( ES = 0.18 ) and 2 BRIEF subscales . At the 6-month follow-up , neurofeedback participants maintained the same stimulant medication dosage , whereas participants in both CT and control conditions showed statistically and clinical ly significant increases ( 9 mg [ P = .002 ] and 13 mg [ P < .001 ] , respectively ) . CONCLUSIONS : Neurofeedback participants made more prompt and greater improvements in ADHD symptoms , which were sustained at the 6-month follow-up , than did CT participants or those in the control group . This finding suggests that neurofeedback is a promising attention training treatment for children with ADHD Background Estimates of the effectiveness of neurofeedback as a treatment for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) are mixed . Aims To investigate the long-term additional effects of neurofeedback ( NFB ) compared with treatment as usual ( TAU ) for adolescents with ADHD . Method Using a multicentre parallel-r and omised controlled trial design , 60 adolescents with a DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of ADHD receiving NFB+TAU ( n=41 ) or TAU ( n=19 ) were followed up .  Neurofeedback treatment consisted of approximately 37 sessions of theta/sensorimotor rhythm (SMR)-training on the vertex ( Cz ) . Outcome measures included behavioural self-reports and neurocognitive measures . Allocation to the conditions was unmasked . Results At 1-year follow-up , inattention as reported by adolescents was decreased ( range ηp2=0.23–0.36 , P<0.01 ) and performance on neurocognitive tasks was faster ( range ηp2=0.20–0.67 , P<0.005 ) irrespective of treatment group . Conclusions Overall , NFB+TAU was as effective as TAU . Given the absence of robust additional effects of neurofeedback in the current study , results do not support the use of theta/SMR neurofeedback as a treatment for adolescents with ADHD and comorbid disorders in clinical practice . Declaration of interest None . Copyright and usage © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2016 . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Non-Commercial , No Derivatives ( CC BY-NC-ND ) licence Objective : Preparing for a definitive r and omized clinical trial ( RCT ) of neurofeedback ( NF ) for ADHD , this pilot trial explored feasibility of a double-blind , sham-controlled design and adherence/palatability/relative effect of two versus three treatments/week . Method : Unmedicated 6- to 12-year-olds with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ( 4th ed . ; DSM-IV ) ADHD were r and omized to active NF versus sham-NF and to 2X versus 3X/week treatment frequency . Frequency switch was allowed after Treatment 24 . Results : In two school years , 39 participants were recruited and 34 ( 87 % ) completed all 40 treatments . Child/parent guesses about assigned treatment were no better than chance . At Treatment 24 , 38 % chose 2X/week and 62 % chose 3X/week . Both active NF and sham yielded large pre – post improvement on parent ratings  but NF no more than sham . Conclusion : Blinding appears to work , and sham does not prevent recruitment/retention . Treatment frequency of 3X/week seems preferred over 2X/week and was as effective . A large double-blind RCT is feasible and necessary to test specific NF effectiveness Neurofeedback ( NFB ) is a potential alternative treatment for children with ADHD that aims to optimize brain activity . Whereas most studies into NFB have investigated behavioral effects , less attention has been paid to the effects on neurocognitive functioning . The present r and omized controlled trial ( RCT ) compared neurocognitive effects of NFB to ( 1 ) optimally titrated methylpheni date ( MPH ) and ( 2 ) a semi-active control intervention , physical activity ( PA ) , to control for non-specific effects . Using a multicentre three-way parallel group RCT design , children with ADHD , aged 7–13 , were r and omly allocated to NFB ( n = 39 ) , MPH ( n = 36 ) or PA ( n = 37 ) over a period of 10–12 weeks . NFB comprised theta/beta training at CZ . The PA intervention was matched in frequency and duration to NFB . MPH was titrated using a double-blind placebo controlled procedure to determine the optimal dose . Neurocognitive functioning was assessed using parameters derived from the auditory oddball- , stop-signal- and visual spatial working memory task . Data collection took place between September 2010 and March 2014 . Intention-to-treat analyses showed improved attention for MPH compared to NFB and PA , as reflected by decreased response speed during the oddball task [ ηp2 = 0.21 , p < 0.001 ] , as well as improved inhibition , impulsivity and attention , as reflected by faster stop signal reaction times , lower commission and omission error rates during the stop-signal task ( range ηp2 = 0.09–0.18 , p values < 0.008 ) . Working memory improved over time , irrespective of received treatment ( ηp2 = 0.17 , p < 0.001 ) . Overall , stimulant medication showed superior effects over NFB to improve neurocognitive functioning . Hence , the findings do not support theta/beta training applied as a st and -alone treatment in children with ADHD In a r and omized controlled trial , neurofeedback ( NF ) training was found to be superior to a computerised attention skills training concerning the reduction of ADHD symptomatology ( Gevensleben et al. , 2009 ) . The aims of this investigation were to assess the impact of different NF protocol s ( theta/beta training and training of slow cortical potentials , SCPs ) on the resting EEG and the association between distinct EEG measures and behavioral improvements . In 72 ( of initially 102 ) children with ADHD , aged 8 - 12 , EEG changes after either a NF training ( n=46 ) or the control training ( n=26 ) could be studied . The combined NF training consisted of one block of theta/beta training and one block of SCP training , each block comprising 18 units of 50 minutes ( balanced order ) .  Spontaneous EEG  was recorded in a two-minute resting condition before the start of the training , between the two training blocks and after the end of the training . Activity in the different EEG frequency b and s was analyzed . In contrast to the control condition , the combined NF training was accompanied by a reduction of theta activity . Protocol -specific EEG changes ( theta/beta training : decrease of posterior-midline theta activity ; SCP training : increase of central -midline alpha activity ) were associated with improvements in the German ADHD rating scale . Related EEG-based predictors were obtained . Thus , differential EEG patterns for theta/beta and SCP training provide further evidence that distinct neuronal mechanisms may contribute to similar behavioral improvements in children with ADHD
Further data on specificity comes from electrophysiological studies reporting that  NF effectively changes brain activity patterns .
No safety issues have emerged from clinical trials and NF seems to be well tolerated and accepted .
Follow-up studies support long-term effects of NF .
In conclusion , NF is a valid option for the treatment for ADHD , but further evidence is required to guide its use
Summary Neurofeedback ( NF ) is a training to enhance self-regulatory capacity over brain activity patterns and consequently over brain mental states .
Recent findings suggest that NF is a promising alternative for the treatment of  attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) .