Effectiveness of an at-work exercise program in the prevention and management of neck and low back complaints in nursery school teachers. Evaluation of a program to reduce back pain in nursing personnel. The effectiveness of exercise programmes after lumbar disc surgery: a randomized controlled study Lumbar supports and education for the prevention of low back pain in industry: a randomized controlled trial. Lumbar supports for prevention and treatment of low back pain: a systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Back Review Group. Evaluation of low back pain and assessment of lumbar corsets with and without back supports. [Evaluation of specific stabilizing exercise in the treatment of low back pain and lumbar disk disease in outpatient rehabilitation]. Evaluation of Specific Stabilizing Exercise in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain With Radiologic Diagnosis of Spondylolysis or Spondylolisthesis Physical therapy management of low back pain: an exploratory survey of therapist approaches. Efficacy of dynamic lumbar stabilization exercise in lumbar microdiscectomy. Lumbar Supports to Prevent Recurrent Low Back Pain among Home Care Workers The effect of lumbar extension training with and without pelvic stabilization on lumbar strength and low back pain. The immediate and long-term effects of exercise and patient education on physical, functional, and quality-of-life outcome measures after single-level lumbar microdiscectomy: a randomized controlled trial protocol The efficacy of active rehabilitation in chronic low back pain. Effect on pain intensity, self-experienced disability, and lumbar fatigability. Control of the Lumbar Neutral Zone Decreases Low Back Pain and Improves Self-Evaluated Work Ability: A 12-Month Randomized Controlled Study A systematic review of workplace interventions to prevent low back pain. Clinical Trial of Postoperative Dynamic Back Exercises After First Lumbar Discectomy
The aim of the study was to determine the effectiveness of an extension-oriented exercise program in the prevention and management of low back/neck pain in nursery school teachers . A Cluster R and omized Controlled Trial was utilized . Seventy-one nursery school teachers working in nine school buildings were r and omly divided into two groups , with each school as a unit of r and omization . All the teachers in both groups received an ergonomic brochure ; teachers in the experimental group also received an extension-oriented exercise program , conducted by a physical therapist . Data were collected at baseline and at a two-month follow-up . The primary outcome measure recorded was the level of disability ( Rol and Morris Disability Question naire and Oswestry Disability Index ) , while secondary outcome measure included the evaluation of cervical and lumbar physical discomfort ( Visual Analogue Scale ) . At follow-up , a significant improvement was registered in the experimental group as compared to the control group for all the outcomes evaluated . In conclusion an extension-oriented exercise program may be a useful strategy to prevent low back and neck complaints and to reduce consequent LBP functional disability among nursery school teachers OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of a program design ed to reduce back pain in nursing aides . METHODS Female nursing aides from a university hospital who had suffered episodes of back pain for at least six months were included in the study . Participants were r and omly divided into a control group and an intervention group . The intervention program involved a set of exercises and an educational component stressing the ergonomic aspect , administered twice a week during working hours for four months . All subjects answered a structured question naire and the intensity of pain was assessed before and after the program using a visual analogue scale ( VAS ) . Student 's t-test or the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test for independent sample s , and Chi-square test or the Exact Fisher test for categorical analysis , were used . The McNemar test and the Wilcoxon matched pairs test were used to compare the periods before and after the program . RESULTS There was a statistically significant decrease in the frequency of cervical pain in the last two months and in the last seven days in the intervention group . There was also a reduction in cervical pain intensity in the two periods ( 2 months , 7 days ) and lumbar pain intensity in the last 7 days . CONCLUSIONS The results suggest that a program of regular exercise with an emphasis on ergonomics can reduce musculoskeletal symptoms in nursing personnel Objective : To compare two different exercise programmes versus a control group , after lumbar disc surgery . Design : A prospect i ve , single-blind , r and omized controlled study . Setting : Outpatient clinic of Istanbul Faculty of Medicine , Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation . Subjects : Sixty patients diagnosed as having single level lumbar disc herniation with clinical examination and MRI evaluation and who had undergone lumbar discectomy ( post-operative first month ) at a single level . Patients with serious pathologies involving the cardiac and respiratory systems that could prevent them from doing exercises were excluded . Intervention : The patients were r and omly split into three groups . The first group received an intensive exercise programme and back school education while the second group received a home exercise programme and back school education . The third group was defined as the control group and did not receive education or exercise . Main measures : The patients were evaluated at the beginning and end of the treatment with clinical parameters , pain levels , endurance tests and weight-lifting tests , modified Oswestry Disability Index , Beck Depression Inventory , Low Back Pain Rating Scale and return to work . Results : The groups doing exercises experienced a decrease in the severity of pain and disability , also functional parameters showed better improvement than the control group . The intensive exercise programme was better than the home exercise programme . Conclusions : It seems that intensive exercise is more effective in reduction of pain and disability , but whether it is cost-effective is not clear CONTEXT Low back pain is a frequent and costly health problem . Prevention of low back pain is important both for the individual patient and from an economic perspective . OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy of lumbar supports and education in the prevention of low back pain in industry . DESIGN A r and omized controlled trial with a factorial design . SETTING The cargo department of an airline company in the Netherl and s. PARTICIPANTS A total of 312 workers were r and omized , of whom 282 were available for the 6-month follow-up . INTERVENTIONS Subjects were r and omly assigned to 4 groups : ( 1 ) education ( lifting instructions ) and lumbar support , ( 2 ) education , ( 3 ) lumbar support , and ( 4 ) no intervention . Education consisted of 3 group sessions on lifting techniques with a total duration of 5 hours . Lumbar supports were recommended to be used during working hours for 6 months . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Low back pain incidence and sick leave because of back pain during the 6-month intervention period . RESULTS Compliance with wearing the lumbar support at least half the time was 43 % . In the 282 subjects for whom data were available , no statistically significant differences in back pain incidence ( 48 [ 36 % ] of 134 with lumbar support vs 51 [ 34 % ] of 148 without , P=.81 ) or in sick leave because of low back pain ( mean , 0.4 days per month with lumbar support vs 0.4 days without , P=.52 ) were found among the intervention groups . In a subgroup of subjects with low back pain at baseline , lumbar supports reduced the number of days with low back pain per month ( median , 1.2 vs 6.5 days per month ; P=.03 ) . CONCLUSIONS Overall , lumbar supports or education did not lead to a reduction in low back pain incidence or sick leave . The results of the subgroup analysis need to be confirmed by future research . Based on our results , the use of education or lumbar supports can not be recommended in the prevention of low back pain in industry STUDY DESIGN A systematic review of r and omized and nonr and omized controlled trials . SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Lumbar supports are used in the treatment of low back pain , but also to prevent the onset ( primary prevention ) or recurrences of a low back pain episode ( secondary prevention ) . OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of lumbar sup-ports for prevention and treatment of nonspecific low back pain .  METHODS The Medline , Cinahl , and Current Contents data bases ; the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register up to September 1999 ; and the Embase data base up to September 1998 were all search ed . References of identified trials and systematic review s were review ed and the Science Citation Index used to identify additional trials . Method ologic quality assessment and data extraction were performed by two review ers independently . A quantitative analysis was performed in which the strength of evidence was classified as strong , moderate , limited or conflicting , and no evidence . RESULTS Five r and omized and two nonr and omized preventive trials and six r and omized therapeutic trials were included in the review . Only 4 of the 13 studies were of high quality . There was moderate evidence that lumbar supports are not effective for primary prevention . No evidence was found on the effectiveness of lumbar supports for secondary prevention . The systematic review of therapeutic trials showed that there is limited evidence that lumbar supports are more effective than no treatment , whereas it is still unclear whether lumbar supports are more effective than other interventions for treatment of low back pain . CONCLUSIONS There continues to be a need for high quality r and omized trials on the effectiveness of lumbar supports . One of the most essential issues to tackle in these future trials seems to be the realization of adequate compliance A method is described for evaluating the progress of patients with back pain .  Various symptoms were scored on analogue scales and spinal motion was measured by various techniques . These data were integrated to make subjective and objective indices respectively . Reasonable reproducibility of the measurements was obtained . This technique was used to eluci date the role of the lumbar support in surgical corsets in relief of back pain .  Sufferers from back pain were r and omly allocated to corsets with and without lumbar supports . There was significant improvement in those with a support compared with those without . On the other h and objective changes measured with the corset removed did not differ between the 2 groups . This study indicates that the spinal support in a lumbosacral corset makes a significant contribution towards the relief of symptoms AIM The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcome of  outpatient rehabilitation in patients with low back pain and lumbar disk disease with a  specific stabilizing exercise of the M. multifidus and M. transversus abdominis . METHOD 99 out patients admitted to a rehabilitation unit were included in a prospect i ve r and omized controlled interventional trial . The interventional group consisted of 50 patients ( 34 male , 16 female ; mean age 41.1 + /- 9.1 , range ; 21 - 54 years ) , 49 patients ( 31 male , 18 female ; mean age 37.9 + /- 9.5 , range ; 19 - 55 years ) were in the control group . Outcomes were assessed at the beginning and the end of the treatment and at a three month follow-up with the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Question naire , the Hannover Functional Ability Question naire FFbH-R , the pain scale SES and a numeric rating scale . RESULTS In both groups there was a significant functional improvement as measured with the Oswestry Score and the FFbH-R. The interventional group showed better values at the end of the treatment . Pain as well could be reduced significantly by the treatment , but no differences were noted between the two groups . CONCLUSION Outpatient rehabilitation improved functional capacity and pain in both groups . Advantages could be seen in the interventional group concerning functional status . The specific stabilizing exercise approach appears to be effective in conservative treatment programs of low back pain and lumbar disk disease Study Design . A r and omized , controlled trial , test‐retest design , with a 3‐ , 6‐ , and 30‐month postal question naire follow‐up . Objective . To determine the efficacy of a specific exercise intervention in the treatment of patients with chronic low back pain and a radiologic diagnosis of spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis . Summary of Background Data . A recent focus in the physiotherapy management of patients with back pain has been the specific training of muscles surrounding the spine ( deep abdominal muscles and lumbar multifidus ) , considered to provide dynamic stability and fine control to the lumbar spine . In no study have research ers evaluated the efficacy of this intervention in a population with chronic low back pain where the anatomic stability of the spine was compromised . Methods . Forty‐four patients with this condition were assigned r and omly to two treatment groups . The first group underwent a 10‐week specific exercise treatment program involving the specific training of the deep abdominal muscles , with co‐activation of the lumbar multifidus proximal to the pars defects . The activation of these muscles was incorporated into previously aggravating static postures and functional tasks . The control group underwent treatment as directed by their treating practitioner . Results . After intervention , the specific exercise group showed a statistically significant reduction in pain intensity and functional disability levels , which was maintained at a 30‐month follow‐up . The control group showed no significant change in these parameters after intervention or at follow‐up . Summary . A " specific exercise " treatment approach appears more effective than other commonly prescribed conservative treatment programs in patients with chronically symptomatic spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Since the release of acute low back pain management guidelines in 1994 , little was known about the effect of these guidelines on clinical practice . The purpose of this study was to examine physical therapists ' reported management of acute and subacute lumbar impairment . SUBJECTS One in 10 registered physical therapists who were r and omly selected from southern Ontario , Canada , ( n=454 ) and all registered physical therapists from northern Ontario ( n=331 ) were surveyed . METHODS In the question naire , case scenarios covered 3 areas related to the management of lumbar impairment : ( 1 ) physical examination , ( 2 ) treatment and recommendations , and ( 3 ) therapists ' beliefs regarding its management . RESULTS Five hundred sixty-nine question naires were returned ( response rate=72.5 % ) . Only data obtained for therapists ( n=274 ) whose weekly workload included more than 10 % of people with lumbar impairment were used in the analysis . Overall ,  patient education , exercise , and electrotherapeutic and thermal modalities were the preferred interventions for acute lumbar impairment ( symptom onset of less than 5 weeks ) with or without sciatica , whereas exercise and work modification were preferred for subacute lumbar impairment ( symptom onset of 5 weeks or longer ) . There was a trend of using electrotherapeutic and thermal modalities with uncertain effectiveness . Only 46.3 % of the therapists agreed or strongly agreed that practice guidelines were useful for managing lumbar impairment . DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION Although the physical therapists surveyed , in general , followed the guidelines in managing acute lumbar impairment , they felt uncertain regarding the value of practice guidelines . Future research should focus on identifying effective treatment approaches and exploring the effectiveness of practice guidelines OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of dynamic lumbar stabilization exercises in patients with lumbar microdiscectomy . DESIGN A prospect i ve , r and omized , controlled study . SUBJECTS Forty-two patients who were diagnosed as having lumbar disc herniation and had been operated on using the microdiscectomy method were divided r and omly into 3 groups . METHODS Dynamic lumbar stabilization exercises were set for the first group and a home exercise programme for the second . The third group given no exercises was considered as a control group . All patients were examined twice , once before the exercise programme and once 8 weeks later . RESULTS Improvement in the first group was highly significant after the treatment ( p < 0.0001 ) . The second group improved significantly more in some parameters ( pain , functional disability , lumbar Schober , progressive isoinertial lifting evaluation ( neck ) , trunk endurance ( flexion-extension ) ) than did the third group . The third group of patients showed some improvement in fingertip-floor distance , functional disability , modified lumbar Schober and left rotation in 8 weeks , but there were no significant improvements in the other parameters . CONCLUSION Dynamic lumbar stabilization exercises are an efficient and useful technique in the rehabilitation of patients who have undergone microdiscectomy . They relieve pain , improve functional parameters and strengthen trunk , abdominal and low back muscles Context Lumbar supports are commonly used to prevent low back pain , but evidence on their effectiveness is lacking . Contribution This trial assigned 360 home care workers with a history of low back pain to a short course on healthy work habits , with or without worker-directed use of a lumbar support . Over 12 months , participants assigned to lumbar support had a similar number of sick days but fewer days with low back pain than did those assigned to the course only . Implication Adding lumbar supports to instruction on healthy work habits may decrease low back pain recurrence , but not absenteeism , among workers with previous low back pain . The Editors Low back pain is a common problem that results in high medical expenses , work absenteeism , and disability ( 1 ) . The reported 1-year prevalence ranges from 15 % to 40 % in a general population ( 2 ) and from 44 % to 72 % among home care workers ( 3 , 4 ) . Various ergonomic aids are marketed for the prevention of low back pain . Workers frequently use lumbar supports to prevent back pain ( 5 ) , but the effectiveness of such supports remains unclear . Recent systematic review s of the sparse evidence on lumbar supports ( 6 , 7 ) concluded that no evidence exists for the effectiveness of  lumbar supports  in the primary prevention of low back pain in the workplace , but 2 of the 4 included r and omized , controlled trials ( 8 , 9 ) reported that lumbar supports might be effective in workers with a history of low back pain ( secondary prevention ) . However , these findings were derived from subgroup analyses , and evidence from direct research on secondary prevention was not available . In cohort studies , a history of low back pain proved to be a strong predictor for the incidence of new episodes of low back pain ( 1012 ) . Home care workers with a history of low back pain may therefore be well suited to secondary preventive measures . In a previous uncontrolled feasibility study , we found that home care workers who had frequent episodes of low back pain reported adherence rates of 61 % to 81 % with lumbar supports and a 45 % decrease in pain intensity when using lumbar supports ( 13 ) . We design ed the current trial to evaluate the effectiveness of adding worker-directed use of lumbar supports to a short course on healthy working methods to reduce low back pain and work absenteeism among home care workers with a history of low back pain . Methods Design Our r and omized , controlled trial included 2 groups . The control group received a short refresher course on healthy working methods provided by their employer at the start of their employment ( Appendix ) ; primary and secondary care for the management of low back pain was available as usual ( 14 ) . The intervention group received a lumbar support in addition to usual care . The intervention and data collection continued for 12 months after enrollment . The Medical Ethical Committee of the Erasmus University Medical Center , Rotterdam , the Netherl and s , approved the study . Participants All participants were recruited from employees of a large home care organization in Rotterdam . During staff meetings , all present team members completed a brief survey about study inclusion criteria that was distributed and collected by the team managers . We included persons who performed medical care or domestic tasks as a home care worker , were experiencing low back pain symptoms at the time of inquiry or had experienced 2 or more episodes ( on 2 consecutive days ) of low back pain symptoms in the 12 months before the inquiry , did not have specific low back pain ( for example , due to rheumatoid arthritis or vertebral fractures ) , and were not pregnant at the start of the study . Because of a possible association between lumbar supports and increased blood pressure and heart rate , we excluded workers receiving medical treatment for high blood pressure ( 15 ) . Employees who met the inclusion criteria received detailed information about the trial , and those who agreed to participate provided written consent . R and omization In the Netherl and s , home care workers provide 1 of 8 functions , each of which requires different skills and tasks . To ensure a balance in workload and working conditions between the 2 study groups , we stratified r and omization by these 8 functions . We also stratified r and omization by low back pain experience at baseline ( current pain vs. past pain ) . The r and omization process used a computer-generated r and om-number table with 16 strata ( 2 low back pain by 8 workplace functions ) , arranged in blocks of 8 within each stratum . After baseline measurements were completed , colleagues who were not otherwise involved in the study and who were blinded to participants ' baseline characteristics used the r and om-number table to allocate each participant to 1 of the study groups . Intervention All participants in the intervention group were instructed to wear the lumbar supports on working days on which they had or expected they might develop low back pain . Participants could select 1 of 4 types of lumbar supports , supplied by Bauerfeind B.V. , Haarlem , the Netherl and s. LumboTrain and LumboTrain Lady are individually adjustable , hook- and -loop fastening , fully elastic supports that are available in 5 sizes for men or women . LumboLoc and LordoLoc are more structured supports , with integrated stays in the back , that have individually adjustable hook- and -loop fastenings and are available in 6 sizes . Participants chose the lumbar support on the basis of fit and wearing comfort , and they were not given advice to direct their choice from among the 4 available supports . When measured by the research er for the lumbar support , the participants were advised to wear the support for a few days in a row , regardless of low back pain , in order to become accustomed to it . The expected duration of wearability of the lumbar supports was 1 year . The costs of the lumbar supports were 75 for LumboTrain and LumboTrain Lady , 56 for LumboLoc , and 50 for LordoLoc . Outcome Measures Our primary outcome measures were the number of days that participants reported low back pain per month and the number of calendar days of sick leave that participants took during the 12-month intervention . Secondary outcome measures were the average severity of low back pain in the previous week , rated on a scale of 0 to 10 ( 16 ) , and functional status in the previous week , measured by using a Dutch translation of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale ( on which 0 corresponds to no disablement and 100 corresponds to fully disabled ) ( 17 , 18 ) . Participants used a calendar to record the days per month on which they experienced low back pain . The intervention group was also asked to record on the calendar whether they had worn the lumbar support ;  thus , the calendars also served as a monitor for adherence to therapy . The calendars were collected for review after 1 , 3 , 6 , 9 , and 12 months . The number of calendar days of sick leave was derived from the staff register and was provided by the home care organization at the end of the study ; this information covered 15 months , from 3 months before the start of the study until the end of the intervention . We could gather only general data on sick leave because employees are not obliged to specify their illness for the employer when they report themselves ill , and registration by a company doctor starts from 6 consecutive weeks of sick leave . We collected information on self-reported , low back painrelated sick leave ; however , this was not a predetermined outcome , and the results should be interpreted cautiously . We administered a question naire at baseline to obtain information on the secondary outcome measures and demographic characteristics ; history of low back pain ; job characteristics ( among others , the Job Content Question naire , Dutch translation [ 19 ] ) ; and other possible confounders , such as additional work ( hours per week and type ) , preference for study group assignment , confidence in pain reduction with use of the lumbar support ( scale of 0 to 10 ) , and confidence in improved functioning ( scale of 0 to 10 ) . Follow-up question naires were administered at 3 , 6 , 9 , and 12 months to measure the secondary outcomes . In the intervention group , these question naires also measured the general satisfaction with the lumbar support ( scale of 0 to 10 ) , several items on comfort of wearing ( 5-point Likert scale ) , and adherence to use of the lumbar support ( 7-point Likert scale ) . We recorded spontaneously reported side events and asked participants about side effects in the question naires . Statistical Analysis We estimated that with a power of 80 % , a significance level of 0.05 , and an SD of 20 days , we would need 140 participants in each study group to demonstrate a difference of 7 days of low back pain per year or sick leave per year between the 2 groups . To prevent inadequate power because of participant withdrawal or low adherence to therapy , we sought to enroll 400 home health care workers . We used a longitudinal marginal model with generalized estimating equation estimates to analyze the data , according to intention-to-treat principles . For the primary outcomes ( number of days of low back pain and number of days of sick leave ) , we used a negative-binomial count data model with a log-link and an exchangeable correlation structure . Covariates ( history of low back pain , body mass index , additional work , and pregnancy during follow-up ) were added to the model separately and were used in the final model if they statistically significantly contributed to the model ( P < 0.05 ) . The scale scores of the secondary outcomes were analyzed by using a normal distributed model and an exchangeable correlation structure . To investigate model misspecification and the effect of missing data , we performed sensitivity analyses in which we used various structures for the working correlation to estimate the models and used multiple imputation techniques to analyze 5 imputed data sets for missing data ( 20 ) . For all analyses , we used SAS , INTRODUCTION A dynamometer employing a stabilization procedure ( lumbar extension machine , MedX , Ocala , FL ) is effective in improving strength and reducing symptoms of low back pain ( LBP ) , and research ers have hypothesized that this effectiveness is due to the pelvic stabilization . However , effects of the dynamometer with and without pelvic stabilization on LBP have not been compared : This was the aim of the present study . METHODS Forty-two chronic LBP patients were r and omly assigned to a lumbar extension training with pelvic stabilization group ( STAB ; n=15 ) , a lumbar extension without pelvic stabilization group ( NO-STAB ; n=15 ) and a control group ( n=12 ) . STAB and NO-STAB participants completed one weekly session of dynamic variable resistance exercise ( one set of 8 - 12 repetitions to fatigue ) on the lumbar extension machine ( with or without pelvic stabilization ) for 12 weeks . Pre- and post-test measures of self-reported LBP ( 101-point visual analog scale ; pre-test mean of 25 ) , related disability ( Oswestry disability index ; pre-test mean of 34 ) and lumbar strength were taken . RESULTS After the exercise program , the STAB group increased significantly in lumbar strength at all joint angles , and decreased significantly in visual analogue and Oswestry scores . However , there were no significant changes in these variables in the NO-STAB and control groups . DISCUSSION Isolated lumbar extension exercise is very effective in reducing  LBP in chronic patients . However , when the pelvis is not stabilized , otherwise identical exercises appear ineffective in reducing LBP Background Low back pain remains a costly quality -of-life-related health problem . Microdiscectomy is often the surgical procedure of choice for a symptomatic , single-level , lumbar disc herniation in younger and middle-aged adults . The question of whether a post-microdiscectomy exercise program enhances function , quality of life , and disability status has not been systematic ally explored . Thus , the overall purpose of this study is to assess immediate and long-term outcomes of an exercise program , developed at University of Southern California ( USC ) , targeting the trunk and lower extremities ( USC Spine Exercise Program ) for persons who have undergone a single-level microdiscectomy for the first time . Methods / design One hundred individuals between the ages of 18 and 60 who consent to undergo lumbar microdiscectomy will be recruited to participate in this study . Subjects will be r and omly assigned to one of two groups : 1 ) one session of back care education , or 2 ) a back care education session followed by the 12-week USC Spine Exercise Program . The outcome examiners ( evaluators ) , as well as the data managers , will be blinded to group allocation . Education will consist of a one-hour " one-on-one " session with the intervention therapist , guided by an educational booklet specifically design ed for post-microdiscectomy care . This session will occur four to six weeks after surgery . The USC Spine Exercise Program consists of two parts : back extensor strength and endurance , and mat and upright therapeutic exercises . This exercise program is goal -oriented , performance-based , and periodized . It will begin two to three days after the education session , and will occur three times a week for 12 weeks . Primary outcome measures include the Oswestry Disability Question naire , Rol and -Morris Disability Question naire , SF-36 ® quality of life assessment , Subjective Quality of Life Scale , 50-foot Walk , Repeated Sit-to-St and , and a modified Sorensen test . The outcome measures in the study will be assessed before and after the 12-week post-surgical intervention program . Long-term follow up assessment s will occur every six months beginning one year after surgery and ending five years after surgery . Immediate and long-term effects will be assessed using repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance ( MANOVA ) . If significant interactions are found , one-way ANOVAs will be performed followed by post-hoc testing to determine statistically significant pairwise comparisons . Discussion We have presented the rationale and design for a r and omized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a treatment regimen  for people who have undergone a single-level lumbar microdiscectomy STUDY DESIGN A r and omized study comparing the results of active rehabilitation and passive control treatment in patients with chronic low back pain with follow-up at 6 months and 1 year . OBJECTIVES To study the efficacy of active rehabilitation on pain , self-experienced disability , and lumbar fatigability . SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Exercises in an outpatient setting are widely used for the treatment of chronic low back pain . The efficacy of the active rehabilitation approach has been documented in r and omized control studies , but these studies have seldom been focused on lumbar fatigability , which is now recognized as a frequent problem among patients with chronic low back pain . METHODS Fifty-nine middle-aged patients ( 37 men and 22 women ) with nonspecific chronic low back pain were r and omly assigned to 12 weeks ' active rehabilitation or to a passive control treatment ( massage , thermal therapy ) .  Pain and disability index , low back pain intensity ( visual analog scale , 100 mm ) , and the objective ly assessed lumbar muscle fatigability ( spectral electromyogram , mean power frequency slope [ MPFSLOPE ] ) in a new 90-second submaximal isoinertial back endurance test were recorded before and after the interventions and at 6-month and 1-year follow-up visits . RESULTS Results of repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance indicated that back pain intensity ( visual analog scale ) and functional disability ( pain and disability index score ) decreased , and lumbar endurance ( MPFSLOPE ) improved significantly more ( P < 0.05 ) in the active rehabilitation group than in the passive control treatment group , when measured at a 1-year follow-up examination . The group difference in visual analog scale and pain and disability index changes became even more significant at the end of 1 year . The change in lumbar endurance was significantly greater in the active rehabilitation group than in the passive control treatment group at the 6-month follow-up , but not at the 1-year follow-up . CONCLUSIONS The active progressive treatment program was more successful in reducing pain and self-experienced disability and also in improving lumbar endurance than was the passive control treatment . However , the group difference in lumbar endurance tended to diminish at the 1-year follow-up Study Design . A r and omized controlled study with 12 months intervention . Objective . To study the effectiveness of a training intervention with emphases on the control of lumbar neutral zone ( NZ ) and behavior modeling as secondary prevention of  low back pain ( LBP ) and disability .  Summary of Background Data . Improving the control of lumbar NZ and enhancing muscle activation patterns ensuring spinal stability have been proposed as means for secondary prevention of LBP and disability . In addition , cognitive behavior interventions have been shown to lower the risk of recurrence of LBP and long-term disability . Methods . Middle-aged working men with recent LBP but without severe disability were r and omly allocated to either a training ( TG , n = 52 ) or control group ( CG , n = 54 ) . The aim was to exercise twice a week for 12 months , once guided and once independently . The outcome measures were the changes in intensity of LBP , disability , self-evaluated future work ability , and neuromuscular fitness . Results . The intensity of LBP decreased significantly more ( 39 % ) in the TG than in CG at 12 months . The proportion of subjects with negative expectations about their future work ability decreased in both groups at 6 and 12 months ; however , the proportion was significantly bigger in TG compared with CG ( P = 0.028 ) . There effects on disability indexes and fitness were not statistically significant . Conclusions . Controlling lumbar NZ is a specific form of exercise and daily self-care with potential for prevention of recurrent nonspecific LBP and disability among middle aged working men A systematic review of r and omised controlled trials was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of  workplace interventions  to prevent low back pain .  Potential trials were located by a computerised search supplemented with citation tracking . The method ological quality of the trials was assessed on 11 criteria and the level of evidence for each intervention was determined , based upon the amount , consistency and quality of evidence from the trials . The review located 13 trials that were generally of moderate quality . The trials suggest that work place exercise is effective , braces and education are ineffective , and workplace modification plus education is of unknown value in preventing low back pain Ninety-six patients who had undergone first-time discectomy for herniated lumbar intervertebral discs were consecutively r and omized to two physical rehabilitation programs : a program of high-intensity , dynamic back extension and abdominal exercises with occurrence of low back pain being the limiting factor or a traditional program of mild , generally mobilityimproving exercises within pain limits . Both groups underwent 14 hours of treatment during a 6-week period 5 weeks after surgery . At 26 weeks ' follow-up , results indicated that patients who did the high-intensity exercises experienced greater success with regard to the patient disabilityindex and work capabilities . After 1 year , a trend that favored the use of intensive exercises could be observed . No differences were found in pain or objective measurements . A rehabilitation program of intensive exercises with occurrence of back pain being the limiting factor appears to increase patient behavioral support , result ing in work capacity improvements and patient self-rated disability levels . The results indicate that a 6-wk , 14-hr postoperative rehabilitation program is inadequate if objective postoperative deficit improvements are the desired goal
There was no evidence for the effectiveness of lumbar supports due to contradictory outcomes of the studies .
Thus there is limited evidence that education does not help to prevent back pain .
All three studies on exercise reported a positive result , indicating limited evidence for the effectiveness of exercise .
The review showed that there is limited evidence that exercise has some effect in the prevention of back pain and that education is not effective .
No conclusive evidence was found for or against the effectiveness of lumbar supports .
OBJECTIVE : To assess the effectiveness of lumbar supports , education , and exercise in the prevention of back pain in industry .