Supervised exercise therapy for intermittent claudication in a community-based setting is as effective as clinic-based. Treatment efficacy of intermittent claudication by surgical intervention, supervised physical exercise training compared to no treatment in unselected randomised patients I: one year results of functional and physiological improvements. Multicenter randomized clinical trial of supervised exercise therapy with or without feedback versus walking advice for intermittent claudication. Does supervised exercise offer adjuvant benefit over exercise advice alone for the treatment of intermittent claudication? A randomised trial. Local Versus Systemic Mechanisms Underlying Supervised Exercise Training for Intermittent Claudication Long‐term clinical effectiveness of supervised exercise therapy versus endovascular revascularization for intermittent claudication from a randomized clinical trial The effect of exercise intensity on the response to exercise rehabilitation in patients with intermittent claudication. Effects of home versus supervised exercise for patients with intermittent claudication. Efficacy of Quantified Home-Based Exercise and Supervised Exercise in Patients With Intermittent Claudication: A Randomized Controlled Trial Exercise for intermittent claudication Predictors of treatment outcome in intermittent claudication. Supervised exercise therapy for intermittent claudication in daily practice. Design of the multicenter standardized supervised exercise training intervention for the ‘CLaudication: Exercise Vs Endoluminal Revascularization (CLEVER) study’ Cost-effectiveness of exercise therapy in patients with intermittent claudication: supervised exercise therapy versus a 'go home and walk' advice. A non-randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost effectiveness of a Supervised Exercise Programme for claudication. Improvement of the walking ability in intermittent claudication due to superficial femoral artery occlusion with supervised exercise and pneumatic foot and calf compression: a randomised controlled trial. Optimizing supervised exercise therapy for patients with intermittent claudication.
OBJECTIVE This cohort study was conducted to determine the effect on walking distances of supervised exercise therapy provided in a community-based setting . METHODS The study included all consecutive patients presenting at the vascular outpatient clinic with intermittent claudication , diagnosed by a resting ankle brachial index<0.9 , who had no previous peripheral vascular intervention for peripheral arterial disease , no major amputation , and sufficient comm and of the Dutch language . The exclusion criterion was the inability to walk the baseline treadmill test for a minimum of 10 m. The intervention was a supervised exercise therapy in a community-based setting . A progressive treadmill test at baseline and at 1 , 3 , and 6 months of follow-up measured initial claudication distance and absolute claudication distance . Changes were calculated using the mean percentages of change . RESULTS From January through October 2005 , 93 consecutive patients with claudication were eligible . Overall , 37 patients discontinued the supervised exercise therapy program . Eleven stopped because of intercurrent diseases , whereas for 10 , supervised exercise therapy did not lead to adequate improvement and they underwent a vascular intervention . Three patients quit the program , stating that they were satisfied with the regained walking distance and did not require further supervised exercise therapy . Ten patients were not motivated sufficiently to continue the program , and in three patients , a lack of adequate insurance coverage was the reason for dropping out . Data for 56 patients were used and showed a mean percentage increase in initial claudication distance of 187 % after 3 months and 240 % after 6 months . The mean percentage of the absolute claudication distance increased 142 % after 3 months and 191 % after 6 months . CONCLUSION Supervised exercise therapy in a community-based setting is a promising approach to providing conservative treatment for patients with intermittent claudication OBJECTIVES to compare the effect of surgery , exercise and simple observation on maximum exercise power in claudicants . DESIGN prospect i ve , r and omised study . METHODS a total of 264 unselected claudicants were r and omised to supervised exercise training , invasive treatment ( open surgical or endovascular procedures ) or observation . One year treatment outcomes were analysed on an intention to-treat basis . RESULTS invasively treated patients showed a significant improvement in maximum walking power , stopping distance , post-ischaemic blood flow and big toe pressure at one year . Patients r and omised to physical exercise training or to the control group did not improve in any outcome measure . CONCLUSION invasive treatment increased walking capacity , leg blood pressure and flow . Supervised physical exercise training offered no therapeutic advantage compared to untreated controls OBJECTIVE The initial treatment for intermittent claudication is supervised exercise therapy ( SET ) . Owing to limited capacity and patient transports costs of clinic-based SET , a concept of SET provided by local physiotherapists was developed . We hypothesized that provision of daily feedback with an accelerometer in addition to SET would further increase walking distance . METHODS This multicenter r and omized trial was set in vascular surgery outpatient clinics and included 304 patients with intermittent claudication . Patients were r and omized to exercise therapy in the form of " go home and walk " advice ( WA ) , SET , or SET with feedback . Local physiotherapists provided SET . The primary outcome measure was the change in absolute claudication distance . Secondary outcomes were the change in functional claudication distance and results on the Walking Impairment Question naire ( WIQ ) and Short-Form 36 ( SF-36 ) Health Survey after 12 months . RESULTS In 11 centers , 102 , 109 , and 93 patients were included , respectively , in the WA , SET , and SET with feedback groups , and data for 83 , 93 , and 76 , respectively , could be analyzed . The median ( interquartile range ) change in walking distance between 12 months and baseline in meters was 110 ( 0 - 300 ) in the WA group , 310 ( 145 - 995 ) in the SET group , and 360 ( 173 - 697 ) in the SET with feedback group ( P < .001 WA vs SET ) . WIQ scores and relevant domains of the SF-36 improved statistically significantly in the SET groups . CONCLUSIONS SET is more effective than WA in improving walking distance , WIQ scores , and quality of life for patients with intermittent claudication . Additional feedback with an accelerometer did not result in further improvement . SET programs should be made available for all patients with intermittent claudication OBJECTIVE Exercise advice is the main treatment for symptom relief in the UK for patients with mild to moderate Intermittent Claudication ( IC ) . Would a weekly exercise and motivation class for 6 months offer adjuvant benefit over written and verbal exercise advice alone ? PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifty-nine patients attending a regional vascular centre for whom IC was the main factor affecting mobility were r and omised to either exercise advice alone ( n=30 ) or exercise advice with a once a week 45 min supervised exercise/motivation class ( n=29 ) . The mean age was 68 years . Baseline and 6-month assessment included a Quality of Life Question naire -- the Short-Form-36 , the Charing Cross Symptom Specific Claudication Question naire ( CCCQ ) and treadmill walking distance ( 3.5 km/h 12 % ) . RESULTS At 6-month follow-up the supervised exercise group had improved their treadmill walking by 129 % compared to 69 % in the advice alone group ( p=0.001 ) . This significant improvement was maintained at the subsequent 9 and 12-month follow-up assessment s. By the 9-month stage the advice only group CCCQ score had improved 16 % from baseline , while the supervised exercise group had a significantly better 43 % improvement in base line score ( p<0.05 ) . Self reported frequency of walks was higher in the exercise class group being significant for improvement in CCCQ score . CONCLUSION A weekly , supervised exercise and motivation class for a 6-month period provides a significant improvement in patients ' symptoms , quality of life , and distance walked compared with advice alone and this improvement continues after attendance at class has ceased The mechanisms by which exercise training improves intermittent claudication remain unclear . In this article , the effects of local and systemic physiological factors on improved exercise tolerance after a supervised exercise program in claudicants are investigated . A total of 60 patients were r and omized to 3 months of supervised exercise followed by 3 months of unsupervised exercise , or to exercise advice alone ( control ) . Supervised exercise increased both pain-free and maximal walking distances . Heart rate during submaximal exercise and resting mean arterial pressure were lower after supervised exercise at 6 months . Serum lactate at maximum claudication increased significantly after 3 months in the supervised exercise group but this change had resolved by 6 months . Symptomatic improvement was accompanied by modest reductions in mean arterial pressure and submaximal heart rate on exercise . Increased serum lactate at maximum claudication subsequently declined despite continued improvement in walking distance , suggesting local adaptations to improve efficiency of muscle oxygen delivery and /or utilization Long‐term comparisons of supervised exercise therapy ( SET ) and endovascular revascularization ( ER )  for patients with intermittent claudication are scarce . The long‐term clinical effectiveness of SET and ER  was assessed in patients from a r and omized trial PURPOSE The purpose of this r and omized trial was to compare the efficacy of a low-intensity exercise rehabilitation program vs a high-intensity program in changing physical function , peripheral circulation , and health-related quality of life in peripheral arterial disease ( PAD ) patients limited by intermittent claudication . METHODS Thirty-one patients r and omized to low-intensity exercise rehabilitation and 33 patients r and omized to high-intensity exercise rehabilitation completed the study . The 6-month exercise rehabilitation programs consisted of intermittent treadmill walking to near maximal claudication pain 3 days per week at either 40 % ( low-intensity group ) or 80 % ( high-intensity group ) of maximal exercise capacity . Total work performed in the two training regimens was similar by having the patients in the low-intensity group exercise for a longer duration than patients in the high-intensity group . Measurements of physical function , peripheral circulation , and health-related quality of life were obtained on each patient before and after the rehabilitation programs . RESULTS After the exercise rehabilitation programs , patients in the two groups had similar improvements in these measures . Initial claudication distance increased by 109 % in the low-intensity group ( P < .01 ) and by 109 % in the high-intensity group ( P < .01 ) , and absolute claudication distance increased by 61 % ( P < 0.01 ) and 63 % ( P < .01 ) in the low-intensity and high-intensity groups , respectively . Furthermore , both exercise programs elicited improvements ( P < .05 ) in peak oxygen uptake , ischemic window , and health-related quality of life . CONCLUSION The efficacy of low-intensity exercise rehabilitation is similar to high-intensity rehabilitation in improving markers of functional independence in PAD patients limited by intermittent claudication , provided that a few additional minutes of walking is accomplished to elicit a similar volume of exercise PURPOSE This study was performed to test the efficacy of a supervised , hospital-based exercise program compared with a home-based exercise program involving minimal supervision , for both walking ability and quality of life measures in patients with exercise-limiting intermittent leg claudication . METHODS Twenty-one patients were assigned r and omly to 12 weeks of supervised exercise or to a home-based exercise group . After 12 weeks the participants in the supervised group transitioned to a home-based program . Both groups were then reevaluated at the end of 24 weeks . The initial claudication distance ( ICD ) and absolute claudication distance ( ACD ) on progressive treadmill exercise was measured at baseline , 12 weeks , and 24 weeks . Additionally , self-reported quality of life status was evaluated using the MOS SF-36 question naire . RESULTS Each group improved ( P < 0.01 ) ACD from baseline to 12 weeks , which was sustained at the 24-week follow-up . Both groups experienced similar long-term improvements ( P < 0.05 ) in ACD ( 521.5 + /- 253.4 meters to 741.9 + /- 365.6 meters for the supervised group , 532.2 + /- 263.5 meters to 715.0 + /- 394.4 meters in the home group , P not significant , between groups ) . The supervised group experienced a greater improvement ( P < 0.01 ) in the ICD after 12 weeks than the home group but not at 24 weeks . The on-site group also experienced significant improvements in ICD after 24 weeks ( P < 0.05 ) . Neither group manifested an improvement in self-reported physical function or mental health as assessed by the MOS SF-36 . CONCLUSION A structured exercise program was more effective in improving the ICD over a 24-week period than a less formal , home-based program . However , if patients are screened properly and receive adequate instruction , a home-based program can be a safe , low-cost alternative providing similar long-term ( 24 weeks ) exercise benefits in ACD Background — This prospect i ve , r and omized , controlled clinical trial compared changes in exercise performance and daily ambulatory activity in peripheral artery disease patients with intermittent claudication after a home-based exercise program , a supervised exercise program , and usual-care control . Methods and Results — Of the 119 patients r and omized , 29 completed home-based exercise  , 33 completed  supervised exercise , and 30 completed usual-care control . Both exercise programs consisted of intermittent walking to nearly maximal claudication pain for 12 weeks . Patients wore a step activity monitor during each exercise session . Primary outcome measures included claudication onset time and peak walking time obtained from a treadmill exercise test ; secondary outcome measures included daily ambulatory cadences measured during a 7-day monitoring period . Adherence to home-based and supervised exercise was similar ( P=0.712 ) and exceeded 80 % . Both exercise programs increased claudication onset time ( P<0.001 ) and peak walking time ( P<0.01 ) , whereas only home-based exercise increased daily average cadence ( P<0.01 ) . No changes were seen in the control group ( P>0.05 ) . The changes in claudication onset time and peak walking time were similar between the 2 exercise groups ( P>0.05 ) , whereas the change in daily average cadence was greater with home-based exercise ( P<0.05 ) . Conclusions — A home-based exercise program , quantified with a step activity monitor , has high adherence and is efficacious in improving claudication measures similar to a st and ard supervised exercise program . Furthermore , home-based exercise appears more efficacious in increasing daily ambulatory activity in the community setting than supervised exercise . Clinical Trial Registration — URL : http://www . Clinical Trials . Gov . Unique identifier : NCT00618670 Intermittent claudication is a common condition leading to significant functional impairment and enhanced risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality . However , despite the functional impairment caused by intermittent claudication , the natural history in the affected limb is fairly benign . Only about 25 % of patients show symptomatic deterioration and only 2 % eventually lose the affected limb.1 This epidemiological evidence has led most clinicians in both primary and hospital care to manage intermittent claudication conservatively , addressing cardiovascular risk factors2 and giving advice on exercise . This may well be appropriate but merely giving advice about exercise is unlikley to be the most effective treatment . Exercise as a treatment for intermittent claudication is not new , with improvements in walking described from as early as 1898 . A recent Cochrane review of 10 r and omised trials of exercise therapy estimated an overall improvement in walking distance of about 150%.3 The exercise component in all but one of these OBJECTIVE To derive formulae to predict the likely 12-month health-related quality of life outcome following different treatments for intermittent claudication ( IC ) . DESIGN A prospect i ve , r and omized , controlled study . MATERIAL S One hundred and seventy-one unselected patients with stable IC were sequentially r and omized to invasive therapy , supervised physical training or observation . Hierarchical analysis was used to identify significant predictors of outcome . RESULTS The strongest outcome predictors were baseline values of the respective outcome variables in all groups . No more than two significant secondary predictors were identified for each outcome variable and no outcome variable was a predictor of any other outcome variable . Result ing prediction equations achieved between 61 and 90 % concordance with improvement ( 75 % considered adequate ) , with best prediction for invasive therapy and poorest for observation . Suggested cutpoints for the various endpoints in the three groups had sensitivities ranging between 65 and 100 % and false positive rates between 5 and 50 % . CONCLUSIONS The derived equations adequately predicted improvement on the various outcome variables in invasive therapy and supervised physical training , and may serve as aids in selecting patients likely to benefit most from a particular treatment strategy . The uniqueness of the outcome variables underscores the importance of implementing a comprehensive set of endpoints relevant to the impacts of the condition OBJECTIVE This study describes the results and functioning of community-based supervised exercise therapy ( SET ) at one year of follow-up . METHODS We conducted a prospect i ve cohort study of community-based SET in regional physiotherapeutic practice s. Consecutive patients with intermittent claudication referred for community-based SET were included . Exclusion criteria for SET were pain at rest or tissue loss . All patients received a diagnostic workup consisting of an ankle-brachial index at rest and after exercise . Interventions were exercise therapy according to the guidelines of the Royal Dutch Society for Physiotherapy . The primary outcome measurement was the increase in absolute claudication distance ( ACD ) , assessed using a st and ardized treadmill protocol by a physiotherapist at baseline and at four , 12 , 26 , and 52 weeks of SET . RESULTS From January 2005 through September 2006 , 349 patients were referred by vascular surgeons for community-based SET . A total of 272 patients with intermittent claudication began the program . Of the 349 initially referred patients , 52 could not perform a st and ard treadmill test but did start community-based SET at a lower level , and 25 patients never started the program . At one year , 129 of the original 272 patients who began community-based SET  ( 47.4 % ) were available for analysis of walking distance . In the interim , 143 patients discontinued the program for the following reasons : satisfaction with the acquired walking distance ( n = 19 ) ; unsatisfying results ( n = 26 ) ; not motivated ( n = 22 ) ; (non)vascular intercurrent disease ( n = 48 ) ; and other reasons ( n = 28 ) . ACD increased significantly from a median of 400 m at baseline to 1100 m after 12 months of follow-up ( P < .001 ) , corresponding to a median increase of 107.8 % . CONCLUSION Community-based SET seems as effective as SET in a hospital-based approach in improving walking distance , however , it has a high dropout rate Abstract The CLaudication :  Exercise Vs Endoluminal Revascularization ( CLEVER ) study is the first r and omized , controlled , clinical , multicenter trial that is evaluating a supervised exercise program compared with revascularization procedures to treat claudication . In this report , the methods and dissemination techniques of the supervised exercise training intervention are described . A total of 217 participants are being recruited and r and omized to one of three arms : ( 1 ) optimal medical care ; ( 2 ) aortoiliac revascularization with stent ; or ( 3 ) supervised exercise training .  Of the enrolled patients , 84 will receive supervised exercise therapy . Supervised exercise will be administered according to a protocol design ed by a central CLEVER exercise training committee based on vali date d methods previously used in single center r and omized control trials . The protocol will be implemented at each site by an exercise committee member using training methods developed and st and ardized by the exercise training committee . The exercise training committee review s progress and compliance with the protocol of each participant weekly . In conclusion , a multicenter approach to disseminate the supervised exercise training technique and to evaluate its efficacy , safety and cost-effectiveness for patients with claudication due to peripheral arterial disease ( PAD ) is being evaluated for the first time in CLEVER . The CLEVER study will further establish the role of supervised exercise training in the treatment of claudication result ing from PAD and provide st and ardized methods for use of supervised exercise training in future PAD clinical trials as well as in clinical practice OBJECTIVES The Exercise Therapy in Peripheral Arterial Disease ( EXITPAD ) study has shown supervised exercise therapy ( SET ) to be more effective regarding walking distance and quality of life than a ' go home and walk ' advice ( WA ) for patients with intermittent claudication . The present study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of SET versus WA . PATIENTS AND METHODS Data from the EXITPAD study , a 12-month r and omised controlled trial in 304 patients with claudication , was used to study the proportion of costs to walking distance and quality of life . Two different incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ( ICERs ) were calculated for SET versus WA : costs per extra metre on the treadmill test , and costs per quality -adjusted life year ( QALY ) . QALYs were based on utilities derived from the EuroQoL-5 dimensions ( EQ-5D ) . RESULTS Mean total costs were higher for SET than for WA ( 3407 versus 2304 Euros ) , mainly caused by the costs of exercise therapy . The median walking distance was 620 m for SET and 400 m for  WA . QALYs were 0.71 for SET and 0.67 for WA . All differences were statistically significant . The ICER for cost per extra metre on the 12-month treadmill test was € 4.08 . For cost per QALY , the ICER was € 28,693 . CONCLUSION At a willingness-to-pay threshold of € 40,000 per QALY , SET likely is a cost-effective therapeutic option for patients with claudication OBJECTIVES The main aims of treatment in patients with intermittent claudication ( IC ) are to improve the clinical indicators of lower limb ischaemia and patients ' quality of life ( QoL ) . The aims of this study were assess the clinical and cost effectiveness of a supervised exercise programme ( SEP ) in patients with IC . DESIGN Non-r and omised , controlled trial . SETTING University teaching hospital . PATIENTS AND METHODS Two groups of patients with IC were studied . Seventy patients were sequentially recruited before and after the establishment of a Supervised Exercise Programme at our unit . Thirty-seven patients ( median age 69 years , 26 men ) received  conservative medical therapy ( CMT ) and 33 patients ( median age 67 years , 22 men ) received CMT plus a 3 month SEP of graduated physical exercise for sixty minutes , three times each week . Patients were assessed prior to and at 6 months following treatment . At each assessment patient reported walking distances ( PRWD ) , treadmill claudication and maximal distances ( ICD and MWD ) , ankle brachial pressure indices ( ABPI ) pre & post exercise and patient reported QoL using the SF36 question naire were assessed . RESULTS Prior to intervention the two groups were well matched . Following treatment , CMT patients demonstrated no significant change in PRWD or ICD but did record a small but significant improvement in MWD .  CMT was also associated with a negative effect size in the SF36 index and in 7 of the 8 SF36 QoL domains , effect size > -0.5 for the domains of Physical Function and Emotional Role . SEP patients demonstrated significant improvement in PRWD , ICD and MWD . SEP was associated with a positive effect size in the SF36 index and in 2 SF36 QoL domains but a negative effect size in a further 2 domains . However , all QoL effect sizes following SEP were < + /-0.5 . Intergroup differences in effect sizes were > 0.5 for the SF36 domains of Physical Function , Physical Role , Emotion Role and SF36 index . SEP result ed in a 0.027 quality adjusted life year ( QALY ) gain over CMT in the first year post-treatment thus the cost/QALY gained of SEP is pound1780 at 1 year . CONCLUSIONS Compared to CMT , SEP increases walking distances , improves QoL and is a highly cost-effective treatment for IC OBJECTIVES To compare the effect of unsupervised exercise , supervised exercise and intermittent pneumatic foot and calf compression ( IPC ) on the claudication distance , lower limb arterial haemodynamics and quality of life of patients with intermittent claudication . METHODS Thirty-four eligible patients with stable intermittent claudication were r and omised to IPC ( n = 13 , 3h/d for 6 months ) , supervised exercise ( n = 12 , three hourly sessions/week for 6 months ) or unsupervised exercise ( n = 9 ) . In each patient , initial claudication distance ( ICD ) , absolute claudication distance ( ACD ) , resting ankle brachial pressure index ( ABPI ) , and resting hyperaemic calf arterial inflow were measured before , 6 weeks , 6 months and 1 year after r and omisation . Quality of life was assessed with the short form (SF)-36 , walking impairment ( WIQ ) and intermittent claudication question naires ( ICQ ) . RESULTS Compared with unsupervised exercise , both IPC and supervised exercise , increased ICD and ACD , up to 2.83 times . IPC  increased arterial inflow ( p < 0.05 at 6 weeks ) and ABPI .  Supervised exercise decreased arterial inflow and increased ABPI ( p < 0.05 at 6 months ) . Unsupervised exercise had no effect on arterial inflow or ABPI . IPC improved significantly the ICQ score and the speed score of the WIQ , while supervised exercise improved the WIQ claudication severity score . At 1 year clinical effectiveness of supervised exercise and IPC was largely preserved . CONCLUSIONS IPC , by augmenting leg perfusion , achieved improvement in walking distance comparable with supervised exercise . Long-term results in a larger number of patients will provide valuable information on the optimal treatment modality of intermittent claudication BACKGROUND The first-line intervention for intermittent claudication is usually supervised exercise therapy ( SET ) . The literature describes a range of exercise programs varying in setting , duration , and content . The purpose of the present study was to examine the exercise protocol s offered and to identify the impact of the intensity of the SET programs ( in terms of frequency , duration , and type of exercise ) on improvements in walking distance ( response ) in the first 3 months . The present study is part of the Exercise Therapy in Peripheral Arterial Disease ( EXITPAD ) study , a multicenter r and omized clinical trial comparing the effects of SET provided by regional physiotherapists , with or without daily feedback , on the level of activities with the effects of walking advice . METHODS The analysis included patients r and omized to receive SET with or without feedback . The physical therapists administering the SET were asked to fill out therapy evaluation sheets stating frequency , duration , and type of exercises . The relationship between training volume and the impact on walking distance was explored by dividing training volume data into tertiles and relating them to the median change in maximum walking distance at 3 and 12 months . RESULTS Data of 169 patients were included in the analysis . A SET program consisting of at least two training sessions per week each lasting over 30 minutes , during the first 3 months of a 1-year program tailored to individual patients ' needs led to better results in terms of walking distance after 3 and 12 months than the other variants . The results of our analysis dividing training volume into tertiles suggest that there is a relationship between training volume and improvement in walking distance and that at least 590 minutes of training should be offered in the first 3 months . No differences were found between program involving only walking and a combination of exercises , nor between individual and group training . CONCLUSION A SET programs consisting of at least two training sessions a week , each lasting over 30 minutes , should be offered during the first 3 months of the SET program to optimize improvement in terms of maximum walking distance
CONCLUSION Exercise therapy increases the PWD and AWD  in patients with intermittent claudication .
Supervised exercise therapy increases the PWD and AWD more than st and ard care .
OBJECTIVE To review the evidence for the effectiveness of exercise therapy and to estimate the additional effect of supervision on exercise therapy in patients with intermittent claudication .