Early Physician Notification of Patient Disability Risk and Clinical Guidelines After Low Back Injury: A Randomized, Controlled Trial Responsiveness of common outcome measures for patients with low back pain. Rasch Analysis of the Roland Disability Questionnaire Disability measurement in persons with back pain: a validity study of spinal range of motion and velocity. Effectiveness of back school for treatment of pain and functional disability in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Concurrent Comparison of Responsiveness in Pain and Functional Status Measurements Used for Patients With Low Back Pain Early Identification of Patients at Risk of Developing a Persistent Back Problem: The Predictive Validity of The Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire Development and Initial Validation of the Back Pain Functional Scale Is Work Status of Low Back Pain Patients Best Described by an Automated Device or by a Questionnaire? Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments Randomised controlled trial of exercise for low back pain: clinical outcomes, costs, and preferences Cervical Spine Outcomes Questionnaire: Its Development and Psychometric Properties Outcome measures in chronic low back pain Shoulder disability questionnaire design and responsiveness of a functional status measure. Information and advice to patients with back pain can have a positive effect. A randomized controlled trial of a novel educational booklet in primary care. The Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: Translation and Validation Studies of the Iranian Versions Level of Distress in a Recurrent Low Back Pain Population Referred for Physical Therapy
Study Design . Back‐injured workers with high disability risk scores on a predictive question naire participated in a r and omized , controlled trial of physician notification , with outcomes follow‐up 3 months after injury . Objectives . To test whether physician intervention improves return to work and self‐ assessment outcomes for people at relatively high risk for disability . Summary of Background Data . Only a small number of back‐injured workers suffer significant disability . Ouick identification of these people would facilitate more efficient targeting and trials of interventions . Controlling variations in practice through practice guidelines has been recommended as a promising strategy for improving care and reducing disability . Methods . Workers filing back injury reports responded to a disability prediction question naire . Those with high risk scores were r and omly assigned to control or intervention groups . Patient‐ design ated physicians in the intervention group received two letters identifying the patient 's risk and making recommendations for care , including the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research 's algorithms for acute low back pain . Predictive accuracy of the question naire and efficacy of physician intervention were evaluated on the basis of work status and self‐ assessment s 3 months after injury . Results . Of the 268 workers completing the question naire portion of the study , 32 ( 12 % ) were out of work because of back pain 3 months after injury . The question naire 's predictive accuracy included maximum κ of 0.277 and a receiver operating curve area of 0.78 . Fifty‐three people completed the physician intervention trial . The intervention had no significant impact on return to work , self‐assessed pain , or satisfaction with health care . Conclusions . Stratification of back‐injured people according to disability risk can can increase intervention efficiency by identifying those who require treatment and sparing those who do not . The apparent failure of risk notification and practice guidelines to reduce disability in this study may be improved by different application methods in the future STUDY DESIGN A prospect i ve cohort study assessing the responsiveness of two disease-specific question naires and a generic health question naire for patients with low back pain and sciatica . OBJECTIVES To compare the responsiveness of the eight scales and two summery scales of the SF-36 question naire with that of the Oswestry Disability Index and Low Back Outcome Score question naires . SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Evaluation of treatment outcome is being determined more frequently from a patient 's perspective , particularly the impact treatment has on current health status . METHODS Patients were recruited from two orthopedic back pain clinics in a tertiary hospital . Patients completed the pretreatment question naire 1 month before treatment and follow-up question naires a minimum of 2 - 6 months after treatment . Patients undergoing surgery were also observed for a minimum of 2 years . RESULTS Overall , the Oswestry Disability Index was most responsive ; however , individual scales from the SF-36 question naire showed equal or greater sensitivity to change than the Oswestry Disability Index in each of the patient subgroups . The SF-36 Role Physical scale was prone to floor effects ( a high percentage of respondents score zero ) , and the change scores from the SF-36 Role Emotional scale varied by 100 points in either direction in each of the patient subgroups . CONCLUSION Responsiveness varied according to which method was used in its calculation . The responsiveness of the SF-36 question naire shows that it can be a useful adjunct in the assessment of patients with low back pain when combined with disease-specific question naires Study Design . A cross-sectional survey using  patient question naires  was conducted . Objective . To assess whether the Rol and Disability Question naire satisfies the Rasch model including unidimensionality and item separation . Summary of Background Data . The Rol and Disability Question naire , the most widely used patient-assessed measure of health outcome for back pain , has undergone several evaluations for its measurement properties including reliability , validity , and responsiveness . However , there is no published work relating to the underlying dimensionality of the instrument and the extent to which individual items contribute to the construct of physical disability result ing from low back pain . Methods . Patients entering a r and omized controlled trial of exercise , manipulation , and usual management for back pain completed a question naire that included the Rol and Disability Question naire . The Winsteps program was used to assess whether the Rol and Disability Question naire fits the Rasch model . Item fit was assessed using the Infit and Outfit statistics . Results . The  Rol and Disability Question  naire was completed by 1008 ( 90 % ) of the patients taking part in the trial . Most of the items in the Rol and Disability Question naire contribute to a single underlying construct . However , four items had poor Outfit statistics , suggesting that they do not contribute sufficiently to the scale hierarchy . Several items positioned around the middle of the hierarchy are not sufficiently distinct in terms of difficulty . There were very few items positioned at the extremes of the hierarchy . Conclusions . The Rol and Disability Question naire largely satisfies the Rasch model for unidimensionality . However , the instrument could be improved through the removal of poorly fitting items and the addition of items at the upper and lower points of the scale hierarchy . The distribution of Rol and Disability Question naire scores should be carefully considered before statistical testing is undertaken . Rasch transformed scores can be used to deal with deficiencies in the scale hierarchy OBJECTIVE To evaluate the criterion validity and responsiveness to change of spine kinematic variables to assess disability in patients with low back pain . DESIGN Blinded comparison between spine kinematic variables , Oswestry disability question naire scores , and work status . SETTING Multidisciplinary occupational rehabilitation clinic of a university hospital . PATIENTS Population -based cohort of 111 patients with subacute work-related back pain who were absent from regular work for more than 4 weeks because of back pain . INTERVENTIONS This study was part of a population -based r and omized clinical trial . Patients were r and omized to 4 different methods of management : usual care , rehabilitation , ergonomics , or rehabilitation and ergonomics . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Oswestry disability question naire , kinematic analysis of the spine during flexion and extension of the trunk , and work status were collected at weeks 4 , 12 , 24 , and 52 after the back accident . RESULTS Kinematic variables were poorly to moderately related to work status and Oswestry question naire scores . Kinematic variables were also unresponsive to change in work status and Oswestry question naire scores over time . CONCLUSION Spine kinematics during flexion and extension of the trunk do not appear to be a valid measure of disability in patients with subacute and chronic back pain OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of the addition of back school to exercise and physical treatment modalities in relieving pain and improving the functional status of patients with chronic low back pain . DESIGN A r and omized controlled trial . PATIENTS A total of 146 patients with chronic low back pain were enrolled in the study . METHODS Subjects were divided into 2 groups : the back school group received exercise , physical treatment modalities and a back school programme ; and the control group received exercise and physical treatment modalities .  Treatment efficacy was evaluated at the end of treatment and 3 months post-treatment , in terms of pain , measured with the Visual Analogue Scale , and functional status , measured with the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Question naire . RESULTS In both groups , Visual Analogue Scale and Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Question naire were significantly reduced after therapy ( p < 0.01 ) , but the difference between the scores at the end of treatment and 3 months post-treatment was not significant . There was a significant improvement in Visual Analogue Scale and Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Question naire in the back school group compared with the control group at the end of therapy and 3 months post-treatment ( p < 0.05 ) . CONCLUSION The addition of back school was more effective than exercise and physical treatment modalities alone in the treatment of patients with chronic low back pain Study Design . Prospect i ve study of two sample s of patients with acute and chronic low back pain , respectively . Objectives . To compare the responsiveness of four functional status question naires , Rol and Morris Disability Question naire ( RMDQ ) ,  Oswestry Disability Index ( ODI ) ,  Disability Rating Index ( DRI ) , and  Physical Functioning scale of the SF-36 ( PFSF-36 ) , and two  pain scales , a  Numerical Pain Rating Scale ( NRS ) and  Visual Analogue Scale ( VAS ) .  Summary of Background Data . Concurrent comparisons of different outcome measurements in back patients have been requested . Methods .  Norwegian versions of the scales and question naires  were completed by 54 patients with acute ( < 3weeks ) and 50 patients with chronic low back pain ( > 3 months ) . Clinical change was estimated on a global change index . An alternative external criterion was the expected clinical course in the two cohorts . Mean changes , st and ardized response mean ( SRM ) , and area under the receiver operating characteristic ( ROC ) curves with cutoff point for highest sensitivity and specificity were calculated . Results . At the follow-up , 63 % of the acute and 41 % of the chronic sample reported improvement on the global change index . Large SRMs ( 1.3–2.0 ) and areas under the ROC curves ( 0.84–0.93 ) were found for the measurements in the acute sample . In the chronic sample , the SRMs ( 0.4–1.1 ) and areas under the ROC curves ( 0.65–0.83 ) were lower , in particular for the PFSF-36 and the VAS . There was no statistically significant difference between the responsiveness in the measurements , except for higher responsiveness in the NRS compared with the VAS when using expected clinical course as the external criterion for change . Conclusion . The results suggest that all the outcome measures were appropriate for measuring changes in functional status and pain in patients with acute low back pain , whereas among chronic patients the RMDQ , ODI , DRI , and NRS were most appropriate Objective To test the predictive utility of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Question naire in identifying patients at risk for developing persistent back pain problems . Design Prospect i ve , where participants completed the question naire and their cases were followed for 6 months to assess outcome with regard to pain , function , and absenteeism due to sickness . Participants One hundred seven patients , recruited from seven primary care units . Results Discriminant analyses showed that the items on the question naire were significantly related to future problems . For absenteeism due to sickness , 68 % of the patients were correctly classified into one of three groups , whereas an even distribution would have produced 33 % . The analyses for function correctly classified 81 % , and for pain 71 % , into one of two groups , compared with a chance level of 50 % . A total score analysis demonstrated that a cutoff score of 90 points had a sensitivity of 89 % and a specificity of 65 % for absenteeism due to sickness , and a sensitivity of 74 % and a specificity of 79 % for functional ability . Conclusions The results underscore that psychological variables are related to outcome 6 months later , and they replicate and extend earlier findings indicating that the Örebro Screening Question naire is a clinical ly reliable and valid instrument . The total score was a relatively good predictor of future absenteeism due to sickness as well as function , but not of pain . The results suggest that the instrument could be of value in isolating patients in need of early interventions and may promote the use of appropriate interventions for patients with psychological risk factors Study Design . A prospect i ve repeated- measures design was applied . Objectives . To examine the measurement properties of the Back Pain Functional Scale ( BPFS ) and the Rol and –Morris Question naire ( RMQ )  and to formulate hypotheses and sample size estimates for a subsequent comparison study . Summary of Background Data . Although there are numerous functional status measures for patients with low back pain , most have been conceived of and vali date d with a group rather than an individual patient as the unit of interest . Also , little has been done to formally compare — this includes the generation of a priori hypotheses , followed by statistical hypotheses testing — the many competing measures . Methods . Subjects were 77 patients with low back pain who were referred by physicians to 10 outpatient physical therapy clinics located in Canada and the United States . The question naires were administered at patients ’ initial visits , within 48 hours of the initial visit , and at 1- , 2- , and 3-week follow-up visits . Reliability , cross-sectional validity , and longitudinal validity ( sensitivity to change ) coefficients were calculated . Results . Test – retest reliability estimates of 0.81 and 0.88 were obtained for the RMQ and BPFS , respectively . The measures demonstrated similar levels of cross-sectional validity . Correlations of 0.56 and 0.65 were noted between a prognostic rating of change and the RMQ and BPFS , respectively . The RMQ demonstrated a ceiling effect .  Approximately 180 patients are needed for a subsequent head-to-head comparison study of the measures . Conclusions . The BPFS appears to have sound measurement properties , and a formal head-to-head comparison study with the RMQ is warranted Study Design . A prospect i ve cohort study of patients with subacute occupational back pain . Objectives . To study the relation between a marketed opto‐electric device measuring trunk kinematics , a widely used specific functional capacity question naire , and work status in back pain patients , and to assess the responsiveness to change in work status of the opto‐electric device and the question naire . Summary of Background Data . Several instruments have been developed to evaluate the functional capacities of patients with back pain , but the relation between these instruments and work status has rarely been studied . Methods . The relation between the opto‐electric device , the question naire , and work status in patients with back pain was evaluated . The study population was a prospect i ve cohort of patients with subacute back pain who were absent from regular work for more than 4 weeks . All data were compiled blindly on the same day , at study entry ( 4 weeks after work accident ) , and at 12 , 24 , and 52 weeks after the work accident . The validity of the question naire and opto‐electric device scores was assessed with partial correlation analyses , st and ardized response mean , logistic regression analyses , and receiver operating characteristics curves . Results . The correlation between the question naire and opto‐electric device scores was low . The question naire scores were significantly related to work status , but the opto‐electric device scores were not . The question naire was responsive to change in work status , whereas the opto‐electric device was not . Conclusions . The opto‐electric device scores were not related to either functional capacity scores ( question naire ) or work status in patients with low back pain , and the opto‐electric device was not responsive to change in work status . Conversely , the question naire was related to work status and was responsive to change in work status & NA ; This study compares the responsiveness of three instruments of functional status : two disease‐specific question naires ( Oswestry and Rol and Disability Question naires ) , and a patient‐specific method ( severity of the main complaint ) . We compared changes over time of functional status instruments with pain rated on a visual analog scale . Two strategies for evaluating the responsiveness in terms of sensitivity to change and specificity to change were used : effect size statistics and receiver‐operating characteristic method . We chose global perceived effect as external criterion . A cohort of 81 patients with non‐specific low back pain for at least 6 weeks assessed these measures before and after 5 weeks of treatment . According to the external criterion 38 patients improved . The results of both strategies were the same . All instruments were able to discriminate between improvement and non‐improvement . The effect size statistics of the instruments were higher in the improved group than in the non‐improved group . For each instrument the receiver‐operating characteristic curves showed some discriminative ability . The curves for the Rol and Question naire and pain were closer to the upper left than the curves for the other instruments . The sensitivity to change of the rating of Oswestry Question naire was lower than that of the other instruments . The main complaint was not very specific to change . The two strategies for evaluating the responsiveness were very useful and appeared to complement each other Abstract Objective : To evaluate effectiveness of an exercise programme in a community setting for patients with low back pain to encourage a return to normal activities . Design : R and omised controlled trial of progressive exercise programme compared with usual primary care management . Patients ' preferences for type of management were elicited independently of r and omisation . Participants : 187 patients aged 18 - 60 years with mechanical low back pain of 4 weeks to 6 months ' duration . Interventions : Exercise classes led by a physiotherapist that included strengthening exercises for all main muscle groups , stretching exercises , relaxation session , and brief education on back care . A cognitive-behavioural approach was used . Main outcome measures : Assessment s of debilitating effects of back pain before and after intervention and at 6 months and 1 year later . Measures included Rol and disability question naire , Aberdeen back pain scale , pain diaries , and use of healthcare services . Results : At 6 weeks after r and omisation , the intervention group improved marginally more than the control group on the disability question naire and reported less distressing pain . At 6 months and 1 year , the intervention group showed significantly greater improvement in the disability question naire score ( mean difference in changes 1.35 , 95 % confidence interval 0.13 to 2.57 ) . At 1 year , the intervention group also showed significantly greater improvement in the Aberdeen back pain scale ( 4.44 , 1.01 to 7.87 ) and reported only 378 days off work compared with 607 in the control group . The intervention group used fewer healthcare re sources . Outcome was not influenced by patients ' preferences . Conclusions : The exercise class was more clinical ly effective than traditional general practitioner management , regardless of patient preference , and was cost effective . Key messages Patients with back pain need to return to normal activities as soon as possible but are often afraid that movement or activity may be harmful An exercise programme led by a physiotherapist in the community and based on cognitive-behavioural principles helped patients to cope better with their pain and function better even one year later Patients ' preferences for type of management did not affect outcome Patients in the intervention group tended to use fewer healthcare re sources and took fewer days off work This type of exercise programme should be more widely Study Design . A cross-sectional study was conducted to analyze a convenience sample of patients seeking treatment for cervical spine conditions . Objective . To develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of a comprehensive , disease-specific question naire for characterizing complaints of neck pain and evaluating the outcomes of treatments for these complaints . Summary of Background Data . There currently are a number of generic and disease-specific instruments for assessing complaints of neck pain . None comprehensively cover the wide range of factors considered essential in evaluating treatment outcomes . Methods . The authors developed a comprehensive , disease-specific question naire for characterizing complaints of neck pain and evaluating the outcomes of treatments for these complaints . In this study , 216 patients who underwent surgery for cervical spine disorders completed the Cervical Spine Outcomes Question naire before treatment , then at 3 and 6 months after treatment . The data were used to evaluate the reliability , validity , and responsiveness of the question naire . Results . The authors have shown that the Cervical Spine Outcomes Question naire has high test – retest reliability , good construct validity , and responsiveness to change after treatment . Conclusions . The Cervical Spine Outcomes Question naire is a comprehensive , disease-specific instrument for assessing complaints of neck pain and evaluating the outcomes of treatments for these complaints . It provides information on demographics , pain severity , functional disability , psychological distress , physical symptoms , health care utilization , and satisfaction . It appears to be acceptable to patients , easy to administer , highly reliable , valid , and responsive . It should be considered for use in monitoring patients with cervical spine conditions and in studies of cervical spine disorders and their treatments The purpose of this prospect i ve , single site cohort quasi-experimental study was to determine the responsiveness of the numerical rating scale ( NRS ) , Rol and –Morris disability question naire ( RMDQ ) , Oswestry disability index ( ODI ) , pain self-efficacy question naire ( PSEQ ) and the patient-specific functional scale ( PSFS ) in order to determine which would best measure clinical ly meaningful change in a chronic low back pain ( LBP ) population . Several patient-based outcome instruments are currently used to measure treatment effect in the chronic LBP population . However , there is a lack of consensus on what constitutes a “ successful ” outcome , how an important improvement/deterioration has been defined and which outcome measure(s ) best captures the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions for the chronic LBP population . Sixty-three consecutive patients with chronic LBP referred to a back exercise and education class participated in this study ; 48 of the 63 patients had complete data . Five question naires were administered initially and after the 5-week back class intervention . Also at 5 weeks , patients completed a global impression of change as a reflection of meaningful change in patient status . Score changes in the five different question naires were subjected to both distribution- and anchor-based methods : st and ard error of measurement ( SEM ) and receiver operating characteristic ( ROC ) curves to define clinical improvement . From these methods , the minimal clinical ly important difference ( MCID ) defined as the smallest difference that patients and clinicians perceive to be worthwhile is presented for each instrument . Based on the SEM , a point score change of 2.4 in the NRS , 5 in the RMDQ , 17 in the ODI , 11 on the PSEQ , and 1.4 on the PSFS corresponded to the MCID . Based on ROC curve analysis , a point score change of 4 points for both the NRS and RMDQ , 8 points for the ODI , 9 points for the PSEQ and 2 points for the PSFS corresponded to the MCID . The ROC analysis demonstrated that both the PSEQ and PSFS are responsive to clinical ly important change over time . The NRS was found to be least responsive . The exact value of the MCID is not a fixed value and is dependent on the assessment method used to calculate the score change . Based on ROC curve analysis the PSFS and PSEQ were more responsive than the other scales in measuring change in patients with chronic LBP following participation in a back class programme . However , due to the small sample size , the lack of observed worsening of symptoms over time , the single centre and intervention studied these results which need to be interpreted with caution The Shoulder Disability Question naire ( SDQ ) is a measure covering 16 items design ed to evaluate functional status limitation in patients with shoulder disorders . The responsiveness of the SDQ was evaluated for 180 patients with soft tissue shoulder disorders , without underlying systemic disorders . These patients participated in a r and omized placebo-controlled trial , in which ultrasound and electrotherapy appeared to be ineffective as adjuvants to st and ardized exercise therapy . At baseline and at 6-week follow-up , patients completed the  SDQ  and rated severity of shoulder pain and their chief complaint , while a research physiotherapist rated severity of symptoms and restriction of mobility . At the 6-week follow-up , patients also rated overall change since baseline . According to the calibrated responsiveness ratio ( CRR ) and the area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve ( AUC ) the SDQ discriminates accurately between self-rated clinical ly stable and improved subjects . The presented results suggest that the SDQ is as responsive as the compared outcome measures , and therefore is ready for use in clinical trials STUDY DESIGN A double-blind , r and omized controlled trial of a novel educational booklet compared with a traditional booklet for patients seeking treatment in primary care for acute or recurrent low back pain . OBJECTIVE To test the impact of a novel educational booklet on patients ' beliefs about back pain and functional outcome . SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA The information and advice that health professionals give to patients may be important in health care intervention , but there is little scientific evidence of their effectiveness . A novel patient educational booklet , The Back Book , has been developed to provide evidence -based information and advice consistent with current clinical guidelines . METHODS One hundred sixty-two patients were given either the experimental booklet or a traditional booklet . The main outcomes studied were fear-avoidance beliefs about physical activity , beliefs about the inevitable consequences of back trouble , the Rol and Disability Question naire , and visual analogue pain scales . Postal follow-up response at 1 year after initial treatment was 78 % . RESULTS Patients receiving the experimental booklet showed a statistically significant greater early improvement in beliefs which was maintained at 1 year . A greater proportion of patients with an initially high fear-avoidance beliefs score who received the experimental booklet had clinical ly important improvement in fear-avoidance beliefs about physical activity at 2 weeks , followed by a clinical ly important improvement in the Rol and Disability Question naire score at 3 months . There was no effect on pain . CONCLUSION This trial shows that carefully selected and presented information and advice about back pain can have a positive effect on patients ' beliefs and clinical outcomes , and suggests that a study of clinical ly important effects in individual patients may provide further insights into the management of low back pain Study Design . Cross-cultural translation and psychometric testing were performed . Objectives . To cross-culturally translate the Oswestry Disability Index ( ODI ) , Rol and -Morris Disability Question naire ( RDQ ) , and Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale ( QDS ) into Persian , and then investigate the psychometric properties of the Persian versions produced . Summary of Background Data . To the authors ’ knowledge , there is no vali date d instrument to measure functional status in Persian-speaking patients with low back pain ( LBP ) in Iran . To our knowledge , the widely used back-specific measures , the ODI , RDQ , and QDS , have not been translated and vali date d for Persian-speaking patients with LBP . Methods . The translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the original question naires were performed in accordance with published guidelines . A total of 100 patients with chronic LBP were asked to complete a question naire booklet ( the Persian versions of the ODI , RDQ , QDS , Short Form Health Survey ( SF-36 ) , and visual analog scale measure of pain ) . There were 31 r and omly select patients with chronic LBP asked to complete the second question naire booklet 24 hours later . Results . The Cronbach-α for the ODI , RDQ , and QDS was 0.75 , 0.83 , and 0.92 , respectively . The ODI , RDQ , and QDS showed excellent test-retest reliability ( intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.91 , 0.86 , and 0.86 , respectively ) ( P < 0.01 ) . The correlation among the ODI , RDQ , QDS and physical functioning scales of the SF-36 was −0.66 , −0.62 , and −0.69 , respectively ( P < 0.001 ) . The correlation among the ODI , RDQ , and QDS and visual analog scale was 0.54 , 0.36 , and 0.46 , respectively ( P < 0.001 ) . Conclusions . The Persian versions of the ODI , RDQ , and QDS are reliable and valid instruments to measure functional status in Persian-speaking patients with LBP.They are simple and fast scales , and the use of them can be recommended in a clinical setting and future outcome studies in Iran Study Design . Recruitment phase of a r and omized clinical trial . Objectives . To review the published literature on the use of the  distress risk assessment method in different back pain population s and healthcare setting s and compare results with those obtained from the current trial . Summary of Background . Psychological distress in low back pain is commonplace , and distress increases the relative risk of poor outcome with physical treatment alone . The  Distress and Risk Assessment Method  is a tool for use in the clinical setting to assist in the identification of distress and clinical decision-making . Methods . The  Distress Risk Assessment Method and Rol and Morris Disability Question naire were used to assess eligibility of patients with recurrent low back pain for recruitment into a r and omized clinical trial examining different physical therapy approaches . Results . In total , 221 patients were assessed , result ing in 212 correctly complete question naires . Of those 212 , 71 ( 33 % ) showed evidence of marked distress ( 41 depressed and 30 somatic ) . Functional disability , measured using the Rol and Morris Disability Question naire , was higher for the distressed group ( mean 14.1 , SD 4.8 , range 3–23 ) than the nondistressed group ( mean 8.0 , SD 5.1 , range 0–21 ) . Distress and anxiety measured using the distress risk assessment method were correlated to self-reported back-related functional disability . Conclusions . Distress associated with low back pain is common with one third of patients referred for physical therapy at the units studied exhibiting a level of distress that increased their relative risk of poor outcome by 3 to 4 times . Clinical ly , screening this group of patients may help indicate when liaison with other professionals is appropriate and possibly identify those patients who may be too distressed to respond to physical therapy intervention alone
Most of the outcome question naires had a mixed content reflecting various constructs such as pain and symptoms , sleep disturbances , psychological dysfunctions , physical impairments , and social functions .
STUDY DESIGN A systematic literature review of outcome question naires design ed for assessing functional status or disability in patients with low back pain .
OBJECTIVES To provide a comprehensive overview of all functioning/disability question naires used in recent years and to explore how the main concept(s ) was described or defined in the original paper , the content or the domains of disability , and the measurement properties of the question naires .
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA A number of clinical tools design ed for evaluating the functional status of patients with low back pain have been developed .
Only a few have been review ed earlier , and there has been little focus on the content reflected in the question naires .