A randomized clinical trial of early invasive intervention for atrial fibrillation (EARLY-AF) - methods and rationale. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2: results from a randomized study comparing pulmonary vein isolation versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure: Role of catheter ablation therapies. Cardiac rate normalization in chronic atrial fibrillation: comparison of long-term efficacy of treatment with amiodarone versus AV node ablation and permanent His-bundle pacing. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with atrial septal defect: long-term follow-up results Phased RF ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation. Symptomatic and asymptomatic atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein ablation and the impact on quality of life. Natural History and Long-Term Outcomes of Ablated Atrial Fibrillation Long-term efficacy and safety of two different rhythm control strategies in elderly patients with symptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation. Safety and efficacy of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with diabetes mellitus—single center experience Atrial fibrillation: the rate versus rhythm management controversy. Performance of an expedited rhythm control method for recent onset atrial fibrillation in a community hospital. Assessment of clinical factors associated with a successful catheter ablation outcome in younger patients with atrial fibrillation. Randomized Ablation Strategies for the Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: RASTA Study A prospective, multicenter evaluation of ablating complex fractionated electrograms (CFEs) during atrial fibrillation (AF) identified by an automated mapping algorithm: acute effects on AF and efficacy as an adjuvant strategy. Radiofrequency catheter ablation maintains its efficacy better than antiarrhythmic medication in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: On-treatment analysis of the randomized controlled MANTRA-PAF trial. An evaluation of the strategy of maintenance of sinus rhythm by antiarrhythmic drug therapy after ablation and pacing therapy in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
BACKGROUND The ideal management of patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic atrial fibrillation ( AF ) remains unknown . Current practice guidelines recommend a trial of antiarrhythmic drugs ( AAD ) prior to considering an invasive ablation procedure . However , earlier ablation offers an opportunity to halt the progressive patho-anatomical changes associated with AF , as well as impart other important clinical benefits . OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to determine the optimal initial management strategy for patients with newly diagnosed , symptomatic atrial fibrillation . METHODS / DESIGN The EARLY-AF study ( Clinical Trials.govNCT02825979 ) is a prospect i ve , open label , multicenter , r and omized trial with a blinded assessment of outcomes . A total of 298 patients will be r and omized in a 1:1 fashion to first-line AAD therapy , or first-line cryoballoon-based pulmonary vein isolation .  Patients with symptomatic treatment naïve AF will be included . Arrhythmia outcomes will be assessed by implantable cardiac monitor ( ICM ) . The primary outcome is time to first recurrence of AF , atrial flutter , or atrial tachycardia ( AF/AFL/AT ) between days 91 and 365 following AAD initiation or AF ablation . Secondary outcomes include arrhythmia burden , quality of life , and healthcare utilization . DISCUSSION The EARLY-AF study is a r and omized trial design ed to evaluate the optimal first management approach for patients with AF . We hypothesize that catheter ablation will be superior to drug therapy in prevention of AF recurrence INTRODUCTION Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and diabetes mellitus type 2 ( DM2 ) often coexist ; however , a small number of patients with DM2 undergoing catheter ablation ( CA ) of AF  have been included in previous studies . The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of ablation therapy in DM2 patients with drug refractory AF . METHODS AND RESULTS From January 2005 to September 2006 , 70 patients with a diagnosis of DM2 and paroxysmal ( n = 29 ) or persistent ( n = 41 ) AF were r and omized to receive either pulmonary vein isolation or a new antiarrhythmic drug treatment ( ADT ) with a 1-year follow-up . The primary endpoint was the time to first AF recurrence . By Kaplan-Meier analysis , at the end of follow-up , 42.9 % of patients in the ADT group and 80 % of patients who received a single ablation procedure and were without medications were free of AF ( P = 0.001 ) . In the ablation group , a significant improvement in quality -of-life ( QoL ) scores as compared with ADT group was observed . Six patients in the ADT group ( 17.1 % ) developed significant adverse drug effects . Hospitalization rate during follow-up was higher in the ADT group ( P = 0.01 ) . The only complication attributable to ablation was one significant access-site hematoma . CONCLUSION In patients with DM2 , CA of AF provides significant clinical benefits over the ADT and appears to be a reasonable approach regarding feasibility , effectiveness , and low procedural risk Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) represents the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia in patients with heart failure ( HF ) . AF in HF patients is associated with worsening of symptoms and also results in a substantial increase in mortality . Although HF patients in sinus rhythm have a better outcome than patients with AF , several r and omized studies investigating pharmacological rhythm control versus rate control have shown no advantage of one strategy over the other in terms of patient outcomes . Catheter-based ablation therapy is a newer therapeutic option with a rapidly evolving and changing role in the management of this arrhythmia . In the present review , the authors discuss the epidemiology , pathophysiology and prognostic significance of AF in patients with HF . Exclusively addressed are studies investigating catheter-based ablation for rhythm-control and rate-control therapies in the management of AF in HF patients Chronic atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a common arrhythmia with significant morbidity and mortality . AF has been the subject of considerable attention and intensive clinical research in recent years . Current opinion on the management of AF favors the restoration and maintenance of normal ventricular rhythm . This has several potential benefits , including the alleviation of arrhythmia-associated symptoms and hemodynamic improvements . Maintenance of frequents normalization of ventricular rhythm ( NVR ) can be achieved with antiarrhythmic drug therapy or with AV node radiofrequency ablation ( RFA ) and permanent ventricular pacing . Recent interest has focused on the use of class III antiarrhythmic agents , such as amiodarone hydrochloride . This investigation compared amiodarone to AV node RFA and permanent pacing of the His-bundle area in maintaining NVR in patients with resistant chronic AF . After 12 months of treatment with amiodarone ( 200 to 400 mg/d ) 30 % of patients remained in NVR , 30 % were in transitional phase of improvement , and 40 % showed negative effect . Only a few patients in this group developed ocular or hepatic side effects . On one year follow-up was achieved in 100 % of cases without any clinical ly significant side effects being seen . In conclusion , analysis of the results of this study suggests that low-dose amiodarone is well tolerated in the management of chronic AF in a selected patient population . The more aggressive interventional radiofrequency ablation technique is significantly more effective and more reliable in the long-term clinical treatment of drug-resistant AF Introduction Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is commonly found in patients with structural heart disease ( SHD ) , including atrial septal defect ( ASD ) . The feasibility and safety of ablation for AF in patients with unrepaired ASD is seldom reported . Objectives This study aims to evaluate and compare the long-term efficacy of  AF ablation  in patients with and without ASD . Methods From January 2008 to December 2012 , 18 consecutive patients were identified with medically refractory AF and an unrepaired ASD under catheter ablation .  For each ASD patient , four control subjects were matched from our data base . Results There were no significant differences between groups in terms of age , sex , type of AF , LA diameter , LVIDD , and EF . The mean procedural and fluoroscopy times were not different between the groups ( p = NS ) . After a median follow-up of 20 months , the patients in the ASD group had 44.4 % AF recurrence after a single procedure compared with 34.7 % in the control group ( p = 0.11 ) . The mean LA diameter in non-recurrent patients was smaller than in recurrent patients ( p = 0.03 ) . In univariate Cox proportional hazards analyses , the factor found to have a significant association with arrhythmia recurrences was left atrial diameter ( hazard ratio 1.059 , 95 % confidence interval 1.002 to 1.120 , p = 0.03 ) . Conclusions These results indicate that in patients with AF and an ASD amenable to percutaneous closure , a staged approach with radiofrequency ablation of AF preceding closure is a rational strategy BACKGROUND Persistent and long-st and ing persistent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) often requires extensive and /or repeat radiofrequency ( RF ) ablation procedures . OBJECTIVE The Tailored Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation ( TTOP-AF ) study assessed the effectiveness and safety of the phased RF system in a r and omized controlled comparison of medical therapy against phased RF ablation for the management of persistent and long-st and ing persistent AF . METHODS Patients who had failed at least 1 antiarrhythmic drug ( AAD ) were r and omized ( 2:1 ) to ablation management ( AM ) or medical management ( MM ) . AM patients were allowed up to 2 ablations . Index and retreatment procedures consisted of pulmonary vein isolation and ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms . MM patients received AAD changes and /or cardioversion . The primary end points of the TTOP-AF study included chronic effectiveness and safety at 6 months and acute safety within 7 days of ablation . RESULTS At 6 months , a greater proportion of AM patients achieved effectiveness off AAD ( 77 of 138 [ 55.8 % ] ) compared to MM patients ( 19 of 72 [ 26.4 % ] ) ( P < .0001 ) . Acutely , 92.8 % ( 128/138 ) of the procedures were successful while 12.3 % ( 17/138 ) experienced a serious procedure and /or device-related adverse event . The predefined acute safety end point was not met . The proportion of patients with chronic safety events did not differ significantly between groups . CONCLUSIONS Catheter ablation of persistent/long-st and ing persistent AF with the phased RF ablation system is effective with greater reduction of AF compared with MM . More intense anticoagulation strategies , careful attention to catheter placement relative to the pulmonary vein ostia , and elimination of electrode interaction are expected to reduce the risk of stroke , pulmonary vein stenosis , and asymptomatic cerebral emboli BACKGROUND The aim of this prospect i ve study was to evaluate the recurrences of atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and flutter ( AFL ) after circumferential pulmonary vein ablation ( CPVA )  using repetitive long-term Holter recordings , and to evaluate the change in quality of life ( QoL ) , especially in patients with asymptomatic AF recurrences . METHODS A total of 149 patients with AF were followed up with 7-day Holter monitoring at 3 , 6 , and 12 months after CPVA .  We calculated the burden of AF/AFL defined as the percentage of time in AF/AFL , and patients with documented arrhythmia were divided into isolated symptomatic episodes of arrhythmia , mixed symptomatic/asymptomatic arrhythmia , or isolated asymptomatic arrhythmia . The QoL was analyzed with SF-36 question naires in patients with sinus rhythm after CPVA , and in patients with recurrence of symptomatic and asymptomatic arrhythmia , respectively . RESULTS Asymptomatic arrhythmia was observed in 44 % of the patients with documented arrhythmia at 12 months of follow-up . In patients with persistent AF , 63 % of the documented arrhythmia at 12 months of follow-up was asymptomatic and often persistent . In the subgroup of patients with asymptomatic arrhythmia , the QoL improved significantly in the physical scores , in contrast to patients with symptomatic arrhythmia who had unchanged or worsened QoL scores . CONCLUSIONS Asymptomatic arrhythmia is very common after AF ablation . Our data indicate that these patients improve their physical component of the QoL significantly , which may be considered a palliative success of treatment . We suggest that patients with asymptomatic AF recurrences are carefully evaluated before considering reablation . Repetitive rhythm monitoring after AF ablation is very important considering the postablation management of anticoagulant therapy Background —Atrial  fibrillation ( AF ) ablation  is increasingly used in clinical practice . We aim ed to study the natural history and long-term outcomes of ablated AF . Methods and Results —We followed 831 patients after pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) performed in 2005 . We documented clinical outcomes using our prospect i ve AF registry with most recent up date on this group of patients in October 2009 . In the first year after ablation , 23.8 % had early recurrence . Over long-term follow-up ( 55 months ) , only 8.9 % had late arrhythmia recurrence defined as occurring beyond the first year after ablation . Repeat ablations in patients with late recurrence revealed conduction recovery in at least 1 of the previously isolated PVs in all of them and right-sided triggers with isoproterenol testing in 55.6 % . At last follow-up , clinical improvement was 89.9 % ( 79.4 % arrhythmia-free off antiarrhythmic drugs and 10.5 % with AF controlled with antiarrhythmic drugs ) . Only 4.6 % continued to have drug-resistant AF . It was possible to safely discontinue anticoagulation in a substantial proportion of patients with no recurrence in the year after ablation ( CHADS score ⩽2 , stroke incidence of 0.06 % per year ) . The procedure-related complication rate was very low . Conclusions —Pulmonary vein isolation is safe and efficacious for long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm and control of symptoms in patients with drug-resistant AF . It obviates the need for antiarrhythmic drugs , negative dromotropic agents , and anticoagulants in a substantial proportion of patients BACKGROUND We prospect ively compared the efficacy , safety , and quality of life ( QoL ) impact of catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs ( AAD ) in elderly patients with persistent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . METHODS AND RESULTS Four hundred and twelve consecutive patients , aged ≥ 70 years , underwent ablation ( Group A , 153 patients ) or AAD ( Group B , 259 patients ) . Study endpoints : treatment failure ( any AF/AT lasting > 30 seconds ) and treatment-related adverse events ( acute when ≤1 month of procedure and long term when > 1 month ) . At a follow-up of 60 ± 17 months , 43 % and 46 % patients in Group B versus 58 % and 76 % in Group A were in sinus rhythm ( SR ) , respectively , after one ( P = 0.003 ) and 2 procedures ( P < 0.001 ) . Fifteen acute adverse events occurred ( 6.7 % in Group A vs 1 % in Group B , P < 0.001 ) , mainly periprocedural cerebral thromboembolism ( 3.3 % in Group A vs 0.7 % in Group B , P = 0.058 ) . Previous TIA/stroke result ed the only independent predictor of periprocedural cerebrovascular accidents ( OR 1.2 , 95%IC 1.1 - 1.3 ) . At follow-up , 74 long-term adverse events occurred ( 7.7 % in Group A vs 23.9 % in Group B , P < 0.001 ) with Group B patients more often experiencing  AAD-related  adverse events ( 12.7 % vs 2.6 % , P < 0.001 ) . Group A and absence of AF/AT recurrences significantly improved QoL scores ( P < 0.001 ) . CONCLUSIONS In elderly persistent AF patients  , catheter ablation is more effective in maintaining SR and in improving QoL  than AAD but is affected by a higher risk of embolic complications , particularly in patients with previous TIA/stroke . Over time , Group A patients more likely discontinued AAD with a reduction of long-term adverse events Background and objective Little is known about the outcome of  catheter ablation of  atrial fibrillation ( AF )  in patients with diabetes mellitus ( DM ) . We investigated the safety and efficacy of catheter ablation of AF  in patients with DM . Material s and methods Thirty one patients with DM from a group of 263 consecutive patients undergoing a first-time catheter ablation of AF procedure  were enrolled in a prospect i ve study . The ablation protocol ( guided by CARTO system ) consisted in two continuous circular lesions around ipsilateral pulmonary veins . Results The following clinical characteristics differed between DM and no-DM patients : age ( 62.0 ± 10.8 vs. 56.1 ± 10.6 years , P = 0.004 ) , longer AF history ( 9.6 ± 9.3 vs. 6.7 ± 6.3 years , P = 0.024 ) , significantly larger left atrium size ( 41.1 ± 7.8 vs. 38.3 ± 5.8 mm , P = 0.021 ) , hypertension ( 58.1 vs. 35.8 % , P = 0.018 ) and structural heart disease ( 67.7 vs. 43.5 % , P = 0.011 ) . Despite a similar AF recurrence rate in DM and no-DM patients ( 32.3 vs. 22.4 % , P = 0.240 ) , the ablation procedure was complicated in 28 patients ( 11 hematomas , three cardiac tamponades and three strokes ) and the incidence of complications was significantly higher in DM than in no-DM patients ( 29.0 vs. 8.2 % , respectively , P = 0.002 ) . Multivariate analysis showed that DM was an independent risk factor for complications occurrence ( odd ratio 5.936 , 95 % confidence interval 2.059 to 17.112 , P = 0.001 ) . Conclusions First catheter ablation of AF procedure in DM patients was equally efficacious than in no-DM patients . However , DM patients had a higher incidence of complications , mostly thrombotic or hemorrhagic The fundamental management strategy for atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is still debated . There is no doubt that those patients at risk of thromboembolic events should be offered anticoagulant therapy . However , it is uncertain whether rhythm control ( restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm ) or rate control ( adjustment to a physiological ventricular rate while allowing AF to continue ) is the preferred primary treatment option for the reduction of symptoms and major cardiovascular ( CV ) outcomes associated with AF . Several well conducted trials comparing the two strategies led to the conclusion that there was little to choose between them . However , guidelines leaned towards recommending rate control as the initial strategy , and reserved rhythm control for those who remained symptomatic . Recently this status quo is being increasingly challenged by the clear demonstration that left atrial catheter ablation is effective at suppressing AF resistant to traditional antiarrhythmic drugs , such as those that failed to demonstrate any superiority when compared with rate control . Also , recently introduced antiarrhythmic therapy may have superior efficacy with regard to reducing unexpected CV hospitalization , CV mortality and stroke . In addition , there is a growing perception that atrial remodelling should be best prevented by early rhythm control rather than delaying until rate control has proven unsatisfactory . For these reasons the results of large r and omised clinical trials , which recruit patients soon after the presentation of AF and compare ' aggressive ' modern rhythm control against the guideline approach of primary rate control , are eagerly awaited . In the meantime the pendulum of clinical opinion has begun to swing towards a rhythm control strategy BACKGROUND A st and ard approach to recent onset atrial fibrillation ( AF ) in the emergency department ( ED ) in the United States has not been established . PURPOSE The purpose of this prospect i ve clinical trial was to determine how an ED protocol emphasizing rhythm control for recent onset AF compared similar patients receiving  st and ard therapy  in the same facility . METHODS We enrolled consecutive patients presenting to our community hospital with recent onset AF into a protocol , which called for rhythm control with procainamide and if unsuccessful electrical cardioversion and discharge home . We compared this prospect i ve cohort with matched historical controls . Primary outcome was admission rate . We also compared ED conversion rates and lengths of stay ( LOS ) . We reported 30-day data on the study group including ED recidivism , recurrent AF , outpatient follow-up , and any important adverse events . RESULTS Fifty-four patients were enrolled in the study group with 4 being admitted compared with 30 of 50 in the historical control group . Ninety-four percent of the study group converted compared with 28 % in the historical control . Both hospital and ED LOS were significantly shorter for the study group . Six patients had recurrent AF , and 4 of those returned to the ED . CONCLUSION An ED protocol that uses rhythm control decreased hospital admission and LOS , and there were no adverse events at 30 days BACKGROUND Catheter ablation is now an alternative approach to antiarrhythmic drug therapy for patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . We focused on younger patients in whom the prevalence of AF is low , and we sought clinical factors associated with unsuccessful ablation outcomes . METHODS AND RESULTS Among 1983 consecutive symptomatic patients who underwent AF ablation procedures , 95 patients ( 4.8 % ) , age ≤ 40 years , were prospect ively included . Of them , 64 had paroxysmal AF , and the remaining 31 had persistent AF . All patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation . When AF recurred , redo ablations were performed if the patients desired . The mean number of ablation procedures was 1.3 ± 0.6 times per patient . During the follow-up of 40 [ 27.8 - 49.6 ] months , sinus rhythm was maintained in 86 patients ( 90.5 % ) without any antiarrhythmic drugs , but not in the remaining 9 patients ( 9.5 % ) . Low body mass index ( BMI ) and persistent AF were associated with unsuccessful ablation procedures . In multivariate logistic regression analysis , a low BMI had the most significant value , with an odds ratio of 7.33 ( p=0.022 ) . The receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated a BMI cut point of 22.1 kg/m(2 ) , with an area under the curve of 0.773 . CONCLUSION In symptomatic younger AF patients , a low BMI was an independent clinical factor for unsuccessful AF ablation outcomes Background — The single-procedure efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) is less than optimal in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . Adjunctive techniques have been developed to enhance single-procedure efficacy in these patients . We conducted a study to compare 3 ablation strategies in patients with persistent AF . Methods and Results — Subjects were r and omized as follows : arm 1 , PVI + ablation of non-PV triggers identified using a stimulation protocol ( st and ard approach ) ; arm 2 , st and ard approach + empirical ablation at common non-PV AF trigger sites ( mitral annulus , fossa ovalis , eustachian ridge , crista terminalis , and superior vena cava ) ; or arm 3 , st and ard approach + ablation of left atrial complex fractionated electrogram sites . Patients were seen at 6 weeks , 6 months , and 1 year ; transtelephonic monitoring was performed at each visit . Antiarrhythmic drugs were discontinued at 3 to 6 months . The primary study end point was freedom from atrial arrhythmias off antiarrhythmic drugs at 1 year after a single-ablation procedure . A total of 156 patients ( aged 59±9 years ; 136 males ; AF duration , 47±50 months ) participated ( arm 1 , 55 patients ; arm 2 , 50 patients ; arm 3 , 51 patients ) . Procedural outcomes ( procedure , fluoroscopy , and PVI times ) were comparable between the 3 arms . More lesions were required to target non-PV trigger sites than a complex fractionated electrogram ( 33±9 versus 22±9 ; P<0.001 ) . The primary end point was achieved in 71 patients and was worse in arm 3 ( 29 % ) compared with arm 1 ( 49 % ; P=0.04 ) and arm 2 ( 58 % ; P=0.004 ) . Conclusions — These data suggest that additional substrate modification beyond PVI does not improve single-procedure efficacy in patients with persistent AF . Clinical Trial Registration — URL : http://www . clinical trials.gov . Unique identifier : NCT00379301 BACKGROUND Complex fractionated electrograms ( CFEs ) are continuous electrograms ( EGMs ) of very short cycle length ( CL ) representing substrate for atrial fibrillation ( AF ) perpetuation . Ablation of CFEs may result in AF slowing , termination , and prevention , but identifying them can be subjective . OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to prospect ively assess ( 1 ) whether an automated algorithm can identify CFE regions , ( 2 ) the acute effects of ablating these regions on AF , and ( 3 ) the long-term efficacy as an adjuvant strategy to pulmonary vein antrum isolation ( PVAI ) . METHODS Thirty-five patients ( three centers , 61 + /- 9 years , left atrium [ LA ] 43 + /- 9 mm , ejection fraction 53 % + /- 7 % ) with symptomatic paroxysmal ( n = 21 ) or persistent ( n = 14 ) AF were studied . A decapolar lasso ( 2-mm spacing ) was used for mapping . A three-dimensional shell of the LA and pulmonary veins ( PVs ) was created . If not already in AF , AF was induced by burst pacing ( with or without isoproterenol ) . Atrial EGMs during AF were mapped/analyzed using an automated CFE algorithm . The algorithm measures the time between discrete deflections in a local EGM over 5 seconds ( based on selectable width and peak-to-peak [ > 0.03 mV ] criteria ) . The mean CL of the local EGM is projected onto the LA shell as a color-coded display . Regions of CL < 120 ms ( published criteria ) were targeted for ablation/elimination . Atrial fibrillation cycle length ( AFCL ) and regularity were measured from the CS . After CFE ablation , further ablation was done to achieve complete PVAI . RESULTS AF was spontaneous ( n = 20 ) or induced ( n = 15 ) in all patients . CFEs were most commonly found along the septum ( 97 % ) , anterior LA ( 97 % ) , PV antra ( 83 % ) , base of appendage ( 83 % ) , and annulus ( 71 % ) . CFE ablation alone prolonged the AFCL ( 171 + /- 27 vs. 304 + /- 41 ms ; P = .03 ) and regularized AF to left/right flutter ( AFL ) in 74 % of patients . CFE ablation terminated AF/AFL in 19 patients (54%)-the other 16 were cardioverted- and AF became noninducible in 77 % . CFE ablation alone did not cause PV isolation ( 0.1 + /- 0.3 PV isolated/patient ) . After combined CFE and PVAI ablation , the single-procedure , off-drug success rate was 83 % ( follow-up 13 + /- 4 months ) versus 71 % in matched controls who had PVAI alone ( P = .045 ) . CONCLUSIONS CFE ablation guided by an automated algorithm result ed in AFCL prolongation , regularization , and noninducibility in most patients . AF terminated in 54 % of cases . PVAI with adjuvant CFE ablation has a high efficacy and may be superior to PVAI alone BACKGROUND The Medical ANtiarrhythmic Treatment or Radiofrequency Ablation in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation ( MANTRA-PAF ) is a r and omized trial comparing radiofrequency catheter ablation ( RFA ) to antiarrhythmic drugs ( AADs ) as first-line treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( PAF ) . In order to eliminate the clouding effect of crossover we performed an on-treatment analysis of the data . METHODS AND RESULTS Patients ( n=294 ) were divided into three groups : those receiving only the assigned therapy ( RFA and AAD groups ) and those receiving both therapies ( crossover group ) . The primary end points were AF burden in 7-day Holter recordings at 3 , 6 , 12 , 18 , and 24 months and cumulative AF burden in all recordings . At 24 months , AF burden was significantly lower in the RFA ( n=110 ) than in the AAD ( n=92 ) and the crossover ( n=84 ) groups ( 90th percentile 1 % vs. 10 % vs. 16 % , P=0.007 ) , and more patients were free from any AF ( 89 % vs. 73 % vs. 74 % , P=0.006 ) . In the RFA , AAD and the crossover groups 63 % , 59 % and 21 % ( P<0.001 ) of the patients had no AF episodes in any Holter recording , respectively . Quality of life improved significantly in all groups . There were no differences in serious adverse events between the RFA , AAD and crossover groups ( 19 % vs. 8 % vs. 23 % ) ( P=0.10 ) . CONCLUSIONS In the treatment of antiarrhythmic therapy naïve patients with PAF long-term efficacy of RFA was superior to AAD therapy . Thus , it is reasonable to offer RFA as first-line treatment for highly symptomatic patients who accept the risks of the procedure and are aware of frequent need for reablation(s ) AIMS Permanent atrial fibrillation develops in many patients after ablation and pacing therapy .  We compared a strategy that initially allowed patients to remain in atrial fibrillation with a strategy that initially attempted to restore and maintain sinus rhythm . METHODS AND RESULTS In this multicentre r and omized controlled trial , 68 patients affected by severely symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were assigned , after successful atrioventricular junction ablation and pacing treatment  , to antiarrhythmic drug therapy with amiodarone , propafenone , flecainide or sotalol and were compared with 69 patients assigned , after successful AV junction ablation and pacing treatment , to no antiarrhythmic drug therapy . The patients were followed-up for 12 to 24 months ( mean 16+/-4 ) . The drug arm patients had a 57 % reduction in the risk of developing permanent atrial fibrillation ( 21 % vs 37 % , P=0.02 ) . Evaluation after 12 months revealed similar quality of life scores and echocardiographic parameters in the two groups , but the drug arm patients had more episodes of heart failure and hospitalizations ( P=0.05 ) . The outcome was similar between the 40 patients who developed permanent atrial fibrillation and the 97 who did not . CONCLUSION Conventional antiarrhythmic therapy reduces the risk of development of permanent atrial fibrillation after ablation and pacing therapy . The present data do not support the concept that the development of permanent atrial fibrillation is related to an adverse outcome when a perfect control of heart rate is obtained by ablation and pacing
Catheter ablation of AF  safety and efficacy in DM patients is similar to general population , especially when performed in younger patients with satisfactory glycemic control .
Catheter ablation of AF reduces the amount of patients requiring AADs , an additional benefit in this population commonly exposed to adverse effects of AF pharmacological treatments
AIMS Diabetes mellitus ( DM ) and atrial fibrillation ( AF ) share pathophysiological links , as supported by the high prevalence of AF within DM patients .
Catheter ablation of AF ( AFCA ) is an established therapeutic option for rhythm control in drug resistant symptomatic patients .
Its efficacy and safety among patients with DM is based on small population s , and long-term outcome is unknown .
The present systematic review and meta- analysis aims to assess safety and long-term outcome of AFCA in DM patients , focusing on predictors of recurrence .