Small or Large Isolation Areas Around the Pulmonary Veins for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation?: Results From a Prospective Randomized Study Electrogram-guided substrate ablation with or without pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. Substrate modification combined with pulmonary vein isolation improves outcome of catheter ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized comparison. Pulmonary Vein Isolation Versus Defragmentation: The CHASE-AF Clinical Trial. Pulmonary vein isolation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation in patients with impaired systolic function. Pulmonary venous isolation versus additional substrate modification as treatment for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation Randomized Ablation Strategies for the Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: RASTA Study Pulmonary vein isolation and linear lesions in atrial fibrillation ablation Role of pulmonary veins isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation ablation: the pulmonary vein isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation (PIPA) study. Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Does electrogram guided substrate ablation add to the success of pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation? A prospective, randomized study. Pulmonary vein isolation using segmental versus electroanatomical circumferential ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation Is Pulmonary Vein Isolation Necessary for Curing Atrial Fibrillation? Pulmonary vein isolation using "contact force" ablation: the effect on dormant conduction and long-term freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation--a prospective study. Ganglionated plexus ablation vs linear ablation in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for persistent/long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: a randomized comparison. Biatrial linear ablation in sustained nonpermanent AF: Results of the substrate modification with ablation and antiarrhythmic drugs in nonpermanent atrial fibrillation (SMAN-PAF) trial. Ablation of superior pulmonary veins compared to ablation of all four pulmonary veins:.
Background — Pulmonary vein ( PV ) isolation is a promising new treatment for  atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . We hypothesized that isolation of large areas around both ipsilateral PVs with verification of conduction block is more effective than the isolation of each individual PV . Methods and Results — A total of 110 patients , 67 with paroxysmal AF and 43 with persistent AF , were r and omly assigned to undergo either isolation of each individual PV or isolation of large areas around both ipsilateral PVs . The isolation of each individual PV was an electrophysiologically guided , ostial segmental ablation with a 64-pole basket catheter or a 20-pole circular mapping catheter ( group I ) . Isolation of large areas was performed around the 2 ipsilateral veins with a nonfluoroscopic navigation system and a circular 20-pole mapping catheter for verification of conduction block ( group II ) . In both groups , an irrigated-tip ablation catheter ( 25 to 35 W ) was used to achieve complete isolation . Procedure and ablation times were longer in group II , whereas fluoroscopic time was significantly shorter ( P≤0.001 ) . After a follow-up period of 15±4 months , 27 patients in group I ( 49 % ) and 37 patients in group II ( 67 % ) remained free of symptoms of AF and had no AF or atrial flutter during repetitive Holter monitoring without antiarrhythmic drug treatment after a single procedure ( P≤0.05 ) . Conclusions — The rate of success was significantly higher and fluoroscopy times were significantly lower in the group with large isolation areas around both ipsilateral PVs than in those who underwent individual PV isolation AIMS Ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms ( CFAEs ) is a new approach for the treatment of atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . The purpose of the study was to assess the efficacy of CFAE ablation as a st and -alone strategy in patients with persistent AF and to compare it with a combined approach of CFAE ablation and pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) . METHODS AND RESULTS The study included 77 consecutive patients with persistent AF who underwent radiofrequency ( RF ) ablation of CFAE as a sole ablation procedure ( CFAE group , n = 23 patients ) or a combined approach of CFAE ablation and PVI ( CFAE plus PVI group , n = 54 patients ) . Procedures were guided by three-dimensional mapping systems . After the procedure , AF recurrences were evaluated with 7-day Holter recordings at 1 , 3 , and 6 months and every 6 months thereafter . Treatment failure was defined as > or=1 AF episode lasting > 30 s on Holter recordings during follow-up . After a mean follow-up time of 13 + /- 10 months , 2 of 23 patients ( 9 % ) with CFAE ablation and 22 of 54 patients ( 41 % ) with CFAE plus PVI were in sinus rhythm after a single ablation procedure without anti-arrhythmic medication ( P = 0.008 ) . CONCLUSION Ablation of CFAE as a st and -alone ablation strategy seems insufficient for the treatment of patients with persistent AF . Pulmonary vein isolation plus CFAE ablation significantly increases the mid-term success rate AIMS To investigate the effectiveness of additional substrate modification ( SM ) by left atrial ( LA ) linear lesions as compared with pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) alone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) in a prospect i ve r and omized study . Percutaneous PVI has evolved as an accepted treatment for paroxysmal AF but seemed to be less effective in patients with persistent AF . The benefit of PVI alone and additional linear lesions has not been vali date d in a r and omized study so far . METHODS AND RESULTS Sixty-two patients with persistent AF ( median duration 7 , range 1 - 18 months ) were r and omly assigned to either PVI alone ( n = 30 ) or additional SM ( n = 32 ) consisting of a roof line connecting both left superior and right superior PV and LA isthmus ablation between left inferior PV and mitral annulus . Procedures including SM were performed using a three-dimensional mapping system ( EnSite NavX , St Jude Medical , St Paul , MN , USA ) . Anti-arrhythmic drugs were discontinued within 8 weeks after ablation in both groups . Follow-up included daily trans-telephonic ECG transmitted irrespective of the patient 's symptoms . PVI was successful in 98 % of all targeted veins in both groups . Additional SM did not increase fluoroscopy time ( 72.1+/-18.7 vs. 72.9+/-17.3 min , P=0.92 ) because of the use of three-dimensional navigation in the PVI+SM group . AF recurrences within the first 4 weeks following ablation were more common after PVI alone ( 77 % ) than additional SM ( 44 % , P=0.002 ) . After a follow-up time of 487 ( 429 - 570 ) days , only 20 % of patients undergoing st and alone PVI  remained in sinus rhythm when compared with 69 % following PVI combined with SM ( P=0.0001 ) . Two patients assigned to PVI+SM experienced procedure-related complications ( cardiac tamponade and minor stroke ) which resolved without sequelae . CONCLUSION PVI alone is insufficient in the treatment of persistent AF . However , additional left linear lesions increase the success rate significantly . Early AF-relapses are associated with a negative outcome after PVI alone but not following additional SM BACKGROUND Long-term success rates using ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) are disappointing and usually do not exceed 60 % . OBJECTIVES This study sought to compare arrhythmia-free survival between pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) and a stepwise approach ( full defrag ) consisting of PVI , ablation of complex fractionated electrograms , and additional linear ablation lines in the setting of atrial tachycardias ( AT ) in patients with persistent AF after PVI . METHODS From November 2010 to February 2013 , 205 patients ( 151 men ; 61.7 ± 10.2 years of age ) underwent de novo ablation for persistent AF . Subsequently , patients were prospect ively r and omized to either PVI alone ( n = 78 ) or full defrag ( n = 75 ) , with 52 patients not r and omized due to AF termination with the original PVI . The primary endpoint was recurrence of any AT after a blanking period of 3 months . RESULTS During the entire study , 241 ablations were performed ( mean : 1.59 in the PVI-alone group , 1.55 in the full-defrag group ) . With the stepwise approach , termination of AF occurred in 45 ( 60 % ) patients . However , arrhythmia-free survival did not differ whether patients underwent single or multiple procedures ( p = 0.468 ) . Procedure duration , fluoroscopy time , and radiofrequency duration were significantly longer in the full-defrag group ( all p < 0.001 ) . CONCLUSIONS A stepwise approach aim ed at AF termination does not seem to provide additional benefit over PVI alone in patients with persistent AF , but it is associated with significantly longer procedural and fluoroscopic duration as well as radiofrequency application time . ( The R and omized Catheter Ablation of Persist End Atrial Fibrillation Study [ CHASE-AF ] ; NCT01580124 ) OBJECTIVES We aim ed to determine the safety and efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) in atrial fibrillation ( AF ) patients with impaired left ventricular ( LV ) systolic function . BACKGROUND To date , PVI has been performed primarily in patients with normal LV function . Yet , many AF patients have impaired LV systolic function . The outcomes of PVI in patients with impaired LV systolic function are unknown . METHODS We included 377 consecutive patients undergoing PVI between December 2000 and January 2003 . Ninety-four patients had impaired LV function ( ejection fraction [ EF ] < 40 % ) , and they comprised the study group . The control group was the remaining 283 patients who had a normal EF . End points included AF recurrence and changes in EF and quality of life ( QoL ) . RESULTS Mean EF was 36 % in our study group , compared with 54 % in controls . After initial PVI , 73 % of patients with impaired EF and 87 % of patients with normal EF were free of AF recurrence at 14 + /- 6 months ( p = 0.03 ) . In the study group , there was a nonsignificant increase in EF of 4.6 % and significant improvement in QoL. Complication rates were low and included a 1 % risk of pulmonary vein stenosis . CONCLUSIONS Although the AF recurrence rate after initial PVI in impaired EF patients was higher than in normal EF subjects , nearly three-fourths of patients with impaired EF remained AF-free . Although our sample size was nonr and omized , our results suggest PVI may be a feasible therapeutic option in AF patients with impaired EF . R and omized studies with more patients and longer follow-up are warranted Background Pulmonary vein isolation alone is ineffective in maintaining sinus rhythm in up to one third of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . We compared pulmonary vein antral isolation plus additional limited ablation along the inferoposterior left atrium and epicardially within the adjacent coronary sinus ( PVAI + CS ) to pulmonary vein antral isolation ( PVAI ) alone in patients with paroxysmal AF . Methods Forty-two consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF were prospect ively r and omized to PVAI vs. PVAI + CS . All patients were seen 3 , 6 , 12 , and 18 months after ablation and underwent 24-h ambulatory Holter monitoring . Results Following a single procedure , 17 out of 22 patients ( 77 % ) remained arrhythmia free off antiarrhythmic medication after PVAI at 18 months vs. 10 out of 20 ( 50 % ) after PVAI + CS ( p < 0.01 ) . After PVAI , three patients had recurrent paroxysmal AF , and two had atrial tachycardia , whereas after PVAI + CS , three patients had recurrent paroxysmal AF , and seven had atrial tachycardia . All patients in the PVAI + CS group with atrial tachycardia who underwent a second procedure were found to have peri-mitral macro-reentry as the underlying mechanism . Eighty-one percent of patients remained arrhythmia free off medication after 1.09 procedures in the PVAI group vs. 80 % after 1.35 procedures in the PVAI + CS group ( p < 0.01 ) . Conclusion The addition of limited ablation along the inferoposterior left atrium and within the adjacent coronary sinus to PVAI alone did not reduce the recurrence rate of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and was associated with an increased rate of peri-mitral macro-reentrant atrial tachycardia Background — The single-procedure efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) is less than optimal in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . Adjunctive techniques have been developed to enhance single-procedure efficacy in these patients . We conducted a study to compare 3 ablation strategies in patients with persistent AF . Methods and Results — Subjects were r and omized as follows : arm 1 , PVI + ablation of non-PV triggers identified using a stimulation protocol ( st and ard approach ) ; arm 2 , st and ard approach + empirical ablation at common non-PV AF trigger sites ( mitral annulus , fossa ovalis , eustachian ridge , crista terminalis , and superior vena cava ) ; or arm 3 , st and ard approach + ablation of left atrial complex fractionated electrogram sites . Patients were seen at 6 weeks , 6 months , and 1 year ; transtelephonic monitoring was performed at each visit . Antiarrhythmic drugs were discontinued at 3 to 6 months . The primary study end point was freedom from atrial arrhythmias off antiarrhythmic drugs at 1 year after a single-ablation procedure . A total of 156 patients ( aged 59±9 years ; 136 males ; AF duration , 47±50 months ) participated ( arm 1 , 55 patients ; arm 2 , 50 patients ; arm 3 , 51 patients ) . Procedural outcomes ( procedure , fluoroscopy , and PVI times ) were comparable between the 3 arms . More lesions were required to target non-PV trigger sites than a complex fractionated electrogram ( 33±9 versus 22±9 ; P<0.001 ) . The primary end point was achieved in 71 patients and was worse in arm 3 ( 29 % ) compared with arm 1 ( 49 % ; P=0.04 ) and arm 2 ( 58 % ; P=0.004 ) . Conclusions — These data suggest that additional substrate modification beyond PVI does not improve single-procedure efficacy in patients with persistent AF . Clinical Trial Registration — URL : http://www . clinical trials.gov . Unique identifier : NCT00379301 Background Various strategies have been used for atrial fibrillation ( AF ) ablation . It is unclear whether adding linear lesions to pulmonary vein ( PV ) isolation has significant advantages . Objectives We assessed the clinical benefit of adding linear lesions in patients undergoing PV isolation for AF . Methods One hundred patients ( 63 male and 37 female ; mean age of 59 ± 11 years ) with documented paroxysmal AF were included in the study . Patients were r and omized into two groups . The first group underwent PV isolation alone . The second group underwent PV isolation and had two linear lesions created ; one line between the superior PVs , and a second line from the left inferior PV to the mitral valve annulus . Patients ’ clinical progress after the ablation was evaluated and compared at 1 , 3 , and 9 months after their respective ablation procedures . Results The linear lesions group maintained sinus rhythm and had fewer symptoms than the lone PV isolation group ( 86 vs. 58 % , respectively ) ( p < 0.05 ) at 1 month . At 9 months , when patients who reverted to AF underwent additional management to regain sinus rhythm ( 90 vs. 82 % , respectively ) ( p = NS ) , there was no statistical difference between the groups regarding the use of antiarrhythmics , the need for electrical cardioversion , and subjective improvement . Conclusion The addition of linear lesions to PV isolation more effectively achieved sinus rhythm initially and fewer patients required additional management to maintain their rhythm when compared to patients who underwent lone PV isolation . However , at 9 months , the overall results were similar in both groups BACKGROUND The role of pulmonary veins ( PV ) isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is still debated . The aim of this study was to evaluate the adjunctive role of PV isolation in patients with persistent AF who underwent circumferential PV ablation ( anatomical approach ) . METHODS We treated 97 consecutive patients presenting with drug-refractory persistent AF by an anatomical approach ( group A , n = 36 , mean age = 60 + /- 8 years , 29 males ) or an integrated approach ( group B , n = 61 , mean age 59 + /- 10 years , 48 males ) . In all patients , radiofrequency ( RF ) ablation was performed by means of a nonfluoroscopic navigation system , in order to anatomically create circumferential lines around the PV . In group B , the persistence of PV potentials was ascertained with a multipolar circular catheter . If PV potentials persisted , RF energy targeting the electrophysiological breakthroughs was delivered to disconnect the PV . Past a 2-month period of observation , success was defined as absence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence lasting > 30 seconds . RESULTS Total procedure duration ( 220 + /- 62 minutes vs 140 + /- 43 minutes , P < 0.001 ) , fluoroscopy time ( 35 + /- 15 minutes vs 17 + /- 9 minutes , P < 0.001 ) , and RF delivery time ( 48 + /- 22 minutes vs 27 + /- 9 minutes , P < 0.001 ) were significantly longer in group B than in group A. One cardiac perforation occurred in group A. After 15 + /- 9.1 months , 21 patients in group A ( 58 % ) and 34 patients in group B ( 56 % ) were free of atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence ( P = 0.9 ) . CONCLUSIONS In patients with persistent AF , who underwent an anatomical approach , electrophysiological confirmation of PV disconnection significantly increased the fluoroscopy and procedural times , without effect on the long-term outcomes Background —The pulmonary veins ( PVs ) have been demonstrated to often play an important role in generating atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of segmental PV isolation in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF . Methods and Results —In 70 consecutive patients ( mean age , 53±11 years ) with paroxysmal ( 58 ) or persistent ( 12 ) AF , segmental PV isolation guided by ostial PV potentials was performed . The left superior , left inferior , and right superior PVs were targeted for isolation in all patients , and the right inferior PV was isolated in 20 patients . Among the 230 targeted PVs , 217 ( 94 % ) were completely isolated , with a mean of 6.5±4.2 minutes of radiofrequency energy applied at a maximum power setting of 35 W. A second PV isolation procedure was performed in 6 patients ( 9 % ) . At 5 months of follow-up , 70 % of patients with paroxysmal and 22 % of patients with persistent AF were free from recurrent AF ( P < 0.001 ) , and 83 % of patients with paroxysmal AF were either free of symptomatic AF or had significant improvement . Among various clinical characteristics , only paroxysmal AF was an independent predictor of freedom from recurrence of AF ( P < 0.05 ) . One patient developed unilateral quadrantopsia after the procedure . There were no other complications . Conclusions —With a segmental isolation approach that targets at least 3 PVs , a clinical ly satisfactory result can be achieved in > 80 % of patients with paroxysmal AF . The clinical efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation is much lower when AF is persistent than when it is paroxysmal INTRODUCTION Pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) is an established treatment for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . The ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms ( CFAE ) has emerged as a novel treatment approach . We sought to evaluate the additional effect of CFAE ablation to PVI in paroxysmal AF . METHODS AND RESULTS Ninety-eight patients with paroxysmal AF ( 57 + /- 10 years , 74 male ) were r and omized to the PVI ( n = 48 ) or PVI + CFAE group ( n = 50 ) . After PVI , CFAE ablation was performed in patients with inducible AF in the PVI + CFAE group . The primary endpoint was combined objective ( 7-day Holter ECG ) and subjective ( symptoms ) freedom of atrial tachyarrhythmia 3 months after ablation . Long-term follow-up ( 19 + /- 8 months ) was available in 94 of 98 patients . CFAE ablation was performed in 30 of 50 patients of the PVI + CFAE group . After 3 months , 36 of 48 patients ( 75 % ) in the PVI group and 38 of 50 patients ( 76 % ) in the PVI + CFAE group were in stable sinus rhythm ( P = NS ) . During long-term follow-up ( 19 + /- 8 months ) , 34 of 46 patients ( 74 % ) in the PVI group and 40 of 48 patients ( 83 % ) in the PVI + CFAE group were in sinus rhythm ( P = 0.08 ) . In a subgroup analysis , a significantly better long-term outcome was achieved if inducible AF after PVI had been treated by additional CFAE ablation as compared with PVI only ( sinus rhythm in 25/28 patients ; 89 % vs 22/30 patients 73 % ; P = 0.003 ) . CONCLUSION In the intention-to-treat analysis , additional CFAE ablation did not improve the success rate of PVI in patients with paroxysmal AF . However , during long-term follow-up , patients with still inducible AF after PVI seemed to profit from additional CFAE ablation Purpose We tested the hypothesis that electroanatomic pulmonary vein ( PV ) antra encircling for the PV isolation will improve the outcome in treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( PAF ) , compared with segmental PV isolation . Methods Fifty-four patients underwent segmental PV isolation ( group 1 ) and 56 patients circumferential PV isolation ( group 2 ) for symptomatic PAF in a r and omized study . Results Following single ablation procedure , at the 48 ± 8 month follow-up , 30 ( 56 % ) and 32 ( 57 % ) patients in groups 1 and 2 remained free of arrhythmia ( P = 0.41 ) . After repeat ablation , 43 ( 80 % ) and 45 ( 80 % ) patients in groups 1 and 2 were free of arrhythmia without antiarrhythmic drugs ( AADs ) ; 48 ( 89 % ) and 51 ( 91 % ) patients in groups 1 and 2 did not have arrhythmia recurrences without or with AADs . Conclusion This study demonstrates no advantage in long-term arrhythmia-free clinical outcome after circumferential PV isolation in patients with frequent PAF Background —Pulmonary veins ( PVs ) play a pivotal role in initiating and perpetuating  atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . We investigated if PV electrical isolation from the left atrium is required for curing AF . Methods and Result —Fifty-one patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF underwent circumferential radiofrequency ablation of PV ostia performed with an anatomic approach . The end point of the ablation procedure was the recording of low peak-to-peak bipolar potentials ( < 0.1 mV ) inside the lesions . Left atrium pacing was used to assess the conduction between the PVs and the left atrium . During a mean follow-up period of 16.6±3.9 months , 41 patients ( 80.4 % ) were free of atrial arrhythmias . When patients with and without AF recurrence were analyzed , no significant difference was observed in the mean number of PVs in which the ablation end point was reached ( 3.4±1.2 versus 3.7±0.87 ) and PVs isolated ( 1.5±1.4 versus 1.6±1 ) . We noted that , although in 29 of 41 patients ( 71 % ) without AF recurrence , the ablation end point was reached in all PVs mapped , it was only possible to demonstrate the isolation of all PVs mapped in 2 patients . On the other h and , in 7 of 10 patients ( 70 % ) with AF recurrence , the ablation end point was reached in all PVs mapped , whereas one patient had all PVs isolated . Conclusions —Our findings show that with the use of a pure anatomic approach , it is possible to prevent AF in > 80 % of patients undergoing catheter ablation . Moreover , the isolation of PVs is not crucial for curing AF BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) is associated with PV to left atrium reconduction . Effective lesion creation necessitates adequate contact force between the ablation catheter and myocardium . OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to study the utility of contact force-guided ablation on immediate and long-term outcomes . METHODS Seventy-five patients with highly symptomatic paroxysmal AF underwent wide circumferential PVI using an irrigated-tip radiofrequency catheter . In 25 patients , ablation was guided by real-time contact force measurements ( CF group ; SmartTouch , Biosense Webster ) . A control group of 50 patients underwent  PVI using a st and ard nonforce sensing catheter ( st and ard group ; ThermoCool , Biosense Webster ) . After PVI , all patients underwent adenosine testing to unmask dormant conduction . Patients were followed up at 3 , 6 , and 12 months and by transtelephonic monitoring as well . RESULTS Dormant conduction was unmasked and subsequently eliminated in 4 PV pairs ( 8 % ; 16 % of patients ) in the CF group and 35 PV pairs ( 35 % ; 52 % of patients ) in the st and ard group ( P = .0004 per PV pair ; P = .0029 per patient ) . The single-procedure , off-antiarrhythmic drug freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmias at 1 year was 88 % in the CF group vs 66 % in the st and ard group ( P = .047 ) . Procedure duration and fluoroscopy time were significantly longer in the CF group ( P = .0038 and P = .0001 , respectively ) . CONCLUSION The use of real-time contact force guidance results in a significant reduction in the prevalence of dormant conduction with improved long-term freedom from recurrent arrhythmias . The utility of a contact force-guided approach requires evaluation in a long-term prospect i ve r and omized study BACKGROUND The optimal ablation technique for persistent and long-st and ing persistent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is unclear . Both linear lesion ( LL ) and ganglionated plexus ( GP ) ablation have been used in addition to pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) , but no direct comparison of the 2 methods exists . OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to assess the comparative safety and efficacy of 2 different ablation strategies-PVI+LL vs PVI+GP ablation -in patients with persistent or long-st and ing persistent AF . METHODS Two hundred sixty-four consecutive patients with persistent/long-st and ing persistent AF were r and omly assigned to 2 different ablation schemes : PVI+LL ( n = 132 ) and PVI+GP ( n = 132 ) ablation . Consistent sinus rhythm ( SR ) off antiarrhythmic drug was assessed after follow-up of at least 3 years with the use of an implanted monitoring device . RESULTS All procedural end points were acutely achieved . At 12 months after a single procedure , 47 % of the patients treated with PVI+LL were in SR compared to 54 % of the patients treated with PVI+GP ( P = .29 ) . At 3 years , 34 % of the patients with PVI+LL and 49 % of the patients with PVI+GP maintained SR ( P = .035 ) . Atrial flutter was more frequent in the PVI+LL group than in PVI+GP group ( 18 % vs 6 % ; P = .002 ) . After a second procedure in 78 patients of the PVI+LL group and 55 patients of the PVI+GP group , the long-term overall success rate was 52 % and 68 % , respectively ( P = .006 ) . CONCLUSIONS PVI+GP ablation confers superior clinical results with less ablation-related left atrial flutter and reduced AF recurrence compared to PVI+LL ablation at 3 years of follow-up BACKGROUND More advanced atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is associated with lower success rates after pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) , and the optimal ablation strategy is uncertain . OBJECTIVES To assess the impact of additional linear ablation ( lines ) compared to PVI alone . METHODS In this multicenter r and omized controlled trial , 122 patients ( mean age 61.9 ± 10.5 years ; left atrial diameter 43 ± 6 mm ) with persistent AF ( PeAF ) or sustained ( > 12 hours ) paroxysmal AF ( SusPAF ) with risk factors for atrial substrate were included and followed up for 12 months . Patients were r and omized to  PVI-only or PVI + lines ( left atrial roof line , mitral isthmus line , and tricuspid isthmus line ) group . Holter monitoring was performed at 3 , 6 , and 12 months and according to symptoms . The primary outcome was atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence lasting ≥30 seconds . RESULTS Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups ; 61 % had PeAF and 39 % SusPAF . Successful PVI was achieved for 98 % of pulmonary veins , and bidirectional block was obtained in 90 % of lines . The primary end point occurred in 38 % of the PVI + lines group and 32 % of the PVI-only group ( P = .50 ) , which was consistent in both PeAF ( 36 % vs 28 % ; P = .45 ) and SusPAF ( 42 % vs 39 % ; P = .86 ) . Compared with the PVI-only group , the PVI + lines group had higher procedure duration ( 209 ± 52 minutes vs 172 ± 44 minutes ; P < .001 ) , ablation time ( 4352 ± 1084 seconds vs 2503 ± 1061 seconds ; P < .001 ) , and radiation exposure ( Dose-area product 3992 ± 6496 Gy·cm(2 ) vs 2106 ± 1679 Gy·cm(2 ) ; P = .03 ) . Quality of life ( disease-specific Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life question naire and mental component scale of the Short Form 36 Health Survey ) improved significantly during the study but did not differ between groups . CONCLUSION Adding lines to wide antral PVI in substrate-based AF requires significantly more ablation , increases procedure duration and radiation dose , but provides no additional clinical benefit INTRODUCTION Isolation of all pulmonary veins ( PV ) is advocated for treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( PAF ) . However , the superior PVs are responsible for most AF triggers , whereas the inferior PVs carry the higher risk for ablation-induced ostial stenosis . The aim of this study was to compare a superior PV isolation approach with isolation of all PVs for treatment of PAF . METHODS AND RESULTS Fifty-two patients with PAF were r and omized to either left superior pulmonary vein ( LSPV ) isolation followed by additional isolation of the right superior pulmonary vein ( RSPV ) in case of AF recurrence ( group A , n = 27 ) or isolation of all four PVs followed by a repeat procedure in case of recurrence ( group B , n = 25 ) . At 1-year follow-up , 11 patients ( 41 % ) in group A and 8 patients ( 32 % ) in group B had AF relapse ( P = 0.55 ) . No significant differences in AF relapse were detected between groups at 3 and 12 months ( log rank = 0.36 , P = 0.54 ) and by Cox proportional hazards model analysis ( P = 0.62 ) . Nonsignificant PV stenosis was detected in two patients from group B. Total radiofrequency energy delivery and fluoroscopy and procedure times were lower in group A : 8.9 + /- 1.4 minutes vs 25.6 + /- 3.7 minutes ( P < 0.001 ) , 22.2 + /- 6.8 minutes vs 62 + /- 10.3 minutes ( P < 0.001 ) , and 131.8 + /- 26.5 minutes vs 222.2 + /- 32.3 minutes ( P < 0.001 ) , respectively . CONCLUSION A staged superior PVs isolation approach confers equal success rates but with reduced radiofrequency energy delivery and fluoroscopy and procedure times compared to isolation of all PVs at the initial ablation attempt
A PVI-only strategy in PeAF patients with a low prevalence of structural heart disease using contemporary technology yields excellent outcomes comparable to those for paroxysmal AF ablation
BACKGROUND Early studies demonstrated relatively low success rates for pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) alone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation ( PeAF ) .
However , the advent of new technologies and the observation that additional substrate ablation does not improve outcomes have created a new focus on PVI alone for treatment of PeAF .
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to systematic ally review the recent medical literature to determine current medium-term outcomes when a PVI-only approach is used for PeAF .