Bariatric Surgery versus Lifestyle Interventions for Morbid Obesity—Changes in Body Weight, Risk Factors and Comorbidities at 1 Year Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. A randomised control trial assessing the impact of an investment based intervention on weight-loss, beliefs and behaviour after bariatric surgery: study protocol Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. The impact of a bariatric rehabilitation service on weight loss and psychological adjustment - study protocol Obesity-related cardiovascular risk factors after weight loss: a clinical trial comparing gastric bypass surgery and intensive lifestyle intervention Optimizing long-term weight control after bariatric surgery: a pilot study. Does cognitive behavioral therapy strengthen the effect of bariatric surgery for obesity? Design and methods of a randomized and controlled study. The role of bariatric surgery in morbidly obese patients with inflammatory bowel disease. The Sleeve Bypass Trial: a multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing the long term outcome of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass for morbid obesity in terms of excess BMI loss percentage and quality of life Surgery for Obesity - An Update of a Randomized Trial A bariatric surgery center of excellence: operative trends and long-term outcomes. Bariatric surgery and prevention of type 2 diabetes in Swedish obese subjects. Sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for type 2 diabetes and morbid obesity: double-blind randomised clinical trial protocol National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis of bariatric operations: modifiable risk factors contribute to bariatric surgical adverse outcomes. Bariatric Surgery May Improve Employment Status in Unemployed, Underserved, Severely Obese Patients Evaluation of Current Eligibility Criteria for Bariatric Surgery
Background Few studies have looked at non-surgical alternatives for morbid obese patients . This study aims to compare 1-year weight loss and changes in risk factors and comorbidities after bariatric surgery and three conservative treatments . Methods Patients with morbid obesity ( BMI > 40 or BMI > 35 kg/m2 plus comorbidities ) on waiting list for bariatric surgery  , were non-r and omly allocated to ( A ) bariatric surgery or to one of three conservative treatments ; ( B ) residential intermittent program ; ( C ) commercial weight loss camp and ( D ) hospital outpatient program . Body weight , risk factors and comorbidities were assessed at baseline and 1 year . Results Of 206 participants , 179 completed the study . All treatments result ed in significant weight loss , but bariatric surgery ( 40 ± 14 kg , 31 ± 9 % ) led to the largest weight loss ( P < 0.0001 ) . There were no differences in weight loss between B and C ( 22 ± 13 kg , 15 ± 8 % vs. 18 ± 12 kg , 13 ± 8 % ) , but these result ed in larger weight loss compared with D ( 7 ± 10 kg , 5 ± 8 % ) . There were no differences in changes in total or LDL cholesterol , triacylglycerols or glucose between groups ; however , the increase in HDL cholesterol was significantly larger in groups A and C. There were no differences in comorbidities resolution between groups A and B , C and D combined ( except hypertension , which was better in group A ) . Conclusion In conclusion , although bariatric surgery leads to a greater weight loss at 1 year compared with conservative treatment , in patients with morbid obesity , clinical significant weight loss and similar improvements in risk factors and comorbidities resolution can also be achieved with lifestyle interventions BACKGROUND Weight loss is associated with short-term amelioration and prevention of metabolic and cardiovascular risk , but whether these benefits persist over time is unknown . METHODS The prospect i ve , controlled Swedish Obese Subjects Study involved obese subjects who underwent gastric surgery and contemporaneously matched , conventionally treated obese control subjects . We now report follow-up data for subjects ( mean age , 48 years ; mean body-mass index , 41 ) who had been enrolled for at least 2 years ( 4047 subjects ) or 10 years ( 1703 subjects ) before the analysis ( January 1 , 2004 ) . The follow-up rate for laboratory examinations was 86.6 percent at 2 years and 74.5 percent at 10 years . RESULTS After two years , the weight had increased by 0.1 percent in the control group and had decreased by 23.4 percent in the surgery group ( P<0.001 ) . After 10 years , the weight had increased by 1.6 percent and decreased by 16.1 percent , respectively ( P<0.001 ) . Energy intake was lower and the proportion of physically active subjects higher in the surgery group than in the control group throughout the observation period . Two- and 10-year rates of recovery from diabetes , hypertriglyceridemia , low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol , hypertension , and hyperuricemia were more favorable in the surgery group than in the control group , whereas recovery from hypercholesterolemia did not differ between the groups . The surgery group had lower 2- and 10-year incidence rates of diabetes , hypertriglyceridemia , and hyperuricemia than the control group ; differences between the groups in the incidence of hypercholesterolemia and hypertension were undetectable . CONCLUSIONS As compared with conventional therapy , bariatric surgery appears to be a viable option for the treatment of severe obesity , result ing in long-term weight loss , improved lifestyle , and , except for hypercholesterolemia , amelioration in risk factors that were elevated at baseline Background Although obesity surgery is currently the most effective method for achieving weight loss , not all patients lose the desired amount of weight and some show weight regain . Previous research shows that successful weight loss may be associated with the amount of investment the patient feels that they have made in their operation . For example , those who feel that it has taken more time and effort to organise , has cost more money , has been more disruptive to their lives and has caused pain are more likely to lose weight after their operation . Therefore , it seems as if the greater the sense of investment , the greater the motivation to make the operation a success . The present study aims to build on these findings by encouraging weight loss surgery patients to focus on the investment they have made , thus making their investment more salient to them and a means to improve weight loss outcomes . Methods The study involves an open r and omised parallel group control trial with patients allocated either to the control or investment intervention group . Using third party blinded r and omization , half the patients will be asked to rate and describe the investment they have made in their operation just before surgery then 3 and 6 months after surgery . All patients will record their weight , beliefs about food , intentions to change and actual eating and exercise behaviour at baseline then 3 , 6 and 12 months follow up . Patients will be recruited from the bariatric surgery pre- assessment clinic at University College Hospital , London . The primary outcome is to explore the impact of the investment based intervention on patient ’s weight and BMI , with secondary outcomes of patients ’ beliefs about foods , behavioural intentions and diet and exercise behaviours . Discussion It is predicted that the investment intervention will improve excess weight loss post-surgery , together with beliefs about food , intentions to change and actual change in diet and exercise behaviour . This has cost implication s for the NHS and other healthcare providers as improved effectiveness of bariatric surgery reduces the health costs of obese patients in the longer term and this simple , easy to administer and low cost intervention could become routine practice for bariatric patients .Trial registration Clinical Trials.gov identifier NCT02045628 ; December 2 , 2013 BACKGROUND Obesity is associated with increased mortality . Weight loss improves cardiovascular risk factors , but no prospect i ve interventional studies have reported whether weight loss decreases overall mortality . In fact , many observational studies suggest that weight reduction is associated with increased mortality . METHODS The prospect i ve , controlled Swedish Obese Subjects study involved 4047 obese subjects . Of these subjects , 2010 underwent bariatric surgery ( surgery group ) and 2037 received conventional treatment ( matched control group ) .  We report on overall mortality during an average of 10.9 years of follow-up . At the time of the analysis ( November 1 , 2005 ) , vital status was known for all but three subjects ( follow-up rate , 99.9 % ) . RESULTS The average weight change in control subjects was less than + /-2 % during the period of up to 15 years during which weights were recorded . Maximum weight losses in the surgical subgroups were observed after 1 to 2 years : gastric bypass , 32 % ; vertical-b and ed gastroplasty , 25 % ; and b and ing , 20 % . After 10 years , the weight losses from baseline were stabilized at 25 % , 16 % , and 14 % , respectively . There were 129 deaths in the control group and 101 deaths in the surgery group . The unadjusted overall hazard ratio was 0.76 in the surgery group ( P=0.04 ) , as compared with the control group , and the hazard ratio adjusted for sex , age , and risk factors was 0.71 ( P=0.01 ) . The most common causes of death were myocardial infa rct ion ( control group , 25 subjects ; surgery group , 13 subjects ) and cancer ( control group , 47 ; surgery group , 29 ) . CONCLUSIONS Bariatric surgery for severe obesity is associated with long-term weight loss and decreased overall mortality Background Bariatric surgery is currently the most effective form of obesity management for those whose BMI is greater than 40 ( or 35 with co morbidities ) . A minority of patients , however , either do not show the desired loss of excess weight or show weight regain by follow up . Research highlights some of the reasons for this variability , most of which centres on the absence of any psychological support with patients describing how although surgery fixes their body , psychological issues relating to dietary control , self esteem , coping and emotional eating remain neglected . The present study aims to evaluate the impact of a health psychology led bariatric rehabilitation service ( BRS ) on patient health outcomes . The bariatric rehabilitation service will provide information , support and mentoring pre and post surgery and will address psychological issues such as dietary control , self esteem , coping and emotional eating . The package reflects the rehabilitation services now common place for patients post heart attack and stroke which have been shown to improve patient health outcomes . Methods / Design The study is a r and omised control trial and patients will be allocated to receive either usual care or the bariatric rehabilitation service pre and post bariatric surgery . Follow up measures of weight loss and psychological issues will be taken at baseline ( 2 weeks preoperatively ) , 3 , 6 and 12 months postoperatively . The contents of the bariatric service and the follow up measures are based on previous pilot work and have been developed further by the research team working closely with two patient support groups ( BOSPA & WLSinfo ) . This study will take place in St Richard 's Hospital in Chichester in the UK . Discussion It is predicted that a bariatric rehabilitation service will improve weight loss following surgery and will also facilitate changes in other psychological variables such as quality of life , dietary control , self esteem , coping and emotional eating . This also has cost implication s for the NHS and other healthcare providers as improved effectiveness of bariatric surgery reduces the health costs of obese patients in the longer term . Trial registration Clinical Trials.gov NCT01264120 Objective Weight reduction improves several obesity-related health conditions . We aim ed to compare the effect of bariatric surgery and comprehensive lifestyle intervention on type 2 diabetes and obesity-related cardiovascular risk factors . Design One-year controlled clinical trial ( Clinical Trials.gov identifier NCT00273104 ) . Methods Morbidly obese subjects ( 19–66 years , mean ( s.d . ) body mass index 45.1 kg/m2 ( 5.6 ) , 103 women ) were treated with either Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery ( n=80 ) or intensive lifestyle intervention at a rehabilitation centre ( n=66 ) . The dropout rate within both groups was 5 % . Results Among the 76 completers in the surgery group and the 63 completers in the lifestyle group , mean ( s.d . ) 1-year weight loss was 30 % ( 8) and 8 % ( 9 ) respectively . Beneficial effects on glucose metabolism , blood pressure , lipids and low- grade inflammation were observed in both groups . Remission rates of type 2 diabetes and hypertension were significantly higher in the surgery group than the lifestyle intervention group ; 70 vs 33 % , P=0.027 , and 49 vs 23 % , P=0.016 . The improvements in glycaemic control and blood pressure were mediated by weight reduction . The surgery group experienced a significantly greater reduction in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome , albuminuria and electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy than the lifestyle group . Gastrointestinal symptoms and symptomatic postpr and ial hypoglycaemia developed more frequently after gastric bypass surgery than after lifestyle intervention . There were no deaths . Conclusions Type 2 diabetes and obesity-related cardiovascular risk factors were improved after both treatment strategies . However , the improvements were greatest in those patients treated with gastric bypass surgery BACKGROUND Although bariatric surgery is associated with significant overall weight loss , many patients experience suboptimal outcomes . Our objective was to document the preliminary efficacy of a behavioral intervention for bariatric surgery patients with relatively poor long-term weight loss and to explore the factors related to outcome at an academic medical center in the United States . METHODS Patients with a body mass index ( BMI ) ≥ 30 kg/m(2 ) who had undergone bariatric surgery ≥ 3 years before study entry and had < 50 % excess weight loss were enrolled . The participants were r and omly assigned to a 6-month behavioral intervention or wait list control group . The assessment s were conducted at baseline ( before intervention ) and 6 months ( after intervention ) and 12 months ( 6-mo follow-up ) . RESULTS On average , the participants ( n = 36 ) had undergone surgery 6.6 years before study entry . The average age was 52.5 ± 7.1 years , and the BMI was 43.1 ± 6.2 kg/m(2 ) ; most participants were women ( 75 % ) and white ( 88.9 % ) . The intervention patients had a greater percentage of excess weight loss than did the wait list control group at 6 ( 6.6 % ± 3.4 % versus 1.6 % ± 3.1 % ) and 12 ( 5.8 % ± 3.5 % versus .9 % ± 3.2 % ) months . However , the differences were not significant and the results varied . The intervention patients with more depressive symptoms ( P = .005 ) and less weight regain before study entry ( P = .05 ) experienced a greater percentage of excess weight loss . CONCLUSION Behavioral intervention holds promise in optimizing long-term weight control after bariatric surgery . More research is needed on when to initiate the intervention and to identify which patients will benefit from this type of approach BACKGROUND ( Extreme ) obesity is a chronic harmful condition with high risk of medical comorbidities and negative social and emotional consequences . Bariatric surgery is an effective intervention for obesity , but approximately 20 to 30 % of the patients experience adverse outcomes after surgery and there is a need for augmentation of current treatment strategies . This study examines the added value of pre-operative cognitive behavioral therapy ( CBT ) focused on modification of thoughts and behaviors in terms of eating behavior and physical exercise as well as preparation for surgery and postoperative life style . We hypothesize that pre-operative CBT will result in better weight loss maintenance , reduction of maladaptive eating behavior and better adherence to postoperative lifestyle on the long term as compared to bariatric surgery alone . METHODS One hundred and twenty eight patients that are on a waiting list for bariatric surgery are r and omly assigned to the control or treatment condition . Patients in the treatment condition receive 10 sessions of CBT before surgery aim ed at modifying dysfunctional eating habits and behaviors and developing more rational weight and body-related beliefs in order to enable long term maintenance of a healthier lifestyle after surgery . Weight loss , eating behavior , eating disorders , depression , quality of life and psychological distress are assessed before and after treatment , as well as 1 , 3 , and 5 year following surgery BACKGROUND Bariatric surgery is considered as being contraindicated for morbidly obese patients who also have inflammatory bowel disease ( IBD ) . The aim of our study was to report the outcomes of bariatric surgery in morbidly obese IBD patients . METHODS The prospect ively collected data of all the patients diagnosed as having IBD who underwent bariatric operations in 2 medical centers between October 2006 and January 2014 were retrieved and analyzed . RESULTS One male and 9 female morbidly obese IBD patients ( 8 with Crohn 's disease and 2 with ulcerative colitis ) underwent bariatric surgery .  Their mean age was 40 years , and their mean body mass index was 42.6 kg/m2 . Nine of them underwent a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and 1 underwent a laparoscopic adjustable gastric b and .  Eight patients had obesity-related co-morbidities , including type 2 diabetes , hypertension , sleep apnea , osteoarthropathy , etc  . After a median follow-up of 46 months ( range 9 - 67 ) , all of the patients lost weight , with an excess weight loss of 71 % , and 10 out of 16 obesity-related co-morbidities were resolved . There was 1 complication not related to IBD , and no IBD exacerbation . CONCLUSION Bariatric surgery was safe and effective in our morbidly obese IBD patients . The surgical outcome in this selected patient group was similar to that of comparable non-IBD patients Background Obesity is an increasing disease worldwide . Bariatric surgery is the only effective therapy to induce sufficient long-term weight loss for morbidly obese patients .  Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass ( LRYGB ) is the gold st and ard surgical technique . Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy ( LSG ) is a new promising bariatric procedure which has the advantage of maintaining an intact gastrointestinal tract . The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of both techniques . Our hypothesis is that LSG has a similar percentage excess BMI loss ( % E BMI L ) after 5 years compared to LRYGB . Methods / Design The Sleeve Bypass Trial is a r and omized multicentre clinical trial : patients eligible for bariatric surgery are r and omized to either LSG or LRYGB . Patients with a body mass index ( BMI ) ≥ 40 kg/m2 or BMI 35 kg/m2 with obesity related comorbidity ( T2 DM , sleep apnoea , hypertension ) are eligible for r and omization . At r and omization patients are stratified for centre , sex , T2 DM and BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2 . A total number of 620 patients will be enrolled and equally ( 1:1 ) r and omized to both treatment arms . Only surgeons experienced in both operation techniques will participate in the Sleeve Bypass trial . The primary endpoint is the 5-year weight loss ( % E BMI L ) of LSG and LRYGB . Secondary endpoints are resolution of obesity related comorbidity , complications , revision bariatric surgery and quality of life ( QOL ) defined in various question naires . Discussion Long-term % E BMI L between the two treatment strategies used to be in favour of LRYGB , but more recent results throughout the world show similar % E BMI L in both techniques . If weight loss is comparable , obesity-related comorbidity and QOL after bariatric procedures should be taken into account when deciding on which surgical technique is to be preferred for certain subgroups in the future . Trial registration Dutch Trial Register : NTR 4741 Background : A prospect i ve , r and omized trial comparing vertical b and ed gastroplasty ( VBG ) and gastric bypass ( GB ) was performed on 106 patients between 1987 and 1990 . Methods and Results : Failures of these two operations ( manifested by failure to lose weight , late weight gain or intolerance of adequate oral intake ) were treated by means of a third operation , isolated gastric bypass ( IGB ) , in which the small gastric pouch was isolated from the gastric fundus . The latter operation was significantly better than VBG or GB and achieved a 63 % success rate , i.e. body mass index ( BMI ) < 35 kg m−2 and less than 50 % excess weight . During the year following this trial an additional 54 patients underwent IGB .  When this operation was performed for morbid obesity and was the initial procedure , 96 % of the patients achieved a successful result . If IGB was performed as a revision procedure or for super obesity ( BMI > 50 kg m−2 ) , the success rate was 63 % with 100 % follow-up at 40 months . Major morbidity occurred in six of the 160 patients who underwent 195 operations ( the trial period and subsequent year ) . There were no deaths and follow-up was 98 % . Conclusions : The ideal gastric operation based on this study emphasizes the following requirements : a small pouch ( < 15ml ) totally separated from the stomach , a pouch not dependent on staples , placed in the dependent position to prevent stasis , constructed without foreign material and with an anastomosis which permits ingestion of solid food BACKGROUND Surgery remains the most effective intervention for obesity and its comorbidities . However , the long-term efficacy of bariatric procedures is rarely reported . This study addresses operative trends , efficiency , and long-term outcomes from a large bariatric program . STUDY DESIGN Data were prospect ively collected on 3,460 patients undergoing 3,503 operations from January 2004 to March 2013 . Primary procedures included  Roux-en-Y gastric bypass  ( RY ; n = 2,966 ) , adjustable b and ( AB ; n = 352 ) , and sleeve gastrectomy ( SG ; n = 118 ) . There were 67 revisional procedures ( RP ) . Mean operative time , hospital length of stay , major 30-day morbidity/mortality , follow-up compliance , and weight loss per procedure at follow-up were recorded . RESULTS Mean operative times decreased to the following : RY , 53 minutes ; AB , 35 minutes ; SG , 46 minutes ; and RP , 71 minutes . Mean length of stay was reduced to the following : RY , 1.53 days ; AB , 0.97 days ; SG , 2.12 days ; and RP , 2.68 days . Major complications were mortality , 0.09 % ; leak , 0.51 % ; bleed , 2.37 % ; pneumonia , 0.63 % ; venous thromboembolism , 0.40 % ; and reoperation , 2.34 % . The complication rate was lowest for AB and highest for SG ( p < 0.05 ) . Adjustable b and was the initial procedure in 73 % of cases requiring RP . Follow-up compliance was 93 % at 1 year , 79 % at 3 years , 71 % at 5 years , and 33 % at 9 years . Adjustable b and offered significant weight loss at 1 and 3 years ( p < 0.0001 ) , but less than RY or SG ( p < 0.0001 ) . Excess weight loss was not significantly different between RY and SG at 1 year . Significant weight loss with RY persisted at 7 to 9 years ( p < 0.0001 ) . CONCLUSIONS Our bariatric program experienced an increase in SG and RP and a decrease in AB . Optimization of care reduced operative time and length of stay . All procedures achieved significant weight loss in the first year . Adjusted b and had the lowest morbidity , but inferior weight loss and greater need for revision . Long-term weight-loss data are only available for RY BACKGROUND Weight loss protects against type 2 diabetes but is hard to maintain with behavioral modification alone . In an analysis of data from a nonr and omized , prospect i ve , controlled study , we examined the effects of bariatric surgery on the prevention of type 2 diabetes . METHODS In this analysis , we included 1658 patients who underwent bariatric surgery and 1771 obese matched controls ( with matching performed on a group , rather than individual , level ) . None of the participants had diabetes at baseline . Patients in the bariatric-surgery cohort underwent b and ing  ( 19 % ) , vertical b and ed gastroplasty ( 69 % ) , or gastric bypass ( 12 % ) ; nonr and omized , matched , prospect i ve controls received usual care . Participants were 37 to 60 years of age , and the body-mass index ( BMI ; the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters ) was 34 or more in men and 38 or more in women . This analysis focused on the rate of incident type 2 diabetes , which was a prespecified secondary end point in the main study . At the time of this analysis ( January 1 , 2012 ) , participants had been followed for up to 15 years . Despite matching , some baseline characteristics differed significantly between the groups ; the baseline body weight was higher and risk factors were more pronounced in the bariatric-surgery group than in the control group . At 15 years , 36.2 % of the original participants had dropped out of the study , and 30.9 % had not yet reached the time for their 15-year follow-up examination . RESULTS During the follow-up period , type 2 diabetes developed in 392 participants in the control group and in 110 in the bariatric-surgery group , corresponding to incidence rates of 28.4 cases per 1000 person-years and 6.8 cases per 1000 person-years , respectively ( adjusted hazard ratio with bariatric surgery , 0.17 ; 95 % confidence interval , 0.13 to 0.21 ; P<0.001 ) . The effect of bariatric surgery was influenced by the presence or absence of impaired fasting glucose ( P=0.002 for the interaction ) but not by BMI ( P=0.54 ) . Sensitivity analyses , including end-point imputations , did not change the overall conclusions . The postoperative mortality was 0.2 % , and 2.8 % of patients who underwent bariatric surgery required reoperation within 90 days owing to complications . CONCLUSIONS Bariatric surgery appears to be markedly more efficient than usual care in the prevention of  type 2 diabetes in obese persons . ( Funded by the Swedish Research Council and others ; Clinical Trials.gov number , NCT01479452 . ) Introduction Type 2 diabetes ( T2D ) in association with obesity is an increasing disease burden . Bariatric surgery is the only effective therapy for achieving remission of T2D among those with morbid obesity . It is unclear which of the two most commonly performed types of bariatric surgery , laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy ( LSG ) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass ( LRYGB ) , is most effective for obese patients with T2D . The primary objective of this study is to determine whether LSG or LRYGB is more effective in achieving HbA1c<6 % ( < 42 mmol/mol ) without the use of diabetes medication at 5 years . Methods and analysis Single-centre , double-blind ( assessor and patient ) , parallel , r and omised clinical trial ( RCT ) conducted in New Zeal and , targeting 106 patients . Eligibility criteria include age 20–55 years , T2D of at least 6 months duration and body mass index 35–65 kg/m2 for at least 5 years . R and omisation 1:1 to LSG or LRYGB , used r and om number codes disclosed to the operating surgeon after induction of anaesthesia . A st and ard medication adjustment schedule will be used during postoperative metabolic assessment s. Secondary outcomes include proportions achieving HbA1c<5.7 % ( 39 mmol/mol ) or HbA1c<6.5 % ( 48 mmol/mol ) without the use of diabetes medication , comparative weight loss , obesity-related comorbidity , operative complications , revision rate , mortality , quality of life , anxiety and depression scores . Exploratory outcomes include changes in satiety , gut hormone and gut microbiota to gain underlying mechanistic insights into T2D remission . Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval was obtained from the New Zeal and regional ethics committee ( NZ93405 ) who also provided independent safety monitoring of the trial . Study commenced in September 2011 . Recruitment completed in October 2014 . Data collection is ongoing . Results will be reported in manuscripts su bmi tted to peer- review ed journals and in presentations at national and international meetings . Trial registration numbers ACTRN12611000751976 , NCT01486680 ; Pre- results BACKGROUND The increase in obesity coupled with greater acceptance of the field of bariatric surgery has result ed in a substantial rise in the number of weight-loss operations . Because obese individuals are at high risk for surgical complications , concern about the safety of bariatric procedures exists . Earlier investigations of the clinical features associated with surgical complications have produced conflicting results . We sought to identify risk factors for surgical complications in a large , nationally representative population of US veterans . STUDY DESIGN We analyzed data  on bariatric procedures performed at 12 Veterans ' Affairs medical centers approved to perform weight-loss operations between 1998 and 2004 . Detailed pre- , intra- , and postoperative information and longterm mortality data were prospect ively collected using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program methodology . We used multivariable logistic regression to identify clinical features associated with postoperative complications . RESULTS Among 575 bariatric patients assessed between 1998 and 2004 , 74 % were men with a mean age of 51 years . Thirty-day mortality was 1.4 % . Overall complication rate was 19.7 % . Of those with complications , one-half were of considerable clinical importance , as they were associated with prolonged length of stay . Clinical features that were predictive of adverse events in our multivariable analyses were superobesity , weight>350 pounds , and smoking . A more than 20 pack-year history of smoking was also associated with difficulty in weaning from a ventilator postoperatively . CONCLUSIONS We identified smoking and superobesity as preoperative risk factors associated with postoperative complications . Future studies should examine the effect of preoperative weight loss and smoking cessation on bariatric procedure outcomes Background The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of bariatric surgery on employment status in underserved , unemployed patients with severe obesity . Methods A retrospective review of all unemployed severely obese patients seen in our urban safety-net bariatric surgery program was performed . Preoperative patient question naires and medical records were review ed to evaluate patient employment status at the time of initial evaluation by the multidisciplinary bariatric surgery team . Follow-up data was obtained on all available patients ( including those who did not undergo surgery ) , including weight and employment status . A st and ardized telephone question naire was administered to supplement details regarding employment . Changes in employment status and body weight were determined in both groups . Results Here , 193 unemployed severely obese patients were evaluated by the multidisciplinary obesity team . The vast majority of patients ( > 80 % ) were minorities ( primarily Hispanic ) and publicly insured . Seventy-two underwent bariatric surgery and 121 did not . Twenty-four percent of the surgical patients and 9 % of the non-surgical patients had acquired full-time employment at least one year postoperatively ( p = 0.043 ) . There was a 10-point body mass index reduction in the surgical group , compared to 1-point reduction in the non-surgical group after one year . Conclusions Bariatric surgery may improve employment status in an unemployed severely obese patient cohort . Future research in this area should collect detailed prospect i ve data on employment prior to surgery and assess changes longitudinally to provide a more complete picture of the impact of bariatric surgery on employment OBJECTIVE Patients with a BMI < 35 kg/m2 and patients with a BMI between 35 and 40 kg/m2 without comorbidities are noneligible by current eligibility criteria for bariatric surgery .  We used Swedish obese subjects ( SOS ) to explore long-term outcomes in noneligible versus eligible patients . RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS The SOS study involved 2,010 obese patients who underwent bariatric surgery ( 68 % vertical-b and ed gastroplasty , 19 % b and ing , and 13 % gastric bypass ) and 2,037 contemporaneously matched obese controls receiving usual care .  At inclusion , the participant age was 37–60 years and BMI was ≥34 kg/m2 in men and ≥38 kg/m2 in women . The effect of surgery was assessed in patients that do ( n = 3,814 ) and do not ( n = 233 ) meet current eligibility criteria . The date of analysis was 1 January 2012 . The follow-up time was up to 20 years , with a median of 10 years . RESULTS Cardiovascular risk factors were significantly improved both in noneligible and eligible individuals after 10 years of follow-up . Surgery reduced the diabetes incidence in both the noneligible ( adjusted hazard ratio 0.33 [ 95 % CI 0.13–0.82 ] , P = 0.017 ) and eligible ( 0.27 [ 0.22–0.33 ] , P < 0.001 ) groups . We could not detect a difference in the effect of surgery between the groups ( adjusted interaction P value = 0.713 ) . CONCLUSIONS Bariatric surgery drastically reduced the incidence of type 2 diabetes both in noneligible and eligible patients and improved cardiovascular risk factors in both groups . Our results show that strict BMI cutoffs are of limited use for bariatric surgery prioritization if the aim is to prevent diabetes and improve cardiovascular risk factors
Surgery results in greater improvement in weight loss outcomes and weight associated comorbidities compared with non-surgical interventions , regardless of the type of procedures used .
When compared with each other , certain procedures result ed in greater weight loss and improvements in comorbidities than others .
Outcomes were similar between RYGB and sleeve gastrectomy , and both of these procedures had better outcomes than adjustable gastric b and ing .
For people with very high BMI , biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch result ed in greater weight loss than RYGB .
Isolated sleeve gastrectomy led to better weight-loss outcomes than adjustable gastric b and ing after three years follow-up .
BACKGROUND Bariatric ( weight loss ) surgery for obesity is considered when other treatments have failed .
The effects of the available bariatric procedures compared with medical management and with each other are uncertain .
This is an up date of a Cochrane review first published in 2003 and most recently up date d in 2009 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of bariatric surgery for overweight and obesity , including the control of comorbidities .