Atrial fibrillation: an observational study with outpatients. Asymptomatic or "silent" atrial fibrillation: frequency in untreated patients and patients receiving azimilide. Randomized trial of rate-control versus rhythm-control in persistent atrial fibrillation: the Strategies of Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (STAF) study. Management of Newly Detected Atrial Fibrillation: A Clinical Practice Guideline from the American Academy of Family Physicians and the American College of Physicians Rhythm control versus rate control for atrial fibrillation and heart failure. Thromboembolic risk in atrial flutter. The FLASIEC (FLutter Atriale Società Italiana di Ecografia Cardiovascolare) multicentre study. Prediction of uneventful cardioversion and maintenance of sinus rhythm from direct-current electrical cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation and flutter. New atrial fibrillation after acute myocardial infarction independently predicts death: the GUSTO-III experience. Radiofrequency ablation vs antiarrhythmic drugs as first-line treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (RAAFT-2): a randomized trial. Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk for mortality and heart failure progression in patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a retrospective analysis of the SOLVD trials. Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction. A randomized clinical trial of early invasive intervention for atrial fibrillation (EARLY-AF) - methods and rationale. Circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation for chronic atrial fibrillation. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. Symptomatic and asymptomatic atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein ablation and the impact on quality of life. Outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with intermittent atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter in the COMPANION trial. An evaluation of the strategy of maintenance of sinus rhythm by antiarrhythmic drug therapy after ablation and pacing therapy in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation.
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common sustained arrhythmia with serious clinical consequences in the absence of treatment . However , there are limited data on the treatment of these patients in Argentina . The objective was to describe the therapeutic management of patients with nonacute AF by Argentinean cardiologists and to determine the incidence of clinical events after 12 months follow-up . METHODS The Atrial Fibrillation study in Argentina ( FARAON ) was an observational , descriptive , prospect i ve , national , and multicentric study that included out patients with AF , followed for 12 months . The study included 38 sites in Argentina . Each research er included the first 10 patients who met the inclusion criteria of being over 21 and also being an AF carrier documented by electrocardiogram or Holter within 12 months prior to or at the time of enrollment . RESULTS A total of 373 patients were included , mean age 70 ± 11.5 years , 40 % women ; 65 % had AF rhythm at the time of inclusion , 57 % had permanent AF , and 56 % were asymptomatic . At the time of enrollment , 40 % of physicians opted for rhythm control strategy . β-blockers and amiodarone were the most used drugs . Patients with rhythm control drugs had higher success rate than those with frequency control drug therapy ( 80 % vs 57 % ) . CONCLUSION Cardiologists in Argentina receive patients with AF that are mostly permanent AF . More than half of the patients are asymptomatic . They opt primarily by controlling the pace . When choosing antiarrhythmic drugs , nearly half of them indicated amiodarone BACKGROUND Asymptomatic , or " silent " atrial fibrillation could increase the risk of stroke . Little is known about the frequency of asymptomatic atrial fibrillation in patients who also have symptomatic atrial fibrillation ; similarly , little is known about the effect of antiarrhythmic drug therapy on asymptomatic atrial fibrillation . METHODS AND RESULTS Patients in sinus rhythm with a history of symptomatic atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter received placebo or azimilide ( 35 to 125 mg ) once daily for 6 or 9 months in 4 similar double-blind trials . The end point was the first recurrence of a symptomatic ECG-documented supraventricular arrhythmia . Routine transtelephonic electrocardiograms , in the absence of symptoms , were recorded for 30 seconds every 2 weeks until patients completed follow-up or documented a symptomatic supraventricular arrhythmia . Of the 1380 patients , 489 received placebo .  Among these patients receiving placebo , 303 transmitted at least one routine ECG while asymptomatic . Asymptomatic atrial fibrillation was recorded in 50 ( 17 % ) within 6 months and before recurrence of symptomatic supraventricular arrhythmia . In the 3 trials evaluating azimilide in therapeutic doses ( 100 and 125 mg ) , asymptomatic atrial fibrillation occurred in 49 of 382 ( 13 % ) receiving azimilide and 43 of 233 ( 18 % ) receiving placebo . Although drug effect on time to first asymptomatic event was not statistically significant ( hazard ratio , 0.70 ; P=0.09 ) , there was a 40 % reduction in asymptomatic atrial fibrillation on azimilide compared with placebo ( P=0.03 ) when repeated observations were considered . CONCLUSIONS Asymptomatic atrial fibrillation is common in untreated patients with a history of symptomatic atrial fibrillation ( and is likely underestimated by this analysis ) . Azimilide may reduce the occurrence of this silent arrhythmia OBJECTIVES This study was design ed to compare two treatment strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation(AF ) :  rhythm-control ( restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm ) and rate-control ( pharmacologic or invasive rate-control and anticoagulation ) . BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia . It is unclear whether a strategy of rhythm- or rate-control is better in terms of mortality , morbidity , and quality of life . METHODS The Strategies of Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation ( STAF ) multicenter pilot trial r and omized 200 patients ( 100 per group ) with persistent AF to rhythm- or rate-control .  The combined primary end point was a combination of death , cardiopulmonary resuscitation , cerebrovascular event , and systemic embolism . RESULTS After 19.6 + /- 8.9 months ( range 0 to 36 months ) there was no difference in the primary end point between rhythm-control ( 9/100 ; 5.54%/year ) and rate-control ( 10/100 ; 6.09%/year ; p = 0.99 ) . The percentage of patients in sinus rhythm in the rhythm-control group after up to four cardioversions during the follow-up period ( rate-control group ) was 23 % ( 0 % ) at 36 months . Eighteen primary end points occurred in atrial fibrillation ; only one occurred in sinus rhythm ( p = 0.049 ) . CONCLUSIONS The STAF pilot study showed no differences between the two treatment strategies in all end points except hospitalizations . These data suggest that there was no benefit in attempting rhythm-control in these patients with a high risk of arrhythmia recurrence . It remains unclear whether the results in the rhythm-control group would have been better if sinus rhythm had been maintained in a higher proportion of patients , as all but one end point occurred during AF Atrial fibrillation is the most common type of arrhythmia in adults . It is more common as patients age ; the prevalence is 1 % among those younger than age 60 years and increases to more than 8 % in those older than age 80 years . When data are adjusted for age , men are affected more often than women . Cardiac conditions associated with the development of atrial fibrillation are hypertension , rheumatic mitral valve disease , coronary artery disease , and congestive heart failure . Noncardiac causes include hyperthyroidism , hypoxic pulmonary conditions , surgery , and alcohol intoxication . Patients with atrial fibrillation may have symptoms of hemodynamic compromise , such as irregular palpitations and lightheadedness , or more vague symptoms , such as malaise , but may be asymptomatic . Patients with atrial fibrillation are at increased risk for thromboembolic disease . The purpose of this guideline is to make recommendations on the pharmacologic management of newly detected atrial fibrillation in primary care . The target patient population is adult patients with first-detected atrial fibrillation , defined as the presence of symptoms or electrocardiographic evidence of atrial fibrillation . The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association has recommended using first-detected atrial fibrillation regardless of whether it is symptomatic or self-limited , recognizing that there can be uncertainty about the duration of the episode and about previous undetected episodes ( 1 ) . This guideline does not apply to patients with postoperative or postmyocardial infa rct ion atrial fibrillation , patients with class IV heart failure , patients already taking antiarrhythmic drugs , or patients with valvular disease . The target physician audience is internists and family physicians dedicated to primary care . This guideline is based on the accompanying background paper by McNamara and colleagues ( 2 ) and on the evidence report Management of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation ( 3 ) , which was produced by the Johns Hopkins Evidence -based Practice Center under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality ( AHRQ ) , Rockville , Maryl and . The American Academy of Family Physicians ( AAFP ) and the American College of Physicians ( ACP ) created this guideline in collaboration . The Joint AAFP/ACP Panel review ed the evidence and developed and grade d the recommendations ( Table 1 ) . The guideline was then approved by both organizations . The guideline makes recommendations in the following areas : rate control versus rhythm control , stroke prevention and anticoagulation , electrical cardioversion versus pharmacologic cardioversion , the role of transesophageal echocardiography in guiding therapy , and maintenance therapy . Table 1 . The Guyatt Approach to Grading Recommendations * Section 1 : Rate Control versus Rhythm Control One of the fundamental questions in the management of atrial fibrillation is whether to attempt cardioversion . The answer to this question depends on whether rate control or rhythm control provides more effective protection from thromboembolic events , improved mortality , better relief of symptoms , or improved quality of life . Another significant clinical question is whether certain population s , such as women , patients with hypertension or congestive heart failure , or young people with structurally healthy hearts , have better outcomes with one or the other strategy . Four studies have compared rate control with rhythm control . The study sample s have generally involved older patients ( > 65 years of age ) , and women and younger patients with healthy hearts and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation have not been well represented ( 5 ) . The Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management ( AFFIRM ) trial compared rhythm control versus rate control , and use of anticoagulation was recommended in both arms ( 6 ) . More than 4000 patients who were at least 65 years of age or who had at least 1 risk factor for stroke or death , such as hypertension , diabetes , previous stroke , or poor ventricular function , were followed for a mean of 3.5 years . Slightly more than one third of the patients were enrolled after their first episode of atrial fibrillation , and more than 90 % had had their qualifying episode within the previous 6 weeks . In more than two thirds of patients , the qualifying episode lasted at least 2 days . The average patient age was 70 years . Sixty-one percent of patients were men , and 89 % were white . Seventy-one percent of patients had hypertension , 38 % had coronary heart disease , 18 % had previously had failure of antiarrhythmic therapy , and 12 % had no apparent heart disease ( lone atrial fibrillation ) . Patients were r and omly assigned to rate or rhythm control , and their physicians chose the specific therapies ( pharmacologic first , then nonpharmacologic if needed ) . Anticoagulation was continued indefinitely in the rate-control group and was encouraged in the rhythm-control group but could be stopped at the physician 's discretion if sinus rhythm had been maintained for at least 4 , and preferably 12 , consecutive weeks with antiarrhythmic therapy . The prevalence of sinus rhythm in the rhythm-control group was 82 % , 73 % , and 63 % at 1 , 3 , and 5 years , respectively . The prevalence of sinus rhythm in the rate-control group was 34.6 % at 5 years . The primary end point in the AFFIRM trial , overall mortality , was not statistically significantly different between the groups . However , the rhythm-control strategy was associated with a higher risk for death than the rate-control strategy among older patients , those without congestive heart failure , and those with coronary disease .  Rates of stroke also did not differ between groups ; 70 % of all strokes occurred in patients who had stopped receiving anticoagulation or who had subtherapeutic international normalized ratios ( < 2.0 ) . More hospitalizations were reported in the rhythm-control group ( P < 0.001 ) . Another recent study , the RAte Control versus Electrical cardioversion for persistent atrial fibrillation ( RACE ) study , r and omly assigned patients to receive aggressive rhythm control or rate control ( 7 ) . This was a smaller study , involving 522 patients ( mean age , 68 years ) . Sixty-four percent of patients were men , 49 % had hypertension , and 27 % had coronary artery disease . All patients had persistent atrial fibrillation lasting less than 1 year and had had at least 1 previous electrical cardioversion ( a maximum of 2 previous cardioversions was permitted for study inclusion ) . The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular mortality , heart failure , thromboembolic complications , bleeding , pacemaker implantation , and severe side effects of antiarrhythmic drugs . Again , no difference was seen between groups in the primary composite end point . As in the AFFIRM study , most of the strokes occurred in patients whose anticoagulation had been halted or patients whose international normalized ratio was subtherapeutic ( < 2.0 ) . In post hoc analysis , a benefit for rate control over rhythm control was seen in patients with hypertension and in women . Since this was a post hoc analysis , these results will need to be confirmed by further studies . Of note , despite an aggressive treatment protocol , at the end of follow-up only 39 % of the patients in the rhythm-control group were in sinus rhythm . The Pharmacological Intervention in Atrial Fibrillation ( PIAF ) trial r and omly assigned 252 patients 18 to 75 years of age with new-onset or permanent symptomatic atrial fibrillation ( mean duration of atrial fibrillation , approximately 4 months ) to rate control with diltiazem or aggressive conversion ( many times if necessary ) and maintenance therapy with amiodarone ( 8) . The primary end point of the study was improvement in symptoms related to atrial fibrillation . After 1 year of follow-up , relief of symptoms was similar in both groups , as were quality -of-life measures . Walking distance was improved in the rhythm-control group , but hospital admissions were more frequent in this group . Although final results are not yet available , preliminary reports of the Strategies of Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation ( STAF ) trial have been presented ( 9 ) . Patients were r and omly assigned to receive anticoagulation for 3 weeks before conversion and for 4 weeks after attempted conversion , with antiarrhythmic therapy to maintain sinus rhythm , or to long-term anticoagulation and rate control . ( Patients included in this study had at least 1 previous conversion attempt . ) After more than 1.5 years of follow-up , no difference was seen between the groups in rates of the primary end points of death , stroke , transient ischemic attacks , cardiopulmonary resuscitation , or thromboembolism . Of interest , only 40 % of patients in the rhythm-control group were still in sinus rhythm at 1 year , and all primary end points occurred in patients in atrial fibrillation , even in the rhythm-control group . This result has created speculation about whether fewer events would have occurred if anticoagulation had been continued indefinitely in the conversion group . It also suggests that despite aggressive rhythm management , a substantial number of patients can not maintain sinus rhythm . In general , the trial sample s were older and male and had risk factors for stroke , such as hypertension , congestive heart failure , and coronary disease . Certain subgroups of patients with atrial fibrillation , such as younger patients with healthy hearts or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation , were not well represented in the trials . Therefore , it is not certain whether these subgroups of patients may benefit from more aggressive rhythm control or rate control . Recommendation 1 : Rate control with chronic anticoagulation is the recommended strategy for the majority of patients with atrial fibrillation . Rhythm control has not been shown to be superior to rate control ( with chronic anticoagulation ) in reducing morbidity and mortality and may be inferior in some patient subgroups to rate control . Rhythm BACKGROUND It is common practice to restore and maintain sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure . This approach is based in part on data indicating that atrial fibrillation is a predictor of death in patients with heart failure and suggesting that the suppression of atrial fibrillation may favorably affect the outcome . However , the benefits and risks of this approach have not been adequately studied . METHODS We conducted a multicenter , r and omized trial comparing the maintenance of sinus rhythm ( rhythm control ) with control of the ventricular rate ( rate control ) in patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 35 % or less , symptoms of congestive heart failure , and a history of atrial fibrillation . The primary outcome was the time to death from cardiovascular causes . RESULTS A total of 1376 patients were enrolled ( 682 in the rhythm-control group and 694 in the rate-control group ) and were followed for a mean of 37 months . Of these patients , 182 ( 27 % ) in the rhythm-control group died from cardiovascular causes , as compared with 175 ( 25 % ) in the rate-control group ( hazard ratio in the rhythm-control group , 1.06 ; 95 % confidence interval , 0.86 to 1.30 ; P=0.59 by the log-rank test ) . Secondary outcomes were similar in the two groups , including death from any cause ( 32 % in the rhythm-control group and 33 % in the rate-control group ) , stroke ( 3 % and 4 % , respectively ) , worsening heart failure ( 28 % and 31 % ) , and the composite of death from cardiovascular causes , stroke , or worsening heart failure ( 43 % and 46 % ) . There were also no significant differences favoring either strategy in any predefined subgroup . CONCLUSIONS In patients with atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure , a routine strategy of rhythm control does not reduce the rate of death from cardiovascular causes , as compared with a rate-control strategy . ( Clinical Trials.gov number , NCT00597077 . AIMS Patients with atrial flutter are believed to be at lower risk of thromboembolism than patients with atrial fibrillation . However , the incidence of atrial thrombi and the need for anticoagulation in patients with atrial flutter is not well established . METHODS AND RESULTS A prospect i ve observational multicentre study was undertaken to assess the frequency of atrial thrombi and spontaneous echocontrast and the prevalence for aortic complex atherosclerotic lesions in a cohort of unselected patients with atrial flutter . We evaluated 134 patients ( 102 male , aged 70+/-9 years ) ; exclusion criteria were history of atrial fibrillation , rheumatic mitral valve disease and mitral mechanical prosthesis . The median of atrial flutter duration was 33 days . Twelve patients had been taking warfarin for more than 7 days . One hundred and twenty-four patients ( 94 % ) underwent a transoesophageal echocardiogram , which revealed left atrial appendage thrombi in two patients ( 1.6 % ) and right atrial thrombi in one patient ( 1 % ) . At least moderate left atrial echocontrast was found in 16/124 patients ( 13 % ) . Complex atherosclerotic aortic plaques were detected in 10 patients ( 8 % ) . Atrial flutter conversion was attempted in 93/134 patients ( 69 % ) . At the 1-month follow-up , two patients experienced a thromboembolic event following restoration of sinus rhythm . CONCLUSIONS Atrial thrombi and echocontrast , and complex aortic atherosclerotic plaques are relatively uncommon in patients with atrial flutter . Post-cardioversion embolism was observed in two patients in our study population The present study was undertaken to reassess prospect ively the immediate and long-term results of direct-current electrical cardioversion in chronic atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter , and to determine factors predicting clinical outcome of the arrhythmia after direct-current cardioversion .  Two-hundred forty-six patients underwent direct-current electrical cardioversion  and were followed during a mean of 260 days . Multivariate analysis was used to identify factors predicting short- and long-term arrhythmia outcome . Cardioversion was achieved in 70 % of patients with atrial fibrillation and in 96 % of patients with atrial flutter . Stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that arrhythmia duration ( p less than 0.001 ) , type of arrhythmia ( fibrillation vs flutter , p less than 0.02 ) and age ( p less than 0.05 ) independently influenced conversion rate . On an actuarial basis , 42 and 36 % of patients remained in sinus rhythm during 1 and 2 years , respectively . Multivariate regression analysis revealed that the type of arrhythmia ( p = 0.0008 ) , low precardioversion functional class ( p = 0.002 ) and the presence of nonrheumatic mitral valve disease ( p = 0.03 ) independently increased the length of the arrhythmia-free episode . Rheumatic heart disease shortened this period ( p = 0.03 ) . In conclusion , patients having a high probability of conversion together with a prolonged post-shock arrhythmia-free episode can be identified . This may improve the cost-benefit ratio of cardioversion BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) or flutter occurring after myocardial infa rct ion may occur alone or in association with other complications . Whether the arrhythmia portends a poor prognosis independent of other complications with contemporary therapy is unknown . METHODS AND RESULTS As part of the Global Use of Strategies To Open occluded coronary arteries ( GUSTO-III ) trial , we evaluated whether postinfa rct ion complications were associated with the subsequent development of  AF  and whether AF independently predicted death over periods of 30 days and 1 year . Information including exact timing was collected on deaths and major in-hospital postinfa rct ion complications up to 30 days . Of the 13,858 patients with sinus rhythm at enrollment , 906 later had AF or flutter and 12 , 952 did not . We compared outcomes between these 2 groups , adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics and prefibrillation complications . Worsening heart failure , hypotension , third-degree heart block , and ventricular fibrillation were independent predictors of new-onset AF . The unadjusted odds ratio ( OR ) for death among patients with versus those without AF was 2.74 ( 95 % confidence interval [ 95 % CI ] , 2.56 - 3.34 ) . After adjusting for baseline differences , the OR was reduced to 1.63 ( 95 % CI , 1.31 - 2.02 ) . Adjustment for other in-hospital complications before the onset of AF further reduced the OR to 1.49 ( 95 % CI , 1.17 - 1.89 ) . CONCLUSIONS Atrial fibrillation or flutter occurs secondary to other postinfa rct ion complications but independently portends a worse prognosis . Prevention and management may improve outcome IMPORTANCE Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common rhythm disorder seen in clinical practice . Antiarrhythmic drugs are effective for reduction of recurrence in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF .  Radiofrequency ablation is an accepted therapy in patients for whom antiarrhythmic drugs have failed ; however , its role as a first-line therapy needs further investigation . OBJECTIVE To compare radiofrequency ablation with antiarrhythmic drugs ( st and ard therapy ) in treating patients with paroxysmal AF as a first-line therapy . DESIGN , SETTING , AND PATIENTS A r and omized clinical trial involving 127 treatment-naive patients with paroxysmal AF were r and omized at 16 centers in Europe and North America to received either antiarrhythmic therapy or ablation .  The first patient was enrolled July 27 , 2006 ; the last patient , January 29 , 2010 . The last follow-up was February 16 , 2012 . INTERVENTIONS Sixty-one patients in the antiarrhythmic drug group and 66 in the radiofrequency ablation group were followed up for 24 months . MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The time to the first documented atrial tachyarrhythmia of more than 30 seconds ( symptomatic or asymptomatic AF , atrial flutter , or atrial tachycardia ) , detected by either scheduled or unscheduled electrocardiogram , Holter , transtelephonic monitor , or rhythm strip , was the primary outcome . Secondary outcomes included symptomatic recurrences of atrial tachyarrhythmias and quality of life measures assessed by the EQ-5D tool . RESULTS Forty-four patients ( 72.1 % ) in the antiarrhythmic group and in 36 patients ( 54.5 % ) in the ablation group experienced the primary efficacy outcome ( hazard ratio [ HR ] , 0.56 [ 95 % CI , 0.35 - 0.90 ] ; P = .02 ) . For the secondary outcomes , 59 % in the drug group and 47 % in the ablation group experienced the first recurrence of symptomatic AF , atrial flutter , atrial tachycardia ( HR , 0.56 [ 95 % CI , 0.33 - 0.95 ] ; P = .03 ) . No deaths or strokes were reported in either group ; 4 cases of cardiac tamponade were reported in the ablation group . In the st and ard treatment group , 26 patients ( 43 % ) underwent ablation after 1-year . Quality of life was moderately impaired at baseline in both groups and improved at the 1 year follow-up . However , improvement was not significantly different among groups . CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients with paroxysmal AF without previous antiarrhythmic drug treatment , radiofrequency ablation compared with antiarrhythmic drugs result ed in a lower rate of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias at 2 years . However , recurrence was frequent in both groups . TRIAL REGISTRATION clinical trials.gov Identifier : NCT00392054 OBJECTIVE This study undertook to determine if the presence of atrial fibrillation in patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic left ventricular dysfunction was associated with increased mortality and , if so , whether the increase could be attributed to progressive heart failure or arrhythmic death . BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation is a common condition in heart failure with the potential to impact hemodynamics and progression of left ventricular systolic dysfunction as well as the electrophysiologic substrate for arrhythmias . The available data do not conclusively define the effect of atrial fibrillation on prognosis in heart failure . METHODS A retrospective analysis of the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction Prevention and Treatment Trials was conducted that compared patients with atrial fibrillation to those in sinus rhythm at baseline  for the risk of all-cause mortality , progressive pump-failure death and arrhythmic death . RESULTS The patients with atrial fibrillation at baseline , compared to those in sinus rhythm , had greater all-cause mortality ( 34 % vs. 23 % , p < 0.001 ) , death attributed to pump-failure ( 16.7 % vs. 9.4 % , p < 0.001 ) and were more likely to reach the composite end point of death or hospitalization for heart failure ( 45 % vs. 33 % , p < 0.001 ) , but there was no significant difference between the groups in arrhythmic deaths . After multivariate analysis , atrial fibrillation remained significantly associated with all-cause mortality ( relative risk [ RR ] 1.34 , 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] 1.12 to 1.62 , p=0.002 ) , progressive pump-failure death ( RR 1.42 , 95 % CI 1.09 to 1.85 , p=0.01 ) , the composite end point of death or hospitalization for heart failure ( RR 1.26 , 95 % CI 1.03 to 1.42 , p=0.02 ) , but not arrhythmic death ( RR 1.13 ; 95 % CI 0.75 to 1.71 ; p=0.55 ) . CONCLUSIONS The presence of atrial fibrillation in patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction is associated with an increased risk for all-cause mortality , largely explained by an increased risk for pump-failure death . These data suggest that atrial fibrillation is associated with progression of left ventricular systolic dysfunction BACKGROUND The ideal management of patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic atrial fibrillation ( AF ) remains unknown . Current practice guidelines recommend a trial of antiarrhythmic drugs ( AAD ) prior to considering an invasive ablation procedure . However , earlier ablation offers an opportunity to halt the progressive patho-anatomical changes associated with AF , as well as impart other important clinical benefits . OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to determine the optimal initial management strategy for patients with newly diagnosed , symptomatic atrial fibrillation . METHODS / DESIGN The EARLY-AF study ( Clinical Trials.govNCT02825979 ) is a prospect i ve , open label , multicenter , r and omized trial with a blinded assessment of outcomes . A total of 298 patients will be r and omized in a 1:1 fashion to first-line AAD therapy , or first-line cryoballoon-based pulmonary vein isolation .  Patients with symptomatic treatment naïve AF will be included . Arrhythmia outcomes will be assessed by implantable cardiac monitor ( ICM ) . The primary outcome is time to first recurrence of AF , atrial flutter , or atrial tachycardia ( AF/AFL/AT ) between days 91 and 365 following AAD initiation or AF ablation . Secondary outcomes include arrhythmia burden , quality of life , and healthcare utilization . DISCUSSION The EARLY-AF study is a r and omized trial design ed to evaluate the optimal first management approach for patients with AF . We hypothesize that catheter ablation will be superior to drug therapy in prevention of AF recurrence BACKGROUND We conducted a r and omized , controlled trial of circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation for the treatment of chronic atrial fibrillation . METHODS A total of 146 patients with a mean ( + /-SD ) age of 57+/-9 years who had chronic atrial fibrillation were r and omly assigned to receive amiodarone and undergo two cardioversions during the first three months alone ( the control group ) or in combination with circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation . Cardiac rhythm was assessed with daily telephonic transmissions for one year . The left atrial diameter and the severity of symptoms were assessed at 12 months . RESULTS Among the 77 patients assigned to undergo circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation , ablation was repeated because of recurrent atrial fibrillation in 26 percent of patients and atypical atrial flutter in 6 percent . An intention-to-treat analysis showed that 74 percent of patients in the ablation group and 58 percent of those in the control group were free of recurrent atrial fibrillation or flutter without antiarrhythmic-drug therapy at one year ( P=0.05 ) . Among the 69 patients in the control group , 53 ( 77 percent ) crossed over to undergo circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation for recurrent atrial fibrillation by one year and only 3 ( 4 percent ) were in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic-drug therapy or ablation . There were significant decreases in the left atrial diameter ( 12+/-11 percent , P<0.001 ) and the symptom severity score ( 59+/-21 percent , P<0.001 ) among patients who remained in sinus rhythm after circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation . Except for atypical atrial flutter , there were no complications attributable to circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation . CONCLUSIONS Sinus rhythm can be maintained long term in the majority of patients with chronic atrial fibrillation by means of circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation independently of the effects of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy , cardioversion , or both . The maintenance of sinus rhythm is associated with a significant decrease in both the severity of symptoms and the left atrial diameter BACKGROUND There are two approaches to the treatment of atrial fibrillation : one is cardioversion and treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs to maintain sinus rhythm , and the other is the use of rate-controlling drugs , allowing atrial fibrillation to persist . In both approaches , the use of anticoagulant drugs is recommended . METHODS We conducted a r and omized , multicenter comparison of these two treatment strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation and a high risk of stroke or death . The primary end point was overall mortality . RESULTS A total of 4060 patients ( mean [ + /-SD ] age , 69.7+/-9.0 years ) were enrolled in the study ; 70.8 percent had a history of hypertension , and 38.2 percent had coronary artery disease . Of the 3311 patients with echocardiograms , the left atrium was enlarged in 64.7 percent and left ventricular function was depressed in 26.0 percent . There were 356 deaths among the patients assigned to rhythm-control therapy and 310 deaths among those assigned to rate-control therapy ( mortality at five years , 23.8 percent and 21.3 percent , respectively ; hazard ratio , 1.15 [ 95 percent confidence interval , 0.99 to 1.34 ] ; P=0.08 ) . More patients in the rhythm-control group than in the rate-control group were hospitalized , and there were more adverse drug effects in the rhythm-control group as well . In both groups , the majority of strokes occurred after warfarin had been stopped or when the international normalized ratio was subtherapeutic . CONCLUSIONS Management of atrial fibrillation with the rhythm-control strategy offers no survival advantage over the rate-control strategy , and there are potential advantages , such as a lower risk of adverse drug effects , with the rate-control strategy . Anticoagulation should be continued in this group of high-risk patients BACKGROUND The aim of this prospect i ve study was to evaluate the recurrences of atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and flutter ( AFL ) after circumferential pulmonary vein ablation ( CPVA )  using repetitive long-term Holter recordings , and to evaluate the change in quality of life ( QoL ) , especially in patients with asymptomatic AF recurrences . METHODS A total of 149 patients with AF were followed up with 7-day Holter monitoring at 3 , 6 , and 12 months after CPVA .  We calculated the burden of AF/AFL defined as the percentage of time in AF/AFL , and patients with documented arrhythmia were divided into isolated symptomatic episodes of arrhythmia , mixed symptomatic/asymptomatic arrhythmia , or isolated asymptomatic arrhythmia . The QoL was analyzed with SF-36 question naires in patients with sinus rhythm after CPVA , and in patients with recurrence of symptomatic and asymptomatic arrhythmia , respectively . RESULTS Asymptomatic arrhythmia was observed in 44 % of the patients with documented arrhythmia at 12 months of follow-up . In patients with persistent AF , 63 % of the documented arrhythmia at 12 months of follow-up was asymptomatic and often persistent . In the subgroup of patients with asymptomatic arrhythmia , the QoL improved significantly in the physical scores , in contrast to patients with symptomatic arrhythmia who had unchanged or worsened QoL scores . CONCLUSIONS Asymptomatic arrhythmia is very common after AF ablation . Our data indicate that these patients improve their physical component of the QoL significantly , which may be considered a palliative success of treatment . We suggest that patients with asymptomatic AF recurrences are carefully evaluated before considering reablation . Repetitive rhythm monitoring after AF ablation is very important considering the postablation management of anticoagulant therapy BACKGROUND Controlled clinical trial data are lacking for cardiac resynchronization therapy ( CRT ) outcomes in patients with advanced heart failure ( HF ) from reduced left ventricular ejection fraction ( HFrEF ) and intermittent atrial fibrillation or flutter ( IAF/AFL ) . OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to describe CRT outcomes in patients with IAF/AFL and advanced HF . METHODS HF outcomes in patients in the COMPANION ( Comparison of Medical Therapy , Pacing , and Defibrillation in Heart Failure ) trial with New York Heart Association class III or IV HFrEF , left ventricular ejection fraction ≤0.35 , sinus rhythm at r and omization , and no history of baseline arrhythmia were compared with those with a history of IAF/AFL . RESULTS In those with no history of baseline arrhythmia ( n = 887 ) , compared with optimal pharmacological therapy ( OPT ) with no CRT , the CRT + OPT arms exhibited a significant reduction in the end points of death or any hospitalization ( hazard ratio [ HR ] 0.73 [ 95 % Confidence Interval ( CI ) : 0.60 to 0.89 ] ; P = .002 ) and death or HF hospitalization ( HR 0.53 [ 95 % CI : 0.41 to 0.68 ] ; P < .001 ) . In contrast , in the IAF/AFL subgroup ( n = 293 ) , CRT did not result in improved outcomes compared with OPT ( death or any hospitalization : HR 1.16 [ 95 % CI : 0.83 to 1.63 ] ; P = .38 ; death or HF hospitalization : HR 0.97 [ 95 % CI : 0.64 to 1.46 ] ; P = .88 ) . The interaction between history of AF/AFL and CRT was statistically significant for both outcomes ( P < .05 ) . CONCLUSION In the COMPANION trial , patients with moderate to severe HFrEF and a history of IAF/AFL had no benefit from CRT AIMS Permanent atrial fibrillation develops in many patients after ablation and pacing therapy .  We compared a strategy that initially allowed patients to remain in atrial fibrillation with a strategy that initially attempted to restore and maintain sinus rhythm . METHODS AND RESULTS In this multicentre r and omized controlled trial , 68 patients affected by severely symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were assigned , after successful atrioventricular junction ablation and pacing treatment  , to antiarrhythmic drug therapy with amiodarone , propafenone , flecainide or sotalol and were compared with 69 patients assigned , after successful AV junction ablation and pacing treatment , to no antiarrhythmic drug therapy . The patients were followed-up for 12 to 24 months ( mean 16+/-4 ) . The drug arm patients had a 57 % reduction in the risk of developing permanent atrial fibrillation ( 21 % vs 37 % , P=0.02 ) . Evaluation after 12 months revealed similar quality of life scores and echocardiographic parameters in the two groups , but the drug arm patients had more episodes of heart failure and hospitalizations ( P=0.05 ) . The outcome was similar between the 40 patients who developed permanent atrial fibrillation and the 97 who did not . CONCLUSION Conventional antiarrhythmic therapy reduces the risk of development of permanent atrial fibrillation after ablation and pacing therapy . The present data do not support the concept that the development of permanent atrial fibrillation is related to an adverse outcome when a perfect control of heart rate is obtained by ablation and pacing BACKGROUND Maintenance of sinus rhythm is the main therapeutic goal in patients with atrial fibrillation . However , recurrences of atrial fibrillation and side effects of antiarrhythmic drugs offset the benefits of sinus rhythm . We hypothesized that ventricular rate control is not inferior to the maintenance of sinus rhythm for the treatment of atrial fibrillation . METHODS We r and omly assigned 522 patients who had persistent atrial fibrillation after a previous electrical cardioversion to receive treatment aim ed at rate control or rhythm control . Patients in the rate-control group received oral anticoagulant drugs and rate-slowing medication . Patients in the rhythm-control group underwent serial cardioversions and received antiarrhythmic drugs and oral anticoagulant drugs . The end point was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes , heart failure , thromboembolic complications , bleeding , implantation of a pacemaker , and severe adverse effects of drugs . RESULTS After a mean ( + /-SD ) of 2.3+/-0.6 years , 39 percent of the 266 patients in the rhythm-control group had sinus rhythm , as compared with 10 percent of the 256 patients in the rate-control group . The primary end point occurred in 44 patients ( 17.2 percent ) in the rate-control group and in 60 ( 22.6 percent ) in the rhythm-control group . The 90 percent ( two-sided ) upper boundary of the absolute difference in the primary end point was 0.4 percent ( the prespecified criterion for noninferiority was 10 percent or less ) . The distribution of the various components of the primary end point was similar in the rate-control and rhythm-control groups . CONCLUSIONS Rate control is not inferior to rhythm control for the prevention of death and morbidity from cardiovascular causes and may be appropriate therapy in patients with a recurrence of persistent atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion
Discussion The results of this systematic review have the potential to benefit thous and s of patients worldwide as well as healthcare systems and healthcare economy .
Background Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia of the heart with a prevalence of approximately 2 % in the western world .
Atrial flutter , another arrhythmia , occurs less often with an incidence of approximately 200,000 new patients per year in the USA .
Patients with atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter have an increased risk of death and morbidities .
The management of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter is often based on interventions aim ing at either a rhythm control strategy or a rate control strategy .
The evidence on the comparable effects of these strategies is unclear .
This protocol for a systematic review aims at identifying the best overall treatment strategy for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter .