Delaying progression to type 2 diabetes among high-risk Spanish individuals is feasible in real-life primary healthcare settings using intensive lifestyle intervention PRomotion Of Physical activity through structured Education with differing Levels of ongoing Support for people at high risk of type 2 diabetes (PROPELS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Lifestyle intervention to prevent diabetes in men and women with impaired glucose tolerance is cost-effective. Translating the Diabetes Prevention Program to Primary Care: A Pilot Study The Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study (DPS): Lifestyle intervention and 3-year results on diet and physical activity. A 3-Year Randomized Trial of Lifestyle Intervention for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction in the Primary Care Setting: The Swedish Björknäs Study Implementation of a lifestyle intervention for type 2 diabetes prevention in Dutch primary care: opportunities for intervention delivery Economic evaluation of a lifestyle intervention in primary care to prevent type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases: a randomized controlled trial A cluster-randomized controlled trial to study the effectiveness of a protocol-based lifestyle program to prevent type 2 diabetes in people with impaired fasting glucose Motivational interviewing and problem solving treatment to reduce type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease risk in real life: a randomized controlled trial Cluster randomised controlled trial of a peer-led lifestyle intervention program: study protocol for the Kerala diabetes prevention program Development of a multi-component lifestyle intervention for preventing type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors in adults with intellectual disabilities Walking away from type 2 diabetes: trial protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating a structured education programme in those at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes The Sydney Diabetes Prevention Program: A community-based translational study Preventing diabetes in primary care: a feasibility cluster randomized trial. Community-Based Translation of the Diabetes Prevention Program’s Lifestyle Intervention in an Underserved Latino Population The Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study.
Aims /hypothesisTo assess the feasibility and effectiveness of an active real-life primary care lifestyle intervention in preventing  type 2 diabetes within a high-risk Mediterranean population . Methods A prospect i ve cohort study was performed in the setting of Spanish primary care . White-European individuals without diabetes aged 45–75 years ( n = 2,054 ) were screened using the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score ( FINDRISC ) and a subsequent 2 h OGTT . Where feasible , high-risk individuals who were identified were allocated sequentially to st and ard care , a group-based or an individual level intervention ( intensive reinforced DE-PLAN [ Diabetes in Europe — Prevention using Lifestyle , Physical Activity and Nutritional ] intervention ) . The primary outcome was the development of diabetes according to WHO criteria . Analyses after 4-year follow-up were performed based on the intention-to-treat principle with comparison of st and ard care and the combined intervention groups . Results The st and ard care ( n = 219 ) and intensive intervention ( n = 333 ) groups were comparable in age ( 62.0/62.2 years ) , sex ( 64.4/68.2 % women ) , BMI ( 31.3/31.2 kg/m2 ) , FINDRISC score ( 16.2/15.8 points ) , fasting ( 5.3/5.2 mmol/l ) , 2 h plasma glucose ( 7.1/6.9 mmol/l ) and self-reported interest to make lifestyle changes at baseline . Diabetes was diagnosed in 124 individuals : 63 ( 28.8 % ) in the st and ard care group and 61 ( 18.3 % ) in the intensive intervention group . During a 4.2-year median follow-up , the incidences of diabetes were 7.2 and 4.6 cases per 100 person-years , respectively ( 36.5 % relative risk reduction , p < 0.005 ) . The number of participants needed to be treated by intensive intervention for 4 years to reduce one case of diabetes was 9.5 . Conclusions /interpretationIntensive lifestyle intervention is feasible in a primary care setting and substantially reduces diabetes incidence among high-risk individuals . Clinical trial registration : Clinical Trial.gov NCT01519505 Funding : Commission of the European Communities , Institute of Health Carlos III , Spanish Ministry of Health and Department of Health , Generalitat de Catalunya Background The prevention of type 2 diabetes is recognised as a health care priority . Lifestyle change has proven effective at reducing the risk of type 2 diabetes , but limitations in the current evidence have been identified in : the promotion of physical activity ; availability of interventions that are suitable for commissioning and implementation ; availability of evidence -based interventions using new technologies ; and physical activity promotion among ethnic minorities . We aim to investigate whether a structured education programme with differing levels of ongoing support , including text-messaging , can increase physical activity over a 4 year period in a multi-ethnic population at high risk of diabetes . Methods / Design A multi-centre r and omised controlled trial , with follow-up at 12 and 48 months . The primary outcome is change in ambulatory activity at 48 months . Secondary outcomes include changes to markers of metabolic , cardiovascular , anthropometric and psychological health along with cost-effectiveness .  Participants aged 40–74 years for White European , or 25–74 years for South Asians , with an HbA1c value of between 6.0 and < 6.4 % ( 42 and 47 mmol/mol ) or with a previously recorded plasma glucose level or HbA1c value within the high risk ( prediabetes ) range within the last five years , are invited to take part in the trial . Participants are identified through primary care , using an automated diabetes risk score within their practice data base , or from a data base of previous research participants . Participants are r and omly assigned to either : 1 ) the control group who receive a detailed advice leaflet ; 2 ) the Walking Away group , who receive the same leaflet and attend a 3 hour structured education programme with annual maintenance sessions delivered in groups ; or 3 ) the Walking Away Plus group , who receive the leaflet , attend the structured education programme with annual maintenance sessions , plus receive follow-on support through highly-tailored text-messaging and telephone calls to help to aid pedometer use and behaviour change . Discussion This study will provide new evidence for the long-term effectiveness of a structured education programme focused on physical activity , conducted within routine care in a multi-ethnic population in the UK . It will also investigate the impact of different levels of ongoing support and the cost-effectiveness of each intervention . Trial registration IS RCT N83465245 Trial registration date : OBJECTIVES The Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study ( DPS ) was a r and omized intervention program that evaluated the effect of intensive lifestyle modification on the development of diabetes mellitus type 2 in patients with impaired glucose tolerance . As such , a program is dem and ing in terms of re sources ; it is necessary to assess whether it would be money well spent . This determination was the purpose of this study . METHODS We developed a simulation model to assess the economic consequences of an intervention like the one studied in DPS in a Swedish setting . The model used data from the trial itself to assess the effect of intervention on the risk of diabetes and on risk factors for cardiovascular disease . Results from the United Kingdom Prospect i ve Diabetes Study were used to estimate the risk of cardiovascular disease and stroke . Cost data were derived from Swedish studies . The intervention was assumed to be applied to eligible patients from a population -based screening program of 60-year-olds in the County of Stockholm from which the baseline characteristics of the patients was used . RESULTS The model predicted that implementing the program would be cost-saving from the healthcare payers ' perspective . Furthermore , it was associated with an increase in estimated survival of .18 years . Taking into consideration the increased consumption by patients due to their longer survival , the predicted cost-effectiveness ratio was 2,363 euro per quality -adjusted life-year gained . CONCLUSIONS Lifestyle intervention directed toward high-risk subjects would be cost-saving for the healthcare payer and highly cost-effective for society as a whole Background : Research on the translation of efficacious lifestyle change programs to prevent type 2 diabetes into community or clinical setting s is needed . Objective : The objective of this study was to examine the reach , implementation , and efficacy of a 6-month lifestyle program implemented in primary care by nurse practitioners ( NPs ) for adults at risk of type 2 diabetes . Methods : The NP sites ( n = 4 ) were r and omized to an enhanced st and ard care program ( one  NP  and one  nutrition session ) or a lifestyle program ( enhanced st and ard care and six NP sessions ) . These NPs recruited adults at risk of diabetes from their practice ( n = 58 ) , with an acceptance rate of 70 % . Results : The program reached a diverse , obese , and moderately low income sample . The NPs were able to successfully implement the protocol s. The average length of the program was 9.3 months . Attendance was high ( 98 % ) , and attrition was low ( 12 % ) . The NPs were able to adopt the educational , behavioral , and psychosocial strategies of the intervention easily . Motivational interviewing was more difficult for NPs . Mixed-model repeated- measures analysis indicated significant trends or improvement in both groups for nutrition and exercise behavior . Participants of the lifestyle program demonstrated trends for better high-density lipoprotein ( HDL ) and exercise behavior compared with the enhanced st and ard care participants . Twenty-five percent of lifestyle participants met treatment goals of 5 % weight loss compared with 11 % of st and ard care participants . Discussion : A lifestyle program can be implemented in primary care by NPs , reach the targeted population , and be modestly successful . Further research is indicated OBJECTIVE To describe the 1 ) lifestyle intervention used in the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study , 2 ) short- and long-term changes in diet and exercise behavior , and 3 ) effect of the intervention on glucose and lipid metabolism . RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS There were 522 middle-aged , overweight subjects with impaired glucose tolerance who were r and omized to either a usual care control group or an intensive lifestyle intervention group .  The control group received general dietary and exercise advice at baseline and had an annual physician 's examination . The subjects in the intervention group received additional individualized dietary counseling from a nutritionist . They were also offered circuit-type resistance training sessions and advised to increase overall physical activity .  The intervention was the most intensive during the first year , followed by a maintenance period . The intervention goals were to reduce body weight , reduce dietary and saturated fat , and increase physical activity and dietary fiber . RESULTS The intervention group showed significantly greater improvement in each intervention goal . After 1 and 3 years , weight reductions were 4.5 and 3.5 kg in the intervention group and 1.0 and 0.9 kg in the control group , respectively . Measures of glycemia and lipemia improved more in the intervention group . CONCLUSIONS The intensive lifestyle intervention produced long-term beneficial changes in diet , physical activity , and clinical and biochemical parameters and reduced diabetes risk . This type of intervention is a feasible option to prevent type 2 diabetes and should be implemented in the primary health care system Background Successfully transferring the findings of expensive and tightly controlled programmes of intensive lifestyle modification to the primary care setting is necessary if such knowledge is to be of clinical utility . The objective of this study was to test whether intensive lifestyle modification , shown previously in tightly-controlled clinical trials to be efficacious for diabetes risk-reduction among high-risk individuals , can reduce cardiovascular risk factor levels in the primary care setting . Methodology / Principal Findings The Swedish Björknäs study was a r and omized controlled trial conducted from 2003 to 2006 with follow-up on cardiovascular risk factors at 3 , 12 , 24 and 36 months . A total of 151 middle-aged men and women at moderate- to high-risk of cardiovascular disease from northern Sweden were r and omly assigned to either an intensive lifestyle intervention ( n = 75 ) or control ( n = 76 ) group . The intervention was based broadly on the protocol of the Diabetes Prevention Program . The three-month intervention period was administered in the primary care setting and consisted of supervised exercise sessions and diet counselling , followed by regular group meetings during three years . The control group was given general advice about diet and exercise and received st and ard clinical care . Outcomes were changes in anthropometrics , aerobic fitness , self-reported physical activity , blood pressure , and metabolic traits . At 36 months post-r and omisation , intensive lifestyle modification  reduced waist circumference ( −2.2 cm : p = 0.001 ) , waist-hip ratio ( −0.02 : p<0.0001 ) , systolic blood pressure ( −4.9 mmHg : p = 0.036 ) , and diastolic blood pressure ( −1.6 mmHg : p = 0.005 ) , and improved aerobic fitness ( 5 % ; p = 0.038 ) . Changes in lipid or glucose values did not differ statistically between groups . At 36 months , self-reported time spent exercising and total physical activity had increased more in the intervention group than in the control group ( p<0.001 ) . Conclusion / Significance A program of intensive lifestyle modification undertaken in the primary health care setting can favourably influence cardiovascular risk-factor profiles in high-risk individuals . Trial Registration Clinical Trials.gov Background As in clinical practice re sources may be limited compared to experimental setting s , translation of evidence -based lifestyle interventions into daily life setting s is challenging . In this study we therefore evaluated the implementation of the APHRODITE lifestyle intervention for the prevention of type 2 diabetes in Dutch primary care . Based on this evaluation we discuss opportunities for refining intervention delivery . Methods A 2.5-year intervention was performed in 14 general practice s in the Netherl and s among individuals at high risk for type 2 diabetes ( FINDRISC-score ≥ 13 ) ( n = 479 ) and was compared to usual care ( n = 446 ) . Intervention consisted of individual lifestyle counselling by nurse practitioners ( n = 24 ) and GPs ( n = 48 ) and group-consultations .  Drop-out and attendance were registered during the programme . After the intervention , satisfaction with the programme and perceived implementation barriers were assessed with question naires . Results Drop-out was modest ( intervention : 14.6 % ; usual care : 13.2 % ) and attendance at individual consultations was high ( intervention : 80 - 97 % ; usual care : 86 - 94 % ) . Providers were confident about diabetes prevention by lifestyle intervention in primary care . Participants were more satisfied with counselling from nurse practitioners than from GPs . A major part of the GPs reported low self-efficacy regarding dietary guidance . Lack of counselling time ( 60 % ) , participant motivation ( 12 % ) , and financial reimbursement ( 11 % ) were regarded by providers as important barriers for intervention implementation . Conclusions High participant compliance and a positive attitude of providers make primary care a suitable setting for diabetes prevention by lifestyle counselling . Results support a role for the nurse practitioner as the key player in guiding lifestyle modification . Further research is needed on strategies that could increase cost-effectiveness , such as more stringent criteria for participant inclusion , group-counselling , more tailor-made counselling and integration of screening and / or interventions for different disorders Background Cost-effectiveness studies of lifestyle interventions in people at risk for lifestyle-related diseases , addressing ‘ real-world ’ implementation , are needed . This study examines the cost-effectiveness of a primary care intervention from a societal perspective , compared with provision of health brochures , alongside a r and omized controlled trial . Methods Adults aged 30 - 50 years , at risk of type 2 diabetes ( T2DM ) and /or cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) , were recruited from twelve general practice s in The Netherl and s. They were r and omized to the intervention ( n = 314 ) or control group ( n = 308 ) . The intervention consisted of up to six face-to-face counseling sessions with a trained practice nurse , followed by three-monthly sessions by phone . Costs were collected using three-monthly retrospective question naires . Quality of life was measured with the EuroQol-5D-3L , at baseline , 6 , 12 and 24 months . Nine-year risk of developing T2DM and ten-year risk of CVD mortality were estimated using the ARIC and SCORE formulae , respectively , based on measurements at baseline and 24 months while applying a fixed age of 60 years at both time points . Results Small , statistically non-significant differences in effects were found between the intervention and control group with regard to risk scores and Quality Adjusted Life Years ( QALYs ) gained . The mean difference in costs between the intervention and control group was € -866 ( 95 % confidence interval -2372 ; 370 ) . The probability that the intervention was cost-effective varied from 93 % at € 8000/QALY to 88 % at € 80,000/QALY . Conclusion A primary care lifestyle intervention aim ed at adults at increased risk of T2DM and /or CVD  could result in cost savings over a two-year period . However , due to method ological uncertainty no advice can be given regarding the implementation of the intervention in Dutch general practice s . Trial registration Current Controlled Trials IS RCT N59358434 Background Effective diabetes prevention strategies that can be implemented in daily practice , without huge amounts of money and a lot of personnel are needed . The Dutch Diabetes Federation developed a protocol for coaching people with impaired fasting glucose ( IFG ; according to WHO criteria : 6.1 to 6.9 mmol/l ) to a sustainable healthy lifestyle change : ‘ the road map towards diabetes prevention ’ ( abbreviated : Road Map : RM ) . This protocol is applied within a primary health care setting by a general practitioner and a practice nurse . The feasibility and ( cost- ) effectiveness of care provided according to the RM protocol will be evaluated . Methods / Design A cluster r and omised clinical trial is performed , with r and omisation at the level of the general practice s. Both opportunistic screening and active case finding took place among clients with high risk factors for diabetes . After IFG is diagnosed , motivated people in the intervention practice s receive 3–4 consultations by the practice nurse within one year . During these consultations they are coached to increase the level of physical activity and healthy dietary habits . If necessary , participants are referred to a dietician , physiotherapist , lifestyle programs and /or local sports activities . The control group receives care as usual . The primary outcome measure in this study is change in Body Mass Index ( BMI ) . Secondary outcome measures are waist circumference , physical activity , total and saturated fat intake , systolic blood pressure , blood glucose , total cholesterol , HDL cholesterol , triglycerides and behaviour determinants like risk perception , perceived knowledge and motivation . Based on a sample size calculation 120 people in each group are needed . Measurements are performed at baseline , and after one ( post-intervention ) and two years follow up . Anthropometrics and biochemical parameters are assessed in the practice s and physical activity , food intake and their determinants by a vali date d question naire . The cost-effectiveness is estimated by using the Chronic Disease Model ( CDM ) . Feasibility will be tested by interviews among health care professionals . Discussion The results of the study will provide valuable information for both health care professionals and policy makers . If this study shows the RM to be both effective and cost-effective the protocol can be implemented on a large scale . Trial registration IS RCT N41209683 . Ethical approval number : NL31342.075.10 Background Intensive lifestyle interventions in well-controlled setting s are effective in lowering the risk of chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes ( T2DM ) and cardiovascular diseases ( CVD ) , but there are still no effective lifestyle interventions for everyday practice . In the Hoorn Prevention Study we aim ed to assess the effectiveness of a primary care based lifestyle intervention to reduce the estimated risk of developing T2DM and for CVD mortality , and to motivate changes in lifestyle behaviors . Methods The Hoorn Prevention Study is a parallel group r and omized controlled trial , implemented in the region of West-Friesl and , the Netherl and s. 622 adults with ≥10 % estimated risk of T2DM and /or CVD mortality were r and omly assigned and monitored over a period of 12 months . The intervention group ( n=314 ) received a theory-based lifestyle intervention based on an innovative combination of motivational interviewing and problem solving treatment , provided by trained practice nurses in 12 general practice s. The control group ( n=308 ) received existing health brochures . Primary outcomes was the estimated diabetes risk according to the formula of the Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities ( ARIC ) Study , and the estimated risk for CVD mortality according to the Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation ( SCORE ) formula . Secondary outcomes included lifestyle behavior ( diet , physical activity and smoking ) . The research assistants , the principal investigator and the general practitioners were blinded to group assignment . Linear and logistic regression analysis was applied to examine the between-group differences in each outcome measure , adjusted for baseline values . Results 536 ( 86.2 % ) of the 622 participants ( age 43.5 years ) completed the 6-month follow-up , and 502 ( 81.2 % ) completed the 12-month follow-up . The mean baseline T2DM risk was 18.9 % ( SD 8.2 ) and the mean CVD mortality risk was 3.8 % ( SD 3.0 ) . The intervention group participated in a median of 2 sessions . Intention-to-treat analyses showed no significant differences in outcomes between the two groups at 6 or 12-months follow-up . Conclusions The lifestyle intervention was not more effective than health brochures in reducing risk scores for T2DM and CVD or improving lifestyle behavior in an at-risk population .Trial registration Current Controlled Trials : IS RCT Background India currently has more than 60 million people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ( T2DM ) and this is predicted to increase by nearly two-thirds by 2030 . While management of those with T2DM is important , preventing or delaying the onset of the disease , especially in those individuals at ‘ high risk ’ of developing T2DM , is urgently needed , particularly in re source -constrained setting s. This paper describes the protocol for a cluster r and omised controlled trial of a peer-led lifestyle intervention program to prevent diabetes in Kerala , India . Methods / design A total of 60 polling booths are r and omised to the intervention arm or control arm in rural Kerala , India . Data collection is conducted in two steps . Step 1 ( Home screening ) : Participants aged 30–60 years are administered a screening question naire . Those having no history of T2DM and other chronic illnesses with an Indian Diabetes Risk Score value of ≥60 are invited to attend a mobile clinic ( Step 2 ) . At the mobile clinic , participants complete question naires , undergo physical measurements , and provide blood sample s for biochemical analysis . Participants identified with T2DM at Step 2 are excluded from further study participation . Participants in the control arm are provided with a health education booklet containing information on symptoms , complications , and risk factors of T2DM with the recommended levels for primary prevention . Participants in the intervention arm receive : ( 1 ) eleven peer-led small group sessions to motivate , guide and support in planning , initiation and maintenance of lifestyle changes ; ( 2 ) two diabetes prevention education sessions led by experts to raise awareness on T2DM risk factors , prevention and management ; ( 3 ) a participant h and book containing information primarily on peer support and its role in assisting with lifestyle modification ; ( 4 ) a participant workbook to guide self-monitoring of lifestyle behaviours , goal setting and goal review ; ( 5 ) the health education booklet that is given to the control arm . Follow-up assessment s are conducted at 12 and 24 months . The primary outcome is incidence of T2DM . Secondary outcomes include behavioural , psychosocial , clinical , and biochemical measures . An economic evaluation is planned . Discussion Results from this trial will contribute to improved policy and practice regarding lifestyle intervention programs to prevent diabetes in India and other re source -constrained setting s . Trial registration Australia and New Zeal and Clinical Trials Registry : ACTRN12611000262909 Background We report on the development of the ' STOP Diabetes ' education programme , a multi-component lifestyle behaviour change intervention for the prevention of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors in adults with intellectual disabilities ( ID ) . Methods We combined qualitative stakeholder interviews with evidence review s to develop the intervention , guided by the MRC Framework and informed by intervention mapping and two existing diabetes prevention programmes . We conducted two pilot cycles drawing on additional stakeholder interviews to inform and refine the intervention . Results The STOP Diabetes education programme employed a theoretical framework , using sound learning and behavioural principles and concrete kinaesthetic methods , to provide the grounding for innovative games and activities to promote health behaviour change in adults with ID . Qualitative data also suggested that two educators and one support person delivering a programme of one carer session followed by seven 2.5-h sessions over 7 weeks was acceptable to service users , carers and educators and appeared to benefit the participants . Conclusions The STOP Diabetes education programme was successfully developed and is suitable for a definitive r and omized controlled trial Background The prevention of  type 2 diabetes  is a recognised health care priority globally . Within the United Kingdom , there is a lack of research investigating optimal methods of translating diabetes prevention programmes , based on the promotion of a healthy lifestyle , into routine primary care . This study aims to establish the behavioural and clinical effectiveness of a structured educational programme design ed to target perceptions and knowledge of diabetes risk and promote a healthily lifestyle , particularly increased walking activity , in a multi-ethnic population at a high risk of developing type 2 diabetes . Design Cluster r and omised controlled trial undertaken at the level of primary care practice s. Follow-up will be conducted at 12 , 24 and 36 months . The primary outcome is change in objective ly measured ambulatory activity . Secondary outcomes include progression to type 2 diabetes , biochemical variables ( including fasting glucose , 2-h glucose , HbA1c and lipids ) , anthropometric variables , quality of life and depression . Methods 10 primary care practice s will be recruited to the study ( 5 intervention , 5 control ) . Within each practice , individuals at high risk of impaired glucose regulation will be identified using an automated version of the Leicester Risk Assessment tool . Individuals scoring within the 90th percentile in each practice will be invited to take part in the study . Practice s will be assigned to either the control group ( advice leaflet ) or the intervention group , in which participants will be invited to attend a 3 hour structured educational programme design ed to promote physical activity and a healthy lifestyle . Participants in the intervention practice s will also be invited to attend annual group-based maintenance workshops and will receive telephone contact halfway between annual sessions . The study will run from 2010–2014 . Discussion This study will provide new evidence surrounding the long-term effectiveness of a diabetes prevention programme run within routine primary care in the United Kingdom . Trial Registration Clinical Trials . Gov identifier : Background Type 2 diabetes is a major public health problem in Australia with prevalence increasing in parallel with increasing obesity . Prevention is an essential component of strategies to reduce the diabetes burden . There is strong and consistent evidence from r and omised controlled trials that type 2 diabetes can be prevented or delayed through lifestyle modification which improves diet , increases physical activity and achieves weight loss in at risk people . The current challenge is to translate this evidence into routine community setting s , determine feasible and effective ways of delivering the intervention and providing on-going support to sustain successful behavioural changes . Methods / Design The Sydney Diabetes Prevention Program ( SDPP ) is a translational study which will be conducted in 1,550 participants aged 50 - 65 years ( including 100 indigenous people aged 18 years and older ) at high risk of future development of diabetes . Participants will be identified through a screening and recruitment program delivered through primary care and will be offered a community-based lifestyle modification intervention . The intervention comprises an initial individual session and three group sessions based on behaviour change principles and focuses on five goals : 5 % weight loss , 210 min/week physical activity ( aerobic and strength training exercise ) , limit dietary fat and saturated fat to less than 30 % and 10 % of energy intake respectively , and at least 15 g/1000 kcal dietary fibre . This is followed by 3-monthly contact with participants to review progress and offer ongoing lifestyle advice for 12 months . The effectiveness and costs of the program on diabetes-related risk factors will be evaluated . Main outcomes include changes in weight , physical activity , and dietary changes ( fat , saturated fat and fibre intake ) . Secondary outcomes include changes in waist circumference , fasting plasma glucose , blood pressure , lipids , quality of life , psychological well being , medication use and health service utilization . Discussion This translational study will ascertain the reach , feasibility , effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a lifestyle modification program delivered in a community setting through primary health care . If demonstrated to be effective , it will result in recommendations for policy change and practical methods for a wider community program for preventing or delaying the onset of type 2 diabetes in high risk people OBJECTIVE To determine the feasibility of implementing a large-scale primary care-based diabetes prevention trial . METHODS A feasibility cluster r and omized controlled trial was conducted in British Columbia , Canada , amongst adults with prediabetes using the Facilitated Lifestyle Intervention Prescription ( FLIP ) vs. usual care . FLIP included lifestyle advice , a pedometer , and telephone support from a lifestyle facilitator for 6 months . Indicators of feasibility included recruitment rates of family practice s , participants and facilitators , as well as feasibility and retention rates in the FLIP program and study protocol s. RESULTS Six family practice s participated ; 59 patients were enrolled between October 2012 and March 2013 . The trial protocol was acceptable to practice s and participants and had a 95 % participant retention rate over the 6 months ( 56/59 ) . Adherence to the intervention was high ( 97 % ) , with 34 of 35 patients continuing to receive telephone calls from the facilitator for 6 months . The mean cost of the intervention was C$ 144 per person . Compared with control , intervention participants significantly reduced weight by 3.2 kg ( 95 % CI , 1.7 to 4.6 ) ; body mass index by 1.2 ( 95 % CI , 0.7 to 1.7 ) and waist circumference by 3 cm ( 95 % CI , 0.3 to 5.7 ) . CONCLUSIONS It is feasible to implement FLIP and to conduct a trial to assess effectiveness . A larger trial with longer follow up to assess progression to diabetes is warranted Purpose The objective was to take prevention from the clinic to the community by including a high-risk group and working with the community to tailor , enhance , deliver , and evaluate a community-based version of the Diabetes Prevention Program ’s ( DPP ) clinic-based lifestyle intervention . Methods This was a nonr and omized prospect i ve study using a single-group design . Study eligibility included a screening glucose value in the normal to prediabetes range with no current diagnosis of diabetes , overweight , not pregnant nor planning to become pregnant during study period , aged 18 to 65 , Latino , living in the study target communities , and no reported medical restrictions related to the program goals . A total of 69 individuals participated . The Healthy Living Program ( HLP ) was based on the DPP ’s 1-year intensive lifestyle program , was tailored and enhanced for a Latino community , and was delivered by community health workers . Anthropometric and paper and pencil measures were administered to examine program outcome at 6 months and 12 months . Results In general , results indicate statistically significant improvements in anthropometrics and many behavioral outcomes , particularly at 6 months . Participants demonstrated forward movement through the stages of change during the program . Conclusions Results support the effectiveness of the intervention and show that delivery of the translated version of the DPP ’s lifestyle intervention in the community by community residents holds promise as one strategy to reach people at increased risk of developing diabetes . Use of this translation model , including collaboration with community health workers , offers diabetes educators an opportunity to extend their reach into underserved communities The aim of the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study is to assess the efficacy of an intensive diet-exercise programme in preventing or delaying  type 2 diabetes in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance ( IGT ) and to evaluate the effect of the programme on the risk factors of atherosclerotic vascular diseases and the incidence of cardiovascular events . In this ongoing study , a total of 523 overweight subjects with IGT based on two oral glucose tolerance tests were r and omized to either an intervention group or a control group . The main measure in the intervention group is individual dietary advice aim ed at reducing weight and intake of saturated fat and increasing intake of dietary fibre . The intervention subjects are individually guided to increase their level of physical activity .  The control group receives general information about the benefits of weight reduction , physical activity and healthy diet in the prevention of diabetes . A pilot study began in 1993 , and recruitment ended in 1998 . By the end of April 1999 there were 65 new cases of diabetes , 34 drop-outs and one death . The weight reduction was greater ( -4.6 kg ) at 1 year in the intervention group ( n = 152 ) than in the control group ( n = 143 , -0.9 kg , P < 0.0001 ) , and this difference was sustained in the second year of follow-up . At 1 year 43.4 % and at 2 years 41.8 % of the intervention subjects had achieved a weight reduction of at least 5 kg , while the corresponding figures for the control subjects were 14.0 and 12.0 % ( P < 0.001 between the groups ) . At 1 year the intervention group showed significantly greater reductions in 2 h glucose , fasting and 2 h insulin , systolic and diastolic blood pressure , and serum triglycerides . Most of the beneficial changes in cardiovascular risk factors were sustained for 2 years . These interim results of the ongoing Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study demonstrate the efficacy and feasibility of the lifestyle intervention programme
A significant positive effect of the interventions on weight was reported by all study types .
The meta- analysis showed that lifestyle interventions achieved weight and waist circumference reductions after one year .
However , no clear effects on biochemical or clinical parameters were observed , possibly due to short follow-up periods or lack of power of the studies meta-analysed .
Changes in dietary parameters or physical activity were generally not reported .
Most studies assessing feasibility were supportive of implementation of lifestyle interventions in routine clinical care .
Conclusion Lifestyle interventions for patients at high risk of diabetes , delivered by a variety of healthcare providers in routine clinical setting s , are feasible but appear to be of limited clinical benefit one year after intervention .
Despite convincing evidence from structured intensive trials , this systematic review showed that translation into routine practice has less effect on diabetes risk reduction
Background The clinical effectiveness of intensive lifestyle interventions in preventing or delaying diabetes in people at high risk has been established from r and omised trials of structured , intensive interventions conducted in several countries over the past two decades .
The challenge is to translate them into routine clinical setting s. The objective of this review is to determine whether lifestyle interventions delivered to high-risk adult patients in routine clinical care setting s are feasible and effective in achieving reductions in risk factors for diabetes .