Left atrial radiofrequency ablation during cardiac surgery in patients with atrial fibrillation. Efficacy of three different ablative procedures to treat atrial fibrillation in patients with valvular heart disease: a randomised trial. Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Is the Persistence of All Intraprocedural Targets Necessary for Long-Term Maintenance of Sinus Rhythm? A randomized assessment of the incremental role of ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms after antral pulmonary vein isolation for long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation. Left atrial radiofrequency ablation during mitral valve surgery for continuous atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial. Techniques, evaluation, and consequences of linear block at the left atrial roof in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized study. A randomized clinical trial of the efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation and amiodarone in the treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation. Image integration-guided catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized study. Circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation for chronic atrial fibrillation. Results of a Minimally Invasive Surgical Pulmonary Vein Isolation and Ganglionic Plexi Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Single-Center Experience With 12-Month Follow-Up Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. Role of pulmonary veins isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation ablation: the pulmonary vein isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation (PIPA) study. Atrial Electroanatomic Remodeling After Circumferential Radiofrequency Pulmonary Vein Ablation: Efficacy of an Anatomic Approach in a Large Cohort of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Randomized Study Comparing Combined Pulmonary Vein–Left Atrial Junction Disconnection and Cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation Versus Pulmonary Vein–Left Atrial Junction Disconnection Alone in Patients Presenting With Typical Atrial Flutter and Atrial Fibrillation Circumferential Radiofrequency Ablation of Pulmonary Vein Ostia: A New Anatomic Approach for Curing Atrial Fibrillation Pulmonary vein isolation and linear lesions in atrial fibrillation ablation Prospective randomized comparison of left atrial and biatrial radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of atrial fibrillation.
INTRODUCTION Intraoperative left atrial radiofrequency ( RF ) ablation recently has been suggested as an effective surgical treatment for atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . The aim of this study was to verify the outcome of this technique in a controlled multicenter trial . METHODS AND RESULTS One hundred three consecutive patients ( 39 men and 65 women ; age 62 + /- 11 years ) affected by AF underwent cardiac surgery and RF ablation in the left atrium ( RF group ) . The control group consisted of 27 patients ( 6 men and 21 women ; age 64 + /- 7 years ) with AF who underwent cardiac surgery during the same period and refused RF ablation .  Mitral valve disease was present in 89 ( 86 % ) and 25 ( 92 % ) patients , respectively ( P = NS ) . RF endocardial ablation was performed in order to obtain isolation of both right and left pulmonary veins , a lesion connecting the previous lines , and a lesion connecting the line encircling the left veins to the mitral annulus . Upon discharge from the hospital , sinus rhythm was present in 65 patients ( 63 % ) versus 5 patients ( 18 % ) in the control group ( P < 0.0001 ) . Mean time of cardiopulmonary bypass was longer in the RF group ( 148 + /- 50 min vs 117 + /- 30 min , P = 0.013 ) . The complication rate was similar in both groups , but RF ablation-related complications occurred in 4 RF group patients ( 3.9 % ) . After a mean follow-up of 12.5 + /- 5 months ( range 4 - 24 ) , 83 ( 81 % ) of 102 RF group patients were in stable sinus rhythm versus 3 ( 11 % ) of 27 in the control group ( P < 0.0001 ) . The success rate was similar among the four surgical centers . Atrial contraction was present in 66 ( 79.5 % ) of 83 patients in the RF group in sinus rhythm . CONCLUSION Endocardial RF left atrial compartmentalization during cardiac surgery is effective in restoring sinus rhythm in many patients . This technique is easy to perform and reproducible . Rare RF ablation-related complications can occur . During follow-up , sinus rhythm persistence is good , and biatrial contraction is preserved in most patients OBJECTIVES Various modifications have been proposed to the original Cox 's Maze procedure due to concerns about the long bypass and cross clamp times . The efficacy of these procedures has been studied and reported . We conducted a r and omised prospect i ve study to compare three procedures , differing in extent , of ablation in patients in atrial fibrillation who were undergoing surgery for rheumatic valvular heart disease . These procedures utilised radiofrequency in the bipolar mode . The extent of ablation was ( 1 ) biatrial ( replication of the Cox Maze ) ( 2 ) left atrial portion of the Cox Maze and ( 3 ) pulmonary vein isolation along with a control group ( the No Maze group ) . Conversion rate to sinus rhythm was studied over a mid-term follow-up period . METHODS A total of 160 patients were studied with 40 patients in each group .  Antiarrhythmic drugs were not used in the three months preceding surgery and for seven days postoperatively . The patients underwent surgery for their valve disease along with the ablative procedure as per r and omisation using radiofrequency microbipolar coagulation and cryoablation . They were followed up and were evaluated for symptomatic improvement , rhythm with ECG documentation and 2D echocardiography . RESULTS Follow-up was available for 133 patients . Mid-term results showed that sinus rhythm was restored in 62.5 % patients of Biatrial Maze group and 57.5 % in the Left Atrial Maze . In the Pulmonary Vein Isolation Maze group , 67.5 % patients converted to NSR whereas in the No Maze group only 20 % patients were in sinus rhythm ( p value for all the groups was 0.001 when compared to the No Maze group ) . The incidence of other arrhythmias was not significant and there were no other major complications . All the patients in sinus rhythm at follow-up were in NYHA functional class I-II and showed good effort tolerance . CONCLUSIONS Results achieved with the three ablative procedures are comparable . Therefore lesser procedures viz . Left Atrial Maze and the Pulmonary Vein Isolation Maze procedures must be studied further with the additional use of antiarrhythmic drugs Background — Several approaches have been developed for radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation , but the correct intraprocedural end point is still under debate , and few data exist about the destiny of ablation lesions over time . The aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term maintenance of intraprocedural end points of ablation procedures . Methods and Results — Inclusion criteria were ( 1 ) a previous ablation procedure of pulmonary vein ( PV ) encircling performed for drug-refractory persistent atrial fibrillation ; ( 2 ) a “ complete ” intraprocedural end point , which consisted of voltage abatement inside the lesions , PV disconnection , and exit-block pacing from inside the lesions , attained in all PVs ; and ( 3 ) stable sinus rhythm documented during a minimum follow-up of 2.5 years after the procedure . Twenty volunteers were selected ( 12 males , mean age 59±7 years ) and underwent a repeat electrophysiological study . After a follow-up of 36.4±4.7 months , complete voltage abatement was maintained around 32 PVs ( 40.0 % ) , PV disconnection persisted in 12 ( 37.5 % ) of the previously isolated PVs , and exit block was present in 39 PVs ( 48.7 % ) . Ten patients who underwent a redo ablation procedure because of recurrences of atrial fibrillation were used as the control group . Differences in intraprocedural end-point maintenance between the 2 groups were not statistically significant . Conclusions — Common intraprocedural end points such as voltage abatement , PV disconnection , and exit block persist only in a limited number of patients , even when the outcome is favorable during follow-up . Further investigation will be required to determine whether such data will have implication s for ablation strategies OBJECTIVES This study sought to determine whether ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms ( CFAEs ) after antral pulmonary vein isolation ( APVI ) further improves the clinical outcome of APVI in patients with long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . BACKGROUND Ablation of CFAEs has been reported to eliminate persistent AF . However , residual pulmonary vein arrhythmogenicity is a common mechanism of recurrence . METHODS In this r and omized study , 119 consecutive patients ( mean age 60 + /- 9 years ) with long-lasting persistent AF underwent APVI with an irrigated-tip radiofrequency ablation catheter . Antral pulmonary vein isolation result ed in termination of AF in 19 of 119 patients ( Group A , 16 % ) . The remaining 100 patients who still were in AF were r and omized to no further ablation and underwent cardioversion ( Group B , n = 50 ) or to ablation of CFAEs in the left atrium or coronary sinus for up to 2 additional hours of procedure duration ( Group C , n = 50 ) . RESULTS Atrial fibrillation terminated during ablation of CFAEs in 9 of 50 patients ( 18 % ) in Group C. At 10 + /- 3 months after a single ablation procedure , 18 of 50 ( 36 % ) in Group B and 17 of 50 ( 34 % ) in Group C were in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic drugs ( p = 0.84 ) . In Group A , 15 of 19 patients ( 79 % ) were in sinus rhythm . A repeat ablation procedure was performed in 34 of 100 r and omized patients ( for AF in 30 and atrial flutter in 4 ) . At 9 + /- 4 months after the final procedure , 34 of 50 ( 68 % ) in Group B and 30 of 50 ( 60 % ) in Group C were in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic drugs ( p = 0.40 ) . CONCLUSIONS Up to 2 h of additional ablation of CFAEs after APVI does not appear to improve clinical outcomes in patients with long-lasting persistent AF CONTEXT Although left atrial radiofrequency ablation ( RFA ) is increasingly used for the treatment of chronic atrial fibrillation during mitral valve surgery , its efficacy to restore sinus rhythm and any result ing benefits have not been examined in the context of an adequately powered r and omized trial . OBJECTIVE To determine whether intraoperative RFA of the left atrium increases the long-term restoration of sinus rhythm and improves exercise capacity . DESIGN , SETTING , AND PATIENTS R and omized , double-blind trial performed in a single UK tertiary referral center with enrollment between December 2001 and November 2003 . A total of 101 patients referred for mitral valve surgery with at least 6 months ' history of uninterrupted atrial fibrillation were assessed for eligibility ; 97 were enrolled . Patients were followed up for 12 months . INTERVENTION Patients were r and omly assigned to undergo mitral valve surgery and RFA of the left atrium ( n = 49 ) or mitral valve surgery alone ( controls ; n = 48 ) . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome measure was presence of sinus rhythm at 12 months ; secondary measures were patient functional status and exercise capacity ( assessed by shuttle-walk test ) , left atrial contractility , and left atrial and left ventricular dimension and function and plasma levels of B-type natriuretic peptide . RESULTS At 12 months , sinus rhythm was present in 20 ( 44.4 % ) of 45 RFA patients and in 2 ( 4.5 % ) of 44 controls ( rate ratio , 9.8 ; 95 % CI , 2.4 - 86.3 ; P<.001 ) . Restoration of sinus rhythm in the RFA group was accompanied by a greater improvement in mean ( SD ) shuttle-walk distance compared with controls ( + 94 [ 102 ] m vs + 48 [ 82 ] m ; P = .003 ) and a greater reduction in the plasma level of B-type natriuretic peptide ( -104 [ 87 ] fmol/mL vs -51 [ 82 ] fmol/mL ; P = .03 ) . Patients r and omized to receive RFA had similar rates of postoperative complications and deaths as control patients . CONCLUSIONS Radiofrequency ablation of the left atrium during mitral valve surgery for continuous atrial fibrillation significantly increases the rate of sinus rhythm restoration 1 year postoperatively , improving patient exercise capacity . On the basis of its efficacy and safety , routine use of RFA of the left atrium during mitral valve surgery may be justified . TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical Trials.gov Identifier : NCT00238706 BACKGROUND There are no reports describing the technique , electrophysiological evaluation , and clinical consequences of complete linear block at roofline joining the superior pulmonary veins ( PVs ) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . METHODS AND RESULTS Ninety patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal AF undergoing radiofrequency ablation  were prospect ively r and omized into 2 ablation strategies : ( 1 ) PV isolation ( n=45 ) or ( 2 ) PV isolation in combination with linear ablation joining the 2 superior PVs ( roofline ; n=45 ) . In both groups , the cavotricuspid isthmus , fragmented peri-PV-ostial electrograms , and spontaneous non-PV foci were ablated . Roofline ablation was performed at the most cranial part of the left atrium ( LA ) with complete conduction block demonstrated during LA appendage pacing by the online mapping of continuous double potential and an activation detour propagating around the PVs to activate caudocranially the posterior wall of the LA . The effect of ablation at the LA roof was evaluated by the change in fibrillatory cycle length , termination and noninducibility of AF , and clinical outcome . PV isolation was achieved in all patients with no significant differences in the radiofrequency duration , fluoroscopy , or procedural time between the groups . Roofline ablation required 12+/-6 ( median 11 , range 3 to 25 ) minutes of radiofrequency energy delivery with a fluoroscopic duration of 7+/-2 minutes and was performed in 19+/-7 minutes . Complete block was confirmed in 43 patients ( 96 % ) and result ed in an activation delay that was shorter circumventing the left than the right PVs during LA appendage pacing ( 138+/-15 versus 146+/-25 ms , respectively ; P=0.01 ) . Roofline ablation result ed in a significant increase in the fibrillatory cycle length ( 198+/-38 to 217+/-44 ms ; P=0.0005 ) , termination of arrhythmia in 47 % ( 8/17 ) , and subsequent noninducibility of AF in 59 % ( 10/17 ) of the patients inducible after PV isolation . However , LA flutter , predominantly perimitral , could be induced in 10 patients ( 22 % ) after roofline ablation . At 15+/-4 months , 87 % of the roofline group and 69 % with PV isolation alone are arrhythmia free without antiarrhythmics ( P=0.04 ) . CONCLUSIONS This prospect i ve r and omized study demonstrates the feasibility of achieving complete linear block at the LA roof . Such ablation result ed in the prolongation of the fibrillatory cycle , termination of AF , and subsequent noninducibility and is associated with an improved clinical outcome compared with PV isolation alone The limited efficacy and proarrhythmic risks of antiarrhythmia agents have result ed in alternative therapeutic approaches . Radiofrequency ablation has been reported to be an effective treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation . However , there is no r and omized clinical trial comparing drug and radiofrequency ablation . The authors r and omized 30 patients with chronic atrial fibrillation refractory to medication into amiodarone and radiofrequency ablation .  The primary objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of amiodarone and radiofrequency ablation in the maintenance of sinus rhythm at 1 year after r and omization . Pulmonary vein isolation and linear ablation of right atrium was the technique used for radiofrequency ablation . There were no significant differences in baseline patient characteristics between the 2 groups . The results of this study showed that the probability of free from atrial fibrillation was better in the radiofrequency ablation group compared to amiodarone ( 78.6 % in the ablation group and 40 % in the amiodarone group , p = 0.018 ) . Radiofrequency ablation results in a significant reduction in symptoms relating to atrial fibrillation and a significant improvement in quality of life , whereas amiodarone had no significant effect on symptoms and quality of life . There was an ischemic stroke as a major complication related to radiofrequency ablation . Amiodarone was associated with adverse effects in 46.7 per cent of patients and needed discontinuation in 1 patient . In conclusion , radiofrequency ablation is an effective alternative treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation refractory to medication BACKGROUND Several studies have provided details of left atrial anatomy by means of the image integration techniques , particularly focusing on the atypical patterns of the pulmonary veins . OBJECTIVE To compare , in a prospect i ve , r and omized fashion , the conventional method of pulmonary vein disconnection and the image integration-guided approach . METHODS Two hundred and ninety consecutive patients ( 290 patients , mean age 55 + /- 11 years ) with drug-refractory paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation were enrolled in the study and were divided into two treatment groups : group 1 ( 145 patients ) undergoing an imaging integration-guided ( CartoMerge TM ) ablation ; group 2 ( 145 patients ) treated by a conventional radiofrequency catheter ablation procedure .  The arrhythmia was refractory to at least two antiarrhythmic drugs ( IC , amiodarone )  . RESULTS Electrical disconnection of all identified pulmonary veins was obtained in all patients of both groups . Bidirectional block of the cavotricuspid isthmus was achieved in 34 group 1 patients and in 40 group 2 patients . Left mitral isthmus ablation was attempted in 52 group 1 patients and in 56 group 2 patients . At a mean follow-up of 14 + /- 12 months , the atrial fibrillation-free survival rate was significantly higher in group 1 patients compared with group 2 patients ( 88 % vs 69 % , P = 0.017 ) . The analysis for the subset of patients with previously ineffective ablation ( 98 patients : 52 group 1 patients and 46 group 2 patients ) showed a significantly lower recurrence rate in group 1 versus group 2 ( 19 % vs 48 % , P < 0.01 ) . CONCLUSIONS Our data indicate a superior efficacy of the image-integration guided catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation over the long term BACKGROUND We conducted a r and omized , controlled trial of circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation for the treatment of chronic atrial fibrillation . METHODS A total of 146 patients with a mean ( + /-SD ) age of 57+/-9 years who had chronic atrial fibrillation were r and omly assigned to receive amiodarone and undergo two cardioversions during the first three months alone ( the control group ) or in combination with circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation . Cardiac rhythm was assessed with daily telephonic transmissions for one year . The left atrial diameter and the severity of symptoms were assessed at 12 months . RESULTS Among the 77 patients assigned to undergo circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation , ablation was repeated because of recurrent atrial fibrillation in 26 percent of patients and atypical atrial flutter in 6 percent . An intention-to-treat analysis showed that 74 percent of patients in the ablation group and 58 percent of those in the control group were free of recurrent atrial fibrillation or flutter without antiarrhythmic-drug therapy at one year ( P=0.05 ) . Among the 69 patients in the control group , 53 ( 77 percent ) crossed over to undergo circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation for recurrent atrial fibrillation by one year and only 3 ( 4 percent ) were in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic-drug therapy or ablation . There were significant decreases in the left atrial diameter ( 12+/-11 percent , P<0.001 ) and the symptom severity score ( 59+/-21 percent , P<0.001 ) among patients who remained in sinus rhythm after circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation . Except for atypical atrial flutter , there were no complications attributable to circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation . CONCLUSIONS Sinus rhythm can be maintained long term in the majority of patients with chronic atrial fibrillation by means of circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation independently of the effects of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy , cardioversion , or both . The maintenance of sinus rhythm is associated with a significant decrease in both the severity of symptoms and the left atrial diameter Background —The Cox Maze procedure for treatment of medically refractory atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is limited by its complexity and requirement for cardiopulmonary bypass . Long-term follow-up and success using criteria established by the Heart Rhythm Society/European Heart Rhythm Association/European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society consensus statement have not been reported for surgical AF ablation . We describe the results of using a thorascopic approach and radiofrequency energy to perform bilateral pulmonary vein isolation and left atrial ganglionic plexi ablation for treatment of AF . Methods and Results —Forty-five ( 33 paroxysmal ; 12 persistent ) consecutive patients underwent thorascopic bilateral radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation , ganglionic plexi ablation , ligament of Marshall ablation , and left atrial appendage exclusion by a single surgeon . Forty-three patients were prospect ively followed without antiarrhythmic drugs for a minimum of 1 year with a 30-day continuous event monitor or pacemaker interrogation at 6 and 12 months . Failure was defined as any atrial tachyarrhythmia of > 30 seconds ’ duration occurring > 90 days after surgery . Mean follow-up was 516±181 days ( 202 to 858 days ) . Twenty-eight ( 65 % ) patients had no atrial tachyarrhythmia > 30 seconds by 1 year , and 15 ( 35 % ) patients had atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrences by 1 year . Eight of 15 patients with recurrent AF had catheter ablation result ing in elimination and /or reduction of AF episodes in 7 of 8 patients . Four of 15 patients had AF elimination or reduction with antiarrhythmic drugs alone . Three patients did not benefit from surgery and received rate control only . There were no deaths ; 1 phrenic nerve injury and 2 pleural effusions were the only major complications . Conclusions —The single procedure success at 1-year follow-up for surgical pulmonary vein isolation and ganglionic plexi ablation is 65 % . Atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrences after surgery are usually responsive to catheter ablation and /or antiarrhythmic drugs BACKGROUND Catheter ablation is less successful for persistent atrial fibrillation than for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation . Guidelines suggest that adjuvant substrate modification in addition to pulmonary-vein isolation is required in persistent atrial fibrillation . METHODS We r and omly assigned 589 patients with persistent atrial fibrillation in a 1:4:4 ratio to ablation with pulmonary-vein isolation alone ( 67 patients  ) , pulmonary-vein isolation plus ablation of electrograms showing complex fractionated activity ( 263 patients  ) , or pulmonary-vein isolation plus additional linear ablation across the left atrial roof and mitral valve isthmus ( 259 patients ) . The duration of follow-up was 18 months . The primary end point was freedom from any documented recurrence of atrial fibrillation lasting longer than 30 seconds after a single ablation procedure . RESULTS Procedure time was significantly shorter for pulmonary-vein isolation alone than for the other two procedures ( P<0.001 ) . After 18 months , 59 % of patients assigned to pulmonary-vein isolation alone were free from recurrent atrial fibrillation , as compared with 49 % of patients assigned to pulmonary-vein isolation plus complex electrogram ablation and 46 % of patients assigned to pulmonary-vein isolation plus linear ablation ( P=0.15 ) . There were also no significant differences among the three groups for the secondary end points , including freedom from atrial fibrillation after two ablation procedures and freedom from any atrial arrhythmia . Complications included tamponade ( three patients ) , stroke or transient ischemic attack ( three patients ) , and atrioesophageal fistula ( one patient ) . CONCLUSIONS Among patients with persistent atrial fibrillation , we found no reduction in the rate of recurrent atrial fibrillation when either linear ablation or ablation of complex fractionated electrograms was performed in addition to pulmonary-vein isolation . ( Funded by St. Jude Medical ; Clinical Trials.gov number , NCT01203748 . ) BACKGROUND The role of pulmonary veins ( PV ) isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is still debated . The aim of this study was to evaluate the adjunctive role of PV isolation in patients with persistent AF who underwent circumferential PV ablation ( anatomical approach ) . METHODS We treated 97 consecutive patients presenting with drug-refractory persistent AF by an anatomical approach ( group A , n = 36 , mean age = 60 + /- 8 years , 29 males ) or an integrated approach ( group B , n = 61 , mean age 59 + /- 10 years , 48 males ) . In all patients , radiofrequency ( RF ) ablation was performed by means of a nonfluoroscopic navigation system , in order to anatomically create circumferential lines around the PV . In group B , the persistence of PV potentials was ascertained with a multipolar circular catheter . If PV potentials persisted , RF energy targeting the electrophysiological breakthroughs was delivered to disconnect the PV . Past a 2-month period of observation , success was defined as absence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence lasting > 30 seconds . RESULTS Total procedure duration ( 220 + /- 62 minutes vs 140 + /- 43 minutes , P < 0.001 ) , fluoroscopy time ( 35 + /- 15 minutes vs 17 + /- 9 minutes , P < 0.001 ) , and RF delivery time ( 48 + /- 22 minutes vs 27 + /- 9 minutes , P < 0.001 ) were significantly longer in group B than in group A. One cardiac perforation occurred in group A. After 15 + /- 9.1 months , 21 patients in group A ( 58 % ) and 34 patients in group B ( 56 % ) were free of atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence ( P = 0.9 ) . CONCLUSIONS In patients with persistent AF , who underwent an anatomical approach , electrophysiological confirmation of PV disconnection significantly increased the fluoroscopy and procedural times , without effect on the long-term outcomes Background —Circumferential radiofrequency ablation around pulmonary vein ( PV ) ostia has recently been described as a new anatomic approach for atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . Methods and Results —We treated 251 consecutive patients with paroxysmal ( n=179 ) or permanent ( n=72 ) AF .  Circular PV lesions were deployed transseptally during sinus rhythm ( n=124 ) or AF ( n=127 ) using 3D electroanatomic guidance . Procedures lasted 148±26 minutes . Among 980 lesions surrounding individual PVs ( n=956 ) or 2 ipsilateral veins with close openings or common ostium ( n=24 ) , 75 % were defined as complete by a bipolar electrogram amplitude < 0.1 mV inside the lesion and a delay > 30 ms across the line . The amount of low-voltage encircled area was 3594±449 mm2 , which accounted for 23±9 % of the total left atrial ( LA ) map surface . Major complications ( cardiac tamponade ) occurred in 2 patients ( 0.8 % ) . No PV stenoses were detected by transesophageal echocardiography . After 10.4±4.5 months , 152 patients with paroxysmal AF ( 85 % ) and 49 with permanent AF ( 68 % ) were AF-free . Patients with and without AF recurrence did not differ in age , AF duration , prevalence of heart disease , or ejection fraction , but the LA diameter was significantly higher ( P < 0.001 ) in permanent AF patients with recurrence . The proportion of PVs with complete lesions was similar between patients with and without recurrence , but the latter had larger low-voltage encircled areas after radiofrequency ( expressed as percent of LA surface area;P < 0.001 ) . Conclusions —Circumferential PV ablation is a safe and effective treatment for AF . Its success is likely due to both PV trigger isolation and electroanatomic remodeling of the area encompassing the PV ostia Background —Atrial flutter ( AFL ) and atrial fibrillation ( AF ) frequently coexist in the same patient . Recently it has been demonstrated that the triggers for both AF and AFL may originate in the pulmonary veins ( PVs ) . We hypothesized that in patients with both AF and typical AFL , pulmonary vein – left atrial junction ( PV-LAJ ) disconnection may eliminate both arrhythmias . Methods and Results —Consecutive patients with documented symptomatic AF and typical AFL were r and omly assigned to have PV-LAJ disconnection combined with cavotricuspid isthmus ( CTI ) ablation ( group 1 , n=49 ) or PV-LAJ disconnection alone ( group 2 , n=59 ) . Within the first 8 weeks after ablation , 32 of the group 2 patients had typical AFL documented , whereas none was seen in group 1 . Twenty of these 32 converted to sinus rhythm after initiating antiarrhythmic drugs ( AADs ) . Twelve were cardioverted , and AADs were started . After 8 weeks , all AADS were stopped , and only 3 patients continued to have recurrent sustained typical AFL that was eliminated by CTI ablation . Beyond 8 weeks of follow-up , 7 patients in group 1 and 6 patients in group 2 ( 14 % and 11 % , respectively ) continued to have AF . Ten of these 13 patients underwent a repeat PV-LAJ disconnection procedure and were cured . The remaining 3 remained in normal sinus rhythm while taking AADs . Conclusions —In patients with both AFL and AF , PV-LAJ disconnection alone may be sufficient to control both arrhythmias . CTI block reduced early postablation recurrence of arrhythmias , which in the majority of patients reflects a short-term clinical problem Background —The pulmonary veins ( PVs ) and surrounding ostial areas frequently house focal triggers or reentrant circuits critical to the genesis of atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . We developed an anatomic approach aim ed at isolating each PV from the left atrium ( LA ) by circumferential radiofrequency ( RF ) lesions around their ostia . Methods and Results —We selected 26 patients with resistant AF , either paroxysmal ( n=14 ) or permanent ( n=12 ) . A nonfluoroscopic mapping system was used to generate 3D electroanatomic LA maps and deliver RF energy . Two maps were acquired during coronary sinus and right atrial pacing to vali date the lateral and septal PV lesions , respectively . Patients were followed up closely for ≥6 months . Procedures lasted 290±58 minutes , including 80±22 minutes for acquisition of all maps , and 118±16 RF pulses were deployed . Among 14 patients in AF at the beginning of the procedure , 64 % had sinus rhythm restoration during ablation . PV isolation was demonstrated in 76 % of 104 PVs treated by low peak-to-peak electrogram amplitude ( 0.08±0.02 mV ) inside the circular line and by disparity in activation times ( 58±11 ms ) across the lesion . After 9±3 months , 22 patients ( 85 % ) were AF-free , including 62 % not taking and 23 % taking antiarrhythmic drugs , with no difference ( P = NS ) between paroxysmal and permanent AF . No thromboembolic events or PV stenoses were observed by transesophageal echocardiography . Conclusions —Radiofrequency PV isolation with electroanatomic guidance is safe and effective in either paroxysmal or permanent AF Background Various strategies have been used for atrial fibrillation ( AF ) ablation . It is unclear whether adding linear lesions to pulmonary vein ( PV ) isolation has significant advantages . Objectives We assessed the clinical benefit of adding linear lesions in patients undergoing PV isolation for AF . Methods One hundred patients ( 63 male and 37 female ; mean age of 59 ± 11 years ) with documented paroxysmal AF were included in the study . Patients were r and omized into two groups . The first group underwent PV isolation alone . The second group underwent PV isolation and had two linear lesions created ; one line between the superior PVs , and a second line from the left inferior PV to the mitral valve annulus . Patients ’ clinical progress after the ablation was evaluated and compared at 1 , 3 , and 9 months after their respective ablation procedures . Results The linear lesions group maintained sinus rhythm and had fewer symptoms than the lone PV isolation group ( 86 vs. 58 % , respectively ) ( p < 0.05 ) at 1 month . At 9 months , when patients who reverted to AF underwent additional management to regain sinus rhythm ( 90 vs. 82 % , respectively ) ( p = NS ) , there was no statistical difference between the groups regarding the use of antiarrhythmics , the need for electrical cardioversion , and subjective improvement . Conclusion The addition of linear lesions to PV isolation more effectively achieved sinus rhythm initially and fewer patients required additional management to maintain their rhythm when compared to patients who underwent lone PV isolation . However , at 9 months , the overall results were similar in both groups OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare , in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) , the efficacy and safety of left atrial ablation with that of a biatrial procedure and to assess the risk factors for late failure of sinus rhythm restoration . METHODS Between January 2004 and January 2007 , 299 consecutive patients underwent the radiofrequency ablation procedure for AF associated with concomitant cardiac surgery .  According to a prospect i ve , open , and r and omized trial , 149 patients underwent left atrial plus cavotricuspid isthmus ablation  ( left atrial group ) , while 150 patients underwent biatrial ablation  ( biatrial group ) . The postoperative and mid-term follow-up results were compared between the two groups . Both univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess the risk factors for late recurrence of AF . RESULTS There were seven in-hospital deaths ( 2.3 % ) , including two in the left atrial group ( 1.3 % ) and five in the biatrial group ( 3.3 % ) , and there were no differences in the incidence of the mortality and complications during the postoperative and follow-up periods between the groups . At discharge , sinus rhythm was maintained in 77.1 % of the patients , including 78.2 % of those in the left atrial group and 75.9 % in the biatrial group ( p=0.68 ) . Follow-up was completed in 97 % of the patients , with a mean time of 28+/-5 months . At the latest follow-up , two deaths occurred in the biatrial group . Sinus rhythm was documented in 237 ( 85.0 % ) out of all the patients , including 85.2 % ( 121/142 ) in the left atrial group and 84.1 % ( 116/138 ) in the biatrial group patients ( p=0.87 ) . Using a multivariate analysis , a left atrial diameter of > /=80 mm ( p=0.02 ) was an independent predictor for a late recurrence of AF . CONCLUSIONS Both the left atrial combined with cavotricuspid isthmus ablation and biatrial maze procedure is safe and effective in treating patients with AF , with an acceptable sinus conversion rate , mortality and morbidity . A left atrial dimension of > /=80 mm was a significant predictor for a late recurrence of AF
Contribution This systematic review found that radiofrequency ablation after a failed drug course maintained sinus rhythm more often than continuation of drug therapy alone .
The benefits of maintaining sinus rhythm with antiarrhythmic drugs appeared to be offset by the serious adverse effects of the drugs .
Context Is radiofrequency catheter ablation a better alternative than medical therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation ?
The Editors Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained arrhythmia in clinical practice ( 1 ) .
Its prevalence increases with age , from 0.1 % in people younger than 55 years to more than 9 % by 80 years of age ( 2 ) .
The heavy burden of atrial fibrillation on morbidity , mortality , and health care re sources creates a pressing need for novel approaches to management .
In some patients , adequate pharmacologic slowing of the ventricular response rate ( a rate-control strategy ) is sufficient to control symptoms .
However , many patients remain symptomatic from the lack of organized atrial contraction and the persistent irregularity of the ventricular response in atrial fibrillation .
In such patients , the appropriate treatment is restoration of normal sinus rhythm , achieved electrically or chemically ( a rhythm-control strategy ) ( 2 ) .
Radiofrequency catheter ablation is a promising approach that offers the benefits of maintaining sinus rhythm without the adverse effects of antiarrhythmic drugs .
Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation is based on the underst and ing that electrical activity emanating from the pulmonary veins frequently serves as a trigger for atrial fibrillation .
In the late 1990s , Hassaguerre and colleagues ( 5 ) observed that elimination of local electrograms at these foci with radiofrequency energy reduced the risk for recurrence of atrial fibrillation .
Currently , the foundation of most atrial fibrillation ablation procedures is to target and electrically isolate the pulmonary veins ( 6 ) .
This may be achieved by delivering lesions immediately outside the ostia of the pulmonary veins or along a wider area in the left atrium encircling the veins .
Additional lesion sets have been used to ablate nonpulmonary vein triggers of atrial fibrillation and to target atrial areas thought to be responsible for maintaining atrial fibrillation ( 6 ) .
These linear lesions may be created in the posterior left atrium , the roof of the left atrium , the interatrial septum , and the isthmus formed between the mitral annulus and the pulmonary vein or left atrial appendage .
At present , the Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation , put forth by the Heart Rhythm Society and endorsed by several professional organizations , states that the foundation of most atrial fibrillation ablation procedures is to target the pulmonary veins , pulmonary vein antra , or both ( 6 ) .
The panel advised us that 8-mmtip and irrigated-tip catheters are now the catheters of choice for radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation in the United States .
The conventional 4-mmtip catheter is rapidly being phased out of use for this indication .
The following 3 key questions were formulated : 1 .
What is the effect of radiofrequency catheter ablation on short-term ( 6 to 12 months ) and long-term ( > 12 months ) rhythm control ; rates of congestive heart failure ; changes in the size of the left atrium and ventricle ; rates of stroke ; quality of life ; avoiding anticoagulation ; and readmissions for paroxysmal , persistent , and long-st and ing persistent ( chronic ) atrial fibrillation ?
2 .
How does the effect of radiofrequency ablation  on rhythm control differ among the various techniques used ?
3 .
What are the short- and long-term complications and harms associated with radiofrequency ablation ?