Management of Newly Detected Atrial Fibrillation: A Clinical Practice Guideline from the American Academy of Family Physicians and the American College of Physicians Unexpected low prevalence of atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic ischemic stroke: a prospective study 2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. Asymptomatic or "silent" atrial fibrillation: frequency in untreated patients and patients receiving azimilide. The Australian Intervention Randomized Control of Rate in Atrial Fibrillation Trial (AIRCRAFT). Atrial fibrillation: an observational study with outpatients. Antiarrhythmics After Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation (5A Study) Atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke. Outcomes of Medicare Beneficiaries Undergoing Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Opportunistic screening for atrial fibrillation versus detecting symptomatic patients aged 65 years and older: A cluster-controlled clinical trial. Prevalence of atrial fibrillation and association of atrial fibrillation with prior and new thromboembolic stroke in older patients. Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation and Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy: A Prospective, Randomized, 4-Year Follow-Up Trial: The APAF Study Rising Rates of Hospital Admissions for Atrial Fibrillation Subclinical atrial fibrillation and the risk of stroke. Atrial Fibrillation and Isolated Systolic Hypertension: The Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program and Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program-Extension Study A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. Distribution and Risk Profile of Paroxysmal, Persistent, and Permanent Atrial Fibrillation in Routine Clinical Practice: Insight From the Real-Life Global Survey Evaluating Patients With Atrial Fibrillation International Registry
Atrial fibrillation is the most common type of arrhythmia in adults . It is more common as patients age ; the prevalence is 1 % among those younger than age 60 years and increases to more than 8 % in those older than age 80 years . When data are adjusted for age , men are affected more often than women . Cardiac conditions associated with the development of atrial fibrillation are hypertension , rheumatic mitral valve disease , coronary artery disease , and congestive heart failure . Noncardiac causes include hyperthyroidism , hypoxic pulmonary conditions , surgery , and alcohol intoxication . Patients with atrial fibrillation may have symptoms of hemodynamic compromise , such as irregular palpitations and lightheadedness , or more vague symptoms , such as malaise , but may be asymptomatic . Patients with atrial fibrillation are at increased risk for thromboembolic disease . The purpose of this guideline is to make recommendations on the pharmacologic management of newly detected atrial fibrillation in primary care . The target patient population is adult patients with first-detected atrial fibrillation , defined as the presence of symptoms or electrocardiographic evidence of atrial fibrillation . The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association has recommended using first-detected atrial fibrillation regardless of whether it is symptomatic or self-limited , recognizing that there can be uncertainty about the duration of the episode and about previous undetected episodes ( 1 ) . This guideline does not apply to patients with postoperative or postmyocardial infa rct ion atrial fibrillation , patients with class IV heart failure , patients already taking antiarrhythmic drugs , or patients with valvular disease . The target physician audience is internists and family physicians dedicated to primary care . This guideline is based on the accompanying background paper by McNamara and colleagues ( 2 ) and on the evidence report Management of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation ( 3 ) , which was produced by the Johns Hopkins Evidence -based Practice Center under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality ( AHRQ ) , Rockville , Maryl and . The American Academy of Family Physicians ( AAFP ) and the American College of Physicians ( ACP ) created this guideline in collaboration . The Joint AAFP/ACP Panel review ed the evidence and developed and grade d the recommendations ( Table 1 ) . The guideline was then approved by both organizations . The guideline makes recommendations in the following areas : rate control versus rhythm control , stroke prevention and anticoagulation , electrical cardioversion versus pharmacologic cardioversion , the role of transesophageal echocardiography in guiding therapy , and maintenance therapy . Table 1 . The Guyatt Approach to Grading Recommendations * Section 1 : Rate Control versus Rhythm Control One of the fundamental questions in the management of atrial fibrillation is whether to attempt cardioversion . The answer to this question depends on whether rate control or rhythm control provides more effective protection from thromboembolic events , improved mortality , better relief of symptoms , or improved quality of life . Another significant clinical question is whether certain population s , such as women , patients with hypertension or congestive heart failure , or young people with structurally healthy hearts , have better outcomes with one or the other strategy . Four studies have compared rate control with rhythm control . The study sample s have generally involved older patients ( > 65 years of age ) , and women and younger patients with healthy hearts and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation have not been well represented ( 5 ) . The Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management ( AFFIRM ) trial compared rhythm control versus rate control , and use of anticoagulation was recommended in both arms ( 6 ) . More than 4000 patients who were at least 65 years of age or who had at least 1 risk factor for stroke or death , such as hypertension , diabetes , previous stroke , or poor ventricular function , were followed for a mean of 3.5 years . Slightly more than one third of the patients were enrolled after their first episode of atrial fibrillation , and more than 90 % had had their qualifying episode within the previous 6 weeks . In more than two thirds of patients , the qualifying episode lasted at least 2 days . The average patient age was 70 years . Sixty-one percent of patients were men , and 89 % were white . Seventy-one percent of patients had hypertension , 38 % had coronary heart disease , 18 % had previously had failure of antiarrhythmic therapy , and 12 % had no apparent heart disease ( lone atrial fibrillation ) . Patients were r and omly assigned to rate or rhythm control , and their physicians chose the specific therapies ( pharmacologic first , then nonpharmacologic if needed ) . Anticoagulation was continued indefinitely in the rate-control group and was encouraged in the rhythm-control group but could be stopped at the physician 's discretion if sinus rhythm had been maintained for at least 4 , and preferably 12 , consecutive weeks with antiarrhythmic therapy . The prevalence of sinus rhythm in the rhythm-control group was 82 % , 73 % , and 63 % at 1 , 3 , and 5 years , respectively . The prevalence of sinus rhythm in the rate-control group was 34.6 % at 5 years . The primary end point in the AFFIRM trial , overall mortality , was not statistically significantly different between the groups . However , the rhythm-control strategy was associated with a higher risk for death than the rate-control strategy among older patients , those without congestive heart failure , and those with coronary disease .  Rates of stroke also did not differ between groups ; 70 % of all strokes occurred in patients who had stopped receiving anticoagulation or who had subtherapeutic international normalized ratios ( < 2.0 ) . More hospitalizations were reported in the rhythm-control group ( P < 0.001 ) . Another recent study , the RAte Control versus Electrical cardioversion for persistent atrial fibrillation ( RACE ) study , r and omly assigned patients to receive aggressive rhythm control or rate control ( 7 ) . This was a smaller study , involving 522 patients ( mean age , 68 years ) . Sixty-four percent of patients were men , 49 % had hypertension , and 27 % had coronary artery disease . All patients had persistent atrial fibrillation lasting less than 1 year and had had at least 1 previous electrical cardioversion ( a maximum of 2 previous cardioversions was permitted for study inclusion ) . The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular mortality , heart failure , thromboembolic complications , bleeding , pacemaker implantation , and severe side effects of antiarrhythmic drugs . Again , no difference was seen between groups in the primary composite end point . As in the AFFIRM study , most of the strokes occurred in patients whose anticoagulation had been halted or patients whose international normalized ratio was subtherapeutic ( < 2.0 ) . In post hoc analysis , a benefit for rate control over rhythm control was seen in patients with hypertension and in women . Since this was a post hoc analysis , these results will need to be confirmed by further studies . Of note , despite an aggressive treatment protocol , at the end of follow-up only 39 % of the patients in the rhythm-control group were in sinus rhythm . The Pharmacological Intervention in Atrial Fibrillation ( PIAF ) trial r and omly assigned 252 patients 18 to 75 years of age with new-onset or permanent symptomatic atrial fibrillation ( mean duration of atrial fibrillation , approximately 4 months ) to rate control with diltiazem or aggressive conversion ( many times if necessary ) and maintenance therapy with amiodarone ( 8) . The primary end point of the study was improvement in symptoms related to atrial fibrillation . After 1 year of follow-up , relief of symptoms was similar in both groups , as were quality -of-life measures . Walking distance was improved in the rhythm-control group , but hospital admissions were more frequent in this group . Although final results are not yet available , preliminary reports of the Strategies of Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation ( STAF ) trial have been presented ( 9 ) . Patients were r and omly assigned to receive anticoagulation for 3 weeks before conversion and for 4 weeks after attempted conversion , with antiarrhythmic therapy to maintain sinus rhythm , or to long-term anticoagulation and rate control . ( Patients included in this study had at least 1 previous conversion attempt . ) After more than 1.5 years of follow-up , no difference was seen between the groups in rates of the primary end points of death , stroke , transient ischemic attacks , cardiopulmonary resuscitation , or thromboembolism . Of interest , only 40 % of patients in the rhythm-control group were still in sinus rhythm at 1 year , and all primary end points occurred in patients in atrial fibrillation , even in the rhythm-control group . This result has created speculation about whether fewer events would have occurred if anticoagulation had been continued indefinitely in the conversion group . It also suggests that despite aggressive rhythm management , a substantial number of patients can not maintain sinus rhythm . In general , the trial sample s were older and male and had risk factors for stroke , such as hypertension , congestive heart failure , and coronary disease . Certain subgroups of patients with atrial fibrillation , such as younger patients with healthy hearts or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation , were not well represented in the trials . Therefore , it is not certain whether these subgroups of patients may benefit from more aggressive rhythm control or rate control . Recommendation 1 : Rate control with chronic anticoagulation is the recommended strategy for the majority of patients with atrial fibrillation . Rhythm control has not been shown to be superior to rate control ( with chronic anticoagulation ) in reducing morbidity and mortality and may be inferior in some patient subgroups to rate control . Rhythm Purpose Ischemic stroke is a frequent pathology with high rate of recurrence and significant morbidity and mortality . There are several causes of stroke , affecting prognosis , outcomes , and management , but in many cases , the etiology remains undetermined . We hypothesized that atrial fibrillation was involved in this pathology but underdiagnosed by st and ard methods . The aim of the study was to determine the incidence of atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic ischemic stroke by using continuous monitoring of the heart rate over several months . The secondary objective was to test the value of atrial vulnerability assessment in predicting spontaneous atrial fibrillation . Methods and results We prospect ively enrolled 24 patients under 75 years of age , 15 men and 9 women of mean age 49 years , who within the last 4 months had experienced cryptogenic stroke diagnosed by clinical presentation and brain imaging and presumed to be of cardioembolic mechanism . All causes of stroke were excluded by normal 12-lead ECG , 24-h Holter monitoring , echocardiography , cervical Doppler , hematological , and inflammatory tests . All patients underwent electrophysiological study . Of the patients , 37.5 % had latent atrial vulnerability , and 33.3 % had inducible sustained arrhythmia . Patients were secondarily implanted with an implantable loop recorder to look for spontaneous atrial fibrillation over a mean follow-up interval of 14.5 months . No sustained arrhythmia was found . Only one patient had non-significant episodes of atrial fibrillation . Conclusion In this study , symptomatic atrial fibrillation or AF with fast ventricular rate has not been demonstrated by the implantable loop recorder  in patients under 75 years with unexplained cerebral ischemia . The use of this device should not be generalized in the systematic evaluation of these patients . In addition , this study attests that the assessment of atrial vulnerability is poor at predicting spontaneous arrhythmia in such patients ACCF : American College of Cardiology Foundation ACCP : American College of Chest Physicians ACS : acute coronary syndrome ACT : Atrial arrhythmia Conversion Trial ADONIS : American – Australian – African trial with DronedarONe In atrial fibrillation or flutter for the maintenance of Sinus rhythm AF : atrial fibrillation AHA : American Heart Association AND ROMEDA : ANtiarrhythmic trial with DROnedarone in Moderate-to-severe congestive heart failure Evaluating morbidity DecreAse APHRS : Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society aPTT : activated partial thromboplastin time ARB : angiotensin-receptor blocker ARISTOTLE : Apixaban for Reduction In STroke and Other ThromboemboLic Events in atrial fibrillation ATHENA : A placebo-controlled , double-blind , parallel arm Trial to assess the efficacy of dronedarone 400 mg b.i.d . for the prevention of cardiovascular Hospitalization or death from any cause in patiENts with Atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter ATRIA : AnTicoagulation and Risk factors In Atrial fibrillation AVERROES : Apixaban VErsus acetylsalicylic acid ( ASA ) to Reduce the Rate Of Embolic Stroke in atrial fibrillation patients who have failed or are unsuitable for vitamin K antagonist treatment AVRO : A prospect i ve , r and omized , double-blind , Active-controlled , superiority study of Vernakalant vs. amiodarone in Recent Onset atrial fibrillation b.i.d : bis in die ( twice daily ) b.p.m . : beats per minute CABANA : Catheter ABlation vs . ANtiarrhythmic drug therapy for Atrial fibrillation CABG : coronary artery bypass graft CAP : Continued Access to Protect AF CHA2DS2-VASc : Congestive heart failure or left ventricular dysfunction Hypertension , Age ≥75 ( doubled ) , Diabetes , Stroke (doubled)-Vascular disease , Age 65–74 , Sex category ( female ) CHADS2 : Congestive heart failure , Hypertension , Age ≥75 , Diabetes , Stroke ( doubled ) CI : confidence interval CRAFT : Controlled R and omized Atrial Fibrillation Trial CrCl : creatinine clearance DAFNE : Dronedarone Atrial FibrillatioN study after Electrical cardioversion DIONYSOS : R and omized Double blind trIal to evaluate efficacy and safety of drOnedarone ( 400 mg b.i.d . ) vs . amiodaroNe ( 600 mg q.d . for 28 daYS , then 200 mg qd thereafter ) for at least 6 mOnths for the maintenance of Sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation EAST : Early treatment of Atrial fibrillation for Stroke prevention Trial EHRA : European Heart Rhythm Association ECG : electrocardiogram EMA : European Medicines Agency ERATO : Efficacy and safety of dRonedArone for The cOntrol of ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation EURIDIS : EURopean trial In atrial fibrillation or flutter patients receiving Dronedarone for the maIntenance of Sinus rhythm FAST : atrial Fibrillation catheter Ablation vs . Surgical ablation Treatment FDA : Food and Drug Administration Flec-SL : Flecainide Short-Long trial HAS-BLED : Hypertension , Abnormal renal/liver function , Stroke , Bleeding history or predisposition , Labile INR , Elderly , Drugs/alcohol concomitantly HF-PEF : heart failure with preserved ejection fraction HF-REF : heart failure with reduced ejection fraction HR : hazard ratio HRS : Heart Rhythm Society ICH : intracranial haemorrhage INR : international normalized ratio i.v . : intravenous J-RHYTHM : Japanese RHYTHM management trial for atrial fibrillation LAA : left atrial appendage LoE : level of evidence LVEF : left ventricular ejection fraction MANTRA-PAF : Medical ANtiarrhythmic Treatment or Radiofrequency Ablation in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation NICE : National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence NOAC : novel oral anticoagulant NSAID : non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug NYHA : New York Heart Association OAC : oral anticoagulant or oral anticoagulation o.d . : omni die ( every day ) PALLAS : Permanent Atrial fibriLLAtion outcome Study using dronedarone on top of st and ard therapy PCI : percutaneous coronary intervention PREVAIL : Prospect i ve R and omized EVAluation of the LAA closure device In patients with atrial fibrillation v s. Long-term warfarin therapy PROTECT AF : WATCHMAN LAA system for embolic PROTECTion in patients with Atrial Fibrillation PT : prothrombin time RAAFT : Radio frequency Ablation Atrial Fibrillation Trial RE-LY : R and omized Evaluation of Long-term anticoagulant therapY with dabigatran etexilate ROCKET-AF : Rivaroxaban Once daily oral direct factor Xa inhibition Compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and Embolism Trial in atrial fibrillation RRR : relative risk reduction TE : thromboembolism TIA : transient ischaemic attack t.i.d . : ter in die ( three times daily ) TOE : transoesophageal echocardiogram TTR : time in therapeutic range VKA : vitamin K antagonist Guidelines summarize and evaluate all currently available evidence on a particular issue with the aim of assisting physicians in selecting the best management strategy for an individual patient suffering from a given condition , taking into account the impact on BACKGROUND Asymptomatic , or " silent " atrial fibrillation could increase the risk of stroke . Little is known about the frequency of asymptomatic atrial fibrillation in patients who also have symptomatic atrial fibrillation ; similarly , little is known about the effect of antiarrhythmic drug therapy on asymptomatic atrial fibrillation . METHODS AND RESULTS Patients in sinus rhythm with a history of symptomatic atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter received placebo or azimilide ( 35 to 125 mg ) once daily for 6 or 9 months in 4 similar double-blind trials . The end point was the first recurrence of a symptomatic ECG-documented supraventricular arrhythmia . Routine transtelephonic electrocardiograms , in the absence of symptoms , were recorded for 30 seconds every 2 weeks until patients completed follow-up or documented a symptomatic supraventricular arrhythmia . Of the 1380 patients , 489 received placebo .  Among these patients receiving placebo , 303 transmitted at least one routine ECG while asymptomatic . Asymptomatic atrial fibrillation was recorded in 50 ( 17 % ) within 6 months and before recurrence of symptomatic supraventricular arrhythmia . In the 3 trials evaluating azimilide in therapeutic doses ( 100 and 125 mg ) , asymptomatic atrial fibrillation occurred in 49 of 382 ( 13 % ) receiving azimilide and 43 of 233 ( 18 % ) receiving placebo . Although drug effect on time to first asymptomatic event was not statistically significant ( hazard ratio , 0.70 ; P=0.09 ) , there was a 40 % reduction in asymptomatic atrial fibrillation on azimilide compared with placebo ( P=0.03 ) when repeated observations were considered . CONCLUSIONS Asymptomatic atrial fibrillation is common in untreated patients with a history of symptomatic atrial fibrillation ( and is likely underestimated by this analysis ) . Azimilide may reduce the occurrence of this silent arrhythmia OBJECTIVES The Australian Intervention R and omized Control of Rate in Atrial Fibrillation Trial was a multicenter trial of atrioventricular junction ablation and pacing ( AVJAP ) compared with pharmacologic ventricular rate control ( medication [ MED ] ) in patients with mild to moderately symptomatic permanent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . BACKGROUND There have been very few prospect i ve r and omized trials , undertaken in highly symptomatic patients , comparing AVJAP with pharmacologic methods of ventricular rate control for patients with permanent AF . METHODS There were 99 patients ( 70 men , mean age 68 + /- 8.6 years ) at five centers . Forty-nine patients were r and omized to AVJAP while 50 patients were r and omized to pharmacologic control . The primary end point was cardiac function measured by echocardiography and exercise tolerance . The secondary end points were ventricular rate control , evaluated by 24-h ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring , and quality of life . Data were collected at r and omization and then at one month , six months , and 12 months post-r and omization . RESULTS At 12 months follow-up there was no significant difference in left ventricular ejection fraction ( AVJAP : 54 + /- 17 % ; MED : 61 + /- 13 % [ p = ns ] ) or exercise duration on treadmill testing ( AVJAP : 4.1 + /- 2 min ; MED : 4.6 + /- 2 min [ p = ns ] ) ; however , the peak ventricular rate was lower in the AVJAP group during exercise ( 112 + /- 17 beats/min vs. 153 + /- 36 beats/min , p < 0.05 ) and activities of daily life ( 117 + /- 16 beats/min vs. 152 + /- 37 beats/min , p < 0.05 ) . The CAST quality -of-life question naire revealed that patients in the AVJAP group had fewer symptoms at six months ( p = 0.003 ) and at 12 months ( p = 0.004 ) . The observed relative risk reduction in symptoms at 12 months was 18 % . Global subjective semiquantitative measurement of quality of life using the " ladder of life " revealed that the AVJAP group reported a 6 % better quality of life at six months ( p = 0.011 ) . CONCLUSIONS In this trial , AVJAP for patients with mild to moderately symptomatic permanent AF did not worsen cardiac function during long-term follow-up , and quality of life was improved BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common sustained arrhythmia with serious clinical consequences in the absence of treatment . However , there are limited data on the treatment of these patients in Argentina . The objective was to describe the therapeutic management of patients with nonacute AF by Argentinean cardiologists and to determine the incidence of clinical events after 12 months follow-up . METHODS The Atrial Fibrillation study in Argentina ( FARAON ) was an observational , descriptive , prospect i ve , national , and multicentric study that included out patients with AF , followed for 12 months . The study included 38 sites in Argentina . Each research er included the first 10 patients who met the inclusion criteria of being over 21 and also being an AF carrier documented by electrocardiogram or Holter within 12 months prior to or at the time of enrollment . RESULTS A total of 373 patients were included , mean age 70 ± 11.5 years , 40 % women ; 65 % had AF rhythm at the time of inclusion , 57 % had permanent AF , and 56 % were asymptomatic . At the time of enrollment , 40 % of physicians opted for rhythm control strategy . β-blockers and amiodarone were the most used drugs . Patients with rhythm control drugs had higher success rate than those with frequency control drug therapy ( 80 % vs 57 % ) . CONCLUSION Cardiologists in Argentina receive patients with AF that are mostly permanent AF . More than half of the patients are asymptomatic . They opt primarily by controlling the pace . When choosing antiarrhythmic drugs , nearly half of them indicated amiodarone Background — Atrial arrhythmias are common early after atrial fibrillation ( AF ) ablation . We hypothesized that empirical antiarrhythmic drug ( AAD ) therapy for 6 weeks after AF ablation would reduce the occurrence of atrial arrhythmias . Methods and Results — We r and omized consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing ablation to empirical antiarrhythmic therapy ( AAD group ) or no antiarrhythmic therapy ( no-AAD group ) for the first 6 weeks after ablation . In the no-AAD group , only atrioventricular nodal blocking agents were prescribed . All patients wore a transtelephonic monitor for 4 weeks after discharge and were reevaluated at 6 weeks . The primary end point of the study was a composite of ( 1 ) atrial arrhythmias lasting more than 24 hours ; ( 2 ) atrial arrhythmias associated with severe symptoms requiring hospital admission , cardioversion , or initiation/change of antiarrhythmic drug therapy ; and ( 3 ) intolerance to antiarrhythmic agent requiring drug cessation .  Of 110 enrolled patients ( age 55±9 years , 71 % male ) , 53 were r and omized to AAD and 57 to no-AAD . There was no difference in baseline characteristics between groups . During the 6 weeks after ablation , fewer patients reached the primary end point in the AAD compared with the no-AAD group ( 19 % versus 42 % ; P=0.005 ) . There remained fewer events in the AAD group ( 13 % versus 28 % ; P=0.05 ) when only end points of AF > 24 hours , arrhythmia-related hospitalization , or electrical cardioversion were compared . Conclusions — AAD treatment during the first 6 weeks after AF ablation is well tolerated and reduces the incidence of clinical ly significant atrial arrhythmias and need for cardioversion/hospitalization for arrhythmia management BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation is a leading preventable cause of recurrent stroke for which early detection and treatment are critical . However , paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is often asymptomatic and likely to go undetected and untreated in the routine care of patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack ( TIA ) . METHODS We r and omly assigned 572 patients 55 years of age or older , without known atrial fibrillation , who had had a cryptogenic ischemic stroke or TIA within the previous 6 months ( cause undetermined after st and ard tests , including 24-hour electrocardiography [ ECG ] ) , to undergo additional noninvasive ambulatory ECG monitoring with either a 30-day event-triggered recorder ( intervention group ) or a conventional 24-hour monitor ( control group ) . The primary outcome was newly detected atrial fibrillation lasting 30 seconds or longer within 90 days after r and omization . Secondary outcomes included episodes of atrial fibrillation lasting 2.5 minutes or longer and anticoagulation status at 90 days . RESULTS Atrial fibrillation lasting 30 seconds or longer was detected in 45 of 280 patients ( 16.1 % ) in the intervention group , as compared with 9 of 277 ( 3.2 % ) in the control group ( absolute difference , 12.9 percentage points ; 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] , 8.0 to 17.6 ; P<0.001 ; number needed to screen , 8) . Atrial fibrillation lasting 2.5 minutes or longer was present in 28 of 284 patients ( 9.9 % ) in the intervention group , as compared with 7 of 277 ( 2.5 % ) in the control group ( absolute difference , 7.4 percentage points ; 95 % CI , 3.4 to 11.3 ; P<0.001 ) . By 90 days , oral anticoagulant therapy had been prescribed for more patients in the intervention group than in the control group ( 52 of 280 patients [ 18.6 % ] vs. 31 of 279 [ 11.1 % ] ; absolute difference , 7.5 percentage points ; 95 % CI , 1.6 to 13.3 ; P=0.01 ) . CONCLUSIONS Among patients with a recent cryptogenic stroke or TIA who were 55 years of age or older , paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was common . Noninvasive ambulatory ECG monitoring for a target of 30 days significantly improved the detection of atrial fibrillation by a factor of more than five and nearly doubled the rate of anticoagulant treatment , as compared with the st and ard practice of short- duration ECG monitoring . ( Funded by the Canadian Stroke Network and others ; EMBRACE Clinical Trials.gov number , NCT00846924 . ) Background — Atrial fibrillation is common among older persons .  Catheter ablation is increasingly used in patients for whom medical therapy has failed . Methods and Results — We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries ≥65 years of age who underwent catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation between July 1 , 2007 , and December 31 , 2009 . The main outcome measures were major complications within 30 days and mortality , heart failure , stroke , hospitalization , and repeat ablation within 1 year . A total of 15 423 patients underwent catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation . Mean age was 72 years ; 41 % were women ; and > 95 % were white . For every 1000 procedures , there were 17 cases of hemopericardium requiring intervention , 8 cases of stroke , and 8 deaths within 30 days . More than 40 % of patients required hospitalization within 1 year ; however , atrial fibrillation or flutter was the primary discharge diagnosis in only 38.4 % of cases . Eleven percent of patients underwent repeat ablation within 1 year . Renal impairment ( hazard ratio , 2.07 ; 95 % confidence interval , 1.66–2.58 ) , age ≥80 years ( hazard ratio , 3.09 ; 95 % confidence interval , 2.32–4.11 ) , and heart failure ( hazard ratio , 2.54 ; 95 % confidence interval , 2.07–3.13 ) were major risk factors for 1-year mortality . Advanced age was a major risk factor for all adverse outcomes . Conclusions — Major complications after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation were associated with advanced age but were fairly infrequent . Few patients underwent repeat ablation . R and omized trials are needed to inform risk-benefit calculations for older persons with drug-refractory , symptomatic atrial fibrillation OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to assess the effectiveness of opportunistic screening through pulse palpation in the early detection of  atrial fibrillation in subjects aged≥65 years versus detection through an active search for patients with symptoms and /or complications and sequelae associated . MATERIAL AND METHODS This was a cluster r and omized controlled trial performed in 48 primary care centers of the Spanish National Healthcare System . A total of 368 physicians and nurses were r and omized . The research ers in the experimental group ( EG ) performed opportunistic screening for auricular fibrillation , whereas the research ers in the control group ( CG ) actively search ed for symptomatic patients . An  ECG  was performed on patients found to have an irregular heartbeat to confirm the diagnosis of auricular fibrillation . RESULTS A total of 5,465 patients with a mean age of 75.61 years were recruited for the EG , and 1,525 patients with a mean age of 74.07 years were recruited for the CG . Of these , 58.6 % were female , without significant differences between groups . Pulse was irregular in 4.3 and 15.0 % of the patients in the EG and the CG , respectively ( P<.001 ) . A total of 164 new cases of atrial fibrillation were detected ( 2.3 % ) , 1.1 % in the EG and 6.7 % in the CG ( adjusted OR : 0.29 ; 95 % CI 0.18 - 0.45 ) . CONCLUSIONS Case finding for atrial fibrillation in patients aged≥65 years with symptoms or signs suggestive of atrial fibrillation is a more effective strategy than opportunistic screening through pulse palpation in asymptomatic patients . TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial is registered in Clinical Trials.gov ( NCT01291953 ; February 8 , 2011 ) OBJECTIVE To correlate atrial fibrillation with the incidence of new thromboembolic ( TE ) stroke  in older patients with and without prior TE stroke . DESIGN In a prospect i ve study of 2101 older patients ,  electrocardiograms  showed that atrial fibrillation was present in 283 patients ( 13 % ) . At 42-month mean follow-up , atrial fibrillation was associated with the incidence of new TE stroke in patients with and without prior TE stroke . SETTING A large long-term health care facility where 2101 older patients were studied . PATIENTS The 2101 patients included 1451 women and 650 men , mean age 81 + /- 8 years ( range 60 to 103 ) . MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Atrial fibrillation was present in 283 of 2101 patients ( 13 % ) . The mean age was 84 + /- 7 years in patients with atrial fibrillation and 81 + /- 8 years in patients with sinus rhythm ( P = .0001 ) . The prevalence of atrial fibrillation was 5 % in patients aged 60 to 70 years , 14 % in patients aged 71 to 80 years , 13 % in patients aged 81 to 90 years , and 22 % in patients aged 91 to 103 years ( P < .0001 ) . Mean follow-up was 31 + /- 18 months in patients with atrial fibrillation and 44 + /- 27 months in patients with sinus rhythm ( P = .0001 ) . Previous TE stroke occurred in 123 of 283 patients ( 43 % ) with atrial fibrillation and in 431 of 1818 patients ( 24 % ) with sinus rhythm ( P < .0001 ) . New TE stroke occurred in 131 of 283 patients ( 46 % ) with atrial fibrillation and in 303 of 1818 patients ( 17 % ) with sinus rhythm ( P < .0001 ) . The log-rank test showed that patients with atrial fibrillation had a significantly higher probability of developing new TE stroke than those with sinus rhythm ( P < .0001 ) . The multivariate Cox regression model showed that independent risk factors for new TE stroke were male sex ( relative risk = 1.3 ) , prior TE stroke ( relative risk = 3.1 ) , and atrial fibrillation ( relative risk = 3.3 ) . CONCLUSIONS Atrial fibrillation , prior TE stroke , and male sex are independent risk factors for the development of new TE stroke in older patients Background — Information on comparative outcome between radiofrequency catheter ablation ( RFA ) and antiarrhythmic drugs ( AADs ) > 1 year after r and omization is important for clinical decision-making . Methods and Results — A total of 198 patients ( age , 56±10 years ) with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were r and omly assigned to RFA ( 99 patients ) or to AADs ( 99 patients ) . We evaluated efficacy of RFA or AADs in a comparable 48-month follow-up period according to intention-to-treat analysis . Cardiac rhythm was assessed with daily transtelephonic transmissions . Quality of life was also analyzed . At 4 years , among the 99 patients first assigned to RFA , the procedure was repeated because of recurrent atrial fibrillation/atrial tachycardia in 27 patients ( 27.3 % ) . Among the 99 patients r and omly assigned to AADs , 87 ( 87.9 % ) crossed over to undergo RFA and 4 years after r and om assignment only 12 ( 12.1 % ) were in sinus rhythm with AAD alone without ablation . Despite the high level of crossovers , at 4 years the intention-to-treat analysis showed that 72.7 % of patients in the ablation arm and 56.5 % of those initially r and omly assigned to AADs were free of recurrent atrial fibrillation/atrial tachycardia ( P=0.017 ) . During the follow-up , 19.2 % of AAD patients progressed to persistent atrial fibrillation before switching to RFA . RFA significantly improved quality of life ( P<0.001 ) , whereas before crossing over to RFA , patients receiving AADs showed poorer quality of life . Except for new left atrial tachycardia , there were no serious complications caused by RFA . Conclusions — With follow-up extended to 4 years after r and omly assigned , ablation remains superior to antiarrhythmic drug in these patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation . Clinical Trial Registration — URL : http://www . clinical trials.gov . Unique identifier : NCT00340314 Background : Atrial fibrillation is a common arrhythmia associated with excess morbidity and mortality . We studied temporal changes in hospital admission rates for atrial fibrillation using data from a prospect i ve population -based cohort study spanning 2 decades ( the Copenhagen City Heart Study ) . Methods : The study included baseline data collected in 1981 through 1983 on 10,955 persons age 40 to 79 years and baseline data collected in 1991 through 1994 on 7212 persons age 40 to 79 years . We used hospital diagnosis data from the Danish National Hospital Discharge Register to determine the rate of first hospital admission for atrial fibrillation during 7 years following each of the 2 baseline data collecting periods . Changes in admission rates were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard models . Results : During the 2 7-year periods , 379 subjects were admitted with a hospital diagnosis of atrial fibrillation . The rate of hospital admissions for atrial fibrillation increased among both men and women from the first to the second period ( relative risk = 1.6 ; 95 % confidence interval = 1.3–1.9 [ adjusted for age , sex , prior myocardial infa rct ion , arterial hypertension , diabetes mellitus , electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy , decreased lung function , smoking , height , and weight ] ) . Conclusion : During the latest 10 to 20 years , there has been a 60 % increase in hospital admissions for atrial fibrillation independent of changes in known risk factors . This increase could result from changes in admission threshold or coding practice s , or it could reflect a genuine increase in the population incidence of atrial fibrillation BACKGROUND One quarter of strokes are of unknown cause , and sub clinical atrial fibrillation may be a common etiologic factor . Pacemakers can detect sub clinical episodes of rapid atrial rate , which correlate with electrocardiographically documented atrial fibrillation . We evaluated whether sub clinical episodes of rapid atrial rate detected by implanted devices were associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke in patients who did not have other evidence of atrial fibrillation . METHODS We enrolled 2580 patients , 65 years of age or older , with hypertension and no history of atrial fibrillation , in whom a pacemaker or defibrillator had recently been implanted . We monitored the patients for 3 months to detect sub clinical atrial tachyarrhythmias ( episodes of atrial rate > 190 beats per minute for more than 6 minutes ) and followed them for a mean of 2.5 years for the primary outcome of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism .  Patients with pacemakers  were r and omly assigned to receive or not to receive continuous atrial overdrive pacing . RESULTS By 3 months , sub clinical atrial tachyarrhythmias detected by implanted devices had occurred in 261 patients ( 10.1 % ) . Sub clinical atrial tachyarrhythmias were associated with an increased risk of clinical atrial fibrillation ( hazard ratio , 5.56 ; 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] , 3.78 to 8.17 ; P<0.001 ) and of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism ( hazard ratio , 2.49 ; 95 % CI , 1.28 to 4.85 ; P=0.007 ) . Of 51 patients who had a primary outcome event , 11 had had sub clinical atrial tachyarrhythmias detected by 3 months , and none had had clinical atrial fibrillation by 3 months . The population attributable risk of stroke or systemic embolism associated with sub clinical atrial tachyarrhythmias was 13 % . Sub clinical atrial tachyarrhythmias remained predictive of the primary outcome after adjustment for predictors of stroke ( hazard ratio , 2.50 ; 95 % CI , 1.28 to 4.89 ; P=0.008 ) . Continuous atrial overdrive pacing did not prevent atrial fibrillation . CONCLUSIONS Sub clinical atrial tachyarrhythmias , without clinical atrial fibrillation , occurred frequently in patients with pacemakers and were associated with a significantly increased risk of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism . ( Funded by St. Jude Medical ; ASSERT Clinical Trials.gov number , NCT00256152 . ) We performed a post hoc analysis of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program data base to assess the incidence of atrial fibrillation in the elderly hypertensive population , its influence on cardiovascular events , and whether antihypertensive treatment can prevent its onset . The Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program was a double-blind placebo-controlled trial in 4736 subjects with isolated systolic hypertension aged ≥60 years . Atrial fibrillation was an exclusion criterion from the trial . Participants were r and omly assigned to stepped care treatment with chlorthalidone and atenolol ( n=2365 ) or placebo ( n=2371 ) . The occurrence of atrial fibrillation and cardiovascular events over 4.7 years as well as the determination of cause of death at 4.7 and 14.3 years were followed . Ninety-eight subjects ( 2.06 % ) developed atrial fibrillation over 4.7 years mean follow-up , without significant difference between treated and placebo groups . Atrial fibrillation increased the risk for : total cardiovascular events ( RR 1.69 ; 95 % CI 1.21 to 2.36 ) , rapid death ( RR 3.29 ; 95 % CI 1.08 to 10.00 ) , total ( RR 5.10 ; 95 % CI 3.12 to 8.37 ) and nonfatal left ventricular failure ( RR 5.31 ; 95 % CI 3.09 to 9.13 ) . All-cause and total cardiovascular death were significantly increased in the atrial fibrillation group at 4.7 years ( HR 3.44 ; 95 % CI 2.18 to 5.42 ; HR 2.39 ; 95 % CI 1.05 to 5.43 ) and 14.3 years follow-up ( HR 2.33 ; 95 % CI 1.83 to 2.98 ; HR 2.21 ; 95 % CI 1.54 to 3.17 ) . Atrial fibrillation increased the risk for total cardiovascular events , rapid death , and left ventricular failure . All-cause mortality and total cardiovascular mortality were significantly increased in hypertensives with atrial fibrillation at 4.7 and 14.3 years follow-up BACKGROUND There are two approaches to the treatment of atrial fibrillation : one is cardioversion and treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs to maintain sinus rhythm , and the other is the use of rate-controlling drugs , allowing atrial fibrillation to persist . In both approaches , the use of anticoagulant drugs is recommended . METHODS We conducted a r and omized , multicenter comparison of these two treatment strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation and a high risk of stroke or death . The primary end point was overall mortality . RESULTS A total of 4060 patients ( mean [ + /-SD ] age , 69.7+/-9.0 years ) were enrolled in the study ; 70.8 percent had a history of hypertension , and 38.2 percent had coronary artery disease . Of the 3311 patients with echocardiograms , the left atrium was enlarged in 64.7 percent and left ventricular function was depressed in 26.0 percent . There were 356 deaths among the patients assigned to rhythm-control therapy and 310 deaths among those assigned to rate-control therapy ( mortality at five years , 23.8 percent and 21.3 percent , respectively ; hazard ratio , 1.15 [ 95 percent confidence interval , 0.99 to 1.34 ] ; P=0.08 ) . More patients in the rhythm-control group than in the rate-control group were hospitalized , and there were more adverse drug effects in the rhythm-control group as well . In both groups , the majority of strokes occurred after warfarin had been stopped or when the international normalized ratio was subtherapeutic . CONCLUSIONS Management of atrial fibrillation with the rhythm-control strategy offers no survival advantage over the rate-control strategy , and there are potential advantages , such as a lower risk of adverse drug effects , with the rate-control strategy . Anticoagulation should be continued in this group of high-risk patients Background — There is a paucity of international data on the various types of atrial fibrillation ( AF ) outside the highly selected population s from r and omized trials . This study aim ed to describe patient characteristics , risk factors , comorbidities , symptoms , management strategy , and control of different types of AF in real-life practice . Methods and Results — Real-life global survey evaluating patients with atrial fibrillation ( RealiseAF ) was a contemporary , large-scale , cross-sectional international survey of patients with AF who had ≥1 episode in the past 12 months . Investigators were r and omly selected to avoid bias . Among 9816 eligible patients from 831 sites in 26 countries , 2606 ( 26.5 % ) had paroxysmal , 2341 ( 23.8 % ) had persistent , and 4869 ( 49.6 % ) had permanent AF . As AF progressed from paroxysmal to persistent and permanent forms , the prevalence of comorbidities , such as heart failure ( 32.9 % , 44.3 % , and 55.6 % ) , coronary artery disease ( 30.0 % , 32.9 % , and 34.3 % ) , cerebrovascular disease ( 11.7 % , 10.8 % , and 17.6 % ) , and valvular disease ( 16.7 % , 21.2 % , and 35.8 % ) , increased , and the prevalence of lone AF decreased . Similarly , there was an increase in mean CHADS2 [ cardiac failure , hypertension , age , diabetes , stroke ( doubled ) ] score ( 1.7 , 1.8 , and 2.2 ) , and more than half of patients ( 51.0 % , 56.7 % , and 67.3 % ) qualified for oral anticoagulants . Almost 90 % of patients received ≥1 antiarrhythmic drug , but > 60 % had European Heart Rhythm Association symptom scores from II to IV . Furthermore , 40.7 % of persistent and 49.8 % of permanent AF patients were still in AF with a heart rate > 80 beats per minute . Conclusions — This survey disclosed high cardiovascular risks and an unmet need in daily practice for patients with any type of AF , especially those with the permanent form
They also have an increased risk for thromboembolism .
Comparing with age-matched controls , the relative risk for stroke is increased 2- to 7-fold in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation ( 3 , 8 , 13 ) , and the absolute risk for stroke is between 1 % and 5 % per year , depending on clinical characteristics ( 3 , 12 , 14 - 16 ) .
Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation disrupts the lives of patients ( 17 ) , but this perception may not be associated with frequency or duration of symptoms .
Warfarin therapy affects quality of life because of frequent blood testing and recommendations for limiting some activities .
Data Synthesis Does Aggressive Rhythm Control Improve Mortality and Morbidity Compared with Rate Control ?
Atrial fibrillation is the most common type of arrhythmia in adults , accounting for about one third of hospitalizations for arrhythmia ( 1 ) .
The prevalence increases from less than 1 % in persons younger than 60 years of age to more than 8 % in those older than 80 years of age ( 2 - 6 ) .
The incidence ranges from 0.2 % per year for men 30 to 39 years of age to 2.3 % per year in men 80 to 89 years of age ( 7 , 8) .
The age-adjusted incidence for women is about half that of men ( 9 ) .
The cardiac conditions most commonly associated with atrial fibrillation are rheumatic mitral valve disease , coronary artery disease , congestive heart failure , and hypertension ( 8 , 10 ) .
Noncardiac causes include hyperthyroidism , hypoxic conditions , surgery , and alcohol intoxication .
A predisposing condition exists in more than 90 % of cases ( 5 , 11 , 12 ) ; the remaining cases have what is called lone atrial fibrillation .
Patients with atrial fibrillation frequently have symptoms of hemodynamic compromise , ranging from irregular palpitations to the more insidious feeling of malaise .
Little is known about the direct effects of antiarrhythmic therapy and rate-control therapy on quality of life .
The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/European Society of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation classified atrial fibrillation into 4 types ( 20 ) : first detected episode , paroxysmal ( terminates spontaneously ) , persistent ( electrical or pharmacologic termination necessary ) , and permanent ( resistant to electrical or pharmacologic conversion or accepted by the physician ) .
The purpose of this review was to summarize the evidence that was available during formulation of the guidelines developed by the American College of Physicians ( ACP ) and the American Academy of Family Physicians ( AAFP ) for management of adult patients with nonpostoperative atrial fibrillation .
Although the relative benefits and risks of rate versus rhythm control are of paramount importance in the management of atrial fibrillation , studies directly addressed this issue only recently .