Implementation of a lifestyle intervention for type 2 diabetes prevention in Dutch primary care: opportunities for intervention delivery Delaying progression to type 2 diabetes among high-risk Spanish individuals is feasible in real-life primary healthcare settings using intensive lifestyle intervention Lifestyle Counseling for Type 2 Diabetes Risk Reduction in Dutch Primary Care Nurse Care Manager Collaboration With Community-Based Physicians Providing Diabetes Care A Randomized Controlled Trial Walking away from type 2 diabetes: trial protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating a structured education programme in those at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes Let’s prevent diabetes: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of an educational intervention in a multi-ethnic UK population with screen detected impaired glucose regulation Controlled trial of a multifaceted intervention for improving quality of care for rural patients with type 2 diabetes. A community based primary prevention programme for type 2 diabetes integrating identification and lifestyle intervention for prevention: the Let's Prevent Diabetes cluster randomised controlled trial. Translating the Diabetes Prevention Program to Primary Care: A Pilot Study Treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in a primary care setting in Taiwan: comparison with secondary/tertiary care. A lifestyle intervention to reduce Type 2 diabetes risk in Dutch primary care: 2.5-year results of a randomized controlled trial. Nurse-led telecoaching of people with type 2 diabetes in primary care: rationale, design and baseline data of a randomized controlled trial Movement as Medicine for Type 2 Diabetes: protocol for an open pilot study and external pilot clustered randomised controlled trial to assess acceptability, feasibility and fidelity of a multifaceted behavioural intervention targeting physical activity in primary care The Sydney Diabetes Prevention Program: A community-based translational study Chronic care clinics for diabetes in primary care: a system-wide randomized trial. Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes by lifestyle intervention in an Australian primary health care setting: Greater Green Triangle (GGT) Diabetes Prevention Project Cluster randomised controlled trial of a peer-led lifestyle intervention program: study protocol for the Kerala diabetes prevention program
Background As in clinical practice re sources may be limited compared to experimental setting s , translation of evidence -based lifestyle interventions into daily life setting s is challenging . In this study we therefore evaluated the implementation of the APHRODITE lifestyle intervention for the prevention of type 2 diabetes in Dutch primary care . Based on this evaluation we discuss opportunities for refining intervention delivery . Methods A 2.5-year intervention was performed in 14 general practice s in the Netherl and s among individuals at high risk for type 2 diabetes ( FINDRISC-score ≥ 13 ) ( n = 479 ) and was compared to usual care ( n = 446 ) . Intervention consisted of individual lifestyle counselling by nurse practitioners ( n = 24 ) and GPs ( n = 48 ) and group-consultations .  Drop-out and attendance were registered during the programme . After the intervention , satisfaction with the programme and perceived implementation barriers were assessed with question naires . Results Drop-out was modest ( intervention : 14.6 % ; usual care : 13.2 % ) and attendance at individual consultations was high ( intervention : 80 - 97 % ; usual care : 86 - 94 % ) . Providers were confident about diabetes prevention by lifestyle intervention in primary care . Participants were more satisfied with counselling from nurse practitioners than from GPs . A major part of the GPs reported low self-efficacy regarding dietary guidance . Lack of counselling time ( 60 % ) , participant motivation ( 12 % ) , and financial reimbursement ( 11 % ) were regarded by providers as important barriers for intervention implementation . Conclusions High participant compliance and a positive attitude of providers make primary care a suitable setting for diabetes prevention by lifestyle counselling . Results support a role for the nurse practitioner as the key player in guiding lifestyle modification . Further research is needed on strategies that could increase cost-effectiveness , such as more stringent criteria for participant inclusion , group-counselling , more tailor-made counselling and integration of screening and / or interventions for different disorders Aims /hypothesisTo assess the feasibility and effectiveness of an active real-life primary care lifestyle intervention in preventing  type 2 diabetes within a high-risk Mediterranean population . Methods A prospect i ve cohort study was performed in the setting of Spanish primary care . White-European individuals without diabetes aged 45–75 years ( n = 2,054 ) were screened using the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score ( FINDRISC ) and a subsequent 2 h OGTT . Where feasible , high-risk individuals who were identified were allocated sequentially to st and ard care , a group-based or an individual level intervention ( intensive reinforced DE-PLAN [ Diabetes in Europe — Prevention using Lifestyle , Physical Activity and Nutritional ] intervention ) . The primary outcome was the development of diabetes according to WHO criteria . Analyses after 4-year follow-up were performed based on the intention-to-treat principle with comparison of st and ard care and the combined intervention groups . Results The st and ard care ( n = 219 ) and intensive intervention ( n = 333 ) groups were comparable in age ( 62.0/62.2 years ) , sex ( 64.4/68.2 % women ) , BMI ( 31.3/31.2 kg/m2 ) , FINDRISC score ( 16.2/15.8 points ) , fasting ( 5.3/5.2 mmol/l ) , 2 h plasma glucose ( 7.1/6.9 mmol/l ) and self-reported interest to make lifestyle changes at baseline . Diabetes was diagnosed in 124 individuals : 63 ( 28.8 % ) in the st and ard care group and 61 ( 18.3 % ) in the intensive intervention group . During a 4.2-year median follow-up , the incidences of diabetes were 7.2 and 4.6 cases per 100 person-years , respectively ( 36.5 % relative risk reduction , p < 0.005 ) . The number of participants needed to be treated by intensive intervention for 4 years to reduce one case of diabetes was 9.5 . Conclusions /interpretationIntensive lifestyle intervention is feasible in a primary care setting and substantially reduces diabetes incidence among high-risk individuals . Clinical trial registration : Clinical Trial.gov NCT01519505 Funding : Commission of the European Communities , Institute of Health Carlos III , Spanish Ministry of Health and Department of Health , Generalitat de Catalunya OBJECTIVE To study the overall effect of the Active Prevention in High-Risk Individuals of Diabetes Type 2 in and Around Eindhoven ( APHRODITE ) lifestyle intervention on type 2 diabetes risk reduction in Dutch primary care after 0.5 and 1.5 years and to evaluate the variability between general practice s. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Individuals at high risk for type 2 diabetes ( Finnish Diabetes Risk Score ≥13 ) were r and omly assigned into an intervention group ( n = 479 ) or a usual-care group ( n = 446 ) . Comparisons were made between study groups and between general practice s regarding changes in clinical and lifestyle measures over 1.5 years . Participant , general practitioner , and nurse practitioner characteristics were compared between individuals who lost weight or maintained a stable weight and individuals who gained weight . RESULTS Both groups showed modest changes in glucose values , weight measures , physical activity , energy intake , and fiber intake . Differences between groups were significant only for total physical activity , saturated fat intake , and fiber intake . Differences between general practice s were significant for BMI and 2-h glucose but not for energy intake and physical activity . In the intervention group , the nurse practitioners ’ mean years of work experience was significantly longer in individuals who were successful at losing weight or maintaining a stable weight compared with unsuccessful individuals . Furthermore , successful individuals more often had a partner . CONCLUSIONS Risk factors for type 2 diabetes could be significantly reduced by lifestyle counseling in Dutch primary care . The small differences in changes over time between the two study groups suggest that additional intervention effects are modest . In particular , the level of experience of the nurse practitioner and the availability of partner support seem to facilitate intervention success PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the potential value of close collaboration at the office level of a nurse care manager with community-based primary care physicians in the care of adult patients with type 2 diabetes , particularly those physicians not affiliated with an integrated care system that some managed care organizations provide . METHODS Patients with type 2 diabetes were recruited from the general population of a large metropolitan area . Each received a comprehensive evaluation of his or her diabetes with results reported to patients and their physicians ( basic intervention ) . A r and om one-half of patients were additionally assigned to individual counseling , problem identification , care planning , and management recommendations by a nurse care manager ( individualized intervention ) . The patients receiving only the basic intervention served as the control group to those receiving the individualized intervention . Re-evaluation of all patients at 6 months after their entry into the study determined the effectiveness of the nurse-directed individualized intervention using A1C , blood pressure , and cholesterol as outcome measures . RESULTS Of 220 patients recruited , 197 had type 2 diabetes , r and omly assigned only the basic intervention ( 102 patients ) or individualized intervention ( 95 patients ) . Postintervention data were obtained on 164 patients ( 83 % ) . Significant improvement occurred in mean systolic blood pressure and A1C of all patients in the individualized but not the basic intervention only group . Patients with a systolic blood pressure > or=130 mm Hg at baseline showed improvement if they had more than 2 contacts with the study nurse but not if they had less than 2 contacts . CONCLUSIONS A nurse care manager collaborating at the office level with community-based primary care physicians can enhance the care provided to adult patients with type 2 diabetes . For those many physicians not affiliated with an integrated care system featured by some managed care organizations , this collaboration could underlie a team approach ( nurse/patient/physician ) for the ambulatory patient with diabetes that would be an essential element in a chronic disease model of care for diabetes at the community level Background The prevention of  type 2 diabetes  is a recognised health care priority globally . Within the United Kingdom , there is a lack of research investigating optimal methods of translating diabetes prevention programmes , based on the promotion of a healthy lifestyle , into routine primary care . This study aims to establish the behavioural and clinical effectiveness of a structured educational programme design ed to target perceptions and knowledge of diabetes risk and promote a healthily lifestyle , particularly increased walking activity , in a multi-ethnic population at a high risk of developing type 2 diabetes . Design Cluster r and omised controlled trial undertaken at the level of primary care practice s. Follow-up will be conducted at 12 , 24 and 36 months . The primary outcome is change in objective ly measured ambulatory activity . Secondary outcomes include progression to type 2 diabetes , biochemical variables ( including fasting glucose , 2-h glucose , HbA1c and lipids ) , anthropometric variables , quality of life and depression . Methods 10 primary care practice s will be recruited to the study ( 5 intervention , 5 control ) . Within each practice , individuals at high risk of impaired glucose regulation will be identified using an automated version of the Leicester Risk Assessment tool . Individuals scoring within the 90th percentile in each practice will be invited to take part in the study . Practice s will be assigned to either the control group ( advice leaflet ) or the intervention group , in which participants will be invited to attend a 3 hour structured educational programme design ed to promote physical activity and a healthy lifestyle . Participants in the intervention practice s will also be invited to attend annual group-based maintenance workshops and will receive telephone contact halfway between annual sessions . The study will run from 2010–2014 . Discussion This study will provide new evidence surrounding the long-term effectiveness of a diabetes prevention programme run within routine primary care in the United Kingdom . Trial Registration Clinical Trials . Gov identifier : Background The prevention of type 2 diabetes is a globally recognised health care priority , but there is a lack of rigorous research investigating optimal methods of translating diabetes prevention programmes , based on the promotion of a healthy lifestyle , into routine primary care . The aim of the study is to establish whether a pragmatic structured education programme targeting lifestyle and behaviour change in conjunction with motivational maintenance via the telephone can reduce the incidence of type 2 diabetes in people with impaired glucose regulation ( a composite of impaired glucose tolerance and /or impaired fasting glucose ) identified through a vali date d risk score screening programme in primary care . Design Cluster r and omised controlled trial undertaken at the level of primary care practice s. Follow-up will be conducted at 12 , 24 and 36 months . The primary outcome is the incidence of type 2 diabetes . Secondary outcomes include changes in HbA1c , blood glucose levels , cardiovascular risk , the presence of the Metabolic Syndrome and the cost-effectiveness of the intervention . Methods The study consists of screening and intervention phases within 44 general practice s coordinated from a single academic research centre . Those at high risk of impaired glucose regulation or type 2 diabetes are identified using a risk score and invited for screening using a 75 g-oral glucose tolerance test . Those with screen detected impaired glucose regulation will be invited to take part in the trial . Practice s will be r and omised to st and ard care or the intensive arm . Participants from intensive arm practice s will receive a structured education programme with motivational maintenance via the telephone and annual refresher sessions . The study will run from 2009–2014 . Discussion This study will provide new evidence surrounding the long-term effectiveness of a diabetes prevention programme conducted within routine primary care in the United Kingdom . Trial registration Clinical trials.gov OBJECTIVE Despite good evidence and clinical practice guidelines , studies document that treatment of type 2 diabetes is less than optimal . Lack of re sources or limited access may put patients in rural communities at particular risk for suboptimal care . RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We conducted a prospect i ve , before/after study with concurrent controls to assess the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary diabetes outreach service ( intervention ) for improving the quality of care for rural patients with type 2 diabetes . Our intervention consisted of six monthly visits by a traveling team of specialist physicians , nurses , dieticians , and a pharmacist . The core of this service was specialist-to-rural primary care physician academic group detailing . Two comparable regions in Northern Alberta were r and omly allocated to control or intervention . Data were collected before and 6 months after intervention in a representative volunteer sample . The primary outcome was a 10 % improvement in any one of the following : blood pressure , total cholesterol , or HbA(1c ) . RESULTS Our analysis included 200 intervention and 179 control subjects ; 14 subjects were at all three primary outcome targets at baseline . The intervention was associated with a trend toward improvement in primary outcome at 6 months ( 44 % intervention vs. 37 % control ; odds ratio 1.32 , 95 % CI 0.87 - 1.99 ) . The intervention was associated with a significant improvement in blood pressure ( 42 % intervention vs. 25 % control , P = 0.004 ) ; however , there were only small , nonsignificant changes in cholesterol or HbA(1c ) . The intervention was associated with a significant increase in satisfaction with diabetes care . Multivariate adjustment for baseline differences between intervention and control subjects did not affect any of the main results . CONCLUSIONS A diabetes outreach service has the potential to improve the quality of diabetes care for rural patients . Future studies need to involve longer timelines and larger sample sizes OBJECTIVES Prevention of type 2 diabetes ( T2DM ) is a priority in healthcare , but there is a lack of evidence investigating how to effectively translate prevention research into a UK primary care setting . We assessed whether a structured education programme targeting lifestyle and behaviour change was effective at preventing progression to T2DM  in people with pre-diabetes . MATERIAL S AND METHODS Forty-four general practice s were r and omised to receive either st and ard care or a 6hour group structured education programme with an annual refresher course , and regular phone contact . Participants were followed up for 3years . The primary outcome was progression to T2DM . RESULTS Eight hundred and eighty participants were included ( 36 % female , mean age 64years , 16 % ethnic minority group ) ; 131 participants developed T2DM . There was a non-significant 26 % reduced risk of developing T2DM in the intervention arm compared to st and ard care ( HR 0.74 , 95 % CI 0.48 , 1.14 , p=0.18 ) . The reduction in T2DM risk when excluding those who did not attend the initial education session was also non-significant ( HR 0.65 , 0.41 , 1.03 , p=0.07 ) . There were statistically significant improvements in HbA1c ( -0.06 , -0.11 , -0.01 ) , LDL cholesterol ( -0.08 , -0.15 , -0.01 ) , sedentary time ( -26.29 , -45.26 , -7.32 ) and step count ( 498.15 , 162.10 , 834.20 ) when data were analysed across all time points . CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that a relatively low re source , pragmatic diabetes prevention programme result ed in modest benefits to biomedical , lifestyle and psychosocial outcomes , however the reduction to the risk of T2DM did not reach significance . The findings have important implication s for future research and primary care Background : Research on the translation of efficacious lifestyle change programs to prevent type 2 diabetes into community or clinical setting s is needed . Objective : The objective of this study was to examine the reach , implementation , and efficacy of a 6-month lifestyle program implemented in primary care by nurse practitioners ( NPs ) for adults at risk of type 2 diabetes . Methods : The NP sites ( n = 4 ) were r and omized to an enhanced st and ard care program ( one  NP  and one  nutrition session ) or a lifestyle program ( enhanced st and ard care and six NP sessions ) . These NPs recruited adults at risk of diabetes from their practice ( n = 58 ) , with an acceptance rate of 70 % . Results : The program reached a diverse , obese , and moderately low income sample . The NPs were able to successfully implement the protocol s. The average length of the program was 9.3 months . Attendance was high ( 98 % ) , and attrition was low ( 12 % ) . The NPs were able to adopt the educational , behavioral , and psychosocial strategies of the intervention easily . Motivational interviewing was more difficult for NPs . Mixed-model repeated- measures analysis indicated significant trends or improvement in both groups for nutrition and exercise behavior . Participants of the lifestyle program demonstrated trends for better high-density lipoprotein ( HDL ) and exercise behavior compared with the enhanced st and ard care participants . Twenty-five percent of lifestyle participants met treatment goals of 5 % weight loss compared with 11 % of st and ard care participants . Discussion : A lifestyle program can be implemented in primary care by NPs , reach the targeted population , and be modestly successful . Further research is indicated BACKGROUND This study investigated the status of diabetes control and management in patients treated in a primary healthcare setting and compared the results with data previously obtained for secondary /tertiary care patients in Taiwan . METHODS This study was conducted at 51 primary healthcare stations r and omly selected isl and -wide in Taiwan in 2001 . A total of 1302 type 2 diabetes patients who had been followed-up for more than 1 year were included .  Blood was collected for central ized HbA1c assay . The remaining data and information were collected by review of medical records and patient interview . RESULTS Compared with the results of a previous study on patients treated in a secondary /tertiary care setting , a significantly smaller percentage of primary care patients were receiving insulin therapy . Primary care patients also had a shorter duration of diabetes , a higher HbA1c level , better blood pressure control and a lower prevalence of complications . The proportion of patients achieving optimal control of glycemia and blood pressure was low . Patients aged < 65 years had a significantly shorter duration of diabetes , poorer diabetes control and better blood pressure control than elderly patients aged > or = 65 years . Primary care patients aged > or = 65 years had a significantly higher frequency of stroke than those aged < 65 years . The elderly group of secondary /tertiary care patients had a significantly higher frequency of coronary heart disease and stroke . Duration of diabetes and hypertension were the leading risk factors for complications in diabetes patients treated in both primary and secondary /tertiary care setting s. CONCLUSION Diabetes control was poorer in primary care than in secondary /tertiary care patients , but control of blood pressure was better in primary care patients . The shorter duration of diabetes and better control of blood pressure in primary care patients and in patients aged < 65 years compared with their elderly counterparts might be related to a lower prevalence of complications AIMS To determine the effectiveness of a 2.5-year lifestyle intervention for Type 2 diabetes prevention in Dutch general practice compared with usual care . METHODS A r and omized controlled trial of 925 individuals at high risk for Type 2 diabetes ( FINDRISC-score ≥ 13 ) in 14 general practice s in the Netherl and s. Intervention consisted of lifestyle counselling from the nurse practitioner and the general practitioner . Usual care consisted of oral and written information at the start of the study . Study groups were compared over 2.5 years regarding changes in clinical and lifestyle measures . RESULTS Both groups showed modest changes in body weight , glucose concentrations , physical activity and dietary intake [ weight : intervention group , -0.8 ( 5.1 ) kg , usual care group , -0.4 ( 4.7 ) kg , ( P=0.69 ) ; fasting plasma glucose : intervention group , -0.17 ( 0.4 ) mmol/l , usual care group , -0.10 ( 0.5 ) mmol/l , ( P=0.10 ) ] . Differences between groups were significant only for total physical activity and fibre intake . In the intervention group , self-efficacy was significantly higher in individuals successful at losing weight compared with unsuccessful individuals . No significant differences in participant weight loss were found between general practitioners and nurse practitioners with different levels of motivation or self-efficacy . CONCLUSIONS Diabetes risk factors could significantly be reduced by lifestyle counselling in Dutch primary care . However , intervention effects above the effects attributable to usual care were modest . Higher participant self-efficacy seemed to facilitate weight loss . Lack of motivation or self-efficacy of professionals did not negatively influence participant guidance Background Despite the efforts of the healthcare community to improve the quality of diabetes care , about 50 % of people with type 2 diabetes do not reach their treatment targets , increasing the risk of future micro- and macro-vascular complications . Diabetes self-management education has been shown to contribute to better disease control . However , it is not known which strategies involving educational programs are cost-effective . Telehealth applications might support chronic disease management . Transferability of successful distant patient self-management support programs to the Belgian setting needs to be confirmed by studies of a high method ological quality . “ The COACH Program ” was developed in Australia as target driven educational telephone delivered intervention to support people with different chronic conditions . It proved to be effective in patients with coronary heart disease after hospitalization . Clinical and cost-effectiveness of The COACH Program in people with type 2 diabetes in Belgium needs to be assessed . Methods / Design R and omized controlled trial in patients with type 2 diabetes . Patients were selected based on their medication consumption data and were recruited by their sickness fund . They were r and omized to receive either usual care plus “ The COACH Program ” or usual care alone . The study will assess the difference in outcomes between groups . The primary outcome measure is the level of HbA1c . The secondary outcomes are : Total Cholesterol , LDL-Cholesterol , HDL-Cholesterol , Triglycerides , Blood Pressure , body mass index , smoking status ; proportion of people at target for HbA1c , LDL-Cholesterol and Blood Pressure ; self-perceived health status , diabetes-specific emotional distress and satisfaction with diabetes care . The follow-up period is 18 months . Within-trial and modeled cost-utility analyses , to project effects over life-time horizon beyond the trial duration , will be undertaken from the perspective of the health care system if the intervention is effective . Discussion The study will enhance our underst and ing of the potential of telehealth in diabetes management in Belgium . Research on the clinical effectiveness and the cost-effectiveness is essential to support policy makers in future reimbursement and implementation decisions . Trial registration Belgian number : B322201213625 . Clinical Trials.gov Identifier : Background Physical activity ( PA ) and nutrition are the cornerstones of diabetes management . Several review s and meta-analyses report that PA independently produces clinical ly important improvements in glucose control in people with Type 2 diabetes . However , it remains unclear what the optimal strategies are to increase PA behaviour in people with Type 2 diabetes in routine primary care . Methods This study will determine whether an evidence -informed multifaceted behaviour change intervention ( Movement as Medicine for Type 2 Diabetes ) targeting both consultation behaviour of primary healthcare professionals and PA behaviour in adults with Type 2 diabetes is both acceptable and feasible in the primary care setting . An open pilot study conducted in two primary care practice s ( phase one ) will assess acceptability , feasibility and fidelity . Ongoing feedback from participating primary healthcare professionals and patients will provide opportunities for systematic adaptation and refinement of the intervention and study procedures . A two-arm parallel group clustered pilot r and omised controlled trial with patients from participating primary care practice s in North East Engl and will assess acceptability , feasibility , and fidelity of the intervention ( versus usual clinical care ) and trial processes over a 12-month period . Consultation behaviour involving fidelity of intervention delivery , diabetes and PA related knowledge , attitudes/beliefs , intentions and self-efficacy for delivering a behaviour change intervention targeting PA behaviour will be assessed in primary healthcare professionals . We will rehearse the collection of outcome data ( with the focus on data yield and quality ) for a future definitive trial , through outcome assessment at baseline , one , six and twelve months . An embedded qualitative process evaluation and treatment fidelity assessment will explore issues around intervention implementation and assess whether intervention components can be reliably and faithfully delivered in routine primary care . Discussion Movement as Medicine for Type 2 Diabetes will address an important gap in the evidence -base , that is , the need for interventions to increase free-living PA behaviour in adults with Type 2 diabetes . The multifaceted intervention incorporates an online accredited training programme for primary healthcare professionals and represents , to the best of our knowledge , the first of its kind in the United Kingdom . This study will establish whether the multifaceted behavioural intervention is acceptable and feasible in routine primary care . Trial registration Movement as Medicine for Type 2 Diabetes ( MaMT2D ) was registered with Current Controlled Trials on the 14th January 2012 : IS RCT N67997502 . The first primary care practice was r and omised on the 5th October 2012 Background Type 2 diabetes is a major public health problem in Australia with prevalence increasing in parallel with increasing obesity . Prevention is an essential component of strategies to reduce the diabetes burden . There is strong and consistent evidence from r and omised controlled trials that type 2 diabetes can be prevented or delayed through lifestyle modification which improves diet , increases physical activity and achieves weight loss in at risk people . The current challenge is to translate this evidence into routine community setting s , determine feasible and effective ways of delivering the intervention and providing on-going support to sustain successful behavioural changes . Methods / Design The Sydney Diabetes Prevention Program ( SDPP ) is a translational study which will be conducted in 1,550 participants aged 50 - 65 years ( including 100 indigenous people aged 18 years and older ) at high risk of future development of diabetes . Participants will be identified through a screening and recruitment program delivered through primary care and will be offered a community-based lifestyle modification intervention . The intervention comprises an initial individual session and three group sessions based on behaviour change principles and focuses on five goals : 5 % weight loss , 210 min/week physical activity ( aerobic and strength training exercise ) , limit dietary fat and saturated fat to less than 30 % and 10 % of energy intake respectively , and at least 15 g/1000 kcal dietary fibre . This is followed by 3-monthly contact with participants to review progress and offer ongoing lifestyle advice for 12 months . The effectiveness and costs of the program on diabetes-related risk factors will be evaluated . Main outcomes include changes in weight , physical activity , and dietary changes ( fat , saturated fat and fibre intake ) . Secondary outcomes include changes in waist circumference , fasting plasma glucose , blood pressure , lipids , quality of life , psychological well being , medication use and health service utilization . Discussion This translational study will ascertain the reach , feasibility , effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a lifestyle modification program delivered in a community setting through primary health care . If demonstrated to be effective , it will result in recommendations for policy change and practical methods for a wider community program for preventing or delaying the onset of type 2 diabetes in high risk people OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of primary care group visits ( chronic care clinics ) on the process and outcome of care for diabetic patients . RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We evaluated the intervention in primary care practice s r and omized to intervention and control groups in a large-staff model health maintenance organization ( HMO ) . Patients included diabetic patients > or = 30 years of age in each participating primary care practice , selected at r and om from an automated diabetes registry . Primary care practice s were r and omized within clinics to either a chronic care clinic ( intervention ) group or a  usual care ( control ) group . The intervention group conducted periodic one-half day chronic care clinics for groups of approximately 8 diabetic patients in their respective doctor 's practice .  Chronic care clinics consisted of st and ardized assessment s ; visits with the primary care physician , nurse , and clinical pharmacist ; and a group education/peer support meeting . We collected  self-report question  naires from patients and data from administrative systems . The question naires were mailed , and telephoned interviews were conducted for nonrespondents , at baseline and at 12 and 24 months ; we queried the process of care received , the satisfaction with care , and the health status of each patient . Serum cholesterol and HbA1c levels and health care use and cost data was collected from HMO administrative systems . RESULTS In an intention-to-treat analysis at 24 months , the intervention group had received significantly more recommended preventive procedures  and helpful patient education .  Of five primary health status indicators examined , two ( SF-36 general health and bed disability days ) were significantly better in the intervention group . Compared with control patients , intervention patients had slightly more primary care visits , but significantly fewer specialty and emergency room visits . Among intervention participants , we found consistently positive associations between the number of chronic care clinics attended and a number of outcomes , including patient satisfaction and HbA1c levels . CONCLUSIONS Periodic primary care sessions organized to meet the complex needs of diabetic patients imrproved the process of diabetes care and were associated with better outcomes Background R and omised controlled trials demonstrate a 60 % reduction in  type 2 diabetes incidence through lifestyle modification programmes . The aim of this study is to determine whether such programmes are feasible in primary health care . Methods An intervention study including 237 individuals 40–75 years of age with moderate or high risk of developing type 2 diabetes . A structured group programme with six 90 minute sessions delivered during an eight month period by trained nurses in Australian primary health care in 2004–2006 . Main outcome measures taken at baseline , three , and 12 months included weight , height , waist circumference , fasting plasma glucose and lipids , plasma glucose two hours after oral glucose challenge , blood pressure , measures of psychological distress and general health outcomes . To test differences between baseline and follow-up , paired t-tests and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were performed . Results At twelve months participants ' mean weight reduced by 2.52 kg ( 95 % confidence interval 1.85 to 3.19 ) and waist circumference by 4.17 cm ( 3.48 to 4.87 ) . Mean fasting glucose reduced by 0.14 mmol/l ( 0.07 to 0.20 ) , plasma glucose two hours after oral glucose challenge by 0.58 mmol/l ( 0.36 to 0.79 ) , total cholesterol by 0.29 mmol/l ( 0.18 to 0.40 ) , low density lipoprotein cholesterol by 0.25 mmol/l ( 0.16 to 0.34 ) , triglycerides by 0.15 mmol/l ( 0.05 to 0.24 ) and diastolic blood pressure by 2.14 mmHg ( 0.94 to 3.33 ) . Significant improvements were also found in most psychological measures . Conclusion This study provides evidence that a type 2 diabetes prevention programme using lifestyle intervention is feasible in primary health care setting s , with reductions in risk factors approaching those observed in clinical trials . Trial NumberCurrent Controlled Trials IS RCT Background India currently has more than 60 million people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ( T2DM ) and this is predicted to increase by nearly two-thirds by 2030 . While management of those with T2DM is important , preventing or delaying the onset of the disease , especially in those individuals at ‘ high risk ’ of developing T2DM , is urgently needed , particularly in re source -constrained setting s. This paper describes the protocol for a cluster r and omised controlled trial of a peer-led lifestyle intervention program to prevent diabetes in Kerala , India . Methods / design A total of 60 polling booths are r and omised to the intervention arm or control arm in rural Kerala , India . Data collection is conducted in two steps . Step 1 ( Home screening ) : Participants aged 30–60 years are administered a screening question naire . Those having no history of T2DM and other chronic illnesses with an Indian Diabetes Risk Score value of ≥60 are invited to attend a mobile clinic ( Step 2 ) . At the mobile clinic , participants complete question naires , undergo physical measurements , and provide blood sample s for biochemical analysis . Participants identified with T2DM at Step 2 are excluded from further study participation . Participants in the control arm are provided with a health education booklet containing information on symptoms , complications , and risk factors of T2DM with the recommended levels for primary prevention . Participants in the intervention arm receive : ( 1 ) eleven peer-led small group sessions to motivate , guide and support in planning , initiation and maintenance of lifestyle changes ; ( 2 ) two diabetes prevention education sessions led by experts to raise awareness on T2DM risk factors , prevention and management ; ( 3 ) a participant h and book containing information primarily on peer support and its role in assisting with lifestyle modification ; ( 4 ) a participant workbook to guide self-monitoring of lifestyle behaviours , goal setting and goal review ; ( 5 ) the health education booklet that is given to the control arm . Follow-up assessment s are conducted at 12 and 24 months . The primary outcome is incidence of T2DM . Secondary outcomes include behavioural , psychosocial , clinical , and biochemical measures . An economic evaluation is planned . Discussion Results from this trial will contribute to improved policy and practice regarding lifestyle intervention programs to prevent diabetes in India and other re source -constrained setting s . Trial registration Australia and New Zeal and Clinical Trials Registry : ACTRN12611000262909
This review also found mixed views on the value of preventative services within primary care .
The third theme was centred on professional factors impacting on diabetes prevention which included workload , time constraints , re sources , self-efficacy and knowledge as well as professionals ' perception of patient motivations towards change .
BACKGROUND Type 2 diabetes is impacting millions of people globally ; however , many future cases can be prevented through lifestyle changes and interventions .
Primary care is an important setting for diabetes prevention , for at-risk population s , because it is a patient 's primary point of contact with the health care system and professionals can provide lifestyle counselling and support , as well as monitoring health outcomes .
These are all essential elements for diabetes prevention for at-risk adults .
AIM To underst and the factors related to the delivery and uptake of type 2 diabetes prevention interventions within primary care in higher income countries .
CONCLUSION This review explored the factors influencing diabetes prevention in primary care , and identified the context of prevention , as well as patient and professional factors related to preventative services being offered in primary care .