Who Can Provide Diabetes Self-Management Support in Primary Care? Diabetes Self-Management Education: Miles to Go Enhancing Diabetes Self-care Among Rural African Americans With Diabetes Design of a randomized, controlled, comparative-effectiveness trial testing a Family Model of Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) vs. Standard DSME for Marshallese in the United States Culturally Tailored Intervention for Rural African Americans With Type 2 Diabetes Motivational interviewing delivered by diabetes educators: does it improve blood glucose control among poorly controlled type 2 diabetes patients? Utilization of a Cloud-Based Diabetes Management Program for Insulin Initiation and Titration Enables Collaborative Decision Making Between Healthcare Providers and Patients A culturally targeted self-management program for African Americans with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Efficacy of ongoing group based diabetes self-management education for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A randomised controlled trial. Impact of automated calls with nurse follow-up on diabetes treatment outcomes in a Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes self-management education improves quality of care and clinical outcomes determined by a diabetes bundle measure Web-based comprehensive information system for self-management of diabetes mellitus. Effect of a community-based diabetes self-management empowerment program on mental health-related quality of life: a causal mediation analysis from a randomized controlled trial Implementation and evaluation of a low-literacy diabetes education computer multimedia application. Integrating medical management with diabetes self-management training: a randomized control trial of the Diabetes Outpatient Intensive Treatment program. Designing and evaluating a web-based self-management site for patients with type 2 diabetes - systematic website development and study protocol Evaluation of a Behavioral Mobile Phone App Intervention for the Self-Management of Type 2 Diabetes: Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol
Purpose The purpose of this comparative effectiveness study is to compare diabetes self-management support ( DSMS ) approaches and determine who can be most effective in helping patients maintain/improve clinical  outcomes  ,  self-care behaviors , distress , and satisfaction following  diabetes self-management education ( DSME )  delivered in primary care . Methods After receiving DSME , 141 participants were r and omized to receive DSMS delivered by a trained supporter :  educator , peer , practice staff , or usual education during a 6-month follow-up period . DSMS groups were compared to determine which supporter helped participants to maintain/improve A1C , blood pressure , lipids , weight , self-care , and distress . DSMS satisfaction was also examined . Results There was a significant improvement in A1C , empowerment , aspects of self-care , and distress following DSME at 6 weeks . Those in the educator DSMS group best sustained improved A1C while those in the other DSMS groups maintained glycemic improvements but began to show trends toward worsening . No significant differences or clear trends were seen in other clinical , behavioral , or psychosocial outcomes . The Program Reinforcement Impacts Self-Management ( PRISM ) study demonstrates that following DSME , participants maintained improved glycemia , lipid , weight , and self-care behaviors and reductions in distress throughout the delivery of DSMS interventions regardless of DSMS supporter . All of the participants reported satisfaction with DSMS . Conclusions These findings reaffirm the critical role of educators but suggest that others may serve as DSMS supporters . Results suggest that DSME delivered in primary care is effective and multiple DSMS agents are reasonable . As patient-centered self-management approaches are being explored in primary care , delivery of DSME and DSMS becomes paramount This meta- analysis assessed how successfully Diabetes Self-Management Education ( DSME ) interventions help people with type 2 diabetes achieve and maintain healthy blood glucose levels . We included 52 DSME programs with 9,631 participants that reported post-intervention A1c levels in r and omized controlled trials . The training conditions result ed in significant reductions in A1c levels compared to control conditions . However , the impact of intervention was modest shifting of only 7.23 % more participants from diabetic to pre-diabetic or normal status , relative to the control condition . Most intervention participants did not achieve healthy A1c levels . Further , few DSME studies assessed long-term maintenance of A1c gains . Past trends suggest that gains are difficult to sustain over time . Our results suggested that interventions delivered by nurses were more successful than those delivered by non-nursing personnel . We suggest that DSME programs might do better by going beyond procedural interventions . Most DSME programs relied heavily on rules and procedures to guide decisions about diet , exercise , and weight loss . Future DSME may need to include cognitive self-monitoring , diagnosis , and planning skills to help patients detect anomalies , identify possible causes , generate corrective action , and avoid future barriers to maintaining healthy A1c levels . Finally , comprehensive descriptions of DSME programs would advance future efforts Purpose The purpose of this study is to test the feasibility of conducting a community-based r and omized controlled trial evaluating a culturally tailored community-based group diabetes self-management education ( DSME ) program among rural African Americans . Methods Thirty-two African American rural adults with type 2 diabetes were recruited and 25 adults were retained and participated in an interventional study design ed to test the effectiveness of the “ Taking Care of Sugar ” DSME program for the 2-year follow-up . Participants were selected from rural central Virginia . Primary outcomes variables included average blood sugar levels , cardiovascular risk factors , and general physical and mental health . These outcomes were assessed at baseline , 3 months , 6 months , and 12 months post baseline . Results From baseline to 3-month follow-up assessment , participants exhibited significant improvement on several physiological and behavioral measures . Given the small sample size , hypothesis testing was limited . Results show change from baseline over time , illustrating that the primary outcome of A1C decreased , although not significant . Additionally , participants reported more knowledge about diabetes self-management and personal care skills ( ie , exercise and foot care ) that persisted over time . The feasibility of the culturally tailored DSME was established , and participation with the program was high . Conclusions A community-based group DSME program using storytelling is feasible . This research will help to inform clinicians and health policymakers as to the types of interventions that are feasible in a larger rural population . If such a program is carried out , we can improve knowledge , reduce complications , and improve quality of life among rural African Americans Background Type 2 diabetes ( T2D ) is a significant public health problem , with U.S. Pacific Isl and er communities — such as the Marshallese — bearing a disproportionate burden . Using a community-based participatory approach ( CBPR ) that engages the strong family-based social infrastructure characteristic of Marshallese communities is a promising way to manage T2D . Objectives Led by a collaborative community-academic partnership , the Family Model of Diabetes Self-Management Education ( DSME ) aim ed to change diabetes management behaviors to improve glycemic control in Marshallese adults with T2D by engaging the entire family . Design To test the Family Model of DSME , a r and omized , controlled , comparative effectiveness trial with 240 primary participants was implemented . Half of the primary participants were r and omly assigned to the St and ard DSME and half were r and omly assigned to the Family Model DSME . Both arms received ten hours of content comprised of 6–8 sessions delivered over a 6–8 week period . Methods The Family Model DSME was a cultural adaptation of DSME , whereby the intervention focused on engaging family support for the primary participant with T2D . The St and ard DSME was delivered to the primary participant in a community-based group format . Primary participants and participating family members were assessed at baseline and immediate post-intervention , and will also be assessed at 6 and 12 months . Summary The Family Model of DSME aim ed to improve glycemic control in Marshallese with T2D . The utilization of a CBPR approach that involves the local stakeholders and the engagement of the family-based social infrastructure of Marshallese communities increase potential for the intervention 's success and sustainability Purpose The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate a culturally tailored intervention for rural African Americans . Social Cognitive Theory provided the framework for the study . Methods Twenty-two participants were recruited and r and omly assigned to either Group or Individual diabetes self-management ( DSME ) . Group DSME included story-telling , h and s-on activities , and problem-solving exercises . Individual DSME sessions focused on goal - setting and problem-solving strategies . Sessions were offered in an accessible community center over a 10-week period . Results Outcomes included glycosylated hemoglobin ( A1C ) , self-care actions , self-efficacy level , goal attainment , and satisfaction with DSME . Participants in both Group and Individual DSME improved slightly over the 3-month period in self-care activities , A1C level , and goal attainment . Although differences were not statistically significant , trends indicate improved scores on dietary actions , foot care , goal attainment , and empowerment for those experiencing Group DSME . Conclusions The culturally tailored approach was well received by all participants . Improvements among those receiving Individual DSME may indicate that brief sessions using a culturally tailored approach could enhance self-care and glycemic control . Additional testing among more participants over a longer time period is recommended AIM To determine whether glycemic control is improved when motivational interviewing ( MI ) , a patient-centered behavior change strategy , is used with diabetes self management education ( DSME ) as compared to DSME alone . METHODS poorly controlled type 2 diabetes ( T2DM ) patients ( n=234 ) were r and omized into 4 groups : MI+DSME or DSME alone , with or without use of a computerized summary of patient self management barriers . We compared HbA1c changes between groups at 6 months and investigated mediators of HbA1c change . RESULTS study patients attended the majority of the four intervention visits ( mean 3.4 ) , but drop-out rate was high at follow-up research visits ( 35 % ) . Multiple regression showed that groups receiving MI had a mean change in HbA1c that was significantly lower ( less improved ) than those not receiving MI ( t=2.10 ; p=0.037 ) . Mediators of HbA1c change for the total group were diabetes self-care behaviors and diabetes distress ; no between-group differences were found . CONCLUSIONS DSME improved blood glucose control , underlining its benefit for T2DM management . However , MI+DSME was less effective than DSME alone . Overall , weak support was found for the clinical utility of MI in the management of T2DM delivered by diabetes educators Abstract Background : Overseeing proper insulin initiation and titration remains a challenging task in diabetes care . Recent advances in mobile technology have enabled new models of collaborative care between patients and healthcare providers ( HCPs ) . We hypothesized that the adoption of such technology could help individuals starting basal insulin achieve better glycemic control compared with st and ard clinical practice . Material s and Methods : This was a 12 ± 2-week r and omized controlled study with 40 individuals with type 2 diabetes who were starting basal insulin due to poor glycemic control . The control group ( n = 20 ) received st and ard face-to-face care and phone follow-up as needed in a tertiary center , whereas the intervention group ( n = 20 ) received care through the cloud-based diabetes management program where regular communications about glycemic control and insulin doses were conducted via patient self-tracking tools , shared decision-making interfaces , secure text messages , and virtual visits ( audio , video , and shared screen control ) instead of office visits . Results : By intention-to-treat analysis , the intervention group achieved a greater hemoglobin A1c decline compared with the control group ( 3.2 ± 1.5 % vs. 2.0 % ± 2.0 % ; P = 0.048 ) . The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Question naire showed a significant improvement in the intervention group compared with the control group ( an increase of 10.1 ± 11.7 vs. 2.1 ± 6.5 points ; P = 0.01 ) . HCPs spent less time with patients in the intervention group compared with those in the control group ( 65.9 min per subject vs. 81.6 min per subject ) . However , the intervention group required additional training time to use the mobile device . Conclusions : Mobile health technology could be an effective tool in sharing data , enhancing communication , and improving glycemic control while enabling collaborative decision making in diabetes care Inadequate knowledge of the influence of lifestyle on clinical outcomes contributes to the difficulties many African Americans experience with type 2 diabetes mellitus ( T2DM ) . This pilot study examined a 12-week church-based culturally targeted diabetes self-management education ( DSME ) intervention for middle-aged and older African Americans with T2DM . Quantitative data were collected at baseline and at 12 weeks and included question naires and anthropometric measures . There were significant increases in medication adherence ( p = .006 ) , healthy eating ( p = .009 ) , and foot care adherence ( p = .003 ) . The intervention had a clinical ly significant effect on systolic blood pressure , blood lipids , physical activity , and waist circumference . Church-based culturally targeted DSME interventions may result in improved outcomes for African-American adults with T2DM . The authors discuss the value of community-based interventions that target behavioural changes in population s of chronically ill patients , particularly those who historically have been disenfranchised and /or underserved OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of ongoing group based diabetes self-management education ( DSME ) for patients with type 2 diabetes . METHODS 146 patients were r and omised to either group education or waiting list control . Primary outcomes were A1C and patient activation measured with patient activation measure ( PAM ) . RESULTS There were no differences in the primary outcomes between the groups at 12 months , but the control group had an increase in A1C of 0.3 % points during follow-up . Diabetes knowledge and some self-management skills improved significantly in the intervention group compared to the control group . A sub group analysis was conducted for the quartile with the highest A1C at baseline ( > 7.7 , n=18 in both groups ) . There were significant improvements within the intervention group at 12 month follow-up for both A1C and PAM and a trend for better outcome in the intervention group compared to the control . CONCLUSIONS The locally developed ongoing diabetes self-management education programs prevented an increase in A1C and can have an effect on A1C in patients with higher A1C level . PRACTICE IMPLICATION S Locally developed programs may be less effective than programs developed for studies OBJECTIVE We evaluated automated telephone disease management ( ATDM ) with telephone nurse follow-up as a strategy for improving diabetes treatment processes and outcomes in Department of Veterans Affairs ( VA ) clinics . We also compared the results with those of a prior ATDM trial conducted in a county health care system . RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A total of 272 VA patients with diabetes using hypoglycemic medications were r and omized . During the 1-year study period , intervention patients received biweekly ATDM health assessment and self-care education calls , and a nurse educator followed up with patients based on their ATDM assessment reports . Telephone surveys were used to measure patients ' self-care , symptoms , and satisfaction with care . Outpatient service use was evaluated using electronic data bases and self-reports , and glycemic control was measured by HbA1c and serum glucose testing . RESULTS At 12 months , intervention patients reported more frequent glucose self-monitoring and foot inspections than patients receiving usual care and were more likely to be seen in podiatry and diabetes specialty clinics . Intervention patients also were more likely than control patients to have had a cholesterol test . Among patients with baseline HbA1c levels > or = 8 % , mean end-point values were lower among intervention patients than control patients ( 8.7 vs. 9.2 % , respectively ; P = 0.04 ) . Among intervention and control patients with baseline values > or = 9 % , mean end-point values were 9.1 and 10.2 % , respectively ( P = 0.04 ) . At follow-up , intervention patients reported fewer symptoms of poor glycemic control than control patients and greater satisfaction with their health care . CONCLUSIONS This intervention improved the quality of VA diabetes care . Intervention effects for most end points replicated findings from the prior county clinic trial , although intervention-control differences in the current study were smaller because of the relatively good self-care and health status among the current study 's enrollees Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of diabetes self-management education ( DSME ) in improving processes and outcomes of diabetes care as measured by a five component diabetes bundle and HbA1c , in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus ( T2DM ) . Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for adult T2DM patients who received DSME training in 2011–2012 from an accredited American Diabetes Association center at Intermountain Healthcare ( IH ) and had an HbA1c measurement within the prior 3 months and 2–6 months after completing their first DSME visit . Control patients were selected from the same clinics as case- patients using r and om number generator to achieve a 1 to 4 ratio . Case and control patients were included if 1 ) pre-education HbA1c was between 6.0%–14.0 % ; 2 ) their main provider was a primary care physician ; 3 ) they met the national Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set criteria for inclusion in the IH diabetes registry . The IH diabetes bundle includes retinal eye exam , nephropathy screening or prescription of angiotensin converting enzyme or angiotensin receptor blocker ; blood pressure < 140/90 mmHg , LDL < 100 mg/dL , HbA1c < 8.0 % . Results DSME patients had a significant difference in achievement of the five element IH diabetes bundle and in HbA1c % compared to those without DSME . After adjusting for possible confounders in a multivariate logistic regression model , DSME patients had a 1.5 fold difference in improvement in their diabetes bundle and almost a 3 fold decline in HbA1c compared to the control group . Conclusion St and ardized DSME taught within an IH American Diabetes Association center is strongly associated with a substantial improvement in patients meeting all five elements of a diabetes bundle and a decline in HbA1c beyond usual care . Given the low operating cost of the DSME program , these results strongly support the value adding benefit of this program in treating T2DM patients BACKGROUND The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of a web-based comprehensive information system , consisting of Internet and cellular phone use , on blood glucose control . METHODS We established eMOD ( electronic Management of Diabetes ) , a web-based ubiquitous information system , for cell phone users along with a website for Internet users to provide diabetes education . We examined whether this information system has the same impact on glycemic control as conventional education for the diabetes patient . Forty volunteers were enrolled and r and omly assigned to either the eMOD experimental group ( n = 20 ) or the control group ( n = 20 ) .  Blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin ( A1C ) levels were evaluated at baseline and after 6 months . RESULTS The two groups were homogeneous in terms of age , sex , and diabetes ' duration at baseline . A1C ( from 9.0 + /- 2.3 % to 7.5 + /- 1.4 % , P = 0.031 ) and postpr and ial glucose level ( 228.1 + /- 79.7 to 173.5 + /- 50.2 mg/dL , P = 0.030 ) were significantly decreased over time in the intervention group but not in the control group . There was a significant relationship between the change in A1C and the frequency of access to the eMOD system via cellular phone ( r = 0.766 , P = 0.03 ; coefficient -0.147 ) . CONCLUSIONS A1C was improved by a web-based intervention not only via computer but also via cellular phone at 6 months post-initiation in patients with type 2 diabetes . These results indicate that the use of a convenient web-based education system could be more effective for glycemic control than traditional education for diabetes patients Background There is a paucity of evidence supporting the effectiveness of diabetes self-management education ( DSME ) in improving mental health-related quality of life ( HRQoL ) for African American and Latinos . Also , among studies supporting the favorable effects of DSME on mental HRQoL , the direct effect of DSME that is independent of improved glycemic control has never been investigated . The objectives of this study were to investigate the effect of community-based DSME intervention targeting empowerment on mental HRQoL and to determine whether the effect is direct or mediated by glycemic control . Methods We conducted secondary analyses of data from the Diabetes Self-Care Study , a r and omized controlled trial of a community-based DSME intervention . Study participants ( n = 516 ) were African Americans and Latinos 55 years or older with poorly controlled diabetes ( HbA1c ≥ 8.0 % ) recruited from senior centers and churches in Los Angeles . The intervention group received six weekly small-group self-care sessions based on the empowerment model . The control group received six lectures on unrelated geriatrics topics . The primary outcome variable in this secondary analysis was the change in Mental Component Summary score ( MCS-12 ) from the SF-12 Health Survey between baseline and six-month follow-up . We used the change in HbA1c during the study period as the main mediator of interest in our causal mediation analysis . Additionally , possible mediations via social support and perceived empowerment attributable to the program were examined . Results MCS-12 increased by 1.4 points on average in the intervention group and decreased by 0.2 points in the control group ( difference-in-change : 1.6 points , 95 % CI : 0.1 to 3.2 ) . In the causal mediation analysis , the intervention had a direct effect on MCS-12 improvement ( 1.7 points , 95 % CI : 0.2 to 3.2 ) with no indirect effects mediated via HbA1c change ( −0.1 points , 95 % CI : −0.4 to 0.1 ) , social support ( 0.1 points ) , and perception of empowerment ( 0.1 points ) . Conclusions This Diabetes Self-Care Study empowerment intervention had a modest positive impact on mental HRQoL not mediated by the improvement in glycemic control , as well as social support and perception of empowerment . This favorable effect on mental HRQoL may be a separate clinical advantage of this DSME intervention . Trial Registration Clinical Trial.gov NCT00263835 OBJECTIVE To evaluate a clinic-based multimedia intervention for diabetes education targeting individuals with low health literacy levels in a diverse population . RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Five public clinics in Chicago , Illinois , participated in the study with computer kiosks installed in waiting room areas . Two hundred forty-four subjects with diabetes were r and omized to receive either supplemental computer multimedia use ( intervention ) or st and ard of care only ( control ) . The intervention includes audio/video sequences to communicate information , provide psychological support , and promote diabetes self-management skills without extensive text or complex navigation .  HbA(1c ) ( A1C ) , BMI , blood pressure , diabetes knowledge , self-efficacy , self-reported medical care , and perceived susceptibility of complications were evaluated at baseline and 1 year . Computer usage patterns and implementation barriers were also examined . RESULTS Complete 1-year data were available for 183 subjects ( 75 % ) . Overall , there were no significant differences in change in A1C , weight , blood pressure , knowledge , self-efficacy , or self-reported medical care between intervention and control groups . However , there was an increase in perceived susceptibility to diabetes complications in the intervention group . This effect was greatest among subjects with lower health literacy . Within the intervention group , time spent on the computer was greater for subjects with higher health literacy . CONCLUSIONS Access to multimedia lessons result ed in an increase in perceived susceptibility to diabetes complications , particularly in subjects with lower health literacy . Despite measures to improve informational access for individuals with lower health literacy , there was relatively less use of the computer among these participants OBJECTIVE This study evaluated the Diabetes Outpatient Intensive Treatment ( DOIT ) program , a multiday group education and skills training experience combined with daily medical management , followed by case management over 6 months . Using a r and omized control design , the study explored how DOIT affected glycemic control and self-care behaviors over a short term . The impact of two additional factors on clinical outcomes were also examined ( frequency of case management contacts and whether or not insulin was started during the program ) . RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in poor glycemic control ( A1c > 8.5 % ) were r and omly assigned to DOIT or a second condition , entitled EDUPOST , which was st and ard diabetes care with the addition of quarterly educational mailings . A total of 167 patients ( 78 EDUPOST , 89 DOIT ) completed all baseline measures , including A1c and a question naire assessing diabetes-related self-care behaviors . At 6 months , 117 patients ( 52 EDUPOST , 65 DOIT ) returned to complete a follow-up A1c and the identical self-care question naire . RESULTS At follow-up , DOIT evidence d a significantly greater drop in A1c than EDUPOST . DOIT patients also reported significantly more frequent blood glucose monitoring and greater attention to carbohydrate and fat contents ( ACFC ) of food compared with EDUPOST patients . An increase in ACFC over the 6-month period was associated with improved glycemic control among DOIT patients . Also , the frequency of nurse case manager follow-up contacts was positively linked to better A1c outcomes . The addition of insulin did not appear to be a significant contributor to glycemic change . CONCLUSIONS DOIT appears to be effective in promoting better diabetes care and positively influencing glycemia and diabetes-related self-care behaviors . However , it dem and s significant time , commitment , and careful coordination with many health care professionals . The role of the nurse case manager in providing ongoing follow-up contact seems important Background Given that patients provide the majority of their own diabetes care , patient self-management training has increasingly become recognized as an important strategy with which to improve quality of care . However , participation in self management programs is low . In addition , the efficacy of current behavioural interventions wanes over time , reducing the impact of self-management interventions on patient health . Web-based interventions have the potential to bridge the gaps in diabetes care and self-management . Methods Our objective is to improve self-efficacy , quality of life , self-care , blood pressure , cholesterol and glycemic control and promote exercise in people with type 2 diabetes through the rigorous development and use of a web-based patient self-management intervention . This study consists of five phases : ( 1 ) intervention development ; ( 2 ) feasibility testing ; ( 3 ) usability testing ; ( 4 ) intervention refinement ; and ( 5 ) intervention evaluation using mixed methods . We will employ evidence -based strategies and tools , using a theoretical framework of self-efficacy , then elicit user feedback through focus groups and individual user testing sessions . Using iterative re design the intervention will be refined . Once finalized , the impact of the website on patient self-efficacy , quality of life , self-care , HbA1c , LDL-cholesterol , blood pressure and weight will be assessed through a non-r and omized observational cohort study using repeated measures modeling and individual interviews . Discussion Increasing use of the World Wide Web by consumers for health information and ongoing revolutions in social media are strong indicators that users are primed to welcome a new era of technology in health care . However , their full potential is hindered by limited knowledge regarding their effectiveness , poor usability , and high attrition rates . Our development and research agenda aims to address these limitations by improving usability , identifying characteristics associated with website use and attrition , and developing strategies to sustain patient use in order to maximize clinical outcomes Background Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus ( T2DM ) struggle with the management of their condition due to difficulty relating lifestyle behaviors with glycemic control . While self-monitoring of blood glucose ( SMBG ) has proven to be effective for those treated with insulin , it has been shown to be less beneficial for those only treated with oral medications or lifestyle modification . We hypothesized that the effective self-management of non-insulin treated T2DM requires a behavioral intervention that empowers patients with the ability to self-monitor , underst and the impact of lifestyle behaviors on glycemic control , and adjust their self-care based on context ualized SMBG data . Objective The primary objective of this r and omized controlled trial ( RCT ) is to determine the impact of bant2 , an evidence -based , patient-centered , behavioral mobile app intervention , on the self-management of T2DM . Our second postulation is that automated feedback delivered through the mobile app will be as effective , less re source intensive , and more scalable than interventions involving additional health care provider feedback . Methods This study is a 12-month , prospect i ve , multicenter RCT in which 150 participants will be r and omly assigned to one of two groups : the control group will receive current st and ard of care , and the intervention group will receive the mobile phone app system in addition to st and ard of care . The primary outcome measure is change in glycated hemoglobin A1c from baseline to 12 months . Results The first patient was enrolled on July 28 , 2015 , and we anticipate completing this study by September , 2018 . Conclusions This RCT is one of the first to evaluate an evidence -based mobile app that focuses on facilitating lifestyle behavior change driven by context ualized and structured SMBG . The results of this trial will provide insights regarding the usage of mobile tools and consumer- grade devices for diabetes self-care , the economic model of using incentives to motivate behavior change , and the consumption of test strips when following a rigorously structured approach for SMBG . Trial Registration Clinical Trials.gov NCT02370719 ; https:// clinical trials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02370719 ( Archived at http://www.webcitation.org/6jpyjfVRs
Discussion Findings suggest that medically underserved patients with diabetes achieve glycemic benefit following HIT DSME interventions , with dissipating but significant effects at 12 months .
Telemedicine/telehealth interventions were the most successful HIT type because they incorporated interaction with educators similar to in-person DSME .
Conclusion These results are similar to in-person DSME in medically underserved patients , showing that well- design ed HIT DSME has the potential to increase access and improve outcomes for this vulnerable group
Objective The purpose of this systematic review and meta- analysis was to examine the effect of health information technology ( HIT ) diabetes self-management education ( DSME ) interventions on glycemic control in medically underserved patients .