The longevity of different restorations in primary teeth. Clinical Investigation of Two Glass–Ionomer Restoratives Used with the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Approach in China: Two–Years Results Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results. Two-year clinical performance of sonic-resin placement system in posterior restorations. Clinical investigation of a high-strength glass ionomer restorative used with the ART technique in Wuhan, China: one-year results. The clinical performance of a posterior composite resin restorative material, Heliomolar R.O.: 3-year report. Survival of glass ionomer restorations placed in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2-year results. One year clinical evaluation of two different types of composite resins in posterior teeth. A clinical evaluation of two glass ionomer cements in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment technique in India: 1 year follow up. Comparison of Conventional versus Colored Compomers for Class II Restorations in Primary Molars: A 12-Month Clinical Study Efficacy of conventional treatment with composite resin and atraumatic restorative treatment in posterior primary teeth: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial A thirty months clinical evaluation of a posterior composite resin in primary molars. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months. Longevity and Cariostatic Effects of Everyday Conventional Glass-ionomer and Amalgam Restorations in Primary Teeth: Three-year Results Flowable resin composite as a class II restorative in primary molars: A two-year clinical evaluation Comparative clinical evaluation of slot versus dovetail Class III composite restorations in primary anterior teeth. Longevity of glass-ionomer restorative materials: results of a 10-year evaluation.
BACKGROUND AND AIM This paper review s three published papers and adds results from a fourth study which aim ed to determine which restorative material would be the best alternative(s ) to amalgam ( AM )  in primary teeth . DESIGN All studies had a practice -based design and were part of the routine treatment of children and adolescents . The clinicians were assigned which material s to use in a r and omised matter in the first three studies which lasted for 7 - 8 years . In the fourth study conducted 4 years after the initial studies , the clinicians were free to select the restorative material s. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Resin modified glass ionomer ( RMGI ) and compomer ( COM ) restorations showed similar longevity compared with AM , whereas conventional GI restorations showed significantly shorter longevity . The studies indicated that the ' new and improved ' material s based on in vitro tests did not always show enhanced clinical properties . In the last study , where clinicians freely selected the restorative material s they used in their practice s , seven used COM , one used conventional GI material s and one used a combination of the two types of material Objective : To compare the clinical performance of two glass – ionomer cements , ChemFlex ( Dentsply DeTrey ) and Fuji IX GP ( GC ) , when used with the atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) approach in China . Methods : Eighty – nine school children aged between 6 and 14 years who had bilateral matched pairs of carious posterior teeth were included . A split – mouth design was used in which the two material s were r and omly placed on contralateral sides . The performance of the restorations was assessed directly and also indirectly from die – stone replicas at baseline and after 6 , 12 , and 24 months . Results : The 24–month cumulative survival rates of ART restorations  in the primary teeth were 93 and 90 % for the ChemFlex and Fuji IX GP class I restorations , respectively , while 40 and 46 % of class II restorations placed with the respective material s were satisfactory . In the permanent dentition , only class I restorations were involved and the cumulative survival rates were 95 and 96 % for ChemFlex and Fuji IX GP . For the primary teeth after 24 months , net mean occlusal wear was 87 µm for ChemFlex and 85 µm for Fuji IX GP . The occlusal wear in the permanent teeth was 75 µm for ChemFlex and 79 µm for Fuji IX GP . Conclusion : The clinical performance of both material s over a 24–month period was similar and the survival rates of class I ART restorations  in both primary and permanent teeth were high PURPOSE To evaluate the clinical performance of adhesive restorations of resin composite and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements in primary molars . METHODS This r and omized clinical trial included subjects ( 5 - 9 year-old children ) selected at two university centers ( UFRGS and UNIFRA ) . The sample consisted of 132 primary molars presenting active cavitated carious lesions ( with radiographic involvement of the inner half of the dentin ) , located on the occlusal and occlusal-proximal surface . The sample was r and omly divided into three groups , according to the restorative material : ( G1 ) universal restorative system ( Adper Single Bond 2 system and Filtek Z350 ) ; ( G2 ) : Resin-modified glass-ionomer cement ( Vitremer ) ; and ( G3 ) : Low shrink restorative system ( Filtek P90 ) . The restorations were clinical ly and radiographically followed every 6 months for up to 18 months using the USPHS modified criteria for clinical evaluation . Survival estimates for restoration longevity were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method . Log-rank test ( P < 0.05 ) was used to compare the differences in the success rate according to the type of the restorative material . RESULTS The type of restorative material used did not influence the longevity of the restorations . After clinical follow-up , there was no statistical difference in the rates of success for the three material s used to restore active cavitated carious lesions in primary molars . The survival rates for the follow-up were similar regarding the number of restored surfaces and the caries removal technique ( partial or complete ) . Mean estimated time of survival was 17.2 months ( 95 % CI : 16.7 - 17.7 ) . Estimated survival rates of the restorations were 100 % , 98 % , 88 % and 65 % at 1 , 6 , 12 and 18 months of clinical evaluations , respectively OBJECTIVE The objective of this split-mouth r and omized controlled study was to compare the 2-year clinical performance of two restorative techniques and material s for posterior permanent carious teeth . METHOD AND MATERIAL S After signing informed consent , 30 patients aged between 7 and 16 received two Class 1 restorations on cavities on permanent first or second molar teeth performed with one of two systems : incrementally placed conventional posterior composite resin ( Herculite Ultra , Kerr ) , and sonic-resin placement system ( SonicFill , Kerr ) with single-component self-etch adhesive system ( Kerr ) according to the manufacturers ' directions . Two blinded observers evaluated the restorations at three times ( baseline , and after 1 and 2 years ) according to the US Public Health Service modified criteria . Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U-test were used to compare the clinical performance of the restorative systems . RESULTS The restorative systems showed similar clinical performance at 2 years . At the end of 2 years in both groups , one restoration 's marginal staining Alpha ratings decreased . In the same period , two restorations in the conventional group and one in the SonicFill group received Bravo ratings for color match and surface roughness scorings . CONCLUSION The sonic-resin placement system demonstrated similar results to incrementally placed conventional composite resin in terms of clinical success . Considering the advantages of providing up to 5 mm in a single layer , and the adjustability of the viscosity , bulk-fill composite restorations seem to be a good alternative to posterior Class 1 composite restorations . CLINICAL RELEVANCE This study suggests that a new dental material for bulk-fill technology exhibits similar clinical success to incrementally placed composite resin OBJECTIVE To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a new glass ionomer restorative , ChemFlex , and to compare its clinical performance and wear to another popular material , Fuji IX GP , when used with the atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) approach in posterior teeth in school children . METHODS Ninety-two subjects aged between 6 and 14 years who had bilateral matched pairs of carious posterior teeth were selected . A split-mouth experimental design was used in which the two restorative material s were r and omly placed on contralateral sides . The restorations were assessed directly and also indirectly from color transparencies and die replicas . RESULTS After one year , the success rates of ART restorations  in the primary teeth were 96.6 % for ChemFlex restorations and 89.7 % for Fuji IX GP restorations placed in the Class I cavity preparations , whereas only 46.2 % ( ChemFlex ) and 61.5 % ( Fuji IX GP ) of Class II restorations were assessed as clinical ly satisfactory . In the permanent dentition , the success rates were 94.6 % and 98.2 % for ChemFlex and Fuji IX GP , respectively ; however , there was no statistically significant difference between the two restoratives for either the permanent or primary teeth . The mean occlusal wear after one year in the permanent teeth was 53.2 microns for ChemFlex and 56.3 microns for Fuji IX GP . Again , there were no statistically significant differences in wear between the two material s ( P > 0.05 ) . CONCLUSION The clinical performance of both ChemFlex and Fuji IX GP over a 12-month period was highly satisfactory and completely adequate for the ART technique , particularly in Class I cavities A  posterior composite resin restorative material  was evaluated over a 3-year period by means of a controlled clinical trial . A total of 52 composite resin restorations and 52 amalgam alloy restorations were included in this trial , and were examined with regard to marginal integrity , surface texture , anatomical form and proximal contact with adjacent teeth . There were no significant differences in clinical performance between test and control material s , which both gave good service over the period of evaluation . Only five restorations ( one of amalgam and four of composite resin )  failed during the trial . Plastic replica dies were used to support the clinical examinations of the restorations , and such dies were found to be helpful OBJECTIVE To compare the survival of  glass ionomer cement ( GIC ) restorations placed in a dental clinic setting using both the atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) approach with h and instruments , and conventional cavity preparation with rotary instruments . METHOD AND MATERIAL S Two encapsulated high-strength conventional GICs ( Fuji IX GP , Ketac-Molar Aplicap ) were placed in 82 Class I and 53 Class II preparations and one encapsulated non-gamma 2 amalgam alloy ( GK-amalgam ) was placed in 32 Class I preparations , in the primary molars of 60 Chinese children with a mean age of 7.40 + /- 1.24 ( SD ) years . Thus , 9 treatment groups were formed . RESULTS After two years , there were no significant survival differences found among 7 of the 9 treatment groups ( p = 0.99 ) . However , two groups comprising Fuji IX GP and Ketac-Molar Aplicap placed in Class II cavities prepared using the ART approach showed significantly lower restoration survivals ( p < 0.001 ) . Only 3 of the 72 initially sealed fissures adjacent to the restorations appeared to retain any GIC material . CONCLUSIONS In a clinic setting , both the ART h and instrument and conventional rotary instrument methods were equally suitable for high Class I restoration survival , but not for Class II restoration survival where the conventional cavity preparation method was preferable AIM The aim of this study was to assess the clinical performance of two adhesive restorative systems ( Single Bond/Filtek P-60 and Single Bond/Filtek Z-250 ) in posterior teeth using a modified United States Public Health Service ( USPHS ) system . METHODS AND MATERIAL S A total of 70 restorations were placed in molars and premolars in 30 patients ( 14 females and 16 males ; 18 - 40 years ) by one operator . All restorations were directly evaluated by two examiners at baseline , six months , and 12 months using the following modified USPHS rating criteria : marginal integrity , marginal discoloration , surface texture , contour , postoperative sensitivity , and recurrent caries . RESULTS At six and 12 months all restorations were available for evaluation of marginal discoloration , surface texture , contour , postoperative sensitivity , and recurrent caries that remained with 100 % Alpha-ratings at recalls for both restorative systems . Marginal integrity for P-60 was scored as 94.3 % and 91.4 % Alpha at six and 12 months , respectively , and rates for Z-250 were 100 % and 97.1 % Alpha at six and 12 months , respectively . Statistical analysis was completed with Fisher 's exact and McNemar Chi-square tests at a significance level of 5 % ( P<0.05 ) . CONCLUSION All restorations were clinical ly satisfactory and no significant differences were found among them . CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Posterior resin composite restorations placed under appropriate conditions provide a satisfactory clinical performance AIM To compare the clinical performance of two glass ionomer cements , Amalgomer CR and Fuji IX in small and medium cavities prepared using Atraumatic restorative treatment approach in India . STUDY DESIGN One hundred school children in the age group of 4 - 9 years who had bilateral matched pair of carious lesions in primary posterior teeth were included . A split mouth design was used in which two material s were r and omly placed in contralateral sides . The performance of the restorations was assessed after 1 year using Frenken 's criteria ( 1996 ) . Survival analysis of restoration was done using chi-square test . RESULTS The survival rate of Amalgomer CR and Fuji IX class I restorations were 97.4 % and 94.9 % , respectively . In class II cavities 95.1 % and 88.5 % of Amalgomer CR and Fuji IX restorations were successful . Amalgomer CR and Fuji IX showed a success of 94.2 % and 92.3 % in small sized class II cavities . Amalgomer CR showed a 100 % success for medium sized class I and II restorations . Whereas Fuji IX showed a 100 % and 66.7 % success in medium sized class I and II cavities . CONCLUSION The clinical performances of both material s were satisfactory at the end of 1 year and ART is suitable procedure to be done in a dental clinic for children Objective : To evaluate the 12-month clinical performance of conventional ( Compoglass F ) and colored ( Twinky Star ) compomer restorative material s in class II restorations of primary molars . Material s and Methods : A total of 196 restorations were placed in 98 children aged between 5 and 10 years ( mean age : 7.43 ± 1.31 years ) who had bilateral matched pairs of carious posterior class II primary molars . A split-mouth design was used in which 2 material s ( Compoglass F , Twinky Star ) were r and omly placed on contralateral sides by 3 dentists . At baseline , after 6 and after 12 months , the restorations were evaluated using modified US Public Health Service criteria for : secondary caries , marginal integrity , marginal discoloration , anatomic form and surface texture . The Alpha and Bravo scores were considered as clinical success . The data were subjected to statistical analysis by the Wilcoxon and McNemar tests ( p < 0.05 ) . The Kaplan-Meier survival method was applied to estimate survival percentages . Results : No significant difference was found among the groups at all recalls regarding marginal integrity , marginal discoloration , anatomic form , secondary caries and surface texture . The 12-month mean cumulative survival rate  of Compoglass F was 95.7 % , while in the Twinky Star group , the survival rate was 93 % in class II restorations with no significant difference between the groups for either material . Conclusion : Both conventional and colored compomer material s are suitable restorative material s for primary teeth for at least 12 months . Colored compomers could also be a good alternative to tooth-colored compomers in the restoration of primary molars Introduction Despite the widespread acceptance of conventional treatment using composite resin in primary teeth , there is limited evidence that this approach is the best option in paediatric clinics .  Atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) using high-viscosity glass ionomer cement has gradually become more popular because it performs well in clinical studies , is easy to h and le and is patient friendly . Therefore , the aim of this r and omised clinical trial study is to compare the restoration longevity of conventional treatment using composite resin with that of ART in posterior primary teeth . As secondary outcomes , cost-efficacy and patient self-reported discomfort will also be tested . Methods and analysis Children aged 3–6 years presenting with at least one occlusal and /or occlusal-proximal cavity will be r and omly assigned to one of two groups according to the dental treatment : ART ( experimental group ) or composite resin restoration ( control group ) . The dental treatment will be performed at a dental care trailer located in an educational complex in Barueri/SP , Brazil . The unit of r and omisation will be the child . A sample size of 240 teeth with occlusal cavities and 188 teeth with occlusal-proximal cavities has been calculated . The primary outcome will be restoration longevity , which will be clinical ly assessed after 6 , 12 , 18 and 24 months by two examiners . The duration of the dental treatment and the cost of all material s used will be considered when estimating the cost-efficacy of each treatment . Individual discomfort will be measured after each dental procedure using the Facial Scale of Wong-Baker . Ethics and dissemination This clinical trial was approved by the local ethics committee from the Faculty of Dentistry of the University of São Paulo ( registration no. 1.556.018 ) . Participants will be included after their legal guardians have signed an informed consent form containing detailed information about the research . Trial registration number www . clinical trials.gov , NCT02562456 ; Pre- results The purpose of this in vivo study was to evaluate the clinical performance of a posterior composite resin TP.H ( Caulk Dentisply ) in class I restorations in primary molars . A total of 30 children aged 5 to 8 years old with 49 class I dental lesions in primary molars participated in the study . The cavity preparations involved removal of carious lesion only and the enamel margins were beveled . The results showed after 30 months that , 82 % ( 32/39 ) of Alfa ratings and 18 % ( 7/39 ) of Bravo ratings . We concluded that the composite resin TP-H could be used in conservative restorations in primary molars , particularly in the late mixed dentition OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate two glass-ionomer cements placed in the occlusal surfaces of permanent molar teeth , using two cavity preparation methods . METHOD AND MATERIAL S Three dentists placed 149 restorations for 68 patients in a hospital clinic .  Atraumatic restorative treatment or conventional cavity preparation methods were used for two encapsulated , high-strength conventional glass-ionomer cements : Fuji IX GP and Ketac-Molar . Non-gamma 2 amalgam alloy was used in conventional preparations for comparison . RESULTS The restorative procedures were uneventful , but cavity preparations made with atraumatic restorative treatment h and instruments took approximately twice as long as did conventional rotary instrumentation . After 30 months , only one glass-ionomer cement restoration had failed . Both glass-ionomer cements showed high early losses of sealant material , but caries was not detected in the exposed fissures . Both glass-ionomer cements also showed relatively high restoration wear . At 30 months , the mean cumulative net occlusal wear was 119 + /- 12 mm for Fuji IX GP and 96 + /- 13 mm for Ketac-Molar ; the difference was not statistically significant . Color matching improved significantly by 6 months ; there was no significant difference in color match between the two glass-ionomer cements by 12 months . Minor surface tarnishing and marginal discrepancies were present in the amalgam restorations and increased with time . CONCLUSION The occlusal restorations performed satisfactorily over periods of up to 30 months . However , the continued deterioration of the cements requires longer-term studies to be undertaken The aim of this study was to compare the longevity and cariostatic effects of everyday  conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth . The material s consisted of  515 Ketac-Fil glass-ionomer restorations and 543 Dispersalloy amalgam restorations prepared in 666 children , from 3 to 13 years of age , by 14 dentists within the Danish Public Dental Health Service in the municipalities of Vaerlose and Hillerød . The restorations , of which 79 % were of the Class II type , were in contact with 593 unrestored surfaces in adjacent primary and permanent teeth . After 3 years , 6 % of the patients had dropped out of the study , and 33 % of the teeth were exfoliated with the restoration in situ . A further 37 % of the glass-ionomer and 18 % of the amalgam restorations were recorded as failed ( p < 0.001 ) . The frequency of failures was highest for Class II glass-ionomer restorations , which showed a 50 % median survival time of only 34½ months , because of many fractures , while the 75 % survival time for Class II amalgam restorations just exceeded the actual 36 months ( p < 0.001 ) . Caries progression was most often recorded in surfaces adjacent to amalgam restorations , and 21 % of these surfaces needed restorative treatment vs. 12 % of the surfaces adjacent to glass-ionomer restorations ( p < 0.01 ) . The three-year results indicated that conventional glass ionomer is not an appropriate alternative to amalgam for all types of restorations in primary teeth . In particular , the short longevity of Class II glass-ionomer restorations could not be compensated for by the reduced caries progression and need for restorative therapy of adjacent surfaces Objective . To evaluate the clinical durability of flowable resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cement when used as class II restoratives in primary molars . Material and Methods . A total of 190 restorations were placed in 61 children , age in the range of 5–11 years . The restoratives , Tetric Flow , in combination with the adhesives , Excite or Prompt-L-Pop and Vitremer , were used in class II cavities in primary molars . An intra-individual study design was used and the restorations were evaluated by modified USPHS criteria over a 2-year period . Results . 146 of the restorations could be evaluated at 2 years . The cumulative failure rate was 10.6 % for Vitremer and 13.6 % for Tetric Flow . No statistically significant differences were found in failure rates between different material s or between bonding systems . The main cause of failure for Tetric Flow was secondary caries and for  Vitremer wear and dissolution . Conclusions . Vitremer and Tetric Flow showed no significant difference concerning clinical durability at 2 years when used as class II restoratives in primary molars . Both material s demonstrated acceptable clinical results This study compares the clinical characteristic evaluations of slot against dovetail class III composite restorations .  Focusing on the primary anterior teeth of children aged 2 years 6 months to 5 years 3 months with the mean age of 4 years , thirty-six matched pairs of class III of slot and dovetail preparations  were made by one investigator These preparations were evaluated for marginal adaptation , anatomic form , secondary caries and marginal discoloration after 6 , 12 , and 24 months by another investigator with the intra-examiner reliability of 0.95 - 1 ( Kappa Statistic ) . The results revealed no statistical significance in the difference of clinical characteristics between the two design s ( p > 0.05 ) Three restorative material s used for cervical erosion /abrasion lesions were evaluated clinical ly after 10 years . Thirty adult patients with at least four cervical lesions received one restoration of each of Ketac-Fil , finished immediately , Ketac-Fil , finished after a delay , Chelon-FIl ( all glass-ionomer cements ) , and Cervident ( a resin composite ) . Restorations were placed without any tooth preparations . Eighteen patients returned for their 10-year examinations . Two experienced examiners provided the periodic evaluations . Complete retention at 10 years was 83 % for Ketac-Fil , finished immediately ; 78 % for Ketac-Fil , finished after a delay ; 67 % for Chelon-Fil ; and 17 % for Cervident . All three glass-ionomer restorative material s exhibited statistically significantly greater retention that did Cervident . When a noninvasive procedure is desired , glass-ionomer material s are the restorative material of choice for abrasion/erosion lesions because of their long-term retention values
Restorations of primary molars with conventional glass ionomer cement showed increased risk of failure than compomer , resin-modified glass ionomer cement , amalgam , and composite resin .
This study aim ed to compare the longevity of different conventional restorative material s placed in posterior primary teeth .