Research In Motion is slashing its global work force by 5,000, nearly a third of its employees, as the one-time icon of Canadian innovation suffers through the darkest days of an already dramatic decline. 
 
 RIM, a rare beacon of high technology in a country more famous for natural resources and banks, essentially invented the smartphone with the BlackBerry and enjoyed years of roaring success. 
 
 But now RIM is struggling for survival, battered by the fast-moving mobile technology market and wildly popular devices from Apple and other competitors. Profits have turned to huge losses as RIM has failed to release a smartphone that can stand up to the iPhone or any of the sleek gadgets running Google’s Android software. 
 
 RIM’s rapidly fizzling fortunes are a blow to the Canadian technology sector, its hometown of Waterloo, Ont., and Canada’s ambition to produce globally competitive innovators. 
 
 “RIM has made an incredible contribution to the information and communication technology industry in Canada,” Gary Goodyear, MP for Cambridge, Ont., and Minister of State for Science and Technology, said in a statement. “This is a business decision and my thoughts are with the affected workers and their families.” 
 
 Leaders are clinging to hope in Waterloo, where RIM employs about 9,000 people and where RIM’s former co-CEOs Mike Lazaridis and Jim Balsillie have spent millions on scientific and academic institutions. “I think every single Canadian should be buying Canadian technology,” said Waterloo mayor Brenda Halloran. “We need to remember they need our support and rally around them and continue to use their products.” 
 
 But on Thursday, amid the lowest expectations anyone has ever had of the company, RIM still managed to shock Bay Street analysts with its dismal performance. For the first time in eight years, RIM lost money – posting a net loss of $518-million (U.S.). Revenue collapsed by 33 per cent to $2.8-billion from the previous quarter. 
 
 “This is nothing short of a complete disaster,” said Kris Thompson, a technology analyst with National Bank Financial. 
 
 Perhaps most damaging to the company, however, is that RIM said it would again delay the launch of its crucial BlackBerry 10 smartphones, which were due out in the fall and have new software meant to re-energize consumer and corporate interest in the BlackBerry platform. Now RIM said those devices won’t hit the market until early in 2013, which means the company will miss the important back-to-school and holiday shopping seasons, when most sales are made, and have to battle for space on store shelves against the newest iteration of the Apple iPhone. As RIM continues to grapple with the conundrum of maintaining sales of current BlackBerrys while building anticipation for future products it hopes will save the company, employees in Waterloo and around the world are facing deep cuts. “I understand this is an incredibly difficult message to deliver but it is necessary,” RIM president and CEO Thorsten Heins said on a conference call with financial analysts. 
 
 RIM is said to be planning a global town hall for Friday morning, although Mr. Heins could not offer much detail on the job cuts. “No one is surprised,” a RIM employee said of the company’s worsening financial shape and the job losses. “My team did have a moment of silence for the 5,000 cuts, which is pretty sombre, as there was never much communication regarding how deep those would run.” 
 
 Kerry Morrison, CEO of Toronto software developer Endloop Mobile, was recently invited to a BlackBerry developer outreach event and says he’s glad he didn’t go. “They had one hope – one – and that was to make BB10 the greatest thing since sliced bread and get it out on time. Clearly, they have failed. There’s just no way now to pull out of the death spiral,” he said. “With stiff competition and a complete lack of marketplace trust, zombie Steve Jobs couldn't fix RIM.” 
 
 RIM’s executives, meanwhile, say they plan to continue, slimming down and refocusing the company. On a conference call, Mr. Heins emphasized the positive momentum in certain international markets, but the overall mood surrounding the company – not optimistic to begin with – took a much darker turn on Thursday: “God. ... It just seems kind of sad,” a former RIM executive said as he took in the developments on Thursday evening. “Companies have come back from the grave. Apple has done it. There’s no reason RIM can’t. They just have to show better leadership over the next few months.” 
 
 With files from Josh O'Kane and Steven Chase 
 
 With reports from Josh O’Kane and Steven Chase ||||| WATERLOO, Ontario—As the BlackBerry smartphone fell steadily further behind app-loaded rivals like the iPhone in recent years, it was time for an unambiguous response from the chief executive's office. 
 
 RIM is expected to report an operating loss following a decline caused partly by overconfidence in its keyboard devices amid the rise of touch-screen smartphones. Will Connors reports on digits. Photo: AP. 
 
 At Research In Motion Ltd., however, that was complicated. The BlackBerry maker had two chief executives. Moreover, their offices were about a 10-minute drive apart. Meetings with both of them present were rare, say former RIM executives and people who dealt with the company. 
 
 Many forces have combined to bring RIM to the point of reporting a quarterly operating loss, as is expected on Thursday, but one of them was a split personality in the executive suite, former executives say. As investor pressure mounted at the company recently, one CEO, company founder Mike Lazaridis, was focused on a make-or-break push to launch a next-generation BlackBerry with a new operating system. His co-CEO, Jim Balsillie, started pursuing a separate strategy that envisioned licensing out some of the company's proprietary technologies. 
 
 Both men are gone from the CEO suite now, replaced in January by former Lazaridis lieutenant Thorsten Heins. He is slashing costs. RIM says it is committed to seeing through the rollout later this year of its next BlackBerry. But Mr. Heins has hired investment bankers to explore options and hasn't ruled out a sale of a company, whose stock has tanked nearly 70% in 12 months and pushed its market value, at under $5 billion, to less than one-fifteenth of its peak. 
 
 RIM still has a comfortable cash cushion of more than $2 billion, which it said last month is likely to have grown in its fiscal first quarter ended June 2. It also is debt-free, giving it more breathing room to get out its new phone, with an operating system called BlackBerry 10 that RIM says "sets the standard for reliable, secure mobile computing." RIM has told its bankers it is focused on that rollout, said a person familiar with the matter. If the phone is a hit, the company will recover some of its lost value, and the new technology will be a boon to any possible sale or partnership in the future, this person said. 
 
 According to interviews with more than a dozen former RIM executives and industry executives who worked closely with the company, it was a blinding confidence in the basic BlackBerry product that was at the root of RIM's current troubles. Compounding that, as they describe the events, were a drawn-out internal debate over who their core customer was; a series of catch-up products that didn't really catch the company up; and tensions within parts of the company. 
 
 The bet long made by RIM was that both corporate and individual customers would continue to favor the BlackBerry's easy-to-use mobile email over the multiplying features and apps on Apple Inc.'s iPhone and devices running on Google Inc.'s Android operating system. When it saw consumers starting to gravitate away from BlackBerrys, RIM moved tentatively. 
 
 At one point, RIM worked to challenge the iPhone with telecom carriers that were fearful of Apple's dominance. The new models that came out of these collaborations, however, failed to generate iPhone-like buzz. 
 
 RIM isn't alone in failing to adapt quickly to the transformation of smartphones from devices to talk and email into pocket-size computers. Once-dominant Nokia Corp. has been forced into a partnership with Microsoft Corp. to equip its phones to compete, and is slashing thousands of jobs as its share of the global smartphone market erodes. 
 
 At RIM, executives eventually brought in outside talent, but that raised tensions inside the ranks of a company that already harbored separate Lazaridis and Balsillie fiefs, some former RIM executives and executives who have worked with RIM say. According to them, the separate teams sometimes clashed, especially as the onetime smartphone leader slipped further behind. 
 
 RIM, in a statement, said the split-personality characterization wasn't accurate. "As with any innovative company there were times when various people within the organization disagreed, but this was not the norm," it said. 
 
 "The CEO structure worked well for many years and allowed each of the co-CEOs to focus on their areas of strength," RIM added. It said the co-CEOs started out sharing an office, had offices next to each other, and then, "as RIM grew, they each took offices closest to those areas each supervised in order to stay close to their teams. At all times, they had an efficient, professional working relationship and were in close communication." 
 
 Read More Investors Brace for RIM's Results 
 
 Mr. Heins, soon after taking over as CEO early this year, put an end to the strategy pursued by one CEO: Mr. Balsillie's licensing initiative. RIM said it doesn't discuss nonpublic internal deliberations. 
 
 Mr. Balsillie has given up his board seat. Mr. Lazaridis remains nonexecutive vice chairman. 
 
 "Successful companies take what they can learn from every situation and use that to push forward," Mr. Lazaridis said, noting that he and Mr. Balsillie "felt it was the right time in RIM's life cycle to turn the leadership of the company over to someone else." Mr. Balsillie didn't respond to requests for comment. 
 
 RIM didn't make Mr. Heins available, citing a quiet period before the earnings release. 
 
 RIM essentially invented email on the go. Founded by Mr. Lazaridis in 1984 with a $15,000 loan from his parents, the company grew to a stock-market value of more than $80 billion at its zenith in 2008, controlling about half the U.S. smartphone market. 
 
 Enlarge Image Close David Manning/Reuters RRIM CEO Thorsten Heins 
 
 RIM hosted lavish banquets for its inventors. To mark milestones, it treated employees to concerts by bands such as U2 and Van Halen. At the company's campus of low-slung gray buildings 70 miles from Toronto, employees got free ice cream on "Frosty Fridays." 
 
 Amid its cost-cutting, RIM isn't giving up entirely on ice cream days. "Ice cream is a relatively low-cost way to build stronger bonds within our team," RIM said. 
 
 Mr. Balsillie, who came aboard in 1992 after having explored a takeover bid for the company, and Mr. Lazaridis became Canada's best-known billionaires, each funneling chunks of wealth to pet projects. Mr. Lazaridis built a theoretical-physics institute. Mr. Balsillie started a school for global governance and tried unsuccessfully to buy three professional hockey teams. 
 
 Behind the success was Mr. Lazaridis's unrelenting vision for robust engineering and innovation and Mr. Balsillie's push for market expansion. But former executives say there was also an aversion at the company to innovations that didn't buttress its core strengths: its proprietary network and reputation for security. 
 
 At an investor meeting about a decade ago, analysts asked Mr. Lazaridis whether RIM was moving to a color screen, a feature popping up on devices in Asia. "Do I need to read my email in color?" he replied, according to Brian Blair, then an analyst with Banc of America Securities. 
 
 Enlarge Image Close Mike Cassese/Reuters Former co-CEOs Mike Lazaridis and Jim Balsillie in January 
 
 RIM says that at the time, color screens were impractical, with high costs and high battery drain. It says it was among the first to adopt color displays just a few years later. 
 
 RIM's customers then were overwhelmingly companies, which gave their employees BlackBerrys for email. But a growing number were individuals, often eager for features such as cameras, games and Internet browsing. RIM brought out devices with cameras and MP3 players including the Pearl in 2006 and the Curve in 2007—the year the iPhone came out. 
 
 Still, RIM's carrier partners worried that the wild popularity of the iPhone could give Apple outsize influence in the market. Executives at Verizon Communications Inc. and Vodafone Group PLC approached RIM to work together on a phone that could compete with the iPhone, say people familiar with the matter. The collaboration resulted in RIM's first touch-screen device, the Storm. 
 
 "Vodafone started really rushing around saying, 'Helps us build an innovative competitor to the iPhone,' " said Pieter Knook, a Vodafone executive at the time. He said Mr. Lazaridis came up with the Storm's marquee innovation, a touch screen that physically clicked. 
 
 The Storm "sold very well," but wasn't a strong competitor to the iPhone, said Denny Strigl, at the time president of Verizon. 
 
 In 2010, AT&T Inc., then Apple's exclusive carrier partner, approached RIM about a plan to develop a touch-screen rival to the iPhone, said two former RIM executives. The chief of AT&T's mobile division visited RIM's research and development team in Waterloo to stress how important it was for AT&T to have a successful BlackBerry product to sell, according to people familiar with the visit. RIM said the objective of the visit was to develop "a differentiated, unique BlackBerry experience for AT&T customers." 
 
 "We work with all device makers to bring the best products to market for our customers," AT&T said. 
 
 A RIM-AT&T collaboration resulted in the BlackBerry Torch, say people familiar with the effort, but it was hobbled by hardware and software shortcomings. 
 
 RIM executives also missed some internal warnings. The sales division produced a research report in 2010 on the future of tactile keyboards, the thumb-friendly feature that was a favorite in the early days of the BlackBerry. The report warned that in the era of Apple's touch-only devices, keyboards would make up a diminishing share of the market, according to a person familiar with it, who said the warning was ignored. 
 
 During a meeting the same year, Mr. Balsillie asked if RIM should be worried about a new trend: consumers bringing their own smartphones to work and asking their employer to let them work on the devices. Some executives said the trend was a threat; a few said they weren't worried. Mr. Balsillie went with the latter view, said a person close to the company. RIM said it doesn't discuss nonpublic "internal company deliberations." 
 
 As Apple and Android devices ate into BlackBerry's market share, Mr. Lazaridis started looking outside for innovation, bringing in a new marketing team and other top executives. In April 2010 RIM bought QNX Software Systems, a maker of operating systems for cars and medical devices. RIM was readying a tablet to compete with the iPad, and executives decided that they would use QNX to power the device, called the PlayBook. 
 
 According to people close to the company, the acquisition stoked tensions between the teams led by Mr. Lazaridis, who was in charge of product development, manufacturing and R&D, and Mr. Balsillie, who ran carrier partnerships, sales and marketing. 
 
 The two CEOs met in person fairly regularly, and would send instant messages or call each other to bounce ideas around or get progress reports when they weren't in the same room. But as RIM hit trouble, they were more often than not toiling in very different worlds, according to these people, who say the teams reporting up to the two didn't communicate effectively if at all. Some projects would go astray before either co-CEO noticed, these people say, and disagreements between the two sides sometimes devolved into shouting matches. 
 
 The QNX leadership team reported directly to Mr. Lazaridis, bypassing Mr. Balsillie and other top RIM officers, rankling them, according to people familiar with the situation. 
 
 Meanwhile, by late 2011, Mr. Balsillie was deep into his own project, an effort aimed at licensing some of RIM's proprietary technology, such as its security network and its popular BBM messaging tool, to outside companies. Some analysts had long suggested such a move to boost revenue and buy the company more time as it readied its new phone. 
 
 Mr. Balsillie and a team under him struck licensing agreements with several partners, including carriers, according to people familiar with the effort. The deals would have allowed other smartphone makers and the carriers to use RIM's network for a fee. 
 
 But by the end of last year, RIM shares were hitting eight-year lows. On Jan. 22, the board, led by Messrs. Lazaridis and Balsillie as co-chairmen, said the two would step aside. They remained big shareholders and each kept a board seat. 
 
 Within a week of becoming CEO, Mr. Heins, a Lazaridis lieutenant, scuttled the licensing plan, people familiar with it said. He said he would focus a slimmed-down RIM on rolling out its new BlackBerry phones. 
 
 —Anton Troianovski, Jessica E. Vascellaro and Anupreeta Das contributed to this article. 
 
 Write to Will Connors at william.connors@wsj.com
– BlackBerry maker Research In Motion's freefall is continuing. The Canadian company's shares plunged 15% after it posted a $518 million third-quarter loss and announced that its new BlackBerry 10 smartphone had been delayed until next year, reports the Wall Street Journal. The company says it is cutting 5,000 jobs—nearly a third of its workforce—and experts believe it might not survive long enough to release the new smartphone. CEO Thorsten Heins says the delay is due to difficulties with new features on the much-hyped phone and the company is in the midst of a "strategic review." "They had one hope—one—and that was to make BB10 the greatest thing since sliced bread and get it out on time. Clearly, they have failed," the chief of a Toronto software firm tells the Globe and Mail. "There’s just no way now to pull out of the death spiral,” he says. “With stiff competition and a complete lack of marketplace trust, zombie Steve Jobs couldn't fix RIM." Where did it all go wrong for the company? Analysts blame years of resistance to innovation and operating with two CEOs.