A Hudson Valley woman is finger lickin’ mad at Kentucky Fried Chicken, claiming its understuffed buckets are for the birds. 
 
 Anna Wurtzburger, of Hopewell Junction, says she bought a $20 bucket of chicken from KFC over the summer and was disappointed to find it looked much different than what’s in the chain’s ads. 
 
 “I came home and said, ‘Where’s the chicken?’ I thought I was going to have a couple of meals,” she told The Post. 
 
 “They say it feeds the whole family … They’re showing a bucket that’s overflowing with chicken,” the 64-year-old widow griped. “You get half a bucket! That’s false advertising, and it doesn’t feed the whole family. They’re small pieces!” 
 
 Wurtzburger rang up the fast-food giant’s Georgia headquarters to complain, and was told the chicken was portrayed prominently on the commercial “so that the public could see the chicken.” 
 
 “If you want the public to look at your chicken, put it in a dish,” she fumed. “It’s a lot of BS. … I expect to get what you’re telling me.” 
 
 Putting her money where her hungry mouth is, Wurtzburger hired a lawyer and filed a lawsuit, demanding KFC change its advertising. 
 
 She also returned two gift certificates the company sent her as a mea culpa. 
 
 “You know what commercial they should put on? You remember the movie, ‘Oliver’?” she said. “It was about the little boy growing up in the orphanages and he was hungry and he goes to the man, ‘Can I have some more?’ ” 
 
 Retired from the Fishkill Correction Facility, Wurtzburger lives off her Social Security check and said the KFC meal was supposed to be a rare treat. 
 
 The grandmother seeks $20 million in damages. KFC called the lawsuit “meritless.” ||||| This story has been updated to reflect a response from KFC. 
 
 KFC is facing a $20 million lawsuit filed by an incensed customer who says she didn’t get enough chicken in her $20 “Fill-Up.” 
 
 Anna Wurtzburger, a 64-year-old retiree of Hudson Valley, N.Y., filed a lawsuit late last month claiming that KFC’s advertising is misleading. The lawsuit, obtained by Consumerist, states that Wurtzburger purchased a $20 Fill-Up and, when she got home, was surprised to find that the bucket was only filled up about half way. Wurtzburger said the commercial for the product shows “an overflowing bucket of chicken.” 
 
 When she contacted KFC to draw these differences, a spokesperson explained to her that the advertising is done that way so viewers can see the product. The lawsuit claims that this proves KFC was aware it was “intentionally misleading and deceiving the public when it advertised an overflowing bucket of chicken on television but knew that they would only sell 8 pieces of chicken to the public.” 
 
 KFC’s menu states that the $20 Fill-Up comes with eight pieces of chicken, though that information isn’t shared in the commercial. But the commercial does say that it feeds a family of four. 
 
 “It doesn’t feed the whole family. They’re small pieces!” Wurtzburger told the New York Post. 
 
 The lawsuit, filed in a New York State Supreme Court, accuses KFC of violating sections of the state’s general business law that prohibit false advertising and misleading trade practices. The plaintiff is demanding that KFC alter its advertising and pay $20 million in damages. 
 
 KFC told Fortune that the claims laid out in the lawsuit are “meritless,” and that the company will be requesting that the court dismiss this case. “The guest received exactly what she requested. She purchased an eight-piece bucket of chicken and she indeed received eight pieces of chicken,” a spokesperson said. “Our menus and advertising clearly show our $20 Fill Up meal includes eight pieces of chicken.” 
 
 Starbucks (sbux) recently faced a similar lawsuit that claimed the coffee chain misled customers by advertising drink sizes in fluid ounces, and deliberately adds too much ice to cold drinks to reduce the size of the beverage. A judge dismissed the case, saying that “a reasonable customer” should understand, “as young children” do, that ordering a drink with less ice will result in more liquid. ||||| Kentucky Fried Chicken suggested Tuesday that a family claiming their little girl was asked to leave a restaurant because the scars on her face from a pit bull attack were disturbing other customers actually made the story up. 
 
 The bizarre story concerns three-year-old Victoria Wilcher, who was reportedly mauled by pitbulls belonging to her family, leaving heavy scarring on her face. Her family said last month that she was asked to leave a Jackson, Miss., KFC restaurant because her appearance disturbed other customers. That claim, initially floated on a “Victoria’s Victories” Facebook page that appeared to have been taken offline Tuesday, ignited outrage on social media, prompting an apology from KFC on June 15 and a promise to spend $30,000 on Wilcher’s medical bills. 
 
 But KFC said Tuesday that it no longer believes the incident actually took place. 
 
 “Like the rest of America, the KFC family has been moved by the story of Victoria’s injuries and recovery,” KFC spokesman Rick Maynard said. “After the alleged incident was reported to us, two investigations took place, including one by an independent investigator. Neither revealed any evidence that the incident occurred and we consider the investigation closed. We are honoring our commitment to make a $30,000 donation to assist with Victoria’s medical bills. We hope everyone keeps Victoria in their thoughts and prayers. She will certainly be in ours.” 
 
 A lawyer for Victoria’s grandmother, who made the initial claim, said Tuesday that the family stands by its story. “Victoria’s family did not anticipate that the response to ‘Victoria’s Victories’ would be so widespread and generous,” lawyer Bill Kellum said in a statement. “A family member simply posted a comment on Victoria’s page regarding her experience at KFC that subsequently went viral. Victoria’s family certainly did not expect the publicity resulting from the post. However, Victoria and her family are very appreciative of the outpouring of sympathy, prayers, donations and love from individuals and entities all over the world.” 
 
 “I promise it’s not a hoax, I never thought any of this would blow up the way it has,” multiple news reports cited Victoria’s aunt as writing on the GoFundMe page where her family was raising money. Those comments preceded KFC’s statement and the page was also offline late Tuesday. 
 
 When reports that Victoria was asked to leave the restaurant ignited a firestorm of criticism on social media, KFC moved quickly to tamp the outrage. 
 
 “As soon as we were notified of this report on Friday, we immediately began an investigation, as this kind of hurtful and disrespectful action would not be tolerated by KFC,” the company said at the time. “Regardless of the outcome of our investigation, we have apologized to Victoria’s family and are committed to assisting them. The company is making a $30,000 donation to assist with her medical bills. The entire KFC family is behind Victoria.” 
 
 The Mississippi-based Laurel Leader-Call newspaper, citing unnamed sources familiar with the investigation, first reported the possibility of a hoax on Tuesday. The family has raised more than $135,000 in the wake of the initial claim, according to numerous reports. 
 
 “Please do not believe untrue media,” Victoria’s aunt Rials Bates wrote on the GoFundMe page that was no longer online Tuesday, ABC reports. “I have personally watched this family go without to provide for Victoria. They have not and would not do anything to hurt Victoria in any way.” 
 
 –Additional reporting by Joan E Greve
– A 64-year-old New York widow just wanted some fried chicken; now she's hoping for a family-size bucket of extra-crispy justice with a side of mashed vindication. The New York Post reports Anna Wurtzburger is suing KFC for false advertising after she bought a $20 bucket of chicken last summer only to find it half full. Her lawsuit states that the commercial for the $20 Fill-Up shows "an overflowing bucket of chicken," according to Fortune. “I came home and said, ‘Where’s the chicken?’ I thought I was going to have a couple of meals,” Wurtzburger tells the Post. Wurtzburger is living off Social Security and was splurging on KFC as a treat. KFC says its menu clearly states the $20 Fill-Up comes with eight pieces, and that's exactly what Wurtzburger got. It explained to her that it has to show the bucket overflowing so viewers can see the chicken. “If you want the public to look at your chicken, put it in a dish,” she retorts. Wurtzburger also takes issue with the ad's claim that the eight-piece Fill-Up can feed a family of four. "They’re small pieces," she says. KFC offered the dissatisfied Wurtzburger $70 in coupons, but she turned them down, CBS New York reports. She's now suing KFC for $20 million. “It’s the principle of the matter,” she says. “Sometimes you gotta hit people where they feel the hurt." KFC calls Wurtzburger's lawsuit "meritless." (A judge dismissed a lawsuit against Starbucks over something even "young children" can understand.)