Running for only a few minutes a day or at slow speeds may significantly reduce a person's risk of death from cardiovascular disease compared to someone who does not run, according to a study published today in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 
 
 Exercise is well-established as way to prevent heart disease and it is component of an overall healthy life, but it is unclear whether there are health benefits below the level of 75 minutes per week of vigorous-intensity activity, such as running, recommended by the U.S. government and World Health Organization. 
 
 Researchers studied 55,137 adults between the ages of 18 and 100 over a 15-year period to determine whether there is a relationship between running and longevity. Data was drawn from the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study, where participants were asked to complete a questionnaire about their running habits. In the study period, 3,413 participants died, including 1,217 whose deaths were related to cardiovascular disease. In this population, 24 percent of the participants reported running as part of their leisure-time exercise. 
 
 Compared with non-runners, the runners had a 30 percent lower risk of death from all causes and a 45 percent lower risk of death from heart disease or stroke. Runners on average lived three years longer compared to non-runners. Also, to reduce mortality risk at a population level from a public health perspective, the authors concluded that promoting running is as important as preventing smoking, obesity or hypertension. The benefits were the same no matter how long, far, frequently or fast participants reported running. Benefits were also the same regardless of sex, age, body mass index, health conditions, smoking status or alcohol use. 
 
 The study showed that participants who ran less than 51 minutes, fewer than 6 miles, slower than 6 miles per hour, or only one to two times per week had a lower risk of dying compared to those who did not run. DC (Duck-chul) Lee, Ph.D., lead author of the study and an assistant professor in the Iowa State University Kinesiology Department in Ames, Iowa, said they found that runners who ran less than an hour per week have the same mortality benefits compared to runners who ran more than three hours per week. Thus, it is possible that the more may not be the better in relation to running and longevity. 
 
 Researchers also looked at running behavior patterns and found that those who persistently ran over a period of six years on average had the most significant benefits, with a 29 percent lower risk of death for any reason and 50 percent lower risk of death from heart disease or stroke. 
 
 "Since time is one of the strongest barriers to participate in physical activity, the study may motivate more people to start running and continue to run as an attainable health goal for mortality benefits," Lee said. "Running may be a better exercise option than more moderate intensity exercises for healthy but sedentary people since it produces similar, if not greater, mortality benefits in five to 10 minutes compared to the 15 to 20 minutes per day of moderate intensity activity that many find too time consuming." 
 
 ### 
 
 The American College of Cardiology is a 47,000-member medical society that is the professional home for the entire cardiovascular care team. The mission of the College is to transform cardiovascular care and to improve heart health. The ACC leads in the formation of health policy, standards and guidelines. The College operates national registries to measure and improve care, provides professional medical education, disseminates cardiovascular research and bestows credentials upon cardiovascular specialists who meet stringent qualifications. For more information, visit Cardiosource.org/ACC ||||| Roger Carlson, 70, takes a three-mile run down Highway 96 in Stillwater on Wednesday to make it 1,762 days in a row of running. Carlson is a marathoner who said that after running 7,813 straight days, he learned in a heart study that he had a major blockage in a coronary artery. He got a stent put into his artery and started running 12 days later. (Pioneer Press: Jean Pieri) 
 
 Exercise usually is regarded as good medicine for your heart, but maybe there's such a thing as an overdose, according to a new study that involved researchers and marathoners from Minnesota. 
 
 The study, recently published in the journal Missouri Medicine with a cover title "Marathons in the Long Run Not Heart Healthy," compared heart scans done on 23 sedentary men and 50 male marathon runners recruited from longtime participants of the Twin Cities Marathon. 
 
 The results show the runners "paradoxically" had greater volume of coronary plaque. That condition narrows the vessels leading to the heart, which can result in a heart attack. 
 
 Robert Schwartz, a Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation researcher, and his fellow researchers wrote that "an emerging body of scientific data" is starting to suggest that "chronic, high-intensity exercise" may be stressing the heart and accelerating problems like plaque build up and cardiac chamber stiffness. 
 
 "It is plausible, not proof by any stretch, that metabolic changes when running, could be moderately toxic to arteries," Schwartz said 
 
 The runners in the study, men who had done at least 25 Twin Cities Marathons in a row, had a mean age of 59 and had lower heart rates and were thinner than the sedentary men, who had a mean age of 55. 
 
 Advertisement 
 
 The runners also had higher levels of good cholesterol, were less likely to have hypertension and none had diabetes, compared with four of the 23 men in the sedentary control group. But more than half the runners had a history of smoking, compared with less than 40 percent of the sedentary men. 
 
 The study said "long-term marathon running in men may not engender protection against coronary artery plaque development" despite providing other benefits in blood pressure, lipid levels and glucose metabolism. 
 
 Roger Carlson, 70, relaxes after running and lifting weights. (Pioneer Press: Jean Pieri) 
 
 The results do not prove a cause-and-effect relationship between marathon running and accelerated coronary plaque, according to the study. 
 
 And doctors aren't certain whether that higher volume of coronary plaque in otherwise fit runners is as damaging as it would be among couch potatoes, Schwartz said. 
 
 The study cited another heart study in Copenhagen that showed that levels of physical activity produced a "U-shaped" curve in mortality. 
 
 Moderate levels of exercise resulted in the lowest mortality rates. But mortality rates rose at the ends of spectrum in physical activity, among those who were sedentary or who were high-volume, high-intensity runners. 
 
 "In other words, excessive running may have abolished the remarkable improvements in longevity conferred by lower doses of running," the Minnesota plaque study authors wrote. 
 
 Sudden deaths among runners during marathons are rare -- about one death in 100,000 participants, according to the plaque study. 
 
 "However, the bigger concern may be the fact that excessive exercise ultimately deprives the individual from reaping the significant longevity benefits conferred by moderate exercise," the study said. 
 
 The study noted that the number of marathon participants has risen dramatically in the past 40 years, approaching half a million in the United States in 2012. 
 
 "We suspect some runners might choose shorter, less exhausting challenges if they were aware of the potential adverse cardiac effects of chronic extreme endurance efforts," the study said. 
 
 Or maybe not. 
 
 "Are far as not running, are you crazy? We're addicted," said Timothy Zoerb, 57, of Eden Prairie, who participated in the marathon heart study. 
 
 Zoerb, who has run 37 marathons, said a heart scan showed that his coronary arteries were fine. But he said he watches what he eats, and not all runners do. 
 
 "I think there's some kind of bravado: 'I can do whatever I want because I'm a runner,' " Zoerb said. 
 
 "You certainly don't want to tell people that exercise is bad," said Paul Arbisi, 58, of Edina, who also participated in the study. 
 
 He said his coronary plaque levels were within acceptable levels, and he doesn't intend to break his streak of 32 Twin Cities Marathons. The clinical psychologist said there are emotional and psychological benefits to marathon running that go beyond physical health. 
 
 Roger Carlson, 70, of Stillwater said that after running 7,813 days straight, he stopped after taking part in the study and learning he had major blockage in a coronary artery. 
 
 But he had a stent put into his artery and resumed running 12 days later. He said his current running streak is more than 1,760 days, including running with a catheter after prostate surgery. 
 
 He said running makes him feel fit and full of life, despite what the heart scan says. 
 
 "I'm willing to bet that anyone's whose run more than two marathons is going to say, 'I don't care; I'm going to run,'" Carlson said. "I never had any symptoms. I think generally my heart is healthy. It's just full of plaque." 
 
 But one person who has given up marathoning is Peter McCullough, a cardiologist at Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas. 
 
 McCullough, 51, has run 54 marathons, but he's given up the long-distance event because of concerns it may be hurting his heart. 
 
 "I've personally been woken up about it," said McCullough, who co-authored an editorial overview in the Missouri Medicine issue about marathon running. 
 
 McCullough said the plaque buildup seen in the study of Minnesota marathoners "really shouldn't be happening in runners, and it really shouldn't be happening more than nonrunners." 
 
 McCullough said he suspects a certain percentage of the population -- perhaps as many as one-fourth of marathon runners -- might have a genetic variation that makes marathon running unhealthy for their hearts. 
 
 "The exercise community has had a mantra that more exercise is better," he said. "We're finding out that more is not better." 
 
 Richard Chin can be reached at 651-228-5560. Follow him at twitter.com/RRChin.
– Good news for those who keep meaning to exercise, but can never seem to find the time: If you can manage a few minutes of running a day—even going slowly—you may cut your risk of death from cardiovascular disease. So suggests a new, 15-year study of more than 55,000 adults. Researchers found that the risk of death from any cause among runners in the group was 30% lower than the risk among non-runners; runners also faced a 45% lower risk of death from cardiovascular disease, according to a press release. The fascinating part: "The benefits were the same no matter how long, far, frequently, or fast participants reported running," the release notes. Nor did a person's sex, age, or body mass index matter, and even smokers saw the same benefits. Runners lived an average of three years longer than non-runners. The study prompts the researchers to suggest that running should be promoted as seriously as smoking and obesity are discouraged. Researchers do, however, note a caveat: The study doesn't prove that running causes longer life, and it's possible—despite efforts to control for outside factors—that those who run are just healthier in general, WebMD adds. (But be careful: Earlier this year, another study found that running too much could kill you sooner.)