Stem cell therapy creates heart cells capable of partially repairing damage to the organ, although more work needed before human trials can take place 
 
 Scientists have taken a step towards a radical new treatment for heart attacks with a stem cell therapy that can partially repair damage to the organ. 
 
 The treatment uses heart cells which are created in the lab from the skin of a donor who is chosen to be a good genetic match for the recipient. 
 
 
 
 Tests in monkeys showed that injections of freshly-made heart cells were quickly incorporated into damaged areas of the heart and helped the organ to pump more vigorously. 
 
 
 
 Stem cell trial suggests damaged heart tissue could be regenerated Read more 
 
 But monkeys that had the procedure also developed unusual heart rhythms, leading the researchers to concede that far more work is needed before the treatment can be considered safe enough for human trials. 
 
 
 
 Heart attacks are one of the leading causes of death in the developed world. In the UK alone, hospitals deal with nearly 200,000 cases each year. While 70% of patients survive, many are left with tissue damage that stops their hearts from working properly. 
 
 
 
 One idea scientists have had to treat heart attack survivors is to take skin cells from the patient and convert them into pumping heart cells. The hope is that, when injected into the heart, these cells take hold and help the heart pump more effectively. The advantage is that the heart cells will not be rejected by the immune system, but the procedure is time consuming and expensive to do for individual patients. 
 
 
 
 In the latest work, researchers in Japan took a different tack. They induced heart attacks in five macaques and then treated the damage with heart cells created from the skin of a donor monkey. The donor was selected to be a close genetic match, but the recipients still need drugs to stop their bodies rejecting the cells. 
 
 
 
 Yuji Shiba and others at Shinshu University injected the monkeys with 400m lab-made heart cells and found that they replaced about 16% of the damaged tissue. The new cells were wired up with healthy ones in the heart and over 12 weeks started to help the organ to pump more strongly. Tests revealed, however, that all of the monkeys developed unusual heart rhythms after the therapy. Details appear in the journal Nature. 
 
 
 
 The scientists are now trying to understand the precise cause of the abnormal heart rhythms, but Shiba told the Guardian: “I think we can manage the post-transplant arrhythmia.” 
 
 
 
 Sam Boateng, who studies the mechanisms of heart failure at Reading University, said the work was exciting because it was a step towards the possibility of repairing a damaged heart following a heart attack. 
 
 
 
 Stem cell treatment repairs damaged hearts in monkeys Read more 
 
 “Currently, the only long term option for these patients is heart transplantation, but there are not enough donors to meet the current demand,” he said. 
 
 
 
 But he added that many challenges remain. “Ideally, immune rejection would be eliminated if the cells could be derived from the same patient, but this is costly and time consuming at a time when the patient requires immediate treatment. Another concern is that the incomplete integration of the transplanted cells could result in irregular heart beats which can be deadly,” he said. 
 
 
 
 Sian Harding, director of the British Heart Foundation cardiovascular regenerative medicine centre at Imperial College London, said the Japanese team’s work was a significant step forward. “They strengthen the case that a bank of pre-prepared matched [cells] could be used to treat patients, without relying on the long process of reprogramming and differentiating the patient’s own cells.” 
 
 
 
 “The arrhythmias were seen in a previous similar study, but in neither study did they prove fatal and both suggested that they would decrease with time. Clinical strategies for preventing sudden cardiac death from arrhythmia, such as implantable cardiodefibrillators, may therefore be necessary as adjunct therapy for some months after implantation,” she added. ||||| In four adjacent enclosures transplantation researcher Bruno Reichart kept four happy baboons. “They can hop around, eat, drink and they are enjoying life,” he says. “They watch TV—their favorite is the cartoon with the chipmunk.” Most importantly, he says, they were healthy and normal—which is astonishing, given the fact that the hearts beating life in their chests were anything but normal for a baboon. 
 
 All four of the baboons that lived in Reichart’s lab at Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich had their original hearts surgically replaced with ones from genetically engineered pigs. Two of the baboons were euthanized after they lived 90 days—the survival period for any nonhuman primate set by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation as a benchmark to indicate xenotransplantation might be safe enough to try in humans. The other two kept going for twice as long before Reichart’s team euthanized them, too. That survival period, says Muhammad Mohiuddin, a surgeon and director of the Cardiac Xenotransplantation Program at the University of Maryland who was not involved with this work, “is an extraordinary achievement. You cannot stress this more. The next step from here is clinical transplantation [in people].” 
 
 Despite the fact monkeys are our evolutionary cousins and can stand in for us fairly well in experiments, nonhuman primates make for poor organ donors. There are concerns a monkey organ could pass on infectious diseases to the human recipient, and the primates are not easily farmed. But there is one animal that is already bred and raised en masse, is easy to genetically edit and has organs eerily similar to an adult human’s: the domestic pig. Researchers have long been eyeing porcine hearts as a potential solution to the ongoing donor shortage. 
 
 But even though humans can give their hearts to compatible persons with little more than a side of immunosuppressants, cross-species transplantation is not so straightforward. More than 60 percent of previous attempts to replace a baboon’s heart with that of a pig ended in the recipients dying within two days, Reichart says. “For 20 years one thought that this would be almost impossible to do, the results were so bad.” 
 
 Two important developments pumped hope into the field over the past few years: First, researchers such as geneticist Luhan Yang, co-founder of life sciences company eGenesis, began using the gene-editing tool CRISPR–Cas9 to remove parts of the pig genome that might harm humans or provoke an immune response. “We were able to genetically modify the pig to make it more like humans,” Mohiuddin says. That significantly reduced the potential for cross-species organ rejection. 
 
 Then in 2016 Mohiuddin’s lab took this further by showing baboons could survive with a genetically engineered pig heart implanted into their abdomens for nearly 1,000 days—if the baboon was on a certain cocktail of immunosuppressants. “The original [baboon] heart was still intact and performing the main work,” Mohiuddin says. “This was to test those different drugs and genetics, and show that we can successfully prevent rejection.” 
 
 For the new workReichart first wanted to see if the same genetically engineered pig hearts—combined with the immunosuppressant regimen Mohiuddin used—could support the life of a baboon. But the first five animals in the new study did not live long. Three died of heart failure almost immediately, Reichart says. “It turns out porcine hearts are more vulnerable compared to human hearts,” he says. During the period between removal from a pig and implantation into a baboon—what surgeons call “ischemic time”—the heart will sustain damage similar to that caused by a heart attack. Human hearts can often recover from this damage, he adds, but the pig hearts could not. 
 
 So Reichart tried something new with another group of baboons. This time he repeatedly immersed the pig hearts in an experimental nutrient solution, developed at Lund University in Sweden, for a couple of hours. Researchers think this formulation, originally designed to help transport human hearts long distances, might have helped keep the pig hearts from deteriorating too much. “That may have even helped to preserve the hearts much better than transplanting them right away,” Mohiuddin says. 
 
 These baboons hung on for about a month before dying—this time because the pig hearts began swelling inside the monkeys’ chests, eventually squeezing against the rib cages and failing. “A pig grows to maturity within four months or so, but a baboon takes about 10 years to grow,” Reichart says. “So the pig heart was growing in the primate as if it was still in a pig. We were just astonished. Nobody had experienced this before—the heart grew like a tumor.” 
 
 In Reichart’s third group he added an immunosuppressant drug called temsirolimus, which could also stop the pig hearts’ unwanted growth. With the exception of one baboon that died of mechanical heart failure 51 days after surgery, the transplant recipients in this group survived in good health until the researchers euthanized them at 90 or 180 days (an action required under the study protocol approved by officials). The team published their results Wednesday in Nature. 
 
 The study is invigorating xenotransplantation researchers who, after decades of sometimes dismal attempts, say human trials are finally in sight. “Now we are really excited,” says Burcin Ekser, a transplant surgeon and director of the Xenotransplantation Research Laboratory at Indiana University who did not work on the new study. “Finally, in the U.S., we are starting to talk about when we can start human trials—probably first in some [pig] organs like kidneys or pancreas cells to cure diabetes,” he says. Kidney or pancreas failure would not definitively result in death, unlike an unsuccessful heart transplantation. 
 
 Much work still needs to be done before human xenotransplantation trials can actually start, says Allan Kirk, a surgeon at Duke University and the editor for the American Journal of Transplantation who did not participate in the work. Notably, special immunosuppressant drugs that are necessary for successful cross-species organ transplantation are not yet available for humans—and they may have intolerable side effects. An older version of a key drug used in Reichart and Mohiuddin’s studies was shown to cause strokes in people. The newer, although similar, drug Reichart used still needs to be tested in humans. “All this stuff will take a long time,” Kirk says. 
 
 Other xenotransplantation researchers agree, but this has not dampened their enthusiasm for Reichart’s work with baboons. “It’s not only emotional to see this but also very hard to imagine,” Mohiuddin says. “We just had this baboon, and it has a pig heart—and it’s living. This is not science fiction, this is really for real now.”
– How do you mend a broken heart? Stem cells. Or at least that's the hope after scientists successfully used lab-created heart muscle cells to partially repair damaged hearts in monkeys, Live Science reports. The healthy stem cells were easily absorbed into the damaged hearts and allowed the organ to pump blood more easily. The procedure could lead to a new way to treat heart attacks and at least partially repair heart damage, the Guardian reports. Heart disease is the leading cause of death for men and women in the US. Scientists are intrigued by the idea of treating damaged hearts by using a patient's own skin cells to create healthy heart cells, which are less likely to be rejected since they don't come from a donor. In the latest study in the journal Nature, the team at Shinshu University induced heart attacks in five macaques and then injected them with heart cells made from the skin of a healthy macaque who was a close genetic match. To avoid rejection, they ensured the donor monkey had a type of protein similar to the recipients' and they gave the sick monkeys anti-rejection drugs. After studying the macaques for three months, researchers found their immune systems tolerated the new cells, which replaced about 16% of the damaged heart tissue. In the end, the monkeys' heart muscles contracted better, pumping blood more efficiently. Human trials are not coming anytime soon, though, after the macaques developed irregular heartbeats. Still, doctors said the findings raise the possibility of treating damage caused by heart attacks. "Currently, the only long term option for these patients is heart transplantation, but there are not enough donors to meet the current demand," heart researcher Sam Boateng told the Guardian. (Monkeys on a strict low-calorie diet lived much longer.)