CNN will offer unrestricted access to Thursday's vice presidential debate coverage starting at 7 p.m. ET on CNN TV, CNN.com and via CNN's apps for iPhone, iPad and Android. Web users can become video editors with a new clip-and-share feature that allows them to share favorite debate moments on Facebook and Twitter. Follow CNN's live blog and visit the CNN debates page for instant updates and comprehensive coverage. 
 
 Danville, Kentucky (CNN) -- Vice President Joe Biden and Rep. Paul Ryan, GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney's running mate, will share the stage in Danville, Kentucky, in their only debate. Biden and Ryan's debate follows the top of the tickets' first of three debates last week, in which Obama turned in a lackluster performance, upstaged by an aggressive and vibrant Romney. 
 
 Here are five things to watch for on Thursday night: 
 
 1. Will Biden go where Obama didn't? 
 
 Biden is not shy on the campaign trail; the day after last week's first presidential debate, the vice president attacked Republican nominee Mitt Romney in a way that many Democrats had wished President Barack Obama would have done the night before. 
 
 King: VP debate no game-changer, but could shift momentum 
 
 How aggressive will Biden be in going after the man at the top of the GOP ticket rather than the man he'll share the debate stage with? Will Biden highlight the "47%" controversy, Bain Capital and Romney's tax returns? 
 
 "The vice president likes laying out the contrast between the Romney-Ryan extreme agenda and the plans he and the president have to move this country forward and we fully expect that to continue Thursday night," an Obama campaign official told CNN. 
 
 With the polls tightening both nationally and in key battleground states after last week's debate, the stakes for the showdown between the running mates have increased. 
 
 7 questions you would ask at the VP debate 
 
 "Biden needs to play offense, not defense," said Democratic strategist and CNN contributor Paul Begala, who is a senior adviser for a pro-Obama super PAC. "Attack the Romney-Ryan plan to cut taxes for the rich and raise them on the middle class. Dissect the Romney-Ryan plan to end Medicare as we know it. Point out that if Romney had been president, Osama bin Laden would be alive and GM would be dead. And be prepared to body-slam Ryan when -- not if -- he fibs." 
 
 2. The wonk trap 
 
 Paul Ryan likes to call himself "a numbers guy." 
 
 Indeed, wonky budget talk is Ryan's calling card. It's the primary reason he has captured the hearts of conservative elites in Washington, who see him as the second coming of Jack Kemp. 
 
 Ryan's debate prep as meticulous as he is 
 
 But fiscal wonkery was quicksand for Obama during last week's debate. His dreary reliance on budget math over pointed political arguments contrasted sharply with Mitt Romney, who presented his ideas with vigor and clarity, despite obvious questions about the factual underpinnings of his ideas. 
 
 Can Ryan avoid getting bogged down in the arithmetic that so thrills him? An adviser to the GOP vice presidential nominee told The National Review's Robert Costa this week that Ryan "may be over-preparing" for his showdown with Biden. 
 
 By some accounts, Ryan has bristled at platitude-driven demands of the campaign trail. He'd rather be talking substance, on the road with a PowerPoint presentation about Medicare costs. 
 
 The challenge for Ryan on Thursday, though, is to present the Romney vision to millions of voters without sounding too much like the Beltway think tank staffer he once was. 
 
 He's done a solid job of that since Romney put him on the GOP ticket in August. Now, on the biggest stage of his career, he has to abandon some of the Capitol Hill tendencies that made him a star in the first place. 
 
 Paul Ryan hasn't called Palin for advice 
 
 3. Will Biden put Social Security in play? 
 
 In the House, Paul Ryan has backed moving Social Security funds to private investment accounts as a way to make the popular entitlement program more solvent. 
 
 Ryan's past proposals would seem to tee up what's usually a winning political argument for Democrats: that the Republican ticket wants to gut Social Security to help their old pals on Wall Street. 
 
 But to the bewilderment of Democratic strategists, Obama appeared to take the issue off the table in the first debate. 
 
 "I suspect that on Social Security, we've got a somewhat similar position," Obama said. "Social Security is structurally sound. It's going to have to be tweaked the way it was by Ronald Reagan and Democratic Speaker Tip O'Neill. But it is, the basic structure is sound." 
 
 CNN Money: Social Security, Where Obama and Romney stand 
 
 The Obama campaign scrambled to clarify last week that yes, in fact, the two candidates have fundamentally different views on Social Security. 
 
 "The choice is clear: President Obama will never privatize Social Security or undermine retirement security for middle-class Americans," read a post on the Obama campaign website that went up after the debate. "The same cannot be said for Romney." 
 
 Will Biden try to score fresh points by raising the issue of Social Security privatization against Ryan? Or did the president already holster one of his party's most effective political attacks? 
 
 4. The age gap 
 
 "I am not going to exploit for political purposes my opponent's youth and inexperience." 
 
 So went Ronald Reagan's famous line in one of his 1984 debates against Democratic challenger Walter Mondale. 
 
 Will Biden have a similar quip ready on Thursday? 
 
 OK, Biden is not nearly as old as Reagan, who was 73 at the time of his re-election. But at 69, he has almost three decades on Ryan, his 42-year-old debate opponent. 
 
 How Ryan sharpens debate skills 
 
 Biden is also known for his exuberance and devilish charm, so perhaps the age gap won't be as apparent as it was in 2008, when 47-year-old Barack Obama shared a stage with 72-year-old John McCain. Or as it was in 1988, when 67-year-old Lloyd Bentsen debated his boyish vice presidential foe Dan Quayle. 
 
 Stylistically, their birthdays might not matter much. But the age difference neatly crystallizes the arguments being presented by both campaigns. 
 
 Will voters choose experience and decide to move forward on the path we're on? Or will they look to a pair of fresh-faced outsiders who offer a new direction? 
 
 5. Ryan's role as commander in chief 
 
 Just as Mitt Romney needed to prove last week that he's acceptable to Americans to serve as president, Ryan needs to convey that he's ready to fill in as president in case something happens to Romney. It's one of the top tasks for the challenger's running mate in a vice presidential debate. 
 
 We'll be keeping a close watch on Ryan to see if he touts his ability to step in, if needed, to the leading role. 
 
 The Romney campaign is confident that the congressman from Wisconsin will pass the test, thanks to Ryan's position as House budget chairman and his mastery of complex fiscal issues. 
 
 "It will come down to his competency on the issues, his command of the issues," a Romney campaign official told CNN. 
 
 But Republican strategist and CNN contributor Alex Castellanos thinks that this time around, passing the competency test is not as important. 
 
 "There is very little pressure for either of these vice presidential candidates to prove they are ready to step into the office of president. Both their bosses are relatively young and in great health," Castellanos said. 
 
 Opinion: Biden must deliver for Team Obama 
 
 What questions would you ask the VP candidates? Share with us on CNN iReport ||||| Thank goodness the Daily Caller has got some game for exposing conflicts of interest and really important stuff that other news sites are missing. The website known for saying that it has unearthed scandals said Wednesday it had unearthed the shocking news that the moderator of Thursday’s vice presidential debate once had someone named Barry Obama as a guest at the first of her three weddings. 
 
 Now most of us in the political press have become far too complacent to backtrack even one wedding into the past of the debate moderators. So, of course, we would miss the glaring conflicts that can be exposed by journalists who dig really, really deep. 
 
 The Daily Caller has revealed that debate moderator Martha Raddatz of ABC News had the self-same Obama at her wedding 21 years ago. And now we are less than 24 hours away from this obvious toady throwing out questions to the two men – Vice President Joe Biden and Rep. Paul Ryan — who would like to be a heartbeat away from the Oval Office that Obama now occupies. 
 
 PHOTOS: Memorable presidential debate moments 
 
 The Daily Caller article clearly suggests that Raddatz’s early 1990s interlude with the man later to be known as Barack should disqualify her from overseeing the contest between Biden and Ryan. 
 
 Skeptics of the right-wing Daily Caller expose might note that Obama was only one of a bunch of Harvard Law School types at the wedding. And that his main connection to the event appeared to be as a friend of the groom, law school classmate Julius Genachowski. And that Raddatz and Genachowski divorced years ago. 
 
 Those niceties would only be pointed out, though, by apologists for the hopelessly biased left-wing press corps. 
 
 Raddatz might have moved on to a couple more marriages and an award-winning career as a White House and then foreign correspondent. But Peabody, Emmy and other awards can’t cover up the hard fact: She partied with the future president. 
 
 You can almost feel the Daily Caller follow-ups: First, eyewitness accounts of Obama catching the Raddatz garter. Then the tell-all video: Raddatz and Obama, mere feet apart on the dance floor, boogieing as only undisciplined left-wingers can. 
 
 PHOTOS: President Obama’s past 
 
 Such associations certainly preclude one person from ever writing and reporting fairly about another. Surely, Raddatz should be forced from her position as senior foreign affairs correspondent for ABC. She may have made dozens of courageous trips to Iraq and Afghanistan. But how can she be fair about Obama’s role in those overseas wars after that glass of Mumm’s back in '91? 
 
 Innocent Paul Ryan has no idea he is about to be blindsided by someone who once may or may not have danced the lambada with President Obama. A naïve Ryan spokesman, asked about the nefarious Raddatz, avowed to having “no concerns.” 
 
 INTERACTIVE: Battleground states map 
 
 Follow Politics Now on Twitter and Facebook 
 
 james.rainey@latimes.com 
 
 twitter.com/@latimesrainey 
 
 MORE COMMENTARY FROM JAMES RAINEY 
 
 Debate moderator "Silent Jim Lehrer" gets one last turn 
 
 Presidential debate: Round One goes to Romney, by many measures 
 
 Romney on a roll? Remember John Kerry, in debate, beat George W. Bush ||||| DANVILLE, Ky. — And now for the undercard. 
 
 Paul Ryan will look to win for the Republican ticket tonight when he takes the debate stage at Centre College here against Joe Biden in the first national face-off in which he’s participated. 
 
 Text Size - 
 
 + 
 
 reset 
 
 Biden — for whom expectations have been lowered over the constant refrain of “What about your gaffes?” — will try his best to triumph, providing Democrats with a strong night to change the momentum of a race that has shifted slightly toward Mitt Romney. 
 
 (Also on POLITICO: Full coverage of the 2012 vice presidential debate) 
 
 The best case scenario for each? A clear win. The worst case scenario for each? A clear loss. The murkiest scenario for each? A debate that gets fought to a draw, which the press will interpret in different ways but which also likely won’t stop the GOP ticket’s momentum. 
 
 And of course, the debate’s subtext: Ryan and Biden are widely believed to be considering their own campaigns in 2016 (Ryan only if Romney loses). 
 
 (PHOTOS: Scenes from the VP debate) 
 
 Below, POLITICO’s five things to watch: 
 
 1. Can Biden draw blood? 
 
 Earlier this week, the congenitally quotable South Carolina Democratic Party Chairman Dick Harpootlian predicted that Biden would take “the old meat-ax” to Ryan — a beating so one-sided that “the humane society” would have to be called in. 
 
 It’s a hope shared by many Democrats — including President Barack Obama himself, who is publicly contrite over his passivity at last week’s Denver debate — flabbergasted by the prospect of the president standing by while Romney got away, in their minds, with 90 minutes of lies, mischaracterizations and manufactured positions contrary to his own history. 
 
 (See also: Complete coverage of 2012 presidential debates) 
 
 Biden, one of his staffers told POLITICO, is “eager to draw the contrast — and very capable of doing so.” 
 
 But will it work? 
 
 Ryan’s perceived weakness — his wonkery and penchant for speaking in numbers — may actually prove to be the congressman’s greatest asset, a rope-a-dope tactic that will take voters into the policy weeds and blunt Biden’s attacks on tax policy, spending and foreign affairs. Obama was momentarily captivated by the Wisconsin congressman earlier in his term, telling aides that he was one of the few members of the GOP congressional crew he actually respected on an intellectual level. 
 
 But the vice president has his own arguments to make. Biden is likely to hammer away at the Medicare cuts Democrats claim are at the core of the Ryan budget passed by the GOP-controlled House, with polls showing older voters in key battlegrounds like Florida and Ohio deeply skeptical of the Republican approach. Biden, aides say, is also likely to emphasize Romney’s on-again, off-again support for Ryan’s plan — in an attempt to wedge the two apart. ||||| Transcript And Audio: Vice Presidential Debate 
 
 Enlarge this image toggle caption Justin Sullivan/Getty Images Justin Sullivan/Getty Images 
 
 Transcript of the Oct. 11 debate between Vice President Biden and his Republican challenger, Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, moderated by Martha Raddatz of ABC News. Source: Federal News Service 
 
 MARTHA RADDATZ: Good evening, and welcome to the first and only vice presidential debate of 2012, sponsored by the Commission on Presidential Debates. I'm Martha Raddatz of ABC News, and I am honored to moderate this debate between two men who have dedicated much of their lives to public service. 
 
 Tonight's debate is divided between domestic and foreign policy issues. 
 
 And I'm going to move back and forth between foreign and domestic since that is what a vice president or president would have to do. 
 
 We will have nine different segments. At the beginning of each segment, I will ask both candidates a question, and they will each have two minutes to answer. Then I will encourage a discussion between the candidates with follow-up questions. By coin toss, it has been determined that Vice President Biden will be first to answer the opening question. 
 
 We have a wonderful audience here at Centre College tonight. You will no doubt hear their enthusiasm at the end of the debate and right now as we welcome Vice President Biden and Congressman Paul Ryan. (Applause.) 
 
 Very nice to see you. Very nice to see you. 
 
 NPR Post-Debate Coverage Listen to NPR Analysis of the Debate Listen 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN: How you doing? 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Hey, you got your little wave to the families in. That's great. 
 
 Good evening, gentlemen. It really is an honor to be here with both of you. 
 
 I would like to begin with Libya on a rather somber note. One month ago tonight, on the anniversary of 9/11, Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other brave Americans were killed in a terrorist attack in Benghazi. The State Department has now made clear there were no protesters there. It was a pre-planned assault by heavily armed men. Wasn't this a massive intelligence failure, Vice President Biden? 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: What it was, it was a tragedy, Martha. It — Chris Stevens was one of our best. We lost three other brave Americans. 
 
 And I can make absolutely two commitments to you and all of the American people tonight: One, we will find and bring to justice the men who did this. 
 
 And secondly, we will get to the bottom of it, and whatever — wherever the facts lead us, wherever they lead us, w will make clear to the American public, because whatever mistakes were made will not be made again. 
 
 When you're looking at a president, Martha, it seems to me that you should take a look at his most important responsibility. That's carrying forward the national security of the country. And the best way to do that is take a look at how he's handled he issues of the day. 
 
 On Iraq, the president said he would end the war. Governor Romney said that was a tragic mistake; we should have left — that he ended it — Governor Romney said that was a tragic mistake; we should have left 30,000 troops there. 
 
 With regard to Afghanistan, he said he will end the war in 2014. Governor Romney said we should not set a date, number one, and number two, with regard to 2014, it depends. 
 
 When it came to Osama bin Laden, the president, the first day in office — I was sitting with him in the Oval Office. He called in the CIA and signed an order saying, my highest priority is to get bin Laden. 
 
 Prior to the election, prior to the — him being sworn in, Governor Romney was asked a question about how he would proceed. He said, I wouldn't move heaven and earth to get bin Laden. He didn't understand it was more than about taking a — a murderer off the battlefield; it was about restoring America's heart and letting terrorists around the world know if you do harm to America, we will track you to the gates of hell, if need be. 
 
 And lastly, the — the president of the United States has — has led with a steady hand and clear vision. Governor Romney, the opposite. The last thing we need now is another war. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Congressman Ryan. 
 
 REP. PAUL RYAN: (Sighs.) We mourn the loss of these four Americans who were murdered. When you take a look at what has happened just in the last few weeks, they sent the U.N. ambassador out to say that this was because of a protest and a YouTube video. It took the president two weeks to acknowledge that this was a terrorist attack. He went to the U.N., and in his speech at the U.N. he said six times — he talked about the YouTube video. 
 
 Look, if we are hit by terrorists, we're going to call it for what it is, a terrorist attack. Our ambassador in Paris has a Marine detachment guarding him. Shouldn't we have a Marine detachment guarding our ambassador in Benghazi, a place where we knew that there was an al-Qaida cell with arms? This is becoming more troubling by the day. They first blamed the YouTube video; now they're trying to blame the Romney-Ryan ticket for making this an issue. 
 
 And with respect to Iraq, we had the same position before the withdrawal, which was we agreed with the Obama administration: Let's have a Status of Forces Agreement to make sure that we secure our gains. The vice president was put in charge of those negotiations by President Obama, and they failed to get the agreement. We don't have a Status of Forces Agreement because they failed to get one. That's what we are talking about. 
 
 And when it comes to our veterans, we owe them a great debt of gratitude for what they've done for us, including your son Beau. But we also want to make sure that we don't lose the things we fought so hard to get. 
 
 And with respect to Afghanistan and the 2014 deadline, we agree with a 2014 transition. But what we also want to do is make sure that we're not projecting weakness abroad, and that's what's happening here. This Benghazi issue would be a tragedy in and of itself. But unfortunately it's indicative of a broader problem, and that is what we are watching on our TV screens is the unraveling of the Obama foreign policy, which is making the world more — more chaotic and us less safe. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: I just want to talk to you about right in the middle of the crisis. Governor Romney — and you're talking about this again tonight — talked about the weakness, talked about apologies from the Obama administration. Was that really appropriate right in the middle of the crisis? 
 
 REP. RYAN: On that same day, the Obama administration had the exact same position. Let's recall that they disavowed their own statement that they had put out earlier in the day in Cairo. 
 
 So we had the same position, but we will — it's never to early to speak out for our values. We should have spoken out right away when the Green Revolution was up and starting, when the mullahs in Iran were attacking their people. We should not have called Bashar Assad a reformer when he was turning his Russian-provided guns on his own people. We should always stand up for peace, for democracy, for individual rights, and we should not be imposing these devastating defense cuts, because what that does when we equivocate on our values, when we show that we're cutting our own defense -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Am I going to get to say anything here? 
 
 REP. RYAN: — it makes us more weak. It projects weakness, and when we look weak, our adversaries are much more willing to test us, they're more brazen in their attacks, and our allies are less willing to -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: With all due respect, that's a bunch of malarkey. In fact -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: And why is that so? 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Because not a single thing he said is accurate. First of all -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Be specific. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: I will be very specific. Number one, the — this lecture on embassy security — the congressman here cut embassy security in his budget by $300 million below what we asked for, number one. So much for the embassy security piece. 
 
 Number two, Governor Romney, before he knew the facts, before he even knew that our ambassador was killed, he was out making a political statement which was panned by the media around the world. And this talk about this — this weakness, I — I don't understand what my friend's talking about here. 
 
 We — this is a president who's gone out and done everything he has said he was going to do. This is the guy who's repaired our alliances so the rest of the world follows us again. This is the guy who brought the entire world, including Russia and China, to bring about the most devastating, most devastating — the most devastating efforts on Iran to make sure that they in fact stop with their — look, I — I — I just — I mean, these guys bet against America all the time. 
 
 REP. RYAN: I -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Can we talk about — let me go back to Libya. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Yeah, sure. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: What were you first told about the attack? Why were people talking about protests? When people in the consulate first saw armed men attacking with guns, there were no protesters. Why did that go on for weeks? 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Because that's exactly what we were told -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: By who? 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: — by the intelligence community. The intelligence community told us that. As they learned more facts about exactly what happened, they changed their assessment. That's why there's also an investigation headed by Tom Pickering, a leading diplomat in the — from the Reagan years, who is doing an investigation as to whether or not there were any lapses, what the lapses were, so that they will never happen again. But -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: And they wanted more security there. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Well, we weren't told they wanted more security again. We did not know they wanted more security again. And by the way, at the time we were told exactly — we said exactly what the intelligence community told us that they knew. That was the assessment. And as the intelligence community changed their view, we made it clear they changed their view. That's why I said, we will get to the bottom of this. 
 
 You know, usually when there's a crisis, we pull together. We pull together as a nation. But as I said, even before we knew what happened to the ambassador, the governor was holding a press conference — was holding a press conference. That's not presidential leadership. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Mr. Ryan, I want to ask you about — the Romney campaign talks a lot about no apologies. He has a book called No Apologies. Should the U.S. have apologized for Americans burning Qurans in Afghanistan? Should the U.S. apologize for U.S. Marines urinating on Taliban corpses? 
 
 REP. RYAN: Oh, gosh, yes. Urinating on Taliban corpses? What we should not apologize for -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Burning Qurans (immediately?)? 
 
 REP. RYAN: What — what we should not be apologizing for are standing up for our values. What we should not be doing is saying to the Egyptian people, while Mubarak is cracking down on them, that he's a good guy and then the next week say he ought to go. What we should not be doing is rejecting claims for — calls for more security in our barracks, in our Marine — we need Marines in Benghazi when the commander on the ground says we need more forces for security. 
 
 There were requests for extra security. Those requests were not honored. 
 
 Look, this was the anniversary of 9/11. It was Libya, a country we knew we had al-Qaida cells there. As we know, al-Qaida and its affiliates are on the rise in northern Africa. And we did not give our ambassador in Benghazi a Marine detachment? Of course there is an investigation so we can make sure that this never happens again. But when it comes to speaking up for our values, we should not apologize for those. 
 
 Here is the problem. Look at all the various issues out there and that's unraveling before our eyes. The vice president talks about sanctions on Iran. They got — we've had four -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Let's move to Iran. I'd actually like to move to Iran because there is really no bigger national security -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: Absolutely. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: — this country is facing. Both President Obama and Governor Romney have said they will prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, even if that means military action. Last week former Defense Secretary Bob Gates said a strike on Iran's facilities would not work and, quote, could prove catastrophic, haunting us for generations. Can the two of you be absolutely clear and specific to the American people how effective would a military strike be? Congressman Ryan. 
 
 REP. RYAN: We cannot allow Iran to gain a nuclear weapons capability. 
 
 Now, let's take a look at where we've gone — come from. When Barack Obama was elected, they had enough fissile material, nuclear material, to make one bomb. Now they have enough for five. They're racing toward a nuclear weapon. They're four years closer toward a nuclear weapons capability. We've had four different sanctions at the U.N. on Iran, three from the Bush administration, one here. And the only reason we got it is because Russia watered it down and prevented the — the sanctions from hitting the central bank. 
 
 Mitt Romney proposed these sanctions in 2007. In Congress, I've been fighting for these sanctions since 2009. The administration was blocking us every step of the way. 
 
 Only because we had strong bipartisan support for these tough sanctions were we able to overrule their objections and put them in spite of the administration. Imagine what would have happened if we had these sanctions in place earlier. You think Iran's not brazen? Look at what they're doing. They're stepping up their terrorist attacks. They tried a terrorist attack in the United States last year when they tried to blow up the Saudi ambassador at a restaurant in Washington, D.C. 
 
 And talk about credibility. When this administration says that all options are on the table, they send out senior administration officials that send all these mixed signals. 
 
 And so in order solve this peacefully, which is everybody's goal, you have to have the ayatollahs change their minds. Look at where they are. They're moving faster toward a nuclear weapon. It's because this administration has no credibility on this issue. It's because this administration watered down sanctions, delayed sanctions, tried to stop us from putting the tough sanctions in place. Now we have them in place because of Congress. They say the military option's on the table but it's not being viewed as credible, and the key is to do this peacefully, is to make sure that we have credibility. Under a Romney administration, we will have credibility on this issue. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Vice President Biden. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Incredible. (Chuckles.) 
 
 Look, imagine had we let the Republican Congress work out the sanctions. You think there's any possibility the entire world would have joined us, Russia and China, all of our allies? These are the most crippling sanctions in the history of sanctions, period, period. 
 
 When Governor Romney's asked about it, he said, we got to keep these sanctions. When they said, well, you're talking about doing more, what are you — are you — you're going to go to war? Is that you want to do now? 
 
 REP. RYAN: We want to prevent war! 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: (Inaudible) — and I — the interesting thing is, how they're going to prevent war. How are they going to prevent war if they say that there's nothing more that we — that they say we should do than what we've already done, number one? 
 
 And number two, with regard to the ability of the United States to take action militarily, it is — it is not in my purview to talk about classified information. 
 
 But we feel quite confident we could deal a serious blow to the Iranians. But number two, the Iranians are — the Israelis and the United States — our military and intelligence communities are absolutely the same exact place in terms of how close — how close the Iranians are to getting a nuclear weapon. They are a good way away. There is no difference between our view and theirs. 
 
 When my friend talks about fissile material, they have to take this highly enriched uranium, get it from 20 percent up. Then they have to be able to have something to put it in. There is no weapon that the Iranians have at this point. Both the Israelis and we know we'll know if they start the process of building a weapon. So all this bluster I keep hearing, all this loose talk — what are they talking about? Are you talking about to be more credible? What — what more can the president do? Stand before the United Nations, tell the whole world, directly communicate to the ayatollah: We will not let them acquire a nuclear weapon, period, unless he's talking about going to war. 
 
 REP. RYAN: Martha, let's just -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Congressman Ryan. 
 
 REP. RYAN: — let's look at this from the view of the ayatollahs. What do they see? They see this administration trying to water down sanctions in Congress for over two years. They're moving faster toward a nuclear weapon; they're spinning the centrifuges faster. They see us saying, when we come into the administration, when they're sworn in, we need more space with our ally Israel. They see President Obama in New York City the same day Bibi Netanyahu is, and he's — instead of meeting with him goes on a — on a daily talk show. They see — when we say that these options are on the table, the secretary of defense walked them back. They are not changing their mind. That's what we have to do, is change their mind so they stop pursuing nuclear weapons, and they're going faster. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: How will you do it so quickly? Look, you both saw Benjamin Netanyahu hold up that picture of a bomb with the red line and talking about the red line being in spring. 
 
 So can you solve this — if the Romney-Ryan ticket is elected, can you solve this in two months before spring and avoid nuclear -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: We — we can debate a timeline. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: (Inaudible.) 
 
 REP. RYAN: We can debate the timeline, whether there's — it's that short a time or longer. I — I agree that it's probably longer. Number two, it's all about credibility. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: You don't agree with that bomb and what the Israelis -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: No, look — (inaudible) -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: (Inaudible) — look, we — we both — (inaudible) -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Vice President Biden. 
 
 REP. RYAN: I don't want to go into classified stuff, but we both agree that to do this peacefully, you've got to get them to change their minds. They're not changing their minds, and look at what this administration does -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: But what do you do — (inaudible) -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Let me tell you what the ayatollah sees. 
 
 REP. RYAN: You have to have credibility. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: The ayatollah sees his economy being crippled. The ayatollah sees that there are 50 percent fewer exports of oil. He sees the currency going into the tank. He sees the economy going into free fall, and he sees the world for the first time totally united in opposition to him getting a nuclear weapon. 
 
 Now, with regard to Bibi, he's been my friend for 39 years. The president has met with Bibi a dozen times. He's spoken to Bibi Netanyahu as much as he's spoken to anybody. The idea that we're not — I was in a — just before he went to the U.N., I was in a conference call with the — with the president, with him talking to Bibi, for well over an hour in — in — in — in — in stark relief and detail about what was going on. This is a bunch of stuff. Look, here's the deal -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: What does that mean, "a bunch of stuff"? 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Well, it means it's simply inaccurate. 
 
 REP. RYAN: It's Irish. (Chuckles.) 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: It is. (Laughter.) We Irish call it malarkey. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Thanks for the translation. OK. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: No, we Irish call it malarkey. (Laughter.) But last thing: the secretary of defense has made it absolutely clear. He didn't walk anything back. We will not allow the Iranians to get a nuclear weapon. What Bibi held up there was when they get to the point where they can enrich uranium enough to put into a weapon, they don't have a weapon to put it into. 
 
 Let's all calm down a little bit here. Iran is more isolated today than when we took office. It was on the ascendancy when we took office. It is totally isolated. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Congressman Ryan -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: I don't know what world you guys are in. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Congressman Ryan -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: Thank — thank heavens we have these sanctions in place. It's in spite of their opposition. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: (Chuckles.) Oh, God. 
 
 REP. RYAN: They have given 20 waivers to this sanction. And all I have to point to are the results. They're four years closer toward a nuclear weapon. I think that case speaks for itself. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Can you tell the American people what's worse -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: By the way, they're — no, no, they are not four years closer to a nuclear weapon. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: — another war in the Middle East or -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: They're — they're closer to being able to get enough fissile material to put in a weapon if they had a weapon. But -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: You're acting a little bit like they don't want one, though. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Oh, I didn't say — no, I'm not saying — (look?), facts matter, Martha. You're a foreign policy expert. Facts matter. All this loose talk about them — all they have to do is get to — enrich uranium in a certain amount and they have a weapon — not true. Not true. They are more — and if we ever have to take action, unlike where we took office, we will have the world behind us, and that matters. That matters. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: What about Bob Gates' statement? Let me read that again: "Could prove catastrophic, haunting us for generations." 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: He is right. It could prove catastrophic if we do — we do it with — (inaudible) -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Congressman Ryan? 
 
 REP. RYAN: And what it does is it — and it undermines our credibility by backing up the point when we make it that all options are on the table. That's the point. The ayatollahs see these kinds of statements, and they think, I'm going to get a nuclear weapon. When — when we see the kind of equivocation that took place because this administration wanted a precondition policy — so when the Green Revolution started up, they were silent for nine days. When they see us putting — when they see us putting daylight between ourselves and our allies in Israel, that gives them encouragement. When they see Russia watering down any further sanctions — and the only reason we got a U.N. sanction is because Russia watered it down and prevented these — (there ?) from being sanctions in the first place. 
 
 So when they see this kind of activity, they are encouraged to continue, and that's the problem. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Martha, let me tell you what Russia's — (inaudible) -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: What — let me ask you what's worse: war in the Middle East, another war in the Middle East, or a nuclear-armed Iran? 
 
 REP. RYAN: I'll tell you what's worse. I'll tell you what's worse. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Quickly. 
 
 REP. RYAN: A nuclear-armed Iran, which triggers a nuclear arms race in the Middle East. This is the world's largest sponsor of — of terrorism. They've dedicated themselves -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: That's the only thing my -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: — to wiping an entire country off the map. They call us the Great Satan. And if they get nuclear weapons, other people in the neighborhood will pursue their nuclear weapons as well. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Vice President Biden. 
 
 REP. RYAN: We can't live with that. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: War should always be the absolute last resort. That's why these crippling sanctions, what Bibi Netanyahu says we should continue — which, if I'm not mistaken, Governor Romney says we — we should continue. If I — I may be mistaken; he changes his mind so often, I could be wrong. But the fact of the matter is, he says they're working. And the fact is that they are being crippled by them. And we've made it clear, big nations can't bluff. This president doesn't bluff. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Gentlemen, I want to bring the conversation to a different kind of national security issue, the state of our economy. The number one issue here at home is jobs. The percentage of unemployed just fell below 8 percent for the first time in 43 months. The Obama administration had projected that it would fall below 6 percent now after the addition of close to a trillion dollars in stimulus money. So will both of you level with the American people? Can you get unemployment to under 6 percent, and how long will it take? 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: I don't know how long it will take. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Vice President Biden. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: We can and we will get it under 6 percent. 
 
 Let's look at the — let's take a look at the facts. Let's look at where we were when we came to office. The economy was in free fall. We had — the Great Recession hit. Nine million people lost their job, 1.7 — $1.6 trillion in wealth lost in equity in your homes, in retirement accounts from the middle class. 
 
 We knew we had to act for the middle class. We immediately went out and rescued General Motors. We went ahead and made sure that we cut taxes for the middle class. And in addition to that, when that — and when that occurred, what did Romney do? Romney said, no, let Detroit go bankrupt. We moved in and helped people refinance their homes. Governor Romney said, no, let foreclosures hit the bottom. 
 
 But it shouldn't be surprising for a guy who says 47 percent of the American people are unwilling to take responsibility for their own lives. My friend recently, in a speech in Washington, said 30% of the American people are takers. These people are my mom and dad, the people I grew up with, my neighbors. They pay more effective tax than Governor Romney pays in his federal income tax. They are elderly people who in fact are living off of Social Security. They are veterans and people fighting in Afghanistan right now who are, quote, not paying any taxes. 
 
 I've had it up to here with this notion that 47 percent — it's about time they take some responsibility here. And instead of signing pledges to Grover Norquist not to ask the wealthiest among us to contribute to bring back the middle class, they should be signing a pledge saying to the middle class, we're going to level the playing field. We're going to give you a fair shot again. We are going to not repeat the mistakes we made in the past by having a different set of rules for Wall Street and Main Street, making sure that we continue to hemorrhage these tax cuts for the superwealthy. 
 
 They're pushing the continuation of a tax cut that will give an additional $500 billion in tax cuts to 120,000 families. And they're holding hostage the middle-class tax cut because they say, we won't pass — we won't continue the middle-class tax cut unless you give the tax cut for the superwealthy. It's about time they take some responsibility. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Mr. Ryan. 
 
 REP. RYAN: Joe and I are from similar towns. 
 
 He's from Scranton, Pennsylvania. I'm from Janesville, Wisconsin. You know what the unemployment rate in Scranton is today? 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: I sure do. 
 
 REP. RYAN: It's 10 percent. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Yeah. 
 
 REP. RYAN: You know what it was the day you guys came in? 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: No. 
 
 REP. RYAN: Eight-point-five percent. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Yeah. 
 
 REP. RYAN: That's how it's going all around America. 
 
 Look -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: You don't read the statistics. That's not "how it's going." It's going down. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: (Inaudible) — two-minute answer, please. 
 
 REP. RYAN: Look — (chuckles) — did they come in and inherit a tough situation? Absolutely. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: (Chuckles.) 
 
 REP. RYAN: But we're going in the wrong direction! Look at where we are. The economy is barely limping along. It's growing at 1.3 percent. That's slower than it grew last year, and last year was slower than the year before. Job growth in September was slower than it was in August, and August was slower than it was in July. We're heading in the wrong direction. 
 
 Twenty-three million Americans are struggling for work today. Fifteen percent of Americans are living in poverty today. This is not what a real recovery looks like. We need real reforms for a real recovery, and that's exactly what Mitt Romney and I are proposing. It's five-point plan. Get America energy-independent in North America by the end of the decade. Help people who are hurting get the skills they need to get the jobs they want. Get this deficit and debt under control to prevent a debt crisis. Make trade work for America so we can make more things in America and sell them overseas and champion small businesses. Don't raise taxes on small businesses, because they're our job creators. 
 
 He talks about Detroit. Mitt Romney's a car guy. They keep misquoting him, but let me tell you about the Mitt Romney I know. This is a guy who — I was talking to a family in Northborough, Massachusetts the other day, Cheryl and Mark Nixon (sp). Their kids were hit in a car crash, four of them — two of them, Rob (sp) and Reid (sp), were paralyzed. The Romneys didn't know them. They went to the same church. They never met before. 
 
 Mitt asked if he could come over on Christmas. He brought his boys, his wife and gifts. Later on he said, I know you're struggling, Mark (sp). Don't worry about their college; I'll pay for it. 
 
 When Mark (sp) told me this story — because you know what, Mitt Romney doesn't tell these stories. 
 
 The Nixons told this story. When he told me this story, he said it wasn't the help — the cash help; it's that he gave his time, and he has consistently. This is a man who gave 30 percent of his income to charity, more than the two of us combined. Mitt Romney's a good man. He cares about a hundred percent of Americans in this country. 
 
 And with respect to that quote, I think the vice president very well knows that sometimes the words don't come out of your mouth the right way. (Laughter.) 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: But I always say what I mean. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: You -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: And so does Romney. 
 
 REP. RYAN: We want everybody to succeed. We want to get people out of poverty, in the middle class, on to lives of self-sufficiency. We believe in opportunity and upward mobility. That's what we're going to push for in a Romney administration. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Vice President? 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Look -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: I have a feeling you have a few things to say here. (Laughter.) 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: (Chuckles.) The idea, if you heard that — that little soliloquy on 47 percent, and you think he just made a mistake, then I think you're — I — I — I — I — I got a bridge to sell you. 
 
 Look, I don't doubt his personal generosity, and I understand what it's like. When I was a little younger than the congressman, my wife was in an accident, killed my daughter and my wife, and my two sons survived. I have sat in the homes of many people who've gone through what I get through because the one thing you can give people solace is to know they know you've been through it, that they can make it. So I don't doubt his personal commitment to individuals. 
 
 But you know what, I know he had no commitment to the automobile industry. He just let — he said, let it go bankrupt, period, let it drop out. All this talk — we saved a million jobs. Two hundred thousand people are working today. And I have never met two guys who are more down on America across the board. We're told everything is going bad. We have 5.2 million new jobs, private sector jobs. We need more, but 5.2 million — if they'd get out of the way, if they get out of the way and let us pass the tax cut for the middle class, make it permanent, if they get out of the way and pass the — pass the jobs bill, if they get out of the way and let us allow 14 million people who are struggling to stay in their homes because their mortgages are upside-down, but they never missed a mortgage payment — just get out of the way. 
 
 Stop talking about how you care about people. Show me something. Show me a policy. Show me a policy where you take responsibility. 
 
 And by the way, they talk about this Great Recession if it fell out of the sky, like, oh my goodness, where did it come from? It came from this man voting to put two wars in a credit card, to at the same time put a prescription drug benefit on the credit card, a trillion- dollar tax cut for a — very wealthy. I was there. I voted against him. I said, no, we can't afford that. And now all of a sudden these guys are so seized with a concern about the debt that they created -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Congressman Ryan. 
 
 REP. RYAN: Let's not forget that they came in with one-party control. When Barack Obama was elected, his party controlled everything. They had the ability to do everything of their choosing, and look at where we are right now. They passed a stimulus, the idea that we could borrow $831 billion, spend it on all these special interest groups and that it would work out just fine, that unemployment would never get to 8 percent. It went up above 8 percent for 43 months. They said that right now, if we just pass this stimulus, the economy would grow at 4 percent. It's growing at 1.3 (percent). 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: When could you get it below 6 percent? 
 
 REP. RYAN: That's what our entire premise of our pro-growth plan for a stronger middle class is all about: getting the economy growing at 4 percent, creating 12 million jobs over the next four years. Look at just the $90 billion in stimulus, and — and the vice president was in charge of overseeing this, $90 billion in green pork to campaign contributors and special interest groups. There are just at the Department of Energy over 100 criminal investigations that have been launched into just how -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Martha -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: — stimulus — (inaudible) — are being spent -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Go ahead. 
 
 Go ahead, Vice -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Martha, look. His colleague runs an investigative committee -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: Crony capitalism — (inaudible). 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: — spent months and months and months going into this -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: This is the — this is the inspector general. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: — months and months. They found no evidence of cronyism. And I love my friend here. I — I'm not allowed to show letters, but go on our website: He sent me two letters saying, by the way, can you send me some stimulus money for companies here in the state of Wisconsin? We sent millions of dollars. You know why he said he needed -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: You did ask for stimulus money, correct? 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Sure he did. By the way — (inaudible) -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: On two occasions, we — we — we advocated for constituents who were applying for grants. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: (Chuckles.) 
 
 REP. RYAN: That's what we do. We do that for all constituents who are — (inaudible) — for grants. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: I love that. I love that. This is such a bad program, and he writes me a letter saying — writes the Department of Energy a letter saying, the reason we need this stimulus — it will create growth and jobs. He — his words. And now he's sitting here looking at me — and by the way, that program — again, investigated — what the Congress said was, it was a model: less than four-tenths of 1 percent waste or fraud in the program. And all this talk about cronyism — they investigated, investigated; did not find one single piece of evidence. I wish he would just tell — be a little more candid. 
 
 REP. RYAN: Was it a good idea to spend taxpayer dollars on electric cars in Finland or on windmills in China? 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Look -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: Was it a good idea to borrow all this money from countries like China -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: (Chuckles.) 
 
 REP. RYAN: — and spend it on all these various different interest groups? 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Let me tell you it was a good idea. It was a good idea — Moody's and others said that this was exactly what we needed that stopped us from going off the cliff. It set the conditions to be able to grow again. We have — in fact, 4 percent of those green jobs didn't go under — or went — went — went under — didn't work. It's a better batting average than investment bankers have. They have about a 40 percent — (inaudible) — loss. 
 
 REP. RYAN: Where are the 5 million green jobs that were being promised -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: I want to move on here to Medicare and entitlements. I think we've gone over this quite enough. And both -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: And by the way, any letter you send me I'll entertain. 
 
 REP. RYAN: I appreciate that, Joe. (Laughter.) 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Let's talk about Medicare and entitlements. 
 
 Both Medicare and Social Security are going broke and taking a larger share of the budget in the process. Will benefits for Americans under these programs have to change for the programs to survive, Mr. Ryan? 
 
 REP. RYAN: Absolutely. Medicare and Social Security are going bankrupt. These are indisputable facts. 
 
 Look, when I look at these programs, we've all had tragedies in our lives. I think about what they've done for my own family. My mom and I had my grandmother move in with us who was facing Alzheimer's. Medicare was there for her, just like it's there for my mom right now who's a Florida senior. After my dad died, my mom and I got Social Security survivors benefits. Helped me pay for college. It helped her go back to college in her 50s, where she started a small business because of the new skills she got. She paid all of her taxes on the promise that these programs would be there for her. We will honor this promise. 
 
 And the best way to do it is reform it for my generation. You see, if you reform these programs for my generation, people 54 and below, you can guarantee they don't change for people in or near retirement, which is precisely what Mitt Romney and I are proposing. 
 
 Look at what — look what "Obamacare" does. "Obamacare" takes $716 billion from Medicare to spend on "Obamacare." Even their own chief actuary at Medicare backs this up. He says you can't spend the same dollar twice. You can't claim that this money goes to Medicare and "Obamacare." 
 
 And then they put this new "Obamacare" board in charge of cutting Medicare each and every year in ways that will lead to denied care for current seniors. This board, by the way, it's 15 people. The president's supposed to appoint them next year. And not one of them even has to have medical training. 
 
 And Social Security, if we don't shore up Social Security, when we run out of the IOUs, when the program goes bankrupt, a 25 percent across-the-board benefit cut kicks in on current seniors in the middle of their retirement. We're going to stop that from happening. 
 
 They haven't put a credible solution on the table. He'll tell you about vouchers. He'll say all these things to try and scare people. 
 
 Here's what we're saying: Give younger people, when they become Medicare-eligible, guaranteed coverage options that you can't be denied, including traditional Medicare. 
 
 Choose your plan, and then Medicare subsidizes your premiums, not as much for the wealthy people, more coverage for middle-income people and total out-of-pocket coverage for the poor and the sick. Choice and competition — we would rather have 50 million future seniors determine how their Medicare is delivered to them instead of 15 bureaucrats deciding what — if, where, when they get it. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Vice President Biden, two minutes. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: You know, I heard that death panel argument from Sarah Palin. It seems that every vice presidential debate, I hear this kind of stuff about panels. But let's talk about Medicare. 
 
 What we did is we saved $716 billion and put it back — applied it to Medicare. We cut the cost of Medicare. We stopped overpaying insurance companies when doctors and hospitals — the AMA supported what we did. AARP endorsed what we did. And it extends the life of Medicare to 2024. They want to wipe this all out. It also gave more benefits. Any senior out there, ask yourself: Do you have more benefits today? You do. If you're near the doughnut hole, you have $600 more to help your prescription drug costs. You get wellness visits without copays. They wipe all of this out, and Medicare goes — becomes insolvent in 2016, number one. 
 
 Number two, guaranteed benefit — it's a voucher. When they first proposed — when the congressman had his first voucher program, the CBO said it would cost $6,400 a year, Martha, more for every senior 55 and below when they got there. He knew that, yet he got it — all the guys in Congress, and women in the Republican party to vote for it. Governor Romney, knowing that, said, I — I — I would sign it were I there. Who you believe, the AMA? Me? A guy who's fought his whole life for this? Or somebody who had actually put in motion a plan that knowingly cut — added $6,400 a year more to the cost of Medicare? 
 
 Now they got a new plan. Trust me, it's not going to cost you any more. Folks, follow your instincts on this one. 
 
 And with regard to Social Security, we will not — we will not privatize it. If we had listened to Romney, to Governor Romney and the congressman during the Bush years, imagine where all those seniors would be now if their money had been in the market. Their ideas are old, and their ideas are bad, and they eliminate the guarantee of Medicare. 
 
 REP. RYAN: Here's the problem. They got caught with their hands in the cookie jar turning Medicare into a piggy bank for "Obamacare". Their own actuary from the administration came to Congress and said one out of six hospitals and nursing homes are going to go out of business as a result of this. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: That's not what they said. 
 
 REP. RYAN: Seven point four million seniors are projected to lose the current Medicare Advantage coverage they have. That's a $3,200 benefit cut. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: That didn't happen. 
 
 REP. RYAN: What we're saying -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: More people signed up. 
 
 REP. RYAN: These are from your own actuaries. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: More — more — more people signed up for Medicare Advantage after the change. 
 
 REP. RYAN: What — what they're -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: No — nobody is getting shut down. 
 
 REP. RYAN: Mr. Vice President, I know -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: No — no — (inaudible) -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: Mr. Vice President, I know you're under a lot of duress — (laughter) — to make up for lost ground — (laughter) — but I think people would be better served if we don't keep interrupting each other. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Well, don't take all the four minutes, then. 
 
 REP. RYAN: Now let me just — let me say this. We are not — we are saying, don't change benefits for people 55 and above. They already organized their retirement around these promises. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: They already are -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: But you want to — (inaudible) — these programs for those of us -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Let me ask you this: what is your specific plan for seniors who really can't afford to make up the difference in the value of what you call a premium support plan and others call a voucher? 
 
 REP. RYAN: A hundred percent coverage for them. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: And what -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: That's what we're saying. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: — what cost -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: So we're saying income-adjust -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: How do you make that up? 
 
 REP. RYAN: — these premium support payments by taking down the subsidies for wealthy people. Look, this is a plan — by the way, that $6,400 number, it was misleading then. It's totally inaccurate now. This is a plan that's bipartisan. It's a plan I put together with a prominent Democrat senator from Oregon. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: There's not one Democrat who endorsed his -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: It's a plan -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: — not one Democrat who signed his plan. 
 
 REP. RYAN: Our partner is a Democrat from Oregon. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: And he said he does no longer support (you for that ?). 
 
 REP. RYAN: We — we put it — we put it together with the former Clinton budget director. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Who disavows it. (Chuckles.) 
 
 REP. RYAN: This idea — this idea came from the Clinton commission to save Medicare, chaired by Senator John Breaux. Here's the point, Martha. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Which was rejected. 
 
 REP. RYAN: If we don't — if we don't fix this problem pretty soon, then current seniors get cut! Here's the problem. Ten thousand people are retiring every single day in America today, and they will for 20 years. That's not a political thing. That's a math thing. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Martha, if we just did one thing, if we just — if they allow Medicare to bargain for the cost of drugs like Medicaid can, that would save $156 billion right off the bat. 
 
 REP. RYAN: And it would deny seniors choices. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: All — all — all -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: It — it has restricted (formula ?) -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Seniors are not denied. 
 
 REP. RYAN: Absolutely. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Sorry, they are not denied. 
 
 Look, folks, and all you seniors out there, have you been denied choices? Have you lost Medicare Advantage or, if you have signed up -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: Because it's working well right now. 
 
 VICE RESIDENT BIDEN: Because we changed the law! 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Vice President Biden, let me ask you, if it could help solve the problem, why not very slowly raise the Medicare eligibility age by two years, as Congressman Ryan suggests? 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Look, I was there when we did that with Social Security, in 1983. I was one of eight people sitting in the room that included Tip O'Neill negotiating with President Reagan. We all got together, and everybody said, as long as everybody's in the deal, everybody's in the deal, and everybody is making some sacrifice, we can find a way. We made the system solvent to 2033. 
 
 We will not, though, be part of any voucher plan eliminating — the voucher says, Mom, when you're — when you're 65, go out there, shop for the best insurance you can get; you're out of Medicare. You can buy back in, if you want, with this voucher, which will not keep pace — will not keep pace with health care costs, because if it did keep pace with health care costs, there would be no savings. That's why they go the voucher — they — we will be no part of a voucher program or the privatization of Social Security. 
 
 REP. RYAN: A voucher is you go to your mailbox, get a check and buy something. Nobody's proposing that. Barack Obama, four years ago, running for president, said if you don't have any fresh ideas, use stale tactics to scare voters. If you don't have a good record to run on, paint your opponent as someone people should run from. Make a big election about small ideas. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: You were one of the few lawmakers to stand with President Bush when he was seeking to partially privatize Social Security. 
 
 REP. RYAN: For younger people. What we said then and what I've always agreed is let younger Americans have a voluntary choice of making their money work faster for them within the Social Security system. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: You saw how well that worked. 
 
 REP. RYAN: That's not what Mitt Romney's proposing. What we're saying is no changes for anybody 55 and above. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: What Mitt Romney is proposing -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: And then the kinds of the changes we're talking about for younger people like myself is don't increase the benefits for wealthy people as fast as everybody else -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Martha -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: — slowly raise the retirement age over time. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Martha -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: It wouldn't get to the age of 70 until the year 2103, according to the actuaries. 
 
 Now, here's the issue. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Quickly, Vice President. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Quickly, the bottom line here is that all the studies show that if we went with Social Security proposal made by Mitt Romney, if you're 40 — in your 40s now, you will pay $2,600 a year — you get $2,600 a year less in Social Security. If you're in your 20s now, you get $4,700 a year less. The idea of changing — and change being, in this case, to cut the benefits for people without taking other action you could do to make it work — is absolutely the wrong way. 
 
 These — look, these guys haven't been big on Medicare from the beginning. Their party's not been big on Medicare from the beginning. And they've always been about Social Security as little as you can do. Look, folks, use your common sense. Who do you trust on this? A man who introduced a bill that would raise it $6,400 a year, knowing it and passing it, and Romney saying he'd sign it? Or me and the president? 
 
 REP. RYAN: That statistic was completely misleading. But more importantly -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: That's — there are the facts, right? 
 
 REP. RYAN: — this is — this is what politicians do when they don't have a record to run on: try to scare people from voting for you. If you don't get ahead of this problem, it's going to — (inaudible) -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Medicare beneficiaries have more benefits now — (inaudible) -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: We are not going to run away — we are not going to run away -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: OK. We're going to — we're going to move on to a very simple question to you both. 
 
 REP. RYAN: Medicare and Social Security did so much for my own family. We are not going to jeopardize this program, but we have to save it for the next generation so it doesn't go bankrupt. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: You are jeopardizing the program. You're changing the program from a guaranteed benefit to a premium support. Whatever you call it, the bottom line is people are going to have to pay more money out of their pocket. 
 
 REP. RYAN: The wealthy would. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: And the families I know and the families I come from — they don't have the money to pay more out of — (inaudible). 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Gentlemen, gentlemen -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: That's why we're saying more for lower-income people and less for higher-income people. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: I would like to move on to a very simple question for both of you. And something tells me -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: (Chuckles.) 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: — I won't get a very simple answer. But let me ask you this. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: I gave you a simple answer: He's raising the cost of Medicare. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: OK, on to taxes. If your ticket is elected, who will pay more in taxes? Who will pay less? And we're starting with Vice President Biden for two minutes. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: The middle class will pay less, and people making a million dollars or more will begin to contribute slightly more. Let me give you one concrete example: the continuation of the Bush tax cuts. We're arguing that the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy should be allowed to expire. Of the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, 800 million — billion dollars of that goes to people making a minimum of a million dollars. We see no justification in these economic times for those — and they're patriotic Americans. They're — they're not asking for this continued tax cut; they're not suggesting it; but my friends are insisting on it. A hundred and twenty thousand families, by continuing that tax cut, will get an additional $500 billion in tax relief in the next 10 years, and their income is an average of $8 million. 
 
 We want to extend permanently the middle-class tax cut for — permanently from the Bush middle-class tax cut. These guys won't allow us to. 
 
 You what we're saying? We say let's have a vote. Let's have a vote on the middle-class tax cut, and let's have a vote on the upper tax cut. Let's go ahead and vote on it. They're saying no. They're holding hostage the middle-class tax cut to the super wealthy. 
 
 And on top of that, they got another tax cut coming that's $5 trillion that all of the studies point out will, in fact, give another $250 million dollar — yeah, $250,000 a year to those 120,000 families and raise taxes for people who are middle-income with a child by $2,000 a year. This is unconscionable. There is no need for this. The middle class got knocked on their heels. The Great Recession crushed them. They need some help now. The last people who need help are 120,000 families for another — another $500 billion tax cut over the next 10 years. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Congressman. 
 
 REP. RYAN: Our entire premise of these tax reform plans is to grow the economy and create jobs. It's a plan that's estimated to create 7 million jobs. 
 
 Now, we think that government taking 28 percent of a family and business' income is enough. President Obama thinks that the government ought to be able to take as much as 44.8 percent of a small business' income. 
 
 Look, if you taxed every person in successful small business making over $250,000 at a hundred percent, it'd only run the government for 98 days. If everybody who paid income taxes last year, including successful small businesses, doubled their income taxes this year, we'd still have a $300 billion deficit. 
 
 You see, there aren't enough rich people and small businesses to tax to pay for all their spending. And so the next time you hear them say, don't worry about it, we'll get a few wealthy people to pay their fair share, watch out, middle class. The tax bill is coming to you. 
 
 That's why we're saying we need fundamental tax reform. 
 
 Let's take a look at it this way: 8-out-of-10 businesses, they file their taxes as individuals, not as corporations. And where I come from, overseas, which is Lake Superior — (chuckles) — the Canadians — they drop their tax rates to 15 percent. The average tax rate on businesses in the industrialized world is 25 percent, and the president wants the top effective tax rate on successful small businesses to go above 40 percent. Two-thirds of our jobs come from small businesses. This one tax would actually tax about 53 percent of small-business income. It's expected that'd cost us 710,000 jobs. And you know what? It doesn't even pay for 10 percent of their proposed deficit spending increases. 
 
 What we are saying is lower tax rates across the board and close loopholes, primarily to the higher-income people. We have three bottom lines: Don't raise the deficit, don't raise taxes on the middle class and don't lower the share of income that is borne by the high-income earners. He — he'll keep saying this $5 trillion plan, I suppose -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: (Chuckles.) 
 
 REP. RYAN: — it's been discredited by six other studies, and even their own deputy campaign manager acknowledged that it wasn't correct. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Well, let's talk about this 20 percent. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Well — (chuckles) -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: You have refused yet again to offer specifics on how you pay for that 20 percent across-the-board tax cut. Do you actually have the specifics, or are you still working on it, and that's why you won't tell voters? 
 
 REP. RYAN: Different than this administration, we actually want to have big bipartisan agreements. You see, I understand the -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Do you have the specifics? Do you have the math? Do you know exactly what you're doing? 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: That'll be — that'd be a first for the Republican Congress. 
 
 REP. RYAN: Look — look at what Mitt — look at what Ronald Reagan and Tip O'Neill did. They worked together out of a framework to lower tax rates and broaden the base, and they worked together to fix that. What we're saying is here's our framework: Lower tax rates 20 percent — we raise about $1.2 trillion through income taxes. We forgo about 1.1 trillion (dollars) in loopholes and deductions. And so what we're saying is deny those loopholes and deductions to higher- income taxpayers so that more of their income is taxed, which has a broader base of taxation -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Can I translate? 
 
 REP. RYAN: — so we can lower tax rates across the board. 
 
 Now, here's why I'm saying this. What we're saying is here's a framework -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: I hope I'm going to get time to respond to this. 
 
 REP. RYAN: We want to work with Congress -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: I — you'll get time. 
 
 REP. RYAN: We want to work with Congress on how best to achieve this. That means successful — look -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: No specifics, yeah. 
 
 REP. RYAN: Mitt — what we're saying is — (laughter) — lower tax rates 20 percent, start with the wealthy, work with Congress to do it -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: And you guarantee this math will add up. 
 
 REP. RYAN: Absolutely. Six studies have guaranteed — six studies have verified that this math adds up, but here's the other point -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Vice President Biden -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Look -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: (Inaudible) — one point — (inaudible) -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Vice President Biden. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Let me translate. Let me have a chance to translate. 
 
 REP. RYAN: I'll come back in a second then, right? 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: First of all, I was there when Ronald Reagan tax breaks — I mean, he gave specifics of what he was going to cut, no — number one, in terms of tax expenditures. 
 
 Number two, 97 percent of the small businesses of America pay less — make less than $250,000. Let me tell you who some of those other small businesses are: hedge funds that make 6(00 million dollars), $800 million a year. That — that's what they count as small business because they're passthrough. 
 
 Let's look at how sincere they are. Ronald — I mean, excuse me, Governor Romney, on "60 Minutes," I guess it's about 10 days ago, was asked, Governor, you pay 14 percent on $20 million. Someone making $50,000 pays more than that. Do you think that's fair? He said, oh, yes, that's fair; that's fair. 
 
 This is — and they're going to talk — I mean, you think these guys are going to go out there and cut those loopholes? The loophole — the biggest loophole they take advantage of is the carried interest loophole and — and capital gains loophole. They exempt that. 
 
 Now, there's not enough — the reason why the AEI study, the American Enterprise Institute study, the Tax Policy Center study, the reason they all say it's going to — taxes will go up on the middle class, the only way you can find $5 trillion in loopholes is cut the mortgage deduction for middle-class people, cut the health care deduction for middle-class people, take away their ability to get a tax break to send their kids to college. That's why they — (inaudible) -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Is he wrong about that? 
 
 REP. RYAN: He is wrong about that. There are — you can -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: How's that? 
 
 REP. RYAN: You can cut tax rates by 20 percent and still preserve these important preferences for middle-class taxpayers -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Not mathematically possible. 
 
 REP. RYAN: It is mathematically possible. It's been done before. It's precisely what we're proposing. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: (Chuckles.) It has never been done before. 
 
 REP. RYAN: It's been done a couple of times, actually. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: It has never been done before. 
 
 REP. RYAN: Jack Kennedy lowered tax rates, increased growth. Ronald Reagan -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Oh, now you're Jack Kennedy. 
 
 REP. RYAN: Ronald Reagan — (laughter) — (chuckles) — Republicans and Democrats -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: This is amazing. 
 
 REP. RYAN: Republicans and Democrats have worked together on this. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: That's right. 
 
 REP. RYAN: I understand aren't used to doing bipartisan deals. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: But we told each other what we were going to do. When we did with Reagan, he said -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: Republicans and Democrats -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: — here — here are the things we're going to cut. This is what he said. 
 
 REP. RYAN: We can agree on a framework; let's work together to fill in the details. That's exactly -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Fill in the details. 
 
 REP. RYAN: That's how you get things done. You work with Congress -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: (Seriously ?). 
 
 REP. RYAN: Look, let me say it this way. Mitt Romney was governor -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: That's coming from the Republican Congress working bipartisanly? 
 
 REP. RYAN: Mitt — Mitt Romney -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Seven percent rating? Come on. 
 
 REP. RYAN: Mitt Romney was governor of Massachusetts, where 87 percent of the legislators he served with were Democrats. He didn't demonize them. He didn't demagogue them. He met with those party leaders every week. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: (Chuckles.) 
 
 REP. RYAN: He reached across the aisle. He didn't compromise principles. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: And you (saw what happened ?). 
 
 REP. RYAN: He found common ground, and he balanced the budget. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: (You saw what ?) — if he did such a great job — if he did such a great job in Massachusetts -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Vice President, what -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: He balanced the budget four times. He balanced the budget four times without raising taxes. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: — why isn't he even contesting Massachusetts? 
 
 REP. RYAN: (Inaudible.) 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Vice President, what would you suggest — what would you suggest beyond raising taxes on the wealthy that would substantially reduce the long-term deficit? 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Not — just let the taxes expire like they're supposed to on those millionaires. We don't — we can't afford $800 billion going to people making a minimum a million dollars. They do not need it, Martha. Those 120,000 families make $8 million a year. Middle-class people need the help. Why does my friend cut out the tuition tax credit for them? Why does he go out after the child — (inaudible)? 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Can you declare anything off-limits -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Why do they do that? 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Can you declare anything off limits? Home mortgages deductions -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: Yeah. We're saying close loopholes on high-interest people-- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Home mortgage deductions -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: — for higher-income people. Here -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Can you guarantee that no one -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: This taxes -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: — making less than $100,000 will have a mortgage -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: This -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: — their mortgage deduction impacted? Guarantee? 
 
 REP. RYAN: This taxes a million small businesses. 
 
 He keeps trying to make you think that it's just some movie star or hedge fund guy or an actor-- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Ninety-seven percent of the small businesses make less than $250,000 a year -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: Joe -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: — would not be affected. 
 
 REP. RYAN: — you know, it hits a million — this taxes a million people, a million small businesses -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Doesn't tax 97 percent of the American businesses — small businesses -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: It — it taxes a million small businesses, who are our great job creators. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: I wish I'd get it — the greatest job creators are the hedge fund guys. 
 
 REP. RYAN: (Let's end ?) -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: And you're going — and you're going to increase the defense budget. 
 
 REP. RYAN: Think about it this way. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: And you're going to increase the defense budget. 
 
 REP. RYAN: No, we're just not going to cut the defense budget like they're — they're proposing -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: They're going to increase it $2 billion — $2 trillion. 
 
 REP. RYAN: That's not accurate. We're talking about preventing -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: More than that. No — so no massive defense increase? 
 
 REP. RYAN: No, we're saying is, don't — OK, you want to get into defense now? 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Let — yes, I do. I do -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: All right. So -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: — because that's another math question. 
 
 REP. RYAN: Right. OK. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: How do you do that? 
 
 REP. RYAN: So they proposed a $478 (sic) billion cut to defense to begin with. Now we have another $500 billion cut to defense that's lurking on the horizon. They insisted upon that cut being involved in the debt negotiations -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Let -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: — and now we have a $1 trillion cut -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Let's put the automatic defense cuts aside. OK? 
 
 REP. RYAN: Right. OK. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Let's put those aside. No one wants that. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: I'd like to go back to that. 
 
 REP. RYAN: OK. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: But I want to know how you do the math and have this increase in defense spending? 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Two trillion dollars. 
 
 REP. RYAN: You don't cut defense by a trillion dollars. That's what we're talking about. The additional trillion -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: And what national security issues justify an increase? 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Who's cutting it by a trillion? 
 
 REP. RYAN: We're going to cut 80,000 soldiers, 20,000 Marines, 120 cargo planes. We're going to push the Joint Strike Fighter out. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Drawing down in one war -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: We're cutting missile defense. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: — and one war — (inaudible ) -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: If these cuts go through, our Navy will be the small it is — it — the smallest it has been since before World War I. This invites weakness. 
 
 Look, do we believe in peace through strength? You bet we do. And that means you don't impose these devastating cuts on our military. So we're saying don't cut the military by a trillion dollars, not increase it by a trillion, don't cut it by a trillion dollars. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Quickly, Vice President Biden, on this, and I want to move on. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Look, we don't cut it. And I might add this so-called — I know we don't want to use the fancy word "sequester," this automatic cut — that was part of a debt deal that they asked for. 
 
 And let me tell you what my friend said at a press conference announcing his support of the deal. He said — and I'm — we've been looking for this moment for a long time. (Inaudible) -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: Can I tell you what that meant? 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Why -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: We've been looking for bipartisanship for a long time. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: And so the bipartisanship is what he voted for: the automatic cuts in defense if they didn't act. And beyond that, they asked for another — look, the military says, we need a smaller, leaner Army. We need more special forces. We need — we don't need more M1 tanks. What we need is more UADs. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Some of the military — I know that's — (inaudible) -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Not some of the military; that was the decision of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, recommended to us and agreed to by the president. That's a fact. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Who answers to the civilian leaders. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: They made the recommendation first. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: OK. Let's move on to Afghanistan. 
 
 REP. RYAN: Can I get into that for a second? 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: I'd like to move on to Afghanistan, please. 
 
 REP. RYAN: OK. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: And that's one of the biggest expenditures this country has made, in dollars and, more importantly, in lives. We just passed the sad milestone of losing 2,000 U.S. troops there in this war. More than 50 of them were killed this year by the very Afghan forces we are trying to help. Now, we've reached the recruiting goal for Afghan forces. We've degraded al-Qaida. So tell me, why not leave now? What more can we really accomplish? Is it worth more American lives? 
 
 REP. RYAN: We don't want to lose the gains we've gotten. We want to make sure that the Taliban does not come back in and give al- Qaida a safe haven. We agree with the administration on their 2014 transition. Look, when I think about Afghanistan, I think about the incredible job that our troops have done. You've been there more than the two of us combined. 
 
 First time I was there in 2002, it was amazing to me what they were facing. When I went to the Arghandab Valley in Kandahar before the surge, I sat down with a young private in the 82nd from the Menominee Indian Reservation who would tell me what he did every day, and I was in awe. And to see what they had in front of them — and then to go back there in December, to go throughout Helmand with the Marines to see what they had accomplished — it's nothing short of amazing. 
 
 What we don't want to do is lose the gains we've gotten. 
 
 Now, we've disagreed from time to time on a few issues. We would have more likely taken into account the recommendations from our commanders, General Petraeus, Admiral Mullen, on troop levels throughout this year's fighting season. We've been skeptical about negotiations with the Taliban, especially while they're shooting at us. But we want to see the 2014 transition be successful. And that means we want to make sure our commanders have what they need to make sure that it is successful so that this does not once again become a launching pad for terrorists. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Vice President Biden. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Martha, let's keep our eye on the ball. The reason I've been in and out of Afghanistan and Iraq 20 times — I've been up in the Kunar — I've been throughout that whole country, mostly in a helicopter and sometimes in a vehicle. The fact is we went there for one reason: to get those people who killed Americans, al-Qaida. We've decimated al-Qaida central. We have eliminated Osama bin Laden. That was our purpose. And in fact, in the meantime, what we said we would do, we would help train the Afghan military. It's their responsibility to take over their own security. That's why, with 49 of our allies in Afghanistan, we've agreed on a gradual drawdown so we're out of there by the year — in the year 2014. 
 
 My friend and the governor say it's based on conditions, which means it depends. It does not depend for us. It is the responsibility of the Afghans to take care of their own security. We have trained over 315,000, mostly without incident. There have been more than two dozen cases of green on blue where Americans have been killed. 
 
 If we do — if the — if the measures the military has taken do not take hold, we will not go on joint patrols, we will not train in the field. We'll only train in the — in the Army bases that exist there. 
 
 But we are leaving. We are leaving in 2014, period, and in the process, we're going to be saving over the next 10 years another $800 billion. We've been in this war for over a decade. The primary objective is almost completed. Now all we're doing is putting the Kabul government in a position to be able to maintain their own security. It's their responsibility, not America's. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: What conditions could justify staying, Congressman Ryan? 
 
 REP. RYAN: We don't want to stay. We want — look, one of my best friends in Janesville, a reservist, is at a forward operating base in Eastern Afghanistan right now. Our wives are best friends, our daughters are best friends. I want — I want him and all of our troops to come home as soon and safely as possible. 
 
 We want to make sure that 2014 is successful. That's why we want to make sure that we give our commanders what they say they need to make it successful. We don't want to extend beyond 2014. That's the point we're making. 
 
 You know, if it was just this, I feel like we would — we would be able to call this a success, but it's not. What we are witnessing as we turn on our television screens these days, is the absolute unraveling of the Obama foreign policy. Problems are growing at home, but jobs — problems are growing abroad, but jobs aren't growing here at home. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Let me go back to this. He says we're absolutely leaving in 2014. You're saying that's not an absolute, but you won't talk about what conditions would justify -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: Do you know why we say that? Do you know why we say that? 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: I'd like to know why. 
 
 REP. RYAN: Because we don't want to broadcast to our enemies, put a date on your calendar, wait us out and then come back. 
 
 We want to make sure -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: But you agree with the timeline? 
 
 REP. RYAN: We do — we do agree with the timeline in the transition, but what we — what any administration will do in 2013 is assess the situation to see how best to complete this timeline. What we do not want to do -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: We will leave in 2014. 
 
 REP. RYAN: What we do not want to do is give our allies reason to trust us less and our enemies more — we don't want to embolden our enemies to hold and wait out for us and then take over the -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Martha, that's a bizarre statement. 
 
 REP. RYAN: That's why we want to make sure — no, that's why we want to make sure that this — that -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: That's a bizarre statement, since 49 of our allies — hear me, 49 of our allies signed onto this position, 49. 
 
 REP. RYAN: And we're reading that they want to pull out early. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Forty-nine. Forty-nine of our allies said out in 2014. It's the responsibility of the Afghans. We have other responsibilities -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: Which is — which is — which is what we agree with. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Do you — do you think that this timeline — but we have — we have soldiers and Marines -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: (Theirs are sufficient. ?) 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: We have Afghan forces murdering our forces over there. The Taliban is, do you think, taking advantage of this timeline? 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Well, look, the Taliban — what we've found out — and we — you — you saw it in Iraq, Martha. Unless you set a timeline, Baghdad in the case of Iraq and — and Kabul in the case of Afghanistan will not step up. They're happy to let us continue to do the job — international security forces to do the job. The only way they step up is say, fellas, we're leaving; we've trained you; step up. Step up. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: But let me — let me go back -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: That's the only way it works. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Let me go back to the surge troops that we put in there. And you brought this up, Congressman Ryan. I have talked to a lot of troops. I've talked to senior officers who were concerned that the surge troops were pulled out during the fighting season, and some of them saw that as a political — as a political move. So can you tell me, Vice President Biden, what was the military reason for bringing those surge troops home before the fighting season ended? 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: The military reason was bringing — by the way, when the president announced the surge — you'll remember, Martha — he said, the surge will be out by the end of the summer. The military said, the surge will be out. Nothing political about this. Before the surge occurred — so you be a little straight with me here, too — before the surge occurred, we said, they'll be out by the end of the summer. That's what the military said. The reason for that is -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Military follows orders. They — I mean, there — trust me, there are people -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Sure -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: — who were concerned about pulling out on the fighting season. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: But — there are people that were concerned, but not the Joint Chiefs. That was their recommendation in the Oval Office to the president of the United States of America. I sat there. I'm sure you'll find someone who disagrees with the Pentagon. I'm positive you'll find that within the military. But that's not the case here. 
 
 And secondly, the reason why the military said that is you cannot wait and have a cliff. It takes, you know, months and months and months to draw down forces. (Inaudible) — cannot wait -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: Let me bring some — let me try and illustrate the issue here, because I think this — it can get a little confusing. We've all met with General Allen and General Scaparotti in Afghanistan to talk about fighting seasons. Here's the way it works. The mountain passes fill in with snow. The Taliban and the terrorists and the Haqqani and the Quetta shura come over from Pakistan to fight our men and women. When it fills in with snow, they can't do it. That's what we call fighting seasons. In the warm months fighting gets really high; in the winter it goes down. 
 
 And so when Admiral Mullen and General Petraeus came to Congress and said, if you pull these people out before the fighting season is end, it puts people more at risk — that's the problem. Yes, we drew 22,000 troops down last month. But the remaining troops that are there, who still have the same mission to prosecute, counterinsurgency, are doing it with fewer people. 
 
 That makes them less safe. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: (Inaudible.) 
 
 REP. RYAN: We're sending fewer people out in all these hot spots to do the same job that they were supposed to do a month ago -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Because we turned it over -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: — but we took 22,000 people out for them to do it. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: — we turned it over to the Afghan troops we trained. No one got pulled out that didn't get filled in by trained Afghan personnel. And he's — he's — he's conflating two issues. The fighting season that Petraeus was talking about and former — and Admiral Mullen was the fighting season this spring. That's what he was talking about. We did not — we did not pull them out. 
 
 REP. RYAN: The calendar works the same every year. (Chuckles.) 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: It does work the same every year. (Inaudible) — there -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: (Chuckles.) Spring, summer, fall — (chuckles) — it's warm or it's not. They're still fighting us, they're still coming over the passes, they'll — they're still coming in to Zabul or to Kunar, to all of these areas, but we are sending fewer people to the front to fight them. And that is not safe. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: That's right, because that's the Afghan responsibility. We've trained them. 
 
 REP. RYAN: Not in the East. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Let's move — let's move to another war. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Not in the East? (Inaudible) -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: (Inaudible) — East, RC-East -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: RC-East, most dangerous place in the world. 
 
 REP. RYAN: That's why — that's why we don't want to send fewer people to do the job. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: That's — that's why we should send Americans in to do the job instead of the — you'd rather Americans be going in and doing the job instead of — (inaudible) -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: No. We are already sending Americans to do the job -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: No -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: — but fewer of them. That's the whole point. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: That — that's right. We're sending in more Afghans to do the job, Afghans to do the job. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Let's move to another war, the civil war in Syria, where there are estimates that — estimates that more than 25,000, 30,000 people have now been killed. In March of last year, President Obama explained the military action taken in Libya by saying it was in the national interest to go in and prevent further massacres from occurring there. So why doesn't the same logic apply in Syria? Vice President Biden. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: It's a different country. It's a different country. It is five times as large geographically. It has one-fifth the population that is Libya, one-fifth the population, five times as large geographically. 
 
 It's in a part of the world where you're not going to see whatever would come from that war. It's (seep ?) into a regional war. You're in a country that is heavily populated in the midst of the most dangerous area in the world. And in fact, if, in fact, it blows up and the wrong people gain control, it's going to have impact on the entire region, causing potentially regional wars. 
 
 We are working hand in glove with the Turks, with the Jordanians, with the Saudis and with all the people in the region attempting to identify the people who deserve the help so that when Assad goes and he will go, there will be a legitimate government that follows on, not an al-Qaida-sponsored government that follows on. 
 
 And all this loose talk of my friend, Governor Romney, and the congressman about how we're going to do, we could do so much more in there, what more would they do other than put American boots on the ground? The last thing America needs is to get into another ground war in the Middle East requiring tens of thousands if not well over a hundred thousand American forces. That — they are the facts. They are the facts. 
 
 Now, every time the governor is asked about this, he doesn't say any — he say — he goes up with a whole lot of verbiage, but when he gets pressed, he says, no, he would not do anything different then we are doing now. Are they proposing putting American troops on the ground, putting American aircraft in their airspace? Is that what they're proposing? If they do, they should speak up and say so. But that's not what they're saying. 
 
 We are doing it exactly like we need to do to identify those forces who, in fact, will provide for a stable government and not cause a regional Sunni-Shia war when Bassad (ph) — when Bashir (sic; Bashar) Assad falls. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Congressman Ryan. 
 
 REP. RYAN: Nobody is proposing to send troops to Syria — American troops. 
 
 Now let me say it this way. How would we do things differently? We wouldn't refer Bashar Assad as a reformer when he's killing his own civilians with his Russian-provided weapons. We wouldn't be outsourcing our foreign policy to the United Nations, giving Vladimir Putin veto power over our efforts to try and deal with this issue. He's vetoed three of them. Hillary Clinton went to Russia to try and convince him not to do so; they thwarted her efforts. She said they were on the wrong side of history. She was right about that. This is just one more example of how the Russia reset's not working. 
 
 And so where are we? After international pressure mounted, then President Obama said Bashar Assad should go. It's been over a year. The man has slaughtered tens of thousands of his own people and more foreign fighters are spilling into this country. So the longer this has gone on, the more people — groups like al-Qaida are going in. We could have more easily identified the Free Syrian Army, the freedom fighters, working with our allies, the Turks, the Qataris, the Saudis, had we had a better plan in place to begin with, working through our allies. But no, we waited for Kofi Annan to try and come up with an agreement through the U.N. That bought Bashar Assad time. We gave Russia veto power over our efforts through the U.N. and meanwhile about 30,000 Syrians are dead. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: What would my friend do differently? If you notice, he never answers the question. 
 
 REP. RYAN: No, I would — I — we would not be going through the U.N. on all of these things -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Let — let — let me — you don't go through the U.N. We are in the process now and have been for months in making sure that help, humanitarian aid, as well as other aid and training, is getting to those forces that we believe, the Turks believe, the Jordanians believe, the Saudis believe are the free forces inside of Syria. 
 
 That is under way. Our allies were all on the same page, NATO as well as our Arab allies, in terms of trying to get a settlement. That was their idea. We're the ones that said, enough. 
 
 With regard to the reset not working, the fact of the matter is that Russia has a different interest in Syria than we do, and that's not in our interest. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: What happens if Assad does not fall? Congressman Ryan, what happens to the region? What happens if he hangs on? What happens if he does? 
 
 REP. RYAN: Then Iran keeps their greatest ally in the region. He's a sponsor of terrorism. He'll probably continue slaughtering his people. We and the world community will lose our credibility on this. Look, he mentioned the reset. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: So what would Romney-Ryan do about that credibility? 
 
 REP. RYAN: Well, we agree with the same red line, actually, they do on chemical weapons, but not putting American troops in, other than to secure those chemical weapons. They're right about that. But what we should have done earlier is work with those freedom fighters, those dissidents in Syria. We should not have called Bashar Assad a reformer, and we should not have — we should not have waited to Russia to give us the green light -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: We didn't call Assad -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: What's your criteria for -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: We should not have waited for Russia to give us the green light at the U.N. to do something about it. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Russia -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: They're — they're still arming the man. Iran is flying flights over Iraq -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: And the opposition is being armed -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: — to help — to help — to help Bashar Assad. And by the way, if we had the status of forces agreement that the vice president said he would bet his vice presidency on in Iraq, we probably would have been able to prevent that. But he failed to achieve that as well. Again -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Let me ask you quickly, what's your criteria for intervention? 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: I don't — yeah. 
 
 REP. RYAN: In Syria? 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Worldwide. 
 
 REP. RYAN: What is in the national interests of the American people. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: How about humanitarian interests? 
 
 REP. RYAN: What is in the national security of the American people — it's got to be in the strategic national interests of our country. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: No humanitarian? 
 
 REP. RYAN: Each situation will — will come up with its own set of circumstances. But putting American troops on the ground, that's got to be within the national security interests of the American people. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: I want to — we're almost out of time here. 
 
 REP. RYAN: That means things like embargoes and sanctions and overflights — those are things that don't put American troops on the ground. But if you're talking about putting American troops on the ground, only in our national security interests. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: I want to move on, and I want to return home for these last few questions. This debate is indeed historic. We have two Catholic candidates, first time on a stage such as this, and I would like to ask you both to tell me what role your religion has played in your own personal views on abortion. Please talk about how you came to that decision. Talk about how your religion played a part in that. And please, this is such an emotional issue for so many -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: Sure. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: — people in this country. Please talk personally about this if you could. Congressman Ryan. 
 
 REP. RYAN: I don't see how a person can separate their public life from their private life or from their faith. Our faith informs us in everything we do. My faith informs me about how to take care of the vulnerable, about how to make sure that people have a chance in life. 
 
 Now, you want to ask basically why I'm pro-life? It's not simply because of my Catholic faith. That's a factor, of course, but it's also because of reason and science. You know, I think about 10 1/2 years ago, my wife Janna and I went to Mercy Hospital in Janesville where I was born for our seven-week ultrasound for our firstborn child, and we saw that heartbeat. Our little baby was in the shape of a bean, and to this day, we have nicknamed our firstborn child, Liza, "Bean." (Chuckles.) 
 
 Now, I believe that life begins at conception. 
 
 That's why — those are the reasons why I'm pro-life. 
 
 Now, I understand this is a difficult issue. And I respect people who don't agree with me on this. But the policy of a Romney administration will be to oppose abortion with the exceptions for rape, incest and life of the mother. 
 
 What troubles me more is how this administration has handled all of these issues. Look at what they're doing through "Obamacare" with respect to assaulting the religious liberties of this country. They're infringing upon our first freedom, the freedom of religion, by infringing on Catholic charities, Catholic churches, Catholic hospitals. Our church should not have to sue our federal government to maintain their religious — religious liberties. 
 
 And with respect to abortion, the Democratic Party used to say they want it to be safe, legal and rare. Now they support it without restriction and with taxpayer funding, taxpayer funding in "Obamacare," taxpayer funding with foreign aid. The vice president himself went to China and said that he sympathized or wouldn't second- guess their one-child policy of forced abortions and sterilizations. That, to me, is pretty extreme. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Vice President Biden. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: My religion defines who I am. And I've been a practicing Catholic my whole life. And it has particularly informed my social doctrine. Catholic social doctrine talks about taking care of those who — who can't take care of themselves, people who need help. 
 
 With regard to — with regard to abortion, I accept my church's position on abortion as a — what we call de fide (doctrine ?). Life begins at conception. That's the church's judgment. I accept it in my personal life. 
 
 But I refuse to impose it on equally devout Christians and Muslims and Jews and — I just refuse to impose that on others, unlike my friend here, the congressman. 
 
 I — I do not believe that — that we have a right to tell other people that women, they — they can't control their body. It's a decision between them and their doctor, in my view. And the Supreme Court — I'm not going to interfere with that. 
 
 With regard to the assault on the Catholic Church, let me make it absolutely clear. No religious institution, Catholic or otherwise, including Catholic Social Services, Georgetown Hospital, Mercy — any hospital — none has to either refer contraception. None has to pay for contraception. None has to be a vehicle to get contraception in any insurance policy they provide. That is a fact. That is a fact. 
 
 Now, with regard to the way in which the — we differ, my friend says that he — well, I guess he accepts Governor Romney's position now, because in the past he has argued that there was — there's rape and forcible rape. He's argued that, in the case of rape or incest, it was still — it would be a crime to engage in having an abortion. I just fundamentally disagree with my friend. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Congressman Ryan. 
 
 REP. RYAN: All I'm saying is if you believe that life begins at conception, that therefore doesn't change the definition of life. That's a principle. The policy of a Romney administration is to oppose abortion with exceptions for rape, incest and life of the mother. Now, I've got to take issue with the Catholic Church and religious liberty. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: You have, on the issue of Catholic social doctrine, taken issue. 
 
 REP. RYAN: If they — if they agree with you, then why would they keep — why would they keep suing you? It's a distinction without a difference. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: (Chuckles.) 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: I want to go back to the abortion question here. If the Romney-Ryan ticket is elected, should those who believe that abortion should remain legal be worried? 
 
 REP. RYAN: We don't think that unelected judges should make this decision; that people, through their elected representatives and reaching a consensus in society through the democratic process, should make this determination. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: The court — the next president will get one or two Supreme Court nominees. That's how close Roe v. Wade is. 
 
 Just ask yourself: With Robert Bork being the chief adviser on the court for — for Mr. Romney, who do you think he's likely to appoint? Do you think he's likely to appoint someone like Scalia or someone else on the court, far right, that would outlaw Planned — excuse me — outlaw abortion? I suspect that would happen. 
 
 I guarantee you that will not happen. We picked two people. We picked people who are open-minded. They've been good justices. So keep an eye on the Supreme Court -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: Was there a litmus test on them? 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: There was no litmus test. We picked people who had an open mind, did not come with an agenda. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: I'm going to move on to this closing question because we are running out of time. 
 
 It's certainly known — you've said it here tonight — that the two of you respect our troops enormously. Your son has served, and perhaps someday your children will serve as well. 
 
 I recently spoke to a highly decorated soldier who said that this presidential campaign has left him dismayed. He told me, quote, "The ads are so negative and they are all tearing down each other, rather than building up the country." 
 
 What would you say to that American hero about this campaign? And at the end of the day, are you ever embarrassed by the tone? 
 
 Vice President Biden. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: I would say to him the same thing I say to my son, who did serve year in Iraq: that we only have one truly sacred obligation as a government. That's to equip those we send into harm's way and care for those who come home. 
 
 That's the only sacred obligation we have. Everything else falls behind that. 
 
 I would also tell him that the fact that he, this decorated soldier you talked about, fought for his country — that that should be honored. He should not be thrown into a category of the 47 percent who don't pay their taxes while he was out there fighting and not having to pay taxes and somehow not taking responsibility. 
 
 I would also tell him that there are things that have occurred in this campaign and occur in every campaign that I'm sure both of us regret anyone having said, particularly in these special new groups that can go out there, raise all the money they want, not have to identify themselves and say the most scurrilous things about the other candidate. It's — it's — it's an abomination. 
 
 But the bottom line here is I'd ask that hero you reference to take a look at whether or not Governor Romney or President Obama has the conviction to help lift up the middle class, restore them to where they were before this Great Recession hit and they got wiped out or whether or not he's going to continue to focus on taking care of only the very wealthy, not asking them to make — pay any part of the deal to bring the — bring back the middle class, the economy of this country. 
 
 I would ask him to take a look at whether the president of the United States has acted wisely in the use of force and whether or not the slipshod comments being made by my — my friend or by Governor Romney serve — serve our interests very well. But there are things that have been said in campaigns that I — I find not very appealing. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Congressman Ryan. 
 
 REP. RYAN: First of all, I'd thank him to his service to our country. 
 
 Second of all, I'd say, we are not going to impose these devastating cuts on our military which compromises their mission and their safety. 
 
 And then I would say, you have a president who ran for president four years ago promising hope and change who has now turned his campaign into attack, blame and defame. You see, if you don't have a good record to run on, then you paint your opponent as someone to run from. That was what President Obama said in 2008. It's what he's doing right now. 
 
 Look at all the string of broken promises. If you like your health care plan you can keep it — try telling that to the 20 million people who are projected to lose their health insurance if "Obamacare" goes through or the seven point million — 7.4 million seniors who are going to lose it. 
 
 Or remember when he said this: I guarantee if you make less than $250,000, your taxes won't go up. Of the 21 tax increases in "Obamacare," 12 of them hit the middle class. 
 
 Or remember when he said, health insurance premiums will go down, and $2,500 per family per year? They've gone up 3,000 (dollars), and they're expected to go up another 2,400 (dollars). 
 
 Or remember when he said, I promise by the end of my first term, I'll cut the deficit in half in four years? We've had four budgets, four trillion-dollar deficits. A debt crisis is coming. We can't keep spending and borrowing like this. We can't just keep spending money we don't have. 
 
 Leaders run to problems to fix problems. President Obama has not even put a credible plan on the table in any — any of his four years to deal with this debt crisis. I passed two budgets to deal with this. Mitt Romney's put ideas on the table. We've got to tackle this debt crisis before it tackles us. 
 
 The president likes to say he has a plan. He gave a speech. We asked his budget office, can we see the plan? They sent us to this press secretary. He gave us a copy of the speech. We asked the Congressional Budget Office, tell us what President Obama's plan is to prevent a debt crisis. They said, it's a speech; we can't estimate speeches. You see? That's what we get in this administration: speeches. But we're not getting leadership. 
 
 Mitt Romney is uniquely qualified to fix these problems. His lifetime of experience, his proven track record of bipartisanship — and what do we have from the president? He broke his big promise to bring people together to solve the country's biggest problems. And what I would tell him is we don't have to settle for this. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: (Inaudible.) 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: I — I -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: We can do better than this. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: I hope I'll get equal time. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: I — you will get just a few minutes here, a few seconds, really. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: The two budgets the congressman introduced have eviscerated all the things that the middle class cares about. It has knocked 19 — it will knock 19 million people off of Medicare. It will kick 200,000 children off of early education. It will eliminate the tax credit people have to be able to send their children to college. It cuts education by $450 billion. It — it — it does — it does virtually nothing, except continue to increase the tax cuts for the very wealthy. 
 
 And, you know, we've had enough of this. My — the idea that these — so concerned about these deficits, I pointed out, he voted to put two wars on a credit card. He did -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: We're — we're going to -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: He voted -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: We're going to the closing statements in a minute. 
 
 REP. RYAN: But let me — just a second -- 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: I — you're going to have your closing -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: Not raising taxes is not cutting taxes. And by the way, our budget -- 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: We have not raised -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: — we increased spending by 3 percent a year instead of 4 1/2 percent like they proposed. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Let me — let me calm down things here -- 
 
 REP. RYAN: So not spending more money as much as they say is not a spending cut. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: — just for a minute. And I want to talk to you very briefly before we go to closing statements about your own personal character. If you are elected, what could you both give to this country as a man, as a human being that no one else could? 
 
 REP. RYAN: Honesty. No one else could? There are plenty of fine people who could lead this country. But what you need are people who, when they say they're going to do something, they go do it. What you need are when people see problems, they offer solutions to fix those problems. We're not getting that. 
 
 Look, we can grow this economy faster. That's what our five-point plan for a stronger middle class is all about. It's about getting 12 million jobs, higher take-home pay; getting people out of poverty, into the middle class. That means going with proven pro-growth policies that we know work to get people back to work, putting ideas on the table, working with Democrats — that actually works sometimes — and then getting things done. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Vice President, could we get to that — to that issue of what you could bring as a man, a human being? And I really am going to keep you to about 15 seconds here. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Well, he gets 40, I get 15, but that's OK. That's all right. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: He didn't have 40. He didn't have 40. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Now, let me tell you, I — my — my record stands for itself. I never say anything I don't mean. Everybody knows whatever I say, I do. And my whole life has been devoted to leveling the playing field for middle-class people, giving them an even break, treating Main Street and Wall Street the same, holding the same responsibility. Look at my record. It's been all about the middle class. They're the people who grow this country. We think you grow this country from the middle out, not from the top down. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: OK. We now turn to the candidates for their closing statements. Thank you, gentlemen. And that coin toss, again, has Vice President Biden starting with a closing statement. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Well, let — let — let me say at the outset that I want to thank you, Martha, for doing this, and Centre College. The fact is that we're in a situation where we inherited a god-awful circumstance. People are in real trouble. We acted to move to bring relief to the people who need the most help now. 
 
 And — and in the process, we — in case you haven't noticed, we have strong disagreements. But I — you probably detected my frustration with their attitude about the — the American people. My friend says that 30 percent of the American people are takers. They — Romney points out, 47 percent of the people won't take responsibility. He's talking about my mother and father. And he's talking about the places I grew up in, my neighbors in Scranton and Claymont. 
 
 He's talking about — he's talking about the people that have built this country. All they're looking for, Martha — all they're looking for is an even shot. When they've been given the shot, they've done it. They've done it. Whenever you level the playing field, they've been able to move. 
 
 And they want a little bit of peace of mind. And the president and I are not going to rest until that playing field is leveled, they in fact have a clear shot and they have peace of mind, until they can turn to their kid and say with a degree of confidence, honey, it's going to be OK. It's going to be OK. That's what this is all about. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: Congressman Ryan. 
 
 REP. RYAN: I want to thank you as well, Martha, Danville, Kentucky, Centre College. 
 
 And I want to thank you, Joe. It's been an honor to engage in this critical debate. 
 
 We face a very big choice. What kind of country are we going to be? What kind of country are we going to give our kids? President Obama — he had his chance. He made his choices. His economic agenda, more spending, more borrowing, higher taxes, a government takeover of health care — it's not working. It's failed to create the jobs we need. Twenty-three million Americans are struggling for work today. Fifteen percent of Americans are in poverty. 
 
 This is not what a real recovery looks like. You deserve better. Mitt Romney and I want to earn your support. We're offering real reforms for a real recovery for every American. Mitt Romney, his experience, his ideas, his solutions, is uniquely qualified to get this job done. At a time when we have a jobs crisis in America, wouldn't it be nice to have a job creator in the White House? 
 
 The choice is clear: a stagnant economy that promotes more government dependency, or a dynamic, growing economy that promotes opportunity and jobs. Mitt Romney and I will not duck the tough issues. We will not blame others for the next four years. 
 
 We will take responsibility. And we will not try to replace our founding principles; we will reapply our founding principles. The choice is clear, and the choice rests with you, and we ask you for your vote. Thank you. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: And thank you both again. Thank you very much. 
 
 VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Thank you. 
 
 MS. RADDATZ: This concludes the vice presidential debate. Please tune in next Tuesday for the second presidential debate at Hofstra University in New York. 
 
 I'm Martha Raddatz of ABC News. I do hope all of you go to the polls. Have a good evening. (Applause.)
– There's a whiff of desperation in the air over tonight's vice presidential debate—and a hint of controversy, too. The desperation, of course, comes from the blue team, which is desperate to halt the momentum Mitt Romney gained in the first debate, and expects Joe Biden to be especially aggressive in attacking Paul Ryan. The controversy? A conservative site has dug up evidence that President Obama may have attended moderator Martha Raddatz's wedding. Here's what you need to know: The Daily Caller has found that Obama had attended the first of Raddatz's three weddings, back in 1991—he was a Harvard Law classmate of groom Julius Genachowski, who he later named to head the FCC. But the LA Times is not impressed, writing snarkily that "most of us in the political press have become far too complacent to backtrack even one wedding into the past of the debate moderators." Everyone is expecting Biden to come out swinging. One Biden staffer tells Politico that the VP is "eager to draw the contrast—and very capable of doing so." Ryan himself told a radio station yesterday that he expects Biden to come at him like a "cannonball," according to USA Today. Expect Biden to go on the attack when it comes to Ryan's Medicare plan in particular. CNN also wonders if Biden will bring up Social Security. Ryan has advocated moving the funds into private investment accounts, an idea Democrats usually attack profitably—but Obama appeared to take it off the table in the first debate, saying he suspected he and Romney had "a somewhat similar position." Ryan's team also expects Biden to bring up Romney's 47% gaffe, and they tell the Wall Street Journal that they've specifically been prepping a response to it. On Ryan's end, everyone's wondering just how wonkish he'll be. CNN worries he'll get "bogged down in arithmetic," but Politico suspects it could be his "greatest asset, a rope-a-dope tactic that will take voters into the policy weeds." Of course, all this sound and fury might not signify much. "By tradition, the vice presidential debates have been like the vice presidency itself: well-publicized but largely inconsequential," quips the Washington Post, noting that Gallup studies found they'd never had a significant impact on the race.