There’s no way to diagnose a stroke before it happens, but researchers say they’ve identified a clue to help doctors predict who’s at risk – the amount of sleep they get at night. 
 
 Older adults who said they slept more than eight hours were 46% more likely to suffer strokes in the next decade than adults who slept for six to eight hours, according to an analysis published Wednesday in the journal Neurology. Even worse, the stroke risk for people who went from sleeping less than six hours to sleeping more than eight hours was nearly four times greater than for people who consistently got six to eight hours of ZZZZs. 
 
 The findings may help clarify the fuzzy relationship between sleep and stroke. A variety of studies have considered the issue, but the results have been inconsistent. 
 
 So researchers from the University of Cambridge and the University of Warwick in England looked for answers in a cancer study. They used data on 9,692 people from Norfolk, England, who participated in the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer. All of them were between the ages of 40 and 79 when they enrolled in the study in the 1990s, and they were tracked for an average of 9.5 years. 
 
 Between 1998 and 2000, and again between 2002 and 2004, the study volunteers were asked how many hours they slept at night and whether they tended to sleep well. Researchers also collected a host of demographic and medical information, including their age, education, smoking and drinking habits, body mass index, blood pressure and family history of stroke. 
 
 Among the 9,692 volunteers, 346 suffered at least one stroke during the years they were tracked (including 67 strokes that were fatal). But these strokes weren’t evenly distributed among all of the volunteers. After controlling for other factors that might affect stroke risk, they found that “long” sleepers (those who slept more than eight hours a night) were at significantly higher risk than “average” sleepers (those who slept for six to eight hours a night). 
 
 People deemed “short” sleepers (those who slept for less than six hours at night) also seemed to be more susceptible to a stroke. Their risk was 18% greater than for average sleepers, but the difference was small enough that it could have been due to chance. 
 
 Upon closer inspection, the researchers noticed some intriguing patterns. The relationship between sleep duration and stroke risk was somewhat stronger for women than for men. It was also stronger for strokes that were fatal, according to the study. 
 
 When the study participants were examined according to age, the researchers found that sleeping for more than eight hours a night increased stroke risk only for people who were at least 63 years old. On the flip side, they found that sleeping for less than six hours a night heightened stroke risk for younger people more than for older people. 
 
 Finally, they discovered that “short” sleepers were more at risk for an ischemic stroke (the kind caused by a clot that blocks blood flow to the brain) while “long” sleepers were more at risk for a hemorrhagic stroke (the kind caused by a ruptured blood vessel bleeds into the brain). 
 
 The research team also conducted a meta-analysis that combined their results with those of 11 previously published studies. Altogether, the analysis included nearly 560,000 people from seven countries who suffered a total of more than 8,000 strokes. 
 
 In the meta-analysis, “short” sleep was associated with a 15% increased risk of stroke and “long” sleep was linked with a 45% greater risk. Those results validated their findings, the researchers wrote. 
 
 Still unclear is whether sleeping too much or too little can actually cause a stroke, or whether the biological processes that lead to a stroke also happen to influence sleep. Other studies have linked long sleep times to cardiac problems like atrial fibrillation, atherosclerosis and other conditions that may make a stroke more likely. But scientists will have to conduct experiments to get a better idea of how sleep and strokes are related, the study authors wrote. 
 
 In the meantime, it would behoove doctors to inquire about their patients’ sleep habits – and if their older patients report long sleeping times, they should consider it a warning sign for a stroke, the researchers wrote. 
 
 That conclusion was echoed by a neurologist and a sleep researcher in an editorial that accompanied the study. 
 
 “Long sleep duration could therefore be a harbinger of stoke through its association with potent cardiovascular risk factors,” wrote Dr. Alberto Ramos of the University of Miami’s Miller School of Medicine and James Gangwisch of Columbia University. “Lengthening sleep duration could portend strokes and serve as an early warning sign, suggesting the need for further diagnostic testing or for taking precautionary measures.” 
 
 For more medical news, follow me on Twitter @LATkarenkaplan and "like" Los Angeles Times Science & Health on Facebook. ||||| People who sleep for more than eight hours a day have an increased risk of stroke, according to a study by the University of Cambridge - and this risk doubles for older people who persistently sleep longer than average. However, the researchers say it is unclear why this association exists and call for further research to explore the link. 
 
 Previous studies have already suggested a possible association between sleep and risk of stroke, but today's study, published in the journal Neurology, is the first to provide detailed information about the British population and to examine the relationship between a change in sleep duration over time and subsequent stroke risk. 
 
 Researchers from the Department of Public Health and Primary Care at the University of Cambridge followed just under 10,000 people aged 42-81 years of age from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer (EPIC)-Norfolk cohort over 9.5 years. During 1998-2000 and then again four years later, they asked the cohort how many hours on average they slept in a day and whether they generally slept well. 
 
 Almost seven out of ten participants reported sleeping between six and eight hours a day, whilst one in ten reported sleeping for over eight hours a day. Participants who slept for less than six hours or more than eight hours were more likely to be older, women and less active. 
 
 Over the almost ten year period of the study, 346 participants suffered a stroke, either non-fatal or fatal stroke. After adjusting for various factors including age and sex, the researchers found that people who slept longer than eight hours a day were at a 46% greater risk of stroke than average. People who slept less than six hours a day were at an 18% increased risk, but the small number of people falling in this category meant the association was not statistically significant. 
 
 Participants who reported persistently long sleep - in other words, they reported sleeping over eight hours when asked at both points of the study - were at double the risk of stroke compared to those with persistently average sleep duration (between six and eight hours a day). This risk was even greater for those whose reported sleep increased from short to long over the four years - their risk was close to four times that of people who maintained an average sleep duration. 
 
 In addition to studying the EPIC-Norfolk cohort, the researchers carried out a study of combined data from 11 other studies related to identify the association between sleep duration and patterns of stroke risk. Their final analysis, including 560,000 participants from seven countries, supported the findings from the EPIC-Norfolk cohort study. 
 
 Yue Leng, PhD candidate at the University of Cambridge, says: "It's apparent both from our own participants and the wealth of international data that there's a link between sleeping longer than average and a greater risk of stroke. What is far less clear, however, is the direction of this link, whether longer sleep is a symptom, an early marker or a cause of cardiovascular problems." 
 
 While older people have less work and fewer social demands and therefore often have the option of sleeping longer, previous research has shown that in fact, they tend to sleep on average for shorter periods. 
 
 The researchers say it is unclear yet why the link between sleep and stroke risk should exist. Lack of sleep has been linked with factors such as disrupted metabolism and raised levels of the 'stress hormone' cortisol, all of which may lead to higher blood pressure and increased stroke risk. However, the current study suggests that the association between longer sleep duration and higher risk of stroke was independent of normal risk factors for cardiovascular disease. 
 
 Professor Kay-Tee Khaw, senior author on the study, adds: "We need to understand the reasons behind the link between sleep and stroke risk. What is happening in the body that causes this link? With further research, we may find that excessive sleep proves to be an early indicator of increased stroke risk, particularly among older people." 
 
 ### 
 
 The study was supported by the Medical Research Council and Cancer Research UK. ||||| Epidemiologic studies have reported conflicting results on the relationship between daytime napping and mortality risk, and there are few data on the potential association in the British population. We investigated the associations between daytime napping and all-cause or cause-specific mortality in the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer-Norfolk study, a British population-based cohort study. Among the 16,374 men and women who answered questions on napping habits between 1998 and 2000, a total of 3,251 died during the 13-year follow-up. Daytime napping was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (for napping less than 1 hour per day on average, hazard ratio = 1.14, 95% confidence interval: 1.02, 1.27; for napping 1 hour or longer per day on average, hazard ratio = 1.32, 95% confidence interval: 1.04, 1.68), independent of age, sex, social class, educational level, marital status, employment status, body mass index, physical activity level, smoking status, alcohol intake, depression, self-reported general health, use of hypnotic drugs or other medications, time spent in bed at night, and presence of preexisting health conditions. This association was more pronounced for death from respiratory diseases (for napping less than 1 hour, hazard ratio = 1.40, 95% confidence interval: 0.95, 2.05; for napping 1 hour or more, hazard ratio = 2.56, 95% confidence interval: 1.34, 4.86) and in individuals 65 years of age or younger. Excessive daytime napping might be a useful marker of underlying health risk, particularly of respiratory problems, especially among those 65 years of age or younger. Further research is required to clarify the nature of the observed association. 
 
 Most previous studies have come from Mediterranean countries ( 10 – 13 ), in which the incidence of and rate of death from CVD tend to be low ( 6 ). Several prospective cohort studies from Israel showed that an increased mortality rate was associated with siesta among older people ( 10 , 11 ), whereas 1 study from Greece suggested that the siesta is protective against heart-related deaths, especially in working men ( 12 ). In addition, conflicting United States–based research has found an increased risk of death associated with daytime napping in both men only ( 14 ) and women only ( 15 ). In both studies, only naps of long durations were found to be significant. A Japanese study suggested that daytime napping was associated with increased risks of all-cause and CVD mortality, but this association was largely explained by comorbid conditions ( 16 ). Meanwhile, there is limited evidence from the British population. Although daytime napping has not been a tradition among British adults, the prevalence of napping is likely to increase with the rapidly aging population ( 17 , 18 ), and it is therefore important to understand the health associations of daytime napping among the British. 
 
 In recent years, there has been growing evidence of a relationship between habitual sleep and the risk of mortality from all-causes and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) ( 1 – 3 ). Most of these studies focused on nighttime sleep duration ( 4 , 5 ); the implications of daytime napping are poorly understood. A long-established practice in Mediterranean areas, daytime napping, namely siesta, is often linked with good health through a postulated “stress relief” mechanism ( 6 ). However, daytime sleepiness, often characterized by daytime napping, has been suggested as an early sign or risk indicator of a range of health problems ( 7 – 9 ). To date, the association between daytime napping and mortality risk is uncertain. 
 
 Finally, we performed stratified analysis with adjustment for all the covariates according to follow-up length and preexisting health conditions and according to potential effect modifiers: age (≤65 vs. >65 years old), sex, smoking status (ever vs. never smoker), employment status, BMI (dichotomized using the median), MDD, time spent in bed at night (dichotomized using the median), and nighttime sleep duration (reported in hours at the time of the third health check). Hazard ratios (with 95% confidence intervals) were calculated using no napping as the reference group (with adjustment for sex through inclusion of sex-specific baseline hazards). The overall associations between the 2 categories of napping and mortality were tested using the likelihood ratio test. All statistical tests were 2-sided, and a P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Analyses were implemented in Stata, version 12.0 (StataCorp LP, College Station, Texas). 
 
 The associations between daytime napping and all-cause or disease-specific mortality were examined using Cox proportional hazards regression models that were adjusted for covariates. The endpoints were grouped into death from all causes, CVD, cancer, respiratory diseases, and all other causes. We firstly examined the proportional hazard assumption using both a Kaplan-Meier plot and Schoenfeld's test, and no sign of violation was found for any endpoint. All covariates were chosen a priori based on the literature and their relevance to napping and health. Models were constructed with progressive adjustment of the covariates to show the associations explained by the covariates: 1) Model A was adjusted for age and sex; 2) model B was further adjusted for social class, educational level, marital status, employment status, BMI, physical activity level, smoking status, and alcohol intake; 3) model C was adjusted for the variables in model B and MDD, self-reported general health, time spent in bed at night, hypnotic drug use, antidepressant use, and COPD drug use; and 4) model D was further adjusted for the variables in all models and preexisting health conditions. Each multivariable model was built on persons for whom we had complete measurements of all covariates. 
 
 Participants were flagged for death certification at the United Kingdom Office of National Statistics so that we were notified of their deaths, with vital status established for the whole cohort. The current analysis presents deaths that occurred during followed up from January 2000 and until December 2012. Deaths were coded initially according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), Ninth Revision, and later the Tenth Revision. The underlying cause of death was categorized as due to CVD (ICD-9 codes 401–448 or ICD-10 codes I10–I79), cancer (ICD-9 codes 140–208 or ICD-10 codes C00–C97), or respiratory diseases (ICD–9 codes 460–496 or ICD-10 codes J00–J99). 
 
 Covariates measured closer in time to the measurement of napping were chosen and included those measured at baseline or at the time of the second health check (1998–2000). Covariates measured at baseline were social class (professionals, managerial and technical occupations, skilled workers subdivided into nonmanual and manual, partly skilled workers, or unskilled manual workers), educational level (highest qualification attained: no qualifications, educated to age 16 years, educated to age 18 years, or educated to degree level), and physical activity level (inactive, moderately inactive, moderately active, or active) ( 22 ). Body mass index (BMI; weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) was measured at the baseline health check. Other covariates were reported in questionnaires during the time of the second health check: age, marital status (single, married, widowed, separated, or divorced), employment status (working or not working), smoking status (current, former, or nonsmokers), alcohol intake (units of alcohol drunk per week), self-reported general health (excellent, good, moderate, or poor), use of hypnotic drugs (yes or no), antidepressant use (yes or no), use of drugs to treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (yes or no), major depressive disorder (MDD) in the previous year (yes or no) ( 23 ), and time spent in bed at night (in hours, derived from the differences between reported rise times and bedtimes). Hypnotic drug use was defined according to the British National Formulary (section 4.1) ( 24 ) and included benzodiazepines, zaleplon, zolpidem, and zopiclone, chloral and its derivatives, clomethiazole, and antihistamines. Preexisting health conditions included self-reported stroke, myocardial infarction, diabetes, cancer, asthma, bronchitis, and emphysema, as well as a proxy measure of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), with persons who were in the highest BMI quartile and who reported taking antihypertension drugs being defined as likely to have underlying OSA. 
 
 During 1998–2000, a total of 16,374 participants completed the following question in the health questionnaire: “Do you normally take a nap during the day?” If they answered in the affirmative, they were asked to categorize the duration of their nap (<1 hour or ≥1 hour). Napping habits were thereby summarized as: no napping, napping less than 1 hour, and napping 1 hour or more per day. 
 
 Data were drawn from the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer (EPIC)-Norfolk prospective cohort study. The design and study methods of EPIC-Norfolk have been described previously ( 20 , 21 ). Briefly, 25,639 men and women aged 40–79 years were recruited using general practice age-sex registers from Norfolk, United Kingdom, and attended a baseline health check during 1993–1997. These participants were then followed up for 2 further health checks from 1996 to 2000 and from 2006 to 2011. In between these health examinations, participants were sent questionnaires for completion and return by post. The Norwich District Ethics Committee approved the study, and all participants gave signed informed consent. 
 
 A total of 3,251 deaths (1,034 from CVD, 1,213 from cancer, 286 from respiratory diseases, and 718 from all other causes) were observed during the 13-year follow-up. There were 1,795 deaths in men and 1,456 in women. Table 3 shows the adjusted hazard ratios associated with napping. After adjustment for age and sex, daytime napping was associated with a 22% increase in the risk of all-cause mortality in persons who napped less than 1 hour (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13, 1.31) and a 54% increase for persons who napped 1 hour or longer (HR = 1.54, 95% CI: 1.31, 1.81). The hazard ratios were attenuated to 1.14 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.27) for napping less than 1 hour and 1.34 (95% CI: 1.07, 1.68) for napping 1 hour or longer after further adjustment for social class, educational level, marital status, employment status, BMI, physical activity level, smoking status, alcohol intake, MDD, self-reported general health, hypnotic drug use, antidepressant and COPD drug use, and time spent in bed at night. This association was little changed after additional adjustment for preexisting health conditions, with a 14% and 32% increase in all-cause mortality risk among those who napped for less than 1 hour or 1 hour or more per day, respectively. This association was more pronounced for death from respiratory diseases (for napping <1 hour, HR = 1.40, 95% CI: 0.95, 2.05; for napping ≥1 hour, HR = 2.56, 95% CI: 1.34, 4.86). No statistically significant associations were observed for death from other causes after full adjustments. Table 4 shows results from stratified analysis for all-cause mortality. The association was stronger in those who were younger (for napping <1 hour, HR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.13, 1.79; for napping ≥1 hour, HR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.16, 3.28; P for interaction = 0.04 for persons 42–65 years of age compared with those 65–82 years of age) and in those who had a lower BMI (for napping <1 hour, HR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.12, 1.56; for napping ≥1 hour, HR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.21, 2.45; P for interaction = 0.02 for those with a BMI of 15.2–25.7 compared with those with a BMI of higher than 25.7). In addition, there was a suggestion that this association was stronger in persons who reported experiencing MDD in the past 12 months (for napping ≥1 hour, HR = 2.90, 95% CI: 1.12, 7.50; P for interaction = 0.13) and in those who were working (for napping ≥1 hour, HR = 2.46, 95% CI: 1.16, 5.20; P for interaction = 0.33). No statistically significant differences were observed by sex, cigarette smoking history, time spent in bed at night, nighttime sleep duration, or preexisting health conditions (among those who reported no preexisting CVD, cancer, asthma, bronchitis, or underlying sleep apnea at baseline and who napped for ≥1 hour, HR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.93). Furthermore, there was no evidence that the association attenuated with increasing length of follow-up (in these data, the association was stronger after 6.5 years of follow-up; P for interaction = 0.07). 
 
 During 1998–2000, napping during the day was reported by 2,653 of 7,161 men (37.0%) and 2,228 of 9,213 women (24.2%). Tables 1 and 2 show participants' baseline characteristics by napping habits. Among the persons who took naps, only 10% napped for more than 1 hour per day. Those who took naps were more likely to be men and were on average 6 years older than those who did not nap. Persons who took naps were more likely to be smokers, not working, and less active and to have a lower educational level, higher BMI, and poor self-reported general health. The above associations were all stronger for those who napped for longer time periods. 
 
 DISCUSSION 
 
 In the present large sample of middle- to older-aged British adults, daytime napping of 1 hour per day or more was associated with a 32% increase in the risk all-cause mortality during the 13-year follow-up. This association was independent of age, sex, social class, educational level, marital status, employment status, BMI, physical activity level, smoking status, alcohol intake, MDD, self-reported general health, time spent in bed at night, hypnotic drug use, antidepressant use, COPD drug use, and preexisting health conditions and was similar among men and women. The associations were more pronounced for deaths from respiratory illness and for participants who were 65 years of age or younger. Furthermore, the association between napping and all-cause mortality remained among those without preexisting health conditions and did not attenuate with increasing length of follow-up. 
 
 To our knowledge, this is the first study to present in detail the association between daytime napping and cause-specific mortality in a British population. Strengths of our study include the long follow-up and range of measures for which we were able to adjust. Our study has several limitations. First, 16,374 of the 25,639 participants at baseline completed the subsequent mailed questionnaire that contained the napping question. Compared with the rest of the participants, these 16,374 people were more likely to be women and to have a higher social class and educational level. Therefore, our results may not be generalizable to populations with lower socioeconomic status. Second, the information on napping was obtained from self-report. Previous studies (25, 26) have shown a tendency for older people to underreport napping behaviors, and this may lead to underestimation of the association. It was suggested that naps of less than 30 minutes (usually known as power naps) can be largely beneficial, especially among shift workers (27–29), whereas naps longer than 30 minutes can cause sleep inertia and are usually not recommended (30). Napping duration was categorized into less than 1 hour and 1 hour or more in our questionnaire, and we were therefore unable to differentiate the effects of power naps from those of excessive napping. Although this might have diluted the overall association, we conclude from the current study that there is an increased health risk associated with excessive daytime napping. 
 
 Voluntary naps and naps as a result of underlying pathology have different implications for health, and identification of the reasons for the naps is crucial. Although a range of preexisting health conditions and medication use was considered in this study, we cannot rule out that our results may be partly explained by the effects of other undiagnosed health problems or medications not included in this study that might cause daytime fatigue or sleepiness. Daytime napping might be a consequence of nighttime sleep disturbance, which has been associated with an increased risk of death (31). Although the detailed purpose of napping was not recorded in the present study, the association between daytime napping and mortality risk did not change by nighttime sleep durations and was independent of time spent in bed at night, which has been suggested to be a good indicator of nighttime sleep patterns in the EPIC-Norfolk population (32). In addition, a surrogate measure of OSA was included in regression models to help address the problem. This measure combines BMI and hypertension, 2 strong correlates of OSA (33–35). The surrogate measure may partly reflect the probability of having OSA; therefore, further studies with more precise measures of OSA and nighttime sleep quality are required to confirm whether the association stands independent of other sleep parameters. 
 
 Our findings are consistent with most previous studies that have reported an association between self-reported daytime napping and increased all-cause mortality (10, 11, 14–16, 36, 37). These studies covered populations from the Mediterranean, Japan, and the United States and included primarily older populations. The largest published report to date came from the Japan Collaborative Cohort Study, in which a total of 9,643 deaths were recorded and daytime napping was found to be associated with increased mortality from specific causes, particularly CVD (16). Indeed, most previous studies have related daytime napping to increased CVD mortality risk (10, 15, 16, 37). In our study, the association between napping and CVD mortality risk was largely explained by MDD in the previous year. MDD is commonly associated with sleep disturbance, which might lead to excessive daytime napping. Previous evidence based upon our cohort (23) has shown major depression to be associated with an increased risk of ischemic heart disease mortality, though understanding of this association remains elusive. It is possible that the association between napping and CVD mortality is mostly explained by depression or MDD reported within a certain time frame. Future studies would need to carefully examine the role of depression in the napping-mortality association. 
 
 At the same time, several earlier studies (6, 12) from Mediterranean populations have suggested different findings. The Greek EPIC cohort study, which is methodologically comparable to our study, found napping to be protective against coronary mortality (12). Notably, the Greek cohort included people who were 20–86 years of age at baseline, whereas our participants were exclusively middle- to older-aged adults. Moreover, the association was particularly strong among working men in their study, which might be explained by the possible stress-releasing effect of afternoon naps (12). This effect could have been masked in our aging population, who are mostly retired and might take naps for other purposes, such as compensating for declining physical functions. Interestingly, in our study, the positive association between napping and mortality was seen to be stronger among persons 65 years of age or younger than among those older than 65 years of age (65 years is the age by which most people have retired from work in the United Kingdom). It is often believed that napping is protective for younger populations and problematic for older ones (12, 19, 37). Notably, the average age of our participants at baseline was 62 years, so the younger persons in the present study were not comparable to those mentioned in earlier studies (12, 38). Although it is unknown why the association was stronger among those 65 years of age or younger, our finding raises the possibility that napping might be more indicative of mortality risk in this population, and this needs to be confirmed by further studies. Unlike in previous studies (14, 36), no evident sex difference was observed in this study. 
 
 In the present study, we found large effect sizes for the association between napping and death from respiratory disease even though there were much fewer respiratory deaths than CVD and cancer deaths. The association was independent of smoking status, preexisting respiratory diseases, and COPD drug use. This is surprising given the lack of evidence of the associations between napping and respiratory health. Although none of the previous studies highlighted the association between napping and respiratory mortality, most of them did suggest the association with non-CVD/non-cancer mortality (10, 15, 16), and these categories were largely made up of respiratory mortality in our study. The reason why daytime napping may increase respiratory mortality is not known, but it is worth noting the interrelationship between the cardiovascular and respiratory systems (39). Although we failed to find an association between napping and CVD mortality, the napping-respiratory association might not be separate from the cardiovascular consequences of sleep problems (e.g., OSA). It seems reasonable to suggest that persons with respiratory problems (especially hypoxic conditions) were more likely to nap and were also more likely to die of respiratory disease because of their underlying problems. The incidence of OSA was not recorded directly in this study, and a proxy measure was used to account for the effects. Given the close link between OSA and mortality (40, 41), daytime napping might well be a good surrogate measure of OSA, which is potentially important for early detection of OSA in the general population. 
 
 Although in this study the association between napping and all-cause mortality remained after excluding participants with known preexisting health conditions at baseline, it remains possible that daytime napping is simply a marker of undiagnosed health problems and of reverse causation, with those individuals who have undiagnosed ill health napping more. In this case, we would expect attenuation in the association whereby it is stronger in the immediate period of follow-up and lessens thereafter. However, the association seemed to be even stronger among those with a follow-up length of 6.5 years or more. Interestingly, the association was stronger among persons with a lower BMI. Although the exact reason for this observation is unclear, it is worth noting the “obesity paradox,” which might have been brought about by existing physiological or pathological changes (42, 43). It is possible that persons with lower BMI could have been suffering from underlying illnesses that led to weight loss and that this added to the health risk conveyed by daytime napping. 
 
 In the United Kingdom, daytime napping is not part of the cultural norm, and in the absence of obvious disruptions in nighttime sleep patterns, it remains plausible that napping might be an early sign of system disregulation and a marker of future health problems. Alternatively, there may be a biological mechanism through which napping is associated with mortality, for example, through inflammatory pathways, especially increased chronic low-grade inflammation. Increased levels of inflammation have been suggested for persons with reduced nighttime sleep durations (44), but we are unaware of any evidence to show an association between daytime napping and inflammation. Our findings need confirmation from further population studies that include examination of the relationship between napping and physiological biomarkers. This further work could help evaluate whether there is a causal link between napping and mortality risk or whether napping is a marker of system disregulation or of undiagnosed respiratory problems that lead to an increased risk of future ill health. 
 
 In summary, independent associations were found between daytime napping and an increased risk of mortality from all causes and respiratory diseases in a large population-based middle- to older-aged British cohort. The association remained after exclusion of persons who died within the first 6.5 years of follow-up and was more pronounced for people 65 years of age or younger. The exact mechanisms of these associations remain unknown. Further studies are needed before any recommendations can be made. Excessive daytime napping might be a useful marker of underlying health risks, particularly respiratory problems, especially among those 65 years of age or younger.
– Sleeping more than eight hours a night? That may be too much of a good thing, because you're more likely to suffer a stroke, according to a study out of the University of Cambridge. Researchers analyzed the sleep patterns of nearly 10,000 people ages 42 to 81 in the UK, and they report in the journal Neurology that based on nearly a decade of follow-up and 346 reported strokes, older adults who sleep more than eight hours a night are 46% more likely to suffer a stroke than adults who slept six to eight hours. That risk is actually four times greater when people went from sleeping for less than six hours at the beginning of the study to more than 8 as the years passed, per a Eureka Alert press release. The researchers adjusted for several factors, including age and sex, and their findings were strikingly consistent with what they found in a review of the combined data of 11 similar studies spanning 560,000 people in seven countries. But in terms of age and sex, the Los Angeles Times notes the following: The link between the risk and sleep length was a little stronger for women, and the increased stroke risk was only seen in those eight-plus-hours sleepers who were 63 or older. The researchers caution that it remains unclear whether longer sleep duration is a symptom or cause of stroke risk. Says one, "With further research, we may find that excessive sleep proves to be an early indicator of increased stroke risk." (Experts have just revealed how much sleep you should be averaging a night based on your age.)