Remember the days when people would bring photos of celebrities to the plastic surgeon’s office and ask for Angelina Jolie’s lips or Brad Pitt’s jaw line? That’s not the case anymore. 
 
 Now, people want to look like themselves — heavily edited or filtered versions of themselves, that is. 
 
 Doctors have spotted a trend of people bringing in their own selfies, usually edited with a smartphone application, and asking to look more like their photos, according to an article recently published in JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery by researchers from Boston University School of Medicine’s Department of Dermatology. 
 
 The phenomenon is known as “Snapchat dysmorphia,” and it’s causing widespread concern among experts who are worried about its negative effect on people’s self-esteem and its potential to trigger body dysmorphic disorder, a mental illness classified on the obsessive-compulsive spectrum. 
 
 “This is an alarming trend because those filtered selfies often present an unattainable look and are blurring the line of reality and fantasy for these patients,” the article states. 
 
 Neelam Vashi, an assistant professor of dermatology at the Boston University School of Medicine and one of the article’s authors, told The Washington Post that “Snapchat dysmorphia” is a result of people now being able to edit away any imperfections with ease. 
 
 “It’s remarkable,” said Vashi, who is also a board-certified dermatologist. “What used to lie in the hands of . . . celebrities and beautiful people who were innately beautiful made to look more beautiful, now it’s in the hands of anyone.” 
 
 On Snapchat, for example, the picture messaging application features upward of 20 filters that users can toggle through by simply swiping across their phone screens. Aside from adding flower crowns or puppy ears, filters can give a person freckles, longer eyelashes, wider eyes and flawless skin, among other augmentations. Facebook, Instagram and Twitter also allow people to edit their photos in the application before uploading. 
 
 Other applications such as Facetune take things a step further. For $3.99, users have access to a host of editing tools such as teeth whitening and making a person’s forehead, nose or waist smaller. The application has been lauded as “a Photoshop editing job in the palm of your hand” and even called “magical.” 
 
 While people most often use filters or editing software for minor fixes such as clearing blemishes or plumping lips, Vashi said traditional cosmetic procedures largely can’t reproduce the “instant fix” people see in their edited photos. 
 
 “Sometimes I have patients who say, ‘I want every single spot gone, and I want it gone by this week or I want it gone tomorrow,’ because that’s what this filtered photograph gave them,” she said. “They check off one thing, and it’s gone. That’s not realistic. I can’t do that. I can make people a lot better, but it will take me a lot more time than a week, and it won’t be 100 percent.” 
 
 Of course, people have long obsessed about their looks, comparing themselves to the idealized images in the media, said Northwestern University psychology professor Renee Engeln during a 2013 TEDx Talk. 
 
 “Our sense of what’s real, what’s possible when it comes to beauty, is warped by our overexposure to these images,” Engeln said. “Instead of seeing them for what they are, which is extraordinarily rare, we start to see them as typical or average.” 
 
 Engeln described people who spend too much time worrying about their appearance as “beauty sick.” 
 
 “When you are beauty sick, you cannot engage with the world,” she said, “because between you and the world is a mirror. It’s a mirror that travels with you everywhere. You can’t seem to put it down.” 
 
 However, the term “Snapchat dysmorphia” was just coined this year by British cosmetic doctor Tijion Esho. 
 
 According to the JAMA article, “Snapchat dysmorphia” is a form of body dysmorphic disorder. Also known as body dysmorphia or BDD, the condition is a mental disorder that causes people to be “extremely preoccupied with a perceived flaw in appearance that to others can’t be seen or appears minor,” according to the Mayo Clinic. People who have BDD tend to obsess over their appearance and body image, often checking the mirror, grooming or seeking reassurance for many hours a day, the clinic said. Treatments include cognitive behavioral therapy and medication. 
 
 “Today’s generation can’t escape ‘the Truman effect’ because from birth they are born into an age of social platforms where their feelings of self-worth can be based purely on the number of likes and followers that they have, which is linked to how good they look or how great these images are,” Esho told the Independent. 
 
 Until recently, only models and celebrities could take flawless, envy-inducing photos, the JAMA article said. However, given the accessibility of editing applications, once seemingly unattainable beauty standards now flood social media feeds daily, and the “perfect” people in the photos are your friends, classmates and family members, the article’s authors wrote. 
 
 “Our society is becoming more and more preoccupied, obsessed with social media and images and photographs and what we look like,” Vashi said. “Now, everywhere you go people are taking selfies and then going on social media.” 
 
 According to the annual American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery survey, selfies continue to be a driving force behind why people wish to get plastic surgery done. 
 
 In 2017, the survey found that 55 percent of surgeons reported seeing patients who requested surgery to look better in selfies — a 13 percent increase from the previous year’s results. 
 
 Being inundated by these edited images on a regular basis can take a toll on people, Vashi said, adding that looking at a photo of yourself and not seeing the same thing reflected in the mirror or an unedited photo can make people unhappy. In some cases, it can even lead to developing body dysmorphic disorder, she said. 
 
 “It can bring feelings of sadness, and then if one really develops this disorder, that sadness clearly progresses to something that can be dangerous and alarming,” she said. 
 
 A 2007 study published in Primary Psychiatry found that about 80 percent of people suffering from body dysmorphic disorder “experience lifetime suicidal ideation and 24% to 28% have attempted suicide.” 
 
 While various experts, including plastic surgeons and psychologists, have cautioned against Snapchat dysmorphia, Vashi said it is unlikely that people will change their behavior in the near future. 
 
 “It sounds like people are still going to do it because they like it. They like the way they look,” she said. “I’m just one small person in a big world, I can’t change everything, but I can make people aware and recognize and know that it’s not the real world. It’s like living in a fantasy.” ||||| Snapchat and Instagram filters are influencing how young people think about beauty. 
 
 Alarmingly, more people are requesting plastic surgery to look better in selfies, according to the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 
 
 And in one disturbing emerging phenomenon, dubbed "Snapchat dysmorphia," some patients are getting plastic surgery to look more like their filtered selfies. 
 
 According to Boston University researchers, digital filters are likely contributing to a rise in body dysmorphia, where people are overly anxious about their appearance. 
 
 
 
 Instagram and Snapchat filters are the new celebrity photo, offering up unrealistic standards of beauty that might trigger people to feel unhappy with the way they look in real life. 
 
 Now Playing: 
 
 That's according to three Boston University researchers, who published an article about body dysmorphia in the JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery medical journal this month. The article is not a study, but an overview of industry research and studies. 
 
 Body dysmorphia is a mental health condition where people feel unduly worried about the way they look, and the authors wrote that Snapchat and Instagram filters were "altering people’s perception of beauty worldwide." 
 
 They highlighted one especially disturbing phenomenon: "Snapchat dysmorphia." They characterised this as an emerging phenomenon where plastic surgery patients no longer ask to look like celebrities, but more like their own filtered selfies with "fuller lips, bigger eyes, or a thinner nose." 
 
 Snapchat dysmorphia was first reported by The Independent earlier this year, when a cosmetic surgeon said more women were asking to look like their selfies. The Boston researchers wrote: "This is an alarming trend because those filtered selfies often present an unattainable look and are blurring the line of reality and fantasy for these patients." 
 
 Lucy Yang/INSIDER 
 
 They added: "It is known that the angle and close distance at which selfies are taken may distort facial dimensions and lead to dissatisfaction. Patients may seek surgery hoping to look better in selfies and social media." 
 
 And according to the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 55% of surgeons reported seeing plastic surgery patients who wanted procedures to improve how they looked in selfies in 2017, versus 42% the prior year. 
 
 "Overall, social media apps, such as Snapchat and Facetune, are providing a new reality of beauty for today’s society," the Boston authors wrote. "These apps allow one to alter his or her appearance in an instant and conform to an unrealistic and often unattainable standard of beauty." 
 
 Business Insider has previously written about how the filters that come pre-loaded on certain smartphone cameras, especially on Asian phones, whiten people's skin and airbrush features. 
 
 According to the Boston University researchers, the ready availability of filters and self-editing on phones is an alarming problem that is likely contributing to rising body issue anxieties among young people. 
 
 They said: "Models and actors were made to look perfect in magazines and ads, but the general public did not have easy access to methods to alter their own appearance ... Today, with apps like Snapchat and Facetune, that same level of perfection is accessible to everyone. Now, it is not just celebrities propagating beauty standards: it is a classmate, a coworker, or a friend." 
 
 Tell us about how you use “Stories” on social networks. 
 
 Want to take more surveys? Share your opinion – Become a BI insider today! 
 
 Join the conversation about this story » 
 
 NOW WATCH: What people get wrong about superfoods 
 
 See Also: 
 
 SEE ALSO: How popular smartphones make your skin look 'whiter' in selfies ||||| Prim psychiatry . Author manuscript; available in PMC 2008 Apr 30. Published in final edited form as: PMCID: PMC2361388 NIHMSID: NIHMS37504 PMID: 18449358 Suicidality in Body Dysmorphic Disorder , MD Katharine A. Phillips Dr. Phillips is professor of psychiatry and human behavior at the Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University and director of the Body Dysmorphic Disorder and Body Image Program at Butler Hospital in Providence, Rhode Island Find articles by Katharine A. Phillips Author information Copyright and License information Disclaimer Katharine A. Phillips, Dr. Phillips is professor of psychiatry and human behavior at the Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University and director of the Body Dysmorphic Disorder and Body Image Program at Butler Hospital in Providence, Rhode Island; Please direct all correspondence to: Katharine A. Phillips, MD, Butler Hospital, 345 Blackstone Blvd, Providence, RI 02906; Tel: 401-455-6490; Fax: 401-455-6539; E-mail: ude.nworB@spillihP_enirahtaK Copyright notice 
 
 Abstract Suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and completed suicide appear common in individuals with body dysmorphic disorder (BDD). Available evidence indicates that approximately 80% of individuals with BDD experience lifetime suicidal ideation and 24% to 28% have attempted suicide. Although data on completed suicide are limited and preliminary, the suicide rate appears markedly high. These findings underscore the importance of recognizing and effectively treating BDD. However, BDD is underrecognized in clinical settings even though it is relatively common and often presents to psychiatrists and other mental health practitioners, dermatologists, surgeons, and other physicians. This article reviews available evidence on suicidality in BDD and discusses how to recognize and diagnose this often secret disorder. Efficacious treatments for BDD, ie, serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) and cognitive-behavioral therapy, are also discussed. Although data are limited, it appears that SRIs often diminish suicidality in these patients. Additional research is greatly needed on suicidality rates, characteristics, correlates, risk factors, treatment, and prevention of suicidality in BDD. 
 
 Needs Assessment: Recent evidence indicates that individuals with body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) have high rates of suicidal ideation and behavior. However, BDD often goes undiagnosed in clinical settings, even though it is relatively common. It is important to be aware of the suicide risk for these individuals and to recognize and appropriately treat patients with BDD. Learning Objectives: Familiarize with suicidality rates in individuals with body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) 
 
 Identify other aspects of suicidality (eg, clinical correlates) in BDD. 
 
 Identify clinical features of BDD. 
 
 Identify approaches to diagnosing and effectively treating BDD. Target Audience: Primary care physicians and psychiatrists. CME Accreditation Statement: This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essentials and Standards of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the Mount Sinai School of Medicine and MBL Communications, Inc. The Mount Sinai School of Medicine is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians. Credit Designation: The Mount Sinai School of Medicine designates this educational activity for a maximum of 3 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Faculty Disclosure Policy Statement: It is the policy of the Mount Sinai School of Medicine to ensure objectivity, balance, independence, transparency, and scientific rigor in all CME-sponsored educational activities. All faculty participating in the planning or implementation of a sponsored activity are expected to disclose to the audience any relevant financial relationships and to assist in resolving any conflict of interest that may arise from the relationship. Presenters must also make a meaningful disclosure to the audience of their discussions of unlabeled or unapproved drugs or devices. This information will be available as part of the course material. This activity has been peer-reviewed and approved by Eric Hollander, MD, chair and professor of psychiatry at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine, and Norman Sussman, MD, editor of Primary Psychiatryand professor of psychiatry at New York University School of Medicine. Review Date: October 25, 2007. Dr. Hollander reports no affiliation with or financial interest in any organization that may pose a conflict of interest. Dr. Sussman is a consultant to and on the advisory boards of GlaxoSmithKline and Wyeth; and has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, and Wyeth. To receive credit for this activity: Read this article and the two CME-designated accompanying articles, reflect on the information presented, and then complete the CME posttest and evaluation found on page 87. To obtain credits, you should score 70% or better. Early submission of this posttest is encouraged: please submit this posttest by December 1, 2009 to be eligible for credit. Release date: December 1, 2007. Termination date: December 31, 2009. The estimated time to complete all three articles and the posttest is 3 hours. 
 
 INTRODUCTION This article is devoted to the topic of suicidality in body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) because emerging empirical data and clinical experience indicate that individuals with BDD are often suicidal and may be at particularly high risk for completed suicide. Patients with BDD are often highly distressed, feel unacceptable to themselves and others, are often depressed and socially isolated, and have other risk factors for suicidal thinking and behavior. However, BDD often goes unrecognized in clinical settings. It is important to recognize BDD and institute appropriate treatment, which often improves BDD symptoms and may diminish suicidal thinking and behavior. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, (DSM-IV),1 defines BDD as a preoccupation with an imagined defect in appearance; if a slight physical anomaly is present, the concern is markedly excessive. The preoccupation must cause clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other areas of functioning. The appearance concerns cannot be better accounted for by another mental disorder such as anorexia nervosa. BDD is also referred to as “dysmorphophobia.” BDD appears to be relatively common. In the largest epidemiologic study, a nationwide survey in Germany (n=2,552), the prevalence of current BDD was 1.7% (95% CI=1.2–2.1%); BDD was somewhat more common in women (1.9%) than in men (1.4%).2 The prevalence of BDD has ranged from 0.7% to 1.1% in smaller community studies and from 2.3% to 13% in nonclinical student samples.3,4 BDD appears relatively common in clinical settings, including inpatient psychiatric settings; among patients with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), eating disorders, social anxiety disorder (SAD), and major depressive disorder (MDD; especially atypical depression); and in dermatology and cosmetic surgery settings.3,4 However, BDD often goes unrecognized.5–7 Many patients are too embarrassed and ashamed of their appearance concerns to raise them with a clinician.3,6 Patients with BDD can be severely disabled and suicidal. Thus, it is important to assess patients for BDD and be alert for clues to its presence.3,8,9 If the diagnosis is missed or misdiagnosed —or if only comorbid conditions such as depression are treated—BDD symptoms, psychosocial functioning, and suicidality may not improve.3,8 Because BDD may be less familiar to clinicians than other mental disorders, this article first briefly discusses some of BDD’s clinical features. Empirical evidence on suicidality in BDD is then reviewed. Finally, to manage suicidality, BDD must be detected (which is sometimes challenging), accurately diagnosed, and appropriately treated. This article, therefore, briefly discusses these topics. More comprehensive sources on BDD’s diagnosis and treatment are available elsewhere (S Wilhelm, PhD, unpublished data 2007).3,4,9,10 
 
 CLINICAL FEATURES OF BODY DYSMORPHIC DISORDER Although individuals with BDD appear normal looking to others, they are preoccupied with distressing and time-consuming thoughts that some aspect of their physical appearance looks flawed or defective.3,5,11–15 They may worry, for example, that they have very noticeable acne, their skin is too red or terribly scarred, their hair is thinning, their nose is too large or misshapen, their head is too big, or their stomach is huge and protuberant. The appearance concerns can focus on any body area, and preoccupation with multiple body areas is common. The appearance preoccupations are obsessional, occurring on average for 3–8 hours per day. The beliefs about the perceived appearance defects are usually delusional or characterized by poor insight.3,16 In other words, most patients are completely or mostly convinced that the disliked body areas look abnormal, ugly, defective, flawed, unattractive, or deformed. Some patients describe themselves as looking like a monster, a severe burn victim, or the “Elephant Man.” Two-thirds of patients have ideas or delusions of reference, believing that other people take special notice of the “defect” (eg, stare at it, laugh at it, or recoil in horror because the defect is so ugly). Nearly all patients perform BDD-related compulsive behaviors, many of which may be observed by other people and can thus be a clue that a person has BDD.3,5,13–15 The aim of these behaviors is usually to check, fix, hide, or be reassured about the perceived defects. Common behaviors are mirror checking, excessive grooming (eg, compulsive hair styling or hair cutting, shaving, plucking eyebrows or body hair, excessive makeup application), asking other people if they look okay, skin picking, frequent clothes changing, tanning (eg, to cover perceived blemishes or “pale” skin), and compulsive shopping for beauty products and clothes. Most patients attempt to “camouflage” the perceived defects, such as by wearing a baseball cap, sunglasses, bulky clothes that cover their body, or heavy makeup, or by holding their body in certain positions (eg, turning the “bad side” of their face away from other people). The gender ratio has varied across studies but appears to be in the range of 1:1 to 3:2 (female:male).3 Comorbidity is common, with MDD, substance use disorders, OCD, and SAD most frequent.17 Functioning and quality of life are usually very poor. For example, in studies that used the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, mental health-related quality of life was markedly poorer than for the general population, and even poorer than for patients with diabetes, a recent myocardial infarction, or clinical depression.18 
 
 SUICIDALITY IN BODY DYSMORPHIC DISORDER Suicidal Ideation and Suicide Attempts in Body Dysmorphic Disorder Over the past century, patients with BDD have been described as being so distressed over their “ugliness” that they thought about, attempted, or committed suicide.13,19–22 For example, one young woman who obsessed about perceived lines under her eyes said, “I am constantly thinking about them, about my face and how I have changed. Makeup is just a waste of time. Life is not worth living.”19 Like this woman and other patients described in earlier reports, a patient seen by the author of this article was so distressed by her supposedly “large” nose, “ugly” hair, and “small” breasts that she considered suicide. She thought about her perceived appearance flaws “every second of every day,” and described these thoughts as “very, very distressing—an obsession. They’re so horrible I get suicidal; it is why I overdosed....” Cross-Sectional/Retrospective Data Empirical research on suicidality in BDD, while still limited, indicates that suicidal ideation and attempts are common in this disorder. summarizes data on suicidal ideation and suicide attempts from cross-sectional studies. Percentages in reflect lifetime (ie, past or current) rates, except for the Italian study which reported a current rate; the German study did not specify a period of time during which suicidality occurred. The United States sample of 307 subjects consisted of individuals seeking consultation or treatment in a BDD specialty setting (this sample is an expansion of previously reported samples).5,23 The other US study (n=200) was more broadly ascertained. Most participants were not seeking or receiving treatment in a BDD specialty setting. 24 The Italian study contained a clinical outpatient sample,15 and the study from England consisted of clinician referrals and self-referrals in response to media articles on BDD.11 The German study was a nationwide survey with participants representative of the general population; 42 individuals were diagnosed with BDD.2 The two US studies found a high rate of lifetime suicidal ideation (81% and 78%) even though the mean age of subjects was only in the early 30s. Comparisons with other groups must be made cautiously because direct comparisons were not made. However, these suicidal ideation rates are higher than reported for any mental disorder in an outpatient study and higher than reported for schizophrenia or MDD.25–27 Regarding suicidal ideation attributed primarily to BDD, both of the US studies found a high lifetime (current and past) rate, and the Italian study found a high current rate. A possible explanation for the lower rate in the German study is that the time period was not specified (this was also the case for suicide attempts). In addition, in the US studies suicidal ideation included thoughts that life was not worth living, whereas the German study asked a “higher-threshold” question about thoughts of taking one’s own life. TABLE 1 Suicidality Variable Non-Epidemiologic Samples Epidemiologic Sample US (n=307) US (n=200) Italy (n=58) England (n=50) Germany (n=42)† Suicidal ideation 81% 78% – – – Suicidal ideation due to BDD‡ 68% 55% 45% – 19% Attempted suicide 24% 28% – 24% – Attempted suicide due to BDD‡ 15% 13% – – 7% Number of suicide attempts§ 2.1±1.4 3.2±4.1 – – – Number of suicide attempts due to BDD‡,§ 1.2±1.4 1.2±3.0 – – – Open in a separate window Studies have found that 24% to 28% of individuals with BDD have attempted suicide ( ). Although here, too, comparisons with other populations should be made cautiously, these suicide attempt rates are an estimated 6–23 times higher than reported for the US population; within the range reported for depressed outpatients; and higher than that which has been reported for generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, or agoraphobia.25,27–32 A small chart-review study of clinic patients in Brazil (n=20) found that only 15% of subjects had a history of suicidal behavior.33 It is unclear whether the lower percentage in this study reflects numerical instability of the result due to the small sample or other factors. Taken together, these studies suggest that individuals with BDD have high rates of suicidal ideation and attempts. However, the findings vary to some extent across studies. Differences across studies may be attributable to differences in sample ascertainment. For example, somewhat lower rates might be expected in an epidemiologic sample. In addition, the studies used different questions to assess suicidality. Higher rates might be expected in the US studies, which asked about lifetime suicidality, whereas the time period covered in the German study was unspecified. Differences may also be attributable to cultural differences or other factors. Clinical Correlates of Suicidality in Body Dysmorphic Disorder One of the above studies (n=200)24 examined clinical correlates of lifetime suicidal ideation and attempts. In univariate analyses, both suicidal ideation and suicide attempts were significantly associated with more severe lifetime BDD, greater current functional impairment, lifetime bipolar disorder, any personality disorder, and borderline personality disorder. A history of suicidal ideation (but not suicide attempts) was additionally associated with comorbid lifetime MDD. A history of suicide attempts (but not ideation) was additionally associated with lifetime posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), an eating disorder, a substance use disorder, and delusional BDD beliefs (as opposed to non-delusional BDD beliefs). In logistic regression analyses, which examined which variables were independently associated with suicidality when controlling for other variables, lifetime suicidal ideation was independently predicted by comorbid MDD (odds ratio [OR]=2.77, P=.011) and more severe BDD (with each one-point increase on a nine-point BDD severity scale, the odds of suicidal ideation increased by 1.48; P=.003). Suicide attempts were independently predicted by PTSD (OR=6.44, P=.011), a substance use disorder (OR=3.07, P=.011), and more severe BDD (with each one-point increase on a nine-point BDD severity scale, the odds of a suicide attempt increased by 1.59; P=.005). Prospective Data One of the studies in (n=200) prospectively followed 185 subjects for up to 4 years, enabling determination of mean annual suicidality rates.34 As shown in ,34 annual suicidality rates were very high. Suicidal ideation was reported by 57.8% of subjects per year (annual weighted mean). This rate is approximately 10–25 times higher than the annual rate in the US population.29,35 Over prospective follow-up, 35.6% of subjects per year reported suicidal ideation that was attributed primarily to BDD symptoms. Among the entire sample, BDD severity was correlated r=.42 (P<.001) with the occurrence of suicidal ideation. TABLE 2 Variable Annual Weighted Mean Range (years 1–4) Subjects (%) 95% CI Subjects (%) Suicidal ideation 57.8 53.3–62.3 51.1–72.0 Suicidal ideation attributed to BDD (among entire sample) 35.6 31.2–39.9 31.0–39.8 Suicide attempt 2.6 1.1–4.0 0.0–3.7 Suicide attempt attributed to BDD (among entire sample) 1.5 0.4–2.6 0.0–1.9 Completed suicides 0.3 −0.1–0.8 0.0–0.8 Mean SD 95% CI Mean SD Among subjects with a suicide attempt Number of total attempts 2.5 2.1 1.4–3.6 1.3–4.8 0.5–3.6 Number of attempts attributed to BDD 2.0 2.9 1.0–3.0 0.8–3.5 0.8–4.5 Open in a separate window The mean annual suicide attempt rate of 2.6% in this study is an estimated 3–12 times higher than in the US population. 29,35 The medical threat of these attempts (plus those made during the month before intake into the study) was moderate or greater for 56% of the attempts. Suicidal intent was serious, very serious, or extreme for 72% of the attempts. Suicidality in Body Dysmorphic Disorder Compared to Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Three studies that compared clinical characteristics of BDD and OCD examined suicidality (two of the studies included a subset of subjects from the previously noted US studies).36–38 A significantly higher proportion of BDD subjects than OCD subjects reported suicidal ideation (in two of three studies) as well as suicidal ideation attributed primarily to their disorder (in two of two studies).37,38 One study assessed lifetime suicide attempts that were attributed primarily to BDD or OCD, finding a higher rate among BDD subjects than OCD subjects (22% versus 8%).37 One study found a higher lifetime rate of suicide attempts (40%) among subjects with comorbid BDD plus OCD than in those with only BDD or only OCD. This appeared to be accounted for by more severe BDD symptoms in the comorbid group.38 Suicide Attempts in Other Patient Samples Other studies have examined suicide attempts in clinical samples that were not ascertained for BDD. In a study on a general psychiatric inpatient unit (n=122), BDD patients had more suicide attempts than non-BDD patients at a trend level (P=.098).6 A significant difference was not found in an outpatient study, although the sample size was small (n=16 BDD patients), which may have led to type II error.7 In an inpatient sample ascertained for anorexia nervosa (n=41), those with comorbid BDD (n=16) had a strikingly high lifetime suicide attempt rate of 63%. Anorexia inpatients with comorbid BDD were three times more likely to have attempted suicide than anorexia inpatients without comorbid BDD (P=.009).39 Among those with comorbid BDD, 69% had considered suicide specifically because of their BDD symptoms. Suicidality in Youths with Body Dysmorphic Disorder Suicide is the third leading cause of death among 15- to- 24-year-olds in the US.40 Thus, suicidality in youths with BDD is important, especially because BDD usually begins during early adolescence.14,23 In two of the previously mentioned studies, 67% and 81% of youths reported a history of suicidal ideation.41,42 Reported rates in the community are 15% to 27%.43,44 In these two BDD studies, 21% and 44% of youths reported a lifetime suicide attempt,41,42 whereas the estimated lifetime prevalence of attempted suicide among adolescents in the community ranges between 2.2% and 20%.45,46 One BDD study directly compared adolescents to adults, finding that a higher proportion of adolescents than adults had attempted suicide (44% versus 24%, P=.012).41 This finding was unexpected, given that adolescents had had fewer years over which to have attempted suicide because of their younger age. This finding did not appear to be explained by higher rates of comorbid depression, more severe depressive symptoms, current treatment status, or a cohort effect. It is possible that adolescents’ recall of suicide attempts was more accurate than adults’ recall. It is also possible that adolescents are at higher risk for suicidality than adults. In a study of adolescents in an inpatient setting,47 adolescent inpatients with BDD (n=14) scored significantly higher (P<.001) than adolescent inpatients without BDD (n=207) on the Suicide Probability Scale. Completed Suicide in Body Dysmorphic Disorder Completed suicide has been reported in numerous case reports and series.3,13,21,48 A retrospective study of suicides known to have occurred over 20 years among patients in two dermatology practices found that most of the patients who committed suicide had acne or BDD.20 The above-noted prospective BDD study found a very high rate of completed suicide—an annual weighted mean of 0.35% per year ( ).34 This annual suicide rate, adjusted for age, gender, and geographic region, is approximately 45 times higher than in the US population.49 That is, the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) for BDD in this study was 45. While SMRs for other populations vary somewhat depending on the study, an SMR of 45 is higher than that for most other mental disorders; the SMR for eating disorders is approximately 23, for MDD approximately 20, and for bipolar disorder approximately 15.50 Prospective studies of depression and panic disorder, which used methodology very similar to that used in the BDD study, found lower suicide rates than in the BDD study.30,51 While these findings suggest that the suicide rate in BDD is markedly high, they should be considered preliminary, especially given the relatively small sample size and short duration of follow up in the prospective BDD study, which limits the stability and precision of the suicide rate. Prospective studies are needed over longer follow-up periods and in other samples. Two Cases of Completed Suicide The two cases described here were participants in the previously noted prospective BDD interview study.24 Both individuals were receiving treatment at the time of their death. The first patient was a 31-year-old single white male who was receiving disability payments due to psychopathology. He had severe BDD (score of 7 on a 7-point severity scale) and BDD was his primary (ie, most problematic) diagnosis. He also met criteria for SAD and was in partial remission from MDD and alcohol dependence. He had no past hospitalizations or suicide attempts. He committed suicide by hanging. The second patient, a 54-year-old single white male, was unemployed due to psychopathology. He had severe BDD (score of 7 on a 7-point severity scale) and BDD was his primary diagnosis. He also had MDD and was in partial or full remission from dependence on alcohol and several drugs. He had four past psychiatric hospitalizations, all primarily for BDD. He also had one prior suicide attempt, which he attributed primarily to BDD. He committed suicide by stabbing himself. Suicide Risk Factors in Individuals with Body Dysmorphic Disorder Individuals with BDD have many risk factors for suicide. Risk factors include high rates of suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, psychiatric hospitalization, unemployment and disability, being single or divorced, poor social supports, and a history of abuse.11,14,15,18,23,24,52 Additional risk factors are high comorbidity with MDD, eating disorders, and substance use disorders.12,17 In addition, individuals with BDD often have poor self-esteem as well as high levels of anxiety, depression, anger/hostility, and impulsivity.53,54 From a clinical perspective, it appears that BDD symptoms may fuel suicidal thinking in several ways. BDD symptoms are about the self, as looking ugly, defective, or abnormal, and as being inadequate, unlovable, and unacceptable.3,11 Negative beliefs about appearance are often firmly held (ie, are delusional) such that patients cannot obtain relief by recognizing that the beliefs are inaccurate or senseless.17 These negative thoughts and beliefs cause distressing feelings such as depression, anxiety, shame, and low self-esteem.3 Of possible relevance to BDD, OCD obsessions that contradict important aspects of the self (as BDD obsessions do) are more upsetting than other types of obsessions.55 The obsessional and intrusive nature of negative BDD-related thoughts further fuel distress. In addition, BDD-related thoughts and distress often lead to social isolation, as many patients feel too self-conscious and ashamed of how they look to be around other people, and many believe that other people reject them, or even mock them, because of how they look.3,16 It can be postulated that BDD symptoms such as these, in combination with suicide risk factors such as those above, may lead to suicidal thinking and behavior. 
 
 SUICIDE IN PATIENTS WHO RECEIVE COSMETIC SURGERY Six epidemiologic studies have found that women who received cosmetic breast implants have a suicide rate that is approximately twice the expected rate based on estimates in the general population.56 The largest investigation of this topic additionally found that women who had other types of cosmetic surgery also had an increased suicide rate.57 In some studies, women with breast implants who committed suicide were more likely to have had psychotherapy and more likely to have lower self-esteem and self-confidence, increased levels of depression, and an increased prevalence of mental illness as measured by psychiatric hospitalization.57 While reasons for the association between cosmetic surgery and suicide are unclear, one possible explanation is that some of these women may have had BDD, which is characterized by low self-esteem, depression, and a high rate of psychiatric hospitalization.56,58 In a recent study, breast augmentation/lift was the second most frequent cosmetic surgery received by individuals with BDD.59 The possible association of BDD with suicide in cosmetic surgery patients warrants further investigation. 
 
 HOW TO RECOGNIZE AND DIAGNOSE BODY DYSMORPHIC DISORDER BDD usually goes undiagnosed in clinical settings.3,5–7 Patients often conceal their symptoms due to embarrassment, shame, or a worry that they will be misunderstood and considered vain.3,6 They may disclose only depression, anxiety, or discomfort in social situations. To diagnose BDD, patients must usually be asked directly about BDD symptoms.3,4,8 BDD can be diagnosed by asking questions that mirror the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for BDD. Suggested questions are shown in .4 BDD is diagnosed if the person is excessively preoccupied with nonexistent or slight physical flaws (eg, thinks about them for at least 1 hour per day) and the preoccupation causes clinically significant distress or impairment in functioning. The appearance concerns should not be better accounted for by an eating disorder. However, if BDD and eating disorders co-occur, both disorders should be diagnosed. In depressed patients, it should not be assumed that BDD symptoms are irrelevant or simply a symptom of depression. If BDD diagnostic criteria are met, both BDD and depression should be diagnosed. BDD-related compulsive and safety behaviors such as mirror checking, excessive grooming, skin picking, and camouflaging may be clues that a person has BDD. TABLE 3 “Are you very worried about your appearance in any way?” or, “Are you unhappy with how you look?” If the patient replies affirmatively, proceed as you would with any other illness, asking the patient to tell you about his or her concern, eg, “What don’t you like about how you look?” or, “What is your concern?” Ask if there are other body areas they do not like, eg, “Are you unhappy with any other aspects of your appearance? Some people are worried about the appearance of their face, skin, hair, nose, or the shape or size of other body areas. Are these or any other body areas a concern for you?” Next, determine whether the patient is preoccupied with the perceived appearance flaws by asking, “How much time would you estimate that you spend each day thinking about your appearance, if you add up all the time you spend during the entire day?” or, “Do these concerns preoccupy you?” Thinking about the perceived flaws for a total of at least 1 hour per day is consistent with the diagnosis of BDD. Ask “How much distress do these concerns cause you?” After the patient replies, ask more specifically whether the concerns cause anxiety, anxiety around other people, anger, depression, panic, or suicidal thinking. Ask about effects of the appearance preoccupations on the patient’s life, eg, “Do these concerns interfere with your life or cause problems for you in any way?” After the patient replies, ask more specifically about effects on: Work: eg, being late, missing work, poor concentration or productivity, being unemployed or underemployed School: eg, being late, missing school, poor concentration or productivity, poor grades, dropping out of school, or not pursuing academic goals Social aspects of one’s life: eg, avoiding relationships, not dating, interference with intimacy or sexual functioning, avoiding social situations or events, becoming withdrawn from family or friends Other types of interference: eg, not caring for children, maintaining a household, paying bills, buying groceries, going shopping, or doing other household tasks Any other aspect of one’s life While BDD behaviors are not required for the diagnosis, most patients perform at least one of them (usually many), so these behaviors may be a clue that a patient has BDD. Ask, “Do you do things to check, try to fix, or hide the body areas you dislike?” Ask specifically about the most common behaviors: Camouflaging with clothing, sunglasses, hair, or body position Comparing their appearance with that of other people Checking the perceived flaws in mirrors or other reflecting surfaces Excessive grooming, eg, makeup application; face cleansing routines; or hair styling, combing, shaving, or plucking Seeking reassurance about how they look Touching the body areas Frequent clothes changing Skin picking to remove blemishes or other skin imperfections, or to “even out” one’s skin Tanning Dieting, excessive exercise, or excessive weightlifting Open in a separate window Patients should not be asked if they are concerned with an “imagined” defect in their appearance, as most have poor insight and do not think they are imagining the flaws they perceive. It is also best not to initially ask if they think they look disfigured or deformed, as words like these may be too extreme for some patients to endorse. Questions should focus specifically on physical appearance rather than bodily functioning, as patients may misinterpret the latter to apply only to physical illness. 
 
 TREATMENT OF BODY DYSMORPHIC DISORDER Treatment of BDD is described in more detail elsewhere (S Wilhelm, PhD, unpublished data, 2007).3,9,10 Serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) are currently recommended as first-line treatments, which appear effective for a majority of patients. In contrast, cosmetic treatment, such as surgery and dermatologic treatment, appears to usually be ineffective for BDD.11,59 All SRI studies indicate that SRIs are often efficacious for BDD.3,9,10 These studies consist of a controlled and blinded cross-over study that compared the SRI clomipramine to the non-SRI desipramine (n=29); a placebo-controlled fluoxetine study (n=67)60; and open-label trials of fluvoxamine, citalopram, and escitalopram (n=15–30).10,61 In these studies, 53% to 73% of patients responded to the SRI. The cross-over trial found greater efficacy for clomipramine than desipramine, suggesting that SSRIs may be more efficacious than non-SRIs for BDD. Delusional BDD patients often improve with SRI monotherapy. Twelve to 14 weeks of SRI treatment appear to often be needed before a response is seen, and relatively high SSRI doses (higher than typically used for depression) often appear to be needed.3,10 If an SSRI is inadequately effective, augmentation of the SRI with another medication, or switching to another SRI, may be effective.3,10 SRIs appear to diminish suicidality in BDD. In the fluoxetine study,60 6% of fluoxetine-treated patients worsened on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression suicidal ideation item between baseline and endpoint, versus 30% of patients on placebo (P=.001). In the escitalopram study, suicidality significantly decreased.61 Available data suggest that CBT is often efficacious for BDD.3,9,62 In two randomized studies (n=54 and n=19), patients treated with CBT improved significantly more than patients on a waiting list. CBT was efficacious for BDD in several case series (n=5–13). The number of sessions in these reports ranged from twelve 60-minute sessions to sixty 90- minute sessions. CBT for BDD usually includes cognitive restructuring to identify cognitive errors and develop more accurate and helpful BDD-related thoughts and beliefs, as well as advanced cognitive techniques which focus on core beliefs; behavioral experiments to test the accuracy of BDD beliefs; exposure to avoided situations such as social situations; and response prevention to decrease compulsive behaviors such as mirror checking (S Wilhelm, PhD, unpublished data, 2007).3,62 Daily CBT homework should be assigned. CBT components that also appear beneficial include mirror retraining, in which patients learn to see their entire body in a nonjudgmental and “holistic” way (rather than focusing on disliked areas), while refraining from excessive mirror checking; mindfulness skills; habit reversal for skin picking and repetitive hair pulling or plucking; activity scheduling and scheduling pleasant activities for more severely ill, depressed, and inactive patients; and motivational interviewing, which is often needed to engage and keep patients in treatment (S Wilhelm, PhD, unpublished data, 2007).3 
 
 CONCLUSION Available data indicate that individuals with BDD have high rates of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts, as well as a markedly high rate of completed suicide. These individuals appear to have many suicide risk factors. However, research on this important topic is limited. There is a pressing need for additional research on all aspects of suicidality in BDD, including rates, characteristics, correlates, risk factors, treatment, and prevention of suicidality. More specifically, studies are needed that use standard suicidality measures, and research is needed in a variety of samples— both clinical and epidemiologic—across different cultures and age groups. Longer follow-up of individuals with BDD is needed to obtain more precise estimates of the rate of completed suicide. The association between BDD and suicide in cosmetic surgery patients needs to be examined. Additional treatment research is also greatly needed, in keeping with Institute of Medicine63 and Surgeon General’s reports,64 which highlight the critical need to develop effective treatments for suicidality. More highly suicidal patients have been excluded from all BDD treatment studies to date because of the risks they pose. In this author’s clinical experience, SRIs are often effective for suicidal patients and should be prescribed for more highly suicidal patients with BDD. More highly suicidal patients also often benefit from therapy. However, there is a pressing need for research that examines the efficacy of existing BDD treatments for more highly suicidal patients and for research that develops even more effective treatments. Finally, because BDD often goes undiagnosed in clinical settings, there is a need for better recognition and diagnosis of this disorder. This will enable clinicians to provide appropriate clinical monitoring and treatment of these high-risk patients. ||||| Recommendations 
 
 The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists makes the following recommendations regarding breast and labial surgery in adolescents: 
 
 The obstetrician–gynecologist caring for adolescents should have good working knowledge of nonsurgical alternatives for comfort and appearance as well as knowledge of indications and timing of surgical intervention and referral. 
 
 When adolescents seek medical treatment, the first step is often education and reassurance regarding normal variation in anatomy, growth, and development. 
 
 Appropriate patient counseling and assessment of the adolescent’s physical maturity and emotional readiness are necessary before surgical management or referral. 
 
 Individuals should be screened for body dysmorphic disorder. If an obstetrician–gynecologist suspects an adolescent has body dysmorphic disorder, referral to a mental health professional is appropriate. 
 
 Adolescents, under the influence of pubertal hormones, undergo rapid transformation and growth of their breasts and genital tissues. This can lead an adolescent to question whether her body is normal and to express occasional dissatisfaction with her body’s appearance, size, symmetry, or function. There has been increasing patient interest in surgical modification of breast and genital tissues during the adolescent period. The obstetrician–gynecologist who provides care for adolescents with these concerns should have good working knowledge of nonsurgical alternatives for comfort and appearance as well as knowledge of indications and timing of surgical intervention and referral. 
 
 Adolescents often desire to improve physical conditions that, if left uncorrected, may affect them into adulthood or that they perceive as flawed (1). This age group may be under particular stress regarding these issues because of societal conceptions of the ideal female body and parental concerns for body perfection (2). Although reconstructive procedures aimed at correction of abnormalities (caused by congenital defects, trauma, infection, or disease) or cosmetic procedures performed to reshape normal structures may improve function, appearance, and self-esteem, not all adolescents are suited for surgical intervention. Appropriate counseling and guidance of adolescents with these concerns require a comprehensive and thoughtful approach, special knowledge of normal physical and psychosocial growth and development, and assessment of the physical maturity and emotional readiness of the patient. 
 
 Counseling Issues 
 
 A thoughtful approach is needed when discussing correction or enhancement of the breast or genitalia with adolescents and their families who seek advice. The adolescent and her parents or guardians should have specifics of the surgery, benefits, and possible risks discussed in detail. The indications and motivation for surgical procedures also should be reviewed. Adolescents who request to have plastic surgery typically have different motivations and goals compared with adults seeking these procedures, such as a desire to “fit in” as opposed to being distinctive (3). Assessing the emotional maturity of the adolescent and her ability to make autonomous decisions free from peer or family pressures is essential. The American Society of Plastic Surgeons notes that surgical procedures initiated by the adolescent are associated with more favorable outcomes than those initiated by family members (4). The obstetrician–gynecologist also should assess whether or not the adolescent has realistic goals of the outcomes and benefits of surgery preoperatively. Surgical procedures are not recommended for adolescents with behavioral or emotional disorders (3). 
 
 Individuals should be screened for body dysmorphic disorder, which according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, criteria include a preoccupation with an imagined physical defect or exaggerated concern about a physical defect that would not be apparent to the casual observer, or a history of repetitive or obsessive behaviors (such as repeated examination or attempts to conceal the flaw, or continually seeking reassurance from others) (5). Body dysmorphic disorder often begins during adolescence and leads to requests for repeated surgical correction without relief of symptoms. If an obstetrician–gynecologist suspects an adolescent has body dysmorphic disorder, referral to a mental health professional is appropriate. 
 
 Labiaplasty 
 
 At the time of puberty, the labia minora enlarge and grow to adult size. The normal labia minora can have marked variation in size, shape, and appearance (6). Asymmetry is common and may be seen as a normal variant. Despite increased awareness and focus on the appearance of the external genitalia, no consensus on the definition of labial hypertrophy or criteria for surgical intervention has been established (7). Mechanisms proposed for labial hypertrophy include congenital malformations, trauma, infection, and manual manipulation (through stretching or pressure). Surgical correction has been suggested based on length, appearance, and functional symptoms. Increasing trends in pubic hair removal, exposure to idealized images of genital anatomy, and increasing awareness of cosmetic vaginal surgery have been proposed as reasons for the increased interest in labial surgery (8, 9). The size of the labia minora can be functionally or psychologically distressing to adolescents. Symptoms of irritation, pain (especially with activity), and interference with menstrual hygiene or sexual relations may be reported. The adolescent patient also may express distress about the cosmetic appearance or visibility of the labia minora through formfitting clothing. Parents, unaware of the normal variation of labia minora anatomy, also may have concerns about their children’s anatomical differences based on their own body appearance. Although there may be a perception that labiaplasty is a minor procedure, serious complications can occur (eg, pain, painful scarring, dyspareunia, hematoma, edema, and infection). 
 
 When adolescents seek medical treatment, the first step is often education and reassurance regarding normal variation in anatomy, growth, and development. Nonsurgical comfort and cosmetic measures may be offered, including supportive garments, personal hygiene measures (such as use of emollients), arrangement of the labia minora during exercise, and use of formfitting clothing. Surgical correction (labiaplasty) in girls younger than 18 years should be considered only in those with significant congenital malformation, or persistent symptoms that the physician believes are caused directly by labial anatomy, or both. Physicians should be aware that surgical alteration of the labia that is not necessary to the health of the adolescent, who is younger than 18 years, is a violation of federal criminal law (10). At least half of the states also have laws criminalizing labiaplasty under certain circumstances, and some of these laws apply to minors and adults. Obstetrician–gynecologists should be aware of federal and state laws that affect this and similar procedures. 
 
 Breast Reduction Surgery 
 
 Breast reduction surgery in adolescents with large breasts can relieve back, shoulder, and neck pain. Surgical correction in adolescents has been associated with improvement of self-esteem, with a greater than 75% satisfaction rate in adolescents undergoing reduction mammoplasty (11, 12). In 2010, more than 4,600 breast reduction surgeries were performed on females aged 13–19 years (4). Recommendations for timing of surgery include postponing surgery until breast maturity is reached, waiting until there is stability in cup size over 6 months, and waiting until the age of 18 years. Although there is no one consensus on timing, it may reasonably be determined by the severity of symptoms. An assessment of the adolescent’s emotional, physiologic, and physical maturity is recommended. The surgeon should be confident that the adolescent’s goals are realistic and that she and her family have a clear sense of risks, benefits, and limitations of breast reduction (4). Nonsurgical alternatives may include proper garment fitting and support and, in some cases, weight reduction. Breast reduction surgery in adolescence typically does not affect the ability to breastfeed later in life (13). 
 
 Breast Augmentation 
 
 More than 8,200 breast augmentations were performed on 18–19-year-old women in 2013 (4). Breast augmentation in adolescents may be performed for reconstruction of congenital conditions with deformity or severe asymmetry or as an elective procedure to augment small breast size or mild asymmetry (3). The American Society of Plastic Surgeons has the following three recommendations for females considering breast augmentation: 1) they should be at least 18 years of age before undergoing the surgery; 2) they have the necessary physical and emotional maturity to ensure the most positive outcome; and 3) they have a realistic understanding of the potential results, as well as the possible need for additional surgery. Saline-filled implants are the only type of implant approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for females younger than 22 years. Saline-filled implants typically have a 10-year lifespan. Before surgery, the adolescent may be referred to specialty shops for assistance with pads or prostheses to wear with her clothing. 
 
 Conclusion 
 
 The obstetrician–gynecologist may receive requests from adolescents and their families for advice, surgery, or referral for conditions of the breast or vulva to improve appearance and function. It is important that the obstetrician–gynecologist be equipped to discuss normal sexual development, the wide variability in appearance of the breast and genitalia, nonsurgical treatment options, and autonomous decision making. Appropriate patient counseling and assessment of the adolescent’s physical maturity and emotional readiness are necessary before surgical management or referral. As with other surgical procedures, credentialing for cosmetic procedures should be based on education, training, experience, and demonstrated competence (14).
– Think you look better in your latest selfie than in real life? Then beware of "Snapchat dysmorphia," a newly dubbed term for people seeking plastic surgery to mimic their appearance in filtered selfies, the San Francisco Chronicle reports. "Sometimes I have patients who say, 'I want every single spot gone, and I want it gone by this week or I want it gone tomorrow,' because that's what this filtered photograph gave them," dermatologist Neelam Vashi tells the Washington Post. "They check off one thing, and it's gone. That's not realistic. I can't do that." Researchers say the fixation may be a new version of body dysmorphic disorder (or BDD), a mental ailment that makes people obsess over any perceived flaw in their appearance. A 2017 survey of plastic surgeons first spotted the trend, which is fueled by photo-filtering and editing technology once available only to celebrities. "This is an alarming trend because those filtered selfies often present an unattainable look and are blurring the line of reality and fantasy for these patients," according to an article in the JAMA medical journal co-written by Vashi. What's more, BDD is a serious mental disorder that can require cognitive behavioral therapy and medication—and lead to suicidal thoughts in 80% of sufferers, per a 2007 study. Just seeing an unfiltered image of oneself "can bring feelings of sadness" for some people, says Vashi, "and then if one really develops this disorder, that sadness clearly progresses to something that can be dangerous and alarming."