Abstract In 1992, Kalai and Kleitman proved that the diameter of a d -dimensional polyhedron with n facets is at most n 2 + log 2 d . In 2014, Todd improved the Kalai–Kleitman bound to ( n − d ) log 2 d . We improve the Todd bound to ( n − d ) − 1 + log 2 d for n ≥ d ≥ 7 , ( n − d ) − 2 + log 2 d for n ≥ d ≥ 37 , and ( n − d ) − 3 + log 2 d + O 1 ∕ d for n ≥ d ≥ 1 .
We also note that there are studies that attempt to understand the behavior of @math when the number of facets is sufficiently large. Gallagher and Kim @cite_23 provided an upper bound on the diameter of a normal simplicial complex and showed the tail-polynomiality ; more specifically, they showed that the diameter is bounded from above by a polynomial in @math when @math is sufficiently large. An alternative simpler proof for such tail-polynomial upper bounds can be found in Mizuno and Sukegawa @cite_13 . In contrast, in this paper, we assume that @math is large, and try to utilize this assumption to strengthen the previous results.
@cite_13 @cite_23
2298099604 2338231399 30524954 1990538552 2144865572 2005598280 2508647357 2609098951 2084050956 2001663593 2114789426 2399682168 2031923588 2000931246 2016576580 1664198596 2963702702 2592044494 2949393806 2012184276
In 1992, Kalai and Kleitman proved a quasipolynomial upper bound on the diameters of convex polyhedra. Todd and Sukegawa-Kitahara proved tail-quasipolynomial bounds on the diameters of polyhedra. These tail bounds apply when the number of facets is greater than a certain function of the dimension. We prove tail-quasipolynomial bounds on the diameters of polytopes and normal simplicial complexes. We also prove tail-polynomial upper bounds on the diameters of polyhedra. Let @math denote the maximum diameter of a @math -dimensional polyhedron with @math facets. In this paper, we propose a unified analysis of a recursive inequality about @math established by Kalai and Kleitman in 1992. This yields much simpler proofs of a tail--polynomial and tail--almost--linear bounds on @math which are recently discussed by Gallagher and Kim. In this paper, we prove tight lower bounds on the smallest degree of a nonzero polynomial in the ideal generated by @math or @math in the polynomial ring @math , @math are coprime, which is called over @math . The immunity of @math is lower bounded by @math , which is achievable when @math is a multiple of @math ; the immunity of @math is exactly @math for every @math and @math . Our result improves the previous bound @math by Green. We observe how immunity over @math is related to @math circuit lower bound. For example, if the immunity of @math over @math is lower bounded by @math , and @math , then @math requires @math circuit of exponential size to compute. We consider the problem of approximating a Boolean functionf∶ 0,1 n → 0,1 by the sign of an integer polynomialp of degreek. For us, a polynomialp(x) predicts the value off(x) if, wheneverp(x)≥0,f(x)=1, and wheneverp(x)<0,f(x)=0. A low-degree polynomialp is a good approximator forf if it predictsf at almost all points. Given a positive integerk, and a Boolean functionf, we ask, “how good is the best degreek approximation tof?” We introduce a new lower bound technique which applies to any Boolean function. We show that the lower bound technique yields tight bounds in the casef is parity. Minsky and Papert [10] proved that a perceptron cannot compute parity; our bounds indicate exactly how well a perceptron canapproximate it. As a consequence, we are able to give the first correct proof that, for a random oracleA, PP A is properly contained in PSPACE A . We are also able to prove the old AC0 exponential-size lower bounds in a new way. This allows us to prove the new result that an AC0 circuit with one majority gate cannot approximate parity. Our proof depends only on basic properties of integer polynomials. We give a sharp lower bound on the number of matchings of a given size in a bipartite graph. When specialized to regular bipartite graphs, our results imply Friedland's Lower Matching Conjecture and Schrijver's theorem proven by Gurvits and Csikvari. Indeed, our work extends the recent work of Csikvari done for regular and bi-regular bipartite graphs. Moreover, our lower bounds are order optimal as they are attained for a sequence of @math -lifts of the original graph as well as for random @math -lifts of the original graph when @math tends to infinity. We then extend our results to permanents and subpermanents sums. For permanents, we are able to recover the lower bound of Schrijver recently proved by Gurvits using stable polynomials. Our proof is algorithmic and borrows ideas from the theory of local weak convergence of graphs, statistical physics and covers of graphs. We provide new lower bounds for subpermanents sums and obtain new results on the number of matching in random @math -lifts with some implications for the matching measure and the spectral measure of random @math -lifts as well as for the spectral measure of infinite trees. We derive a new upper bound on the diameter of a polyhedron @math P = x ? R n : A x ≤ b , where @math A ? Z m × n . The bound is polynomial in @math n and the largest absolute value of a sub-determinant of @math A , denoted by @math Δ . More precisely, we show that the diameter of @math P is bounded by @math O ( Δ 2 n 4 log n Δ ) . If @math P is bounded, then we show that the diameter of @math P is at most @math O ( Δ 2 n 3.5 log n Δ ) . For the special case in which @math A is a totally unimodular matrix, the bounds are @math O ( n 4 log n ) and @math O ( n 3.5 log n ) respectively. This improves over the previous best bound of @math O ( m 16 n 3 ( log m n ) 3 ) due to Dyer and Frieze (Math Program 64:1---16, 1994). Spanners, emulators, and approximate distance oracles can be viewed as lossy compression schemes that represent an unweighted graph metric in small space, say O(n1+Δ) bits. There is an inherent tradeoff between the sparsity parameter Δ and the stretch function f of the compression scheme, but the qualitative nature of this tradeoff has remained a persistent open problem. It has been known for some time that when Δ ≥ 1 3 there are schemes with constant additive stretch (distance d is stretched to at most f(d) = d + O(1)), and recent results of Abboud and Bodwin show that when Δ In this paper we show that the lower bound of Abboud and Bodwin is just the first step in a hierarchy of lower bounds that characterize the asymptotic behavior of the optimal stretch function f for sparsity parameter Δ ∈ (0,1 3). Specifically, for any integer k ≥ 2, any compression scheme with size [EQUATION] has a sublinear additive stretch function f: f(d) = d + Ω(d1−1 k). This lower bound matches Thorup and Zwick's (2006) construction of sublinear additive emulators. It also shows that Elkin and Peleg's (1 + ϵ, β)-spanners have an essentially optimal tradeoff between Δ, ϵ, and β, and that the sublinear additive spanners of Pettie (2009) and Chechik (2013) are not too far from optimal. To complement these lower bounds we present a new construction of (1 + ϵ, O(k ϵ)k−1)-spanners with size [EQUATION], where hk Our lower bound technique exhibits several interesting degrees of freedom in the framework of Abboud and Bodwin. By carefully exploiting these freedoms, we are able to obtain lower bounds for several related combinatorial objects. We get lower bounds on the size of (β, ϵ)-hopsets, matching Elkin and Neiman's construction (2016), and lower bounds on shortcutting sets for digraphs that preserve the transitive closure. Our lower bound simplifies Hesse's (2003) refutation of Thorup's conjecture (1992), which stated that adding a linear number of shortcuts suffices to reduce the diameter to polylogarithmic. Finally, we show matching upper and lower bounds for graph compression schemes that work for graph metrics with girth at least 2γ + 1. One consequence is that 's (2010) additive O(γ)-spanners with size [EQUATION] cannot be improved in the exponent. The full' edge isoperimetric inequality for the discrete cube (due to Harper, Bernstein, Lindsay and Hart) specifies the minimum size of the edge boundary @math of a set @math , as a function of @math . A weaker (but more widely-used) lower bound is @math , where equality holds iff @math is a subcube. In 2011, the first author obtained a sharp stability' version of the latter result, proving that if @math , then there exists a subcube @math such that @math . The weak' version of the edge isoperimetric inequality has the following well-known generalization for the @math -biased' measure @math on the discrete cube: if @math , or if @math and @math is monotone increasing, then @math . In this paper, we prove a sharp stability version of the latter result, which generalizes the aforementioned result of the first author. Namely, we prove that if @math , then there exists a subcube @math such that @math , where @math . This result is a central component in recent work of the authors proving sharp stability versions of a number of Erd o s-Ko-Rado type theorems in extremal combinatorics, including the seminal complete intersection theorem' of Ahlswede and Khachatrian. In addition, we prove a biased-measure analogue of the full' edge isoperimetric inequality, for monotone increasing sets, and we observe that such an analogue does not hold for arbitrary sets, hence answering a question of Kalai. We use this result to give a new proof of the full' edge isoperimetric inequality, one relying on the Kruskal-Katona theorem. We show that, over Q, if an n-variate polynomial of degree d = nO(1) is computable by an arithmetic circuit of size s (respectively by an arithmetic branching program of size s) then it can also be computed by a depth three circuit (i.e. a ΣΠΣ-circuit) of size exp(O(√(d log n log d log s))) (respectively of size exp(O(√(d log n log s))). In particular this yields a ΣΠΣ circuit of size exp(O(√(d log d))) computing the d × d determinant Detd. It also means that if we can prove a lower bound of exp(omega(√(d log d))) on the size of any ΣΠΣ-circuit computing the d × d permanent Permd then we get super polynomial lower bounds for the size of any arithmetic branching program computing Permd. We then give some further results pertaining to derandomizing polynomial identity testing and circuit lower bounds. The ΣΠΣ circuits that we construct have the property that (some of) the intermediate polynomials have degree much higher than d. Indeed such a counterintuitive construction is unavoidable - it is known that in any ΣΠΣ circuit C computing either Detd or Perm_d, if every multiplication gate has fanin at most d (or any constant multiple thereof) then C must have size at least exp(Ω(d)). par>We prove some non-approximability results for restrictions of basic combinatorial optimization problems to instances of bounded “degreeror bounded “width.” Specifically: We prove that the Max 3SAT problem on instances where each variable occurs in at most B clauses, is hard to approximate to within a factor @math , unless @math . H stad [18] proved that the problem is approximable to within a factor @math in polynomial time, and that is hard to approximate to within a factor @math . Our result uses a new randomized reduction from general instances of Max 3SAT to bounded-occurrences instances. The randomized reduction applies to other Max SNP problems as well. We observe that the Set Cover problem on instances where each set has size at most B is hard to approximate to within a factor @math unless @math . The result follows from an appropriate setting of parameters in Feige's reduction [11]. This is essentially tight in light of the existence of @math -approximate algorithms [20, 23, 9] We present a new PCP construction, based on applying parallel repetition to the inner verifier,'' and we provide a tight analysis for it. Using the new construction, and some modifications to known reductions from PCP to Hitting Set, we prove that Hitting Set with sets of size B is hard to approximate to within a factor @math . The problem can be approximated to within a factor B [19], and it is the Vertex Cover problem for B =2. The relationship between hardness of approximation and set size seems to have not been explored before. We observe that the Independent Set problem on graphs having degree at most B is hard to approximate to within a factor @math , unless P = NP . This follows from a comination of results by Clementi and Trevisan [28] and Reingold, Vadhan and Wigderson [27]. It had been observed that the problem is hard to approximate to within a factor @math unless P = NP [1]. An algorithm achieving factor @math is also known [21, 2, 30, 16 . We consider the problem of robustly recovering a @math -sparse coefficient vector from the Fourier series that it generates, restricted to the interval @math . The difficulty of this problem is linked to the superresolution factor SRF, equal to the ratio of the Rayleigh length (inverse of @math ) by the spacing of the grid supporting the sparse vector. In the presence of additive deterministic noise of norm @math , we show upper and lower bounds on the minimax error rate that both scale like @math , providing a partial answer to a question posed by Donoho in 1992. The scaling arises from comparing the noise level to a restricted isometry constant at sparsity @math , or equivalently from comparing @math to the so-called @math -spark of the Fourier system. The proof involves new bounds on the singular values of restricted Fourier matrices, obtained in part from old techniques in complex analysis. We develop a new technique for constructing sparse graphs that allow us to prove near-linear lower bounds on the round complexity of computing distances in the CONGEST model. Specifically, we show an @math lower bound for computing the diameter in sparse networks, which was previously known only for dense networks [, SODA 2012]. In fact, we can even modify our construction to obtain graphs with constant degree, using a simple but powerful degree-reduction technique which we define. Moreover, our technique allows us to show @math lower bounds for computing @math -approximations of the diameter or the radius, and for computing a @math -approximation of all eccentricities. For radius, we are unaware of any previous lower bounds. For diameter, these greatly improve upon previous lower bounds and are tight up to polylogarithmic factors [, SODA 2012], and for eccentricities the improvement is both in the lower bound and in the approximation factor [Holzer and Wattenhofer, PODC 2012]. Interestingly, our technique also allows showing an almost-linear lower bound for the verification of @math -spanners, for @math . We introduce a method for proving lower bounds on the efficacy of semidefinite programming (SDP) relaxations for combinatorial problems. In particular, we show that the cut, TSP, and stable set polytopes on n-vertex graphs are not the linear image of the feasible region of any SDP (i.e., any spectrahedron) of dimension less than 2nδ, for some constant δ > 0. This result yields the first super-polynomial lower bounds on the semidefinite extension complexity of any explicit family of polytopes. Our results follow from a general technique for proving lower bounds on the positive semidefinite rank of a matrix. To this end, we establish a close connection between arbitrary SDPs and those arising from the sum-of-squares SDP hierarchy. For approximating maximum constraint satisfaction problems, we prove that SDPs of polynomial-size are equivalent in power to those arising from degree-O(1) sum-of-squares relaxations. This result implies, for instance, that no family of polynomial-size SDP relaxations can achieve better than a 7 8-approximation for max-sat. Let f be a random Boolean formula that is an instance of 3-SAT. We consider the problem of computing the least real number k such that if the ratio of the number of clauses over the number of variables of f strictly exceeds k , then f is almost certainly unsatisfiable. By a well-known and more or less straightforward argument, it can be shown that kF5.191. This upper bound was improved by to 4.758 by first providing new improved bounds for the occupancy problem. There is strong experimental evidence that the value of k is around 4.2. In this work, we define, in terms of the random formula f, a decreasing sequence of random variables such that, if the expected value of any one of them converges to zero, then f is almost certainly unsatisfiable. By letting the expected value of the first term of the sequence converge to zero, we obtain, by simple and elementary computations, an upper bound for k equal to 4.667. From the expected value of the second term of the sequence, we get the value 4.601q . In general, by letting the U This work was performed while the first author was visiting the School of Computer Science, Carleton Ž University, and was partially supported by NSERC Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council . of Canada , and by a grant from the University of Patras for sabbatical leaves. The second and third Ž authors were supported in part by grants from NSERC Natural Sciences and Engineering Research . Council of Canada . During the last stages of this research, the first and last authors were also partially Ž . supported by EU ESPRIT Long-Term Research Project ALCOM-IT Project No. 20244 . †An extended abstract of this paper was published in the Proceedings of the Fourth Annual European Ž Symposium on Algorithms, ESA’96, September 25]27, 1996, Barcelona, Spain Springer-Verlag, LNCS, . pp. 27]38 . That extended abstract was coauthored by the first three authors of the present paper. Correspondence to: L. M. Kirousis Q 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. CCC 1042-9832r98r030253-17 253 In their paper on the ''chasm at depth four'', Agrawal and Vinay have shown that polynomials in m variables of degree O(m) which admit arithmetic circuits of size 2^o^(^m^) also admit arithmetic circuits of depth four and size 2^o^(^m^). This theorem shows that for problems such as arithmetic circuit lower bounds or black-box derandomization of identity testing, the case of depth four circuits is in a certain sense the general case. In this paper we show that smaller depth four circuits can be obtained if we start from polynomial size arithmetic circuits. For instance, we show that if the permanent of nxn matrices has circuits of size polynomial in n, then it also has depth 4 circuits of size n^O^(^n^l^o^g^n^). If the original circuit uses only integer constants of polynomial size, then the same is true for the resulting depth four circuit. These results have potential applications to lower bounds and deterministic identity testing, in particular for sums of products of sparse univariate polynomials. We also use our techniques to reprove two results on: -the existence of nontrivial boolean circuits of constant depth for languages in LOGCFL; -reduction to polylogarithmic depth for arithmetic circuits of polynomial size and polynomially bounded degree. We introduce a new approach to isolate the real roots of a square-free polynomial @math with real coefficients. It is assumed that each coefficient of @math can be approximated to any specified error bound. The presented method is exact, complete and deterministic. Due to its similarities to the Descartes method, we also consider it practical and easy to implement. Compared to previous approaches, our new method achieves a significantly better bit complexity. It is further shown that the hardness of isolating the real roots of @math is exclusively determined by the geometry of the roots and not by the complexity or the size of the coefficients. For the special case where @math has integer coefficients of maximal bitsize @math , our bound on the bit complexity writes as @math which improves the best bounds known for existing practical algorithms by a factor of @math . The crucial idea underlying the new approach is to run an approximate version of the Descartes method, where, in each subdivision step, we only consider approximations of the intermediate results to a certain precision. We give an upper bound on the maximal precision that is needed for isolating the roots of @math . For integer polynomials, this bound is by a factor @math lower than that of the precision needed when using exact arithmetic explaining the improved bound on the bit complexity. We prove tight upper bounds on the logarithmic derivative of the independence and matching polynomials of d-regular graphs. For independent sets, this theorem is a strengthening of Kahn's result that a disjoint union of copies of Kd;d maximizes the number of independent sets of a bipartite d-regular graph, Galvin and Tet ali's result that the independence polynomial is maximized by the same, and Zhao's extension of both results to all d-regular graphs. For matchings, this shows that the matching polynomial and the total number of matchings of a d-regular graph are maximized by a union of copies of Kd;d. Using this we prove the asymptotic upper matching conjecture of Friedland, Krop, Lundow, and Markstrom. In probabilistic language, our main theorems state that for all d-regular graphs and all �, the occupancy fraction of the hard-core model and the edge occupancy fraction of the monomer-dimer model with fugacity � are maximized by Kd;d. Our method involves constrained optimization problems over distributions of random variables and applies to all d-regular graphs directly, without a reduction to the bipartite case. Using a variant of the method we prove a lower bound on the occupancy fraction of the hard-core model on any d-regular, vertex-transitive, bipartite graph: the occupancy fraction of such a graph is strictly greater than the occupancy fraction of the unique translationinvariant hard-core measure on the infinite d-regular tree We study the tail behavior for the maximum of discrete Gaussian free field on a 2D box with Dirichlet boundary condition after centering by its expectation. We show that it exhibits an exponential decay for the right tail and a double exponential decay for the left tail. In particular, our result implies that the variance of the maximum is of order 1, improving an (o( n) ) bound by Chatterjee (Chaos, concentration, and multiple valleys, 2008) and confirming a folklore conjecture. An important ingredient for our proof is a result of Bramson and Zeitouni (Commun. Pure Appl. Math, 2010), who proved the tightness of the centered maximum together with an evaluation of the expectation up to an additive constant. We show a new way to round vector solutions of semidefinite programming (SDP) hierarchies into integral solutions, based on a connection between these hierarchies and the spectrum of the input graph. We demonstrate the utility of our method by providing a new SDP-hierarchy based algorithm for constraint satisfaction problems with 2-variable constraints (2-CSP's). More concretely, we show for every 2-CSP instance I a rounding algorithm for r rounds of the Lasserre SDP hierarchy for I that obtains an integral solution that is at most worse than the relaxation's value (normalized to lie in [0,1]), as long as r > k ( ) ( ) ;, where k is the alphabet size of I, @math , and @math denotes the number of eigenvalues larger than @math in the normalized adjacency matrix of the constraint graph of @math . In the case that @math is a instance, the threshold @math is only a polynomial in @math , and is independent of the alphabet size. Also in this case, we can give a non-trivial bound on the number of rounds for instance. In particular our result yields an SDP-hierarchy based algorithm that matches the performance of the recent subexponential algorithm of Arora, Barak and Steurer (FOCS 2010) in the worst case, but runs faster on a natural family of instances, thus further restricting the set of possible hard instances for Khot's Unique Games Conjecture. Our algorithm actually requires less than the @math constraints specified by the @math level of the Lasserre hierarchy, and in some cases @math rounds of our program can be evaluated in time @math . Consider the random graph models G(n, #edges = M) and G(n, Prob(edge) = p) with M = M(n) = (1 + )n-1 3)n 2 and p = p(n) = (1 +An-1 3) n . For 1 > -1 define an i-component of a random graph as a component which has exactly I more edges than vertices. Call an i-component with I > 1 a complex component. For both models, we show that when A is constant, the expected number of complex components is bounded, almost surely (a.s.) each of these components (if any exist) has size of order n2 3, and the maximum value of I is bounded in probability. We prove that a.s. the largest suspended tree in each complex component has size of order n2 3, and deletion of all suspended trees results in a "smoothed" graph of size of order n 3, with the maximum vertex degree 3. The total number of branching vertices, i.e., of degree 3, is bounded in probability. Thus, each complex component is almost surely topologically equivalent to a 3-regular multigraph of a uniformly bounded size. Lengths of the shortest cycle and of the shortest path between two branching vertices of a smoothed graph are each of order n 3. We find a relatively simple integral formula for the limit distribution of the numbers of complex components, which implies, in particular, that all values of the "complexity spectrum" have positive limiting probabilities. We also answer questions raised by Erdos and Renyi back in 1960. It is proven that there exists p(A), the limiting planarity probability, with 0 < p(A) < 1, p(-oo) = 1, p(oo) = 0. In particular, G(n, M) (G(n, p), resp.) is almost surely nonplanar iff (M n 2)n-213 -* 00 ((np I)n-1 3) -+ oo, resp.).