The CL-SciSumm 2016 shared task introduced an interesting problem: given a document D and a piece of text that cites D, how do we identify the text spans of D being referenced by the piece of text? The shared task provided the first annotated dataset for studying this problem. We present an analysis of our continued work in improving our system’s performance on this task. We demonstrate how topic models and word embeddings can be used to surpass the previously best performing system.
In addition to these features, we have to consider that multiple citation markers may be present in a sentence. Thus, only certain parts of a sentence may be relevant to identifying the target of a particular citation marker. Qazvinian and Radev @cite_8 share an approach to find the fragment of a sentence that applies to a citation, especially in the case of sentences with multiple citation markers. The research of Abu-Jbara and Radev @cite_3 further argues that a fragment need not always be continguous.
@cite_3 @cite_8
62810358 2461928176 2130508301 2025882237 2097323193 2151170651 2112609142 1790180460 2343777367 2157979304 1991638834 2280395961 2103305545 2122778642 2018557178 2126953195 2008127487 1985710361 1995326326 2251332263
A citing sentence is one that appears in a scientific article and cites previous work. Citing sentences have been studied and used in many applications. For example, they have been used in scientific paper summarization, automatic survey generation, paraphrase identification, and citation function classification. Citing sentences that cite multiple papers are common in scientific writing. This observation should be taken into consideration when using citing sentences in applications. For instance, when a citing sentence is used in a summary of a scientific paper, only the fragments of the sentence that are relevant to the summarized paper should be included in the summary. In this paper, we present and compare three different approaches for identifying the fragments of a citing sentence that are related to a given target reference. Our methods are: word classification, sequence labeling, and segment classification. Our experiments show that segment classification achieves the best results. In example (1), a sentence from a Wall Street Journal article taken from the Penn TreeBank corpus is further segmented into four EDUs, (1a), (1b), (1c) and (1d) (RST, 2002). Discourse segmentation, clearly, is not as easy as sentence boundary detection. The lack of consensus with regards to what constitutes an elementary discourse unit adds to the difficulty. Building a rule based discourse segmenter can be a tedious task since these rules would have to be based on the underlying grammar of the particular parser that is to be used. Therefore, we adopted a neural network model for automatically building a discourse segmenter from an underlying corpus of segmented text. We chose to use part-of-speech tags, syntactic information, discourse cues and punctuation. Our ultimate goal is to build a discourse parser that uses this discourse segmenter. The data that we used to train and test our discourse segmenter is the RST-DT (RST, 2002) corpus. The corpus contains 385 Wall Street Journal articles from the Penn Treebank. The training set consists of 347 articles for a total of 6132 sentences, whilst the test set contains 38 articles for a total of 991 sentences. The RST-DT corpus provides us with pairs of sentences and EDUs. For the syntactic structure of the sentences, we have used both the gold standard Penn Treebank data and syntactic parse trees generated by (Charniak, 2000). As regards the discourse cues, we used a list of 168 possible discourse markers. Textual entailment recognition is the task of deciding, when given two text fragments, whether the meaning of one text is entailed from the other text. This year, at our second participation in the RTE competition, we improve the system built for the RTE3 competition. The main idea of our system is to map every word from hypothesis to one or more words from the text. For that, we transform the hypothesis making use of extensive semantic knowledge from sources like DIRT, WordNet, VerbOcean, Wikipedia and Acronyms database. After the mapping process, we associate a local fitness value to every word from hypothesis, which is used to calculate a global fitness value for current fragments of text. The global fitness value is decreased in cases in which a word from hypothesis cannot be map to one word from the text or when we have different forms of negations for mapped verbs. In the end, using thresholds identified in the training step for global fitness values, we decide for every pair from test data if we have entailment or not. We present a method for authorship discrimination that is based on the frequency of bigrams of syntactic labels that arise from partial parsing of the text. We show that this method, alone or combined with other classification features, achieves a high accuracy on discrimination of the work of Anne and Charlotte Bronte ¨, which is very difficult to do by traditional methods. Moreover, high accuracies are achieved even on fragments of text little more than 200 words long. UIUC participated in the HARD track in TREC 2004 and focused on the evaluation of a new method for identifying variable-length passages using HMMs. Most existing approaches to passage retrieval rely on pre-segmentation of documents, but the optimal boundaries of a relevant passage depends on both the query and the document. Our new method aims at determining or improving the boundaries of a relevant passage based on both the query and topical coherence in the document. In this paper, we describe the method and present analysis of our HARD 2004 evaluation results. The results show that the HMM method can improve the boundaries of pre-segmented passages in terms of overall passage retrieval accuracy and recall, but at the price of precision sometimes. However, due to the non-optimality of the relevance feedback procedure and the poor ranking performance based on passage scoring, the best of our passage runs is still worse than a whole document baseline run. Further experiments and analysis are needed to fully understand why the language modeling approach did not work well on passage scoring. We present a system for identifying the semantic relationships, or semantic roles, filled by constituents of a sentence within a semantic frame. Given an input sentence and a target word and frame, the system labels constituents with either abstract semantic roles, such as AGENT or PATIENT, or more domain-specific semantic roles, such as SPEAKER, MESSAGE, and TOPIC.The system is based on statistical classifiers trained on roughly 50,000 sentences that were hand-annotated with semantic roles by the FrameNet semantic labeling project. We then parsed each training sentence into a syntactic tree and extracted various lexical and syntactic features, including the phrase type of each constituent, its grammatical function, and its position in the sentence. These features were combined with knowledge of the predicate verb, noun, or adjective, as well as information such as the prior probabilities of various combinations of semantic roles. We used various lexical clustering algorithms to generalize across possible fillers of roles. Test sentences were parsed, were annotated with these features, and were then passed through the classifiers.Our system achieves 82 accuracy in identifying the semantic role of presegmented constituents. At the more difficult task of simultaneously segmenting constituents and identifying their semantic role, the system achieved 65 precision and 61 recall.Our study also allowed us to compare the usefulness of different features and feature combination methods in the semantic role labeling task. We also explore the integration of role labeling with statistical syntactic parsing and attempt to generalize to predicates unseen in the training data. We present a system for deciding whether a given sentence can be inferred from text. Each sentence is represented as a directed graph (extracted from a dependency parser) in which the nodes represent words or phrases, and the links represent syntactic and semantic relationships. We develop a learned graph matching approach to approximate entailment using the amount of the sentence's semantic content which is contained in the text. We present results on the Recognizing Textual Entailment dataset (, 2005), and show that our approach outperforms Bag-Of-Words and TF-IDF models. In addition, we explore common sources of errors in our approach and how to remedy them. The task of monolingual text alignment consists in finding similar text fragments between two given documents. It has applications in plagiarism detection, detection of text reuse, author identification, authoring aid, and information retrieval, to mention only a few. We describe our approach to the text alignment subtask of the plagiarism detection competition at PAN 2014, which resulted in the best-performing system at the PAN 2014 competition and outperforms the best-performing system of the PAN 2013 competition by the cumulative evaluation measure Plagdet. Our method relies on a sentence similarity measure based on a tf-idf-like weighting scheme that permits us to consider stopwords without increasing the rate of false positives. We introduce a recursive algorithm to extend the ranges of matching sentences to maximal length passages. We also introduce a novel filtering method to resolve overlapping plagiarism cases. Our system is available as open source. Proposing a candidate retrieval model for cross-lingual plagiarism detectionThe method relies on using two levels of proximity informationProposing a topic-based text segmentation methodComparing the method with other cross-lingual plagiarism detection approachesShowing improvements using text segmentation and positional language models The rapid growth of documents in different languages, the increased accessibility of electronic documents, and the availability of translation tools have caused cross-lingual plagiarism detection research area to receive increasing attention in recent years. The task of cross-language plagiarism detection entails two main steps: candidate retrieval and assessing pairwise document similarity. In this paper we examine candidate retrieval, where the goal is to find potential source documents of a suspicious text. Our proposed method for cross-language plagiarism detection is a keyword-focused approach. Since plagiarism usually happens in parts of the text, there is a requirement to segment the texts into fragments to detect local similarity. Therefore we propose a topic-based segmentation algorithm to convert the suspicious document to a set of related passages. After that, we use a proximity-based model to retrieve documents with the best matching passages. Experiments show promising results for this important phase of cross-language plagiarism detection. In citation-based summarization, text written by several researchers is leveraged to identify the important aspects of a target paper. Previous work on this problem focused almost exclusively on its extraction aspect (i.e. selecting a representative set of citation sentences that highlight the contribution of the target paper). Meanwhile, the fluency of the produced summaries has been mostly ignored. For example, diversity, readability, cohesion, and ordering of the sentences included in the summary have not been thoroughly considered. This resulted in noisy and confusing summaries. In this work, we present an approach for producing readable and cohesive citation-based summaries. Our experiments show that the proposed approach outperforms several baselines in terms of both extraction quality and fluency. Authorship analysis by means of textual features is an important task in linguistic studies. We employ complex networks theory to tackle this disputed problem. In this work, we focus on some measurable quantities of word co-occurrence network of each book for authorship characterization. Based on the network features, attribution probability is defined for authorship identification. Furthermore, two scaling exponents, q-parameter and α-exponent, are combined to classify personal writing style with acceptable high resolution power. The q-parameter, generally known as the nonextensivity measure, is calculated for degree distribution and the α-exponent comes from a power law relationship between number of links and number of nodes in the co-occurrence network constructed for different books written by each author. The applicability of the presented method is evaluated in an experiment with thirty six books of five Persian litterateurs. Our results show high accuracy rate in authorship attribution. Most conventional sentence similarity methods only focus on similar parts of two input sentences, and simply ignore the dissimilar parts, which usually give us some clues and semantic meanings about the sentences. In this work, we propose a model to take into account both the similarities and dissimilarities by decomposing and composing lexical semantics over sentences. The model represents each word as a vector, and calculates a semantic matching vector for each word based on all words in the other sentence. Then, each word vector is decomposed into a similar component and a dissimilar component based on the semantic matching vector. After this, a two-channel CNN model is employed to capture features by composing the similar and dissimilar components. Finally, a similarity score is estimated over the composed feature vectors. Experimental results show that our model gets the state-of-the-art performance on the answer sentence selection task, and achieves a comparable result on the paraphrase identification task. Paraphrase detection is the task of examining two sentences and determining whether they have the same meaning. In order to obtain high accuracy on this task, thorough syntactic and semantic analysis of the two statements is needed. We introduce a method for paraphrase detection based on recursive autoencoders (RAE). Our unsupervised RAEs are based on a novel unfolding objective and learn feature vectors for phrases in syntactic trees. These features are used to measure the word- and phrase-wise similarity between two sentences. Since sentences may be of arbitrary length, the resulting matrix of similarity measures is of variable size. We introduce a novel dynamic pooling layer which computes a fixed-sized representation from the variable-sized matrices. The pooled representation is then used as input to a classifier. Our method outperforms other state-of-the-art approaches on the challenging MSRP paraphrase corpus. When we write or prepare to write a research paper, we always have appropriate references in mind. However, there are most likely references we have missed and should have been read and cited. As such a good citation recommendation system would not only improve our paper but, overall, the efficiency and quality of literature search. Usually, a citation's context contains explicit words explaining the citation. Using this, we propose a method that "translates" research papers into references. By considering the citations and their contexts from existing papers as parallel data written in two different "languages", we adopt the translation model to create a relationship between these two "vocabularies". Experiments on both CiteSeer and CiteULike dataset show that our approach outperforms other baseline methods and increase the precision, recall and f-measure by at least 5 to 10 , respectively. In addition, our approach runs much faster in the both training and recommending stage, which proves the effectiveness and the scalability of our work. We consider the problem of question-focused sentence retrieval from complex news articles describing multi-event stories published over time. Annotators generated a list of questions central to understanding each story in our corpus. Because of the dynamic nature of the stories, many questions are time-sensitive (e.g. "How many victims have been found?") Judges found sentences providing an answer to each question. To address the sentence retrieval problem, we apply a stochastic, graph-based method for comparing the relative importance of the textual units, which was previously used successfully for generic summarization. Currently, we present a topic-sensitive version of our method and hypothesize that it can outperform a competitive baseline, which compares the similarity of each sentence to the input question via IDF-weighted word overlap. In our experiments, the method achieves a TRDR score that is significantly higher than that of the baseline. Citations play an essential role in navigating academic literature and following chains of evidence in research. With the growing availability of large digital archives of scientific papers, the automated extraction and analysis of citations is becoming increasingly relevant. However, existing approaches to citation extraction still fall short of the high accuracy required to build more sophisticated and reliable tools for citation analysis and corpus navigation. In this paper, we present techniques for high accuracy extraction of citations and references from academic papers. By collecting multiple sources of evidence about entities from documents, and integrating citation extraction, reference segmentation, and citation-reference matching, we are able to significantly improve performance in subtasks including citation identification, author named entity recognition, and citation-reference matching. Applying our algorithm to previously-unseen documents, we demonstrate high F-measure performance of 0.980 for citation extraction, 0.983 for author named entity recognition, and 0.948 for citation-reference matching. To paraphrase means to rewrite content while preserving the original meaning. Paraphrasing is important in fields such as text reuse in journalism, anonymizing work, and improving the quality of customer-written reviews. This article contributes to paraphrase acquisition and focuses on two aspects that are not addressed by current research: (1) acquisition via crowdsourcing, and (2) acquisition of passage-level samples. The challenge of the first aspect is automatic quality assurance; without such a means the crowdsourcing paradigm is not effective, and without crowdsourcing the creation of test corpora is unacceptably expensive for realistic order of magnitudes. The second aspect addresses the deficit that most of the previous work in generating and evaluating paraphrases has been conducted using sentence-level paraphrases or shorter; these short-sample analyses are limited in terms of application to plagiarism detection, for example. We present the Webis Crowd Paraphrase Corpus 2011 (Webis-CPC-11), which recently formed part of the PAN 2010 international plagiarism detection competition. This corpus comprises passage-level paraphrases with 4067 positive samples and 3792 negative samples that failed our criteria, using Amazon's Mechanical Turk for crowdsourcing. In this article, we review the lessons learned at PAN 2010, and explain in detail the method used to construct the corpus. The empirical contributions include machine learning experiments to explore if passage-level paraphrases can be identified in a two-class classification problem using paraphrase similarity features, and we find that a k-nearest-neighbor classifier can correctly distinguish between paraphrased and nonparaphrased samples with 0.980 precision at 0.523 recall. This result implies that just under half of our samples must be discarded (remaining 0.477 fraction), but our cost analysis shows that the automation we introduce results in a 18p financial saving and over 100 hours of time returned to the researchers when repeating a similar corpus design. On the other hand, when building an unrelated corpus requiring, say, 25p training data for the automated component, we show that the financial outcome is cost neutral, while still returning over 70 hours of time to the researchers. The work presented here is the first to join the paraphrasing and plagiarism communities. Comments left by readers on Web documents contain valuable information that can be utilized in different information retrieval tasks including document search, visualization, and summarization. In this paper, we study the problem of comments-oriented document summarization and aim to summarize a Web document (e.g., a blog post) by considering not only its content, but also the comments left by its readers. We identify three relations (namely, topic, quotation, and mention) by which comments can be linked to one another, and model the relations in three graphs. The importance of each comment is then scored by: (i) graph-based method, where the three graphs are merged into a multi-relation graph; (ii) tensor-based method, where the three graphs are used to construct a 3rd-order tensor. To generate a comments-oriented summary, we extract sentences from the given Web document using either feature-biased approach or uniform-document approach. The former scores sentences to bias keywords derived from comments; while the latter scores sentences uniformly with comments. In our experiments using a set of blog posts with manually labeled sentences, our proposed summarization methods utilizing comments showed significant improvement over those not using comments. The methods using feature-biased sentence extraction approach were observed to outperform that using uniform-document approach. We approach the problem of academic literature search by considering an unpublished manuscript as a query to a search system. We use the text of previous literature as well as the citation graph that connects it to find relevant related material. We evaluate our technique with manual and automatic evaluation methods, and find an order of magnitude improvement in mean average precision as compared to a text similarity baseline. We consider the task of identifying and labeling the semantic arguments of a predicate that evokes a FrameNet frame. This task is challenging because there are only a few thousand fully annotated sentences for supervised training. Our approach augments an existing model with features derived from FrameNet and PropBank and with partially annotated exemplars from FrameNet. We observe a 4 absolute increase in F1 versus the original model.