We exhibit a strong connection between cover times of graphs, Gaussian processes, and Talagrand's theory of majorizing measures. In particular, we show that the cover time of any graph @math is equivalent, up to universal constants, to the square of the expected maximum of the Gaussian free field on @math , scaled by the number of edges in @math . This allows us to resolve a number of open questions. We give a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm that computes the cover time to within an O(1) factor for any graph, answering a question of Aldous and Fill (1994). We also positively resolve the blanket time conjectures of Winkler and Zuckerman (1996), showing that for any graph, the blanket and cover times are within an O(1) factor. The best previous approximation factor for both these problems was @math for @math -vertex graphs, due to Kahn, Kim, Lovasz, and Vu (2000).
A fundamental bound of Matthews @cite_46 shows that @math where we recall that @math is the expected hitting time from @math to @math . Using the straightforward lower bound @math , this fact provides a deterministic @math -approximation to @math in @math -node graphs.
@cite_46
2136645553 2138144746 816673839 2900102855 1515635142 1967595345 1564010364 2907564786 2950981509 2509251441 2508919161 2609730020 2612518566 2009279347 2953105294 2047805348 2898008966 2146466672 1983915440 2034380011
We prove upper and lower bounds and give an approximation algorithm for the cover time of the random walk on a graph. We introduce a parameter M motivated by the well-known Matthews bounds (P. Matthews, 1988) on the cover time, C, and prove that M 2<C= O(M(lnlnn) sup 2 ). We give a deterministic-polynomial time algorithm to approximate M within a factor of 2; this then approximates C within a factor of O((lnlnn) sup 2 ), improving the previous bound O(lnn) due to Matthews. The blanket time B was introduced by P. Winkler and D. Zuckerman (1996): it is the expectation of the first time when all vertices are visited within a constant factor of the number of times suggested by the stationary distribution. Obviously C spl les B. Winkler and Zuckerman conjectured B=O(C) and proved B=O(Clnn). Our bounds above are also valid for the blanket time, and so it follows that B=O(C(lnlnn) sup 2 ). A general technique for proving lower bounds on expected covering times of random walks on graphs in terms of expected hitting times between vertices is given. This technique is used to prove (i) A tight bound of @math for the two-dimensional torus; (ii) A tight bound of @math for trees with maximum degree @math ; (iii) Tight bounds of @math for rapidly mixing walks on vertex transitive graphs, where @math denotes the maximum expected hitting time between vertices.In addition to these new results, the technique allows several known lower bounds on cover times to be systematically proved, often in a much simpler way.Finally, a different technique is used to prove an @math lower bound on the cover time, where @math is the second largest eigenvalue of the transition matrix. This was previously known only in the case where the walk starts in the stationary distribution [... We present a deterministic (1+o(1))-approximation O(n1 2+o(1)+D1+o(1))-time algorithm for solving the single-source shortest paths problem on distributed weighted networks (the CONGEST model); here n is the number of nodes in the network and D is its (hop) diameter. This is the first non-trivial deterministic algorithm for this problem. It also improves (i) the running time of the randomized (1+o(1))-approximation O(n1 2D1 4+D)-time algorithm of Nanongkai [STOC 2014] by a factor of as large as n1 8, and (ii) the O(є−1logє−1)-approximation factor of Lenzen and Patt-Shamir’s O(n1 2+є+D)-time algorithm [STOC 2013] within the same running time. Our running time matches the known time lower bound of Ω(n1 2 logn + D) [Das STOC 2011] modulo some lower-order terms, thus essentially settling the status of this problem which was raised at least a decade ago [Elkin SIGACT News 2004]. It also implies a (2+o(1))-approximation O(n1 2+o(1)+D1+o(1))-time algorithm for approximating a network’s weighted diameter which almost matches the lower bound by [PODC 2012]. In achieving this result, we develop two techniques which might be of independent interest and useful in other settings: (i) a deterministic process that replaces the “hitting set argument” commonly used for shortest paths computation in various settings, and (ii) a simple, deterministic, construction of an (no(1), o(1))-hop set of size O(n1+o(1)). We combine these techniques with many distributed algorithmic techniques, some of which from problems that are not directly related to shortest paths, e.g. ruling sets [ STOC 1987], source detection [Lenzen, Peleg PODC 2013], and partial distance estimation [Lenzen, Patt-Shamir PODC 2015]. Our hop set construction also leads to single-source shortest paths algorithms in two other settings: (i) a (1+o(1))-approximation O(no(1))-time algorithm on congested cliques, and (ii) a (1+o(1))-approximation O(no(1)logW)-pass O(n1+o(1)logW)-space streaming algorithm, when edge weights are in 1, 2, …, W . The first result answers an open problem in [Nanongkai, STOC 2014]. The second result partially answers an open problem raised by McGregor in 2006 [ sublinear.info , Problem 14]. In the distributed all-pairs shortest paths problem (APSP), every node in the weighted undirected distributed network (the CONGEST model) needs to know the distance from every other node using least number of communication rounds (typically called time complexity ). The problem admits @math -approximation @math -time algorithm and a nearly-tight @math lower bound [Nanongkai, STOC'14; Lenzen and Patt-Shamir PODC'15] @math , @math and @math hide polylogarithmic factors. Note that the lower bounds also hold even in the unweighted case and in the weighted case with polynomial approximation ratios LenzenP_podc13,HolzerW12,PelegRT12,Nanongkai-STOC14 . . For the exact case, Elkin [STOC'17] presented an @math time bound, which was later improved to @math [Huang, Nanongkai, Saranurak FOCS'17]. It was shown that any super-linear lower bound (in @math ) requires a new technique [Censor-Hillel, Khoury, Paz, DISC'17], but otherwise it remained widely open whether there exists a @math -time algorithm for the exact case, which would match the best possible approximation algorithm. This paper resolves this question positively: we present a randomized (Las Vegas) @math -time algorithm, matching the lower bound up to polylogarithmic factors. Like the previous @math bound, our result works for directed graphs with zero (and even negative) edge weights. In addition to the improved running time, our algorithm works in a more general setting than that required by the previous @math bound; in our setting (i) the communication is only along edge directions (as opposed to bidirectional), and (ii) edge weights are arbitrary (as opposed to integers in 1, 2, ... poly(n) ). ... We study the broadcast version of the CONGEST CLIQUE model of distributed computing. In this model, in each round, any node in a network of size @math can send the same message (i.e. broadcast a message) of limited size to every other node in the network. Nanongkai presented in [STOC'14] a randomized @math -approximation algorithm to compute all pairs shortest paths (APSP) in time @math on weighted graphs, where we use the convention that @math is essentially @math polylog @math and @math is essentially @math polylog @math . We complement this result by proving that any randomized @math -approximation of APSP and @math -approximation of the diameter of a graph takes @math time in the worst case. This demonstrates that getting a negligible improvement in the approximation factor requires significantly more time. Furthermore this bound implies that already computing a @math -approximation of all pairs shortest paths is among the hardest graph-problems in the broadcast-version of the CONGEST CLIQUE model and contrasts a recent @math -approximation for APSP that runs in time @math in the unicast version of the CONGEST CLIQUE model. On the positive side we provide a deterministic version of Nanongkai's @math -approximation algorithm for APSP. To do so we present a fast deterministic construction of small hitting sets. We also show how to replace another randomized part within Nanongkai's algorithm with a deterministic source-detection algorithm designed for the CONGEST model presented by Lenzen and Peleg at PODC'13. We present two new approximation algorithms for the problem of finding a k-node connected spanning subgraph (directed or undirected) of minimum cost. The best known approximation guarantees for this problem were @math for both directed and undirected graphs, and @math for undirected graphs with @math , where @math is the number of nodes in the input graph. Our first algorithm has approximation ratio @math , which is @math except for very large values of @math , namely, @math . This algorithm is based on a new result on @math -connected @math -critical graphs, which is of independent interest in the context of graph theory. Our second algorithm uses the primal-dual method and has approximation ratio @math for all values of @math . Combining these two gives an algorithm with approximation ratio @math , which asymptotically improves the best known approximation guarantee for directed graphs for all values of @math , and for undirected graphs for @math . Moreover, this is the first algorithm that has an approximation guarantee better than @math for all values of @math . Our approximation ratio also provides an upper bound on the integrality gap of the standard LP-relaxation. Thorup and Zwick showed that for any integer k≥ 1, it is possible to preprocess any positively weighted undirected graph G=(V,E), with |E|=m and |V|=n, in O(kmn @math ) expected time and construct a data structure (a (2k–1)-approximate distance oracle) of size O(kn @math ) capable of returning in O(k) time an approximation @math of the distance δ(u,v) from u to v in G that satisfies @math , for any two vertices u,v∈ V. They also presented a much slower O(kmn) time deterministic algorithm for constructing approximate distance oracle with the slightly larger size of O(kn @math log n). We present here a deterministic O(kmn @math ) time algorithm for constructing oracles of size O(kn @math ). Our deterministic algorithm is slower than the randomized one by only a logarithmic factor. Using our derandomization technique we also obtain the first deterministic linear time algorithm for constructing optimal spanners of weighted graphs. We do that by derandomizing the O(km) expected time algorithm of Baswana and Sen (ICALP’03) for constructing (2k–1)-spanners of size O(kn @math ) of weighted undirected graphs without incurring any asymptotic loss in the running time or in the size of the spanners produced. Motivated by applications in blockchains and sensor networks, we consider a model of @math nodes trying to reach consensus on their majority bit. Each node @math is assigned a bit at time zero, and is a finite automaton with @math bits of memory (i.e., @math states) and a Poisson clock. When the clock of @math rings, @math can choose to communicate, and is then matched to a uniformly chosen node @math . The nodes @math and @math may update their states based on the state of the other node. Previous work has focused on minimizing the time to consensus and the probability of error, while our goal is minimizing the number of communications. We show that when @math , consensus can be reached at linear communication cost, but this is impossible if @math . We also study a synchronous variant of the model, where our upper and lower bounds on @math for achieving linear communication cost are @math and @math , respectively. A key step is to distinguish when nodes can become aware of knowing the majority bit and stop communicating. We show that this is impossible if their memory is too low. Let @math be a tree space (or tree network) represented by a weighted tree with @math vertices, and @math be a set of @math stochastic points in @math , each of which has a fixed location with an independent existence probability. We investigate two fundamental problems under such a stochastic setting, the closest-pair problem and the nearest-neighbor search. For the former, we study the computation of the @math -threshold probability and the expectation of the closest-pair distance of a realization of @math . We propose the first algorithm to compute the @math -threshold probability in @math time for any given threshold @math , which immediately results in an @math -time algorithm for computing the expected closest-pair distance. Based on this, we further show that one can compute a @math -approximation for the expected closest-pair distance in @math time, by arguing that the expected closest-pair distance can be approximated via @math threshold probability queries. For the latter, we study the @math most-likely nearest-neighbor search ( @math -LNN) via a notion called @math most-likely Voronoi Diagram ( @math -LVD). We show that the size of the @math -LVD @math of @math on @math is bounded by @math if the existence probabilities of the points in @math are constant-far from 0. Furthermore, we establish an @math average-case upper bound for the size of @math , by regarding the existence probabilities as i.i.d. random variables drawn from some fixed distribution. Our results imply the existence of an LVD data structure which answers @math -LNN queries in @math time using average-case @math space, and worst-case @math space if the existence probabilities are constant-far from 0. Finally, we also give an @math -time algorithm to construct the LVD data structure. For any integers @math and @math , we show the existence of a set of @math vectors @math such that any embedding @math satisfying @math must have @math This lower bound matches the upper bound given by the Johnson-Lindenstrauss lemma [JL84]. Furthermore, our lower bound holds for nearly the full range of @math of interest, since there is always an isometric embedding into dimension @math (either the identity map, or projection onto @math ). Previously such a lower bound was only known to hold against linear maps @math , and not for such a wide range of parameters @math [LN16]. The best previously known lower bound for general @math was @math [Wel74, Lev83, Alo03], which is suboptimal for any @math . [See the paper for the full abstract.] We show tight upper and lower bounds for time-space trade-offs for the @math -Approximate Near Neighbor Search problem. For the @math -dimensional Euclidean space and @math -point datasets, we develop a data structure with space @math and query time @math for every @math such that: This is the first data structure that achieves sublinear query time and near-linear space for every approximation factor @math , improving upon [Kapralov, PODS 2015]. The data structure is a culmination of a long line of work on the problem for all space regimes; it builds on Spherical Locality-Sensitive Filtering [Becker, Ducas, Gama, Laarhoven, SODA 2016] and data-dependent hashing [Andoni, Indyk, Nguyen, Razenshteyn, SODA 2014] [Andoni, Razenshteyn, STOC 2015]. Our matching lower bounds are of two types: conditional and unconditional. First, we prove tightness of the whole above trade-off in a restricted model of computation, which captures all known hashing-based approaches. We then show unconditional cell-probe lower bounds for one and two probes that match the above trade-off for @math , improving upon the best known lower bounds from [Panigrahy, Talwar, Wieder, FOCS 2010]. In particular, this is the first space lower bound (for any static data structure) for two probes which is not polynomially smaller than the one-probe bound. To show the result for two probes, we establish and exploit a connection to locally-decodable codes. The celebrated Time Hierarchy Theorem for Turing machines states, informally, that more problems can be solved given more time. The extent to which a time hierarchy-type theorem holds in the distributed LOCAL model has been open for many years. It is consistent with previous results that all natural problems in the LOCAL model can be classified according to a small constant number of complexities, such as @math , etc. In this paper we establish the first time hierarchy theorem for the LOCAL model and prove that several gaps exist in the LOCAL time hierarchy. 1. We define an infinite set of simple coloring problems called Hierarchical @math -Coloring . A correctly colored graph can be confirmed by simply checking the neighborhood of each vertex, so this problem fits into the class of locally checkable labeling (LCL) problems. However, the complexity of the @math -level Hierarchical @math -Coloring problem is @math , for @math . The upper and lower bounds hold for both general graphs and trees, and for both randomized and deterministic algorithms. 2. Consider any LCL problem on bounded degree trees. We prove an automatic-speedup theorem that states that any randomized @math -time algorithm solving the LCL can be transformed into a deterministic @math -time algorithm. Together with a previous result, this establishes that on trees, there are no natural deterministic complexities in the ranges @math --- @math or @math --- @math . 3. We expose a gap in the randomized time hierarchy on general graphs. Any randomized algorithm that solves an LCL problem in sublogarithmic time can be sped up to run in @math time, which is the complexity of the distributed Lovasz local lemma problem, currently known to be @math and @math . In the subgraph-freeness problem, we are given a constant-size graph @math , and wish to determine whether the network contains @math as a subgraph or not. The relaxation of the problem only requires us to distinguish graphs that are @math -free from graphs that are @math -far from @math -free, meaning an @math -fraction of their edges must be removed to obtain an @math -free graph. Recently, Censor-Hillel et. al. and showed that in the property-testing regime it is possible to test @math -freeness for any graph @math of size 4 in constant time, @math rounds, regardless of the network size. However, Fraigniaud et. al. also showed that their techniques for graphs @math of size 4 cannot test @math -cycle-freeness in constant time. In this paper we revisit the subgraph-freeness problem and show that @math -cycle-freeness, and indeed @math -freeness for many other graphs @math comprising more than 4 vertices, can be tested in constant time. We show that @math -freeness can be tested in @math rounds for any cycle @math , improving on the running time of @math of the previous algorithms for triangle-freeness and @math -freeness. In the special case of triangles, we show that triangle-freeness can be solved in @math rounds independently of @math , when @math is not too small with respect to the number of nodes and edges. We also show that @math -freeness for any constant-size tree @math can be tested in @math rounds, even without the property-testing relaxation. Building on these results, we define a general class of graphs for which we can test subgraph-freeness in @math rounds. This class includes all graphs over 5 vertices except the 5-clique, @math . For cliques @math over @math nodes, we show that @math -freeness can be tested in @math rounds, where @math is the number of edges. We give a 7.18-approximation algorithm for the minimum latency problem that uses only @math calls to the prize-collecting Steiner tree (PCST) subroutine of Goemans and Williamson. This improves the previous best algorithms in both performance guarantee and running time. A previous algorithm of Goemans and Kleinberg for the minimum latency problem requires an approximation algorithm for the @math -minimum spanning tree ( @math -MST) problem which is called as a black box for each value of @math . Their algorithm can achieve an approximation factor of 10.77 while making @math PCST calls, a factor of 8.98 using @math PCST calls, or a factor of @math using @math PCST calls, via the @math -MST algorithms of Garg, Arya and Ramesh, and Arora and Karakostas, respectively. Here @math denotes the number of nodes in the instance, and @math is the largest edge cost in the input. In all cases, the running time is dominated by the PCST calls. Since the PCST subroutine can be implemented to run in @math time, the overall running time of our algorithm is @math . We also give a faster randomized version of our algorithm that achieves the same approximation guarantee in expectation, but uses only @math PCST calls, and derandomize it to obtain a deterministic algorithm with factor @math , using @math PCST calls. The basic idea for our improvement is that we do not treat the @math -MST algorithm as a black box. This allows us to take advantage of some special situations in which the PCST subroutine delivers a 2-approximate @math -MST. We are able to obtain the same approximation ratio that would be given by Goemans and Kleinberg if we had access to 2-approximate @math -MSTs for all values of @math , even though we have them only for some values of @math that we are not able to specify in advance. We also extend our algorithm to a weighted version of the minimum latency problem. We give new deterministic bounds for fully-dynamic graph connectivity. Our data structure supports updates (edge insertions deletions) in @math amortized time and connectivity queries in @math worst-case time, where @math is the number of vertices of the graph. This improves the deterministic data structures of Holm, de Lichtenberg, and Thorup (STOC 1998, J.ACM 2001) and Thorup (STOC 2000) which both have @math amortized update time and @math worst-case query time. Our model of computation is the same as that of Thorup, i.e., a pointer machine with standard @math instructions. We prove the first nontrivial (superlinear) lower bound in the noisy broadcast model, defined by El Gamal in [Open problems presented at the @math workshop on Specific Problems in Communication and Computation sponsored by Bell Communication Research, in Open Problems in Communication and Computation, T. M. Cover and B. Gopinath, eds., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987, pp. 60-62]. In this model there are @math processors @math , each of which is initially given a private input bit @math . The goal is for @math to learn the value of @math , for some specified function @math , using a series of noisy broadcasts. At each step a designated processor broadcasts one bit to all of the other processors, and the bit received by each processor is flipped with fixed probability (independently for each recipient). In 1988, Gallager [IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 34 (1988), pp. 176-180] gave a noise-resistant protocol that allows @math to learn the entire input with constant probability in @math broadcasts. We prove that Gallager's protocol is optimal, up to a constant factor. Our lower bound follows by reduction from a lower bound for generalized noisy decision trees, a new model which may be of independent interest. For this new model we show a lower bound of @math on the depth of a tree that learns the entire input. While the above lower bound is for an @math -bit function, we also show an @math lower bound for the number of broadcasts required to compute certain explicit boolean-valued functions, when the correct output must be attained with probability at least @math for a constant parameter @math (this bound applies to all threshold functions as well as any other boolean-valued function with linear sensitivity). This bound also follows by reduction from a lower bound of @math on the depth of generalized noisy decision trees that compute the same functions with the same error. We also show a (nontrivial) @math lower bound on the depth of generalized noisy decision trees that compute such functions with small constant error. Finally, we show the first protocol in the noisy broadcast model that computes the Hamming weight of the input using a linear number of broadcasts. The key to our investigation is an improved (and in a sense sharp) understanding of the survival time of the contact process on star graphs. Using these results, we show that for the contact process on Galton-Watson trees, when the offspring distribution (i) is subexponential the critical value for local survival @math and (ii) when it is geometric( @math ) we have @math , where the @math are much smaller than previous estimates. We also study the critical value @math for "prolonged persistence" on graphs with @math vertices generated by the configuration model. In the case of power law and stretched exponential distributions where it is known @math we give estimates on the rate of convergence. Physicists tell us that @math where @math is the maximum eigenvalue of the adjacency matrix. Our results show that this is not correct. We study the stopping times of gossip algorithms for network coding. We analyze algebraic gossip (i.e., random linear coding) and consider three gossip algorithms for information spreading Pull, Push, and Exchange. The stopping time of algebraic gossip is known to be linear for the complete graph, but the question of determining a tight upper bound or lower bounds for general graphs is still open. We take a major step in solving this question, and prove that algebraic gossip on any graph of size n is O(Δn) where Δ is the maximum degree of the graph. This leads to a tight bound of Θ(n) for bounded degree graphs and an upper bound of O(n2) for general graphs. We show that the latter bound is tight by providing an example of a graph with a stopping time of Ω(n2). Our proofs use a novel method that relies on Jackson's queuing theorem to analyze the stopping time of network coding; this technique is likely to become useful for future research. We consider the problem of broadcasting in an unknown radio network modeled as a directed graph @math , where @math . In unknown networks, every node knows only its own label, while it is unaware of any other parameter of the network, including its neighborhood and even any upper bound on the number of nodes. We show an @math upper bound on the time complexity of deterministic broadcasting. This is an improvement over the currently best upper bound @math for arbitrary networks, thus shrinking exponentially the existing gap between the lower bound @math and the upper bound from @math to @math . We show a worst-case lower bound and a smoothed upper bound on the number of iterations performed by the Iterative Closest Point (ICP) algorithm. First proposed by Besl and McKay, the algorithm is widely used in computational geometry, where it is known for its simplicity and its observed speed. The theoretical study of ICP was initiated by Ezra, Sharir, and Efrat, who showed that the worst-case running time to align two sets of @math points in @math is between @math and @math . We substantially tighten this gap by improving the lower bound to @math . To help reconcile this bound with the algorithm's observed speed, we also show that the smoothed complexity of ICP is polynomial, independent of the dimensionality of the data. Using similar methods, we improve the best known smoothed upper bound for the popular k-means method to @math , once again independent of the dimension.