We show that the ratio of matched individuals to blocking pairs grows linearly with the number of propose–accept rounds executed by the Gale–Shapley algorithm for the stable marriage problem. Consequently, the participants can arrive at an almost stable matching even without full information about the problem instance; for each participant, knowing only its local neighbourhood is enough. In distributed-systems parlance, this means that if each person has only a constant number of acceptable partners, an almost stable matching emerges after a constant number of synchronous communication rounds. We apply our results to give a distributed (2+e)-approximation algorithm for maximum-weight matching in bicoloured graphs and a centralised randomised constant-time approximation scheme for estimating the size of a stable matching.
Our centralised constant-time approximation algorithm in Theorem is based on the ideas of Parnas and Ron @cite_9 and Nguyen and Onak @cite_21 . Their work presents constant-time approximation algorithms for estimating the size of a maximal matching, maximum-cardinality matching, and maximum-weight matching. Our work complements this line of research by presenting an algorithm for estimating the size of a stable matching.
@cite_9 @cite_21
2768321248 2019340823 1563534733 2109330224 2117761060 1617753329 2004854811 1523785148 2626065578 2605350614 2079168081 1993913882 2605027943 2547342773 1512148653 2072015757 2064135158 1514707655 2008724760 1485041102
We present a simple randomized reduction from fully-dynamic integral matching algorithms to fully-dynamic approximately-maximal" fractional matching algorithms. Applying this reduction to the recent fractional matching algorithm of Bhattacharya, Henzinger, and Nanongkai (SODA 2017), we obtain a novel result for the integral problem. Specifically, our main result is a randomized fully-dynamic @math -approximate integral matching algorithm with small polylog worst-case update time. For the @math -approximation regime only a fractional fully-dynamic @math -matching algorithm with worst-case polylog update time was previously known, due to (SODA 2017). Our algorithm is the first algorithm that maintains approximate matchings with worst-case update time better than polynomial, for any constant approximation ratio. We give a 3 2 -approximation algorithm for finding stable matchings that runs in O(m) time. The previous most well-known algorithm, by McDermid, has the same approximation ratio but runs in O(n3 2m) time, where n denotes the number of people andm is the total length of the preference lists in a given instance. In addition, the algorithm and the analysis are much simpler. We also give the extension of the algorithm for computing stable many-to-many matchings. In an instance of the stable marriage problem with ties and incomplete preference lists, stable matchings can have different sizes. It is APX-hard to compute a maximum cardinality stable matching, but there have recently been proposed polynomial-time approximation algorithms, with constant performance guarantees for both the general version of this problem, and for several special cases. Our contribution is to describe a @math -approximation algorithm for the general version of this problem, improving upon the recent @math -approximation algorithm of Kiraly. Interest in such algorithms arises because of the problem's application to centralized matching schemes, the best known of which involve the assignment of graduating medical students to hospitals in various countries. We present a technique for transforming classical approximation algorithms into constant-time algorithms that approximate the size of the optimal solution. Our technique is applicable to a certain subclass of algorithms that compute a solution in a constant number of phases. The technique is based on greedily considering local improvements in random order.The problems amenable to our technique include vertex cover, maximum matching, maximum weight matching, set cover, and minimum dominating set. For example, for maximum matching, we give the first constant-time algorithm that for the class of graphs of degree bounded by d, computes the maximum matching size to within epsivn, for any epsivn > 0, where n is the number of nodes in the graph. The running time of the algorithm is independent of n, and only depends on d and epsiv. In this paper, we study distributed algorithms to compute a weighted matching that have constant (or at least sub-logarithmic) running time and that achieve approximation ratio 2 + e or better. In fact we present two such synchronous algorithms, that work on arbitrary weighted trees The first algorithm is a randomised distributed algorithm that computes a weighted matching of an arbitrary weighted tree, that approximates the maximum weighted matching by a factor 2 + e. The running time is O(1). The second algorithm is deterministic, and approximates the maximum weighted matching by a factor 2 + e, but has running time O(log* |V|). Our algorithms can also be used to compute maximum unweighted matchings on regular and almost regular graphs within a constant approximation This paper presents an algorithm for estimating the weight of a maximum weighted matching by augmenting any estimation routine for the size of an unweighted matching. The algorithm is implementable in any streaming model including dynamic graph streams. We also give the first constant estimation for the maximum matching size in a dynamic graph stream for planar graphs (or any graph with bounded arboricity) using ( O (n^ 4 5 ) ) space which also extends to weighted matching. Using previous results by Kapralov, Khanna, and Sudan (2014) we obtain a polylog(n) approximation for general graphs using polylog(n) space in random order streams, respectively. In addition, we give a space lower bound of Ω(n1 − e) for any randomized algorithm estimating the size of a maximum matching up to a 1 + O(e) factor for adversarial streams. We show that the ratio of matched individuals to blocking pairs grows linearly with the number of propose–accept rounds executed by the Gale–Shapley algorithm for the stable marriage problem. Consequently, the participants can arrive at an almost stable matching even without full information about the problem instance; for each participant, knowing only its local neighbourhood is enough. In distributed-systems parlance, this means that if each person has only a constant number of acceptable partners, an almost stable matching emerges after a constant number of synchronous communication rounds. We apply our results to give a distributed (2+e)-approximation algorithm for maximum-weight matching in bicoloured graphs and a centralised randomised constant-time approximation scheme for estimating the size of a stable matching. In this paper, we present fast and fully distributed algorithms for matching in weighted trees and general weighted graphs. The time complexity as well as the approximation ratio of the tree algorithm is constant. In particular, the approximation ratio is 4. For the general graph algorithm we prove a constant ratio bound of 5 and a polylogarithmic time complexity of O(log2 n). In this paper, we present fast and fully distributed algorithms for matching in weighted trees and general weighted graphs. The time complexity as well as the approximation ratio of the tree algorithm is constant. In particular, the approximation ratio is 4. For the general graph algorithm we prove a constant ratio bound of 5 and a polylogarithmic time complexity of O(log2 n). Finding maximum-cardinality matchings in undirected graphs is arguably one of the most central graph problems. For general m-edge and n-vertex graphs, it is well-known to be solvable in @math time. We develop a linear-time algorithm to find maximum-cardinality matchings on cocomparability graphs, a prominent subclass of perfect graphs that contains interval graphs as well as permutation graphs. Our algorithm is based on the recently discovered Lexicographic Depth First Search (LDFS). Let G = G(A∪B,A×B), with |A| = |B| = n, be a weighted bipartite graph, and let d(·,·) be the cost function on the edges. Let w(M) denote the weight of a matching in G, and M* a minimum-cost perfect matching in G. We call a perfect matching M c-approximate, for c ≥ 1, if w(M) ≤ c · w(M*). We present three approximation algorithms for computing minimum-cost perfect matchings in G. First, we consider the case when d(·,·) is a metric. For any Δ > 0, we present an algorithm that, in O(n2+Δ log n log2(1 Δ)) time, computes a O(1 Δα)-approximate matching of G, where α = log3 2 ≈ 0.631. Next, we assume the existence of a dynamic data structure for answering approximate nearest neighbor (ANN) queries under d(··). Given two parameters e, d e) is the query and update time of an (e 2)-ANN data structure. Finally, we present an algorithm that works even if d(·,·) is not a metric but admits an ANN data structure for d(·,·). In particular, we present an algorithm that computes, in O(e---1n3 2τ (n, e) log4(n e) log Δ) time, a (1 + e)-approximate matching of A and B; here Δ is the ratio of the largest to the smallest-cost edge in G, and τ (n, e) is the query and update time of an (e c)-ANN data structure for some constant c > 1. We show that our results lead to faster matching algorithms for many geometric settings. We consider distributed algorithms for approximate maximum matching on general graphs. Our main result is a randomized @math -approximation distributed algorithm for maximum weighted matching, whose running time is @math for any constant @math , where @math is the number of nodes in the graph. This is, to the best of our knowledge, the first log-time distributed algorithm that achieves constant approximation for maximum weighted matching on general graphs. In addition, we consider the dynamic case, where nodes are inserted and deleted one at a time. For unweighted dynamic graphs, we give a distributed algorithm that maintains a @math -approximation in @math time for each node insertion or deletion for any constant @math . For weighted dynamic graphs we give a constant-factor approximation distributed algorithm that runs in constant time for each insertion or deletion. Copyright © 2017, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (www.aaai.org). All rights reserved. Motivated by the fact that in several cases a matching in a graph is stable if and only if it is produced by a greedy algorithm, we study the problem of computing a maximum weight greedy matching on weighted graphs, termed GREEDY-MATCHING. In wide contrast to the maximum weight matching problem, for which many efficient algorithms are known, we prove that GREEDYMATCHING is strongly NP-hard and APX-complete, and thus it does not admit a PTAS unless P=NP, even on graphs with maximum degree at most 3 and with at most three different integer edge weights. Furthermore we prove that GREEDYMATCHING is strongly NP-hard if the input graph is in addition bipartite. Moreover we consider three natural parameters of the problem, for which we establish a sharp threshold behavior between NP-hardness and computational tractability. On the positive side, we present a randomized approximation algorithm (RGMA) for GREEDYMATCHING on a special class of weighted graphs, called bush graphs. We highlight an unexpected connection between RGMA and the approximation of maximum cardinality matching in unweighted graphs via randomized greedy algorithms. We show that, if the approximation ratio of RGMA is θ, then for every ϵ > 0 the randomized MRG algorithm of ( 1995) gives a (ρ - ϵ)-approximation for the maximum cardinality matching. We conjecture that a tight bound for ρ is 2 3; we prove our conjecture true for four subclasses of bush graphs. Proving a tight bound for the approximation ratio of MRG on unweighted graphs (and thus also proving a tight value for ρ) is a long-standing open problem (Poloczek and Szegedy 2012). This unexpected relation of our RGMA algorithm with the MRG algorithm may provide new insights for solving this problem. In an instance G = (A union B, E) of the stable marriage problem with strict and possibly incomplete preference lists, a matching M is popular if there is no matching M0 where the vertices that prefer M' to M outnumber those that prefer M to M'. All stable matchings are popular and there is a simple linear time algorithm to compute a maximum-size popular matching. More generally, what we seek is a min-cost popular matching where we assume there is a cost function c : E -> Q. However there is no polynomial time algorithm currently known for solving this problem. Here we consider the following generalization of a popular matching called a popular half-integral matching: this is a fractional matching x = (M_1 + M_2) 2, where M1 and M2 are the 0-1 edge incidence vectors of matchings in G, such that x satisfies popularity constraints. We show that every popular half-integral matching is equivalent to a stable matching in a larger graph G^*. This allows us to solve the min-cost popular half-integral matching problem in polynomial time. In this paper we demonstrate a general method of designing constant-factor approximation algorithms for some discrete optimization problems with cardinality constraints. The core of the method is a simple deterministic ("pipage") procedure of rounding of linear relaxations. By using the method we design a (1-(1-1 k)k)-approximation algorithm for the maximum coverage problem where k is the maximum size of the subsets that are covered, and a 1 2-approximation algorithm for the maximum cut problem with given sizes of parts in the vertex set bipartition. The performance guarantee of the former improves on that of the well-known (1 - e-1)-greedy algorithm due to Cornuejols, Fisher and Nemhauser in each case of bounded k. The latter is, to the best of our knowledge, the first constant-factor algorithm for that version of the maximum cut problem. We study constant-time approximation algorithms for bounded-degree graphs, which run in time independent of the number of vertices @math . We present an algorithm that decides whether a vertex is contained in a some fixed maximal independent set with expected query complexity @math , where @math is the degree bound. Using this algorithm, we show constant-time approximation algorithms with certain multiplicative error and additive error @math for many other problems, e.g., the maximum matching problem, the minimum vertex cover problem, and the minimum set cover problem, that run exponentially faster than existing algorithms with respect to @math and @math . Our approximation algorithm for the maximum matching problem can be transformed to a two-sided error tester for the property of having a perfect matching. On the contrary, we show that every one-sided error tester for the property requires at least @math queries. We study a mechanism design version of matching computation in graphs that models the game played by hospitals participating in pairwise kidney exchange programs. We present a new randomized matching mechanism for two agents which is truthful in expectation and has an approximation ratio of 3 2 to the maximum cardinality matching. This is an improvement over a recent upper bound of 2 (, 2010 2]) and, furthermore, our mechanism beats for the first time the lower bound on the approximation ratio of deterministic truthful mechanisms. We complement our positive result with new lower bounds. Among other statements, we prove that the weaker incentive compatibility property of truthfulness in expectation in our mechanism is necessary; universally truthful mechanisms that have an inclusion-maximality property have an approximation ratio of at least 2. We present algorithms for finding large graph matchings in the streaming model. In this model, applicable when dealing with massive graphs, edges are streamed-in in some arbitrary order rather than residing in randomly accessible memory. For e>0, we achieve a @math approximation for maximum cardinality matching and a @math approximation to maximum weighted matching. Both algorithms use a constant number of passes and @math space. In this paper we study a fundamental open problem in the area of probabilistic checkable proofs: What is the smallest s such that NP ⊆ naPCP1,s[O(log n),3]? In the language of hardness of approximation, this problem is equivalent to determining the smallest s such that getting an s-approximation for satisfiable 3-bit constraint satisfaction problems ("3-CSPs") is NP-hard. The previous best upper bound and lower bound for s are 20 27+µ by Khot and Saket [KS06], and 5 8 (assuming NP subseteq BPP) by Zwick [Zwi98]. In this paper we close the gap assuming Khot's d-to-1 Conjecture. Formally, we prove that if Khot's d-to-1 Conjecture holds for any finite constant integer d, then NP naPCP1,5 8+ µ[O(log n),3] for any constant µ > 0. Our conditional result also solves Hastad's open question [Has01] on determining the inapproximability of satisfiable Max-NTW ("Not Two") instances and confirms Zwick's conjecture [Zwi98] that the 5 8-approximation algorithm for satisfiable 3-CSPs is optimal. A new approximation algorithm for maximum weighted matching in general edge-weighted graphs is presented. It calculates a matching with an edge weight of at least 1 2 of the edge weight of a maximum weighted matching. Its time complexity is O(|E|), with |E| being the number of edges in the graph. This improves over the previously known 1 2 -approximation algorithms for maximum weighted matching which require O(|E| ċ log(|V|)) steps, where |V| is the number of vertices.