Geometric model fitting is a fundamental research topic in computer vision and it aims to fit and segment multiple-structure data. In this paper, we propose a novel superpixel-guided two-view geometric model fitting method (called SDF), which can obtain reliable and consistent results for real images. Specifically, SDF includes three main parts: a deterministic sampling algorithm, a model hypothesis updating strategy and a novel model selection algorithm. The proposed deterministic sampling algorithm generates a set of initial model hypotheses according to the prior information of superpixels. Then the proposed updating strategy further improves the quality of model hypotheses. After that, by analyzing the properties of the updated model hypotheses, the proposed model selection algorithm extends the conventional "fit-and-remove" framework to estimate model instances in multiple-structure data. The three parts are tightly coupled to boost the performance of SDF in both speed and accuracy, and SDF has the deterministic nature. Experimental results show that the proposed SDF has significant advantages over several state-of-the-art fitting methods when it is applied to real images with single-structure and multiple-structure data.
Some works, e.g., @cite_22 @cite_14 @cite_1 , were proposed to guide the minimal subset sampling process. These model fitting methods have achieved better performance than RANSAC on either speed or accuracy. However, they cannot achieve consistent and tractable fitting results. In contrast, the proposed method in this paper focuses on the deterministic fitting, and it can obtain more consistent results.
@cite_14 @cite_1 @cite_22
2314497771 2106199912 2114759747 2057749491 1910960015 2762725970 2949526110 2616038372 2151843422 2085261163 2061055677 2102233204 2130017587 2024276620 2122735658 2052976238 1561329191 1952061682 2026888851 2207085776
This paper presents a novel improved RANSAC algorithm based on probability and DS evidence theory to deal with the robust pose estimation in robot 3D map building. In this proposed RANSAC algorithm, a parameter model is estimated by using a random sampling test set. Based on this estimated model, all points are tested to evaluate the fitness of current parameter model and their probabilities are updated by using a total probability formula during the iterations. The maximum size of inlier set containing the test point is taken into account to get a more reliable evaluation for test points by using DS evidence theory. Furthermore, the theories of forgetting are utilized to filter out the unstable inliers and improve the stability of the proposed algorithm. In order to boost a high performance, an inverse mapping sampling strategy is adopted based on the updated probabilities of points. Both the simulations and real experimental results demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed algorithm. A new robust matching method is proposed. The progressive sample consensus (PROSAC) algorithm exploits the linear ordering defined on the set of correspondences by a similarity function used in establishing tentative correspondences. Unlike RANSAC, which treats all correspondences equally and draws random samples uniformly from the full set, PROSAC samples are drawn from progressively larger sets of top-ranked correspondences. Under the mild assumption that the similarity measure predicts correctness of a match better than random guessing, we show that PROSAC achieves large computational savings. Experiments demonstrate it is often significantly faster (up to more than hundred times) than RANSAC. For the derived size of the sampled set of correspondences as a function of the number of samples already drawn, PROSAC converges towards RANSAC in the worst case. The power of the method is demonstrated on wide-baseline matching problems. Algorithms based on RANSAC that estimate models using feature correspondences between images can slow down tremendously when the percentage of correct correspondences (inliers) is small. In this paper, we present a probabilistic parametric model that allows us to assign confidence values for each matching correspondence and therefore accelerates the generation of hypothesis models for RANSAC under these conditions. Our framework leverages Extreme Value Theory to accurately model the statistics of matching scores produced by a nearest-neighbor feature matcher. Using a new algorithm based on this model, we are able to estimate accurate hypotheses with RANSAC at low inlier ratios significantly faster than previous state-of-the-art approaches, while still performing comparably when the number of inliers is large. We present results of homography and fundamental matrix estimation experiments for both SIFT and SURF matches that demonstrate that our method leads to accurate and fast model estimations. A randomized model verification strategy for RANSAC is presented. The proposed method finds, like RANSAC, a solution that is optimal with user-specified probability. The solution is found in time that is close to the shortest possible and superior to any deterministic verification strategy. A provably fastest model verification strategy is designed for the (theoretical) situation when the contamination of data by outliers is known. In this case, the algorithm is the fastest possible (on the average) of all randomized RANSAC algorithms guaranteeing a confidence in the solution. The derivation of the optimality property is based on Wald's theory of sequential decision making, in particular, a modified sequential probability ratio test (SPRT). Next, the R-RANSAC with SPRT algorithm is introduced. The algorithm removes the requirement for a priori knowledge of the fraction of outliers and estimates the quantity online. We show experimentally that on standard test data, the method has performance close to the theoretically optimal and is 2 to 10 times faster than standard RANSAC and is up to four times faster than previously published methods. Identifying the underlying model in a set of data contaminated by noise and outliers is a fundamental task in computer vision. The cost function associated with such tasks is often highly complex, hence in most cases only an approximate solution is obtained by evaluating the cost function on discrete locations in the parameter (hypothesis) space. To be successful at least one hypothesis has to be in the vicinity of the solution. Due to noise hypotheses generated by minimal subsets can be far from the underlying model, even when the samples are from the said structure. In this paper we investigate the feasibility of using higher than minimal subset sampling for hypothesis generation. Our empirical studies showed that increasing the sample size beyond minimal size ( @math ), in particular up to @math , will significantly increase the probability of generating a hypothesis closer to the true model when subsets are selected from inliers. On the other hand, the probability of selecting an all inlier sample rapidly decreases with the sample size, making direct extension of existing methods unfeasible. Hence, we propose a new computationally tractable method for robust model fitting that uses higher than minimal subsets. Here, one starts from an arbitrary hypothesis (which does not need to be in the vicinity of the solution) and moves until either a structure in data is found or the process is re-initialized. The method also has the ability to identify when the algorithm has reached a hypothesis with adequate accuracy and stops appropriately, thereby saving computational time. The experimental analysis carried out using synthetic and real data shows that the proposed method is both accurate and efficient compared to the state-of-the-art robust model fitting techniques. In this paper, we study the problem of sampling from a given probability density function that is known to be smooth and strongly log-concave. We analyze several methods of approximate sampling based on discretizations of the (highly overdamped) Langevin diffusion and establish guarantees on its error measured in the Wasserstein-2 distance. Our guarantees improve or extend the state-of-the-art results in three directions. First, we provide an upper bound on the error of the first-order Langevin Monte Carlo (LMC) algorithm with optimized varying step-size. This result has the advantage of being horizon free (we do not need to know in advance the target precision) and to improve by a logarithmic factor the corresponding result for the constant step-size. Second, we study the case where accurate evaluations of the gradient of the log-density are unavailable, but one can have access to approximations of the aforementioned gradient. In such a situation, we consider both deterministic and stochastic approximations of the gradient and provide an upper bound on the sampling error of the first-order LMC that quantifies the impact of the gradient evaluation inaccuracies. Third, we establish upper bounds for two versions of the second-order LMC, which leverage the Hessian of the log-density. We nonasymptotic guarantees on the sampling error of these second-order LMCs. These guarantees reveal that the second-order LMC algorithms improve on the first-order LMC in ill-conditioned settings. We reconsider randomized algorithms for the low-rank approximation of symmetric positive semi-definite (SPSD) matrices such as Laplacian and kernel matrices that arise in data analysis and machine learning applications. Our main results consist of an empirical evaluation of the performance quality and running time of sampling and projection methods on a diverse suite of SPSD matrices. Our results highlight complementary aspects of sampling versus projection methods; they characterize the effects of common data preprocessing steps on the performance of these algorithms; and they point to important differences between uniform sampling and nonuniform sampling methods based on leverage scores. In addition, our empirical results illustrate that existing theory is so weak that it does not provide even a qualitative guide to practice. Thus, we complement our empirical results with a suite of worst-case theoretical bounds for both random sampling and random projection methods. These bounds are qualitatively superior to existing bounds---e.g. improved additive-error bounds for spectral and Frobenius norm error and relative-error bounds for trace norm error---and they point to future directions to make these algorithms useful in even larger-scale machine learning applications. We reconsider randomized algorithms for the low-rank approximation of symmetric positive semi-definite (SPSD) matrices such as Laplacian and kernel matrices that arise in data analysis and machine learning applications. Our main results consist of an empirical evaluation of the performance quality and running time of sampling and projection methods on a diverse suite of SPSD matrices. Our results highlight complementary aspects of sampling versus projection methods; they characterize the effects of common data preprocessing steps on the performance of these algorithms; and they point to important differences between uniform sampling and nonuniform sampling methods based on leverage scores. In addition, our empirical results illustrate that existing theory is so weak that it does not provide even a qualitative guide to practice. Thus, we complement our empirical results with a suite of worst-case theoretical bounds for both random sampling and random projection methods. These bounds are qualitatively superior to existing bounds--e.g., improved additive-error bounds for spectral and Frobenius norm error and relative-error bounds for trace norm error--and they point to future directions to make these algorithms useful in even larger-scale machine learning applications. The random sample consensus (RANSAC) algorithm, along with its many cousins such as MSAC and MLESAC, has become a standard choice for robust estimation in many computer vision problems. Recently, a raft of modifications to the basic RANSAC algorithm have been proposed aimed at improving its efficiency. Many of these optimizations work by reducing the number of hypotheses that need to be evaluated. This paper proposes a complementary strategy that aims to reduce the average amount of time spent computing the consensus score for each hypothesis. A simple statistical test is proposed that permits the scoring process be terminated early, potentially yielding large computational savings. The proposed test is simple to implement, imposes negligible computational overhead, and is effective for any given size of data set. The approach is evaluated by estimation of the fundamental matrix for a large number of image pairs and is shown to offer a significant reduction in computational cost compared to recently proposed RANSAC modifications. A new paradigm, Random Sample Consensus (RANSAC), for fitting a model to experimental data is introduced. RANSAC is capable of interpreting smoothing data containing a significant percentage of gross errors, and is thus ideally suited for applications in automated image analysis where interpretation is based on the data provided by error-prone feature detectors. A major portion of this paper describes the application of RANSAC to the Location Determination Problem (LDP): Given an image depicting a set of landmarks with known locations, determine that point in space from which the image was obtained. In response to a RANSAC requirement, new results are derived on the minimum number of landmarks needed to obtain a solution, and algorithms are presented for computing these minimum-landmark solutions in closed form. These results provide the basis for an automatic system that can solve the LDP under difficult viewing It has great significance to acquire vehicle speed for active safety system. This paper presents a methodology for identifying vehicle speed by obtaining a sparse optical flow from image sequences. Distinct corners can be detected by Harris corner detector after image enhancement. Then, Lucas-Kanade method for optical flow calculation is utilized to match the sparse feature set of one frame on the consecutive frame. In order to improve the accuracy of optical flow, RANSAC algorithm is introduced to optimize the matched corners. Finally, the vehicle speed can be determined by averaging all the speeds estimated by every optimized matched corner. The results of field test indicated that the computation time of the developed method to execute for one time was 59ms, and the mean error of speed estimation relative to the measurement of GPS was 0.121 m s. The developed method can achieve satisfying performance, such as accuracy and output frequency. The paper focuses on developing effective importance sampling algorithms for mixed probabilistic and deterministic graphical models. The use of importance sampling in such graphical models is problematic because it generates many useless zero weight samples which are rejected yielding an inefficient sampling process. To address this rejection problem, we propose the SampleSearch scheme that augments sampling with systematic constraint-based backtracking search. We characterize the bias introduced by the combination of search with sampling, and derive a weighting scheme which yields an unbiased estimate of the desired statistics (e.g., probability of evidence). When computing the weights exactly is too complex, we propose an approximation which has a weaker guarantee of asymptotic unbiasedness. We present results of an extensive empirical evaluation demonstrating that SampleSearch outperforms other schemes in presence of significant amount of determinism. A new enhancement of ransac, the locally optimized ransac (lo-ransac), is introduced. It has been observed that, to find an optimal solution (with a given probability), the number of samples drawn in ransac is significantly higher than predicted from the mathematical model. This is due to the incorrect assumption, that a model with parameters computed from an outlier-free sample is consistent with all inliers. The assumption rarely holds in practice. The locally optimized ransac makes no new assumptions about the data, on the contrary – it makes the above-mentioned assumption valid by applying local optimization to the solution estimated from the random sample. Geometric model fitting is a typical chicken-&-egg problem: data points should be clustered based on geometric proximity to models whose unknown parameters must be estimated at the same time. Most existing methods, including generalizations of RANSAC, greedily search for models with most inliers (within a threshold) ignoring overall classification of points. We formulate geometric multi-model fitting as an optimal labeling problem with a global energy function balancing geometric errors and regularity of inlier clusters. Regularization based on spatial coherence (on some near-neighbor graph) and or label costs is NP hard. Standard combinatorial algorithms with guaranteed approximation bounds (e.g. ?-expansion) can minimize such regularization energies over a finite set of labels, but they are not directly applicable to a continuum of labels, e.g. @math in line fitting. Our proposed approach (PEaRL) combines model sampling from data points as in RANSAC with iterative re-estimation of inliers and models' parameters based on a global regularization functional. This technique efficiently explores the continuum of labels in the context of energy minimization. In practice, PEaRL converges to a good quality local minimum of the energy automatically selecting a small number of models that best explain the whole data set. Our tests demonstrate that our energy-based approach significantly improves the current state of the art in geometric model fitting currently dominated by various greedy generalizations of RANSAC. A constructive solution of the irregular sampling problem for band- limited functions is given. We show how a band-limited function can be com- pletely reconstructed from any random sampling set whose density is higher than the Nyquist rate, and give precise estimates for the speed of convergence of this iteration method. Variations of this algorithm allow for irregular sampling with derivatives, reconstruction of band-limited functions from local averages, and irregular sampling of multivariate band-limited functions. In the irregular sampling problem one is asked whether and how a band- limited function can be completely reconstructed from its irregularly sam- pled values f(xi). This has many applications in signal and image processing, seismology, meteorology, medical imaging, etc. Finding constructive solutions of this problem has received considerable attention among mathematicians and engineers. The mathematical literature provides several uniqueness results (1, 2, 17, 18, 19). It is now part of the folklore that for stable sampling the sampling rate must be at least the Nyquist rate (18). These results, as deep as they are, have had little impact for the applied sciences, because they were not constructive. If the sampling set is just a perturbation of the regular oversampling, then a reconstruction method has been obtained in a seminal paper by Duffin and Schaeffer (6) (see also (29)): if for some L > 0, a > 0, and o > 0 the sampling points xk , k e Z , satisfy (a) - ok a, k ^ I, then the norm equivalence A iR (x) ) with w < n o. This norm equivalence implies that it is possible to reconstruct through an iterative procedure, the so-called frame method. Most of the later work on constructive methods consists of variations of this method (3, 21, 22, 26). The above conditions on the sampling set exclude random irregular sampling sets, e.g., sets with regions of higher sampling density. A partial, but undesirable remedy, to handle highly irregular sampling sets, would be to force the above conditions by throwing away information on part of the points and accept a very slow convergence of the iteration. Given a noisy and incomplete point set, we introduce a method that simultaneously recovers a set of locally fitted primitives along with their global mutual relations. We operate under the assumption that the data corresponds to a man-made engineering object consisting of basic primitives, possibly repeated and globally aligned under common relations. We introduce an algorithm to directly couple the local and global aspects of the problem. The local fit of the model is determined by how well the inferred model agrees to the observed data, while the global relations are iteratively learned and enforced through a constrained optimization. Starting with a set of initial RANSAC based locally fitted primitives, relations across the primitives such as orientation, placement, and equality are progressively learned and conformed to. In each stage, a set of feasible relations are extracted among the candidate relations, and then aligned to, while best fitting to the input data. The global coupling corrects the primitives obtained in the local RANSAC stage, and brings them to precise global alignment. We test the robustness of our algorithm on a range of synthesized and scanned data, with varying amounts of noise, outliers, and non-uniform sampling, and validate the results against ground truth, where available. Random hypothesis generation underpins many geometric model fitting techniques. Unfortunately it is also computationally expensive. We propose a fundamentally new approach to accelerate hypothesis sampling by guiding it with information derived from residual sorting. We show that residual sorting innately encodes the probability of two points to have arisen from the same model and is obtained without recourse to domain knowledge (e.g. keypoint matching scores) typically used in previous sampling enhancement methods. More crucially our approach is naturally capable of handling data with multiple model instances and excels in applications (e.g. multi-homography fitting) which easily frustrate other techniques. Experiments show that our method provides superior efficiency on various geometric model estimation tasks. Implementation of our algorithm is available on the authors, homepage. Outliers pose a problem in all real structure from motion systems. Due to the use of automatic matching methods one has to expect that a (sometimes very large) portion of the detected correspondences can be incorrect. In this paper we propose a method that estimates the relative translation between two cameras and simultaneously maximizes the number of inlier correspondences. Traditionally, outlier removal tasks have been addressed using RANSAC approaches. However, these are random in nature and offer no guarantees of finding a good solution. If the amount of mismatches is large, the approach becomes costly because of the need to evaluate a large number of random samples. In contrast, our approach is based on the branch and bound methodology which guarantees that an optimal solution will be found. While most optimal methods trade speed for optimality, the proposed algorithm has competitive running times on problem sizes well beyond what is common in practice. Experiments on both real and synthetic data show that the method outperforms state-of-the-art alternatives, including RANSAC, in terms of solution quality. In addition, the approach is shown to be faster than RANSAC in settings with a large amount of outliers. In this paper we consider the problem of outlier removal for large scale multiview reconstruction problems. An efficient and very popular method for this task is RANSAC. However, as RANSAC only works on a subset of the images, mismatches in longer point tracks may go undetected. To deal with this problem we would like to have, as a post processing step to RANSAC, a method that works on the entire (or a larger) part of the sequence. In this paper we consider two algorithms for doing this. The first one is related to a method by Sim & Hartley where a quasiconvex problem is solved repeatedly and the error residuals with the largest error is removed. Instead of solving a quasiconvex problem in each step we show that it is enough to solve a single LP or SOCP which yields a significant speedup. Using duality we show that the same theoretical result holds for our method. The second algorithm is a faster version of the first, and it is related to the popular method of L 1 -optimization. While it is faster and works very well in practice, there is no theoretical guarantee of success. We show that these two methods are related through duality, and evaluate the methods on a number of data sets with promising results.1 Robust estimation of model parameters in the presence of outliers is a key problem in computer vision. RANSAC inspired techniques are widely used in this context, although their application might be limited due to the need of a priori knowledge on the inlier noise level. We propose a new approach for jointly optimizing over model parameters and the inlier noise level based on the likelihood ratio test. This allows control over the type I error incurred. We also propose an early bailout strategy for efficiency. Tests on both synthetic and real data show that our method outperforms the state-of-the-art in a fraction of the time.