Several exact recovery criteria (ERC) ensuring that orthogonal matching pursuit (OMP) identifies the correct support of sparse signals have been developed in the last few years. These ERC rely on the restricted isometry property (RIP), the associated restricted isometry constant (RIC) and sometimes the restricted orthogonality constant (ROC). In this paper, three of the most recent ERC for OMP are examined. The contribution is to show that these ERC remain valid for a generalization of OMP, entitled simultaneous orthogonal matching pursuit (SOMP), that is capable to process several measurement vectors simultaneously and return a common support estimate for the underlying sparse vectors. The sharpness of the bounds is also briefly discussed in light of previous works focusing on OMP.
Regarding older works, it is also worth pointing out that the ERC @math , first obtained in [Theorem 5.2] liu2012orthogonal for OMP, has been shown to remain valid for SOMP in [Corollary 1] ding2012robustness . Thereby, the authors of @cite_1 also proved that the older ERC @math , initially derived in [Theorem 3.1] davenport2010analysis for OMP, remains correct for SOMP as @math is implied by @math . Very recently, ) was extended to SOMP in [Remark 1] xu2015perturbation . However, the extension to SOMP of both ) and ) is a novel result. In @cite_8 , the author has derived the ERC @math , which is sharper than ). Combining the ideas developed in @cite_8 and our paper could possibly extend this ERC to SOMP.
@cite_1 @cite_8
2000931246 2295840581 2952621790 1897704527 2021217869 2170546552 2069546133 2100038678 1970278864 2084050956 2066969286 1973652906 2952554977 2949393806 2159268377 2010163765 2336459687 1945101555 2609098951 2047805348
Let f be a random Boolean formula that is an instance of 3-SAT. We consider the problem of computing the least real number k such that if the ratio of the number of clauses over the number of variables of f strictly exceeds k , then f is almost certainly unsatisfiable. By a well-known and more or less straightforward argument, it can be shown that kF5.191. This upper bound was improved by to 4.758 by first providing new improved bounds for the occupancy problem. There is strong experimental evidence that the value of k is around 4.2. In this work, we define, in terms of the random formula f, a decreasing sequence of random variables such that, if the expected value of any one of them converges to zero, then f is almost certainly unsatisfiable. By letting the expected value of the first term of the sequence converge to zero, we obtain, by simple and elementary computations, an upper bound for k equal to 4.667. From the expected value of the second term of the sequence, we get the value 4.601q . In general, by letting the U This work was performed while the first author was visiting the School of Computer Science, Carleton Ž University, and was partially supported by NSERC Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council . of Canada , and by a grant from the University of Patras for sabbatical leaves. The second and third Ž authors were supported in part by grants from NSERC Natural Sciences and Engineering Research . Council of Canada . During the last stages of this research, the first and last authors were also partially Ž . supported by EU ESPRIT Long-Term Research Project ALCOM-IT Project No. 20244 . †An extended abstract of this paper was published in the Proceedings of the Fourth Annual European Ž Symposium on Algorithms, ESA’96, September 25]27, 1996, Barcelona, Spain Springer-Verlag, LNCS, . pp. 27]38 . That extended abstract was coauthored by the first three authors of the present paper. Correspondence to: L. M. Kirousis Q 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. CCC 1042-9832r98r030253-17 253 We show an exponential separation between two well-studied models of algebraic computation, namely read-once oblivious algebraic branching programs (ROABPs) and multilinear depth three circuits. In particular we show the following: 1. There exists an explicit n-variate polynomial computable by linear sized multilinear depth three circuits (with only two product gates) such that every ROABP computing it requires 2^ Omega(n) size. 2. Any multilinear depth three circuit computing IMM_ n,d (the iterated matrix multiplication polynomial formed by multiplying d, n * n symbolic matrices) has n^ Omega(d) size. IMM_ n,d can be easily computed by a poly(n,d) sized ROABP. 3. Further, the proof of 2 yields an exponential separation between multilinear depth four and multilinear depth three circuits: There is an explicit n-variate, degree d polynomial computable by a poly(n,d) sized multilinear depth four circuit such that any multilinear depth three circuit computing it has size n^ Omega(d) . This improves upon the quasi-polynomial separation result by Raz and Yehudayoff [2009] between these two models. The hard polynomial in 1 is constructed using a novel application of expander graphs in conjunction with the evaluation dimension measure used previously in Nisan [1991], Raz [2006,2009], Raz and Yehudayoff [2009], and Forbes and Shpilka [2013], while 2 is proved via a new adaptation of the dimension of the partial derivatives measure used by Nisan and Wigderson [1997]. Our lower bounds hold over any field. Let @math be a nontrivial @math -ary predicate. Consider a random instance of the constraint satisfaction problem @math on @math variables with @math constraints, each being @math applied to @math randomly chosen literals. Provided the constraint density satisfies @math , such an instance is unsatisfiable with high probability. The problem is to efficiently find a proof of unsatisfiability. We show that whenever the predicate @math supports a @math - probability distribution on its satisfying assignments, the sum of squares (SOS) algorithm of degree @math (which runs in time @math ) refute a random instance of @math . In particular, the polynomial-time SOS algorithm requires @math constraints to refute random instances of CSP @math when @math supports a @math -wise uniform distribution on its satisfying assignments. Together with recent work of [LRS15], our result also implies that polynomial-size semidefinite programming relaxation for refutation requires at least @math constraints. Our results (which also extend with no change to CSPs over larger alphabets) subsume all previously known lower bounds for semialgebraic refutation of random CSPs. For every constraint predicate @math , they give a three-way hardness tradeoff between the density of constraints, the SOS degree (hence running time), and the strength of the refutation. By recent algorithmic results of [AOW15] and [RRS16], this full three-way tradeoff is , up to lower-order factors. We give a lower bound of @math for the degree-4 Sum-of-Squares SDP relaxation for the planted clique problem. Specifically, we show that on an Erd "os-R 'enyi graph @math , with high probability there is a feasible point for the degree-4 SOS relaxation of the clique problem with an objective value of @math , so that the program cannot distinguish between a random graph and a random graph with a planted clique of size @math . This bound is tight. We build on the works of Deshpande and Montanari and , who give lower bounds of @math and @math respectively. We improve on their results by making a perturbation to the SDP solution proposed in their work, then showing that this perturbation remains PSD as the objective value approaches @math . In an independent work, Hopkins, Kothari and Potechin [HKP15] have obtained a similar lower bound for the degree- @math SOS relaxation. A well known but incorrect piece of functional programming folklore is that ML expressions can be efficiently typed in polynomial time. In probing the truth of that folklore, various researchers, including Wand, Buneman, Kanellakis, and Mitchell, constructed simple counterexamples consisting of typable ML programs having length n , with principal types having O(2 cn ) distinct type variables and length O(2 2cn ). When the types associated with these ML constructions were represented as directed acyclic graphs, their sizes grew as O(2 cn ). The folklore was even more strongly contradicted by the recent result of Kanellakis and Mitchell that simply deciding whether or not an ML expression is typable is PSPACE-hard. We improve the latter result, showing that deciding ML typability is DEXPTIME-hard. As Kanellakis and Mitchell have shown containment in DEXPTIME, the problem is DEXPTIME-complete. The proof of DEXPTIME-hardness is carried out via a generic reduction: it consists of a very straightforward simulation of any deterministic one-tape Turing machine M with input k running in O ( c |k| ) time by a polynomial-sized ML formula P M,k , such that M accepts k iff P M,k is typable. The simulation of the transition function δ of the Turing Machine is realized uniquely through terms in the lambda calculus without the use of the polymorphic let construct. We use let for two purposes only: to generate an exponential amount of blank tape for the Turing Machine simulation to begin, and to compose an exponential number of applications of the ML formula simulating state transition. It is purely the expressive power of ML polymorphism to succinctly express function composition which results in a proof of DEXPTIME-hardness. We conjecture that lower bounds on deciding typability for extensions to the typed lambda calculus can be regarded precisely in terms of this expressive capacity for succinct function composition. To further understand this lower bound, we relate it to the problem of proving equality of type variables in a system of type equations generated from an ML expression with let-polymorphism. We show that given an oracle for solving this problem, deciding typability would be in PSPACE, as would be the actual computation of the principal type of the expression, were it indeed typable. Mulmuley [Mul12a] recently gave an explicit version of Noether’s Normalization lemma for ring of invariants of matrices under simultaneous conjugation, under the conjecture that there are deterministic black-box algorithms for polynomial identity testing (PIT). He argued that this gives evidence that constructing such algorithms for PIT is beyond current techniques. In this work, we show this is not the case. That is, we improve Mulmuley’s reduction and correspondingly weaken the conjecture regarding PIT needed to give explicit Noether Normalization. We then observe that the weaker conjecture has recently been nearly settled by the authors ([FS12]), who gave quasipolynomial size hitting sets for the class of read-once oblivious algebraic branching programs (ROABPs). This gives the desired explicit Noether Normalization unconditionally, up to quasipolynomial factors. As a consequence of our proof we give a deterministic parallel polynomial-time algorithm for deciding if two matrix tuples have intersecting orbit closures, under simultaneous conjugation. We also study the strength of conjectures that Mulmuley requires to obtain similar results as ours. We prove that his conjectures are stronger, in the sense that the computational model he needs PIT algorithms for is equivalent to the well-known algebraic branching program (ABP) model, which is provably stronger than the ROABP model. Finally, we consider the depth-3 diagonal circuit model as defined by Saxena [Sax08], as PIT algorithms for this model also have implications in Mulmuley’s work. Previous work (such as [ASS12] and [FS12]) have given quasipolynomial size hitting sets for this model. In this work, we give a much simpler construction of such hitting sets, using techniques of Shpilka and Volkovich [SV09]. We consider arithmetic formulas consisting of alternating layers of addition (+) and multiplication (×) gates such that the fanin of all the gates in any fixed layer is the same. Such a formula Φ which additionally has the property that its formal syntactic degree is at most twice the (total) degree of its output polynomial, we refer to as a regular formula. As usual, we allow arbitrary constants from the underlying field F on the incoming edges to a + gate so that a + gate can in fact compute an arbitrary F-linear combination of its inputs. We show that there is an (n2 + 1)-variate polynomial of degree 2n in VNP such that any regular formula computing it must be of size at least nΩ(log n). Along the way, we examine depth four (ΣΠΣΠ) regular formulas wherein all multiplication gates in the layer adjacent to the inputs have fanin a and all multiplication gates in the layer adjacent to the output node have fanin b. We refer to such formulas as ΣΠ[b]ΣΠ[a]-formulas. We show that there exists an n2-variate polynomial of degree n in VNP such that any ΣΠ[O(√n)]ΣΠ[√n]-formula computing it must have top fan-in at least 2Ω(√n·log n). In comparison, Tavenas [Tav13] has recently shown that every nO(1)-variate polynomial of degree n in VP admits a ΣΠ[O(√n)]ΣΠ[√n]-formula of top fan-in 2O(√n·log n). This means that any further asymptotic improvement in our lower bound for such formulas (to say 2ω(√n log n)) will imply that VP is different from VNP. Successive overrelaxation (SOR) for symmetric linear complementarity problems and quadratic programs is used to train a support vector machine (SVM) for discriminating between the elements of two massive datasets, each with millions of points. Because SOR handles one point at a time, similar to Platt's sequential minimal optimization (SMO) algorithm (1999) which handles two constraints at a time and Joachims' SVM sup light (1998) which handles a small number of points at a time, SOR can process very large datasets that need not reside in memory. The algorithm converges linearly to a solution. Encouraging numerical results are presented on datasets with up to 10 000 000 points. Such massive discrimination problems cannot be processed by conventional linear or quadratic programming methods, and to our knowledge have not been solved by other methods. On smaller problems, SOR was faster than SVM sup light and comparable or faster than SMO. In this work we look back into the proof of the PCP (probabilistically checkable proofs) theorem, with the goal of finding new proofs that are “more combinatorial” and arguably simpler. For that we introduce the notion of an assignment tester, which is a strengthening of the standard PCP verifier, in the following sense. Given a statement and an alleged proof for it, while the PCP verifier checks correctness of the statement, the assignment tester checks correctness of the statement and the proof. This notion enables composition that is truly modular; i.e., one can compose two assignment testers without any assumptions on how they are constructed. A related notion called PCPs of proximity was independently introduced in [E. Ben-, Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, Chicago, IL, 2004, ACM, New York, 2004, pp. 1-10]. We provide a toolkit of (nontrivial) generic transformations on assignment testers. These transformations may be interesting in their own right, and allow us to present the following two main results: 1. A new proof of the PCP theorem. This proof relies on a rather weak assignment tester given as a “black box.” From this, we construct combinatorially the full PCP. An important component of this proof is a new combinatorial aggregation technique (i.e., a new transformation that allows the verifier to read fewer, though possibly longer, “pieces” of the proof). An implementation of the black-box tester can be obtained from the algebraic proof techniques that already appear in [L. , Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, New Orleans, LA, 1991, ACM, New York, 1991, pp. 21-31; U. , J. ACM, 43 (1996), pp. 268-292]. 2. Our second construction is a “standalone” combinatorial construction showing @math . This implies, for example, that approximating max-SAT is quasi-NP-hard. This construction relies on a transformation that makes an assignment tester “oblivious,” so that the proof locations read are independent of the statement that is being proven. This eliminates, in a rather surprising manner, the need for aggregation in a crucial point in the proof. We show that, over Q, if an n-variate polynomial of degree d = nO(1) is computable by an arithmetic circuit of size s (respectively by an arithmetic branching program of size s) then it can also be computed by a depth three circuit (i.e. a ΣΠΣ-circuit) of size exp(O(√(d log n log d log s))) (respectively of size exp(O(√(d log n log s))). In particular this yields a ΣΠΣ circuit of size exp(O(√(d log d))) computing the d × d determinant Detd. It also means that if we can prove a lower bound of exp(omega(√(d log d))) on the size of any ΣΠΣ-circuit computing the d × d permanent Permd then we get super polynomial lower bounds for the size of any arithmetic branching program computing Permd. We then give some further results pertaining to derandomizing polynomial identity testing and circuit lower bounds. The ΣΠΣ circuits that we construct have the property that (some of) the intermediate polynomials have degree much higher than d. Indeed such a counterintuitive construction is unavoidable - it is known that in any ΣΠΣ circuit C computing either Detd or Perm_d, if every multiplication gate has fanin at most d (or any constant multiple thereof) then C must have size at least exp(Ω(d)). Beck's early work [3] gave an efficient version of the Lovasz Local Lemma(LLL) with significant compromise in the parameters. Following several improvements [1,7,4,13], Moser [8], and Moser and Tardos [9] obtained asymptotically optimal results in terms of the maximal degree. For a fixed dependency graph G the exact criterion under which LLL applies is given by Shearer in [12]. For a dependency structure G, let LO(G) be the set of those probability assignments to the nodes of G for which the Lovasz Local Lemma holds. We show that: Both the sequential and parallel ersions of the Moser-Tardos algorithm are efficient up to the Shearer's bound, by giving a tighter analysis. We also prove that, whenever p ∈ LO(G) (1+e), the expected running times of the sequential and parallel versions are at most n e and O(1 e log n e), the later when e In a maximum-r-constraint satisfaction problem with variables x1, x2, ... ,xn , we are given Boolean functions f1, f2, ..., fm each involving r of the n variables and are to find the maximum number of these functions that can be made true by a truth assignment to the variables. We show that for r fixed, there is an integer q ∈ O(log(1 e) e4) such that if we choose q variables (uniformly) at random, the answer to the subproblem induced on the chosen variables is, with high probability, within an additive error of eqr of qr nr times the answer to the original n-variable problem. The previous best result for the case of r = 2 (which includes many graph problems) was that there is an algorithm which given the induced sub-problem on q = O(1 e5) variables, can find an approximation to the answer to the whole problem within additive error en2. For r≥3, the conference version of this paper (in: Proceedings of the 34th ACM STOC, ACM, New York, 2002, pp. 232-239) and independently Andersson and Engebretsen give the first results with sample complexity q dependent only polynomially upon 1 e. Their algorithm has a sample complexity q of O(1 e7). They (as also the earlier papers) however do not directly prove any relation between the answer to the sub-problem and the whole problem as we do here. Our method also differs from other results in that it is linear algebraic, rather than combinatorial in nature. In this paper we consider a fragment of the first-order theory of the real numbers that includes systems of equations of continuous functions in bounded domains, and for which all functions are computable in the sense that it is possible to compute arbitrarily close piece-wise interval approximations. Even though this fragment is undecidable, we prove that there is a (possibly non-terminating) algorithm for checking satisfiability such that (1) whenever it terminates, it computes a correct answer, and (2) it always terminates when the input is robust. A formula is robust, if its satisfiability does not change under small perturbations. As a basic tool for our algorithm we use the notion of degree from the field of (differential) topology. We show a new way to round vector solutions of semidefinite programming (SDP) hierarchies into integral solutions, based on a connection between these hierarchies and the spectrum of the input graph. We demonstrate the utility of our method by providing a new SDP-hierarchy based algorithm for constraint satisfaction problems with 2-variable constraints (2-CSP's). More concretely, we show for every 2-CSP instance I a rounding algorithm for r rounds of the Lasserre SDP hierarchy for I that obtains an integral solution that is at most worse than the relaxation's value (normalized to lie in [0,1]), as long as r > k ( ) ( ) ;, where k is the alphabet size of I, @math , and @math denotes the number of eigenvalues larger than @math in the normalized adjacency matrix of the constraint graph of @math . In the case that @math is a instance, the threshold @math is only a polynomial in @math , and is independent of the alphabet size. Also in this case, we can give a non-trivial bound on the number of rounds for instance. In particular our result yields an SDP-hierarchy based algorithm that matches the performance of the recent subexponential algorithm of Arora, Barak and Steurer (FOCS 2010) in the worst case, but runs faster on a natural family of instances, thus further restricting the set of possible hard instances for Khot's Unique Games Conjecture. Our algorithm actually requires less than the @math constraints specified by the @math level of the Lasserre hierarchy, and in some cases @math rounds of our program can be evaluated in time @math . We study the complexity of computing the kth-power of an element of F2n by constant depth arithmetic circuits over F2 (also known as ACP). Our study encompasses the complexity of basic arithmetic operations such as computing cube-root and computing cubic-residuosity of elements of F2n. Our main result is that these problems require exponential size circuits. We also derive strong average-case versions of these results. For example, we show that no subexponential-size, constant-depth, arithmetic circuit over F2 can correctly compute the cubic residue symbol for more than 1 3 + o(1) fraction of the elements of F2n. As a corollary, we deduce a character sum bound showing that the cubic residue character over F2n is uncorrelated with all degree-d n-variate F2 polynomials (viewed as functions over F2n in a natural way), provided d l ne for some universal e > 0. Classical methods (based on van der Corput differencing and the Weil bounds) show this only for d l log(n). Our proof revisits the classical Razborov-Smolensky method for circuit lower bounds, and executes an analogue of it in the land of univariate polynomials over F2n. The tools we use come from both F2n and F2n. In recent years, this interplay between F2n and F2n has played an important role in many results in pseudorandomness, property testing and coding theory. We establish a lower bound for the formula size of quolynomials over arbitrary fields. Our basic formula operations are addition, subtraction, multiplication and division. The proof is based on Neciporuk’s [Soviet Math. Doklady, 7 (1966), pp. 999–1000] lower bound for Boolean functions and uses formal power series. This result immediately yields a lower bound for the formula size of rational functions over infinite fields. We also show how to adapt Neciporuk’s method to rational functions over finite fields. These results are then used to show that, over any field, the @math determinant function has formula size at least @math . We thus have an algebraic analogue to the @math lower bound for the Boolean determinant due to Kloss [Soviet Math. Doklady, 7 (1966), pp. 1537–1540]. Erdős-Ko-Rado (EKR) type theorems yield upper bounds on the sizes of families of sets, subject to various intersection requirements on the sets in the family. Stability versions of such theorems assert that if the size of a family is close to the maximum possible size, then the family itself must be close (in some appropriate sense) to a maximum-sized family. In this paper, we present an approach to obtaining stability versions of EKR-type theorems, via isoperimetric inequalities for subsets of the hypercube. Our approach is rather general, and allows the leveraging of a wide variety of exact EKR-type results into strong stability versions of these results, without going into the proofs of the original results. We use this approach to obtain tight stability versions of the EKR theorem itself and of the Ahlswede-Khachatrian theorem on @math -intersecting families of @math -element subsets of @math (for @math ), and to show that, somewhat surprisingly, all these results hold when the intersection requirement is replaced by a much weaker requirement. Other examples include stability versions of Frankl's recent result on the Erdős matching conjecture, the Ellis-Filmus-Friedgut proof of the Simonovits-Sos conjecture, and various EKR-type results on @math -wise (cross)- @math -intersecting families. Let @math be a smooth scheme over an algebraically closed field @math of characteristic zero and @math a regular function, and write @math Crit @math , as a closed subscheme of @math . The motivic vanishing cycle @math is an element of the @math -equivariant motivic Grothendieck ring @math defined by Denef and Loeser math.AG 0006050 and Looijenga math.AG 0006220, and used in Kontsevich and Soibelman's theory of motivic Donaldson-Thomas invariants, arXiv:0811.2435. We prove three main results: (a) @math depends only on the third-order thickenings @math of @math . (b) If @math is another smooth scheme, @math is regular, @math Crit @math , and @math is an embedding with @math and @math an isomorphism, then @math equals @math "twisted" by a motive associated to a principal @math -bundle defined using @math , where now we work in a quotient ring @math of @math . (c) If @math is an "oriented algebraic d-critical locus" in the sense of Joyce arXiv:1304.4508, there is a natural motive @math , such that if @math is locally modelled on Crit @math , then @math is locally modelled on @math . Using results from arXiv:1305.6302, these imply the existence of natural motives on moduli schemes of coherent sheaves on a Calabi-Yau 3-fold equipped with "orientation data", as required in Kontsevich and Soibelman's motivic Donaldson-Thomas theory arXiv:0811.2435, and on intersections of oriented Lagrangians in an algebraic symplectic manifold. This paper is an analogue for motives of results on perverse sheaves of vanishing cycles proved in arXiv:1211.3259. We extend this paper to Artin stacks in arXiv:1312.0090. The full' edge isoperimetric inequality for the discrete cube (due to Harper, Bernstein, Lindsay and Hart) specifies the minimum size of the edge boundary @math of a set @math , as a function of @math . A weaker (but more widely-used) lower bound is @math , where equality holds iff @math is a subcube. In 2011, the first author obtained a sharp stability' version of the latter result, proving that if @math , then there exists a subcube @math such that @math . The weak' version of the edge isoperimetric inequality has the following well-known generalization for the @math -biased' measure @math on the discrete cube: if @math , or if @math and @math is monotone increasing, then @math . In this paper, we prove a sharp stability version of the latter result, which generalizes the aforementioned result of the first author. Namely, we prove that if @math , then there exists a subcube @math such that @math , where @math . This result is a central component in recent work of the authors proving sharp stability versions of a number of Erd o s-Ko-Rado type theorems in extremal combinatorics, including the seminal complete intersection theorem' of Ahlswede and Khachatrian. In addition, we prove a biased-measure analogue of the full' edge isoperimetric inequality, for monotone increasing sets, and we observe that such an analogue does not hold for arbitrary sets, hence answering a question of Kalai. We use this result to give a new proof of the full' edge isoperimetric inequality, one relying on the Kruskal-Katona theorem. We prove the first nontrivial (superlinear) lower bound in the noisy broadcast model, defined by El Gamal in [Open problems presented at the @math workshop on Specific Problems in Communication and Computation sponsored by Bell Communication Research, in Open Problems in Communication and Computation, T. M. Cover and B. Gopinath, eds., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987, pp. 60-62]. In this model there are @math processors @math , each of which is initially given a private input bit @math . The goal is for @math to learn the value of @math , for some specified function @math , using a series of noisy broadcasts. At each step a designated processor broadcasts one bit to all of the other processors, and the bit received by each processor is flipped with fixed probability (independently for each recipient). In 1988, Gallager [IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 34 (1988), pp. 176-180] gave a noise-resistant protocol that allows @math to learn the entire input with constant probability in @math broadcasts. We prove that Gallager's protocol is optimal, up to a constant factor. Our lower bound follows by reduction from a lower bound for generalized noisy decision trees, a new model which may be of independent interest. For this new model we show a lower bound of @math on the depth of a tree that learns the entire input. While the above lower bound is for an @math -bit function, we also show an @math lower bound for the number of broadcasts required to compute certain explicit boolean-valued functions, when the correct output must be attained with probability at least @math for a constant parameter @math (this bound applies to all threshold functions as well as any other boolean-valued function with linear sensitivity). This bound also follows by reduction from a lower bound of @math on the depth of generalized noisy decision trees that compute the same functions with the same error. We also show a (nontrivial) @math lower bound on the depth of generalized noisy decision trees that compute such functions with small constant error. Finally, we show the first protocol in the noisy broadcast model that computes the Hamming weight of the input using a linear number of broadcasts.