Given a set @math of @math points in the plane, we solve the problems of constructing a geometric planar graph spanning @math 1) of minimum degree 2, and 2) which is 2-edge connected, respectively, and has max edge length bounded by a factor of 2 times the optimal; we also show that the factor 2 is best possible given appropriate connectivity conditions on the set @math , respectively. First, we construct in @math time a geometric planar graph of minimum degree 2 and max edge length bounded by 2 times the optimal. This is then used to construct in @math time a 2-edge connected geometric planar graph spanning @math with max edge length bounded by @math times the optimal, assuming that the set @math forms a connected Unit Disk Graph. Second, we prove that 2 times the optimal is always sufficient if the set of points forms a 2 edge connected Unit Disk Graph and give an algorithm that runs in @math time. We also show that for @math , there exists a set @math of @math points in the plane such that even though the Unit Disk Graph spanning @math is @math -vertex connected, there is no 2-edge connected geometric planar graph spanning @math even if the length of its edges is allowed to be up to 17 16.
A related problem is studied in @cite_2 . The authors prove that it is NP-hard to decide whether @math contains a spanning planar graph of minimum degree 2 even if @math itself has minimum degree 2. They also posed and studied the problem of finding the minimum radius @math so that @math has a geometric planar spanning subgraph of minimum degree 3 provided that @math has a spanning subgraph of minimum degree 3.
@cite_2
2161190897 1844546726 2066700938 2008562682 2055636480 1496182974 1799262171 2065527713 2098823334 2080022329 2121815516 1967595345 2949856235 2294674552 2951159514 2052687843 1968729061 2004779317 2034501275 1969940463
We present algorithmic and hardness results for network design problems with degree or order constraints. The first problem we consider is the Survivable Network Design problem with degree constraints on vertices. The objective is to find a minimum cost subgraph which satisfies connectivity requirements between vertices and also degree upper bounds @math on the vertices. This includes the well-studied Minimum Bounded Degree Spanning Tree problem as a special case. Our main result is a @math -approximation algorithm for the edge-connectivity Survivable Network Design problem with degree constraints, where the cost of the returned solution is at most twice the cost of an optimum solution (satisfying the degree bounds) and the degree of each vertex @math is at most @math . This implies the first constant factor (bicriteria) approximation algorithms for many degree constrained network design problems, including the Minimum Bounded Degree Steiner Forest problem. Our results also extend to directed graphs and provide the first constant factor (bicriteria) approximation algorithms for the Minimum Bounded Degree Arborescence problem and the Minimum Bounded Degree Strongly @math -Edge-Connected Subgraph problem. In contrast, we show that the vertex-connectivity Survivable Network Design problem with degree constraints is hard to approximate, even when the cost of every edge is zero. A striking aspect of our algorithmic result is its simplicity. It is based on the iterative relaxation method, which is an extension of Jain's iterative rounding method. This provides an elegant and unifying algorithmic framework for a broad range of network design problems. We also study the problem of finding a minimum cost @math -edge-connected subgraph with at least @math vertices, which we call the @math -subgraph problem. This generalizes some well-studied classical problems such as the @math -MST and the minimum cost @math -edge-connected subgraph problems. We give a polylogarithmic approximation for the @math -subgraph problem. However, by relating it to the Densest @math -Subgraph problem, we provide evidence that the @math -subgraph problem might be hard to approximate for arbitrary @math . We study the following problem: given a geometric graph G and an integer k, determine if G has a planar spanning subgraph (with the original embedding and straight-line edges) such that all nodes have degree at least k. If G is a unit disk graph, the problem is trivial to solve for k = 1. We show that even the slightest deviation from the trivial case (e.g., quasi unit disk graphs or k = 2) leads to NP-hard problems. Abstract The problem of constructing a spanning tree for a graph G = ( V , E ) with n vertices whose maximal degree is the smallest among all spanning trees of G is considered. This problem is easily shown to be NP-hard. In the Steiner version of this problem, along with the input graph, a set of distinguished vertices D ⊆ V is given. A minimum-degree Steiner tree is a tree of minimum degree which spans at least the set D . Iterative polynomial time approximation algorithms for the problems are given. The algorithms compute trees whose maximal degree is at most Δ* + 1, where Δ* is the degree of some optimal tree for the respective problems. Unless P = NP, this is the best bound achievable in polynomial time. 2-Edge connectivity is an important fault tolerance property of a network because it maintains network communication despite the deletion of a single arbitrary edge. Planar spanning subgraphs have been shown to play a significant role for achieving local decentralized routing in wireless networks. Existing algorithmic constructions of spanning planar subgraphs of unit disk graphs (UDGs) such as Minimum Spanning Tree, Gabriel Graph, Nearest Neighborhood Graph, etc. do not always ensure connectivity of the resulting graph under single edge deletion. Furthermore, adding edges to the network so as to improve its edge connectivity not only may create edge crossings (at points which are not vertices) but it may also require edges of unbounded length. Thus we are faced with the problem of constructing 2-edge connected geometric planar spanning graphs by adding edges of bounded length without creating edge crossings (at points which are not vertices). To overcome this difficulty, in this paper we address the problem of augmenting the edge set (i.e., adding new edges) of planar geometric graphs with straight line edges of bounded length so that the resulting graph is planar and 2-edge connected. We provide bounds on the number of newly added straight-line edges, prove that such edges can be of length at most 3 times the max length of an edge of the original graph, and also show that the factor 3 is optimal. It is shown to be NP-Complete to augment a geometric planar graph to a 2-edge connected geometric planar graph with the minimum number of new edges of a given bounded length. We also provide a constant time algorithm that works in location-aware settings to augment a planar graph into a 2-edge connected planar graph with straight-line edges of length bounded by 3 times the longest edge of the original graph. It turns out that knowledge of vertex coordinates is crucial to our construction and in fact we prove that this problem cannot be solved locally if the vertices do not know their coordinates. Moreover, we provide a family of k-connected UDGs which does not have 2-edge connected spanning planar subgraphs, for any . LetH=(T,U) be a connected graph,V?Ta set, andca non-negative function on the unordered pairs of elements ofV. In theminimum0-extension problem(*), one is asked to minimize the inner productcmover all metricsmonVsuch that (i)mcoincides with the distance function ofHwithinT; and (ii) eachv?Vis at zero distance from somes?T, i.e.m(v,s)=0. This problem is known to be NP-hard ifH=K3(as being equivalent to the minimum 3-terminal cut problem), while it is polynomially solvable ifH=K2(the minimum cut problem) orH=K2,r(the minimum (2,r)-metric problem). We study problem (*) for all fixedH. More precisely, we consider the linear programming relaxation (**) of (*) that is obtained by dropping condition (ii) above, and callHminimizableif the minima in (*) and (**) coincide for allVandc. Note that for such anHproblem (*) is solvable in strongly polynomial time. Our main theorem asserts thatHis minimizable if and only ifHis bipartite, has no isometric circuit with six or more nodes, and is orientable in the sense thatHcan be oriented so that nonadjacent edges of any 4-circuit are oppositely directed along this circuit. The proof is based on a combinatorial and topological study of tight and extreme extensions of graph metrics. Based on the idea of the proof of the NP-hardness for the minimum 3-terminal cut problem in 4, we then show that the minimum 0-extension problem is strongly NP-hard for many non-minimizable graphsH. Other results are also presented. Given a connected geometric graph G, we consider the problem of constructing a t-spanner of G having the minimum number of edges. We prove that for every t with @math , there exists a connected geometric graph G with n vertices, such that every t-spanner of G contains Ω( n1+1 t ) edges. This bound almost matches the known upper bound, which states that every connected weighted graph with n vertices contains a t-spanner with O(tn1+2 (t+1)) edges. We also prove that the problem of deciding whether a given geometric graph contains a t-spanner with at most K edges is NP-hard. Previously, this NP-hardness result was only known for non-geometric graphs Given two graphs @math and @math , the Subgraph Isomorphism problem asks if @math is isomorphic to a subgraph of @math . While NP-hard in general, algorithms exist for various parameterized versions of the problem: for example, the problem can be solved (1) in time @math using the color-coding technique of Alon, Yuster, and Zwick; (2) in time @math using Courcelle's Theorem; (3) in time @math using a result on first-order model checking by Frick and Grohe; or (4) in time @math for connected @math using the algorithm of Matou s ek and Thomas. Already this small sample of results shows that the way an algorithm can depend on the parameters is highly nontrivial and subtle. We develop a framework involving 10 relevant parameters for each of @math and @math (such as treewidth, pathwidth, genus, maximum degree, number of vertices, number of components, etc.), and ask if an algorithm with running time [ f_1(p_1,p_2,..., p_ ) n^ f_2(p_ +1 ,..., p_k) ] exist, where each of @math is one of the 10 parameters depending only on @math or @math . We show that all the questions arising in this framework are answered by a set of 11 maximal positive results (algorithms) and a set of 17 maximal negative results (hardness proofs); some of these results already appear in the literature, while others are new in this paper. On the algorithmic side, our study reveals for example that an unexpected combination of bounded degree, genus, and feedback vertex set number of @math gives rise to a highly nontrivial algorithm for Subgraph Isomorphism. On the hardness side, we present W[1]-hardness proofs under extremely restricted conditions, such as when @math is a bounded-degree tree of constant pathwidth and @math is a planar graph of bounded pathwidth. We propose a fast methodology for encoding graphs with information-theoretically minimum numbers of bits. Specifically, a graph with property @math is called a @math -graph . If @math satisfies certain properties, then an n-node m-edge @math -graph G can be encoded by a binary string X such that (1) G and X can be obtained from each other in O(n log n) time, and (2) X has at most @math bits for any continuous superadditive function @math so that there are at most @math distinct @math -node @math -graphs. The methodology is applicable to general classes of graphs; this paper focuses on planar graphs. Examples of such @math include all conjunctions over the following groups of properties: (1) G is a planar graph or a plane graph; (2) @math is directed or undirected; (3) @math is triangulated, triconnected, biconnected, merely connected, or not required to be connected; (4) the nodes of G are labeled with labels from @math for @math ; (5) the edges of G are labeled with labels from @math for @math ; and (6) each node (respectively, edge) of G has at most @math self-loops (respectively, @math multiple edges). Moreover, @math and @math are not required to be O(1) for the cases of @math being a plane triangulation. These examples are novel applications of small cycle separators of planar graphs and are the only nontrivial classes of graphs, other than rooted trees, with known polynomial-time information-theoretically optimal coding schemes. In this paper we study connectivity augmentation problems. Given a connected graph G with some desirable property, we want to make G 2-vertex connected (or 2-edge connected) by adding edges such that the resulting graph keeps the property. The aim is to add as few edges as possible. The property that we consider is planarity, both in an abstract graph-theoretic and in a geometric setting, where vertices correspond to points in the plane and edges to straight-line segments. We show that it is NP-hard to nd a minimum-cardinality augmentation that makes a planar graph 2-edge connected. For making a planar graph 2-vertex connected this was known. We further show that both problems are hard in the geometric setting, even when restricted to trees. The problems remain hard for higher degrees of connectivity. On the other hand we give polynomial-time algorithms for the special case of convex geometric graphs. We also study the following related problem. Given a planar (plane geometric) graph G, two vertices s and t of G, and an integer c, how many edges have to be added to G such that G is still planar (plane geometric) and contains c edge- (or vertex-) disjoint s t paths? For the planar case we give a linear-time algorithm for c = 2. For the plane geometric case we give optimal worst-case bounds for c = 2; for c = 3 we characterize the cases that have a solution. A problem arising in the design of vacuum systems and having applications to some natural problems of interconnection design is described as follows. (1) Given a set X and subsets @math of @math , satisfying @math , find a graph G with vertex set X and the minimum number of edges such that for any i, the subgraph induced by @math has a connected component containing @math .Two other problems related to this one are the following ones. (2) Given a set X and subsets @math such that @math , find a graph G with vertex set X and the minimum number of edges such that for any i the subgraph @math induced by @math in G is connected. (3) Given a set X and subsets @math such that @math , find a graph G with vertex set X, find a graph G with vertex set X and the minimum number of edges such that for any subset I of @math , the subgraph induced by @math is co... Given a directed graph G=(V,A) with a non-negative weight (length) function on its arcs w:A→ℝ+ and two terminals s,t∈V, our goal is to destroy all short directed paths from s to t in G by eliminating some arcs of A. This is known as the short paths interdiction problem. We consider several versions of it, and in each case analyze two subcases: total limited interdiction, when a fixed number k of arcs can be removed, and node-wise limited interdiction, when for each node v∈V a fixed number k(v) of out-going arcs can be removed. Our results indicate that the latter subcase is always easier than the former one. In particular, we show that the short paths node-wise interdiction problem can be efficiently solved by an extension of Dijkstra’s algorithm. In contrast, the short paths total interdiction problem is known to be NP-hard. We strengthen this hardness result by deriving the following inapproximability bounds: Given k, it is NP-hard to approximate within a factor c<2 the maximum s–t distance d(s,t) obtainable by removing (at most) k arcs from G. Furthermore, given d, it is NP-hard to approximate within a factor @math the minimum number of arcs which has to be removed to guarantee d(s,t)≥d. Finally, we also show that the same inapproximability bounds hold for undirected graphs and or node elimination. We present two new approximation algorithms for the problem of finding a k-node connected spanning subgraph (directed or undirected) of minimum cost. The best known approximation guarantees for this problem were @math for both directed and undirected graphs, and @math for undirected graphs with @math , where @math is the number of nodes in the input graph. Our first algorithm has approximation ratio @math , which is @math except for very large values of @math , namely, @math . This algorithm is based on a new result on @math -connected @math -critical graphs, which is of independent interest in the context of graph theory. Our second algorithm uses the primal-dual method and has approximation ratio @math for all values of @math . Combining these two gives an algorithm with approximation ratio @math , which asymptotically improves the best known approximation guarantee for directed graphs for all values of @math , and for undirected graphs for @math . Moreover, this is the first algorithm that has an approximation guarantee better than @math for all values of @math . Our approximation ratio also provides an upper bound on the integrality gap of the standard LP-relaxation. We introduce a family of directed geometric graphs, denoted @math , that depend on two parameters @math and @math . For @math and @math , the @math graph is a strong @math -spanner, with @math . The out-degree of a node in the @math graph is at most @math . Moreover, we show that routing can be achieved locally on @math . Next, we show that all strong @math -spanners are also @math -spanners of the unit disk graph. Simulations for various values of the parameters @math and @math indicate that for random point sets, the spanning ratio of @math is better than the proven theoretical bounds. This paper introduces the concept of low-congestion shortcuts for (near-)planar networks, and demonstrates their power by using them to obtain near-optimal distributed algorithms for problems such as Minimum Spanning Tree (MST) or Minimum Cut, in planar networks. Consider a graph G = (V, E) and a partitioning of V into subsets of nodes S1, . . ., SN, each inducing a connected subgraph G[Si]. We define an α-congestion shortcut with dilation β to be a set of subgraphs H1, . . ., HN ⊆ G, one for each subset Si, such that 1. For each i ∈ [1, N], the diameter of the subgraph G[Si] + Hi is at most β. 2. For each edge e ∈ E, the number of subgraphs G[Si] + Hi containing e is at most α. We prove that any partition of a D-diameter planar graph into individually-connected parts admits an O(D log D)-congestion shortcut with dilation O(D log D), and we also present a distributed construction of it in O(D) rounds. We moreover prove these parameters to be near-optimal; i.e., there are instances in which, unavoidably, max α, β = Ω(D[EQUATION]). Finally, we use low-congestion shortcuts, and their efficient distributed construction, to derive O(D)-round distributed algorithms for MST and Min-Cut, in planar networks. This complexity nearly matches the trivial lower bound of Ω(D). We remark that this is the first result bypassing the well-known Ω(D + [EQUATION]) existential lower bound of general graphs (see Peleg and Rubinovich [FOCS'99]; Elkin [STOC'04]; and Das [STOC'11]) in a family of graphs of interest. Given a large edge-weighted network @math with @math terminal vertices, we wish to compress it and store, using little memory, the value of the minimum cut (or equivalently, maximum flow) between every bipartition of terminals. One appealing methodology to implement a compression of @math is to construct a : a small network @math with the same @math terminals, in which the minimum cut value between every bipartition of terminals is the same as in @math . This notion was introduced by Hagerup, Katajainen, Nishimura, and Ragde [JCSS '98], who proved that such @math of size at most @math always exists. Obviously, by having access to the smaller network @math , certain computations involving cuts can be carried out much more efficiently. We provide several new bounds, which together narrow the previously known gap from doubly-exponential to only singly-exponential, both for planar and for general graphs. Our first and main result is that every @math -terminal planar network admits a mimicking network @math of size @math , which is moreover a minor of @math . On the other hand, some planar networks @math require @math . For general networks, we show that certain bipartite graphs only admit mimicking networks of size @math , and moreover, every data structure that stores the minimum cut value between all bipartitions of the terminals must use @math machine words. In the survivable network design problem (SNDP), the goal is to find a minimum-cost spanning subgraph satisfying certain connectivity requirements. We study the vertex-connectivity variant of SNDP in which the input specifies, for each pair of vertices, a required number of vertex-disjoint paths connecting them. We give the first strong lower bound on the approximability of SNDP, showing that the problem admits no efficient @math ratio approximation for any fixed @math , unless @math . We show hardness of approximation results for some important special cases of SNDP, and we exhibit the first lower bound on the approximability of the related classical NP-hard problem of augmenting the connectivity of a graph using edges from a given set. We introduce the following notion of compressing an undirected graph @math with (nonnegative) edge-lengths and terminal vertices @math . A distance-preserving minor is a minor @math (of @math ) with possibly different edge-lengths, such that @math and the shortest-path distance between every pair of terminals is exactly the same in @math and in @math . We ask: what is the smallest @math such that every graph @math with @math terminals admits a distance-preserving minor @math with at most @math vertices? Simple analysis shows that @math . Our main result proves that @math , significantly improving on the trivial @math . Our lower bound holds even for planar graphs @math , in contrast to graphs @math of constant treewidth, for which we prove that @math vertices suffice. For a graph G and a collection of vertex pairs (s"1,t"1),...,(s"k,t"k) , the k disjoint paths problem is to find k vertex-disjoint paths P"1,...,P"k, where P"i is a path from s"i to t"i for each i=1,...,k. In the corresponding optimization problem, the shortest disjoint paths problem, the vertex-disjoint paths P"i have to be chosen such that a given objective function is minimized. We consider two different objectives, namely minimizing the total path length (minimum sum, or short: Min-Sum), and minimizing the length of the longest path (Min-Max), for k=2,3. Min-Sum: We extend recent results by Colin de Verdiere and Schrijver to prove that, for a planar graph and for terminals adjacent to at most two faces, the Min-Sum 2 Disjoint Paths Problem can be solved in polynomial time. We also prove that, for six terminals adjacent to one face in any order, the Min-Sum 3 Disjoint Paths Problem can be solved in polynomial time. Min-Max: The Min-Max 2 Disjoint Paths Problem is known to be NP-hard for general graphs. We present an algorithm that solves the problem for graphs with tree-width 2 in polynomial time. We thus close the gap between easy and hard instances, since the problem is weakly NP-hard for graphs with tree-width 3. We consider the problem of labeling the nodes of a graph in a way that will allow one to compute the distance between any two nodes directly from their labels (without using any additional information). Our main interest is in the minimal length of labels needed in different cases. We obtain upper and lower bounds for several interesting families of graphs. In particular, our main results are the following. For general graphs, we show that the length needed is Θ(n). For trees, we show that the length needed is Θ(log2 n). For planar graphs, we show an upper bound of O(√nlogn) and a lower bound of Ω(n1 3). For bounded degree graphs, we show a lower bound of Ω(√n). The upper bounds for planar graphs and for trees follow by a more general upper bound for graphs with a r(n)-separator. The two lower bounds, however, are obtained by two different arguments that may be interesting in their own right. We also show some lower bounds on the length of the labels, even if it is only required that distances be approximated to a multiplicative factor s. For example, we show that for general graphs the required length is Ω(n) for every s < 3. We also consider the problem of the time complexity of the distance function once the labels are computed. We show that there are graphs with optimal labels of length 3 log n, such that if we use any labels with fewer than n bits per label, computing the distance function requires exponential time. A similar result is obtained for planar and bounded degree graphs. Given a setX and subsetsX1,...,Xm, we consider the problem of finding a graphG with vertex setX and the minimum number of edges such that fori=1,...,m, the subgraphGi; induced byXi is connected. Suppose that for anyα pointsx1,...,xαe X, there are at mostβXi 's containing the set x1,...,xα . In the paper, we show that the problem is polynomial-time solvable for (α ⩽ 2,β ⩽ 2) and is NP-hard for (α⩾3,β=1), (α=l,β⩾6), and (α⩾2,β⩾3).