The area of parameterized approximation seeks to combine approximation and parameterized algorithms to obtain, e.g., (1+eps)-approximations in f(k,eps)n^ O(1) time where k is some parameter of the input. We obtain the following results on parameterized approximability: 1) In the maximum independent set of rectangles problem (MISR) we are given a collection of n axis parallel rectangles in the plane. Our goal is to select a maximum-cardinality subset of pairwise non-overlapping rectangles. This problem is NP-hard and also W[1]-hard [Marx, ESA'05]. The best-known polynomial-time approximation factor is O(loglog n) [Chalermsook and Chuzhoy, SODA'09] and it admits a QPTAS [Adamaszek and Wiese, FOCS'13; Chuzhoy and Ene, FOCS'16]. Here we present a parameterized approximation scheme (PAS) for MISR, i.e. an algorithm that, for any given constant eps>0 and integer k>0, in time f(k,eps)n^ g(eps) , either outputs a solution of size at least k (1+eps), or declares that the optimum solution has size less than k. 2) In the (2-dimensional) geometric knapsack problem (TDK) we are given an axis-aligned square knapsack and a collection of axis-aligned rectangles in the plane (items). Our goal is to translate a maximum cardinality subset of items into the knapsack so that the selected items do not overlap. In the version of TDK with rotations (TDKR), we are allowed to rotate items by 90 degrees. Both variants are NP-hard, and the best-known polynomial-time approximation factors are 558 325+eps and 4 3+eps, resp. [, FOCS'17]. These problems admit a QPTAS for polynomially bounded item sizes [Adamaszek and Wiese, SODA'15]. We show that both variants are W[1]-hard. Furthermore, we present a PAS for TDKR. For all considered problems, getting time f(k,eps)n^ O(1) , rather than f(k,eps)n^ g(eps) , would give FPT time f'(k)n^ O(1) exact algorithms using eps=1 (k+1), contradicting W[1]-hardness.
One of the first fruitful connections between parameterized complexity and approximability was observed independently by Bazgan @cite_23 and Cesati and Trevisan @cite_29 : They showed that EPTASs, i.e., @math -approximation algorithms with @math time, imply fixed-parameter tractability for the decision version. Thus, proofs for 1 -hardness of the decision version became a strong tool for ruling out improvements of PTASs, with running time @math , to EPTASs. More recently, @cite_25 improved this approach by directly proving 1 -hardness of obtaining a @math -approximation, thus bypassing the requirement of a 1 -hard decision version (see also @cite_33 ).
@cite_29 @cite_33 @cite_25 @cite_23
2963006872 2567804199 2949062889 1749371477 2001663593 2139692878 2057087699 1510609119 2281706401 2949142592 2071423034 1995073517 2769189507 2118980874 1972853793 2473549844 2008724760 2963782499 1982492546 2963693432
In the Closest String problem one is given a family S of equal-length strings over some fixed alphabet, and the task is to find a string y that minimizes the maximum Hamming distance between y and a string from S. While polynomial-time approximation schemes (PTASes) for this problem are known for a long time [; J. ACM'02], no efficient polynomial-time approximation scheme (EPTAS) has been proposed so far. In this paper, we prove that the existence of an EPTAS for Closest String is in fact unlikely, as it would imply that FPT=W[1], a highly unexpected collapse in the hierarchy of parameterized complexity classes. Our proof also shows that the existence of a PTAS for Closest String with running time f(eps) n^o(1 eps), for any computable function f, would contradict the Exponential Time Hypothesis. An important question in theoretical computer science is to determine the best possible running time for solving a problem at hand. For geometric optimization problems, we often understand their complexity on a rough scale, but not very well on a finer scale. One such example is the two-dimensional knapsack problem for squares. There is a polynomial time (1 + ϵ)-approximation algorithm for it (i.e., a PTAS) but the running time of this algorithm is triple exponential in 1 ϵ, i.e., Ω(n221 ϵ). A double or triple exponential dependence on 1 ϵ is inherent in how this and several other algorithms for other geometric problems work. In this paper, we present an EPTAS for knapsack for squares, i.e., a (1+ϵ)-approximation algorithm with a running time of Oϵ(1)·nO(1). In particular, the exponent of n in the running time does not depend on ϵ at all! Since there can be no FPTAS for the problem (unless P = NP) this is the best kind of approximation scheme we can hope for. To achieve this improvement, we introduce two new key ideas: We present a fast method to guess the Ω(221 ϵ) relatively large squares of a suitable near-optimal packing instead of using brute-force enumeration. Secondly, we introduce an indirect guessing framework to define sizes of cells for the remaining squares. In the previous PTAS each of these steps needs a running time of Ω(n221 ϵ) and we improve both to Oϵ(1) · nO(1). We complete our result by giving an algorithm for two-dimensional knapsack for rectangles under (1 + ϵ)-resource augmentation. In this setting, we also improve the best known running time of Ω(n1 ϵ1 ϵ) to Oϵ(1) · nO(1) and compute even a solution with optimal profit, in contrast to the best previously known polynomial time algorithm for this setting that computes only an approximation. We believe that our new techniques have the potential to be useful for other settings as well. A Fixed-Parameter Tractable ( ) @math -approximation algorithm for a minimization (resp. maximization) parameterized problem @math is an FPT algorithm that, given an instance @math computes a solution of cost at most @math (resp. @math ) if a solution of cost at most (resp. at least) @math exists; otherwise the output can be arbitrary. For well-known intractable problems such as the W[1]-hard Clique and W[2]-hard Set Cover problems, the natural question is whether we can get any -approximation. It is widely believed that both Clique and Set-Cover admit no FPT @math -approximation algorithm, for any increasing function @math . Assuming standard conjectures such as the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) eth-paturi and the Projection Games Conjecture (PGC) r3 , we make the first progress towards proving this conjecture by showing that 1. Under the ETH and PGC, there exist constants @math such that the Set Cover problem does not admit an FPT approximation algorithm with ratio @math in @math time, where @math is the size of the universe and @math is the number of sets. 2. Unless @math , for every @math there exists a constant @math such that Clique has no FPT cost approximation with ratio @math in @math time, where @math is the number of vertices in the graph. In the second part of the paper we consider various W[1]-hard problems such as , , Directed Steiner Network and . For all these problem we give polynomial time @math -approximation algorithms for some small function @math (the largest approximation ratio we give is @math ). We motivate and describe a new parameterized approximation paradigm which studies the interaction between performance ratio and running time for any parametrization of a given optimization problem. As a key tool, we introduce the concept of α-shrinking transformation, for α≥1. Applying such transformation to a parameterized problem instance decreases the parameter value, while preserving approximation ratio of α (or α-fidelity). For example, it is well-known that Vertex Cover cannot be approximated within any constant factor better than 2 [24] (under usual assumptions). Our parameterized α-approximation algorithm for k-Vertex Cover, parameterized by the solution size, has a running time of 1.273(2−α)k, where the running time of the best FPT algorithm is 1.273k [10]. Our algorithms define a continuous tradeoff between running times and approximation ratios, allowing practitioners to appropriately allocate computational resources. Moving even beyond the performance ratio, we call for a new type of approximative kernelization race. Our α-shrinking transformations can be used to obtain kernels which are smaller than the best known for a given problem. For the Vertex Cover problem we obtain a kernel size of 2(2−α)k. The smaller "α-fidelity" kernels allow us to solve exactly problem instances more efficiently, while obtaining an approximate solution for the original instance. We show that such transformations exist for several fundamental problems, including Vertex Cover, d-Hitting Set, Connected Vertex Cover and Steiner Tree. We note that most of our algorithms are easy to implement and are therefore practical in use. par>We prove some non-approximability results for restrictions of basic combinatorial optimization problems to instances of bounded “degreeror bounded “width.” Specifically: We prove that the Max 3SAT problem on instances where each variable occurs in at most B clauses, is hard to approximate to within a factor @math , unless @math . H stad [18] proved that the problem is approximable to within a factor @math in polynomial time, and that is hard to approximate to within a factor @math . Our result uses a new randomized reduction from general instances of Max 3SAT to bounded-occurrences instances. The randomized reduction applies to other Max SNP problems as well. We observe that the Set Cover problem on instances where each set has size at most B is hard to approximate to within a factor @math unless @math . The result follows from an appropriate setting of parameters in Feige's reduction [11]. This is essentially tight in light of the existence of @math -approximate algorithms [20, 23, 9] We present a new PCP construction, based on applying parallel repetition to the inner verifier,'' and we provide a tight analysis for it. Using the new construction, and some modifications to known reductions from PCP to Hitting Set, we prove that Hitting Set with sets of size B is hard to approximate to within a factor @math . The problem can be approximated to within a factor B [19], and it is the Vertex Cover problem for B =2. The relationship between hardness of approximation and set size seems to have not been explored before. We observe that the Independent Set problem on graphs having degree at most B is hard to approximate to within a factor @math , unless P = NP . This follows from a comination of results by Clementi and Trevisan [28] and Reingold, Vadhan and Wigderson [27]. It had been observed that the problem is hard to approximate to within a factor @math unless P = NP [1]. An algorithm achieving factor @math is also known [21, 2, 30, 16 . We give the first black-box reduction from approximation algorithms to truthful approximation mechanisms for a non-trivial class of multi-parameter problems. Specifically, we prove that every welfare-maximization problem that admits a fully polynomial-time approximation scheme (FPTAS) and can be encoded as a packing problem also admits a truthful-in-expectation randomized mechanism that is an FPTAS. Our reduction makes novel use of smoothed analysis by employing small perturbations as a tool in algorithmic mechanism design. We develop a “duality” between linear perturbations of the objective function of an optimization problem and of its feasible set, and we use the “primal” and “dual” viewpoints to prove the running time bound and the truthfulness guarantee, respectively, for our mechanism. We present the first monotone randomized polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS) for minimizing the makespan of parallel related machines ( @math ), the paradigmatic problem in single-parameter algorithmic mechanism design. This result immediately gives a polynomial-time, truthful (in expectation) mechanism whose approximation guarantee attains the best-possible one for all polynomial-time algorithms (assuming @math ). Our algorithmic techniques are flexible and also yield a monotone deterministic quasi-PTAS for @math and a monotone randomized PTAS for max-min scheduling on related machines. An EPTAS (efficient PTAS) is an approximation scheme where e does not appear in the exponent of n, i.e., the running time is f(e)nc. We use parameterized complexity to investigate the possibility of improving the known approximation schemes for certain geometric problems to EPTAS. Answering an open question of Alber and Fiala [2], we show that Maximum Independent Set is W[1]-complete for the intersection graphs of unit disks and axis-parallel unit squares in the plane. A standard consequence of this result is that the @math time PTAS of [11] for Maximum Independent Set on unit disk graphs cannot be improved to an EPTAS. Similar results are obtained for the problem of covering points with squares. Given n length-L strings S = s1, …, s n over a constant size alphabet Σ together with an integer l, where l ≤ L, the objective of Consensus Patterns is to find a length-l string s, a substring t i of each s i in S such that ∑ ∀ id(t i , s) is minimized. Here d(x, y) denotes the Hamming distance between the two strings x and y. Consensus Patterns admits a PTAS [, JCSS 2002] is fixed parameter tractable when parameterized by the objective function value [Marx, SICOMP 2008], and although it is a well-studied problem, improvement of the PTAS to an EPTAS seemed elusive. We prove that Consensus Patterns does not admit an EPTAS unless FPT=W[1], answering an open problem from [, STACS 2002, Combinatorica 2006]. To the best of our knowledge, Consensus Patterns is the first problem that admits a PTAS, and is fixed parameter tractable when parameterized by the value of the objective function but does not admit an EPTAS under plausible complexity assumptions. The proof of our hardness of approximation result combines parameterized reductions and gap preserving reductions in a novel manner. Recently, hardness results for problems in P were achieved using reasonable complexity-theoretic assumptions such as the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis. According to these assumptions, many graph-theoretic problems do not admit truly subquadratic algorithms. A central technique used to tackle the difficulty of the above-mentioned problems is fixed-parameter algorithms with polynomial dependency in the fixed parameter (P-FPT). Applying this technique to clique-width, an important graph parameter, remained to be done. In this article, we study several graph-theoretic problems for which hardness results exist such as cycle problems, distance problems, and maximum matching. We give hardness results and P-FPT algorithms, using clique-width and some of its upper bounds as parameters. We believe that our most important result is an algorithm in O(k4 ⋅ n + m)-time for computing a maximum matching, where k is either the modular-width of the graph or the P4-sparseness. The latter generalizes many algorithms that have been introduced so far for specific subclasses such as cographs. Our algorithms are based on preprocessing methods using modular decomposition and split decomposition. Thus they can also be generalized to some graph classes with unbounded clique-width. We present an exact algorithm that decides, for every fixed r ≥ 2 in time O(m) + 2O(k2) whether a given set of m clauses of size r admits a truth assignment that satisfies at least ((2r - 1)m + k) 2r clauses. Thus Max-r-Sat is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by the number of satisfied clauses above the tight lower bound (1--2-r)m. This solves an open problem of Mahajan, Raman and Sikdar (J. Comput. System Sci., 75, 2009). Our algorithm is based on a polynomial-time data reduction procedure that reduces a problem instance to an equivalent algebraically represented problem with O(k2) variables. This is done by representing the instance as an appropriate polynomial, and by applying a probabilistic argument combined with some simple tools from Harmonic analysis to show that if the polynomial cannot be reduced to one of size O(k2), then there is a truth assignment satisfying the required number of clauses. Combining another probabilistic argument with tools from graph matching theory and signed graphs, we show that if an instance of Max-2-Sat with m clauses has at least 3k variables after application of certain polynomial time reduction rules to it, then there is a truth assignment that satisfies at least (3m + k) 4 clauses. We also outline how the fixed-parameter tractability result on Max-r-Sat can be extended to a family of Boolean Constraint Satisfaction Problems. In 1966, Graham showed that a simple procedure called list scheduling yields a 2-approximation algorithm for the central problem of scheduling precedence constrained jobs on identical machines to minimize makespan. To date this has remained the best algorithm, and whether it can or cannot be improved has become a major open problem in scheduling theory. We address this problem by establishing a quite surprising relation between the approximability of the considered problem and that of scheduling precedence constrained jobs on a single machine to minimize weighted completion time. More specifically, we prove that if the single machine problem is hard to approximate within a factor of @math , then the considered parallel machine problem, even in the case of unit processing times, is hard to approximate within a factor of @math , where @math tends to 0 as @math tends to 0. Combining this with Bansal and Khot's recent hardness result for the single machine problem gives that it is NP-hard to improve upon the approximation ratio obtained by Graham, assuming a new variant of the unique games conjecture. We study a natural generalization of the problem of minimizing makespan on unrelated machines in which jobs may be split into parts. The different parts of a job can be (simultaneously) processed on different machines, but each part requires a setup time before it can be processed. First we show that a natural adaptation of the seminal approximation algorithm for unrelated machine scheduling [11] yields a 3-approximation algorithm, equal to the integrality gap of the corresponding LP relaxation. Through a stronger LP relaxation, obtained by applying a lift-and-project procedure, we are able to improve both the integrality gap and the implied approximation factor to 1 + φ, where φ ≈ 1.618 is the golden ratio. This ratio decreases to 2 in the restricted assignment setting, matching the result for the classic version. Interestingly, we show that our problem cannot be approximated within a factor better than e e-1 ≈ 1.582 (unless P = NP). This provides some evidence that it is harder than the classic version, which is only known to be inapproximable within a factor 1.5 - e. Since our 1 + φ bound remains tight when considering the seemingly stronger machine configuration LP, we propose a new job based configuration LP that has an infinite number of variables, one for each possible way a job may be split and processed on the machines. Using convex duality we show that this infinite LP has a finite representation and can be solved in polynomial time to any accuracy, rendering it a promising relaxation for obtaining better algorithms. © 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland. The notion of fixed-parameter approximation is introduced to investigate the approximability of optimization problems within the framework of fixed-parameter computation. This work partially aims at enhancing the world of fixed-parameter computation in parallel with the conventional theory of computation that includes both exact and approximate computations. In particular, it is proved that fixed-parameter approximability is closely related to the approximation of small-cost solutions in polynomial time. It is also demonstrated that many fixed-parameter intractable problems are not fixed-parameter approximable. On the other hand, fixed-parameter approximation appears to be a viable approach to solving some inapproximable yet important optimization problems. For instance, all problems in the class MAX SNP admit fixed-parameter approximation schemes in time O(2 @math p(n)) for any small e> 0. A polynomial time approximation scheme (PTAS) for an optimization problem A is an algorithm that given in input an instance of A and e > 0 finds a (1 + e)-approximate solution in time that is polynomial for each fixed e. Typical running times are nO(1e) or 21eO(1) n. While algorithms of the former kind tend to be impractical, the latter ones are more interesting. In several cases, the development of algorithms of the second type required considerably new, and sometimes harder, techniques. For some interesting problems, only nO(1e) approximation schemes are known. Under likely assumptions, we prove that for some problems (including natural ones) there cannot be approximation schemes running in time f(1 ϵ) n p0(1), no matter how fast function f grows. Our result relies on a connection with Parameterized Complexity Theory, and we show that this connection is necessary. We consider the adversarial convex bandit problem and we build the first @math -time algorithm with @math -regret for this problem. To do so we introduce three new ideas in the derivative-free optimization literature: (i) kernel methods, (ii) a generalization of Bernoulli convolutions, and (iii) a new annealing schedule for exponential weights (with increasing learning rate). The basic version of our algorithm achieves @math -regret, and we show that a simple variant of this algorithm can be run in @math -time per step at the cost of an additional @math factor in the regret. These results improve upon the @math -regret and @math -time result of the first two authors, and the @math -regret and @math -time result of Hazan and Li. Furthermore we conjecture that another variant of the algorithm could achieve @math -regret, and moreover that this regret is unimprovable (the current best lower bound being @math and it is achieved with linear functions). For the simpler situation of zeroth order stochastic convex optimization this corresponds to the conjecture that the optimal query complexity is of order @math . In this paper we study a fundamental open problem in the area of probabilistic checkable proofs: What is the smallest s such that NP ⊆ naPCP1,s[O(log n),3]? In the language of hardness of approximation, this problem is equivalent to determining the smallest s such that getting an s-approximation for satisfiable 3-bit constraint satisfaction problems ("3-CSPs") is NP-hard. The previous best upper bound and lower bound for s are 20 27+µ by Khot and Saket [KS06], and 5 8 (assuming NP subseteq BPP) by Zwick [Zwi98]. In this paper we close the gap assuming Khot's d-to-1 Conjecture. Formally, we prove that if Khot's d-to-1 Conjecture holds for any finite constant integer d, then NP naPCP1,5 8+ µ[O(log n),3] for any constant µ > 0. Our conditional result also solves Hastad's open question [Has01] on determining the inapproximability of satisfiable Max-NTW ("Not Two") instances and confirms Zwick's conjecture [Zwi98] that the 5 8-approximation algorithm for satisfiable 3-CSPs is optimal. We consider the classical scheduling problem on parallel identical machines to minimize the makespan. There is a long history of studies on this problem, focusing on exact and approximation algorithms, and it is thus natural to consider whether these algorithms are best possible in terms of the running time. Under the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), we achieve the following results in this paper: • The scheduling problem on a constant number m of identical machines, which is denoted as Pm||Cmax, is known to admit a fully polynomial time approximation scheme (FPTAS) of running time O(n) + (1 e)O(m) (indeed, the algorithm works for an even more general problem where machines are unrelated). We prove this algorithm is essentially the best possible in the sense that a (1 e)O(m1-δ) + nO(1) time FPTAS for any δ > 0 implies that ETH fails. • The scheduling problem on an arbitrary number of identical machines, which is denoted as P||Cmax, is known to admit a polynomial time approximation scheme (PTAS) of running time 2O(1 e2 log3(1 e))+nO(1). We prove this algorithm is nearly optimal in the sense that a 2O((1 e)1-δ+nO(1) time PTAS for any δ > 0 implies that ETH fails, leaving a small room for improvement. In addition, we also consider exact algorithms for the scheduling problem and prove the following result: • The traditional dynamic programming algorithm for P||Cmax is known to run in 2O(n) time. We prove this is essentially the best possible in the sense that even if we restrict that there are n jobs and the processing time of each job is bounded by O(n), an exact algorithm of running time 22O(n1-δ) for any δ > 0 implies that ETH fails. To obtain these results we will provide two new reductions from 3SAT, one for Pm||Cmax and another for P||Cmax. Indeed, the new reductions explore the structure of scheduling problems and can also lead to other interesting results. For example, using the framework of our reduction for P||Cmax, [5] are able to prove the APX-hardness of the scheduling problem in which the matrix of job processing times P = (pij)mxn is of rank 3, solving the open problem mentioned in [2]. This paper deals with the design of efficiently computable incentive compatible, or truthful, mechanisms for combinatorial optimization problems with multi-parameter agents. We focus on approximation algorithms for NP-hard mechanism design problems. These algorithms need to satisfy certain monotonicity properties to ensure truthfulness. Since most of the known approximation techniques do not fulfill these properties, we study alternative techniques.Our first contribution is a quite general method to transform a pseudopolynomial algorithm into a monotone FPTAS. This can be applied to various problems like, e.g., knapsack, constrained shortest path, or job scheduling with deadlines. For example, the monotone FPTAS for the knapsack problem gives a very efficient, truthful mechanism for single-minded multi-unit auctions. The best previous result for such auctions was a 2-approximation. In addition, we present a monotone PTAS for the generalized assignment problem with any bounded number of parameters per agent.The most efficient way to solve packing integer programs (PIPs) is LP-based randomized rounding, which also is in general not monotone. We show that primal-dual greedy algorithms achieve almost the same approximation ratios for PIPs as randomized rounding. The advantage is that these algorithms are inherently monotone. This way, we can significantly improve the approximation ratios of truthful mechanisms for various fundamental mechanism design problems like single-minded combinatorial auctions (CAs), unsplittable flow routing and multicast routing. Our approximation algorithms can also be used for the winner determination in CAs with general bidders specifying their bids through an oracle. Optimizing parameters of Two-Prover-One-Round Game (2P1R) is an important task in PCPs literature as it would imply a smaller PCP with the same or stronger soundness. While this is a basic question in PCPs community, the connection between the parameters of PCPs and hardness of approximations is sometimes obscure to approximation algorithm community. In this paper, we investigate the connection between the parameters of 2P1R and the hardness of approximating the class of so-called connectivity problems, which includes as subclasses the survivable network design and (multi)cut problems. Based on recent development on 2P1R by Chan (STOC 2013) and several techniques in PCPs literature, we improve hardness results of some connectivity problems that are in the form kσ, for some (very) small constant σ > 0, to hardness results of the form kc for some explicit constant c, where k is a connectivity parameter. In addition, we show how to convert these hardness into hardness results of the form Dc', where D is the number of demand pairs (or the number of terminals).