This chapter presents a novel idea for the general case of the Common Due-Date (CDD) scheduling problem. The problem is about scheduling a certain number of jobs on a single or parallel machines where all the jobs possess different processing times but a common due-date. The objective of the problem is to minimize the total penalty incurred due to earliness or tardiness of the job completions. This work presents exact polynomial algorithms for optimizing a given job sequence for single and identical parallel machines with the run-time complexities of O(nlogn) for both cases, where n is the number of jobs. Besides, we show that our approach for the parallel machine case is also suitable for non-identical parallel machines. We prove the optimality for the single machine case and the run-time complexities of both. Henceforth, we extend our approach to one particular dynamic case of the CDD and conclude the chapter with our results for the benchmark instances provided in the OR library.
In @math , Banisadr studied the single-machine scheduling problem for the case that each job is considered to have linear earliness and quadratic tardiness penalties with no machine idle time. They proposed a hybrid approach for the problem based upon evolutionary algorithm concepts @cite_8 . Yang investigated the single-machine multiple common due dates assignment and scheduling problems in which the processing time of any job depends on its position in a job sequence and its resource allocation. They proposed a polynomial algorithm to minimize the total penalty function containing earliness, tardiness, due date, and resource consumption costs @cite_3 .
@cite_3 @cite_8
2009357368 2084068443 2091164478 2027120502 1979277836 1995073517 2081035842 2043295707 2117416910 2002352006 2963356083 2136186989 1964447957 2032069874 1485083952 1964506478 2002235837 2056177557 2117135110 2562694639
This paper investigates the single-machine multiple common due dates assignment and scheduling problems in which the processing time of a job depends on its position in a job sequence and its resource allocation. We examine the general position-dependent deterioration effect and two models of resource allocation. The objective function is to minimize a total penalty function containing earliness, tardiness, due date, and resource consumption costs. We introduce two polynomial time algorithms to solve the considered problems. Since the two algorithms solve the problems in polynomial time, they can solve large-scale instances of the problem under study in little time. We consider a one-machine scheduling problem with earliness and tardiness penalties. All jobs are assigned a common due date and the objective is to minimize the total penalty due to job earliness and tardiness. We are interested in finding the optimal combination of the common due-date value and the job sequence. Despite the fact that this problem in general is very hard to solve, we prove that there exists at least a common property for all optimal solutions: The first job in an optimal sequence is one of the longest jobs. We also prove that this property holds for a general class of unimodal penalty functions. A companion paper Part I considers the problem of minimizing the weighted earliness and tardiness of jobs scheduled on a single machine around a common due date, d, which is unrestrictively late. This paper Part II considers the problem of minimizing the unweighted earliness and tardiness of jobs, allowing the possibility that d is early enough to constrain the scheduling decision. We describe several optimality conditions. The recognition version of the problem is shown to be NP-complete in the ordinary sense, confirming a well known conjecture. Moreover, this complexity definition is precise, since we describe a dynamic programming algorithm which runs in pseudopolynomial time. This algorithm is also extremely efficient computationally, providing an improvement over earlier procedures, of almost two orders of magnitude in the size of instance that can be solved. Finally, we describe a special case of the problem which is polynomially solvable. This paper addresses the single machine scheduling problem with a common due date aiming to minimize earliness and tardiness penalties. Due to its complexity, most of the previous studies in the literature deal with this problem using heuristics and metaheuristics approaches. With the intention of contributing to the study of this problem, a branch-and-bound algorithm is proposed. Lower bounds and pruning rules that exploit properties of the problem are introduced. The proposed approach is examined through a computational comparative study with 280 problems involving different due date scenarios. In addition, the values of optimal solutions for small problems from a known benchmark are provided. Mathematical subject classification: 90C11, 62P30, 90B35. In this paper, we study single-machine scheduling problem when each job is considered with linear earliness and quadratic tardiness penalties with no machine idle time. Here the objective is to find the best sequence of jobs in the reasonable time. This model was studied in several researches, and some algorithms were proposed to solve it such as genetic algorithm. As the size of problem increased, such algorithms were not effective and efficient. Hence, we proposed the hybrid imperialist competitive algorithm. The proposed algorithm is based upon the imperialist competitive algorithm and genetic algorithm concepts. This algorithm was tested in problems with different sizes. The results denoted that the hybrid algorithm can solve different size of problem in reasonable time. This procedure showed its efficiency in medium- and large-sized problems as compared with other available methods. In 1966, Graham showed that a simple procedure called list scheduling yields a 2-approximation algorithm for the central problem of scheduling precedence constrained jobs on identical machines to minimize makespan. To date this has remained the best algorithm, and whether it can or cannot be improved has become a major open problem in scheduling theory. We address this problem by establishing a quite surprising relation between the approximability of the considered problem and that of scheduling precedence constrained jobs on a single machine to minimize weighted completion time. More specifically, we prove that if the single machine problem is hard to approximate within a factor of @math , then the considered parallel machine problem, even in the case of unit processing times, is hard to approximate within a factor of @math , where @math tends to 0 as @math tends to 0. Combining this with Bansal and Khot's recent hardness result for the single machine problem gives that it is NP-hard to improve upon the approximation ratio obtained by Graham, assuming a new variant of the unique games conjecture. This paper considers earliness tardiness (ET) scheduling problem on a parallel machine environment with common due-date under the effects of time-dependent learning and linear and nonlinear deterioration. In this paper, the effects of learning and deterioration are considered simultaneously. By the effects of learning and deterioration, we mean that the processing time of a job is defined by increasing function of its execution start time and position in the sequence. This study shows that optimal solution for ET scheduling problem under effects of learning and deterioration is V-shape schedule under certain agreeable conditions. Furthermore, we present a mathematical model for the problem under study and an algorithm for solving large test problems. The algorithm can solve problems of 1000 jobs and four machines within 3s on average. Abstract This paper considers due-date assignments and sequencing of n jobs in a single- machine shop in which each job is given a constant waiting allowance. The objective is to find the optimal value of the waiting allowance and the optimal job sequence to minimize a cost function based on the waiting allowance and the job earliness and tardiness values. We formulate the problem as an LP and find the optimal solution via considering the LP dual problem and show that the optimal waiting allowance is independent of the job sequence. We consider an n job, one machine scheduling problem in which all jobs have a common due date. The objective is to determine the optimal value of this due date and an optimal sequence to minimize a total penalty function. This penalty function is based on the due date value and on the earliness or the lateness of each job in the selected sequence. We present a polynomial bound scheduling algorithm for the solution of this problem along with the proof of optimality, a numerical example and discuss some extensions. Given processing times of n jobs on a single machine with penalties for earliness and tardiness and penalties associated with assignment of due-dates, the objective is to select optimal due-dates and optimal sequence. Scheduling procedure for the solution of this problem is presented along with proof of optimality and illustrative numerical examples. This paper considers the problem of scheduling jobs on single and parallel machines where all the jobs possess different processing times but a common due date. There is a penalty involved with each job if it is processed earlier or later than the due date. The objective of the problem is to find the assignment of jobs to machines, the processing sequence of jobs and the time at which they are processed, which minimizes the total penalty incurred due to tardiness or earliness of the jobs. This work presents exact polynomial algorithms for optimizing a given job sequence for single and parallel machines with the run-time complexities of O(n log n) and O(mn2 log n) respectively, where n is the number of jobs and m the number of machines. The algorithms take a sequence consisting of all the jobs (J_i, i = 1,2,...,n) as input and distribute the jobs to machines (for m>1) along with their best completion times so as to get the least possible total penalty for this sequence. We prove the optimality for the single machine case and the runtime complexities of both. Henceforth, we present the results for the benchmark problems and compare with previous work for both single and parallel machine cases, up to 200 jobs. We address the problem of scheduling n jobs on a batching machine to minimize regular scheduling criteria that are non-decreasing in the job completion times. A batching machine is a machine that can handle up to b jobs simultaneously. The jobs that are processed together form a batch, and all jobs in a batch start and complete at the same time. The processing time of a batch is equal to the largest processing time of any job in the batch. We analyse two variants: the unbounded model, where b⩾n; and the bounded model, where b<n. For the unbounded model, we give a characterization of a class of optimal schedules, which leads to a generic dynamic programming algorithm that solves the problem of minimizing an arbitrary regular cost function in pseudopolynomial time. The characterization leads to more efficient dynamic programming algorithms for specific cost functions: a polynomial algorithm for minimizing the maximum cost, an O(n3) time algorithm for minimizing the number of tardy jobs, an O(n2) time algorithm for minimizing the maximum lateness, and an O(n log n) time algorithm for minimizing the total weighted completion time. Furthermore, we prove that minimizing the weighted number of tardy jobs and the total weighted tardiness are NP-hard problems. For the bounded model, we derive an O(nb(b−1)) time dynamic programming algorithm for minimizing total completion time when b>1; for the case with m different processing times, we give a dynamic programming algorithm that requires O(b2m22m) time. Moreover, we prove that due date based scheduling criteria give rise to NP-hard problems. Finally, we show that an arbitrary regular cost function can be minimized in polynomial time for a fixed number of batches. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Abstract We consider the NP-hard problem of scheduling jobs on a single machine against common due dates with respect to earliness and tardiness penalties. The paper covers two aspects: Firstly, we develop a problem generator and solve 280 instances with two new heuristics to obtain upper bounds on the optimal objective function value. Secondly, we demonstrate computationally that our heuristics are efficient in obtaining near-optimal solutions for small problem instances. The generated problem instances in combination with the upper bounds can be used as benchmarks for future approaches in the field of common due-date scheduling. Scope and purpose In connection with just-in-time production and delivery, earliness as well as tardiness penalties are of interest. Thus scheduling against common due dates has received growing attention during the last decade. Many algorithms have been developed to solve the different variants of this problem. But whenever a new algorithm for scheduling against common due dates is proposed, its quality is assessed only on a few self-generated examples. Hence it is difficult to evaluate the various approaches, particularly in comparison with each other. Therefore the goal of this paper is to present numerous benchmark problems together with some upper bounds on the optimal objective function value. We consider the problem of scheduling a number of jobs on a single machine against a restrictive common due date. The paper consists of two parts: firstly a new and appropriate problem representation is developed. As the restrictive common due date problem is known to be intractable we decided, secondly, to apply meta-heuristics, namely evolutionary strategies, simulated annealing and threshold accepting. We demonstrate that our application of these meta-heuristics is efficient in obtaining near-optimal solutions by solving 140 benchmark problems with up to 1000 jobs. Furthermore, we compare their solution quality and find that a new variant of threshold accepting is superior to the other approaches. We consider scheduling on an unreliable machine that may experience unexpected changes in processing speed or even full breakdowns. We aim for a universal solution that performs well without adaptation for any possible machine behavior. For the objective of minimizing the total weighted completion time, we design a polynomial time deterministic algorithm that finds a universal scheduling sequence with a solution value within 4 times the value of an optimal clairvoyant algorithm that knows the disruptions in advance. A randomized version of this algorithm attains in expectation a ratio of e. We also show that both results are best possible among all universal solutions. As a direct consequence of our results, we answer affirmatively the question of whether a constant approximation algorithm exists for the offline version of the problem when machine unavailability periods are known in advance. When jobs have individual release dates, the situation changes drastically. Even if all weights are equal, there are instances for which any universal solution is a factor of Ω(logn loglogn) worse than an optimal sequence. Motivated by this hardness, we study the special case when the processing time of each job is proportional to its weight. We present a non-trivial algorithm with a small constant performance guarantee. We consider the classical problem of minimizing the total weighted flow-time for unrelated machines in the online non-clairvoyant setting. In this problem, a set of jobs J arrive over time to be scheduled on a set of M machines. Each job J has processing length pj, weight wj, and is processed at a rate of lij when scheduled on machine i. The online scheduler knows the values of wj and lij upon arrival of the job, but is not aware of the quantity pj. We present the first online algorithm that is scalable ((1+e)-speed O(1 2)-competitive for any constant e > 0) for the total weighted flow-time objective. No non-trivial results were known for this setting, except for the most basic case of identical machines. Our result resolves a major open problem in online scheduling theory. Moreover, we also show that no job needs more than a logarithmic number of migrations. We further extend our result and give a scalable algorithm for the objective of minimizing total weighted flow-time plus energy cost for the case of unrelated machines. In this problem, each machine can be sped up by a factor of f-1i(P) when consuming power P, where fi is an arbitrary strictly convex power function. In particular, we get an O(γ2)-competitive algorithm when all power functions are of form sγ. These are the first non-trivial non-clairvoyant results in any setting with heterogeneous machines. The key algorithmic idea is to let jobs migrate selfishly until they converge to an equilibrium. Towards this end, we define a game where each job's utility which is closely tied to the instantaneous increase in the objective the job is responsible for, and each machine declares a policy that assigns priorities to jobs based on when they migrate to it, and the execution speeds. This has a spirit similar to coordination mechanisms that attempt to achieve near optimum welfare in the presence of selfish agents (jobs). To the best our knowledge, this is the first work that demonstrates the usefulness of ideas from coordination mechanisms and Nash equilibria for designing and analyzing online algorithms. Abstract [Jansen, K., Woeginger, G. J. and Yu, Z., UET-Scheduling with chain-type precedence constraints . Report 277, Technische Universitat Graz, Institut fur Mathematik, Graz, Austria, 1993.] studied the U2Chain problem in which two processors are given and all jobs have unit processing time; every job can be executed on only one machine; there are chain-type precedence constraints among the jobs and the objective is to minimize the makespan. This problem arises from the job-system where different jobs require different resources, thus a job may be processed only on some special machine. Since the problem is strongly NP-hard, they gave an approximation algorithm with performance ratio of 5 3. The purpose of our paper is to improve their result by giving a new approximation algorithm with a worst-case guarantee 3 2 for this problem. In this paper a new approximation algorithm with worst case performance ratio 3 2 is presented for the problem of scheduling unit execution time jobs on two parallel machines with the objective of minimizing the makespan where each job can be processed on only one machine and there are chain-type precedence constraints in the jobs. This result answers an open problem in [Jansen, K., Woeginger, G. J. and Yu, Z., UET-Scheduling with chain-type precedence constraints . Report 277, Technische Universitat Graz, Institut fur Mathematik, Graz, Austria, 1993.]: “Does there exist a polynomial time heuristic with worst-case guarantee better than 5 3 for the problem U2Chain?”. The new approximation algorithm is also applied to the problem J 2| pmtn | C max . A set of n jobs has to be scheduled on a single machine which can handle only one job at a time. Each job requires a given positive uninterrupted processing time and has a positive weight. The problem is to find a schedule that minimizes the sum of weighted deviations of the job completion times from a given common due date d, which is smaller than the sum of the processing times. We prove that this problem is NP-hard even if all job weights are equal. In addition, we present a pseudopolynomial algorithm that requires O(n2d) time and O(nd) space. Chen (1994) develops an attractive variant of the classical problem of preemptively scheduling independent jobs with release dates and due dates. Chen suggests that in practice one can often pay to reduce the processing requirement of a job. This leads to two parametric max flow problems. Serafini (1996) considers scheduling independent jobs with due dates on multiple machines, where jobs can be split among machines so that pieces of a single job can execute in parallel. Minimizing the maximum tardiness again gives a parametric max flow problem. A third problem of this type is deciding how many more games a baseball team can lose part way through a season without being eliminated from finishing first (assuming a best possible distribution of wins and losses by other teams). A fourth such problem is an extended selection problem of (1995a), where we want to discount the costs of "tree-structured" tools as little as possible to be able to process all jobs at a profit. It is tempting to try to solve these problems with the parametric push-relabel max flow methods of (GGT) (1989). However, all these applications appear to violate the conditions necessary to apply GGT. We extend GGT in three ways that allow it to be applied to all four of the above applications. We also consider some other applications where these ideas apply. Our extensions to GGT yield faster algorithms for all these applications. We consider the classical machine scheduling, where n jobs need to be scheduled on m machines, with the goal of minimizing the makespan, i.e., the maximum load of any machine in the schedule. We study inefficiency of schedules that are obtained when jobs arrive sequentially one by one, and choose themselves the machine on which they will be scheduled. Every job is only interested to be on a machine with a small load (and does not care about the loads of other machines). We measure the inefficiency of a schedule as the ratio of the makespan obtained in the worst-case equilibrium schedule, and of the optimum makespan. This ratio is known as the sequential price of anarchy. We also introduce alternative inefficiency measures, which allow for a favorable choice of the order in which the jobs make their decisions. We first disprove the conjecture of Hassin and Yovel (OR Letters, 2015) claiming that for unrelated machines, i.e., for the setting where every job can have a different processing time on every machine, the sequential price of anarchy for m = 2 machines is at most 3. We provide an answer for the setting with m = 2 and show that the sequential price of anarchy grows at least linearly with the number of players. Furthermore, we show that for a certain order of the jobs, the resulting makespan is at most linearly larger than the optimum makespan. Furthermore, we show that if an authority can change the order of the jobs adaptively to the decisions made by the jobs so far (but cannot influence the decisions of the jobs), then there exists an adaptive ordering in which the jobs end up in an optimum schedule. To the end we consider identical machines, i.e., the setting where every job has the same processing time on every machine, and provide matching lower bound examples to the existing upper bounds on the sequential price of anarchy.