We present StarSpace, a general-purpose neural embedding model that can solve a wide variety of problems: labeling tasks such as text classification, ranking tasks such as information retrieval web search, collaborative filtering-based or content-based recommendation, embedding of multi-relational graphs, and learning word, sentence or document level embeddings. In each case the model works by embedding those entities comprised of discrete features and comparing them against each other -- learning similarities dependent on the task. Empirical results on a number of tasks show that StarSpace is highly competitive with existing methods, whilst also being generally applicable to new cases where those methods are not.
In the domain of supervised embeddings, SSI @cite_24 and WSABIE @cite_23 are early approaches that showed promise in NLP and information retrieval tasks ( @cite_30 , @cite_6 ). Several more recent works including @cite_3 , @cite_19 , @cite_26 , TagSpace @cite_21 and fastText @cite_18 have yielded good results on classification tasks such as sentiment analysis or hashtag prediction.
@cite_30 @cite_18 @cite_26 @cite_21 @cite_3 @cite_6 @cite_24 @cite_19 @cite_23
2129921015 2891768540 2096252540 2158139315
In this article we propose Supervised Semantic Indexing (SSI), an algorithm that is trained on (query, document) pairs of text documents to predict the quality of their match. Like Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI), our models take account of correlations between words (synonymy, polysemy). However, unlike LSI our models are trained with a supervised signal directly on the ranking task of interest, which we argue is the reason for our superior results. As the query and target texts are modeled separately, our approach is easily generalized to different retrieval tasks, such as online advertising placement. Dealing with models on all pairs of words features is computationally challenging. We propose several improvements to our basic model for addressing this issue, including low rank (but diagonal preserving) representations, and correlated feature hashing (CFH). We provide an empirical study of all these methods on retrieval tasks based on Wikipedia documents as well as an Internet advertisement task. We obtain state-of-the-art performance while providing realistically scalable methods. Abstract Efficient distributed numerical word representation models (word embeddings) combined with modern machine learning algorithms have recently yielded considerable improvement on automatic document classification tasks. However, the effectiveness of such techniques has not been assessed for the hierarchical text classification (HTC) yet. This study investigates application of those models and algorithms on this specific problem by means of experimentation and analysis. We trained classification models with prominent machine learning algorithm implementations—fastText, XGBoost, SVM, and Keras’ CNN—and noticeable word embeddings generation methods—GloVe, word2vec, and fastText—with publicly available data and evaluated them with measures specifically appropriate for the hierarchical context. FastText achieved an lca F 1 of 0.893 on a single-labeled version of the RCV1 dataset. An analysis indicates that using word embeddings and its flavors is a very promising approach for HTC. This issue of JAMIA focuses on natural language processing (NLP) techniques for clinical-text information extraction. Several articles are offshoots of the yearly ‘Informatics for Integrating Biology and the Bedside’ (i2b2) (http: www.i2b2.org) NLP shared-task challenge, introduced by ( see page 552 )1 and co-sponsored by the Veteran's Administration for the last 2 years. This shared task follows long-running challenge evaluations in other fields, such as the Message Understanding Conference (MUC) for information extraction,2 TREC3 for text information retrieval, and CASP4 for protein structure prediction. Shared tasks in the clinical domain are recent and include annual i2b2 Challenges that began in 2006, a challenge for multi-label classification of radiology reports sponsored by Cincinnati Children's Hospital in 2007,5 a 2011 Cincinnati Children's Hospital challenge on suicide notes,6 and the 2011 TREC information retrieval shared task involving retrieval of clinical cases from narrative records.7 @PARASPLIT Although NLP research in the clinical domain has been active since the 1960s, progress in the development of NLP applications for clinical text has been slow and lags behind progress in the general NLP domain. There are several barriers to NLP development in the clinical domain, and shared tasks like the i2b2 VA Challenge address some of these barriers. Nevertheless, many barriers remain and unless the community takes a more active role in developing novel approaches for addressing the barriers, advancement and innovation will continue to be slow. @PARASPLIT Historically, there have been substantial barriers to NLP development in the clinical domain. These barriers are not unique to the clinical domain: they also occur in the fields of software engineering and general NLP. @PARASPLIT ### Lack of access to shared data @PARASPLIT Because of concerns regarding patient privacy and worry about revealing unfavorable institutional practices, hospitals and clinics have been extremely reluctant to allow access to clinical data for researchers from outside … @PARASPLIT Correspondence to Dr Wendy W Chapman, Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr, Bldg 2 #0728, La Jolla, California, USA; wwchapman at ucsd.edu If we take an existing supervised NLP system, a simple and general way to improve accuracy is to use unsupervised word representations as extra word features. We evaluate Brown clusters, Collobert and Weston (2008) embeddings, and HLBL (Mnih & Hinton, 2009) embeddings of words on both NER and chunking. We use near state-of-the-art supervised baselines, and find that each of the three word representations improves the accuracy of these baselines. We find further improvements by combining different word representations. You can download our word features, for off-the-shelf use in existing NLP systems, as well as our code, here: http: metaoptimize.com projects wordreprs