Static malware analysis is well-suited to endpoint anti-virus systems as it can be conducted quickly by examining the features of an executable piece of code and matching it to previously observed malicious code. However, static code analysis can be vulnerable to code obfuscation techniques. Behavioural data collected during file execution is more difficult to obfuscate, but takes a relatively long time to capture - typically up to 5 minutes, meaning the malicious payload has likely already been delivered by the time it is detected. In this paper we investigate the possibility of predicting whether or not an executable is malicious based on a short snapshot of behavioural data. We find that an ensemble of recurrent neural networks are able to predict whether an executable is malicious or benign within the first 5 seconds of execution with 94 accuracy. This is the first time general types of malicious file have been predicted to be malicious during execution rather than using a complete activity log file post-execution, and enables cyber security endpoint protection to be advanced to use behavioural data for blocking malicious payloads rather than detecting them post-execution and having to repair the damage.
Static data, derived directly from code, can be collected quickly. Though signature-based methods fail to detect obfuscated or entirely new malware, researchers have extracted other features for static detection. Saxe and Berlin @cite_22 distinguish malware from benignware using a deep feed-forward neural network with a true-positive rate of 95.2 Methods using dynamic data assume that malware must enact the behaviours necessary to achieve their aims. Typically, these approaches capture behaviours such as API calls to the operating system kernel. @cite_7 use RNNs to extract features from 5 minutes of API call log sequences which are then fed into a convolutional neural network to obtain 0.96 AUC score with a dataset of 170 samples. @cite_31 compare machine learning algorithms trained on API calls and achieve an accuracy of 96.8
@cite_31 @cite_22 @cite_7
2168103835 2508015754 2018022926 2600055486
The drastic increase of Android malware has led to a strong interest in developing methods to automate the malware analysis process. Existing automated Android malware detection and classification methods fall into two general categories: 1) signature-based and 2) machine learning-based. Signature-based approaches can be easily evaded by bytecode-level transformation attacks. Prior learning-based works extract features from application syntax, rather than program semantics, and are also subject to evasion. In this paper, we propose a novel semantic-based approach that classifies Android malware via dependency graphs. To battle transformation attacks, we extract a weighted contextual API dependency graph as program semantics to construct feature sets. To fight against malware variants and zero-day malware, we introduce graph similarity metrics to uncover homogeneous application behaviors while tolerating minor implementation differences. We implement a prototype system, DroidSIFT, in 23 thousand lines of Java code. We evaluate our system using 2200 malware samples and 13500 benign samples. Experiments show that our signature detection can correctly label 93 of malware instances; our anomaly detector is capable of detecting zero-day malware with a low false negative rate (2 ) and an acceptable false positive rate (5.15 ) for a vetting purpose. Increase of malware and advanced cyber-attacks are now becoming a serious problem. Unknown malware which has not determined by security vendors is often used in these attacks, and it is becoming difficult to protect terminals from their infection. Therefore, a countermeasure for after infection is required. There are some malware infection detection methods which focus on the traffic data comes from malware. However, it is difficult to perfectly detect infection only using traffic data because it imitates benign traffic. In this paper, we propose malware process detection method based on process behavior in possible infected terminals. In proposal, we investigated stepwise application of Deep Neural Networks to classify malware process. First, we train the Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) to extract features of process behavior. Second, we train the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to classify feature images which are generated by the extracted features from the trained RNN. The evaluation result in several image size by comparing the AUC of obtained ROC curves and we obtained AUC= 0:96 in best case. Since signature based methods cannot identify sophisticated malware quickly and effectively, research is moving toward using samples' runtime behavior. But these methods are often slow and have lower detection rate and are not usually used in antivirus software. In this article we introduce a scalable method that relies on utilizing features other than traditional API calls to obtain higher accuracies. Two feature categories including API names and a combination of API names and their input arguments were extracted to investigate their effect in identifying and distinguishing malware and benign applications. Feature selection techniques are then applied to reduce the number of features and enhance the analysis time. Various classifiers were then utilized along with 10-fold cross validation approach to achieve an accuracy of 98.4 with a false positive rate less than two percent in best case. The small number of extracted features in the proposed technique and the high accuracy achieved makes it an appropriate approach to be used in industrial applications. The continuing fight against intentionally malicious software has, to date, favoured the proliferators of malware. Signature detection methods are growingly impotent against rapidly evolving obfuscation techniques. Research has recently focussed on the low-level opcode analysis of disassembled executable programs, both statically and dynamically. While able to detect malware, static analysis often still cannot unravel obfuscated code; dynamic approaches allow investigators to reveal the run-time code. Old and inadequately sampled datasets have limited the extrapolation potential of much of the body of research. This work presents a dynamic opcode analysis approach to malware detection, applying machine learning techniques to the largest dataset of its kind, both in terms of breadth (610–100k features) and depth (48k samples). N-gram analysis of opcode sequences from n = 1. . 3 was applied as a means of enhancing the feature set. Feature selection was then investigated to tackle the feature explosion which resulted in more than 100,000 features in some cases. As the earliest detection of malware is the most favourable, run-length, i.e. the number of recorded opcodes in a trace, was examined to find the optimal capture size. This research found that dynamic opcode analysis can detect malware from benignware with a 99.01 accuracy rate, using a sequence of only 32k opcodes and 50 features. This demonstrates that a dynamic opcode analysis approach can compare with static analysis in terms of speed. Furthermore, it has a very real potential application to the unending fight against malware, which is, by definition, continuously on the back foot.