Advanced channel reservation is emerging as an important feature of ultra high-speed networks requiring the transfer of large files. Applications include scientific data transfers and database backup. In this paper, we present two new, on-line algorithms for advanced reservation, called BatchAll and BatchLim, that are guaranteed to achieve optimal throughput performance, based on multi-commodity flow arguments. Both algorithms are shown to have polynomial-time complexity and provable bounds on the maximum delay for 1+epsilon bandwidth augmented networks. The BatchLim algorithm returns the completion time of a connection immediately as a request is placed, but at the expense of a slightly looser competitive ratio than that of BatchAll. We also present a simple approach that limits the number of parallel paths used by the algorithms while provably bounding the maximum reduction factor in the transmission throughput. We show that, although the number of different paths can be exponentially large, the actual number of paths needed to approximate the flow is quite small and proportional to the number of edges in the network. Simulations for a number of topologies show that, in practice, 3 to 5 parallel paths are sufficient to achieve close to optimal performance. The performance of the competitive algorithms are also compared to a greedy benchmark, both through analysis and simulation.
Most of the works regarding competitive approaches to routing focused mainly on call admission, without the ability of advance reservation. For some results in this field see, e.g., @cite_20 @cite_3 . Some results involving advanced reservation are presented in @cite_6 . However, the path selection there is based on several alternatives supplied by a user in the request rather than a path selection using an automated mechanism attempting to optimize performance, as discussed here. In @cite_27 a combination of call admission and circuit switching is used to obtain a routing scheme with a logarithmic competitive ratio on the total revenue received. A competitive routing scheme in terms of the number of failed routes in the setting of ad-hoc networks is presented in @cite_15 . A survey of on-line routing results is presented in @cite_22 . A competitive algorithm for admission and routing in a multicasting setting is presented in @cite_18 . Most of the other existing work in this area consists of heuristic approaches which main emphasis are on the algorithm correctness and computational complexity, without throughput guarantees.
@cite_18 @cite_22 @cite_3 @cite_6 @cite_27 @cite_15 @cite_20
2096909875 2114641109 2139386764 2149933233
Classical routing and admission control strategies achieve provably good performance by relying on an assumption that the virtual circuits arrival pattern can be described by some a priori known probabilistic model. A new on-line routing framework, based on the notion of competitive analysis, was proposed. This framework is geared toward design of strategies that have provably good performance even in the case where there are no statistical assumptions on the arrival pattern and parameters of the virtual circuits. The on-line strategies motivated by this framework are quite different from the min-hop and reservation-based strategies. This paper surveys the on-line routing framework, the proposed routing and admission control strategies, and discusses some of the implementation issues. > We present the first polylog-competitive online algorithm for the general multicast admission control and routing problem in the throughput model. The ratio of the number of requests accepted by the optimum offline algorithm to the expected number of requests accepted by our algorithm is O((logn + loglogM)(logn + logM)logn), where M is the number of multicast groups and n is the number of nodes in the graph. We show that this is close to optimum by presenting an Ω(lognlogM) lower bound on this ratio for any randomized online algorithm against an oblivious adversary, when M is much larger than the link capacities. Our lower bound applies even in the restricted case where the link capacities are much larger than bandwidth requested by a single multicast. We also present a simple proof showing that it is impossible to be competitive against an adaptive online adversary.As in the previous online routing algorithms, our algorithm uses edge-costs when deciding on which is the best path to use. In contrast to the previous competitive algorithms in the throughput model, our cost is not a direct function of the edge load. The new cost definition allows us to decouple the effects of routing and admission decisions of different multicast groups. This paper builds upon the scalable admission control schemes for CDMA networks developed in F. (2003, December 2004). These schemes are based on an exact representation of the geometry of both the downlink and the uplink channels and ensure that the associated power allocation problems have solutions under constraints on the maximal power of each station user. These schemes are decentralized in that they can be implemented in such a way that each base station only has to consider the load brought by its own users to decide on admission. By load we mean here some function of the configuration of the users and of their bit rates that is described in the paper. When implemented in each base station, such schemes ensure the global feasibility of the power allocation even in a very large (infinite number of cells) network. The estimation of the capacity of large CDMA networks controlled by such schemes was made in these references. In certain cases, for example for a Poisson pattern of mobiles in an hexagonal network of base stations, this approach gives explicit formulas for the infeasibility probability, defined as the fraction of cells where the population of users cannot be entirely admitted by the base station. In the present paper we show that the notion of infeasibility probability is closely related to the notion of blocking probability, defined as the fraction of users that are rejected by the admission control policy in the long run, a notion of central practical importance within this setting. The relation between these two notions is not bound to our particular admission control schemes, but is of more general nature, and in a simplified scenario it can be identified with the well-known Erlang loss formula. We prove this relation using a general spatial birth-and-death process, where customer locations are represented by a spatial point process that evolves over time as users arrive or depart. This allows our model to include the exact representation of the geometry of inter-cell and intra-cell interferences, which play an essential role in the load indicators used in these cellular network admission control schemes. This paper considers max-min fair rate allocation and routing in energy harvesting networks where fairness is required among both the nodes and the time slots. Unlike most previous work on fairness, we focus on multihop topologies and consider different routing methods. We assume a predictable energy profile and focus on the design of efficient and optimal algorithms that can serve as benchmarks for distributed and approximate algorithms. We first develop an algorithm that obtains a max-min fair rate assignment for any given (time-variable or time-invariable) unsplittable routing or a routing tree. For time-invariable unsplittable routing, we also develop an algorithm that finds routes that maximize the minimum rate assigned to any node in any slot. For fractional routing, we study the joint routing and rate assignment problem. We develop an algorithm for the time-invariable case with constant rates. We show that the time-variable case is at least as hard as the 2-commodity feasible flow problem and design an FPTAS to combat the high running time. Finally, we show that finding a max-min fair unsplittable routing or a routing tree is NP-hard, even for a time horizon of a single slot. Our analysis provides insights into the problem structure and can be applied to other related fairness problems.