In a column-restricted covering integer program (CCIP), all the non-zero entries of any column of the constraint matrix are equal. Such programs capture capacitated versions of covering problems. In this paper, we study the approximability of CCIPs, in particular, their relation to the integrality gaps of the underlying 0,1-CIP. If the underlying 0,1-CIP has an integrality gap O(γ), and assuming that the integrality gap of the priority version of the 0,1-CIP is O(ω), we give a factor O(γ+ω) approximation algorithm for the CCIP. Priority versions of 0,1-CIPs (PCIPs) naturally capture quality of service type constraints in a covering problem. We investigate priority versions of the line (PLC) and the (rooted) tree cover (PTC) problems. Apart from being natural objects to study, these problems fall in a class of fundamental geometric covering problems. We bound the integrality of certain classes of this PCIP by a constant. Algorithmically, we give a polytime exact algorithm for PLC, show that the PTC problem is APX-hard, and give a factor 2-approximation algorithm for it.
There is a rich and long line of work ( @cite_9 @cite_13 @cite_11 @cite_15 @cite_0 ) on approximation algorithms for CIPs, of which we state the most relevant to our work. Assuming no upper bounds on the variables, Srinivasan @cite_15 gave a @math -approximation to the problem (where @math is the dilation as before). Later on, Kolliopoulos and Young @cite_19 obtained the same approximation factor, respecting the upper bounds. However, these algorithms didn't give any better results when special structure of the constraint matrix was known. On the hardness side, Trevisan @cite_10 showed that it is NP-hard to obtain a @math -approximation algorithm even for 0,1-CIPs.
@cite_10 @cite_9 @cite_0 @cite_19 @cite_15 @cite_13 @cite_11
2963986064 2069278600 2001663593 2008724760
We consider positive covering integer programs, which generalize set cover and which have attracted a long line of research developing (randomized) approximation algorithms. Srinivasan (2006) gave a rounding algorithm based on the FKG inequality for systems which are "column-sparse." This algorithm may return an integer solution in which the variables get assigned large (integral) values; Kolliopoulos & Young (2005) modified this algorithm to limit the solution size, at the cost of a worse approximation ratio. We develop a new rounding scheme based on the Partial Resampling variant of the Lovasz Local Lemma developed by Harris & Srinivasan (2013). This achieves an approximation ratio of 1 + ln([EQUATION]), where amin is the minimum covering constraint and Δ1 is the maximum e1-norm of any column of the covering matrix (whose entries are scaled to lie in [0, 1]); we also show nearly-matching inapproximability and integrality-gap lower bounds. Our approach improves asymptotically, in several different ways, over known results. First, it replaces Δ0, the maximum number of nonzeroes in any column (from the result of Srinivasan) by Δ1 which is always - and can be much - smaller than Δ0; this is the first such result in this context. Second, our algorithm automatically handles multi-criteria programs; we achieve improved approximation ratios compared to the algorithm of Srinivasan, and give, for the first time when the number of objective functions is large, polynomial-time algorithms with good multi-criteria approximations. We also significantly improve upon the upper-bounds of Kolliopoulos & Young when the integer variables are required to be within (1 + e) of some given upper-bounds, and show nearly-matching inapproximability. We present a new efficient algorithm for the search version of the approximate Closest Vector Problem with Preprocessing (CVPP). Our algorithm achieves an approximation factor of O(n sqrt log n ), improving on the previous best of O(n^ 1.5 ) due to Lag arias, Lenstra, and Schnorr hkzbabai . We also show, somewhat surprisingly, that only O(n) vectors of preprocessing advice are sufficient to solve the problem (with the slightly worse approximation factor of O(n)). We remark that this still leaves a large gap with respect to the decisional version of CVPP, where the best known approximation factor is O(sqrt n log n ) due to Aharonov and Regev AharonovR04 . To achieve these results, we show a reduction to the same problem restricted to target points that are close to the lattice and a more efficient reduction to a harder problem, Bounded Distance Decoding with preprocessing (BDDP). Combining either reduction with the previous best-known algorithm for BDDP by Liu, Lyubashevsky, and Micciancio LiuLM06 gives our main result. In the setting of CVP without preprocessing, we also give a reduction from (1+eps)gamma approximate CVP to gamma approximate CVP where the target is at distance at most 1+1 eps times the minimum distance (the length of the shortest non-zero vector) which relies on the lattice sparsification techniques of Dadush and Kun DadushK13 . As our final and most technical contribution, we present a substantially more efficient variant of the LLM algorithm (both in terms of run-time and amount of preprocessing advice), and via an improved analysis, show that it can decode up to a distance proportional to the reciprocal of the smoothing parameter of the dual lattice MR04 . We show that this is never smaller than the LLM decoding radius, and that it can be up to an wide tilde Omega (sqrt n ) factor larger. par>We prove some non-approximability results for restrictions of basic combinatorial optimization problems to instances of bounded “degreeror bounded “width.” Specifically: We prove that the Max 3SAT problem on instances where each variable occurs in at most B clauses, is hard to approximate to within a factor @math , unless @math . H stad [18] proved that the problem is approximable to within a factor @math in polynomial time, and that is hard to approximate to within a factor @math . Our result uses a new randomized reduction from general instances of Max 3SAT to bounded-occurrences instances. The randomized reduction applies to other Max SNP problems as well. We observe that the Set Cover problem on instances where each set has size at most B is hard to approximate to within a factor @math unless @math . The result follows from an appropriate setting of parameters in Feige's reduction [11]. This is essentially tight in light of the existence of @math -approximate algorithms [20, 23, 9] We present a new PCP construction, based on applying parallel repetition to the inner verifier,'' and we provide a tight analysis for it. Using the new construction, and some modifications to known reductions from PCP to Hitting Set, we prove that Hitting Set with sets of size B is hard to approximate to within a factor @math . The problem can be approximated to within a factor B [19], and it is the Vertex Cover problem for B =2. The relationship between hardness of approximation and set size seems to have not been explored before. We observe that the Independent Set problem on graphs having degree at most B is hard to approximate to within a factor @math , unless P = NP . This follows from a comination of results by Clementi and Trevisan [28] and Reingold, Vadhan and Wigderson [27]. It had been observed that the problem is hard to approximate to within a factor @math unless P = NP [1]. An algorithm achieving factor @math is also known [21, 2, 30, 16 . In this paper we study a fundamental open problem in the area of probabilistic checkable proofs: What is the smallest s such that NP ⊆ naPCP1,s[O(log n),3]? In the language of hardness of approximation, this problem is equivalent to determining the smallest s such that getting an s-approximation for satisfiable 3-bit constraint satisfaction problems ("3-CSPs") is NP-hard. The previous best upper bound and lower bound for s are 20 27+µ by Khot and Saket [KS06], and 5 8 (assuming NP subseteq BPP) by Zwick [Zwi98]. In this paper we close the gap assuming Khot's d-to-1 Conjecture. Formally, we prove that if Khot's d-to-1 Conjecture holds for any finite constant integer d, then NP naPCP1,5 8+ µ[O(log n),3] for any constant µ > 0. Our conditional result also solves Hastad's open question [Has01] on determining the inapproximability of satisfiable Max-NTW ("Not Two") instances and confirms Zwick's conjecture [Zwi98] that the 5 8-approximation algorithm for satisfiable 3-CSPs is optimal.