Graph convolution networks (GCN) have emerged as the leading method to classify node classes in networks, and have reached the highest accuracy in multiple node classification tasks. In the absence of available tagged samples, active learning methods have been developed to obtain the highest accuracy using the minimal number of queries to an oracle. The current best active learning methods use the sample class uncertainty as selection criteria. However, in graph based classification, the class of each node is often related to the class of its neighbors. As such, the uncertainty in the class of a node's neighbor may be a more appropriate selection criterion. We here propose two such criteria, one extending the classical uncertainty measure, and the other extending the page-rank algorithm. We show that the latter is optimal when the fraction of tagged nodes is low, and when this fraction grows to one over the average degree, the regional uncertainty performs better than all existing methods. While we have tested this methods on graphs, such methods can be extended to any classification problem, where a distance metrics can be defined between the input samples. All the code used can be accessed at : this https URL All the datasets used can be accessed at : this https URL
In representative sampling, one assumes that informative instances are representative" of the underlying distribution. @cite_39 considered a query strategy for nearest-neighbor methods that selects queries that are (i) least similar to the labeled instances, and (ii) most similar to the unlabeled instances. Nguyen and Smeulders (2004) @cite_14 proposed a density-based approach that first clusters instances and tries to avoid querying outliers by propagating label information to instances in the same cluster. Settles and Craven (2008) suggested a general density-weighting technique combining both uncertainty and representative. They query instances as follows: @math where @math represents the informativeness of x according to some base" query strategy A, and @math are the unlabeled samples. The second term weights the informativeness of x by its average similarity to all other instances in the input distribution (as approximated by U), subject to a parameter @math that controls the relative importance of the density term @cite_6 . Zhu and Wang also proposed sampling by a combination of uncertainty and density to solve the outliers problem emerging in some uncertainty techniques @cite_42
@cite_14 @cite_42 @cite_6 @cite_39
2762725970 2089135543 2807660787 2142385580
In this paper, we study the problem of sampling from a given probability density function that is known to be smooth and strongly log-concave. We analyze several methods of approximate sampling based on discretizations of the (highly overdamped) Langevin diffusion and establish guarantees on its error measured in the Wasserstein-2 distance. Our guarantees improve or extend the state-of-the-art results in three directions. First, we provide an upper bound on the error of the first-order Langevin Monte Carlo (LMC) algorithm with optimized varying step-size. This result has the advantage of being horizon free (we do not need to know in advance the target precision) and to improve by a logarithmic factor the corresponding result for the constant step-size. Second, we study the case where accurate evaluations of the gradient of the log-density are unavailable, but one can have access to approximations of the aforementioned gradient. In such a situation, we consider both deterministic and stochastic approximations of the gradient and provide an upper bound on the sampling error of the first-order LMC that quantifies the impact of the gradient evaluation inaccuracies. Third, we establish upper bounds for two versions of the second-order LMC, which leverage the Hessian of the log-density. We nonasymptotic guarantees on the sampling error of these second-order LMCs. These guarantees reveal that the second-order LMC algorithms improve on the first-order LMC in ill-conditioned settings. We give efficient algorithms for volume sampling, i.e., for picking @math -subsets of the rows of any given matrix with probabilities proportional to the squared volumes of the simplices defined by them and the origin (or the squared volumes of the parallelepipeds defined by these subsets of rows). In other words, we can efficiently sample @math -subsets of @math with probabilities proportional to the corresponding @math by @math principal minors of any given @math by @math positive semi definite matrix. This solves an open problem from the monograph on spectral algorithms by Kannan and Vempala (see Section @math of KV , also implicit in BDM, DRVW ). Our first algorithm for volume sampling @math -subsets of rows from an @math -by- @math matrix runs in @math arithmetic operations (where @math is the exponent of matrix multiplication) and a second variant of it for @math -approximate volume sampling runs in @math arithmetic operations, which is almost linear in the size of the input (i.e., the number of entries) for small @math . Our efficient volume sampling algorithms imply the following results for low-rank matrix approximation: (1) Given @math , in @math arithmetic operations we can find @math of its rows such that projecting onto their span gives a @math -approximation to the matrix of rank @math closest to @math under the Frobenius norm. This improves the @math -approximation of Boutsidis, Drineas and Mahoney BDM and matches the lower bound shown in DRVW . The method of conditional expectations gives a algorithm with the same complexity. The running time can be improved to @math at the cost of losing an extra @math in the approximation factor. (2) The same rows and projection as in the previous point give a @math -approximation to the matrix of rank @math closest to @math under the spectral norm. In this paper, we show an almost matching lower bound of @math , even for @math . Suppose an n x d design matrix in a linear regression problem is given, but the response for each point is hidden unless explicitly requested. The goal is to sample only a small number k << n of the responses, and then produce a weight vector whose sum of squares loss over all points is at most 1+epsilon times the minimum. When k is very small (e.g., k=d), jointly sampling diverse subsets of points is crucial. One such method called "volume sampling" has a unique and desirable property that the weight vector it produces is an unbiased estimate of the optimum. It is therefore natural to ask if this method offers the optimal unbiased estimate in terms of the number of responses k needed to achieve a 1+epsilon loss approximation. Surprisingly we show that volume sampling can have poor behavior when we require a very accurate approximation -- indeed worse than some i.i.d. sampling techniques whose estimates are biased, such as leverage score sampling. We then develop a new rescaled variant of volume sampling that produces an unbiased estimate which avoids this bad behavior and has at least as good a tail bound as leverage score sampling: sample size k=O(d log d + d epsilon) suffices to guarantee total loss at most 1+epsilon times the minimum with high probability. Thus, we improve on the best previously known sample size for an unbiased estimator, k=O(d^2 epsilon). Our rescaling procedure leads to a new efficient algorithm for volume sampling which is based on a "determinantal rejection sampling" technique with potentially broader applications to determinantal point processes. Other contributions include introducing the combinatorics needed for rescaled volume sampling and developing tail bounds for sums of dependent random matrices which arise in the process. We propose a novel approach to performing efficient similarity search and classification in high dimensional data. In this framework, the database elements are vectors in a Euclidean space. Given a query vector in the same space, the goal is to find elements of the database that are similar to the query. In our approach, a small number of independent "voters" rank the database elements based on similarity to the query. These rankings are then combined by a highly efficient aggregation algorithm. Our methodology leads both to techniques for computing approximate nearest neighbors and to a conceptually rich alternative to nearest neighbors.One instantiation of our methodology is as follows. Each voter projects all the vectors (database elements and the query) on a random line (different for each voter), and ranks the database elements based on the proximity of the projections to the projection of the query. The aggregation rule picks the database element that has the best median rank. This combination has several appealing features. On the theoretical side, we prove that with high probability, it produces a result that is a (1 + e) factor approximation to the Euclidean nearest neighbor. On the practical side, it turns out to be extremely efficient, often exploring no more than 5 of the data to obtain very high-quality results. This method is also database-friendly, in that it accesses data primarily in a pre-defined order without random accesses, and, unlike other methods for approximate nearest neighbors, requires almost no extra storage. Also, we extend our approach to deal with the k nearest neighbors.We conduct two sets of experiments to evaluate the efficacy of our methods. Our experiments include two scenarios where nearest neighbors are typically employed---similarity search and classification problems. In both cases, we study the performance of our methods with respect to several evaluation criteria, and conclude that they are uniformly excellent, both in terms of quality of results and in terms of efficiency.