In the Convex Body Chasing problem, we are given an initial point @math in @math and an online sequence of @math convex bodies @math . When we receive @math , we are required to move inside @math . Our goal is to minimize the total distance travelled. This fundamental online problem was first studied by Friedman and Linial (DCG 1993). They proved an @math lower bound on the competitive ratio, and conjectured that a competitive ratio depending only on d is possible. However, despite much interest in the problem, the conjecture remains wide open. We consider the setting in which the convex bodies are nested: @math . The nested setting is closely related to extending the online LP framework of Buchbinder and Naor (ESA 2005) to arbitrary linear constraints. Moreover, this setting retains much of the difficulty of the general setting and captures an essential obstacle in resolving Friedman and Linial's conjecture. In this work, we give the first @math -competitive algorithm for chasing nested convex bodies in @math .
While the online primal-dual framework @cite_3 has been applied successfully to many online problems, so far it is limited to LPs with covering and packing constraints, and minor tweaks thereof. An important goal is to extend the online LP framework more broadly beyond packing and covering LPs. For example, it is unclear how to do this even for seemingly simple formulations such as @math -server on depth- @math HSTs or Metrical Task Systems on a line. Since the nested convex body chasing problem corresponds to solving online LPs with arbitrary constraints (with both positive and negative entries) and a specific type of objective, understanding the nested convex body chasing problem is an essential step towards this goal. Indeed, this is one of our main motivations to consider this problem.
@cite_3
1806207712 1964001041 2112788936 1547968147
Recent work has shown that the classical framework of solving optimization problems by obtaining a fractional solution to a linear program (LP) and rounding it to an integer solution can be extended to the online setting using primal-dual techniques. The success of this new framework for online optimization can be gauged from the fact that it has led to progress in several longstanding open questions. However, to the best of our knowledge, this framework has previously been applied to LPs containing only packing or only covering constraints, or minor variants of these. We extend this framework in a fundamental way by demonstrating that it can be used to solve mixed packing and covering LPs online, where packing constraints are given offline and covering constraints are received online. The objective is to minimize the maximum multiplicative factor by which any packing constraint is violated, while satisfying the covering constraints. Our results represent the first algorithm that obtains a polylogarithmic competitive ratio for solving mixed LPs online. We then consider two canonical examples of mixed LPs: unrelated machine scheduling with startup costs, and capacity constrained facility location. We use ideas generated from our result for mixed packing and covering to obtain polylogarithmic-competitive algorithms for these problems. We also give lower bounds to show that the competitive ratios of our algorithms are nearly tight. Primal-dual algorithms have played an integral role in recent developments in approximation algorithms, and yet there has been little work on these algorithms in the context of LP relaxations that have been strengthened by the addition of more sophisticated valid inequalities. We introduce primal-dual schema based on the LP relaxations devised by for the minimum knapsack problem as well as for the single-demand capacitated facility location problem. Our primal-dual algorithms achieve the same performance guarantees as the LP-rounding algorithms of which rely on applying the ellipsoid algorithm to an exponentially-sized LP. Furthermore, we introduce new flow-cover inequalities to strengthen the LP relaxation of the more general capacitated single-item lot-sizing problem; using just these inequalities as the LP relaxation, we obtain a primal-dual algorithm that achieves a performance guarantee of 2. Computational experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of this algorithm on generated problem instances. We consider packing LP's with m rows where all constraint coefficients are normalized to be in the unit interval. The n columns arrive in random order and the goal is to set the corresponding decision variables irrevocably when they arrive to obtain a feasible solution maximizing the expected reward. Previous (1−e)-competitive algorithms require the right-hand side of the LP to be @math , a bound that worsens with the number of columns and rows. However, the dependence on the number of columns is not required in the single-row case and known lower bounds for the general case are also independent of n. Our goal is to understand whether the dependence on n is required in the multi-row case, making it fundamentally harder than the single-row version. We refute this by exhibiting an algorithm which is (1−e)-competitive as long as the right-hand sides are @math . Our techniques refine previous PAC-learning based approaches which interpret the online decisions as linear classifications of the columns based on sampled dual prices. The key ingredient of our improvement comes from a non-standard covering argument together with the realization that only when the columns of the LP belong to few 1-d subspaces we can obtain small such covers; bounding the size of the cover constructed also relies on the geometry of linear classifiers. General packing LP's are handled by perturbing the input columns, which can be seen as making the learning problem more robust. We propose a new primal-dual algorithmic framework for a prototypical constrained convex optimization template. The algorithmic instances of our framework are universal since they can automatically adapt to the unknown Holder continuity degree and constant within the dual formulation. They are also guaranteed to have optimal convergence rates in the objective residual and the feasibility gap for each Holder smoothness degree. In contrast to existing primal-dual algorithms, our framework avoids the proximity operator of the objective function. We instead leverage computationally cheaper, Fenchel-type operators, which are the main workhorses of the generalized conditional gradient (GCG)-type methods. In contrast to the GCG-type methods, our framework does not require the objective function to be differentiable, and can also process additional general linear inclusion constraints, while guarantees the convergence rate on the primal problem.