In this article, I present the questions that I seek to answer in my PhD research. I posit to analyze natural language text with the help of semantic annotations and mine important events for navigating large text corpora. Semantic annotations such as named entities, geographic locations, and temporal expressions can help us mine events from the given corpora. These events thus provide us with useful means to discover the locked knowledge in them. I pose three problems that can help unlock this knowledge vault in semantically annotated text corpora: i. identifying important events; ii. semantic search; iii. and event analytics.
The work by Yeung and Jatowt @cite_7 tackles the problem of analysis of historical events in multiple large document collections. They utilize to identify distributions along time. Thereafter they perform analytics to answer questions such as significant years and topics, triggers that caused remembrance of the past and historical similarity of countries.
@cite_7
762870823 2111856671 2005580324 2005492507
We address the problem of identifying important events in the past, present, and future from semantically-annotated large-scale document collections. Semantic annotations that we consider are named entities (e.g., persons, locations, organizations) and temporal expressions (e.g., during the 1990s). More specifically, for a given time period of interest, our objective is to identify, rank, and describe important events that happened. Our approach P2F Miner makes use of frequent itemset mining to identify events and group sentences related to them. It uses an information-theoretic measure to rank identified events. For each of them, it selects a representative sentence as a description. Experiments on ClueWeb09 using events listed in Wikipedia year articles as ground truth show that our approach is effective and outperforms a baseline based on statistical language models. This paper addresses the extraction of event records from documents that describe multiple events. Specifically, we aim to identify the fields of information contained in a document and aggregate together those fields that describe the same event. To exploit the inherent connections between field extraction and event identification, we propose to model them jointly. Our model is novel in that it integrates information from separate sequential models, using global potentials that encourage the extracted event records to have desired properties. While the model contains high-order potentials, efficient approximate inference can be performed with dual-decomposition. We experiment with two data sets that consist of newspaper articles describing multiple terrorism events, and show that our model substantially outperforms traditional pipeline models. In this paper, we present a framework and a system that extracts events relevant to a query from a collection C of documents, and places such events along a timeline. Each event is represented by a sentence extracted from C, based on the assumption that "important" events are widely cited in many documents for a period of time within which these events are of interest. In our experiments, we used queries that are event types ("earthquake") and person names (e.g. "George Bush"). Evaluation was performed using G8 leader names as queries: comparison made by human evaluators between manually and system generated timelines showed that although manually generated timelines are on average more preferable, system generated timelines are sometimes judged to be better than manually constructed ones. We present a statistical model of feature occurrence over time, and develop tests based on classical hypothesis testing for significance of term appearance on a given date. Using additional classical hypothesis testing we are able to combine these terms to generate “topics” as defined by the Topic Detection and Tracking study. The groupings of terms obtained can be used to automatically generate an interactive timeline displaying the major events and topics covered by the corpus. To test the validity of our technique we extracted a large number of these topics from a test corpus and had human evaluators judge how well the selected features captured the gist of the topics, and how they overlapped with a set of known topics from the corpus. The resulting topics were highly rated by evaluators who compared them to known topics.