The present paper considers leveraging network topology information to improve the convergence rate of ADMM for decentralized optimization, where networked nodes work collaboratively to minimize the objective. Such problems can be solved efficiently using ADMM via decomposing the objective into easier subproblems. Properly exploiting network topology can significantly improve the algorithm performance. Hybrid ADMM explores the direction of exploiting node information by taking into account node centrality but fails to utilize edge information. This paper fills the gap by incorporating both node and edge information and provides a novel convergence rate bound for decentralized ADMM that explicitly depends on network topology. Such a novel bound is attainable for certain class of problems, thus tight. The explicit dependence further suggests possible directions to optimal design of edge weights to achieve the best performance. Numerical experiments show that simple heuristic methods could achieve better performance, and also exhibits robustness to topology changes.
Many convex optimization problems can be analyzed from the perspective of @cite_6 @cite_9 . For example, the problem of minimizing @math can be cast as finding the zero of the subdifferntial @math , which happens to be a maximal monotone operator provided @math is convex, closed and proper. However, finding zeros of two operators can be difficult, whereas methods can be employed to split the problem into easier subproblems @cite_38 @cite_16 @cite_9 . One prominent example is @cite_22 @cite_13 .
@cite_38 @cite_22 @cite_9 @cite_6 @cite_16 @cite_13
2953167455 2081956522 2048733643 2517669009
A new result in convex analysis on the calculation of proximity operators in certain scaled norms is derived. We describe efficient implementations of the proximity calculation for a useful class of functions; the implementations exploit the piece-wise linear nature of the dual problem. The second part of the paper applies the previous result to acceleration of convex minimization problems, and leads to an elegant quasi-Newton method. The optimization method compares favorably against state-of-the-art alternatives. The algorithm has extensive applications including signal processing, sparse recovery and machine learning and classification. An algorithm for solving the problem: minimize @math (a convex function) subject to @math , @math , each @math a concave function, is presented. Specifically, the function [ P [ x,t,r_k ] f( x ) + r_k^ - 1 [ g_i ( x ) - t_i ] ^2 ] is minimized over all x, nonnegative t, for a strictly decreasing null sequence @math . This extends the work of T. Pietrzykowski [5]. It is proved that for every @math , there exists a finite point @math which minimizes P, and which solves the convex programming problem as @math . This algorithm is similar to the Sequential Unconstrained Minimization Technique (SUMT) [1] in that it solves the (Wolfe) dual programming problem [6]. It differs from SUMT in that (1) it approaches the optimum from the region of infeasibility (i.e., it is a relaxation technique), (2) it does not require a nonempty interior to the nonlinearly constrained region, (3) no separate feasibilit... In the first part of this paper, we reduce two geometric optimization problems to convex programming: finding the largest axis-aligned box in the intersection of a family of convex sets, and finding the translation and scaling that minimizes the Hausdorff distance between two polytopes. These reductions imply that important cases of these problems can be solved in expected linear time. In the second part of the paper, we use convex programming to give a new, short proof of an interesting Helly-type theorem, first conjectured by Gru¨nbaum and Motzkin. In stochastic convex optimization the goal is to minimize a convex function @math over a convex set @math where @math is some unknown distribution and each @math in the support of @math is convex over @math . The optimization is commonly based on i.i.d. samples @math from @math . A standard approach to such problems is empirical risk minimization (ERM) that optimizes @math . Here we consider the question of how many samples are necessary for ERM to succeed and the closely related question of uniform convergence of @math to @math over @math . We demonstrate that in the standard @math setting of Lipschitz-bounded functions over a @math of bounded radius, ERM requires sample size that scales linearly with the dimension @math . This nearly matches standard upper bounds and improves on @math dependence proved for @math setting by Shalev- (2009). In stark contrast, these problems can be solved using dimension-independent number of samples for @math setting and @math dependence for @math setting using other approaches. We further show that our lower bound applies even if the functions in the support of @math are smooth and efficiently computable and even if an @math regularization term is added. Finally, we demonstrate that for a more general class of bounded-range (but not Lipschitz-bounded) stochastic convex programs an infinite gap appears already in dimension 2.