Privacy-preserving data splitting is a technique that aims to protect data privacy by storing different fragments of data in different locations. In this work we give a new combinatorial formulation to the data splitting problem. We see the data splitting problem as a purely combinatorial problem, in which we have to split data attributes into different fragments in a way that satisfies certain combinatorial properties derived from processing and privacy constraints. Using this formulation, we develop new combinatorial and algebraic techniques to obtain solutions to the data splitting problem. We present an algebraic method which builds an optimal data splitting solution by using Gr " o bner bases. Since this method is not efficient in general, we also develop a greedy algorithm for finding solutions that are not necessarily minimal sized.
In @cite_30 , the authors study the time complexity of the proposed optimal decomposition problem in terms of the number of attributes. The general problem can theoretically be solved in polynomial time if the collection contains only few sets of constraints (by solving the minimum cut problem). It can also be solved in logarithmic time @math when the problem is equivalent to the hitting set problem. And it can be solved in an approximation factor of @math if each constraint set has size @math , by using directed multicat (i.e., solving the minimum edge deletion bipartition problem). The problem becomes intractable if the sets of constraints have size @math . In fact, in this case the problem is reduced to the not-all-equal @math -satisfiability problem, which is an NP-complete problem.
@cite_30
2001663593 2567804199 2962968573 2071423034
par>We prove some non-approximability results for restrictions of basic combinatorial optimization problems to instances of bounded “degreeror bounded “width.” Specifically: We prove that the Max 3SAT problem on instances where each variable occurs in at most B clauses, is hard to approximate to within a factor @math , unless @math . H stad [18] proved that the problem is approximable to within a factor @math in polynomial time, and that is hard to approximate to within a factor @math . Our result uses a new randomized reduction from general instances of Max 3SAT to bounded-occurrences instances. The randomized reduction applies to other Max SNP problems as well. We observe that the Set Cover problem on instances where each set has size at most B is hard to approximate to within a factor @math unless @math . The result follows from an appropriate setting of parameters in Feige's reduction [11]. This is essentially tight in light of the existence of @math -approximate algorithms [20, 23, 9] We present a new PCP construction, based on applying parallel repetition to the inner verifier,'' and we provide a tight analysis for it. Using the new construction, and some modifications to known reductions from PCP to Hitting Set, we prove that Hitting Set with sets of size B is hard to approximate to within a factor @math . The problem can be approximated to within a factor B [19], and it is the Vertex Cover problem for B =2. The relationship between hardness of approximation and set size seems to have not been explored before. We observe that the Independent Set problem on graphs having degree at most B is hard to approximate to within a factor @math , unless P = NP . This follows from a comination of results by Clementi and Trevisan [28] and Reingold, Vadhan and Wigderson [27]. It had been observed that the problem is hard to approximate to within a factor @math unless P = NP [1]. An algorithm achieving factor @math is also known [21, 2, 30, 16 . An important question in theoretical computer science is to determine the best possible running time for solving a problem at hand. For geometric optimization problems, we often understand their complexity on a rough scale, but not very well on a finer scale. One such example is the two-dimensional knapsack problem for squares. There is a polynomial time (1 + ϵ)-approximation algorithm for it (i.e., a PTAS) but the running time of this algorithm is triple exponential in 1 ϵ, i.e., Ω(n221 ϵ). A double or triple exponential dependence on 1 ϵ is inherent in how this and several other algorithms for other geometric problems work. In this paper, we present an EPTAS for knapsack for squares, i.e., a (1+ϵ)-approximation algorithm with a running time of Oϵ(1)·nO(1). In particular, the exponent of n in the running time does not depend on ϵ at all! Since there can be no FPTAS for the problem (unless P = NP) this is the best kind of approximation scheme we can hope for. To achieve this improvement, we introduce two new key ideas: We present a fast method to guess the Ω(221 ϵ) relatively large squares of a suitable near-optimal packing instead of using brute-force enumeration. Secondly, we introduce an indirect guessing framework to define sizes of cells for the remaining squares. In the previous PTAS each of these steps needs a running time of Ω(n221 ϵ) and we improve both to Oϵ(1) · nO(1). We complete our result by giving an algorithm for two-dimensional knapsack for rectangles under (1 + ϵ)-resource augmentation. In this setting, we also improve the best known running time of Ω(n1 ϵ1 ϵ) to Oϵ(1) · nO(1) and compute even a solution with optimal profit, in contrast to the best previously known polynomial time algorithm for this setting that computes only an approximation. We believe that our new techniques have the potential to be useful for other settings as well. We investigate the complexity of several fundamental polynomial-time solvable problems on graphs and on matrices, when the given instance has low treewidth; in the case of matrices, we consider the treewidth of the graph formed by non-zero entries. In each of the considered cases, the best known algorithms working on general graphs run in polynomial, but far from linear, time. Thus, our goal is to construct algorithms with running time of the form poly(k)·n or poly(k) · n log n, where k is the width of the tree decomposition given on the input. Such procedures would outperform the best known algorithms for the considered problems already for moderate values of the treewidth, like O(n1 c) for some small constant c. Our results include: -- an algorithm for computing the determinant and the rank of an n × n matrix using O(k3 · n) time and arithmetic operations; -- an algorithm for solving a system of linear equations using O(k3 · n) time and arithmetic operations; -- an O(k3 O n log n)-time randomized algorithm for finding the cardinality of a maximum matching in a graph; -- an O(k4 · n log2 n)-time randomized algorithm for constructing a maximum matching in a graph; -- an O(k2 · n log n)-time algorithm for finding a maximum vertex flow in a directed graph. Moreover, we provide an approximation algorithm for treewidth with time complexity suited to the running times as above. Namely, the algorithm, when given a graph G and integer k, runs in time O(k7 · n log n) and either correctly reports that the treewidth of G is larger than k, or constructs a tree decomposition of G of width O(k2). The above results stand in contrast with the recent work of [SODA 2016], which shows that the existence of algorithms with similar running times is unlikely for the problems of finding the diameter and the radius of a graph of low treewidth. We present an exact algorithm that decides, for every fixed r ≥ 2 in time O(m) + 2O(k2) whether a given set of m clauses of size r admits a truth assignment that satisfies at least ((2r - 1)m + k) 2r clauses. Thus Max-r-Sat is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by the number of satisfied clauses above the tight lower bound (1--2-r)m. This solves an open problem of Mahajan, Raman and Sikdar (J. Comput. System Sci., 75, 2009). Our algorithm is based on a polynomial-time data reduction procedure that reduces a problem instance to an equivalent algebraically represented problem with O(k2) variables. This is done by representing the instance as an appropriate polynomial, and by applying a probabilistic argument combined with some simple tools from Harmonic analysis to show that if the polynomial cannot be reduced to one of size O(k2), then there is a truth assignment satisfying the required number of clauses. Combining another probabilistic argument with tools from graph matching theory and signed graphs, we show that if an instance of Max-2-Sat with m clauses has at least 3k variables after application of certain polynomial time reduction rules to it, then there is a truth assignment that satisfies at least (3m + k) 4 clauses. We also outline how the fixed-parameter tractability result on Max-r-Sat can be extended to a family of Boolean Constraint Satisfaction Problems.