MetaSpace II (MS2) is a social Virtual Reality (VR) system where multiple users can not only see and hear but also interact with each other, grasp and manipulate objects, walk around in space, and get tactile feedback. MS2 allows walking in physical space by tracking each user’s skeleton in realtime and allows users to feel by employing passive haptics i.e., when users touch or manipulate an object in the virtual world, they simultaneously also touch or manipulate a corresponding object in the physical world. To enable these elements in VR, MS2 creates a correspondence in spatial layout and object placement by building the virtual world on top of a 3D scan of the real world. Through the association between the real and virtual world, users are able to walk freely while wearing a head-mounted device, avoid obstacles like walls and furniture, and interact with people and objects. Most current virtual reality (VR) environments are designed for a single user experience where interactions with virtual objects are mediated by hand-held input devices or hand gestures. Additionally, users are only shown a representation of their hands in VR floating in front of the camera as seen from a first person perspective. We believe, representing each user as a fullbody avatar that is controlled by natural movements of the person in the real world (see Figure 1d), can greatly enhance believability and a user’s sense immersion in VR.
In the real world, people have a physical presence in their spatial environment. We are surrounded by objects and landscape that facilitate our sense of orientation and spatial understanding @cite_6 . For example, the horizon gives us a sense of directional information, occlusions give us relative distance cues while atmospheric color, fog, lighting, and shadow provide depth cues @cite_9 . People also develop skills to manipulate objects in their environment, such as picking up, positioning, altering, and arranging objects @cite_6 . Our VR system uses these skills along with people's innate sense of motion and proprioception for interacting naturally with the virtual world, grasping and manipulating objects in both the real and virtual environments.
@cite_9 @cite_6
1489557789 2142859885 2155301351 2100964723
One of the most disconcertingly unnatural properties of most virtual environments (VEs) is the ability of the user to pass through objects. I hypothesize that passive haptics, augmenting a high-fidelity visual virtual environment with low-fidelity physical objects, will markedly improve both sense of presence and spatial knowledge training transfer. The low-fidelity physical models can be constructed from cheap, easy-to-assemble materials such as styrofoam, plywood, and particle board. The first study investigated the effects of augmenting a visual-cliff environment with a slight physical ledge on participants' sense of presence. I found when participants experienced passive haptics in the VE, they exhibited significantly more behaviors associated with pit avoidance than when experiencing the non-augmented VE. Changes in heart rate and skin conductivity were significantly higher than when they experienced the VE without passive haptics. The second study investigated passive haptics' effects on performance of a real-world navigation task after training in a virtual environment. Half of the participants trained on maze navigation in a VE augmented with a styrofoam physical model, while half trained in a non-augmented VE but were given visual and audio contact cues. The task was to gain as much information as possible about the layout of the environment. Participants knew before the VE session that their training would be tested by navigating an identical real maze environment while blindfolded. Significant differences in the time to complete the blindfolded navigation task and significant differences in the number of collisions with objects were found between the participants trained in an augmented VE and the participants trained in a non-augmented VE. 11 of 15 participants trained without passive haptics bumped into the next-to-last obstacle encountered in the testing session and turned the wrong direction to navigate around it: only 2 of 15 participants trained with passive haptics made the same navigation error. On the other hand, the assessment of the participants' cognitive maps of the virtual environment did not find significant differences between groups as measured by sketch maps and object dimension estimation. Manipulation in immersive virtual environments is difficult partly because users must do without the haptic contact with real objects they rely on in the real world to orient themselves and their manipulanda. To compensate for this lack, we propose exploiting the one real object every user has in a virtual environment, his body. We present a unified framework for virtual-environment interaction based on proprioception, a person's sense of the position and orientation of his body and limbs. We describe three forms of body-relative interaction: • Direct manipulation—ways to use body sense to help control manipulation • Physical mnemonics—ways to store recall information relative to the body • Gestural actions—ways to use body-relative actions to issue commands Automatic scaling is a way to bring objects instantly within reach so that users can manipulate them using proprioceptive cues. Several novel virtual interaction techniques based upon automatic scaling and our proposed framework of proprioception allow a user to interact with a virtual world intuitively, efficiently, precisely, and lazily. We report the results of both informal user trials and formal user studies of the usability of the body-relative interaction techniques presented. CR Traveling through immersive virtual environments (IVEs) by means of real walking is an important activity to increase naturalness of VR-based interaction. However, the size of the virtual world often exceeds the size of the tracked space so that a straightforward implementation of omni-directional and unlimited walking is not possible. Redirected walking is one concept to solve this problem of walking in IVEs by inconspicuously guiding the user on a physical path that may differ from the path the user visually perceives. When the user approaches a virtual object she can be redirected to a real proxy object that is registered to the virtual counterpart and provides passive haptic feedback. In such passive haptic environments, any number of virtual objects can be mapped to proxy objects having similar haptic properties, e.g., size, shape and texture. The user can sense a virtual object by touching its real world counterpart. Redirecting a user to a registered proxy object makes it necessary to predict the user's intended position in the IVE. Based on this target position we determine a path through the physical space such that the user is guided to the registered proxy object. We present a taxonomy of possible redirection techniques that enable user guidance such that inconsistencies between visual and proprioceptive stimuli are imperceptible. We describe how a user's target in the virtual world can be predicted reliably and how a corresponding real-world path to the registered proxy object can be derived. We describe a between-subjects experiment that compared four different methods of travel and their effect on cognition and paths taken in an immersive virtual environment (IVE). Participants answered a set of questions based on Crook's condensation of Bloom's taxonomy that assessed their cognition of the IVE with respect to knowledge, understanding and application, and higher mental processes. Participants also drew a sketch map of the IVE and the objects within it. The users' sense of presence was measured using the Steed-Usoh-Slater presence questionnaire. The participants' position and head orientation were automatically logged during their exposure to the virtual environment. These logs were later used to create visualizations of the paths taken. Path analysis, such as exploring the overlaid path visualizations and dwell data information, revealed further differences among the travel techniques. Our results suggest that, for applications where problem solving and evaluation of information is important or where opportunity to train is minimal, then having a large tracked space so that the participant can walk around the virtual environment provides benefits over common virtual travel techniques.