More than ever, technical inventions are the symbol of our society's advance. Patents guarantee their creators protection against infringement. For an invention being patentable, its novelty and inventiveness have to be assessed. Therefore, a search for published work that describes similar inventions to a given patent application needs to be performed. Currently, this so-called search for prior art is executed with semi-automatically composed keyword queries, which is not only time consuming, but also prone to errors. In particular, errors may systematically arise by the fact that different keywords for the same technical concepts may exist across disciplines. In this paper, a novel approach is proposed, where the full text of a given patent application is compared to existing patents using machine learning and natural language processing techniques to automatically detect inventions that are similar to the one described in the submitted document. Various state-of-the-art approaches for feature extraction and document comparison are evaluated. In addition to that, the quality of the current search process is assessed based on ratings of a domain expert. The evaluation results show that our automated approach, besides accelerating the search process, also improves the search results for prior art with respect to their quality.
Approaches for automatically adapting and extending queries still require the patent examiner to manually formulate the initial search query. To make this step obsolete, heuristics can be used to automatically extract keywords from a given patent application @cite_56 @cite_2 @cite_29 or a (BOW) approach can be used to transform the entire text of a patent into a list of words that can then be used to search for its prior art @cite_67 @cite_52 @cite_18 . Often times, partial patent applications, such as an extended abstract, may already suffice to conduct the search @cite_52 . The search results can also be further refined with a graph-based ranking model @cite_4 or by using the patents' categories to filter the results @cite_60 . Different prior art search approaches have previously been discussed and benchmarked within the CLEF project, see e.g. @cite_54 and @cite_73 .
@cite_67 @cite_18 @cite_4 @cite_60 @cite_29 @cite_54 @cite_52 @cite_56 @cite_2 @cite_73
2123675809 1967684050 2044413982 2396479859
Queries in patent prior art search are full patent applications and much longer than standard ad hoc search and web search topics. Standard information retrieval (IR) techniques are not entirely effective for patent prior art search because of ambiguous terms in these massive queries. Reducing patent queries by extracting key terms has been shown to be ineffective mainly because it is not clear what the focus of the query is. An optimal query reduction algorithm must thus seek to retain the useful terms for retrieval favouring recall of relevant patents, but remove terms which impair IR effectiveness. We propose a new query reduction technique decomposing a patent application into constituent text segments and computing the Language Modeling (LM) similarities by calculating the probability of generating each segment from the top ranked documents. We reduce a patent query by removing the least similar segments from the query, hypothesising that removal of these segments can increase the precision of retrieval, while still retaining the useful context to achieve high recall. Experiments on the patent prior art search collection CLEF-IP 2010 show that the proposed method outperforms standard pseudo-relevance feedback (PRF) and a naive method of query reduction based on removal of unit frequency terms (UFTs). Patents are used by legal entities to legally protect their inventions and represent a multi-billion dollar industry of licensing and litigation. In 2014, 326,033 patent applications were approved in the US alone -- a number that has doubled in the past 15 years and which makes prior art search a daunting, but necessary task in the patent application process. In this work, we seek to investigate the efficacy of prior art search strategies from the perspective of the inventor who wishes to assess the patentability of their ideas prior to writing a full application. While much of the literature inspired by the evaluation framework of the CLEF-IP competition has aimed to assist patent examiners in assessing prior art for complete patent applications, less of this work has focused on patent search with queries representing partial applications. In the (partial) patent search setting, a query is often much longer than in other standard IR tasks, e.g., the description section may contain hundreds or even thousands of words. While the length of such queries may suggest query reduction strategies to remove irrelevant terms, intentional obfuscation and general language used in patents suggests that it may help to expand queries with additionally relevant terms. To assess the trade-offs among all of these pre-application prior art search strategies, we comparatively evaluate a variety of partial application search and query reformulation methods. Among numerous findings, querying with a full description, perhaps in conjunction with generic (non-patent specific) query reduction methods, is recommended for best performance. However, we also find that querying with an abstract represents the best trade-off in terms of writing effort vs. retrieval efficacy (i.e., querying with the description sections only lead to marginal improvements) and that for such relatively short queries, generic query expansion methods help. Prior art search or recommending citations for a patent application is a challenging task. Many approaches have been proposed and shown to be useful for prior art search. However, most of these methods do not consider the network structure for integrating and diffusion of different kinds of information present among tied patents in the citation network. In this paper, we propose a method based on a time-aware random walk on a weighted network of patent citations, the weights of which are characterized by contextual similarity relations between two nodes on the network. The goal of the random walker is to find influential documents in the citation network of a query patent, which can serve as candidates for drawing query terms and bigrams for query refinement. The experimental results on CLEF-IP datasets (CLEF-IP 2010 and CLEF-IP 2011) show the effectiveness of encoding contextual similarities (common classification codes, common inventor, and common applicant) between nodes in the citation network. Our proposed approach can achieve significantly better results in terms of recall and Mean Average Precision rates compared to strong baselines of prior art search. In this paper we describe experiments conducted for CLEF- IP 2011 Prior Art Retrieval track. We examined the impact of 1) us- ing key phrase extraction to generate queries from input patent and 2) the use of citation network and (International Patent Classification) IPC class vector in ranking patents. Variations of a popular key phrase extrac- tion technique were explored for extracting and scoring terms of query patent. These terms are used as queries to retrieve similar patents. In the second approach, we use a two stage retrieval model to find similar patents. Each patent is represented as an IPC class vector. Citation net- work of patents is used to propagate these vectors from a node (patent) to its neighbors (cited patents). Similar patents are found by comparing query vector with vectors of patents in the corpus. Text based search is used to re-rank this solution set to improve precision. Two-stage sys- tem is used to retrieve and rank patents. Finally, we also extract and add citations present within the text of a query patent to the result set. Adding these citations (present in query patent text) to the results shows significant improvement in Mean Average Precision (MAP).