In this work we study the semi-supervised framework of confidence set classification with controlled expected size in minimax settings. We obtain semi-supervised minimax rates of convergence under the margin assumption and a H o lder condition on the regression function. Besides, we show that if no further assumptions are made, there is no supervised method that outperforms the semi-supervised estimator proposed in this work. We establish that the best achievable rate for any supervised method is n^ --1 2 , even if the margin assumption is extremely favorable. On the contrary, semi-supervised estimators can achieve faster rates of convergence provided that sufficiently many unlabeled samples are available. We additionally perform numerical evaluation of the proposed algorithms empirically confirming our theoretical findings.
On the other part, the confidence set estimation problem is directly related to the standard classification settings. This problem has been widely studied from a theoretical point of view in the binary classification framework. @cite_1 study the statistical performance of plug-in classification rules under assumptions which involve the smoothness of the regression function and the margin condition. In particular, they derive fast rates of convergence for plug-in classifiers based on local polynomial estimators and show their optimality in the minimax sense. One of the aim of present work is to extend these results to the confidence set classification framework.
@cite_1
2941609697 2113290770 2963185791 2122770142
In this work we study the semi-supervised framework of confidence set classification with controlled expected size in minimax settings. We obtain semi-supervised minimax rates of convergence under the margin assumption and a H o lder condition on the regression function. Besides, we show that if no further assumptions are made, there is no supervised method that outperforms the semi-supervised estimator proposed in this work. We establish that the best achievable rate for any supervised method is n^ --1 2 , even if the margin assumption is extremely favorable. On the contrary, semi-supervised estimators can achieve faster rates of convergence provided that sufficiently many unlabeled samples are available. We additionally perform numerical evaluation of the proposed algorithms empirically confirming our theoretical findings. In this paper, we theoretically study the problem of binary classification in the presence of random classification noise—the learner, instead of seeing the true labels, sees labels that have independently been flipped with some small probability. Moreover, random label noise is class-conditional— the flip probability depends on the class. We provide two approaches to suitably modify any given surrogate loss function. First, we provide a simple unbiased estimator of any loss, and obtain performance bounds for empirical risk minimization in the presence of iid data with noisy labels. If the loss function satisfies a simple symmetry condition, we show that the method leads to an efficient algorithm for empirical minimization. Second, by leveraging a reduction of risk minimization under noisy labels to classification with weighted 0-1 loss, we suggest the use of a simple weighted surrogate loss, for which we are able to obtain strong empirical risk bounds. This approach has a very remarkable consequence — methods used in practice such as biased SVM and weighted logistic regression are provably noise-tolerant. On a synthetic non-separable dataset, our methods achieve over 88 accuracy even when 40 of the labels are corrupted, and are competitive with respect to recently proposed methods for dealing with label noise in several benchmark datasets. Multiclass classification problems such as image annotation can involve a large number of classes. In this context, confusion between classes can occur, and single label classification may be misleading. We provide in the present paper a general device that, given an unlabeled dataset and a score function defined as the minimizer of some empirical and convex risk, outputs a set of class labels, instead of a single one. Interestingly, this procedure does not require that the unlabeled dataset explores the whole classes. Even more, the method is calibrated to control the expected size of the output set while minimizing the classification risk. We show the statistical optimality of the procedure and establish rates of convergence under the Tsybakov margin condition. It turns out that these rates are linear on the number of labels. We apply our methodology to convex aggregation of confidence sets based on the V-fold cross validation principle also known as the superlearning principle. We illustrate the numerical performance of the procedure on real data and demonstrate in particular that with moderate expected size, w.r.t. the number of labels, the procedure provides significant improvement of the classification risk. Performance metrics for binary classification are designed to capture tradeoffs between four fundamental population quantities: true positives, false positives, true negatives and false negatives. Despite significant interest from theoretical and applied communities, little is known about either optimal classifiers or consistent algorithms for optimizing binary classification performance metrics beyond a few special cases. We consider a fairly large family of performance metrics given by ratios of linear combinations of the four fundamental population quantities. This family includes many well known binary classification metrics such as classification accuracy, AM measure, F-measure and the Jaccard similarity coefficient as special cases. Our analysis identifies the optimal classifiers as the sign of the thresholded conditional probability of the positive class, with a performance metric-dependent threshold. The optimal threshold can be constructed using simple plug-in estimators when the performance metric is a linear combination of the population quantities, but alternative techniques are required for the general case. We propose two algorithms for estimating the optimal classifiers, and prove their statistical consistency. Both algorithms are straightforward modifications of standard approaches to address the key challenge of optimal threshold selection, thus are simple to implement in practice. The first algorithm combines a plug-in estimate of the conditional probability of the positive class with optimal threshold selection. The second algorithm leverages recent work on calibrated asymmetric surrogate losses to construct candidate classifiers. We present empirical comparisons between these algorithms on benchmark datasets.