The problem of merging databases arises in many government and commercial applications. Schema matching, a common first step, identifies equivalent fields between databases. We introduce a schema matching framework that builds nonparametric Bayesian models for each field and compares them by computing the probability that a single model could have generated both fields. Our experiments show that our method is more accurate and faster than the existing instance-based matching algorithms in part because of the use of nonparametric Bayesian models.
More recently, especially as researchers have shifted their focus from databases to ontologies, additional emphasis has been placed on exploiting the relationships among fields (also called concepts in the ontology context), such as is-a and has-a relationships. Because these methods are applied to expert-developed ontologies (e.g., different anatomy ontologies) there are generally only a few available instances for each field. Methods exist to leverage known matched instances for schema matching @cite_20 . Such matched pairs provide a significant advantage in finding schema matches. In many applications, including typical cross-organizational data integration efforts, the existence of common referents cannot be assumed. Furthermore, even if such common referents exist, finding them is itself a highly challenging research problem. Our method does not depend on having coreferents.
@cite_20
1592230611 161226219 1500155021 1984978840
Ontology Matching aims to find the semantic correspondences between ontologies that belong to a single domain but that have been developed separately. However, there are still some problem areas to be solved, because experts are still needed to supervise the matching processes and an efficient way to reuse the alignments has not yet been found. We propose a novel technique named Reverse Ontology Matching, which aims to find the matching functions that were used in the original process. The use of these functions is very useful for aspects such as modeling behavior from experts, performing matching-by-example, reverse engineering existing ontology matching tools or compressing ontology alignment repositories. Moreover, the results obtained from a widely used benchmark dataset provide evidence of the effectiveness of this approach. Ontology matching, the task of determining relations that hold among terms of two different ontologies, is a key issue in the Semantic Web and other related fields. In order to compare the behaviour of different ontology matching systems, the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) has established a periodical controlled evaluation that comes in a yearly event. We present here our participation in the 2008 initiative. Our schema-based alignment algorithm compares each pair of ontology terms by, firstly, extracting their ontological contexts up to a certain depth (enriched by using transitive entailment) and, secondly, combining different elementary ontology matching techniques (e.g., lexical distances and vector space modelling). Benchmark results show a very good behaviour in terms of precision, while preserving an acceptable recall. Based on our experience, we have also included some remarks about the nature of benchmark test cases that, in our opinion, could help improving the OAEI tests in the future. An ontology matching method (or a matcher) aims at matching every entity (or concept) in one ontology to the most suitable entity (or entities) in another ontology. Usually it is almost impossible to find a perfect match in the second ontology for every entity in the first ontology, so a matcher generally returns a set of possible matches with some weights (uncertainty) attached to each pair of match. In order to improve a matching result, several matchers can be used and the matched results from these matchers are combined with suitable approaches. In this paper, we first propose two new matchers among three matchers we use. We then address the need of dealing with uncertainties in mapping by investigating how some uncertainty reasoning frameworks can be used to combine matching results. We apply both the Dempster Shafer theory of evidence (DS theory) and Possibility Theory to merge the results computed by different matchers. Our experimental results and comparisons with related work indicate that integrating these theories to deal with uncertain ontology matching is a promising way to improve the overall matching results. Achieving high match accuracy for a large variety of ontologies, considering a single matcher is often not sufficient for high match quality. Therefore, combining the corresponding weights for different semantic aspects, reflecting their different importance or contributions becomes unavoidable for ontology matching. Combining multiple measures into a single similarity metric has been traditionally solved using weights determined manually by an expert, or calculated through general methods e.g. average or sigmoid function, however this does not provide a flexible and self-configuring matching tool. In this paper, an intelligent combination using Artificial Neural Network ANN as a machine learning-based method to ascertain how to combine multiple similarity measures into a single aggregated metric with the final aim of improving the ontology alignment quality is proposed. XMap++ is applied to benchmark and anatomy tests at OAEI campaign 2012. Results show that neural network boosts the performance in most cases, and that the proposed novel approach is competitive with top-ranked system.