With the fast expanding scale of vehicular networks, vehicular edge computing (VEC) has emerged and attracted growing attention from both industry and academia. Parked vehicles (PVs) have great potential to join vehicular networks for sharing their idle computing and networking resources. However, due to the underlying security and privacy threats, it is challenging to fairly motivate PVs for resource sharing in an efficient and secure way. In this paper, we propose a permissioned vehicular blockchain for secure and efficient resource sharing in VEC, namely, Parkingchain. We first design smart contract to achieve secure resource sharing and efficient service provisioning between PVs and service requesters (SRs). A multi-weight subjective logic based delegated Byzantine Fault Tolerance (DBFT) consensus mechanism is presented to improve the consensus process in Parkingchain. Further, we design a contract theory-based incentive mechanism to model the interactions between SR and PVs under asymmetric information scenario. Finally, numerical results demonstrate that the proposed incentive mechanism is effective and efficient compared with existing schemes.
The most accepted PoW consensus algorithm is based on the fact that if a node performs a lot of work for the network, it is less likely that it is going to attack it. However, it requires miners to perform computationally expensive tasks and consume a large amount energy. Proof-of-stake (PoS) is similar to PoW, but the target value depends on the owned stakes of nodes. PoS is a consensus mechanism that requires less computational power than PoW, so it consumes less energy. Different from PoW and PoS applied in the public blockchain, Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PBFT) @cite_22 is carried on by a group of authenticated nodes to validate the transactions. Some variants, such as delegated PoS (DPoS) and DBFT select some nodes to generate and validate blocks to achieve high scalability, high throughput and low latency @cite_37 . In the proposed Parkingchain, the consensus algorithm converges to an agreement fast and is superior to a computational-based algorithm (i.e. PoW algorithm). We design our consensus phases based on DBFT algorithm to satisfy the requirements of efficiency in a vehicular networking scenario.
@cite_37 @cite_22
2902905458 2767855054 2536325433 2584120063
This paper introduces a new leaderless Byzantine consensus called the Democratic Byzantine Fault Tolerance (DBFT) for blockchains. While most blockchain consensus protocols rely on a correct leader or coordinator to terminate, our algorithm can terminate even when its coordinator is faulty. The key idea is to allow processes to complete asynchronous rounds as soon as they receive a threshold of messages, instead of having to wait for a message from a coordinator that may be slow. The resulting decentralization is particularly appealing for blockchains for two reasons: (i) each node plays a similar role in the execution of the consensus, hence making the decision inherently “democratic” (ii) decentralization avoids bottlenecks by balancing the load, making the solution scalable. DBFT is deterministic, assumes partial synchrony, is resilience optimal, time optimal and does not need signatures. We first present a simple safe binary Byzantine consensus algorithm, modify it to ensure termination, and finally present an optimized reduction from multivalue consensus to binary consensus whose fast path terminates in 4 message delays. The blockchain initially gained traction in 2008 as the technology underlying bitcoin, but now has been employed in a diverse range of applications and created a global market worth over $150B as of 2017. What distinguishes blockchains from traditional distributed databases is the ability to operate in a decentralized setting without relying on a trusted third party. As such their core technical component is consensus: how to reach agreement among a group of nodes. This has been extensively studied already in the distributed systems community for closed systems, but its application to open blockchains has revitalized the field and led to a plethora of new designs. The inherent complexity of consensus protocols and their rapid and dramatic evolution makes it hard to contextualize the design landscape. We address this challenge by conducting a systematic and comprehensive study of blockchain consensus protocols. After first discussing key themes in classical consensus protocols, we describe: first protocols based on proof-of-work (PoW), second proof-of-X (PoX) protocols that replace PoW with more energy-efficient alternatives, and third hybrid protocols that are compositions or variations of classical consensus protocols. We develop a framework to evaluate their performance, security and design properties, and use it to systematize key themes in the protocol categories described above. This evaluation leads us to identify research gaps and challenges for the community to consider in future research endeavours. Proof of Work (PoW) powered blockchains currently account for more than 90 of the total market capitalization of existing digital cryptocurrencies. Although the security provisions of Bitcoin have been thoroughly analysed, the security guarantees of variant (forked) PoW blockchains (which were instantiated with different parameters) have not received much attention in the literature. This opens the question whether existing security analysis of Bitcoin's PoW applies to other implementations which have been instantiated with different consensus and or network parameters. In this paper, we introduce a novel quantitative framework to analyse the security and performance implications of various consensus and network parameters of PoW blockchains. Based on our framework, we devise optimal adversarial strategies for double-spending and selfish mining while taking into account real world constraints such as network propagation, different block sizes, block generation intervals, information propagation mechanism, and the impact of eclipse attacks. Our framework therefore allows us to capture existing PoW-based deployments as well as PoW blockchain variants that are instantiated with different parameters, and to objectively compare the tradeoffs between their performance and security provisions. The surging interest in blockchain technology has revitalized the search for effective Byzantine consensus schemes. In particular, the blockchain community has been looking for ways to effectively integrate traditional Byzantine fault-tolerant (BFT) protocols into a blockchain consensus layer allowing various financial institutions to securely agree on the order of transactions. However, existing BFT protocols can only scale to tens of nodes due to their @math message complexity. In this paper, we propose FastBFT, a fast and scalable BFT protocol. At the heart of FastBFT is a novel message aggregation technique that combines hardware-based trusted execution environments (TEEs) with lightweight secret sharing. Combining this technique with several other optimizations (i.e., optimistic execution, tree topology and failure detection), FastBFT achieves low latency and high throughput even for large scale networks. Via systematic analysis and experiments, we demonstrate that FastBFT has better scalability and performance than previous BFT protocols.