In complex inferential tasks like question answering, machine learning models must confront two challenges: the need to implement a compositional reasoning process, and, in many applications, the need for this reasoning process to be interpretable to assist users in both development and prediction. Existing models designed to produce interpretable traces of their decision-making process typically require these traces to be supervised at training time. In this paper, we present a novel neural modular approach that performs compositional reasoning by automatically inducing a desired sub-task decomposition without relying on strong supervision. Our model allows linking different reasoning tasks though shared modules that handle common routines across tasks. Experiments show that the model is more interpretable to human evaluators compared to other state-of-the-art models: users can better understand the model's underlying reasoning procedure and predict when it will succeed or fail based on observing its intermediate outputs.
Interpretable reasoning and explainable neural networks. Recent years have seen increased interest in various aspects of interpretability in learned models @cite_39 , particularly in neural networks @cite_12 . This includes work aimed at both explaining the decision rules implemented by learned models, and the mechanisms by which these rules are derived from data @cite_28 @cite_25 . In the present work we are primarily interested in the former. One line of research in this direction attempts to generate post-hoc explanations of decisions from generic model architectures, either by finding interpretable local surrogates in the form of linear models @cite_15 , logical rules @cite_36 @cite_21 or natural language descriptions @cite_24 @cite_4 , or by visualizing salient features @cite_30 @cite_22 .
@cite_30 @cite_4 @cite_22 @cite_28 @cite_36 @cite_21 @cite_39 @cite_24 @cite_15 @cite_25 @cite_12
2946940672 2895739182 2963081790 2769943106
Explaining decisions of deep neural networks is a hot research topic with applications in medical imaging, video surveillance, and self driving cars. Many methods have been proposed in literature to explain these decisions by identifying relevance of different pixels. In this paper, we propose a method that can generate contrastive explanations for such data where we not only highlight aspects that are in themselves sufficient to justify the classification by the deep model, but also new aspects which if added will change the classification. One of our key contributions is how we define "addition" for such rich data in a formal yet humanly interpretable way that leads to meaningful results. This was one of the open questions laid out in Dhurandhar this http URL. (2018) [5], which proposed a general framework for creating (local) contrastive explanations for deep models. We showcase the efficacy of our approach on CelebA and Fashion-MNIST in creating intuitive explanations that are also quantitatively superior compared with other state-of-the-art interpretability methods. Explanations of the decisions made by a deep neural network are important for human end-users to be able to understand and diagnose the trustworthiness of the system. Current neural networks used for visual recognition are generally used as black boxes that do not provide any human interpretable justification for a prediction. In this work we propose a new framework called Interpretable Basis Decomposition for providing visual explanations for classification networks. By decomposing the neural activations of the input image into semantically interpretable components pre-trained from a large concept corpus, the proposed framework is able to disentangle the evidence encoded in the activation feature vector, and quantify the contribution of each piece of evidence to the final prediction. We apply our framework for providing explanations to several popular networks for visual recognition, and show it is able to explain the predictions given by the networks in a human-interpretable way. The human interpretability of the visual explanations provided by our framework and other recent explanation methods is evaluated through Amazon Mechanical Turk, showing that our framework generates more faithful and interpretable explanations (The code and data are available at https: github.com CSAILVision IBD). The success of recent deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) depends on learning hidden representations that can summarize the important factors of variation behind the data. In this work, we describe Network Dissection, a method that interprets networks by providing meaningful labels to their individual units. The proposed method quantifies the interpretability of CNN representations by evaluating the alignment between individual hidden units and visual semantic concepts. By identifying the best alignments, units are given interpretable labels ranging from colors, materials, textures, parts, objects and scenes. The method reveals that deep representations are more transparent and interpretable than they would be under a random equivalently powerful basis. We apply our approach to interpret and compare the latent representations of several network architectures trained to solve a wide range of supervised and self-supervised tasks. We then examine factors affecting the network interpretability such as the number of the training iterations, regularizations, different initialization parameters, as well as networks depth and width. Finally we show that the interpreted units can be used to provide explicit explanations of a given CNN prediction for an image. Our results highlight that interpretability is an important property of deep neural networks that provides new insights into what hierarchical structures can learn. The success of recent deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) depends on learning hidden representations that can summarize the important factors of variation behind the data. However, CNNs often criticized as being black boxes that lack interpretability, since they have millions of unexplained model parameters. In this work, we describe Network Dissection, a method that interprets networks by providing labels for the units of their deep visual representations. The proposed method quantifies the interpretability of CNN representations by evaluating the alignment between individual hidden units and a set of visual semantic concepts. By identifying the best alignments, units are given human interpretable labels across a range of objects, parts, scenes, textures, materials, and colors. The method reveals that deep representations are more transparent and interpretable than expected: we find that representations are significantly more interpretable than they would be under a random equivalently powerful basis. We apply the method to interpret and compare the latent representations of various network architectures trained to solve different supervised and self-supervised training tasks. We then examine factors affecting the network interpretability such as the number of the training iterations, regularizations, different initializations, and the network depth and width. Finally we show that the interpreted units can be used to provide explicit explanations of a prediction given by a CNN for an image. Our results highlight that interpretability is an important property of deep neural networks that provides new insights into their hierarchical structure.