Most deep architectures for image classification–even those that are trained to classify a large number of diverse categories–learn shared image representations with a single model. Intuitively, however, categories that are more similar should share more information than those that are very different. While hierarchical deep networks address this problem by learning separate features for subsets of related categories, current implementations require simplified models using fixed architectures specified via heuristic clustering methods. Instead, we propose Blockout, a method for regularization and model selection that simultaneously learns both the model architecture and parameters. A generalization of Dropout, our approach gives a novel parametrization of hierarchical architectures that allows for structure learning via back-propagation. To demonstrate its utility, we evaluate Blockout on the CIFAR and Image Net datasets, demonstrating improved classification accuracy, better regularization performance, faster training, and the clear emergence of hierarchical network structures.
Despite the long history of deep neural networks in computer vision @cite_14 , the modern incarnation of deep learning'' is a relatively recent phenomenon that began with empirical success in the task of image recognition @cite_0 on the ImageNet dataset @cite_18 . Since then, tactful architecture modifications have yielded a steady stream of further improvements @cite_10 @cite_21 , even surpassing human performance @cite_3 .
@cite_18 @cite_14 @cite_21 @cite_3 @cite_0 @cite_10
1932198206 2613962421 2734558172 2951128674
Deep neural networks (DNNs) have recently been achieving state-of-the-art performance on a variety of pattern-recognition tasks, most notably visual classification problems. Given that DNNs are now able to classify objects in images with near-human-level performance, questions naturally arise as to what differences remain between computer and human vision. A recent study [30] revealed that changing an image (e.g. of a lion) in a way imperceptible to humans can cause a DNN to label the image as something else entirely (e.g. mislabeling a lion a library). Here we show a related result: it is easy to produce images that are completely unrecognizable to humans, but that state-of-the-art DNNs believe to be recognizable objects with 99.99 confidence (e.g. labeling with certainty that white noise static is a lion). Specifically, we take convolutional neural networks trained to perform well on either the ImageNet or MNIST datasets and then find images with evolutionary algorithms or gradient ascent that DNNs label with high confidence as belonging to each dataset class. It is possible to produce images totally unrecognizable to human eyes that DNNs believe with near certainty are familiar objects, which we call “fooling images” (more generally, fooling examples). Our results shed light on interesting differences between human vision and current DNNs, and raise questions about the generality of DNN computer vision. In recent years, the widespread use of deep neural networks (DNNs) has facilitated great improvements in performance for computer vision tasks like image classification and object recognition. In most realistic computer vision applications, an input image undergoes some form of image distortion such as blur and additive noise during image acquisition or transmission. Deep networks trained on pristine images perform poorly when tested on such distortions. In this paper, we evaluate the effect of image distortions like Gaussian blur and additive noise on the activations of pre-trained convolutional filters. We propose a metric to identify the most noise susceptible convolutional filters and rank them in order of the highest gain in classification accuracy upon correction. In our proposed approach called DeepCorrect , we apply small stacks of convolutional layers with residual connections at the output of these ranked filters and train them to correct the worst distortion affected filter activations, while leaving the rest of the pre-trained filter outputs in the network unchanged. Performance results show that applying DeepCorrect models for common vision tasks like image classification (ImageNet), object recognition (Caltech-101, Caltech-256), and scene classification (SUN-397), significantly improves the robustness of DNNs against distorted images and outperforms other alternative approaches. In the last few years, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) had become the default paradigm to address classification problems, specially, but not only, in image recognition. This is mainly due to the high success rate that they provide. Despite there currently exist approaches that apply deep learning to the 3D recognition problem, they are either too slow for online uses or too error prone. To fill this gap, we propose LonchaNet, a deep learning architecture for point clouds classification. Our system successfully achieves a high accuracy yet providing a low computation cost. A dense set of experiments were carried out in order to validate our system in the frame of the ModelNet — a large-scale 3D CAD models dataset — challenge. Our proposal achieves a success rate of 94.37 in the ModelNet-10 classification task, the second place in the leaderboard as of today (November, 2016). Traditional methods of computer vision and machine learning cannot match human performance on tasks such as the recognition of handwritten digits or traffic signs. Our biologically plausible deep artificial neural network architectures can. Small (often minimal) receptive fields of convolutional winner-take-all neurons yield large network depth, resulting in roughly as many sparsely connected neural layers as found in mammals between retina and visual cortex. Only winner neurons are trained. Several deep neural columns become experts on inputs preprocessed in different ways; their predictions are averaged. Graphics cards allow for fast training. On the very competitive MNIST handwriting benchmark, our method is the first to achieve near-human performance. On a traffic sign recognition benchmark it outperforms humans by a factor of two. We also improve the state-of-the-art on a plethora of common image classification benchmarks.