The vast majority of real-world networks are scale-free, loopy, and sparse, with a power-law degree distribution and a constant average degree. In this paper, we study first-order consensus dynamics in binary scale-free networks, where vertices are subject to white noise. We focus on the coherence of networks characterized in terms of the @math -norm, which quantifies how closely agents track the consensus value. We first provide a lower bound of coherence of a network in terms of its average degree, which is independent of the network order. We then study the coherence of some sparse, scale-free real-world networks, which approaches a constant. We also study numerically the coherence of Barab 'asi-Albert networks and high-dimensional random Apollonian networks, which also converges to a constant when the networks grow. Finally, based on the connection of coherence and the Kirchhoff index, we study analytically the coherence of two deterministically-growing sparse networks and obtain the exact expressions, which tend to small constants. Our results indicate that the effect of noise on the consensus dynamics in power-law networks is negligible. We argue that scale-free topology, together with loopy structure, is responsible for the strong robustness with respect to noisy consensus dynamics in power-law networks.
From Table , we can observe that the leading behavior for @math in different networks is rich. For a network with @math vertices, @math can behave linearly, sub-linearly, logarithmically, inversely with @math , or independently of @math . For example, in the path graph @cite_33 , 1-dimensional torus @cite_49 @cite_29 , 1-dimensional Cayley graph @cite_20 , and regular ring lattice @cite_15 , @math ; in some fractal tree-like graphs @cite_46 including Vicsek fractal, T fractal, and Peano Basin fractal, @math grows sub-linearly with @math as @math with @math ; in 2-dimensional torus @cite_49 , 2-dimensional Cayley graph @cite_20 , Farey graph @cite_15 , and Koch graph @cite_2 , @math ; in the complete graph @cite_33 , @math ; while in @math -dimensional torus ( @math ) @cite_49 , @math -dimensional Cayley graph ( @math ) @cite_20 , as well as star graph @cite_33 , @math is a constant, irrespective of @math .
@cite_33 @cite_46 @cite_29 @cite_49 @cite_2 @cite_15 @cite_20
1945101555 2065527713 2532977679 2612518566
Let @math be a smooth scheme over an algebraically closed field @math of characteristic zero and @math a regular function, and write @math Crit @math , as a closed subscheme of @math . The motivic vanishing cycle @math is an element of the @math -equivariant motivic Grothendieck ring @math defined by Denef and Loeser math.AG 0006050 and Looijenga math.AG 0006220, and used in Kontsevich and Soibelman's theory of motivic Donaldson-Thomas invariants, arXiv:0811.2435. We prove three main results: (a) @math depends only on the third-order thickenings @math of @math . (b) If @math is another smooth scheme, @math is regular, @math Crit @math , and @math is an embedding with @math and @math an isomorphism, then @math equals @math "twisted" by a motive associated to a principal @math -bundle defined using @math , where now we work in a quotient ring @math of @math . (c) If @math is an "oriented algebraic d-critical locus" in the sense of Joyce arXiv:1304.4508, there is a natural motive @math , such that if @math is locally modelled on Crit @math , then @math is locally modelled on @math . Using results from arXiv:1305.6302, these imply the existence of natural motives on moduli schemes of coherent sheaves on a Calabi-Yau 3-fold equipped with "orientation data", as required in Kontsevich and Soibelman's motivic Donaldson-Thomas theory arXiv:0811.2435, and on intersections of oriented Lagrangians in an algebraic symplectic manifold. This paper is an analogue for motives of results on perverse sheaves of vanishing cycles proved in arXiv:1211.3259. We extend this paper to Artin stacks in arXiv:1312.0090. We propose a fast methodology for encoding graphs with information-theoretically minimum numbers of bits. Specifically, a graph with property @math is called a @math -graph . If @math satisfies certain properties, then an n-node m-edge @math -graph G can be encoded by a binary string X such that (1) G and X can be obtained from each other in O(n log n) time, and (2) X has at most @math bits for any continuous superadditive function @math so that there are at most @math distinct @math -node @math -graphs. The methodology is applicable to general classes of graphs; this paper focuses on planar graphs. Examples of such @math include all conjunctions over the following groups of properties: (1) G is a planar graph or a plane graph; (2) @math is directed or undirected; (3) @math is triangulated, triconnected, biconnected, merely connected, or not required to be connected; (4) the nodes of G are labeled with labels from @math for @math ; (5) the edges of G are labeled with labels from @math for @math ; and (6) each node (respectively, edge) of G has at most @math self-loops (respectively, @math multiple edges). Moreover, @math and @math are not required to be O(1) for the cases of @math being a plane triangulation. These examples are novel applications of small cycle separators of planar graphs and are the only nontrivial classes of graphs, other than rooted trees, with known polynomial-time information-theoretically optimal coding schemes. Given a directed graph @math and a list @math of terminal pairs, the Directed Steiner Network problem asks for a minimum-cost subgraph of @math that contains a directed @math path for every @math . The special case Directed Steiner Tree (when we ask for paths from a root @math to terminals @math ) is known to be fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by the number of terminals, while the special case Strongly Connected Steiner Subgraph (when we ask for a path from every @math to every other @math ) is known to be W[1]-hard. We systematically explore the complexity landscape of directed Steiner problems to fully understand which other special cases are FPT or W[1]-hard. Formally, if @math is a class of directed graphs, then we look at the special case of Directed Steiner Network where the list @math of requests form a directed graph that is a member of @math . Our main result is a complete characterization of the classes @math resulting in fixed-parameter tractable special cases: we show that if every pattern in @math has the combinatorial property of being "transitively equivalent to a bounded-length caterpillar with a bounded number of extra edges," then the problem is FPT, and it is W[1]-hard for every recursively enumerable @math not having this property. This complete dichotomy unifies and generalizes the known results showing that Directed Steiner Tree is FPT [Dreyfus and Wagner, Networks 1971], @math -Root Steiner Tree is FPT for constant @math [Such 'y, WG 2016], Strongly Connected Steiner Subgraph is W[1]-hard [, SIAM J. Discrete Math. 2011], and Directed Steiner Network is solvable in polynomial-time for constant number of terminals [Feldman and Ruhl, SIAM J. Comput. 2006], and moreover reveals a large continent of tractable cases that were not known before. In the subgraph-freeness problem, we are given a constant-size graph @math , and wish to determine whether the network contains @math as a subgraph or not. The relaxation of the problem only requires us to distinguish graphs that are @math -free from graphs that are @math -far from @math -free, meaning an @math -fraction of their edges must be removed to obtain an @math -free graph. Recently, Censor-Hillel et. al. and showed that in the property-testing regime it is possible to test @math -freeness for any graph @math of size 4 in constant time, @math rounds, regardless of the network size. However, Fraigniaud et. al. also showed that their techniques for graphs @math of size 4 cannot test @math -cycle-freeness in constant time. In this paper we revisit the subgraph-freeness problem and show that @math -cycle-freeness, and indeed @math -freeness for many other graphs @math comprising more than 4 vertices, can be tested in constant time. We show that @math -freeness can be tested in @math rounds for any cycle @math , improving on the running time of @math of the previous algorithms for triangle-freeness and @math -freeness. In the special case of triangles, we show that triangle-freeness can be solved in @math rounds independently of @math , when @math is not too small with respect to the number of nodes and edges. We also show that @math -freeness for any constant-size tree @math can be tested in @math rounds, even without the property-testing relaxation. Building on these results, we define a general class of graphs for which we can test subgraph-freeness in @math rounds. This class includes all graphs over 5 vertices except the 5-clique, @math . For cliques @math over @math nodes, we show that @math -freeness can be tested in @math rounds, where @math is the number of edges.