Matrix recovery is raised in many areas. In this paper, we build up a framework for almost everywhere matrix recovery which means to recover almost all the @math from @math where @math . We mainly focus on the following question: how many measurements are needed to recover almost all the matrices in @math ? For the case where both @math and @math are algebraic varieties, we use the tools from algebraic geometry to study the question and present some results to address it under many different settings.
Under the setting of @math and @math with @math , @math has the almost everywhere @math -recovery property if and only if @math has the almost phase retrieval property. It is an active topic to present the smallest @math for which @math having the almost phase retrieval property @cite_18 @cite_19 @cite_2 @cite_14 . For the case where @math , it is known that @math is sufficient and necessary. For @math , it is known that @math generic measurements are sufficient for almost phase retrieval (see @cite_18 ). However, one still does not know whether @math is tight or not.
@cite_19 @cite_18 @cite_14 @cite_2
2168831133 2963131734 1605194072 2018778093
The goal of (stable) sparse recovery is to recover a @math -sparse approximation @math of a vector @math from linear measurements of @math . Specifically, the goal is to recover @math such that @math for some constant @math and norm parameters @math and @math . It is known that, for @math or @math , this task can be accomplished using @math non-adaptive measurements CRT06:Stable-Signal and that this bound is tight DIPW, FPRU, PW11 . In this paper we show that if one is allowed to perform measurements that are adaptive , then the number of measurements can be considerably reduced. Specifically, for @math and @math we show A scheme with @math measurements that uses @math rounds. This is a significant improvement over the best possible non-adaptive bound. A scheme with @math measurements that uses two rounds. This improves over the best possible non-adaptive bound. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first results of this type. Recovering an unknown complex signal from the magnitude of linear combinations of the signal is referred to as phase retrieval. We present an exact performance analysis of a recently proposed convex-optimization-formulation for this problem, known as PhaseMax. Standard convex-relaxation-based methods in phase retrieval resort to the idea of “lifting” which makes them computationally inefficient, since the number of unknowns is effectively squared. In contrast, PhaseMax is a novel convex relaxation that does not increase the number of unknowns. Instead it relies on an initial estimate of the true signal which must be externally provided. In this paper, we investigate the required number of measurements for exact recovery of the signal in the large system limit and when the linear measurement matrix is random with iid standard normal entries. If @math denotes the dimension of the unknown complex signal and @math the number of phaseless measurements, then in the large system limit, @math measurements is necessary and sufficient to recover the signal with high probability, where @math is the angle between the initial estimate and the true signal. Our result indicates a sharp phase transition in the asymptotic regime which matches the empirical result in numerical simulations. Consider the recovery of an unknown signal @math from quantized linear measurements. In the one-bit compressive sensing setting, one typically assumes that @math is sparse, and that the measurements are of the form @math . Since such measurements give no information on the norm of @math , recovery methods typically assume that @math . We show that if one allows more generally for quantized affine measurements of the form @math , and if the vectors @math are random, an appropriate choice of the affine shifts @math allows norm recovery to be easily incorporated into existing methods for one-bit compressive sensing. In addition, we show that for arbitrary fixed @math in the annulus @math , one may estimate the norm @math up to additive error @math from @math such binary measurements through a single evaluation of the inverse Gaussian error function. Finally, all of our recovery guarantees can be made universal over sparse vectors in the sense that with high probability, one set of measurements and thresholds can successfully estimate all sparse vectors @math in a Euclidean ball of known radius. Consider the problem of recovering a measure @math supported on a lattice of span @math , when measurements are only available concerning the Fourier Transform @math at frequencies @math . If @math is much smaller than the Nyquist frequency @math and the measurements are noisy, then, in general, stable recovery of @math is impossible. In this paper it is shown that if, in addition, we know that the measure @math satisfies certain sparsity constraints, then stable recovery is possible. Say that a set has Rayleigh index less than or equal to R if in any interval of length @math there are at most R elements. Indeed, if the (unknown) support of @math is known, a priori, to have Rayleigh index at most R, then stable recovery is possible with a stability coefficient that grows at most like @math as @math . This result validates certain practical efforts, in spectroscopy, seismic prospecting, and astrono...