We present AUEB's submissions to the BioASQ 6 document and snippet retrieval tasks (parts of Task 6b, Phase A). Our models use novel extensions to deep learning architectures that operate solely over the text of the query and candidate document snippets. Our systems scored at the top or near the top for all batches of the challenge, highlighting the effectiveness of deep learning for these tasks.
Document ranking has been studied since the dawn of ; classic term-weighting schemes were designed for this problem @cite_7 @cite_14 . With the advent of statistical and statistical , probabilistic language and topic modeling were explored @cite_15 @cite_12 , followed recently by deep learning methods @cite_1 @cite_19 @cite_5 @cite_6 @cite_9 .
@cite_14 @cite_7 @cite_9 @cite_1 @cite_6 @cite_19 @cite_5 @cite_15 @cite_12
2082729696 2109154616 1975998118 2159545104
This paper reports on a novel technique for literature indexing and searching in a mechanized library system. The notion of relevance is taken as the key concept in the theory of information retrieval and a comparative concept of relevance is explicated in terms of the theory of probability. The resulting technique called “Probabilistic Indexing,” allows a computing machine, given a request for information, to make a statistical inference and derive a number (called the “relevance number”) for each document, which is a measure of the probability that the document will satisfy the given request. The result of a search is an ordered list of those documents which satisfy the request ranked according to their probable relevance. The paper goes on to show that whereas in a conventional library system the cross-referencing (“see” and “see also”) is based solely on the “semantical closeness” between index terms, statistical measures of closeness between index terms can be defined and computed. Thus, given an arbitrary request consisting of one (or many) index term(s), a machine can elaborate on it to increase the probability of selecting relevant documents that would not otherwise have been selected. Finally, the paper suggests an interpretation of the whole library problem as one where the request is considered as a clue on the basis of which the library system makes a concatenated statistical inference in order to provide as an output an ordered list of those documents which most probably satisfy the information needs of the user. We propose a new unsupervised learning technique for extracting information from large text collections. We model documents as if they were generated by a two-stage stochastic process. Each author is represented by a probability distribution over topics, and each topic is represented as a probability distribution over words for that topic. The words in a multi-author paper are assumed to be the result of a mixture of each authors' topic mixture. The topic-word and author-topic distributions are learned from data in an unsupervised manner using a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm. We apply the methodology to a large corpus of 160,000 abstracts and 85,000 authors from the well-known CiteSeer digital library, and learn a model with 300 topics. We discuss in detail the interpretation of the results discovered by the system including specific topic and author models, ranking of authors by topic and topics by author, significant trends in the computer science literature between 1990 and 2002, parsing of abstracts by topics and authors and detection of unusual papers by specific authors. An online query interface to the model is also discussed that allows interactive exploration of author-topic models for corpora such as CiteSeer. Abstract One of the most important problems in information retrieval is determining the order of documents in the answer returned to the user. Many methods and algorithms for document ordering have been proposed. The method introduced in this paper differs from them especially in that it uses a probabilistic model of a document set. In this model documents are regarded as states of a Markov chain, where transition probabilities are directly proportional to similarities between documents. Steady-state probabilities reflect similarities of particular documents to the whole answer set. If documents are ordered according to these probabilities, at the top of a list there will be documents that are the best representatives of the set, and at the bottom those which are the worst representatives. The method was tested against databases INSPEC and Networked Computer Science Technical Reference Library (NCSTRL). Test results are positive. Values of the Kendall rank correlation coefficient indicate high similarity between rankings generated by the proposed method and rankings produced by experts. Results are comparable with rankings generated by the vector model using standard weighting schema tf·idf. Ranking a set of retrieved documents according to their relevance to a query is a popular problem in information retrieval. Methods that learn ranking functions are difficult to optimize, as ranking performance is typically judged by metrics that are not smooth. In this paper we propose a new listwise approach to learning to rank. Our method creates a conditional probability distribution over rankings assigned to documents for a given query, which permits gradient ascent optimization of the expected value of some performance measure. The rank probabilities take the form of a Boltzmann distribution, based on an energy function that depends on a scoring function composed of individual and pairwise potentials. Including pairwise potentials is a novel contribution, allowing the model to encode regularities in the relative scores of documents; existing models assign scores at test time based only on individual documents, with no pairwise constraints between documents. Experimental results on the LETOR3.0 data set show that our method out-performs existing learning approaches to ranking.