The general problem of robust optimization is this: one of several possible scenarios will appear tomorrow, but things are more expensive tomorrow than they are today. What should you anticipatorily buy today, so that the worst-case cost (summed over both days) is minimized? and considered the k-robust model where the possible outcomes tomorrow are given by all demand-subsets of size k, and gave algorithms for the set cover problem, and the Steiner tree and facility location problems in this model, respectively. In this paper, we give the following simple and intuitive template for k-robust problems: "having built some anticipatory solution, if there exists a single demand whose augmentation cost is larger than some threshold, augment the anticipatory solution to cover this demand as well, and repeat". In this paper we show that this template gives us improved approximation algorithms for k-robust Steiner tree and set cover, and the first approximation algorithms for k-robust Steiner forest, minimum-cut and multicut. All our approximation ratios (except for multicut) are almost best possible. As a by-product of our techniques, we also get algorithms for max-min problems of the form: "given a covering problem instance, which k of the elements are costliest to cover?".
To the best of our knowledge, none of the @math -max-min problems other than min-cut and set cover @cite_12 have been studied earlier. The @math - min -min versions of covering problems (i.e. which @math demands are the cheapest to cover?'') have been extensively studied for set cover @cite_11 @cite_19 , Steiner tree @cite_32 , Steiner forest @cite_9 , min-cut and multicut @cite_33 @cite_34 . However these problems seem to be related to the @math -max-min versions only in spirit.
@cite_33 @cite_9 @cite_32 @cite_19 @cite_34 @cite_12 @cite_11
1579892319 2009279347 2949832116 2901780026
Demand-robust versions of common optimization problems were recently introduced by [4] motivated by the worst-case considerations of two-stage stochastic optimization models. We study the demand robust min-cut and shortest path problems, and exploit the nature of the robust objective to give improved approximation factors. Specifically, we give a @math approximation for robust min-cut and a 7.1 approximation for robust shortest path. Previously, the best approximation factors were O(log n) for robust min-cut and 16 for robust shortest paths, both due to [4]. Our main technique can be summarized as follows: We investigate each of the second stage scenarios individually, checking if it can be independently serviced in the second stage within an acceptable cost (namely, a guess of the optimal second stage costs). For the costly scenarios that cannot be serviced in this way (“rainy days”), we show that they can be fully taken care of in a near-optimal first stage solution (i.e., by ”paying today”). We also consider “hitting-set” extensions of the robust min-cut and shortest path problems and show that our techniques can be combined with algorithms for Steiner multicut and group Steiner tree problems to give similar approximation guarantees for the hitting-set versions of robust min-cut and shortest path problems respectively. We give a 7.18-approximation algorithm for the minimum latency problem that uses only @math calls to the prize-collecting Steiner tree (PCST) subroutine of Goemans and Williamson. This improves the previous best algorithms in both performance guarantee and running time. A previous algorithm of Goemans and Kleinberg for the minimum latency problem requires an approximation algorithm for the @math -minimum spanning tree ( @math -MST) problem which is called as a black box for each value of @math . Their algorithm can achieve an approximation factor of 10.77 while making @math PCST calls, a factor of 8.98 using @math PCST calls, or a factor of @math using @math PCST calls, via the @math -MST algorithms of Garg, Arya and Ramesh, and Arora and Karakostas, respectively. Here @math denotes the number of nodes in the instance, and @math is the largest edge cost in the input. In all cases, the running time is dominated by the PCST calls. Since the PCST subroutine can be implemented to run in @math time, the overall running time of our algorithm is @math . We also give a faster randomized version of our algorithm that achieves the same approximation guarantee in expectation, but uses only @math PCST calls, and derandomize it to obtain a deterministic algorithm with factor @math , using @math PCST calls. The basic idea for our improvement is that we do not treat the @math -MST algorithm as a black box. This allows us to take advantage of some special situations in which the PCST subroutine delivers a 2-approximate @math -MST. We are able to obtain the same approximation ratio that would be given by Goemans and Kleinberg if we had access to 2-approximate @math -MSTs for all values of @math , even though we have them only for some values of @math that we are not able to specify in advance. We also extend our algorithm to a weighted version of the minimum latency problem. In this paper we study the Steiner tree problem over a dynamic set of terminals. We consider the model where we are given an @math -vertex graph @math with positive real edge weights, and our goal is to maintain a tree which is a good approximation of the minimum Steiner tree spanning a terminal set @math , which changes over time. The changes applied to the terminal set are either terminal additions (incremental scenario), terminal removals (decremental scenario), or both (fully dynamic scenario). Our task here is twofold. We want to support updates in sublinear @math time, and keep the approximation factor of the algorithm as small as possible. We show that we can maintain a @math -approximate Steiner tree of a general graph in @math time per terminal addition or removal. Here, @math denotes the stretch of the metric induced by @math . For planar graphs we achieve the same running time and the approximation ratio of @math . Moreover, we show faster algorithms for incremental and decremental scenarios. Finally, we show that if we allow higher approximation ratio, even more efficient algorithms are possible. In particular we show a polylogarithmic time @math -approximate algorithm for planar graphs. One of the main building blocks of our algorithms are dynamic distance oracles for vertex-labeled graphs, which are of independent interest. We also improve and use the online algorithms for the Steiner tree problem. In a minimum partial set multi-cover problem (MinPSMC), given an element set E, a collection of subsets ( S 2^E ), a cost (w_S ) on each set (S S ), a covering requirement (r_e ) for each element (e E ), and an integer k, the goal is to find a sub-collection ( F S ) to fully cover at least k elements such that the cost of ( F ) is as small as possible, where element e is fully covered by ( F ) if it belongs to at least (r_e ) sets of ( F ). On the application side, the problem has its background in the seed selection problem in a social network. On the theoretical side, it is a natural combination of the minimum partial (single) set cover problem (MinPSC) and the minimum set multi-cover problem (MinSMC). Although both MinPSC and MinSMC admit good approximations whose performance ratios match those lower bounds for the classic set cover problem, previous studies show that theoretical study on MinPSMC is quite challenging. In this paper, we prove that MinPSMC cannot be approximated within factor (O(n^ 1 2( n)^c ) ) under the ETH assumption. A primal dual algorithm for MinPSMC is presented with a guaranteed performance ratio (O( n ) ) when (r_ ) and f are constants, where (r_ = _ e E r_e ) is the maximum covering requirement and f is the maximum frequency of elements (that is the maximum number of sets containing a common element). We also improve the ratio for a restricted version of MinPSMC which possesses a graph-type structure.