Nez is a PEG(Parsing Expressing Grammar)-based open grammar language that allows us to describe complex syntax constructs without action code. Since open grammars are declarative and free from a host programming language of parsers, software engineering tools and other parser applications can reuse once-defined grammars across programming languages. A key challenge to achieve practical open grammars is the expressiveness of syntax constructs and the resulting parser performance, as the traditional action code approach has provided very pragmatic solutions to these two issues. In Nez, we extend the symbol-based state management to recognize context-sensitive language syntax, which often appears in major programming languages. In addition, the Abstract Syntax Tree constructor allows us to make flexible tree structures, including the left-associative pair of trees. Due to these extensions, we have demonstrated that Nez can parse not all but many grammars. Nez can generate various types of parsers since all Nez operations are independent of a specific parser language. To highlight this feature, we have implemented Nez with dynamic parsing, which allows users to integrate a Nez parser as a parser library that loads a grammar at runtime. To achieve its practical performance, Nez operators are assembled into low-level virtual machine instructions, including automated state modifications when backtracking, transactional controls of AST construction, and efficient memoization in packrat parsing. We demonstrate that Nez dynamic parsers achieve very competitive performance compared to existing efficient parser generators.
Developing parsers is ubiquitous in many applications, and hand-written parsers are obviously prone to errors. Parser generation from a formal grammar specification has a long history in programming language research. A common key challenge is balancing the expressiveness of formal grammars and how to implement them in practical manners. In the early 1970s, Stephen C. Johnson developed Yacc @cite_25 , based on a LALR(1) grammar with embedded C code to perfom user-defined actions. Since Yacc successfully hits a sweet spot between the expressiveness and practical parser generation, the use of action code has been broadly adopted in most of the major parser generators @cite_21 @cite_23 @cite_11 across various grammar foundations, including LL( @math ), GLR, and PEG.
@cite_21 @cite_25 @cite_23 @cite_11
2018045485 2072750798 2001404404 2091232155
For decades we have been using Chomsky's generative system of grammars, particularly context-free grammars (CFGs) and regular expressions (REs), to express the syntax of programming languages and protocols. The power of generative grammars to express ambiguity is crucial to their original purpose of modelling natural languages, but this very power makes it unnecessarily difficult both to express and to parse machine-oriented languages using CFGs. Parsing Expression Grammars (PEGs) provide an alternative, recognition-based formal foundation for describing machine-oriented syntax, which solves the ambiguity problem by not introducing ambiguity in the first place. Where CFGs express nondeterministic choice between alternatives, PEGs instead use prioritized choice. PEGs address frequently felt expressiveness limitations of CFGs and REs, simplifying syntax definitions and making it unnecessary to separate their lexical and hierarchical components. A linear-time parser can be built for any PEG, avoiding both the complexity and fickleness of LR parsers and the inefficiency of generalized CFG parsing. While PEGs provide a rich set of operators for constructing grammars, they are reducible to two minimal recognition schemas developed around 1970, TS TDPL and gTS GTDPL, which are here proven equivalent in effective recognition power. Despite the power of Parser Expression Grammars (PEGs) and GLR, parsing is not a solved problem. Adding nondeterminism (parser speculation) to traditional LL and LR parsers can lead to unexpected parse-time behavior and introduces practical issues with error handling, single-step debugging, and side-effecting embedded grammar actions. This paper introduces the LL(*) parsing strategy and an associated grammar analysis algorithm that constructs LL(*) parsing decisions from ANTLR grammars. At parse-time, decisions gracefully throttle up from conventional fixed k>=1 lookahead to arbitrary lookahead and, finally, fail over to backtracking depending on the complexity of the parsing decision and the input symbols. LL(*) parsing strength reaches into the context-sensitive languages, in some cases beyond what GLR and PEGs can express. By statically removing as much speculation as possible, LL(*) provides the expressivity of PEGs while retaining LL's good error handling and unrestricted grammar actions. Widespread use of ANTLR (over 70,000 downloads year) shows that it is effective for a wide variety of applications. Despite the long history of research in parsing, constructing parsers for real programming languages remains a difficult and painful task. In the last decades, different parser generators emerged to allow the construction of parsers from a BNF-like specification. However, still today, many parsers are handwritten, or are only partly generated, and include various hacks to deal with different peculiarities in programming languages. The main problem is that current declarative syntax definition techniques are based on pure context-free grammars, while many constructs found in programming languages require context information. In this paper we propose a parsing framework that embraces context information in its core. Our framework is based on data-dependent grammars, which extend context-free grammars with arbitrary computation, variable binding and constraints. We present an implementation of our framework on top of the Generalized LL (GLL) parsing algorithm, and show how common idioms in syntax of programming languages such as (1) lexical disambiguation filters, (2) operator precedence, (3) indentation-sensitive rules, and (4) conditional preprocessor directives can be mapped to data-dependent grammars. We demonstrate the initial experience with our framework, by parsing more than 20000 Java, C#, Haskell, and OCaml source files. Despite the advances made by modern parsing strategies such as PEG, LL(*), GLR, and GLL, parsing is not a solved problem. Existing approaches suffer from a number of weaknesses, including difficulties supporting side-effecting embedded actions, slow and or unpredictable performance, and counter-intuitive matching strategies. This paper introduces the ALL(*) parsing strategy that combines the simplicity, efficiency, and predictability of conventional top-down LL(k) parsers with the power of a GLR-like mechanism to make parsing decisions. The critical innovation is to move grammar analysis to parse-time, which lets ALL(*) handle any non-left-recursive context-free grammar. ALL(*) is O(n4) in theory but consistently performs linearly on grammars used in practice, outperforming general strategies such as GLL and GLR by orders of magnitude. ANTLR 4 generates ALL(*) parsers and supports direct left-recursion through grammar rewriting. Widespread ANTLR 4 use (5000 downloads month in 2013) provides evidence that ALL(*) is effective for a wide variety of applications.