Controversial social and political issues of the day spur people to express their opinion on social networks, often sharing links to online media articles and reposting statements from prominent members of the platforms. Discovering the stances of people and entire media on current, debatable topics is important for social statisticians and policy makers. Many supervised solutions exist for determining viewpoints, but manually annotating training data is costly. In this paper, we propose a method that uses unsupervised learning and is able to characterize both the general political leaning of online media and popular Twitter users, as well as their stances with respect to controversial topics, by leveraging on the retweet behavior of users. We evaluate the model by comparing its bias predictions to gold labels from the Media Bias Fact Check website, and we further perform manual analysis.
Multiple methods involving supervised learning were employed for stance detection. Such methods require the availability of an initial set of labeled users, and they use some of the aforementioned features for classification @cite_17 @cite_21 @cite_10 . Such classification can label users with precision typically ranging between 70 methods for user stance detection include collective classification @cite_0 , where users in a network are jointly labeled, and classification in a low- dimensional user-space @cite_25 .
@cite_21 @cite_0 @cite_10 @cite_25 @cite_17
2786918876 2160904077 2411155974 2437771934
The task of stance detection is to determine whether someone is in favor or against a certain topic. A person may express the same stance towards a topic using positive or negative words. In this paper, several features and classifiers are explored to find out the combination that yields the best performance for stance detection. Due to the large number of features, ReliefF feature selection method was used to reduce the large dimensional feature space and improve the generalization capabilities. Experimental analyses were performed on five datasets, and the obtained results revealed that a majority vote classifier of the three classifiers: Random Forest, linear SVM and Gaussian Naive Bayes classifiers can be adopted for stance detection task. In this paper, we present a methodology for recognizing seatedpostures using data from pressure sensors installed on a chair.Information about seated postures could be used to help avoidadverse effects of sitting for long periods of time or to predictseated activities for a human-computer interface. Our system designdisplays accurate near-real-time classification performance on datafrom subjects on which the posture recognition system was nottrained by using a set of carefully designed, subject-invariantsignal features. By using a near-optimal sensor placement strategy,we keep the number of required sensors low thereby reducing costand computational complexity. We evaluated the performance of ourtechnology using a series of empirical methods including (1)cross-validation (classification accuracy of 87 for ten posturesusing data from 31 sensors), and (2) a physical deployment of oursystem (78 classification accuracy using data from 19sensors). We propose using five data-driven community detection approaches from social networks to partition the label space in the task of multi-label classification as an alternative to random partitioning into equal subsets as performed by RAkELd. We evaluate modularity-maximizing using fast greedy and leading eigenvector approximations, infomap, walktrap and label propagation algorithms. For this purpose, we propose to construct a label co-occurrence graph (both weighted and unweighted versions) based on training data and perform community detection to partition the label set. Then, each partition constitutes a label space for separate multi-label classification sub-problems. As a result, we obtain an ensemble of multi-label classifiers that jointly covers the whole label space. Based on the binary relevance and label powerset classification methods, we compare community detection methods to label space divisions against random baselines on 12 benchmark datasets over five evaluation measures. We discover that data-driven approaches are more efficient and more likely to outperform RAkELd than binary relevance or label powerset is, in every evaluated measure. For all measures, apart from Hamming loss, data-driven approaches are significantly better than RAkELd ( α = 0 . 05 ), and at least one data-driven approach is more likely to outperform RAkELd than a priori methods in the case of RAkELd’s best performance. This is the largest RAkELd evaluation published to date with 250 samplings per value for 10 values of RAkELd parameter k on 12 datasets published to date. Stance detection is the task of classifying the attitude expressed in a text towards a target such as Hillary Clinton to be "positive", negative" or "neutral". Previous work has assumed that either the target is mentioned in the text or that training data for every target is given. This paper considers the more challenging version of this task, where targets are not always mentioned and no training data is available for the test targets. We experiment with conditional LSTM encoding, which builds a representation of the tweet that is dependent on the target, and demonstrate that it outperforms encoding the tweet and the target independently. Performance is improved further when the conditional model is augmented with bidirectional encoding. We evaluate our approach on the SemEval 2016 Task 6 Twitter Stance Detection corpus achieving performance second best only to a system trained on semi-automatically labelled tweets for the test target. When such weak supervision is added, our approach achieves state-of-the-art results.