Current distributed representations of words show little resemblance to theories of lexical semantics. The former are dense and uninterpretable, the latter largely based on familiar, discrete classes (e.g., supersenses) and relations (e.g., synonymy and hypernymy). We propose methods that transform word vectors into sparse (and optionally binary) vectors. The resulting representations are more similar to the interpretable features typically used in NLP, though they are discovered automatically from raw corpora. Because the vectors are highly sparse, they are computationally easy to work with. Most importantly, we find that they outperform the original vectors on benchmark tasks.
Sparsity constraints are in general useful in NLP problems @cite_56 @cite_42 @cite_20 , like POS tagging @cite_48 , dependency parsing @cite_30 , text classification @cite_45 , and representation learning @cite_46 @cite_34 . Including sparsity constraints in Bayesian models of lexical semantics like LDA in the form of sparse Dirichlet priors has been shown to be useful for downstream tasks like POS-tagging @cite_24 , and improving interpretation @cite_43 @cite_52 .
@cite_30 @cite_48 @cite_42 @cite_52 @cite_56 @cite_24 @cite_43 @cite_45 @cite_46 @cite_34 @cite_20
2168820925 2127300249 2111854888 1970304186
We address the problem of learning structured unsupervised models with moment sparsity typical in many natural language induction tasks. For example, in unsupervised part-of-speech (POS) induction using hidden Markov models, we introduce a bias for words to be labeled by a small number of tags. In order to express this bias of posterior sparsity as opposed to parametric sparsity, we extend the posterior regularization framework [7]. We evaluate our methods on three languages — English, Bulgarian and Portuguese — showing consistent and significant accuracy improvement over EM-trained HMMs, and HMMs with sparsity-inducing Dirichlet priors trained by variational EM. We increase accuracy with respect to EM by 2.3 -6.5 in a purely unsupervised setting as well as in a weakly-supervised setting where the closed-class words are provided. Finally, we show improvements using our method when using the induced clusters as features of a discriminative model in a semi-supervised setting. The problem of consistently estimating the sparsity pattern of a vector β* ∈ RP based on observations contaminated by noise arises in various contexts, including signal denoising, sparse approximation, compressed sensing, and model selection. We analyze the behavior of l1-constrained quadratic programming (QP), also referred to as the Lasso, for recovering the sparsity pattern. Our main result is to establish precise conditions on the problern dimension p, the number k of nonzero elements in β*, and the number of observations n that are necessary and sufficient for sparsity pattern recovery using the Lasso. We first analyze the case of observations made using deterministic design matrices and sub-Gaussian additive noise, and provide sufficient conditions for support recovery and l∞-error bounds, as well as results showing the necessity of incoherence and bounds on the minimum value. We then turn to the case of random designs, in which each row of the design is drawn from a N(0, Σ) ensemble. For a broad class of Gaussian ensembles satisfying mutual incoherence conditions, we compute explicit values of thresholds 0 0, if n > 2(θu + δ)k log(p - k), then the Lasso succeeds in recovering the sparsity pattern with probability converging to one for large problems, whereas for n < 2(θl - δ)k log(p - k), then the probability of successful recovery converges to zero. For the special case of the uniform Gaussian ensemble (Σ = I p×p), we show that θl = θu = 1, so that the precise threshold n = 2k log (p - k) is exactly determined. Sparsity of representations of signals has been shown to be a key concept of fundamental importance in fields such as blind source separation, compression, sampling and signal analysis. The aim of this paper is to compare several commonly-used sparsity measures based on intuitive attributes. Intuitively, a sparse representation is one in which a small number of coefficients contain a large proportion of the energy. In this paper, six properties are discussed: (Robin Hood, Scaling, Rising Tide, Cloning, Bill Gates, and Babies), each of which a sparsity measure should have. The main contributions of this paper are the proofs and the associated summary table which classify commonly-used sparsity measures based on whether or not they satisfy these six propositions. Only two of these measures satisfy all six: the pq-mean with p les 1, q > 1 and the Gini index. Sparse regression often uses l p norm priors (with p < 2). This paper demonstrates that the introduction of mixed-norms in such contexts allows one to go one step beyond in signal models, and promote some different, structured, forms of sparsity. It is shown that the particular case of the l1,2 and l2,1 norms leads to new group shrinkage operators. Mixed norm priors are shown to be particularly efficient in a generalized basis pursuit denoising approach, and are also used in a context of morphological component analysis. A suitable version of the Block Coordinate Relaxation algorithm is derived for the latter. The group-shrinkage operators are then modified to overcome some limitations of the mixed-norms. The proposed group shrinkage operators are tested on simulated signals in specific situations, to illustrate and compare their different behaviors. Results on real data are also used to illustrate the relevance of the approach.