In this paper we describe a system for visualizing and analyzing worldwide research topics, rtopmap . We gather data from google scholar academic research profiles, putting together a weighted topics graph, consisting of over 35,000 nodes and 646,000 edges. The nodes correspond to self-reported research topics, and edges correspond to co-occurring topics in google scholar profiles. The rtopmap system supports zooming panning searching and other google-maps-based interactive features. With the help of map overlays, we also visualize the strengths and weaknesses of different academic institutions in terms of human resources (e.g., number of researchers in different areas), as well as scholarly output (e.g., citation counts in different areas). Finally, we also visualize what parts of the map are associated with different academic departments, or with specific documents (such as research papers, or calls for proposals). The system itself is available at this http URL .
Words from paper titles have also been used as indicators for the content of a research topic, and visualizations based on this approach have been studied @cite_21 @cite_55 @cite_7 . Many earlier approaches focus on analyzing specific journals, conferences, or research areas, e.g., analyzing computer science conferences and journals @cite_55 , trends in computer science research @cite_29 , the International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM) @cite_13 , publications in data visualization @cite_15 . Domenico @cite_22 quantify attractive topics (i.e., topics that attract researchers from different areas). Sun @cite_51 build a network, with computer science conferences as nodes and edges between two conferences with common authors. Map-based visualization has been used for document visualization @cite_1 @cite_18 .
@cite_18 @cite_22 @cite_7 @cite_29 @cite_55 @cite_21 @cite_1 @cite_51 @cite_15 @cite_13
2109154616 1980270372 2663075978 1974087593
We propose a new unsupervised learning technique for extracting information from large text collections. We model documents as if they were generated by a two-stage stochastic process. Each author is represented by a probability distribution over topics, and each topic is represented as a probability distribution over words for that topic. The words in a multi-author paper are assumed to be the result of a mixture of each authors' topic mixture. The topic-word and author-topic distributions are learned from data in an unsupervised manner using a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm. We apply the methodology to a large corpus of 160,000 abstracts and 85,000 authors from the well-known CiteSeer digital library, and learn a model with 300 topics. We discuss in detail the interpretation of the results discovered by the system including specific topic and author models, ranking of authors by topic and topics by author, significant trends in the computer science literature between 1990 and 2002, parsing of abstracts by topics and authors and detection of unusual papers by specific authors. An online query interface to the model is also discussed that allows interactive exploration of author-topic models for corpora such as CiteSeer. The trends in a research field, especially changes in the features over the years, are subjects of interest for many researchers. This paper reports an exploratory analysis of the changes of research topics in an academic field. The target data of the analysis are the author-keywords included in papers presented at a series of academic conferences, IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM). The analysis process consists of three phases: (1) frequency of keywords, (2) appearance of keywords in papers, and (3) relationships among keywords. In phase 1, bar charts were used to observe the ranking of frequencies. In phases 2 and 3, anchored maps were adopted. The anchored maps are based on the spring-embedder model, but they provide viewpoints by using fixed "anchors." The analysis process revealed the major topics in the field of data mining and some changes in the relationships among topics. In this paper, we present the results of a user study on exploratory search activities in a social science digital library. We conducted a user study with 32 participants with a social sciences background—16 postdoctoral researchers and 16 students—who were asked to solve a task on searching related work to a given topic. The exploratory search task was performed in a 10-min time slot. The use of certain search activities is measured and compared to gaze data recorded with an eye tracking device. We use a novel tree graph representation to visualise the users’ search patterns and introduce a way to combine multiple search session trees. The tree graph representation is capable of creating one single tree for multiple users and identifying common search patterns. In addition, the information behaviour of students and postdoctoral researchers is being compared. The results show that search activities on the stratagem level are frequently utilised by both user groups. The most heavily used search activities were keyword search, followed by browsing through references and citations, and author searching. The eye tracking results showed an intense examination of documents metadata, especially on the level of citations and references. When comparing the group of students and postdoctoral researchers, we found significant differences regarding gaze data on the area of the journal name of the seed document. In general, we found a tendency of the postdoctoral researchers to examine the metadata records more intensively with regard to dwell time and the number of fixations. By creating combined session trees and deriving subtrees from those, we were able to identify common patterns like economic (explorative) and exhaustive (navigational) behaviour. Our results show that participants utilised multiple search strategies starting from the seed document, which means that they examined different paths to find related publications. This paper presents the analysis and modelling of two data sets associated with the literature of hypertext as represented by the ACM Hypertext conference series. This work explores new ways of organising and accessing the vast amount of interrelated information. The first data set, including all the full papers published in this series (1987 1998), is structured and visualised as a semantic space. This semantic space provides an access point for each paper in this collection. The second data set, containing author co-citation counts based on nine conferences in the series (1989 1998), is analysed and mapped in its entirety and in three evenly distributed sub-periods. Specialties  major research fronts in the field of hypertext  are identified based on the results of a factor analysis and corresponding author co-citation maps. The names of authors in these maps are linked to the bibliographical and citation summaries of these authors on the WWW.