Finding the dense regions of a graph and relations among them is a fundamental problem in network analysis. Core and truss decompositions reveal dense subgraphs with hierarchical relations. The incremental nature of algorithms for computing these decompositions and the need for global information at each step of the algorithm hinders scalable parallelization and approximations since the densest regions are not revealed until the end. In a previous work, proposed to iteratively compute the @math -indices of neighbor vertex degrees to obtain the core numbers and prove that the convergence is obtained after a finite number of iterations. This work generalizes the iterative @math -index computation for truss decomposition as well as nucleus decomposition which leverages higher-order structures to generalize core and truss decompositions. In addition, we prove convergence bounds on the number of iterations. We present a framework of local algorithms to obtain the core, truss, and nucleus decompositions. Our algorithms are local, parallel, offer high scalability, and enable approximations to explore time and quality trade-offs. Our shared-memory implementation verifies the efficiency, scalability, and effectiveness of our local algorithms on real-world networks.
Previous attempts to find the approximate core numbers (or @math -cores) focus on the neighborhood of a vertex within a certain radius @cite_46 . It is reported that if the radius is at least half of the diameter, close approximations can be obtained. However, given the small-world nature of the real-world networks, the local graph within a distance of half the diameter is too large to compute. In our work, we approximate the @math -core, @math -truss, and @math nucleus decompositions in a rigorous and efficient way that does not depend on the diameter.
@cite_46
2083162966 2010961994 2092349993 2399682168
We present the best known algorithms for approximating the minimum-size undirected @math -edge connected spanning subgraph. For simple graphs our approximation ratio is @math . The more precise version of this bound requires @math , and for all such @math it improves the long-standing performance ratio of Cheriyan and Thurimella [SIAM J. Comput., 30 (2000), pp. 528-560], @math . The improvement comes in two steps. First we show that for simple @math -edge connected graphs, any laminar family of degree @math sets is smaller than the general bound ( @math versus @math ). This immediately implies that iterated rounding improves the performance ratio of Cheriyan and Thurimella. The second step carefully chooses good edges for rounding. For multigraphs our approximation ratio is @math . This improves the previous ratio @math [H. N. Gabow, M. X. Goemans, E. Tardos, and D. P. Williamson, Networks, 53 (2009), pp. 345-357]. It is of interest since it is known that for some constant @math , an approximation ratio @math implies @math . Our approximation ratio extends to the minimum-size Steiner network problem, where @math denotes the average vertex demand. The algorithm exploits rounding properties of the first two linear programs in iterated rounding. Problems of finding p-centers and dominating sets of radius r in networks are discussed in this paper. Let n be the number of vertices and @math be the number of edges of a network. With the assumption that the distance-matrix of the network is available, we design an @math algorithm for finding an absolute 1-center of a vertex-weighted network and an @math algorithm for finding an absolute 1-center of a vertex-unweighted network (the problem of finding a vertex 1-center of a network is trivial). We show that the problem of finding a (vertex or absolute) p-center (for @math ) of a (vertex-weighted or vertex-unweighted) network, and the problem of finding a dominating set of radius r are @math -hard even in the case where the network has a simple structure (e.g., a planar graph of maximum vertex degree 3). However, we describe an algorithm of complexity @math (respectively, $ O[| E |^p n^ 2p - 1... Chapter 36 Decomposing Graphs into Regions of Small Diameter* Nathan Linialt Michael .lss A decomposition of a graph G = (V, E) is a partition of the vertex set into subsets (called lhks). The diameter of a decomposition is the least. d such that any two vertices belonging to the same connected component of a block are at distance < d. In this paper we prove (nearly best possible) statements of the form: .4ny n–vertex graph has a decomposition into a small number of blocks each having small diameter. Such decompositions provide a tool for efficiently decentralizing distributed computations. In [AGLP1 it was shown that every graph has a decomposition into at most s(n) blocks of diameter at most s(n) for s(n) = o( loglog d h n). usinga,technique of Awerbuch [A] and Awerbuch and Peleg [AP], we improve this result by showing that every graph has a decomposition of diameter ()(log n) into O(log n) blocks. In addition, we give a randomized distributed algorithm that produces such a decomposition and runs in time 0(log2 n). The construction can be parametrized to provide decompositions that trade-off between the number of blocks and the diameter. We show that this trade-off is nearly best possible for two families of graphs the first consists of skeletons of certain triangulations of a simplex and the second consists of grid graphs with added diagonals. The proofs in both cases rely on basic results in combinatorial topology, Sperner’s lemma for the first class and Tucker’s lemma for the second. *This work was supported in part by NSF contracts DMS87-03541 and CCR-8911388 tDepartment of Computer Science, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel. + ‘Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Mail Code C-014, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0114. We develop a new technique for constructing sparse graphs that allow us to prove near-linear lower bounds on the round complexity of computing distances in the CONGEST model. Specifically, we show an @math lower bound for computing the diameter in sparse networks, which was previously known only for dense networks [, SODA 2012]. In fact, we can even modify our construction to obtain graphs with constant degree, using a simple but powerful degree-reduction technique which we define. Moreover, our technique allows us to show @math lower bounds for computing @math -approximations of the diameter or the radius, and for computing a @math -approximation of all eccentricities. For radius, we are unaware of any previous lower bounds. For diameter, these greatly improve upon previous lower bounds and are tight up to polylogarithmic factors [, SODA 2012], and for eccentricities the improvement is both in the lower bound and in the approximation factor [Holzer and Wattenhofer, PODC 2012]. Interestingly, our technique also allows showing an almost-linear lower bound for the verification of @math -spanners, for @math .