This paper presents a randomized Las Vegas distributed algorithm that constructs a minimum spanning tree (MST) in weighted networks with optimal (up to polylogarithmic factors) time and message complexity. This algorithm runs in @math time and exchanges @math messages (both with high probability), where @math is the number of nodes of the network, @math is the diameter, and @math is the number of edges. This is the first distributed MST algorithm that matches the time lower bound of @math [Elkin, SIAM J. Comput. 2006] and the message lower bound of @math [, J.ACM 2015] (which both apply to randomized algorithms). The prior time and message lower bounds are derived using two completely different graph constructions; the existing lower bound construction that shows one lower bound does not work for the other. To complement our algorithm, we present a new lower bound graph construction for which any distributed MST algorithm requires @math rounds and @math messages.
It is important to point out that this paper and all the prior results discussed above (including the prior MST results @cite_6 @cite_26 @cite_18 @cite_38 @cite_10 @cite_2 @cite_35 ) assume the so-called clean network model , a.k.a. @math @cite_44 (cf. Section ), where nodes do not have initial knowledge of the identity of their neighbors. However, one can assume a model where nodes do have such a knowledge. This model is called the @math model . Although the distinction between @math and @math has clearly no bearing on the asymptotic bounds for the time complexity, it is significant when considering message complexity. @cite_21 show that @math is a message lower bound for MST in the @math model, if one allows only (possibly randomized Monte Carlo) comparison-based algorithms, i.e., algorithms that can operate on IDs only by comparing them. (We note that all prior MST algorithms mentioned earlier are comparison-based, including ours.) Hence, the result of @cite_21 implies that our MST algorithm (which is comparison-based and randomized) is time- and message-optimal in the @math model if one considers comparison-based algorithms only.
@cite_38 @cite_18 @cite_26 @cite_35 @cite_21 @cite_6 @cite_44 @cite_2 @cite_10
1992996565 2591036807 2030982625 2068322213
We study two fundamental graph problems, Graph Connectivity (GC) and Minimum Spanning Tree (MST), in the well-studied Congested Clique model, and present several new bounds on the time and message complexities of randomized algorithms for these problems. No non-trivial (i.e., super-constant) time lower bounds are known for either of the aforementioned problems; in particular, an important open question is whether or not constant-round algorithms exist for these problems. We make progress toward answering this question by presenting randomized Monte Carlo algorithms for both problems that run in O(log log log n) rounds (where n is the size of the clique). Our results improve by an exponential factor on the long-standing (deterministic) time bound of O(log log n) rounds for these problems due to (SICOMP 2005). Our algorithms make use of several algorithmic tools including graph sketching, random sampling, and fast sorting. The second contribution of this paper is to present several almost-tight bounds on the message complexity of these problems. Specifically, we show that Ω(n2) messages are needed by any algorithm (including randomized Monte Carlo algorithms, and regardless of the number of rounds) that solves the GC (and hence also the MST) problem if each machine in the Congested Clique has initial knowledge only of itself (the so-called KT0 model). In contrast, if the machines have initial knowledge of their neighbors' IDs (the so-called KT1 model), we present a randomized Monte Carlo algorithm for MST that uses O(n polylog n) messages and runs in O(polylog n) rounds. To complement this, we also present a lower bound in the KT1 model that shows that Ω(n) messages are required by any algorithm that solves GC, regardless of the number of rounds used. Our results are a step toward understanding the power of randomization in the Congested Clique with respect to both time and message complexity. We consider distributed plurality consensus in a complete graph of size @math with @math initial opinions. We design an efficient and simple protocol in the asynchronous communication model that ensures that all nodes eventually agree on the initially most frequent opinion. In this model, each node is equipped with a random Poisson clock with parameter @math . Whenever a node's clock ticks, it samples some neighbors, uniformly at random and with replacement, and adjusts its opinion according to the sample. A prominent example is the so-called two-choices algorithm in the synchronous model, where in each round, every node chooses two neighbors uniformly at random, and if the two sampled opinions coincide, then that opinion is adopted. This protocol is very efficient and well-studied when @math . If @math for some small @math , we show that it converges to the initial plurality opinion within @math rounds, w.h.p., as long as the initial difference between the largest and second largest opinion is @math . On the other side, we show that there are cases in which @math rounds are needed, w.h.p. One can beat this lower bound in the synchronous model by combining the two-choices protocol with randomized broadcasting. Our main contribution is a non-trivial adaptation of this approach to the asynchronous model. If the support of the most frequent opinion is at least @math times that of the second-most frequent one and @math , then our protocol achieves the best possible run time of @math , w.h.p. We relax full synchronicity by allowing @math nodes to be poorly synchronized, and the well synchronized nodes are only required to be within a certain time difference from one another. We enforce this synchronicity by introducing a novel gadget into the protocol. This paper studies the problem of constructing a minimum-weight spanning tree (MST) in a distributed network. This is one of the most important problems in the area of distributed computing. There is a long line of gradually improving protocols for this problem, and the state of the art today is a protocol with running time O(Λ(G)+n⋅log∗n) due to Kutten and Peleg [S. Kutten, D. Peleg, Fast distributed construction of k-dominating sets and applications, J. Algorithms 28 (1998) 40–66; preliminary version appeared in: Proc. of 14th ACM Symp. on Principles of Distributed Computing, Ottawa, Canada, August 1995, pp. 20–27], where Λ(G) denotes the diameter of the graph G. Peleg and Rubinovich [D. Peleg, V. Rubinovich, A near-tight lower bound on the time complexity of distributed MST construction, in: Proc. 40th IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science, 1999, pp. 253–261] have shown that Ω˜(n) time is required for constructing MST even on graphs of small diameter, and claimed that their result “establishes the asymptotic near-optimality” of the protocol of [S. Kutten, D. Peleg, Fast distributed construction of k-dominating sets and applications, J. Algorithms 28 (1998) 40–66; preliminary version appeared in: Proc. of 14th ACM Symp. on Principles of Distributed Computing, Ottawa, Canada, August 1995, pp. 20–27]. In this paper we refine this claim, and devise a protocol that constructs the MST in Ω˜(μ(G,ω)+n) rounds, where μ(G,ω) is the MST-radius of the graph. The ratio between the diameter and the MST-radius may be as large as Θ(n), and, consequently, on some inputs our protocol is faster than the protocol of [S. Kutten, D. Peleg, Fast distributed construction of k-dominating sets and applications, J. Algorithms 28 (1998) 40–66; preliminary version appeared in: Proc. of 14th ACM Symp. on Principles of Distributed Computing, Ottawa, Canada, August 1995, pp. 20–27] by a factor of Ω˜(n). Also, on every input, the running time of our protocol is never greater than twice the running time of the protocol of [S. Kutten, D. Peleg, Fast distributed construction of k-dominating sets and applications, J. Algorithms 28 (1998) 40–66; preliminary version appeared in: Proc. of 14th ACM Symp. on Principles of Distributed Computing, Ottawa, Canada, August 1995, pp. 20–27]. As part of our protocol for constructing an MST, we develop a protocol for constructing neighborhood covers with a drastically improved running time. The latter result may be of independent interest. In this paper, we study the question of how efficiently a collection of interconnected nodes can perform a global computation in the GOSSIP model of communication. In this model, nodes do not know the global topology of the network, and they may only initiate contact with a single neighbor in each round. This model contrasts with the much less restrictive LOCAL model, where a node may simultaneously communicate with all of its neighbors in a single round. A basic question in this setting is how many rounds of communication are required for the information dissemination problem, in which each node has some piece of information and is required to collect all others. In the LOCAL model, this is quite simple: each node broadcasts all of its information in each round, and the number of rounds required will be equal to the diameter of the underlying communication graph. In the GOSSIP model, each node must independently choose a single neighbor to contact, and the lack of global information makes it difficult to make any sort of principled choice. As such, researchers have focused on the uniform gossip algorithm, in which each node independently selects a neighbor uniformly at random. When the graph is well-connected, this works quite well. In a string of beautiful papers, researchers proved a sequence of successively stronger bounds on the number of rounds required in terms of the conductance φ and graph size n, culminating in a bound of O(φ-1 log n). In this paper, we show that a fairly simple modification of the protocol gives an algorithm that solves the information dissemination problem in at most O(D + polylog (n)) rounds in a network of diameter D, with no dependence on the conductance. This is at most an additive polylogarithmic factor from the trivial lower bound of D, which applies even in the LOCAL model. In fact, we prove that something stronger is true: any algorithm that requires T rounds in the LOCAL model can be simulated in O(T + polylog(n)) rounds in the GOSSIP model. We thus prove that these two models of distributed computation are essentially equivalent.