In this paper we analyze boosting algorithms in linear regression from a new perspective: that of modern first-order methods in convex optimization. We show that classic boosting algorithms in linear regression, namely the incremental forward stagewise algorithm (FS @math ) and least squares boosting (LS-Boost( @math )), can be viewed as subgradient descent to minimize the loss function defined as the maximum absolute correlation between the features and residuals. We also propose a modification of FS @math that yields an algorithm for the Lasso, and that may be easily extended to an algorithm that computes the Lasso path for different values of the regularization parameter. Furthermore, we show that these new algorithms for the Lasso may also be interpreted as the same master algorithm (subgradient descent), applied to a regularized version of the maximum absolute correlation loss function. We derive novel, comprehensive computational guarantees for several boosting algorithms in linear regression (including LS-Boost( @math ) and FS @math ) by using techniques of modern first-order methods in convex optimization. Our computational guarantees inform us about the statistical properties of boosting algorithms. In particular they provide, for the first time, a precise theoretical description of the amount of data-fidelity and regularization imparted by running a boosting algorithm with a prespecified learning rate for a fixed but arbitrary number of iterations, for any dataset.
A parallel line of work in machine learning @cite_43 explores the scope of boosting-like algorithms on @math -regularized versions of different loss functions arising mainly in the context of classification problems. The proposal of @cite_43 , when adapted to the least squares regression problem with @math -regularization penalty, leads to the following optimization problem: for which the authors @cite_43 employ greedy coordinate descent methods. Like the boosting algorithms considered herein, at each iteration the algorithm studied by @cite_43 selects a certain coefficient @math to update, leaving all other coefficients @math unchanged. The amount with which to update the coefficient @math is determined by fully optimizing the loss function with respect to @math , again holding all other coefficients constant (note that one recovers @math if @math ). This way of updating @math leads to a simple soft-thresholding operation @cite_7 and is different from forward stagewise update rules. In contrast, the boosting algorithm @math that we propose here is based on subgradient descent on the dual of the problem , i.e., problem .
@cite_43 @cite_7
2099119387 2162139029 2125607229 2153656574
We study the performance of a family of randomized parallel coordinate descent methods for minimizing the sum of a nonsmooth and separable convex functions. The problem class includes as a special case L1-regularized L1 regression and the minimization of the exponential loss ("AdaBoost problem"). We assume the input data defining the loss function is contained in a sparse @math matrix @math with at most @math nonzeros in each row. Our methods need @math iterations to find an approximate solution with high probability, where @math is the number of processors and @math for the fastest variant. The notation hides dependence on quantities such as the required accuracy and confidence levels and the distance of the starting iterate from an optimal point. Since @math is a decreasing function of @math , the method needs fewer iterations when more processors are used. Certain variants of our algorithms perform on average only @math arithmetic operations during a single iteration per processor and, because @math decreases when @math does, fewer iterations are needed for sparser problems. Boosting is one of the most significant advances in machine learning for classification and regression. In its original and computationally flexible version, boosting seeks to minimize empirically a loss function in a greedy fashion. The resulting estimator takes an additive function form and is built iteratively by applying a base estimator (or learner) to updated samples depending on the previous iterations. An unusual regularization technique, early stopping, is employed based on CV or a test set. This paper studies numerical convergence, consistency and statistical rates of convergence of boosting with early stopping, when it is carried out over the linear span of a family of basis functions. For general loss functions, we prove the convergence of boosting's greedy optimization to the infinimum of the loss function over the linear span. Using the numerical convergence result, we find early-stopping strategies under which boosting is shown to be consistent based on i.i.d. samples, and we obtain bounds on the rates of convergence for boosting estimators. Simulation studies are also presented to illustrate the relevance of our theoretical results for providing insights to practical aspects of boosting. As a side product, these results also reveal the importance of restricting the greedy search step-sizes. as known in practice through the work of Friedman and others. Moreover, our results lead to a rigorous proof that for a linearly separable problem, AdaBoost with E → 0 step-size becomes an L 1 -margin maximizer when left to run to convergence. We study boosting algorithms from a new perspective. We show that the Lagrange dual problems of l1-norm-regularized AdaBoost, LogitBoost, and soft-margin LPBoost with generalized hinge loss are all entropy maximization problems. By looking at the dual problems of these boosting algorithms, we show that the success of boosting algorithms can be understood in terms of maintaining a better margin distribution by maximizing margins and at the same time controlling the margin variance. We also theoretically prove that approximately, l1-norm-regularized AdaBoost maximizes the average margin, instead of the minimum margin. The duality formulation also enables us to develop column-generation-based optimization algorithms, which are totally corrective. We show that they exhibit almost identical classification results to that of standard stagewise additive boosting algorithms but with much faster convergence rates. Therefore, fewer weak classifiers are needed to build the ensemble using our proposed optimization technique. We consider the problem of learning an unknown large-margin halfspace in the context of parallel computation, giving both positive and negative results. As our main positive result, we give a parallel algorithm for learning a large-margin half-space, based on an algorithm of Nesterov's that performs gradient descent with a momentum term. We show that this algorithm can learn an unknown γ-margin halfspace over n dimensions using n ċ poly(1 γ) processors and running in time O(1 γ)+O(log n). In contrast, naive parallel algorithms that learn a γ-margin halfspace in time that depends polylogarithmically on n have an inverse quadratic running time dependence on the margin parameter γ. Our negative result deals with boosting, which is a standard approach to learning large-margin halfspaces. We prove that in the original PAC framework, in which a weak learning algorithm is provided as an oracle that is called by the booster, boosting cannot be parallelized. More precisely, we show that, if the algorithm is allowed to call the weak learner multiple times in parallel within a single boosting stage, this ability does not reduce the overall number of successive stages of boosting needed for learning by even a single stage. Our proof is information-theoretic and does not rely on unproven assumptions.