Since word embeddings have been the most popular input for many NLP tasks, evaluating their quality is of critical importance. Most research efforts are focusing on English word embeddings. This paper addresses the problem of constructing and evaluating such models for the Greek language. We created a new word analogy corpus considering the original English Word2vec word analogy corpus and some specific linguistic aspects of the Greek language as well. Moreover, we created a Greek version of WordSim353 corpora for a basic evaluation of word similarities. We tested seven word vector models and our evaluation showed that we are able to create meaningful representations. Last, we discovered that the morphological complexity of the Greek language and polysemy can influence the quality of the resulting word embeddings.
Most of the proposed evaluation schemes are based on word analogies that were presented in @cite_5 for English. However, there are several publications about other languages as well. For the Arabic language @cite_24 , a benchmark has been created so that it can be utilized to perform intrinsic evaluation of different word embeddings. It consists of nine relations, each consisting of over 100 word pairs. Next, an evaluation analogy corpus has been proposed for Croatian @cite_15 , which it consists of two groups of analogy questions, one for semantic analogies and one for syntactic as in the original one presented in @cite_5 for the English language. Semantic questions are divided into 9 categories, each having around 20-100 question pairs. The Syntactic part of corpus is divided into 14 categories. Moreover, research on the evaluation of word embeddings has been published for the Polish language @cite_20 as well as Czech @cite_23 . To the best of our knowledge, no work has been done so far on the evaluation of word embeddings produced from Greek text data.
@cite_24 @cite_23 @cite_5 @cite_15 @cite_20
2336505456 2152180407 2038227658 2159495802
Despite interest in using cross-lingual knowledge to learn word embeddings for various tasks, a systematic comparison of the possible approaches is lacking in the literature. We perform an extensive evaluation of four popular approaches of inducing cross-lingual embeddings, each requiring a different form of supervision, on four typographically different language pairs. Our evaluation setup spans four different tasks, including intrinsic evaluation on mono-lingual and cross-lingual similarity, and extrinsic evaluation on downstream semantic and syntactic applications. We show that models which require expensive cross-lingual knowledge almost always perform better, but cheaply supervised models often prove competitive on certain tasks. In Semantic Textual Similarity (STS), systems rate the degree of semantic equivalence, on a graded scale from 0 to 5, with 5 being the most similar. This year we set up two tasks: (i) a core task (CORE), and (ii) a typed-similarity task (TYPED). CORE is similar in set up to SemEval STS 2012 task with pairs of sentences from sources related to those of 2012, yet different in genre from the 2012 set, namely, this year we included newswire headlines, machine translation evaluation datasets and multiple lexical resource glossed sets. TYPED, on the other hand, is novel and tries to characterize why two items are deemed similar, using cultural heritage items which are described with metadata such as title, author or description. Several types of similarity have been defined, including similar author, similar time period or similar location. The annotation for both tasks leverages crowdsourcing, with relative high interannotator correlation, ranging from 62 to 87 . The CORE task attracted 34 participants with 89 runs, and the TYPED task attracted 6 teams with 14 runs. We present an algorithm for learning from unlabeled text, based on the Vector Space Model (VSM) of information retrieval, that can solve verbal analogy questions of the kind found in the SAT college entrance exam. A verbal analogy has the form A:B::C:D, meaning "A is to B as C is to D"; for example, mason:stone::carpenter:wood. SAT analogy questions provide a word pair, A:B, and the problem is to select the most analogous word pair, C:D, from a set of five choices. The VSM algorithm correctly answers 47 of a collection of 374 college-level analogy questions (random guessing would yield 20 correct; the average college-bound senior high school student answers about 57 correctly). We motivate this research by applying it to a difficult problem in natural language processing, determining semantic relations in noun-modifier pairs. The problem is to classify a noun-modifier pair, such as "laser printer", according to the semantic relation between the noun (printer) and the modifier (laser). We use a supervised nearest-neighbour algorithm that assigns a class to a given noun-modifier pair by finding the most analogous noun-modifier pair in the training data. With 30 classes of semantic relations, on a collection of 600 labeled noun-modifier pairs, the learning algorithm attains an F value of 26.5 (random guessing: 3.3 ). With 5 classes of semantic relations, the F value is 43.2 (random: 20 ). The performance is state-of-the-art for both verbal analogies and noun-modifier relations. Recognizing analogies, synonyms, antonyms, and associations appear to be four distinct tasks, requiring distinct NLP algorithms. In the past, the four tasks have been treated independently, using a wide variety of algorithms. These four semantic classes, however, are a tiny sample of the full range of semantic phenomena, and we cannot afford to create ad hoc algorithms for each semantic phenomenon; we need to seek a unified approach. We propose to subsume a broad range of phenomena under analogies. To limit the scope of this paper, we restrict our attention to the subsumption of synonyms, antonyms, and associations. We introduce a supervised corpus-based machine learning algorithm for classifying analogous word pairs, and we show that it can solve multiple-choice SAT analogy questions, TOEFL synonym questions, ESL synonym-antonym questions, and similar-associated-both questions from cognitive psychology.