This paper aims to introduces a new algorithm for automatic speech-to-text summarization based on statistical divergences of probabilities and graphs. The input is a text from speech conversations with noise, and the output a compact text summary. Our results, on the pilot task CCCS Multiling 2015 French corpus are very encouraging
@cite_1 developed a method to generate automatic summaries by identifying and synthesizing similar elements in a cluster of documents. This method creates the summary based on similarity between the sentences and topic. @cite_24 described an approach to fusion sentences through the text-to-text technique, to synthesize repeated information from multiple documents. This method uses a syntactic alignment in sentences to identify common information. After the identification step, sentences are processed and a new text is generated with the same content.
@cite_24 @cite_1
2012561700 2118733980 1967082914 2053818817
A system that can produce informative summaries, highlighting common information found in many online documents, will help Web users to pinpoint information that they need without extensive reading. In this article, we introduce sentence fusion, a novel text-to-text generation technique for synthesizing common information across documents. Sentence fusion involves bottom-up local multisequence alignment to identify phrases conveying similar information and statistical generation to combine common phrases into a sentence. Sentence fusion moves the summarization field from the use of purely extractive methods to the generation of abstracts that contain sentences not found in any of the input documents and can synthesize information across sources. We present a method to automatically generate a concise summary by identifying and synthesizing similar elements across related text from a set of multiple documents. Our approach is unique in its usage of language generation to reformulate the wording of the summary. In this paper, we propose two generic text summarization methods that create text summaries by ranking and extracting sentences from the original documents. The first method uses standard IR methods to rank sentence relevances, while the second method uses the latent semantic analysis technique to identify semantically important sentences, for summary creations. Both methods strive to select sentences that are highly ranked and different from each other. This is an attempt to create a summary with a wider coverage of the document's main content and less redundancy. Performance evaluations on the two summarization methods are conducted by comparing their summarization outputs with the manual summaries generated by three independent human evaluators. The evaluations also study the influence of different VSM weighting schemes on the text summarization performances. Finally, the causes of the large disparities in the evaluators' manual summarization results are investigated, and discussions on human text summarization patterns are presented. One of the important Natural Language Processing applications is Text Summarization, which helps users to manage the vast amount of information available, by condensing documents' content and extracting the most relevant facts or topics included. Text Summarization can be classified according to the type of summary: extractive, and abstractive. Extractive summary is the procedure of identifying important sections of the text and producing them verbatim while abstractive summary aims to produce important material in a new generalized form. In this paper, a novel approach is presented to create an abstractive summary for a single document using a rich semantic graph reducing technique. The approach summaries the input document by creating a rich semantic graph for the original document, reducing the generated graph, and then generating the abstractive summary from the reduced graph. Besides, a simulated case study is presented to show how the original text was minimized to fifty percent.