We consider the multivariate interlace polynomial introduced by Courcelle (Electron. J. Comb. 15(1), 2008), which generalizes several interlace polynomials defined by Arratia, Bollobas, and Sorkin (J. Comb. Theory Ser. B 92(2):199---233, 2004) and by Aigner and van der Holst (Linear Algebra Appl., 2004). We present an algorithm to evaluate the multivariate interlace polynomial of a graph with n vertices given a tree decomposition of the graph of width k. The best previously known result (Courcelle, Electron. J. Comb. 15(1), 2008) employs a general logical framework and leads to an algorithm with running time f(k)?n, where f(k) is doubly exponential in k. Analyzing the GF(2)-rank of adjacency matrices in the context of tree decompositions, we give a faster and more direct algorithm. Our algorithm uses @math arithmetic operations and can be efficiently implemented in parallel.
The monadic second order logic approach is very general and can be applied not only to the interlace polynomial but to a much wider class of graph polynomials @cite_24 . However, it does not consider characteristic properties of the actual graph polynomial. In this paper, we restrict ourselves to the interlace polynomial so as to exploit its specific properties and to gain a more efficient algorithm (Algorithm ). Our algorithm performs @math arithmetic operations to evaluate Courcelle's multivariate interlace polynomial (and thus any other version of the interlace polynomial mentioned above) on an @math -vertex graph given a tree decomposition of width @math (Theorem ). The algorithm can be implemented in parallel using depth polylogarithmic in @math (). Apart from evaluating the interlace polynomial, our approach can also be used to compute coefficients of the interlace polynomial, for example so called @math -truncations [Section 5] courcelle_interlace_final (). Our approach is not via logic but via the @math -rank of adjacency matrices, which is specific to the interlace polynomial.
@cite_24
2295840581 2531021157 2084050956 2016576580
We show an exponential separation between two well-studied models of algebraic computation, namely read-once oblivious algebraic branching programs (ROABPs) and multilinear depth three circuits. In particular we show the following: 1. There exists an explicit n-variate polynomial computable by linear sized multilinear depth three circuits (with only two product gates) such that every ROABP computing it requires 2^ Omega(n) size. 2. Any multilinear depth three circuit computing IMM_ n,d (the iterated matrix multiplication polynomial formed by multiplying d, n * n symbolic matrices) has n^ Omega(d) size. IMM_ n,d can be easily computed by a poly(n,d) sized ROABP. 3. Further, the proof of 2 yields an exponential separation between multilinear depth four and multilinear depth three circuits: There is an explicit n-variate, degree d polynomial computable by a poly(n,d) sized multilinear depth four circuit such that any multilinear depth three circuit computing it has size n^ Omega(d) . This improves upon the quasi-polynomial separation result by Raz and Yehudayoff [2009] between these two models. The hard polynomial in 1 is constructed using a novel application of expander graphs in conjunction with the evaluation dimension measure used previously in Nisan [1991], Raz [2006,2009], Raz and Yehudayoff [2009], and Forbes and Shpilka [2013], while 2 is proved via a new adaptation of the dimension of the partial derivatives measure used by Nisan and Wigderson [1997]. Our lower bounds hold over any field. In our LICS 2004 paper we introduced an approach to the study of the local structure of finite algebras and relational structures that aims at applications in the Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP). This approach involves a graph associated with an algebra @math or a relational structure A, whose vertices are the elements of @math (or A), the edges represent subsets of @math such that the restriction of some term operation of @math is ‘good’ on the subset, that is, act as an operation of one of the 3 types: semilattice, majority, or affine. In this paper we significantly refine and advance this approach. In particular, we prove certain connectivity and rectangularity properties of relations over algebras related to components of the graph connected by semilattice and affine edges. We also prove a result similar to 2-decomposition of relations invariant under a majority operation, only here we do not impose any restrictions on the relation. These results allow us to give a new, somewhat more intuitive proof of the bounded width theorem: the CSP over algebra @math has bounded width if and only if @math does not contain affine edges. Actually, this result shows that bounded width implies width (2,3). We also consider algebras with edges from a restricted set of types. In particular, it can be proved that type restrictions are preserved under the standard algebraic constructions. Finally, we prove that algebras without semilattice edges have few subalgebras of powers, that is, the CSP over such algebras is also polynomial time. We show that, over Q, if an n-variate polynomial of degree d = nO(1) is computable by an arithmetic circuit of size s (respectively by an arithmetic branching program of size s) then it can also be computed by a depth three circuit (i.e. a ΣΠΣ-circuit) of size exp(O(√(d log n log d log s))) (respectively of size exp(O(√(d log n log s))). In particular this yields a ΣΠΣ circuit of size exp(O(√(d log d))) computing the d × d determinant Detd. It also means that if we can prove a lower bound of exp(omega(√(d log d))) on the size of any ΣΠΣ-circuit computing the d × d permanent Permd then we get super polynomial lower bounds for the size of any arithmetic branching program computing Permd. We then give some further results pertaining to derandomizing polynomial identity testing and circuit lower bounds. The ΣΠΣ circuits that we construct have the property that (some of) the intermediate polynomials have degree much higher than d. Indeed such a counterintuitive construction is unavoidable - it is known that in any ΣΠΣ circuit C computing either Detd or Perm_d, if every multiplication gate has fanin at most d (or any constant multiple thereof) then C must have size at least exp(Ω(d)). In their paper on the ''chasm at depth four'', Agrawal and Vinay have shown that polynomials in m variables of degree O(m) which admit arithmetic circuits of size 2^o^(^m^) also admit arithmetic circuits of depth four and size 2^o^(^m^). This theorem shows that for problems such as arithmetic circuit lower bounds or black-box derandomization of identity testing, the case of depth four circuits is in a certain sense the general case. In this paper we show that smaller depth four circuits can be obtained if we start from polynomial size arithmetic circuits. For instance, we show that if the permanent of nxn matrices has circuits of size polynomial in n, then it also has depth 4 circuits of size n^O^(^n^l^o^g^n^). If the original circuit uses only integer constants of polynomial size, then the same is true for the resulting depth four circuit. These results have potential applications to lower bounds and deterministic identity testing, in particular for sums of products of sparse univariate polynomials. We also use our techniques to reprove two results on: -the existence of nontrivial boolean circuits of constant depth for languages in LOGCFL; -reduction to polylogarithmic depth for arithmetic circuits of polynomial size and polynomially bounded degree.