Process consistency checking (PCC), an interdiscipline of natural language processing (NLP) and business process management (BPM), aims to quantify the degree of (in)consistencies between graphical and textual descriptions of a process. However, previous studies heavily depend on a great deal of complex expert-defined knowledge such as alignment rules and assessment metrics, thus suffer from the problems of low accuracy and poor adaptability when applied in open-domain scenarios. To address the above issues, this paper makes the first attempt that uses deep learning to perform PCC. Specifically, we proposed TraceWalk, using semantic information of process graphs to learn latent node representations, and integrates it into a convolutional neural network (CNN) based model called TraceNet to predict consistencies. The theoretical proof formally provides the PCC's lower limit and experimental results demonstrate that our approach performs more accurately than state-of-the-art baselines.
Recently, some NLP techniques are applied to address a variety of use cases in the context of BPM. This includes a variety of works that focus on process graph labels, for example by annotating process graph elements and correcting linguistic guideline violations @cite_19 , investigating the problem of mixing graphical and textual languages @cite_1 , or resolving lexical ambiguities in process graphs labels @cite_25 @cite_11 . Other use cases involve process texts generation @cite_6 or process graph extraction @cite_4 . However, these methods have been found to produce inaccurate results and require extensive manual participation.
@cite_4 @cite_1 @cite_6 @cite_19 @cite_25 @cite_11
1747312753 2149791639 2962809918 2411480514
Many NLP tasks make predictions that are inherently coupled to syntactic relations, but for many languages the resources required to provide such syntactic annotations are unavailable. For others it is unclear exactly how much of the syntactic annotations can be effectively leveraged with current models, and what structures in the syntactic trees are most relevant to the current task. We propose a novel method which avoids the need for any syntactically annotated data when predicting a related NLP task. Our method couples latent syntactic representations, constrained to form valid dependency graphs or constituency parses, with the prediction task via specialized factors in a Markov random field. At both training and test time we marginalize over this hidden structure, learning the optimal latent representations for the problem. Results show that this approach provides significant gains over a syntactically un-informed baseline, outperforming models that observe syntax on an English relation extraction task, and performing comparably to them in semantic role labeling. Supervised approaches to NLP tasks rely on high-quality data annotations, which typically result from expensive manual labelling procedures. For some tasks, however, the subjectivity of human judgements might reduce the usefulness of the annotation for real-world applications. In Machine Translation (MT) Quality Estimation (QE), for instance, using humanannotated data to train a binary classifier that discriminates between good (useful for a post-editor) and bad translations is not trivial. Focusing on this binary task, we show that subjective human judgements can be effectively replaced with an automatic annotation procedure. To this aim, we compare binary classifiers trained on different data: the human-annotated dataset from the 7 th Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation (WMT-12), and an automatically labelled version of the same corpus. Our results show that human labels are less suitable for the task. Enabling a computer to understand a document so that it can answer comprehension questions is a central, yet unsolved goal of NLP. A key factor impeding its solution by machine learned systems is the limited availability of human-annotated data. (2015) seek to solve this problem by creating over a million training examples by pairing CNN and Daily Mail news articles with their summarized bullet points, and show that a neural network can then be trained to give good performance on this task. In this paper, we conduct a thorough examination of this new reading comprehension task. Our primary aim is to understand what depth of language understanding is required to do well on this task. We approach this from one side by doing a careful hand-analysis of a small subset of the problems and from the other by showing that simple, carefully designed systems can obtain accuracies of 72.4 and 75.8 on these two datasets, exceeding current state-of-the-art results by over 5 and approaching what we believe is the ceiling for performance on this task.1 Enabling a computer to understand a document so that it can answer comprehension questions is a central, yet unsolved goal of NLP. A key factor impeding its solution by machine learned systems is the limited availability of human-annotated data. (2015) seek to solve this problem by creating over a million training examples by pairing CNN and Daily Mail news articles with their summarized bullet points, and show that a neural network can then be trained to give good performance on this task. In this paper, we conduct a thorough examination of this new reading comprehension task. Our primary aim is to understand what depth of language understanding is required to do well on this task. We approach this from one side by doing a careful hand-analysis of a small subset of the problems and from the other by showing that simple, carefully designed systems can obtain accuracies of 73.6 and 76.6 on these two datasets, exceeding current state-of-the-art results by 7-10 and approaching what we believe is the ceiling for performance on this task.