In this paper we explore how actor-critic methods in deep reinforcement learning, in particular Asynchronous Advantage Actor-Critic (A3C), can be extended with agent modeling. Inspired by recent works on representation learning and multiagent deep reinforcement learning, we propose two architectures to perform agent modeling: the first one based on parameter sharing, and the second one based on agent policy features. Both architectures aim to learn other agents' policies as auxiliary tasks, besides the standard actor (policy) and critic (values). We performed experiments in both cooperative and competitive domains. The former is a problem of coordinated multiagent object transportation and the latter is a two-player mini version of the Pommerman game. Our results show that the proposed architectures stabilize learning and outperform the standard A3C architecture when learning a best response in terms of expected rewards.
Deep Reinforcement Opponent Network (DRON) @cite_5 was the first DRL work that performed opponent modeling. DRON's idea is to have two networks: one learns @math values (similar to DQN @cite_2 ) and a second learns a representation of the opponent's policy. DRON used hand-crafted features to define the opponent network. In contrast, Deep Policy Inference Q-Network (DPIQN) and Deep Policy Inference Recurrent Q-Network (DPIRQN) @cite_0 learned opponent directly from raw observations of the other agents. The way to learn these policy features is by means of auxiliary tasks @cite_19 that provide additional learning goals; in this case, the auxiliary task is to learn the opponent's policy. Then, the @math value function of the learning agent is conditioned on the policy features, which aim to reduce the non-stationarity of the multiagent environment. In contrast, our proposals do not need an experience replay buffer, learn completely on-policy and we make use of full parameter sharing @cite_23 .
@cite_0 @cite_19 @cite_23 @cite_2 @cite_5
2963259091 2152342063 2603550564 2904455790
We present DPIQN, a deep policy inference Q-network that targets multi-agent systems composed of controllable agents, collaborators, and opponents that interact with each other. We focus on one challenging issue in such systems---modeling agents with varying strategies---and propose to employ "policy features'' learned from raw observations (e.g., raw images) of collaborators and opponents by inferring their policies. DPIQN incorporates the learned policy features as a hidden vector into its own deep Q-network (DQN), such that it is able to predict better Q values for the controllable agents than the state-of-the-art deep reinforcement learning models. We further propose an enhanced version of DPIQN, called deep recurrent policy inference Q-network (DRPIQN), for handling partial observability. Both DPIQN and DRPIQN are trained by an adaptive training procedure, which adjusts the network's attention to learn the policy features and its own Q-values at different phases of the training process. We present a comprehensive analysis of DPIQN and DRPIQN, and highlight their effectiveness and generalizability in various multi-agent settings. Our models are evaluated in a classic soccer game involving both competitive and collaborative scenarios. Experimental results performed on 1 vs. 1 and 2 vs. 2 games show that DPIQN and DRPIQN demonstrate superior performance to the baseline DQN and deep recurrent Q-network (DRQN) models. We also explore scenarios in which collaborators or opponents dynamically change their policies, and show that DPIQN and DRPIQN do lead to better overall performance in terms of stability and mean scores. We use single-agent and multi-agent Reinforcement Learning (RL) for learning dialogue policies in a resource allocation negotiation scenario. Two agents learn concurrently by interacting with each other without any need for simulated users (SUs) to train against or corpora to learn from. In particular, we compare the Qlearning, Policy Hill-Climbing (PHC) and Win or Learn Fast Policy Hill-Climbing (PHC-WoLF) algorithms, varying the scenario complexity (state space size), the number of training episodes, the learning rate, and the exploration rate. Our results show that generally Q-learning fails to converge whereas PHC and PHC-WoLF always converge and perform similarly. We also show that very high gradually decreasing exploration rates are required for convergence. We conclude that multiagent RL of dialogue policies is a promising alternative to using single-agent RL and SUs or learning directly from corpora. Standard deep reinforcement learning methods such as Deep Q-Networks (DQN) for multiple tasks (domains) face scalability problems due to large search spaces. This paper proposes a three-stage method for multi-domain dialogue policy learning-termed NDQN, and applies it to an information-seeking spoken dialogue system in the domains of restaurants and hotels. In this method, the first stage does multi-policy learning via a network of DQN agents; the second makes use of compact state representations by compressing raw inputs; and the third stage applies a pre-training phase for bootstraping the behaviour of agents in the network. Experimental results comparing DQN (baseline) versus NDQN (proposed) using simulations report that the proposed method exhibits better scalability and is promising for optimising the behaviour of multi-domain dialogue systems. An additional evaluation reports that the NDQN agents outperformed a K-Nearest Neighbour baseline in task success and dialogue length, yielding more efficient and successful dialogues. Despite the recent advances of deep reinforcement learning (DRL), agents trained by DRL tend to be brittle and sensitive to the training environment, especially in the multi-agent scenarios. In the multi-agent setting, a DRL agent’s policy can easily get stuck in a poor local optima w.r.t. its training partners – the learned policy may be only locally optimal to other agents’ current policies. In this paper, we focus on the problem of training robust DRL agents with continuous actions in the multi-agent learning setting so that the trained agents can still generalize when its opponents’ policies alter. To tackle this problem, we proposed a new algorithm, MiniMax Multi-agent Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (M3DDPG) with the following contributions: (1) we introduce a minimax extension of the popular multi-agent deep deterministic policy gradient algorithm (MADDPG), for robust policy learning; (2) since the continuous action space leads to computational intractability in our minimax learning objective, we propose Multi-Agent Adversarial Learning (MAAL) to efficiently solve our proposed formulation. We empirically evaluate our M3DDPG algorithm in four mixed cooperative and competitive multi-agent environments and the agents trained by our method significantly outperforms existing baselines.