Random Forest (RF) is an ensemble supervised machine learning technique that was developed by Breiman over a decade ago. Compared with other ensemble techniques, it has proved its accuracy and superiority. Many researchers, however, believe that there is still room for enhancing and improving its performance accuracy. This explains why, over the past decade, there have been many extensions of RF where each extension employed a variety of techniques and strategies to improve certain aspect(s) of RF. Since it has been proven empiricallthat ensembles tend to yield better results when there is a significant diversity among the constituent models, the objective of this paper is twofold. First, it investigates how data clustering (a well known diversity technique) can be applied to identify groups of similar decision trees in an RF in order to eliminate redundant trees by selecting a representative from each group (cluster). Second, these likely diverse representatives are then used to produce an extension of RF termed CLUB-DRF that is much smaller in size than RF, and yet performs at least as good as RF, and mostly exhibits higher performance in terms of accuracy. The latter refers to a known technique called ensemble pruning. Experimental results on 15 real datasets from the UCI repository prove the superiority of our proposed extension over the traditional RF. Most of our experiments achieved at least 95 or above pruning level while retaining or outperforming the RF accuracy.
G. @cite_20 also categorized ensemble diversity techniques into three categories: starting point in hypothesis space, set of accessible hypotheses, and manipulation of training data. Methods in the first category use different starting points in the hypothesis space, therefore, influencing the convergence place within the space. Because of their poor performance of achieving diversity, such methods are used by many authors as a default benchmark for their own methods @cite_35 . Methods in the second category vary the set of hypotheses that are available and accessible by the ensemble. For different ensembles, these methods vary either the training data used or the architecture employed. In the third category, the methods alter the way space is traversed. Occupying any point in the search space, gives a particular hypothesis. The type of the ensemble obtained will be determined by how the space of the possible hypotheses is traversed.
@cite_35 @cite_20
2106979123 2167055186 2762596667 2006721374
Ensemble methods, which train multiple learners for a task, are among the state-of-the-art learning approaches. The diversity of the component learners has been recognized as a key to a good ensemble, and existing ensemble methods try different ways to encourage diversity, mostly by heuristics. In this paper, we propose the diversity regularized machine (DRM) in a mathematical programming framework, which efficiently generates an ensemble of diverse support vector machines (SVMs). Theoretical analysis discloses that the diversity constraint used in DRM can lead to an effective reduction on its hypothesis space complexity, implying that the diversity control in ensemble methods indeed plays a role of regularization as in popular statistical learning approaches. Experiments show that DRM can significantly improve generalization ability and is superior to some state-of-the-art SVM ensemble methods. Ensemble approaches to classication and regression have attracted a great deal of interest in recent years. These methods can be shown both theoretically and empirically to outperform single predictors on a wide range of tasks. One of the elements required for accurate prediction when using an ensemble is recognised to be error ". However, the exact meaning of this concept is not clear from the literature, particularly for classication tasks. In this paper we rst review the varied attempts to provide a formal explanation of error diversity, including several heuristic and qualitative explanations in the literature. For completeness of discussion we include not only the classication literature but also some excerpts of the rather more mature regression literature, which we believe can still provide some insights. We proceed to survey the various techniques used for creating diverse ensembles, and categorise them, forming a preliminary taxonomy of diversity creation methods. As part of this taxonomy we introduce the idea of implicit and explicit diversity creation methods, and three dimensions along which these may be applied. Finally we propose some new directions that may prove fruitful in understanding classication error diversity. Abstract Nowadays fast-arriving information flows lay the basis of many data mining applications. Such data streams are usually affected by non-stationary events that eventually change their distribution (concept drift), causing that predictive models trained over these data become obsolete and do not adapt suitably to the new distribution. Specially in online learning scenarios, there is a pressing need for new algorithms that adapt to this change as fast as possible, while maintaining good performance scores. Recent studies have revealed that a good strategy is to construct highly diverse ensembles towards utilizing them shortly after the drift (independently from the type of drift) to obtain good performance scores. However, the existence of the so-called trade-off between stability (performance over stable data concepts) and plasticity (recovery and adaptation after drift events) implies that the construction of the ensemble model should account simultaneously for these two conflicting objectives. In this regard, this work presents a new approach to artificially generate an optimal diversity level when building prediction ensembles once shortly after a drift occurs. The approach uses a Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) method to generate synthetic data, which are subsequently labeled by means a multi-objective optimization method that allows training each model of the ensemble with a different subset of synthetic samples. Computational experiments reveal that the proposed approach can be hybridized with other traditional diversity generation approaches, yielding optimized levels of diversity that render an enhanced recovery from drifts. Ensembles of learning machines have been formally and empirically shown to outperform (generalise better than) single predictors in many cases. Evidence suggests that ensembles generalise better when they constitute members which form a diverse and accurate set. Additionally, there have been a multitude of theories on how one can enforce diversity within a combined predictor setup. We recently attempted to integrate these theories together into a co-evolutionary framework with a view to synthesising new evolutionary ensemble learning algorithms using the fact that multi-objective evolutionary optimisation is a formidable ensemble construction technique. This paper explicates on the intricacies of the proposed framework in addition to presenting detailed empirical results and comparisons with a wide range of algorithms in the machine learning literature. The framework treats diversity and accuracy as evolutionary pressures which are exerted at multiple levels of abstraction and is shown to be effective.