@math rounds has been a well known upper bound for rumor spreading using push&pull in the random phone call model (i.e., uniform gossip in the complete graph). A matching lower bound of @math is also known for this special case. Under the assumption of this model and with a natural addition that nodes can call a partner once they learn its address (e.g., its IP address) we present a new distributed, address-oblivious and robust algorithm that uses push&pull with pointer jumping to spread a rumor to all nodes in only @math rounds, w.h.p. This algorithm can also cope with @math node failures, in which case all but @math nodes become informed within @math rounds, w.h.p.
Another line of research was to study (as well as and separately) but not under the uniform gossip model. Censor- @cite_12 , gave an algorithm for all-to-all dissemination in arbitrary graphs which eliminates the dependency on the conductance. For unlimited message sizes (essentially you can send everything you know), their randomized algorithm informs all nodes in @math rounds where @math is the graph diameter; clearly this is tight for many graphs. Quasirandom rumor spreading was first offered by in @cite_4 @cite_27 and showed to outperform the randomize algorithms in some cases (see also @cite_32 for a study of the message complexity of quasirandom rumor spreading). Most recently Haeupler @cite_29 proposed a completely deterministic algorithm that spread a rumor with @math rounds (but also requires unlimited message size).
@cite_4 @cite_29 @cite_32 @cite_27 @cite_12
2078958987 2952550120 2144828388 2068322213
In this paper, we provide a detailed comparison between a fully randomized protocol for rumor spreading on a complete graph and a quasirandom protocol introduced by Doerr, Friedrich, and Sauerwald [Quasirandom rumor spreading, in Proceedings of the 19th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, ACM, New York, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2008, pp. 773-781]. In the former, initially there is one vertex which holds a piece of information, and during each round every one of the informed vertices chooses uniformly at random and independently one of its neighbors and informs it. In the quasirandom version of this method (cf. Doerr, Friedrich, and Sauerwald) each vertex has a cyclic list of its neighbors. Once a vertex has been informed, it chooses uniformly at random only one neighbor. In the following round, it informs this neighbor, and at each subsequent round it picks the next neighbor from its list and informs it. We give a precise analysis of the evolution of the quasirandom protocol on the complete graph with @math vertices and show that it evolves essentially in the same way as the randomized protocol. In particular, if @math denotes the number of rounds that are needed until all vertices are informed, we show that for any slowly growing function @math , we have @math , with probability @math . We study gossip algorithms for the rumor spreading problem which asks each node to deliver a rumor to all nodes in an unknown network. Gossip algorithms allow nodes only to call one neighbor per round and have recently attracted attention as message efficient, simple and robust solutions to the rumor spreading problem. Recently, non-uniform random gossip schemes were devised to allow efficient rumor spreading in networks with bottlenecks. In particular, [Censor-, STOC'12] gave an O(log^3 n) algorithm to solve the 1-local broadcast problem in which each node wants to exchange rumors locally with its 1-neighborhood. By repeatedly applying this protocol one can solve the global rumor spreading quickly for all networks with small diameter, independently of the conductance. This and all prior gossip algorithms for the rumor spreading problem have been inherently randomized in their design and analysis. This resulted in a parallel research direction trying to reduce and determine the amount of randomness needed for efficient rumor spreading. This has been done via lower bounds for restricted models and by designing gossip algorithms with a reduced need for randomness. The general intuition and consensus of these results has been that randomization plays a important role in effectively spreading rumors. In this paper we improves over this state of the art in several ways by presenting a deterministic gossip algorithm that solves the the k-local broadcast problem in 2(k+log n)log n rounds. Besides being the first efficient deterministic solution to the rumor spreading problem this algorithm is interesting in many aspects: It is simpler, more natural, more robust and faster than its randomized pendant and guarantees success with certainty instead of with high probability. Its analysis is furthermore simple, self-contained and fundamentally different from prior works. We propose and analyse a quasirandom analogue to the classical push model for disseminating information in networks ("randomized rumor spreading"). In the classical model, in each round each informed node chooses a neighbor at random and informs it. Results of Frieze and Grimmett (Discrete Appl. Math. 1985) show that this simple protocol succeeds in spreading a rumor from one node of a complete graph to all others within O(log n) rounds. For the network being a hypercube or a random graph G(n, p) with p ≥ (1 +e)(log n) n, also O(log n) rounds suffice (Feige, Peleg. Raghavan, and Upfal, Random Struct. Algorithms 1990). In the quasirandom model, we assume that each node has a (cyclic) list of its neighbors. Once informed, it starts at a random position of the list, but from then on informs its neighbors in the order of the list. Surprisingly, irrespective of the orders of the lists, the above mentioned bounds still hold. In addition, we also show a O(log n) bound for sparsely connected random graphs G(n, p) with p = (log n + f(n)) n, where f(n) → ∞ and f(n) = O(log log n). Here, the classical model needs Θ(log2(n)) rounds. Hence the quasirandom model achieves similar or better broadcasting times with a greatly reduced use of random bits. In this paper, we study the question of how efficiently a collection of interconnected nodes can perform a global computation in the GOSSIP model of communication. In this model, nodes do not know the global topology of the network, and they may only initiate contact with a single neighbor in each round. This model contrasts with the much less restrictive LOCAL model, where a node may simultaneously communicate with all of its neighbors in a single round. A basic question in this setting is how many rounds of communication are required for the information dissemination problem, in which each node has some piece of information and is required to collect all others. In the LOCAL model, this is quite simple: each node broadcasts all of its information in each round, and the number of rounds required will be equal to the diameter of the underlying communication graph. In the GOSSIP model, each node must independently choose a single neighbor to contact, and the lack of global information makes it difficult to make any sort of principled choice. As such, researchers have focused on the uniform gossip algorithm, in which each node independently selects a neighbor uniformly at random. When the graph is well-connected, this works quite well. In a string of beautiful papers, researchers proved a sequence of successively stronger bounds on the number of rounds required in terms of the conductance φ and graph size n, culminating in a bound of O(φ-1 log n). In this paper, we show that a fairly simple modification of the protocol gives an algorithm that solves the information dissemination problem in at most O(D + polylog (n)) rounds in a network of diameter D, with no dependence on the conductance. This is at most an additive polylogarithmic factor from the trivial lower bound of D, which applies even in the LOCAL model. In fact, we prove that something stronger is true: any algorithm that requires T rounds in the LOCAL model can be simulated in O(T + polylog(n)) rounds in the GOSSIP model. We thus prove that these two models of distributed computation are essentially equivalent.