A heuristic framework for a class of robust optimization problems is proposed.The heuristic framework explores dual information.The heuristic is successfully applied to solve two robust optimization problems.The heuristic is able to outperform a widely used 2-approximation procedure.A robust optimization version of the restricted shortest path problem is introduced. This work deals with a class of problems under interval data uncertainty, namely interval robust-hard problems, composed of interval data min-max regret generalizations of classical NP-hard combinatorial problems modeled as 0-1 integer linear programming problems. These problems are more challenging than other interval data min-max regret problems, as solely computing the cost of any feasible solution requires solving an instance of an NP-hard problem. The state-of-the-art exact algorithms in the literature are based on the generation of a possibly exponential number of cuts. As each cut separation involves the resolution of an NP-hard classical optimization problem, the size of the instances that can be solved efficiently is relatively small. To smooth this issue, we present a modeling technique for interval robust-hard problems in the context of a heuristic framework. The heuristic obtains feasible solutions by exploring dual information of a linearly relaxed model associated with the classical optimization problem counterpart. Computational experiments for interval data min-max regret versions of the restricted shortest path problem and the set covering problem show that our heuristic is able to find optimal or near-optimal solutions and also improves the primal bounds obtained by a state-of-the-art exact algorithm and a 2-approximation procedure for interval data min-max regret problems.
The study of approximative procedures for interval min-max regret problems in general is a relatively unexplored field, and not much is known. Conde @cite_14 proved that AMU gives a 2-approximation for an even broader class of min-max regret problems. Precisely, while the works of @cite_46 @cite_12 only address combinatorial (finite and discrete) min-max regret optimization models, Conde @cite_14 extends the 2-approximation result for models with compact constraint sets in general, including continuous ones. Recently, some research has been conducted to refine the constant factor of the aforementioned approximation. For example, in @cite_44 , the author attempts to tighten this factor of 2 through the resolution of a robust optimization problem over a reduced uncertainty cost set. Moreover, in @cite_9 , the authors introduced a new bound that gives an instance dependent performance guarantee of the solution for interval data min-max regret versions of combinatorial problems. They show that the new performance ratio is at most 2, and the bound is successfully applied to solve the interval data min-max regret shortest path problem @cite_26 within a framework.
@cite_14 @cite_26 @cite_9 @cite_44 @cite_46 @cite_12
2051407192 2153675120 2044046971 2001532848
The general problem of minimizing the maximal regret in combinatorial optimization problems with interval data is considered. In many cases, the minmax regret versions of the classical, polynomially solvable, combinatorial optimization problems become NP-hard and no approximation algorithms for them have been known. Our main result is a polynomial time approximation algorithm with a performance ratio of 2 for this class of problems. The minmax regret problem for combinatorial optimization under uncertainty can be viewed as a zero-sum game played between an optimizing player and an adversary, where the optimizing player selects a solution and the adversary selects costs with the intention of maximizing the regret of the player. The conventional minmax regret model considers only deterministic solutions strategies, and minmax regret versions of most polynomial solvable problems are NP-hard. In this paper, we consider a randomized model where the optimizing player selects a probability distribution (corresponding to a mixed strategy) over solutions and the adversary selects costs with knowledge of the player’s distribution, but not its realization. We show that under this randomized model, the minmax regret version of any polynomial solvable combinatorial problem becomes polynomial solvable. This holds true for both interval and discrete scenario representations of uncertainty. Using the randomized model, we show new proofs of existing approximation algorithms for the deterministic model based on primal-dual approaches. We also determine integrality gaps of minmax regret formulations, giving tight bounds on the limits of performance gains from randomization. Finally, we prove that minmax regret problems are NP-hard under general convex uncertainty. The following optimization problem is studied. There are several sets of integer positive numbers whose values are uncertain. The problem is to select one representative of each set such that the sum of the selected numbers is minimum. The uncertainty is modeled by discrete and interval scenarios, and the min–max and min–max (relative) regret approaches are used for making a selection decision. The arising min–max, min–max regret and min–max relative regret optimization problems are shown to be polynomially solvable for interval scenarios. For discrete scenarios, they are proved to be NP-hard in the strong sense if the number of scenarios is part of the input. If it is part of the problem type, then they are NP-hard in the ordinary sense, pseudo-polynomially solvable by a dynamic programming algorithm and possess an FPTAS. This study is motivated by the problem of selecting tools of minimum total cost in the design of a production line. In this note, a 2-approximation method for minmax regret optimization problems is developed which extends the work of Kasperski and Zielinski [A. Kasperski, P. Zielinski, An approximation algorithm for interval data minmax regret combinatorial optimization problems, Information Processing Letters 97 (2006) 177-180] from finite to compact constraint sets.