We show that for the problem of testing if a matrix @math has rank at most @math , or requires changing an @math -fraction of entries to have rank at most @math , there is a non-adaptive query algorithm making @math queries. Our algorithm works for any field @math . This improves upon the previous @math bound (SODA'03), and bypasses an @math lower bound of (KDD'14) which holds if the algorithm is required to read a submatrix. Our algorithm is the first such algorithm which does not read a submatrix, and instead reads a carefully selected non-adaptive pattern of entries in rows and columns of @math . We complement our algorithm with a matching query complexity lower bound for non-adaptive testers over any field. We also give tight bounds of @math queries in the sensing model for which query access comes in the form of @math ; perhaps surprisingly these bounds do not depend on @math . We next develop a novel property testing framework for testing numerical properties of a real-valued matrix @math more generally, which includes the stable rank, Schatten- @math norms, and SVD entropy. Specifically, we propose a bounded entry model, where @math is required to have entries bounded by @math in absolute value. We give upper and lower bounds for a wide range of problems in this model, and discuss connections to the sensing model above.
Our non-adaptive sample complexity bound of @math matches what is known with adaptive queries @cite_27 , and thus we show the best known upper bound might as well be non-adaptive.
@cite_27
2171200367 2593853527 2267350596 2168831133
We prove new upper and lower bounds on the sample complexity of (a#x03B5;, a#x03B4;) differentially private algorithms for releasing approximate answers to threshold functions. A threshold function cx over a totally ordered domain X evaluates to cx(y) = 1 if y a#x2264; x, and evaluates to 0 otherwise. We give the first nontrivial lower bound for releasing thresholds with (a#x03B5;, a#x03B4;) differential privacy, showing that the task is impossible over an infinite domain X, and moreover requires sample complexity n a#x2265; (log* |X|), which grows with the size of the domain. Inspired by the techniques used to prove this lower bound, we give an algorithm for releasing thresholds with n a#x2264; 2(1+o(1)) log* |X| samples. This improves the previous best upper bound of 8(1+o(1)) log* |X| (, RANDOM'13). Our sample complexity upper and lower bounds also apply to the tasks of learning distributions with respect to Kolmogorov distance and of properly PAC learning thresholds with differential privacy. The lower bound gives the first separation between the sample complexity of properly learning a concept class with (a#x03B5;, a#x03B4;) differential privacy and learning without privacy. For properly learning thresholds in 'dimensions, this lower bound extends to n a#x2265; (l a#x2219; log* |X|). To obtain our results, we give reductions in both directions from releasing and properly learning thresholds and the simpler interior point problem. Given a database D of elements from X, the interior point problem asks for an element between the smallest and largest elements in D. We introduce new recursive constructions for bounding the sample complexity of the interior point problem, as well as further reductions and techniques for proving impossibility results for other basic problems in differential privacy. We prove a lower bound of Ω(n1 3) for the query complexity of any two-sided and adaptive algorithm that tests whether an unknown Boolean function f: 0,1 n→ 0,1 is monotone versus far from monotone. This improves the recent lower bound of Ω(n1 4) for the same problem by Belovs and Blais (STOC'16). Our result builds on a new family of random Boolean functions that can be viewed as a two-level extension of Talagrand's random DNFs. Beyond monotonicity we prove a lower bound of Ω(√n) for two-sided, adaptive algorithms and a lower bound of Ω(n) for one-sided, non-adaptive algorithms for testing unateness, a natural generalization of monotonicity. The latter matches the linear upper bounds by Khot and Shinkar (RANDOM'16) and by Baleshzar, Chakrabarty, Pallavoor, Raskhodnikova, and Seshadhri (2017). We show that every algorithm for testing n-variate Boolean functions for monotonicityhas query complexity Ω(n1 4). All previous lower bounds for this problem were designed for non-adaptive algorithms and, as a result, the best previous lower bound for general (possibly adaptive) monotonicity testers was only Ω(logn). Combined with the query complexity of the non-adaptive monotonicity tester of Khot, Minzer, and Safra (FOCS 2015), our lower bound shows that adaptivity can result in at most a quadratic reduction in the query complexity for testing monotonicity. By contrast, we show that there is an exponential gap between the query complexity of adaptive and non-adaptive algorithms for testing regular linear threshold functions (LTFs) for monotonicity. Chen, De, Servedio, and Tan (STOC 2015)recently showed that non-adaptive algorithms require almost Ω(n1 2) queries for this task. We introduce a new adaptive monotonicity testing algorithm which has query complexity O(logn) when the input is a regular LTF. The goal of (stable) sparse recovery is to recover a @math -sparse approximation @math of a vector @math from linear measurements of @math . Specifically, the goal is to recover @math such that @math for some constant @math and norm parameters @math and @math . It is known that, for @math or @math , this task can be accomplished using @math non-adaptive measurements CRT06:Stable-Signal and that this bound is tight DIPW, FPRU, PW11 . In this paper we show that if one is allowed to perform measurements that are adaptive , then the number of measurements can be considerably reduced. Specifically, for @math and @math we show A scheme with @math measurements that uses @math rounds. This is a significant improvement over the best possible non-adaptive bound. A scheme with @math measurements that uses two rounds. This improves over the best possible non-adaptive bound. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first results of this type.