One of the most widely studied problem in mining and analysis of complex networks is the detection of community structures. The problem has been extensively studied by researchers due to its high utility and numerous applications in various domains. Many algorithmic solutions have been proposed for the community detection problem but the quest to find the best algorithm is still on. More often than not, researchers focus on developing fast and accurate algorithms that can be generically applied to networks from a variety of domains without taking into consideration the structural and topological variations in these networks. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of different clustering algorithms as a function of varying network topology. Along with the well known LFR model to generate benchmark networks with communities,we also propose a new model named Naive Scale Free Model to study the behavior of community detection algorithms with respect to different topological features. More specifically, we are interested in the size of networks, the size of community structures, the average connectivity of nodes and the ratio of inter-intra cluster edges. Results reveal several limitations of the current popular network clustering algorithms failing to correctly find communities. This suggests the need to revisit the design of current clustering algorithms that fail to incorporate varying topological features of different networks.
Most networks found in the real world have a non-uniform degree distribution, often following power-law @cite_54 . Furthermore, the community sizes in these real networks also follow a power-law @cite_52 @cite_26 @cite_7 which in turn justifies the drawbacks identified in the benchmark proposed by @cite_48 . Thus @cite_2 proposed a new benchmark called the LFR benchmark which has a number of interesting features. The degree distribution of the generated networks follow power-law and the average degree can be adjusted as required. The distribution of the community sizes also follow power-law and can be parametrized between a minimum and maximum value. Each node can have a fraction of intra-cluster and inter-cluster edges which are also controlled by a mixing parameter.
@cite_26 @cite_7 @cite_48 @cite_54 @cite_52 @cite_2
2140488329 2396986403 1970878284 2137465421
In this article, we propose a simple rule that generates scale-free networks with very large clustering coefficient and very small average distance. These networks are called random Apollonian networks (RANs) as they can be considered as a variation of Apollonian networks. We obtain the analytic results of power-law exponent gamma =3 and clustering coefficient C=(46 3)-36 ln (3 2) approx_equal 0.74, which agree with the simulation results very well. We prove that the increasing tendency of average distance of RANs is a little slower than the logarithm of the number of nodes in RANs. Since most real-life networks are both scale-free and small-world networks, RANs may perform well in mimicking the reality. The RANs possess hierarchical structure as C(k) approx k sup -1 that are in accord with the observations of many real-life networks. In addition, we prove that RANs are maximal planar networks, which are of particular practicability for layout of printed circuits and so on. The percolation and epidemic spreading process are also studied and the comparisons between RANs and Barabasi-Albert (BA) as well as Newman-Watts (NW) networks are shown. We find that, when the network order N (the total number of nodes) is relatively small (as N approx 10 sup 4 ), the performance of RANs under intentional attackmore » is not sensitive to N, while that of BA networks is much affected by N. And the diseases spread slower in RANs than BA networks in the early stage of the suseptible-infected process, indicating that the large clustering coefficient may slow the spreading velocity, especially in the outbreaks.« less The throughput capacity of arbitrary wireless networks under the physical Signal to Interference Plus Noise Ratio (SINR) model has received much attention in recent years. In this paper, we investigate the question of how much the worst-case performance of uniform and non-uniform power assignments differ under constraints such as a bound on the area where nodes are distributed or restrictions on the maximum power available. We determine the maximum factor by which a non-uniform power assignment can outperform the uniform case in the SINR model. More precisely, we prove that in one-dimensional settings the capacity of a non-uniform assignment exceeds a uniform assignment by at most a factor of (O( L_ ) ) when the length of the network is (L_ ). In two-dimensional settings, the uniform assignment is at most a factor of (O( P_ ) ) worse than the non-uniform assignment if the maximum power is (P_ ). We provide algorithms that reach this capacity in both cases. These bounds are tight in the sense that previous work gave examples of networks where the lack of power control causes a performance loss in the order of these factors. To complement our theoretical results and to evaluate our algorithms with concrete input networks, we carry out simulations on random wireless networks. The results demonstrate that the link sets generated by the algorithms contain around 20–35 of all links. As a consequence, engineers and researchers may prefer the uniform model due to its simplicity if this degree of performance deterioration is acceptable. We define a class of growing networks in which new nodes are given a spatial position and are connected to existing nodes with a probability mechanism favoring short distances and high degrees. The competition of preferential attachment and spatial clustering gives this model a range of interesting properties. Empirical degree distributions converge to a limit law, which can be a power law with any exponent τ>2 . The average clustering coefficient of the networks converges to a positive limit. Finally, a phase transition occurs in the global clustering coefficients and empirical distribution of edge lengths when the power-law exponent crosses the critical value τ=3 . Our main tool in the proof of these results is a general weak law of large numbers in the spirit of Penrose and Yukich. A power law degree distribution is established for a graph evolution model based on the graph class of k-trees. This k-tree-based graph process can be viewed as an idealized model that captures some characteristics of the preferential attachment and copying mechanisms that existing evolving graph processes fail to model due to technical obstacles. The result also serves as a further cautionary note reinforcing the point of view that a power law degree distribution should not be regarded as the only important characteristic of a complex network, as has been previously argued [D. Achlioptas, A. Clauset, D. Kempe, C. Moore, On the bias of traceroute sampling, or power-law degree distribution in regular graphs, in: Proceedings of the 37th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC'05, 2005, pp. 694-703; L. Li, D. Alderson, J. Doyle, W. Willinger, Towards a theory of scale-free graphs: Definition, properties, and implications, Internet Mathematics 2 (4) (2005) 431-523; M. Mitzenmacher, The future of power law research, Internet Mathematics, 2 (4) (2005) 525-534].