A standard way to approximate the distance between two vertices p and q in a graph is to compute a shortest path from p to q that goes through one of k sources, which are well-chosen vertices. Precomputing the distance between each of the k sources to all vertices yields an efficient computation of approximate distances between any two vertices. One standard method for choosing k sources is the so-called Farthest Point Sampling (FPS), which starts with a random vertex as the first source, and iteratively selects the farthest vertex from the already selected sources.In this paper, we analyze the stretch factor F FPS of approximate geodesics computed using FPS, which is the maximum, over all pairs of distinct vertices, of their approximated distance over their geodesic distance in the graph. We show that F FPS can be bounded in terms of the minimal value F * of the stretch factor obtained using an optimal placement of k sources as F FPS ≤ 2 r e 2 F * + 2 r e 2 + 8 r e + 1 , where r e is the length ratio of longest edge over the shortest edge in the graph. We further show that the factor r e is not an artefact of the analysis by providing a class of graphs for which F FPS ź 1 2 r e F * .
The problem we study is closely related to the @math -center problem, which aims at finding @math centers (or sources) @math , such that the maximum distance of any point to its closest center is minimized. With the notation defined above, the @math -center problem aims at finding @math , such that @math is minimized. This problem is @math -hard and FPS gives a @math -approximation, which means that the @math centers @math found using FPS have the property that @math @cite_14 .
@cite_14
2785893262 2081956522 2949966487 2293564405
The @math -center problem is a classical combinatorial optimization problem which asks to find @math centers such that the maximum distance of any input point in a set @math to its assigned center is minimized. The problem allows for elegant @math -approximations. However, the situation becomes significantly more difficult when constraints are added to the problem. We raise the question whether general methods can be derived to turn an approximation algorithm for a clustering problem with some constraints into an approximation algorithm that respects one constraint more. Our constraint of choice is privacy: Here, we are asked to only open a center when at least @math clients will be assigned to it. We show how to combine privacy with several other constraints. An algorithm for solving the problem: minimize @math (a convex function) subject to @math , @math , each @math a concave function, is presented. Specifically, the function [ P [ x,t,r_k ] f( x ) + r_k^ - 1 [ g_i ( x ) - t_i ] ^2 ] is minimized over all x, nonnegative t, for a strictly decreasing null sequence @math . This extends the work of T. Pietrzykowski [5]. It is proved that for every @math , there exists a finite point @math which minimizes P, and which solves the convex programming problem as @math . This algorithm is similar to the Sequential Unconstrained Minimization Technique (SUMT) [1] in that it solves the (Wolfe) dual programming problem [6]. It differs from SUMT in that (1) it approaches the optimum from the region of infeasibility (i.e., it is a relaxation technique), (2) it does not require a nonempty interior to the nonlinearly constrained region, (3) no separate feasibilit... We consider the @math -Center problem and some generalizations. For @math -Center a set of @math center vertices needs to be found in a graph @math with edge lengths, such that the distance from any vertex of @math to its nearest center is minimized. This problem naturally occurs in transportation networks, and therefore we model the inputs as graphs with bounded highway dimension, as proposed by [SODA 2010]. We show both approximation and fixed-parameter hardness results, and how to overcome them using fixed-parameter approximations, where the two paradigms are combined. In particular, we prove that for any @math computing a @math -approximation is W[2]-hard for parameter @math and NP-hard for graphs with highway dimension @math . The latter does not rule out fixed-parameter @math -approximations for the highway dimension parameter @math , but implies that such an algorithm must have at least doubly exponential running time in @math if it exists, unless the ETH fails. On the positive side, we show how to get below the approximation factor of @math by combining the parameters @math and @math : we develop a fixed-parameter @math -approximation with running time @math . Additionally we prove that, unless P=NP, our techniques cannot be used to compute fixed-parameter @math -approximations for only the parameter @math . We also provide similar fixed-parameter approximations for the weighted @math -Center and @math -Partition problems, which generalize @math -Center. We consider the k-Center problem and some generalizations. For k-Center a set of kcenter vertices needs to be found in a graph G with edge lengths, such that the distance from any vertex ofi¾?G to its nearest center is minimized. This problem naturally occurs in transportation networks, and therefore we model the inputs as graphs with bounded highway dimension, as proposed by [ICALP 2011]. We show both approximation and fixed-parameter hardness results, and how to overcome them using fixed-parameter approximations. In particular, we prove that for any @math computing a @math -approximation is W[2]-hard for parameter k, and NP-hard for graphs with highway dimension @math . The latter does not rule out fixed-parameter @math -approximations for the highway dimension parameteri¾?h, but implies that such an algorithm must have at least doubly exponential running time in h if it exists, unless the ETH fails. On the positive side, we show how to get below the approximation factor ofi¾?2 by combining the parameters k andi¾?h: we develop a fixed-parameter 3 2-approximation with running time @math . We also provide similar fixed-parameter approximations for the weightedk-Center and @math -Partition problems, which generalize k-Center.