An important question in evolutionary computation is how good solutions evolutionary algorithms can produce. This paper aims to provide an analytic analysis of solution quality in terms of the relative approximation error, which is defined by the error between 1 and the approximation ratio of the solution found by an evolutionary algorithm. Since evolutionary algorithms are iterative methods, the relative approximation error is a function of generations. With the help of matrix analysis, it is possible to obtain an exact expression of such a function. In this paper, an analytic expression for calculating the relative approximation error is presented for a class of evolutionary algorithms, that is, (1+1) strictly elitist evolution algorithms. Furthermore, analytic expressions of the fitness value and the average convergence rate in each generation are also derived for this class of evolutionary algorithms. The approach is promising, and it can be extended to non-elitist or population-based algorithms too.
The convergence rate study can implement the same task as fixed budget analysis does. Provided that @math , it is trivial to derive @math . Nevertheless, there are significant differences between the convergence rate study and fixed budget analysis. The convergence rate study has existed in EAs for more than two decades @cite_22 @cite_13 @cite_16 . Fixed budget analysis was recently proposed by Jansen and Zarges @cite_4 .
@cite_16 @cite_13 @cite_22 @cite_4
1549918636 2034171981 2167754005 2733259313
The formulation @math minx,yf(x)+g(y),subjecttoAx+By=b,where f and g are extended-value convex functions, arises in many application areas such as signal processing, imaging and image processing, statistics, and machine learning either naturally or after variable splitting. In many common problems, one of the two objective functions is strictly convex and has Lipschitz continuous gradient. On this kind of problem, a very effective approach is the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADM or ADMM), which solves a sequence of f g-decoupled subproblems. However, its effectiveness has not been matched by a provably fast rate of convergence; only sublinear rates such as O(1 k) and @math O(1 k2) were recently established in the literature, though the O(1 k) rates do not require strong convexity. This paper shows that global linear convergence can be guaranteed under the assumptions of strong convexity and Lipschitz gradient on one of the two functions, along with certain rank assumptions on A and B. The result applies to various generalizations of ADM that allow the subproblems to be solved faster and less exactly in certain manners. The derived rate of convergence also provides some theoretical guidance for optimizing the ADM parameters. In addition, this paper makes meaningful extensions to the existing global convergence theory of ADM generalizations. This paper considers local convergence and rate of convergence results for algorithms for minimizing the composite functionF(x)=f(x)+h(c(x)) wheref andc are smooth buth(c) may be nonsmooth. Local convergence at a second order rate is established for the generalized Gauss—Newton method whenh is convex and globally Lipschitz and the minimizer is strongly unique. Local convergence at a second order rate is established for a generalized Newton method when the minimizer satisfies nondegeneracy, strict complementarity and second order sufficiency conditions. Assuming the minimizer satisfies these conditions, necessary and sufficient conditions for a superlinear rate of convergence for curvature approximating methods are established. Necessary and sufficient conditions for a two-step superlinear rate of convergence are also established when only reduced curvature information is available. All these local convergence and rate of convergence results are directly applicable to nonlinearing programming problems. We propose a novel schedulability analysis for verifying the feasibility of large periodic task sets under the rate monotonic algorithm when the exact test cannot be applied on line due to prohibitively long execution times. The proposed test has the same complexity as the original Liu and Layland (1973) bound, but it is less pessimistic, thus allowing it to accept task sets that would be rejected using the original approach. The performance of the proposed approach is evaluated with respect to the classical Liu and Layland method and theoretical bounds are derived as a function of n (the number of tasks) and for the limit case of n tending to infinity. The analysis is also extended to include aperiodic servers and blocking times due to concurrency control protocols. Extensive simulations on synthetic tasks sets are presented to compare the effectiveness of the proposed test with respect to the Liu and Layland method and the exact response time analysis. In the last decade there has been a steady uptrend in the popularity of embedded multi-core platforms. This represents a turning point in the theory and implementation of real-time systems. From a real-time standpoint, however, the extensive sharing of hardware resources (e.g. caches, DRAM subsystem, I O channels) represents a major source of unpredictability. Budget-based memory regulation (throttling) has been extensively studied to enforce a strict partitioning of the DRAM subsystem’s bandwidth. The common approach to analyze a task under memory bandwidth regulation is to consider the budget of the core where the task is executing, and assume the worst-case about the remaining cores' budgets. In this work, we propose a novel analysis strategy to derive the WCET of a task under memory bandwidth regulation that takes into account the exact distribution of memory budgets to cores. In this sense, the proposed analysis represents a generalization of approaches that consider (i) even budget distribution across cores; and (ii) uneven but unknown (except for the core under analysis) budget assignment. By exploiting the additional piece of information, we show that it is possible to derive a more accurate WCET estimation. Our evaluations highlight that the proposed technique can reduce overestimation by 30 in average, and up to 60 , compared to the state of the art.