Let F be a family of Borel measurable functions on a complete separable metric space. The gap (or fat-shattering) dimension of F is a combinatorial quantity that measures the extent to which functions f in F can separate finite sets of points at a predefined resolution gamma > 0. We establish a connection between the gap dimension of F and the uniform convergence of its sample averages under ergodic sampling. In particular, we show that if the gap dimension of F at resolution gamma > 0 is finite, then for every ergodic process the sample averages of functions in F are eventually within 10 gamma of their limiting expectations uniformly over the class F. If the gap dimension of F is finite for every resolution gamma > 0 then the sample averages of functions in F converge uniformly to their limiting expectations. We assume only that F is uniformly bounded and countable (or countably approximable). No smoothness conditions are placed on F, and no assumptions beyond ergodicity are placed on the sampling processes. Our results extend existing work for i.i.d. processes.
Adams and Nobel @cite_0 established Theorem in the special case where the elements of @math are indicator functions of subsets of @math . The problem simplifies in this case, as @math is zero for @math , and equal to the VC-dimension of @math if @math . If @math has finite VC-dimension, their results imply that @math for every ergodic process @math . For uniformly bounded families @math they show that @math for every ergodic process @math if @math , or if @math is a VC-graph class (c.f. @cite_5 ).
@cite_0 @cite_5
2094096036 2529480917 2336459687 2947949186
We show that if X is a complete separable metric space and C is a countable family of Borel subsets of X with finite VC dimension, then, for every stationary ergodic process with values in X, the relative frequencies of sets C ∈ C converge uniformly to their limiting probabilities. Beyond ergodicity, no assumptions are imposed on the sampling process, and no regularity conditions are imposed on the elements of C. The result extends existing work of Vapnik and Chervonenkis, among others, who have studied uniform convergence for i.i.d. and strongly mixing processes. Our method of proof is new and direct: it does not rely on symmetrization techniques, probability inequalities or mixing conditions. The uniform convergence of relative frequencies for VC-major and VC-graph classes of functions under ergodic sampling is established as a corollary of the basic result for sets. The seminal complete intersection theorem of Ahlswede and Khachatrian gives the maximum cardinality of a @math -uniform @math -intersecting family on @math points, and describes all optimal families. We extend this theorem to several other settings: the weighted case, the case of infinitely many points, and the Hamming scheme. The weighted Ahlswede-Khachatrian theorem gives the maximal @math measure of a @math -intersecting family on @math points, where @math . As has been observed by Ahlswede and Khachatrian and by Dinur and Safra, this theorem can be derived from the classical one by a simple reduction. However, this reduction fails to identify the optimal families, and only works for @math , using a different technique of Ahlswede and Khachatrian (the case @math is Katona's intersection theorem). We then extend the weighted Ahlswede-Khachatrian theorem to the case of infinitely many points. The Ahlswede-Khachatrian theorem on the Hamming scheme gives the maximum cardinality of a subset of @math in which any two elements @math have @math positions @math such that @math . We show that this case corresponds to @math with @math , extending work of Ahlswede and Khachatrian, who considered the case @math . We also determine the maximum cardinality families. We obtain similar results for subsets of @math , though in this case we are not able to identify all maximum cardinality families. Erdős-Ko-Rado (EKR) type theorems yield upper bounds on the sizes of families of sets, subject to various intersection requirements on the sets in the family. Stability versions of such theorems assert that if the size of a family is close to the maximum possible size, then the family itself must be close (in some appropriate sense) to a maximum-sized family. In this paper, we present an approach to obtaining stability versions of EKR-type theorems, via isoperimetric inequalities for subsets of the hypercube. Our approach is rather general, and allows the leveraging of a wide variety of exact EKR-type results into strong stability versions of these results, without going into the proofs of the original results. We use this approach to obtain tight stability versions of the EKR theorem itself and of the Ahlswede-Khachatrian theorem on @math -intersecting families of @math -element subsets of @math (for @math ), and to show that, somewhat surprisingly, all these results hold when the intersection requirement is replaced by a much weaker requirement. Other examples include stability versions of Frankl's recent result on the Erdős matching conjecture, the Ellis-Filmus-Friedgut proof of the Simonovits-Sos conjecture, and various EKR-type results on @math -wise (cross)- @math -intersecting families. We study the problem of approximating the commuting-operator value of a two-player non-local game. It is well-known that it is @math -complete to decide whether the classical value of a non-local game is 1 or @math . Furthermore, as long as @math is small enough, this result does not depend on the gap @math . In contrast, a recent result of Fitzsimons, Ji, Vidick, and Yuen shows that the complexity of computing the quantum value grows without bound as the gap @math decreases. In this paper, we show that this also holds for the commuting-operator value of a game. Specifically, in the language of multi-prover interactive proofs, we show that the power of @math (proofs with two provers, one round, completeness probability @math , soundness probability @math , and commuting-operator strategies) can increase without bound as the gap @math gets arbitrarily small. Our results also extend naturally in two ways, to perfect zero-knowledge protocols, and to lower bounds on the complexity of computing the approximately-commuting value of a game. Thus we get lower bounds on the complexity class @math - @math of perfect zero-knowledge multi-prover proofs with approximately-commuting operator strategies, as the gap @math gets arbitrarily small. While we do not know any computable time upper bound on the class @math , a result of the first author and Vidick shows that for @math and @math , the class @math , with constant communication from the provers, is contained in @math . We give a lower bound of @math (ignoring constants inside the function) for this class, which is tight up to polynomial factors assuming the exponential time hypothesis.