A significant part of the largest Knowledge Graph today, the Linked Open Data cloud, consists of metadata about documents such as publications, news reports, and other media articles. While the widespread access to the document metadata is a tremendous advancement, it is yet not so easy to assign semantic annotations and organize the documents along semantic concepts. Providing semantic annotations like concepts in SKOS thesauri is a classical research topic, but typically it is conducted on the full-text of the documents. For the first time, we offer a systematic comparison of classification approaches to investigate how far semantic annotations can be conducted using just the metadata of the documents such as titles published as labels on the Linked Open Data cloud. We compare the classifications obtained from analyzing the documents' titles with semantic annotations obtained from analyzing the full-text. Apart from the prominent text classification baselines kNN and SVM, we also compare recent techniques of Learning to Rank and neural networks and revisit the traditional methods logistic regression, Rocchio, and Naive Bayes. The results show that across three of our four datasets, the performance of the classifications using only titles reaches over 90 of the quality compared to the classification performance when using the full-text. Thus, conducting document classification by just using the titles is a reasonable approach for automated semantic annotation and opens up new possibilities for enriching Knowledge Graphs.
In the biomedical domain, the most popular approach is Learning to Rank @cite_20 @cite_23 . The algorithm learns a ranking of the MeSH terms. In multi-label classification, however, a hard decision is necessary to enable fully automated classification. Thus, Learning to Rank is typically adjusted for multi-labeling by imposing a hard cut-off. There are also approaches that use Learning to Rank along with dynamic cut-off techniques @cite_10 . The most prominent approach to adapt classifiers for multi-labeling is binary relevance @cite_36 @cite_13 . Other options include the chaining @cite_32 as well as stacking @cite_12 @cite_29 of classifiers. While the former is not well-suited for high amounts of considered labels, we also include a variation of the latter idea in our comparison. Bi and Kwok @cite_31 approach the multi-label classification task from a different direction. They strive for more efficient multi-label classification and proper treatment of label correlation by transforming the label indicator matrix.
@cite_13 @cite_36 @cite_29 @cite_32 @cite_23 @cite_31 @cite_10 @cite_12 @cite_20
2046194813 1600005011 2461743311 1480958671
Multi-label classification refers to learning tasks with each instance belonging to one or more classes simultaneously. It arose from real-world applications such as information retrieval, text categorization and functional genomics. Currently, most of the multi-label learning methods use the strategy called binary relevance, which constructs a classifier for each unique label by grouping data into positives (examples with this label) and negatives (examples without this label). With binary relevance, an example with multiple labels is considered as a positive data for each label it belongs to. For some classes, this data point may behave like an outlier confusing classifiers, especially in the cases of well-separated classes. In this paper, we first introduce a new strategy called soft relevance, where each multi-label example is assigned a relevance score to the labels it belongs to. This soft relevance is then employed in a voting function used in a k nearest neighbor classifier. Furthermore, a voting-margin ratio is introduced to the k nearest neighbor classifier for better performance. We compare the proposed method to other multi-label learning methods over three multi-label datasets and demonstrate that the proposed method provides an effective way to multi-label learning. In multi-label classification, each example can be associated with multiple labels simultaneously. The task of learning from multilabel data can be addressed by methods that transform the multi-label classification problem into several single-label classification problems. The binary relevance approach is one of these methods, where the multilabel learning task is decomposed into several independent binary classification problems, one for each label in the set of labels, and the final labels for each example are determined by aggregating the predictions from all binary classifiers. However, this approach fails to consider any dependency among the labels. In this paper, we consider a simple approach which can be used to explore labels dependency aiming to accurately predict label combinations. An experimental study using decision trees, a kernel method as well as Naive Bayes as base-learning techniques shows the potential of the proposed approach to improve the multi-label classification performance. We consider Multiclass and Multilabel classification with extremely large number of classes, of which only few are labeled to each instance. In such setting, standard methods that have training, prediction cost linear to the number of classes become intractable. State-of-the-art methods thus aim to reduce the complexity by exploiting correlation between labels under assumption that the similarity between labels can be captured by structures such as low-rank matrix or balanced tree. However, as the diversity of labels increases in the feature space, structural assumption can be easily violated, which leads to degrade in the testing performance. In this work, we show that a margin-maximizing loss with l1 penalty, in case of Extreme Classification, yields extremely sparse solution both in primal and in dual without sacrificing the expressive power of predictor. We thus propose a Fully-Corrective Block-Coordinate Frank-Wolfe (FC-BCFW) algorithm that exploits both primal and dual sparsity to achieve a complexity sublinear to the number of primal and dual variables. A bi-stochastic search method is proposed to further improve the efficiency. In our experiments on both Multiclass and Multilabel problems, the proposed method achieves significant higher accuracy than existing approaches of Extreme Classification with very competitive training and prediction time. Multi-label Classification (MC) often deals with hierarchically organized class taxonomies. In contrast to Hierarchical Multilabel Classification (HMC), where the class hierarchy is assumed to be known a priori, we are interested in the opposite case where it is unknown and should be extracted from multi-label data automatically. In this case the predictive performance of a classifier can be assessed by well-known Performance Measures (PMs) used in flat MC such as precision and recall. The fact that these PMs treat all class labels as independent labels, in contrast to hierarchically structured taxonomies, is a problem. As an alternative, special hierarchical PMs can be used that utilize hierarchy knowledge and apply this knowledge to the extracted hierarchy. This type of hierarchical PM has only recently been mentioned in literature. The aim of this study is first to verify whether HMC measures do significantly improve quality assessment in this setting. In addition, we seek to find a proper measure that reflects the potential quality of extracted hierarchies in the best possible way. We empirically compare ten hierarchical and four traditional flat PMs in order to investigate relations between them. The performance measurements obtained for predictions of four multi-label classifiers ML-ARAM, ML-kNN, BoosTexter and SVM on four datasets from the text mining domain are analyzed by means of hierarchical clustering and by calculating pairwise statistical consistency and discriminancy.