In this work we present an in-depth analysis of the user behaviors on different Social Sharing systems. We consider three popular platforms, Flickr, Delicious and StumbleUpon, and, by combining techniques from social network analysis with techniques from semantic analysis, we characterize the tagging behavior as well as the tendency to create friendship relationships of the users of these platforms. The aim of our investigation is to see if (and how) the features and goals of a given Social Sharing system reflect on the behavior of its users and, moreover, if there exists a correlation between the social and tagging behavior of the users. We report our findings in terms of the characteristics of user profiles according to three different dimensions: (i) intensity of user activities, (ii) tag-based characteristics of user profiles, and (iii) semantic characteristics of user profiles.
In the latest years many researchers studied how to aggregate data coming from disparate Social Web systems with the goal of enhancing the level of personalization offered to the end users @cite_16 @cite_18 or improve the description of Web resources @cite_28 .
@cite_28 @cite_18 @cite_16
1967507014 2096463110 2238603330 2130831177
We study personalized recommendation of social software items, including bookmarked web-pages, blog entries, and communities. We focus on recommendations that are derived from the user's social network. Social network information is collected and aggregated across different data sources within our organization. At the core of our research is a comparison between recommendations that are based on the user's familiarity network and his her similarity network. We also examine the effect of adding explanations to each recommended item that show related people and their relationship to the user and to the item. Evaluation, based on an extensive user survey with 290 participants and a field study including 90 users, indicates superiority of the familiarity network as a basis for recommendations. In addition, an important instant effect of explanations is found - interest rate in recommended items increases when explanations are provided. Finding relevant and reliable information on the web is a non-trivial task. While internet search engines do find correct web pages with respect to a set of keywords, they often cannot ensure the relevance or reliability of their content. An emerging trend is to harness internet users in the spirit of Web 2.0, to discern and personalize relevant and reliable information. Users collaboratively search or browse for information, either directly by communicating or indirectly by adding meta information (e.g., tags) to web pages. While gaining much popularity, such approaches are bound to specific service providers, or the Web 2.0 sites providing the necessary features, and the knowledge so generated is also confined to, and subject to the whims and censorship of such providers. To overcome these limitations we introduce COBS, a browser-centric knowledge repository which enjoys the inherent openness (similar to Wikipedia) while aiming to provide end-users the freedom of personalization and privacy by adopting an eventually hybrid p2p back-end. In this paper we first present the COBS front-end, a browser add-on that enables users to tag, rate or comment arbitrary web pages and to socialize with others in both a synchronous and asynchronous manner. We then discuss how a decentralized back-end can be realized. While Distributed Hash Tables (DHTs) are the most natural choice, and despite a decade of research on DHT designs, we encounter several, some small, while others more fundamental shortcomings that need to be surmounted in order to realize an efficient, scalable and reliable decentralized back-end for COBS. To that end, we outline various design alternatives and discuss qualitatively (and quantitatively, when possible) their (dis-)advantages. We believe that the objectives of COBS are ambitious, posing significant challenges for distributed systems, middleware and distributed data-analytics research, even while building on the existing momentum. Based on experiences from our ongoing work on COBS, we outline these systems research issues in this position paper. One key feature of the Semantic Web lies in the ability to link related Web resources. However, while relations within particular datasets are often well-defined, links between disparate datasets and corpora of Web resources are rare. The increasingly widespread use of cross-domain reference datasets, such as Freebase and DBpedia for annotating and enriching datasets as well as documents, opens up opportunities to exploit their inherent semantic relationships to align disparate Web resources. In this paper, we present a combined approach to uncover relationships between disparate entities which exploits (a) graph analysis of reference datasets together with (b) entity co-occurrence on the Web with the help of search engines. In (a), we introduce a novel approach adopted and applied from social network theory to measure the connectivity between given entities in reference datasets. The connectivity measures are used to identify connected Web resources. Finally, we present a thorough evaluation of our approach using a publicly available dataset and introduce a comparison with established measures in the field. This paper addresses the issue of extraction of an academic researcher social network. By researcher social network extraction, we are aimed at finding, extracting, and fusing the 'semantic '-based profiling information of a researcher from the Web. Previously, social network extraction was often undertaken separately in an ad-hoc fashion. This paper first gives a formalization of the entire problem. Specifically, it identifies the 'relevant documents' from the Web by a classifier. It then proposes a unified approach to perform the researcher profiling using conditional random fields (CRF). It integrates publications from the existing bibliography datasets. In the integration, it proposes a constraints-based probabilistic model to name disambiguation. Experimental results on an online system show that the unified approach to researcher profiling significantly outperforms the baseline methods of using rule learning or classification. Experimental results also indicate that our method to name disambiguation performs better than the baseline method using unsupervised learning. The methods have been applied to expert finding. Experiments show that the accuracy of expert finding can be significantly improved by using the proposed methods.