An increasing number of computer vision tasks can be tackled with deep features, which are the intermediate outputs of a pre-trained Convolutional Neural Network. Despite the astonishing performance, deep features extracted from low-level neurons are still below satisfaction, arguably because they cannot access the spatial context contained in the higher layers. In this paper, we present InterActive, a novel algorithm which computes the activeness of neurons and network connections. Activeness is propagated through a neural network in a top-down manner, carrying high-level context and improving the descriptive power of low-level and mid-level neurons. Visualization indicates that neuron activeness can be interpreted as spatial-weighted neuron responses. We achieve state-of-the-art classification performance on a wide range of image datasets.
Image classification is a fundamental problem in computer vision. In recent years, researchers have extended the conventional tasks @cite_29 @cite_8 to fine-grained @cite_12 @cite_24 @cite_48 , and large-scale @cite_46 @cite_19 @cite_38 cases.
@cite_38 @cite_8 @cite_48 @cite_29 @cite_24 @cite_19 @cite_46 @cite_12
2909200230 2797977484 2736618577 2519898457
Image classification is a classical task heavily studied in computer vision and widely required in many concrete scientific and industrial scenarios. Is it better to rely on human eyes, thus asking people to classify pictures, or to train a machine learning system to automatically solve the task? The answer largely depends on the specific case and the required accuracy: humans may be more reliable - especially if they are domain experts - but automatic processing can be cheaper, even if less capable to demonstrate an "intelligent" behaviour. In this paper, we present an experimental comparison of different Human Computation and Machine Learning approaches to solve the same image classification task on a set of pictures used in light pollution research. We illustrate the adopted methods and the obtained results and we compare and contrast them in order to come up with a long term combined strategy to address the specific issue at scale: while it is hard to ensure a long-term engagement of users to exclusively rely on the Human Computation approach, the human classification is indispensable to overcome the "cold start" problem of automated data modelling. Existing image classification datasets used in computer vision tend to have a uniform distribution of images across object categories. In contrast, the natural world is heavily imbalanced, as some species are more abundant and easier to photograph than others. To encourage further progress in challenging real world conditions we present the iNaturalist species classification and detection dataset, consisting of 859,000 images from over 5,000 different species of plants and animals. It features visually similar species, captured in a wide variety of situations, from all over the world. Images were collected with different camera types, have varying image quality, feature a large class imbalance, and have been verified by multiple citizen scientists. We discuss the collection of the dataset and present extensive baseline experiments using state-of-the-art computer vision classification and detection models. Results show that current non-ensemble based methods achieve only 67 top one classification accuracy, illustrating the difficulty of the dataset. Specifically, we observe poor results for classes with small numbers of training examples suggesting more attention is needed in low-shot learning. Existing image classification datasets used in computer vision tend to have an even number of images for each object category. In contrast, the natural world is heavily imbalanced, as some species are more abundant and easier to photograph than others. To encourage further progress in challenging real world conditions we present the iNaturalist Challenge 2017 dataset - an image classification benchmark consisting of 675,000 images with over 5,000 different species of plants and animals. It features many visually similar species, captured in a wide variety of situations, from all over the world. Images were collected with different camera types, have varying image quality, have been verified by multiple citizen scientists, and feature a large class imbalance. We discuss the collection of the dataset and present baseline results for state-of-the-art computer vision classification models. Results show that current non-ensemble based methods achieve only 64 top one classification accuracy, illustrating the difficulty of the dataset. Finally, we report results from a competition that was held with the data. Image classification is one of the main research problems in computer vision and machine learning. Since in most real-world image classification applications there is no control over how the images are captured, it is necessary to consider the possibility that these images might be affected by noise (e.g. sensor noise in a low-quality surveillance camera). In this paper we analyse the impact of three different types of noise on descriptors extracted by two widely used feature extraction methods (LBP and HOG) and how denoising the images can help to mitigate this problem. We carry out experiments on two different datasets and consider several types of noise, noise levels, and denoising methods. Our results show that noise can hinder classification performance considerably and make classes harder to separate. Although denoising methods were not able to reach the same performance of the noise-free scenario, they improved classification results for noisy data.