How can we learn a classifier that is "fair" for a protected or sensitive group, when we do not know if the input to the classifier belongs to the protected group? How can we train such a classifier when data on the protected group is difficult to attain? In many settings, finding out the sensitive input attribute can be prohibitively expensive even during model training, and sometimes impossible during model serving. For example, in recommender systems, if we want to predict if a user will click on a given recommendation, we often do not know many attributes of the user, e.g., race or age, and many attributes of the content are hard to determine, e.g., the language or topic. Thus, it is not feasible to use a different classifier calibrated based on knowledge of the sensitive attribute. Here, we use an adversarial training procedure to remove information about the sensitive attribute from the latent representation learned by a neural network. In particular, we study how the choice of data for the adversarial training effects the resulting fairness properties. We find two interesting results: a small amount of data is needed to train these adversarial models, and the data distribution empirically drives the adversary's notion of fairness.
A growing body of literature is aimed at improving model performance for underserved parts of the data. For example, @cite_1 uses hyperparameter optimization to improve model performance for underserved regions of the data in collaborative filtering. More directly in the fairness'' literature, @cite_2 first attempted to learn fair'' latent representations by directly enforcing statistical parity during unsupervised learning.
@cite_1 @cite_2
2598232788 2104936489 1663203009 2796902300
The performance of many machine learning algorithms depends crucially on the hyperparameter settings, especially in Deep Learning. Manually tuning the hyperparameters is laborious and time consuming. To address this issue, Bayesian optimization (BO) methods and their extensions have been proposed to optimize the hyperparameters automatically. However, they still suffer from highly computational expense when applying to deep generative models (DGMs) due to their strategy of the black-box function optimization. This paper provides a new hyperparameter optimization procedure at the pre-training phase of the DGMs, where we avoid combining all layers as one black-box function by taking advantage of the layer-by-layer learning strategy. Following this procedure, we are able to optimize multiple hyperparameters in an adaptive way by using Gaussian process. In contrast to the traditional BO methods, which mainly focus on the supervised models, the pre-training procedure is unsupervised where there is no validation error can be used. To alleviate this problem, this paper proposes a new holdout loss, the free energy gap, which takes into account both factors of the model fitting and over-fitting. The empirical evaluations demonstrate that our method not only speeds up the process of hyperparameter optimization, but also improves the performances of DGMs significantly in both the supervised and unsupervised learning tasks. Multi-task learning is the problem of maximizing the performance of a system across a number of related tasks. When applied to multiple domains for the same task, it is similar to domain adaptation, but symmetric, rather than limited to improving performance on a target domain. We present a more principled, better performing model for this problem, based on the use of a hierarchical Bayesian prior. Each domain has its own domain-specific parameter for each feature but, rather than a constant prior over these parameters, the model instead links them via a hierarchical Bayesian global prior. This prior encourages the features to have similar weights across domains, unless there is good evidence to the contrary. We show that the method of (Daume III, 2007), which was presented as a simple "preprocessing step," is actually equivalent, except our representation explicitly separates hyperparameters which were tied in his work. We demonstrate that allowing different values for these hyperparameters significantly improves performance over both a strong baseline and (Daume III, 2007) within both a conditional random field sequence model for named entity recognition and a discriminatively trained dependency parser. In machine learning, hyperparameter optimization is a challenging task that is usually approached by experienced practitioners or in a computationally expensive brute-force manner such as grid-search. Therefore, recent research proposes to use observed hyperparameter performance on already solved problems (i.e. data sets) in order to speed up the search for promising hyperparameter configurations in the sequential model based optimization framework. In this paper, we propose multilayer perceptrons as surrogate models as they are able to model highly nonlinear hyperparameter response surfaces. However, since interactions of hyperparameters, data sets and metafeatures are only implicitly learned in the subsequent layers, we improve the performance of multilayer perceptrons by means of an explicit factorization of the interaction weights and call the resulting model a factorized multilayer perceptron. Additionally, we evaluate different ways of obtaining predictive uncertainty, which is a key ingredient for a decent tradeoff between exploration and exploitation. Our experimental results on two public meta data sets demonstrate the efficiency of our approach compared to a variety of published baselines. For reproduction purposes, we make our data sets and all the program code publicly available on our supplementary webpage. Tuning hyperparameters of machine learning models is important for their performance. Bayesian optimization has recently emerged as a de-facto method for this task. The hyperparameter tuning is usually performed by looking at model performance on a validation set. Bayesian optimization is used to find the hyperparameter set corresponding to the best model performance. However, in many cases, the function representing the model performance on the validation set contains several spurious sharp peaks due to limited datapoints. The Bayesian optimization, in such cases, has a tendency to converge to sharp peaks instead of other more stable peaks. When a model trained using these hyperparameters is deployed in the real world, its performance suffers dramatically. We address this problem through a novel stable Bayesian optimization framework. We construct two new acquisition functions that help Bayesian optimization to avoid the convergence to the sharp peaks. We conduct a theoretical analysis and guarantee that Bayesian optimization using the proposed acquisition functions prefers stable peaks over unstable ones. Experiments with synthetic function optimization and hyperparameter tuning for support vector machines show the effectiveness of our proposed framework.