Typical recommender systems push K items at once in the result page in the form of a feed, in which the selection and the order of the items are important for user experience. In this paper, we formalize the K-item recommendation problem as taking an unordered set of candidate items as input, and exporting an ordered list of selected items as output. The goal is to maximize the overall utility, e.g. the click through rate, of the whole list. As one solution to the K-item recommendation problem under this proposition, we proposed a new ranking framework called the Evaluator-Generator framework. In this framework, the Evaluator is trained on user logs to precisely predict the expected feedback of each item by fully considering its intra-list correlations with other co-exposed items. On the other hand, the Generator will generate different sequences from which the Evaluator will choose one sequence as the final recommendation. In our experiments, both the offline analysis and the online test show the effectiveness of our proposed framework. Furthermore, we show that the offline behavior of the Evaluator is consistent with the realistic online environment.
Some recent works have been addresses long-term rewards in recommender systems. @cite_33 also work on intra-list correlations, which applies policy gradient and Monte Carlo Tree Search(MCTS) to optimize the @math -NDCG in diversified ranking for the global optimum. Other works pursues long-term rewards in inter-list recommendations ( @cite_10 , @cite_2 ). Though @cite_10 also proposed treating a page of recommendation list as a whole, the intra-list correlations are not well modelled and analyzed in their work. Also their work is not testified on realistic online RS. In this paper, we more thoroughly investigates the general form of the intra-list correlations. We formalize the utility of the whole list as our final target, but we have also used item-level feedbacks. This has not been sufficiently studied in the above works.
@cite_10 @cite_33 @cite_2
1797876566 2155912844 2042281163 2120391124
Tasks such as record linkage and multi-target tracking, which involve reconstructing the set of objects that underlie some observed data, are particularly challenging for probabilistic inference. Recent work has achieved efficient and accurate inference on such problems using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) techniques with customized proposal distributions. Currently, implementing such a system requires coding MCMC state representations and acceptance probability calculations that are specific to a particular application. An alternative approach, which we pursue in this paper, is to use a general-purpose probabilistic modeling language (such as BLOG) and a generic Metropolis-Hastings MCMC algorithm that supports user-supplied proposal distributions. Our algorithm gains flexibility by using MCMC states that are only partial descriptions of possible worlds; we provide conditions under which MCMC over partial worlds yields correct answers to queries. We also show how to use a context-specific Bayes net to identify the factors in the acceptance probability that need to be computed for a given proposed move. Experimental results on a citation matching task show that our general-purpose MCMC engine compares favorably with an application-specific system. In this work we present topic diversification, a novel method designed to balance and diversify personalized recommendation lists in order to reflect the user's complete spectrum of interests. Though being detrimental to average accuracy, we show that our method improves user satisfaction with recommendation lists, in particular for lists generated using the common item-based collaborative filtering algorithm.Our work builds upon prior research on recommender systems, looking at properties of recommendation lists as entities in their own right rather than specifically focusing on the accuracy of individual recommendations. We introduce the intra-list similarity metric to assess the topical diversity of recommendation lists and the topic diversification approach for decreasing the intra-list similarity. We evaluate our method using book recommendation data, including offline analysis on 361, !, 349 ratings and an online study involving more than 2, !, 100 subjects. Recommender systems apply knowledge discovery techniques to the problem of making personalized recommendations for information, products or services during a live interaction. These systems, especially the k-nearest neighbor collaborative ltering based ones, are achieving widespread success on the Web. The tremendous growth in the amount of available information and the number of visitors to Web sites in recent years poses some key challenges for recommender systems. These are: producing high quality recommendations, performing many recommendations per second for millions of users and items and achieving high coverage in the face of data sparsity. In traditional collaborative ltering systems the amount of work increases with the number of participants in the system. New recommender system technologies are needed that can quickly produce high quality recommendations, even for very large-scale problems. To address these issues we have explored item-based collaborative ltering techniques. Item-based techniques rst analyze the user-item matrix to identify relationships between di erent items, and then use these relationships to indirectly compute recommendations for users. In this paper we analyze di erent item-based recommendation generation algorithms. We look into di erent techniques for computing item-item similarities (e.g., item-item correlation vs. cosine similarities between item vectors) and di erent techniques for obtaining recommendations from them (e.g., weighted sum vs. regression model). Finally, we experimentally evaluate our results and compare them to the basic k-nearest neighbor approach. Our experiments suggest that item-based algorithms provide dramatically better performance than user-based algorithms, while at the same time providing better quality than the best available userbased algorithms. We cast the ranking problem as (1) multiple classification ("Mc") (2) multiple ordinal classification, which lead to computationally tractable learning algorithms for relevance ranking in Web search. We consider the DCG criterion (discounted cumulative gain), a standard quality measure in information retrieval. Our approach is motivated by the fact that perfect classifications result in perfect DCG scores and the DCG errors are bounded by classification errors. We propose using the Expected Relevance to convert class probabilities into ranking scores. The class probabilities are learned using a gradient boosting tree algorithm. Evaluations on large-scale datasets show that our approach can improve LambdaRank [5] and the regressions-based ranker [6], in terms of the (normalized) DCG scores. An efficient implementation of the boosting tree algorithm is also presented.