Measuring the salience of a word is an essential step in numerous NLP tasks. Heuristic approaches such as tfidf have been used so far to estimate the salience of words. We propose (NWS) scores, unlike heuristics, are learnt from a corpus. Specifically, we learn word salience scores such that, using pre-trained word embeddings as the input, can accurately predict the words that appear in a sentence, given the words that appear in the sentences preceding or succeeding that sentence. Experimental results on sentence similarity prediction show that the learnt word salience scores perform comparably or better than some of the state-of-the-art approaches for representing sentences on benchmark datasets for sentence similarity, while using only a fraction of the training and prediction times required by prior methods. Moreover, our NWS scores positively correlate with psycholinguistic measures such as concreteness, and imageability implying a close connection to the salience as perceived by humans.
Surprisingly, averaging word embeddings to create sentence embeddings has shown comparable performances to sentence embeddings that are learnt using more sophisticated word-order sensitive methods. For example, @cite_6 proposed a method to find the optimal weights for combining word embeddings when creating sentence embeddings using unigram probabilities, by maximising the likelihood of the occurrences of words in a corpus. Siamese CBOW learns word embeddings such that we can accurately compute sentence embeddings by averaging the word embeddings. Although averaging is an order insensitive operator, @cite_0 empirically showed that it can accurately predict the content and word order in sentences. This can be understood intuitively by recalling that words that appear between two words are often different in contexts where those two words are swapped. For example, in the two sentences is a large that lives in Africa'' and Large such as live in Africa'', the words that appear in between and are different, giving rise to different sentence embeddings even when sentence embeddings are computed by averaging the individual word embeddings. Instead of considering all words equally for sentence embedding purposes, attention-based models learn the amount of weight (attention) we must assign to each word in a given context.
@cite_0 @cite_6
2752172973 2963502184 2759712386 114321176
The success of neural network methods for computing word embeddings has motivated methods for generating semantic embeddings of longer pieces of text, such as sentences and paragraphs. Surprisingly, (ICLR'16) showed that such complicated methods are outperformed, especially in out-of-domain (transfer learning) settings, by simpler methods involving mild retraining of word embeddings and basic linear regression. The method of requires retraining with a substantial labeled dataset such as Paraphrase Database (, 2013). @PARASPLIT The current paper goes further, showing that the following completely unsupervised sentence embedding is a formidable baseline: Use word embeddings computed using one of the popular methods on unlabeled corpus like Wikipedia, represent the sentence by a weighted average of the word vectors, and then modify them a bit using PCA SVD. This weighting improves performance by about 10 to 30 in textual similarity tasks, and beats sophisticated supervised methods including RNN's and LSTM's. It even improves 's embeddings. This simple method should be used as the baseline to beat in future, especially when labeled training data is scarce or nonexistent. @PARASPLIT The paper also gives a theoretical explanation of the success of the above unsupervised method using a latent variable generative model for sentences, which is a simple extension of the model in (TACL'16) with new "smoothing" terms that allow for words occurring out of context, as well as high probabilities for words like and, not in all contexts. We present the Siamese Continuous Bag of Words (Siamese CBOW) model, a neural network for efficient estimation of highquality sentence embeddings. Averaging the embeddings of words in a sentence has proven to be a surprisingly successful and efficient way of obtaining sentence embeddings. However, word embeddings trained with the methods currently available are not optimized for the task of sentence representation, and, thus, likely to be suboptimal. Siamese CBOW handles this problem by training word embeddings directly for the purpose of being averaged. The underlying neural network learns word embeddings by predicting, from a sentence representation, its surrounding sentences. We show the robustness of the Siamese CBOW model by evaluating it on 20 datasets stemming from a wide variety of sources. Distributed word embeddings have shown superior performances in numerous Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. However, their performances vary significantly across different tasks, implying that the word embeddings learnt by those methods capture complementary aspects of lexical semantics. Therefore, we believe that it is important to combine the existing word embeddings to produce more accurate and complete of words. For this purpose, we propose an unsupervised locally linear meta-embedding learning method that takes pre-trained word embeddings as the input, and produces more accurate meta embeddings. Unlike previously proposed meta-embedding learning methods that learn a global projection over all words in a vocabulary, our proposed method is sensitive to the differences in local neighbourhoods of the individual source word embeddings. Moreover, we show that vector concatenation, a previously proposed highly competitive baseline approach for integrating word embeddings, can be derived as a special case of the proposed method. Experimental results on semantic similarity, word analogy, relation classification, and short-text classification tasks show that our meta-embeddings to significantly outperform prior methods in several benchmark datasets, establishing a new state of the art for meta-embeddings. An unsupervised iterative approach for extracting a new lexicon (or unknown words) from a Chinese text corpus is proposed in this paper. Instead of using a non-iterative segmentation-merging-filtering-and-disambiguation approach, the proposed method iteratively integrates the contextual constraints (among word candidates) and a joint character association metric to progressively improve the segmentation results of the input corpus (and thus the new word list.) An augmented dictionary, which includes potential unknown words (in addition to known words), is used to segment the input corpus, unlike traditional approaches which use only known words for segmentation. In the segmentation process, the augmented dictionary is used to impose contextual constraints over known words and potential unknown words within input sentences; an unsupervised Viterbi Training process is then applied to ensure that the selected potential unknown words (and known words) maximize the likelihood of the input corpus. On the other hand, the joint character association metric (which reflects the global character association characteristics across the corpus) is derived by integrating several commonly used word association metrics, such as mutual information and entropy, with a joint Gaussian mixture density function; such integration allows the filter to use multiple features simultaneously to evaluate character association, unlike traditional filters which apply multiple features independently. The proposed method then allows the contextual constraints and the joint character association metric to enhance each other; this is achieved by iteratively applying the joint association metric to truncate unlikely unknown words in the augmented dictionary and using the segmentation result to improve the estimation of the joint association metric. The refined augmented dictionary and improved estimation are then used in the next iteration to acquire better segmentation and carry out more reliable filtering. Experiments show that both the precision and recall rates are improved almost monotonically, in contrast to non-iterative segmentation-merging-filtering-and-disambiguation approaches, which often sacrifice precision for recall or vice versa. With a corpus of 311,591 sentences, the performance is 76 (bigram), 54 (trigram), and 70 (quadragram) in F-measure, which is significantly better than using the non-iterative approach with F-measures of 74 (bigram), 46 (trigram), and 58 (quadragram).