Anecdotal evidence has emerged suggesting that state-sponsored organizations, like the Russian Internet Research Agency, have exploited mainstream social. Their primary goal is apparently to conduct information warfare operations to manipulate public opinion using accounts disguised as "normal" people. To increase engagement and credibility of their posts, these accounts regularly share images. However, the use of images by state-sponsored accounts has yet to be examined by the research community. In this work, we address this gap by analyzing a ground truth dataset of 1.8M images posted to Twitter by called Russian trolls. More specifically, we analyze the content of the images, as well as the posting activity of the accounts. Among other things, we find that image posting activity of Russian trolls is tightly coupled with real-world events, and that their targets, as well as the content shared, changed over time. When looking at the interplay between domains that shared the same images as state-sponsored trolls, we find clear cut differences in the origin and or spread of images across the Web. Overall, our findings provide new insight into how state-sponsored trolls operate, and specifically how they use imagery to achieve their goals.
Finally, @cite_18 use machine learning to detect Twitter users that are likely to share content that originates from Russian state-sponsored accounts.
@cite_18
2963523292 2595521492 1517046895 2521978756
During sudden onset crisis events, the presence of spam, rumors and fake content on Twitter reduces the value of information contained on its messages (or “tweets”). A possible solution to this problem is to use machine learning to automatically evaluate the credibility of a tweet, i.e. whether a person would deem the tweet believable or trustworthy. This has been often framed and studied as a supervised classification problem in an off-line (post-hoc) setting. Increasing evidence suggests that a growing amount of social media content is generated by autonomous entities known as social bots. In this work we present a framework to detect such entities on Twitter. We leverage more than a thousand features extracted from public data and meta-data about users: friends, tweet content and sentiment, network patterns, and activity time series. We benchmark the classification framework by using a publicly available dataset of Twitter bots. This training data is enriched by a manually annotated collection of active Twitter users that include both humans and bots of varying sophistication. Our models yield high accuracy and agreement with each other and can detect bots of different nature. Our estimates suggest that between 9 and 15 of active Twitter accounts are bots. Characterizing ties among accounts, we observe that simple bots tend to interact with bots that exhibit more human-like behaviors. Analysis of content flows reveals retweet and mention strategies adopted by bots to interact with different target groups. Using clustering analysis, we characterize several subclasses of accounts, including spammers, self promoters, and accounts that post content from connected applications. As online social networking sites become more and more popular, they have also attracted the attentions of the spammers. In this paper, Twitter, a popular micro-blogging service, is studied as an example of spam bots detection in online social networking sites. A machine learning approach is proposed to distinguish the spam bots from normal ones. To facilitate the spam bots detection, three graph-based features, such as the number of friends and the number of followers, are extracted to explore the unique follower and friend relationships among users on Twitter. Three content-based features are also extracted from user's most recent 20 tweets. A real data set is collected from Twitter's public available information using two different methods. Evaluation experiments show that the detection system is efficient and accurate to identify spam bots in Twitter. A considerable amount of data in social networks like Twitter is not generated by humans but by automatic programs (bots). Some of these bots are mimicking humans (socialbots) and can hardly be identified. In this article, we analyze a social botnet involved in the Ukrainian Russian conflict. Based on text mining and unsupervised learning, we can identify three different behaviors: mimicry, window dressing, and reverberation.