Performance and scalability are a major concern for blockchain systems to become viable for mainstream applications. While many permissionless systems are limited by slow the consensus algorithms, Hyperledger Fabric has unique throughput optimization potential due to its permissioned nature. It has been shown to handle tens of thousands of transactions per second. However, these numbers show only the nominal throughput for uncontested transaction workloads. If incoming transactions compete for a small set of hot keys in the world state, the effective throughput drops drastically. We propose a novel two-pronged transaction execution approach that minimizes invalid transactions in the Fabric blockchain while maximizing concurrent execution.
Lastly, Zhang @cite_3 present a solution for a client-side early abort mechanism for Fabric. They introduce a transaction cache on the client that analyzes endorsed transactions to detect RW set conflicts and only sends conflict-free transactions to the ordering service. Transactions that have dependencies are held in the cache until the conflict is resolved and then they are sent back to the endorsers for re-execution. This approach prevents invalid transactions from a single client, but cannot deal with conflicts between multiple clients. Moreover, it cannot deal with hot key workloads either.
@cite_3
2612369081 2403712541 1566614300 2051343255
The optimistic variants of Multi-Version Concurrency Control (MVCC) avoid blocking concurrent transactions at the cost of having a validation phase. Upon failure in the validation phase, the transaction is usually aborted and restarted from scratch. The "abort and restart" approach becomes a performance bottleneck for use cases with high contention objects or long running transactions. In addition, restarting from scratch creates a negative feedback loop in the system, because the system incurs additional overhead that may create even more conflicts. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for conflict resolution in MVCC for in-memory databases. This low overhead approach summarizes the transaction programs in the form of a dependency graph. The dependency graph also contains the constructs used in the validation phase of the MVCC algorithm. Then, when encountering conflicts among transactions, our mechanism quickly detects the conflict locations in the program and partially re-executes the conflicting transactions. This approach maximizes the reuse of the computations done in the initial execution round, and increases the transaction processing throughput. Many proposals for managing replicated data use sites running the Snapshot Isolation (SI) concurrency control mechanism, and provide 1-copy SI or something similar, as the global isolation level. This allows good scalability, since only ww-conflicts need to be managed globally. However, 1-copy SI can lead to data corruption and violation of integrity constraints [5]. 1-copy serializability is the global correctness condition that prevents data corruption. We propose a new algorithm Replicated Serializable Snapshot Isolation (RSSI) that uses SI at each site, and combines this with a certification algorithm to guarantee 1-copy serializable global execution. Management of ww-conflicts is similar to what is done in 1-copy SI. But unlike previous designs for 1-copy serializable systems, we do not need to prevent all rw-conflicts among concurrent transactions. We formalize this in a theorem that shows that many rw-conflicts are indeed false positives that do not risk non-serializable behavior. Our proposed RSSI algorithm will only abort a transaction when it detects a well-defined pattern of two consecutive rw-edges in the serialization graph. We have built a prototype that integrates our RSSI with the existing open-source PostgresR(SI) system. Our performance evaluation shows that there is a worst-case overhead of about 15 for getting full 1copy serializability as compared to 1-copy SI in a cluster of 8 nodes, with our proposed RSSI clearly outperforming the previous work [6] for update-intensive workloads. In a software transactional memory (STM) system, conflict detection is the problem of determining when two transactions cannot both safely commit. Validation is the related problem of ensuring that a transaction never views inconsistent data, which might potentially cause a doomed transaction to exhibit irreversible, externally visible side effects. Existing mechanisms for conflict detection vary greatly in their degree of speculation and their relative treatment of read-write and write-write conflicts. Validation, for its part, appears to be a dominant factor—perhaps the dominant factor—in the cost of complex transactions. We present the most comprehensive study to date of conflict detection strategies, characterizing the tradeoffs among them and identifying the ones that perform the best for various types of workload. In the process we introduce a lightweight heuristic mechanism—the global commit counter—that can greatly reduce the cost of validation and of single-threaded execution. The heuristic also allows us to experiment with mixed invalidation, a more opportunistic interleaving of reading and writing transactions. Experimental results on a 16-processor SunFire machine running our RSTM system indicate that the choice of conflict detection strategy can have a dramatic impact on performance, and that the best choice is workload dependent. In workloads whose transactions rarely conflict, the commit counter does little to help (and can even hurt) performance. For less scalable applications, however—those in which STM performance has traditionally been most problematic—it can improve transaction throughput many fold. This paper introduces a novel technique for access by a cognitive Secondary User (SU) to a spectrum with an incumbent Primary User (PU), which uses Type-I Hybrid ARQ. The technique allows the SU to perform selective retransmissions of previously corrupted SU data packets. The temporal redundancy introduced by the primary ARQ protocol and by the selective SU retransmission process can be exploited by the SU receiver to perform Interference Cancellation (IC) over the entire interference pattern, thus creating a "clean" channel for the decoding of the concurrent message. The chain decoding technique, initiated by a successful decoding operation of a SU or PU message, consists in the iterative application of IC, as previously corrupted messages become decodable. Based on this scheme, we design an optimal policy that maximizes the SU throughput under a constraint on the average long-term PU throughput degradation. We show that the optimal policy can be found by first optimizing the SU access policy using a Markov Decision Process formulation, and then applying a chain decoding protocol defined by five basic rules. Such an approach enables a compact state representation of the protocol, and its efficient numerical optimization. Finally, we show by numerical results the throughput benefit of the proposed technique.