We propose a new iris presentation attack detection method using three-dimensional features of an observed iris region estimated by photometric stereo. Our implementation uses a pair of iris images acquired by a common commercial iris sensor (LG 4000). No hardware modifications of any kind are required. Our approach should be applicable to any iris sensor that can illuminate the eye from two different directions. Each iris image in the pair is captured under near-infrared illumination at a different angle relative to the eye. Photometric stereo is used to estimate surface normal vectors in the non-occluded portions of the iris region. The variability of the normal vectors is used as the presentation attack detection score. This score is larger for a texture that is irregularly opaque and printed on a convex contact lens, and is smaller for an authentic iris texture. Thus the problem is formulated as binary classification into (a) an eye wearing textured contact lens and (b) the texture of an actual iris surface (possibly seen through a clear contact lens). Experiments were carried out on a database of approx. 2,900 iris image pairs acquired from approx. 100 subjects. Our method was able to correctly classify over 95 of samples when tested on contact lens brands unseen in training, and over 98 of samples when the contact lens brand was seen during training. The source codes of the method are made available to other researchers.
Iris presentation attack detection has received considerable attention, especially in recent years. A recent survey by Czajka and Bowyer provides detailed summary of the research to date in iris PAD @cite_15 . Below we discuss the iris PAD approaches based on three-dimensional features that are most closely related to the proposed method. In each case we explain how our new approach is different and improves on the known technique.
@cite_15
2017891060 2964009128 2787293095 2627044814
Presentation (or spoof) attacks on biometric system is a growing concern that received substantial attention from both academics and industry. In this paper, we present a novel way of addressing a Presentation Attack Detection (PAD) (or spoof detection) by exploiting the inherent characteristics of the Light Field Camera (LFC) for visible spectrum iris biometric system. The proposed PAD algorithm will capture the variation in the depth (or focus) between multiple depth images rendered by the LFC that in turn can be used to reveal the presentation attacks. To this extent, we introduce a new presentation attack database comprised of 52 subjects with 104 unique eye samples. The database is collected using LFC by simulating the attacks through visible spectrum iris biometric artefacts like printed photo and electronic display (using both Apple iPad (4th generation) and Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 tablet). Extensive experiments carried out on this database reveal the efficacy of the proposed PAD algorithm with a lowest Average Classification Error Rate = 0.5 when confronted with diverse set of attacks on visible spectrum iris biometric system. Iris recognition is increasingly used in large-scale applications. As a result, presentation attack detection for iris recognition takes on fundamental importance. This survey covers the diverse research literature on this topic. Different categories of presentation attack are described and placed in an application-relevant framework, and the state of the art in detecting each category of attack is summarized. One conclusion from this is that presentation attack detection for iris recognition is not yet a solved problem. Datasets available for research are described, research directions for the near- and medium-term future are outlined, and a short list of recommended readings is suggested. Presentation attacks such as using a contact lens with a printed pattern or printouts of an iris can be utilized to bypass a biometric security system. The first international iris liveness competition was launched in 2013 in order to assess the performance of presentation attack detection (PAD) algorithms, with a second competition in 2015. This paper presents results of the third competition, LivDet-Iris 2017. Three software-based approaches to Presentation Attack Detection were submitted. Four datasets of live and spoof images were tested with an additional cross-sensor test. New datasets and novel situations of data have resulted in this competition being of a higher difficulty than previous competitions. Anonymous received the best results with a rate of rejected live samples of 3.36 and rate of accepted spoof samples of 14.71 . The results show that even with advances, printed iris attacks as well as patterned contacts lenses are still difficult for software-based systems to detect. Printed iris images were easier to be differentiated from live images in comparison to patterned contact lenses as was also seen in previous competitions. Presentation attacks such as printed iris images or patterned contact lenses can be used to circumvent an iris recognition system. Different solutions have been proposed to counteract this vulnerability with Presentation Attack Detection (commonly called liveness detection) being used to detect the presence of an attack, yet independent evaluations and comparisons are rare. To fill this gap we have launched the first international iris liveness competition in 2013. This paper presents detailed results of its second edition, organized in 2015 (LivDet-Iris 2015). Four software-based approaches to Presentation Attack Detection were submitted. Results were tallied across three different iris datasets using a standardized testing protocol and large quantities of live and spoof iris images. The Federico Algorithm received the best results with a rate of rejected live samples of 1.68 and rate of accepted spoof samples of 5.48 . This shows that simple static attacks based on paper printouts and printed contact lenses are still challenging to be recognized purely by software-based approaches. Similar to the 2013 edition, printed iris images were easier to be differentiated from live images in comparison to patterned contact lenses.