This paper proposes a machine learning method to predict the solutions of related nonlinear optimal control problems given some parametric input, such as the initial state. The map between problem parameters to optimal solutions is called the problem-optimum map, and is often discontinuous due to nonconvexity, discrete homotopy classes, and control switching. This causes difficulties for traditional function approximators such as neural networks, which assume continuity of the underlying function. This paper proposes a mixture of experts (MoE) model composed of a classifier and several regressors, where each regressor is tuned to a particular continuous region. A novel training approach is proposed that trains classifier and regressors independently. MoE greatly outperforms standard neural networks, and achieves highly reliable trajectory prediction (over 99.5 accuracy) in several dynamic vehicle control problems.
The most related work is previous research on MoE @cite_11 @cite_19 @cite_13 . This paper proposes several modifications to MoE make it suitable for learning optimal control. We use hard classification boundaries to avoid predicting an average of both sides, and we also modify the training approach. Traditionally MoE is trained using either backpropagation @cite_2 or expectation maximization @cite_11 so the gating function and experts are both updated. However, we train the classifier and regressors individually, and experiments suggest that this is fundamental to achieving high trajectory tracking accuracy.
@cite_2 @cite_19 @cite_13 @cite_11
2609701267 2963476860 2344260694 2104094955
Self-paced learning and hard example mining re-weight training instances to improve learning accuracy. This paper presents two improved alternatives based on lightweight estimates of sample uncertainty in stochastic gradient descent (SGD): the variance in predicted probability of the correct class across iterations of mini-batch SGD, and the proximity of the correct class probability to the decision threshold. Extensive experimental results on six datasets show that our methods reliably improve accuracy in various network architectures, including additional gains on top of other popular training techniques, such as residual learning, momentum, ADAM, batch normalization, dropout, and distillation. Self-paced learning and hard example mining re-weight training instances to improve learning accuracy. This paper presents two improved alternatives based on lightweight estimates of sample uncertainty in stochastic gradient descent (SGD): the variance in predicted probability of the correct class across iterations of mini-batch SGD, and the proximity of the correct class probability to the decision threshold. Extensive experimental results on six datasets show that our methods reliably improve accuracy in various network architectures, including additional gains on top of other popular training techniques, such as residual learning, momentum, ADAM, batch normalization, dropout, and distillation. In this paper, we address the problem of simultaneously achieving low trajectory tracking errors and compliant control without using explicit mathematical models of task dynamics. To achieve this goal, we propose a new movement representation called compliant movement primitives (CMPs), which encodes position trajectory and associated torque profiles and can be learned from a single user demonstration. With the proposed control framework, the robot can remain compliant and consequently safe for humans sharing its workspace, even if high trajectory tracking accuracy is required. We developed a statistical learning approach that can use a database of existing CMPs and compute new ones, adapted for novel task variations. The proposed approach was evaluated on a Kuka LWR-4 robot performing 1) a discrete pick-and-place task with objects of varying weight and 2) a periodic handle turning operation. The evaluation of the discrete task showed a 15-fold decrease of the tracking error while exhibiting compliant behavior compared to the standard feedback control approach. It also indicated no significant rise in the tracking error while using generalized primitives computed by the statistical learning method. With respect to unforeseen collisions, the proposed approach resulted in a 75 drop of contact forces compared to standard feedback control. The periodic task demonstrated on-line use of the proposed approach to accomplish a task of handle turning. Discriminative learning methods for classification perform well when training and test data are drawn from the same distribution. Often, however, we have plentiful labeled training data from a source domain but wish to learn a classifier which performs well on a target domain with a different distribution and little or no labeled training data. In this work we investigate two questions. First, under what conditions can a classifier trained from source data be expected to perform well on target data? Second, given a small amount of labeled target data, how should we combine it during training with the large amount of labeled source data to achieve the lowest target error at test time? We address the first question by bounding a classifier's target error in terms of its source error and the divergence between the two domains. We give a classifier-induced divergence measure that can be estimated from finite, unlabeled samples from the domains. Under the assumption that there exists some hypothesis that performs well in both domains, we show that this quantity together with the empirical source error characterize the target error of a source-trained classifier. We answer the second question by bounding the target error of a model which minimizes a convex combination of the empirical source and target errors. Previous theoretical work has considered minimizing just the source error, just the target error, or weighting instances from the two domains equally. We show how to choose the optimal combination of source and target error as a function of the divergence, the sample sizes of both domains, and the complexity of the hypothesis class. The resulting bound generalizes the previously studied cases and is always at least as tight as a bound which considers minimizing only the target error or an equal weighting of source and target errors.