With the demand to process ever-growing data volumes, a variety of new data stream processing frameworks have been developed. Moving an implementation from one such system to another, e.g., for performance reasons, requires adapting existing applications to new interfaces. Apache Beam addresses these high substitution costs by providing an abstraction layer that enables executing programs on any of the supported streaming frameworks. In this paper, we present a novel benchmark architecture for comparing the performance impact of using Apache Beam on three streaming frameworks: Apache Spark Streaming, Apache Flink, and Apache Apex. We find significant performance penalties when using Apache Beam for application development in the surveyed systems. Overall, usage of Apache Beam for the examined streaming applications caused a high variance of query execution times with a slowdown of up to a factor of 58 compared to queries developed without the abstraction layer. All developed benchmark artifacts are publicly available to ensure reproducible results.
The work presented in @cite_11 compares Apache Flink and Apache Spark. The conducted measurements include different queries, a grep query being one of them. One focus area that is analyzed is the scaling behavior with regard to different numbers of nodes in the cluster. However, studying both systems from a data stream processing point of view is out of scope in the performed measurements.
@cite_11
2498111289 2131492297 2221846841 2461442606
Big Data analytics has recently gained increasing popularity as a tool to process large amounts of data on-demand. Spark and Flink are two Apache-hosted data analytics frameworks that facilitate the development of multi-step data pipelines using directly acyclic graph patterns. Making the most out of these frameworks is challenging because efficient executions strongly rely on complex parameter configurations and on an in-depth understanding of the underlyingarchitectural choices. Although extensive research has been devoted to improving and evaluating the performance of such analytics frameworks, most of them benchmarkthe platforms against Hadoop, as a baseline, a rather unfair comparison consideringthe fundamentally different design principles. This paper aims to bring some justice in this respect, by directly evaluating the performance of Sparkand Flink. Our goal is to identify and explain the impact of the different architecturalchoices and the parameter configurations on the perceived end-to-end performance. To this end, we develop a methodology for correlating the parameter settings and the operators execution plan with the resource usage. We use this methodologyto dissect the performance of Spark and Flink with several representative batchand iterative workloads on up to 100 nodes. Our key finding is that there none of the two framework outperforms the other for all data types, sizes and job patterns. This paper performs a fine characterization of the cases when each framework is superior, and we highlight how this performance correlates to operators, to resource usage and to the specifics of the internal framework design. Inspired by Google's BigTable, a variety of scalable, semi-structured, weak-semantic table stores have been developed and optimized for different priorities such as query speed, ingest speed, availability, and interactivity. As these systems mature, performance benchmarking will advance from measuring the rate of simple workloads to understanding and debugging the performance of advanced features such as ingest speed-up techniques and function shipping filters from client to servers. This paper describes YCSB++, a set of extensions to the Yahoo! Cloud Serving Benchmark (YCSB) to improve performance understanding and debugging of these advanced features. YCSB++ includes multi-tester coordination for increased load and eventual consistency measurement, multi-phase workloads to quantify the consequences of work deferment and the benefits of anticipatory configuration optimization such as B-tree pre-splitting or bulk loading, and abstract APIs for explicit incorporation of advanced features in benchmark tests. To enhance performance debugging, we customized an existing cluster monitoring tool to gather the internal statistics of YCSB++, table stores, system services like HDFS, and operating systems, and to offer easy post-test correlation and reporting of performance behaviors. YCSB++ features are illustrated in case studies of two BigTable-like table stores, Apache HBase and Accumulo, developed to emphasize high ingest rates and finegrained security. Distributed graph processing platforms have helped emerging application domains use commodity clusters and Clouds to analyze large graphs. Vertex-centric programming models like Google Pregel, and their subgraph-centric variants, specify data-parallel application logic for a single vertex or component that execute iteratively. The locality and balancing of components within partitions affects the performance of such platforms. We propose three partitioning strategies for a subgraph-centric model, and analyze their impact on CPU utilization, communication, iterations, and makespan. We analyze these using Breadth First Search and PageRank algorithms on powerlaw and spatio-planar graphs. They are validated on a commodity cluster using our GoFFish subgraph-centric platform, and compared against Apache Giraph vertex-centric platform. Our experiments show upto 8 times improvement in utilization resulting to upto 5 times improvement of overall makespan for flat and hierarchical partitioning over the default strategy due to improved machine utilization. Further, these also exhibit better horizontal scalability relative to Giraph. Abstract Large amount of data is being generated from sensors, satellites, social media etc. This big data (velocity, variety, veracity, value and veracity) can be processed so as to make timely decisions by the decision makers. This paper presents results of the proposed Hadoop framework that performs entity resolution in Map and reduce phase. MapReduce phase matches two real world objects and generates rules. The similarity score of these rules are used for matching stream data during testing phase. Similarity is calculated using 13 different semantic measures such as token-based similarity, edit-based similarity, hybrid similarity, phonetic similarity as well as domain dependent Natural language processing measures. Semantic measures are implemented using Hive programming. The proposed system is tested using e-catalogues of Amazon and Google.