The rate of a network code is the ratio of the block size of the network's messages to that of its edge codewords. We compare the linear capacities and achievable rate regions of networks using finite field alphabets to the more general cases of arbitrary ring and module alphabets. For non-commutative rings, two-sided linearity is allowed. Specifically, we prove the following for directed acyclic networks: (i) The linear rate region and the linear capacity of any network over a finite field depend only on the characteristic of the field. Furthermore, any two fields with different characteristics yield different linear capacities for at least one network. (ii) Whenever the characteristic of a given finite field divides the size of a given finite ring, each network's linear rate region over the ring is contained in its linear rate region over the field. Thus, any network's linear capacity over a field is at least its linear capacity over any other ring of the same size. An analogous result also holds for linear network codes over module alphabets. (iii) Whenever the characteristic of a given finite field does not divide the size of a given finite ring, there is some network whose linear capacity over the ring is strictly greater than its linear capacity over the field. Thus, for any finite field, there always exist rings over which some networks have higher linear capacities than over the field.
It was shown in @cite_32 that the capacity of a network is independent of the coding alphabet. However, there are multiple examples in the literature (e.g., @cite_2 , @cite_10 , @cite_40 ) of networks whose linear capacity over a finite field can depend on the field alphabet, specifically by way of the characteristic of the field. Muralidharan and Rajan @cite_20 demonstrated that a fractional linear solution over a finite field @math exists for a network if and only if the network is associated with a discrete polymatroid representable over @math . Linear rank inequalities of vector subspaces and linear information inequalities (e.g., @cite_38 ) are known to be closely related and have been shown to be useful in determining or bounding networks' linear capacities over finite fields (e.g., @cite_29 , @cite_40 , and @cite_31 ).
@cite_38 @cite_29 @cite_32 @cite_40 @cite_2 @cite_31 @cite_10 @cite_20
2103320637 2170344325 1971976913 2119407552
It is known that every solvable multicast network has a scalar linear solution over a sufficiently large finite-field alphabet. It is also known that this result does not generalize to arbitrary networks. There are several examples in the literature of solvable networks with no scalar linear solution over any finite field. However, each example has a linear solution for some vector dimension greater than one. It has been conjectured that every solvable network has a linear solution over some finite-field alphabet and some vector dimension. We provide a counterexample to this conjecture. We also show that if a network has no linear solution over any finite field, then it has no linear solution over any finite commutative ring with identity. Our counterexample network has no linear solution even in the more general algebraic context of modules, which includes as special cases all finite rings and Abelian groups. Furthermore, we show that the network coding capacity of this network is strictly greater than the maximum linear coding capacity over any finite field (exactly 10 greater), so the network is not even asymptotically linearly solvable. It follows that, even for more general versions of linearity such as convolutional coding, filter-bank coding, or linear time sharing, the network has no linear solution. We consider requests for capacity in a given tree network T e (V, E) where each edge e of the tree has some integer capacity ue. Each request f is a node pair with an integer demand df and a profit wf which is obtained if the request is satisfied. The objective is to find a set of demands that can be feasibly routed in the tree and which provides a maximum profit. This generalizes well-known problems, including the knapsack and b-matching problems. When all demands are 1, we have the integer multicommodity flow problem. [1997] had shown that this problem is NP-hard and gave a 2-approximation algorithm for the cardinality case (all profits are 1) via a primal-dual algorithm. Our main result establishes that the integrality gap of the natural linear programming relaxation is at most 4 for the case of arbitrary profits. Our proof is based on coloring paths on trees and this has other applications for wavelength assignment in optical network routing. We then consider the problem with arbitrary demands. When the maximum demand dmax is at most the minimum edge capacity umin, we show that the integrality gap of the LP is at most 48. This result is obtained by showing that the integrality gap for the demand version of such a problem is at most 11.542 times that for the unit-demand case. We use techniques of Kolliopoulos and Stein [2004, 2001] to obtain this. We also obtain, via this method, improved algorithms for line and ring networks. Applications and connections to other combinatorial problems are discussed. We present a framework to study linear deterministic interference networks over finite fields. Unlike the popular linear deterministic models introduced to study Gaussian networks, we consider networks where the channel coefficients are general scalars over some extension field Fpm (scalar m-th extensionfield models), m×m diagonal matrices over Fp (m-symbol extension ground-field models), and m×m general non-singular matrices (MIMO ground field models). We use the companion matrix representation of the extension field to convert m-th extension scalar models into MIMO ground-field models where the channel matrices have special algebraic structure. For such models, we consider the 2× 2× 2 topology (two-hops two-flow) and the 3-user interference network topology. We derive achievability results and feasibility conditions for certain schemes based on the Precoding-Based Network Alignment (PBNA) approach, where intermediate nodes use random linear network coding (i.e., propagate random linear combinations of their incoming messages) and non-trivial precoding decoding is performed only at the network edges, at the sources and destinations. Furthermore, we apply this approach to the scalar 2×2×2 complex Gaussian IC with fixed channel coefficients, and show two competitive schemes outperforming other known approaches at any SNR, where we combine finite-field linear precoding decoding with lattice coding and the Compute and Forward approach at the signal level. As a side result, we also show significant advantages of vector linear network coding both in terms of feasibility probability (with random coding coefficients) and in terms of coding latency, with respect to standard scalar linear network coding, in PBNA schemes. We consider the problem of achieving capacity through network coding when some of the nodes act covertly as Byzantine adversaries. For several case-study networks, we investigate rates of reliable communication through network coding and upper bounds on capacity. We show that linear codes are inadequate in general, and a slight augmentation of the class of linear codes can increase throughput. Furthermore, we show that even this nonlinear augmentation may not be enough to achieve capacity. We introduce a new class of codes known as bounded-linear that make use of distributions defined over bounded sets of integers subject to linear constraints using real arithmetic.