We consider polling models in the sense of Takagi (MIT Press, 1986). In our case, the feature of the server is that it may be forced to wait idly for new messages at an empty queue instead of switching to the next station. We propose four different wait-and-see strategies that govern these waiting periods. We assume Poisson arrivals for new messages and allow general service and switchover time distributions. The results are formulas for the mean average queueing delay and characterisations of the cases where the wait-and-see strategies yield a lower delay compared to the exhaustive strategy.
Besides the main references @cite_14 and @cite_16 , further papers deal with service strategies which have in common that the server does not necessarily switch to the next station when the current queue is empty. Polling models with deterministic sojourn times and preemptive service are considered in @cite_15 and with exponentially distributed sojourn times in @cite_0 . Similar to Strategy IV, in the setting of @cite_10 the server waits exactly for the first arriving message at an empty station. @cite_1 @cite_2 @cite_5 , forced idle times are examined where the server is not allowed to resume service immediately as soon as a new message arrives during these idle periods.
@cite_14 @cite_1 @cite_0 @cite_2 @cite_5 @cite_15 @cite_16 @cite_10
2015774390 1979835465 2014774334 2021011293
In a Fork-Join (FJ) queueing system an upstream fork station splits incoming jobs into N tasks to be further processed by N parallel servers, each with its own queue; the response time of one job is determined, at a downstream join station, by the maximum of the corresponding tasks' response times. This queueing system is useful to the modelling of multi-service systems subject to synchronization constraints, such as MapReduce clusters or multipath routing. Despite their apparent simplicity, FJ systems are hard to analyze. This paper provides the first computable stochastic bounds on the waiting and response time distributions in FJ systems. We consider four practical scenarios by combining 1a) renewal and 1b) non-renewal arrivals, and 2a) non-blocking and 2b) blocking servers. In the case of non blocking servers we prove that delays scale as O(logN), a law which is known for first moments under renewal input only. In the case of blocking servers, we prove that the same factor of log N dictates the stability region of the system. Simulation results indicate that our bounds are tight, especially at high utilizations, in all four scenarios. A remarkable insight gained from our results is that, at moderate to high utilizations, multipath routing 'makes sense' from a queueing perspective for two paths only, i.e., response times drop the most when N = 2; the technical explanation is that the resequencing (delay) price starts to quickly dominate the tempting gain due to multipath transmissions. We propose a new priority discipline called the T-preemptive priority discipline. Under this discipline, during the service of a customer, at every T time units the server periodically reviews the queue states of each class with different queue-review processing times. If the server finds any customers with higher priorities than the customer being serviced during the queue-review process, then the service of the customer being serviced is preempted and the service for customers with higher priorities is started immediately. We derive the waiting-time distributions of each class in the M G 1 priority queue with multiple classes of customers under the proposed T-preemptive priority discipline. We also present lower and upper bounds on the offered loads and the mean waiting time of each class, which hold regardless of the arrival processes and service-time distributions of lower-class customers. To demonstrate the utility of the T-preemptive priority queueing model, we take as an example an opportunistic spectrum access in cognitive radio networks, where one primary (licensed) user and multiple (unlicensed) users with distinct priorities can share a communication channel. We analyze the queueing delays of the primary and secondary users in the proposed opportunistic spectrum access model, and present numerical results of the queueing analysis. For a system of finite queues, we study how servers should be assigned dynamically to stations in order to obtain optimal (or near-optimal) long-run average throughput. We assume that travel times between different service facilities are negligible, that each server can work on only one job at a time, and that several servers can work together on one job. We show that when the service rates depend only on either the server or the station (and not both), then all nonidling server assignment policies are optimal. Moreover, for a Markovian system with two stations in tandem and two servers, we show that the optimal policy assigns one server to each station unless that station is blocked or starved (in which case the server helps at the other station), and we specify the criterion used for assigning servers to stations. Finally, we propose a simple server assignment policy for tandem systems in which the number of stations equals the number of servers, and we present numerical results that show that our policy appears to yield near-optimal throughput under general conditions. We consider a distributed server system in which heterogeneous servers operate under the processor sharing (PS) discipline. Exponentially distributed jobs arrive to a dispatcher, which assigns each task to one of the servers. In the so-called size-aware system, the dispatcher is assumed to know the remaining service requirements of some or all of the existing jobs in each server. The aim is to minimize the mean sojourn time, i.e., the mean response time. To this end, we first analyze an M M 1-PS queue in the framework of Markov decision processes, and derive the so-called size-aware relative value of state, which sums up the deviation from the average rate at which sojourn times are accumulated in the infinite time horizon. This task turns out to be non-trivial. The exact analysis yields an infinite system of first order differential equations, for which an explicit solution is derived. The relative values are then utilized to develop efficient dispatching policies by means of the first policy iteration (FPI). Numerically, we show that for the exponentially distributed job sizes the myopic approach, ignoring the future arrivals, yields an efficient and robust policy when compared to other heuristics. However, in the case of highly asymmetric service rates, an FPI based policy outperforms it. Additionally, the size-aware relative value of an M G 1-PS queue is shown to be sensitive with respect to the form of job size distribution, and indeed, the numerical experiments with constant job sizes confirm that the optimal decision depends on the job size distribution.