Light field cameras capture the 3D information in a scene with a single exposure. This special feature makes light field cameras very appealing for a variety of applications: from post-capture refocus to depth estimation and image-based rendering. However, light field cameras suffer by design from strong limitations in their spatial resolution. Off-the-shelf super-resolution algorithms are not ideal for light field data, as they do not consider its structure. On the other hand, the few super-resolution algorithms explicitly tailored for light field data exhibit significant limitations, such as the need to carry out a costly disparity estimation procedure with sub-pixel precision. We propose a new light field super-resolution algorithm meant to address these limitations. We use the complementary information in the different light field views to augment the spatial resolution of the whole light field at once. In particular, we show that coupling the multi-view approach with a graph-based regularizer, which enforces the light field geometric structure, permits to avoid the need of a precise and costly disparity estimation step. Extensive experiments show that the new algorithm compares favorably to the state-of-the-art methods for light field super-resolution, both in terms of visual quality and in terms of reconstruction error.
The super-resolution literature is quite vast, but it can be divided mainly into two areas: single-frame and multi-frame super-resolution methods. In single-frame super-resolution, only one image from a scene is provided, and its resolution has to be increased. This goal is typically achieved by learning a mapping from the low resolution data to the high resolution one, either on an external training set @cite_11 @cite_28 @cite_19 or on the image itself @cite_31 @cite_13 . Single-frame algorithms can be applied to each light field view separately in order to augment the resolution of the whole light field, but this approach would neither exploit the high correlation among the views, nor enforce the consistency among them.
@cite_28 @cite_19 @cite_31 @cite_13 @cite_11
2534320940 1601729531 2914829730 1950594372
Methods for super-resolution can be broadly classified into two families of methods: (i) The classical multi-image super-resolution (combining images obtained at subpixel misalignments), and (ii) Example-Based super-resolution (learning correspondence between low and high resolution image patches from a database). In this paper we propose a unified framework for combining these two families of methods. We further show how this combined approach can be applied to obtain super resolution from as little as a single image (with no database or prior examples). Our approach is based on the observation that patches in a natural image tend to redundantly recur many times inside the image, both within the same scale, as well as across different scales. Recurrence of patches within the same image scale (at subpixel misalignments) gives rise to the classical super-resolution, whereas recurrence of patches across different scales of the same image gives rise to example-based super-resolution. Our approach attempts to recover at each pixel its best possible resolution increase based on its patch redundancy within and across scales. We propose a super-resolution method that exploits selfsimilarities and group structural information of image patches using only one single input frame. The super-resolution problem is posed as learning the mapping between pairs of low-resolution and high-resolution image patches. Instead of relying on an extrinsic set of training images as often required in example-based super-resolution algorithms, we employ a method that generates image pairs directly from the image pyramid of one single frame. The generated patch pairs are clustered for training a dictionary by enforcing group sparsity constraints underlying the image patches. Super-resolution images are then constructed using the learned dictionary. Experimental results show the proposed method is able to achieve the state-of-the-art performance. Image Super-Resolution: Historical Overview and Future Challenges, J. Yang and T. Huang Introduction to Super-Resolution Notations Techniques for Super-Resolution Challenge issues for Super-Resolution Super-Resolution Using Adaptive Wiener Filters, R.C. Hardie Introduction Observation Model AWF SR Algorithms Experimental Results Conclusions Acknowledgments Locally Adaptive Kernel Regression for Space-Time Super-Resolution, H. Takeda and P. Milanfar Introduction Adaptive Kernel Regression Examples Conclusion AppendiX Super-Resolution With Probabilistic Motion Estimation, M. Protter and M. Elad Introduction Classic Super-Resolution: Background The Proposed Algorithm Experimental Validation Summary Spatially Adaptive Filtering as Regularization in Inverse Imaging, A. Danielyan, A. Foi, V. Katkovnik, and K. Egiazarian Introduction Iterative filtering as regularization Compressed sensing Super-resolution Conclusions Registration for Super-Resolution, P. Vandewalle, L. Sbaiz, and M. Vetterli Camera Model What Is Resolution? Super-Resolution as a Multichannel Sampling Problem Registration of Totally Aliased Signals Registration of Partially Aliased Signals Conclusions Towards Super-Resolution in the Presence of Spatially Varying Blur, M. Sorel, F. Sroubek and J. Flusser Introduction Defocus and Optical Aberrations Camera Motion Blur Scene Motion Algorithms Conclusion Acknowledgments Toward Robust Reconstruction-Based Super-Resolution, M. Tanaka and M. Okutomi Introduction Overviews Robust SR Reconstruction with Pixel Selection Robust Super-Resolution Using MPEG Motion Vectors Robust Registration for Super-Resolution Conclusions Multi-Frame Super-Resolution from a Bayesian Perspective, L. Pickup, S. Roberts, A. Zisserman and D. Capel The Generative Model Where Super-Resolution Algorithms Go Wrong Simultaneous Super-Resolution Bayesian Marginalization Concluding Remarks Variational Bayesian Super Resolution Reconstruction, S. Derin Babacan, R. Molina, and A.K. Katsaggelos Introduction Problem Formulation Bayesian Framework for Super Resolution Bayesian Inference Variational Bayesian Inference Using TV Image Priors Experiments Estimation of Motion and Blur Conclusions Acknowledgements Pattern Recognition Techniques for Image Super-Resolution, K. Ni and T.Q. Nguyen Introduction Nearest Neighbor Super-Resolution Markov Random Fields and Approximations Kernel Machines for Image Super-Resolution Multiple Learners and Multiple Regressions Design Considerations and Examples Remarks Glossary Super-Resolution Reconstruction of Multi-Channel Images, O.G. Sezer and Y. Altunbasak Introduction Notation Image Acquisition Model Subspace Representation Reconstruction Algorithm Experiments & Discussions Conclusion New Applications of Super-Resolution in Medical Imaging, M.D.Robinson, S.J. Chiu, C.A. Toth, J.A. Izatt, J.Y. Lo, and S. Farsiu Introduction The Super-Resolution Framework New Medical Imaging Applications Conclusion Acknowledgment Practicing Super-Resolution: What Have We Learned? N. Bozinovic Abstract Introduction MotionDSP: History and Concepts Markets and Applications Technology Results Lessons Learned Conclusions The aim of single image super-resolution is to reconstruct a high-resolution image from a single low-resolution input. Although the task is ill-posed it can be seen as finding a non-linear mapping from a low to high-dimensional space. Recent methods that rely on both neighborhood embedding and sparse-coding have led to tremendous quality improvements. Yet, many of the previous approaches are hard to apply in practice because they are either too slow or demand tedious parameter tweaks. In this paper, we propose to directly map from low to high-resolution patches using random forests. We show the close relation of previous work on single image super-resolution to locally linear regression and demonstrate how random forests nicely fit into this framework. During training the trees, we optimize a novel and effective regularized objective that not only operates on the output space but also on the input space, which especially suits the regression task. During inference, our method comprises the same well-known computational efficiency that has made random forests popular for many computer vision problems. In the experimental part, we demonstrate on standard benchmarks for single image super-resolution that our approach yields highly accurate state-of-the-art results, while being fast in both training and evaluation.