In this paper, we derive bounds for profit maximizing prior-free procurement auctions where a buyer wishes to procure multiple units of a homogeneous item from n sellers who are strategic about their per unit valuation. The buyer earns the profit by reselling these units in an external consumer market. The paper looks at three scenarios of increasing complexity. First, we look at unit capacity sellers where per unit valuation is private information of each seller and the revenue curve is concave. For this setting, we define two benchmarks. We show that no randomized prior free auction can be constant competitive against any of these two benchmarks. However, for a lightly constrained benchmark we design a prior-free auction PEPA (Profit Extracting Procurement Auction) which is 4-competitive and we show this bound is tight. Second, we study a setting where the sellers have non-unit capacities that are common knowledge and derive similar results. In particular, we propose a prior free auction PEPAC (Profit Extracting Procurement Auction with Capacity) which is truthful for any concave revenue curve. Third, we obtain results in the inherently harder bi-dimensional case where per unit valuation as well as capacities are private information of the sellers. We show that PEPAC is truthful and constant competitive for the specific case of linear revenue curves. We believe that this paper represents the first set of results on single dimensional and bi-dimensional profit maximizing prior-free multi-unit procurement auctions.
Beyond the digital goods setting, @cite_2 have studied prior-free auctions under several settings such as multi-unit, position auctions, downward-closed, and matroid environments. They design a prior-free auction with competitive ratio of 6.24 for the multi-unit and position auctions using the 3.12 competitive auction for digital goods given in @cite_15 . They also design an auction with a competitive ratio of 12.5 for multi-unit settings by directly generalizing the random sampling auction given in @cite_3 . Our setting is different than the above works on forward auction as we consider a procurement auction with capacitated sellers.
@cite_15 @cite_3 @cite_2
2952244728 2269992556 2404718321 1964005287
We consider prior-free auctions for revenue and welfare maximization when agents have a common budget. The abstract environments we consider are ones where there is a downward-closed and symmetric feasibility constraint on the probabilities of service of the agents. These environments include position auctions where slots with decreasing click-through rates are auctioned to advertisers. We generalize and characterize the envy-free benchmark from Hartline and Yan (2011) to settings with budgets and characterize the optimal envy-free outcomes for both welfare and revenue. We give prior-free mechanisms that approximate these benchmarks. A building block in our mechanism is a clinching auction for position auction environments. This auction is a generalization of the multi-unit clinching auction of (2008) and a special case of the polyhedral clinching auction of (2012). For welfare maximization, we show that this clinching auction is a good approximation to the envy-free optimal welfare for position auction environments. For profit maximization, we generalize the random sampling profit extraction auction from (2002) for digital goods to give a 10.0-approximation to the envy-free optimal revenue in symmetric, downward-closed environments. The profit maximization question is of interest even without budgets and our mechanism is a 7.5-approximation which improving on the 30.4 bound of Ha and Hartline (2012). We study digital-goods auctions for items in unlimited supply introduced by Goldberg, Hartline and Wright. Since no deterministic algorithms are competitive for this class of auctions, one of the central research issues is how to obtain a nice probabilistic distribution over truthful algorithms. In this paper, we introduce a rather systematic approach to this goal: Consider for example the Sampling Cost Share (SCS) auction. It is well known that SCS works well if the the current bid vector produces many winners against F(2), the standard benchmark algorithm for competitive analysis. In fact, its competitive ratio is approaching to 2.0 as k (= the number of F(2) winners) grows. On the other hand, its competitive ratio becomes as bad as 4.0 for k = 2. Our new approach is to develop a sequence of similar cost-share type algorithms, DCSk, which work well for small k. Now we choose a sufficiently large constant N and run DCS1, DCS2, ..., DCSN and SCS with probabilities p1, p2, ..., pN and q, respectively. It should be noted that we can use LP to obtain optimal p1, p2,..., pN and q. By this averaging method, we can improve the competitive ratio of SCS from 4.0 to 3.531 and that of the currently best Aggregated γ3 algorithm due to Hartline and McGrew from 3.243 to 3.119. We consider the problem of maximizing revenue in prior-free auctions for general single parameter settings. The setting is modeled by an arbitrary downward-closed set system, which captures many special cases such as single item, digital goods and single-minded combinatorial auctions. We relax the truthfulness requirement by the solution concept of Nash equilibria. Implementation by Nash equilibria is a natural and relevant framework in many applications of computer science, where auctions are run repeatedly and bidders can observe others’ strategies, but the auctioneer needs to design a mechanism in advance and cannot use any information on the bidders’ private valuations. We introduce a worst-case revenue benchmark which generalizes the second price of single item auction and the F2 benchmark, introduced by , for digital goods. We design a mechanism whose Nash equilibria obtains at least a constant factor of this benchmark and prove that no truthful mechanisms can achieve a constant approximation. We study a class of single round, sealed bid auctions for items in unlimited supply such as digital goods. We focus on auctions that are truthful and competitive. Truthful auctions encourage bidders to bid their utility; competitive auctions yield revenue within a constant factor of the revenue for optimal fixed pricing. We show that for any truthful auction, even a multi-price auction, the expected revenue does not exceed that for optimal fixed pricing. We also give a bound on how far the revenue for optimal fixed pricing can be from the total market utility. We show that several randomized auctions are truthful and competitive under certain assumptions, and that no truthful deterministic auction is competitive. We present simulation results which confirm that our auctions compare favorably to fixed pricing. Some of our results extend to bounded supply markets, for which we also get truthful and competitive auctions.