In this paper, we discuss a method for identifying a seed word that would best represent a class of named entities in a graphical representation of words and their similarities. Word networks, or word graphs, are representations of vectorized text where nodes are the words encountered in a corpus, and the weighted edges incident on the nodes represent how similar the words are to each other. We intend to build a bilingual word graph and identify seed words through community analysis that would be best used to segment a graph according to its named entities, therefore providing an unsupervised way of tagging named entities for a bilingual language base.
In work done by @cite_1 researchers created sense graphs @math , for topic @math , such that @math is a seed concept or seed word, to model topics in DBpedia. They constructed a DBpedia graph, and using centrality measures, were able to show which words best represent topics in DBpedia. The researchers suggest several centrality measures to identify the best seed words, and present their experimental results for several focused centrality measures.
@cite_1
2097807612 1550806611 2110693578 2251786111
Automated topic labelling brings benefits for users aiming at analysing and understanding document collections, as well as for search engines targetting at the linkage between groups of words and their inherent topics. Current approaches to achieve this suffer in quality, but we argue their performances might be improved by setting the focus on the structure in the data. Building upon research for concept disambiguation and linking to DBpedia, we are taking a novel approach to topic labelling by making use of structured data exposed by DBpedia. We start from the hypothesis that words co-occuring in text likely refer to concepts that belong closely together in the DBpedia graph. Using graph centrality measures, we show that we are able to identify the concepts that best represent the topics. We comparatively evaluate our graph-based approach and the standard text-based approach, on topics extracted from three corpora, based on results gathered in a crowd-sourcing experiment. Our research shows that graph-based analysis of DBpedia can achieve better results for topic labelling in terms of both precision and topic coverage. Keywords characterize the topics discussed in a document. Extracting a small set of keywords from a single document is an important problem in text mining. We propose a hybrid structural and statistical approach to extract keywords. We represent the given document as an undirected graph, whose vertices are words in the document and the edges are labeled with a dissimilarity measure between two words, derived from the frequency of their co-occurrence in the document. We propose that central vertices in this graph are candidates as keywords. We model importance of a word in terms of its centrality in this graph. Using graph-theoretical notions of vertex centrality, we suggest several algorithms to extract keywords from the given document. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms on real-life documents. We introduce a stochastic graph-based method for computing relative importance of textual units for Natural Language Processing. We test the technique on the problem of Text Summarization (TS). Extractive TS relies on the concept of sentence salience to identify the most important sentences in a document or set of documents. Salience is typically defined in terms of the presence of particular important words or in terms of similarity to a centroid pseudo-sentence. We consider a new approach, LexRank, for computing sentence importance based on the concept of eigenvector centrality in a graph representation of sentences. In this model, a connectivity matrix based on intra-sentence cosine similarity is used as the adjacency matrix of the graph representation of sentences. Our system, based on LexRank ranked in first place in more than one task in the recent DUC 2004 evaluation. In this paper we present a detailed analysis of our approach and apply it to a larger data set including data from earlier DUC evaluations. We discuss several methods to compute centrality using the similarity graph. The results show that degree-based methods (including LexRank) outperform both centroid-based methods and other systems participating in DUC in most of the cases. Furthermore, the LexRank with threshold method outperforms the other degree-based techniques including continuous LexRank. We also show that our approach is quite insensitive to the noise in the data that may result from an imperfect topical clustering of documents. In this paper, we present and compare various centrality measures for graphbased keyphrase extraction. Through experiments carried out on three standard datasets of different languages and domains, we show that simple degree centrality achieve results comparable to the widely used TextRank algorithm, and that closeness centrality obtains the best results on short documents.