A communication network is called a radio network if its nodes exchange messages in the following restricted way. First, a send operation performed by a node delivers copies of the same message to all directly reachable nodes. Secondly, a node can successfully receive an incoming message only if exactly one of its neighbors sent a message in that step. It is this semantics of how ports at nodes send and receive messages that defines the networks rather than the fact that only radio waves are used as a medium of communication; but if that is the case then just a single frequency is used. We discuss algorithmic aspects of exchanging information in such networks, concentrating on distributed randomized protocols. Specific problems and solutions depend a lot on the topology of the underlying reachability graph and how much the nodes know about it. In single-hop networks each pair of nodes can communicate directly. This kind of networks is also known as the multiple access channel. Popular broadcasting protocols used on such channels are Aloha and the exponential backoff. Multi-hop networks may have arbitrary topology and packets need to be routed hopping through a sequence of adjacent nodes. Distributed protocols run by such networks are usually robust enough not to expect the nodes to know their neighbors. These ad-hoc networks and protocols model the situation when nodes are mobile and do not rely on a fixed infrastructure.
G asieniec, Pelc and Peleg @cite_40 compared the locally and globally synchronous models of single-hop radio networks in the context of the wakeup problem, in which the time when each station joins the protocol is controlled by an adversary, and the goal of an algorithm is to perform a successful broadcast as soon as possible. If the stations have access to a global clock then wakeup can be realized in time @math with the probability at least @math , by iterating procedure Decay . If the local clocks are not synchronized, then processors may flip coins with the probability @math of heads to come up, to decide if to transmit in a step, this yields an algorithm operating in time @math with the probability at least @math . Deterministic algorithms in such setting require time @math , and deterministic schedules are known to exist achieving time @math .
@cite_40
1984375161 1984355228 2116344546 2088895311
We present an improved algorithm to wake up a multi-hop ad-hoc radio network. The goal is to have all the nodes activated, when some of them may wake up spontaneously at arbitrary times and the remaining nodes need to be awoken by the already active ones. The best previously known wake-up algorithm was given by Chrobak, Gasieniec and Kowalski [11], and operated in time O(n5 3 log n), where n is the number of nodes. We give an algorithm with the running time O(n3 2 log n). This also yields better algorithms for other synchronization-type primitives, like leader election and local-clocks synchronization, each with a time performance that differs from that of wake-up by an extra factor of O(log n) only, and improves the best previously known method for the problem by a factor of n1 6. A wake-up algorithm is a schedule of transmissions for each node. It can be represented as a collection of binary sequences. Useful properties of such collections have been abstracted to define a (radio) synchronizer. It has been known that good radio synchronizers exist and previous algorithms [17,11] relied on this. We show how to construct such synchronizers in polynomial time, from suitable constructible expanders. As an application, we obtain a wake-up protocol for a multiple-access channel that activates the network in time O(k2 polylog n), where k is the number of stations that wake up spontaneously, and which can be found in time polynomial in n. We extend the notion of synchronizers to universal synchronizers. We show that there exist universal synchronizers with parameters that guarantee time O(n3 2 log n) of wake-up. We study the problem of waking up a collection of @math processors connected by a multihop ad hoc ratio network with unknown topology, no access to a global clock, and no collision detection mechanism available. Each node in the network either wakes up spontaneously or gets activated by receiving a wake-up signal from another node. All active nodes transmit the wake-up signals according to a given protocol @math . The running time of @math is the number of steps counted from the first spontaneous wake-up until all nodes become activated. We provide two protocols for this problem. The first one is a deterministic protocol with running time @math . Our protocol is based on a novel concept of a shift-tolerant selector to which we refer as a (radio) synchronizer. The second protocol is randomized, and its expected running time is @math , where @math is the diameter of the network. Subsequently we show how to employ our wake-up protocols to solve two other communication primitives: leader election and clock synchronization. Radio networks model wireless communication when processing units communicate using one wave frequency. This is captured by the property that multiple messages arriving simultaneously to a node interfere with one another and none of them can be read reliably. We present improved solutions to the problem of waking up such a network. This requires activating all nodes in a scenario when some nodes start to be active spontaneously, while every sleeping node needs to be awaken by receiving successfully a message from a neighbor. Our contributions concern the existence and efficient construction of universal radio synchronizers, which are combinatorial structures introduced in [6] as building blocks of efficient wake-up algorithms. First we show by counting that there are (n,g)-universal synchronizers for @math . Next we show an explicit construction of (n,g)-universal-synchronizers for @math . By way of applications, we obtain an existential wake-up algorithm which works in time @math and an explicitly instantiated algorithm that works in time @math , where n is the number of nodes and @math is the maximum in-degree in the network. Algorithms for leader-election and synchronization can be developed on top of wake-up ones, as shown in [7], such that they work in time slower by a factor of @math than the underlying wake-up ones. The paper considers broadcasting in radio networks, modeled as unit disk graphs (UDG). Such networks occur in wireless communication between sites (e.g., stations or sensors) situated in a terrain. Network stations are represented by points in the Euclidean plane, where a station is connected to all stations at distance at most 1 from it. A message transmitted by a station reaches all its neighbors, but a station hears a message (receives the message correctly) only if exactly one of its neighbors transmits at a given time step. One station of the network, called the source, has a message which has to be disseminated to all other stations. Stations are unaware of the network topology. Two broadcasting models are considered. In the conditional wake up model, the stations other than the source are initially idle and cannot transmit until they hear a message for the first time. In the spontaneous wake up model, all stations are awake (and may transmit messages) from the beginning. It turns out that broadcasting time depends on two parameters of the UDG network, namely, its diameter D and its granularity g, which is the inverse of the minimum distance between any two stations. We present a deterministic broadcasting algorithm which works in time O (D g) under the conditional wake up model and prove that broadcasting in this model cannot be accomplished by any deterministic algorithm in time better than ( (D g ) ) . For the spontaneous wake up model, we design two deterministic broadcasting algorithms: the first works in time O (D + g 2) and the second in time O (D log g). While neither of these algorithms alone is optimal for all parameter values, we prove that the algorithm obtained by interleaving their steps, and thus working in time ( O ( D + g^2, D g ) ), turns out to be optimal by establishing a matching lower bound.