Many widely studied graphical models with latent variables lead to nontrivial constraints on the distribution of the observed variables. Inspired by the Bell inequalities in quantum mechanics, we refer to any linear inequality whose violation rules out some latent variable model as a "hidden variable test" for that model. Our main contribution is to introduce a sequence of relaxations which provides progressively tighter hidden variable tests. We demonstrate applicability to mixtures of sequences of i.i.d. variables, Bell inequalities, and homophily models in social networks. For the last, we demonstrate that our method provides a test that is able to rule out latent homophily as the sole explanation for correlations on a real social network that are known to be due to influence.
is another algebraic technique that uses Gr "obner bases to find the smallest (set of polynomial equality statements) that contains a semi-algebraic set @cite_9 @cite_4 . Unfortunately, this approach has two limitations. First, it can only find equality constraints, which may not be sufficient for some models. For instance, in the CHSH experiment case, the smallest algebraic variety containing local hidden variable'' models will also contain quantum correlations; whereas, the CHSH inequalities rule out some quantum correlations @cite_22 . The second drawback of the implicitization approach is that its complexity depends on the size of the domains of all the model variables and, in principle, the size of the domain of the latent variable could be infinite.
@cite_9 @cite_4 @cite_22
1988342708 2170546552 2101776314 39834257
By introducing a quantitative degree of commutativity'' in terms of the angle between spin observables we present two tight quantitative trade-off relations in the case of two qubits. First, for entangled states, between the degree of commutativity of local observables and the maximal amount of violation of the Bell inequality: if both local angles increase from zero to @math (i.e., the degree of local commutativity decreases), the maximum violation of the Bell inequality increases. Secondly, a converse trade-off relation holds for separable states: if both local angles approach @math the maximal value obtainable for the correlations in the Bell inequality decreases and thus the non-violation increases. As expected, the extremes of these relations are found in the case of anticommuting local observables where, respectively, the bounds of @math and @math hold for the expectation value of the Bell operator. The trade-off relations show that noncommmutativity gives a more than classical result'' for entangled states, whereas a less than classical result'' is obtained for separable states. The experimental relevance of the trade-off relation for separable states is that it provides an experimental test for two qubit entanglement. Its advantages are twofold: in comparison to violations of Bell inequalities it is a stronger criterion and in comparison to entanglement witnesses it needs to make less strong assumptions about the observables implemented in the experiment. Mulmuley [Mul12a] recently gave an explicit version of Noether’s Normalization lemma for ring of invariants of matrices under simultaneous conjugation, under the conjecture that there are deterministic black-box algorithms for polynomial identity testing (PIT). He argued that this gives evidence that constructing such algorithms for PIT is beyond current techniques. In this work, we show this is not the case. That is, we improve Mulmuley’s reduction and correspondingly weaken the conjecture regarding PIT needed to give explicit Noether Normalization. We then observe that the weaker conjecture has recently been nearly settled by the authors ([FS12]), who gave quasipolynomial size hitting sets for the class of read-once oblivious algebraic branching programs (ROABPs). This gives the desired explicit Noether Normalization unconditionally, up to quasipolynomial factors. As a consequence of our proof we give a deterministic parallel polynomial-time algorithm for deciding if two matrix tuples have intersecting orbit closures, under simultaneous conjugation. We also study the strength of conjectures that Mulmuley requires to obtain similar results as ours. We prove that his conjectures are stronger, in the sense that the computational model he needs PIT algorithms for is equivalent to the well-known algebraic branching program (ABP) model, which is provably stronger than the ROABP model. Finally, we consider the depth-3 diagonal circuit model as defined by Saxena [Sax08], as PIT algorithms for this model also have implications in Mulmuley’s work. Previous work (such as [ASS12] and [FS12]) have given quasipolynomial size hitting sets for this model. In this work, we give a much simpler construction of such hitting sets, using techniques of Shpilka and Volkovich [SV09]. We use the implicitization procedure to generate polynomial equality constraints on the set of distributions induced by local interventions on variables governed by a causal Bayesian network with hidden variables. We show how we may reduce the complexity of the implicitization problem and make the problem tractable in certain causal Bayesian networks. We also show some preliminary results on the algebraic structure of polynomial constraints. The results have applications in distinguishing between causal models and in testing causal models with combined observational and experimental data. Geometric heuristics for the quantifier elimination approach presented by Kapur (2004) are investigated to automatically derive loop invariants expressing weakly relational numerical properties (such as l≤x≤h or l≤±x ±y≤h) for imperative programs. Such properties have been successfully used to analyze commercial software consisting of hundreds of thousands of lines of code (using for example, the Astree tool based on abstract interpretation framework proposed by Cousot and his group). The main attraction of the proposed approach is its much lower complexity in contrast to the abstract interpretation approach (O(n2) in contrast to O(n4), where n is the number of variables) with the ability to still generate invariants of comparable strength. This approach has been generalized to consider disjunctive invariants of the similar form, expressed using maximum function (such as max (x+a,y+b,z+c,d)≤max (x+e,y+f,z+g,h)), thus enabling automatic generation of a subclass of disjunctive invariants for imperative programs as well.