In the incremental knapsack problem (IK), we are given a knapsack whose capacity grows weakly as a function of time. There is a time horizon of T periods and the capacity of the knapsack is Bt in period t for t = 1,...,T. We are also given a set S of N items to be placed in the knapsack. Item i has a value of vi and a weight of wi that is independent of the time period. At any time period t, the sum of the weights of the items in the knapsack cannot exceed the knapsack capac- ity Bt. Moreover, once an item is placed in the knapsack, it cannot be removed from the knapsack at a later time period. We seek to maximize the sum of (discounted) knapsack values over time subject to the capac- ity constraints. We first give a constant factor approximation algorithm for IK, under mild restrictions on the growth rate of Bt (the constant factor depends on the growth rate). We then give a PTAS for IIK, the special case of IK with no discounting, when T = O( p log N).
A special case of the generalized assignment problem where the items' weight and value are identical across knapsacks is known as the ; for this problem, Chekuri and Khanna @cite_2 developed a PTAS. Moreover, they also showed that two mild generalization of the MKP--- @math and @math or @math and @math --- are APX hard, thus ruling out a PTAS for these generalizations, assuming @math . Again, neither the PTAS nor their hardness results are directly applicable to the @math .
@cite_2
2000444555 2036199750 2031666601 2770216739
The multiple knapsack problem (MKP) is a natural and well-known generalization of the single knapsack problem and is defined as follows. We are given a set of @math items and @math bins (knapsacks) such that each item @math has a profit @math and a size @math , and each bin @math has a capacity @math . The goal is to find a subset of items of maximum profit such that they have a feasible packing in the bins. MKP is a special case of the generalized assignment problem (GAP) where the profit and the size of an item can vary based on the specific bin that it is assigned to. GAP is APX-hard and a 2-approximation, for it is implicit in the work of Shmoys and Tardos [Math. Program. A, 62 (1993), pp. 461-474], and thus far, this was also the best known approximation for MKP @. The main result of this paper is a polynomial time approximation scheme (PTAS) for MKP @. Apart from its inherent theoretical interest as a common generalization of the well-studied knapsack and bin packing problems, it appears to be the strongest special case of GAP that is not APX-hard. We substantiate this by showing that slight generalizations of MKP are APX-hard. Thus our results help demarcate the boundary at which instances of GAP become APX-hard. An interesting aspect of our approach is a PTAS-preserving reduction from an arbitrary instance of MKP to an instance with @math distinct sizes and profits. In the partially ordered knapsack problem (POK) we are given a set N of items and a partial order @?"P on N. Each item has a size and an associated weight. The objective is to pack a set N^'@?N of maximum weight in a knapsack of bounded size. N^' should be precedence-closed, i.e., be a valid prefix of @?"P. POK is a natural generalization, for which very little is known, of the classical Knapsack problem. In this paper we present both positive and negative results. We give an FPTAS for the important case of a two-dimensional partial order, a class of partial orders which is a substantial generalization of the series-parallel class, and we identify the first non-trivial special case for which a polynomial-time algorithm exists. Our results have implications for approximation algorithms for scheduling precedence-constrained jobs on a single machine to minimize the sum of weighted completion times, a problem closely related to POK. Abstract We address a variant of the classical knapsack problem in which an upper bound is imposed on the number of items that can be selected. This problem arises in the solution of real-life cutting stock problems by column generation, and may be used to separate cover inequalities with small support within cutting-plane approaches to integer linear programs. We focus our attention on approximation algorithms for the problem, describing a linear-storage Polynomial Time Approximation Scheme (PTAS) and a dynamic-programming based Fully Polynomial Time Approximation Scheme (FPTAS). The main ideas contained in our PTAS are used to derive PTAS's for the knapsack problem and its multi-dimensional generalization which improve on the previously proposed PTAS's. We finally illustrate better PTAS's and FPTAS's for the subset sum case of the problem in which profits and weights coincide. We study the two-dimensional geometric knapsack problem (2DK) in which we are given a set of n axis-aligned rectangular items, each one with an associated profit, and an axis-aligned square knapsack. The goal is to find a (non-overlapping) packing of a maximum profit subset of items inside the knapsack (without rotating items). The best-known polynomial-time approximation factor for this problem (even just in the cardinality case) is (2 + ) [Jansen and Zhang, SODA 2004]. In this paper, we break the 2 approximation barrier, achieving a polynomial-time (17 9 + ) < 1.89 approximation, which improves to (558 325 + ) < 1.72 in the cardinality case. Essentially all prior work on 2DK approximation packs items inside a constant number of rectangular containers, where items inside each container are packed using a simple greedy strategy. We deviate for the first time from this setting: we show that there exists a large profit solution where items are packed inside a constant number of containers plus one L-shaped region at the boundary of the knapsack which contains items that are high and narrow and items that are wide and thin. As a second major and the main algorithmic contribution of this paper, we present a PTAS for this case. We believe that this will turn out to be useful in future work in geometric packing problems. We also consider the variant of the problem with rotations (2DKR), where items can be rotated by 90 degrees. Also, in this case, the best-known polynomial-time approximation factor (even for the cardinality case) is (2 + ) [Jansen and Zhang, SODA 2004]. Exploiting part of the machinery developed for 2DK plus a few additional ideas, we obtain a polynomial-time (3 2 + )-approximation for 2DKR, which improves to (4 3 + ) in the cardinality case.