Motivated by applications in graph drawing and information visualization, we examine the planar split thickness of a graph, that is, the smallest k such that the graph is k-splittable into a planar graph. A k-split operation substitutes a vertex v by at most k new vertices such that each neighbor of v is connected to at least one of the new vertices. We first examine the planar split thickness of complete graphs, complete bipartite graphs, multipartite graphs, bounded degree graphs, and genus-1 graphs. We then prove that it is NP-hard to recognize graphs that are 2-splittable into a planar graph, and show that one can approximate the planar split thickness of a graph within a constant factor. If the treewidth is bounded, then we can even verify k-splittability in linear time, for a constant k.
Knauer and Ueckerdt @cite_29 studied the which is equivalent to our problem and stated several results for splitting graphs into a star forest, a caterpillar forest, or an interval graph. They showed that planar graphs are 4-splittable into a star forest, and planar bipartite graphs as well as outerplanar graphs are 3-splittable into a star forest. It follows from Scheinerman and West @cite_3 that planar graphs are 3-splittable into an interval graph and 4-splittable into a caterpillar forest, while outerplanar graphs are 2-splittable into an interval graph.
@cite_29 @cite_3
2139849594 2018399909 2534944111 2151239055
We consider the problem of covering an input graph H with graphs from a fixed covering class G . The classical covering number of H with respect to G is the minimum number of graphs from G needed to cover the edges of H without covering non-edges of H . We introduce a unifying notion of three covering parameters with respect to G , two of which are novel concepts only considered in special cases before: the local and the folded covering number. Each parameter measures "how far" H is from G in a different way. Whereas the folded covering number has been investigated thoroughly for some covering classes, e.g.,?interval graphs and planar graphs, the local covering number has received little attention.We provide new bounds on each covering number with respect to the following covering classes: linear forests, star forests, caterpillar forests, and interval graphs. The classical graph parameters that result this way are interval number, track number, linear arboricity, star arboricity, and caterpillar arboricity. As input graphs we consider graphs of bounded degeneracy, bounded degree, bounded tree-width or bounded simple tree-width, as well as outerplanar, planar bipartite, and planar graphs. For several pairs of an input class and a covering class we determine exactly the maximum ordinary, local, and folded covering number of an input graph with respect to that covering class. Abstract We study the maximum differential coloring problem , where the vertices of an n -vertex graph must be labeled with distinct numbers ranging from 1 to n , so that the minimum absolute difference between two labels of any two adjacent vertices is maximized. As the problem is NP -hard for general graphs [16] , we consider planar graphs and subclasses thereof. We prove that the maximum differential coloring problem remains NP -hard, even for planar graphs. We also present tight bounds for regular caterpillars and spider graphs. Using these new bounds, we prove that the Miller–Pritikin labeling scheme [19] for forests is optimal for regular caterpillars and for spider graphs. We study a family of closely-related distributed graph problems, which we call degree splitting, where roughly speaking the objective is to partition (or orient) the edges such that each node's degree is split almost uniformly. Our findings lead to answers for a number of problems, a sampling of which includes: • We present a poly log n round deterministic algorithm for (2Δ−1)·(1+o(1))-edge-coloring, where Δ denotes the maximum degree. Modulo the 1 + o(1) factor, this settles one of the long-standing open problems of the area from the 1990's (see e.g. Panconesi and Srinivasan [PODC'92]). Indeed, a weaker requirement of (2Δ − 1) · poly log Δ-edge-coloring in poly log n rounds was asked for in the 4th open question in the Distributed Graph Coloring book by Barenboim and Elkin. • We show that sinkless orientation---i.e., orienting edges such that each node has at least one out-going edge---on Δ-regular graphs can be solved in O(logΔ log n) rounds randomized and in O(logΔ n) rounds deterministically. These prove the corresponding lower bounds by [STOC'16] and Chang, Kopelowitz, and Pettie [FOCS'16] to be tight. Moreover, these show that sinkless orientation exhibits an exponential separation between its randomized and deterministic complexities, akin to the results of for Δ-coloring Δ-regular trees. • We present a randomized O(log4 n) round algorithm for orienting a-arboricity graphs with maximum out-degree a(1 + e). This can be also turned into a decomposition into a(1 + e) forests when a = Ω(log n) and into a(1 + e) pseduo-forests when a = o(log n). Obtaining an efficient distributed decomposition into less than 2a forests was stated as the 10th open problem in the book by Barenboim and Elkin. Given an arc-weighted directed graph G = (V, A, spl lscr ) and a pair of nodes s, t, we seek to find an s-t walk of length at most B that maximizes some given function f of the set of nodes visited by the walk. The simplest case is when we seek to maximize the number of nodes visited: this is called the orienteering problem. Our main result is a quasi-polynomial time algorithm that yields an O(log OPT) approximation for this problem when f is a given submodular set function. We then extend it to the case when a node v is counted as visited only if the walk reaches v in its time window [R(v), D(v)]. We apply the algorithm to obtain several new results. First, we obtain an O(log OPT) approximation for a generalization of the orienteering problem in which the profit for visiting each node may vary arbitrarily with time. This captures the time window problem considered earlier for which, even in undirected graphs, the best approximation ratio known [Bansal, (2004)] is O(log sup 2 OPT). The second application is an O(log sup 2 k) approximation for the k-TSP problem in directed graphs (satisfying asymmetric triangle inequality). This is the first non-trivial approximation algorithm for this problem. The third application is an O(log sup 2 k) approximation (in quasi-poly time) for the group Steiner problem in undirected graphs where k is the number of groups. This improves earlier ratios (Garg, ) by a logarithmic factor and almost matches the inapproximability threshold on trees (Halperin and Krauthgamer, 2003). This connection to group Steiner trees also enables us to prove that the problem we consider is hard to approximate to a ratio better than spl Omega (log sup 1- spl epsi OPT), even in undirected graphs. Even though our algorithm runs in quasi-poly time, we believe that the implications for the approximability of several basic optimization problems are interesting.