We examine a generalised randomised response (RR) technique in the context of differential privacy and examine the optimality of such mechanisms. Strict and relaxed differential privacy are considered for binary outputs. By examining the error of a statistical estimator, we present closed solutions for the optimal mechanism(s) in both cases. The optimal mechanism is also given for the specific case of the original RR technique as introduced by Warner in 1965.
The application of differential privacy to randomised response has been limited to date. @cite_16 examined using randomised response to differentially privately collect data, although their analysis only considered strict @math -differential privacy and a comparison of its efficiency with respect to the Laplace mechanism, a mechanism popular in the differential privacy literature.
@cite_16
2398203045 2154086287 2951448804 2099259603
This paper studies how to enforce differential privacy by using the randomized response in the data collection scenario. Given a client’s value, the randomized algorithm executed by the client reports to the untrusted server a perturbed value. The use of randomized response in surveys enables easy estimations of accurate population statistics while preserving the privacy of the individual respondents. We compare the randomized response with the standard Laplace mechanism which is based on query-output independent adding of Laplace noise. Our research starts from the simple case with one single binary attribute and extends to the general case with multiple polychotomous attributes. We measure utility preservation in terms of the mean squared error of the estimate for various calculations including individual value estimate, proportion estimate, and various derived statistics. We theoretically derive the explicit formula of the mean squared error of various derived statistics based on the randomized response theory and prove the randomized response outperforms the Laplace mechanism. We evaluate our algorithms on YesiWell database including sensitive biomarker data and social network relationships of patients. Empirical evaluation results show effectiveness of our proposed techniques. Especially the use of the randomized response for collecting data incurs fewer utility loss than the output perturbation when the sensitivity of functions is high. A mechanism for releasing information about a statistical database with sensitive data must resolve a trade-off between utility and privacy. Publishing fully accurate information maximizes utility while minimizing privacy, while publishing random noise accomplishes the opposite. Privacy can be rigorously quantified using the framework of differential privacy, which requires that a mechanism's output distribution is nearly the same whether or not a given database row is included or excluded. The goal of this paper is strong and general utility guarantees, subject to differential privacy. We pursue mechanisms that guarantee near-optimal utility to every potential user, independent of its side information (modeled as a prior distribution over query results) and preferences (modeled via a loss function). Our main result is: for each fixed count query and differential privacy level, there is a geometric mechanism M* -- a discrete variant of the simple and well-studied Laplace mechanism -- that is simultaneously expected loss-minimizing for every possible user, subject to the differential privacy constraint. This is an extremely strong utility guarantee: every potential user u, no matter what its side information and preferences, derives as much utility from M* as from interacting with a differentially private mechanism Mu that is optimally tailored to u. More precisely, for every user u there is an optimal mechanism Mu for it that factors into a user-independent part (the geometric mechanism M*) followed by user-specific post-processing that can be delegated to the user itself. The first part of our proof of this result characterizes the optimal differentially private mechanism for a fixed but arbitrary user in terms of a certain basic feasible solution to a linear program with constraints that encode differential privacy. The second part shows that all of the relevant vertices of this polytope (ranging over all possible users) are derivable from the geometric mechanism via suitable remappings of its range. A mechanism for releasing information about a statistical database with sensitive data must resolve a trade-off between utility and privacy. Privacy can be rigorously quantified using the framework of differential privacy , which requires that a mechanism's output distribution is nearly the same whether or not a given database row is included or excluded. The goal of this paper is strong and general utility guarantees, subject to differential privacy. We pursue mechanisms that guarantee near-optimal utility to every potential user, independent of its side information (modeled as a prior distribution over query results) and preferences (modeled via a loss function). Our main result is: for each fixed count query and differential privacy level, there is a geometric mechanism @math -- a discrete variant of the simple and well-studied Laplace mechanism -- that is simultaneously expected loss-minimizing for every possible user, subject to the differential privacy constraint. This is an extremely strong utility guarantee: every potential user @math , no matter what its side information and preferences, derives as much utility from @math as from interacting with a differentially private mechanism @math that is optimally tailored to @math . Differential privacy is a robust privacy standard that has been successfully applied to a range of data analysis tasks. But despite much recent work, optimal strategies for answering a collection of related queries are not known. We propose the matrix mechanism, a new algorithm for answering a workload of predicate counting queries. Given a workload, the mechanism requests answers to a different set of queries, called a query strategy, which are answered using the standard Laplace mechanism. Noisy answers to the workload queries are then derived from the noisy answers to the strategy queries. This two stage process can result in a more complex correlated noise distribution that preserves differential privacy but increases accuracy. We provide a formal analysis of the error of query answers produced by the mechanism and investigate the problem of computing the optimal query strategy in support of a given workload. We show this problem can be formulated as a rank-constrained semidefinite program. Finally, we analyze two seemingly distinct techniques, whose similar behavior is explained by viewing them as instances of the matrix mechanism.