Training models on highly unbalanced data is admitted to be a challenging task for machine learning algorithms. Current studies on deep learning mainly focus on data sets with balanced class labels, or unbalanced data but with massive amount of samples available, like in speech recognition. However, the capacities of deep learning on imbalanced data with little samples is not deeply investigated in literature, while it is a very common application context, in numerous industries. To contribute to fill this gap, this paper compares the performances of several popular machine learning algorithms previously applied with success to unbalanced data set with deep learning algorithms. We conduct those experiments on an highly unbalanced data set, used for credit scoring. We evaluate various configuration including neural network optimisation techniques and try to determine their capacities when they operate with imbalanced corpora.
In @cite_5 , authors outline the performance of several popular decision tree splitting criteria – information gain, Gini measure, and DKM – can be used to form decision trees, and improve performances of tree construction method applied to unbalanced data.
@cite_5
1831729862 2050806103 1967148170 2124357902
Learning from unbalanced datasets presents a convoluted problem in which traditional learning algorithms may perform poorly. The objective functions used for learning the classifiers typically tend to favor the larger, less important classes in such problems. This paper compares the performance of several popular decision tree splitting criteria --- information gain, Gini measure, and DKM --- and identifies a new skew insensitive measure in Hellinger distance. We outline the strengths of Hellinger distance in class imbalance, proposes its application in forming decision trees, and performs a comprehensive comparative analysis between each decision tree construction method. In addition, we consider the performance of each tree within a powerful sampling wrapper framework to capture the interaction of the splitting metric and sampling. We evaluate over this wide range of datasets and determine which operate best under class imbalance. Decision trees are the commonly applied tools in the task of data stream classification. The most critical point in decision tree construction algorithm is the choice of the splitting attribute. In majority of algorithms existing in literature the splitting criterion is based on statistical bounds derived for split measure functions. In this paper we propose a totally new kind of splitting criterion. We derive statistical bounds for arguments of split measure function instead of deriving it for split measure function itself. This approach allows us to properly use the Hoeffding's inequality to obtain the required bounds. Based on this theoretical results we propose the Decision Trees based on the Fractions Approximation algorithm (DTFA). The algorithm exhibits satisfactory results of classification accuracy in numerical experiments. It is also compared with other existing in literature methods, demonstrating noticeably better performance. Decision trees are probably the most popular and commonly used classification model. They are recursively built following a top-down approach (from general concepts to particular examples) by repeated splits of the training dataset. When this dataset contains numerical attributes, binary splits are usually performed by choosing the threshold value which minimizes the impurity measure used as splitting criterion (e.g. C4.5 gain ratio criterion or CART Gini's index). In this paper we propose the use of multi-way splits for continuous attributes in order to reduce the tree complexity without decreasing classification accuracy. This can be done by intertwining a hierarchical clustering algorithm with the usual greedy decision tree learning. In mining data streams the most popular tool is the Hoeffding tree algorithm. It uses the Hoeffding's bound to determine the smallest number of examples needed at a node to select a splitting attribute. In the literature the same Hoeffding's bound was used for any evaluation function (heuristic measure), e.g., information gain or Gini index. In this paper, it is shown that the Hoeffding's inequality is not appropriate to solve the underlying problem. We prove two theorems presenting the McDiarmid's bound for both the information gain, used in ID3 algorithm, and for Gini index, used in Classification and Regression Trees (CART) algorithm. The results of the paper guarantee that a decision tree learning system, applied to data streams and based on the McDiarmid's bound, has the property that its output is nearly identical to that of a conventional learner. The results of the paper have a great impact on the state of the art of mining data streams and various developed so far methods and algorithms should be reconsidered.