We initiate a thorough study of -- producing algorithms for the approximation problems of property testing in the CONGEST model. In particular, for the so-called testing model we emulate sequential tests for nearly all graph properties having @math -sided tests, while in the and models we obtain faster tests for triangle-freeness and bipartiteness respectively. In most cases, aided by parallelism, the distributed algorithms have a much shorter running time as compared to their counterparts from the sequential querying model of traditional property testing. The simplest property testing algorithms allow a relatively smooth transitioning to the distributed model. For the more complex tasks we develop new machinery that is of independent interest. This includes a method for distributed maintenance of multiple random walks.
Finding induced subgraphs is a crucial task and has been studied in several different distributed models (see, e.g., @cite_25 @cite_12 @cite_3 @cite_7 ). Notice that for subgraphs, having instances of the desired subgraph can help speedup the computation, as in @cite_7 . This is in contrast to algorithms that perform faster if there are or only instances, as explained above, which is why we test for, e.g., the property of being , rather for the property of triangles. (Notice that these are not the same, and in fact every graph with @math or more vertices is @math -close to having a triangle.)
@cite_7 @cite_3 @cite_25 @cite_12
2795050613 2266714125 1960457407 2070491228
The subgraph isomorphism problem involves deciding whether a copy of a pattern graph occurs inside a larger target graph. The non-induced version allows extra edges in the target, whilst the induced version does not. Although both variants are NP-complete, algorithms inspired by constraint programming can operate comfortably on many real-world problem instances with thousands of vertices. However, they cannot handle arbitrary instances of this size. We show how to generate " really hard " random instances for subgraph isomorphism problems, which are computationally challenging with a couple of hundred vertices in the target, and only twenty pattern vertices. For the non-induced version of the problem, these instances lie on a satisfiable unsatisfiable phase transition, whose location we can predict; for the induced variant, much richer behaviour is observed, and constrained-ness gives a better measure of difficulty than does proximity to a phase transition. These results have practical consequences: we explain why the widely researched " filter verify " indexing technique used in graph databases is founded upon a misunderstanding of the empirical hardness of NP-complete problems, and cannot be beneficial when paired with any reasonable subgraph isomorphism algorithm. Numerous graph mining applications rely on detecting subgraphs which are large near-cliques. Since formulations that are geared towards finding large near-cliques are hard and frequently inapproximable due to connections with the Maximum Clique problem, the poly-time solvable densest subgraph problem which maximizes the average degree over all possible subgraphs "lies at the core of large scale data mining" [10]. However, frequently the densest subgraph problem fails in detecting large near-cliques in networks. In this work, we introduce the k-clique densest subgraph problem, k ≥ 2. This generalizes the well studied densest subgraph problem which is obtained as a special case for k=2. For k=3 we obtain a novel formulation which we refer to as the triangle densest subgraph problem: given a graph G(V,E), find a subset of vertices S* such that τ(S*)=max limitsS ⊆ V t(S) |S|, where t(S) is the number of triangles induced by the set S. On the theory side, we prove that for any k constant, there exist an exact polynomial time algorithm for the k-clique densest subgraph problem . Furthermore, we propose an efficient 1 k-approximation algorithm which generalizes the greedy peeling algorithm of Asahiro and Charikar [8,18] for k=2. Finally, we show how to implement efficiently this peeling framework on MapReduce for any k ≥ 3, generalizing the work of Bahmani, Kumar and Vassilvitskii for the case k=2 [10]. On the empirical side, our two main findings are that (i) the triangle densest subgraph is consistently closer to being a large near-clique compared to the densest subgraph and (ii) the peeling approximation algorithms for both k=2 and k=3 achieve on real-world networks approximation ratios closer to 1 rather than the pessimistic 1 k guarantee. An interesting consequence of our work is that triangle counting, a well-studied computational problem in the context of social network analysis can be used to detect large near-cliques. Finally, we evaluate our proposed method on a popular graph mining application. The complexity of the subgraph isomorphism problem where the pattern graph is of fixed size is well known to depend on the topology of the pattern graph. For instance, the larger the maximum independent set of the pattern graph is the more efficient algorithms are known. The situation seems to be substantially different in the case of induced subgraph isomorphism for pattern graphs of fixed size. We present two results which provide evidence that no topology of an induced subgraph of fixed size can be easier to detect or count than an independent set of related size. We show that: Any fixed pattern graph that has a maximum independent set of size k that is disjoint from other maximum independent sets is not easier to detect as an induced subgraph than an independent set of size k. It follows in particular that an induced path on k vertices is not easier to detect than an independent set on ⌈k 2 ⌉ vertices, and that an induced even cycle on k vertices is not easier to detect than an independent set on k 2 vertices. In view of linear time upper bounds on induced paths of length three and four, our lower bound is tight. Similar corollaries hold for the detection of induced complete bipartite graphs and induced complete split graphs. For an arbitrary pattern graph H on k vertices with no isolated vertices, there is a simple subdivision of H, resulting from splitting each edge into a path of length four and attaching a distinct path of length three at each vertex of degree one, that is not easier to detect or count than an independent set on k vertices, respectively. Finally, we show that the so called diamond, paw and C 4 are not easier to detect as induced subgraphs than an independent set on three vertices. The ability to find and count subgraphs of a given network is an important non trivial task with multidisciplinary applicability. Discovering network motifs or computing graphlet signatures are two examples of methodologies that at their core rely precisely on the subgraph counting problem. Here we present the g-trie, a data-structure specifically designed for discovering subgraph frequencies. We produce a tree that encapsulates the structure of the entire graph set, taking advantage of common topologies in the same way a prefix tree takes advantage of common prefixes. This avoids redundancy in the representation of the graphs, thus allowing for both memory and computation time savings. We introduce a specialized canonical labeling designed to highlight common substructures and annotate the g-trie with a set of conditional rules that break symmetries, avoiding repetitions in the computation. We introduce a novel algorithm that takes as input a set of small graphs and is able to efficiently find and count them as induced subgraphs of a larger network. We perform an extensive empirical evaluation of our algorithms, focusing on efficiency and scalability on a set of diversified complex networks. Results show that g-tries are able to clearly outperform previously existing algorithms by at least one order of magnitude.