We study revenue optimization learning algorithms for repeated posted-price auctions where a seller interacts with a single strategic buyer that holds a fixed private valuation for a good and seeks to maximize his cumulative discounted surplus. For this setting, first, we propose a novel algorithm that never decreases offered prices and has a tight strategic regret bound in @math under some mild assumptions on the buyer surplus discounting. This result closes the open research question on the existence of a no-regret horizon-independent weakly consistent pricing. The proposed algorithm is inspired by our observation that a double decrease of offered prices in a weakly consistent algorithm is enough to cause a linear regret. This motivates us to construct a novel transformation that maps a right-consistent algorithm to a weakly consistent one that never decreases offered prices. Second, we outperform the previously known strategic regret upper bound of the algorithm PRRFES, where the improvement is achieved by means of a finer constant factor @math of the principal term @math in this upper bound. Finally, we generalize results on strategic regret previously known for geometric discounting of the buyer's surplus to discounting of other types, namely: the optimality of the pricing PRRFES to the case of geometrically concave decreasing discounting; and linear lower bound on the strategic regret of a wide range of horizon-independent weakly consistent algorithms to the case of arbitrary discounts.
Studies on revenue maximization were devoted to both the seller revenue solely @cite_14 @cite_33 and different sort of trade-offs either between several auction stakeholders @cite_36 @cite_24 @cite_46 or between auction characteristics (like revenue monotonicity @cite_24 , expressivity, and simplicity @cite_8 ). The optimization problem was generally reduced to a selection of proper quality scores for advertisements (for auctions with several advertisers @cite_14 @cite_33 ) or reserve prices for buyers (e.g., in VCG @cite_9 , GSP @cite_32 , and others @cite_36 @cite_1 ). The reserve prices, in such setups, usually depend on distributions of buyer bids or valuations and was in turn estimated by machine learning techniques @cite_33 @cite_21 @cite_1 , while alternative approaches learned reserve prices directly @cite_55 @cite_6 @cite_43 . In contrast to these works, we use an online deterministic learning approach for repeated auctions.
@cite_14 @cite_33 @cite_8 @cite_36 @cite_9 @cite_21 @cite_1 @cite_32 @cite_55 @cite_6 @cite_24 @cite_43 @cite_46
1718157382 203000141 2189241046 611768045
Revenue maximization in multi-item settings is notoriously elusive. This paper studies a class of two-item auctions which we call a mixed-bundling auction with reserve prices (MBARP). It calls VCG on an enlarged set of agents by adding the seller---who has reserve valuations for each bundle of items---and a fake agent who receives nothing nor has valuations for any item or bundle, but has a valuation for pure bundling allocations, i.e., allocations where the two items are allocated to a single agent. This is a strict subclass of several known classes of auctions, including the affine maximizer auction (AMA), λ-aution, and the virtual valuations combinatorial auction (VVCA). As we show, a striking feature of MBARP is that its revenue can be represented in a simple closed form as a function of the parameters. Thus, we can solve first-order conditions on the parameters and obtain the optimal MBARP. The optimal MBARP yields significantly higher revenue than prior auctions for which the revenue-maximizing parameters could be solved for in closed form: separate Myerson auctions, pure-bundling Myerson auction, VCG, and mixed-bundling auction without reserve prices. Its revenue even exceeds that obtained via simulation within broader classes: VVCA and AMA. The VCG mechanism is the gold standard for combinatorial auctions (CAs), and it maximizes social welfare. In contrast, the revenue-maximizing (aka optimal) CA is unknown, and designing one is NP-hard. Therefore, research on optimal CAs has progressed into special settings. Notably, Levin [1997] derived the optimal CA for complements when each agent's private type is one-dimensional. (This does not fall inside the well-studied "single-parameter environment".) We introduce a new research avenue for increasing revenue where we poke holes in the allocation space--based on the bids--and then use a welfare-maximizing allocation rule within the remaining allocation set. In this paper, the first step down this avenue, we introduce a new form of "reserve pricing" into CAs. We show that Levin's optimal revenue can be 2-approximated by using "monopoly reserve prices" to curtail the allocation set, followed by welfare-maximizing allocation and Levin's payment rule. A key lemma of potential independent interest is that the expected revenue from any truthful allocation-monotonic mechanism equals the expected virtual valuation; this generalizes Myerson's lemma [1981] from the single-parameter environment. Our mechanism is close to the gold standard and thus easier to adopt than Levin's. It also requires less information about the prior over the bidders' types, and is always more efficient. Finally, we show that the optimal revenue can be 6- approximated even if the "reserve pricing" is required to be symmetric across bidders. This paper develops a general approach, rooted in statistical learning theory, to learning an approximately revenue-maximizing auction from data. We introduce t-level auctions to interpolate between simple auctions, such as welfare maximization with reserve prices, and optimal auctions, thereby balancing the competing demands of expressivity and simplicity. We prove that such auctions have small representation error, in the sense that for every product distribution F over bidders’ valuations, there exists a t-level auction with small t and expected revenue close to optimal. We show that the set of t-level auctions has modest pseudo-dimension (for polynomial t) and therefore leads to small learning error. One consequence of our results is that, in arbitrary single-parameter settings, one can learn a mechanism with expected revenue arbitrarily close to optimal from a polynomial number of samples. This paper develops a general approach, rooted in statistical learning theory, to learning an approximately revenue-maximizing auction from data. We introduce t-level auctions to interpolate between simple auctions, such as welfare maximization with reserve prices, and optimal auctions, thereby balancing the competing demands of expressivity and simplicity. We prove that such auctions have small representation error, in the sense that for every product distribution F over bidders' valuations, there exists a t-level auction with small t and expected revenue close to optimal. We show that the set of t-level auctions has modest pseudo-dimension (for polynomial t) and therefore leads to small learning error. One consequence of our results is that, in arbitrary single-parameter settings, one can learn a mechanism with expected revenue arbitrarily close to optimal from a polynomial number of samples.