When collecting information, local differential privacy (LDP) alleviates privacy concerns of users, as users' private information is randomized before being sent to the central aggregator. However, LDP results in loss of utility due to the amount of noise that is added. To address this issue, recent work introduced an intermediate server and with the assumption that this intermediate server did not collude with the aggregator. Using this trust model, one can add less noise to achieve the same privacy guarantee; thus improving the utility. In this paper, we investigate this multiple-party setting of LDP. We first analyze the threat model and identify potential adversaries. We then make observations about existing approaches and propose new techniques that achieve a better privacy-utility tradeoff than existing ones. Finally, we perform experiments to compare different methods and demonstrate the benefits of using our proposed method.
Aggregation using Secure Computation Our work shares similar threat models from work on secure aggregation such as the electronic voting @cite_12 and statistic aggregation @cite_25 . In particular, multiple users compute some information collaboratively without leaking information about their own data. Note that the primary goal of secure aggregation is different: the result must be deterministic and correct, while in , a significant amount of noise is necessary.
@cite_25 @cite_12
2525846285 2154625773 1597292924 1667014488
This paper considers the problem of secure data aggregation (mainly summation) in a distributed setting, while ensuring differential privacy of the result. We study secure multiparty addition protocols using well known security schemes: Shamir’s secret sharing, perturbation-based, and various encryptions. We supplement our study with our new enhanced encryption scheme EFT, which is efficient and fault tolerant.Differential privacy of the final result is achieved by either distributed Laplace or Geometric mechanism (respectively DLPA or DGPA), while approximated differential privacy is achieved by diluted mechanisms. Distributed random noise is generated collectively by all participants, which draw random variables from one of several distributions: Gamma, Gauss, Geometric, or their diluted versions. We introduce a new distributed privacy mechanism with noise drawn from the Laplace distribution, which achieves smaller redundant noise with efficiency. We compare complexity and security characteristics of the protocols with different differential privacy mechanisms and security schemes. More importantly, we implemented all protocols and present an experimental comparison on their performance and scalability in a real distributed environment. Based on the evaluations, we identify our security scheme and Laplace DLPA as the most efficient for secure distributed data aggregation with differential privacy. In-network aggregation is an essential primitive for performing queries on sensor network data. However, most aggregation algorithms assume that all intermediate nodes are trusted. In contrast, the standard threat model in sensor network security assumes that an attacker may control a fraction of the nodes, which may misbehave in an arbitrary (Byzantine) manner.We present the first algorithm for provably secure hierarchical in-network data aggregation. Our algorithm is guaranteed to detect any manipulation of the aggregate by the adversary beyond what is achievable through direct injection of data values at compromised nodes. In other words, the adversary can never gain any advantage from misrepresenting intermediate aggregation computations. Our algorithm incurs only O(Δ log2 n) node congestion, supports arbitrary tree-based aggregator topologies and retains its resistance against aggregation manipulation in the presence of arbitrary numbers of malicious nodes. The main algorithm is based on performing the sum aggregation securely by first forcing the adversary to commit to its choice of intermediate aggregation results, and then having the sensor nodes independently verify that their contributions to the aggregate are correctly incorporated. We show how to reduce secure median , count , and average to this primitive. Combining and analyzing data collected at multiple administrative locations is critical for a wide variety of applications, such as detecting malicious attacks or computing an accurate estimate of the popularity of Web sites. However, legitimate concerns about privacy often inhibit participation in collaborative data aggregation. In this paper, we design, implement, and evaluate a practical solution for privacy-preserving data aggregation (PDA) among a large number of participants. Scalability and efficiency is achieved through a "semi-centralized" architecture that divides responsibility between a proxy that obliviously blinds the client inputs and a database that aggregates values by (blinded) keywords and identifies those keywords whose values satisfy some evaluation function. Our solution leverages a novel cryptographic protocol that provably protects the privacy of both the participants and the keywords, provided that proxy and database do not collude, even if both parties may be individually malicious. Our prototype implementation can handle over a million suspect IP addresses per hour when deployed across only two quad-core servers, and its throughput scales linearly with additional computational resources. In information theoretically secure multiparty computation, several mutually distrusting users want to jointly compute a function of their private data such that users do not learn any additional information about other users' data other than what they can infer from their own data and the function value they compute. In this work we consider asymptotically secure computation - where vanishing probability of error and vanishing information leakage are allowed as block lengths become large - in a three user setting, where two users have inputs and third user securely computes the output of a function on these two inputs. We provide generic lower bounds on the amount of communication required among users and the total amount of private randomness needed to compute any function in this three-user model. We also consider some examples where our bounds are tight. Our lower bounds are derived for the honest-but-curious security model and hence also apply for the malicious model.