We present a simple noise-robust margin-based active learning algorithm to find homogeneous (passing the origin) linear separators and analyze its error convergence when labels are corrupted by noise. We show that when the imposed noise satisfies the Tsybakov low noise condition (Mammen, Tsybakov, and others 1999; Tsybakov 2004) the algorithm is able to adapt to unknown level of noise and achieves optimal statistical rate up to poly-logarithmic factors. We also derive lower bounds for margin based active learning algorithms under Tsybakov noise conditions (TNC) for the membership query synthesis scenario (Angluin 1988). Our result implies lower bounds for the stream based selective sampling scenario (Cohn 1990) under TNC for some fairly simple data distributions. Quite surprisingly, we show that the sample complexity cannot be improved even if the underlying data distribution is as simple as the uniform distribution on the unit ball. Our proof involves the construction of a well separated hypothesis set on the d-dimensional unit ball along with carefully designed label distributions for the Tsybakov noise condition. Our analysis might provide insights for other forms of lower bounds as well.
In @cite_4 a noise-robust disagreement-based algorithm was proposed for agnostic active learning. The analysis was further improved in @cite_12 by replacing the disagreement coefficient with a provably smaller quantity. However, their error bounds are slightly worse under our settings, as we discuss in Section . Also, in both analysis the desired accuracy @math is fixed, while in our setting the number of active queries @math is fixed. Under the one-dimensional threshold learning setting, @cite_6 proposed a noise-adaptive active learning algorithm inspired by recent developments of adaptive algorithms for stochastic convex optimization @cite_22 . For multiple dimensions, it was shown recently in @cite_0 that a noise-robust variant of margin-based active learning achieves near optimal noise tolerance. The authors analyzed the maximum amount of adversarial noise an algorithm can tolerate under the constraints of constant excess risk and polylogarithmic sample complexity, which is equivalent to an exponential rate of error convergence. In contrast, we study the rate at which the excess risk (relative to Bayes optimal classifier) converges to zero with number of samples that are not restricted to be polylogarithmic.
@cite_4 @cite_22 @cite_6 @cite_0 @cite_12
2583780928 2951249809 2143203060 2097373287
Most of the existing active learning algorithms are based on the realizability assumption: The learner's hypothesis class is assumed to contain a target function that perfectly classifies all training and test examples. This assumption can hardly ever be justified in practice. In this paper, we study how relaxing the realizability assumption affects the sample complexity of active learning. First, we extend existing results on query learning to show that any active learning algorithm for the realizable case can be transformed to tolerate random bounded rate class noise. Thus, bounded rate class noise adds little extra complications to active learning, and in particular exponential label complexity savings over passive learning are still possible. However, it is questionable whether this noise model is any more realistic in practice than assuming no noise at all. Our second result shows that if we move to the truly non-realizable model of statistical learning theory, then the label complexity of active learning has the same dependence Ω(1 ∈ 2 ) on the accuracy parameter e as the passive learning label complexity. More specifically, we show that under the assumption that the best classifier in the learner's hypothesis class has generalization error at most β > 0, the label complexity of active learning is Ω(β 2 ∈ 2 log(1 δ)), where the accuracy parameter e measures how close to optimal within the hypothesis class the active learner has to get and δ is the confidence parameter. The implication of this lower bound is that exponential savings should not be expected in realistic models of active learning, and thus the label complexity goals in active learning should be refined. We tackle the fundamental problem of Bayesian active learning with noise, where we need to adaptively select from a number of expensive tests in order to identify an unknown hypothesis sampled from a known prior distribution. In the case of noise-free observations, a greedy algorithm called generalized binary search (GBS) is known to perform near-optimally. We show that if the observations are noisy, perhaps surprisingly, GBS can perform very poorly. We develop EC2, a novel, greedy active learning algorithm and prove that it is competitive with the optimal policy, thus obtaining the first competitiveness guarantees for Bayesian active learning with noisy observations. Our bounds rely on a recently discovered diminishing returns property called adaptive submodularity, generalizing the classical notion of submodular set functions to adaptive policies. Our results hold even if the tests have non-uniform cost and their noise is correlated. We also propose EffECXtive, a particularly fast approximation of EC2, and evaluate it on a Bayesian experimental design problem involving human subjects, intended to tease apart competing economic theories of how people make decisions under uncertainty. We tackle the fundamental problem of Bayesian active learning with noise, where we need to adaptively select from a number of expensive tests in order to identify an unknown hypothesis sampled from a known prior distribution. In the case of noise-free observations, a greedy algorithm called generalized binary search (GBS) is known to perform near-optimally. We show that if the observations are noisy, perhaps surprisingly, GBS can perform very poorly. We develop EC2, a novel, greedy active learning algorithm and prove that it is competitive with the optimal policy, thus obtaining the first competitiveness guarantees for Bayesian active learning with noisy observations. Our bounds rely on a recently discovered diminishing returns property called adaptive submodularity, generalizing the classical notion of submodular set functions to adaptive policies. Our results hold even if the tests have non-uniform cost and their noise is correlated. We also propose EFFECX-TIVE, a particularly fast approximation of EC2, and evaluate it on a Bayesian experimental design problem involving human subjects, intended to tease apart competing economic theories of how people make decisions under uncertainty. We study agnostic active learning, where the goal is to learn a classifier in a pre-specified hypothesis class interactively with as few label queries as possible, while making no assumptions on the true function generating the labels. The main algorithms for this problem are disagreement-based active learning , which has a high label requirement, and margin-based active learning , which only applies to fairly restricted settings. A major challenge is to find an algorithm which achieves better label complexity, is consistent in an agnostic setting, and applies to general classification problems. In this paper, we provide such an algorithm. Our solution is based on two novel contributions -- a reduction from consistent active learning to confidence-rated prediction with guaranteed error, and a novel confidence-rated predictor.