In this work, we study the fundamental naming and counting problems (and some variations) in networks that are anonymous, unknown, and possibly dynamic. In counting, nodes must determine the size of the network n and in naming they must end up with unique identities. By anonymous we mean that all nodes begin from identical states apart possibly from a unique leader node and by unknown that nodes have no a priori knowledge of the network (apart from some minimal knowledge when necessary) including ignorance of n. Network dynamicity is modeled by the 1-interval connectivity model, in which communication is synchronous and a worst-case adversary chooses the edges of every round subject to the condition that each instance is connected. We first focus on static networks with broadcast where we prove that, without a leader, counting is impossible to solve and that naming is impossible to solve even with a leader and even if nodes know n. These impossibilities carry over to dynamic networks as well. We also show that a unique leader suffices in order to solve counting in linear time. Then we focus on dynamic networks with broadcast. We conjecture that dynamicity renders nontrivial computation impossible. In view of this, we let the nodes know an upper bound on the maximum degree that will ever appear and show that in this case the nodes can obtain an upper bound on n. Finally, we replace broadcast with one-to-each, in which a node may send a different message to each of its neighbors. Interestingly, this natural variation is proved to be computationally equivalent to a full-knowledge model, in which unique names exist and the size of the network is known.
Distributed systems with worst-case dynamicity were first studied in @cite_19 . Their outstanding novelty was to assume a communication network that may change arbitrarily from time to time subject to the condition that each instance of the network is connected. They studied asynchronous communication and allowed nodes detect local neighborhood changes. They studied the and problems in this setting and among others provided a uniform protocol for flooding that terminates in @math rounds using @math bit storage and message overhead, where @math is the maximum time it takes to transmit a message.
@cite_19
2100169223 1990476939 2006786627 2120741723
We consider the problem of classifying among a set of M hypotheses via distributed noisy sensors. The sensors can collaborate over a communication network and the task is to arrive at a consensus about the event after exchanging messages. We apply a variant of belief propagation as a strategy for collaboration to arrive at a solution to the distributed classification problem. We show that the message evolution can be reformulated as the evolution of a linear dynamical system, which is primarily characterized by network connectivity. We show that a consensus to the centralized maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimate can almost always reached by the sensors for any arbitrary network. We then extend these results in several directions. First, we demonstrate that these results continue to hold with quantization of the messages, which is appealing from the point of view of finite bit rates supportable between links. We then demonstrate robustness against packet losses, which implies that optimal decisions can be achieved with asynchronous transmissions as well. Next, we present an account of energy requirements for distributed detection and demonstrate significant improvement over conventional decentralized detection. Finally, extensions to distributed estimation are described The dynamic behavior of a network in which information is changing continuously over time requires robust and efficient mechanisms for keeping nodes updated about new information. Gossip protocols are mechanisms for this task in which nodes communicate with one another according to some underlying deterministic or randomized algorithm, exchanging information in each communication step. In a variety of contexts, the use of randomization to propagate information has been found to provide better reliability and scalability than more regimented deterministic approaches.In many settings, such as a cluster of distributed computing hosts, new information is generated at individual nodes, and is most "interesting" to nodes that are nearby. Thus, we propose distance-based propagation bounds as a performance measure for gossip mechanisms: a node at distance d from the origin of a new piece of information should be able to learn about this information with a delay that grows slowly with d, and is independent of the size of the network.For nodes arranged with uniform density in Euclidean space, we present natural gossip mechanisms, called spatial gossip, that satisfy such a guarantee: new information is spread to nodes at distance d, with high probability, in O(log1 + e d) time steps. Such a bound combines the desirable qualitative features of uniform gossip, in which information is spread with a delay that is logarithmic in the full network size, and deterministic flooding, in which information is spread with a delay that is linear in the distance and independent of the network size. Our mechanisms and their analysis resolve a conjecture of [1987].We further show an application of our gossip mechanisms to a basic resource location problem, in which nodes seek to rapidly learn the location of the nearest copy of a resource in a network. This problem, which is of considerable practical importance, can be solved by a very simple protocol using Spatial Gossip, whereas we can show that no protocol built on top of uniform gossip can inform nodes of their approximately nearest resource within poly-logarithmic time. The analysis relies on an additional useful property of spatial gossip, namely that information travels from its source to sinks along short paths not visiting points of the network far from the two nodes. The computational power of different communication models is a fundamental question in the theory of distributed computation. For example, in the synchronous model messages are assumed to be delivered within one time unit, whereas in the asynchronous model message delays may be arbitrary. Another important parameter of the model is the assumptions about the topology. In the dynamic topology model, links are assumed to crash and recover dynamically, but their status is known to the incident node processors. A meaningful computation can be carried out if the topology stabilizes for a sufficiently long period. In this paper we show that the model of asynchronous, dynamic-topology network is equivalent, up to polylogarithmic factors, to the synchronous, static protocols that can withstand arbitrary link delays and changing topology at the expense of only polylogarithmic blowup in the running time, the number of messages, and the space requirement. Previous methods entailed a linear blowup in at least one of these resources. The generality of our method is demonstrated by a series of improvements for important applications, including Breadth First Search, computing compact efficient routing tables, and packet routing on asynchronous networks. In this paper we investigate distributed computation in dynamic networks in which the network topology changes from round to round. We consider a worst-case model in which the communication links for each round are chosen by an adversary, and nodes do not know who their neighbors for the current round are before they broadcast their messages. The model captures mobile networks and wireless networks, in which mobility and interference render communication unpredictable. In contrast to much of the existing work on dynamic networks, we do not assume that the network eventually stops changing; we require correctness and termination even in networks that change continually. We introduce a stability property called T -interval connectivity (for T >= 1), which stipulates that for every T consecutive rounds there exists a stable connected spanning subgraph. For T = 1 this means that the graph is connected in every round, but changes arbitrarily between rounds. We show that in 1-interval connected graphs it is possible for nodes to determine the size of the network and compute any com- putable function of their initial inputs in O(n2) rounds using messages of size O(log n + d), where d is the size of the input to a single node. Further, if the graph is T-interval connected for T > 1, the computation can be sped up by a factor of T, and any function can be computed in O(n + n2 T) rounds using messages of size O(log n + d). We also give two lower bounds on the token dissemination problem, which requires the nodes to disseminate k pieces of information to all the nodes in the network. The T-interval connected dynamic graph model is a novel model, which we believe opens new avenues for research in the theory of distributed computing in wireless, mobile and dynamic networks.