This paper describes an approach for automatic construction of dictionaries for Named Entity Recognition (NER) using large amounts of unlabeled data and a few seed examples. We use Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) to obtain lower dimensional embeddings (representations) for candidate phrases and classify these phrases using a small number of labeled examples. Our method achieves 16.5 and 11.3 F-1 score improvement over co-training on disease and virus NER respectively. We also show that by adding candidate phrase embeddings as features in a sequence tagger gives better performance compared to using word embeddings.
used CCA to learn word embeddings and added them as features in a sequence tagger. They show that CCA learns better word embeddings than CW embeddings @cite_3 , Hierarchical log-linear (HLBL) embeddings @cite_5 and embeddings learned from many other techniques for NER and chunking. Unlike PCA, a widely used dimensionality reduction technique, CCA is invariant to linear transformations of the data. Our approach is motivated by the theoretical result in which is developed in the co-training setting. We directly use the CCA embeddings to predict the label of a data point instead of using them as features in a sequence tagger. Also, we learn CCA embeddings for candidate phrases instead of all words in the vocabulary since named entities often contain more than one word. learn a multi-class SVM using the CCA word embeddings to predict the POS tag of a word type. We extend this technique to NER by learning a binary SVM using the CCA embeddings of a high recall, low precision list of candidate phrases to predict whether a candidate phrase is a named entity or not.
@cite_5 @cite_3
1755456395 2752172973 2250753706 1951325712
This paper describes an approach for automatic construction of dictionaries for Named Entity Recognition (NER) using large amounts of unlabeled data and a few seed examples. We use Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) to obtain lower dimensional embeddings (representations) for candidate phrases and classify these phrases using a small number of labeled examples. Our method achieves 16.5 and 11.3 F-1 score improvement over co-training on disease and virus NER respectively. We also show that by adding candidate phrase embeddings as features in a sequence tagger gives better performance compared to using word embeddings. The success of neural network methods for computing word embeddings has motivated methods for generating semantic embeddings of longer pieces of text, such as sentences and paragraphs. Surprisingly, (ICLR'16) showed that such complicated methods are outperformed, especially in out-of-domain (transfer learning) settings, by simpler methods involving mild retraining of word embeddings and basic linear regression. The method of requires retraining with a substantial labeled dataset such as Paraphrase Database (, 2013). @PARASPLIT The current paper goes further, showing that the following completely unsupervised sentence embedding is a formidable baseline: Use word embeddings computed using one of the popular methods on unlabeled corpus like Wikipedia, represent the sentence by a weighted average of the word vectors, and then modify them a bit using PCA SVD. This weighting improves performance by about 10 to 30 in textual similarity tasks, and beats sophisticated supervised methods including RNN's and LSTM's. It even improves 's embeddings. This simple method should be used as the baseline to beat in future, especially when labeled training data is scarce or nonexistent. @PARASPLIT The paper also gives a theoretical explanation of the success of the above unsupervised method using a latent variable generative model for sentences, which is a simple extension of the model in (TACL'16) with new "smoothing" terms that allow for words occurring out of context, as well as high probabilities for words like and, not in all contexts. Continuous space word embeddings learned from large, unstructured corpora have been shown to be effective at capturing semantic regularities in language. In this paper we replace LDA’s parameterization of “topics” as categorical distributions over opaque word types with multivariate Gaussian distributions on the embedding space. This encourages the model to group words that are a priori known to be semantically related into topics. To perform inference, we introduce a fast collapsed Gibbs sampling algorithm based on Cholesky decompositions of covariance matrices of the posterior predictive distributions. We further derive a scalable algorithm that draws samples from stale posterior predictive distributions and corrects them with a Metropolis–Hastings step. Using vectors learned from a domain-general corpus (English Wikipedia), we report results on two document collections (20-newsgroups and NIPS). Qualitatively, Gaussian LDA infers different (but still very sensible) topics relative to standard LDA. Quantitatively, our technique outperforms existing models at dealing with OOV words in held-out documents. Most state-of-the-art named entity recognition (NER) systems rely on handcrafted features and on the output of other NLP tasks such as part-of-speech (POS) tagging and text chunking. In this work we propose a language-independent NER system that uses automatically learned features only. Our approach is based on the CharWNN deep neural network, which uses word-level and character-level representations (embeddings) to perform sequential classification. We perform an extensive number of experiments using two annotated corpora in two different languages: HAREM I corpus, which contains texts in Portuguese; and the SPA CoNLL-2002 corpus, which contains texts in Spanish. Our experimental results shade light on the contribution of neural character embeddings for NER. Moreover, we demonstrate that the same neural network which has been successfully applied to POS tagging can also achieve state-of-the-art results for language-independet NER, using the same hyperparameters, and without any handcrafted features. For the HAREM I corpus, CharWNN outperforms the state-of-the-art system by 7.9 points in the F1-score for the total scenario (ten NE classes), and by 7.2 points in the F1 for the selective scenario (five NE classes).