Recent years have seen a surge of interest in Probabilistic Logic Programming (PLP) and Statistical Relational Learning (SRL) models that combine logic with probabilities. Structure learning of these systems is an intersection area of Inductive Logic Programming (ILP) and statistical learning (SL). However, ILP cannot deal with probabilities, SL cannot model relational hypothesis. The biggest challenge of integrating these two machine learning frameworks is how to estimate the probability of a logic clause only from the observation of grounded logic atoms. Many current methods models a joint probability by representing clause as graphical model and literals as vertices in it. This model is still too complicate and only can be approximate by pseudo-likelihood. We propose Inductive Logic Boosting framework to transform the relational dataset into a feature-based dataset, induces logic rules by boosting Problog Rule Trees and relaxes the independence constraint of pseudo-likelihood. Experimental evaluation on benchmark datasets demonstrates that the AUC-PR and AUC-ROC value of ILP learned rules are higher than current state-of-the-art SRL methods.
There are also some methods combines ILP with SL by boosting. For example, Boosting FFOIL @cite_10 directly adopts the boosting framework with a classical ILP system, FFOIL, as weak learners, it proves that boosting is beneficial for first-order induction. More recently, RDN-Boost @cite_15 and MLN-Boost @cite_16 turns the problem into relational regression problems and learns both structures and weights of graphical model simultaneously.
@cite_15 @cite_16 @cite_10
1986767090 2021602734 2024046085 2103000819
Relational learning can be described as the task of learning first-order logic rules from examples. It has enabled a number of new machine learning applications, e.g. graph mining and link analysis. Inductive Logic Programming (ILP) performs relational learning either directly by manipulating first-order rules or through propositionalization, which translates the relational task into an attribute-value learning task by representing subsets of relations as features. In this paper, we introduce a fast method and system for relational learning based on a novel propositionalization called Bottom Clause Propositionalization (BCP). Bottom clauses are boundaries in the hypothesis search space used by ILP systems Progol and Aleph. Bottom clauses carry semantic meaning and can be mapped directly onto numerical vectors, simplifying the feature extraction process. We have integrated BCP with a well-known neural-symbolic system, C-IL2P, to perform learning from numerical vectors. C-IL2P uses background knowledge in the form of propositional logic programs to build a neural network. The integrated system, which we call CILP++, handles first-order logic knowledge and is available for download from Sourceforge. We have evaluated CILP++ on seven ILP datasets, comparing results with Aleph and a well-known propositionalization method, RSD. The results show that CILP++ can achieve accuracy comparable to Aleph, while being generally faster, BCP achieved statistically significant improvement in accuracy in comparison with RSD when running with a neural network, but BCP and RSD perform similarly when running with C4.5. We have also extended CILP++ to include a statistical feature selection method, mRMR, with preliminary results indicating that a reduction of more than 90 of features can be achieved with a small loss of accuracy. Recent years have seen a surge of interest in Statistical Relational Learning (SRL) models that combine logic with probabilities. One prominent example is Markov Logic Networks (MLNs). While MLNs are indeed highly expressive, this expressiveness comes at a cost. Learning MLNs is a hard problem and therefore has attracted much interest in the SRL community. Current methods for learning MLNs follow a two-step approach: first, perform a search through the space of possible clauses and then learn appropriate weights for these clauses. We propose to take a different approach, namely to learn both the weights and the structure of the MLN simultaneously. Our approach is based on functional gradient boosting where the problem of learning MLNs is turned into a series of relational functional approximation problems. We use two kinds of representations for the gradients: clause-based and tree-based. Our experimental evaluation on several benchmark data sets demonstrates that our new approach can learn MLNs as good or better than those found with state-of-the-art methods, but often in a fraction of the time. Boosting is one of the most important recent developments in classification methodology. Boosting works by sequentially applying a classification algorithm to reweighted versions of the training data and then taking a weighted majority vote of the sequence of classifiers thus produced. For many classification algorithms, this simple strategy results in dramatic improvements in performance. We show that this seemingly mysterious phenomenon can be understood in terms of well-known statistical principles, namely additive modeling and maximum likelihood. For the two-class problem, boosting can be viewed as an approximation to additive modeling on the logistic scale using maximum Bernoulli likelihood as a criterion. We develop more direct approximations and show that they exhibit nearly identical results to boosting. Direct multiclass generalizations based on multinomial likelihood are derived that exhibit performance comparable to other recently proposed multiclass generalizations of boosting in most situations, and far superior in some. We suggest a minor modification to boosting that can reduce computation, often by factors of 10 to 50. Finally, we apply these insights to produce an alternative formulation of boosting decision trees. This approach, based on best-first truncated tree induction, often leads to better performance, and can provide interpretable descriptions of the aggregate decision rule. It is also much faster computationally, making it more suitable to large-scale data mining applications. Boosting combines a set of moderately accurate weak classifiers to form a highly accurate predictor. Compared with binary boosting classification, multi-class boosting received less attention. We propose a novel multi-class boosting formulation here. Unlike most previous multi-class boosting algorithms which decompose a multi-boost problem into multiple independent binary boosting problems, we formulate a direct optimization method for training multi-class boosting. Moreover, by explicitly deriving the La-grange dual of the formulated primal optimization problem, we design totally-corrective boosting using the column generation technique in convex optimization. At each iteration, all weak classifiers' weights are updated. Our experiments on various data sets demonstrate that our direct multi-class boosting achieves competitive test accuracy compared with state-of-the-art multi-class boosting in the literature.