Attributes possess appealing properties and benefit many computer vision problems, such as object recognition, learning with humans in the loop, and image retrieval. Whereas the existing work mainly pursues utilizing attributes for various computer vision problems, we contend that the most basic problem---how to accurately and robustly detect attributes from images---has been left under explored. Especially, the existing work rarely explicitly tackles the need that attribute detectors should generalize well across different categories, including those previously unseen. Noting that this is analogous to the objective of multi-source domain generalization, if we treat each category as a domain, we provide a novel perspective to attribute detection and propose to gear the techniques in multi-source domain generalization for the purpose of learning cross-category generalizable attribute detectors. We validate our understanding and approach with extensive experiments on four challenging datasets and three different problems.
The distributional variance follows naturally, where @math is the map of the mean of all the distributions in @math . In practice, we do not have access to the distributions. Instead, we observe the samples @math each drawn from a distribution @math and can thus empirically estimate the distributional variance by @math . Here @math is the (centered) All kernels discussed in this paper have been centered @cite_12 . kernel matrix over all the samples, and @math collects the coefficients which depend on only the numbers of samples. We refer the readers to @cite_79 for more details including the consistency between the distributional variance @math and its estimate @math .
@cite_79 @cite_12
1724455341 2562674776 2953266361 2037228647
Let @math be an i.i.d. sequence of random variables in @math , @math . We show that, for any function @math , under regularity conditions, [n^ 1 2 (n^ -1 i=1 ^n (X_i) f ^(X_i) - (x) ,dx ) P 0, ] where @math is the classical kernel estimator of the density of @math . This result is striking because it speeds up traditional rates, in root @math , derived from the central limit theorem when @math . Although this paper highlights some applications, we mainly address theoretical issues related to the later result. We derive upper bounds for the rate of convergence in probability. These bounds depend on the regularity of the functions @math and @math , the dimension @math and the bandwidth of the kernel estimator @math . Moreover, they are shown to be accurate since they are used as renormalizing sequences in two central limit theorems each reflecting different degrees of smoothness of @math . As an application to regression modelling with random design, we provide the asymptotic normality of the estimation of the linear functionals of a regression function. As a consequence of the above result, the asymptotic variance does not depend on the regression function. Finally, we debate the choice of the bandwidth for integral approximation and we highlight the good behavior of our procedure through simulations. We consider in this paper the problem of sampling a high-dimensional probability distribution @math having a density with respect to the Lebesgue measure on @math , known up to a normalization constant @math . Such problem naturally occurs for example in Bayesian inference and machine learning. Under the assumption that @math is continuously differentiable, @math is globally Lipschitz and @math is strongly convex, we obtain non-asymptotic bounds for the convergence to stationarity in Wasserstein distance of order @math and total variation distance of the sampling method based on the Euler discretization of the Langevin stochastic differential equation, for both constant and decreasing step sizes. The dependence on the dimension of the state space of these bounds is explicit. The convergence of an appropriately weighted empirical measure is also investigated and bounds for the mean square error and exponential deviation inequality are reported for functions which are measurable and bounded. An illustration to Bayesian inference for binary regression is presented to support our claims. There has been much progress on efficient algorithms for clustering data points generated by a mixture of @math probability distributions under the assumption that the means of the distributions are well-separated, i.e., the distance between the means of any two distributions is at least @math standard deviations. These results generally make heavy use of the generative model and particular properties of the distributions. In this paper, we show that a simple clustering algorithm works without assuming any generative (probabilistic) model. Our only assumption is what we call a "proximity condition": the projection of any data point onto the line joining its cluster center to any other cluster center is @math standard deviations closer to its own center than the other center. Here the notion of standard deviations is based on the spectral norm of the matrix whose rows represent the difference between a point and the mean of the cluster to which it belongs. We show that in the generative models studied, our proximity condition is satisfied and so we are able to derive most known results for generative models as corollaries of our main result. We also prove some new results for generative models - e.g., we can cluster all but a small fraction of points only assuming a bound on the variance. Our algorithm relies on the well known @math -means algorithm, and along the way, we prove a result of independent interest -- that the @math -means algorithm converges to the "true centers" even in the presence of spurious points provided the initial (estimated) centers are close enough to the corresponding actual centers and all but a small fraction of the points satisfy the proximity condition. Finally, we present a new technique for boosting the ratio of inter-center separation to standard deviation. We consider linear regression in the high-dimensional regime where the number of observations @math is smaller than the number of parameters @math . A very successful approach in this setting uses @math -penalized least squares (a.k.a. the Lasso) to search for a subset of @math parameters that best explain the data, while setting the other parameters to zero. Considerable amount of work has been devoted to characterizing the estimation and model selection problems within this approach. In this paper we consider instead the fundamental, but far less understood, question of . More precisely, we address the problem of computing p-values for single regression coefficients. On one hand, we develop a general upper bound on the minimax power of tests with a given significance level. On the other, we prove that this upper bound is (nearly) achievable through a practical procedure in the case of random design matrices with independent entries. Our approach is based on a debiasing of the Lasso estimator. The analysis builds on a rigorous characterization of the asymptotic distribution of the Lasso estimator and its debiased version. Our result holds for optimal sample size, i.e., when @math is at least on the order of @math . We generalize our approach to random design matrices with i.i.d. Gaussian rows @math . In this case we prove that a similar distributional characterization (termed standard distributional limit') holds for @math much larger than @math . Finally, we show that for optimal sample size, @math being at least of order @math , the standard distributional limit for general Gaussian designs can be derived from the replica heuristics in statistical physics.