In Artificial Intelligence with Coalition Structure Generation (CSG) one refers to those cooperative complex problems that require to find an optimal partition, maximising a social welfare, of a set of entities involved in a system into exhaustive and disjoint coalitions. The solution of the CSG problem finds applications in many fields such as Machine Learning (covering machines, clustering), Data Mining (decision tree, discretization), Graph Theory, Natural Language Processing (aggregation), Semantic Web (service composition), and Bioinformatics. The problem of finding the optimal coalition structure is NP-complete. In this paper we present a greedy adaptive search procedure (GRASP) with path-relinking to efficiently search the space of coalition structures. Experiments and comparisons to other algorithms prove the validity of the proposed method in solving this hard combinatorial problem.
Both DP and IDP are not anytime algorithms, they cannot be interrupted before their normal termination. @cite_1 , have presented the first anytime algorithm, sketched in Algorithm , that can be interrupted to obtain a solution within a time limit but not guaranteed to be optimal. When not interrupted it returns the optimal solution. The CSG process can be viewed as a search in a coalition structure graph as reported in Figure . One desideratum is to be able to guarantee that the CS is within a worst case bound from optimal, i.e. that searching through a subset @math of coalition structures, @math is finite, and as small as possible, where @math is the best CS and @math is the best CS that has been seen in the subset @math . @cite_1 has been proved that: a) to bound @math , it suffices to search the lowest two levels of the coalition structure graph (with this search, the bound @math , and the number of nodes searched is @math ); b) this bound is tight; and, c) no other search algorithm can establish any bound @math while searching only @math nodes or fewer.
@cite_1
144107075 2949393806 2097646889 2950469527
We present a new Dynamic Programming (DP) formulation of the Coalition Structure Generation (CSG) problem based on imposing a hierarchical organizational structure over the agents. We show the efficiency of this formulation by deriving DyPE, a new optimal DP algorithm which significantly outperforms current DP approaches in speed and memory usage. In the classic case, in which all coalitions are feasible, DyPE has half the memory requirements of other DP approaches. On graph-restricted CSG, in which feasibility is restricted by a (synergy) graph, DyPE has either the same or lower computational complexity depending on the underlying graph structure of the problem. Our empirical evaluation shows that DyPE outperforms the state-of-the-art DP approaches by several orders of magnitude in a large range of graph structures (e.g. for certain scalefree graphs DyPE reduces the memory requirements by @math and solves problems that previously needed hours in minutes). We show a new way to round vector solutions of semidefinite programming (SDP) hierarchies into integral solutions, based on a connection between these hierarchies and the spectrum of the input graph. We demonstrate the utility of our method by providing a new SDP-hierarchy based algorithm for constraint satisfaction problems with 2-variable constraints (2-CSP's). More concretely, we show for every 2-CSP instance I a rounding algorithm for r rounds of the Lasserre SDP hierarchy for I that obtains an integral solution that is at most worse than the relaxation's value (normalized to lie in [0,1]), as long as r > k ( ) ( ) ;, where k is the alphabet size of I, @math , and @math denotes the number of eigenvalues larger than @math in the normalized adjacency matrix of the constraint graph of @math . In the case that @math is a instance, the threshold @math is only a polynomial in @math , and is independent of the alphabet size. Also in this case, we can give a non-trivial bound on the number of rounds for instance. In particular our result yields an SDP-hierarchy based algorithm that matches the performance of the recent subexponential algorithm of Arora, Barak and Steurer (FOCS 2010) in the worst case, but runs faster on a natural family of instances, thus further restricting the set of possible hard instances for Khot's Unique Games Conjecture. Our algorithm actually requires less than the @math constraints specified by the @math level of the Lasserre hierarchy, and in some cases @math rounds of our program can be evaluated in time @math . By the breakthrough work of Hastad [J ACM 48(4) (2001), 798–859], several constraint satisfaction problems are now known to have the following approximation resistance property: Satisfying more clauses than what picking a random assignment would achieve is NP-hard. This is the case for example for Max E3-Sat, Max E3-Lin, and Max E4-Set Splitting. A notable exception to this extreme hardness is constraint satisfaction over two variables (2-CSP); as a corollary of the celebrated Goemans-Williamson algorithm [J ACM 42(6) (1995), 1115–1145], we know that every Boolean 2-CSP has a nontrivial approximation algorithm whose performance ratio is better than that obtained by picking a random assignment to the variables. An intriguing question then is whether this is also the case for 2-CSPs over larger, non-Boolean domains. This question is still open, and is equivalent to whether the generalization of Max 2-SAT to domains of size d, can be approximated to a factor better than (1 − 1 d2). In an attempt to make progress towards this question, in this paper we prove, first, that a slight restriction of this problem, namely, a generalization of linear inequations with two variables per constraint, is not approximation resistant, and, second, that the Not-All-Equal Sat problem over domain size d with three variables per constraint, is approximation resistant, for every d ≥ 3. In the Boolean case, Not-All-Equal Sat with three variables per constraint is equivalent to Max 2-SAT and thus has a nontrivial approximation algorithm; for larger domain sizes, Max 2-SAT can be reduced to Not-All-Equal Sat with three variables per constraint. Our approximation algorithm implies that a wide class of 2-CSPs called regular 2-CSPs can all be approximated beyond their random assignment threshold. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Random Struct. Alg. 2004 We consider a system of @math servers inter-connected by some underlying graph topology @math . Tasks arrive at the various servers as independent Poisson processes of rate @math . Each incoming task is irrevocably assigned to whichever server has the smallest number of tasks among the one where it appears and its neighbors in @math . Tasks have unit-mean exponential service times and leave the system upon service completion. The above model has been extensively investigated in the case @math is a clique. Since the servers are exchangeable in that case, the queue length process is quite tractable, and it has been proved that for any @math , the fraction of servers with two or more tasks vanishes in the limit as @math . For an arbitrary graph @math , the lack of exchangeability severely complicates the analysis, and the queue length process tends to be worse than for a clique. Accordingly, a graph @math is said to be @math -optimal or @math -optimal when the occupancy process on @math is equivalent to that on a clique on an @math -scale or @math -scale, respectively. We prove that if @math is an Erd o s-R 'enyi random graph with average degree @math , then it is with high probability @math -optimal and @math -optimal if @math and @math as @math , respectively. This demonstrates that optimality can be maintained at @math -scale and @math -scale while reducing the number of connections by nearly a factor @math and @math compared to a clique, provided the topology is suitably random. It is further shown that if @math contains @math bounded-degree nodes, then it cannot be @math -optimal. In addition, we establish that an arbitrary graph @math is @math -optimal when its minimum degree is @math , and may not be @math -optimal even when its minimum degree is @math for any @math .