Over the past several years progress in designing better neural network architectures for visual recognition has been substantial. To help sustain this rate of progress, in this work we propose to reexamine the methodology for comparing network architectures. In particular, we introduce a new comparison paradigm of distribution estimates, in which network design spaces are compared by applying statistical techniques to populations of sampled models, while controlling for confounding factors like network complexity. Compared to current methodologies of comparing point and curve estimates of model families, distribution estimates paint a more complete picture of the entire design landscape. As a case study, we examine design spaces used in neural architecture search (NAS). We find significant statistical differences between recent NAS design space variants that have been largely overlooked. Furthermore, our analysis reveals that the design spaces for standard model families like ResNeXt can be comparable to the more complex ones used in recent NAS work. We hope these insights into distribution analysis will enable more robust progress toward discovering better networks for visual recognition.
General hyperparameter search techniques @cite_42 @cite_33 address the laborious model tuning process in machine learning. A possible approach for comparing networks from two different model families is to first tune their hyperparameters @cite_29 . However, such comparisons can be challenging in practice. Instead, @cite_43 advocates using random search as a strong baseline for hyperparameter search and suggests that it additionally helps improve reproducibility. In our work we propose to directly compare the model distributions (not just their minima).
@cite_43 @cite_29 @cite_42 @cite_33
2244094084 2304209433 2796902300 2598232788
Hyperparameter tuning is often done manually but current research has proven that automatic tuning yields effective hyperparameter configurations even faster and does not require any expertise. To further improve the search, recent publications propose transferring knowledge from previous experiments to new experiments. We adapt the sequential model-based optimization by replacing its surrogate model and acquisition function with one policy that is optimized for the task of hyperparameter tuning. This policy generalizes over previous experiments but neither uses a model nor uses meta-features, nevertheless, outperforms the state of the art. We show that a static ranking of hyperparameter combinations yields competitive results and substantially outperforms a random hyperparameter search. Thus, it is a fast and easy alternative to complex hyperparameter tuning strategies and allows practitioners to tune their hyperparameters by simply using a look-up table. We made look-up tables for two classifiers publicly available: SVM and AdaBoost. Furthermore, we propose a similarity measure for data sets that yields more comprehensible results than those using meta-features. We show how this similarity measure can be applied to surrogate models in the SMBO framework and empirically show that this change leads to better hyperparameter configurations in less trials. Performance of machine learning algorithms depends critically on identifying a good set of hyperparameters. While current methods offer efficiencies by adaptively choosing new configurations to train, an alternative strategy is to adaptively allocate resources across the selected configurations. We formulate hyperparameter optimization as a pure-exploration non-stochastic infinitely many armed bandit problem where allocation of additional resources to an arm corresponds to training a configuration on larger subsets of the data. We introduce Hyperband for this framework and analyze its theoretical properties, providing several desirable guarantees. We compare Hyperband with state-of-the-art Bayesian optimization methods and a random search baseline on a comprehensive benchmark including 117 datasets. Our results on this benchmark demonstrate that while Bayesian optimization methods do not outperform random search trained for twice as long, Hyperband in favorable settings offers valuable speedups. Tuning hyperparameters of machine learning models is important for their performance. Bayesian optimization has recently emerged as a de-facto method for this task. The hyperparameter tuning is usually performed by looking at model performance on a validation set. Bayesian optimization is used to find the hyperparameter set corresponding to the best model performance. However, in many cases, the function representing the model performance on the validation set contains several spurious sharp peaks due to limited datapoints. The Bayesian optimization, in such cases, has a tendency to converge to sharp peaks instead of other more stable peaks. When a model trained using these hyperparameters is deployed in the real world, its performance suffers dramatically. We address this problem through a novel stable Bayesian optimization framework. We construct two new acquisition functions that help Bayesian optimization to avoid the convergence to the sharp peaks. We conduct a theoretical analysis and guarantee that Bayesian optimization using the proposed acquisition functions prefers stable peaks over unstable ones. Experiments with synthetic function optimization and hyperparameter tuning for support vector machines show the effectiveness of our proposed framework. The performance of many machine learning algorithms depends crucially on the hyperparameter settings, especially in Deep Learning. Manually tuning the hyperparameters is laborious and time consuming. To address this issue, Bayesian optimization (BO) methods and their extensions have been proposed to optimize the hyperparameters automatically. However, they still suffer from highly computational expense when applying to deep generative models (DGMs) due to their strategy of the black-box function optimization. This paper provides a new hyperparameter optimization procedure at the pre-training phase of the DGMs, where we avoid combining all layers as one black-box function by taking advantage of the layer-by-layer learning strategy. Following this procedure, we are able to optimize multiple hyperparameters in an adaptive way by using Gaussian process. In contrast to the traditional BO methods, which mainly focus on the supervised models, the pre-training procedure is unsupervised where there is no validation error can be used. To alleviate this problem, this paper proposes a new holdout loss, the free energy gap, which takes into account both factors of the model fitting and over-fitting. The empirical evaluations demonstrate that our method not only speeds up the process of hyperparameter optimization, but also improves the performances of DGMs significantly in both the supervised and unsupervised learning tasks.