Finite-state models are widely used in software engineering, especially in control systems development. Commonly, in control applications such models are developed manually, hence, keeping them up-to-date requires extra effort. To simplify the maintenance process, an automatic approach may be used, allowing to infer models from behavior examples and temporal properties. As an example of a specific control systems development application we focus on inferring finite-state models of function blocks (FBs) defined by the IEC 61499 international standard for distributed automation systems. In this paper we propose a method for FB model inference from behavior examples, based on reduction to Boolean satisfiability problem (SAT). Additionally, we take into account linear temporal properties using counterexample-guided synthesis. In contrast to existing approaches, suggested method is more efficient and produce minimal finite-state models both in terms of number of states and guard conditions. We also present the developed tool fbSAT which implements the proposed method, and evaluate it in two case studies: inference of a finite-state model of a Pick-and-Place manipulator, and reconstruction of randomly generated automata.
@cite_35 the two-stage approach of is developed further: on the first stage, a base model is inferred with a translation to SAT, and on the second stage its guard conditions are minimized via a CSP-based approach, in which guard condition Boolean formulas are represented with parse trees. By introducing a total bound on the number of nodes in these parse trees and solving a series of CSP problems, the method finds a model with minimal guard conditions w.r.t. the base model identified on the first stage. Global minimality of guard conditions is not guaranteed due to the two-stage implementation: minimal guards may correspond to another base model, not the one found on the first stage. The same argument applies against any approach based on state machine minimization @cite_31 . In addition, LTL properties are not supported.
@cite_35 @cite_31
2908682741 2121127625 1523041988 2282479846
We propose a two-stage exact approach for identifying finite-state models of function blocks based on given execution traces. First, a base finite-state model is inferred with a method based on translation to the Boolean satisfiability problem, and then, the base model is generalized by inferring minimal guard conditions of the state machine with a method based on translation to the constraint satisfaction problem. This article considers approaches which rerank the output of an existing probabilistic parser. The base parser produces a set of candidate parses for each input sentence, with associated probabilities that define an initial ranking of these parses. A second model then attempts to improve upon this initial ranking, using additional features of the tree as evidence. The strength of our approach is that it allows a tree to be represented as an arbitrary set of features, without concerns about how these features interact or overlap and without the need to define a derivation or a generative model which takes these features into account. We introduce a new method for the reranking task, based on the boosting approach to ranking problems described in (1998). We apply the boosting method to parsing the Wall Street Journal treebank. The method combined the log-likelihood under a baseline model (that of Collins [1999]) with evidence from an additional 500,000 features over parse trees that were not included in the original model. The new model achieved 89.75 F-measure, a 13 relative decrease in F measure error over the baseline model's score of 88.2 . The article also introduces a new algorithm for the boosting approach which takes advantage of the sparsity of the feature space in the parsing data. Experiments show significant efficiency gains for the new algorithm over the obvious implementation of the boosting approach. We argue that the method is an appealing alternative—in terms of both simplicity and efficiency—to work on feature selection methods within log-linear (maximum-entropy) models. Although the experiments in this article are on natural language parsing (NLP), the approach should be applicable to many other NLP problems which are naturally framed as ranking tasks, for example, speech recognition, machine translation, or natural language generation. A traditional counterexample to a linear-time safety property shows the values of all signals at all times prior to the error. However, some signals may not be critical to causing the failure. A succinct explanation may help human understanding as well as speed up algorithms that have to analyze many such traces. In Bounded Model Checking (BMC), a counterexample is constructed from a satisfying assignment to a Boolean formula, typically in CNF. Modern SAT solvers usually assign values to all variables when the input formula is satisfiable. Deriving minimal satisfying assignments from such complete assignments does not lead to concise explanations of counterexamples because of how CNF formulae are derived from the models. Hence, we formulate the extraction of a succinct counterexample as the problem of finding a minimal assignment that, together with the Boolean formula describing the model, implies an objective. We present a two-stage algorithm for this problem, such that the result of each stage contributes to identify the “interesting” events that cause the failure. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach with an example and with experimental results. This paper proposes algorithms for learning two-level Boolean rules in Conjunctive Normal Form (CNF, i.e. AND-of-ORs) or Disjunctive Normal Form (DNF, i.e. OR-of-ANDs) as a type of human-interpretable classification model, aiming for a favorable trade-off between the classification accuracy and the simplicity of the rule. Two formulations are proposed. The first is an integer program whose objective function is a combination of the total number of errors and the total number of features used in the rule. We generalize a previously proposed linear programming (LP) relaxation from one-level to two-level rules. The second formulation replaces the 0-1 classification error with the Hamming distance from the current two-level rule to the closest rule that correctly classifies a sample. Based on this second formulation, block coordinate descent and alternating minimization algorithms are developed. Experiments show that the two-level rules can yield noticeably better performance than one-level rules due to their dramatically larger modeling capacity, and the two algorithms based on the Hamming distance formulation are generally superior to the other two-level rule learning methods in our comparison. A proposed approach to binarize any fractional values in the optimal solutions of LP relaxations is also shown to be effective.