A regret minimizing set Q is a small size representation of a much larger database P so that user queries executed on Q return answers whose scores are not much worse than those on the full dataset. In particular, a k-regret minimizing set has the property that the regret ratio between the score of the top-1 item in Q and the score of the top-k item in P is minimized, where the score of an item is the inner product of the item's attributes with a user's weight (preference) vector. The problem is challenging because we want to find a single representative set Q whose regret ratio is small with respect to all possible user weight vectors. We show that k-regret minimization is NP-Complete for all dimensions d >= 3. This settles an open problem from [VLDB 2014], and resolves the complexity status of the problem for all d: the problem is known to have polynomial-time solution for d <= 2. In addition, we propose two new approximation schemes for regret minimization, both with provable guarantees, one based on coresets and another based on hitting sets. We also carry out extensive experimental evaluation, and show that our schemes compute regret-minimizing sets comparable in size to the greedy algorithm proposed in [VLDB 14] but our schemes are significantly faster and scalable to large data sets.
In general, preference top- @math queries are hard, and this has led to approximate query answering @cite_4 @cite_2 @cite_31 . Motivated by the need of answering preference top- @math queries, Nanongkai et. al. @cite_13 introduced the notion of a @math -regret minimizing set (RMS) query. Their definition attempted to combine preference top- @math queries and the concept of skylines. They gave upper and lower bounds on the regret ratio if the size of the returned set is fixed to @math . Moreover, they proposed an algorithm to compute a @math -regret set of size @math with regret ratio @math , as well as a greedy heuristic that works well in practice.
@cite_13 @cite_31 @cite_4 @cite_2
2092181172 2918221278 2104211550 1998952728
We propose the k-representative regret minimization query (k-regret) as an operation to support multi-criteria decision making. Like top-k, the k-regret query assumes that users have some utility or scoring functions; however, it never asks the users to provide such functions. Like skyline, it filters out a set of interesting points from a potentially large database based on the users' criteria; however, it never overwhelms the users by outputting too many tuples. In particular, for any number k and any class of utility functions, the k-regret query outputs k tuples from the database and tries to minimize the maximum regret ratio. This captures how disappointed a user could be had she seen k representative tuples instead of the whole database. We focus on the class of linear utility functions, which is widely applicable. The first challenge of this approach is that it is not clear if the maximum regret ratio would be small, or even bounded. We answer this question affirmatively. Theoretically, we prove that the maximum regret ratio can be bounded and this bound is independent of the database size. Moreover, our extensive experiments on real and synthetic datasets suggest that in practice the maximum regret ratio is reasonably small. Additionally, algorithms developed in this paper are practical as they run in linear time in the size of the database and the experiments show that their running time is small when they run on top of the skyline operation which means that these algorithm could be integrated into current database systems. We consider two regret minimisation problems over subsets of a finite ground set @math , with subset-wise relative preference information feedback according to the Multinomial logit choice model. The first setting requires the learner to test subsets of size bounded by a maximum size followed by receiving top- @math rank-ordered feedback, while in the second setting the learner is restricted to play subsets of a fixed size @math with a full ranking observed as feedback. For both settings, we devise new, order-optimal regret algorithms, and derive fundamental limits on the regret performance of online learning with subset-wise preferences. Our results also show the value of eliciting a general top @math -rank-ordered feedback over single winner feedback ( @math ). We study the notion of regret ratio proposed in [19] [VLDB10] to deal with multi-criteria decision making in database systems. The regret minimization query proposed in [19] was shown to have features of both skyline and top-k: it does not need information from the user but still controls the output size. While this approach is suitable for obtaining a reasonably small regret ratio, it is still open whether one can make the regret ratio arbitrarily small. Moreover, it remains open whether reasonable questions can be asked to the users in order to improve efficiency of the process. In this paper, we study the problem of minimizing regret ratio when the system is enhanced with interaction. We assume that when presented with a set of tuples the user can tell which tuple is most preferred. Under this assumption, we develop the problem of interactive regret minimization where we fix the number of questions and tuples per question that we can display, and aim at minimizing the regret ratio. We try to answer two questions in this paper: (1) How much does interaction help? That is, how much can we improve the regret ratio when there are interactions? (2) How efficient can interaction be? In particular, we measure how many questions we have to ask the user in order to make her regret ratio small enough. We answer both questions from both theoretical and practical standpoints. For the first question, we show that interaction can reduce the regret ratio almost exponentially. To do this, we prove a lower bound for the previous approach (thereby resolving an open problem from [19] ), and develop an almost-optimal upper bound that makes the regret ratio exponentially smaller. Our experiments also confirm that, in practice, interactions help in improving the regret ratio by many orders of magnitude. For the second question, we prove that when our algorithm shows a reasonable number of points per question, it only needs a few questions to make the regret ratio small. Thus, interactive regret minimization seems to be a necessary and sufficient way to deal with multi-criteria decision making in database systems. Returning tuples that users may be interested in is one of the most important goals for multi-criteria decision making. Top-k queries and skyline queries are two representative queries. A top-k query has its merit of returning a limited number of tuples to users but requires users to give their exact utility functions. A skyline query has its merit that users do not need to give their exact utility functions but has no control over the number of tuples to be returned. In this paper, we study a k-regret query, a recently proposed query, which integrates the merits of the two representative queries. We first identify some interesting geometry properties for the k-regret query. Based on these properties, we define a set of candidate points called happy points for the k-regret query, which has not been studied in the literature. This result is very fundamental and beneficial to not only all existing algorithms but also all new algorithms to be developed for the k-regret query. Since it is found that the number of happy points is very small, the efficiency of all existing algorithms can be improved significantly. Furthermore, based on other geometry properties, we propose two efficient algorithms each of which performs more efficiently than the best-known fastest algorithm. Our experimental results show that our proposed algorithms run faster than the best-known method on both synthetic and real datasets. In particular, in our experiments on real datasets, the best-known method took more than 3 hours to answer a k-regret query but one of our proposed methods took about a few minutes and the other took within a second.