Online learning with limited information feedback (bandit) tries to solve the problem where an online learner receives partial feedback information from the environment in the course of learning. Under this setting, [8] extended Zinkevich's classical Online Gradient Descent (OGD) algorithm [29] by proposing the Online Gradient Descent with Expected Gradient (OGDEG) algorithm. Specifically, it uses a simple trick to approximate the gradient of the loss function @math by evaluating it at a single point and bounds the expected regret as @math [8], where the number of rounds is @math . Meanwhile, past research efforts have shown that compared with the first-order algorithms, second-order online learning algorithms such as Online Newton Step (ONS) [11] can significantly accelerate the convergence rate of traditional online learning algorithms. Motivated by this, this paper aims to exploit the second-order information to speed up the convergence of the OGDEG algorithm. In particular, we extend the ONS algorithm with the trick of expected gradient and develop a novel second-order online learning algorithm, i.e., Online Newton Step with Expected Gradient (ONSEG). Theoretically, we show that the proposed ONSEG algorithm significantly reduces the expected regret of OGDEG algorithm from @math to @math in the bandit feedback scenario. Empirically, we further demonstrate the advantages of the proposed algorithm on multiple real-world datasets.
For some specifical classes of nonlinear convex losses, several methods have been proposed @cite_11 @cite_23 @cite_0 @cite_1 @cite_13 . Under the assumption of strongly convex loss, @cite_7 attained an upper bound of @math . The follow-up work of Saha @cite_11 showed that for convex and smooth loss functions, one can run FTRL with a self-concordant barrier as regularization and sample around the Dikin ellipsoid to attain regret bound of @math . In a recent paper, Hazan and Levy investigated the bandit convex optimization setting by assuming that the adversary is limited to inflicting strongly convex and smooth loss functions and the player may choose points from a constrained set. In this setting, they devised an algorithm that achieves a regret bound of @math . While a recent paper by @cite_2 shows that the lower bound of regret has to be @math even with the strongly convex and smooth assumptions.
@cite_7 @cite_1 @cite_0 @cite_23 @cite_2 @cite_13 @cite_11
2284345772 1937834619 2186453173 2138682935
The study of online convex optimization in the bandit setting was initiated by Kleinberg (2004) and (2005). Such a setting models a decision maker that has to make decisions in the face of adversarially chosen convex loss functions. Moreover, the only information the decision maker receives are the losses. The identities of the loss functions themselves are not revealed. In this setting, we reduce the gap between the best known lower and upper bounds for the class of smooth convex functions, i.e. convex functions with a Lipschitz continuous gradient. Building upon existing work on selfconcordant regularizers and one-point gradient estimation, we give the first algorithm whose expected regret is O(T ), ignoring constant and logarithmic factors. In this paper, we initiate a systematic investigation of differentially private algorithms for convex empirical risk minimization. Various instantiations of this problem have been studied before. We provide new algorithms and matching lower bounds for private ERM assuming only that each data point's contribution to the loss function is Lipschitz bounded and that the domain of optimization is bounded. We provide a separate set of algorithms and matching lower bounds for the setting in which the loss functions are known to also be strongly convex. Our algorithms run in polynomial time, and in some cases even match the optimal non-private running time (as measured by oracle complexity). We give separate algorithms (and lower bounds) for @math - and @math -differential privacy; perhaps surprisingly, the techniques used for designing optimal algorithms in the two cases are completely different. Our lower bounds apply even to very simple, smooth function families, such as linear and quadratic functions. This implies that algorithms from previous work can be used to obtain optimal error rates, under the additional assumption that the contributions of each data point to the loss function is smooth. We show that simple approaches to smoothing arbitrary loss functions (in order to apply previous techniques) do not yield optimal error rates. In particular, optimal algorithms were not previously known for problems such as training support vector machines and the high-dimensional median. We study the online convex optimization problem, in which an online algorithm has to make repeated decisions with convex loss functions and hopes to achieve a small regret. We consider a natural restriction of this problem in which the loss functions have a small deviation, measured by the sum of the distances between every two consecutive loss functions, according to some distance metrics. We show that for the linear and general smooth convex loss functions, an online algorithm modified from the gradient descend algorithm can achieve a regret which only scales as the square root of the deviation. For the closely related problem of prediction with expert advice, we show that an online algorithm modified from the multiplicative update algorithm can also achieve a similar regret bound for a different measure of deviation. Finally, for loss functions which are strictly convex, we show that an online algorithm modified from the online Newton step algorithm can achieve a regret which is only logarithmic in terms of the deviation, and as an application, we can also have such a logarithmic regret for the portfolio management problem. This paper examines the generalization properties of online convex programming algorithms when the loss function is Lipschitz and strongly convex. Our main result is a sharp bound, that holds with high probability, on the excess risk of the output of an online algorithm in terms of the average regret. This allows one to use recent algorithms with logarithmic cumulative regret guarantees to achieve fast convergence rates for the excess risk with high probability. As a corollary, we characterize the convergence rate of PEGASOS (with high probability), a recently proposed method for solving the SVM optimization problem.