AbstractThe overwhelming majority of survivable (fault-tolerant) network design models assume auniform scenario set. Such a scenario set assumes that every subset of the network resources(edges or vertices) of a given cardinality k comprises a scenario. While this approach yieldsproblems with clean combinatorial structure and good algorithms, it often fails to capture thetrue nature of the scenario set coming from applications.One natural reﬁnement of the uniform model is obtained by partitioning the set of resourcesinto faulty and secure resources. The scenario set contains every subset of at most k faultyresources. This work studies the Fault-Tolerant Path (FTP) problem, the counterpart of theShortest Path problem in this failure model. We present complexity results alongside exact andapproximation algorithms for FTP. We emphasize the vast increase in the complexity of theproblem with respect to its uniform analogue, the Edge-Disjoint Paths problem. 1 Introduction The Minimum-Cost Edge-Disjoint Path (EDP) problem is a classical network design problem,deﬁned as follows. Given an edge-weighted graph G = (V,E), two terminals s,t ∈V and an integerparameter k ∈Z
A two-stage robust model called was introduced by @cite_18 . In this model a scenario corresponds to a subset of the initially given constraints that need to be satisfied. For shortest path this means that the source node and the target node are not fixed, but are rather revealed in the second stage. The authors provide approximation algorithms for some problems such as Steiner Tree, Multi-Cut, facility Location etc. in the demand-robust setting. @cite_14 later improved some of those results, including a constant factor approximation algorithm for the robust shortest path problem. @cite_17 and @cite_8 studied an extension of the demand-robust model that allows exponentially many scenarios.
@cite_8 @cite_18 @cite_14 @cite_17
1579892319 2167240010 2121638441 1528210381
Demand-robust versions of common optimization problems were recently introduced by [4] motivated by the worst-case considerations of two-stage stochastic optimization models. We study the demand robust min-cut and shortest path problems, and exploit the nature of the robust objective to give improved approximation factors. Specifically, we give a @math approximation for robust min-cut and a 7.1 approximation for robust shortest path. Previously, the best approximation factors were O(log n) for robust min-cut and 16 for robust shortest paths, both due to [4]. Our main technique can be summarized as follows: We investigate each of the second stage scenarios individually, checking if it can be independently serviced in the second stage within an acceptable cost (namely, a guess of the optimal second stage costs). For the costly scenarios that cannot be serviced in this way (“rainy days”), we show that they can be fully taken care of in a near-optimal first stage solution (i.e., by ”paying today”). We also consider “hitting-set” extensions of the robust min-cut and shortest path problems and show that our techniques can be combined with algorithms for Steiner multicut and group Steiner tree problems to give similar approximation guarantees for the hitting-set versions of robust min-cut and shortest path problems respectively. We study two-stage robustvariants of combinatorial optimization problems like Steiner tree, Steiner forest, and uncapacitated facility location. The robust optimization problems, previously studied by [1], [6], and [4], are two-stage planning problems in which the requirements are revealed after some decisions are taken in stage one. One has to then complete the solution, at a higher cost, to meet the given requirements. In the robust Steiner tree problem, for example, one buys some edges in stage one after which some terminals are revealed. In the second stage, one has to buy more edges, at a higher cost, to complete the stage one solution to build a Steiner tree on these terminals. The objective is to minimize the total cost under the worst-case scenario. In this paper, we focus on the case of exponentially manyscenarios given implicitly. A scenario consists of any subset of kterminals (for Steiner tree), or any subset of kterminal-pairs (for Steiner forest), or any subset of kclients (for facility location). We present the first constant-factor approximation algorithms for the robust Steiner tree and robust uncapacitated facility location problems. For the robust Steiner forest problem with uniform inflation, we present an O(logn)-approximation and show that the problem with two inflation factors is impossible to approximate within O(log1 2 i¾? i¾?n) factor, for any constant i¾?> 0, unless NP has randomized quasi-polynomial time algorithms. Finally, we show APX-hardness of the robust min-cut problem (even with singleton-set scenarios), resolving an open question by [1] and [6]. We study the Steiner tree problem and the single-cable single-sink network design problem under a two-stage stochastic model with recourse and finitely many scenarios. In these models, some edges are purchased in a first stage when only probabilistic information about the second stage is available. In the second stage, one of a finite number of specified scenarios is realized, which results in the set of terminals becoming known and the opportunity to purchase additional edges (under an inflated cost function) to augment the first-stage solution. We provide constant factor approximation algorithms for these problems by rounding the linear relaxation of IP formulations of the problems. Our algorithms involve solving the linear relaxation first, followed by a primal-dual routine that is guided by the LP solution. We also show that because our bounds are local (the cost of each component is bounded by its cost in the LP solution), we are able to obtain bounds that guard against a form of downside risk. This paper considers the Steiner tree problem in the model of two-stage stochastic optimization with recourse. This model, the focus of much recent research [11, 16, 8, 18], tries to capture the fact that many infrastructure planning problems have to be solved in the presence of uncertainty, and that we have make decisions knowing merely market forecasts (and not the precise set of demands); by the time the actual demands arrive, the costs may be higher due to inflation. In the context of the Stochastic Steiner Tree problem on a graph G = (V,E), the model can be paraphrased thus: on Monday, we are given a probability distribution π on subsets of vertices, and can build some subset EM of edges. On Tuesday, a set of terminals D materializes (drawn from the same distribution π). We now have to buy edges ET so that the set EM ∪ ET forms a Steiner tree on D. The goal is to minimize the expected cost of the solution. We give the first constant-factor approximation algorithm for this problem. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first O(1)-approximation for the stochastic version of a non sub-additive problem. In fact, algorithms for the unrooted stochastic Steiner tree problem we consider are powerful enough to solve the Multicommodity Rent-or-Buy problem, itself a topic of recent interest [3, 7, 15].