In this paper, we provide a systematic analysis of the Twitter discussion on the 2016 Austrian presidential elections. In particular, we extracted and analyzed a data-set consisting of 343645 Twitter messages related to the 2016 Austrian presidential elections. Our analysis combines methods from network science, sentiment analysis, as well as bot detection. Among other things, we found that: a) the winner of the election (Alexander Van der Bellen) was considerably more popular and influential on Twitter than his opponent, b) the Twitter followers of Van der Bellen substantially participated in the spread of misinformation about him, c) there was a clear polarization in terms of the sentiments spread by Twitter followers of the two presidential candidates, d) the in-degree and out-degree distributions of the underlying communication network are heavy-tailed, and e) compared to other recent events, such as the 2016 Brexit referendum or the 2016 US presidential elections, only a very small number of bots participated in the Twitter discussion on the 2016 Austrian presidential election.
In @cite_64 , Stieglitz and Dang-Xuan applied the SentiStrength algorithm for sentiment analysis to study the spread of tweets during the German elections in 2012. In particular, they quantified the impact of positive and negative tweets in terms of the re-tweet count and the speed of re-tweeting. In @cite_52 , Diaz- studied the public opinion about the presidents of 18 Latin American countries by applying sentiment analysis techniques to Spanish language tweets and short blog posts. To determine how people feel about each president, the authors carried out a part-of-speech tagging to extract the list of nouns and adjectives which they later mapped to a corresponding emotion score in the NRC emotion lexicon. Additional non-English language studies have been conducted for the Nigerian presidential elections 2011 @cite_80 , Indonesian presidential elections @cite_50 , as well as the Bulgarian presidential elections @cite_9 .
@cite_64 @cite_9 @cite_52 @cite_50 @cite_80
2060968456 2368278370 2184009014 2156413587
This paper analyzes a corpus of Nigerian Tweets collected during the run-up to the 2011 Nigerian Presidential election and compares it with official election returns and polling data. We found that counts of the mentions on Twitter of the two major candidates correlated strongly with polling and election results when compared across the country's geopolitical regions, though the same data over represented two other candidates who did not fare as well in the polls or at the ballot box. Sentiment extracted from Twitter was less accurate in capturing mean levels of support for the two major candidates and, in particular, showed a strong negativity bias against the incumbent president. Twitter sentiment did mirror regional trends in the polling and election results though not as strongly as seen for mention counts. We demonstrate methodologically how to sample these data, extract sentiment, and compare this sentiment with ground-truth polling data and election results. Although social media clearly capture opinion about contentious issues, our results suggest that the opinion represented there may not always accurately reflect true public opinion. We propose a supervised model for expanding an opinion lexicon for Twitter.We combine automatically annotated tweets with existing hand-made opinion lexicons.We use POS tags and associations between words and sentiment as word-level features.Expanded words are mapped to a positive, negative, and neutral distribution.We outperform the performance obtained by using PMI semantic orientation alone. Opinion lexicons, which are lists of terms labeled by sentiment, are widely used resources to support automatic sentiment analysis of textual passages. However, existing resources of this type exhibit some limitations when applied to social media messages such as tweets (posts in Twitter), because they are unable to capture the diversity of informal expressions commonly found in this type of media.In this article, we present a method that combines information from automatically annotated tweets and existing hand-made opinion lexicons to expand an opinion lexicon in a supervised fashion. The expanded lexicon contains part-of-speech (POS) disambiguated entries with a probability distribution for positive, negative, and neutral polarity classes, similarly to SentiWordNet.To obtain this distribution using machine learning, we propose word-level attributes based on (a) the morphological information conveyed by POS tags and (b) associations between words and the sentiment expressed in the tweets that contain them. We consider tweets with both hard and soft sentiment labels. The sentiment associations are modeled in two different ways: using point-wise-mutual-information semantic orientation (PMI-SO), and using stochastic gradient descent semantic orientation (SGD-SO), which learns a linear relationship between words and sentiment. The training dataset is labeled by a seed lexicon formed by combining multiple hand-annotated lexicons.Our experimental results show that our method outperforms the three-dimensional word-level polarity classification performance obtained by using PMI-SO alone. This is significant because PMI-SO is a state-of-the-art measure for establishing world-level sentiment. Additionally, we show that lexicons created with our method achieve significant improvements over SentiWordNet for classifying tweets into polarity classes, and also outperform SentiStrength in the majority of the experiments. We present a generic approach to real-time monitoring of the Twitter sentiment and show its application to the Bulgarian parliamentary elections in May 2013. Our approach is based on building high quality sentiment classification models from manually annotated tweets. In particular, we have developed a user-friendly annotation platform, a feature selection procedure based on maximizing prediction accuracy, and a binary SVM classifier extended with a neutral zone. We have also considerably improved the language detection in tweets. The evaluation results show that before and after the Bulgarian elections, negative sentiment about political parties prevailed. Both, the volume and the difference between the negative and positive tweets for individual parties closely match the election results. The later result is somehow surprising, but consistent with the prevailing negative sentiment during the elections. We describe a state-of-the-art sentiment analysis system that detects (a) the sentiment of short informal textual messages such as tweets and SMS (message-level task) and (b) the sentiment of a word or a phrase within a message (term-level task). The system is based on a supervised statistical text classification approach leveraging a variety of surface-form, semantic, and sentiment features. The sentiment features are primarily derived from novel high-coverage tweet-specific sentiment lexicons. These lexicons are automatically generated from tweets with sentiment-word hashtags and from tweets with emoticons. To adequately capture the sentiment of words in negated contexts, a separate sentiment lexicon is generated for negated words. The system ranked first in the SemEval-2013 shared task 'Sentiment Analysis in Twitter' (Task 2), obtaining an F-score of 69.02 in the message-level task and 88.93 in the term-level task. Post-competition improvements boost the performance to an F-score of 70.45 (message-level task) and 89.50 (term-level task). The system also obtains state-of-the-art performance on two additional datasets: the SemEval-2013 SMS test set and a corpus of movie review excerpts. The ablation experiments demonstrate that the use of the automatically generated lexicons results in performance gains of up to 6.5 absolute percentage points.