We present DANTE, a novel method for training neural networks using the alternating minimization principle. DANTE provides an alternate perspective to traditional gradient-based backpropagation techniques commonly used to train deep networks. It utilizes an adaptation of quasi-convexity to cast training a neural network as a bi-quasi-convex optimization problem. We show that for neural network configurations with both differentiable (e.g. sigmoid) and non-differentiable (e.g. ReLU) activation functions, we can perform the alternations very effectively. DANTE can also be extended to networks with multiple hidden layers. In experiments on standard datasets, neural networks trained using the proposed method were found to be very promising and competitive to traditional backpropagation techniques, both in terms of quality of the solution, as well as training speed.
Some other efforts have also explored target propagation based methods, such as in @cite_20 , Difference Target Propagation @cite_19 and target propagation in a Bayesian setting @cite_12 . There are also efforts that use random feedback weights such as feedback-alignment @cite_13 and direct indirect feedback-alignment @cite_14 where the weights used for propagation need not be symmetric with the weights used for forward propagation. We however do not focus on credit assignment in this work. However, one could view the proposed method as carrying out implicit' credit assignment using partial derivatives, but there is no defined model for credit assignment in our work.
@cite_14 @cite_19 @cite_20 @cite_13 @cite_12
1855112655 2964115671 2139919528 2949405272
Back-propagation has been the workhorse of recent successes of deep learning but it relies on infinitesimal effects (partial derivatives) in order to perform credit assignment. This could become a serious issue as one considers deeper and more non-linear functions, e.g., consider the extreme case of non-linearity where the relation between parameters and cost is actually discrete. Inspired by the biological implausibility of back-propagation, a few approaches have been proposed in the past that could play a similar credit assignment role. In this spirit, we explore a novel approach to credit assignment in deep networks that we call target propagation. The main idea is to compute targets rather than gradients, at each layer. Like gradients, they are propagated backwards. In a way that is related but different from previously proposed proxies for back-propagation which rely on a backwards network with symmetric weights, target propagation relies on auto-encoders at each layer. Unlike back-propagation, it can be applied even when units exchange stochastic bits rather than real numbers. We show that a linear correction for the imperfectness of the auto-encoders, called difference target propagation, is very effective to make target propagation actually work, leading to results comparable to back-propagation for deep networks with discrete and continuous units and denoising auto-encoders and achieving state of the art for stochastic networks. Artificial neural networks are most commonly trained with the back-propagation algorithm, where the gradient for learning is provided by back-propagating the error, layer by layer, from the output layer to the hidden layers. A recently discovered method called feedback-alignment shows that the weights used for propagating the error backward don't have to be symmetric with the weights used for propagation the activation forward. In fact, random feedback weights work evenly well, because the network learns how to make the feedback useful. In this work, the feedback alignment principle is used for training hidden layers more independently from the rest of the network, and from a zero initial condition. The error is propagated through fixed random feedback connections directly from the output layer to each hidden layer. This simple method is able to achieve zero training error even in convolutional networks and very deep networks, completely without error back-propagation. The method is a step towards biologically plausible machine learning because the error signal is almost local, and no symmetric or reciprocal weights are required. Experiments show that the test performance on MNIST and CIFAR is almost as good as those obtained with back-propagation for fully connected networks. If combined with dropout, the method achieves 1.45 error on the permutation invariant MNIST task. Experimental results show that certain message passing algorithms, namely, survey propagation, are very effective in finding satisfying assignments in random satisfiable 3CNF formulas. In this paper we make a modest step towards providing rigorous analysis that proves the effectiveness of message passing algorithms for random 3SAT. We analyze the performance of Warning Propagation, a popular message passing algorithm that is simpler than survey propagation. We show that for 3CNF formulas generated under the planted assignment distribution, running warning propagation in the standard way works when the clause-to-variable ratio is a sufficiently large constant. We are not aware of previous rigorous analysis of message passing algorithms for satisfiability instances, though such analysis was performed for decoding of Low Density Parity Check (LDPC) Codes. We discuss some of the differences between results for the LDPC setting and our results. Gradient backpropagation (BP) requires symmetric feedforward and feedback connections -- the same weights must be used for forward and backward passes. This "weight transport problem" (Grossberg 1987) is thought to be one of the main reasons to doubt BP's biologically plausibility. Using 15 different classification datasets, we systematically investigate to what extent BP really depends on weight symmetry. In a study that turned out to be surprisingly similar in spirit to 's demonstration ( 2014) but orthogonal in its results, our experiments indicate that: (1) the magnitudes of feedback weights do not matter to performance (2) the signs of feedback weights do matter -- the more concordant signs between feedforward and their corresponding feedback connections, the better (3) with feedback weights having random magnitudes and 100 concordant signs, we were able to achieve the same or even better performance than SGD. (4) some normalizations stabilizations are indispensable for such asymmetric BP to work, namely Batch Normalization (BN) (Ioffe and Szegedy 2015) and or a "Batch Manhattan" (BM) update rule.