This article describes an absolutely stable, first-order constraint solverfor multi-rigid body systems that calculates (predicts) constraint forces for typical bilateral and unilateral constraints, contact constraints with friction, and many other constraint types. Redundant constraints do not pose numerical problems or require regularization. Coulomb friction for contact is modeled using a true friction cone, rather than a linearized approximation. The computational expense of the solver is dependent upon the types of constraints present in the input. The hardest (in a computational complexity sense) inputs are reducible to solving convex optimization problems, i.e., polynomial time solvable. The simplest inputs require only solving a linear system. The solver is L-stable, which will imply that the forces due to constraints induce no computational stiffness into the multi-body dynamics differential equations. This approach is targeted to multibodies simulated with coarse accuracy, subject to computational stiffness arising from constraints, and where the number of constraint equations is not large compared to the number of multibody position and velocity state variables. For such applications, the approach should prove far faster than using other implicit integration approaches. I assess the approach on some fundamental multibody dynamics problems.
The contact aspects of the constraint model introduced in this article are effectively that of the @cite_25 contact model, though I introduce numerous computational and modeling advantages over the approach they describe. Mine does not require categorizing contact into sticking and sliding. My approach permits using realistic stiffness values derived via engineering tables and without needing to consider whether the choice of modeling parameters might make the simulation unstable.
@cite_25
2099876657 2166185271 2040973163 2075921599
We propose a new explicit contact algorithm for finite element discretized solids and shells with smooth and non-smooth geometries. The equations of motion are integrated in time with a predictor-corrector-type algorithm. After each predictor step, the impenetrability constraints and the exchange of momenta between the impacting bodies are considered and enforced independently. The geometrically inadmissible penetrations are removed using closest point projections or similar updates. Penetration is measured using the signed volume of intersection described by the contacting surface elements, which is well-defined for both smooth and non-smooth geometries. For computing the instantaneous velocity changes that occur during the impact event, we introduce the decomposition contact response method. This enables the closed-form solution of the jump equations at impact, and applies to non-frictional as well as frictional contact, as exemplified by the Coulomb frictional model. The overall algorithm has excellent momentum and energy conservation characteristics, as several numerical examples demonstrate. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Abstract The nature of the constitutive contact force law utilized to describe contact–impact events in solid contact interfaces plays a key role in predicting the response of multibody mechanical systems and in the simulation of engineering applications. The goal of this work is to present a comparative study on the most relevant existing viscoelastic contact force models. In the sequel of this process, their fundamental characteristics are examined and their performances evaluated. Models developed based on the Hertz contact theory and augmented with a damping term to accommodate the dissipation of energy during the impact process, which typically is a function of the coefficient of restitution between the contacting solids, are considered in this study. In particular, the identified contact force models are compared in the present study for simple solid impact problems with the sole purpose of comparing the performance of the various models and examining the corresponding system behavior. The outcomes indicate that the prediction of the dynamic behavior of contacting solids strongly depends on the selection of the contact force model. The use of Coulomb's friction law with the principles of classical rigid-body dynamics introduces mathematical inconsistencies. Specifically, the forward dynamics problem can have no solutions or multiple solutions. In these situations, compliant contact models, while increasing the dimensionality of the state vector, can resolve these problems. The simplicity and efficiency of rigid-body models, however, provide strong motivation for their use during those portions of a simulation when the rigid-body solution is unique and stable. In this paper, we use singular perturbation analysis in conjunction with linear complementarity theory to establish conditions under which the solution predicted by the rigid-body dynamic model is stable. We employ a general model of contact compliance to derive stability criteria for planar mechanical systems. In particular, we show that for cases with one sliding contact, there is always at most one stable solution. Our approach is not directly applicable to transitions between rolling and sliding where the Coulomb friction law is discontinuous. To overcome this difficulty, we introduce a smooth nonlinear friction law, which approximates Coulomb friction. Such a friction model can also increase the efficiency of both rigid-body and compliant contact simulation. Numerical simulations for the different models and comparison with experimental results are also presented. The present work extends the non-smooth contact class of algorithms introduced by to the case of friction. The formulation specifically addresses contact geometries, e.g. involving multiple collisions between tightly packed non-smooth bodies, for which neither normals nor gap functions can be properly defined. A key aspect of the approach is that the incremental displacements follow from a minimum principle. The objective function comprises terms which account for inertia, strain energy, contact, friction and external forcing. The Euler–Lagrange equations corresponding to this extended variational principle are shown to be consistent with the equations of motion of solids in frictional contact. In addition to its value as a basis for formulating numerical algorithms, the variational framework offers theoretical advantages as regards the selection of trajectories in cases of non-uniqueness. We present numerical and analytical examples which demonstrate the good momentum and energy conservation characteristics of the numerical algorithms, as well as the ability of the approach to account for stick and slip conditions.