In recent years, a number of artificial intelligent services have been developed such as defect detection system or diagnosis system for customer services. Unfortunately, the core in these services is a black-box in which human cannot understand the underlying decision making logic, even though the inspection of the logic is crucial before launching a commercial service. Our goal in this paper is to propose an analytic method of a model explanation that is applicable to general classification models. To this end, we introduce the concept of a contribution matrix and an explanation embedding in a constraint space by using a matrix factorization. We extract a rule-like model explanation from the contribution matrix with the help of the nonnegative matrix factorization. To validate our method, the experiment results provide with open datasets as well as an industry dataset of a LTE network diagnosis and the results show our method extracts reasonable explanations.
A model level explanation necessarily needs to understand the underlying decision making constraint of a given classification model. proposed a simplification method of Bayesian network model @cite_10 . Rule extraction methods have been proposed in @cite_7 , but they are restricted in the support vector machine. try to understand the reasoning process of a black box model by extracting a decision tree that approximates the classification model @cite_13 .
@cite_13 @cite_10 @cite_7
2808925008 1990088911 2803532212 1625504505
The widescale use of machine learning algorithms to drive decision-making has highlighted the critical importance of ensuring the interpretability of such models in order to engender trust in their output. The state-of-the-art recommendation systems use black-box latent factor models that provide no explanation of why a recommendation has been made, as they abstract their decision processes to a high-dimensional latent space which is beyond the direct comprehension of humans. We propose a novel approach for extracting explanations from latent factor recommendation systems by training association rules on the output of a matrix factorisation black-box model. By taking advantage of the interpretable structure of association rules, we demonstrate that predictive accuracy of the recommendation model can be maintained whilst yielding explanations with high fidelity to the black-box model on a unique industry dataset. Our approach mitigates the accuracy-interpretability trade-off whilst avoiding the need to sacrifice flexibility or use external data sources. We also contribute to the ill-defined problem of evaluating interpretability. Artificial neural networks often achieve high classification accuracy rates, but they are considered as black boxes due to their lack of explanation capability. This paper proposes the new rule extraction algorithm RxREN to overcome this drawback. In pedagogical approach the proposed algorithm extracts the rules from trained neural networks for datasets with mixed mode attributes. The algorithm relies on reverse engineering technique to prune the insignificant input neurons and to discover the technological principles of each significant input neuron of neural network in classification. The novelty of this algorithm lies in the simplicity of the extracted rules and conditions in rule are involving both discrete and continuous mode of attributes. Experimentation using six different real datasets namely iris, wbc, hepatitis, pid, ionosphere and creditg show that the proposed algorithm is quite efficient in extracting smallest set of rules with high classification accuracy than those generated by other neural network rule extraction methods. The recent years have witnessed the rise of accurate but obscure decision systems which hide the logic of their internal decision processes to the users. The lack of explanations for the decisions of black box systems is a key ethical issue, and a limitation to the adoption of machine learning components in socially sensitive and safety-critical contexts. Therefore, we need explanations that reveals the reasons why a predictor takes a certain decision. In this paper we focus on the problem of black box outcome explanation, i.e., explaining the reasons of the decision taken on a specific instance. We propose LORE, an agnostic method able to provide interpretable and faithful explanations. LORE first leans a local interpretable predictor on a synthetic neighborhood generated by a genetic algorithm. Then it derives from the logic of the local interpretable predictor a meaningful explanation consisting of: a decision rule, which explains the reasons of the decision; and a set of counterfactual rules, suggesting the changes in the instance's features that lead to a different outcome. Wide experiments show that LORE outperforms existing methods and baselines both in the quality of explanations and in the accuracy in mimicking the black box. In this paper we present an average-case analysis of the Bayesian classifier, a simple induction algorithm that fares remarkably well on many learning tasks. Our analysis assumes a monotone conjunctive target concept, and independent, noise-free Boolean attributes. We calculate the probability that the algorithm will induce an arbitrary pair of concept descriptions and then use this to compute the probability of correct classification over the instance space. The analysis takes into account the number of training instances, the number of attributes, the distribution of these attributes, and the level of class noise. We also explore the behavioral implications of the analysis by presenting predicted learning curves for artificial domains, and give experimental results on these domains as a check on our reasoning.