We give an overview of new and existing cut- and flow-based ILP formulations for the two-stage stochastic Steiner tree problem and compare the strength of the LP relaxations.
Last but not least, fixed parameter tractable algorithms are described for the stochastic problems with parameter overall number of terminals @cite_16 and on partial 2-trees with parameter number of scenarios @cite_20 .
@cite_16 @cite_20
75217549 164287990 1514180083 1528210381
We consider the Steiner tree problem in graphs under uncertainty, the so-called two-stage stochastic Steiner tree problem (SSTP). The problem consists of two stages: In the first stage, we do not know which nodes need to be connected. Instead, we know costs at which we may buy edges, and a set of possible scenarios one of which will arise in the second stage. Each scenario consists of its own terminal set, a probability, and second-stage edge costs. We want to find a selection of first-stage edges and second-stage edges for each scenario that minimizes the expected costs and satisfies all connectivity requirements. We show that SSTP is in the class of fixed-parameter tractable problems (FPT), parameterized by the number of terminals. Additionally, we transfer our results to the directed and the prize-collecting variant of SSTP. Tuning an algorithm’s parameters for robust and high performance is a tedious and time-consuming task that often requires knowledge about both the domain and the algorithm of interest. Furthermore, the optimal parameter configuration to use may differ considerably across problem instances. In this report, we define and tackle the algorithm configuration problem, which is to automatically choose the optimal parameter configuration for a given algorithm on a per-instance base. We employ an indirect approach that predicts algorithm runtime for the problem instance at hand and each (continuous) parameter configuration, and then simply chooses the configuration that minimizes the prediction. This approach is based on similar work by Leyton- [LBNS02, NLBD04] who tackle the algorithm selection problem [Ric76] (given a problem instance, choose the best algorithm to solve it). While all previous studies for runtime prediction focussed on tree search algorithm, we demonstrate that it is possible to fairly accurately predict the runtime of SAPS [HTH02], one of the best-performing stochastic local search algorithms for SAT. We also show that our approach automatically picks parameter configurations that speed up SAPS by an average factor of more than two when compared to its default parameter configuration. Finally, we introduce sequential Bayesian learning to the problem of runtime prediction, enabling an incremental learning approach and yielding very informative estimates of predictive uncertainty. We consider the stochastic geometry model where the location of each node is a random point in a given metric space, or the existence of each node is uncertain. We study the problems of computing the expected lengths of several combinatorial or geometric optimization problems over stochastic points, including closest pair, minimum spanning tree, (k )-clustering, minimum perfect matching, and minimum cycle cover. We also consider the problem of estimating the probability that the length of closest pair, or the diameter, is at most, or at least, a given threshold. Most of the above problems are known to be ( # P )-hard. We obtain FPRAS (Fully Polynomial Randomized Approximation Scheme) for most of them in both the existential and locational uncertainty models. Our result for stochastic minimum spanning trees in the locational uncertain model improves upon the previously known constant factor approximation algorithm. Our results for other problems are the first known to the best of our knowledge. This paper considers the Steiner tree problem in the model of two-stage stochastic optimization with recourse. This model, the focus of much recent research [11, 16, 8, 18], tries to capture the fact that many infrastructure planning problems have to be solved in the presence of uncertainty, and that we have make decisions knowing merely market forecasts (and not the precise set of demands); by the time the actual demands arrive, the costs may be higher due to inflation. In the context of the Stochastic Steiner Tree problem on a graph G = (V,E), the model can be paraphrased thus: on Monday, we are given a probability distribution π on subsets of vertices, and can build some subset EM of edges. On Tuesday, a set of terminals D materializes (drawn from the same distribution π). We now have to buy edges ET so that the set EM ∪ ET forms a Steiner tree on D. The goal is to minimize the expected cost of the solution. We give the first constant-factor approximation algorithm for this problem. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first O(1)-approximation for the stochastic version of a non sub-additive problem. In fact, algorithms for the unrooted stochastic Steiner tree problem we consider are powerful enough to solve the Multicommodity Rent-or-Buy problem, itself a topic of recent interest [3, 7, 15].