In this paper, we present the actual risks of stealing user PINs by using mobile sensors versus the perceived risks by users. First, we propose PINlogger.js which is a JavaScript-based side channel attack revealing user PINs on an Android mobile phone. In this attack, once the user visits a website controlled by an attacker, the JavaScript code embedded in the web page starts listening to the motion and orientation sensor streams without needing any permission from the user. By analysing these streams, it infers the user’s PIN using an artificial neural network. Based on a test set of fifty 4-digit PINs, PINlogger.js is able to correctly identify PINs in the first attempt with a success rate of 74 which increases to 86 and 94 in the second and third attempts, respectively. The high success rates of stealing user PINs on mobile devices via JavaScript indicate a serious threat to user security. With the technical understanding of the information leakage caused by mobile phone sensors, we then study users’ perception of the risks associated with these sensors. We design user studies to measure the general familiarity with different sensors and their functionality, and to investigate how concerned users are about their PIN being discovered by an app that has access to all these sensors. Our studies show that there is significant disparity between the actual and perceived levels of threat with regard to the compromise of the user PIN. We confirm our results by interviewing our participants using two different approaches, within-subject and between-subject, and compare the results. We discuss how this observation, along with other factors, renders many academic and industry solutions ineffective in preventing such side channel attacks.
Another category of works directly target user PINs. For example, PIN skimmer by Simon and Anderson @cite_25 is an attack on a user's numpad and PINs using the camera and microphone on the smartphone. Spreitzer suggests another PIN Skimming attack @cite_9 and steals a user's PIN based on the measurements from the smartphone's ambient light sensor. introduce another attack @cite_14 on smartphone numerical and alphabetical keyboards and the user's PINs and credit card numbers by using the smartphone microphone. TapLogger by @cite_2 is another attack on the smartphone numpad which outputs the pressed digits and PINs based on accelerometer and orientation sensor data. Similarly, introduce an accelerometer-based side channel attack on the user's PINs and patterns in @cite_26 . We choose to compare PINlogger.js with the works in this category since they have the same goal of revealing the user's PINs. Table presents the results of our comparison.
@cite_14 @cite_26 @cite_9 @cite_2 @cite_25
1973831058 1980481605 2150097065 1533974647
Today's smartphones provide services and uses that required a panoply of dedicated devices not so long ago. With them, we listen to music, play games or chat with our friends; but we also read our corporate email and documents, manage our online banking; and we have started to use them directly as a means of payment. In this paper, we aim to raise awareness of side-channel attacks even when strong isolation protects sensitive applications. Previous works have studied the use of the phone accelerometer and gyroscope as side channel data to infer PINs. Here, we describe a new side-channel attack that makes use of the video camera and microphone to infer PINs entered on a number-only soft keyboard on a smartphone. The microphone is used to detect touch events, while the camera is used to estimate the smartphone's orientation, and correlate it to the position of the digit tapped by the user. We present the design, implementation and early evaluation of PIN Skimmer, which has a mobile application and a server component. The mobile application collects touch-event orientation patterns and later uses learnt patterns to infer PINs entered in a sensitive application. When selecting from a test set of 50 4-digit PINs, PIN Skimmer correctly infers more than 30 of PINs after 2 attempts, and more than 50 of PINs after 5 attempts on android-powered Nexus S and Galaxy S3 phones. When selecting from a set of 200 8-digit PINs, PIN Skimmer correctly infers about 45 of the PINs after 5 attempts and 60 after 10 attempts. It turns out to be difficult to prevent such side-channel attacks, so we provide guidelines for developers to mitigate present and future side-channel attacks on PIN input. The rapid deployment of sensing technology in smartphones and the explosion of their usage in people's daily lives provide users with the ability to collectively sense the world. This leads to a growing trend of mobile healthcare systems utilizing sensing data collected from smartphones with without additional external sensors to analyze and understand people's physical and mental states. However, such healthcare systems are vulnerable to user spoofing attacks, in which an adversary distributes his registered device to other users such that data collected from these users can be claimed as his own to obtain more healthcare benefits and undermine the successful operation of mobile healthcare systems. Existing mitigation approaches either only rely on a secret PIN number (which can not deal with colluded attacks) or require an explicit user action for verification. In this paper, we propose a user verification scheme leveraging unique gait patterns derived from acceleration readings in mobile healthcare systems to detect possible user spoofing attacks. Our framework exploits the readily available accelerometers embedded within smartphones for user verification. Specifically, our user spoofing attack mitigation scheme (which consists of three components, namely Step Cycle Identification, Step Cycle Interpolation, and Similarity Score Computation) is used to extract gait patterns from run-time accelerometer measurements to perform robust user verification under various walking speeds. Our experiments using 322 smartphone-based traces over a period of 6 months confirm that our scheme is highly effective for detecting user spoofing attacks. This strongly indicates the feasibility of using smartphone based low grade accelerometer to conduct gait recognition and facilitate effective user verification without active user cooperation. The pervasive usage of mobile devices, i.e., smartphones and tablet computers, and their vast amount of sensors represent a plethora of side channels posing a serious threat to the user's privacy and security. In this paper, we propose a new type of side channel which is based on the ambient-light sensor employed in today's mobile devices. While recent advances in this area of research focused on the employed motion sensors and the camera as well as the sound, we investigate a less obvious source of information leakage, namely the ambient light. We successfully demonstrate that minor tilts and turns of mobile devices cause variations of the ambient-light sensor information. Furthermore, we show that these variations leak enough information to infer a user's personal identification number (PIN) input based on a set of known PINs. Our results clearly show that we are able to determine the correct PIN---out of a set of 50 random PINs---within the first ten guesses about 80 of the time. In contrast, the chance of finding the right PIN by randomly guessing ten PINs would be 20 . Since the data required to perform such an attack can be gathered without any specific permissions or privileges, the presented attack seriously jeopardizes the security and privacy of mobile-device owners. Recent researches have shown that motion sensors may be used as a side channel to infer keystrokes on the touchscreen of smartphones. However, the practicality of this attack is unclear. For example, does this attack work on different devices, screen dimensions, keyboard layouts, or keyboard types? Does this attack depend on specific users or is it user independent? To answer these questions, we conducted a user study where 21 participants typed a total of 47,814 keystrokes on four different mobile devices in six settings. Our results show that this attack remains effective even though the accuracy is affected by user habits, device dimension, screen orientation, and keyboard layout. On a number-only keyboard, after the attacker tries 81 4-digit PINs, the probability that she has guessed the correct PIN is 65 , which improves the accuracy rate of random guessing by 81 times. Our study also indicates that inference based on the gyroscope is more accurate than that based on the accelerometer. We evaluated two classification techniques in our prototype and found that they are similarly effective.