Given a high-dimensional data matrix @math , Approximate Message Passing (AMP) algorithms construct sequences of vectors @math , @math , indexed by @math by iteratively applying @math or @math , and suitable non-linear functions, which depend on the specific application. Special instances of this approach have been developed --among other applications-- for compressed sensing reconstruction, robust regression, Bayesian estimation, low-rank matrix recovery, phase retrieval, and community detection in graphs. For certain classes of random matrices @math , AMP admits an asymptotically exact description in the high-dimensional limit @math , which goes under the name of state evolution.' Earlier work established state evolution for separable non-linearities (under certain regularity conditions). Nevertheless, empirical work demonstrated several important applications that require non-separable functions. In this paper we generalize state evolution to Lipschitz continuous non-separable nonlinearities, for Gaussian matrices @math . Our proof makes use of Bolthausen's conditioning technique along with several approximation arguments. In particular, we introduce a modified algorithm (called LAMP for Long AMP) which is of independent interest.
Finally, a recent paper by Ma, Rush and Baron @cite_32 states a theorem establishing state evolution for compressed sensing reconstruction via AMP with a non-separable sliding-window denoiser. The result of @cite_32 is not directly comparable with ours, since it concerns a special class of non-separable nonlinearities, but provides non-asymptotic guarantees.
@cite_32
2571527823 2747181576 2953338282 2103539935
We study the compressed sensing reconstruction problem for a broad class of random, band-diagonal sensing matrices. This construction is inspired by the idea of spatial coupling in coding theory. As demonstrated heuristically and numerically by Krzakala [30], message passing algorithms can effectively solve the reconstruction problem for spatially coupled measurements with undersampling rates close to the fraction of nonzero coordinates. We use an approximate message passing (AMP) algorithm and analyze it through the state evolution method. We give a rigorous proof that this approach is successful as soon as the undersampling rate δ exceeds the (upper) Renyi information dimension of the signal, d(pX). More precisely, for a sequence of signals of diverging dimension n whose empirical distribution converges to pX, reconstruction is with high probability successful from d(pX) n+o(n) measurements taken according to a band diagonal matrix. For sparse signals, i.e., sequences of dimension n and k(n) nonzero entries, this implies reconstruction from k(n)+o(n) measurements. For “discrete” signals, i.e., signals whose coordinates take a fixed finite set of values, this implies reconstruction from o(n) measurements. The result is robust with respect to noise, does not apply uniquely to random signals, but requires the knowledge of the empirical distribution of the signal pX. Given a high-dimensional data matrix @math , Approximate Message Passing (AMP) algorithms construct sequences of vectors @math , @math , indexed by @math by iteratively applying @math or @math , and suitable non-linear functions, which depend on the specific application. Special instances of this approach have been developed --among other applications-- for compressed sensing reconstruction, robust regression, Bayesian estimation, low-rank matrix recovery, phase retrieval, and community detection in graphs. For certain classes of random matrices @math , AMP admits an asymptotically exact description in the high-dimensional limit @math , which goes under the name of state evolution.' Earlier work established state evolution for separable non-linearities (under certain regularity conditions). Nevertheless, empirical work demonstrated several important applications that require non-separable functions. In this paper we generalize state evolution to Lipschitz continuous non-separable nonlinearities, for Gaussian matrices @math . Our proof makes use of Bolthausen's conditioning technique along with several approximation arguments. In particular, we introduce a modified algorithm (called LAMP for Long AMP) which is of independent interest. We study the compressed sensing reconstruction problem for a broad class of random, band-diagonal sensing matrices. This construction is inspired by the idea of spatial coupling in coding theory. As demonstrated heuristically and numerically by KrzakalaEtAl , message passing algorithms can effectively solve the reconstruction problem for spatially coupled measurements with undersampling rates close to the fraction of non-zero coordinates. We use an approximate message passing (AMP) algorithm and analyze it through the state evolution method. We give a rigorous proof that this approach is successful as soon as the undersampling rate @math exceeds the (upper) R 'enyi information dimension of the signal, @math . More precisely, for a sequence of signals of diverging dimension @math whose empirical distribution converges to @math , reconstruction is with high probability successful from @math measurements taken according to a band diagonal matrix. For sparse signals, i.e., sequences of dimension @math and @math non-zero entries, this implies reconstruction from @math measurements. For discrete' signals, i.e., signals whose coordinates take a fixed finite set of values, this implies reconstruction from @math measurements. The result is robust with respect to noise, does not apply uniquely to random signals, but requires the knowledge of the empirical distribution of the signal @math . Compressed sensing posits that, within limits, one can undersample a sparse signal and yet reconstruct it accurately. Knowing the precise limits to such undersampling is important both for theory and practice. We present a formula that characterizes the allowed undersampling of generalized sparse objects. The formula applies to approximate message passing (AMP) algorithms for compressed sensing, which are here generalized to employ denoising operators besides the traditional scalar soft thresholding denoiser. This paper gives several examples including scalar denoisers not derived from convex penalization-the firm shrinkage nonlinearity and the minimax nonlinearity-and also nonscalar denoisers-block thresholding, monotone regression, and total variation minimization. Let the variables e = k N and δ = n N denote the generalized sparsity and undersampling fractions for sampling the k-generalized-sparse N-vector x0 according to y=Ax0. Here, A is an n×N measurement matrix whose entries are iid standard Gaussian. The formula states that the phase transition curve δ = δ(e) separating successful from unsuccessful reconstruction of x0 by AMP is given by δ = M(e|Denoiser) where M(e|Denoiser) denotes the per-coordinate minimax mean squared error (MSE) of the specified, optimally tuned denoiser in the directly observed problem y = x + z. In short, the phase transition of a noiseless undersampling problem is identical to the minimax MSE in a denoising problem. We prove that this formula follows from state evolution and present numerical results validating it in a wide range of settings. The above formula generates numerous new insights, both in the scalar and in the nonscalar cases.