We propose a novel boosting approach to multi-class classification problems, in which multiple classes are distinguished by a set of random projection matrices in essence. The approach uses random projections to alleviate the proliferation of binary classifiers typically required to perform multi-class classification. The result is a multi-class classifier with a single vector-valued parameter, irrespective of the number of classes involved. Two variants of this approach are proposed. The first method randomly projects the original data into new spaces, while the second method randomly projects the outputs of learned weak classifiers. These methods are not only conceptually simple but also effective and easy to implement. A series of experiments on synthetic, machine learning and visual recognition data sets demonstrate that our proposed methods compare favorably to existing multi-class boosting algorithms in terms of both the convergence rate and classification accuracy.
Boosting is a supervised learning algorithm which has attracted significant research attention over the past decade due to its effectiveness and efficiency. The first practical boosting algorithm, AdaBoost, was introduced for binary classification problems @cite_0 . Since then, many subsequent works have been focusing on binary classification problems. Recently, however, several multi-class boosting algorithms have been proposed. Many of these algorithms convert multi-class problems into a set of binary classification problems. Here we loosely divide existing work on multi-class boosting into four categories.
@cite_0
2164921999 2112076978 2103000819 2024046085
Boosting is a general method for improving the performance of learning algorithms. A recently proposed boosting algorithm, AdaBoost, has been applied with great success to several benchmark machine learning problems using mainly decision trees as base classifiers. In this article we investigate whether AdaBoost also works as well with neural networks, and we discuss the advantages and drawbacks of different versions of the AdaBoost algorithm. In particular, we compare training methods based on sampling the training set and weighting the cost function. The results suggest that random resampling of the training data is not the main explanation of the success of the improvements brought by AdaBoost. This is in contrast to bagging, which directly aims at reducing variance and for which random resampling is essential to obtain the reduction in generalization error. Our system achieves about 1.4 error on a data set of on-line handwritten digits from more than 200 writers. A boosted multilayer network achieved 1.5 error on the UCI letters and 8.1 error on the UCI satellite data set, which is significantly better than boosted decision trees. In an earlier paper, we introduced a new "boosting" algorithm called AdaBoost which, theoretically, can be used to significantly reduce the error of any learning algorithm that con- sistently generates classifiers whose performance is a little better than random guessing. We also introduced the related notion of a "pseudo-loss" which is a method for forcing a learning algorithm of multi-label concepts to concentrate on the labels that are hardest to discriminate. In this paper, we describe experiments we carried out to assess how well AdaBoost with and without pseudo-loss, performs on real learning problems. We performed two sets of experiments. The first set compared boosting to Breiman's "bagging" method when used to aggregate various classifiers (including decision trees and single attribute- value tests). We compared the performance of the two methods on a collection of machine-learning benchmarks. In the second set of experiments, we studied in more detail the performance of boosting using a nearest-neighbor classifier on an OCR problem. Boosting combines a set of moderately accurate weak classifiers to form a highly accurate predictor. Compared with binary boosting classification, multi-class boosting received less attention. We propose a novel multi-class boosting formulation here. Unlike most previous multi-class boosting algorithms which decompose a multi-boost problem into multiple independent binary boosting problems, we formulate a direct optimization method for training multi-class boosting. Moreover, by explicitly deriving the La-grange dual of the formulated primal optimization problem, we design totally-corrective boosting using the column generation technique in convex optimization. At each iteration, all weak classifiers' weights are updated. Our experiments on various data sets demonstrate that our direct multi-class boosting achieves competitive test accuracy compared with state-of-the-art multi-class boosting in the literature. Boosting is one of the most important recent developments in classification methodology. Boosting works by sequentially applying a classification algorithm to reweighted versions of the training data and then taking a weighted majority vote of the sequence of classifiers thus produced. For many classification algorithms, this simple strategy results in dramatic improvements in performance. We show that this seemingly mysterious phenomenon can be understood in terms of well-known statistical principles, namely additive modeling and maximum likelihood. For the two-class problem, boosting can be viewed as an approximation to additive modeling on the logistic scale using maximum Bernoulli likelihood as a criterion. We develop more direct approximations and show that they exhibit nearly identical results to boosting. Direct multiclass generalizations based on multinomial likelihood are derived that exhibit performance comparable to other recently proposed multiclass generalizations of boosting in most situations, and far superior in some. We suggest a minor modification to boosting that can reduce computation, often by factors of 10 to 50. Finally, we apply these insights to produce an alternative formulation of boosting decision trees. This approach, based on best-first truncated tree induction, often leads to better performance, and can provide interpretable descriptions of the aggregate decision rule. It is also much faster computationally, making it more suitable to large-scale data mining applications.