We present a method to restore a clear image from a haze-affected image using a Wasserstein generative adversarial network. As the problem is ill-conditioned, previous methods have required a prior on natural images or multiple images of the same scene. We train a generative adversarial network to learn the probability distribution of clear images conditioned on the haze-affected images using the Wasserstein loss function, using a gradient penalty to enforce the Lipschitz constraint. The method is data-adaptive, end-to-end, and requires no further processing or tuning of parameters. We also incorporate the use of a texture-based loss metric and the L1 loss to improve results, and show that our results are better than the current state-of-the-art.
@math describes the 1-Lipschitz family of functions. In this formulation, @math is no longer called the discriminator, but is called the critic. This is because it does not perform classification, but simply produces a score that goes towards forming the objective function that is to be maximized with respect to @math and minimized with respect to @math . proposed to clip the weights of the critic in order to enforce the 1-Lipschitz constraint, which biases the critic towards simpler functions and requires careful tuning of the clipping parameter. Instead, @cite_6 proposed an alternative way to enforce the Lipschitz constraint, based on the observation that a function is 1-Lipschitz if and only if it has gradients of norm at most 1 everywhere. The new conditional WGAN objective then becomes:
@cite_6
2759973161 2567882221 2517669009 2766153148
Since their invention, generative adversarial networks (GANs) have become a popular approach for learning to model a distribution of real (unlabeled) data. Convergence problems during training are overcome by Wasserstein GANs which minimize the distance between the model and the empirical distribution in terms of a different metric, but thereby introduce a Lipschitz constraint into the optimization problem. A simple way to enforce the Lipschitz constraint on the class of functions, which can be modeled by the neural network, is weight clipping. It was proposed that training can be improved by instead augmenting the loss by a regularization term that penalizes the deviation of the gradient of the critic (as a function of the network's input) from one. We present theoretical arguments why using a weaker regularization term enforcing the Lipschitz constraint is preferable. These arguments are supported by experimental results on toy data sets. This paper addresses the problem of minimizing a convex, Lipschitz function @math over a convex, compact set @math under a stochastic bandit (i.e., noisy zeroth-order) feedback model. In this model, the algorithm is allowed to observe noisy realizations of the function value @math at any query point @math . The quantity of interest is the regret of the algorithm, which is the sum of the function values at algorithm's query points minus the optimal function value. We demonstrate a generalization of the ellipsoid algorithm that incurs @math regret. Since any algorithm has regret at least @math on this problem, our algorithm is optimal in terms of the scaling with @math . In stochastic convex optimization the goal is to minimize a convex function @math over a convex set @math where @math is some unknown distribution and each @math in the support of @math is convex over @math . The optimization is commonly based on i.i.d. samples @math from @math . A standard approach to such problems is empirical risk minimization (ERM) that optimizes @math . Here we consider the question of how many samples are necessary for ERM to succeed and the closely related question of uniform convergence of @math to @math over @math . We demonstrate that in the standard @math setting of Lipschitz-bounded functions over a @math of bounded radius, ERM requires sample size that scales linearly with the dimension @math . This nearly matches standard upper bounds and improves on @math dependence proved for @math setting by Shalev- (2009). In stark contrast, these problems can be solved using dimension-independent number of samples for @math setting and @math dependence for @math setting using other approaches. We further show that our lower bound applies even if the functions in the support of @math are smooth and efficiently computable and even if an @math regularization term is added. Finally, we demonstrate that for a more general class of bounded-range (but not Lipschitz-bounded) stochastic convex programs an infinite gap appears already in dimension 2. The usual approach to developing and analyzing first-order methods for non-smooth (stochastic or deterministic) convex optimization assumes that the objective function is uniformly Lipschitz continuous with parameter @math . However, in many settings the non-differentiable convex function @math is not uniformly Lipschitz continuous -- for example (i) the classical support vector machine (SVM) problem, (ii) the problem of minimizing the maximum of convex quadratic functions, and even (iii) the univariate setting with @math . Herein we develop a notion of "relative continuity" that is determined relative to a user-specified "reference function" @math (that should be computationally tractable for algorithms), and we show that many non-differentiable convex functions are relatively continuous with respect to a correspondingly fairly-simple reference function @math . We also similarly develop a notion of "relative stochastic continuity" for the stochastic setting. We analysis two standard algorithms -- the (deterministic) mirror descent algorithm and the stochastic mirror descent algorithm -- for solving optimization problems in these two new settings, and we develop for the first time computational guarantees for instances where the objective function is not uniformly Lipschitz continuous. This paper is a companion paper for non-differentiable convex optimization to the recent paper by Lu, Freund, and Nesterov, which developed similar sorts of results for differentiable convex optimization.