We propose a system for automated essay grading using ontologies and textual entailment. The process of textual entailment is guided by hypotheses, which are extracted from a domain ontology. Textual entailment checks if the truth of the hypothesis follows from a given text. We enact textual entailment to compare students answer to a model answer obtained from ontology. We validated the solution against various essays written by students in the chemistry domain.
The National Assessment Program Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) @cite_1 rubric of persuasive essay grading lists a set of criteria for marking persuasive writing. The Spelling Mark algorithm is developed to formalise the NAPLAN rubric for marking spelling based on common heuristics and rules of the English language. The first step is to obtain the total number of words in the essay and the number of spelling errors in the essay. Then, each word is categorized based on the difficulty level into one of four classes: simple, common, difficult or challenging, while the number of correct and incorrect words in each category is counted. The final step in the algorithm is to assign the spelling mark according to the set of rules @cite_1 .
@cite_1
1972609793 2605898966 174933446 2165608467
Abstract Automated Essay Grading (AEG) is defined as a computer technology that evaluates and scores written prose. A number of AEG systems have been developed since the 1960s and in most of them, an ad-hoc or generalized approach is used to grade spelling even though it is an important element of an essay-scoring rubric. Existing approaches do not therefore give an accurate representation or measure of spelling in essays. According to the rubric-based scoring method used in the National Assessment Program “Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) in Australia, spelling is marked in three steps” first, by identifying the correct and incorrect words in the essay; second, by categorizing each word based on the difficulty level into one of four classes: Simple, Common, Difficult or Challenging, and counting the number of correct and incorrect words in each category; finally, by using the pre-defined NAPLAN rubric scale to assign the mark. Only a small number of existing AEG systems can be used for rubric-based scoring, and none can be used to grade spelling according to the NAPLAN rubric. In this paper, we address this shortcoming in the existing literature and present an innovative approach to automatically mark spelling using rubric based scoring. We develop two algorithms based on the rules and heuristics of the English language to formulize the rubric for spelling and then implement these algorithms in Java language and perform a series of evaluations of our system using an essay dataset. Our results are very promising, even though it is the first system of this kind. The need for automated grading tools for essay writing and open-ended assignments has received increasing attention due to the unprecedented scale of Massive Online Courses (MOOCs) and the fact that more and more students are relying on computers to complete and submit their school work. In this paper, we propose an efficient memory networks-powered automated grading model. The idea of our model stems from the philosophy that with enough graded samples for each score in the rubric, such samples can be used to grade future work that is found to be similar. For each possible score in the rubric, a student response graded with the same score is collected. These selected responses represent the grading criteria specified in the rubric and are stored in the memory component. Our model learns to predict a score for an ungraded response by computing the relevance between the ungraded response and each selected response in memory. The evaluation was conducted on the Kaggle Automated Student Assessment Prize (ASAP) dataset. The results show that our model achieves state-of-the-art performance in 7 out of 8 essay sets. Criterion Online Essay Evaluation Service includes a capability that labels sentences in student writing with essay-based discourse elements (e.g., thesis statements). We describe a new system that enhances Criterion’s capability, by evaluating multiple aspects of coherence in essays. This system identifies features of sentences based on semantic similarity measures and discourse structure. A support vector machine uses these features to capture breakdowns in coherence due to relatedness to the essay question and relatedness between discourse elements. Intra-sentential quality is evaluated with rule-based heuristics. Results indicate that the system yields higher performance than a baseline on all three aspects. We present the first system developed for automated grading of high school essays written in Swedish. The system uses standard text quality indicators and is able to compare vocabulary and grammar to large reference corpora of blog posts and newspaper articles. The system is evaluated on a corpus of 1 702 essays, each graded independently by the student’s own teacher and also in a blind re-grading process by another teacher. We show that our system’s performance is fair, given the low agreement between the two human graders, and furthermore show how it could improve efficiency in a practical setting where one seeks to identify incorrectly graded essays.