We consider a classical k-center problem in trees. Let T be a tree of n vertices and every vertex has a nonnegative weight. The problem is to find k centers on the edges of T such that the maximum weighted distance from all vertices to their closest centers is minimized. Megiddo and Tamir (SIAM J. Comput., 1983) gave an algorithm that can solve the problem in @math time by using Cole's parametric search. Since then it has been open for over three decades whether the problem can be solved in @math time. In this paper, we present an @math time algorithm for the problem and thus settle the open problem affirmatively.
For the unweighted case where the vertices of @math have the same weight, an @math -time algorithm was given in @cite_29 for the @math -center problem. Later, @cite_26 solved the problem in @math time, and the algorithm was improved to @math time @cite_16 . Finally, Frederickson @cite_10 solved the problem in @math time. The above four papers also solve the discrete case and the following problem version in the same running times: All points of @math are considered as demand points and the centers are required to be at vertices of @math . Further, if all points of @math are demand points and centers can be any points of @math , Megiddo and Tamir solved the problem in @math time @cite_11 , and the running time can be reduced to @math by applying Cole's parametric search @cite_21 .
@cite_26 @cite_29 @cite_21 @cite_16 @cite_10 @cite_11
1923579438 2900102855 2473549844 2410099853
The main aim of this note is to show that a polynomial-time algorithm for the scheduling problem 1|r j ; p j = p| ∑ Uj given by Carlier in (1981) is incorrect. In this problem we are given n jobs with release times and deadlines. All jobs have the same processing time p. The objective is to find a non-preemptive schedule that maximizes the number of jobs completed by their deadlines. The feasibility version of this problem, where we ask whether all jobs can meet their deadlines, has been studied thoroughly. Polynomial-time algorithms for this version were first found, independently, by Simons (1978) and Carlier (1981). A faster algorithm, with running time O(n log n), was subsequently given by (1981). The elegant feasibility algorithm of Carlier (1981) is based on dynamic programming and it processes jobs from left to right on the time-axis. For each time t, it constructs a partial schedule with jobs that complete at or before time t. Carlier also attempted to apply the same technique to design a polynomial-time algorithm for the maximization version, 1|r j ; p j = p| ∑ Uj , and claimed an O(n3 log n)-time algorithm. His result is now widely cited in the literature. We show, however, that this algorithm is not correct, by giving an instance on which it produces a sub-optimal schedule. Our counter-example can be, in fact, extended to support a broader claim, namely that even the general approach from Carlier (1981) cannot yield a polynomial-time algorithm. By this general approach we mean a class of algorithms that processes the input from left to right and make decisions based on the deadline ordering, and not their exact values. The question remains as to how efficiently can we solve the scheduling problem 1|r j ; p j = p| ∑ Uj . Baptiste (1999) gave an O(n7)-time algorithm for the more general version of this problem where jobs have weights. We show how to modify his algorithm to obtain a faster, O(n5)-time algorithm for the non-weighted case. These last two results are discussed only briefly in this note. The complete proofs can be found in the full version of this paper, see (2004). In the distributed all-pairs shortest paths problem (APSP), every node in the weighted undirected distributed network (the CONGEST model) needs to know the distance from every other node using least number of communication rounds (typically called time complexity ). The problem admits @math -approximation @math -time algorithm and a nearly-tight @math lower bound [Nanongkai, STOC'14; Lenzen and Patt-Shamir PODC'15] @math , @math and @math hide polylogarithmic factors. Note that the lower bounds also hold even in the unweighted case and in the weighted case with polynomial approximation ratios LenzenP_podc13,HolzerW12,PelegRT12,Nanongkai-STOC14 . . For the exact case, Elkin [STOC'17] presented an @math time bound, which was later improved to @math [Huang, Nanongkai, Saranurak FOCS'17]. It was shown that any super-linear lower bound (in @math ) requires a new technique [Censor-Hillel, Khoury, Paz, DISC'17], but otherwise it remained widely open whether there exists a @math -time algorithm for the exact case, which would match the best possible approximation algorithm. This paper resolves this question positively: we present a randomized (Las Vegas) @math -time algorithm, matching the lower bound up to polylogarithmic factors. Like the previous @math bound, our result works for directed graphs with zero (and even negative) edge weights. In addition to the improved running time, our algorithm works in a more general setting than that required by the previous @math bound; in our setting (i) the communication is only along edge directions (as opposed to bidirectional), and (ii) edge weights are arbitrary (as opposed to integers in 1, 2, ... poly(n) ). ... We consider the adversarial convex bandit problem and we build the first @math -time algorithm with @math -regret for this problem. To do so we introduce three new ideas in the derivative-free optimization literature: (i) kernel methods, (ii) a generalization of Bernoulli convolutions, and (iii) a new annealing schedule for exponential weights (with increasing learning rate). The basic version of our algorithm achieves @math -regret, and we show that a simple variant of this algorithm can be run in @math -time per step at the cost of an additional @math factor in the regret. These results improve upon the @math -regret and @math -time result of the first two authors, and the @math -regret and @math -time result of Hazan and Li. Furthermore we conjecture that another variant of the algorithm could achieve @math -regret, and moreover that this regret is unimprovable (the current best lower bound being @math and it is achieved with linear functions). For the simpler situation of zeroth order stochastic convex optimization this corresponds to the conjecture that the optimal query complexity is of order @math . In this paper we provide faster algorithms for solving the geometric median problem: given n points in d compute a point that minimizes the sum of Euclidean distances to the points. This is one of the oldest non-trivial problems in computational geometry yet despite a long history of research the previous fastest running times for computing a (1+є)-approximate geometric median were O(d· n4 3є−8 3) by Chin et. al, O(dexpє−4logє−1) by Badoiu et. al, O(nd+poly(d,є−1)) by Feldman and Langberg, and the polynomial running time of O((nd)O(1)log1 є) by Parrilo and Sturmfels and Xue and Ye. In this paper we show how to compute such an approximate geometric median in time O(ndlog3n є) and O(dє−2). While our O(dє−2) is a fairly straightforward application of stochastic subgradient descent, our O(ndlog3n є) time algorithm is a novel long step interior point method. We start with a simple O((nd)O(1)log1 є) time interior point method and show how to improve it, ultimately building an algorithm that is quite non-standard from the perspective of interior point literature. Our result is one of few cases of outperforming standard interior point theory. Furthermore, it is the only case we know of where interior point methods yield a nearly linear time algorithm for a canonical optimization problem that traditionally requires superlinear time.