We study gossip algorithms for the rumor spreading problem which asks one node to deliver a rumor to all nodes in an unknown network. We present the first protocol for any expander graph @math with @math nodes such that, the protocol informs every node in @math rounds with high probability, and uses @math random bits in total. The runtime of our protocol is tight, and the randomness requirement of @math random bits almost matches the lower bound of @math random bits for dense graphs. We further show that, for many graph families, polylogarithmic number of random bits in total suffice to spread the rumor in @math rounds. These results together give us an almost complete understanding of the randomness requirement of this fundamental gossip process. Our analysis relies on unexpectedly tight connections among gossip processes, Markov chains, and branching programs. First, we establish a connection between rumor spreading processes and Markov chains, which is used to approximate the rumor spreading time by the mixing time of Markov chains. Second, we show a reduction from rumor spreading processes to branching programs, and this reduction provides a general framework to derandomize gossip processes. In addition to designing rumor spreading protocols, these novel techniques may have applications in studying parallel and multiple random walks, and randomness complexity of distributed algorithms.
The study of determining and reducing the amount of randomness required for rumor spreading has been studied extensively in the past years. proposed a version of the rumor spreading push protocol. In contrast to @math random bits that used in the standard push model, the quasi-random rumor spreading model uses @math random bits, and has been shown to be efficient on several graph topologies @cite_4 @cite_29 . Further progress along this line include @cite_21 @cite_30 . Besides this, researchers also studied the question of designing randomness-efficient or deterministic protocols for similar problems. For instance, presented one deterministic gossip algorithm for the @math -local broadcast and the global broadcast problem. However, the algorithms in @cite_11 require that all nodes in the graph have unique identifiers (UID), and every node knows its own and the neighbors' UIDs. Hence the techniques developed there cannot be applied to our setting.
@cite_30 @cite_4 @cite_29 @cite_21 @cite_11
2952550120 2009267577 2144828388 2078958987
We study gossip algorithms for the rumor spreading problem which asks each node to deliver a rumor to all nodes in an unknown network. Gossip algorithms allow nodes only to call one neighbor per round and have recently attracted attention as message efficient, simple and robust solutions to the rumor spreading problem. Recently, non-uniform random gossip schemes were devised to allow efficient rumor spreading in networks with bottlenecks. In particular, [Censor-, STOC'12] gave an O(log^3 n) algorithm to solve the 1-local broadcast problem in which each node wants to exchange rumors locally with its 1-neighborhood. By repeatedly applying this protocol one can solve the global rumor spreading quickly for all networks with small diameter, independently of the conductance. This and all prior gossip algorithms for the rumor spreading problem have been inherently randomized in their design and analysis. This resulted in a parallel research direction trying to reduce and determine the amount of randomness needed for efficient rumor spreading. This has been done via lower bounds for restricted models and by designing gossip algorithms with a reduced need for randomness. The general intuition and consensus of these results has been that randomization plays a important role in effectively spreading rumors. In this paper we improves over this state of the art in several ways by presenting a deterministic gossip algorithm that solves the the k-local broadcast problem in 2(k+log n)log n rounds. Besides being the first efficient deterministic solution to the rumor spreading problem this algorithm is interesting in many aspects: It is simpler, more natural, more robust and faster than its randomized pendant and guarantees success with certainty instead of with high probability. Its analysis is furthermore simple, self-contained and fundamentally different from prior works. We investigate the randomness requirements of the classical rumor spreading problem on fully connected graphs with n vertices. In the standard random protocol, where each node that knows the rumor sends it to a randomly chosen neighbor in every round, each node needs O((log n)2) random bits in order to spread the rumor in O(log n) rounds with high probability (w.h.p.). For the simple quasirandom rumor spreading protocol proposed by Doerr, Friedrich, and Sauerwald (2008), [log n] random bits per node are sufficient. A lower bound by Doerr and Fouz (2009) shows that this is asymptotically tight for a slightly more general class of protocols, the so-called gate-model. In this paper, we consider general rumor spreading protocols. We provide a simple push-protocol that requires only a total of O(n log log n) random bits (i.e., on average O(log log n) bits per node) in order to spread the rumor in O(log n) rounds w.h.p. We also investigate the theoretical minimal randomness requirements of efficient rumor spreading. We prove the existence of a (non-uniform) push-protocol for which a total of 2 log n + log log n + o(log log n) random bits suffice to spread the rumor in log n + ln n + O(1) rounds with probability 1 − o(1). This is contrasted by a simple time-randomness tradeoff for the class of all rumor spreading protocols, according to which any protocol that uses log n − log log n − ω(1) random bits requires ω(log n) rounds to spread the rumor. We propose and analyse a quasirandom analogue to the classical push model for disseminating information in networks ("randomized rumor spreading"). In the classical model, in each round each informed node chooses a neighbor at random and informs it. Results of Frieze and Grimmett (Discrete Appl. Math. 1985) show that this simple protocol succeeds in spreading a rumor from one node of a complete graph to all others within O(log n) rounds. For the network being a hypercube or a random graph G(n, p) with p ≥ (1 +e)(log n) n, also O(log n) rounds suffice (Feige, Peleg. Raghavan, and Upfal, Random Struct. Algorithms 1990). In the quasirandom model, we assume that each node has a (cyclic) list of its neighbors. Once informed, it starts at a random position of the list, but from then on informs its neighbors in the order of the list. Surprisingly, irrespective of the orders of the lists, the above mentioned bounds still hold. In addition, we also show a O(log n) bound for sparsely connected random graphs G(n, p) with p = (log n + f(n)) n, where f(n) → ∞ and f(n) = O(log log n). Here, the classical model needs Θ(log2(n)) rounds. Hence the quasirandom model achieves similar or better broadcasting times with a greatly reduced use of random bits. In this paper, we provide a detailed comparison between a fully randomized protocol for rumor spreading on a complete graph and a quasirandom protocol introduced by Doerr, Friedrich, and Sauerwald [Quasirandom rumor spreading, in Proceedings of the 19th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, ACM, New York, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2008, pp. 773-781]. In the former, initially there is one vertex which holds a piece of information, and during each round every one of the informed vertices chooses uniformly at random and independently one of its neighbors and informs it. In the quasirandom version of this method (cf. Doerr, Friedrich, and Sauerwald) each vertex has a cyclic list of its neighbors. Once a vertex has been informed, it chooses uniformly at random only one neighbor. In the following round, it informs this neighbor, and at each subsequent round it picks the next neighbor from its list and informs it. We give a precise analysis of the evolution of the quasirandom protocol on the complete graph with @math vertices and show that it evolves essentially in the same way as the randomized protocol. In particular, if @math denotes the number of rounds that are needed until all vertices are informed, we show that for any slowly growing function @math , we have @math , with probability @math .