The arboricity of a graph is the minimum number of forests it can be partitioned into. Previous approximation schemes were nonconstructive, i.e., they only approximated the arboricity as a value without computing a corresponding forest partition, as they operate on the related pseudoforest partitions or the dual problem. We propose an algorithm for converting a partition of @math pseudoforests into a partition of @math forests in @math time, where @math is the inverse Ackermann function, when @math expected time is allowed for pre-computation of a perfect hash function. Without perfect hashing, we obtain @math with a data structure by Brodal and Fagerberg that stores graphs of arboricity @math . For every fixed @math , the latter result implies a constructive @math -approximation algorithm with runtime @math by using Kowalik's approximation scheme for pseudoforest partitions. Our algorithm might help in designing a faster exact arboricity algorithm. We also make several remarks on approximation algorithms for the pseudoarboricity and the equivalent graph orientations with smallest maximum indegree, and correct some mistakes made in the literature.
Barenboim and Elkin @cite_39 propose a constructive distributed algorithm that computes a @math -approximation of @math . @cite_12 describe an algorithm that distinguishes with high constant probability between graphs that are @math -close to and graphs that are @math -far from having arboricity @math , for some constant @math . Several upper bounds of the type @math for the arboricity were given by Chiba and Nishizeki @cite_25 , Gabow and Westermann @cite_9 , @cite_35 and Blumenstock @cite_28 . Let @math denote the bounds, and write @math if @math holds plus an example exists where the bounds differ. One can show @math . We do not know whether the second inequality is strict. The bound @math of is optimal.
@cite_35 @cite_28 @cite_9 @cite_39 @cite_25 @cite_12
2952482095 2900102855 2963301485 2047805348
We present a near-optimal distributed algorithm for @math -approximation of single-commodity maximum flow in undirected weighted networks that runs in @math communication rounds in the model. Here, @math and @math denote the number of nodes and the network diameter, respectively. This is the first improvement over the trivial bound of @math , and it nearly matches the @math round complexity lower bound. The development of the algorithm contains two results of independent interest: (i) A @math -round distributed construction of a spanning tree of average stretch @math . (ii) A @math -round distributed construction of an @math -congestion approximator consisting of the cuts induced by @math virtual trees. The distributed representation of the cut approximator allows for evaluation in @math rounds. All our algorithms make use of randomization and succeed with high probability. In the distributed all-pairs shortest paths problem (APSP), every node in the weighted undirected distributed network (the CONGEST model) needs to know the distance from every other node using least number of communication rounds (typically called time complexity ). The problem admits @math -approximation @math -time algorithm and a nearly-tight @math lower bound [Nanongkai, STOC'14; Lenzen and Patt-Shamir PODC'15] @math , @math and @math hide polylogarithmic factors. Note that the lower bounds also hold even in the unweighted case and in the weighted case with polynomial approximation ratios LenzenP_podc13,HolzerW12,PelegRT12,Nanongkai-STOC14 . . For the exact case, Elkin [STOC'17] presented an @math time bound, which was later improved to @math [Huang, Nanongkai, Saranurak FOCS'17]. It was shown that any super-linear lower bound (in @math ) requires a new technique [Censor-Hillel, Khoury, Paz, DISC'17], but otherwise it remained widely open whether there exists a @math -time algorithm for the exact case, which would match the best possible approximation algorithm. This paper resolves this question positively: we present a randomized (Las Vegas) @math -time algorithm, matching the lower bound up to polylogarithmic factors. Like the previous @math bound, our result works for directed graphs with zero (and even negative) edge weights. In addition to the improved running time, our algorithm works in a more general setting than that required by the previous @math bound; in our setting (i) the communication is only along edge directions (as opposed to bidirectional), and (ii) edge weights are arbitrary (as opposed to integers in 1, 2, ... poly(n) ). ... We bound the performance guarantees that follow from Turan-like bounds for unweighted and weighted independent sets in bounded-degree graphs. In particular, a randomized approach of Boppana forms a simple 1-round distributed algorithm, as well as a streaming and preemptive online algorithm. We show it gives a tight (( +1) 2 )-approximation in unweighted graphs of maximum degree ( ), which is best possible for 1-round distributed algorithms. For weighted graphs, it gives only a (( +1) )-approximation, but a simple modification results in an asymptotic expected (0.529 ( +1) )-approximation. This compares with a recent, more complex ( )-approximation [6], which holds deterministically. We prove the first nontrivial (superlinear) lower bound in the noisy broadcast model, defined by El Gamal in [Open problems presented at the @math workshop on Specific Problems in Communication and Computation sponsored by Bell Communication Research, in Open Problems in Communication and Computation, T. M. Cover and B. Gopinath, eds., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987, pp. 60-62]. In this model there are @math processors @math , each of which is initially given a private input bit @math . The goal is for @math to learn the value of @math , for some specified function @math , using a series of noisy broadcasts. At each step a designated processor broadcasts one bit to all of the other processors, and the bit received by each processor is flipped with fixed probability (independently for each recipient). In 1988, Gallager [IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 34 (1988), pp. 176-180] gave a noise-resistant protocol that allows @math to learn the entire input with constant probability in @math broadcasts. We prove that Gallager's protocol is optimal, up to a constant factor. Our lower bound follows by reduction from a lower bound for generalized noisy decision trees, a new model which may be of independent interest. For this new model we show a lower bound of @math on the depth of a tree that learns the entire input. While the above lower bound is for an @math -bit function, we also show an @math lower bound for the number of broadcasts required to compute certain explicit boolean-valued functions, when the correct output must be attained with probability at least @math for a constant parameter @math (this bound applies to all threshold functions as well as any other boolean-valued function with linear sensitivity). This bound also follows by reduction from a lower bound of @math on the depth of generalized noisy decision trees that compute the same functions with the same error. We also show a (nontrivial) @math lower bound on the depth of generalized noisy decision trees that compute such functions with small constant error. Finally, we show the first protocol in the noisy broadcast model that computes the Hamming weight of the input using a linear number of broadcasts.