We present a simple noise-robust margin-based active learning algorithm to find homogeneous (passing the origin) linear separators and analyze its error convergence when labels are corrupted by noise. We show that when the imposed noise satisfies the Tsybakov low noise condition (Mammen, Tsybakov, and others 1999; Tsybakov 2004) the algorithm is able to adapt to unknown level of noise and achieves optimal statistical rate up to poly-logarithmic factors. We also derive lower bounds for margin based active learning algorithms under Tsybakov noise conditions (TNC) for the membership query synthesis scenario (Angluin 1988). Our result implies lower bounds for the stream based selective sampling scenario (Cohn 1990) under TNC for some fairly simple data distributions. Quite surprisingly, we show that the sample complexity cannot be improved even if the underlying data distribution is as simple as the uniform distribution on the unit ball. Our proof involves the construction of a well separated hypothesis set on the d-dimensional unit ball along with carefully designed label distributions for the Tsybakov noise condition. Our analysis might provide insights for other forms of lower bounds as well.
@cite_2 analyzed the minimax rate of active learning under the membership query synthesis model (cf. Section ). Their analysis implies a lower bound for stream-based setting when the data distribution is uniform or bounded from below (cf. Proposition and ). However, their analysis focuses on the nonparametric setting where the Bayes classifier @math is not assumed to have a parametric form such as linear. Consequently, their is a polynomial gap between their lower bound and the upper bound for linear classifiers.
@cite_2
2132162087 2594745741 2106447856 2583780928
We introduce efficient margin-based algorithms for selective sampling and filtering in binary classification tasks. Experiments on real-world textual data reveal that our algorithms perform significantly better than popular and similarly efficient competitors. Using the so-called Mammen-Tsybakov low noise condition to parametrize the instance distribution, and assuming linear label noise, we show bounds on the convergence rate to the Bayes risk of a weaker adaptive variant of our selective sampler. Our analysis reveals that, excluding logarithmic factors, the average risk of this adaptive sampler converges to the Bayes risk at rate N ?(1+?)(2+?) 2(3+?) where N denotes the number of queried labels, and ?>0 is the exponent in the low noise condition. For all @math this convergence rate is asymptotically faster than the rate N ?(1+?) (2+?) achieved by the fully supervised version of the base selective sampler, which queries all labels. Moreover, for ??? (hard margin condition) the gap between the semi- and fully-supervised rates becomes exponential. We analyze the problem of learning a single user's preferences in an active learning setting, sequentially and adaptively querying the user over a finite time horizon. Learning is conducted via choice-based queries, where the user selects her preferred option among a small subset of offered alternatives. These queries have been shown to be a robust and efficient way to learn an individual's preferences. We take a parametric approach and model the user's preferences through a linear classifier, using a Bayesian prior to encode our current knowledge of this classifier. The rate at which we learn depends on the alternatives offered at every time epoch. Under certain noise assumptions, we show that the Bayes-optimal policy for maximally reducing entropy of the posterior distribution of this linear classifier is a greedy policy, and that this policy achieves a linear lower bound when alternatives can be constructed from the continuum. Further, we analyze a different metric called misclassification error, proving that the performance of the optimal policy that minimizes misclassification error is bounded below by a linear function of differential entropy. Lastly, we numerically compare the greedy entropy reduction policy with a knowledge gradient policy under a number of scenarios, examining their performance under both differential entropy and misclassification error. This paper analyzes the potential advantages and theoretical challenges of "active learning" algorithms. Active learning involves sequential sampling procedures that use information gleaned from previous samples in order to focus the sampling and accelerate the learning process relative to "passive learning" algorithms, which are based on nonadaptive (usually random) samples. There are a number of empirical and theoretical results suggesting that in certain situations active learning can be significantly more effective than passive learning. However, the fact that active learning algorithms are feedback systems makes their theoretical analysis very challenging. This paper aims to shed light on achievable limits in active learning. Using minimax analysis techniques, we study the achievable rates of classification error convergence for broad classes of distributions characterized by decision boundary regularity and noise conditions. The results clearly indicate the conditions under which one can expect significant gains through active learning. Furthermore, we show that the learning rates derived are tight for "boundary fragment" classes in d-dimensional feature spaces when the feature marginal density is bounded from above and below. Most of the existing active learning algorithms are based on the realizability assumption: The learner's hypothesis class is assumed to contain a target function that perfectly classifies all training and test examples. This assumption can hardly ever be justified in practice. In this paper, we study how relaxing the realizability assumption affects the sample complexity of active learning. First, we extend existing results on query learning to show that any active learning algorithm for the realizable case can be transformed to tolerate random bounded rate class noise. Thus, bounded rate class noise adds little extra complications to active learning, and in particular exponential label complexity savings over passive learning are still possible. However, it is questionable whether this noise model is any more realistic in practice than assuming no noise at all. Our second result shows that if we move to the truly non-realizable model of statistical learning theory, then the label complexity of active learning has the same dependence Ω(1 ∈ 2 ) on the accuracy parameter e as the passive learning label complexity. More specifically, we show that under the assumption that the best classifier in the learner's hypothesis class has generalization error at most β > 0, the label complexity of active learning is Ω(β 2 ∈ 2 log(1 δ)), where the accuracy parameter e measures how close to optimal within the hypothesis class the active learner has to get and δ is the confidence parameter. The implication of this lower bound is that exponential savings should not be expected in realistic models of active learning, and thus the label complexity goals in active learning should be refined.