Designing efficient and fair algorithms for sharing multiple resources between heterogeneous demands is becoming increasingly important. Applications include compute clusters shared by multi-task jobs and routers equipped with middleboxes shared by flows of different types. We show that the currently preferred objective of Dominant Resource Fairness has a significantly less favorable efficiency-fairness tradeoff than alternatives like Proportional Fairness and our proposal, Bottleneck Max Fairness. In addition to other desirable properties, these objectives are equally strategyproof in any realistic scenario with dynamic demand.
The packet-based algorithms designed by Ghodsi al @cite_0 to realize DRFQ for shared router resources are based on start-time fair queuing. Wang and co-authors have proposed alternative realizations that adapt DRR @cite_14 to the multi-resource context @cite_2 . Our implementations of PF and BMF rely on SFQ though it appears straightforward to substitute alternative fair queuing algorithms if required.
@cite_0 @cite_14 @cite_2
2032824989 2021763947 2113551315 2147524058
This paper addresses the problem of fairness in wireless ad-hoc networks. Usually, the problem of fairness in wireless ad-hoc networks is addressed in a classic approach inherited from wired networks. The common assumption is that nodes flows have pre-assigned fair shares. The task becomes then to modify wired networks' fair queueing algorithms to address wireless network nature. Wired networks have efficient means of allocating fiar shares through admission control and additionally, the fair shares remain constant throughout the session duration due to the static nature of the nodes. In ad-hoc networks, it is meaningless to assume statically pre-assigned fair shares, since on one hand, not only the nodes move, but also the routers are mobile, and on the other hand, contention is location dependent, such that in terms of absolute guarantees, fairness would at most mean "avoiding starvation": thus applying rate proportional fiar queueing algorithms is beyond the original goal of such algorithm, viz. flow isolation protection and bandwidth guarantee. In this work we argue in favor of multi-level scheduling for wireless ad-hoc networks with max-min fair allocation of the fair shares at the lower-most layer (MAC layer). This paper, mainly lays down the theoretical framework by which one can calculate the fair shares that would achieve max-min fairness in an ad-hoc network. We design distributed algorithms that allow each node to determine its max-min per-link fair share in a global ad-hoc network without knowledge of the global topology of the network. The results are then used in conjunction with a novel practical scheduling algorithm for IEEE 802.11 to show how fairness is achieved SUMMARY The token bank fair queuing algorithm (TBFQ) is a novel scheduling algorithm that is suitable for wireless multimedia services. The bandwidth allocation mechanism integrates the leaky bucket structure with priority handling to address the problem of providing quality-of-service (QoS) guarantees to heterogeneous applications in the next generation packet-switched wireless networks. Scheduling algorithms are often tightly integrated with the wireless medium access control (MAC) protocol. However, when heterogeneous wireless systems need to be integrated and interoperate with each other, it is desirable from the QoS provisioning standpoint to decouple scheduling algorithm from the MAC protocol. In this paper we propose a framework of seamless QoS provisioning and the application of TBFQ for uplink and downlink scheduling in wireless networks. We study its performance under a generic medium access framework that enables the algorithm to be generalized to provide QoS guarantees under various medium access schemes. We give a brief analysis of the algorithm and compare its performance with common scheduling algorithms through simulation. Our results demonstrate that TBFQ significantly increases wireless channel utilization while maintaining the same QoS, unlike many fair queuing algorithms, TBFQ does not require timestamping information of each packet arrival an impractical feature in an already resource scarce environment. This makes TBFQ suitable for wireless multimedia communication. Copyright # 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Middleboxes are ubiquitous in today's networks and perform a variety of important functions, including IDS, VPN, firewalling, and WAN optimization. These functions differ vastly in their requirements for hardware resources (e.g., CPU cycles and memory bandwidth). Thus, depending on the functions they go through, different flows can consume different amounts of a middlebox's resources. While there is much literature on weighted fair sharing of link bandwidth to isolate flows, it is unclear how to schedule multiple resources in a middlebox to achieve similar guarantees. In this paper, we analyze several natural packet scheduling algorithms for multiple resources and show that they have undesirable properties. We propose a new algorithm, Dominant Resource Fair Queuing (DRFQ), that retains the attractive properties that fair sharing provides for one resource. In doing so, we generalize the concept of virtual time in classical fair queuing to multi-resource settings. The resulting algorithm is also applicable in other contexts where several resources need to be multiplexed in the time domain. In this paper, we demonstrate the existence of fair end-to-end window-based congestion control protocols for packet-switched networks with first come-first served routers. Our definition of fairness generalizes proportional fairness and includes arbitrarily close approximations of max-min fairness. The protocols use only information that is available to end hosts and are designed to converge reasonably fast. Our study is based on a multiclass fluid model of the network. The convergence of the protocols is proved using a Lyapunov function. The technical challenge is in the practical implementation of the protocols.