We study a family of closely-related distributed graph problems, which we call degree splitting, where roughly speaking the objective is to partition (or orient) the edges such that each node's degree is split almost uniformly. Our findings lead to answers for a number of problems, a sampling of which includes: -- We present a @math round deterministic algorithm for @math -edge-coloring, where @math denotes the maximum degree. Modulo the @math factor, this settles one of the long-standing open problems of the area from the 1990's (see e.g. Panconesi and Srinivasan [PODC'92]). Indeed, a weaker requirement of @math -edge-coloring in @math rounds was asked for in the 4th open question in the Distributed Graph Coloring book by Barenboim and Elkin. -- We show that sinkless orientation---i.e., orienting edges such that each node has at least one outgoing edge---on @math -regular graphs can be solved in @math rounds randomized and in @math rounds deterministically. These prove the corresponding lower bounds by [STOC'16] and Chang, Kopelowitz, and Pettie [FOCS'16] to be tight. Moreover, these show that sinkless orientation exhibits an exponential separation between its randomized and deterministic complexities, akin to the results of for @math -coloring @math -regular trees. -- We present a randomized @math round algorithm for orienting @math -arboricity graphs with maximum out-degree @math . This can be also turned into a decomposition into @math forests when @math and into @math pseduo-forests when @math . Obtaining an efficient distributed decomposition into less than @math forests was stated as the 10th open problem in the book by Barenboim and Elkin.
@cite_13 used sinkless orientation to prove an @math round lower bound on @math -algorithms for Lovasz Local Lemma (LLL). Since LLL can provide much finer degree splits, studying these stronger degree-splits might expose higher lower bounds for LLL. Moreover, @cite_21 recently presented the first exponential separation between randomized and deterministic distributed complexities, by showing that @math -vertex-coloring @math -regular trees requires @math rounds randomized and @math rounds deterministically. thm:sinkless , in conjunction with the aforementioned lower bounds, exhibits the same exponential separation on sinkless orientation.
@cite_21 @cite_13
2534944111 2279830512 2009970369 2243868910
We study a family of closely-related distributed graph problems, which we call degree splitting, where roughly speaking the objective is to partition (or orient) the edges such that each node's degree is split almost uniformly. Our findings lead to answers for a number of problems, a sampling of which includes: • We present a poly log n round deterministic algorithm for (2Δ−1)·(1+o(1))-edge-coloring, where Δ denotes the maximum degree. Modulo the 1 + o(1) factor, this settles one of the long-standing open problems of the area from the 1990's (see e.g. Panconesi and Srinivasan [PODC'92]). Indeed, a weaker requirement of (2Δ − 1) · poly log Δ-edge-coloring in poly log n rounds was asked for in the 4th open question in the Distributed Graph Coloring book by Barenboim and Elkin. • We show that sinkless orientation---i.e., orienting edges such that each node has at least one out-going edge---on Δ-regular graphs can be solved in O(logΔ log n) rounds randomized and in O(logΔ n) rounds deterministically. These prove the corresponding lower bounds by [STOC'16] and Chang, Kopelowitz, and Pettie [FOCS'16] to be tight. Moreover, these show that sinkless orientation exhibits an exponential separation between its randomized and deterministic complexities, akin to the results of for Δ-coloring Δ-regular trees. • We present a randomized O(log4 n) round algorithm for orienting a-arboricity graphs with maximum out-degree a(1 + e). This can be also turned into a decomposition into a(1 + e) forests when a = Ω(log n) and into a(1 + e) pseduo-forests when a = o(log n). Obtaining an efficient distributed decomposition into less than 2a forests was stated as the 10th open problem in the book by Barenboim and Elkin. Over the past 30 years numerous algorithms have been designed for symmetry breaking problems in the LOCAL model, such as maximal matching, MIS, vertex coloring, and edge-coloring. For most problems the best randomized algorithm is at least exponentially faster than the best deterministic algorithm. In this paper we prove that these exponential gaps are necessary and establish connections between the deterministic and randomized complexities in the LOCAL model. Each result has a very compelling take-away message: 1. Fast @math -coloring of trees requires random bits: Building on the recent lower bounds of , we prove that the randomized complexity of @math -coloring a tree with maximum degree @math is @math , whereas its deterministic complexity is @math for any @math . This also establishes a large separation between the deterministic complexity of @math -coloring and @math -coloring trees. 2. Randomized lower bounds imply deterministic lower bounds: We prove that any deterministic algorithm for a natural class of problems that runs in @math rounds can be transformed to run in @math rounds. If the transformed algorithm violates a lower bound (even allowing randomization), then one can conclude that the problem requires @math time deterministically. 3. Deterministic lower bounds imply randomized lower bounds: We prove that the randomized complexity of any natural problem on instances of size @math is at least its deterministic complexity on instances of size @math . This shows that a deterministic @math lower bound for any problem implies a randomized @math lower bound. It also illustrates that the graph shattering technique is absolutely essential to the LOCAL model. The Lovasz Local Lemma (LLL), introduced by Erdos and Lovasz in 1975, is a powerful tool of the probabilistic method that allows one to prove that a set of n "bad" events do not happen with non-zero probability, provided that the events have limited dependence. However, the LLL itself does not suggest how to find a point avoiding all bad events. Since the work of Beck (1991) there has been a sustained effort to find a constructive proof (i.e. an algorithm) for the LLL or weaker versions of it. In a major breakthrough Moser and Tardos (2010) showed that a point avoiding all bad events can be found efficiently. They also proposed a distributed parallel version of their algorithm that requires O(log2 n) rounds of communication in a distributed network. In this paper we provide two new distributed algorithms for the LLL that improve on both the efficiency and simplicity of the Moser-Tardos algorithm. For clarity we express our results in terms of the symmetric LLL though both algorithms deal with the asymmetric version as well. Let p bound the probability of any bad event and d be the maximum degree in the dependency graph of the bad events. When epd2 In many graph coloring problems the existence of a valid coloring is established by one or more applications of the LLL. Using our LLL algorithms, we give logarithmic-time distributed algorithms for frugal coloring, defective coloring, coloring girth-4 (triangle-free) and girth-5 graphs, edge coloring, and list coloring. We show that any randomised Monte Carlo distributed algorithm for the Lovasz local lemma requires Omega(log log n) communication rounds, assuming that it finds a correct assignment with high probability. Our result holds even in the special case of d = O(1), where d is the maximum degree of the dependency graph. By prior work, there are distributed algorithms for the Lovasz local lemma with a running time of O(log n) rounds in bounded-degree graphs, and the best lower bound before our work was Omega(log* n) rounds [ 2014].