This paper studies the gap between quantum one-way communication complexity Q(f) and its classical counterpart C(f), under the unbounded-error setting, i.e., it is enough that the success probability is strictly greater than 1 2. It is proved that for any (total or partial) Boolean function f, Q(f) = ⌈C(f) 2⌉, i.e., the former is always exactly one half as large as the latter. The result has an application to obtaining an exact bound for the existence of (m, n, p)-QRAC which is the n-qubit random access coding that can recover any one of m original bits with success probability ≥ p. We can prove that (m, n, > 1 2)-QRAC exists if and only if m ≤ 22n - 1. Previously, only the non-existence of (22n, n,> 1 2)-QRAC was known.
Private-coin Public-coin Models. The exponential quantum classical separations in @cite_13 and @cite_11 still hold under the public-coin model where Alice and Bob share random coins, since the one-way classical public-coin model can be simulated by the one-way classical private-coin model with additional @math -bit communication @cite_19 . However, exponential quantum classical separation for total functions remains open for all of the bounded-error two-way, one-way and SMP models. Note that the public-coin model is too powerful in the unbounded-error model: we can easily see that the unbounded-error one-way (classical or quantum) communication complexity of any function (or relation) is @math with prior shared randomness.
@cite_19 @cite_13 @cite_11
2148488235 1914859158 2611161794 2949754091
We give an exponential separation between one-way quantum and classical communication protocols for twopartial Boolean functions, both of which are variants of the Boolean Hidden Matching Problem of Bar- Earlier such an exponential separation was known only for a relational version of the Hidden Matching Problem. Our proofs use the Fourier coefficients inequality of Kahn, Kalai, and Linial. We give a number of applications of this separation. In particular, in the bounded-storage model of cryptography we exhibita scheme that is secure against adversaries with a certain amount of classical storage, but insecure against adversaries with a similar (or even much smaller) amount of quantum storage; in the setting of privacy amplification, we show that there are strong extractors that yield a classically secure key, but are insecure against a quantum adversary. We study a model of communication complexity that encompasses many well-studied problems, including classical and quantum communication complexity, the complexity of simulating distributions arising from bipartite measurements of shared quantum states, and XOR games. In this model, Alice gets an input x, Bob gets an input y, and their goal is to each produce an output a, b distributed according to some pre-specified joint distribution p(a, b|x, y). Our results apply to any non-signaling distribution, that is, those where Alice's marginal distribution does not depend on Bob's input, and vice versa. By taking a geometric view of the non-signaling distributions, we introduce a simple new technique based on affine combinations of lower-complexity distributions, and we give the first general technique to apply to all these settings, with elementary proofs and very intuitive interpretations. Specifically, we introduce two complexity measures, one which gives lower bounds on classical communication, and one for quantum communication. These measures can be expressed as convex optimization problems. We show that the dual formulations have a striking interpretation, since they coincide with maximum violations of Bell and Tsirelson inequalities. The dual expressions are closely related to the winning probability of XOR games. Despite their apparent simplicity, these lower bounds subsume many known communication complexity lower bound methods, most notably the recent lower bounds of Linial and Shraibman for the special case of Boolean functions. We show that as in the case of Boolean functions, the gap between the quantum and classical lower bounds is at most linear in the size of the support of the distribution, and does not depend on the size of the inputs. This translates into a bound on the gap between maximal Bell and Tsirelson inequality violations, which was previously known only for the case of distributions with Boolean outcomes and uniform marginals. It also allows us to show that for some distributions, information theoretic methods are necessary to prove strong lower bounds. Finally, we give an exponential upper bound on quantum and classical communication complexity in the simultaneous messages model, for any non-signaling distribution. One consequence of this is a simple proof that any quantum distribution can be approximated with a constant number of bits of communication. Although a quantum state requires exponentially many classical bits to describe, the laws of quantum mechanics impose severe restrictions on how that state can be accessed. This paper shows in three settings that quantum messages have only limited advantages over classical ones. First, we show that BQP qpoly is contained in PP poly, where BQP qpoly is the class of problems solvable in quantum polynomial time, given a polynomial-size "quantum advice state" that depends only on the input length. This resolves a question of Buhrman, and means that we should not hope for an unrelativized separation between quantum and classical advice. Underlying our complexity result is a general new relation between deterministic and quantum one-way communication complexities, which applies to partial as well as total functions. Second, we construct an oracle relative to which NP is not contained in BQP qpoly. To do so, we use the polynomial method to give the first correct proof of a direct product theorem for quantum search. This theorem has other applications; for example, it can be used to fix a flawed result of Klauck about quantum time-space tradeoffs for sorting. Third, we introduce a new trace distance method for proving lower bounds on quantum one-way communication complexity. Using this method, we obtain optimal quantum lower bounds for two problems of Ambainis, for which no nontrivial lower bounds were previously known even for classical randomized protocols. We consider the scenario where Alice wants to send a secret (classical) @math -bit message to Bob using a classical key, and where only one-way transmission from Alice to Bob is possible. In this case, quantum communication cannot help to obtain perfect secrecy with key length smaller then @math . We study the question of whether there might still be fundamental differences between the case where quantum as opposed to classical communication is used. In this direction, we show that there exist ciphers with perfect security producing quantum ciphertext where, even if an adversary knows the plaintext and applies an optimal measurement on the ciphertext, his Shannon uncertainty about the key used is almost maximal. This is in contrast to the classical case where the adversary always learns @math bits of information on the key in a known plaintext attack. We also show that there is a limit to how different the classical and quantum cases can be: the most probable key, given matching plain- and ciphertexts, has the same probability in both the quantum and the classical cases. We suggest an application of our results in the case where only a short secret key is available and the message is much longer.