Cloud Service Providers deliver their products in form of ”as-a-Service”, which are typically categorized by the level of abstraction. This approach hides the implementation details and shows only functionality to the user. However, the problem is that it is hard to measure the performance of Cloud services, because they behave like black boxes. Especially with Function-as-a-Service it is even more difficult because it completely hides server and infrastructure management from users by design. Cloud Service Prodivers usually restrict the maximum size of code, memory and runtime of Cloud Functions. Nevertheless, users need clarification if more ressources are needed to deliver services in high quality. In this regard, we present the architectural design of a new Function-as-a-Service benchmarking tool, which allows users to evaluate the performance of Cloud Functions. Furthermore, the capabilities of the framework are tested on an isolated platform with a specific workload. The results show that users are able to get insights into Function-as-a-Service environments. This, in turn, allows users to identify factors which may slow down or speed up the performance of Cloud Functions.
@cite_10 present a generic Cloud Performance Model and provide a summary of useful Cloud Performance Metrics (CPM) on three levels: Basic performance metrics, Cloud capabilities, and Cloud productivity. The Basic performance metrics include traditional metrics such as execution time or speed. The Cloud capabilities describe throughput, bandwidth, and network latency. Finally, Cloud productivity deals with productivity metrics such as Quality of Service (QoS), Service Level Agreement (SLA) and security. The authors encourage the Cloud community to test Cloud capability in big-data analytics and machine learning intelligence. In particular, they argue that the Cloud community is short of benchmarking tests. In this regard, the authors motivated us to develop the FaaS Benchmarking Framework and to adapt existing tests for FaaS platforms. This includes also the analysis and feasibility of appropriate FaaS performance metrics.
@cite_10
2038249652 2777322518 1988620903 1651603302
In this paper, we present generic cloud performance models for evaluating Iaas, PaaS, SaaS, and mashup or hybrid clouds. We test clouds with real-life benchmark programs and propose some new performance metrics. Our benchmark experiments are conducted mainly on IaaS cloud platforms over scale-out and scale-up workloads. Cloud benchmarking results are analyzed with the efficiency, elasticity, QoS, productivity, and scalability of cloud performance. Five cloud benchmarks were tested on Amazon IaaS EC2 cloud: namely YCSB, CloudSuite, HiBench, BenchClouds, and TPC-W. To satisfy production services, the choice of scale-up or scale-out solutions should be made primarily by the workload patterns and resources utilization rates required. Scaling-out machine instances have much lower overhead than those experienced in scale-up experiments. However, scaling up is found more cost-effective in sustaining heavier workload. The cloud productivity is greatly attributed to system elasticity, efficiency, QoS and scalability. We find that auto-scaling is easy to implement but tends to over provision the resources. Lower resource utilization rate may result from auto-scaling, compared with using scale-out or scale-up strategies. We also demonstrate that the proposed cloud performance models are applicable to evaluate PaaS, SaaS and hybrid clouds as well. The adoption of cloud computing facilities and programming models differs vastly between different application domains. Scalable web applications, low-latency mobile backends and on-demand provisioned databases are typical cases for which cloud services on the platform or infrastructure level exist and are convincing when considering technical and economical arguments. Applications with specific processing demands, including high-performance computing, high-throughput computing and certain flavours of scientific computing, have historically required special configurations such as compute- or memory-optimised virtual machine instances. With the rise of function-level compute instances through Function-as-a-Service (FaaS) models, the fitness of generic configurations needs to be re-evaluated for these applications. We analyse several demanding computing tasks with regards to how FaaS models compare against conventional monolithic algorithm execution. Beside the comparison, we contribute a refined FaaSification process for legacy software and provide a roadmap for future work. The recent surge in the popularity and usage of Cloud Computing services by both the enterprise and individual consumers has necessitated efficient and proactive management of data center resources which host services having varied characteristics. One of the major issues concerning both the cloud service providers and consumers is the automatic scalability of resources (i.e., compute, storage and bandwidth) in response to the highly unpredictable demands. To this end, an opportunity exists to harness the predictive and diagnostic capabilities of machine learning approaches to incorporate dynamic scaling up and scaling down of resources without violating the Service Level Agreements (SLA) and simultaneously ensuring adequate revenue to the providers. This paper proposes, implements and evaluates a Bayesian Networks based predictive modeling framework to provide for an autonomic scaling of utility computing resources in the Cloud Computing scenario. In essence, the BN-based model captures the historical behavior of the system involving various performance metrics (indicators) and predicts the desired unknown metric (e.g. SLA parameter). Initial simulated experiments involving random demand scenarios provide insights into the feasibility and applicability of the proposed approach for improving the management of present data center facilities. Benchmarking the performance of public cloud providers is a common research topic. Previous work has already extensively evaluated the performance of different cloud platforms for different use cases, and under different constraints and experiment setups. In this article, we present a principled, large-scale literature review to collect and codify existing research regarding the predictability of performance in public Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) clouds. We formulate 15 hypotheses relating to the nature of performance variations in IaaS systems, to the factors of influence of performance variations, and how to compare different instance types. In a second step, we conduct extensive real-life experimentation on four cloud providers to empirically validate those hypotheses. We show that there are substantial differences between providers. Hardware heterogeneity is today less prevalent than reported in earlier research, while multitenancy has a dramatic impact on performance and predictability, but only for some cloud providers. We were unable to discover a clear impact of the time of the day or the day of the week on cloud performance.