We propose a new concept named adaptive submodularity ratio to study the greedy policy for sequential decision making. While the greedy policy is known to perform well for a wide variety of adaptive stochastic optimization problems in practice, its theoretical properties have been analyzed only for a limited class of problems. We narrow the gap between theory and practice by using adaptive submodularity ratio, which enables us to prove approximation guarantees of the greedy policy for a substantially wider class of problems. Examples of newly analyzed problems include important applications such as adaptive influence maximization and adaptive feature selection. Our adaptive submodularity ratio also provides bounds of adaptivity gaps. Experiments confirm that the greedy policy performs well with the applications being considered compared to standard heuristics.
. Another attempt to relax adaptive submodularity is presented in @cite_2 . They introduced as follows: Analogous to our adaptive submodularity ratio, one can readily see that @math -weak adaptive submodularity is equivalent to the adaptive submodularity. In general, however, there is a difference between the two notions; the adaptive submodularity ratio can be bounded from below by @math , implying that it is more demanding to bound the value of @math than that of the adaptive submodularity ratio. We provide a proof in subsec:proof-yong . studied a problem called and gave a bound of @math , but some vital assumptions seem to have been missed. In sec:counter-yong , we provide a problem instance in which their bound does not hold. We also present instances of adaptive influence maximization and adaptive feature selection for which our framework provides strictly better approximation ratios than those obtained with the weak adaptive submodularity in subsec:comparison-yong-infmax,subsec:comparison-yong-feature .
@cite_2
2949121341 2545520746 1542719709 1542515633
We study the problem of fair allocation for indivisible goods. We use the the maxmin share paradigm introduced by Budish as a measure for fairness. Procacciafirst (EC'14) were first to investigate this fundamental problem in the additive setting. In contrast to what real-world experiments suggest, they show that a maxmin guarantee (1- @math allocation) is not always possible even when the number of agents is limited to 3. While the existence of an approximation solution (e.g. a @math - @math allocation) is quite straightforward, improving the guarantee becomes subtler for larger constants. Procaccia provide a proof for existence of a @math - @math allocation and leave the question open for better guarantees. Our main contribution is an answer to the above question. We improve the result of ! to a @math factor in the additive setting. The main idea for our @math - @math allocation method is clustering the agents. To this end, we introduce three notions and techniques, namely reducibility, matching allocation, and cycle-envy-freeness, and prove the approximation guarantee of our algorithm via non-trivial applications of these techniques. Our analysis involves coloring and double counting arguments that might be of independent interest. One major shortcoming of the current studies on fair allocation is the additivity assumption on the valuations. We alleviate this by extending our results to the case of submodular, fractionally subadditive, and subadditive settings. More precisely, we give constant approximation guarantees for submodular and XOS agents, and a logarithmic approximation for the case of subadditive agents. Furthermore, we complement our results by providing close upper bounds for each class of valuation functions. Finally, we present algorithms to find such allocations for additive, submodular, and XOS settings in polynomial time. Submodularity is one of the most important properties of combinatorial optimization, and k-submodularity is a generalization of submodularity. Maximization of a k-submodular function is NP-hard, and approximation algorithms have been studied. Most of algorithms use randomization and achieve the approximation ratio as the expected value. For unconstrained submodular maximization, [Buchbinder and Feldman 2016] gave a derandomization scheme, and showed that randomness is not necessary for obtaining optimal results. In this paper, we extend their scheme for unconstrained k-submodular maximization and give two deterministic algorithms for k-submodular maximization. The first is for monotone k-submodular functions. We derandomize (k (2k-1) )-approximation algorithm [Iwata, Tanigawa, and Yoshida 2016], and achieve the same approximation ratio. The second is for nonmonotone functions with (k 2 ). It achieves (k (3k-2) )-approximation, and it is better than a simple greedy algorithm [Ward and Živný 2016] which achieves 1 3-approximation for (k 3 ). We consider the problem of maximizing a nonnegative (possibly non-monotone) submodular set function with or without constraints. [9] showed a 2 5-approximation for the unconstrained problem and also proved that no approximation better than 1 2 is possible in the value oracle model. Constant-factor approximation has been also known for submodular maximization subject to a matroid independence constraint (a factor of 0.309 [33]) and for submodular maximization subject to a matroid base constraint, provided that the fractional base packing number ν is bounded away from 1 (a 1 4-approximation assuming that ν ≥ 2 [33]). In this paper, we propose a new algorithm for submodular maximization which is based on the idea of simulated annealing. We prove that this algorithm achieves improved approximation for two problems: a 0.41-approximation for unconstrained submodular maximization, and a 0.325-approximation for submodular maximization subject to a matroid independence constraint. On the hardness side, we show that in the value oracle model it is impossible to achieve a 0.478-approximation for submodular maximization subject to a matroid independence constraint, or a 0.394-approximation subject to a matroid base constraint in matroids with two disjoint bases. Even for the special case of cardinality constraint, we prove it is impossible to achieve a 0.491-approximation. (Previously it was conceivable that a 1 2-approximation exists for these problems.) It is still an open question whether a 1 2-approximation is possible for unconstrained submodular maximization. Consider a suboptimal solution S for a maximization problem. Suppose S's value is small compared to an optimal solution OPT to the problem, yet S is structurally similar to OPT. A natural question in this setting is whether there is a way of improving S based solely on this information. In this paper we introduce the Structural Continuous Greedy Algorithm, answering this question affirmatively in the setting of the Nonmonotone Submodular Maximization Problem. We improve on the best approximation factor known for this problem. In the Nonmonotone Submodular Maximization Problem we are given a non-negative submodular function f, and the objective is to find a subset maximizing f. Our method yields an 0.42-approximation for this problem, improving on the current best approximation factor of 0.41 given by Gharan and Vondrak [5]. On the other hand, [4] showed a lower bound of 0.5 for this problem.