Recent years have witnessed the successful application of low-dimensional vector space representations of knowledge graphs to predict missing facts or find erroneous ones. However, it is not yet well-understood to what extent ontological knowledge, e.g. given as a set of (existential) rules, can be embedded in a principled way. To address this shortcoming, in this paper we introduce a general framework based on a view of relations as regions, which allows us to study the compatibility between ontological knowledge and different types of vector space embeddings. Our technical contribution is two-fold. First, we show that some of the most popular existing embedding methods are not capable of modelling even very simple types of rules, which in particular also means that they are not able to learn the type of dependencies captured by such rules. Second, we study a model in which relations are modelled as convex regions. We show particular that ontologies which are expressed using so-called quasi-chained existential rules can be exactly represented using convex regions, such that any set of facts which is induced using that vector space embedding is logically consistent and deductively closed with respect to the input ontology.
Within KR research, @cite_35 recently made first steps towards the integration of ontological reasoning and deep learning, obtaining encouraging results. Indeed, the developed system was considerably faster than the state of the art RDFox @cite_23 , while retaining high-accuracy. Initial results have also been obtained in the use of ontological reasoning to derive human-interpretable explanations from the output of a neural network @cite_25 .
@cite_35 @cite_25 @cite_23
2619454468 2556644972 2466714650 2612675303
In this work, we present a novel approach to ontology reasoning that is based on deep learning rather than logic-based formal reasoning. To this end, we introduce a new model for statistical relational learning that is built upon deep recursive neural networks, and give experimental evidence that it can easily compete with, or even outperform, existing logic-based reasoners on the task of ontology reasoning. More precisely, we compared our implemented system with one of the best logic-based ontology reasoners at present, RDFox, on a number of large standard benchmark datasets, and found that our system attained high reasoning quality, while being up to two orders of magnitude faster. The effective integration of learning and reasoning is a well-known and challenging area of research within artificial intelligence. Neural-symbolic systems seek to integrate learning and reasoning by combining neural networks and symbolic knowledge representation. In this paper, a novel methodology is proposed for the extraction of relational knowledge from neural networks which are trainable by the efficient application of the backpropagation learning algorithm. First-order logic rules are extracted from the neural networks, offering interpretable symbolic relational models on which logical reasoning can be performed. The wellknown knowledge extraction algorithm TREPAN was adapted and incorporated into the first-order version of the neural-symbolic system CILP++. Empirical results obtained in comparison with a probabilistic model for relational learning, Markov Logic Networks, and a state-of-the-art Inductive Logic Programming system, Aleph, indicate that the proposed methodology achieves competitive accuracy results consistently in all datasets investigated, while either Markov Logic Networks or Aleph show considerably worse results in at least one dataset. It is expected that effective knowledge extraction from neural networks can contribute to the integration of heterogeneous knowledge representations. Our goal is to combine the rich multistep inference of symbolic logical reasoning with the generalization capabilities of neural networks. We are particularly interested in complex reasoning about entities and relations in text and large-scale knowledge bases (KBs). (2015) use RNNs to compose the distributed semantics of multi-hop paths in KBs; however for multiple reasons, the approach lacks accuracy and practicality. This paper proposes three significant modeling advances: (1) we learn to jointly reason about relations, entities, and entity-types; (2) we use neural attention modeling to incorporate multiple paths; (3) we learn to share strength in a single RNN that represents logical composition across all relations. On a largescale Freebase+ClueWeb prediction task, we achieve 25 error reduction, and a 53 error reduction on sparse relations due to shared strength. On chains of reasoning in WordNet we reduce error in mean quantile by 84 versus previous state-of-the-art. The code and data are available at this https URL Attentional, RNN-based encoder-decoder models for abstractive summarization have achieved good performance on short input and output sequences. For longer documents and summaries however these models often include repetitive and incoherent phrases. We introduce a neural network model with a novel intra-attention that attends over the input and continuously generated output separately, and a new training method that combines standard supervised word prediction and reinforcement learning (RL). Models trained only with supervised learning often exhibit "exposure bias" - they assume ground truth is provided at each step during training. However, when standard word prediction is combined with the global sequence prediction training of RL the resulting summaries become more readable. We evaluate this model on the CNN Daily Mail and New York Times datasets. Our model obtains a 41.16 ROUGE-1 score on the CNN Daily Mail dataset, an improvement over previous state-of-the-art models. Human evaluation also shows that our model produces higher quality summaries.