Neuroscience theory posits that the brain's visual system coarsely identifies broad object categories via neural activation patterns, with similar objects producing similar neural responses. Artificial neural networks also have internal activation behavior in response to stimuli. We hypothesize that networks exhibiting brain-like activation behavior will demonstrate brain-like characteristics, e.g., stronger generalization capabilities. In this paper we introduce a human-model similarity (HMS) metric, which quantifies the similarity of human fMRI and network activation behavior. To calculate HMS, representational dissimilarity matrices (RDMs) are created as abstractions of activation behavior, measured by the correlations of activations to stimulus pairs. HMS is then the correlation between the fMRI RDM and the neural network RDM across all stimulus pairs. We test the metric on unsupervised predictive coding networks, which specifically model visual perception, and assess the metric for statistical significance over a large range of hyperparameters. Our experiments show that networks with increased human-model similarity are correlated with better performance on two computer vision tasks: next frame prediction and object matching accuracy. Further, HMS identifies networks with high performance on both tasks. An unexpected secondary finding is that the metric can be employed during training as an early-stopping mechanism.
HMS uses human participant fMRI data as ground-truth internal behavior that leads to good generalization. The comparison between networks and human fMRI data is inspired by Kriegeskorte al @cite_34 , who described how network or neural activations could be abstracted into an RDM. An RDM is an abstract representation that can be directly compared against another RDM, as long as both are created from a joint set of stimuli. Fig. shows how internal behavior is calculated and abstracted into RDMs, and how RDMs can be compared. Sec. describes the formal RDM creation process. Kriegeskorte has a long history of utilizing RDMs to study neural behavior @cite_16 @cite_42 @cite_34 @cite_33 @cite_49 @cite_41 .
@cite_33 @cite_41 @cite_42 @cite_16 @cite_49 @cite_34
2474152637 2888432608 2079124220 2098899472
Wepropose using relaxed deep supervision (RDS) within convolutional neural networks for edge detection. The conventional deep supervision utilizes the general groundtruth to guide intermediate predictions. Instead, we build hierarchical supervisory signals with additional relaxed labels to consider the diversities in deep neural networks. We begin by capturing the relaxed labels from simple detectors (e.g. Canny). Then we merge them with the general groundtruth to generate the RDS. Finally we employ the RDS to supervise the edge network following a coarse-to-fine paradigm. These relaxed labels can be seen as some false positives that are difficult to be classified. Weconsider these false positives in the supervision, and are able to achieve high performance for better edge detection. Wecompensate for the lack of training images by capturing coarse edge annotations from a large dataset of image segmentations to pretrain the model. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance on the well-known BSDS500 dataset (ODS F-score of .792) and obtains superior cross-dataset generalization results on NYUD dataset. We introduce a novel recurrent neural network (RNN) approach to account for temporal dynamics and dependencies in brain networks observed via functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Our approach directly parameterizes temporal dynamics through recurrent connections, which can be used to formulate blind source separation with a conditional (rather than marginal) independence assumption, which we call RNN-ICA. This formulation enables us to visualize the temporal dynamics of both first order (activity) and second order (directed connectivity) information in brain networks that are widely studied in a static sense, but not well-characterized dynamically. RNN-ICA predicts dynamics directly from the recurrent states of the RNN in both task and resting state fMRI. Our results show both task-related and group-differentiating directed connectivity. Perceptual and cognitive content is thought to be represented in the brain by patterns of activity across populations of neurons. In order to test whether a computational model can explain a given population code and whether corresponding codes in man and monkey convey the same information, we need to quantitatively relate population-code representations. Here I give a brief introduction to representational similarity analysis (RSA), a particular approach to this problem. A population code is characterized by a representational dissimilarity matrix (RDM), which contains a dissimilarity for each pair of activity patterns elicited by a given stimulus set. The RDM encapsulates which distinctions the representation emphasizes and which it deemphasizes. By analyzing correlations between RDMs we can test models and compare different species. Moreover, we can study how representations are transformed across stages of processing and how they relate to behavioral measures of object similarity. We use an example from object vision to illustrate the method’s potential to bridge major divides that have hampered progress in systems neuroscience. Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) has enabled scientists to look into the active brain. However, interactivity between functional brain regions, is still little studied. In this paper, we contribute a novel framework for modeling the interactions between multiple active brain regions, using Dynamic Bayesian Networks (DBNs) as generative models for brain activation patterns. This framework is applied to modeling of neuronal circuits associated with reward. The novelty of our framework from a Machine Learning perspective lies in the use of DBNs to reveal the brain connectivity and interactivity. Such interactivity models which are derived from fMRI data are then validated through a group classification task. We employ and compare four different types of DBNs: Parallel Hidden Markov Models, Coupled Hidden Markov Models, Fully-linked Hidden Markov Models and Dynamically Multi-Linked HMMs (DML-HMM). Moreover, we propose and compare two schemes of learning DML-HMMs. Experimental results show that by using DBNs, group classification can be performed even if the DBNs are constructed from as few as 5 brain regions. We also demonstrate that, by using the proposed learning algorithms, different DBN structures characterize drug addicted subjects vs. control subjects. This finding provides an independent test for the effect of psychopathology on brain function. In general, we demonstrate that incorporation of computer science principles into functional neuroimaging clinical studies provides a novel approach for probing human brain function.