For fixed @math , we consider the task of adding to a graph @math a set of weighted shortcut edges on the same vertex set, such that the length of a shortest @math -hop path between any pair of vertices in the augmented graph is exactly the same as the original distance between these vertices in @math . A set of shortcut edges with this property is called an exact @math -hopset and may be applied in processing distance queries on graph @math . In particular, a @math -hopset directly corresponds to a distributed distance oracle known as a hub labeling. In this work, we explore centralized distance oracles based on @math -hopsets and display their advantages in several practical scenarios. In particular, for graphs of constant highway dimension, and more generally for graphs of constant skeleton dimension, we show that @math -hopsets require exponentially fewer shortcuts per node than any previously described distance oracle while incurring only a quadratic increase in the query decoding time, and actually offer a speedup when compared to simple oracles based on a direct application of @math -hopsets. Finally, we consider the problem of computing minimum-size @math -hopset (for any @math ) for a given graph @math , showing a polylogarithmic-factor approximation for the case of unique shortest path graphs. When @math , for a given bound on the space used by the distance oracle, we provide a construction of hopsets achieving polylog approximation both for space and query time compared to the optimal @math -hopset oracle given the space bound.
Exact hopsets were implicitly constructed in the context of single-source shortest paths parallel computation @cite_8 @cite_12 @cite_39 @cite_34 . Such works study the work versus time trade-offs of such computation. Cohen @cite_37 explicitly introduced the notion of @math -hopset of @math as set @math of weighted edges such that paths of @math hops at most in @math have length within @math of the corresponding shortest path in @math . The parameter @math is called the . For any graph @math and @math , she proposed a construction of @math -hopset of @math with size @math . More recently, @cite_1 proposed the construction of @math -hopset with @math edges for any @math and integral @math . @cite_15 recently showed the optimiality of the @cite_1 result. In particular, they showed that for any @math and integer @math , any hopset of size less than @math must have hop bound @math , where @math is a constant depending only on @math . As far as we know, exact hopsets (with @math ) have not been explicitly studied. However, they are related to the following well studied notion.
@cite_37 @cite_8 @cite_1 @cite_39 @cite_15 @cite_34 @cite_12
2610522381 2963618817 816673839 2787728049
For a positive parameter @math , the @math -bounded distance between a pair of vertices @math in a weighted undirected graph @math is the length of the shortest @math path in @math with at most @math edges, aka hops . For @math as above and @math , a @math -hopset of @math is a graph @math on the same vertex set, such that all distances in @math are @math -approximated by @math -bounded distances in @math . Hopsets are a fundamental graph-theoretic and graph-algorithmic construct, and they are widely used for distance-related problems in a variety of computational settings. Currently existing constructions of hopsets produce hopsets either with @math edges, or with a hopbound @math . In this paper we devise a construction of linear-size hopsets with hopbound @math . This improves the previous bound almost exponentially. We also devise efficient implementations of our construction in PRAM and distributed settings. The only existing PRAM algorithm EN16 for computing hopsets with a constant (i.e., independent of @math ) hopbound requires @math time. We devise a PRAM algorithm with polylogarithmic running time for computing hopsets with a constant hopbound, i.e., our running time is exponentially better than the previous one. Moreover, these hopsets are also significantly sparser than their counterparts from EN16 . We use our hopsets to devise a distributed routing scheme that exhibits near-optimal tradeoff between individual memory requirement @math of vertices throughout preprocessing and routing phases of the algorithm, and stretch @math , along with a near-optimal construction time @math , where @math is the hop-diameter of the input graph. A (β, e)-hopset for a weighted undirected n-vertex graph G = (V, E) is a set of edges, whose addition to the graph guarantees that every pair of vertices has a path between them that contains at most β edges, whose length is within 1 + e of the shortest path. In her seminal paper, Cohen [8, JACM 2000] introduced the notion of hopsets in the context of parallel computation of approximate shortest paths, and since then it has found numerous applications in various other settings, such as dynamic graph algorithms, distributed computing, and the streaming model. Cohen [8] devised efficient algorithms for constructing hopsets with polylogarithmic in n number of hops. Her constructions remain the state-of-the–art since the publication of her paper in STOC'94, i.e., for more than two decades. In this paper we exhibit the first construction of sparse hopsets with a constant number of hops. We also find efficient algorithms for hopsets in various computational settings, improving the best known constructions. Generally, our hopsets strictly outperform the hopsets of [8], both in terms of their parameters, and in terms of the resources required to construct them. We demonstrate the applicability of our results for the fundamental problem of computing approximate shortest paths from s sources. Our results improve the running time for this problem in the parallel, distributed and streaming models, for a vast range of s. We present a deterministic (1+o(1))-approximation O(n1 2+o(1)+D1+o(1))-time algorithm for solving the single-source shortest paths problem on distributed weighted networks (the CONGEST model); here n is the number of nodes in the network and D is its (hop) diameter. This is the first non-trivial deterministic algorithm for this problem. It also improves (i) the running time of the randomized (1+o(1))-approximation O(n1 2D1 4+D)-time algorithm of Nanongkai [STOC 2014] by a factor of as large as n1 8, and (ii) the O(є−1logє−1)-approximation factor of Lenzen and Patt-Shamir’s O(n1 2+є+D)-time algorithm [STOC 2013] within the same running time. Our running time matches the known time lower bound of Ω(n1 2 logn + D) [Das STOC 2011] modulo some lower-order terms, thus essentially settling the status of this problem which was raised at least a decade ago [Elkin SIGACT News 2004]. It also implies a (2+o(1))-approximation O(n1 2+o(1)+D1+o(1))-time algorithm for approximating a network’s weighted diameter which almost matches the lower bound by [PODC 2012]. In achieving this result, we develop two techniques which might be of independent interest and useful in other settings: (i) a deterministic process that replaces the “hitting set argument” commonly used for shortest paths computation in various settings, and (ii) a simple, deterministic, construction of an (no(1), o(1))-hop set of size O(n1+o(1)). We combine these techniques with many distributed algorithmic techniques, some of which from problems that are not directly related to shortest paths, e.g. ruling sets [ STOC 1987], source detection [Lenzen, Peleg PODC 2013], and partial distance estimation [Lenzen, Patt-Shamir PODC 2015]. Our hop set construction also leads to single-source shortest paths algorithms in two other settings: (i) a (1+o(1))-approximation O(no(1))-time algorithm on congested cliques, and (ii) a (1+o(1))-approximation O(no(1)logW)-pass O(n1+o(1)logW)-space streaming algorithm, when edge weights are in 1, 2, …, W . The first result answers an open problem in [Nanongkai, STOC 2014]. The second result partially answers an open problem raised by McGregor in 2006 [ sublinear.info , Problem 14]. The well-known @math -disjoint path problem ( @math -DPP) asks for pairwise vertex-disjoint paths between @math specified pairs of vertices @math in a given graph, if they exist. The decision version of the shortest @math -DPP asks for the length of the shortest (in terms of total length) such paths. Similarly the search and counting versions ask for one such and the number of such shortest set of paths, respectively. We restrict attention to the shortest @math -DPP instances on undirected planar graphs where all sources and sinks lie on a single face or on a pair of faces. We provide efficient sequential and parallel algorithms for the search versions of the problem answering one of the main open questions raised by Colin de Verdiere and Schrijver for the general one-face problem. We do so by providing a randomised @math algorithm along with an @math time randomised sequential algorithm. We also obtain deterministic algorithms with similar resource bounds for the counting and search versions. In contrast, previously, only the sequential complexity of decision and search versions of the "well-ordered" case has been studied. For the one-face case, sequential versions of our routines have better running times for constantly many terminals. In addition, the earlier best known sequential algorithms (e.g. ) were randomised while ours are also deterministic. The algorithms are based on a bijection between a shortest @math -tuple of disjoint paths in the given graph and cycle covers in a related digraph. This allows us to non-trivially modify established techniques relating counting cycle covers to the determinant. We further need to do a controlled inclusion-exclusion to produce a polynomial sum of determinants such that all "bad" cycle covers cancel out in the sum allowing us to count "good" cycle covers.