We study the wireless scheduling problem in the SINR model. More specifically, given a set of @math links, each a sender-receiver pair, we wish to partition (or ) the links into the minimum number of slots, each satisfying interference constraints allowing simultaneous transmission. In the basic problem, all senders transmit with the same uniform power. We give a distributed @math -approximation algorithm for the scheduling problem, matching the best ratio known for centralized algorithms. It holds in arbitrary metric space and for every length-monotone and sublinear power assignment. It is based on an algorithm of Kesselheim and V "ocking, whose analysis we improve by a logarithmic factor. We show that every distributed algorithm uses @math slots to schedule certain instances that require only two slots, which implies that the best possible absolute performance guarantee is logarithmic.
As in @cite_11 , our results hold in arbitrary distance metrics (and do not require the common assumption that @math ).
@cite_11
2288452560 2107342718 2168532736 2140017549
We showed in this work how the Hassanat distance metric enhances the performance of the nearest neighb our classifiers. The results demonstrate the superiority of this distanc e metric over the traditional and most-used distanc es, such as Manhattan distance and Euclidian distance. Moreover, we prove d that the Hassanat distance metric is invariant to data scale, noise and outliers. Throughout this work, it is clearly notab le that both ENN and IINC performed very well with the distance investigated, as their accuracy increased significantly by 3.3 a nd 3.1 respectively, with no significant advantage of the ENN over the IINC in terms of accuracy. Correspondingly, it can be no ted from our results that there is no optimal algor ithm that can solve all reallife problems perfectly; this is supported by the n o-free-lunch theorem. We define a natural notion of efficiency for approximate nearest-neighbor (ANN) search in general n-point metric spaces, namely the existence of a randomized algorithm which answers (1 + e)-ANN queries in polylog(n) time using only polynomial space. We then study which families of metric spaces admit efficient ANN schemes in the black-box model, where only oracle access to the distance function is given, and any query consistent with the triangle inequality may be asked.For e < 2 5, we offer a complete answer to this problem. Using the notion of metric dimension defined in [A. Gupta, et al, Bounded geometries, fractals, and low-distortion embeddings, in: 44th Annu. IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science, 2003, pp. 534-543] (a la [P. Assouad, Plongements lipschitziens dans Rn, Bull. Soc. Math. France 111 (4) (1983) 429-448]), we show that a metric space X admits an efficient (1+e)-ANN scheme for any e < 2 5 if and only if dim(X) = O(log log n). For coarser approximations, clearly the upper bound continues to hold, but there is a threshold at which our lower bound breaks down--this is precisely when points in the "ambient space" may begin to affect the complexity of "hard" subspaces S ⊆ X. Indeed, we give examples which show that dim(X) does not characterize the black-box complexity of ANN above the threshold.Our scheme for ANN in low-dimensional metric spaces is the first to yield efficient algorithms without relying on any additional assumptions on the input. In previous approaches (e.g., [K.L. Clarkson, Nearest neighbor queries in metric spaces, Discrete Comput. Geom. 22(1) (1999) 63-93; D. Karger, M. Ruhl, Finding nearest neighbors in growth-restricted metrics, in: 34th Annu. ACM Symp. on the Theory of Computing, 2002, pp. 63-66; R. Krauthgamer, J.R. Lee, Navigating nets: simple algorithms for proximity search, in: 15th Annu. ACM-SIAM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms, 2004, pp. 791-801; K. Hildrum, et al, A note on finding nearest neighbors in growth-restricted metrics, in: Proc. of the 15th Annu. ACM-SIAM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms, 2004, pp. 560-561]), even spaces with dim(X) = O(1) sometimes required Ω(n) query times. Nearest neighbor search and many other numerical data analysis tools most often rely on the use of the euclidean distance. When data are high dimensional, however, the euclidean distances seem to concentrate; all distances between pairs of data elements seem to be very similar. Therefore, the relevance of the euclidean distance has been questioned in the past, and fractional norms (Minkowski-like norms with an exponent less than one) were introduced to fight the concentration phenomenon. This paper justifies the use of alternative distances to fight concentration by showing that the concentration is indeed an intrinsic property of the distances and not an artifact from a finite sample. Furthermore, an estimation of the concentration as a function of the exponent of the distance and of the distribution of the data is given. It leads to the conclusion that, contrary to what is generally admitted, fractional norms are not always less concentrated than the euclidean norm; a counterexample is given to prove this claim. Theoretical arguments are presented, which show that the concentration phenomenon can appear for real data that do not match the hypotheses of the theorems, in particular, the assumption of independent and identically distributed variables. Finally, some insights about how to choose an optimal metric are given. In this paper, we introduce a set of novel distance metrics that use model based representations for trajectories. We determine the similarity of trajectories using the conformity of the corresponding HMM models. These metrics enable the comparison of tracjectories without any limitations of the conventional measures. They accurately identify the coordinate, orientation, and speed affinity. The proposed HMM based distance metrics can be used not only for ground truth comparisons but for clustering as well. Our experiments prove that they have superior discriminative properties.