Codd's relational model describes just one possible world. To better cope with incomplete information, extended database models allow several possible worlds. Vague tables are one such convenient extended model where attributes accept sets of possible values (e.g., the manager is either Jill or Bob). However, conceptual database design in such cases remains an open problem. In particular, there is no canonical definition of functional dependencies (FDs) over possible worlds (e.g., each employee has just one manager). We identify several desirable properties that the semantics of such FDs should meet including Armstrong's axioms, the independence from irrelevant attributes, seamless satisfaction and implied by strong satisfaction. We show that we can define FDs such that they have all our desirable properties over vague tables. However, we also show that no notion of FD can satisfy all our desirable properties over a more general model (disjunctive tables). Our work formalizes a trade-off between having a general model and having well-behaved FDs.
In the first approach, it is common to consider the database as denoting a set of possible worlds. This line of research has applied the tools of modal logic to the study of data dependencies @cite_12 .
@cite_12
1970372413 1990391007 2535582266 2125791539
We study functional and multivalued dependencies over SQL tables with NOT NULL constraints. Under a no-information interpretation of null values we develop tools for reasoning. We further show that in the absence of NOT NULL constraints the associated implication problem is equivalent to that in propositional fragments of Priest's paraconsistent Logic of Paradox. Subsequently, we extend the equivalence to Boolean dependencies and to the presence of NOT NULL constraints using Schaerf and Cadoli's S-3 logics where S corresponds to the set of attributes declared NOT NULL. The findings also apply to Codd's interpretation "value at present unknown" utilizing a weak possible world semantics. Our results establish NOT NULL constraints as an effective mechanism to balance the expressiveness and tractability of consequence relations, and to control the degree by which the existing classical theory of data dependencies can be soundly approximated in practice. ABSTRACT This paper concerns the semantics of Codd's relational model of data. Formulated are precise conditions that should be satisfied in a semantically meaningful extension of the usual relational operators, such as projection, selection, union, and join, from operators on relations to operators on tables with “null values” of various kinds allowed. These conditions require that the system be safe in the sense that no incorrect conclusion is derivable by using a specified subset Ω of the relational operators; and that it be complete in the sense that all valid conclusions expressible by relational expressions using operators in Ω are in fact derivable in this system. Two such systems of practical interest are shown. The first, based on the usual Codd's null values, supports projection and selection. The second, based on many different (“marked”) null values or variables allowed to appear in a table, is shown to correctly support projection, positive selection (with no negation occurring in the selection condition), union, and renaming of attributes, which allows for processing arbitrary conjunctive queries. A very desirable property enjoyed by this system is that all relational operators on tables are performed in exactly the same way as in the case of the usual relations. A third system, mainly of theoretical interest, supporting projection, selection, union, join, and renaming, is also discussed. Under a so-called closed world assumption, it can also handle the operator of difference. It is based on a device called a conditional table and is crucial to the proof of the correctness of the second system. All systems considered allow for relational expressions containing arbitrarily many different relation symbols, and no form of the universal relation assumption is required. Categories and Subject Descriptors: H.2.3 [Database Management]: Languages— query languages; H.2.4 [Database Management]: Systems— query processing General Terms: Theory We investigate the impact of uncertainty on relational data -base schema design. Uncertainty is modeled qualitatively by assigning to tuples a degree of possibility with which they occur, and assigning to functional dependencies a degree of certainty which says to which tuples they apply. A design theory is developed for possibilistic functional dependencies, including efficient axiomatic and algorithmic characterizations of their implication problem. Naturally, the possibility degrees of tuples result in a scale of different degrees of data redundancy. Scaled versions of the classical syntactic Boyce-Codd and Third Normal Forms are established and semantically justified in terms of avoiding data redundancy of different degrees. Classical decomposition and synthesis techniques are scaled as well. Therefore, possibilistic functional dependencies do not just enable designers to control the levels of data integrity and losslessness targeted but also to balance the classical trade-off between query and update efficiency. Extensive experiments confirm the efficiency of our framework and provide original insight into relational schema design. It is often desirable to represent in a database, entities whose properties cannot be deterministically classified. The authors develop a data model that includes probabilities associated with the values of the attributes. The notion of missing probabilities is introduced for partially specified probability distributions. This model offers a richer descriptive language allowing the database to more accurately reflect the uncertain real world. Probabilistic analogs to the basic relational operators are defined and their correctness is studied. A set of operators that have no counterpart in conventional relational systems is presented. >