Consider a lossy communication channel for unicast with zero-delay feedback. For this communication scenario, a simple retransmission scheme is optimum with respect to delay. An alternative approach is to use random linear coding in automatic repeat-request (ARQ) mode. We extend the work of Shrader and Ephremides in [1], by deriving an expression for the delay of random linear coding over a field of infinite size. Simulation results for various field sizes are also provided.
As far as we know, @cite_4 is the only paper in the literature to deal with this specific model. Related but different work in a unicast setting can be found in @cite_9 @cite_6 , but in the model addressed in these papers packets arrive to the sender as a block, so there is no loss in waiting. Reference @cite_1 addresses delay in forward-error correction schemes for sender nodes with a finite buffer capacity.
@cite_1 @cite_9 @cite_4 @cite_6
2534339435 2076648698 2953360229 2141661023
This paper considers network communications under a hard timeliness constraint , where a source node streams perishable information to a destination node over a directed acyclic graph subject to a hard delay constraint. Transmission along any edge incurs unit delay, and it is required that every information bit generated at the source at the beginning of time @math to be received and recovered by the destination at the end of time @math , where @math is the maximum allowed end-to-end delay. We study the corresponding delay-constrained unicast capacity problem. This paper presents the first example showing that network coding (NC) can achieve strictly higher delay-constrained throughput than routing even for the single unicast setting and the NC gain can be arbitrarily close to 2 in some instances. This is in sharp contrast to the delay-unconstrained ( @math ) single-unicast case where the classic min-cut max-flow theorem implies that coding cannot improve throughput over routing. Motivated by the above findings, a series of investigation on the delay-constrained capacity problem is also made, including: 1) an equivalent multiple-unicast representation based on a time-expanded graph approach; 2) a new delay-constrained capacity upper bound and its connections to the existing routing-based results [ 2011]; 3) an example showing that the penalty of using random linear NC can be unbounded; and 4) a counter example of the tree-packing Edmonds’ theorem in the new delay-constrained setting. Built upon the time-expanded graph approach, we also discuss how our results can be readily extended to cyclic networks. Overall, our results suggest that delay-constrained communication is fundamentally different from the well-understood delay-unconstrained one and call for investigation participation. We consider packet scheduling in a network providing differentiated services, where each packet is assigned a value. We study various queueing models for supporting QoS (Quality of Service). In the nonpreemptive model, packets accepted to the queue will be transmitted eventually and cannot be dropped. The FIFO preemptive model allows packets accepted to the queue to be preempted (dropped) prior to their departure, while ensuring that transmitted packets are sent in the order of arrival. In the bounded delay model, packets must be transmitted before a certain deadline, otherwise it is lost (while transmission ordering is allowed to be arbitrary). In all models the goal of the buffer policy is to maximize the total value of the accepted packets.Let α be the ratio between the maximal and minimal value. For the non-preemptive model we derive a Θ(log &alpha) competitive ratio, both exhibiting a buffer policy and a general lower bound. For the interesting case of two distinct values, we give an 2α--1 α competitive buffer policy, which exactly matches the lower bound. We also analyze a RED-like policy and derive its competitive ratio, which is approximately 2α--0.5 α for two values and Θ(log α) for multiple values. In addition we improve the previous known lower and upper bounds of the Fixed Partition and Flexible Partition policies.For the FIFO preemptive model, we improve the general lower bound and show a tight bound for the special case of queue size 2. We prove that the bounded delay model with uniform delay 2 is equivalent to a modified FIFO preemptive model with queue size 2. We then give improved upper and lower bounds on the 2-uniform bounded delay model. We also give lower bound for the 2-variable bounded delay model, which matches the previously known upper bound. We present a capacity-achieving coding scheme for unicast or multicast over lossy packet networks. In the scheme, intermediate nodes perform additional coding yet do not decode nor even wait for a block of packets before sending out coded packets. Rather, whenever they have a transmission opportunity, they send out coded packets formed from random linear combinations of previously received packets. All coding and decoding operations have polynomial complexity. We show that the scheme is capacity-achieving as long as packets received on a link arrive according to a process that has an average rate. Thus, packet losses on a link may exhibit correlation in time or with losses on other links. In the special case of Poisson traffic with i.i.d. losses, we give error exponents that quantify the rate of decay of the probability of error with coding delay. Our analysis of the scheme shows that it is not only capacity-achieving, but that the propagation of packets carrying "innovative" information follows the propagation of jobs through a queueing network, and therefore fluid flow models yield good approximations. We consider networks with both lossy point-to-point and broadcast links, allowing us to model both wireline and wireless packet networks. Existing position-based unicast routing algorithms which forward packets in the geographic direction of the destination require that the forwarding node knows the positions of all neighbors in its transmission range. This information on direct neighbors is gained by observing beacon messages each node sends out periodically. Due to mobility, the information that a node receives about its neighbors becomes outdated, leading either to a significant decrease in the packet delivery rate or to a steep increase in load on the wireless channel as node mobility increases. In this paper, we propose a mechanism to perform position-based unicast forwarding without the help of beacons. In our contention-based forwarding scheme (CBF) the next hop is selected through a distributed contention process based on the actual positions of all current neighbors. For the contention process, CBF makes use of biased timers. To avoid packet duplication, the first node that is selected suppresses the selection of further nodes. We propose three suppression strategies which vary with respect to forwarding efficiency and suppression characteristics. We analyze the behavior of CBF with all three suppression strategies and compare it to an existing greedy position-based routing approach by means of simulation with ns-2. Our results show that CBF significantly reduces the load on the wireless channel required to achieve a specific delivery rate compared to the load a beacon-based greedy forwarding strategy generates.