One of the most crucial issues in data mining is to model human behaviour in order to provide personalisation, adaptation and recommendation. This usually involves implicit or explicit knowledge, either by observing user interactions, or by asking users directly. But these sources of information are always subject to the volatility of human decisions, making utilised data uncertain to a particular extent. In this contribution, we elaborate on the impact of this human uncertainty when it comes to comparative assessments of different data mining approaches. In particular, we reveal two problems: (1) biasing effects on various metrics of model-based prediction and (2) the propagation of uncertainty and its thus induced error probabilities for algorithm rankings. For this purpose, we introduce a probabilistic view and prove the existence of those problems mathematically, as well as provide possible solution strategies. We exemplify our theory mainly in the context of recommender systems along with the metric RMSE as a prominent example of precision quality measures.
Probabilistic modelling of human cognition processes is quite common to the field of computational neuroscience. In particular, aspects of human decision-making can be stated as problems of probabilistic inference @cite_7 (often referred to as Bayesian Brain'' paradigm). Besides external influential factors, the belief precision is influenced by biological factors like current activity of dopamin cells @cite_21 . In other words, human decisions can be seen as uncertain quantities by nature of the underlying cognition mechanisms. Recently, this idea has been adopted for various probabilistic approaches of neural coding @cite_16 . In parallel, many methods of predictive data mining employ probabilistic (e.g. Bayesian) models for approximating mechanisms of human decisions based on prior observations as training data. At the same time, common evaluation approaches still use non-random quality metrics and thus do not account for possible decision ranking errors in a natural way. As a consequence, we systematically tackle both, observed user responses and resulting quality of the evaluated predictor as random quantities. This allows us to elaborate on the impact of human uncertainty and provide solutions for a more differentiated and objective assessment of predictive models. [.25ex]
@cite_21 @cite_7 @cite_16
2521579474 2114157818 2962861173 1511986666
Objective Build probabilistic topic model representations of hospital admissions processes and compare the ability of such models to predict clinical order patterns as compared to preconstructed order sets. @PARASPLIT Materials and Methods The authors evaluated the first 24 hours of structured electronic health record data for > 10 K inpatients. Drawing an analogy between structured items (e.g., clinical orders) to words in a text document, the authors performed latent Dirichlet allocation probabilistic topic modeling. These topic models use initial clinical information to predict clinical orders for a separate validation set of > 4 K patients. The authors evaluated these topic model-based predictions vs existing human-authored order sets by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, precision, and recall for subsequent clinical orders. @PARASPLIT Results Existing order sets predict clinical orders used within 24 hours with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.81, precision 16 , and recall 35 . This can be improved to 0.90, 24 , and 47 ( P < 10−20) by using probabilistic topic models to summarize clinical data into up to 32 topics. Many of these latent topics yield natural clinical interpretations (e.g., “critical care,” “pneumonia,” “neurologic evaluation”). @PARASPLIT Discussion Existing order sets tend to provide nonspecific, process-oriented aid, with usability limitations impairing more precise, patient-focused support. Algorithmic summarization has the potential to breach this usability barrier by automatically inferring patient context, but with potential tradeoffs in interpretability. @PARASPLIT Conclusion Probabilistic topic modeling provides an automated approach to detect thematic trends in patient care and generate decision support content. A potential use case finds related clinical orders for decision support. Several real-world applications need to effectively manage and reason about large amounts of data that are inherently uncertain. For instance, pervasive computing applications must constantly reason about volumes of noisy sensory readings for a variety of reasons, including motion prediction and human behavior modeling. Such probabilistic data analyses require sophisticated machine-learning tools that can effectively model the complex spatio temporal correlation patterns present in uncertain sensory data. Unfortunately, to date, most existing approaches to probabilistic database systems have relied on somewhat simplistic models of uncertainty that can be easily mapped onto existing relational architectures: Probabilistic information is typically associated with individual data tuples, with only limited or no support for effectively capturing and reasoning about complex data correlations. In this paper, we introduce BayesStore, a novel probabilistic data management architecture built on the principle of handling statistical models and probabilistic inference tools as first-class citizens of the database system. Adopting a machine-learning view, BAYESSTORE employs concise statistical relational models to effectively encode the correlation patterns between uncertain data, and promotes probabilistic inference and statistical model manipulation as part of the standard DBMS operator repertoire to support efficient and sound query processing. We present BAYESSTORE's uncertainty model based on a novel, first-order statistical model, and we redefine traditional query processing operators, to manipulate the data and the probabilistic models of the database in an efficient manner. Finally, we validate our approach, by demonstrating the value of exploiting data correlations during query processing, and by evaluating a number of optimizations which significantly accelerate query processing. We aim to produce predictive models that are not only accurate, but are also interpretable to human experts. Our models are decision lists, which consist of a series of if...then... statements (for example, if high blood pressure, then stroke) that discretize a high-dimensional, multivariate feature space into a series of simple, readily interpretable decision statements. We introduce a generative model called Bayesian Rule Lists that yields a posterior distribution over possible decision lists. It employs a novel prior structure to encourage sparsity. Our experiments show that Bayesian Rule Lists has predictive accuracy on par with the current top algorithms for prediction in machine learning. Our method is motivated by recent developments in personalized medicine, and can be used to produce highly accurate and interpretable medical scoring systems. We demonstrate this by producing an alternative to the CHADS2 score, actively used in clinical practice for estimating the risk of stroke in patients that have atrial fibrillation. Our model is as interpretable as CHADS2, but more accurate. Most tasks require a person or an automated system to reason -- to reach conclusions based on available information. The framework of probabilistic graphical models, presented in this book, provides a general approach for this task. The approach is model-based, allowing interpretable models to be constructed and then manipulated by reasoning algorithms. These models can also be learned automatically from data, allowing the approach to be used in cases where manually constructing a model is difficult or even impossible. Because uncertainty is an inescapable aspect of most real-world applications, the book focuses on probabilistic models, which make the uncertainty explicit and provide models that are more faithful to reality. Probabilistic Graphical Models discusses a variety of models, spanning Bayesian networks, undirected Markov networks, discrete and continuous models, and extensions to deal with dynamical systems and relational data. For each class of models, the text describes the three fundamental cornerstones: representation, inference, and learning, presenting both basic concepts and advanced techniques. Finally, the book considers the use of the proposed framework for causal reasoning and decision making under uncertainty. The main text in each chapter provides the detailed technical development of the key ideas. Most chapters also include boxes with additional material: skill boxes, which describe techniques; case study boxes, which discuss empirical cases related to the approach described in the text, including applications in computer vision, robotics, natural language understanding, and computational biology; and concept boxes, which present significant concepts drawn from the material in the chapter. Instructors (and readers) can group chapters in various combinations, from core topics to more technically advanced material, to suit their particular needs.