In reinforcement learning, we often define goals by specifying rewards within desirable states. One problem with this approach is that we typically need to redefine the rewards each time the goal changes, which often requires some understanding of the solution in the agents environment. When humans are learning to complete tasks, we regularly utilize alternative sources that guide our understanding of the problem. Such task representations allow one to specify goals on their own terms, thus providing specifications that can be appropriately interpreted across various environments. This motivates our own work, in which we represent goals in environments that are different from the agents. We introduce Cross-Domain Perceptual Reward (CDPR) functions, learned rewards that represent the visual similarity between an agents state and a cross-domain goal image. We report results for learning the CDPRs with a deep neural network and using them to solve two tasks with deep reinforcement learning.
Inverse RL aims to infer a reward function from expert demonstrations @cite_29 . This approach typically requires multiple demonstrations for a single task. We also aim to learn a reward function in our approach, but we use a single sample to represent the goal. A similar approach is imitation learning, which aims to learn a policy directly from demonstrations @cite_31 . Both of these techniques often assume that the student, i.e., agent, and the teacher, or demonstrator, share a common environment. That is, the observed states and actions are shared between the teacher and student. When the observations are dissimilar, a correspondence problem must be solved @cite_33 . These correspondences are often hand-specified, and may require equipment such as sensors on the teacher’s body. Our own approach aims to learn such correspondences between different representations.
@cite_29 @cite_31 @cite_33
2133068870 2059517962 2148051740 2287850282
We consider the problem of imitation learning where the examples, demonstrated by an expert, cover only a small part of a large state space. Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) provides an ecient tool for generalizing the demonstration, based on the assumption that the expert is optimally acting in a Markov Decision Process (MDP). Most of the past work on IRL requires that a (near)optimal policy can be computed for dierent reward functions. However, this requirement can hardly be satised in systems with a large, or continuous, state space. In this paper, we propose a model-free IRL algorithm, where the relative entropy between the empirical distribution of the state-action trajectories under a baseline policy and their distribution under the learned policy is minimized by stochastic gradient descent. We compare this new approach to well-known IRL algorithms using learned MDP models. Empirical results on simulated car racing, gridworld and ball-in-a-cup problems show that our approach is able to learn good policies from a small number of demonstrations. Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) is an approach for domain-reward discovery from demonstration, where an agent mines the reward function of a Markov decision process by observing an expert acting in the domain. In the standard setting, it is assumed that the expert acts (nearly) optimally, and a large number of trajectories, i.e., training examples are available for reward discovery (and consequently, learning domain behavior). These are not practical assumptions: trajectories are often noisy, and there can be a paucity of examples. Our novel approach incorporates advice-giving into the IRL framework to address these issues. Inspired by preference elicitation, a domain expert provides advice on states and actions (features) by stating preferences over them. We evaluate our approach on several domains and show that with small amounts of targeted preference advice, learning is possible from noisy demonstrations, and requires far fewer trajectories compared to simply learning from trajectories alone. This paper provides a comparative study between Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) and Apprenticeship Learning (AL). IRL and AL are two frameworks, using Markov Decision Processes (MDP), which are used for the imitation learning problem where an agent tries to learn from demonstrations of an expert. In the AL framework, the agent tries to learn the expert policy whereas in the IRL framework, the agent tries to learn a reward which can explain the behavior of the expert. This reward is then optimized to imitate the expert. One can wonder if it is worth estimating such a reward, or if estimating a policy is sufficient. This quite natural question has not really been addressed in the literature right now. We provide partial answers, both from a theoretical and empirical point of view. Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) allows autonomous agents to learn to solve complex tasks from successful demonstrations. However, in many settings, e.g., when a human learns the task by trial and error, failed demonstrations are also readily available. In addition, in some tasks, purposely generating failed demonstrations may be easier than generating successful ones. Since existing IRL methods cannot make use of failed demonstrations, in this paper we propose inverse reinforcement learning from failure (IRLF) which exploits both successful and failed demonstrations. Starting from the state-of-the-art maximum causal entropy IRL method, we propose a new constrained optimisation formulation that accommodates both types of demonstrations while remaining convex. We then derive update rules for learning reward functions and policies. Experiments on both simulated and real-robot data demonstrate that IRLF converges faster and generalises better than maximum causal entropy IRL, especially when few successful demonstrations are available.