Public debates are a common platform for presenting and juxtaposing diverging views on important issues. In this work we propose a methodology for tracking how ideas flow between participants throughout a debate. We use this approach in a case study of Oxford-style debates---a competitive format where the winner is determined by audience votes---and show how the outcome of a debate depends on aspects of conversational flow. In particular, we find that winners tend to make better use of a debate's interactive component than losers, by actively pursuing their opponents' points rather than promoting their own ideas over the course of the conversation.
Previous work on conversational structure has proposed approaches to model dialogue acts @cite_0 @cite_11 @cite_19 or disentangle interleaved conversations @cite_21 @cite_23 . Other research has considered the problem of detecting conversation-level traits such as the presence of disagreements @cite_2 @cite_7 or the likelihood of relation dissolution @cite_6 . At the participant level, several studies present approaches to identify ideological stances @cite_20 @cite_8 , using features based on participant interactions @cite_5 @cite_13 , or extracting words and reasons characterizing a stance @cite_14 @cite_22 @cite_4 . In our setting, both the stances and the turn structure of a debate are known, allowing us to instead focus on the debate's outcome.
@cite_14 @cite_4 @cite_22 @cite_7 @cite_8 @cite_21 @cite_6 @cite_0 @cite_19 @cite_23 @cite_2 @cite_5 @cite_13 @cite_20 @cite_11
2128970689 2555891875 2114030807 1914856875
We describe a statistical approach for modeling dialogue acts in conversational speech, i.e., speech-act-like units such as STATEMENT, QUESTION, BACKCHANNEL, AGREEMENT, DISAGREEMENT, and APOLOGY. Our model detects and predicts dialogue acts based on lexical, collocational, and prosodic cues, as well as on the discourse coherence of the dialogue act sequence. The dialogue model is based on treating the discourse structure of a conversation as a hidden Markov model and the individual dialogue acts as observations emanating from the model states. Constraints on the likely sequence of dialogue acts are modeled via a dialogue act n-gram. The statistical dialogue grammar is combined with word n-grams, decision trees, and neural networks modeling the idiosyncratic lexical and prosodic manifestations of each dialogue act. We develop a probabilistic integration of speech recognition with dialogue modeling, to improve both speech recognition and dialogue act classification accuracy. Models are trained and evaluated using a large hand-labeled database of 1,155 conversations from the Switchboard corpus of spontaneous human-to-human telephone speech. We achieved good dialogue act labeling accuracy (65 based on errorful, automatically recognized words and prosody, and 71 based on word transcripts, compared to a chance baseline accuracy of 35 and human accuracy of 84 ) and a small reduction in word recognition error. The utilization of social media material in journalistic workflows is increasing, demanding automated methods for the identification of mis- and disinformation. Since textual contradiction across social media posts can be a signal of rumorousness, we seek to model how claims in Twitter posts are being textually contradicted. We identify two different contexts in which contradiction emerges: its broader form can be observed across independently posted tweets and its more specific form in threaded conversations. We define how the two scenarios differ in terms of central elements of argumentation: claims and conversation structure. We design and evaluate models for the two scenarios uniformly as 3-way Recognizing Textual Entailment tasks in order to represent claims and conversation structure implicitly in a generic inference model, while previous studies used explicit or no representation of these properties. To address noisy text, our classifiers use simple similarity features derived from the string and part-of-speech level. Corpus statistics reveal distribution differences for these features in contradictory as opposed to non-contradictory tweet relations, and the classifiers yield state of the art performance. Three experiments were conducted to determine the psychometric properties of language in dyadic interactions. Using text-analysis, it was possible to assess the degree to which people coordinate their word use in natural conversations. In Experiments 1 (n = 130) and 2( n = 32), college students interacted in dyadic conversations in laboratory-based private Internet chat rooms. Experiment 3 analyzed the official transcripts of the Watergate tapes involving the dyadic interactions between President Richard Nixon and his aids H. R. Haldeman, John Erlichman, and John Dean. The results of the three studies offer sub- stantial evidence that individuals in dyadic interactions exhibit linguistic style matching (LSM) on both the conversation level as well as on a turn-by-turn level. Furthermore, LSM is unrelated to ratings of the quality of the interaction by both participants and judges. We propose that a coordination-engagement hypothesis is a better description of linguistic behaviors than the coordination-rapport hypothesis that has been proposed in the nonver- bal literature. For years social psychologists have exalted the power of the situa- tion. We comfortably acknowledge that across different situations, with different people, we may act in a range of ways, or even talk using a variety of styles. Aware of this tendency, Gergen (1972) began his explorations of our shifting masks of identity. In writing letters to close friends, he realized that he came across as a "completely different per- son" in each letter. "In one, I was morose, pouring out a philosophy of existential sorrow; in another I was a lusty realist: in a third I was a lighthearted jokester" (p. 32). Based merely on his word choices, Gergen inadvertently varied his style to adapt to the recipients of his letters. This is a prime demonstration of our inherent knowledge of the mutability of our language with respect to varying social contexts. While the study of the connection between discourse patterns and personal identification is decades old, the study of these patterns using language technologies is relatively recent. In that more recent tradition we frame author age prediction from text as a regression problem. We explore the same task using three very different genres of data simultaneously: blogs, telephone conversations, and online forum posts. We employ a technique from domain adaptation that allows us to train a joint model involving all three corpora together as well as separately and analyze differences in predictive features across joint and corpus-specific aspects of the model. Effective features include both stylistic ones (such as POS patterns) as well as content oriented ones. Using a linear regression model based on shallow text features, we obtain correlations up to 0.74 and mean absolute errors between 4.1 and 6.8 years.