Systems that make sequential decisions in the presence of partial feedback on actions often need to strike a balance between maximizing immediate payoffs based on available information, and acquiring new information that may be essential for maximizing future payoffs. This trade-off is captured by the multi-armed bandit (MAB) framework that has been studied and applied for designing sequential experiments when at each time epoch a single observation is collected on the action that was selected at that epoch. However, in many practical settings additional information may become available between decision epochs. We introduce a generalized MAB formulation in which auxiliary information on each arm may appear arbitrarily over time. By obtaining matching lower and upper bounds, we characterize the minimax complexity of this family of MAB problems as a function of the information arrival process, and study how salient characteristics of this process impact policy design and achievable performance. We establish the robustness of a Thompson sampling policy in the presence of additional information, but observe that other policies that are of practical importance do not exhibit such robustness. We therefore introduce a broad adaptive exploration approach for designing policies that, without any prior knowledge on the information arrival process, attain the best performance (in terms of regret rate) that is achievable when the information arrival process is a priori known. Our approach is based on adjusting MAB policies designed to perform well in the absence of auxiliary information by using dynamically customized virtual time indexes to endogenously control the exploration rate of the policy. We demonstrate our approach through appropriately adjusting known MAB policies and establishing improved performance bounds for these policies in the presence of auxiliary information.
On the other hand, few papers have studied cases where exploration is not only essential but should be enhanced in order to maintain optimality. For example, @cite_29 introduce a partial monitoring setting where after playing an arm the agent does not get to see the incurred loss but only observes a feedback that carries some information about it, and show that such feedback structure requires higher exploration rates. @cite_38 consider a general framework where the reward distribution may change over time according to a budget of variation, and characterize the manner in which optimal exploration rates increase as a function of said budget. In addition, @cite_2 consider a platform in which the preferences of arriving users may depend on the experience of previous users. They show that in this setting classical MAB policies may under-explore, and introduce a balanced-exploration approach that results in optimal performance.
@cite_38 @cite_29 @cite_2
1761637522 2950303912 2952720101 2148250692
We introduce the budget-limited multi-armed bandit (MAB), which captures situations where a learner's actions are costly and constrained by a fixed budget that is incommensurable with the rewards earned from the bandit machine, and then describe a first algorithm for solving it. Since the learner has a budget, the problem's duration is finite. Consequently an optimal exploitation policy is not to pull the optimal arm repeatedly, but to pull the combination of arms that maximises the agent's total reward within the budget. As such, the rewards for all arms must be estimated, because any of them may appear in the optimal combination. This difference from existing MABs means that new approaches to maximising the total reward are required. To this end, we propose an ∊-first algorithm, in which the first ∊ of the budget is used solely to learn the arms' rewards (exploration), while the remaining 1 - ∊ is used to maximise the received reward based on those estimates (exploitation). We derive bounds on the algorithm's loss for generic and uniform exploration methods, and compare its performance with traditional MAB algorithms under various distributions of rewards and costs, showing that it outperforms the others by up to 50 . In budget-limited multi-armed bandit (MAB) problems, the learner's actions are costly and constrained by a fixed budget. Consequently, an optimal exploitation policy may not be to pull the optimal arm repeatedly, as is the case in other variants of MAB, but rather to pull the sequence of different arms that maximises the agent's total reward within the budget. This difference from existing MABs means that new approaches to maximising the total reward are required. Given this, we develop two pulling policies, namely: (i) KUBE; and (ii) fractional KUBE. Whereas the former provides better performance up to 40 in our experimental settings, the latter is computationally less expensive. We also prove logarithmic upper bounds for the regret of both policies, and show that these bounds are asymptotically optimal (i.e. they only differ from the best possible regret by a constant factor). In environments with uncertain dynamics exploration is necessary to learn how to perform well. Existing reinforcement learning algorithms provide strong exploration guarantees, but they tend to rely on an ergodicity assumption. The essence of ergodicity is that any state is eventually reachable from any other state by following a suitable policy. This assumption allows for exploration algorithms that operate by simply favoring states that have rarely been visited before. For most physical systems this assumption is impractical as the systems would break before any reasonable exploration has taken place, i.e., most physical systems don't satisfy the ergodicity assumption. In this paper we address the need for safe exploration methods in Markov decision processes. We first propose a general formulation of safety through ergodicity. We show that imposing safety by restricting attention to the resulting set of guaranteed safe policies is NP-hard. We then present an efficient algorithm for guaranteed safe, but potentially suboptimal, exploration. At the core is an optimization formulation in which the constraints restrict attention to a subset of the guaranteed safe policies and the objective favors exploration policies. Our framework is compatible with the majority of previously proposed exploration methods, which rely on an exploration bonus. Our experiments, which include a Martian terrain exploration problem, show that our method is able to explore better than classical exploration methods. We consider the restless multi-armed bandit (RMAB) problem with unknown dynamics. At each time, a player chooses K out of N (N > K) arms to play. The state of each arm determines the reward when the arm is played and transits according to Markovian rules no matter the arm is engaged or passive. The Markovian dynamics of the arms are unknown to the player. The objective is to maximize the long-term expected reward by designing an optimal arm selection policy. The performance of a policy is measured by regret, defined as the reward loss with respect to the case where the player knows which K arms are the most rewarding and always plays these K best arms. We construct a policy, referred to as Restless Upper Confidence Bound (RUCB), that achieves a regret with logarithmic order of time when an arbitrary nontrivial bound on certain system parameters is known. When no knowledge about the system is available, we extend the RUCB policy to achieve a regret arbitrarily close to the logarithmic order. In both cases, the system achieves the maximum average reward offered by the K best arms. Potential applications of these results include cognitive radio networks, opportunistic communications in unknown fading environments, and financial investment.