The Isabelle proof assistant comes equipped with a very powerful tactic for term simplification. While tremendously useful, the results of simplifying a term do not always match the user’s expectation: sometimes, the resulting term is not in the form the user expected, or the simplifier fails to apply a rule. We describe a new, interactive tracing facility which offers insight into the hierarchical structure of the simplification with user-defined filtering, memoization and search. The new simplifier trace is integrated into the Isabelle jEdit Prover IDE.
is a logic programming language @cite_8 @cite_9 . A program consists of a set of , namely and . Rules are (usually) Horn clauses, with a head and a body. Facts are merely rules with an empty body. Heads may contain variables, and bodies may contain variables not occurring in the head. Variable names must begin with an upper-case letter or an underscore, whereas must begin with a lower-case latter.
@cite_9 @cite_8
2096368963 2093111544 2011124182 2161525442
Programmers reason about their programs using a wide variety of formal and informal methods. Programmers in untyped languages such as Scheme or Erlang are able to use any such method to reason about the type behavior of their programs. Our type system for Scheme accommodates common reasoning methods by assigning variable occurrences a subtype of their declared type based on the predicates prior to the occurrence, a discipline dubbed occurrence typing. It thus enables programmers to enrich existing Scheme code with types, while requiring few changes to the code itself. Three years of practical experience has revealed serious shortcomings of our type system. In particular, it relied on a system of ad-hoc rules to relate combinations of predicates, it could not reason about subcomponents of data structures, and it could not follow sophisticated reasoning about the relationship among predicate tests, all of which are used in existing code. In this paper, we reformulate occurrence typing to eliminate these shortcomings. The new formulation derives propositional logic formulas that hold when an expression evaluates to true or false, respectively. A simple proof system is then used to determine types of variable occurrences from these propositions. Our implementation of this revised occurrence type system thus copes with many more untyped programming idioms than the original system. Abstract Miller, D., G. Nadathur, F. Pfenning and A. Scedrov, Uniform proofs as a foundation for logic programming, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 51 (1991) 125–157. A proof-theoretic characterization of logical languages that form suitable bases for Prolog-like programming languages is provided. This characterization is based on the principle that the declarative meaning of a logic program, provided by provability in a logical system, should coincide with its operational meaning, provided by interpreting logical connectives as simple and fixed search instructions. The operational semantics is formalized by the identification of a class of cut-free sequent proofs called uniform proofs . A uniform proof is one that can be found by a goal-directed search that respects the interpretation of the logical connectives as search instructions. The concept of a uniform proof is used to define the notion of an abstract logic programming language , and it is shown that first-order and higher-order Horn clauses with classical provability are examples of such a language. Horn clauses are then generalized to hereditary Harrop formulas and it is shown that first-order and higher-order versions of this new class of formulas are also abstract logic programming languages if the inference rules are those of either intuitionistic or minimal logic. The programming language significance of the various generalizations to first-order Horn clauses is briefly discussed. A novel logic program like language, weight constraint rules, is developed for answer set programming purposes. It generalizes normal logic programs by allowing weight constraints in place of literals to represent, e.g., cardinality and resource constraints and by providing optimization capabilities. A declarative semantics is developed which extends the stable model semantics of normal programs. The computational complexity of the language is shown to be similar to that of normal programs under the stable model semantics. A simple embedding of general weight constraint rules to a small subclass of the language called basic constraint rules is devised. An implementation of the language, the SMODELS system, is developed based on this embedding. It uses a two level architecture consisting of a front-end and a kernel language implementation. The front-end allows restricted use of variables and functions and compiles general weight constraint rules to basic constraint rules. A major part of the work is the development of an efficient search procedure for computing stable models for this kernel language. The procedure is compared with and empirically tested against satisfiability checkers and an implementation of the stable model semantics. It offers a competitive implementation of the stable model semantics for normal programs and attractive performance for problems where the new types of rules provide a compact representation. Datalog programs, i.e., Prolog programs without function symbols, are considered It is assumed that a variable appearing in the head of a rule must also appear in the body of the rule. The input of a program is a set of ground atoms (which are given in addition to the program's rules) and, therefore, can be viewed as an assignment of relations to some of the program's predicates. Two programs are equivalent if they produce the same result for all possible assignments of relations to the extensional predicates (i.e., the predicates that do not appear as heads of rules). Two programs are uniformly equivalent if they produce the same result for all possible assignments of initial relations to all the predicates (i.e., both extensional and intentional). The equivalence problem for Datalog programs is known to be undecidable. It is shown that uniform equivalence is decidable, and an algorithm is given for minimizing a Datalog program under uniform equivalence. A technique for removing parts of a program that are redundant under equivalence (but not under uniform equivalence) is developed. A procedure for testing uniform equivalence is also developed for the case in which the database satisfies some constraints.