Humans have an unparalleled visual intelligence and can overcome visual ambiguities that machines currently cannot. Recent works have shown that incorporating guidance from humans during inference for real-world, challenging tasks like viewpoint-estimation and fine-grained classification, can help overcome difficult cases in which the computer-alone would have otherwise failed. These hybrid intelligence approaches are hence gaining traction. However, deciding what question to ask the human in the loop at inference time remains an unknown for these problems. We address this question by formulating it as what we call the Adviser Problem: can we learn a mapping from the input to a specific question to ask the human in the loop so as to maximize the expected positive impact to the overall task? We formulate a solution to the adviser problem using a deep network and apply it to the viewpoint estimation problem where the question asks for the location of a specific keypoint in the input image. We show that by using the keypoint guidance from the Adviser Network and the human, the model is able to outperform the previous hybrid-intelligence state-of-the-art by 3.27 , and outperform the computer-only state-of-the-art by 10.44 absolute.
Work in the area of active learning @cite_8 has been concerned with choosing the best instance to train a model. While we share their goal of finding the next data point to choose, their work is focused on finding the best instance to train a model, while our focus is on choosing the best keypoint at inference time. Hence, their methods do not apply to our problem.
@cite_8
2128678390 2021732807 2133860205 2181558882
We present a framework for active learning in the multiple-instance (MI) setting. In an MI learning problem, instances are naturally organized into bags and it is the bags, instead of individual instances, that are labeled for training. MI learners assume that every instance in a bag labeled negative is actually negative, whereas at least one instance in a bag labeled positive is actually positive. We consider the particular case in which an MI learner is allowed to selectively query unlabeled instances from positive bags. This approach is well motivated in domains in which it is inexpensive to acquire bag labels and possible, but expensive, to acquire instance labels. We describe a method for learning from labels at mixed levels of granularity, and introduce two active query selection strategies motivated by the MI setting. Our experiments show that learning from instance labels can significantly improve performance of a basic MI learning algorithm in two multiple-instance domains: content-based image retrieval and text classification. Active learning aims to train an accurate prediction model with minimum cost by labeling most informative instances. In this paper, we survey existing works on active learning from an instance-selection perspective and classify them into two categories with a progressive relationship: (1) active learning merely based on uncertainty of independent and identically distributed (IID) instances, and (2) active learning by further taking into account instance correlations. Using the above categorization, we summarize major approaches in the field, along with their technical strengths weaknesses, followed by a simple runtime performance comparison, and discussion about emerging active learning applications and instance-selection challenges therein. This survey intends to provide a high-level summa- rization for active learning and motivates interested readers to consider instance-selection approaches for designing effective active learning solutions. Most active learning methods avoid model selection by training models of one type (SVMs, boosted trees, etc.) using one pre-defined set of model hyperparameters. We propose an algorithm that actively samples data to simultaneously train a set of candidate models (different model types and or different hyperparameters) and also select the best model from this set. The algorithm actively samples points for training that are most likely to improve the accuracy of the more promising candidate models, and also samples points for model selection-- all samples count against the same labeling budget. This exposes a natural trade-off between the focused active sampling that is most effective for training models, and the unbiased sampling that is better for model selection. We empirically demonstrate on six test problems that this algorithm is nearly as effective as an active learning oracle that knows the optimal model in advance. Obtaining labels can be expensive or time-consuming, but unlabeled data is often abundant and easier to obtain. Most learning tasks can be made more efficient, in terms of labeling cost, by intelligently choosing specific unlabeled instances to be labeled by an oracle. The general problem of optimally choosing these instances is known as active learning. As it is usually set in the context of supervised learning, active learning relies on a single oracle playing the role of a teacher. We focus on the multiple annotator scenario where an oracle, who knows the ground truth, no longer exists; instead, multiple labelers, with varying expertise, are available for querying. This paradigm posits new challenges to the active learning scenario. We can now ask which data sample should be labeled next and which annotator should be queried to benefit our learning model the most. In this paper, we employ a probabilistic model for learning from multiple annotators that can also learn the annotator expertise even when their expertise may not be consistently accurate across the task domain. We then focus on providing a criterion and formulation that allows us to select both a sample and the annotator s to query the labels from.