In computational complexity theory, a decision problem is NP-complete when it is both in NP and NP-hard. Although a solution to a NP-complete can be verified quickly, there is no known algorithm to solve it in polynomial time. There exists a method to reduce a SAT (Satifiability) problem to Subset Sum Problem (SSP) in the literature, however, it can only be applied to small or medium size problems. Our study is to find an efficient method to transform a SAT problem to a mixed integer linear programming problem in larger size. Observing the feature of variable-clauses constraints in SAT, we apply linear inequality model (LIM) to the problem and propose a method called LIMSAT. The new method can work efficiently for very large size problem with thousands of variables and clauses in SAT tested using up-to-date benchmarks.
Symmetry is another characteristic of SAT problem. Jo @cite_10 present symmetric explanation learning (SEL), in which symmetric clauses are learned only when they are unit or conflicting. 1300 benchmark instances indicate that among GLUCOSE, BREAKID, SEL, SP, SLS, SEL outperforms other four solver configurations and as a dynamic symmetry handling technique, SEL is the first one competitive with static symmetry breaking which is known to the most effective way to handle symmetry. In terms of symmetry, C.K @cite_14 as well propose a method transforming unavoidable sub-graphs to SAT, which can make up for the shortcomings of SAT solvers.
@cite_14 @cite_10
2742197492 2027876313 1510651616 2467514673
The presence of symmetry in Boolean satisfiability (SAT) problem instances often poses challenges to solvers. Currently, the most effective approach to handle symmetry is by static symmetry breaking, which generates asymmetric constraints to add to the instance. An alternative way is to handle symmetry dynamically during solving. As modern SAT solvers can be viewed as propositional proof generators, adding a symmetry rule in a solver’s proof system would be a straightforward technique to handle symmetry dynamically. However, none of these proposed symmetrical learning techniques are competitive to static symmetry breaking. In this paper, we present symmetric explanation learning, a form of symmetrical learning based on learning symmetric images of explanation clauses for unit propagations performed during search. A key idea is that these symmetric clauses are only learned when they would restrict the current search state, i.e., when they are unit or conflicting. We further provide a theoretical discussion on symmetric explanation learning and a working implementation in a state-of-the-art SAT solver. We also present extensive experimental results indicating that symmetric explanation learning is the first symmetrical learning scheme competitive with static symmetry breaking. Instances of the Boolean satisfiability problem (SAT) arise in many areas of circuit design and verification. These instances are typically constructed from some human-designed artifact, and thus are likely to possess much inherent symmetry and sparsity. Previous work[4] has shown that exploiting symmetries results in vastly reduced SAT solver run times, often with the search for the symmetries themselves dominating the total SAT solving time. Our contribution is twofold. First, we dissect the algorithms behind the venerable NAUTY[9] package, particularly the partition refinement procedure responsible for the majority of search space pruning as well as the majority of run time overhead. Second, we present a new symmetry-detection tool, SAUCY, which outperforms NAUTY by several orders of magnitude on the large, structured CNF formulas generated from typical EDA problems. A variational approach to finite connectivity spin-glass-like models is developed and applied to describe the structure of optimal solutions in random satisfiability problems. Our variational scheme accurately reproduces the known replica symmetric results and also allows for the inclusion of replica symmetry breaking effects. For the 3-SAT problem, we find two transitions as the ratio α of logical clauses per Boolean variables increases. At the first one ( a_s 3.96 ), a non-trivial organization of the solution space in geometrically separated clusters emerges. The multiplicity of these clusters as well as the typical distances between different solutions are calculated. At the second threshold ( a_c 4.48 ), satisfying assignments disappear and a finite fraction ( B_o 0.13 ) of variables are overconstrained and take the same values in all optimal (though unsatisfying) assignments. These values have to be compared to ( a_c 4.27 ), ( B_o 0.4 ) obtained from numerical experiments on small instances. Within the present variational approach, the SAT-UNSAT transition naturally appears as a mixture of a first and a second order transition. For the mixed 2+p-SAT with p<2 5, the behavior is as expected much simpler: a unique smooth transition from SAT to UNSAT takes place at ( a_c = 1 (1 - p) ). Symmetry-breaking problems are among the most well studied in the field of distributed computing and yet the most fundamental questions about their complexity remain open. In this article we work in the LOCAL model (where the input graph and underlying distributed network are identical) and study the randomized complexity of four fundamental symmetry-breaking problems on graphs: computing MISs (maximal independent sets), maximal matchings, vertex colorings, and ruling sets. A small sample of our results includes the following: —An MIS algorithm running in O(log2D Δ L 2√log n, and comes close to the Ω(flog Δ log log Δ lower bound of Kuhn, Moscibroda, and Wattenhofer. —A maximal matching algorithm running in O(log Δ + log 4log n) time. This is the first significant improvement to the 1986 algorithm of Israeli and Itai. Moreover, its dependence on Δ is nearly optimal. —A (Δ + 1)-coloring algorithm requiring O(log Δ + 2o(√log log n) time, improving on an O(log Δ + √log n)-time algorithm of Schneider and Wattenhofer. —A method for reducing symmetry-breaking problems in low arboricity degeneracy graphs to low-degree graphs. (Roughly speaking, the arboricity or degeneracy of a graph bounds the density of any subgraph.) Corollaries of this reduction include an O(√log n)-time maximal matching algorithm for graphs with arboricity up to 2√log n and an O(log 2 3n)-time MIS algorithm for graphs with arboricity up to 2(log n)1 3. Each of our algorithms is based on a simple but powerful technique for reducing a randomized symmetry-breaking task to a corresponding deterministic one on a poly(log n)-size graph.