Closeness centrality, first considered by Bavelas (1948), is an importance measure of a node in a network which is based on the distances from the node to all other nodes. The classic definition, proposed by Bavelas (1950), Beauchamp (1965), and Sabidussi (1966), is (the inverse of) the average distance to all other nodes. We propose the first highly scalable (near linear-time processing and linear space overhead) algorithm for estimating, within a small relative error, the classic closeness centralities of all nodes in the graph. Our algorithm applies to undirected graphs, as well as for centrality computed with respect to round-trip distances in directed graphs. For directed graphs, we also propose an efficient algorithm that approximates generalizations of classic closeness centrality to outbound and inbound centralities. Although it does not provide worst-case theoretical approximation guarantees, it is designed to perform well on real networks. We perform extensive experiments on large networks, demonstrating high scalability and accuracy.
Closeness centrality is only one of several common definitions of importance rankings. These include degree centrality, intended to capture activity level, betweenness centrality, which captures power, and eigenvalue centralities, which capture reputation @cite_23 @cite_36 . We only consider the classic definition of closeness centrality. A well-studied alternative is distance-decay closeness centrality, where the contribution of each node to the centrality of another is discounted (is non-increasing) with distance @cite_1 @cite_33 @cite_25 @cite_24 @cite_40 @cite_37 . The subtle difference between distance-decay and classic closeness centrality is that the latter emphasizes the penalties for far nodes, whereas the distance-decay measures instead emphasize the reward from closer nodes. Distance-decay centrality is well defined on disconnected or directed graphs. In terms of scalable computation, efficient algorithms with a small relative error guarantee were known for two decades and engineered to handle graphs with billions of edges @cite_20 @cite_33 @cite_35 @cite_51 @cite_27 @cite_28 @cite_44 @cite_37 . These algorithms, however, provide no guarantees for estimating classic closeness centrality. The intuitive reason is that they are based on sampling that is biased towards closer nodes, whereas correctly estimating classic closeness centrality requires accounting for distant nodes, which can be missed by such a sample.
@cite_35 @cite_37 @cite_33 @cite_36 @cite_28 @cite_1 @cite_24 @cite_44 @cite_40 @cite_27 @cite_23 @cite_51 @cite_25 @cite_20
1536060130 2048468623 1605385825 1029409534
Closeness centrality is an important concept in social network analysis. In a graph representing a social network, closeness centrality measures how close a vertex is to all other vertices in the graph. In this paper, we combine existing methods on calculating exact values and approximate values of closeness centrality and present new algorithms to rank the top-kvertices with the highest closeness centrality. We show that under certain conditions, our algorithm is more efficient than the algorithm that calculates the closeness-centralities of all vertices. Centrality metrics have shown to be highly correlated with the importance and loads of the nodes within the network traffic. In this work, we provide fast incremental algorithms for closeness centrality computation. Our algorithms efficiently compute the closeness centrality values upon changes in network topology, i.e., edge insertions and deletions. We show that the proposed techniques are efficient on many real-life networks, especially on small-world networks, which have a small diameter and spike-shaped shortest distance distribution. We experimentally validate the efficiency of our algorithms on large-scale networks and show that they can update the closeness centrality values of 1.2 million authors in the temporal DBLP-coauthorship network 460 times faster than it would take to recompute them from scratch. Analyzing networks requires complex algorithms to extract meaningful information. Centrality metrics have shown to be correlated with the importance and loads of the nodes in network traffic. Here, we are interested in the problem of centrality-based network management. The problem has many applications such as verifying the robustness of the networks and controlling or improving the entity dissemination. It can be defined as finding a small set of topological network modifications which yield a desired closeness centrality configuration. As a fundamental building block to tackle that problem, we propose incremental algorithms which efficiently update the closeness centrality values upon changes in network topology, i.e., edge insertions and deletions. Our algorithms are proven to be efficient on many real-life networks, especially on small-world networks, which have a small diameter and a spike-shaped shortest distance distribution. In addition to closeness centrality, they can also be a great arsenal for the shortest-path-based management and analysis of the networks. We experimentally validate the efficiency of our algorithms on large networks and show that they update the closeness centrality values of the temporal DBLP-coauthorship network of 1.2 million users 460 times faster than it would take to compute them from scratch. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work which can yield practical large-scale network management based on closeness centrality values. Betweenness centrality is a fundamental measure in social network analysis, expressing the importance or influence of individual vertices (or edges) in a network in terms of the fraction of shortest paths that pass through them. Since exact computation in large networks is prohibitively expensive, we present two efficient randomized algorithms for betweenness estimation. The algorithms are based on random sampling of shortest paths and offer probabilistic guarantees on the quality of the approximation. The first algorithm estimates the betweenness of all vertices (or edges): all approximate values are within an additive factor @math ??(0,1) from the real values, with probability at least @math 1-?. The second algorithm focuses on the top-K vertices (or edges) with highest betweenness and estimate their betweenness value to within a multiplicative factor @math ?, with probability at least @math 1-?. This is the first algorithm that can compute such approximation for the top-K vertices (or edges). By proving upper and lower bounds to the VC-dimension of a range set associated with the problem at hand, we can bound the sample size needed to achieve the desired approximations. We obtain sample sizes that are independent from the number of vertices in the network and only depend on a characteristic quantity that we call the vertex-diameter, that is the maximum number of vertices in a shortest path. In some cases, the sample size is completely independent from any quantitative property of the graph. An extensive experimental evaluation on real and artificial networks shows that our algorithms are significantly faster and much more scalable as the number of vertices grows than other algorithms with similar approximation guarantees.