Recently, the iterative approach named linear tabling has received considerable attention because of its simplicity, ease of implementation, and good space efficiency. Linear tabling is a framework from which different methods can be derived based on the strategies used in handling looping subgoals. One decision concerns when answers are consumed and returned. This paper describes two strategies, namely, lazy and eager strategies, and compares them both qualitatively and quantitatively. The results indicate that, while the lazy strategy has good locality and is well suited for finding all solutions, the eager strategy is comparable in speed with the lazy strategy and is well suited for programs with cuts. Linear tabling relies on depth-first iterative deepening rather than suspension to compute fixpoints. Each cluster of inter-dependent subgoals as represented by a top-most looping subgoal is iteratively evaluated until no subgoal in it can produce any new answers. Naive re-evaluation of all looping subgoals, albeit simple, may be computationally unacceptable. In this paper, we also introduce semi-naive optimization, an effective technique employed in bottom-up evaluation of logic programs to avoid redundant joins of answers, into linear tabling. We give the conditions for the technique to be safe (i.e. sound and complete) and propose an optimization technique called early answer promotion to enhance its effectiveness. Benchmarking in B-Prolog demonstrates that with this optimization linear tabling compares favorably well in speed with the state-of-the-art implementation of SLG.
The two consumption strategies have been compared in XSB @cite_5 as two scheduling strategies. The lazy strategy is called local scheduling and the eager strategy is called single-stack scheduling . Another strategy, called batched scheduling , is similar to local scheduling but top-most looping subgoals do not have to wait until their clusters become complete to return answers. Their experimental results indicate that local scheduling constantly outperforms the other two strategies on stack space and can perform asymptotically better than the other two strategies on speed. The superior performance of local scheduling is attributed to the saving of freezing stack segments. Although our experiment confirms the good space performance of the lazy strategy, it gives a counterintuitive result that the eager strategy is as fast as the lazy strategy. This result implies that the cost of iterative evaluation is considerably smaller than that of freezing stack segments, and for predicates with cuts the eager strategy can be used without significant slow-down. In our tabling system, different answer consumption strategies can be used for different predicates. The tabling system described in @cite_31 also supports mixed strategies.
@cite_5 @cite_31
2130683061 1510598052 2058056324 1517415100
Tabling is an implementation technique that improves the declarativeness and expressiveness of Prolog by reusing answers to subgoals. During tabled execution, several decisions have to be made. These are determined by the scheduling strategy. Whereas a strategy can achieve very good performance for certain applications, for others it might add overheads and even lead to unacceptable inefficiency. The ability of using multiple strategies within the same evaluation can be a means of achieving the best possible performance. In this work, we present how the YapTab system was designed to support dynamic mixed-strategy evaluation of the two most successful tabling scheduling strategies: batched scheduling and local scheduling. We study a processing system comprised of parallel queues, whose individual service rates are specified by a global service mode (configuration). The issue is how to switch the system between various possible service modes, so as to maximize its throughput and maintain stability under the most workload-intensive input traffic traces (arrival processes). Stability preserves the job inflow–outflow balance at each queue on the traffic traces. Two key families of service policies are shown to maximize throughput, under the mild condition that traffic traces have long-term average workload rates. In the first family of cone policies, the service mode is chosen based on the system backlog state belonging to a corresponding cone. Two distinct policy classes of that nature are investigated, MaxProduct and FastEmpty. In the second family of batch policies (BatchAdapt), jobs are collectively scheduled over adaptively chosen horizons, according to an asymptotically optimal, robust schedule. The issues of nonpreemptive job processing and non-negligible switching times between service modes are addressed. The analysis is extended to cover feed-forward networks of such processing systems nodes. The approach taken unifies and generalizes prior studies, by developing a general trace-based modeling framework (sample-path approach) for addressing the queueing stability problem. It treats the queueing structure as a deterministic dynamical system and analyzes directly its evolution trajectories. It does not require any probabilistic superstructure, which is typically used in previous approaches. Probability can be superposed later to address finer performance questions (e.g., delay). The throughput maximization problem is seen to be primarily of structural nature. The developed methodology appears to have broader applicability to other queueing systems. This paper considers the rescheduling of operations with release dates and multiple resources when disruptions prevent the use of a preplanned schedule. The overall strategy is to follow the preschedule until a disruption occurs. After a disruption, part of the schedule is reconstructed to match up with the preschedule at some future time. Conditions are given for the optimality of this approach. A practical implementation is compared with the alternatives of preplanned static scheduling and myopic dynamic scheduling. A set of practical test problems demonstrates the advantages of the matchup approach. We also explore the solution of the matchup scheduling problem and show the advantages of an integer programming approach for allocating resources to jobs. We study the problem of non-preemptive scheduling to minimize energy consumption for devices that allow dynamic voltage scaling. Specifically, consider a device that can process jobs in a non-preemptive manner. The input consists of (i) the set R of available speeds of the device, (ii) a set J of jobs, and (iii) a precedence constraint Π among J. Each job j in J, defined by its arrival time aj, deadline dj, and amount of computation cj, is supposed to be processed by the device at a speed in R. Under the assumption that a higher speed means higher energy consumption, the power-saving scheduling problem is to compute a feasible schedule with speed assignment for the jobs in J such that the required energy consumption is minimized. This paper focuses on the setting of weakly dynamic voltage scaling, i.e., speed change is not allowed in the middle of processing a job. To demonstrate that this restriction on many portable power-aware devices introduces hardness to the power-saving scheduling problem, we prove that the problem is NP-hard even if aj = aj ′ and dj = dj ′ hold for all j,j ′∈ Jand |R|=2. If |R|<∞, we also give fully polynomial-time approximation schemes for two cases of the general NP-hard problem: (a) all jobs share a common arrival time, and (b) Π = ∅ and for any j,j ′ ∈ J, aj ≤ aj ′ implies dj ≤ dj ′. To the best of our knowledge, there is no previously known approximation algorithm for any special case of the NP-hard problem.