The automation of text summarisation of biomedical publications is a pressing need due to the plethora of information available on-line. This paper explores the impact of several supervised machine learning approaches for extracting multi-document summaries for given queries. In particular, we compare classification and regression approaches for query-based extractive summarisation using data provided by the BioASQ Challenge. We tackled the problem of annotating sentences for training classification systems and show that a simple annotation approach outperforms regression-based summarisation.
Another significant work done in this category uses ranking SVM to combine features for extractive query focused multi-document summarisation @cite_18 . In order to do that, a graph-based method was proposed for training data generation by utilizing the sentence relationships and a cost sensitive loss was introduced to improve the robustness of learning. The method outperformed the baseline strategies.
@cite_18
2006928886 2233653089 2097385711 1976727267
In this paper, we explore how to use ranking SVM to train the feature weights for query-focused multi-document summarization. To apply a supervised learning method to sentence extraction in multi-document summarization, we need to derive the sentence labels for training corpus from the existing human labeling data in form of. However, this process is not trivial, because the human summaries are abstractive, and do not necessarily well match the sentences in the documents. In this paper, we try to address the above problem from the following two aspects. First, we make use of sentence-to-sentence relationships to better estimate the probability of a sentence in the document set to be a summary sentence. Second, to make the derived training data less sensitive, we adopt a cost sensitive loss in the ranking SVM's objective function. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method. We describe a legal question answering system which combines legal information retrieval and textual entailment. We have evaluated our system using the data from the first competition on legal information extraction entailment (COLIEE) 2014. The competition focuses on two aspects of legal information processing related to answering yes no questions from Japanese legal bar exams. The shared task consists of two phases: legal ad hoc information retrieval and textual entailment. The first phase requires the identification of Japan civil law articles relevant to a legal bar exam query. We have implemented two unsupervised baseline models (tf-idf and Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA)-based Information Retrieval (IR)), and a supervised model, Ranking SVM, for the task. The features of the model are a set of words, and scores of an article based on the corresponding baseline models. The results show that the Ranking SVM model nearly doubles the Mean Average Precision compared with both baseline models. The second phase is to answer “Yes” or “No” to previously unseen queries, by comparing the meanings of queries with relevant articles. The features used for phase two are syntactic semantic similarities and identification of negation antonym relations. The results show that our method, combined with rule-based model and the unsupervised model, outperforms the SVM-based supervised model. This paper addresses the issue of automatically extracting keyphrases from a document. Previously, this problem was formalized as classification and learning methods for classification were utilized. This paper points out that it is more essential to cast the problem as ranking and employ a learning to rank method to perform the task. Specifically, it employs Ranking SVM, a state-of-art method of learning to rank, in keyphrase extraction. Experimental results on three datasets show that Ranking SVM significantly outperforms the baseline methods of SVM and Naive Bayes, indicating that it is better to exploit learning to rank techniques in keyphrase extraction. This paper focuses on the problem of Question Routing (QR) in Community Question Answering (CQA), which aims to route newly posted questions to the potential answerers who are most likely to answer them. Traditional methods to solve this problem only consider the text similarity features between the newly posted question and the user profile, while ignoring the important statistical features, including the question-specific statistical feature and the user-specific statistical features. Moreover, traditional methods are based on unsupervised learning, which is not easy to introduce the rich features into them. This paper proposes a general framework based on the learning to rank concepts for QR. Training sets consist of triples (q, asker, answerers) are first collected. Then, by introducing the intrinsic relationships between the asker and the answerers in each CQA session to capture the intrinsic labels orders of the users about their expertise degree of the question q, two different methods, including the SVM-based and RankingSVM-based methods, are presented to learn the models with different example creation processes from the training set. Finally, the potential answerers are ranked using the trained models. Extensive experiments conducted on a real world CQA dataset from Stack Overflow show that our proposed two methods can both outperform the traditional query likelihood language model (QLLM) as well as the state-of-the-art Latent Dirichlet Allocation based model (LDA). Specifically, the RankingSVM-based method achieves statistical significant improvements over the SVM-based method and has gained the best performance.