We consider a switched (queuing) network in which there are constraints on which queues may be served simultaneously; such networks have been used to effectively model input-queued switches and wireless networks. The scheduling policy for such a network specifies which queues to serve at any point in time, based on the current state or past history of the system. In the main result of this paper, we provide a new class of online scheduling policies that achieve optimal queue-size scaling for a class of switched networks including input-queued switches. In particular, it establishes the validity of a conjecture (documented in Shah, Tsitsiklis and Zhong [Queueing Syst. 68 (2011) 375-384]) about optimal queue-size scaling for input-queued switches.
In the context of input-queued switches, the example that has primarily motivated this work, the policy that we propose has the average total queue size bounded within factor @math of the same quantity induced by policy, in the heavy-traffic limit. Furthermore, this result does not require conditions like complete resource pooling. More generally, our policy provides non-asymptotic bounds on queue sizes for every arrival rate and switch size. The policy even admits exponential tail bounds with respect to the stationary distribution; and the exponent of these tail bounds is . These results are significant improvements on the state-of-the-art bounds for best performing policies for input-queued switches. As noted in the introduction, our bound on the average total queue size is @math times better than the existing bound for the maximum-weight policy, and @math times better than that for the batching policy in @cite_17 . (Here @math is the number of queues, and @math the system load.) For more details of these results, see @cite_2 .
@cite_2 @cite_17
1984382275 1911070062 2059060883 2065649422
This paper proposes a new class of online policies for scheduling in input-buffered crossbar switches. Given an initial configuration of packets at the input buffers, these policies drain all packets in the system in the minimal amount of time provided that there are no further arrivals. These policies are also throughput optimal for a large class of arrival processes which satisfy strong-law of large numbers. We show that it is possible for policies in our class to be throughput optimal even if they are not constrained to be maximal in every time slot. Most algorithms for switch scheduling take an edge based approach; in contrast, we focus on scheduling (a large enough set of) the most congested ports. This alternate approach allows for lower-complexity algorithms, and also requires a non-standard technique to prove throughput-optimality. One algorithm in our class, Maximum Vertex-weighted Matching (MVM) has worst-case complexity similar to Max-size Matching, and in simulations shows slightly better delay performance than Max-(edge)weighted-Matching (MWM). Combined input and output queued (CIOQ) architectures with a moderate fabric speedupS> 1 have come to play a major role in the design of high performance switches. In this paper we study CIOQ switches with First-In-First-Out (FIFO) buffers providing Quality of Service (QoS) guarantees. The goal of the switch policy is to maximize the total value of packets sent out of the switch. We analyze the performance of a switch policy by means of competitive analysis, where a uniform performance guarantee is provided for all traffic patterns. Azar and Richter [8] proposed an algorithm β-PG(Preemptive Greedy with a preemption factor of β) that is 8-competitive for an arbitrary speedup value when β= 3. We improve upon their result by showing that this algorithm achieves a competitive ratio of 7.5 and 7.47 for β= 3 and β= 2.8, respectively. Basically, we demonstrate that β-PGis at most @math and at least @math -competitive. .We consider a class of stochastic processing networks. Assume that the networks satisfy a complete resource pooling condition. We prove that each maximum pressure policy asymptotically minimizes the workload process in a stochastic processing network in heavy traffic. We also show that, under each quadratic holding cost structure, there is a maximum pressure policy that asymptotically minimizes the holding cost. A key to the optimality proofs is to prove a state space collapse result and a heavy traffic limit theorem for the network processes under a maximum pressure policy. We extend a framework of Bramson [Queueing Systems Theory Appl. 30 (1998) 89–148] and Williams [Queueing Systems Theory Appl. 30 (1998b) 5–25] from the multiclass queueing network setting to the stochastic processing network setting to prove the state space collapse result and the heavy traffic limit theorem. The extension can be adapted to other studies of stochastic processing networks. 1. Introduction. This paper is a continuation of Dai and Lin (2005), in which maximum pressure policies are shown to be throughput optimal for a class of stochastic processing networks. Throughput optimality is an important, first-order objective for many networks, but it ignores some key secondary performance measures like queueing delays experienced by jobs in these networks. In this paper we show that maximum pressure policies enjoy additional optimality properties; they are asymptotically optimal in minimizing a certain workload or holding cost of a stochastic processing network. Stochastic processing networks have been introduced in a series of three papers by Harrison (2000, 2002, 2003). In Dai and Lin (2005) and this paper we consider a special class of Harrison’s model. This class of stochastic processing networks is much more general than multiclass queueing networks that have been a subject of intensive study in the last 20 years; see, for example, Harrison (1988), Williams We review some known results and state a few versions of an open problem related to the scaling of the total queue size (in steady state) in an n×n input-queued switch, as a function of the port number n and the load factor ?. Loosely speaking, the question is whether the total number of packets in queue, under either the maximum weight policy or under an optimal policy, scales (ignoring any logarithmic factors) as O(n (1??)).