We present exponential finite-sample nonasymptotic deviation inequalities for the SAA estimator's near-optimal solution set over the class of stochastic optimization problems with heavy-tailed random H "older continuous functions in the objective and constraints. Such setting is better suited for problems where a sub-Gaussian data generating distribution is less expected, e.g., in stochastic portfolio optimization. One of our contributions is to exploit of the perturbed objective and the perturbed constraints as a property which entails deviation inequalities for joint feasibility and optimality guarantees. This means that our bounds are significantly tighter in terms of diameter and metric entropy since they depend only on the near-optimal solution set but not on the whole feasible set. As a result, we obtain a much sharper sample complexity estimate when compared to a general nonconvex problem. In our analysis, we derive some localized deterministic perturbation error bounds for convex optimization problems which are of independent interest. To obtain our results, we only assume a metric regular convex feasible set, possibly not satisfying the Slater condition and not having a metric regular solution set. In this general setting, joint near feasibility and near optimality are guaranteed. If in addition the set satisfies the Slater condition, we obtain finite-sample simultaneous exact feasibility and near optimality guarantees. Another contribution of our work is to present, as a proof of concept of our localized techniques, a persistent result for a variant of the LASSO estimator under very weak assumptions on the data generating distribution.
We remark that our analysis only requires MR convex , possibly not satisfying the SCQ and without a MR . In such case, our bounds imply near feasibility guarantees. Nevertheless, our results in Theorems - and Corollary of Section also give an interesting transition regime'' for feasible sets satisfying the SCQ. For sample size @math , it is guaranteed a @math - and @math -near optimality. For sample sizes satisfying @math , and @math -near optimality is guaranteed with high-probability, where @math is an error associated to set approximation (see Section for details). Here, @math and @math change but are still given in terms of @math . Moreover, if the problem admits an interior solution, @math is removed. See also Proposition 1 in @cite_5 .
@cite_5
2001663593 2517669009 2911793117 2088419249
par>We prove some non-approximability results for restrictions of basic combinatorial optimization problems to instances of bounded “degreeror bounded “width.” Specifically: We prove that the Max 3SAT problem on instances where each variable occurs in at most B clauses, is hard to approximate to within a factor @math , unless @math . H stad [18] proved that the problem is approximable to within a factor @math in polynomial time, and that is hard to approximate to within a factor @math . Our result uses a new randomized reduction from general instances of Max 3SAT to bounded-occurrences instances. The randomized reduction applies to other Max SNP problems as well. We observe that the Set Cover problem on instances where each set has size at most B is hard to approximate to within a factor @math unless @math . The result follows from an appropriate setting of parameters in Feige's reduction [11]. This is essentially tight in light of the existence of @math -approximate algorithms [20, 23, 9] We present a new PCP construction, based on applying parallel repetition to the inner verifier,'' and we provide a tight analysis for it. Using the new construction, and some modifications to known reductions from PCP to Hitting Set, we prove that Hitting Set with sets of size B is hard to approximate to within a factor @math . The problem can be approximated to within a factor B [19], and it is the Vertex Cover problem for B =2. The relationship between hardness of approximation and set size seems to have not been explored before. We observe that the Independent Set problem on graphs having degree at most B is hard to approximate to within a factor @math , unless P = NP . This follows from a comination of results by Clementi and Trevisan [28] and Reingold, Vadhan and Wigderson [27]. It had been observed that the problem is hard to approximate to within a factor @math unless P = NP [1]. An algorithm achieving factor @math is also known [21, 2, 30, 16 . In stochastic convex optimization the goal is to minimize a convex function @math over a convex set @math where @math is some unknown distribution and each @math in the support of @math is convex over @math . The optimization is commonly based on i.i.d. samples @math from @math . A standard approach to such problems is empirical risk minimization (ERM) that optimizes @math . Here we consider the question of how many samples are necessary for ERM to succeed and the closely related question of uniform convergence of @math to @math over @math . We demonstrate that in the standard @math setting of Lipschitz-bounded functions over a @math of bounded radius, ERM requires sample size that scales linearly with the dimension @math . This nearly matches standard upper bounds and improves on @math dependence proved for @math setting by Shalev- (2009). In stark contrast, these problems can be solved using dimension-independent number of samples for @math setting and @math dependence for @math setting using other approaches. We further show that our lower bound applies even if the functions in the support of @math are smooth and efficiently computable and even if an @math regularization term is added. Finally, we demonstrate that for a more general class of bounded-range (but not Lipschitz-bounded) stochastic convex programs an infinite gap appears already in dimension 2. Consider a Markov decision process (MDP) that admits a set of state-action features, which can linearly express the process's probabilistic transition model. We propose a parametric Q-learning algorithm that finds an approximate-optimal policy using a sample size proportional to the feature dimension @math and invariant with respect to the size of the state space. To further improve its sample efficiency, we exploit the monotonicity property and intrinsic noise structure of the Bellman operator, provided the existence of anchor state-actions that imply implicit non-negativity in the feature space. We augment the algorithm using techniques of variance reduction, monotonicity preservation, and confidence bounds. It is proved to find a policy which is @math -optimal from any initial state with high probability using @math sample transitions for arbitrarily large-scale MDP with a discount factor @math . A matching information-theoretical lower bound is proved, confirming the sample optimality of the proposed method with respect to all parameters (up to polylog factors). Many NP-complete constraint satisfaction problems appear to undergo a “phase transition” from solubility to insolubility when the constraint density passes through a critical threshold. In all such cases it is easy to derive upper bounds on the location of the threshold by showing that above a certain density the first moment (expectation) of the number of solutions tends to zero. We show that in the case of certain symmetric constraints, considering the second moment of the number of solutions yields nearly matching lower bounds for the location of the threshold. Specifically, we prove that the threshold for both random hypergraph 2-colorability (Property B) and random Not-All-Equal @math -SAT is @math . As a corollary, we establish that the threshold for random @math -SAT is of order @math , resolving a long-standing open problem.