LCLs or locally checkable labelling problems (e.g. maximal independent set, maximal matching, and vertex colouring) in the LOCAL model of computation are very well-understood in cycles (toroidal 1-dimensional grids): every problem has a complexity of @math , @math , or @math , and the design of optimal algorithms can be fully automated. This work develops the complexity theory of LCL problems for toroidal 2-dimensional grids. The complexity classes are the same as in the 1-dimensional case: @math , @math , and @math . However, given an LCL problem it is undecidable whether its complexity is @math or @math in 2-dimensional grids. Nevertheless, if we correctly guess that the complexity of a problem is @math , we can completely automate the design of optimal algorithms. For any problem we can find an algorithm that is of a normal form @math , where @math is a finite function, @math is an algorithm for finding a maximal independent set in @math th power of the grid, and @math is a constant. Finally, partially with the help of automated design tools, we classify the complexity of several concrete LCL problems related to colourings and orientations.
Recently @cite_4 showed that there are further gaps in the time complexities of problems. They gave a speed-up lemma for simulating any deterministic @math -time algorithm in time @math by computing new small and locally unique identifiers for the input graph. This implies that there are no problems with deterministic complexity @math and @math . They also show that the deterministic complexity of an on instances of size @math is at most the randomised complexity on instances of size @math . This implies a similar gap for randomised complexities between @math and @math .
@cite_4
2609730020 2279830512 1564010364 2343345052
The celebrated Time Hierarchy Theorem for Turing machines states, informally, that more problems can be solved given more time. The extent to which a time hierarchy-type theorem holds in the distributed LOCAL model has been open for many years. It is consistent with previous results that all natural problems in the LOCAL model can be classified according to a small constant number of complexities, such as @math , etc. In this paper we establish the first time hierarchy theorem for the LOCAL model and prove that several gaps exist in the LOCAL time hierarchy. 1. We define an infinite set of simple coloring problems called Hierarchical @math -Coloring . A correctly colored graph can be confirmed by simply checking the neighborhood of each vertex, so this problem fits into the class of locally checkable labeling (LCL) problems. However, the complexity of the @math -level Hierarchical @math -Coloring problem is @math , for @math . The upper and lower bounds hold for both general graphs and trees, and for both randomized and deterministic algorithms. 2. Consider any LCL problem on bounded degree trees. We prove an automatic-speedup theorem that states that any randomized @math -time algorithm solving the LCL can be transformed into a deterministic @math -time algorithm. Together with a previous result, this establishes that on trees, there are no natural deterministic complexities in the ranges @math --- @math or @math --- @math . 3. We expose a gap in the randomized time hierarchy on general graphs. Any randomized algorithm that solves an LCL problem in sublogarithmic time can be sped up to run in @math time, which is the complexity of the distributed Lovasz local lemma problem, currently known to be @math and @math . Over the past 30 years numerous algorithms have been designed for symmetry breaking problems in the LOCAL model, such as maximal matching, MIS, vertex coloring, and edge-coloring. For most problems the best randomized algorithm is at least exponentially faster than the best deterministic algorithm. In this paper we prove that these exponential gaps are necessary and establish connections between the deterministic and randomized complexities in the LOCAL model. Each result has a very compelling take-away message: 1. Fast @math -coloring of trees requires random bits: Building on the recent lower bounds of , we prove that the randomized complexity of @math -coloring a tree with maximum degree @math is @math , whereas its deterministic complexity is @math for any @math . This also establishes a large separation between the deterministic complexity of @math -coloring and @math -coloring trees. 2. Randomized lower bounds imply deterministic lower bounds: We prove that any deterministic algorithm for a natural class of problems that runs in @math rounds can be transformed to run in @math rounds. If the transformed algorithm violates a lower bound (even allowing randomization), then one can conclude that the problem requires @math time deterministically. 3. Deterministic lower bounds imply randomized lower bounds: We prove that the randomized complexity of any natural problem on instances of size @math is at least its deterministic complexity on instances of size @math . This shows that a deterministic @math lower bound for any problem implies a randomized @math lower bound. It also illustrates that the graph shattering technique is absolutely essential to the LOCAL model. Thorup and Zwick showed that for any integer k≥ 1, it is possible to preprocess any positively weighted undirected graph G=(V,E), with |E|=m and |V|=n, in O(kmn @math ) expected time and construct a data structure (a (2k–1)-approximate distance oracle) of size O(kn @math ) capable of returning in O(k) time an approximation @math of the distance δ(u,v) from u to v in G that satisfies @math , for any two vertices u,v∈ V. They also presented a much slower O(kmn) time deterministic algorithm for constructing approximate distance oracle with the slightly larger size of O(kn @math log n). We present here a deterministic O(kmn @math ) time algorithm for constructing oracles of size O(kn @math ). Our deterministic algorithm is slower than the randomized one by only a logarithmic factor. Using our derandomization technique we also obtain the first deterministic linear time algorithm for constructing optimal spanners of weighted graphs. We do that by derandomizing the O(km) expected time algorithm of Baswana and Sen (ICALP’03) for constructing (2k–1)-spanners of size O(kn @math ) of weighted undirected graphs without incurring any asymptotic loss in the running time or in the size of the spanners produced. This paper concerns the worst-case complexity of Gauss-Seidel method for solving a positive semi-definite linear system; or equivalently, that of cyclic coordinate descent (C-CD) for minimizing a convex quadratic function. The known provable complexity of C-CD can be @math times slower than gradient descent (GD) and @math times slower than randomized coordinate descent (R-CD). However, these gaps seem rather puzzling since so far they have not been observed in practice; in fact, C-CD usually converges much faster than GD and sometimes comparable to R-CD. Thus some researchers believe the gaps are due to the weakness of the proof, but not that of the C-CD algorithm itself. In this paper we show that the gaps indeed exist. We prove that there exists an example for which C-CD takes at least @math or @math operations, where @math is the condition number, @math is a well-studied quantity that determines the convergence rate of R-CD, and @math hides the dependency on @math . This implies that C-CD can indeed be @math times slower than GD, and @math times slower than R-CD in the worst case. Our result establishes one of the few examples in continuous optimization that demonstrates a large gap between a deterministic algorithm and its randomized counterpart. Based on the example, we establish several almost tight complexity bounds of C-CD for quadratic problems. One difficulty with the analysis of the constructed example is that the spectral radius of a non-symmetric iteration matrix does not necessarily constitutes a lower bound for the convergence rate.