We introduce a new approach for designing computationally efficient learning algorithms that are tolerant to noise. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach by designing algorithms with improved noise tolerance guarantees for learning linear separators. We consider the malicious noise model of Valiant and the adversarial label noise model of Kearns, Schapire, and Sellie. For malicious noise, where the adversary can corrupt an @math of fraction both the label part and the feature part, we provide a polynomial-time algorithm for learning linear separators in @math under the uniform distribution with near information-theoretic optimal noise tolerance of @math . We also get similar improvements for the adversarial label noise model. We obtain similar results for more general classes of distributions including isotropic log-concave distributions. In addition, our algorithms achieve a label complexity whose dependence on the error parameter @math is exponentially better than that of any passive algorithm. This provides the first polynomial-time active learning algorithm for learning linear separators in the presence of adversarial label noise, as well as the first analysis of active learning under the malicious noise model.
@cite_20 @cite_48 online learning algorithms in the selective sampling framework are presented, where labels must be actively queried before they are revealed. Under the assumption that the label conditional distribution is a linear function determined by a fixed target vector, they provide bounds on the regret of the algorithm and on the number of labels it queries when faced with an adaptive adversarial strategy of generating the instances. As pointed out in @cite_48 , these results can also be converted to a distributional PAC setting where instances @math are drawn i.i.d. In this setting they obtain exponential improvement in label complexity over passive learning. These interesting results and techniques are not directly comparable to ours. Our framework is not restricted to halfspaces. Another important difference is that (as pointed out in @cite_7 ) the exponential improvement they give is not possible in the noiseless version of their setting. In other words, the addition of linear noise defined by the target makes the problem easier for active sampling. By contrast RCN can only make the classification task harder than in the realizable case.
@cite_48 @cite_7 @cite_20
2132162087 2147004922 2605194399 2963402790
We introduce efficient margin-based algorithms for selective sampling and filtering in binary classification tasks. Experiments on real-world textual data reveal that our algorithms perform significantly better than popular and similarly efficient competitors. Using the so-called Mammen-Tsybakov low noise condition to parametrize the instance distribution, and assuming linear label noise, we show bounds on the convergence rate to the Bayes risk of a weaker adaptive variant of our selective sampler. Our analysis reveals that, excluding logarithmic factors, the average risk of this adaptive sampler converges to the Bayes risk at rate N ?(1+?)(2+?) 2(3+?) where N denotes the number of queried labels, and ?>0 is the exponent in the low noise condition. For all @math this convergence rate is asymptotically faster than the rate N ?(1+?) (2+?) achieved by the fully supervised version of the base selective sampler, which queries all labels. Moreover, for ??? (hard margin condition) the gap between the semi- and fully-supervised rates becomes exponential. We present a new online learning algorithm in the selective sampling framework, where labels must be actively queried before they are revealed. We prove bounds on the regret of our algorithm and on the number of labels it queries when faced with an adaptive adversarial strategy of generating the instances. Our bounds both generalize and strictly improve over previous bounds in similar settings. Additionally, our selective sampling algorithm can be converted into an efficient statistical active learning algorithm. We extend our algorithm and analysis to the multiple-teacher setting, where the algorithm can choose which subset of teachers to query for each label. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our techniques on a real-world Internet search problem. We consider a crowd-sourcing problem where in the process of labeling massive data sets, multiple labelers with unknown annotation quality must be selected to perform the labeling task for each incoming data sample or task, with the results aggregated using for example simple or weighted majority voting rule. In this paper, we approach this labeler selection problem in an online learning framework, whereby the quality of the labeling outcome by a specific set of labelers is estimated so that the learning algorithm over time learns to use the most effective combinations of labelers. This type of online learning in some sense falls under the family of multi-armed bandit (MAB) problems, but with a distinct feature not commonly seen: since the data is unlabeled to begin with and the labelers’ quality is unknown, their labeling outcome (or reward in the MAB context) cannot be readily verified; it can only be estimated against the crowd and be known probabilistically. We design an efficient online algorithm LS_OL using a simple majority voting rule that can differentiate high and low quality labelers over time, and is shown to have a regret (with respect to always using the optimal set of labelers) of @math uniformly in time under mild assumptions on the collective quality of the crowd, thus regret free in the average sense. We discuss further performance improvement by using a more sophisticated majority voting rule, and show how to detect and filter out “bad” (dishonest, malicious or very incompetent) labelers to further enhance the quality of crowd-sourcing. Extension to the case when a labeler’s quality is task-type dependent is also discussed using techniques from the literature on continuous arms. We establish a lower bound on the order of @math , where @math is an arbitrary function such that @math . We further provide a matching upper bound through a minor modification of the algorithm we proposed and studied earlier on. We present numerical results using both simulation and set of images labeled by amazon mechanic turks. We provide new results concerning label efficient, polynomial time, passive and active learning of linear separators. We prove that active learning provides an exponential improvement over PAC (passive) learning of homogeneouslinear separators under nearly log-concave distributions. Building on this, we provide a computationally efficient PAC algorithm with optimal (up to a constant factor) sample complexity for such problems. This resolves an open question of (Long, 1995, 2003; , 2009) concerning the sample complexity of efficient PAC algorithms under the uniformdistribution in the unit ball. Moreover,it providesthe first bound for a polynomial-time PAC algorithm that is tight for an interesting infinite class of hypothesis functions under a general and natural class of data-distributions, providing significant progress towards a longstanding open question of (, 1989; , 1989). We also provide new bounds for active and passive learning in the case that the data might not be linearly separable, both in the agnostic case and and underthe Tsybakovlow-noisecondition. To derive our results, we provide new structural results for (nearly) log-concave distributions, which might be of independent interest as well.