Objective assessment of image quality is fundamentally important in many image processing tasks. In this paper, we focus on learning blind image quality assessment (BIQA) models, which predict the quality of a digital image with no access to its original pristine-quality counterpart as reference. One of the biggest challenges in learning BIQA models is the conflict between the gigantic image space (which is in the dimension of the number of image pixels) and the extremely limited reliable ground truth data for training. Such data are typically collected via subjective testing, which is cumbersome, slow, and expensive. Here, we first show that a vast amount of reliable training data in the form of quality-discriminable image pairs (DIPs) can be obtained automatically at low cost by exploiting large-scale databases with diverse image content. We then learn an opinion-unaware BIQA (OU-BIQA, meaning that no subjective opinions are used for training) model using RankNet, a pairwise learning-to-rank (L2R) algorithm, from millions of DIPs, each associated with a perceptual uncertainty level, leading to a DIP inferred quality (dipIQ) index. Extensive experiments on four benchmark IQA databases demonstrate that dipIQ outperforms the state-of-the-art OU-BIQA models. The robustness of dipIQ is also significantly improved as confirmed by the group MAximum Differentiation competition method. Furthermore, we extend the proposed framework by learning models with ListNet (a listwise L2R algorithm) on quality-discriminable image lists (DIL). The resulting DIL inferred quality index achieves an additional performance gain.
Pairwise approaches assume that the relative order between two instances is known or can be inferred from other ground truth formats. The goal is to minimize the number of misclassified instance pairs. In the extreme case, if all instance pairs are correctly classified, they will be correctly ranked @cite_84 . In RankSVM @cite_49 , Joachims creatively generated training pairs from clickthrough data and reformulated SVM to learn the score function @math from instance pairs. Proposed in 2005, RankNet @cite_75 was probably the first L2R algorithm used by commercial search engines, which had a typical neural network with a weight-sharing scheme forming its skeleton. Tsai @cite_31 replaced RankNet's loss function @cite_75 with a fidelity loss originating from quantum physics. In this paper, RankNet is adopted as the default pairwise L2R algorithm to learn OU-BIQA models for reasons that will be described later. RankBoost @cite_15 is another well-known pairwise L2R algorithm based on AdaBoost @cite_94 with an exponential loss.
@cite_15 @cite_84 @cite_49 @cite_31 @cite_75 @cite_94
2108862644 2061545541 2091158010 1990016442
The paper is concerned with learning to rank, which is to construct a model or a function for ranking objects. Learning to rank is useful for document retrieval, collaborative filtering, and many other applications. Several methods for learning to rank have been proposed, which take object pairs as 'instances' in learning. We refer to them as the pairwise approach in this paper. Although the pairwise approach offers advantages, it ignores the fact that ranking is a prediction task on list of objects. The paper postulates that learning to rank should adopt the listwise approach in which lists of objects are used as 'instances' in learning. The paper proposes a new probabilistic method for the approach. Specifically it introduces two probability models, respectively referred to as permutation probability and top k probability, to define a listwise loss function for learning. Neural Network and Gradient Descent are then employed as model and algorithm in the learning method. Experimental results on information retrieval show that the proposed listwise approach performs better than the pairwise approach. Pair wise learning to rank algorithms (such as Rank SVM) teach a machine how to rank objects given a collection of ordered object pairs. However, their accuracy is highly dependent on the abundance of training data. To address this limitation and reduce annotation efforts, the framework of active pair wise learning to rank was introduced recently. However, in such a framework the number of possible query pairs increases quadratic ally with the number of instances. In this work, we present the first scalable pair wise query selection method using a layered (two-step) hashing framework. The first step relevance hashing aims to retrieve the strongly relevant or highly ranked points, and the second step uncertainty hashing is used to nominate pairs whose ranking is uncertain. The proposed framework aims to efficiently reduce the search space of pair wise queries and can be used with any pair wise learning to rank algorithm with a linear ranking function. We evaluate our approach on large-scale real problems and show it has comparable performance to exhaustive search. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, and validate the efficiency of hashing in accelerating the search of massive pair wise queries. This paper aims to conduct a study on the listwise approach to learning to rank. The listwise approach learns a ranking function by taking individual lists as instances and minimizing a loss function defined on the predicted list and the ground-truth list. Existing work on the approach mainly focused on the development of new algorithms; methods such as RankCosine and ListNet have been proposed and good performances by them have been observed. Unfortunately, the underlying theory was not sufficiently studied so far. To amend the problem, this paper proposes conducting theoretical analysis of learning to rank algorithms through investigations on the properties of the loss functions, including consistency, soundness, continuity, differentiability, convexity, and efficiency. A sufficient condition on consistency for ranking is given, which seems to be the first such result obtained in related research. The paper then conducts analysis on three loss functions: likelihood loss, cosine loss, and cross entropy loss. The latter two were used in RankCosine and ListNet. The use of the likelihood loss leads to the development of a new listwise method called ListMLE, whose loss function offers better properties, and also leads to better experimental results. We study the problem of label ranking, a machine learning task that consists of inducing a mapping from instances to rankings over a finite number of labels. Our learning method, referred to as ranking by pairwise comparison (RPC), first induces pairwise order relations (preferences) from suitable training data, using a natural extension of so-called pairwise classification. A ranking is then derived from a set of such relations by means of a ranking procedure. In this paper, we first elaborate on a key advantage of such a decomposition, namely the fact that it allows the learner to adapt to different loss functions without re-training, by using different ranking procedures on the same predicted order relations. In this regard, we distinguish between two types of errors, called, respectively, ranking error and position error. Focusing on the position error, which has received less attention so far, we then propose a ranking procedure called ranking through iterated choice as well as an efficient pairwise implementation thereof. Apart from a theoretical justification of this procedure, we offer empirical evidence in favor of its superior performance as a risk minimizer for the position error.