In this study, we aim to identify moments of rudeness between two individuals. In particular, we segment all occurrences of rudeness in conversations into three broad, distinct categories and try to identify each. We show how machine learning algorithms can be used to identify rudeness based on acoustic and semantic signals extracted from conversations. Furthermore, we make note of our shortcomings in this task and highlight what makes this problem inherently difficult. Finally, we provide next steps which are needed to ensure further success in identifying rudeness in conversations.
Also, neural word embeddings are useful for identifying speech disfluencies (e.g., um", mid-sentence restarts, etc.) @cite_11 and can achieve an F1 score greater than 0.85 using a bi-directional LSTM neural network on the Switchboard corpus of telephone conversation transcripts. This approach is particularly interesting because conversational text is different from spoken language in that it does not contain speech disfluencies. In theory, any algorithm which aims to successfully identify rude conversational behaviour must be robust against speech disfluencies.
@cite_11
2752172973 2802973008 2951015274 2267805933
The success of neural network methods for computing word embeddings has motivated methods for generating semantic embeddings of longer pieces of text, such as sentences and paragraphs. Surprisingly, (ICLR'16) showed that such complicated methods are outperformed, especially in out-of-domain (transfer learning) settings, by simpler methods involving mild retraining of word embeddings and basic linear regression. The method of requires retraining with a substantial labeled dataset such as Paraphrase Database (, 2013). @PARASPLIT The current paper goes further, showing that the following completely unsupervised sentence embedding is a formidable baseline: Use word embeddings computed using one of the popular methods on unlabeled corpus like Wikipedia, represent the sentence by a weighted average of the word vectors, and then modify them a bit using PCA SVD. This weighting improves performance by about 10 to 30 in textual similarity tasks, and beats sophisticated supervised methods including RNN's and LSTM's. It even improves 's embeddings. This simple method should be used as the baseline to beat in future, especially when labeled training data is scarce or nonexistent. @PARASPLIT The paper also gives a theoretical explanation of the success of the above unsupervised method using a latent variable generative model for sentences, which is a simple extension of the model in (TACL'16) with new "smoothing" terms that allow for words occurring out of context, as well as high probabilities for words like and, not in all contexts. The effectiveness of introducing deep neural networks into conventional speaker recognition pipelines has been broadly shown to benefit system performance. A novel text-independent speaker verification (SV) framework based on the triplet loss and a very deep convolutional neural network architecture (i.e., Inception-Resnet-v1) are investigated in this study, where a fixed-length speaker discriminative embedding is learned from sparse speech features and utilized as a feature representation for the SV tasks. A concise description of the neural network based speaker discriminative training with triplet loss is presented. An Euclidean distance similarity metric is applied in both network training and SV testing, which ensures the SV system to follow an end-to-end fashion. By replacing the final max average pooling layer with a spatial pyramid pooling layer in the Inception-Resnet-v1 architecture, the fixed-length input constraint is relaxed and an obvious performance gain is achieved compared with the fixed-length input speaker embedding system. For datasets with more severe training test condition mismatches, the probabilistic linear discriminant analysis (PLDA) back end is further introduced to replace the distance based scoring for the proposed speaker embedding system. Thus, we reconstruct the SV task with a neural network based front-end speaker embedding system and a PLDA that provides channel and noise variabilities compensation in the back end. Extensive experiments are conducted to provide useful hints that lead to a better testing performance. Comparison with the state-of-the-art SV frameworks on three public datasets (i.e., a prompt speech corpus, a conversational speech Switchboard corpus, and NIST SRE10 10 s–10 s condition) justifies the effectiveness of our proposed speaker embedding system. Lipreading, i.e. speech recognition from visual-only recordings of a speaker's face, can be achieved with a processing pipeline based solely on neural networks, yielding significantly better accuracy than conventional methods. Feed-forward and recurrent neural network layers (namely Long Short-Term Memory; LSTM) are stacked to form a single structure which is trained by back-propagating error gradients through all the layers. The performance of such a stacked network was experimentally evaluated and compared to a standard Support Vector Machine classifier using conventional computer vision features (Eigenlips and Histograms of Oriented Gradients). The evaluation was performed on data from 19 speakers of the publicly available GRID corpus. With 51 different words to classify, we report a best word accuracy on held-out evaluation speakers of 79.6 using the end-to-end neural network-based solution (11.6 improvement over the best feature-based solution evaluated). Lipreading, i.e. speech recognition from visual-only recordings of a speaker's face, can be achieved with a processing pipeline based solely on neural networks, yielding significantly better accuracy than conventional methods. Feedforward and recurrent neural network layers (namely Long Short-Term Memory; LSTM) are stacked to form a single structure which is trained by back-propagating error gradients through all the layers. The performance of such a stacked network was experimentally evaluated and compared to a standard Support Vector Machine classifier using conventional computer vision features (Eigenlips and Histograms of Oriented Gradients). The evaluation was performed on data from 19 speakers of the publicly available GRID corpus. With 51 different words to classify, we report a best word accuracy on held-out evaluation speakers of 79.6 using the end-to-end neural network-based solution (11.6 improvement over the best feature-based solution evaluated).