Non-convex optimization problems arise from various areas in science and engineering. Although many numerical methods and theories have been developed for unconstrained non-convex problems, the parallel development for constrained non-convex problems remains limited. That restricts the practices of mathematical modeling and quantitative decision making in many disciplines. In this paper, an inexact proximal-point penalty method is proposed for constrained optimization problems where both the objective function and the constraint can be non-convex. The proposed method approximately solves a sequence of subproblems, each of which is formed by adding to the original objective function a proximal term and quadratic penalty terms associated to the constraint functions. Under a weak-convexity assumption, each subproblem is made strongly convex and can be solved effectively to a required accuracy by an optimal gradient-type method. The theoretical property of the proposed method is analyzed in two different cases. In the first case, the objective function is non-convex but the constraint functions are assumed to be convex, while in the second case, both the objective function and the constraint are non-convex. For both cases, we give the complexity results in terms of the number of function value and gradient evaluations to produce near-stationary points. Due to the different structures, different definitions of near-stationary points are given for the two cases. The complexity for producing a nearly @math -stationary point is @math for the first case while it becomes @math for the second case.
Barrier methods @cite_54 @cite_83 @cite_56 @cite_74 @cite_16 @cite_11 @cite_3 @cite_36 @cite_13 are another traditional class of algorithms for constrained optimization. Similar to the penalty methods, they also solve a sequence of unconstrained subproblems with barrier functions added to objective function. The barrier functions will increase to infinity as the iterates approach the boundary of the feasible set, and thus enforce the iterates to stay in the interior of the feasible set. However, the convergence rate of barrier methods is only shown when the problem is convex @cite_3 @cite_36 @cite_13 @cite_5 , and only asymptotic convergence analysis is available for non-convex problems.
@cite_36 @cite_54 @cite_3 @cite_56 @cite_83 @cite_74 @cite_5 @cite_16 @cite_13 @cite_11
2962853966 2893640118 2011430287 1986891697
In this paper, we analyze the convergence of the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) for minimizing a nonconvex and possibly nonsmooth objective function, ( (x_0, ,x_p,y) ), subject to coupled linear equality constraints. Our ADMM updates each of the primal variables (x_0, ,x_p,y ), followed by updating the dual variable. We separate the variable y from (x_i )’s as it has a special role in our analysis. The developed convergence guarantee covers a variety of nonconvex functions such as piecewise linear functions, ( _q ) quasi-norm, Schatten-q quasi-norm ( (0<q<1 )), minimax concave penalty (MCP), and smoothly clipped absolute deviation penalty. It also allows nonconvex constraints such as compact manifolds (e.g., spherical, Stiefel, and Grassman manifolds) and linear complementarity constraints. Also, the (x_0 )-block can be almost any lower semi-continuous function. By applying our analysis, we show, for the first time, that several ADMM algorithms applied to solve nonconvex models in statistical learning, optimization on manifold, and matrix decomposition are guaranteed to converge. Our results provide sufficient conditions for ADMM to converge on (convex or nonconvex) monotropic programs with three or more blocks, as they are special cases of our model. ADMM has been regarded as a variant to the augmented Lagrangian method (ALM). We present a simple example to illustrate how ADMM converges but ALM diverges with bounded penalty parameter ( ). Indicated by this example and other analysis in this paper, ADMM might be a better choice than ALM for some nonconvex nonsmooth problems, because ADMM is not only easier to implement, it is also more likely to converge for the concerned scenarios. We develop two new proximal alternating penalty algorithms to solve a wide range class of constrained convex optimization problems. Our approach mainly relies on a novel combination of the classical quadratic penalty, alternating minimization, Nesterov’s acceleration, adaptive strategy for parameters. The first algorithm is designed to solve generic and possibly nonsmooth constrained convex problems without requiring any Lipschitz gradient continuity or strong convexity, while achieving the best-known ( O ( 1 k ) )-convergence rate in a non-ergodic sense, where k is the iteration counter. The second algorithm is also designed to solve non-strongly convex, but semi-strongly convex problems. This algorithm can achieve the best-known ( O ( 1 k^2 ) )-convergence rate on the primal constrained problem. Such a rate is obtained in two cases: (1) averaging only on the iterate sequence of the strongly convex term, or (2) using two proximal operators of this term without averaging. In both algorithms, we allow one to linearize the second subproblem to use the proximal operator of the corresponding objective term. Then, we customize our methods to solve different convex problems, and lead to new variants. As a byproduct, these algorithms preserve the same convergence guarantees as in our main algorithms. We verify our theoretical development via different numerical examples and compare our methods with some existing state-of-the-art algorithms. Many scientific and engineering applications feature nonsmooth convex minimization problems over convex sets. In this paper, we address an important instance of this broad class where we assume that the nonsmooth objective is equipped with a tractable proximity operator and that the convex constraint set affords a self-concordant barrier. We provide a new joint treatment of proximal and self-concordant barrier concepts and illustrate that such problems can be efficiently solved, without the need of lifting the problem dimensions, as in disciplined convex optimization approach. We propose an inexact path-following algorithmic framework and theoretically characterize the worst-case analytical complexity of this framework when the proximal subproblems are solved inexactly. To show the merits of our framework, we apply its instances to both synthetic and real-world applications, where it shows advantages over standard interior point methods. As a byproduct, we describe how our framework can obtain points on t... Interior gradient (subgradient) and proximal methods for convex constrained minimization have been much studied, in particular for optimization problems over the nonnegative octant. These methods are using non-Euclidean projections and proximal distance functions to exploit the geometry of the constraints. In this paper, we identify a simple mechanism that allows us to derive global convergence results of the produced iterates as well as improved global rates of convergence estimates for a wide class of such methods, and with more general convex constraints. Our results are illustrated with many applications and examples, including some new explicit and simple algorithms for conic optimization problems. In particular, we derive a class of interior gradient algorithms which exhibits an @math global convergence rate estimate.