Complex queries for massive data analysis jobs have become increasingly commonplace. Many such queries contain com- mon subexpressions, either within a single query or among multiple queries submitted as a batch. Conventional query optimizers do not exploit these subexpressions and produce sub-optimal plans. The problem of multi-query optimization (MQO) is to generate an optimal combined evaluation plan by computing common subexpressions once and reusing them. Exhaustive algorithms for MQO explore an O(n^n) search space. Thus, this problem has primarily been tackled using various heuristic algorithms, without providing any theoretical guarantees on the quality of their solution. In this paper, instead of the conventional cost minimization problem, we treat the problem as maximizing a linear transformation of the cost function. We propose a greedy algorithm for this transformed formulation of the problem, which under weak, intuitive assumptions, provides an approximation factor guarantee for this formulation. We go on to show that this factor is optimal, unless P = NP. Another noteworthy point about our algorithm is that it can be easily incorporated into existing transformation-based optimizers. We finally propose optimizations which can be used to improve the efficiency of our algorithm.
@cite_4 gave a @math -approximation algorithm for unconstrained non-monotone submodular maximization, for which there is a matching hardness result. However, all these results assume non-negativity of the function @math . Mittal and Shulz @cite_24 show that a constant factor approximation for non-negative supermodular minimization is @math -hard. Inapproximability of non-monotone submodular maximization (with possibly negative values) is also well known. To the best of our knowledge, ours is the first work which, under the assumption of @math , provides an approximation algorithm with a matching hardness of approximation result for unconstrained non-monotone submodular maximization when the function may take negative values. Since the hardness of approximation factor depends on the optimal (and may go to 0), this rules out constant factor approximations for the problem even in the restricted setting of @math .
@cite_24 @cite_4
2089729462 1542719709 1542515633 2514846057
A number of recent results on optimization problems involving submodular functions have made use of the "multilinear relaxation" of the problem. We present a general approach to deriving inapproximability results in the value oracle model, based on the notion of "symmetry gap". Our main result is that for any fixed instance that exhibits a certain "symmetry gap" in its multilinear relaxation, there is a naturally related class of instances for which a better approximation factor than the symmetry gap would require exponentially many oracle queries. This unifies several known hardness results for submodular maximization, e.g. the optimality of (1-1 e)-approximation for monotone submodular maximization under a cardinality constraint, and the impossibility of (1 2+epsilon)-approximation for unconstrained (non-monotone) submodular maximization. It follows from our result that (1 2+epsilon)-approximation is also impossible for non-monotone submodular maximization subject to a (non-trivial) matroid constraint. On the algorithmic side, we present a 0.309-approximation for this problem, improving the previously known factor of 1 4-o(1).As another application, we consider the problem of maximizing a non-monotone submodular function over the bases of a matroid. A (1 6-o(1))-approximation has been developed for this problem, assuming that the matroid contains two disjoint bases. We show that the best approximation one can achieve is indeed related to packings of bases in the matroid. Specifically, for any k≫=2, there is a class of matroids of fractional base packing number nu = k (k-1), such that any algorithm achieving a better than (1-1 nu)-approximation for this class would require exponentially many value queries. On the positive side, we present a 1 2 (1-1 nu-o(1))-approximation algorithm for the same problem. Our hardness results hold in fact for very special symmetric instances. For such symmetric instances, we show that the approximation factors of 1 2 (for submodular maximization subject to a matroid constraint) and 1-1 nu (for a matroid base constraint) can be achieved algorithmically and hence are optimal. We consider the problem of maximizing a nonnegative (possibly non-monotone) submodular set function with or without constraints. [9] showed a 2 5-approximation for the unconstrained problem and also proved that no approximation better than 1 2 is possible in the value oracle model. Constant-factor approximation has been also known for submodular maximization subject to a matroid independence constraint (a factor of 0.309 [33]) and for submodular maximization subject to a matroid base constraint, provided that the fractional base packing number ν is bounded away from 1 (a 1 4-approximation assuming that ν ≥ 2 [33]). In this paper, we propose a new algorithm for submodular maximization which is based on the idea of simulated annealing. We prove that this algorithm achieves improved approximation for two problems: a 0.41-approximation for unconstrained submodular maximization, and a 0.325-approximation for submodular maximization subject to a matroid independence constraint. On the hardness side, we show that in the value oracle model it is impossible to achieve a 0.478-approximation for submodular maximization subject to a matroid independence constraint, or a 0.394-approximation subject to a matroid base constraint in matroids with two disjoint bases. Even for the special case of cardinality constraint, we prove it is impossible to achieve a 0.491-approximation. (Previously it was conceivable that a 1 2-approximation exists for these problems.) It is still an open question whether a 1 2-approximation is possible for unconstrained submodular maximization. Consider a suboptimal solution S for a maximization problem. Suppose S's value is small compared to an optimal solution OPT to the problem, yet S is structurally similar to OPT. A natural question in this setting is whether there is a way of improving S based solely on this information. In this paper we introduce the Structural Continuous Greedy Algorithm, answering this question affirmatively in the setting of the Nonmonotone Submodular Maximization Problem. We improve on the best approximation factor known for this problem. In the Nonmonotone Submodular Maximization Problem we are given a non-negative submodular function f, and the objective is to find a subset maximizing f. Our method yields an 0.42-approximation for this problem, improving on the current best approximation factor of 0.41 given by Gharan and Vondrak [5]. On the other hand, [4] showed a lower bound of 0.5 for this problem. In this work, we present a new algorithm for maximizing a non-monotone submodular function subject to a general constraint. Our algorithm finds an approximate fractional solution for maximizing the multilinear extension of the function over a down-closed polytope. The approximation guarantee is 0.372 and it is the first improvement over the 1 e approximation achieved by the unified Continuous Greedy algorithm [, FOCS 2011].