Although there exist plentiful theories of empirical risk minimization (ERM) for supervised learning, current theoretical understandings of ERM for a related problem---stochastic convex optimization (SCO), are limited. In this work, we strengthen the realm of ERM for SCO by exploiting smoothness and strong convexity conditions to improve the risk bounds. First, we establish an @math risk bound when the random function is nonnegative, convex and smooth, and the expected function is Lipschitz continuous, where @math is the dimensionality of the problem, @math is the number of samples, and @math is the minimal risk. Thus, when @math is small we obtain an @math risk bound, which is analogous to the @math optimistic rate of ERM for supervised learning. Second, if the objective function is also @math -strongly convex, we prove an @math risk bound where @math is the condition number, and improve it to @math when @math . As a result, we obtain an @math risk bound under the condition that @math is large and @math is small, which to the best of our knowledge, is the first @math -type of risk bound of ERM. Third, we stress that the above results are established in a unified framework, which allows us to derive new risk bounds under weaker conditions, e.g., without convexity of the random function and Lipschitz continuity of the expected function. Finally, we demonstrate that to achieve an @math risk bound for supervised learning, the @math requirement on @math can be replaced with @math , which is dimensionality-independent.
It is worth mentioning the difference among proof techniques in these works. The uniform convergence result of @cite_5 leverages the covering number to bound @math for any @math . The analysis for strongly convex functions by @cite_5 and exp-concave functions by @cite_1 utilize the tool of stability, which only produces risk bounds that hold in expectation. A simple way to achieve a high probability bound is to use ERM combined with a generic or specific boosting-the-confidence method , but the guarantee is not directly on the empirical minimizer as noted by @cite_5 . The convergence of ERM given by @cite_6 relies on a central condition or stochastic mixability'' of the exp-concave function. In this paper, we present a general approach for analyzing ERM for SCO of smooth functions. In particular, our analysis is based on a uniform convergence of @math to @math for any @math , and a concentration inequality of @math , where @math is the optimal solution to ).
@cite_5 @cite_1 @cite_6
2547508527 2962853966 2517669009 2163786124
We present an algorithm for the statistical learning setting with a bounded exp-concave loss in @math dimensions that obtains excess risk @math with probability at least @math . The core technique is to boost the confidence of recent in-expectation @math excess risk bounds for empirical risk minimization (ERM), without sacrificing the rate, by leveraging a Bernstein condition which holds due to exp-concavity. We also show that with probability @math the standard ERM method obtains excess risk @math . We further show that a regret bound for any online learner in this setting translates to a high probability excess risk bound for the corresponding online-to-batch conversion of the online learner. Lastly, we present two high probability bounds for the exp-concave model selection aggregation problem that are quantile-adaptive in a certain sense. The first bound is a purely exponential weights type algorithm, obtains a nearly optimal rate, and has no explicit dependence on the Lipschitz continuity of the loss. The second bound requires Lipschitz continuity but obtains the optimal rate. In this paper, we analyze the convergence of the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) for minimizing a nonconvex and possibly nonsmooth objective function, ( (x_0, ,x_p,y) ), subject to coupled linear equality constraints. Our ADMM updates each of the primal variables (x_0, ,x_p,y ), followed by updating the dual variable. We separate the variable y from (x_i )’s as it has a special role in our analysis. The developed convergence guarantee covers a variety of nonconvex functions such as piecewise linear functions, ( _q ) quasi-norm, Schatten-q quasi-norm ( (0<q<1 )), minimax concave penalty (MCP), and smoothly clipped absolute deviation penalty. It also allows nonconvex constraints such as compact manifolds (e.g., spherical, Stiefel, and Grassman manifolds) and linear complementarity constraints. Also, the (x_0 )-block can be almost any lower semi-continuous function. By applying our analysis, we show, for the first time, that several ADMM algorithms applied to solve nonconvex models in statistical learning, optimization on manifold, and matrix decomposition are guaranteed to converge. Our results provide sufficient conditions for ADMM to converge on (convex or nonconvex) monotropic programs with three or more blocks, as they are special cases of our model. ADMM has been regarded as a variant to the augmented Lagrangian method (ALM). We present a simple example to illustrate how ADMM converges but ALM diverges with bounded penalty parameter ( ). Indicated by this example and other analysis in this paper, ADMM might be a better choice than ALM for some nonconvex nonsmooth problems, because ADMM is not only easier to implement, it is also more likely to converge for the concerned scenarios. In stochastic convex optimization the goal is to minimize a convex function @math over a convex set @math where @math is some unknown distribution and each @math in the support of @math is convex over @math . The optimization is commonly based on i.i.d. samples @math from @math . A standard approach to such problems is empirical risk minimization (ERM) that optimizes @math . Here we consider the question of how many samples are necessary for ERM to succeed and the closely related question of uniform convergence of @math to @math over @math . We demonstrate that in the standard @math setting of Lipschitz-bounded functions over a @math of bounded radius, ERM requires sample size that scales linearly with the dimension @math . This nearly matches standard upper bounds and improves on @math dependence proved for @math setting by Shalev- (2009). In stark contrast, these problems can be solved using dimension-independent number of samples for @math setting and @math dependence for @math setting using other approaches. We further show that our lower bound applies even if the functions in the support of @math are smooth and efficiently computable and even if an @math regularization term is added. Finally, we demonstrate that for a more general class of bounded-range (but not Lipschitz-bounded) stochastic convex programs an infinite gap appears already in dimension 2. We consider the problem of minimizing the sum of two convex functions: one is smooth and given by a gradient oracle, and the other is separable over blocks of coordinates and has a simple known structure over each block. We develop an accelerated randomized proximal coordinate gradient (APCG) method for minimizing such convex composite functions. For strongly convex functions, our method achieves faster linear convergence rates than existing randomized proximal coordinate gradient methods. Without strong convexity, our method enjoys accelerated sublinear convergence rates. We show how to apply the APCG method to solve the regularized empirical risk minimization (ERM) problem and devise efficient implementations that avoid full-dimensional vector operations. For ill-conditioned ERM problems, our method obtains improved convergence rates than the state-of-the-art stochastic dual coordinate ascent method.