In order to drive safely and efficiently under merging scenarios, autonomous vehicles should be aware of their surroundings and make decisions by interacting with other road participants. Moreover, different strategies should be made when the autonomous vehicle is interacting with drivers having different level of cooperativeness. Whether the vehicle is on the merge-lane or main-lane will also influence the driving maneuvers since drivers will behave differently when they have the right-of-way than otherwise. Many traditional methods have been proposed to solve decision making problems under merging scenarios. However, these works either are incapable of modeling complicated interactions or require implementing hand-designed rules which cannot properly handle the uncertainties in real-world scenarios. In this paper, we proposed an interaction-aware decision making with adaptive strategies (IDAS) approach that can let the autonomous vehicle negotiate the road with other drivers by leveraging their cooperativeness under merging scenarios. A single policy is learned under the multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) setting via the curriculum learning strategy, which enables the agent to automatically infer other drivers' various behaviors and make decisions strategically. A masking mechanism is also proposed to prevent the agent from exploring states that violate common sense of human judgment and increase the learning efficiency. An exemplar merging scenario was used to implement and examine the proposed method.
This paper @cite_6 COMA: It uses a centralized critic. It uses a counterfactual baseline to address the issue of multi-agent credit assignment. In this way, the agent is able to deduce it's own contribution to the team's success
@cite_6
2617547828 1990254626 2891663723 1504352750
Cooperative multi-agent systems can be naturally used to model many real world problems, such as network packet routing and the coordination of autonomous vehicles. There is a great need for new reinforcement learning methods that can efficiently learn decentralised policies for such systems. To this end, we propose a new multi-agent actor-critic method called counterfactual multi-agent (COMA) policy gradients. COMA uses a centralised critic to estimate the Q-function and decentralised actors to optimise the agents' policies. In addition, to address the challenges of multi-agent credit assignment, it uses a counterfactual baseline that marginalises out a single agent's action, while keeping the other agents' actions fixed. COMA also uses a critic representation that allows the counterfactual baseline to be computed efficiently in a single forward pass. We evaluate COMA in the testbed of StarCraft unit micromanagement, using a decentralised variant with significant partial observability. COMA significantly improves average performance over other multi-agent actor-critic methods in this setting, and the best performing agents are competitive with state-of-the-art centralised controllers that get access to the full state. Just as POMDPs have been used to reason explicitly about uncertainty in single-agent systems, there has been recent interest in using multi-agent POMDPs to coordinate teams of agents in the presence of uncertainty. Although multi-agent POMDPs are known to be highly intractable, communication at every time step transforms a multi-agent POMDP into a more tractable single-agent POMDP. In this paper, we present an approach that generates "centralized" policies for multi-agent POMDPs at plan-time by assuming the presence of free communication, and at run-time, handles the problem of limited communication resources by reasoning about the use of communication as needed for effective execution. This approach trades off the need to do some computation at execution-time for the ability to generate policies more tractably at plan-time. In our algorithm, each agent, at run-time, models the distribution of possible joint beliefs. Joint actions are selected over this distribution, ensuring that agents remain synchronized. Communication is used to integrate local observations into the team belief only when those observations would improve team performance. We show, both through a detailed example and with experimental results, that our approach allows for effective decentralized execution while avoiding unnecessary instances of communication. Scaling decision theoretic planning to large multiagent systems is challenging due to uncertainty and partial observability in the environment. We focus on a multiagent planning model subclass, relevant to urban settings, where agent interactions are dependent on their collective influence'' on each other, rather than their identities. Unlike previous work, we address a general setting where system reward is not decomposable among agents. We develop collective actor-critic RL approaches for this setting, and address the problem of multiagent credit assignment, and computing low variance policy gradient estimates that result in faster convergence to high quality solutions. We also develop difference rewards based credit assignment methods for the collective setting. Empirically our new approaches provide significantly better solutions than previous methods in the presence of global rewards on two real world problems modeling taxi fleet optimization and multiagent patrolling, and a synthetic grid navigation domain. Decentralised coordination in multi-agent systems is typically achieved using communication. However, in many cases, communication is expensive to utilise because there is limited bandwidth, it may be dangerous to communicate, or communication may simply be unavailable at times. In this context, we argue for a rational approach to communication --- if it has a cost, the agents should be able to calculate a value of communicating. By doing this, the agents can balance the need to communicate with the cost of doing so. In this research, we present a novel model of rational communication, that uses reward shaping to value communications, and employ this valuation in decentralised POMDP policy generation. In this context, reward shaping is the process by which expectations over joint actions are adjusted based on how coordinated the agent team is. An empirical evaluation of the benefits of this approach is presented in two domains. First, in the context of an idealised bench-mark problem, the multiagent Tiger problem, our method is shown to require significantly less communication (up to 30 fewer messages) and still achieves a 30 performance improvement over the current state of the art. Second, in the context of a larger-scale problem, RoboCupRescue, our method is shown to scale well, and operate without recourse to significant amounts of domain knowledge.