In this paper, we use Proximal Cubic regularized Newton Methods (PCNM) to optimize the sum of a smooth convex function and a non-smooth convex function, where we use inexact gradient and Hessian, and an inexact subsolver for the cubic regularized second-order subproblem. We propose inexact variants of PCNM and accelerated PCNM respectively, and show that both variants can achieve the same convergence rate as in the exact case, provided that the errors in the inexact gradient, Hessian and subsolver decrease at appropriate rates. Meanwhile, in the online stochastic setting where data comes endlessly, we give the overall complexity of the proposed algorithms and show that they are as competitive as the stochastic gradient descent. Moreover, we give the overall complexity of the proposed algorithms in the finite-sum setting and show that it is as competitive as the state of the art variance reduced algorithms. Finally, we propose an efficient algorithm for the cubic regularized second-order subproblem, which can converge to an enough small neighborhood of the optimal solution in a superlinear rate.
Table gives the overall complexity of representative algorithms in the online stochastic setting. For simplicity, in Table , we neglect the poly-logarithmic factor and use the @math notation. The existing algorithms under this setting are mainly first-order algorithms @cite_4 , which can be divided into methods that pass one sample or a fixed mini-batch samples in each iteration @cite_21 @cite_3 , and methods that use an increased sample size in each iteration @cite_20 @cite_18 @cite_5 . If we do not consider the poly-logarithmic factor, COMID @cite_21 obtains the optimal convergence rate ( @math regret) @math in the convex setting and @math in the @math -strongly convex setting. However, as shown in Table , the Inexact Proximal Gradient Method (IPGM) and Accelerated IPGM (IPGM) @cite_5 Although @cite_5 do not give the overall complexity in the online stochastic setting, we can give the complexity results in Table based on the same analysis in this paper. , which belongs to the methods with increased sample size, can not obtain the optimal rate in the convex setting. The proposed methods IPCNM and AIPCNM belongs to the methods with an increased sample size, while we use the second-order information.
@cite_18 @cite_4 @cite_21 @cite_3 @cite_5 @cite_20
2950132609 2969771825 2163786124 2962721705
We obtain an improved finite-sample guarantee on the linear convergence of stochastic gradient descent for smooth and strongly convex objectives, improving from a quadratic dependence on the conditioning @math (where @math is a bound on the smoothness and @math on the strong convexity) to a linear dependence on @math . Furthermore, we show how reweighting the sampling distribution (i.e. importance sampling) is necessary in order to further improve convergence, and obtain a linear dependence in the average smoothness, dominating previous results. We also discuss importance sampling for SGD more broadly and show how it can improve convergence also in other scenarios. Our results are based on a connection we make between SGD and the randomized Kaczmarz algorithm, which allows us to transfer ideas between the separate bodies of literature studying each of the two methods. In particular, we recast the randomized Kaczmarz algorithm as an instance of SGD, and apply our results to prove its exponential convergence, but to the solution of a weighted least squares problem rather than the original least squares problem. We then present a modified Kaczmarz algorithm with partially biased sampling which does converge to the original least squares solution with the same exponential convergence rate. Augmented Lagrangian method (ALM) has been popularly used for solving constrained optimization problems. Practically, subproblems for updating primal variables in the framework of ALM usually can only be solved inexactly. The convergence and local convergence speed of ALM have been extensively studied. However, the global convergence rate of the inexact ALM is still open for problems with nonlinear inequality constraints. In this paper, we work on general convex programs with both equality and inequality constraints. For these problems, we establish the global convergence rate of the inexact ALM and estimate its iteration complexity in terms of the number of gradient evaluations to produce a primal and or primal-dual solution with a specified accuracy. We first establish an ergodic convergence rate result of the inexact ALM that uses constant penalty parameters or geometrically increasing penalty parameters. Based on the convergence rate result, we then apply Nesterov’s optimal first-order method on each primal subproblem and estimate the iteration complexity of the inexact ALM. We show that if the objective is convex, then (O( ^ -1 ) ) gradient evaluations are sufficient to guarantee a primal ( )-solution in terms of both primal objective and feasibility violation. If the objective is strongly convex, the result can be improved to (O( ^ - 1 2 | |) ). To produce a primal-dual ( )-solution, more gradient evaluations are needed for convex case, and the number is (O( ^ - 4 3 ) ), while for strongly convex case, the number is still (O( ^ - 1 2 | |) ). Finally, we establish a nonergodic convergence rate result of the inexact ALM that uses geometrically increasing penalty parameters. This result is established only for the primal problem. We show that the nonergodic iteration complexity result is in the same order as that for the ergodic result. Numerical experiments on quadratically constrained quadratic programming are conducted to compare the performance of the inexact ALM with different settings. We consider the problem of minimizing the sum of two convex functions: one is smooth and given by a gradient oracle, and the other is separable over blocks of coordinates and has a simple known structure over each block. We develop an accelerated randomized proximal coordinate gradient (APCG) method for minimizing such convex composite functions. For strongly convex functions, our method achieves faster linear convergence rates than existing randomized proximal coordinate gradient methods. Without strong convexity, our method enjoys accelerated sublinear convergence rates. We show how to apply the APCG method to solve the regularized empirical risk minimization (ERM) problem and devise efficient implementations that avoid full-dimensional vector operations. For ill-conditioned ERM problems, our method obtains improved convergence rates than the state-of-the-art stochastic dual coordinate ascent method. Successive quadratic approximations, or second-order proximal methods, are useful for minimizing functions that are a sum of a smooth part and a convex, possibly nonsmooth part that promotes regularization. Most analyses of iteration complexity focus on the special case of proximal gradient method, or accelerated variants thereof. There have been only a few studies of methods that use a second-order approximation to the smooth part, due in part to the difficulty of obtaining closed-form solutions to the subproblems at each iteration. In fact, iterative algorithms may need to be used to find inexact solutions to these subproblems. In this work, we present global analysis of the iteration complexity of inexact successive quadratic approximation methods, showing that an inexact solution of the subproblem that is within a fixed multiplicative precision of optimality suffices to guarantee the same order of convergence rate as the exact version, with complexity related in an intuitive way to the measure of inexactness. Our result allows flexible choices of the second-order term, including Newton and quasi-Newton choices, and does not necessarily require increasing precision of the subproblem solution on later iterations. For problems exhibiting a property related to strong convexity, the algorithms converge at global linear rates. For general convex problems, the convergence rate is linear in early stages, while the overall rate is O(1 k). For nonconvex problems, a first-order optimality criterion converges to zero at a rate of (O(1 k ) ).