While motion planning approaches for automated driving often focus on safety and mathematical optimality with respect to technical parameters, they barely consider convenience, perceived safety for the passenger and comprehensibility for other traffic participants. For automated driving in mixed traffic, however, this is key to reach public acceptance. In this paper, we revise the problem statement of motion planning in mixed traffic: Instead of largely simplifying the motion planning problem to a convex optimization problem, we keep a more complex probabilistic multi agent model and strive for a near optimal solution. We assume cooperation of other traffic participants, yet being aware of violations of this assumption. This approach yields solutions that are provably safe in all situations, and convenient and comprehensible in situations that are also unambiguous for humans. Thus, it outperforms existing approaches in mixed traffic scenarios, as we show in our simulation environment.
The RSS concept promises to ensure safety in a meaningful way, while allowing normal flow of traffic, i.e. not being overcautious. By deploying it, we are able to guarantee that we will not cause a collision within the next one or two seconds @cite_16 , @cite_6 , @cite_15 . However, the behavior of self-driving vehicles shall not only be safe, but also comfortable for the passengers and comprehensible for other traffic participants. Thus, also the perceived safety plays an important role.
@cite_15 @cite_16 @cite_6
2749747771 2021667711 2896214412 2038609352
In recent years, car makers and tech companies have been racing towards self driving cars. It seems that the main parameter in this race is who will have the first car on the road. The goal of this paper is to add to the equation two additional crucial parameters. The first is standardization of safety assurance --- what are the minimal requirements that every self-driving car must satisfy, and how can we verify these requirements. The second parameter is scalability --- engineering solutions that lead to unleashed costs will not scale to millions of cars, which will push interest in this field into a niche academic corner, and drive the entire field into a "winter of autonomous driving". In the first part of the paper we propose a white-box, interpretable, mathematical model for safety assurance, which we call Responsibility-Sensitive Safety (RSS). In the second part we describe a design of a system that adheres to our safety assurance requirements and is scalable to millions of cars. An approach for formally verifying the safety of automated vehicles is proposed. Due to the uniqueness of each traffic situation, we verify safety online, i.e., during the operation of the vehicle. The verification is performed by predicting the set of all possible occupancies of the automated vehicle and other traffic participants on the road. In order to capture all possible future scenarios, we apply reachability analysis to consider all possible behaviors of mathematical models considering uncertain inputs (e.g., sensor noise, disturbances) and partially unknown initial states. Safety is guaranteed with respect to the modeled uncertainties and behaviors if the occupancy of the automated vehicle does not intersect that of other traffic participants for all times. The applicability of the approach is demonstrated by test drives with an automated vehicle at the Robotics Institute at Carnegie Mellon University. Highly automated road vehicles need the capability of stopping safely in a situation that disrupts continued normal operation, e.g. due to internal system faults. Motion planning for safe stop differs from nominal motion planning, since there is not a specific goal location. Rather, the desired behavior is that the vehicle should reach a stopped state, preferably outside of active lanes. Also, the functionality to stop safely needs to be of high integrity. The first contribution of this paper is to formulate the safe stop problem as a benchmark optimal control problem, which can be solved by dynamic programming. However, this solution method cannot be used in real-time. The second contribution is to develop a real-time safe stop trajectory planning algorithm, based on selection from a precomputed set of trajectories. By exploiting the particular properties of the safe stop problem, the cardinality of the set is decreased, making the algorithm computationally efficient. Furthermore, a monitoring based architecture concept is proposed, that ensures dependability of the safe stop function. Finally, a proof of concept simulation using the proposed architecture and the safe stop trajectory planner is presented. Cooperative vehicle safety (CVS) systems operate based on broadcast of vehicle position and safety information to neighboring cars. The communication medium of CVS is a vehicular ad-hoc network. One of the main challenges in large scale deployment of CVS systems is the issue of scalability. To address the scalability problem, several congestion control methods have been proposed and are currently under field study. These algorithms adapt transmission rate and power based on network measures such as channel busy ratio. We examine two such algorithms and study their dynamic behavior in time and space to evaluate stability (in time) and fairness (in space) properties of these algorithms. We present stability conditions and evaluate stability and fairness of the algorithms through simulation experiments. Results show that there is a trade-off between fast convergence, temporal stability and spatial fairness. The proper ranges of parameters for achieving stability are presented for the discussed algorithms. Stability is verified for all typical highway density cases for static traffic as well as real scenarios. Fairness is shown to be naturally achieved for some algorithms and its analysis is under study in another work of us. Under the same conditions other algorithms may have problem to maintain fairness in space. We have shown that this can be resolved by a distributed measurement of CBR and is verified.