Natural language generation (NLG) plays a critical role in spoken dialogue systems. This paper presents a new approach to NLG by using recurrent neural networks (RNN), in which a gating mechanism is applied before RNN computation. This allows the proposed model to generate appropriate sentences. The RNN-based generator can be learned from unaligned data by jointly training sentence planning and surface realization to produce natural language responses. The model was extensively evaluated on four different NLG domains. The results show that the proposed generator achieved better performance on all the NLG domains compared to previous generators.
Conventional approaches to NLG traditionally split the task into two subtasks: sentence planning and surface realization. Sentence planning deals with mapping of the input semantic symbols onto a linguistic structure, ., a tree-like or a template structure. The surface realization then converts the structure into an appropriate sentence @cite_10 . Despite their success and wide use in solving NLG problems, these traditional methods still rely on the handcrafted rule-based generators or rerankers. The authors in @cite_7 proposed a class-based n-gram language model (LM) generator which can learn to generate the sentences for a given DA and then select the best sentences using a rule-based reranker. Some of the limitation of the class-based LMs were addressed in @cite_20 by proposing a method based on a syntactic dependency tree. A phrase-based generator based on factored LMs was introduced in @cite_19 , which can learn from a semantically aligned corpus.
@cite_19 @cite_20 @cite_10 @cite_7
2250530145 2250220874 2949465329 2122514299
We present a novel syntax-based natural language generation system that is trainable from unaligned pairs of input meaning representations and output sentences. It is divided into sentence planning, which incrementally builds deep-syntactic dependency trees, and surface realization. Sentence planner is based on A* search with a perceptron ranker that uses novel differing subtree updates and a simple future promise estimation; surface realization uses a rule-based pipeline from the Treex NLP toolkit. Our first results show that training from unaligned data is feasible, the outputs of our generator are mostly fluent and relevant. Natural Language Generation (NLG) is the task of automatically producing natural language text to describe information present in non-linguistic data. It involves three main subtasks: (i) selecting the relevant portion of input data; (ii) determining the words that will be used to verbalise the selected data; and (iii) mapping these words into natural language text. The latter task is known as Surface Realisation (SR). In my thesis, I study the SR task in the context of input data coming from Knowledge Bases (KB). I present two novel approaches to surface realisation from knowledge bases: a supervised approach and a weakly supervised approach. In the first, supervised, approach, I present a corpus-based method for inducing a Feature Based Lexicalized Tree Adjoining Grammar (FB-LTAG) from a parallel corpus of text and data. The resulting grammar includes a unification based semantics and can be used by an existing surface realiser to generate sentences from test data. I show that the induced grammar is compact and generalises well over the test data yielding results that are close to those produced by a handcrafted symbolic approach and which outperform an alternative statistical approach. In the weakly supervised approach, I explore a method for surface realisation from KB data which uses a supplied lexicon but does not require a parallel corpus. Instead, I build a corpus from heterogeneous sources of domain-related text and use it to identify possible lexicalisations of KB symbols (classes and relations) and their verbalisation patterns (frames). Based on the observations made, I build different probabilistic models which are used for selection of appropriate frames and syntax semantics linking while verbalising KB inputs. I evaluate the output sentences and analyse the issues relevant to learning from non-parallel corpora. In both these approaches, I use the data derived from an existing biomedical ontology as a reference input. The proposed methods are generic and can be easily adapted for input from other ontologies for which a parallel non-parallel corpora exists. We present three systems for surface natural language generation that are trainable from annotated corpora. The first two systems, called NLG1 and NLG2, require a corpus marked only with domain-specific semantic attributes, while the last system, called NLG3, requires a corpus marked with both semantic attributes and syntactic dependency information. All systems attempt to produce a grammatical natural language phrase from a domain-specific semantic representation. NLG1 serves a baseline system and uses phrase frequencies to generate a whole phrase in one step, while NLG2 and NLG3 use maximum entropy probability models to individually generate each word in the phrase. The systems NLG2 and NLG3 learn to determine both the word choice and the word order of the phrase. We present experiments in which we generate phrases to describe flights in the air travel domain. Most previous work on trainable language generation has focused on two paradigms: (a) using a generation decisions of an existing generator. Both approaches rely on the existence of a handcrafted generation component, which is likely to limit their scalability to new domains. The first contribution of this article is to present Bagel, a fully data-driven generation method that treats the language generation task as a search for the most likely sequence of semantic concepts and realization phrases, according to Factored Language Models (FLMs). As domain utterances are not readily available for most natural language generation tasks, a large creative effort is required to produce the data necessary to represent human linguistic variation for nontrivial domains. This article is based on the assumption that learning to produce paraphrases can be facilitated by collecting data from a large sample of untrained annotators using crowdsourcing—rather than a few domain experts—by relying on a coarse meaning representation. A second contribution of this article is to use crowdsourced data to show how dialogue naturalness can be improved by learning to vary the output utterances generated for a given semantic input. Two data-driven methods for generating paraphrases in dialogue are presented: (a) by sampling from the n-best list of realizations produced by Bagel's FLM reranker; and (b) by learning a structured perceptron predicting whether candidate realizations are valid paraphrases. We train Bagel on a set of 1,956 utterances produced by 137 annotators, which covers 10 types of dialogue acts and 128 semantic concepts in a tourist information system for Cambridge. An automated evaluation shows that Bagel outperforms utterance class LM baselines on this domain. A human evaluation of 600 resynthesized dialogue extracts shows that Bagel's FLM output produces utterances comparable to a handcrafted baseline, whereas the perceptron classifier performs worse. Interestingly, human judges find the system sampling from the n-best list to be more natural than a system always returning the first-best utterance. The judges are also more willing to interact with the n-best system in the future. These results suggest that capturing the large variation found in human language using data-driven methods is beneficial for dialogue interaction.