We study ways to accelerate greedy coordinate descent in theory and in practice, where "accelerate" refers either to @math convergence in theory, in practice, or both. We introduce and study two algorithms: Accelerated Semi-Greedy Coordinate Descent (ASCD) and Accelerated Greedy Coordinate Descent (AGCD). While ASCD takes greedy steps in the @math -updates and randomized steps in the @math -updates, AGCD is a straightforward extension of standard greedy coordinate descent that only takes greedy steps. On the theory side, our main results are for ASCD: we show that ASCD achieves @math convergence, and it also achieves accelerated linear convergence for strongly convex functions. On the empirical side, we observe that both AGCD and ASCD outperform Accelerated Randomized Coordinate Descent on a variety of instances. In particular, we note that AGCD significantly outperforms the other accelerated coordinate descent methods in numerical tests, in spite of a lack of theoretical guarantees for this method. To complement the empirical study of AGCD, we present a Lyapunov energy function argument that points to an explanation for why a direct extension of the acceleration proof for AGCD does not work; and we also introduce a technical condition under which AGCD is guaranteed to have accelerated convergence. Last of all, we confirm that this technical condition holds in our empirical study.
Accelerated Randomized Coordinate Descent. Since Nesterov's paper on RCD @cite_11 there has been significant focus on accelerated versions of RCD. In particular, @cite_11 developed the first accelerated randomized coordinate gradient method for minimizing unconstrained smooth functions. @cite_6 present a sharper convergence analysis of Nesterov's method using a randomized estimate sequence framework. @cite_20 proposed the APPROX (Accelerated, Parallel and PROXimal) coordinate descent method and obtained an accelerated sublinear convergence rate, and @cite_25 developed an efficient implementation of ARCD.
@cite_20 @cite_25 @cite_6 @cite_11
2769394111 2963487351 2075660001 2153749284
Nesterov's accelerated gradient descent (AGD), an instance of the general family of "momentum methods", provably achieves faster convergence rate than gradient descent (GD) in the convex setting. However, whether these methods are superior to GD in the nonconvex setting remains open. This paper studies a simple variant of AGD, and shows that it escapes saddle points and finds a second-order stationary point in @math iterations, faster than the @math iterations required by GD. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first Hessian-free algorithm to find a second-order stationary point faster than GD, and also the first single-loop algorithm with a faster rate than GD even in the setting of finding a first-order stationary point. Our analysis is based on two key ideas: (1) the use of a simple Hamiltonian function, inspired by a continuous-time perspective, which AGD monotonically decreases per step even for nonconvex functions, and (2) a novel framework called improve or localize, which is useful for tracking the long-term behavior of gradient-based optimization algorithms. We believe that these techniques may deepen our understanding of both acceleration algorithms and nonconvex optimization. Nesterov's accelerated gradient descent (AGD), an instance of the general family of momentum methods,'' provably achieves faster convergence rate than gradient descent (GD) in the convex setting. While these methods are widely used in modern nonconvex applications, including training of deep neural networks, whether they are provably superior to GD in the nonconvex setting remains open. This paper studies a simple variant of Nesterov's AGD, and shows that it escapes saddle points and finds a second-order stationary point in ( O (1 ^ 7 4 ) ) iterations, matching the best known convergence rate, which is faster than the ( O (1 ^ 2 ) ) iterations required by GD. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first direct acceleration (single-loop) algorithm that is provably faster than GD in general nonconvex setting---all previous nonconvex accelerated algorithms rely on more complex mechanisms such as nested loops and proximal terms. Our analysis is based on two key ideas: (1) the use of a simple Hamiltonian function, inspired by a continuous-time perspective, which AGD monotonically decreases on each step even for nonconvex functions, and (2) a novel framework called improve or localize, which is useful for tracking the long-term behavior of gradient-based optimization algorithms. We believe that these techniques may deepen our understanding of both acceleration algorithms and nonconvex optimization. In this paper we analyze the randomized block-coordinate descent (RBCD) methods proposed in Nesterov (SIAM J Optim 22(2):341---362, 2012), Richtarik and Takaă? (Math Program 144(1---2):1---38, 2014) for minimizing the sum of a smooth convex function and a block-separable convex function, and derive improved bounds on their convergence rates. In particular, we extend Nesterov's technique developed in Nesterov (SIAM J Optim 22(2):341---362, 2012) for analyzing the RBCD method for minimizing a smooth convex function over a block-separable closed convex set to the aforementioned more general problem and obtain a sharper expected-value type of convergence rate than the one implied in Richtarik and Takaă? (Math Program 144(1---2):1---38, 2014). As a result, we also obtain a better high-probability type of iteration complexity. In addition, for unconstrained smooth convex minimization, we develop a new technique called randomized estimate sequence to analyze the accelerated RBCD method proposed by Nesterov (SIAM J Optim 22(2):341---362, 2012) and establish a sharper expected-value type of convergence rate than the one given in Nesterov (SIAM J Optim 22(2):341---362, 2012). We propose a new method for unconstrained optimization of a smooth and strongly convex function, which attains the optimal rate of convergence of Nesterov’s accelerated gradient descent. The new algorithm has a simple geometric interpretation, loosely inspired by the ellipsoid method. We provide some numerical evidence that the new method can be superior to Nesterov’s accelerated gradient descent.