Crowd workers are distributed and decentralized. While decentralization is designed to utilize independent judgment to promote high-quality results, it paradoxically undercuts behaviors and institutions that are critical to high-quality work. Reputation is one central example: crowdsourcing systems depend on reputation scores from decentralized workers and requesters, but these scores are notoriously inflated and uninformative. In this paper, we draw inspiration from historical worker guilds (e.g., in the silk trade) to design and implement crowd guilds: centralized groups of crowd workers who collectively certify each other's quality through double-blind peer assessment. A two-week field experiment compared crowd guilds to a traditional decentralized crowd work model. Crowd guilds produced reputation signals more strongly correlated with ground-truth worker quality than signals available on current crowd working platforms, and more accurate than in the traditional model.
Self-assessment is another route to help workers reflect, learn skills and more clearly draw connections between learning goals and evaluation criteria @cite_73 . However, workers in self-assessment systems become dependant on rubrics or use special domain language, which tends to be difficult for novices to understand @cite_11 . Automated feedback @cite_7 also enhances workers' performance. However, such systems are generally used to enhance the capabilities of specialized platforms; for example, Duolingo and LevelUp integrate interactive tutorials to enhance the quality of work @cite_61 , which requires significant customization for a given domain, and has not been demonstrated in general work platforms.
@cite_61 @cite_73 @cite_7 @cite_11
2168765606 2275056699 2126975755 2141927646
Micro-task platforms provide massively parallel, on-demand labor. However, it can be difficult to reliably achieve high-quality work because online workers may behave irresponsibly, misunderstand the task, or lack necessary skills. This paper investigates whether timely, task-specific feedback helps crowd workers learn, persevere, and produce better results. We investigate this question through Shepherd, a feedback system for crowdsourced work. In a between-subjects study with three conditions, crowd workers wrote consumer reviews for six products they own. Participants in the None condition received no immediate feedback, consistent with most current crowdsourcing practices. Participants in the Self-assessment condition judged their own work. Participants in the External assessment condition received expert feedback. Self-assessment alone yielded better overall work than the None condition and helped workers improve over time. External assessment also yielded these benefits. Participants who received external assessment also revised their work more. We conclude by discussing interaction and infrastructure approaches for integrating real-time assessment into online work. Texts with potential educational value are becoming available through the Internet (e.g., Wikipedia, news services). However, using these new tests in classrooms introduces many challenges, one of which is that they usually lack practice exercises and assessments. Here, we address part of this challenge by automating the creation of specific type of assessment item. Specifically, we focus automatically generating factual WH questions. Our goal is to create an automated system that can take as input a text and produce as output questions for assessing a reader's knowledge of the information in the text. The questions could then be presented to a teacher, who could select and revise the ones that he or she judges to be useful. After introducing the problem, we describe some of the computational and linguistic challenges presented by factual question generation. We then present an implemented system that leverages existing natural language processing techniques to address some of these challenges. The system uses a combination or manually encoded transformation rules and a statistical question ranker trained on a tailored dataset of labeled system output. We present experiments that evaluate individual components of the system as well as the system as a whole. We found, among other things, that the question ranker roughly doubled the acceptability rate of top-ranked questions. In a user study, we tested whether K-12 teachers could efficiently create factual questions by selecting and revising suggestions from the system. Offering automatic suggestions reduced the time and effort spent by participants, though it also affected the types or questions that were created. This research supports the idea that natural language processing can help teachers efficiently create instructional content. It provides solutions to some of the major challenges in question generation and an analysis and better understanding of those that remain. Objective A system that translates narrative text in the medical domain into structured representation is in great demand. The system performs three sub-tasks: concept extraction, assertion classification, and relation identification. @PARASPLIT Design The overall system consists of five steps: (1) pre-processing sentences, (2) marking noun phrases (NPs) and adjective phrases (APs), (3) extracting concepts that use a dosage-unit dictionary to dynamically switch two models based on Conditional Random Fields (CRF), (4) classifying assertions based on voting of five classifiers, and (5) identifying relations using normalized sentences with a set of effective discriminating features. @PARASPLIT Measurements Macro-averaged and micro-averaged precision, recall and F-measure were used to evaluate results. @PARASPLIT Results The performance is competitive with the state-of-the-art systems with micro-averaged F-measure of 0.8489 for concept extraction, 0.9392 for assertion classification and 0.7326 for relation identification. @PARASPLIT Conclusions The system exploits an array of common features and achieves state-of-the-art performance. Prudent feature engineering sets the foundation of our systems. In concept extraction, we demonstrated that switching models, one of which is especially designed for telegraphic sentences, improved extraction of the treatment concept significantly. In assertion classification, a set of features derived from a rule-based classifier were proven to be effective for the classes such as conditional and possible. These classes would suffer from data scarcity in conventional machine-learning methods. In relation identification, we use two-staged architecture, the second of which applies pairwise classifiers to possible candidate classes. This architecture significantly improves performance. We present a fully automatic method for content selection evaluation in summarization that does not require the creation of human model summaries. Our work capitalizes on the assumption that the distribution of words in the input and an informative summary of that input should be similar to each other. Results on a large scale evaluation from the Text Analysis Conference show that input-summary comparisons are very effective for the evaluation of content selection. Our automatic methods rank participating systems similarly to manual model-based pyramid evaluation and to manual human judgments of responsiveness. The best feature, Jensen-Shannon divergence, leads to a correlation as high as 0.88 with manual pyramid and 0.73 with responsiveness evaluations.