Over the past years, political events and public opinion on the Web have been allegedly manipulated by accounts dedicated to spreading disinformation and performing malicious activities on social media. These accounts hereafter referred to as "Pathogenic Social Media (PSM)" accounts, are often controlled by terrorist supporters, water armies or fake news writers and hence can pose threats to social media and general public. Understanding and analyzing PSMs could help social media firms devise sophisticated and automated techniques that could be deployed to stop them from reaching their audience and consequently reduce their threat. In this paper, we leverage the well-known statistical technique "Hawkes Process" to quantify the influence of PSM accounts on the dissemination of malicious information on social media platforms. Our findings on a real-world ISIS-related dataset from Twitter indicate that PSMs are significantly different from regular users in making a message viral. Specifically, we observed that PSMs do not usually post URLs from mainstream news sources. Instead, their tweets usually receive large impact on audience, if contained URLs from Facebook and alternative news outlets. In contrary, tweets posted by regular users receive nearly equal impression regardless of the posted URLs and their sources. Our findings can further shed light on understanding and detecting PSM accounts.
Social bot is a computer program that automatically generate content and interacts with real people on social media, trying to emulate and possibly alter their behavior @cite_33 . Recently, DARPA organized a Twitter bot challenge to detect influence bots'' @cite_17 , where supervised and semi-supervised approaches were proposed using different features. The work of @cite_8 for example, use similarity to cluster accounts and uncover groups of malicious users. The work of @cite_19 presents a supervised framework for bot detection which uses more than thousands features. In a different attempt, the work of @cite_31 studied the problem of spam detection in Wikipedia using different spammers behavioral features. For a comprehensive survey on the ongoing efforts to fight social bots, we direct the reader to @cite_33 .
@cite_33 @cite_8 @cite_19 @cite_31 @cite_17
2290561533 2595521492 2013734030 2462265707
Social bots are automatic or semi-automatic computer programs that mimic humans and or human behavior in online social networks. Social bots can attack users (targets) in online social networks to pursue a variety of latent goals, such as to spread information or to influence targets. Without a deep understanding of the nature of such attacks or the susceptibility of users, the potential of social media as an instrument for facilitating discourse or democratic processes is in jeopardy. In this paper, we study data from the Social Bot Challenge 2011 - an experiment conducted by the WebEcologyProject during 2011 - in which three teams implemented a number of social bots that aimed to influence user behavior on Twitter. Using this data, we aim to develop models to (i) identify susceptible users among a set of targets and (ii) predict users’ level of susceptibility. We explore the predictiveness of three different groups of features (network, behavioral and linguistic features) for these tasks. Our results suggest that susceptible users tend to use Twitter for a conversational purpose and tend to be more open and social since they communicate with many different users, use more social words and show more affection than non-susceptible users. Increasing evidence suggests that a growing amount of social media content is generated by autonomous entities known as social bots. In this work we present a framework to detect such entities on Twitter. We leverage more than a thousand features extracted from public data and meta-data about users: friends, tweet content and sentiment, network patterns, and activity time series. We benchmark the classification framework by using a publicly available dataset of Twitter bots. This training data is enriched by a manually annotated collection of active Twitter users that include both humans and bots of varying sophistication. Our models yield high accuracy and agreement with each other and can detect bots of different nature. Our estimates suggest that between 9 and 15 of active Twitter accounts are bots. Characterizing ties among accounts, we observe that simple bots tend to interact with bots that exhibit more human-like behaviors. Analysis of content flows reveals retweet and mention strategies adopted by bots to interact with different target groups. Using clustering analysis, we characterize several subclasses of accounts, including spammers, self promoters, and accounts that post content from connected applications. The popularity of the Twitter social networking site has made it a target for social bots, which use increasingly-complex algorithms to engage users and pretend to be humans. While much research has studied how to identify such bots in the process of spam detection, little research has looked at the other side of the question - detecting users likely to be fooled by bots. In this paper, we examine a dataset consisting of 610 users who were messaged by Twitter bots, and determine which features describing these users were most helpful in predicting whether or not they would interact with the bots (through replies or following the bot). We then use six classifiers to build models for predicting whether a given user will interact with the bot, both using the selected features and using all features. We find that a users' Klout score, friends count, and followers count are most predictive of whether a user will interact with a bot, and that the Random Forest algorithm produces the best classifier, when used in conjunction with one of the better feature ranking algorithms (although poor feature ranking can actually make performance worse than no feature ranking). Overall, these results show promise for helping understand which users are most vulnerable to social bots. Technology is rapidly evolving, and with it comes increasingly sophisticated bots (i.e. software robots) which automatically produce content to inform, influence, and deceive genuine users. This is particularly a problem for social media networks where content tends to be extremely short, informally written, and full of inconsistencies. Motivated by the rise of bots on these networks, we investigate the ease with which a bot can deceive a human. In particular, we focus on deceiving a human into believing that an automatically generated sample of text was written by a human, as well as analysing which factors affect how convincing the text is. To accomplish this, we train a set of models to write text about several distinct topics, to simulate a bot's behaviour, which are then evaluated by a panel of judges. We find that: (1) typical Internet users are twice as likely to be deceived by automated content than security researchers; (2) text that disagrees with the crowd's opinion is more believably human; (3) light-hearted topics such as Entertainment are significantly easier to deceive with than factual topics such as Science; and (4) automated text on Adult content is the most deceptive regardless of a user's background.