Efficient processing of large-scale graphs in distributed environments has been an increasingly popular topic of research in recent years. Inter-connected data that can be modeled as graphs appear in application domains such as machine learning, recommendation, web search, and social network analysis. Writing distributed graph applications is inherently hard and requires programming models that can cover a diverse set of problems, including iterative refinement algorithms, graph transformations, graph aggregations, pattern matching, ego-network analysis, and graph traversals. Several high-level programming abstractions have been proposed and adopted by distributed graph processing systems and big data platforms. Even though significant work has been done to experimentally compare distributed graph processing frameworks, no qualitative study and comparison of graph programming abstractions has been conducted yet. In this survey, we review and analyze the most prevalent high-level programming models for distributed graph processing, in terms of their semantics and applicability. We review 34 distributed graph processing systems with respect to the graph processing models they implement and we survey applications that appear in recent distributed graph systems papers. Finally, we discuss trends and open research questions in the area of distributed graph processing.
The work that is closest to ours is a recent survey of vertex-centric frameworks for graph processing @cite_56 . It presents a extensive study of frameworks that implement the vertex-centric programming model and compares them in terms of system design characteristics, such as scheduling, partitioning, fault-tolerance, and scalability. Moreover, it briefly introduces subgraph-centric frameworks, as an optimization to vertex-centric implementations. While there is some overlap between this work and ours, the objective of our study is to present the first comprehensive comparison of distributed graph processing abstractions, regardless of the specifics of their implementations. While in @cite_56 the discussion revolves around certain frameworks, in our work, we first consider the programming models decoupled from the systems, then build a taxonomy of systems based on their implemented model.
@cite_56
2221846841 2080098453 1893414835 2146838049
Distributed graph processing platforms have helped emerging application domains use commodity clusters and Clouds to analyze large graphs. Vertex-centric programming models like Google Pregel, and their subgraph-centric variants, specify data-parallel application logic for a single vertex or component that execute iteratively. The locality and balancing of components within partitions affects the performance of such platforms. We propose three partitioning strategies for a subgraph-centric model, and analyze their impact on CPU utilization, communication, iterations, and makespan. We analyze these using Breadth First Search and PageRank algorithms on powerlaw and spatio-planar graphs. They are validated on a commodity cluster using our GoFFish subgraph-centric platform, and compared against Apache Giraph vertex-centric platform. Our experiments show upto 8 times improvement in utilization resulting to upto 5 times improvement of overall makespan for flat and hierarchical partitioning over the default strategy due to improved machine utilization. Further, these also exhibit better horizontal scalability relative to Giraph. The vertex-centric programming model is an established computational paradigm recently incorporated into distributed processing frameworks to address challenges in large-scale graph processing. Billion-node graphs that exceed the memory capacity of commodity machines are not well supported by popular Big Data tools like MapReduce, which are notoriously poor performing for iterative graph algorithms such as PageRank. In response, a new type of framework challenges one to “think like a vertex” (TLAV) and implements user-defined programs from the perspective of a vertex rather than a graph. Such an approach improves locality, demonstrates linear scalability, and provides a natural way to express and compute many iterative graph algorithms. These frameworks are simple to program and widely applicable but, like an operating system, are composed of several intricate, interdependent components, of which a thorough understanding is necessary in order to elicit top performance at scale. To this end, the first comprehensive survey of TLAV frameworks is presented. In this survey, the vertex-centric approach to graph processing is overviewed, TLAV frameworks are deconstructed into four main components and respectively analyzed, and TLAV implementations are reviewed and categorized. Vertex centric models for large scale graph processing are gaining traction due to their simple distributed programming abstraction. However, pure vertex centric algorithms under-perform due to large communication overheads and slow iterative convergence. We introduce GoFFish a scalable sub-graph centric framework co-designed with a distributed persistent graph storage for large scale graph analytics on commodity clusters, offering the added natural flexibility of shared memory sub-graph computation. We map Connected Components, SSSP and PageRank algorithms to this model and empirically analyze them for several real world graphs, demonstrating orders of magnitude improvements, in some cases, compared to Apache Giraph’s vertex centric framework. There is an increasing interest in executing complex analyses over large graphs, many of which require processing a large number of multi-hop neighborhoods or subgraphs. Examples include ego network analysis, motif counting, finding social circles, personalized recommendations, link prediction, anomaly detection, analyzing influence cascades, and others. These tasks are not well served by existing vertex-centric graph processing frameworks, where user programs are only able to directly access the state of a single vertex at a time, resulting in high communication, scheduling, and memory overheads in executing such tasks. Further, most existing graph processing frameworks ignore the challenges in extracting the relevant portions of the graph that an analysis task is interested in, and loading those onto distributed memory. This paper introduces NScale, a novel end-to-end graph processing framework that enables the distributed execution of complex subgraph-centric analytics over large-scale graphs in the cloud. NScale enables users to write programs at the level of subgraphs rather than at the level of vertices. Unlike most previous graph processing frameworks, which apply the user program to the entire graph, NScale allows users to declaratively specify subgraphs of interest. Our framework includes a novel graph extraction and packing (GEP) module that utilizes a cost-based optimizer to partition and pack the subgraphs of interest into memory on as few machines as possible. The distributed execution engine then takes over and runs the user program in parallel on those subgraphs, restricting the scope of the execution appropriately, and utilizes novel techniques to minimize memory consumption by exploiting overlaps among the subgraphs. We present a comprehensive empirical evaluation comparing against three state-of-the-art systems, namely Giraph, GraphLab, and GraphX, on several real-world datasets and a variety of analysis tasks. Our experimental results show orders-of-magnitude improvements in performance and drastic reductions in the cost of analytics compared to vertex-centric approaches.