It is well known that the generalized max-weight matching (GMWM) scheduling policy, and in general throughput-optimal scheduling policies, often require the solution of a complex optimization problem, making their implementation prohibitively difficult in practice. This has motivated many researchers to develop distributed sub-optimal algorithms that approximate the GMWM policy. One major assumption commonly shared in this context is that the time required to find an appropriate schedule vector is negligible compared to the length of a timeslot. This assumption may not be accurate as the time to find schedule vectors usually increases polynomially with the network size. On the other hand, we intuitively expect that for many sub-optimal algorithms, the schedule vector found becomes a better estimate of the one returned by the GMWM policy as more time is given to the algorithm. We thus, in this paper, consider the problem of scheduling from a new perspective through which we carefully incorporate channel variations and time-efficiency of sub-optimal algorithms into the scheduler design. Specifically, we propose a dynamic control policy (DCP) that works on top of a given sub-optimal algorithm, and dynamically but in a large time-scale adjusts the time given to the algorithm according to queue backlog and channel correlations. This policy does not require the knowledge of the structure of the given sub-optimal algorithm, and with low-overhead can be implemented in a distributed manner. Using a novel Lyapunov analysis, we characterize the stability region induced by DCP, and show that our characterization can be tight. We also show that the stability region of DCP is at least as large as the one for any other static policy. Finally, we provide two case studies to gain further intuition into the performance of DCP.
Previous work on throughput-optimal scheduling includes the studies in @cite_27 @cite_21 @cite_26 @cite_15 . In particular, in @cite_27 , Tassiulas and Ephremides characterized the throughput capacity region for multi-hop wireless networks, and developed the GMWM scheduling as a throughput-optimal scheduling policy. This result has been further extended to general network models with ergodic channel and arrival processes @cite_26 . Due to its applicability to general multi-hop networks, the GMWM scheduling has been employed, either directly or in a modified form, as a key component in different setups and many cross-layer designs. Examples include control of cooperative relay networks @cite_15 , rate control @cite_2 , energy efficiency @cite_12 @cite_4 , and congestion control @cite_0 @cite_24 . This scheduling policy has also inspired pricing strategies maximizing social welfare @cite_13 , and fair resource allocation @cite_0 .
@cite_26 @cite_4 @cite_21 @cite_0 @cite_24 @cite_27 @cite_2 @cite_15 @cite_13 @cite_12
2039917366 2017161886 2120024772 2949886575
Efficient operation of wireless networks and switches requires using simple (and in some cases distributed) scheduling algorithms. In general, simple greedy algorithms (known as Greedy Maximal Scheduling, or GMS) are guaranteed to achieve only a fraction of the maximum possible throughput (e.g., 50 throughput in switches). However, it was recently shown that in networks in which the Local Pooling conditions are satisfied, GMS achieves 100 throughput. Moreover, in networks in which the σ-Local Pooling conditions hold, GMS achieves σ throughput. In this paper, we focus on identifying the specific network topologies that satisfy these conditions. In particular, we provide the first characterization of all the network graphs in which Local Pooling holds under primary interference constraints (in these networks, GMS achieves 100 throughput). This leads to a linear-time algorithm for identifying Local-Pooling-satisfying graphs. Moreover, by using similar graph-theoretical methods, we show that in all bipartite graphs (i.e., input-queued switches) of size up to 7 × n, GMS is guaranteed to achieve 66 throughput, thereby improving upon the previously known 50 lower bound. Finally, we study the performance of GMS in interference graphs and show that in certain specific topologies, its performance could be very bad. Overall, the paper demonstrates that using graph-theoretical techniques can significantly contribute to our understanding of greedy scheduling algorithms. In this paper, we derive new bounds on the throughput efficiency of Greedy Maximal Scheduling (GMS) for wireless networks of arbitrary topology under the general k -hop interference model. These results improve the known bounds for networks with up to 26 nodes under the 2-hop interference model. We also prove that GMS is throughput-optimal in small networks. In particular, we show that GMS achieves 100 throughput in networks with up to eight nodes under the 2-hop interference model. Furthermore, we provide a simple proof to show that GMS can be implemented using only local neighborhood information in networks of any size. In this paper, we consider CSMA policies for scheduling packet transmissions in multihop wireless networks with one-hop traffic. The main contribution of the paper is to propose a novel CSMA policy, called Unlocking CSMA (U-CSMA), that enables to obtain both high throughput and low packet delays in large wireless networks. More precisely, we show that for torus interference graph topologies with one-hop traffic, U-CSMA is throughput optimal and achieves order-optimal delay. For one-hop traffic, the delay performance is defined to be order-optimal if the delay stays bounded as the network-size increases. Simulations that we conducted suggest that (a) U-CSMA is throughput-optimal and achieves order-optimal delay for general geometric interference graphs and (b) that U-CSMA can be combined with congestion control algorithms to maximize the network-wide utility and obtain order-optimal delay. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that a simple distributed scheduling policy has been proposed that is both throughput utility optimal and achieves order-optimal delay. In this paper, we consider CSMA policies for scheduling of multihop wireless networks with one-hop traffic. The main contribution of this paper is to propose Unlocking CSMA (U-CSMA) policy that enables to obtain high throughput with low (average) packet delay for large wireless networks. In particular, the delay under U-CSMA policy becomes order-optimal. For one-hop traffic, delay is defined to be order-optimal if it is O(1), i.e., it stays bounded, as the network-size increases to infinity. Using mean field theory techniques, we analytically show that for torus (grid-like) interference topologies with one-hop traffic, to achieve a network load of @math , the delay under U-CSMA policy becomes @math as the network-size increases, and hence, delay becomes order optimal. We conduct simulations for general random geometric interference topologies under U-CSMA policy combined with congestion control to maximize a network-wide utility. These simulations confirm that order optimality holds, and that we can use U-CSMA policy jointly with congestion control to operate close to the optimal utility with a low packet delay in arbitrarily large random geometric topologies. To the best of our knowledge, it is for the first time that a simple distributed scheduling policy is proposed that in addition to throughput utility-optimality exhibits delay order-optimality.