Social (or folksonomic) tagging has become a very popular way to describe content within Web 2.0 websites. Unlike taxonomies, which overimpose a hierarchical categorisation of content, folksonomies enable end-users to freely create and choose the categories (in this case, tags) that best describe some content. However, as tags are informally defined, continually changing, and ungoverned, social tagging has often been criticised for lowering, rather than increasing, the efficiency of searching, due to the number of synonyms, homonyms, polysemy, as well as the heterogeneity of users and the noise they introduce. To address this issue, a variety of approaches have been proposed that recommend users what tags to use, both when labelling and when looking for resources. As we illustrate in this paper, real world folksonomies are characterized by power law distributions of tags, over which commonly used similarity metrics, including the Jaccard coefficient and the cosine similarity, fail to compute. We thus propose a novel metric, specifically developed to capture similarity in large-scale folksonomies, that is based on a mutual reinforcement principle: that is, two tags are deemed similar if they have been associated to similar resources, and vice-versa two resources are deemed similar if they have been labelled by similar tags. We offer an efficient realisation of this similarity metric, and assess its quality experimentally, by comparing it against cosine similarity, on three large-scale datasets, namely Bibsonomy, MovieLens and CiteULike.
Similarity measures have often been evaluated on different datasets, making it difficult to assess their relative advantages and disadvantage in different domains. Furthermore, they have often been applied to manipulated datasets, making the comparison even more difficult. Indeed, in order to critically compare them, an evaluation framework has recently been proposed @cite_18 , with the aim of providing support to systematically compare several tag similarity measures, using data from Delicious @cite_19 . This work contributes to the assessment of the suitability of similarity measures to scenarios characterized by power-law distribution of tags and non-independence of data, showing how traditional measures like cosine do not work, and proposing an alternative, iterative measure that provides good accuracy instead.
@cite_19 @cite_18
2736422900 2039094769 2952366910 2129735430
Domain similarity measures can be used to gauge adaptability and select suitable data for transfer learning, but existing approaches define ad hoc measures that are deemed suitable for respective tasks. Inspired by work on curriculum learning, we propose to data selection measures using Bayesian Optimization and evaluate them across models, domains and tasks. Our learned measures outperform existing domain similarity measures significantly on three tasks: sentiment analysis, part-of-speech tagging, and parsing. We show the importance of complementing similarity with diversity, and that learned measures are -- to some degree -- transferable across models, domains, and even tasks. Abstract When dealing with the registration of information from different image sources, the de facto similarity measure used is Mutual Information (MI). Although MI gives good performance in many image registration applications, recent works in thermal–visible registration have shown that other similarity measures can give results that are as accurate, if not more than MI. Furthermore, some of these measures also have the advantage of being calculated independently from each image to register, which allows them to be integrated more easily in energy minimization frameworks. In this article, we investigate the accuracy of similarity measures for thermal–visible image registration of human silhouettes, including MI, Sum of Squared Differences (SSD), Normalized Cross-Correlation (NCC), Histograms of Oriented Gradients (HOG), Local Self-Similarity (LSS), Scale-Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF), Census, Fast Retina Keypoint (FREAK), and Binary Robust Independent Elementary Feature (BRIEF). We tested the various similarity measures in dense stereo matching tasks over 25,000 windows to have statistically significant results. To do so, we created a new dataset in which one to five humans are walking in a scene in various depth planes. Results show that even if MI is a very strong performer, particularly for large regions of interest (ROI), LSS gives better accuracies when ROI are small or segmented into small fragments because of its ability to capture shape. The other tested similarity measures did not give consistently accurate results. We consider the problem of classification using similarity distance functions over data. Specifically, we propose a framework for defining the goodness of a (dis)similarity function with respect to a given learning task and propose algorithms that have guaranteed generalization properties when working with such good functions. Our framework unifies and generalizes the frameworks proposed by [Balcan-Blum ICML 2006] and [ ICML 2007]. An attractive feature of our framework is its adaptability to data - we do not promote a fixed notion of goodness but rather let data dictate it. We show, by giving theoretical guarantees that the goodness criterion best suited to a problem can itself be learned which makes our approach applicable to a variety of domains and problems. We propose a landmarking-based approach to obtaining a classifier from such learned goodness criteria. We then provide a novel diversity based heuristic to perform task-driven selection of landmark points instead of random selection. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our goodness criteria learning method as well as the landmark selection heuristic on a variety of similarity-based learning datasets and benchmark UCI datasets on which our method consistently outperforms existing approaches by a significant margin. We consider the problem of classification using similarity distance functions over data. Specifically, we propose a framework for defining the goodness of a (dis)similarity function with respect to a given learning task and propose algorithms that have guaranteed generalization properties when working with such good functions. Our framework unifies and generalizes the frameworks proposed by [1] and [2]. An attractive feature of our framework is its adaptability to data - we do not promote a fixed notion of goodness but rather let data dictate it. We show, by giving theoretical guarantees that the goodness criterion best suited to a problem can itself be learned which makes our approach applicable to a variety of domains and problems. We propose a landmarking-based approach to obtaining a classifier from such learned goodness criteria. We then provide a novel diversity based heuristic to perform task-driven selection of landmark points instead of random selection. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our goodness criteria learning method as well as the landmark selection heuristic on a variety of similarity-based learning datasets and benchmark UCI datasets on which our method consistently outperforms existing approaches by a significant margin.