Based on a non-rigorous formalism called the “cavity method”, physicists have put forward intriguing predictions on phase transitions in diluted mean-field models, in which the geometry of interactions is induced by a sparse random graph or hypergraph. One example of such a model is the graph coloring problem on the Erdős–Renyi random graph G(n, d n), which can be viewed as the zero temperature case of the Potts antiferromagnet. The cavity method predicts that in addition to the k-colorability phase transition studied intensively in combinatorics, there exists a second phase transition called the condensation phase transition ( in Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:10318–10323, 2007). In fact, there is a conjecture as to the precise location of this phase transition in terms of a certain distributional fixed point problem. In this paper we prove this conjecture for k exceeding a certain constant k0.
The present work builds upon the second moment argument from @cite_2 . Conversely, yields a small improvement over the lower bound from @cite_2 . Indeed, as we saw above implies that @math , thereby determining the precise error term'' @math in the lower bound ).
@cite_2
2236569555 1970259241 30524954 2963885173
Two alternative exact characterizations of the minimum error probability of Bayesian @math -ary hypothesis testing are derived. The first expression corresponds to the error probability of an induced binary hypothesis test and implies the tightness of the meta-converse bound by ; the second expression is a function of an information-spectrum measure and implies the tightness of a generalized Verdu-Han lower bound. The formulas characterize the minimum error probability of several problems in information theory and help to identify the steps where existing converse bounds are loose. We show that a parallel repetition of any two-prover one-round proof system (MIP(2,1)) decreases the probability of error at an exponential rate. No constructive bound was previously known. The constant in the exponent (in our analysis) depends only on the original probability of error and on the total number of possible answers of the two provers. The dependency on the total number of possible answers is logarithmic, which was recently proved to be almost the best possible [U. Feige and O. Verbitsky, Proc.11th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 1996, pp. 70--76]. In this paper, we prove tight lower bounds on the smallest degree of a nonzero polynomial in the ideal generated by @math or @math in the polynomial ring @math , @math are coprime, which is called over @math . The immunity of @math is lower bounded by @math , which is achievable when @math is a multiple of @math ; the immunity of @math is exactly @math for every @math and @math . Our result improves the previous bound @math by Green. We observe how immunity over @math is related to @math circuit lower bound. For example, if the immunity of @math over @math is lower bounded by @math , and @math , then @math requires @math circuit of exponential size to compute. In this paper we establish a substantially improved lower bound on the k-color ability threshold of the random graph G(n, m) with n vertices and m edges. The new lower bound is ≈ 1.39 less than the 2k ln (k)-ln (k) first-moment upper bound (and approximately 0.39 less than the 2k ln (k) - ln(k) - 1 physics conjecture). By comparison, the best previous bounds left a gap of about 2+ln(k), unbounded in terms of the number of colors [Achlioptas, Naor: STOC 2004]. Furthermore, we prove that, in a precise sense, our lower bound marks the so-called condensation phase transition predicted on the basis of physics arguments [: PNAS 2007]. Our proof technique is a novel approach to the second moment method, inspired by physics conjectures on the geometry of the set of k-colorings of the random graph.