In this paper, we propose a path following replicator dynamic, and investigate its potentials in uncovering the underlying cluster structure of a graph. The proposed dynamic is a generalization of the discrete replicator dynamic. The replicator dynamic has been successfully used to extract dense clusters of graphs; however, it is often sensitive to the degree distribution of a graph, and usually biased by vertices with large degrees, thus may fail to detect the densest cluster. To overcome this problem, we introduce a dynamic parameter, called path parameter, into the evolution process. The path parameter can be interpreted as the maximal possible probability of a current cluster containing a vertex, and it monotonically increases as evolution process proceeds. By limiting the maximal probability, the phenomenon of some vertices dominating the early stage of evolution process is suppressed, thus making evolution process more robust. To solve the optimization problem with a fixed path parameter, we propose an efficient fixed point algorithm. The time complexity of the path following replicator dynamic is only linear in the number of edges of a graph, thus it can analyze graphs with millions of vertices and tens of millions of edges on a common PC in a few minutes. Besides, it can be naturally generalized to hypergraph and graph with edges of different orders. We apply it to four important problems: maximum clique problem, densest k-subgraph problem, structure fitting, and discovery of high-density regions. The extensive experimental results clearly demonstrate its advantages, in terms of robustness, scalability and flexility.
Cluster analysis is a basic problem in various disciplines @cite_2 , such as pattern recognition, data mining and computer vision, and a huge number of such methods have been proposed. It is beyond the scope of this paper to list all of them, therefore, we focus on methods closely related to ours.
@cite_2
2011832962 2165835468 2160642098 2170718421
Cluster analysis is the automated search for groups of related observations in a dataset. Most clustering done in practice is based largely on heuristic but intuitively reasonable procedures, and most clustering methods available in commercial software are also of this type. However, there is little systematic guidance associated with these methods for solving important practical questions that arise in cluster analysis, such as how many clusters are there, which clustering method should be used, and how should outliers be handled. We review a general methodology for model-based clustering that provides a principled statistical approach to these issues. We also show that this can be useful for other problems in multivariate analysis, such as discriminant analysis and multivariate density estimation. We give examples from medical diagnosis, minefield detection, cluster recovery from noisy data, and spatial density estimation. Finally, we mention limitations of the methodology and discuss recent development... Cluster analysis is aimed at classifying elements into categories on the basis of their similarity. Its applications range from astronomy to bioinformatics, bibliometrics, and pattern recognition. We propose an approach based on the idea that cluster centers are characterized by a higher density than their neighbors and by a relatively large distance from points with higher densities. This idea forms the basis of a clustering procedure in which the number of clusters arises intuitively, outliers are automatically spotted and excluded from the analysis, and clusters are recognized regardless of their shape and of the dimensionality of the space in which they are embedded. We demonstrate the power of the algorithm on several test cases. Cluster analysis is a primary method for database mining. It is either used as a stand-alone tool to get insight into the distribution of a data set, e.g. to focus further analysis and data processing, or as a preprocessing step for other algorithms operating on the detected clusters. Almost all of the well-known clustering algorithms require input parameters which are hard to determine but have a significant influence on the clustering result. Furthermore, for many real-data sets there does not even exist a global parameter setting for which the result of the clustering algorithm describes the intrinsic clustering structure accurately. We introduce a new algorithm for the purpose of cluster analysis which does not produce a clustering of a data set explicitly; but instead creates an augmented ordering of the database representing its density-based clustering structure. This cluster-ordering contains information which is equivalent to the density-based clusterings corresponding to a broad range of parameter settings. It is a versatile basis for both automatic and interactive cluster analysis. We show how to automatically and efficiently extract not only 'traditional' clustering information (e.g. representative points, arbitrary shaped clusters), but also the intrinsic clustering structure. For medium sized data sets, the cluster-ordering can be represented graphically and for very large data sets, we introduce an appropriate visualization technique. Both are suitable for interactive exploration of the intrinsic clustering structure offering additional insights into the distribution and correlation of the data. Cluster analysis has long been a fundamental task in data mining and machine learning. However, traditional clustering methods concentrate on producing a single solution, even though multiple alternative clusterings may exist. It is thus difficult for the user to validate whether the given solution is in fact appropriate, particularly for large and complex datasets. In this paper we explore the critical requirements for systematically finding a new clustering, given that an already known clustering is available and we also propose a novel algorithm, COALA, to discover this new clustering. Our approach is driven by two important factors; dissimilarity and quality. These are especially important for finding a new clustering which is highly informative about the underlying structure of data, but is at the same time distinctively different from the provided clustering. We undertake an experimental analysis and show that our method is able to outperform existing techniques, for both synthetic and real datasets.