Memorization is worst-case generalization. Based on MacKay's information theoretic model of supervised machine learning, this article discusses how to practically estimate the maximum size of a neural network given a training data set. First, we present four easily applicable rules to analytically determine the capacity of neural network architectures. This allows the comparison of the efficiency of different network architectures independently of a task. Second, we introduce and experimentally validate a heuristic method to estimate the neural network capacity requirement for a given dataset and labeling. This allows an estimate of the required size of a neural network for a given problem. We conclude the article with a discussion on the consequences of sizing the network wrongly, which includes both increased computation effort for training as well as reduced generalization capability.
One measure that handles the properties of given data is the Rademacher complexity @cite_40 . For understanding the properties of large neural networks, @cite_3 recently performed randomization tests. They show that their observed networks can memorize the data as well as the noise. This is proven by evaluating that their neural networks perfectly learn with random labels or with random data. This shows that the VC dimension of the analyzed networks is above the size of the used dataset. But it is not clear what the full capacity of the networks is. This observation also explains why smaller size networks can outperform larger networks. A more elaborate extension of this evaluation has been provided by @cite_35 .
@cite_35 @cite_40 @cite_3
2526782364 2950220847 2798986185 2963038205
Recently, neuron activations extracted from a pre-trained convolutional neural network (CNN) show promising performance in various visual tasks. However, due to the domain and task bias, using the features generated from the model pre-trained for image classification as image representations for instance retrieval is problematic. In this paper, we propose quartet-net learning to improve the discriminative power of CNN features for instance retrieval. The general idea is to map the features into a space where the image similarity can be better evaluated. Our network differs from the traditional Siamese-net in two ways. First, we adopt a double-margin contrastive loss with a dynamic margin tuning strategy to train the network which leads to more robust performance. Second, we introduce in the mimic learning regularization to improve the generalization ability of the network by preventing it from overfitting to the training data. Catering for the network learning, we collect a large-scale dataset, namely GeoPair, which consists of 68k matching image pairs and 63k non-matching pairs. Experiments on several standard instance retrieval datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our method. Despite their massive size, successful deep artificial neural networks can exhibit a remarkably small difference between training and test performance. Conventional wisdom attributes small generalization error either to properties of the model family, or to the regularization techniques used during training. Through extensive systematic experiments, we show how these traditional approaches fail to explain why large neural networks generalize well in practice. Specifically, our experiments establish that state-of-the-art convolutional networks for image classification trained with stochastic gradient methods easily fit a random labeling of the training data. This phenomenon is qualitatively unaffected by explicit regularization, and occurs even if we replace the true images by completely unstructured random noise. We corroborate these experimental findings with a theoretical construction showing that simple depth two neural networks already have perfect finite sample expressivity as soon as the number of parameters exceeds the number of data points as it usually does in practice. We interpret our experimental findings by comparison with traditional models. Neural networks, a central tool in machine learning, have demonstrated remarkable, high fidelity performance on image recognition and classification tasks. These successes evince an ability to accurately represent high dimensional functions, potentially of great use in computational and applied mathematics. That said, there are few rigorous results about the representation error and trainability of neural networks. Here we characterize both the error and the scaling of the error with the size of the network by reinterpreting the standard optimization algorithm used in machine learning applications, stochastic gradient descent, as the evolution of a particle system with interactions governed by a potential related to the objective or "loss" function used to train the network. We show that, when the number @math of parameters is large, the empirical distribution of the particles descends on a convex landscape towards a minimizer at a rate independent of @math . We establish a Law of Large Numbers and a Central Limit Theorem for the empirical distribution, which together show that the approximation error of the network universally scales as @math . Remarkably, these properties do not depend on the dimensionality of the domain of the function that we seek to represent. Our analysis also quantifies the scale and nature of the noise introduced by stochastic gradient descent and provides guidelines for the step size and batch size to use when training a neural network. We illustrate our findings on examples in which we train neural network to learn the energy function of the continuous 3-spin model on the sphere. The approximation error scales as our analysis predicts in as high a dimension as @math . We study the sample complexity of learning neural networks, by providing new bounds on their Rademacher complexity assuming norm constraints on the parameter matrix of each layer. Compared to previous work, these bounds have improved dependence on the network depth, and under some additional assumptions, are fully independent of the network size (both depth and width). These results are derived using some novel techniques, which may be of independent interest.