First-order factoid question answering assumes that the question can be answered by a single fact in a knowledge base (KB). While this does not seem like a challenging task, many recent attempts that apply either complex linguistic reasoning or deep neural networks achieve 65 -76 accuracy on benchmark sets. Our approach formulates the task as two machine learning problems: detecting the entities in the question, and classifying the question as one of the relation types in the KB. We train a recurrent neural network to solve each problem. On the SimpleQuestions dataset, our approach yields substantial improvements over previously published results --- even neural networks based on much more complex architectures. The simplicity of our approach also has practical advantages, such as efficiency and modularity, that are valuable especially in an industry setting. In fact, we present a preliminary analysis of the performance of our model on real queries from Comcast's X1 entertainment platform with millions of users every day.
If knowledge is presented in a structured form (e.g., knowledge base (KB)), the standard approach to QA is to transform the question and knowledge into a compatible form, and perform reasoning to determine which fact in the KB answers a given question. Examples of this approach include pattern-based question analyzers @cite_18 , combination of syntactic parsing and semantic role labeling @cite_8 @cite_20 , as well as lambda calculus @cite_16 and combinatory categorical grammars (CCG) @cite_15 . A downside of these approaches is the reliance on linguistic resources heuristics, making them language- and or domain-specific. Even though claim that their approach requires less supervision than prior work, it still relies on many English-specific heuristics and hand-crafted features. Also, their most accurate model uses a corpus of paraphrases to generalize to linguistic diversity. Linguistic parsers can also be too slow for real-time applications.
@cite_18 @cite_8 @cite_15 @cite_16 @cite_20
2774249241 1646084575 2090243146 2778792674
Research has seen considerable achievements concerning translation of natural language patterns into formal queries for Question Answering (QA) based on Knowledge Graphs (KG). One of the main challenges in this research area is about how to identify which property within a Knowledge Graph matches the predicate found in a Natural Language (NL) relation. Current approaches for formal query generation attempt to resolve this problem mainly by first retrieving the named entity from the KG together with a list of its predicates, then filtering out one from all the predicates of the entity. We attempt an approach to directly match an NL predicate to KG properties that can be employed within QA pipelines. In this paper, we specify a systematic approach as well as providing a tool that can be employed to solve this task. Our approach models KB relations with their underlying parts of speech, we then enhance this with extra attributes obtained from Wordnet and Dependency parsing characteristics. From a question, we model a similar representation of query relations. We then define distance measurements between the query relation and the properties representations from the KG to identify which property is referred to by the relation within the query. We report substantive recall values and considerable precision from our evaluation. Most recent question answering (QA) systems query large-scale knowledge bases (KBs) to answer a question, after parsing and transforming natural language questions to KBs-executable forms (e.g., logical forms). As a well-known fact, KBs are far from complete, so that information required to answer questions may not always exist in KBs. In this paper, we develop a new QA system that mines answers directly from the Web, and meanwhile employs KBs as a significant auxiliary to further boost the QA performance. Specifically, to the best of our knowledge, we make the first attempt to link answer candidates to entities in Freebase, during answer candidate generation. Several remarkable advantages follow: (1) Redundancy among answer candidates is automatically reduced. (2) The types of an answer candidate can be effortlessly determined by those of its corresponding entity in Freebase. (3) Capitalizing on the rich information about entities in Freebase, we can develop semantic features for each answer candidate after linking them to Freebase. Particularly, we construct answer-type related features with two novel probabilistic models, which directly evaluate the appropriateness of an answer candidate's types under a given question. Overall, such semantic features turn out to play significant roles in determining the true answers from the large answer candidate pool. The experimental results show that across two testing datasets, our QA system achieves an 18 54 improvement under F_1 metric, compared with various existing QA systems. We consider the problem of open-domain question answering (Open QA) over massive knowledge bases (KBs). Existing approaches use either manually curated KBs like Freebase or KBs automatically extracted from unstructured text. In this paper, we present OQA, the first approach to leverage both curated and extracted KBs. A key technical challenge is designing systems that are robust to the high variability in both natural language questions and massive KBs. OQA achieves robustness by decomposing the full Open QA problem into smaller sub-problems including question paraphrasing and query reformulation. OQA solves these sub-problems by mining millions of rules from an unlabeled question corpus and across multiple KBs. OQA then learns to integrate these rules by performing discriminative training on question-answer pairs using a latent-variable structured perceptron algorithm. We evaluate OQA on three benchmark question sets and demonstrate that it achieves up to twice the precision and recall of a state-of-the-art Open QA system. Transforming natural language questions into formal queries is an integral task in Question Answering (QA) systems. QA systems built on knowledge graphs like DBpedia, require a step after natural language processing for linking words, specifically including named entities and relations, to their corresponding entities in a knowledge graph. To achieve this task, several approaches rely on background knowledge bases containing semantically-typed relations, e.g., PATTY, for an extra disambiguation step. Two major factors may affect the performance of relation linking approaches whenever background knowledge bases are accessed: a) limited availability of such semantic knowledge sources, and b) lack of a systematic approach on how to maximize the benefits of the collected knowledge. We tackle this problem and devise SIBKB, a semantic-based index able to capture knowledge encoded on background knowledge bases like PATTY. SIBKB represents a background knowledge base as a bi-partite and a dynamic index over the relation patterns included in the knowledge base. Moreover, we develop a relation linking component able to exploit SIBKB features. The benefits of SIBKB are empirically studied on existing QA benchmarks and observed results suggest that SIBKB is able to enhance the accuracy of relation linking by up to three times.