In this paper, we propose a distributed multi-hop interference avoidance algorithm, namely, IAA to avoid co-channel interference inside a wireless body area network (WBAN). Our proposal adopts carrier sense multiple access with collision avoidance (CSMA CA) between sources and relays and a flexible time division multiple access (FTDMA) between relays and coordinator. The proposed scheme enables low interfering nodes to transmit their messages using base channel. Depending on suitable situations, high interfering nodes double their contention windows (CW) and probably use switched orthogonal channel. Simulation results show that proposed scheme has far better minimum SINR (12dB improvement) and longer energy lifetime than other schemes (power control and opportunistic relaying). Additionally, we validate our proposal in a theoretical analysis and also propose a probabilistic approach to prove the outage probability can be effectively reduced to the minimal.
Recent studies show multi-hop schemes have a lower power consumption in comparison to one-hop scheme. However, using relays reduces the WBAN interference and consequently the power consumption. Authors of @cite_3 propose a single-relay cooperative scheme where the best relay is selected in a distributed fashion. Also, authors of @cite_6 propose a prediction-based dynamic relay transmission scheme through which the problem of "when to relay" and "who to relay" are decided in an optimal way. The interference problem among multiple co-located WBANs is investigated in @cite_3 . The authors show cooperative two relay communication with opportunistic relaying significantly mitigates WBAN interference.
@cite_6 @cite_3
2292788438 2156149655 2159297871 2083602816
In this paper, we propose a distributed multi-hop interference avoidance algorithm, namely, IAA to avoid co-channel interference inside a wireless body area network (WBAN). Our proposal adopts carrier sense multiple access with collision avoidance (CSMA CA) between sources and relays and a flexible time division multiple access (FTDMA) between relays and coordinator. The proposed scheme enables low interfering nodes to transmit their messages using base channel. Depending on suitable situations, high interfering nodes double their contention windows (CW) and probably use switched orthogonal channel. Simulation results show that proposed scheme has far better minimum SINR (12dB improvement) and longer energy lifetime than other schemes (power control and opportunistic relaying). Additionally, we validate our proposal in a theoretical analysis and also propose a probabilistic approach to prove the outage probability can be effectively reduced to the minimal. In this paper, a cooperative two-hop communication scheme, together with opportunistic relaying (OR), is applied within a mobile wireless body area network (WBAN). Its effectiveness in interference mitigation is investigated in a scenario where there are multiple closely-located networks. Due to a typical WBAN's nature, no coordination is used among different WBANs. A suitable time-division-multiple-access (TDMA) scheme is adopted as both an intra-network and also an internetwork access scheme. Extensive on-body and off-body channel gain measurements are employed to gauge performance, which are overlaid to simulate a realistic WBAN working environment. It is found that opportunistic relaying is able to improve the signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) performance at an outage probability of 10 by an average of 5 dB, and it is also shown that it can reduce level crossing rate (LCR) significantly at low SINRs. Furthermore, this scheme is more efficient when on-body channels fade more rapidly. A scheme for two-hop relay-assisted cooperative communications integrated with transmit power control, based on simple channel prediction, is presented. A large set of empirical on- and inter-body channel data is employed to model various scenarios of wireless body area network (WBAN) communica- tions, from one isolated WBAN up to 10 closely located WBANs coexisting. Our study shows that relay assisted power control can reduce approximately 60 circuit power consumption from that of constant transmission at 0 dBm, without much loss in reliability. Further, interference mitigation is significantly enhanced over constant transmission at −5 dBm, with similar power consumption. Such performance is maintained from 2 to 10 closely-located WBANs coexisting. And the joint algorithm works best for one isolated WBAN. A trade-off between power saving and interference mitigation is motivated, taking remaining sensor-battery level, amount of interference and on-body channel quality into account. Index Terms—Cooperative communications, interference mit- igation, transmit power control, wireless body area networks. In this paper, a dynamic resource allocation scheme is proposed to avoid interference amongst coexisting Wireless Body Area Networks (WBAN). In the proposed scheme, each WBAN generates a table consisting of interfering nodes from coexisting WBANs in its vicinity. Then each WBAN broadcasts this table to its neighbors, which allows for efficient interpretation of an Interference Region (IR) between each pair of WBANs. The nodes in the IR are later allocated orthogonal sub-channels; whilst nodes that do not exist in the IR can potentially transmit in the same time interval. We further demonstrate a precise trade- off between the minimum interference level and spatial reuse. Simulation results show that our proposed scheme has far better spectral efficiency compared to the conventional orthogonal schemes, whilst maintaining an acceptable interference level. We also provide mathematical analysis on the proposed scheme to validate its efficiency for increasing spectral efficiency and avoiding interference. To further reduce the interference level, we propose a probabilistic approach, and analytically show that the outage probability can be effectively reduced at the cost of very small change in the spatial reuse factor. Index Terms—Wireless Body Area Networks, Spectral Effi- ciency, IEEE 802.15.6, Interference Mitigation