Comments of online articles provide extended views and improve user engagement. Automatically making comments thus become a valuable functionality for online forums, intelligent chatbots, etc. This paper proposes the new task of automatic article commenting, and introduces a large-scale Chinese dataset with millions of real comments and a human-annotated subset characterizing the comments' varying quality. Incorporating the human bias of comment quality, we further develop automatic metrics that generalize a broad set of popular reference-based metrics and exhibit greatly improved correlations with human evaluations.
There is a surge of interest in natural language generation tasks, such as machine translation @cite_33 @cite_4 , dialog @cite_19 @cite_34 , text manipulation @cite_20 , visual description generation @cite_28 @cite_18 , and so forth. Automatic article commenting poses new challenges due to the large input and output spaces and the open-domain nature of comments.
@cite_18 @cite_4 @cite_33 @cite_28 @cite_19 @cite_34 @cite_20
2509282593 2512924740 2794070657 2251796964
This paper introduces and summarises the findings of a new shared task at the intersection of Natural Language Processing and Computer Vision: the generation of image descriptions in a target language, given an image and or one or more descriptions in a different (source) language. This challenge was organised along with the Conference on Machine Translation (WMT16), and called for system submissions for two task variants: (i) a translation task, in which a source language image description needs to be translated to a target language, (optionally) with additional cues from the corresponding image, and (ii) a description generation task, in which a target language description needs to be generated for an image, (optionally) with additional cues from source language descriptions of the same image. In this first edition of the shared task, 16 systems were submitted for the translation task and seven for the image description task, from a total of 10 teams. This paper presents the results of the WMT16 shared tasks, which included five machine translation (MT) tasks (standard news, IT-domain, biomedical, multimodal, pronoun), three evaluation tasks (metrics, tuning, run-time estimation of MT quality), and an automatic post-editing task and bilingual document alignment task. This year, 102 MT systems from 24 institutions (plus 36 anonymized online systems) were submitted to the 12 translation directions in the news translation task. The IT-domain task received 31 submissions from 12 institutions in 7 directions and the Biomedical task received 15 submissions systems from 5 institutions. Evaluation was both automatic and manual (relative ranking and 100-point scale assessments). The quality estimation task had three subtasks, with a total of 14 teams, submitting 39 entries. The automatic post-editing task had a total of 6 teams, submitting 11 entries. Computer-generated text plays a pivotal role in various applications, but the quality of the generated text is much lower than that of human-generated text. The use of artificially generated “machine text” can thus negatively affect such practical applications as website generation and text corpora collection. A method for distinguishing computer- and human-generated text is thus needed. Previous methods extract fluency features from a limited internal corpus and use them to identify the generated text. We have extended this approach to also estimate fluency using an enormous external corpus. We have also developed a method for extracting and distinguishing the noises characteristically created by a person or a machine. For example, people frequently use spoken noise words (2morrow, wanna, etc.) and misspelled ones (comin, hapy, etc.) while machines frequently generate incorrect expressions (such as untranslated phrases). A method combining these fluency and noise features was evaluated using 1000 original English messages and 1000 artificial English ones translated from Spanish. The results show that this combined method had the highest accuracy (80.35 ) and the lowest equal error rate (19.44 ) compared with one of state-of-the-art methods, which uses syntactic parser. Moreover, experiments using texts in other languages produced similar results, demonstrated that our proposed method works consistently across various languages. Corpus-based approaches to machine translation (MT) rely on the availability of parallel corpora. To produce user-acceptable translation outputs, such systems need high quality data to be efficiently trained, optimized and evaluated. However, building high quality dataset is a relatively expensive task. In this paper, we describe the data collection and analysis of a large database of 10.881 SMT translation output hypotheses manually corrected. These post-editions were collected using Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, following some ethical guidelines. A complete analysis of the collected data pointed out a high quality of the corrections with more than 87 of the collected post-editions that improve hypotheses and more than 94 of the crowdsourced post-editions which are at least of professional quality. We also post-edited 1,500 gold-standard reference translations (of bilingual parallel corpora generated by professional) and noticed that 72 of these translations needed to be corrected during post-edition. We computed a proximity measure between the different kind of translations and pointed out that reference translations are as far from the hypotheses as from the corrected hypotheses (i.e. the post-editions). In light of these last findings, we discuss the adequation of text-based generated reference translations to train setence-to-sentence based SMT systems.