A large number of the most-subscribed YouTube channels target children of very young age. Hundreds of toddler-oriented channels on YouTube feature inoffensive, well produced, and educational videos. Unfortunately, inappropriate content that targets this demographic is also common. YouTube's algorithmic recommendation system regrettably suggests inappropriate content because some of it mimics or is derived from otherwise appropriate content. Considering the risk for early childhood development, and an increasing trend in toddler's consumption of YouTube media, this is a worrisome problem. In this work, we build a classifier able to discern inappropriate content that targets toddlers on YouTube with 84.3 accuracy, and leverage it to perform a first-of-its-kind, large-scale, quantitative characterization that reveals some of the risks of YouTube media consumption by young children. Our analysis reveals that YouTube is still plagued by such disturbing videos and its currently deployed counter-measures are ineffective in terms of detecting them in a timely manner. Alarmingly, using our classifier we show that young children are not only able, but likely to encounter disturbing videos when they randomly browse the platform starting from benign videos.
O' @cite_4 use dynamic network analysis methods to identify the nature of different spam campaign strategies. @cite_9 propose two supervised classification algorithms to detect spammers, promoters, and legitimate YouTube users. Also, in an effort to improve the performance of spam filtering on the platform, @cite_14 test numerous approaches and propose a tool, based on Naive Bayes, that filters spam comments on YouTube. Finally, @cite_19 propose a deep learning classifier for identifying videos that use manipulative techniques in order to increase their views (i.e., clickbait videos).
@cite_19 @cite_9 @cite_14 @cite_4
2028772504 2097436041 2295416969 2022303741
A number of online video sharing systems, out of which YouTube is the most popular, provide features that allow users to post a video as a response to a discussion topic. These features open opportunities for users to introduce polluted content, or simply pollution, into the system. For instance, spammers may post an unrelated video as response to a popular one, aiming at increasing the likelihood of the response being viewed by a larger number of users. Moreover, content promoters may try to gain visibility to a specific video by posting a large number of (potentially unrelated) responses to boost the rank of the responded video, making it appear in the top lists maintained by the system. Content pollution may jeopardize the trust of users on the system, thus compromising its success in promoting social interactions. In spite of that, the available literature is very limited in providing a deep understanding of this problem. In this paper, we address the issue of detecting video spammers and promoters. Towards that end, we first manually build a test collection of real YouTube users, classifying them as spammers, promoters, and legitimate users. Using our test collection, we provide a characterization of content, individual, and social attributes that help distinguish each user class. We then investigate the feasibility of using supervised classification algorithms to automatically detect spammers and promoters, and assess their effectiveness in our test collection. While our classification approach succeeds at separating spammers and promoters from legitimate users, the high cost of manually labeling vast amounts of examples compromises its full potential in realistic scenarios. For this reason, we further propose an active learning approach that automatically chooses a set of examples to label, which is likely to provide the highest amount of information, drastically reducing the amount of required training data while maintaining comparable classification effectiveness. A number of online video social networks, out of which YouTube is the most popular, provides features that allow users to post a video as a response to a discussion topic. These features open opportunities for users to introduce polluted content, or simply pollution, into the system. For instance, spammers may post an unrelated video as response to a popular one aiming at increasing the likelihood of the response being viewed by a larger number of users. Moreover, opportunistic users--promoters--may try to gain visibility to a specific video by posting a large number of (potentially unrelated) responses to boost the rank of the responded video, making it appear in the top lists maintained by the system. Content pollution may jeopardize the trust of users on the system, thus compromising its success in promoting social interactions. In spite of that, the available literature is very limited in providing a deep understanding of this problem. In this paper, we go a step further by addressing the issue of detecting video spammers and promoters. Towards that end, we manually build a test collection of real YouTube users, classifying them as spammers, promoters, and legitimates. Using our test collection, we provide a characterization of social and content attributes that may help distinguish each user class. We also investigate the feasibility of using a state-of-the-art supervised classification algorithm to detect spammers and promoters, and assess its effectiveness in our test collection. We found that our approach is able to correctly identify the majority of the promoters, misclassifying only a small percentage of legitimate users. In contrast, although we are able to detect a significant fraction of spammers, they showed to be much harder to distinguish from legitimate users. The profitability promoted by Google in its brand new video distribution platform YouTube has attracted an increasing number of users. However, such success has also attracted malicious users, which aim to self-promote their videos or disseminate viruses and malwares. Since YouTube offers limited tools for comment moderation, the spam volume is shockingly increasing which lead owners of famous channels to disable the comments section in their videos. Automatic comment spam filtering on YouTube is a challenge even for established classification methods, since the messages are very short and often rife with slangs, symbols and abbreviations. In this work, we have evaluated several top-performance classification techniques for such purpose. The statistical analysis of results indicate that, with 99.9 of confidence level, decision trees, logistic regression, Bernoulli Naive Bayes, random forests, linear and Gaussian SVMs are statistically equivalent. Based on this, we have also offered the TubeSpam -- an accurate online system to filter comments posted on YouTube. This paper presents an efficient approach for copies detection in a large videos archive consisting of several hundred of hours. The video content indexing method consists of extracting the dynamic behavior on the local description of interest points and further on the estimation of their trajectories along the video sequence. Analyzing the low-level description obtained allows to highlight trends of behaviors and then to assign a label of behavior to each local descriptor. Such an indexing approach has several interesting properties: it provides a rich, compact and generic description, while labels of behavior provide a high-level description of the video content. Here, we focus on video Content Based Copy Detection (CBCD). Copy detection is problematic as similarity search problem but with prominent differences. To be efficient, it requires a dedicated on-line retrieval method based on a specific voting function. This voting function must be robust to signal transformations and discriminating versus high similarities which are not copies. The method we propose in this paper is a dedicated on-line retrieval method based on a combination of the different dynamic contexts computed during the off-line indexing. A spatio-temporal registration based on the relevant combination of detected labels is then applied. This approach is evaluated using a huge video database of 300 hours with different video tests. The method is compared to a state-of-the art technique in the same conditions. We illustrate that taking labels into account in the specific voting process reduces false alarms significantly and drastically improves the precision.