This paper proposes a general system for compute-intensive graph mining tasks that find from a big graph all subgraphs that satisfy certain requirements (e.g., graph matching and community detection). Due to the broad range of applications of such tasks, many single-threaded algorithms have been proposed. However, graphs such as online social networks and knowledge graphs often have billions of vertices and edges, which require distributed processing in order to scale. Unfortunately, existing distributed graph processing systems such as Pregel and GraphLab are designed for data-intensive analytics, and are inefficient for compute-intensive graph mining tasks since computation over any data is coupled with the data's access that involves network transmission. We propose a distributed graph mining framework, called G-thinker, which is designed for compute-intensive graph mining workloads. G-thinker provides an intuitive graph-exploration API for the convenient implementation of various graph mining algorithms, and the runtime engine provides efficient execution with bounded memory consumption, light network communication, and parallelism between computation and communication. Extensive experiments were conducted, which demonstrate that G-thinker is orders of magnitude faster than existing solution, and can scale to graphs that are two orders of magnitude larger given the same hardware resources.
However, the vertex-centric API is not suitable for , and each vertex @math needs to communicate with its surrounding vertices in a breadth-first manner (one more hop per iteration) to get their information for constructing @math . The solution cannot scale to large graphs since the total volume of (possibly overlapping) decomposed subgraphs may easily exceed the memory capacity of a cluster. Vertex-centric systems also do not provide any mechanism for decomposed subgraphs to share common vertex's information Pregel's message combiner @cite_9 does not help, since it is to aggregate messages towards the same target vertex, while we consider getting information from the same source vertex. .
@cite_9
2221846841 1893414835 2516174802 217817341
Distributed graph processing platforms have helped emerging application domains use commodity clusters and Clouds to analyze large graphs. Vertex-centric programming models like Google Pregel, and their subgraph-centric variants, specify data-parallel application logic for a single vertex or component that execute iteratively. The locality and balancing of components within partitions affects the performance of such platforms. We propose three partitioning strategies for a subgraph-centric model, and analyze their impact on CPU utilization, communication, iterations, and makespan. We analyze these using Breadth First Search and PageRank algorithms on powerlaw and spatio-planar graphs. They are validated on a commodity cluster using our GoFFish subgraph-centric platform, and compared against Apache Giraph vertex-centric platform. Our experiments show upto 8 times improvement in utilization resulting to upto 5 times improvement of overall makespan for flat and hierarchical partitioning over the default strategy due to improved machine utilization. Further, these also exhibit better horizontal scalability relative to Giraph. Vertex centric models for large scale graph processing are gaining traction due to their simple distributed programming abstraction. However, pure vertex centric algorithms under-perform due to large communication overheads and slow iterative convergence. We introduce GoFFish a scalable sub-graph centric framework co-designed with a distributed persistent graph storage for large scale graph analytics on commodity clusters, offering the added natural flexibility of shared memory sub-graph computation. We map Connected Components, SSSP and PageRank algorithms to this model and empirically analyze them for several real world graphs, demonstrating orders of magnitude improvements, in some cases, compared to Apache Giraph’s vertex centric framework. Vertex-centric graph processing systems such as Pregel, PowerGraph, or GraphX recently gained popularity due to their superior performance of data analytics on graph-structured data. These systems exploit the graph structure to improve data access locality during computation, making use of specialized graph partitioning algorithms. Recent partitioning techniques assume a uniform and constant amount of data exchanged between graph vertices (i.e., uniform vertex traffic) and homogeneous underlying network costs. However, in real-world scenarios vertex traffic and network costs are heterogeneous. This leads to suboptimal partitioning decisions and inefficient graph processing. To this end, we designed GrapH, the first graph processing system using vertex-cut graph partitioning that considers both, diverse vertex traffic and heterogeneous network, to minimize overall communication costs. The main idea is to avoid frequent communication over expensive network links using an adaptive edge migration strategy. Our evaluations show an improvement of 60 in communication costs compared to state-of-the-art partitioning approaches. To meet the challenge of processing rapidly growing graph and network data created by modern applications, a number of distributed graph processing systems have emerged, such as Pregel and GraphLab. All these systems divide input graphs into partitions, and employ a "think like a vertex" programming model to support iterative graph computation. This vertex-centric model is easy to program and has been proved useful for many graph algorithms. However, this model hides the partitioning information from the users, thus prevents many algorithm-specific optimizations. This often results in longer execution time due to excessive network messages (e.g. in Pregel) or heavy scheduling overhead to ensure data consistency (e.g. in GraphLab). To address this limitation, we propose a new "think like a graph" programming paradigm. Under this graph-centric model, the partition structure is opened up to the users, and can be utilized so that communication within a partition can bypass the heavy message passing or scheduling machinery. We implemented this model in a new system, called Giraph++, based on Apache Giraph, an open source implementation of Pregel. We explore the applicability of the graph-centric model to three categories of graph algorithms, and demonstrate its flexibility and superior performance, especially on well-partitioned data. For example, on a web graph with 118 million vertices and 855 million edges, the graph-centric version of connected component detection algorithm runs 63X faster and uses 204X fewer network messages than its vertex-centric counterpart.