We describe a new algorithm called Frequent Directions for deterministic matrix sketching in the row-updates model. The algorithm is presented an arbitrary input matrix @math one row at a time. It performed @math operations per row and maintains a sketch matrix @math such that for any @math @math and @math . Here, @math stands for the minimizer of @math over all rank @math matrices (similarly @math ) and @math is the rank @math matrix resulting from projecting @math on the row span of @math . We show both of these bounds are the best possible for the space allowed. The summary is mergeable, and hence trivially parallelizable. Moreover, Frequent Directions outperforms exemplar implementations of existing streaming algorithms in the space-error tradeoff.
It is worth noting that under the construction model, and allowing streaming turnstile updates to each element of the matrix, the hashing algorithm has been shown space optimal by Clarkson and Woodruff @cite_46 (assuming each matrix entry requires @math bits, and otherwise off by only a @math factor). It is randomized and it constructs a decomposition of a rank @math matrix @math that satisfies @math , with probability at least @math . This provides a relative error construction bound of size @math bits. They also show an @math bits lower bound. Our paper shows that the row-update model is strictly easier with a lower upper bound.
@cite_46
2059867647 2089135543 2951810887 2117756735
We give near-optimal space bounds in the streaming model for linear algebra problems that include estimation of matrix products, linear regression, low-rank approximation, and approximation of matrix rank. In the streaming model, sketches of input matrices are maintained under updates of matrix entries; we prove results for turnstile updates, given in an arbitrary order. We give the first lower bounds known for the space needed by the sketches, for a given estimation error e. We sharpen prior upper bounds, with respect to combinations of space, failure probability, and number of passes. The sketch we use for matrix A is simply STA, where S is a sign matrix. Our results include the following upper and lower bounds on the bits of space needed for 1-pass algorithms. Here A is an n x d matrix, B is an n x d' matrix, and c := d+d'. These results are given for fixed failure probability; for failure probability δ>0, the upper bounds require a factor of log(1 δ) more space. We assume the inputs have integer entries specified by O(log(nc)) bits, or O(log(nd)) bits. (Matrix Product) Output matrix C with F(ATB-C) ≤ e F(A) F(B). We show that Θ(ce-2log(nc)) space is needed. (Linear Regression) For d'=1, so that B is a vector b, find x so that Ax-b ≤ (1+e) minx' ∈ Reald Ax'-b. We show that Θ(d2e-1 log(nd)) space is needed. (Rank-k Approximation) Find matrix tAk of rank no more than k, so that F(A-tAk) ≤ (1+e) F A-Ak , where Ak is the best rank-k approximation to A. Our lower bound is Ω(ke-1(n+d)log(nd)) space, and we give a one-pass algorithm matching this when A is given row-wise or column-wise. For general updates, we give a one-pass algorithm needing [O(ke-2(n + d e2)log(nd))] space. We also give upper and lower bounds for algorithms using multiple passes, and a sketching analog of the CUR decomposition. We give efficient algorithms for volume sampling, i.e., for picking @math -subsets of the rows of any given matrix with probabilities proportional to the squared volumes of the simplices defined by them and the origin (or the squared volumes of the parallelepipeds defined by these subsets of rows). In other words, we can efficiently sample @math -subsets of @math with probabilities proportional to the corresponding @math by @math principal minors of any given @math by @math positive semi definite matrix. This solves an open problem from the monograph on spectral algorithms by Kannan and Vempala (see Section @math of KV , also implicit in BDM, DRVW ). Our first algorithm for volume sampling @math -subsets of rows from an @math -by- @math matrix runs in @math arithmetic operations (where @math is the exponent of matrix multiplication) and a second variant of it for @math -approximate volume sampling runs in @math arithmetic operations, which is almost linear in the size of the input (i.e., the number of entries) for small @math . Our efficient volume sampling algorithms imply the following results for low-rank matrix approximation: (1) Given @math , in @math arithmetic operations we can find @math of its rows such that projecting onto their span gives a @math -approximation to the matrix of rank @math closest to @math under the Frobenius norm. This improves the @math -approximation of Boutsidis, Drineas and Mahoney BDM and matches the lower bound shown in DRVW . The method of conditional expectations gives a algorithm with the same complexity. The running time can be improved to @math at the cost of losing an extra @math in the approximation factor. (2) The same rows and projection as in the previous point give a @math -approximation to the matrix of rank @math closest to @math under the spectral norm. In this paper, we show an almost matching lower bound of @math , even for @math . This paper provides the best bounds to date on the number of randomly sampled entries required to reconstruct an unknown low rank matrix. These results improve on prior work by Candes and Recht, Candes and Tao, and Keshavan, Montanari, and Oh. The reconstruction is accomplished by minimizing the nuclear norm, or sum of the singular values, of the hidden matrix subject to agreement with the provided entries. If the underlying matrix satisfies a certain incoherence condition, then the number of entries required is equal to a quadratic logarithmic factor times the number of parameters in the singular value decomposition. The proof of this assertion is short, self contained, and uses very elementary analysis. The novel techniques herein are based on recent work in quantum information theory. Low-rank matrix approximations, such as the truncated singular value decomposition and the rank-revealing QR decomposition, play a central role in data analysis and scientific computing. This work surveys and extends recent research which demonstrates that randomization offers a powerful tool for performing low-rank matrix approximation. These techniques exploit modern computational architectures more fully than classical methods and open the possibility of dealing with truly massive data sets. This paper presents a modular framework for constructing randomized algorithms that compute partial matrix decompositions. These methods use random sampling to identify a subspace that captures most of the action of a matrix. The input matrix is then compressed—either explicitly or implicitly—to this subspace, and the reduced matrix is manipulated deterministically to obtain the desired low-rank factorization. In many cases, this approach beats its classical competitors in terms of accuracy, robustness, and or speed. These claims are supported by extensive numerical experiments and a detailed error analysis. The specific benefits of randomized techniques depend on the computational environment. Consider the model problem of finding the @math dominant components of the singular value decomposition of an @math matrix. (i) For a dense input matrix, randomized algorithms require @math floating-point operations (flops) in contrast to @math for classical algorithms. (ii) For a sparse input matrix, the flop count matches classical Krylov subspace methods, but the randomized approach is more robust and can easily be reorganized to exploit multiprocessor architectures. (iii) For a matrix that is too large to fit in fast memory, the randomized techniques require only a constant number of passes over the data, as opposed to @math passes for classical algorithms. In fact, it is sometimes possible to perform matrix approximation with a single pass over the data.