Let B be a set of n axis-parallel boxes in d-dimensions such that each box has a corner at the origin and the other corner in the positive quadrant, and let k be a positive integer. We study the problem of selecting k boxes in B that maximize the volume of the union of the selected boxes. The research is motivated by applications in skyline queries for databases and in multicriteria optimization, where the problem is known as the hypervolume subset selection problem. It is known that the problem can be solved in polynomial time in the plane, while the best known algorithms in any dimension d>2 enumerate all size-k subsets. We show that: * The problem is NP-hard already in 3 dimensions. * In 3 dimensions, we break the enumeration of all size-k subsets, by providing an n^O(sqrt(k)) algorithm. * For any constant dimension d, we give an efficient polynomial-time approximation scheme.
Since the volume of the union of boxes is a submodular function (see, e.g., @cite_7 ), the greedy algorithm for submodular function maximization @cite_4 yields a @math -approximation of @math . This algorithm solves @math instances of Klee's measure problem on at most @math anchored boxes, and thus runs in time @math . Using @cite_1 , this running time improves to @math , at the cost of decreasing the approximation ratio to @math and introducing an error probability @math . See @cite_11 for related results in @math dimensions.
@cite_1 @cite_4 @cite_7 @cite_11
1542515633 1569766464 2179494254 2514846057
Consider a suboptimal solution S for a maximization problem. Suppose S's value is small compared to an optimal solution OPT to the problem, yet S is structurally similar to OPT. A natural question in this setting is whether there is a way of improving S based solely on this information. In this paper we introduce the Structural Continuous Greedy Algorithm, answering this question affirmatively in the setting of the Nonmonotone Submodular Maximization Problem. We improve on the best approximation factor known for this problem. In the Nonmonotone Submodular Maximization Problem we are given a non-negative submodular function f, and the objective is to find a subset maximizing f. Our method yields an 0.42-approximation for this problem, improving on the current best approximation factor of 0.41 given by Gharan and Vondrak [5]. On the other hand, [4] showed a lower bound of 0.5 for this problem. Klee’s Measure Problem (KMP) asks for the volume of the union of n axis-aligned boxes in ℝ d . Omitting logarithmic factors, the best algorithm has runtime ( O ^*(n^ d 2 ) ) [Overmars,Yap’91]. There are faster algorithms known for several special cases: Cube-KMP (where all boxes are cubes), Unitcube-KMP (where all boxes are cubes of equal side length), Hypervolume (where all boxes share a vertex), and k -Grounded (where the projection onto the first k dimensions is a Hypervolume instance). We consider the Unconstrained Submodular Maximization problem in which we are given a nonnegative submodular function @math , and the objective is to find a subset @math maximizing @math . This is one of the most basic submodular optimization problems, having a wide range of applications. Some well-known problems captured by Unconstrained Submodular Maximization include Max-Cut, Max-DiCut, and variants of Max-SAT and maximum facility location. We present a simple randomized linear time algorithm achieving a tight approximation guarantee of 1 2, thus matching the known hardness result of Feige, Mirrokni, and Vondrak [SIAM J. Comput., 40 (2011), pp. 1133--1153]. Our algorithm is based on an adaptation of the greedy approach which exploits certain symmetry properties of the problem. In this work, we present a new algorithm for maximizing a non-monotone submodular function subject to a general constraint. Our algorithm finds an approximate fractional solution for maximizing the multilinear extension of the function over a down-closed polytope. The approximation guarantee is 0.372 and it is the first improvement over the 1 e approximation achieved by the unified Continuous Greedy algorithm [, FOCS 2011].