We study revenue maximization through sequential posted price mechanisms (SPMs) in single-dimensional settings with n buyers, and independent but not necessarily identical value distributions. We construct our SPMs by considering two simple pricing schemes: one that imitates Myerson's mechanism via taxation principle, and the other that posts a uniform price. We design a factor revealing LP that crisply captures the approximation factor of this SPM. In the H-units setting, our SPM yields the first improvement in approximation over the correlation-gap-based approximation factor from over eight years ago (Yan 2011). In the position auction setting, our SPM yields the first higher-than 1-1 e approximation factor. In the 1-unit setting, our SPM yields better than the current best known approximation factor for small values of the number of buyers n. Our results on SPMs immediately imply improved performance guarantees for the equivalent free-order prophet inequality problem. In the recent surge of results that show an improvement over 1-1 e for SPMs, ours is the only technique that generalizes beyond the 1-unit setting, and yields the first improvement over long established approximation factors in several settings.
false Moved these two paragraphs here. Todo Finally, we compare our result with the results of @cite_6 . Though they have a worse factor, their posted price result is applicable for a more general setting: i.e., applicable both for a fixed-seller-chosen ordering of buyers, and random ordering of buyers, whereas our posted pricing result is applicable only for a fixed-seller-chosen-ordering of buyers (namely, descending order of prices). While the random order setting is more general, note that a random order model for posted pricing does not give any additional benefit over the fixed-ordering when it comes to approximation for second price auctions with eager reserves.
@cite_6
1656659859 161187638 2010377201 2962979247
We study prior-free revenue maximization for a seller with unlimited supply of n item types facing m myopic buyers present for k < log n days. We show that a certain randomized schedule of posted prices has an approximation factor of O(log m+log n k). This algorithm relies on buyer valuations having hereditary maximizers, a novel natural property satisfied for example by gross substitutes valuations. We obtain a matching lower bound with multi-unit valuations. In light of existing results [2], k days can thus improve the approximation by a Θ(k) factor. We also provide a posted price schedule with the same factor for positive affine allocative externalities, despite an increase in the optimal revenue. We consider a dynamic auction model, where bidders sequentially arrive to the market. The values of the bidders for the item for sale are independently drawn from a distribution, but this distribution is unknown to the seller. The seller offers a personalized take-it-or-leave-it price for each arriving bidder and aims to maximize revenue. We study how well can such sequential posted-price mechanisms approximate the optimal revenue that would be achieved if the distribution was known to the seller. On the negative side, we show that sequential posted-price mechanisms cannot guarantee a constant fraction of this revenue when the class of candidate distributions is unrestricted. We show that this impossibility holds even for randomized mechanisms and even if the set of possible distributions is very small or when the seller has a prior distribution over the candidate distributions. On the positive side, we devise a simple posted-price mechanism that guarantees a constant fraction of the known-distribution revenue when all candidate distributions exhibit the monotone hazard rate property. The design of optimal auctions focuses on ways to negotiate with the bidders for eliciting relevant information that they hold. Sometimes, however, decisions should be made very quickly, and the auctioneer cannot allow a costly iterative procedure of negotiation or waiting for bidders to determine their exact valuation. One solution that has been used in practice is to post prices for the bidders, without collecting any information from the bidders, and ask for their immediate take-it-or-leave-it response. Our paper compares the expected revenue in full-revelation auctions to that in posted-price auctions. We focus on single-item auctions in a Bayesian model where the values that the bidders are willing to pay for the item are independently identically distributed according to a known distribution. This paper provides an exact asymptotic characterization of the optimal expected revenue achieved by each one of the above auctions. For posted price auctions, we also present the exact prices that achieve the optimal results.Our results are given up to terms with lower asymptotic order, that is, up to factor of 1--o(1). We provide two sets of results; one for distributions on a support that is bounded from above, and a second set for distributions on unbounded supports. In the first case we require a mild assumption on the way the distribution function approaches the end of the support, called the first von Mises condition; the latter case requires a similar mild condition called the second von Mises condition. These very weak conditions are taken from works on extreme-value theory and highest-order statistics. We consider the problem of a single seller repeatedly selling a single item to a single buyer (specifically, the buyer has a value drawn fresh from known distribution D in every round). Prior work assumes that the buyer is fully rational and will perfectly reason about how their bids today affect the seller's decisions tomorrow. In this work we initiate a different direction: the buyer simply runs a no-regret learning algorithm over possible bids. We provide a fairly complete characterization of optimal auctions for the seller in this domain. Specifically: - If the buyer bids according to EXP3 (or any "mean-based" learning algorithm), then the seller can extract expected revenue arbitrarily close to the expected welfare. This auction is independent of the buyer's valuation D , but somewhat unnatural as it is sometimes in the buyer's interest to overbid. - There exists a learning algorithm A such that if the buyer bids according to A then the optimal strategy for the seller is simply to post the Myerson reserve for D every round. - If the buyer bids according to EXP3 (or any "mean-based" learning algorithm), but the seller is restricted to "natural" auction formats where overbidding is dominated (e.g. Generalized First-Price or Generalized Second-Price), then the optimal strategy for the seller is a pay-your-bid format with decreasing reserves over time. Moreover, the seller's optimal achievable revenue is characterized by a linear program, and can be unboundedly better than the best truthful auction yet simultaneously unboundedly worse than the expected welfare.