Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks (cGANs) are finding increasingly widespread use in many application domains. Despite outstanding progress, quantitative evaluation of such models often involves multiple distinct metrics to assess different desirable properties such as image quality, intra-conditioning diversity, and conditional consistency, making model benchmarking challenging. In this paper, we propose the Frechet Joint Distance (FJD), which implicitly captures the above mentioned properties in a single metric. FJD is defined as the Frechet Distance of the joint distribution of images and conditionings, making it less sensitive to the often limited per-conditioning sample size. As a result, it scales more gracefully to stronger forms of conditioning such as pixel-wise or multi-modal conditioning. We evaluate FJD on a modified version of the dSprite dataset as well as on the large scale COCO-Stuff dataset, and consistently highlight its benefits when compared to currently established metrics. Moreover, we use the newly introduced metric to compare existing cGAN-based models, with varying conditioning strengths, and show that FJD can be used as a promising single metric for model benchmarking.
Beyond IS and FID, a number of GAN evaluation metrics have emerged in the literature. Most of these metrics either focus on the separability between generated images and real images @cite_54 @cite_43 @cite_23 @cite_38 , compute the distance between distributions @cite_33 @cite_9 @cite_17 , assess sample quality and diversity from conditional or marginal distributions @cite_21 @cite_2 @cite_52 , measure the similarity between generated and real images @cite_46 @cite_56 @cite_35 @cite_24 or are log-likelihood based @cite_55 . Despite this progress, there is still no clear consensus on which metrics are most appropriate to use, and the vast majority of available metrics are only concerned with unconditional generation. We refer the reader to @cite_6 for a detailed overview and insightful discussion of existing metrics.
@cite_38 @cite_35 @cite_33 @cite_54 @cite_9 @cite_21 @cite_52 @cite_55 @cite_56 @cite_24 @cite_43 @cite_6 @cite_23 @cite_2 @cite_46 @cite_17
2607491080 2962919088 2548275288 2950776302
Traditional generative adversarial networks (GAN) and many of its variants are trained by minimizing the KL or JS-divergence loss that measures how close the generated data distribution is from the true data distribution. A recent advance called the WGAN based on Wasserstein distance can improve on the KL and JS-divergence based GANs, and alleviate the gradient vanishing, instability, and mode collapse issues that are common in the GAN training. In this work, we aim at improving on the WGAN by first generalizing its discriminator loss to a margin-based one, which leads to a better discriminator, and in turn a better generator, and then carrying out a progressive training paradigm involving multiple GANs to contribute to the maximum margin ranking loss so that the GAN at later stages will improve upon early stages. We call this method Gang of GANs (GoGAN). We have shown theoretically that the proposed GoGAN can reduce the gap between the true data distribution and the generated data distribution by at least half in an optimally trained WGAN. We have also proposed a new way of measuring GAN quality which is based on image completion tasks. We have evaluated our method on four visual datasets: CelebA, LSUN Bedroom, CIFAR-10, and 50K-SSFF, and have seen both visual and quantitative improvement over baseline WGAN. We investigate the training and performance of generative adversarial networks using the Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) as critic, termed MMD GANs. As our main theoretical contribution, we clarify the situation with bias in GAN loss functions raised by recent work: we show that gradient estimators used in the optimization process for both MMD GANs and Wasserstein GANs are unbiased, but learning a discriminator based on samples leads to biased gradients for the generator parameters. We also discuss the issue of kernel choice for the MMD critic, and characterize the kernel corresponding to the energy distance used for the Cramer GAN critic. Being an integral probability metric, the MMD benefits from training strategies recently developed for Wasserstein GANs. In experiments, the MMD GAN is able to employ a smaller critic network than the Wasserstein GAN, resulting in a simpler and faster-training algorithm with matching performance. We also propose an improved measure of GAN convergence, the Kernel Inception Distance, and show how to use it to dynamically adapt learning rates during GAN training. Synthesizing high resolution photorealistic images has been a long-standing challenge in machine learning. In this paper we introduce new methods for the improved training of generative adversarial networks (GANs) for image synthesis. We construct a variant of GANs employing label conditioning that results in 128x128 resolution image samples exhibiting global coherence. We expand on previous work for image quality assessment to provide two new analyses for assessing the discriminability and diversity of samples from class-conditional image synthesis models. These analyses demonstrate that high resolution samples provide class information not present in low resolution samples. Across 1000 ImageNet classes, 128x128 samples are more than twice as discriminable as artificially resized 32x32 samples. In addition, 84.7 of the classes have samples exhibiting diversity comparable to real ImageNet data. Synthesizing high resolution photorealistic images has been a long-standing challenge in machine learning. In this paper we introduce new methods for the improved training of generative adversarial networks (GANs) for image synthesis. We construct a variant of GANs employing label conditioning that results in 128x128 resolution image samples exhibiting global coherence. We expand on previous work for image quality assessment to provide two new analyses for assessing the discriminability and diversity of samples from class-conditional image synthesis models. These analyses demonstrate that high resolution samples provide class information not present in low resolution samples. Across 1000 ImageNet classes, 128x128 samples are more than twice as discriminable as artificially resized 32x32 samples. In addition, 84.7 of the classes have samples exhibiting diversity comparable to real ImageNet data.