In this work we derandomize two central results in graph algorithms, replacement paths and distance sensitivity oracles (DSOs) matching in both cases the running time of the randomized algorithms. For the replacement paths problem, let G = (V,E) be a directed unweighted graph with n vertices and m edges and let P be a shortest path from s to t in G. The replacement paths problem is to find for every edge e P the shortest path from s to t avoiding e. Roditty and Zwick [ICALP 2005] obtained a randomized algorithm with running time of O(m n ). Here we provide the first deterministic algorithm for this problem, with the same O(m n ) time. For the problem of distance sensitivity oracles, let G = (V,E) be a directed graph with real-edge weights. An f-Sensitivity Distance Oracle (f-DSO) gets as input the graph G=(V,E) and a parameter f, preprocesses it into a data-structure, such that given a query (s,t,F) with s,t V and F E V, |F| f being a set of at most f edges or vertices (failures), the query algorithm efficiently computes the distance from s to t in the graph G F ( i.e. , the distance from s to t in the graph G after removing from it the failing edges and vertices F). For weighted graphs with real edge weights, Weimann and Yuster [FOCS 2010] presented a combinatorial randomized f-DSO with O(mn^ 4- ) preprocessing time and subquadratic O(n^ 2-2(1- ) f ) query time for every value of 0 < < 1. We derandomize this result and present a combinatorial deterministic f-DSO with the same asymptotic preprocessing and query time.
In the deterministic regime no algorithm for the directed case is known that is asymptotically better (up to ploylog) than invoking APSP algorithm. Interestingly, in the fault-tolerant and the dynamic settings many of the existing algorithms are randomized, and for many of the problems there is a polynomial gap between the best randomized and deterministic algorithms (see e.g. sensitive distance oracles @cite_11 , dynamic shortest paths @cite_17 @cite_31 , dynamic strongly connected components @cite_50 @cite_2 @cite_30 , dynamic matching @cite_3 @cite_27 , and many more). Randomization is a powerful tool in the classic setting of graph algorithms with full knowledge and is often used to simplify the algorithm and to speed-up its running time. However, physical computers are deterministic machines, and obtaining true randomness can be a hard task to achieve. A central line of research is focused on the derandomization of algorithms that relies on randomness.
@cite_30 @cite_11 @cite_3 @cite_27 @cite_50 @cite_2 @cite_31 @cite_17
2040273581 1977980414 816673839 2279830512
We study approximate distributed solutions to the weighted all-pairs shortest-paths (APSP) problem in the CONGEST model. We obtain the following results. A deterministic (1+epsilon)-approximation to APSP with running time O(e-2n log n) rounds. The best previously known algorithm was randomized and slower by a Theta(log n) factor. In many cases, routing schemes involve relabeling, i.e., assigning new names to nodes and that are used in distance and routing queries. It is known that relabeling is necessary to achieve running times of o(n log n). In the relabeling model, we obtain the following results. A randomized O(k)-approximation to APSP, for any integer k>1, running in O(n1 2+1 k+D) rounds, where D is the hop diameter of the network. This algorithm simplifies the best previously known result and reduces its approximation ratio from O(k log k) to O(k). Also, the new algorithm uses O(log n)-bit labels, which is asymptotically optimal. A randomized O(k)-approximation to APSP, for any integer k>1, running in time O((nD)1 2 n1 k+D) and producing compact routing tables of size O(n1 k). The node labels consist of O(k log n) bits. This improves on the approximation ratio of Theta(k2) for tables of that size achieved by the best previously known algorithm, which terminates faster, in O(n1 2+1 k+D) rounds. In addition, we improve on the time complexity of the best known deterministic algorithm for distributed approximate Steiner forest. This paper deals with the design of efficiently computable incentive-compatible mechanisms for combinatorial optimization problems with single-minded agents each possibly having multiple private parameters. We focus on approximation algorithms for NP-hard mechanism design problems. These algorithms need to satisfy certain monotonicity properties to ensure truthfulness. Since most of the known approximation techniques do not fulfill these properties, we study alternative techniques. Our first contribution is a quite general method to transform a pseudopolynomial algorithm into a monotone fully polynomial time approximation scheme (FPTAS). This can be applied to various problems like, e.g., knapsack, constrained shortest path, or job scheduling with deadlines. For example, the monotone FPTAS for the knapsack problem gives a very efficient, truthful mechanism for single-minded multiunit auctions. The best previous result for such auctions was a 2-appro-xi-ma-tion. In addition, we present a monotone PTAS for the generalized assignment problem with any constant number of private parameters per agent. The most efficient way to solve packing integer programs (PIPs) is linear programming-based randomized rounding, which also is in general not monotone. We show that primal-dual greedy algorithms achieve almost the same approximation ratios for PIPs as randomized rounding. The advantage is that these algorithms are inherently monotone. This way, we can significantly improve the approximation ratios of truthful mechanisms for various fundamental mechanism design problems like single-minded combinatorial auctions (CAs), unsplittable flow routing, and multicast routing. Our primal-dual approximation algorithms can also be used for the winner determination in CAs with general bidders specifying their bids through an oracle. We present a deterministic (1+o(1))-approximation O(n1 2+o(1)+D1+o(1))-time algorithm for solving the single-source shortest paths problem on distributed weighted networks (the CONGEST model); here n is the number of nodes in the network and D is its (hop) diameter. This is the first non-trivial deterministic algorithm for this problem. It also improves (i) the running time of the randomized (1+o(1))-approximation O(n1 2D1 4+D)-time algorithm of Nanongkai [STOC 2014] by a factor of as large as n1 8, and (ii) the O(є−1logє−1)-approximation factor of Lenzen and Patt-Shamir’s O(n1 2+є+D)-time algorithm [STOC 2013] within the same running time. Our running time matches the known time lower bound of Ω(n1 2 logn + D) [Das STOC 2011] modulo some lower-order terms, thus essentially settling the status of this problem which was raised at least a decade ago [Elkin SIGACT News 2004]. It also implies a (2+o(1))-approximation O(n1 2+o(1)+D1+o(1))-time algorithm for approximating a network’s weighted diameter which almost matches the lower bound by [PODC 2012]. In achieving this result, we develop two techniques which might be of independent interest and useful in other settings: (i) a deterministic process that replaces the “hitting set argument” commonly used for shortest paths computation in various settings, and (ii) a simple, deterministic, construction of an (no(1), o(1))-hop set of size O(n1+o(1)). We combine these techniques with many distributed algorithmic techniques, some of which from problems that are not directly related to shortest paths, e.g. ruling sets [ STOC 1987], source detection [Lenzen, Peleg PODC 2013], and partial distance estimation [Lenzen, Patt-Shamir PODC 2015]. Our hop set construction also leads to single-source shortest paths algorithms in two other settings: (i) a (1+o(1))-approximation O(no(1))-time algorithm on congested cliques, and (ii) a (1+o(1))-approximation O(no(1)logW)-pass O(n1+o(1)logW)-space streaming algorithm, when edge weights are in 1, 2, …, W . The first result answers an open problem in [Nanongkai, STOC 2014]. The second result partially answers an open problem raised by McGregor in 2006 [ sublinear.info , Problem 14]. Over the past 30 years numerous algorithms have been designed for symmetry breaking problems in the LOCAL model, such as maximal matching, MIS, vertex coloring, and edge-coloring. For most problems the best randomized algorithm is at least exponentially faster than the best deterministic algorithm. In this paper we prove that these exponential gaps are necessary and establish connections between the deterministic and randomized complexities in the LOCAL model. Each result has a very compelling take-away message: 1. Fast @math -coloring of trees requires random bits: Building on the recent lower bounds of , we prove that the randomized complexity of @math -coloring a tree with maximum degree @math is @math , whereas its deterministic complexity is @math for any @math . This also establishes a large separation between the deterministic complexity of @math -coloring and @math -coloring trees. 2. Randomized lower bounds imply deterministic lower bounds: We prove that any deterministic algorithm for a natural class of problems that runs in @math rounds can be transformed to run in @math rounds. If the transformed algorithm violates a lower bound (even allowing randomization), then one can conclude that the problem requires @math time deterministically. 3. Deterministic lower bounds imply randomized lower bounds: We prove that the randomized complexity of any natural problem on instances of size @math is at least its deterministic complexity on instances of size @math . This shows that a deterministic @math lower bound for any problem implies a randomized @math lower bound. It also illustrates that the graph shattering technique is absolutely essential to the LOCAL model.