In this article we present Mutable Locks, a synchronization construct with the same execution semantic of traditional locks (such as spin locks or sleep locks), but with a self-tuned optimized trade off between responsiveness---in the access to a just released critical section---and CPU-time usage during threads' wait phases. It tackles the need for modern synchronization supports, in the era of multi-core machines, whose runtime behavior should be optimized along multiple dimensions (performance vs resource consumption) with no intervention by the application programmer. Our proposal is intended for exploitation in generic concurrent applications where scarce or none knowledge is available about the underlying software hardware stack and the actual workload, an adverse scenario for static choices between spinning and sleeping faced by mutable locks just thanks to their hybrid waiting phases and self-tuning capabilities.
The -test-and-set spin lock @cite_5 makes challenging threads continuously check the lock variable until it is released and, only in this case, they try to acquire it via RMW instructions. This allows threads to (read the actual value of the lock variable) in cache without disturbing others, thus generating cache memory traffic only when strictly needed.
@cite_5
1523041988 2403712541 2160781056 2611422138
A traditional counterexample to a linear-time safety property shows the values of all signals at all times prior to the error. However, some signals may not be critical to causing the failure. A succinct explanation may help human understanding as well as speed up algorithms that have to analyze many such traces. In Bounded Model Checking (BMC), a counterexample is constructed from a satisfying assignment to a Boolean formula, typically in CNF. Modern SAT solvers usually assign values to all variables when the input formula is satisfiable. Deriving minimal satisfying assignments from such complete assignments does not lead to concise explanations of counterexamples because of how CNF formulae are derived from the models. Hence, we formulate the extraction of a succinct counterexample as the problem of finding a minimal assignment that, together with the Boolean formula describing the model, implies an objective. We present a two-stage algorithm for this problem, such that the result of each stage contributes to identify the “interesting” events that cause the failure. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach with an example and with experimental results. Many proposals for managing replicated data use sites running the Snapshot Isolation (SI) concurrency control mechanism, and provide 1-copy SI or something similar, as the global isolation level. This allows good scalability, since only ww-conflicts need to be managed globally. However, 1-copy SI can lead to data corruption and violation of integrity constraints [5]. 1-copy serializability is the global correctness condition that prevents data corruption. We propose a new algorithm Replicated Serializable Snapshot Isolation (RSSI) that uses SI at each site, and combines this with a certification algorithm to guarantee 1-copy serializable global execution. Management of ww-conflicts is similar to what is done in 1-copy SI. But unlike previous designs for 1-copy serializable systems, we do not need to prevent all rw-conflicts among concurrent transactions. We formalize this in a theorem that shows that many rw-conflicts are indeed false positives that do not risk non-serializable behavior. Our proposed RSSI algorithm will only abort a transaction when it detects a well-defined pattern of two consecutive rw-edges in the serialization graph. We have built a prototype that integrates our RSSI with the existing open-source PostgresR(SI) system. Our performance evaluation shows that there is a worst-case overhead of about 15 for getting full 1copy serializability as compared to 1-copy SI in a cluster of 8 nodes, with our proposed RSSI clearly outperforming the previous work [6] for update-intensive workloads. Concurrency libraries can facilitate the development of multi-threaded programs by providing concurrent implementations of familiar data types such as queues or sets. There exist many optimized algorithms that can achieve superior performance on multiprocessors by allowing concurrent data accesses without using locks. Unfortunately, such algorithms can harbor subtle concurrency bugs. Moreover, they requirememory ordering fences to function correctly on relaxed memory models. To address these difficulties, we propose a verification approach that can exhaustively check all concurrent executions of a given test program on a relaxed memory model and can verify that they are observationally equivalent to a sequential execution. Our CheckFence prototype automatically translates the C implementation code and the test program into a SAT formula, hands the latter to a standard SAT solver, and constructs counter example traces if there exist incorrect executions. Applying CheckFence to five previously published algorithms, we were able to (1) find several bugs (some not previously known), and (2) determine how to place memory ordering fences for relaxed memory models. Unsafe memory accesses in programs written using popular programming languages like C and C++ have been among the leading causes of software vulnerability. Memory safety checkers, such as Softbound, enforce memory spatial safety by checking if accesses to array elements are within the corresponding array bounds. However, such checks often result in high execution time overhead due to the cost of executing the instructions associated with the bound checks. To mitigate this problem, techniques to eliminate redundant bound checks are needed. In this paper, we propose a novel framework, SIMBER, to eliminate redundant memory bound checks via statistical inference. In contrast to the existing techniques that primarily rely on static code analysis, our solution leverages a simple, model-based inference to identify redundant bound checks based on runtime statistics from past program executions. We construct a knowledge base containing sufficient conditions using variables inside functions, which are then applied adaptively to avoid future redundant checks at a function-level granularity. Our experimental results on real-world applications show that SIMBER achieves zero false positives. Also, our approach reduces the performance overhead by up to 86.94 over Softbound, and incurs a modest 1.7 code size increase on average to circumvent the redundant bound checks inserted by Softbound.