Cloud computing has grown to become a popular distributed computing service offered by commercial providers. More recently, Edge and Fog computing resources have emerged on the wide-area network as part of Internet of Things (IoT) deployments. These three resource abstraction layers are complementary, and provide distinctive benefits. Scheduling applications on clouds has been an active area of research, with workflow and dataflow models serving as a flexible abstraction to specify applications for execution. However, the application programming and scheduling models for edge and fog are still maturing, and can benefit from learnings on cloud resources. At the same time, there is also value in using these resources cohesively for application execution. In this article, we present a taxonomy of concepts essential for specifying and solving the problem of scheduling applications on edge, for and cloud computing resources. We first characterize the resource capabilities and limitations of these infrastructure, and design a taxonomy of application models, Quality of Service (QoS) constraints and goals, and scheduling techniques, based on a literature review. We also tabulate key research prototypes and papers using this taxonomy. This survey benefits developers and researchers on these distributed resources in designing and categorizing their applications, selecting the relevant computing abstraction(s), and developing or selecting the appropriate scheduling algorithm. It also highlights gaps in literature where open problems remain.
Similarly, @cite_82 also discuss -- service, task and VM -- for public and private clouds. We limit our focus to that are exceedingly popular and where issues of elasticity and costing offer clear challenges and opportunities to end users, and complement this with emerging edge and fog resource layers. Our work also emphasizes the , a subset of which is the task level considered by @cite_82 , with the objective of meeting QoS requirements and or budget constraints for the application. We also offer greater detail on various aspects of the unit of scheduling, which is lacking in these surveys.
@cite_82
2122985136 2561316248 1493613888 1984255960
We consider a market-based resource allocation model for batch jobs in cloud computing clusters. In our model, we incorporate the importance of the due date of a job rather than the number of servers allocated to it at any given time. Each batch job is characterized by the work volume of total computing units (e.g., CPU hours) along with a bound on maximum degree of parallelism. Users specify, along with these job characteristics, their desired due date and a value for finishing the job by its deadline. Given this specification, the primary goal is to determine the scheduling of cloud computing instances under capacity constraints in order to maximize the social welfare (i.e., sum of values gained by allocated users). Our main result is a new ( C (C-k) ⋅ s (s-1))-approximation algorithm for this objective, where C denotes cloud capacity, k is the maximal bound on parallelized execution (in practical settings, k l C) and s is the slackness on the job completion time i.e., the minimal ratio between a specified deadline and the earliest finish time of a job. Our algorithm is based on utilizing dual fitting arguments over a strengthened linear program to the problem. Based on the new approximation algorithm, we construct truthful allocation and pricing mechanisms, in which reporting the job true value and properties (deadline, work volume and the parallelism bound) is a dominant strategy for all users. To that end, we provide a general framework for transforming allocation algorithms into truthful mechanisms in domains of single-value and multi-properties. We then show that the basic mechanism can be extended under proper Bayesian assumptions to the objective of maximizing revenues, which is important for public clouds. We empirically evaluate the benefits of our approach through simulations on data-center job traces, and show that the revenues obtained under our mechanism are comparable with an ideal fixed-price mechanism, which sets an on-demand price using oracle knowledge of users' valuations. Finally, we discuss how our model can be extended to accommodate uncertainties in job work volumes, which is a practical challenge in cloud settings. Execution of workflow applications in Cloud environments involves many uncertainties because of elastic resource provisioning and unstable performance of multitenant virtual machines (VM) instances over time. These uncertainties are usually either neglected by existing researches, or modeled with some probability distribution function. To address this gap, we extend a multi-objective workflow scheduling algorithm (MOHEFT) in two directions: (1) to deal with the dynamic nature of Cloud environments offering a potentially infinite amount of on-demand resources, and (2) to consider robustness as an objective that mitigates the variability in VM performance over time. Our new robust model, called R-MOHEFT, considers uncertainty in processing times of workflow activities without a precise estimation or known distribution function within an uncertainty interval. We approach this scheduling problem as a three-objective optimisation that considers makespan, monetary cost, and robustness as simultaneous objectives of a commercial Cloud environment. Our new algorithm is able to estimate the Pareto optimal set of scheduling solutions that resist against fluctuations in processing times three times better than its MOHEFT predecessor, with a tradeoff of only 15 worse Pareto frontier. R-MOHEFT's hypervolume suffers by only 5 to 16 , compared to the MOHEFT's drawback of 38 to surprisingly 87 , when the processing time fluctuates up to its double value. With the emergence of Cloud Computing resources of physical machines have to be allocated to virtual machines (VMs) in an on-demand way. However, the efficient allocation of resources like memory, storage or bandwidth to a VM is not a trivial task. On the one hand, the Service Level Agreement (SLA) that defines QoS goals for arbitrary parameters between the Cloud provider and the customer should not be violated. On the other hand, the Cloud providers aim to maximize their profit, where optimizing resource usage is an important part. In this paper we develop a simulation engine that mimics the control cycle of an autonomic manager to evaluate different knowledge management techniques (KM) feasible for efficient resource management and SLA attainment. We especially focus on the use of Case Based Reasoning (CBR) for KM and decision-making. We discuss its suitability for efficiently governing on-demand resource allocation in Cloud infrastructures by evaluating it with the simulation engine. As companies shift from desktop applications to cloud-based software as a service (SaaS) applications deployed on public clouds, the competition for end-users by cloud providers offering similar services grows. In order to survive in such a competitive market, cloud-based companies must achieve good quality of service (QoS) for their users, or risk losing their customers to competitors. However, meeting the QoS with a cost-effective amount of resources is challenging because workloads experience variation over time. This problem can be solved with proactive dynamic provisioning of resources, which can estimate the future need of applications in terms of resources and allocate them in advance, releasing them once they are not required. In this paper, we present the realization of a cloud workload prediction module for SaaS providers based on the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model. We introduce the prediction based on the ARIMA model and evaluate its accuracy of future workload prediction using real traces of requests to web servers. We also evaluate the impact of the achieved accuracy in terms of efficiency in resource utilization and QoS. Simulation results show that our model is able to achieve an average accuracy of up to 91 percent, which leads to efficiency in resource utilization with minimal impact on the QoS.