Due to the increased capabilities of mobile devices and through wireless opportunistic contacts, users can experience new ways to share and retrieve content anywhere and anytime, even in the presence of link intermittency. Due to the significant number of available routing solutions, it is difficult to understand which one has the best performance, since all of them follow a different evaluation method. This paper proposes an assessment model, based on a new taxonomy, which comprises an evaluation guideline with performance metrics and experimental setup to aid designers in evaluating solutions through fair comparisons. Simulation results based on the proposed model revisit the performance results published by Epidemic, PROPHET, and BubbleRap, showing how they perform under the same set of metrics and scenario.
We observe that the main goal of these classifications is uniquely to identify the different families of routing solutions. Some of them @cite_12 @cite_11 provide evaluation principles that simply aid designers to identify the application requirements in order to propose the right'' algorithm. We, on the other hand, use our classification to identify common aspects among the analysed solutions to propose a fair way to assess routing performance independently of the amount of needed knowledge and application scenario.
@cite_12 @cite_11
1853087932 2028069703 2124802514 2165983440
We investigate the exact solution of the vehicle routing problem with time windows, where multiple trips are allowed for the vehicles. In contrast to previous works in the literature, we specifically consider the case in which it is mandatory to visit all customers and there is no limitation on duration. We develop two branch-and-price frameworks based on two set covering formulations: a traditional one where columns (variables) represent routes, that is, a sequence of consecutive trips, and a second one in which columns are single trips. One important difficulty related to the latter is the way mutual temporal exclusion of trips can be handled. It raises the issue of time discretization when solving the pricing problem. Our dynamic programming algorithm is based on concept of groups of labels and representative labels. We provide computational results on modified small-sized instances (25 customers) from Solomon’s benchmarks in order to evaluate and compare the two methods. Results show that some difficult instances are out of reach for the first branch-and-price implementation, while they are consistently solved with the second. We propose a routing strategy to improve the transportation efficiency on complex networks. Instead of using the routing strategy for shortest path, we give a generalized routing algorithm to find the so-called efficient path, which considers the possible congestion in the nodes along actual paths. Since the nodes with the largest degree are very susceptible to traffic congestion, an effective way to improve traffic and control congestion, as our strategy, can be redistributing traffic load in central nodes to other noncentral nodes. Simulation results indicate that the network capability in processing traffic is improved more than 10 times by optimizing the efficient path, which is in good agreement with the analysis. DOI: 10.1103 PhysRevE.73.046108 PACS numbers: 89.75.Hc Since the seminal work on scale-free networks by Barabasi and Albert BA model1 and on the small-world phenomenon by Watts and Strogatz 2, the structure and dynamics of complex networks have recently attracted a tremendous amount of interest and attention from the physics community see the review papers 3‐5 and references therein. The increasing importance of large communication networks such as the Internet 6, upon which our society survives, calls for the need for high efficiency in handling and delivering information. In this light, to find optimal strategies for traffic routing is one of the important issues we have to address. There have been many previous studies to understand and control traffic congestion on networks, with a basic assumption that the network has a homogeneous structure 7‐11. However, many real networks display both scale-free and small-world features, and thus it is of great interest to study the effect of network topology on traffic flow and the effect of traffic on network evolution. present a formalism that can cope simultaneously with the searching and traffic dynamics in parallel transportation systems 12. This formalism can be used to optimize network structure under a local search algorithm, while to obtain the formalism one should know the global information of the whole networks. Holme and Kim provide an in-depth analysis on the vertex edge overload cascading breakdowns based on evolving networks, and suggest a method to avoid We describe methods for routing a prediction task on a network where each participant can contribute information and route the task onwards. Routing scoring rules bring truthful contribution of information about the task and optimal routing of the task into a Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium under common knowledge about the competencies of agents. Relaxing the common knowledge assumption, we address the challenge of routing in situations where each agent's knowledge about other agents is limited to a local neighborhood. A family of local routing rules isolate in equilibrium routing decisions that depend only on this local knowledge, and are the only routing scoring rules with this property. Simulation results show that local routing rules can promote effective task routing. It was recently reported that all known face and combined greedy-face routing variants cannot guarantee message delivery in arbitrary undirected planar graphs. The purpose of this article is to clarify that this is not the truth in general. We show that specifically in relative neighborhood and Gabriel graphs recovery from a greedy routing failure is always possible without changing between any adjacent faces. Guaranteed delivery then follows from guaranteed recovery while traversing the very first face. In arbitrary graphs, however, a proper face selection mechanism is of importance since recovery from a greedy routing failure may require visiting a sequence of faces before greedy routing can be restarted again. A prominent approach is to visit a sequence of faces which are intersected by the line connecting the source and destination node. Whenever encountering an edge which is intersecting with this line, the critical part is to decide if face traversal has to change to the next adjacent one or not. Failures may occur from incorporating face routing procedures that force to change the traversed face at each intersection. Recently observed routing failures which were produced by the GPSR protocol in arbitrary planar graphs result from incorporating such a face routing variant. They cannot be constructed by the well known GFG algorithm which does not force changing the face anytime. Beside methods which visit the faces intersected by the source destination line, we discuss face routing variants which simply restart face routing whenever the next face has to be explored. We give the first complete and formal proofs that several proposed face routing, and combined greedyface routing schemes do guarantee delivery in specific graph classes or even any arbitrary planar graphs. We also discuss the reasons why other methods may fail to deliver a message or even end up in a loop.