Expert finding is an important task in both industry and academia. It is challenging to rank candidates with appropriate expertise for various queries. In addition, different types of objects interact with one another, which naturally forms heterogeneous information networks. We study the task of expert finding in heterogeneous bibliographical networks based on two aspects: textual content analysis and authority ranking. Regarding the textual content analysis, we propose a new method for query expansion via locally-trained embedding learning with concept hierarchy as guidance, which is particularly tailored for specific queries with narrow semantic meanings. Compared with global embedding learning, locally-trained embedding learning projects the terms into a latent semantic space constrained on relevant topics, therefore it preserves more precise and subtle information for specific queries. Considering the candidate ranking, the heterogeneous information network structure, while being largely ignored in the previous studies of expert finding, provides additional information. Specifically, different types of interactions among objects play different roles. We propose a ranking algorithm to estimate the authority of objects in the network, treating each strongly-typed edge type individually. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework, we apply the proposed method to a large-scale bibliographical dataset with over two million entries and one million researcher candidates. The experiment results show that the proposed framework outperforms existing methods for both general and specific queries.
The idea of query expansion regarding local document analysis has been previously studied for information retrieval @cite_5 . Global analysis and local feedback are combined for query expansion with a new weight ranking function for query expansion. Recently, propose to perform query expansion based on locally-trained embeddings for queries with ambiguous semantic meanings @cite_13 . In contrast, our locally-trained embedding is designed for query expansion for specific queries, which is of particular importance for the task of expert finding; while theirs is for ad-hoc retrieval task @cite_13 . In addition, our locally-trained embeddings are learned with guidance from a concept hierarchy. The details will be discussed in .
@cite_5 @cite_13
2002306339 1979459060 1898200041 80286018
Techniques for automatic query expansion have been extensively studied in information research as a means of addressing the word mismatch between queries and documents. These techniques can be categorized as either global or local. While global techniques rely on analysis of a whole collection to discover word relationships, local techniques emphasize analysis of the top-ranked documents retrieved for a query. While local techniques have shown to be more effective that global techniques in general, existing local techniques are not robust and can seriously hurt retrieved when few of the retrieval documents are relevant. We propose a new technique, called local context analysis, which selects expansion terms based on cooccurrence with the query terms within the top-ranked documents. Experiments on a number of collections, both English and non-English, show that local context analysis offers more effective and consistent retrieval results. Automatic query expansion has long been suggested as a technique for dealing with the fundamental issue of word mismatch in information retrieval. A number of approaches to expansion have been studied and, more recently, attention has focused on techniques that analyze the corpus to discover word relationship (global techniques) and those that analyze documents retrieved by the initial query ( local feedback). In this paper, we compare the effectiveness of these approaches and show that, although global analysis haa some advantages, local analysia is generally more effective. We also show that using global analysis techniques. Automatic query expansion may be used in document retrieval to improve search effectiveness. Traditional query expansion methods are based on the document collection itself. For example, pseudo-relevance feedback (PRF) assumes that the top retrieved documents are relevant, and uses the terms extracted from those documents for query expansion. However, there are other sources of evidence that can be used for expansion, some of which may give better search results with greater efficiency at query time. In this paper, we use the external evidence, especially the hints obtained from external web search engines to expand the original query. We explore 6 different methods using search engine query log, snippets and search result documents. We conduct extensive experiments, with state of the art PRF baselines and careful parameter tuning, on three TREC collections: AP, WT10g, GOV2. Log-based methods do not show consistent significant gains, despite being very efficient at query-time. Snippet-based expansion, using the summaries provided by an external search engine, provides significant effectiveness gains with good efficiency at query-time. We present a study that developed and tested three query expansion methods for the retrieval of clinical documents. Finding relevant documents in a large clinical data warehouse is a challenging task. To address this issue, first, we implemented a synonym expansion strategy that used a few selected vocabularies. Second, we trained a topic model on a large set of clinical documents, which was then used to identify related terms for query expansion. Third, we obtained related terms from a large predicate database derived from Medline abstracts for query expansion. The three expansion methods were tested on a set of clinical notes. All three methods successfully achieved higher average recalls and average F-measures when compared with the baseline method. The average precisions and precision at 10, however, decreased with all expansions. Amongst the three expansion methods, the topic model-based method performed the best in terms of recall and F-measure.