The problem of constrained clustering has attracted significant attention in the past decades. In this paper, we study the balanced @math -center, @math -median, and @math -means clustering problems where the size of each cluster is constrained by the given lower and upper bounds. The problems are motivated by the applications in processing large-scale data in high dimension. Existing methods often need to compute complicated matchings (or min cost flows) to satisfy the balance constraint, and thus suffer from high complexities especially in high dimension. We develop an effective framework for the three balanced clustering problems to address this issue, and our method is based on a novel spatial partition idea in geometry. For the balanced @math -center clustering, we provide a @math -approximation algorithm that improves the existing approximation factors; for the balanced @math -median and @math -means clusterings, our algorithms yield constant and @math -approximation factors with any @math . More importantly, our algorithms achieve linear or nearly linear running times when @math is a constant, and significantly improve the existing ones. Our results can be easily extended to metric balanced clusterings and the running times are sub-linear in terms of the complexity of @math -point metric.
Clustering problems commonly involve two key steps: ). determine the @math cluster centers and ). partition the input data into @math clusters. For ordinary clustering problems, step ( 2 ) is trivial. Namely, we just need to assign each data point to its nearest cluster center to minimize the total clustering cost. However, step ( 2 ) can be complicated for constrained clustering problems. In general, we need to compute the matching between input points @math and the obtained cluster centers, such that the objective value is minimized and the constraint (e.g., the balancedness) can be satisfied simultaneously. For example, the algorithms in @cite_38 @cite_28 @cite_15 all need to reduce it to be a max flow or min cost flow problem. They build a bipartite graph between @math and the @math cluster centers, and the numbers of the vertices @math and edges @math are both linear on @math ; therefore, their running times will be @math that is at least quadratic on the input size. The authors of @cite_28 proposed the open problem: can we avoid computing the high complexity matching in step ( 2 )?
@cite_28 @cite_38 @cite_15
1986219860 2734881792 2952769483 2901801762
One of the fundamental clustering problems is to assign @math points into @math clusters based on minimal sum-of-squared distances (MSSC), which is known to be NP-hard. In this paper, by using matrix arguments, we first model MSSC as a so-called 0-1 semidefinite programming (SDP) problem. We show that our 0-1 SDP model provides a unified framework for several clustering approaches such as normalized k-cut and spectral clustering. Moreover, the 0-1 SDP model allows us to solve the underlying problem approximately via the linear programming and SDP relaxations. Second, we consider the issue of how to extract a feasible solution of the original 0-1 SDP model from the optimal solution of the relaxed SDP problem. By using principal component analysis, we develop a rounding procedure to construct a feasible partitioning from a solution of the relaxed problem. In our rounding procedure, we need to solve a K-means clustering problem in @math , which can be done in @math time. In case of biclustering, the running time of our rounding procedure can be reduced to @math . We show that our algorithm provides a 2-approximate solution to the original problem. Promising numerical results for biclustering based on our new method are reported. Clustering problems are well-studied in a variety of fields such as data science, operations research, and computer science. Such problems include variants of centre location problems, @math -median, and @math -means to name a few. In some cases, not all data points need to be clustered; some may be discarded for various reasons. We study clustering problems with outliers. More specifically, we look at Uncapacitated Facility Location (UFL), @math -Median, and @math -Means. In UFL with outliers, we have to open some centres, discard up to @math points of @math and assign every other point to the nearest open centre, minimizing the total assignment cost plus centre opening costs. In @math -Median and @math -Means, we have to open up to @math centres but there are no opening costs. In @math -Means, the cost of assigning @math to @math is @math . We present several results. Our main focus is on cases where @math is a doubling metric or is the shortest path metrics of graphs from a minor-closed family of graphs. For uniform-cost UFL with outliers on such metrics we show that a multiswap simple local search heuristic yields a PTAS. With a bit more work, we extend this to bicriteria approximations for the @math -Median and @math -Means problems in the same metrics where, for any constant @math , we can find a solution using @math centres whose cost is at most a @math -factor of the optimum and uses at most @math outliers. We also show that natural local search heuristics that do not violate the number of clusters and outliers for @math -Median (or @math -Means) will have unbounded gap even in Euclidean metrics. Furthermore, we show how our analysis can be extended to general metrics for @math -Means with outliers to obtain a @math bicriteria. We study exact recovery conditions for convex relaxations of point cloud clustering problems, focusing on two of the most common optimization problems for unsupervised clustering: @math -means and @math -median clustering. Motivations for focusing on convex relaxations are: (a) they come with a certificate of optimality, and (b) they are generic tools which are relatively parameter-free, not tailored to specific assumptions over the input. More precisely, we consider the distributional setting where there are @math clusters in @math and data from each cluster consists of @math points sampled from a symmetric distribution within a ball of unit radius. We ask: what is the minimal separation distance between cluster centers needed for convex relaxations to exactly recover these @math clusters as the optimal integral solution? For the @math -median linear programming relaxation we show a tight bound: exact recovery is obtained given arbitrarily small pairwise separation @math between the balls. In other words, the pairwise center separation is @math . Under the same distributional model, the @math -means LP relaxation fails to recover such clusters at separation as large as @math . Yet, if we enforce PSD constraints on the @math -means LP, we get exact cluster recovery at center separation @math . In contrast, common heuristics such as Lloyd's algorithm (a.k.a. the @math -means algorithm) can fail to recover clusters in this setting; even with arbitrarily large cluster separation, k-means++ with overseeding by any constant factor fails with high probability at exact cluster recovery. To complement the theoretical analysis, we provide an experimental study of the recovery guarantees for these various methods, and discuss several open problems which these experiments suggest. Clustering is a fundamental tool in data mining. It partitions points into groups (clusters) and may be used to make decisions for each point based on its group. However, this process may harm protected (minority) classes if the clustering algorithm does not adequately represent them in desirable clusters -- especially if the data is already biased. At NIPS 2017, proposed a model for fair clustering requiring the representation in each cluster to (approximately) preserve the global fraction of each protected class. Restricting to two protected classes, they developed both a 4-approximation for the fair @math -center problem and a @math -approximation for the fair @math -median problem, where @math is a parameter for the fairness model. For multiple protected classes, the best known result is a 14-approximation for fair @math -center. We extend and improve the known results. Firstly, we give a 5-approximation for the fair @math -center problem with multiple protected classes. Secondly, we propose a relaxed fairness notion under which we can give bicriteria constant-factor approximations for all of the classical clustering objectives @math -center, @math -supplier, @math -median, @math -means and facility location. The latter approximations are achieved by a framework that takes an arbitrary existing unfair (integral) solution and a fair (fractional) LP solution and combines them into an essentially fair clustering with a weakly supervised rounding scheme. In this way, a fair clustering can be established belatedly, in a situation where the centers are already fixed.