In multimedia, text or bioinformatics databases, applicat ions query sequences of n consecutive symbols called n-grams. Estimating the number of distinct n-grams is a view-size estimation problem. While view sizes can be estimated by sampling under statistical assumptions, we desire an unassuming algorithm with universally valid accuracy bounds. Most related work has focused on repeatedly hashing the data, which is prohibitive for large data sources. We prove that a one-pass one-hash algorithm is suffi cient for accurate estimates if the hashing is sufficiently independent. T o reduce costs further, we investigate recursive random hashing algorithms and show that they are sufficiently independent in practice. We compare our run ning times with exact counts using suffix arrays and show that, while we use ha rdly any storage, we are an order of magnitude faster. The approach further is extended to a one-pass one-hash computation of n-gram entropy and iceberg counts. The experiments use a large collection of English text from the Gutenberg Project as well as synthetic data.
Using suffix arrays @cite_28 @cite_2 and the length of the maximal common prefix between successive prefixes, Nagao and Mori @cite_47 proposed a fast algorithm to compute @math -gram statistics exactly. However, it cannot be considered an online algorithm even if we compute the suffix array in one pass: after constructing the suffix array, one must go through all suffixes at least once more. Their implementation was later improved by Kit and Wilks @cite_13 . Unlike suffix trees @cite_0 , uncompressed suffix arrays do not require several times the storage of the original document and their performance does not depend on the size of the alphabet. Suffix arrays can be constructed in @math time using @math working space @cite_24 . Querying a suffix array for a given @math -gram takes @math time.
@cite_28 @cite_0 @cite_24 @cite_2 @cite_47 @cite_13
2105633925 2158874082 2152486057 2141957180
Suffix trees and suffix arrays are the most prominent full-text indices, and their construction algorithms are well studied. In the literature, the fastest algorithm runs in @math time, while it requires @math -bit working space, where @math denotes the length of the text. On the other hand, the most space-efficient algorithm requires @math -bit working space while it runs in @math time. It was open whether these indices can be constructed in both @math time and @math -bit working space. This paper breaks the above time-and-space barrier under the unit-cost word RAM. We give an algorithm for constructing the suffix array, which takes @math time and @math -bit working space, for texts with constant-size alphabets. Note that both the time and the space bounds are optimal. For constructing the suffix tree, our algorithm requires @math time and @math -bit working space for any @math . Apart from that, our algorithm can also be adopted to build other existing full-text indices, such as compressed suffix tree, compressed suffix arrays, and FM-index. We also study the general case where the size of the alphabet @math is not constant. Our algorithm can construct a suffix array and a suffix tree using optimal @math -bit working space while running in @math time and @math time, respectively. These are the first algorithms that achieve @math time with optimal working space. Moreover, for the special case where @math , we can speed up our suffix array construction algorithm to the optimal @math . A new and conceptually simple data structure, called a suffix array, for on-line string searches is introduced in this paper. Constructing and querying suffix arrays is reduced to a sort and search paradigm that employs novel algorithms. The main advantage of suffix arrays over suffix trees is that, in practice, they use three to five times less space. From a complexity standpoint, suffix arrays permit on-line string searches of the type, “Is W a substring of A?” to be answered in time @math , where P is the length of W and N is the length of A, which is competitive with (and in some cases slightly better than) suffix trees. The only drawback is that in those instances where the underlying alphabet is finite and small, suffix trees can be constructed in @math time in the worst case, versus @math time for suffix arrays. However, an augmented algorithm is given that, regardless of the alphabet size, constructs suffix arrays in @math expected time, albeit with lesser space efficiency. It is ... Suffix trees and suffix arrays are the most prominent full-text indices, and their construction algorithms are well studied. It has been open for a long time whether these indices can be constructed in both O(n log n) time and O(n log n)-bit working space, where n denotes the length of the text. In the literature, the fastest algorithm runs in O(n) time, while it requires O(n log n)-bit working space. On the other hand, the most space-efficient algorithm requires O(n)-bit working space while it runs in O(n log n) time. This paper breaks the long-standing time-and-space barrier under the unit-cost word RAM. We give an algorithm for constructing the suffix array which takes O(n) time and O(n)-bit working space, for texts with constant-size alphabets. Note that both the time and the space bounds are optimal. For constructing the suffix tree, our algorithm requires O(n log sup spl epsi n) time and O(n)-bit working space for any 0 < spl epsi < 1. Apart from that, our algorithm can also be adopted to build other existing full-text indices, such as Compressed Suffix Tree, Compressed Suffix Arrays and FM-index. We also study the general case where the size of the alphabet A is not constant. Our algorithm can construct a suffix array and a suffix tree using optimal O(n log |A|)-bit working space while running in O(n log log |A|) time and O(n log sup spl epsi n) time, respectively. These are the first algorithms that achieve 0(n log n) time with optimal working space, under a reasonable assumption that log |A| = o(log n). Given a set @math of @math strings of total length @math , our task is to report the "most relevant"strings for a given query pattern @math . This involves somewhat more advanced query functionality than the usual pattern matching, as some notion of "most relevant" is involved. In information retrieval literature, this task is best achieved by using inverted indexes. However, inverted indexes work only for some predefined set of patterns. In the pattern matching community, the most popular pattern-matching data structures are suffix trees and suffix arrays. However, a typical suffix tree search involves going through all the occurrences of the pattern over the entire string collection, which might be a lot more than the required relevant documents. The first formal framework to study such kind of retrieval problems was given by [Muthukrishnan, 2002]. He considered two metrics for relevance: frequency and proximity. He took a threshold-based approach on these metrics and gave data structures taking @math words of space. We study this problem in a slightly different framework of reporting the top @math most relevant documents (in sorted order) under similar and more general relevance metrics. Our framework gives linear space data structure with optimal query times for arbitrary score functions. As a corollary, it improves the space utilization for the problems in [Muthukrishnan, 2002] while maintaining optimal query performance. We also develop compressed variants of these data structures for several specific relevance metrics.