Neighbor discovery is the procedure in which two wireless devices initiate a first contact. In low power ad-hoc networks, radios are duty-cycled and the latency until a packet meets a reception phase of another device is determined by a random process. Most research considers slotted protocols, in which the points in time for reception are temporally coupled to beacon transmissions. In contrast, many recent protocols, such as ANT ANT+ and Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) use a slotless, periodic-interval based scheme for neighbor discovery. Here, one device periodically broadcasts packets, whereas the other device periodically listens to the channel. Both periods are independent from each other and drawn over continuous time. Such protocols provide 3 degrees of freedom (viz., the intervals for advertising and scanning and the duration of each scan phase). Though billions of existing BLE devices rely on these protocols, neither their expected latencies nor beneficial configurations with good latency-duty-cycle relations are known. Parametrizations for the participating devices are usually determined based on a “good guess”. In this paper, we, for the first time, present a mathematical theory which can compute the neighbor discovery latencies for all possible parametrizations. Further, our theory shows that upper bounds on the latency can be guaranteed for all parametrizations, except for a finite number of singularities. Therefore, slotless, periodic interval-based protocols can be used in applications with deterministic latency demands, which have been reserved for slotted protocols until now. Our proposed theory can be used for analyzing the neighbor discovery latencies, for tweaking protocol parameters and for developing new protocols.
Usually, PI-based protocols are considered to be non-deterministic, since no upper bound could be determined until now. To overcome the lack of determinism, it has been proposed to configure the BLE protocol such that the parameter values fulfill the CRT @cite_10 . However, such configurations restrict the range of possible valuations unnecessarily. In summary, to the best of our knowledge, no valid model for PI-based protocols for the general case ( @math ) has been presented until now.
@cite_10
2088665600 2524874630 2234042337 1597844714
In the unconditionally reliable message transmission (URMT) problem, two non-faulty players, the sender S and the receiver R are part of a synchronous network modeled as a directed graph. S has a message that he wishes to send to R; the challenge is to design a protocol such that after exchanging messages as per the protocol, the receiver R should correctly obtain S's message with arbitrarily small error probability Δ, in spite of the influence of a Byzantine adversary that may actively corrupt up to t nodes in the network (we denote such a URMT protocol as (t, (1 - Δ))-reliable). While it is known that (2t + 1) vertex disjoint directed paths from S to R are necessary and sufficient for (t, 1)-reliable URMT (that is with zero error probability), we prove that a strictly weaker condition, which we define and denote as (2t, t)-special-connectivity, together with just (t+1) vertex disjoint directed paths from S to R, is necessary and sufficient for (t, (1' - Δ))-reliable URMT with arbitrarily small (but non-zero) error probability, Δ. Thus, we demonstrate the power of randomization in the context of reliable message transmission. In fact, for any positive integer k > 0, we show that there always exists a digraph Gk such that (k, 1)-reliable URMT is impossible over Gk whereas there exists a (2k, (1 - Δ))-reliable URMT protocol, Δ > 0 in Gk. In a digraph G on which (t, (1 - Δ))-reliable URMT is possible, an edge is called critical if the deletion of that edge renders (t, (1 - Δ))-reliable URMT impossible. We give an example of a digraph G on n vertices such that G has Ω(n2) critical edges. This is quite baffling since no such graph exists for the case of perfect reliable message transmission (or equivalently (t, 1)-reliable URMT) or when the underlying graph is undirected. Such is the anomalous behavior of URMT protocols (when "randomness meet directedness") that it makes it extremely hard to design efficient protocols over arbitrary digraphs. However, if URMT is possible between every pair of vertices in the network, then we present efficient protocols for the same. Given the scalability of the advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) networks, maintenance and access of certificate revocation lists (CRLs) pose new challenges. It is inefficient to create one large CRL for all the smart meters (SMs) or create a customized CRL for each SM since too many CRLs will be required. In order to tackle the scalability of the AMI network, we divide the network into clusters of SMs, but there is a tradeoff between the overhead at the certificate authority (CA) and the overhead at the clusters. We use Bloom filters to reduce the size of the CRLs in order to alleviate this tradeoff by increasing the clusters’ size with acceptable overhead. However, since Bloom filters suffer from false positives, there is a need to handle this problem so that SMs will not discard important messages due to falsely identifying the certificate of a sender as invalid. To this end, we propose two certificate revocation schemes that can identify and nullify the false positives. While the first scheme requires contacting the gateway to resolve them, the second scheme requires the CA additionally distribute the list of certificates that trigger false positives. Using mathematical models, we have demonstrated that the probability of contacting the gateway in the first scheme and the overhead of the second scheme can be very low by properly designing the Bloom filters. In order to assess the scalability and validate the mathematical formulas, we have implemented the proposed schemes using Visual C. The results indicate that our schemes are much more scalable than the conventional CRL and the mathematical and simulation results are almost identical. Moreover, we simulated the distribution of the CRLs in a wireless mesh-based AMI network using ns-3 network simulator and assessed its distribution overhead. In this paper, we provide a proof of unconditional security for a semi-quantum key distribution protocol introduced in a previous work. This particular protocol demonstrated the possibility of using X basis states to contribute to the raw key of the two users (as opposed to using only direct measurement results) even though a semi-quantum participant cannot directly manipulate such states. In this work, we provide a complete proof of security by deriving a lower bound of the protocol's key rate in the asymptotic scenario. Using this bound, we are able to find an error threshold value such that for all error rates less than this threshold, it is guaranteed that A and B may distill a secure secret key; for error rates larger than this threshold, A and B should abort. We demonstrate that this error threshold compares favorably to several fully quantum protocols. We also comment on some interesting observations about the behavior of this protocol under certain noise scenarios. We propose a more efficient privacy preserving set intersection protocol which improves the previously known result by a factor of O(N) in both the computation and communication complexities (N is the number of parties in the protocol). Our protocol is obtained in the malicious model, in which we assume a probabilistic polynomial-time bounded adversary actively controls a fixed set of t (t < N 2) parties. We use a (t + 1,N)-threshold version of the Boneh-Goh-Nissim (BGN) cryptosystem whose underlying group supports bilinear maps. The BGN cryptosystem is generally used in applications where the plaintext space should be small, because there is still a Discrete Logarithm (DL) problem after the decryption. In our protocol the plaintext space can be as large as bounded by the security parameter τ, and the intractability of DL problem is utilized to protect the private datasets. Based on the bilinear map, we also construct some efficient non-interactive proofs. The security of our protocol can be reduced to the common intractable problems including the random oracle, subgroup decision and discrete logarithm problems. The computation complexity of our protocol is O(NS2τ3) (S is the cardinality of each party's dataset), and the communication complexity is O(NS2τ) bits. A similar work by (2006) needs O(N2S2τ3) computation complexity and O(N2S2τ) communication complexity for the same level of correctness as ours.