Blelloch and Farzan (2010) showed how we can represent succinctly any planar embedding of a connected planar simple graph while still supporting constant-time navigation queries, but their representation does not allow multi-edges. Other authors have shown how to represent any connected planar multigraph compactly while supporting fast navigation, but not with an arbitrary planar embedding of such a graph. In this paper we show how we can represent any given planar embedding of any connected planar (multi)graph using asymptotically four bits per edge such that later we can list the edges incident to any vertex in counter-clockwise order using constant time per edge, and determine whether two vertices are neighbours or find a vertex's degree in almost constant time.
Most of the navigable representations we have mentioned require complicated construction algorithms, generally defying a parallel implementation. It is not known how to compute a book embedding @cite_12 in parallel, which is necessary to build the representations of Jacobson and of Munro and Raman. There are also no parallel algorithms to build orderly spanning trees @cite_29 , necessary for the representation of Chiang Its predecessor @cite_39 uses instead a triangulation and a canonical ordering; for the latter there is only a CREW construction running in @math time with @math processors @cite_30 . As for the vertex separators @cite_14 required to build the representation of Blandford and of Blelloch and Farzan, Kao @cite_27 designed a linear-work, logarithmic-span algorithm for computing a cycle separator of a planar graph. However, the construction of these representations of planar embeddings decompose the input graph by repeatedly computing separators until each piece is sufficiently small. This increases the total work to @math even if this optimal parallel algorithm is used. The best linear-work parallel algorithms @cite_41 for building the realizers @cite_52 used in the construction of Barbay 's representation have @math span in the expected case but @math deterministic span.
@cite_30 @cite_14 @cite_41 @cite_29 @cite_52 @cite_39 @cite_27 @cite_12
1991838331 1546311336 2086179657 2092349993
We present the design and analysis of a nearly-linear work parallel algorithm for solving symmetric diagonally dominant (SDD) linear systems. On input an SDD n-by-n matrix A with m nonzero entries and a vector b, our algorithm computes a vector @math such that @math in @math work and @math depth for any ?>0, where A + denotes the Moore-Penrose pseudoinverse of A. The algorithm relies on a parallel algorithm for generating low-stretch spanning trees or spanning subgraphs. To this end, we first develop a parallel decomposition algorithm that in O(mlog O(1) n) work and polylogarithmic depth, partitions a graph with n nodes and m edges into components with polylogarithmic diameter such that only a small fraction of the original edges are between the components. This can be used to generate low-stretch spanning trees with average stretch O(n ? ) in O(mlog O(1) n) work and O(n ? ) depth for any ?>0. Alternatively, it can be used to generate spanning subgraphs with polylogarithmic average stretch in O(mlog O(1) n) work and polylogarithmic depth. We apply this subgraph construction to derive a parallel linear solver. By using this solver in known applications, our results imply improved parallel randomized algorithms for several problems, including single-source shortest paths, maximum flow, minimum-cost flow, and approximate maximum flow. We prove the approximation ratio 8 5 for the metric s,t -path-TSP, and more generally for shortest connected T-joins. The algorithm that achieves this ratio is the simple "Best of Many" version of Christofides' algorithm (1976), suggested by An, Kleinberg and Shmoys (2012), which consists in determining the best Christofides s,t -tour out of those constructed from a family @math of trees having a convex combination dominated by an optimal solution x* of the Held-Karp relaxation. They give the approximation guarantee @math for such an s,t -tour, which is the first improvement after the 5 3 guarantee of Hoogeveen's Christofides type algorithm (1991). Cheriyan, Friggstad and Gao (2012) extended this result to a 13 8-approximation of shortest connected T-joins, for |T|≥4. The ratio 8 5 is proved by simplifying and improving the approach of An, Kleinberg and Shmoys that consists in completing x* 2 in order to dominate the cost of "parity correction" for spanning trees. We partition the edge-set of each spanning tree in @math into an s,t -path (or more generally, into a T-join) and its complement, which induces a decomposition of x*. This decomposition can be refined and then efficiently used to complete x* 2 without using linear programming or particular properties of T, but by adding to each cut deficient for x* 2 an individually tailored explicitly given vector, inherent in x*. A simple example shows that the Best of Many Christofides algorithm may not find a shorter s,t -tour than 3 2 times the incidentally common optima of the problem and of its fractional relaxation. Abstract We propose a novel approach to solving the approximate k-nearest neighbor search problem in metric spaces. The search structure is based on a navigable small world graph with vertices corresponding to the stored elements, edges to links between them, and a variation of greedy algorithm for searching. The navigable small world is created simply by keeping old Delaunay graph approximation links produced at the start of construction. The approach is very universal, defined in terms of arbitrary metric spaces and at the same time it is very simple. The algorithm handles insertions in the same way as queries: by finding approximate neighbors for the inserted element and connecting it to them. Both search and insertion can be done in parallel requiring only local information from the structure. The structure can be made distributed. The accuracy of the probabilistic k-nearest neighbor queries can be adjusted without rebuilding the structure. The performed simulation for data in the Euclidean spaces shows that the structure built using the proposed algorithm has small world navigation properties with log 2 ( n ) insertion and search complexity at fixed accuracy, and performs well at high dimensionality. Simulation on a CoPHiR dataset revealed its high efficiency in case of large datasets (more than an order of magnitude less metric computations at fixed recall) compared to permutation indexes. Only 0.03 of the 10 million 208-dimensional vector dataset is needed to be evaluated to achieve 0.999 recall (virtually exact search). For recall 0.93 processing speed 2800 queries s can be achieved on a dual Intel X5675 Xenon server node with Java implementation. Chapter 36 Decomposing Graphs into Regions of Small Diameter* Nathan Linialt Michael .lss A decomposition of a graph G = (V, E) is a partition of the vertex set into subsets (called lhks). The diameter of a decomposition is the least. d such that any two vertices belonging to the same connected component of a block are at distance < d. In this paper we prove (nearly best possible) statements of the form: .4ny n–vertex graph has a decomposition into a small number of blocks each having small diameter. Such decompositions provide a tool for efficiently decentralizing distributed computations. In [AGLP1 it was shown that every graph has a decomposition into at most s(n) blocks of diameter at most s(n) for s(n) = o( loglog d h n). usinga,technique of Awerbuch [A] and Awerbuch and Peleg [AP], we improve this result by showing that every graph has a decomposition of diameter ()(log n) into O(log n) blocks. In addition, we give a randomized distributed algorithm that produces such a decomposition and runs in time 0(log2 n). The construction can be parametrized to provide decompositions that trade-off between the number of blocks and the diameter. We show that this trade-off is nearly best possible for two families of graphs the first consists of skeletons of certain triangulations of a simplex and the second consists of grid graphs with added diagonals. The proofs in both cases rely on basic results in combinatorial topology, Sperner’s lemma for the first class and Tucker’s lemma for the second. *This work was supported in part by NSF contracts DMS87-03541 and CCR-8911388 tDepartment of Computer Science, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel. + ‘Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Mail Code C-014, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0114.