Causal inference from observational data is an ambitious but highly relevant task, with diverse applications ranging from natural to social sciences. Within the scope of nonparametric time series, causal inference defined through interventions (cf. Pearl (2000)) is largely unexplored, although time order simplifies the problem substantially. We consider a marginal integration scheme for inferring causal effects from observational time series data, MINT-T (marginal integration in time series), which is an adaptation for time series of a method proposed by Ernest and Buhlmann (Electron. J. Statist, pp. 3155-3194, vol. 9, 2015) for the case of independent data. Our approach for stationary stochastic processes is fully nonparametric and, assuming no instantaneous effects consistently recovers the total causal effect of a single intervention with optimal one-dimensional nonparametric convergence rate @math assuming regularity conditions and twice differentiability of a certain corresponding regression function. Therefore, MINT-T remains largely unaffected by the curse of dimensionality as long as smoothness conditions hold in higher dimensions and it is feasible for a large class of stationary time series, including nonlinear and multivariate processes. For the case with instantaneous effects, we provide a procedure which guards against false positive causal statements.
There is a substantial literature on nonparametric estimation of causal effects of binary treatment or intervention variables . For continuous treatments or intervention variables, recent work also includes @cite_6 , besides the marginal integration approach . Marginal integration itself has been proposed by for smooth function estimation in structured nonparametric regression, mainly for additive models. The theoretical analysis in is the basis for inferring causal effects in the setting of independent data . We are not aware of any other work which considers estimation of causal effects, as defined in , for the setting of stationary time series.
@cite_6
2963139802 2138290169 1577116359 2591915067
Causal inference from observational data is an ambitious but highly relevant task, with diverse applications ranging from natural to social sciences. Within the scope of nonparametric time series, causal inference defined through interventions is largely unexplored, although time order simplifies the problem substantially. A marginal integration scheme is considered for inferring causal effects from observational time series data, MINT-T (marginal integration in time series), which is an adaptation for time series of a previously proposed method for the case of independent data. This approach for stationary stochastic processes is fully nonparametric and, assuming no instantaneous effects consistently recovers the total causal effect of a single intervention with optimal one-dimensional nonparametric convergence rate n−2 5 assuming regularity conditions and twice differentiability of a certain corresponding regression function. Therefore, MINT-T remains largely unaffected by the curse of dimensionality as long as smoothness conditions hold in higher dimensions and it is feasible for a large class of stationary time series, including nonlinear and multivariate processes. For the case with instantaneous effects, we provide a procedure which guards against false positive causal statements. Abstract We outline a framework for causal inference in settings where assignment to a binary treatment is ignorable, but compliance with the assignment is not perfect so that the receipt of treatment is nonignorable. To address the problems associated with comparing subjects by the ignorable assignment—an “intention-to-treat analysis”—we make use of instrumental variables, which have long been used by economists in the context of regression models with constant treatment effects. We show that the instrumental variables (IV) estimand can be embedded within the Rubin Causal Model (RCM) and that under some simple and easily interpretable assumptions, the IV estimand is the average causal effect for a subgroup of units, the compliers. Without these assumptions, the IV estimand is simply the ratio of intention-to-treat causal estimands with no interpretation as an average causal effect. The advantages of embedding the IV approach in the RCM are that it clarifies the nature of critical assumptions needed for a... Researchers in economics and other disciplines are often interested in the causal effect of a binary treatment on outcomes. Econometric methods used to estimate such effects are divided into one of two strands depending on whether they require the conditional independence assumption (i.e., independence of potential outcomes and treatment assignment conditional on a set of observable covariates). When this assumption holds, researchers now have a wide array of estimation techniques from which to choose. However, very little is known about their performance – both in absolute and relative terms – when measurement error is present. In this study, the performance of several estimators that require the conditional independence assumption, as well as some that do not, are evaluated in a Monte Carlo study. In all cases, the data-generating process is such that conditional independence holds with the 'real' data. However, measurement error is then introduced. Specifically, three types of measurement error are considered: (i) errors in treatment assignment, (ii) errors in the outcome, and (iii) errors in the vector of covariates. Recommendations for researchers are provided. In many areas, practitioners seek to use observational data to learn a treatment assignment policy that satisfies application-specific constraints, such as budget, fairness, simplicity, or other functional form constraints. For example, policies may be restricted to take the form of decision trees based on a limited set of easily observable individual characteristics. We propose a new approach to this problem motivated by the theory of semiparametrically efficient estimation. Our method can be used to optimize either binary treatments or infinitesimal nudges to continuous treatments, and can leverage observational data where causal effects are identified using a variety of strategies, including selection on observables and instrumental variables. Given a doubly robust estimator of the causal effect of assigning everyone to treatment, we develop an algorithm for choosing whom to treat, and establish strong guarantees for the asymptotic utilitarian regret of the resulting policy.