Suppose we are given a submodular function @math over a set of elements, and we want to maximize its value subject to certain constraints. Good approximation algorithms are known for such problems under both monotone and non-monotone submodular functions. We consider these problems in a stochastic setting, where elements are not all active and we can only get value from active elements. Each element @math is active independently with some known probability @math , but we don't know the element's status . We find it out only when we the element @math ---probing reveals whether it's active or not, whereafter we can use this information to decide which other elements to probe. Eventually, if we have a probed set @math and a subset @math of active elements in @math , we can pick any @math and get value @math . Moreover, the sequence of elements we probe must satisfy a given ---e.g., these may be given by a matroid, or an orienteering constraint, or deadline, or precedence constraint, or an arbitrary downward-closed constraint---if we can probe some sequence of elements we can probe any prefix of it. What is a good strategy to probe elements to maximize the expected value? In this paper we study the gap between adaptive and non-adaptive strategies for @math being a submodular or a fractionally subadditive (XOS) function. If this gap is small, we can focus on finding good non-adaptive strategies instead, which are easier to find as well as to represent. We show that the adaptivity gap is a constant for monotone and non-monotone submodular functions, and logarithmic for XOS functions of small . These bounds are nearly tight. Our techniques show new ways of arguing about the optimal adaptive decision tree for stochastic problems.
The previous work of the authors @cite_2 gave results for the case where @math was the rank function of matroids (or their intersections). That work bounded the adaptivity gap by logarithmic factors, and gave better results for special cases like uniform and partition matroids. This work both improves the quantitative bounds (down to small constants), generalizes it to all submodular functions with the hope of getting to all subadditive functions, and arguably also makes the proof simpler.
@cite_2
2089729462 1503396090 1961231572 1542719709
A number of recent results on optimization problems involving submodular functions have made use of the "multilinear relaxation" of the problem. We present a general approach to deriving inapproximability results in the value oracle model, based on the notion of "symmetry gap". Our main result is that for any fixed instance that exhibits a certain "symmetry gap" in its multilinear relaxation, there is a naturally related class of instances for which a better approximation factor than the symmetry gap would require exponentially many oracle queries. This unifies several known hardness results for submodular maximization, e.g. the optimality of (1-1 e)-approximation for monotone submodular maximization under a cardinality constraint, and the impossibility of (1 2+epsilon)-approximation for unconstrained (non-monotone) submodular maximization. It follows from our result that (1 2+epsilon)-approximation is also impossible for non-monotone submodular maximization subject to a (non-trivial) matroid constraint. On the algorithmic side, we present a 0.309-approximation for this problem, improving the previously known factor of 1 4-o(1).As another application, we consider the problem of maximizing a non-monotone submodular function over the bases of a matroid. A (1 6-o(1))-approximation has been developed for this problem, assuming that the matroid contains two disjoint bases. We show that the best approximation one can achieve is indeed related to packings of bases in the matroid. Specifically, for any k≫=2, there is a class of matroids of fractional base packing number nu = k (k-1), such that any algorithm achieving a better than (1-1 nu)-approximation for this class would require exponentially many value queries. On the positive side, we present a 1 2 (1-1 nu-o(1))-approximation algorithm for the same problem. Our hardness results hold in fact for very special symmetric instances. For such symmetric instances, we show that the approximation factors of 1 2 (for submodular maximization subject to a matroid constraint) and 1-1 nu (for a matroid base constraint) can be achieved algorithmically and hence are optimal. Constrained submodular maximization problems have long been studied, most recently in the context of auctions and computational advertising, with near-optimal results known under a variety of constraints when the submodular function is monotone. In this paper, we give constant approximation algorithms for the non-monotone case that work for p-independence systems (which generalize constraints given by the intersection of p matroids that had been studied previously), where the running time is poly(n, p). Our algorithms and analyses are simple, and essentially reduce non-monotone maximization to multiple runs of the greedy algorithm previously used in the monotone case. We extend these ideas to give a simple greedy-based constant factor algorithms for non-monotone submodular maximization subject to a knapsack constraint, and for (online) secretary setting (where elements arrive one at a time in random order and the algorithm must make irrevocable decisions) subject to uniform matroid or a partition matroid constraint. Finally, we give an O(log k) approximation in the secretary setting subject to a general matroid constraint of rank k. We study the approximability of multiway partitioning problems, examples of which include Multiway Cut, Node-weighted Multiway Cut, and Hypergraph Multiway Cut. We investigate these problems from the point of view of two possible generalizations: as Min-CSPs, and as Submodular Multiway Partition problems. These two generalizations lead to two natural relaxations that we call respectively the Local Distribution LP, and the Lovasz relaxation. The Local Distribution LP is generally stronger than the Lovasz relaxation, but applicable only to Min-CSP with predicates of constant size. The relaxations coincide in some cases such as Multiway Cut where they are both equivalent to the CKR relaxation. We show that the Lovasz relaxation gives a (2--2 k)-approximation for Submodular Multiway Partition with k terminals, improving a recent 2-approximation [2]. We prove that this factor is optimal in two senses: (1) A (2--2 k -- e)-approximation for Submodular Multiway Partition with k terminals would require exponentially many value queries (in the oracle model), or imply NP = RP (for certain explicit submodular functions). (2) For Hypergraph Multiway Cut and Node-weighted Multiway Cut with k terminals, both special cases of Submodular Multiway Partition, we prove that a (2--2 k -- e)-approximation is NP-hard, assuming the Unique Games Conjecture. Both our hardness results are more general: (1) We show that the notion of symmetry gap, previously used for submodular maximization problems [19, 6], also implies hardness results for submodular minimization problems. (2) Assuming the Unique Games Conjecture, we show that the Local Distribution LP gives an optimal approximation for every Min-CSP that includes the Not-Equal predicate. Finally, we connect the two hardness techniques by proving that the integrality gap of the Local Distribution LP coincides with the symmetry gap of the multilinear relaxation (for a related instance). This shows that the appearance of the same hardness threshold for a Min-CSP and the related submodular minimization problem is not a coincidence. We consider the problem of maximizing a nonnegative (possibly non-monotone) submodular set function with or without constraints. [9] showed a 2 5-approximation for the unconstrained problem and also proved that no approximation better than 1 2 is possible in the value oracle model. Constant-factor approximation has been also known for submodular maximization subject to a matroid independence constraint (a factor of 0.309 [33]) and for submodular maximization subject to a matroid base constraint, provided that the fractional base packing number ν is bounded away from 1 (a 1 4-approximation assuming that ν ≥ 2 [33]). In this paper, we propose a new algorithm for submodular maximization which is based on the idea of simulated annealing. We prove that this algorithm achieves improved approximation for two problems: a 0.41-approximation for unconstrained submodular maximization, and a 0.325-approximation for submodular maximization subject to a matroid independence constraint. On the hardness side, we show that in the value oracle model it is impossible to achieve a 0.478-approximation for submodular maximization subject to a matroid independence constraint, or a 0.394-approximation subject to a matroid base constraint in matroids with two disjoint bases. Even for the special case of cardinality constraint, we prove it is impossible to achieve a 0.491-approximation. (Previously it was conceivable that a 1 2-approximation exists for these problems.) It is still an open question whether a 1 2-approximation is possible for unconstrained submodular maximization.