The bag-of-words model is a standard representation of text for many linear classifier learners. In many problem domains, linear classifiers are preferred over more complex models due to their efficiency, robustness and interpretability, and the bag-of-words text representation can capture sufficient information for linear classifiers to make highly accurate predictions. However in settings where there is a large vocabulary, large variance in the frequency of terms in the training corpus, many classes and very short text (e.g., single sentences or document titles) the bag-of-words representation becomes extremely sparse, and this can reduce the accuracy of classifiers. A particular issue in such settings is that short texts tend to contain infrequently occurring or rare terms which lack class-conditional evidence. In this work we introduce a method for enriching the bag-of-words model by complementing such rare term information with related terms from both general and domain-specific Word Vector models. By reducing sparseness in the bag-of-words models, our enrichment approach achieves improved classification over several baseline classifiers in a variety of text classification problems. Our approach is also efficient because it requires no change to the linear classifier before or during training, since bag-of-words enrichment applies only to text being classified.
A number of approaches for transforming the bag-of-words model or modifying linear models to increase the classification accuracy have been proposed in previous works. These approaches generally involve: 1) Reducing the dimensionality of models by removing stop words @cite_26 , stemming terms @cite_27 and removing the least frequent words @cite_16 ; 2) Transforming word frequencies by TF-IDF and other measures to identify the key terms in particular classes @cite_13 ; 3) Limiting classes to a maximum vocabulary size through methods such as mutual information metrics @cite_2 ; 4) Using dictionaries @cite_7 @cite_26 @cite_9 and encyclopaedias @cite_21 @cite_5 to find synonyms for rare terms. However, the names of people and organisations are unlikely to occur in dictionaries @cite_17 @cite_26 and may be used rarely in training text.
@cite_26 @cite_7 @cite_9 @cite_21 @cite_27 @cite_2 @cite_5 @cite_16 @cite_13 @cite_17
1550206324 2147777361 1965667542 2131273899
Recent work in text classification has used two different first-order probabilistic models for classification, both of which make the naive Bayes assumption. Some use a multi-variate Bernoulli model, that is, a Bayesian Network with no dependencies between words and binary word features (e.g. Larkey and Croft 1996; Koller and Sahami 1997). Others use a multinomial model, that is, a uni-gram language model with integer word counts (e.g. Lewis and Gale 1994; Mitchell 1997). This paper aims to clarify the confusion by describing the differences and details of these two models, and by empirically comparing their classification performance on five text corpora. We find that the multi-variate Bernoulli performs well with small vocabulary sizes, but that the multinomial performs usually performs even better at larger vocabulary sizes--providing on average a 27 reduction in error over the multi-variate Bernoulli model at any vocabulary size. This paper presents the results of a study on information extraction from unrestricted Turkish text using statistical language processing methods. In languages like English, there is a very small number of possible word forms with a given root word. However, languages like Turkish have very productive agglutinative morphology. Thus, it is an issue to build statistical models for specific tasks using the surface forms of the words, mainly because of the data sparseness problem. In order to alleviate this problem, we used additional syntactic information, i.e. the morphological structure of the words. We have successfully applied statistical methods using both the lexical and morphological information to sentence segmentation, topic segmentation, and name tagging tasks. For sentence segmentation, we have modeled the final inflectional groups of the words and combined it with the lexical model, and decreased the error rate to 4.34 , which is 21 better than the result obtained using only the surface forms of the words. For topic segmentation, stems of the words (especially nouns) have been found to be more effective than using the surface forms of the words and we have achieved 10.90 segmentation error rate on our test set according to the weighted TDT-2 segmentation cost metric. This is 32 better than the word-based baseline model. For name tagging, we used four different information sources to model names. Our first information source is based on the surface forms of the words. Then we combined the contextual cues with the lexical model, and obtained some improvement. After this, we modeled the morphological analyses of the words, and finally we modeled the tag sequence, and reached an F-Measure of 91.56 , according to the MUC evaluation criteria. Our results are important in the sense that, using linguistic information, i.e. morphological analyses of the words, and a corpus large enough to train a statistical model significantly improves these basic information extraction tasks for Turkish. A novel probabilistic retrieval model is presented. It forms a basis to interpret the TF-IDF term weights as making relevance decisions. It simulates the local relevance decision-making for every location of a document, and combines all of these “local” relevance decisions as the “document-wide” relevance decision for the document. The significance of interpreting TF-IDF in this way is the potential to: (1) establish a unifying perspective about information retrieval as relevance decision-making; and (2) develop advanced TF-IDF-related term weights for future elaborate retrieval models. Our novel retrieval model is simplified to a basic ranking formula that directly corresponds to the TF-IDF term weights. In general, we show that the term-frequency factor of the ranking formula can be rendered into different term-frequency factors of existing retrieval systems. In the basic ranking formula, the remaining quantity - log p(rvt ∈ d) is interpreted as the probability of randomly picking a nonrelevant usage (denoted by r) of term t. Mathematically, we show that this quantity can be approximated by the inverse document-frequency (IDF). Empirically, we show that this quantity is related to IDF, using four reference TREC ad hoc retrieval data collections. Traditional term weighting schemes in text categorization, such as TF-IDF, only exploit the statistical information of terms in documents. Instead, in this paper, we propose a novel term weighting scheme by exploiting the semantics of categories and indexing terms. Specifically, the semantics of categories are represented by senses of terms appearing in the category labels as well as the interpretation of them by WordNet. Also, the weight of a term is correlated to its semantic similarity with a category. Experimental results on three commonly used data sets show that the proposed approach outperforms TF-IDF in the cases that the amount of training data is small or the content of documents is focused on well-defined categories. In addition, the proposed approach compares favorably with two previous studies.