A recent study characterizing failures in computer networks shows that transient single element (node link) failures are the dominant failures in large communication networks like the Internet. Thus, having the routing paths globally recomputed on a failure does not pay off since the failed element recovers fairly quickly, and the recomputed routing paths need to be discarded. In this paper, we present the first distributed algorithm that computes the alternate paths required by some "proactive recovery schemes" for handling transient failures. Our algorithm computes paths that avoid a failed node, and provides an alternate path to a particular destination from an upstream neighbor of the failed node. With minor modifications, we can have the algorithm compute alternate paths that avoid a failed link as well. To the best of our knowledge all previous algorithms proposed for computing alternate paths are centralized, and need complete information of the network graph as input to the algorithm.
Zhang, et. al. @cite_0 present protocols based on local re-routing for dealing with transient single node failures. They demonstrate via simulations that the recovery paths computed by their algorithm are usually within 15 the theoretically optimal alternate paths.
@cite_0
1658695903 2132422341 1530120774 2110916358
Single node failures represent more than 85 of all node failures in the today's large communication networks such as the Internet. Also, these node failures are usually transient. Consequently, having the routing paths globally recomputed does not pay off since the failed nodes recover fairly quickly, and the recomputed routing paths need to be discarded. Instead, we develop algorithms and protocols for dealing with such transient single node failures by suppressing the failure (instead of advertising it across the network), and routing messages to the destination via alternate paths that do not use the failed node. We compare our solution to that of Ref. [11] wherein the authors have presented a "Failure Insensitive Routing" protocol as a proactive recovery scheme for handling transient node failures. We show that our algorithms are faster by an order of magnitude while our paths are equally good. We show via simulation results that our paths are usually within 15 of the optimal for randomly generated graph with 100-1000 nodes. We investigate the single link failure recovery problem and its application to the alternate path routing problem for ATM networks, and the k-replacement edges for each edge of a minimum cost spanning tree. Specifically, given a 2-connected graph G, a specified node s, and a shortest paths tree Ts = e1, e2, . . . , eni1 of s, where ei = (xi, yi) and xi = parentTs(yi), find a shortest path from yi to s in the graph G for 1 · i · n i 1. We present an O(m + n log n) time algorithm for this problem and a linear time algorithm for the case when all weights are equal. When the edge weights are integers, we present an algorithm that takes O(m + Tsort(n)) time, where Tsort(n) is the time required to sort n integers. We establish a lower bound of ­(min(m p n, n 2 )) for the directed version of our problem under the path comparison model, where Ts is the shortest paths destination tree of s. We show that any solution to the single link recovery problem can be adapted to solve the alternate path routing problem in ATM networks. Our technique for the single link failure recovery problem is adapted to find the k-replacement edges for the tree edges of a minimum cost spanning tree in O(m + n log n) time. Recent work has focused on increasing availability in the face of Internet path failures. To date, proposed solutions have relied on complex routing and path-monitoring schemes, trading scalability for availability among a relatively small set of hosts. This paper proposes a simple, scalable approach to recover from Internet path failures. Our contributions are threefold. First, we conduct a broad measurement study of Internet path failures on a collection of 3,153 Internet destinations consisting of popular Web servers, broad-band hosts, and randomly selected nodes. We monitored these destinations from 67 PlanetLab vantage points over a period of seven days, and found availabilities ranging from 99.6 for servers to 94.4 for broadband hosts. When failures do occur, many appear too close to the destination (e.g., last-hop and end-host failures) to be mitigated through alternative routing techniques of any kind. Second, we show that for the failures that can be addressed through routing, a simple, scalable technique, called one-hop source routing, can achieve close to the maximum benefit available with very low overhead. When a path failure occurs, our scheme attempts to recover from it by routing indirectly through a small set of randomly chosen intermediaries. Third, we implemented and deployed a prototype one-hop source routing infrastructure on PlanetLab. Over a three day period, we repeatedly fetched documents from 982 popular Internet Web servers and used one-hop source routing to attempt to route around the failures we observed. Our results show that our prototype successfully recovered from 56 of network failures. However, we also found a large number of server failures that cannot be addressed through alternative routing. Our research demonstrates that one-hop source routing is easy to implement, adds negligible overhead, and achieves close to the maximum benefit available to indirect routing schemes, without the need for path monitoring, history, or a-priori knowledge of any kind. Dealing with network failures effectively is a major operational challenge for Internet service providers. Commonly deployed link state routing protocols such as OSPF react to link failures through global (i.e., network-wide) link state advertisements and routing table recomputations, causing significant forwarding discontinuity after a failure. The drawback with these protocols is that they need to trade off routing stability and forwarding continuity. To improve failure resiliency without jeopardizing routing stability, we propose a proactive local rerouting based approach called failure insensitive routing (FIR). The proposed approach prepares for failures using interface-specific forwarding, and upon a failure, suppresses the link state advertisement and instead triggers local rerouting using a backwarding table. In this paper, we prove that when no more than one link failure notification is suppressed, FIR always finds a loop-free path to a destination if one such path exists. We also formally analyze routing stability and network availability under both proactive and reactive approaches, and show that FIR provides better stability and availability than OSPF.