We propose an effective technique to solving review-level sentiment classification problem by using sentence-level polarity correction. Our polarity correction technique takes into account the consistency of the polarities (positive and negative) of sentences within each product review before performing the actual machine learning task. While sentences with inconsistent polarities are removed, sentences with consistent polarities are used to learn state-of-the-art classifiers. The technique achieved better results on different types of products reviews and outperforms baseline models without the correction technique. Experimental results show an average of 82 F-measure on four different product review domains.
More importantly, we believe every sentence in the review may not necessarily contribute to the classification of the review to the appropriate class. @cite_30 We say that certain could be sufficient to represent and distinguish between the sentiment classes of a review. Representative features have been argued to be the key to effective classification technique. @cite_2 @cite_25 We emphasize that our approach is promising and can be easily integrated by any sentiment classification system regardless of the sentiment detection technique employed.
@cite_30 @cite_25 @cite_2
2138260386 150150005 1489003673 2518806256
In this paper, we investigate structured models for document-level sentiment classification. When predicting the sentiment of a subjective document (e.g., as positive or negative), it is well known that not all sentences are equally discriminative or informative. But identifying the useful sentences automatically is itself a difficult learning problem. This paper proposes a joint two-level approach for document-level sentiment classification that simultaneously extracts useful (i.e., subjective) sentences and predicts document-level sentiment based on the extracted sentences. Unlike previous joint learning methods for the task, our approach (1) does not rely on gold standard sentence-level subjectivity annotations (which may be expensive to obtain), and (2) optimizes directly for document-level performance. Empirical evaluations on movie reviews and U.S. Congressional floor debates show improved performance over previous approaches. We address the problem of sentiment and objectivity classification of product reviews in Chinese. Our approach is distinctive in that it treats both positive negative sentiment and subjectivity objectivity not as distinct classes but rather as a continuum; we argue that this is desirable from the perspective of would-be customers who read the reviews. We use novel unsupervised techniques, including a one-word 'seed' vocabulary and iterative retraining for sentiment processing, and a criterion of 'sentiment density' for determining the extent to which a document is opinionated. The classifier achieves up to 87 F-measure for sentiment polarity detection. The internet has made it feasible to tap a continuous stream of public sentiment from the world wide web, quite literally permitting one to "feel the pulse" of any issue under consideration. We present a methodology for real time sentiment extraction in the domain of finance. With the advent of the web, there has been a sharp increase in the influence of individuals on the stock market via web-based trading and the posting of sentiment to stock message boards. While it is importantto capture this "sentiment" of small investors, as yet, no index of sentiment has been compiled. This paper comprises (a) a technology for extracting small investor sentiment from web sources to create an index, and (b) illustrative applications of the methodology. We make use of computerized natural language and statistical algorithms for the automated classification of messages posted on the web. We design a suite of classification algorithms, each of different theoretical content, with a view to characterizing the sentiment of any single posting to a message board. The use of multiple methods allows imposition of voting rules in the classification process. It also enables elimination of "fuzzy" messages which are better off uninterpreted. A majority rule across algorithms vastly improves classification accuracy, but also leads to a natural increase in the number of messages classified as "fuzzy". The classifier achieves an accuracy of 62 (versus a random classification accuracy of 33 ), and compares favorably against human agreement on message classification, which was 72 . The technology is computationally efficient, allowing the access and interpretations of thousands of messages within minutes. Our illustrative applications show evidence of a strong link between market movements and sentiment. Based on approximately 25,000 messages for the last quarter of 2000, we found evidence that sentiment is based on stock movements. Opinion mining from customer reviews has become pervasive in recent years. Sentences in reviews, however, are usually classified independently, even though they form part of a review's argumentative structure. Intuitively, sentences in a review build and elaborate upon each other; knowledge of the review structure and sentential context should thus inform the classification of each sentence. We demonstrate this hypothesis for the task of aspect-based sentiment analysis by modeling the interdependencies of sentences in a review with a hierarchical bidirectional LSTM. We show that the hierarchical model outperforms two non-hierarchical baselines, obtains results competitive with the state-of-the-art, and outperforms the state-of-the-art on five multilingual, multi-domain datasets without any hand-engineered features or external resources.