One challenge in fact checking is the ability to improve the transparency of the decision. We present a fact checking method that uses reference information in knowledge graphs (KGs) to assess claims and explain its decisions. KGs contain a formal representation of knowledge with semantic descriptions of entities and their relationships. We exploit such rich semantics to produce interpretable explanations for the fact checking output. As information in a KG is inevitably incomplete, we rely on logical rule discovery and on Web text mining to gather the evidence to assess a given claim. Uncertain rules and facts are turned into logical programs and the checking task is modeled as an inference problem in a probabilistic extension of answer set programs. Experiments show that the probabilistic inference enables the efficient labeling of claims with interpretable explanations, and the quality of the results is higher than state of the art baselines.
Markov Logic combines first-order logic and Markov networks @cite_9 . In principle, learning in Markov Logic could learn the uncertain rules and inference can be applied to the learned rules as we do here. We tested alchemy to learn logical rules for spouse relation with only 10 positive examples, the system was not able to produce results after 2 hours of execution. This illustrates that rule learning in Markov Logic has scalability issues with large KGs such as DBpedia, let alone the quality of the rules learned.
@cite_9
2119421136 2121075864 1977970897 1576159843
Markov logic is a widely used tool in statistical relational learning, which uses a weighted first-order logic knowledge base to specify a Markov random field (MRF) or a conditional random field (CRF). In many applications, a Markov logic network (MLN) is trained in one domain, but used in a different one. This paper focuses on dynamic Markov logic networks, where the size of the discretized time-domain typically varies between training and testing. It has been previously pointed out that the marginal probabilities of truth assignments to ground atoms can change if one extends or reduces the domains of predicates in an MLN. We show that in addition to this problem, the standard way of unrolling a Markov logic theory into a MRF may result in time-inhomogeneity of the underlying Markov chain. Furthermore, even if these representational problems are not significant for a given domain, we show that the more practical problem of generating samples in a sequential conditional random field for the next slice relying on the samples from the previous slice has high computational cost in the general case, due to the need to estimate a normalization factor for each sample. We propose a new discriminative model, slice normalized dynamic Markov logic networks (SN-DMLN), that suffers from none of these issues. It supports efficient online inference, and can directly model influences between variables within a time slice that do not have a causal direction, in contrast with fully directed models (e.g., DBNs). Experimental results show an improvement in accuracy over previous approaches to online inference in dynamic Markov logic networks. Markov logic networks (MLNs) combine logic and probability by attaching weights to first-order clauses, and viewing these as templates for features of Markov networks. In this paper we develop an algorithm for learning the structure of MLNs from relational databases, combining ideas from inductive logic programming (ILP) and feature induction in Markov networks. The algorithm performs a beam or shortest-first search of the space of clauses, guided by a weighted pseudo-likelihood measure. This requires computing the optimal weights for each candidate structure, but we show how this can be done efficiently. The algorithm can be used to learn an MLN from scratch, or to refine an existing knowledge base. We have applied it in two real-world domains, and found that it outperforms using off-the-shelf ILP systems to learn the MLN structure, as well as pure ILP, purely probabilistic and purely knowledge-based approaches. We propose a simple approach to combining first-order logic and probabilistic graphical models in a single representation. A Markov logic network (MLN) is a first-order knowledge base with a weight attached to each formula (or clause). Together with a set of constants representing objects in the domain, it specifies a ground Markov network containing one feature for each possible grounding of a first-order formula in the KB, with the corresponding weight. Inference in MLNs is performed by MCMC over the minimal subset of the ground network required for answering the query. Weights are efficiently learned from relational databases by iteratively optimizing a pseudo-likelihood measure. Optionally, additional clauses are learned using inductive logic programming techniques. Experiments with a real-world database and knowledge base in a university domain illustrate the promise of this approach. Markov Logic Networks (MLNs) combine Markov networks and first-order logic by attaching weights to first-order formulas and viewing these as templates for features of Markov networks. Learning the structure of MLNs is performed by state-of-the-art methods by maximizing the likelihood of a relational database. This can lead to suboptimal results given prediction tasks. On the other hand better results in prediction problems have been achieved by discriminative learning of MLNs weights given a certain structure. In this paper we propose an algorithm for learning the structure of MLNs discriminatively by maximimizing the conditional likelihood of the query predicates instead of the joint likelihood of all predicates. The algorithm chooses the structures by maximizing conditional likelihood and sets the parameters by maximum likelihood. Experiments in two real-world domains show that the proposed algorithm improves over the state-of-the-art discriminative weight learning algorithm for MLNs in terms of conditional likelihood. We also compare the proposed algorithm with the state-of-the-art generative structure learning algorithm for MLNs and confirm the results in [22] showing that for small datasets the generative algorithm is competitive, while for larger datasets the discriminative algorithm outperfoms the generative one.