Recent progress in the deep learning-based models has improved photo-realistic (or perceptual) single-image super-resolution significantly. However, despite their powerful performance, many models are difficult to apply to the real-world applications because of the heavy computational requirements. To facilitate the use of a deep learning model under such demands, we focus on keeping the model fast and lightweight while maintaining its performance. In detail, we design an architecture that implements a cascading mechanism on a residual network to boost the performance with limited resources via multi-level feature fusion. Moreover, we adopt group convolution and weight-tying for our proposed model in order to achieve extreme efficiency. In addition to our network, we use the adversarial learning paradigm and a multi-scale discriminator approach. By doing so, we show that the performances of the proposed models surpass those of the recent methods, which have a complexity similar to ours, for both traditional pixel-based and perception-based tasks. To verify the effectiveness of our models, we investigate through extensive internal experiments and benchmark using various datasets.
For the photo-realistic SR task, how to measure the quality is a major argument. There are many studies that propose distortion-based metrics for the image quality assessment @cite_50 @cite_39 @cite_31 . But these works do not always reflect the visual quality, and some metrics often contradict human judgment @cite_54 . @cite_59 reveal the trade-off between the average distortion and perceptual quality. Considering the trade-off, we mainly use NIMA @cite_47 and LPIPS @cite_0 perceptual quality metrics as our benchmark test. The NIMA is a newly proposed metric that predicts the distribution of human opinion scores using a deep learning model. It makes the assessment in a non-reference, where all the evaluation is done without ground-truth images. The LPIPS criticizes the perceptual quality by using the distance between two deep features generated by the network pretrained on ImageNet @cite_27 . Upon the pretrained network, they add an extra linear layer and fine-tune it to the human perceptual dataset. In our experiments, we use a fine-tuned AlexNet (linear version 0.1) @cite_1 .
@cite_47 @cite_54 @cite_1 @cite_39 @cite_0 @cite_27 @cite_59 @cite_50 @cite_31
2898677683 2133946027 2964060609 2102166818
Convolutional neural network (CNN) based methods have recently achieved great success for image super-resolution (SR). However, most deep CNN based SR models attempt to improve distortion measures (e.g. PSNR, SSIM, IFC, VIF) while resulting in poor quantified perceptual quality (e.g. human opinion score, no-reference quality measures such as NIQE). Few works have attempted to improve the perceptual quality at the cost of performance reduction in distortion measures. A very recent study has revealed that distortion and perceptual quality are at odds with each other and there is always a trade-off between the two. Often the restoration algorithms that are superior in terms of perceptual quality, are inferior in terms of distortion measures. Our work attempts to analyze the trade-off between distortion and perceptual quality for the problem of single image SR. To this end, we use the well-known SR architecture- enhanced deep super-resolution (EDSR) network and show that it can be adapted to achieve better perceptual quality for a specific range of the distortion measure. While the original network of EDSR was trained to minimize the error defined based on per-pixel accuracy alone, we train our network using a generative adversarial network framework with EDSR as the generator module. Our proposed network, called enhanced perceptual super-resolution network (EPSR), is trained with a combination of mean squared error loss, perceptual loss, and adversarial loss. Our experiments reveal that EPSR achieves the state-of-the-art trade-off between distortion and perceptual quality while the existing methods perform well in either of these measures alone. Since the human visual system (HVS) is the ultimate assessor of image quality, current research on the design of objective image quality metrics tends to include an important feature of the HVS, namely, visual attention. Different metrics for image quality prediction have been extended with a computational model of visual attention, but the resulting gain in reliability of the metrics so far was variable. To better understand the basic added value of including visual attention in the design of objective metrics, we used measured data of visual attention. To this end, we performed two eye-tracking experiments: one with a free-looking task and one with a quality assessment task. In the first experiment, 20 observers looked freely to 29 unimpaired original images, yielding us so-called natural scene saliency (NSS). In the second experiment, 20 different observers assessed the quality of distorted versions of the original images. The resulting saliency maps showed some differences with the NSS, and therefore, we applied both types of saliency to four different objective metrics predicting the quality of JPEG compressed images. For both types of saliency the performance gain of the metrics improved, but to a larger extent when adding the NSS. As a consequence, we further integrated NSS in several state-of-the-art quality metrics, including three full-reference metrics and two no-reference metrics, and evaluated their prediction performance for a larger set of distortions. By doing so, we evaluated whether and to what extent the addition of NSS is beneficial to objective quality prediction in general terms. In addition, we address some practical issues in the design of an attention-based metric. The eye-tracking data are made available to the research community . This paper reports on the 2018 PIRM challenge on perceptual super-resolution (SR), held in conjunction with the Perceptual Image Restoration and Manipulation (PIRM) workshop at ECCV 2018. In contrast to previous SR challenges, our evaluation methodology jointly quantifies accuracy and perceptual quality, therefore enabling perceptual-driven methods to compete alongside algorithms that target PSNR maximization. Twenty-one participating teams introduced algorithms which well-improved upon the existing state-of-the-art methods in perceptual SR, as confirmed by a human opinion study. We also analyze popular image quality measures and draw conclusions regarding which of them correlates best with human opinion scores. We conclude with an analysis of the current trends in perceptual SR, as reflected from the leading submissions. An important aim of research on the blind image quality assessment (IQA) problem is to devise perceptual models that can predict the quality of distorted images with as little prior knowledge of the images or their distortions as possible. Current state-of-the-art “general purpose” no reference (NR) IQA algorithms require knowledge about anticipated distortions in the form of training examples and corresponding human opinion scores. However we have recently derived a blind IQA model that only makes use of measurable deviations from statistical regularities observed in natural images, without training on human-rated distorted images, and, indeed without any exposure to distorted images. Thus, it is “completely blind.” The new IQA model, which we call the Natural Image Quality Evaluator (NIQE) is based on the construction of a “quality aware” collection of statistical features based on a simple and successful space domain natural scene statistic (NSS) model. These features are derived from a corpus of natural, undistorted images. Experimental results show that the new index delivers performance comparable to top performing NR IQA models that require training on large databases of human opinions of distorted images. A software release is available at http: live.ece.utexas.edu research quality niqe_release.zip.