Determining the geographic focus of digital media is an essential first step for modern geographic information retrieval. However, publicly-visible location annotations are remarkably sparse in online data. In this work, we demonstrate a method which infers the geographic focus of an online document by examining the locations of Twitter users who share links to the document. We apply our geotagging technique to multiple datasets built from different content: manually-annotated news articles, GDELT, YouTube, Flickr, Twitter, and Tumblr.
Other approaches construct their own generative, realtional location dictionaries by data-mining rich, online geo-referenced data, such as using geo-tags on Flickr @cite_18 @cite_4 . The work of @cite_32 extends these by adding temporal and image features to the textual cues to geotag images using a multi-feature approach. The work of @cite_30 and @cite_8 improve these approaches by defining location priors and, in the case of @cite_30 , using statistical term selection. The joint modelling of location-based and topic-based content on social media posts in @cite_21 is used to build geographic language models, that give better geotagging results than geographic terms alone, and in @cite_3 to group geographic regions by topic-similarity.
@cite_30 @cite_18 @cite_4 @cite_8 @cite_21 @cite_32 @cite_3
2127860643 27793324 1998797494 2142191319
This paper studies the problem of discovering and comparing geographical topics from GPS-associated documents. GPS-associated documents become popular with the pervasiveness of location-acquisition technologies. For example, in Flickr, the geo-tagged photos are associated with tags and GPS locations. In Twitter, the locations of the tweets can be identified by the GPS locations from smart phones. Many interesting concepts, including cultures, scenes, and product sales, correspond to specialized geographical distributions. In this paper, we are interested in two questions: (1) how to discover different topics of interests that are coherent in geographical regions? (2) how to compare several topics across different geographical locations? To answer these questions, this paper proposes and compares three ways of modeling geographical topics: location-driven model, text-driven model, and a novel joint model called LGTA (Latent Geographical Topic Analysis) that combines location and text. To make a fair comparison, we collect several representative datasets from Flickr website including Landscape, Activity, Manhattan, National park, Festival, Car, and Food. The results show that the first two methods work in some datasets but fail in others. LGTA works well in all these datasets at not only finding regions of interests but also providing effective comparisons of the topics across different locations. The results confirm our hypothesis that the geographical distributions can help modeling topics, while topics provide important cues to group different geographical regions. With the availability of cheap location sensors, geotagging of messages in online social networks is proliferating. For instance, Twitter, Facebook, Foursquare, and Google+ provide these services both explicitly by letting users choose their location or implicitly via a sensor. This paper presents an integrated generative model of location and message content. That is, we provide a model for combining distributions over locations, topics, and over user characteristics, both in terms of location and in terms of their content preferences. Unlike previous work which modeled data in a flat pre-defined representation, our model automatically infers both the hierarchical structure over content and over the size and position of geographical locations. This affords significantly higher accuracy --- location uncertainty is reduced by 40 relative to the best previous results [21] achieved on location estimation from Tweets. We achieve this goal by proposing a new statistical model, the nested Chinese Restaurant Franchise (nCRF), a hierarchical model of tree distributions. Much statistical structure is shared between users. That said, each user has his own distribution over interests and places. The use of the nCRF allows us to capture the following effects: (1) We provide a topic model for Tweets; (2) We obtain location specific topics; (3) We infer a latent distribution of locations; (4) We provide a joint hierarchical model of topics and locations; (5) We infer personalized preferences over topics and locations within the above model. In doing so, we are both able to obtain accurate estimates of the location of a user based on his tweets and to obtain a detailed estimate of a geographical language model. In this paper we focus on the locations explicit and implicit in users descriptions of their surroundings. We propose a statistical language modeling approach to identifying locations in arbitrary text, and investigate several ways to estimate the models, based on the term frequency and the user frequency. The geotagged public photos in Flickr serve as a convenient ground truth. Our results show that we can predict location within a one kilometer by one kilometer cell with 17 accuracy, and within a three kilometer radius around such a one kilometer cell with 40 accuracy, using only a photo's tags. This is significantly better than the state of the art. Further we examine several estimation strategies that leverage the physical proximity of places, and show that for sparsely represented locations, smoothing from the immediate neighborhood improves results. We also show that estimation strategies based on user frequency are much more reliable than approaches based on the raw term frequency. Geographical location is vital to geospatial applications like local search and event detection. In this paper, we investigate and improve on the task of text-based geolocation prediction of Twitter users. Previous studies on this topic have typically assumed that geographical references (e.g., gazetteer terms, dialectal words) in a text are indicative of its author's location. However, these references are often buried in informal, ungrammatical, and multilingual data, and are therefore non-trivial to identify and exploit. We present an integrated geolocation prediction framework and investigate what factors impact on prediction accuracy. First, we evaluate a range of feature selection methods to obtain "location indicative words". We then evaluate the impact of nongeotagged tweets, language, and user-declared metadata on geolocation prediction. In addition, we evaluate the impact of temporal variance on model generalisation, and discuss how users differ in terms of their geolocatability. We achieve state-of-the-art results for the text-based Twitter user geolocation task, and also provide the most extensive exploration of the task to date. Our findings provide valuable insights into the design of robust, practical text-based geolocation prediction systems.