Abstract We consider a network pricing game on a parallel network with congestion effects in which link owners set tolls for travel so as to maximize profit. A central authority is able to regulate this competition by means of a (uniform) price cap. The first question we want to answer is how such a cap should be designed in order to minimize the total congestion. We provide an algorithm that finds an optimal price cap for networks with affine latency functions and a full support Wardrop equilibrium. Second, we consider the induced network performance at an optimal price cap. We show that for two link networks with affine latency functions, the congestion costs at the optimal price cap are at most 8 7 times the optimal congestion costs. For more general latency functions, this bound goes up to 2 under the assumption that an uncapped Nash equilibrium exists. However, in general such an equilibrium need not exist and this can be used to show that optimal price caps can induce arbitrarily inefficient flows.
Recently, following our question on competition regulation of price competition between edge owners, @cite_33 consider the setting in which a central authority is allowed to put different toll caps on different edges of the network. Their main result is that for all network topologies there are toll caps so that firms are willing to put their toll equal to the cap, and the induced equilibrium flow is the optimal flow. An example of such caps are marginal tolls as introduced by @cite_3 . Notice that the assumption of individual toll caps is important. In practice, however, toll cap discrimination is often not allowed, which motivates our work on uniform toll caps.
@cite_33 @cite_3
2064824188 2123733911 2084281377 2007169922
The notions of user equilibrium (UE) and system optimum (SO) often allude to the literature together with the well-known principle of marginal-cost pricing in traffic network analyses. This pricing principle states that the UE flow pattern on a network can be driven to an SO in the sense of total travel cost minimization by charging a toll on each link equal to the difference between marginal social cost and marginal private cost. In reality, users do not always behave in a UE manner, typically when there exist oligopoly Cournot-Nash (CN) firms. Users in a CN firm cooperate among themselves to minimize total cost of the firm and compete against others. In the presence of such UE-CN mixed equilibrium behaviors, we are interested in whether an SO flow pattern remains attainable by meaningful link tolls. In this paper we show that in a network with both UE and CN users, applying the traditional marginal-cost pricing for a system optimum requires that link tolls be differentiated across user classes. Because users differ from one another in an unobservable way, it is impossible to introduce discriminatory tolling on a network in a mixed behaviour equilibrium. We then seek alternative meaningful tolls by establishing the existence of nonnegative anonymous link tolls to decentralize the SO into a UE-CN mixed behavior equilibrium with resort to a rigorous mathematical programming approach. We prove the existence of tolls to induce multicommodity, heterogeneous network users that independently choose routes minimizing their own linear function of tolls versus latency to collectively form the traffic pattern of a minimum average latency flow. This generalizes both the previous known results of the existence of tolls for multicommodity, homogeneous users (, 1956) and for single commodity, heterogeneous users (, 2003). Unlike previous proofs for single commodity users in general graphs, our proof is constructive - it does not rely on a fixed point theorem - and results in a simple polynomial-sized linear program to compute tolls when the number of different types of users is bounded by a polynomial. We show that our proof gives a complete characterization of flows that are enforceable by tolls. In particular, tolls exist to induce any traffic pattern that is the result of minimizing an arbitrary function from R sup E(G) to the reals that is nondecreasing in each of its arguments. Thus, tolls exist to induce flows with minimum average weighted latency, minimum maximum latency, and other natural objectives. We give an exponential bound on tolls that is independent of the number of network users and the number of commodities. We use this to show that multicommodity tolls also exist when users are not from discrete classes, but instead define a general function that trades off latency versus toll preference. Finally, we show that our result extends to very general frameworks. In particular, we show that tolls exist to induce the Nash equilibrium of general nonatomic congestion games to be system optimal. In particular, tolls exist even when 1) latencies depend on user type; 2) latency functions are nonseparable functions of traffic on edges; 3) the latency of a set S is an arbitrary function of the latencies of the resources contained in S. Our exponential bound on size of tolls also holds in this case; and we give an example of a congestion game that shows this is tight; it requires tolls that are exponential in the size of the game. As the provision of roads has become market driven, many intriguing issues have emerged, such as the strategic interactions among private firms in determining road supply and pricing in a network and, more importantly, the resulting inefficiencies when competition substitutes for government regulation. This paper studies both toll and capacity competition among private asymmetric roads with congestion in a network with parallel links. We find that oligopolistic competition yields higher tolls but lower construction capacities than the socially optimal levels and, as a result, the level of traffic congestion does not decline. Based on some widely used assumptions, we show that the usage or the congestion level of each road controlled by each private firm, represented by the volume-capacity (v c) ratio, is independent of the other competitors' choices of capacities and tolls in the oligopolistic market. To quantify the inefficiency of the oligopolistic equilibria via higher tolls and less realized traffic demand, we establish the upper bound of the ratio of the social welfare between the competitive equilibrium and the social optimum. The inefficiency bound depends mainly on the marginal benefit of trip-makers and the realized traffic demand at equilibrium on the private roads. Exact bounds are given by considering both the worst and symmetric cases. Naturally, our results show that the distortion disappears when the oligopoly changes to perfect competition. We investigate the existence of optimal tolls for atomic symmetric network congestion games with unsplittable traffic and arbitrary nondecreasing latency functions. We focus on pure Nash equilibria, and consider a natural toll mechanism, which we call cost-balancing tolls. A set of cost-balancing tolls turns every path with positive traffic on its edges into a minimum-cost path. Hence any given configuration is induced as a pure Nash equilibrium of the modified game with the corresponding cost-balancing tolls. We show how to compute in linear time a set of cost-balancing tolls for the optimal solution such that the total amount of tolls paid by any player in any pure Nash equilibrium of the modified game does not exceed the latency on the maximum-latency path in the optimal solution. Our main result is that for congestion games on series-parallel networks with strictly increasing latency functions, the optimal solution is induced as the unique pure Nash equilibrium of the game with the corresponding cost-...