In this paper, we formalize the notion of distributed sensitive social networks (DSSNs), which encompasses networks like enmity networks, financial transaction networks, supply chain networks and sexual relationship networks. Compared to the well studied traditional social networks, DSSNs are often more challenging to study, given the privacy concerns of the individuals on whom the network is knit. In the current work, we envision the use of secure multiparty tools and techniques for performing privacy preserving social network analysis over DSSNs. As a step towards realizing this, we design efficient data-oblivious algorithms for computing the K-shell decomposition and the PageRank centrality measure for a given DSSN. The designed data-oblivious algorithms can be translated into equivalent secure computation protocols. We also list a string of challenges that are needed to be addressed, for employing secure computation protocols as a practical solution for studying DSSNs.
There exist works that have aimed at designing secure MPC algorithms for a few network measures. These works have generally been motivated by some particular application scenario. To employ SNA for criminal investigation, Kerschbaum and Schaad @cite_31 propose secure multiparty protocols for closeness and betweenness centrality measures. They assume a different definition of betweenness centrality compared to the classical one specified by Brandes @cite_39 ). Furthermore, they employ the adjacency matrix graph representation and hence their protocols are not very efficient for sparse graphs. @cite_41 propose secure multiparty protocols for degree distribution, closeness centrality, Pagerank and K-shell decomposition for the adjacency matrix representation. Employing the ORAM primitive and the edgelist graph representation, the Pagerank and K-shell decomposition protocols designed in the current paper asymptotically outperforms the algorithms in the above work. @cite_47 study the a set of centrality measures over multilayer networks distributedly held by a set of individuals organizations. They propose information theoretic secure MPC protocols for distance based centrality measures.
@cite_41 @cite_31 @cite_47 @cite_39
25045116 2728487654 2082624086 2604699949
Secure multiparty computation (MPC) allows joint privacy-preserving computations on data of multiple parties. Although MPC has been studied substantially, building solutions that are practical in terms of computation and communication cost is still a major challenge. In this paper, we investigate the practical usefulness of MPC for multi-domain network security and monitoring. We first optimize MPC comparison operations for processing high volume data in near real-time. We then design privacy-preserving protocols for event correlation and aggregation of network traffic statistics, such as addition of volume metrics, computation of feature entropy, and distinct item count. Optimizing performance of parallel invocations, we implement our protocols along with a complete set of basic operations in a library called SEPIA. We evaluate the running time and bandwidth requirements of our protocols in realistic settings on a local cluster as well as on PlanetLab and show that they work in near real-time for up to 140 input providers and 9 computation nodes. Compared to implementations using existing general-purpose MPC frameworks, our protocols are significantly faster, requiring, for example, 3 minutes for a task that takes 2 days with general-purpose frameworks. This improvement paves the way for new applications of MPC in the area of networking. Finally, we run SEPIA's protocols on real traffic traces of 17 networks and show how they provide new possibilities for distributed troubleshooting and early anomaly detection. We introduce a new approach to multiparty computation (MPC) basing it on homomorphic threshold crypto-systems. We show that given keys for any sufficiently efficient system of this type, general MPC protocols for n players can be devised which are secure against an active adversary that corrupts any minority of the players. The total number of bits sent is O(nk|C|), where k is the security parameter and |C| is the size of a (Boolean) circuit computing the function to be securely evaluated. An earlier proposal by Franklin and Haber with the same complexity was only secure for passive adversaries, while all earlier protocols with active security had complexity at least quadratic in n. We give two examples of threshold cryptosystems that can support our construction and lead to the claimed complexities. Many deployments of secure multi-party computation (MPC) in practice have used information-theoretic three-party protocols that tolerate a single, semi-honest corrupt party, since these protocols enjoy very high efficiency. We propose a new approach for secure three-party computation (3PC) that improves security while maintaining practical efficiency that is competitive with traditional information-theoretic protocols. Our protocol is based on garbled circuits and provides security against a single, malicious corrupt party. Unlike information-theoretic 3PC protocols, ours uses a constant number of rounds. Our protocol only uses inexpensive symmetric-key cryptography: hash functions, block ciphers, pseudorandom generators (in particular, no oblivious transfers) and has performance that is comparable to that of Yao's (semi-honest) 2PC protocol. We demonstrate the practicality of our protocol with an implementation based on the JustGarble framework of (S&P 2013). The implementation incorporates various optimizations including the most recent techniques for efficient circuit garbling. We perform experiments on several benchmarking circuits, in different setups. Our experiments confirm that, despite providing a more demanding security guarantee, our protocol has performance comparable to existing information-theoretic 3PC. Consider a multi-layered graph, where the different layers correspond to different proprietary social networks on the same ground set of users. Suppose that the owners of the different networks (called hosts) are mutually non-trusting parties: how can they compute a centrality score for each of the users using all the layers, but without disclosing information about their private graphs? Under this setting we study a suite of three centrality measures whose algebraic structure allows performing that computation with provable security and efficiency. The first measure counts the nodes reachable from a node within a given radius. The second measure extends the first one by counting the number of paths between any two nodes. The final one is a generalization to the multi-layered graph case: not only the number of paths is counted, but also the multiplicity of these paths in the different layers is considered. We devise a suite of multiparty protocols to compute those centrality measures, which are all provably secure in the information-theoretic sense. One typical challenge and limitation of secure multiparty computation protocols is their scalability. We tackle this problem and devise a protocol which is highly scalable and still provably secure. We test our protocols on several real-world multi-layered graphs: interestingly, the protocol to compute the most sensitive measure (i.e., the multi-layered centrality) is also the most scalable one and can be efficiently run on very large networks.