The vast increase in amount and complexity of digital content led to a wide interest in ad-hoc retrieval systems in recent years. Complementary, the existence of heterogeneous data sources and retrieval models stimulated the proliferation of increasingly ingenious and effective rank aggregation functions. Although recently proposed rank aggregation functions are promising with respect to effectiveness, existing proposals in the area usually overlook efficiency aspects. We propose an innovative rank aggregation function that is unsupervised, intrinsically multimodal, and targeted for fast retrieval and top effectiveness performance. We introduce the concepts of embedding and indexing of graph-based rank-aggregation representation models, and their application for search tasks. Embedding formulations are also proposed for graph-based rank representations. We introduce the concept of fusion vectors, a late-fusion representation of objects based on ranks, from which an intrinsically rank-aggregation retrieval model is defined. Next, we present an approach for fast retrieval based on fusion vectors, thus promoting an efficient rank aggregation system. Our method presents top effectiveness performance among state-of-the-art related work, while bringing novel aspects of multimodality and effectiveness. Consistent speedups are achieved against the recent baselines in all datasets considered.
Rank aggregation problem (RAP) targets an optimal rank that best represents a set of given base ranks. RAP is NP-hard for more than three input ranks @cite_16 . From a theoretical perspective, some heuristics have been proposed to find approximate solutions, based on, among other strategies, branch-and-bound search @cite_73 and evolutionary algorithms @cite_74 @cite_15 @cite_52 @cite_1 .
@cite_73 @cite_1 @cite_52 @cite_74 @cite_15 @cite_16
182456511 2158923808 2134297689 2140560120
We consider the problem of finding a ranking of a set of elements that is "closest to" a given set of input rankings of the elements; more precisely, we want to find a permutation that minimizes the Kendall-tau distance to the input rankings, where the Kendall-tau distance is defined as the sum over all input rankings of the number of pairs of elements that are in a different order in the input ranking than in the output ranking. If the input rankings are permutations, this problem is known as the Kemeny rank aggregation problem. This problem arises for example in building meta-search engines for Web search, aggregating viewers' rankings of movies, or giving recommendations to a user based on several different criteria, where we can think of having one ranking of the alternatives for each criterion. Many of the approximation algorithms and heuristics that have been proposed in the literature are either positional, comparison sort or local search algorithms. The rank aggregation problem is a special case of the (weighted) feedback arc set problem, but in the feedback arc set problem we use only information about the preferred relative ordering of pairs of elements to find a ranking of the elements, whereas in the case of the rank aggregation problem, we have additional information in the form of the complete input rankings. The positional methods are the only algorithms that use this additional information. Since the rank aggregation problem is NP-hard, none of these algorithms is guaranteed to find the optimal solution, and different algorithms will provide different solutions. We give theoretical and practical evidence that a combination of these different approaches gives algorithms that are superior to the individual algorithms. Theoretically, we give lower bounds on the performance for many of the "pure" methods. Practically, we perform an extensive evaluation of the "pure" algorithms and combinations of different approaches. We give three recommendations for which (combination of) methods to use based on whether a user wants to have a very fast, fast or reasonably fast algorithm. In this paper, we address compressed sensing of a low-rank matrix posing the inverse problem as an approximation problem with a specified target rank of the solution. A simple search over the target rank then provides the minimum rank solution satisfying a prescribed data approximation bound. We propose an atomic decomposition providing an analogy between parsimonious representations of a sparse vector and a low-rank matrix and extending efficient greedy algorithms from the vector to the matrix case. In particular, we propose an efficient and guaranteed algorithm named atomic decomposition for minimum rank approximation (ADMiRA) that extends Needell and Tropp's compressive sampling matching pursuit (CoSaMP) algorithm from the sparse vector to the low-rank matrix case. The performance guarantee is given in terms of the rank-restricted isometry property (R-RIP) and bounds both the number of iterations and the error in the approximate solution for the general case of noisy measurements and approximately low-rank solution. With a sparse measurement operator as in the matrix completion problem, the computation in ADMiRA is linear in the number of measurements. Numerical experiments for the matrix completion problem show that, although the R-RIP is not satisfied in this case, ADMiRA is a competitive algorithm for matrix completion. Kemeny Rank Aggregation is a consensus finding problem important in many areas ranging from classical voting over web search and databases to bioinformatics. The underlying decision problem Kemeny Score is NP-complete even in case of four input rankings to be aggregated into a "median ranking". We analyze efficient polynomial-time data reduction rules with provable performance bounds that allow us to find even all optimal median rankings. We show that our reduced instances contain at most [InlineEquation not available: see fulltext.] candidates where @math d a denotes the average Kendall's tau distance between the input votes. On the theoretical side, this improves a corresponding result for a "partial problem kernel" from quadratic to linear size. In this context we provide a theoretical analysis of a commonly used data reduction. On the practical side, we provide experimental results with data based on web search and sport competitions, e.g., computing optimal median rankings for real-world instances with more than 100 candidates within milliseconds. Moreover, we perform experiments with randomly generated data based on two random distribution models for permutations. There has been much interest recently in the problem of rank aggregation from pairwise data. A natural question that arises is: under what sorts of statistical assumptions do various rank aggregation algorithms converge to an 'optimal' ranking? In this paper, we consider this question in a natural setting where pairwise comparisons are drawn randomly and independently from some underlying probability distribution. We first show that, under a 'time-reversibility' or Bradley-Terry-Luce (BTL) condition on the distribution, the rank centrality (PageRank) and least squares (HodgeRank) algorithms both converge to an optimal ranking. Next, we show that a matrix version of the Borda count algorithm, and more surprisingly, an algorithm which performs maximum likelihood estimation under a BTL assumption, both converge to an optimal ranking under a 'low-noise' condition that is strictly more general than BTL. Finally, we propose a new SVM-based algorithm for rank aggregation from pairwise data, and show that this converges to an optimal ranking under an even more general condition that we term 'generalized low-noise'. In all cases, we provide explicit sample complexity bounds for exact recovery of an optimal ranking. Our experiments confirm our theoretical findings and help to shed light on the statistical behavior of various rank aggregation algorithms.