Curated web archive collections contain focused digital content which is collected by archiving organizations, groups, and individuals to provide a representative sample covering specific topics and events to preserve them for future exploration and analysis. In this paper, we discuss how to best support collaborative construction and exploration of these collections through the ArchiveWeb system. ArchiveWeb has been developed using an iterative evaluation-driven design-based research approach, with considerable user feedback at all stages. The first part of this paper describes the important insights we gained from our initial requirements engineering phase during the first year of the project and the main functionalities of the current ArchiveWeb system for searching, constructing, exploring, and discussing web archive collections. The second part summarizes the feedback we received on this version from archiving organizations and libraries, as well as our corresponding plans for improving and extending the system for the next release.
Information retrieval (IR) models and algorithms have been extremely successful during the last 20 years in providing everybody with easy access to the vast amount of information available on and through the web. Web and IR conferences connect a large number of researchers working on problems related to web search, the Social Web and data mining, and related topics. Surprisingly little work has been spent, however, on issues related to temporal retrieval, or exploration and analysis of large temporal collections like web archives @cite_0 , even though the need for focusing research on these issues has been recognized @cite_8 @cite_17 .
@cite_0 @cite_17 @cite_8
2585363530 2133968343 2128878007 2156037541
In ad hoc information retrieval (IR), some information need (e.g., find the advantages and disadvantages of smoking) requires the explicit identification of information related to the discourse type (e.g., advantages disadvantages) as well as to the topic (e.g., smoking). Such information need is not uncommon and may not be satisfied by using conventional retrieval methods. We extend existing retrieval models by adding a re-ranking strategy based on a novel graph-based retrieval model using document contexts that are called information units (IU). For evaluation, we focused on a discourse type that appeared in a subset of TREC topics where the retrieval effectiveness achieved by our conventional retrieval models for those topics was low. We showed that our approach is able to enhance the retrieval effectiveness for the selected TREC topics. This shows that our preliminary investigation is promising and deserves further investigation. Familiar evaluation methodologies for information retrieval (IR) are not well suited to the task of comparing systems in many real settings. These systems and evaluation methods must support contextual, interactive retrieval over changing, heterogeneous data collections, including private and confidential information.We have implemented a comparison tool which can be inserted into the natural IR process. It provides a familiar search interface, presents a small number of result sets in side-by-side panels, elicits searcher judgments, and logs interaction events. The tool permits study of real information needs as they occur, uses the documents actually available at the time of the search, and records judgments taking into account the instantaneous needs of the searcher.We have validated our proposed evaluation approach and explored potential biases by comparing different whole-of-Web search facilities using a Web-based version of the tool. In four experiments, one with supplied queries in the laboratory and three with real queries in the workplace, subjects showed no discernable left-right bias and were able to reliably distinguish between high- and low-quality result sets. We found that judgments were strongly predicted by simple implicit measures.Following validation we undertook a case study comparing two leading whole-of-Web search engines. The approach is now being used in several ongoing investigations. Information Retrieval (IR) approaches for semantic web search engines have become very populars in the last years. Popularization of different IR libraries, like Lucene, that allows IR implementations almost out-of-the-box have make easier IR integration in Semantic Web search engines. However, one of the most important features of Semantic Web documents is the structure, since this structure allow us to represent semantic in a machine readable format. In this paper we analyze the specific problems of structured IR and how to adapt weighting schemas for semantic document retrieval. Classic IR (information retrieval) is inherently predicated on users searching for information, the so-called "information need". But the need behind a web search is often not informational -- it might be navigational (give me the url of the site I want to reach) or transactional (show me sites where I can perform a certain transaction, e.g. shop, download a file, or find a map). We explore this taxonomy of web searches and discuss how global search engines evolved to deal with web-specific needs.