We study the problem of obtaining deterministic black-box polynomial identity testing algorithms (PIT) for algebraic branching programs (ABPs) that are read-once and oblivious. This class has an deterministic white-box polynomial identity testing algorithm (due to Raz and Shpilka), but prior to this work there was no known such black-box algorithm. The main result of this work gives the first quasi-polynomial sized hitting sets for size S circuits from this class, when the order of the variables is known. As our hitting set is of size exp(lg^2 S), this is analogous (in the terminology of boolean pseudorandomness) to a seed-length of lg^2 S, which is the seed length of the pseudorandom generators of Nisan and Impagliazzo-Nisan-Wigderson for read-once oblivious boolean branching programs. Our results are stronger for branching programs of bounded width, where we give a hitting set of size exp(lg^2 S lglg S), corresponding to a seed length of lg^2 S lglg S. This is in stark contrast to the known results for read-once oblivious boolean branching programs of bounded width, where no pseudorandom generator (or hitting set) with seed length o(lg^2 S) is known. In follow up work, we strengthened a result of Mulmuley, and showed that derandomizing a particular case of the Noether Normalization Lemma is reducible to black-box PIT of read-once oblivious ABPs. Using the results of the present work, this gives a derandomization of Noether Normalization in that case, which Mulmuley conjectured would difficult due to its relations to problems in algebraic geometry. We also show that several other circuit classes can be black-box reduced to read-once oblivious ABPs, including set-multilinear ABPs (a generalization of depth-3 set-multilinear formulas), non-commutative ABPs (generalizing non-commutative formulas), and (semi-)diagonal depth-4 circuits (as introduced by Saxena).
Similarly, the PIT problem has also been studied in the non-commutative model. While the work of Raz and Shpilka @cite_12 establishes a white-box PIT algorithm for non-commutative ABPs, the black-box PIT question for this model is more intricate since one cannot immediately apply the usual Schwartz-Zippel algorithm over non-commutative domains. However, Bogdanov and Wee @cite_13 showed how, leveraging the ideas in the Amitsur-Levitzki theorem @cite_18 , one can reduce non-commutative black-box PIT questions to commutative black-box PIT questions. By then appealing to Schwartz-Zippel, they give the first randomized algorithm for non-commutative PIT. They also discussed the possibility of derandomizing their result and raise a conjecture that if true would lead to a hitting set of size @math for non-commutative ABPs of size @math . Our Theorem gives a hitting set of size @math and does not require unproven assumptions.
@cite_18 @cite_13 @cite_12
2170546552 2148231801 2122213509 2147716837
Mulmuley [Mul12a] recently gave an explicit version of Noether’s Normalization lemma for ring of invariants of matrices under simultaneous conjugation, under the conjecture that there are deterministic black-box algorithms for polynomial identity testing (PIT). He argued that this gives evidence that constructing such algorithms for PIT is beyond current techniques. In this work, we show this is not the case. That is, we improve Mulmuley’s reduction and correspondingly weaken the conjecture regarding PIT needed to give explicit Noether Normalization. We then observe that the weaker conjecture has recently been nearly settled by the authors ([FS12]), who gave quasipolynomial size hitting sets for the class of read-once oblivious algebraic branching programs (ROABPs). This gives the desired explicit Noether Normalization unconditionally, up to quasipolynomial factors. As a consequence of our proof we give a deterministic parallel polynomial-time algorithm for deciding if two matrix tuples have intersecting orbit closures, under simultaneous conjugation. We also study the strength of conjectures that Mulmuley requires to obtain similar results as ours. We prove that his conjectures are stronger, in the sense that the computational model he needs PIT algorithms for is equivalent to the well-known algebraic branching program (ABP) model, which is provably stronger than the ROABP model. Finally, we consider the depth-3 diagonal circuit model as defined by Saxena [Sax08], as PIT algorithms for this model also have implications in Mulmuley’s work. Previous work (such as [ASS12] and [FS12]) have given quasipolynomial size hitting sets for this model. In this work, we give a much simpler construction of such hitting sets, using techniques of Shpilka and Volkovich [SV09]. We continue the study of noncommutative polynomial identity testing initiated by Raz and Shpilka and present efficient algorithms for the following problems in the noncommutative model: polynomial identity testing: The algorithm gets as an input an arithmetic circuit with the promise that the polynomial it computes has small degree (for instance, a circuit of logarithmic depth or an arithmetic formula) and determines whether or not the output of the circuit is identically zero (as a formal expression). Unlike the algorithm by Raz and Shpilka, our algorithm is black-box (but randomized with one-sided error) and evaluates the circuit over the ring of matrices. In addition, we present query complexity lower bounds for identity testing and explore the possibility of de-randomizing our algorithm. The analysis of our algorithm uses a noncommutative variant of the Schwartz-Zippel test. Minimizing algebraic branching programs: The algorithm gets as an input an algebraic branching program (ABP) and outputs a smallest equivalent ABP. The algorithm is based on Nisan's characterization of ABP complexity, and uses as a sub-routine an algorithm for computing linear dependencies amongst arithmetic formulas, a problem previously studied by the authors. Using ideas from automata theory we design a new efficient (deterministic) identity test for the noncommutative polynomial identity testing problem (first introduced and studied in [RS05, BW05]). More precisely, given as input a noncommutative circuit C x1, ldrldrldr , xn computing a polynomial in F x1, ldrldrldr , xn of degree d with at most t monomials, where the variables xi are noncommuting, we give a deterministic polynomial identity test that checks if C equiv 0 and runs in time polynomial in d, n, |C|, and t. The same methods works in a black-box setting: given a noncommuting black-box polynomial f isin F x1, ldrldrldr , xn of degree d with t monomials we can, in fact, reconstruct the entire polynomial f in time polynomial in n, d and t. Indeed, we apply this idea to the reconstruction of black-box noncommuting algebraic branching programs (the ABPs considered by Nisan in [N91] and Raz-Shpilka in [RS05]). Assuming that the black-box model allows us to query the ABP for the output at any given gate then we can reconstruct an (equivalent) ABP in deterministic polynomial time. Finally, we turn to commutative identity testing and explore the complexity of the problem when the coefficients of the input polynomial come from an arbitrary finite commutative ring with unity whose elements are uniformly encoded as strings and the ring operations are given by an oracle. We show that several algorithmic results for polynomial identity testing over fields also hold when the coefficients come from such finite rings. We study the problem of polynomial identity testing (PIT) for depth 2 arithmetic circuits over matrix algebra. We show that identity testing of depth 3 (SPS) arithmetic circuits over a field F is polynomial time equivalent to identity testing of depth 2 (PS) arithmetic circuits over U2(F), the algebra of upper-triangular 2 2 matrices with entries from F. Such a connection is a bit surprising since we also show that, as computational models, PS circuits over U2(F) are strictly ‘weaker’ than SPS circuits over F. The equivalence further implies that PIT of SPS circuits reduces to PIT of width-2 commutative Algebraic Branching Programs(ABP). Further, we give a deterministic polynomial time identity testing algorithm for a PS circuit of size s over commutative algebras of dimension O(log s log log s) over F. Over commutative algebras of dimension poly(s), we show that identity testing of PS circuits is at least as hard as that of SPS circuits over F.