The (maximum receiver-centric) interference of a geometric graph (von (2005)) is studied. It is shown that, with high probability, the following results hold for a set, V, of n points independently and uniformly distributed in the unit d-cube, for constant dimension d: (1) there exists a connected graph with vertex set V that has interference O((log n)^ 1 3 ); (2) no connected graph with vertex set V has interference o((log n)^ 1 4 ); and (3) the minimum spanning tree of @math has interference Theta(( n)^ 1 2 ).
In higher dimensions, Khabbazian, Durocher, and Haghnegahdar @cite_0 use their version of log to show that minimum spanning trees of random point sets have at most logarithmic interference. Part 1 of main improves the upper bound in durocher to @math and Part 1 of lower-bound gives a matching lower bound.
@cite_0
2013024470 2023425290 2032607682 1985289891
Using the theory of negative association for measures and the notion of unimodularity for random weak limits of sparse graphs, we establish the validity of the cavity method for counting spanning subgraphs subject to local constraints in asymptotically tree-like graphs. Specifically, the normalized logarithm of the associated partition function (free energy) is shown to converge along any sequence of graphs whose random weak limit is a tree, and the limit is directly expressed in terms of the unique solution to a limiting cavity equation. On a Galton–Watson tree, the latter simplifies into a recursive distributional equation which can be solved explicitly. As an illustration, we provide a new asymptotic formula for the maximum size of a b-matching in the Erdős–Renyi random graph with fixed average degree and diverging size, for any . To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that correlation inequalities and unimodularity are combined together to yield a general proof of uniqueness of Gibbs measures on infinite trees. We believe that a similar argument is applicable to other Gibbs measures than those over spanning subgraphs considered here. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Random Struct. Alg., 2013 The problem of verifying a Minimum Spanning Tree (MST) was introduced by Tarjan in a sequential setting. Given a graph and a tree that spans it, the algorithm is required to check whether this tree is an MST. This paper investigates the problem in the distributed setting, where the input is given in a distributed manner, i.e., every node “knows” which of its own emanating edges belong to the tree. Informally, the distributed MST verification problem is the following. Label the vertices of the graph in such a way that for every node, given (its own state and label and) the labels of its neighbors only, the node can detect whether these edges are indeed its MST edges. In this paper, we present such a verification scheme with a maximum label size of O(log n log W), where n is the number of nodes and W is the largest weight of an edge. We also give a matching lower bound of Ω(log n log W) (as long as W > (log n)1+e for some fixed e > 0). Both our bounds improve previously known bounds for the problem. This paper considers the problem of distributively constructing a minimum-weight spanning tree (MST) for graphs of constant diameter in the bounded-messages model, where each message can contain at most B bits for some parameter B. It is shown that the number of communication rounds necessary to compute an MST for graphs of diameter 4 or 3 can be as high as ( ( [3]n B ) ) and ( ( [4]n B ) ), respectively. The asymptotic lower bounds hold for randomized algorithms as well. On the other hand, we observe that O(log n) communication rounds always suffice to compute an MST deterministically for graphs with diameter 2, when B = O(log n). These results complement a previously known lower bound of ( ( [2]n B) ) for graphs of diameter Ω(log n). We study lower bounds for Locality-Sensitive Hashing (LSH) in the strongest setting: point sets in 0,1 d under the Hamming distance. Recall that H is said to be an (r, cr, p, q)-sensitive hash family if all pairs x, y ∈ 0,1 d with dist(x, y) ≤ r have probability at least p of collision under a randomly chosen h ∈ H, whereas all pairs x, y ∈ 0, 1 d with dist(x, y) ≥ cr have probability at most q of collision. Typically, one considers d → ∞, with c > 1 fixed and q bounded away from 0. For its applications to approximate nearest-neighbor search in high dimensions, the quality of an LSH family H is governed by how small its ρ parameter ρ = ln(1 p) ln(1 q) is as a function of the parameter c. The seminal paper of Indyk and Motwani [1998] showed that for each c ≥ 1, the extremely simple family H = x ↦ xi : i ∈ [d] achieves ρ ≤ 1 c. The only known lower bound, due to [2007], is that ρ must be at least ( e1 c - 1) (e1 c + 1) ≥ .46 c (minus od(1)). The contribution of this article is twofold. (1) We show the “optimal” lower bound for ρ: it must be at least 1 c (minus od(1)). Our proof is very simple, following almost immediately from the observation that the noise stability of a boolean function at time t is a log-convex function of t. (2) We raise and discuss the following issue: neither the application of LSH to nearest-neighbor search nor the known LSH lower bounds hold as stated if the q parameter is tiny. Here, “tiny” means q = 2-Θ(d), a parameter range we believe is natural.