An electric vehicle (EV) may be used as energy storage which allows the bi-directional electricity flow between the vehicle's battery and the electric power grid. In order to flatten the load profile of the electricity system, EV scheduling has become a hot research topic in recent years. In this paper, we propose a new formulation of the joint scheduling of EV and Unit Commitment (UC), called EVUC. Our formulation considers the characteristics of EVs while optimizing the system total running cost. We employ Chemical Reaction Optimization (CRO), a general-purpose optimization algorithm to solve this problem and the simulation results on a widely used set of instances indicate that CRO can effectively optimize this problem.
Researchers have been using metaheuristics to solve UC and its related problems for many years. Mantawy proposed a hybrid algorithm integrating genetic algorithm, tabu search and simulated annealing to solve UC in @cite_9 . Rajan proposed an evolutionary programming-based tabu search method for the same problem in @cite_16 . Yousuf proposed a binary particle swarm optimization to solve the UC with renewable energy sources in @cite_25 . Chen proposed an expert system with elite particle swarm optimization algorithm to solve UC in @cite_5 . As CRO has been applied to solve related power system optimization problems, e.g., @cite_12 @cite_15 and has demonstrated outstanding performance, we adopt CRO to solve this EVUC problem.
@cite_9 @cite_5 @cite_15 @cite_16 @cite_25 @cite_12
2169171797 2592415617 2121957462 2017565019
This paper presents a two-level hierarchical approach that combines an expert system (ES) with an elite particle swarm optimization (EPSO) to solve the unit commitment (UC) problem. Existing UC solution methods have the problems of stopping at a local optimum and slow convergence when applied to large-scale, heavily constrained UC applications. In this work, an ES is developed to handle all constraints. The ES is initially used as a pre-dispatch tool to create a robust swarm. Then, the ES and EPSO are combined to seek the optimal solution. All constraints are incorporated and satisfied during the pre-dispatch and the evolution process. Hence, infeasible positions in the solution space will not be visited. The execution time of the proposed approach grows approximately linearly, rather than geometrically, with problem size. This feature is attractive in large-scale systems. The proposed approach is successfully applied to a popular test system of up to 100 units and the real Taipower 40-unit 168-h system. Both solution cost and execution time are superior to those of published methods. Total fuel costs of the proposed approach are several millions of dollars less than those of existing methods in the Taipower case. Recently, many meta-heuristic algorithms have been proposed to serve as the basis of a t-way test generation strategy (where t indicates the interaction strength) including Genetic Algorithms (GA), Ant Colony Optimization (ACO), Simulated Annealing (SA), Cuckoo Search (CS), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and Harmony Search (HS). Although useful, meta-heuristic algorithms that make up these strategies often require specific domain knowledge in order to allow effective tuning before good quality solutions can be obtained. Hyper-heuristics provide an alternative methodology to meta-heuristics which permit adaptive selection and or generation of meta-heuristics automatically during the search process. This paper describes our experience with four hyper-heuristic selection and acceptance mechanisms namely Exponential Monte Carlo with counter (EMCQ), Choice Function (CF), Improvement Selection Rules (ISR), and newly developed Fuzzy Inference Selection (FIS), using the t-way test generation problem as a case study. Based on the experimental results, we offer insights on why each strategy differs in terms of its performance. This paper presents a new algorithm based on integrating genetic algorithms, tabu search and simulated annealing methods to solve the unit commitment problem. The core of the proposed algorithm is based on genetic algorithms. Tabu search is used to generate new population members in the reproduction phase of the genetic algorithm. A simulated annealing method is used to accelerate the convergence of the genetic algorithm by applying the simulated annealing test for all the population members. A new implementation of the genetic algorithm is introduced. The genetic algorithm solution is coded as a mix between binary and decimal representation. The fitness function is constructed from the total operating cost of the generating units without penalty terms. In the tabu search part of the proposed algorithm, a simple short-term memory procedure is used to counter the danger of entrapment at a local optimum, and the premature convergence of the genetic algorithm. A simple cooling schedule has been implemented to apply the simulated annealing test in the algorithm. Numerical results showed the superiority of the solutions obtained compared to genetic algorithms, tabu search and simulated annealing methods, and to two exact algorithms. This paper considers a new variant of the two-dimensional bin packing problem where each rectangle is assigned a due date and each bin has a fixed processing time. Hence the objective is not only to minimize the number of bins, but also to minimize the maximum lateness of the rectangles. This problem is motivated by the cutting of stock sheets and the potential increased efficiency that might be gained by drawing on a larger pool of demand pieces by mixing orders, while also aiming to ensure a certain level of customer service. We propose a genetic algorithm for searching the solution space, which uses a new placement heuristic for decoding the gene based on the best fit heuristic designed for the strip packing problems. The genetic algorithm employs an innovative crossover operator that considers several different children from each pair of parents. Further, the dual objective is optimized hierarchically with the primary objective periodically alternating between maximum lateness and number of bins. As a result, the approach produces several non-dominated solutions with different trade-offs. Two further approaches are implemented. One is based on a previous Unified Tabu Search, suitably modified to tackle this revised problem. The other is randomized descent and serves as a benchmark for comparing the results. Comprehensive computational results are presented, which show that the Unified Tabu Search still works well in minimizing the bins, but the genetic algorithm performs slightly better. When also considering maximum lateness, the genetic algorithm is considerably better.