Facebook pages offer an easy way to reach out to a very large audience as they can easily be promoted using Facebook's advertising platform. Recently, the number of likes of a Facebook page has become a measure of its popularity and profitability, and an underground market of services boosting page likes, aka like farms, has emerged. Some reports have suggested that like farms use a network of profiles that also like other pages to elude fraud protection algorithms, however, to the best of our knowledge, there has been no systematic analysis of Facebook pages' promotion methods. This paper presents a comparative measurement study of page likes garnered via Facebook ads and by a few like farms. We deploy a set of honeypot pages, promote them using both methods, and analyze garnered likes based on likers' demographic, temporal, and social characteristics. We highlight a few interesting findings, including that some farms seem to be operated by bots and do not really try to hide the nature of their operations, while others follow a stealthier approach, mimicking regular users' behavior.
Stringhini al @cite_0 and Lee al @cite_9 created honeypot profiles in Facebook, MySpace, and Twitter to detect spammers. Their work differs from ours in that (1) their honeypot profiles were designed to look legitimate, while our honeypot pages explicitly indicated they were not real'' (to deflect real profiles), and (2) our honeypot pages actively attracted fake profiles by means of paid campaigns, as opposed to passive honeypot profiles. Also, Thomas al @cite_10 analyzed trafficking of fake accounts in Twitter. They bought fake profiles from 27 merchants and developed a classifier to detect these fake accounts. In a similar study, Stringhini al @cite_5 analyzed the market of Twitter followers , which, akin to Facebook like farms, provide Twitter followers for sale. Note that Twitter follower markets differ from Facebook like farms as Twitter entails a follower-followee relationship among users, while Facebook friendships imply a bidirectional relationships. Also, there is no equivalent of liking a Facebook page in the Twitter ecosystem.
@cite_0 @cite_5 @cite_9 @cite_10
1996802155 176212337 2005556331 2398757235
Web-based social systems enable new community-based opportunities for participants to engage, share, and interact. This community value and related services like search and advertising are threatened by spammers, content polluters, and malware disseminators. In an effort to preserve community value and ensure longterm success, we propose and evaluate a honeypot-based approach for uncovering social spammers in online social systems. Two of the key components of the proposed approach are: (1) The deployment of social honeypots for harvesting deceptive spam profiles from social networking communities; and (2) Statistical analysis of the properties of these spam profiles for creating spam classifiers to actively filter out existing and new spammers. We describe the conceptual framework and design considerations of the proposed approach, and we present concrete observations from the deployment of social honeypots in MySpace and Twitter. We find that the deployed social honeypots identify social spammers with low false positive rates and that the harvested spam data contains signals that are strongly correlated with observable profile features (e.g., content, friend information, posting patterns, etc.). Based on these profile features, we develop machine learning based classifiers for identifying previously unknown spammers with high precision and a low rate of false positives. The rise in popularity of social networking sites such as Twitter and Facebook has been paralleled by the rise of unwanted, disruptive entities on these networks- — including spammers, malware disseminators, and other content polluters. Inspired by sociologists working to ensure the success of commons and criminologists focused on deterring vandalism and preventing crime, we present the first long-term study of social honeypots for tempting, profiling, and filtering content polluters in social media. Concretely, we report on our experiences via a seven-month deployment of 60 honeypots on Twitter that resulted in the harvesting of 36,000 candidate content polluters. As part of our study, we (1) examine the harvested Twitter users, including an analysis of link payloads, user behavior over time, and followers following network dynamics and (2) evaluate a wide range of features to investigate the effectiveness of automatic content polluter identification. Recently, Twitter has emerged as a popular platform for discovering real-time information on the Web, such as news stories and people's reaction to them. Like the Web, Twitter has become a target for link farming, where users, especially spammers, try to acquire large numbers of follower links in the social network. Acquiring followers not only increases the size of a user's direct audience, but also contributes to the perceived influence of the user, which in turn impacts the ranking of the user's tweets by search engines. In this paper, we first investigate link farming in the Twitter network and then explore mechanisms to discourage the activity. To this end, we conducted a detailed analysis of links acquired by over 40,000 spammer accounts suspended by Twitter. We find that link farming is wide spread and that a majority of spammers' links are farmed from a small fraction of Twitter users, the social capitalists, who are themselves seeking to amass social capital and links by following back anyone who follows them. Our findings shed light on the social dynamics that are at the root of the link farming problem in Twitter network and they have important implications for future designs of link spam defenses. In particular, we show that a simple user ranking scheme that penalizes users for connecting to spammers can effectively address the problem by disincentivizing users from linking with other users simply to gain influence. Twitter can suffer from malicious tweets containing suspicious URLs for spam, phishing, and malware distribution. Previous Twitter spam detection schemes have used account features such as the ratio of tweets containing URLs and the account creation date, or relation features in the Twitter graph. Malicious users, however, can easily fabricate account features. Moreover, extracting relation features from the Twitter graph is time and resource consuming. Previous suspicious URL detection schemes have classified URLs using several features including lexical features of URLs, URL redirection, HTML content, and dynamic behavior. However, evading techniques exist, such as time-based evasion and crawler evasion. In this paper, we propose WARNINGBIRD, a suspicious URL detection system for Twitter. Instead of focusing on the landing pages of individual URLs in each tweet, we consider correlated redirect chains of URLs in a number of tweets. Because attackers have limited resources and thus have to reuse them, a portion of their redirect chains will be shared. We focus on these shared resources to detect suspicious URLs. We have collected a large number of tweets from the Twitter public timeline and trained a statistical classifier with features derived from correlated URLs and tweet context information. Our classifier has high accuracy and low false-positive and falsenegative rates. We also present WARNINGBIRD as a realtime system for classifying suspicious URLs in the Twitter stream. ∗This research was supported by the MKE (The Ministry of Knowledge Economy), Korea, under the ITRC (Information Technology Research Center) support program supervised by the NIPA (National IT Industry Promotion Agency) (NIPA-2011-C1090-1131-0009) and World Class University program funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology through the National Research Foundation of Korea(R31-10100).