In this paper, we propose to study the problem of COURT VIEW GENeration from the fact description in a criminal case. The task aims to improve the interpretability of charge prediction systems and help automatic legal document generation. We formulate this task as a text-to-text natural language generation (NLG) problem. Sequenceto-sequence model has achieved cutting-edge performances in many NLG tasks. However, due to the non-distinctions of fact descriptions, it is hard for Seq2Seq model to generate charge-discriminative court views. In this work, we explore charge labels to tackle this issue. We propose a label-conditioned Seq2Seq model with attention for this problem, to decode court views conditioned on encoded charge labels. Experimental results show the effectiveness of our method.
Our work is firstly related to previous studies on legal assistant systems. Previous work considers the task of charge prediction as a text classification problem @cite_27 @cite_29 @cite_43 @cite_24 . Recently, investigate deep learning methods for this task. Besides, there are also works on identifying applicable articles for a given case @cite_17 @cite_43 @cite_22 , answering legal questions as a consulting system @cite_44 @cite_19 and searching relevant cases for a given query @cite_42 @cite_32 . As a legal assistant system, @math can benefit automatic legal document generation by generating court views from fact descriptions obtained from the last phase, through legal professionals or other technics like information extraction @cite_30 from raw documents in a case, if we generate legal documents step by step. Our work is also related to recent studies on model interpretation @cite_37 @cite_10 @cite_6 . Recently, much work has paid attention to giving textual explanations for classifications. generate visual explanations for image classification. propose to learn to select most supportive snippets from raw texts for text classification. @math @math @math can improve the interpretability of charge prediction systems by generating textual court views when predict the charges.
@cite_30 @cite_37 @cite_22 @cite_29 @cite_42 @cite_32 @cite_6 @cite_24 @cite_43 @cite_27 @cite_44 @cite_19 @cite_10 @cite_17
2740833370 2536769020 2233653089 2765440119
The charge prediction task is to determine appropriate charges for a given case, which is helpful for legal assistant systems where the user input is fact description. We argue that relevant law articles play an important role in this task, and therefore propose an attention-based neural network method to jointly model the charge prediction task and the relevant article extraction task in a unified framework. The experimental results show that, besides providing legal basis, the relevant articles can also clearly improve the charge prediction results, and our full model can effectively predict appropriate charges for cases with different expression styles. Recent advances in Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning provide us with the tools to build predictive models that can be used to unveil patterns driving judicial decisions. This can be useful, for both lawyers and judges, as an assisting tool to rapidly identify cases and extract patterns which lead to certain decisions. This paper presents the first systematic study on predicting the outcome of cases tried by the European Court of Human Rights based solely on textual content. We formulate a binary classification task where the input of our classifiers is the textual content extracted from a case and the target output is the actual judgment as to whether there has been a violation of an article of the convention of human rights. Textual information is represented using contiguous word sequences, i.e., N-grams, and topics. Our models can predict the court’s decisions with a strong accuracy (79 on average). Our empirical analysis indicates that the formal facts of a case are the most important predictive factor. This is consistent with the theory of legal realism suggesting that judicial decision-making is significantly affected by the stimulus of the facts. We also observe that the topical content of a case is another important feature in this classification task and explore this relationship further by conducting a qualitative analysis. We describe a legal question answering system which combines legal information retrieval and textual entailment. We have evaluated our system using the data from the first competition on legal information extraction entailment (COLIEE) 2014. The competition focuses on two aspects of legal information processing related to answering yes no questions from Japanese legal bar exams. The shared task consists of two phases: legal ad hoc information retrieval and textual entailment. The first phase requires the identification of Japan civil law articles relevant to a legal bar exam query. We have implemented two unsupervised baseline models (tf-idf and Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA)-based Information Retrieval (IR)), and a supervised model, Ranking SVM, for the task. The features of the model are a set of words, and scores of an article based on the corresponding baseline models. The results show that the Ranking SVM model nearly doubles the Mean Average Precision compared with both baseline models. The second phase is to answer “Yes” or “No” to previously unseen queries, by comparing the meanings of queries with relevant articles. The features used for phase two are syntactic semantic similarities and identification of negation antonym relations. The results show that our method, combined with rule-based model and the unsupervised model, outperforms the SVM-based supervised model. In this paper, we investigate the application of text classification methods to support law professionals. We present several experiments applying machine learning techniques to predict with high accuracy the ruling of the French Supreme Court and the law area to which a case belongs to. We also investigate the influence of the time period in which a ruling was made on the form of the case description and the extent to which we need to mask information in a full case ruling to automatically obtain training and test data that resembles case descriptions. We developed a mean probability ensemble system combining the output of multiple SVM classifiers. We report results of 98 average F1 score in predicting a case ruling, 96 F1 score for predicting the law area of a case, and 87.07 F1 score on estimating the date of a ruling.