We extend previous work about general election-related abuse of UK MPs with two new time periods, one in late 2018 and the other in early 2019, allowing previous observations to be extended to new data and the impact of key stages in the UK withdrawal from the European Union on patterns of abuse to be explored. The topics that draw abuse evolve over the four time periods are reviewed, with topics relevant to the Brexit debate and campaign tone showing a varying pattern as events unfold, and a suggestion of a "bubble" of topics emphasized in the run-up to the highly Brexit-focused 2017 general election. Brexit stance shows a variable relationship with abuse received. We find, as previously, that in quantitative terms, Conservatives and male politicians receive more abuse. Gender difference remains significant even when accounting for prominence, as gauged from Google Trends data, but prominence, or other factors related to being in power, as well as gender, likely account for the difference associated with party membership. No clear relationship between ethnicity and abuse is found in what remains a very small sample (BAME and mixed heritage MPs). Differences are found in the choice of abuse terms levelled at female vs. male MPs.
A surge of recent interest aims to detect abuse, hate speech and toxicity automatically, resulting in increasing availability of training data and workshops focused on the topic @cite_0 @cite_14 @cite_21 @cite_36 @cite_2 @cite_1 @cite_14 @cite_13 . http: tinyurl.com alw-workshop-2017 http: tinyurl.com alw-workshop-2018 http: tinyurl.com alw-stack-overflow Schmidt and Wiegand provide a review of prior work and methods, as do Fortuna and Nunes . Reported performances vary widely depending on the specifics of the task. In very recent times attention has begun to turn to the issue of bias in abuse classification. Unintended bias, for example being more likely to label a text as abusive if it was penned by a particular demographic because that bias was present in the training data, has been highlighted as an issue in Google's Perspective'' toxicity scorer, http: tinyurl.com jigsaw-unintend-bias which they have recognized, and the overcoming of which is formulated as an explicit objective in their new competition. http: tinyurl.com jigsaw-kaggle-toxic Whilst unintended bias has been the subject of much research in recent years with regards to making predictive systems that don't discriminate, it has only just begun to be taken up within abuse classification @cite_8 .
@cite_14 @cite_8 @cite_36 @cite_21 @cite_1 @cite_0 @cite_2 @cite_13
2888167352 2886424491 2150997454 2891179298
Abusive language detection models tend to have a problem of being biased toward identity words of a certain group of people because of imbalanced training datasets. For example, "You are a good woman" was considered "sexist" when trained on an existing dataset. Such model bias is an obstacle for models to be robust enough for practical use. In this work, we measure gender biases on models trained with different abusive language datasets, while analyzing the effect of different pre-trained word embeddings and model architectures. We also experiment with three bias mitigation methods: (1) debiased word embeddings, (2) gender swap data augmentation, and (3) fine-tuning with a larger corpus. These methods can effectively reduce gender bias by 90-98 and can be extended to correct model bias in other scenarios. Given a partial description like "she opened the hood of the car," humans can reason about the situation and anticipate what might come next ("then, she examined the engine"). In this paper, we introduce the task of grounded commonsense inference, unifying natural language inference and commonsense reasoning. We present SWAG, a new dataset with 113k multiple choice questions about a rich spectrum of grounded situations. To address the recurring challenges of the annotation artifacts and human biases found in many existing datasets, we propose Adversarial Filtering (AF), a novel procedure that constructs a de-biased dataset by iteratively training an ensemble of stylistic classifiers, and using them to filter the data. To account for the aggressive adversarial filtering, we use state-of-the-art language models to massively oversample a diverse set of potential counterfactuals. Empirical results demonstrate that while humans can solve the resulting inference problems with high accuracy (88 ), various competitive models struggle on our task. We provide comprehensive analysis that indicates significant opportunities for future research. Recently, the following discrimination aware classification problem was introduced: given a labeled dataset and an attribute B, find a classifier with high predictive accuracy that at the same time does not discriminate on the basis of the given attribute B. This problem is motivated by the fact that often available historic data is biased due to discrimination, e.g., when B denotes ethnicity. Using the standard learners on this data may lead to wrongfully biased classifiers, even if the attribute B is removed from training data. Existing solutions for this problem consist in “cleaning away” the discrimination from the dataset before a classifier is learned. In this paper we study an alternative approach in which the non-discrimination constraint is pushed deeply into a decision tree learner by changing its splitting criterion and pruning strategy. Experimental evaluation shows that the proposed approach advances the state-of-the-art in the sense that the learned decision trees have a lower discrimination than models provided by previous methods, with little loss in accuracy. We present an adversarial domain adaptation based deep learning approach for automatic tumor segmentation from T2-weighted MRI. Our approach is composed of two steps: (i) a tumor-aware unsupervised cross-domain adaptation (CT to MRI), followed by (ii) semi-supervised tumor segmentation using Unet trained with synthesized and limited number of original MRIs. We introduced a novel target specific loss, called tumor-aware loss, for unsupervised cross-domain adaptation that helps to preserve tumors on synthesized MRIs produced from CT images. In comparison, state-of-the art adversarial networks trained without our tumor-aware loss produced MRIs with ill-preserved or missing tumors. All networks were trained using labeled CT images from 377 patients with non-small cell lung cancer obtained from the Cancer Imaging Archive and unlabeled T2w MRIs from a completely unrelated cohort of 6 patients with pre-treatment and 36 on-treatment scans. Next, we combined 6 labeled pre-treatment MRI scans with the synthesized MRIs to boost tumor segmentation accuracy through semi-supervised learning. Semi-supervised training of cycle-GAN produced a segmentation accuracy of 0.66 computed using Dice Score Coefficient (DSC). Our method trained with only synthesized MRIs produced an accuracy of 0.74 while the same method trained in semi-supervised setting produced the best accuracy of 0.80 on test. Our results show that tumor-aware adversarial domain adaptation helps to achieve reasonably accurate cancer segmentation from limited MRI data by leveraging large CT datasets.