The Maximum Weight Independent Set of Polygons problem is a fundamental problem in computational geometry. Given a set of weighted polygons in the 2-dimensional plane, the goal is to find a set of pairwise non-overlapping polygons with maximum total weight. Due to its wide range of applications, the MWISP problem and its special cases have been extensively studied both in the approximation algorithms and the computational geometry community. Despite a lot of research, its general case is not well-understood. Currently the best known polynomial time algorithm achieves an approximation ratio of n^(epsilon) [Fox and Pach, SODA 2011], and it is not even clear whether the problem is APX-hard. We present a (1+epsilon)-approximation algorithm, assuming that each polygon in the input has at most a polylogarithmic number of vertices. Our algorithm has quasi-polynomial running time. We use a recently introduced framework for approximating maximum weight independent set in geometric intersection graphs. The framework has been used to construct a QPTAS in the much simpler case of axis-parallel rectangles. We extend it in two ways, to adapt it to our much more general setting. First, we show that its technical core can be reduced to the case when all input polygons are triangles. Secondly, we replace its key technical ingredient which is a method to partition the plane using only few edges such that the objects stemming from the optimal solution are evenly distributed among the resulting faces and each object is intersected only a few times. Our new procedure for this task is not more complex than the original one, and it can handle the arising difficulties due to the arbitrary angles of the polygons. Note that already this obstacle makes the known analysis for the above framework fail. Also, in general it is not well understood how to handle this difficulty by efficient approximation algorithms.
When going beyond the fat objects, the problem becomes much less understood. Even for axis-parallel rectangles the best known polynomial time algorithms are @math -approximation for weighted case due to Chan and Har-Peled @cite_21 , and a @math -approximation for unweighted case by Chalermsook and Chuzhoy @cite_18 . Prior to the latter results, many @math -approximation algorithms have been found @cite_17 @cite_4 @cite_23 @cite_20 . Very recently, a QPTAS has been presented @cite_8 .
@cite_18 @cite_4 @cite_8 @cite_21 @cite_23 @cite_20 @cite_17
1998375208 2567804199 2084165935 2123068254
In the Maximum Weight Independent Set of Rectangles (MWISR) problem we are given a set of n axis-parallel rectangles in the 2D-plane, and the goal is to select a maximum weight subset of pairwise non-overlapping rectangles. Due to many applications, e.g. in data mining, map labeling and admission control, the problem has received a lot of attention by various research communities. We present the first (1 + e)-approximation algorithm for the MWISR problem with quasipolynomial running time 2poly(log n e). In contrast, the best known polynomial time approximation algorithms for the problem achieve superconstant approximation ratios of O(log log n) (unweighted case) and O(log n log log n) (weighted case). Key to our results is a new geometric dynamic program which recursively subdivides the plane into polygons of bounded complexity. We provide the technical tools that are needed to analyze its performance. In particular, we present a method of partitioning the plane into small and simple areas such that the rectangles of an optimal solution are intersected in a very controlled manner. Together with a novel application of the weighted planar graph separator theorem due to [4] this allows us to upper bound our approximation ratio by 1 + e. Our dynamic program is very general and we believe that it will be useful for other settings. In particular, we show that, when parametrized properly, it provides a polynomial time (1 + e)-approximation for the special case of the MWISR problem when each rectangle is relatively large in at least one dimension. Key to this analysis is a method to tile the plane in order to approximately describe the topology of these rectangles in an optimal solution. This technique might be a useful insight to design better polynomial time approximation algorithms or even a PTAS for the MWISR problem. In particular, note that our results imply that the MWISR problem is not APX-hard, unless NP ⊆ DTIME(2polylog (n)). An important question in theoretical computer science is to determine the best possible running time for solving a problem at hand. For geometric optimization problems, we often understand their complexity on a rough scale, but not very well on a finer scale. One such example is the two-dimensional knapsack problem for squares. There is a polynomial time (1 + ϵ)-approximation algorithm for it (i.e., a PTAS) but the running time of this algorithm is triple exponential in 1 ϵ, i.e., Ω(n221 ϵ). A double or triple exponential dependence on 1 ϵ is inherent in how this and several other algorithms for other geometric problems work. In this paper, we present an EPTAS for knapsack for squares, i.e., a (1+ϵ)-approximation algorithm with a running time of Oϵ(1)·nO(1). In particular, the exponent of n in the running time does not depend on ϵ at all! Since there can be no FPTAS for the problem (unless P = NP) this is the best kind of approximation scheme we can hope for. To achieve this improvement, we introduce two new key ideas: We present a fast method to guess the Ω(221 ϵ) relatively large squares of a suitable near-optimal packing instead of using brute-force enumeration. Secondly, we introduce an indirect guessing framework to define sizes of cells for the remaining squares. In the previous PTAS each of these steps needs a running time of Ω(n221 ϵ) and we improve both to Oϵ(1) · nO(1). We complete our result by giving an algorithm for two-dimensional knapsack for rectangles under (1 + ϵ)-resource augmentation. In this setting, we also improve the best known running time of Ω(n1 ϵ1 ϵ) to Oϵ(1) · nO(1) and compute even a solution with optimal profit, in contrast to the best previously known polynomial time algorithm for this setting that computes only an approximation. We believe that our new techniques have the potential to be useful for other settings as well. We describe a polynomial-time algorithm for learning axis-aligned rectangles in Q^d with respect to product distributions from multiple-instance examples in the PAC model. Here, each example consists of n elements of Q^d together with a label indicating whether any of the n points is in the rectangle to be learned. We assume that there is an unknown product distribution D over Q^d such that all instances are independently drawn according to D. The accuracy of a hypothesis is measured by the probability that it would incorrectly predict whether one of n more points drawn from D was in the rectangle to be learned. Our algorithm achieves accuracy e with probability 1-δ in O ( d^5n^ 12 ^ 20 ^2 nd ) time. We present several polynomial-time approximation algorithms for the one-dimensional bin-packing problem. using a subroutine to solve a certain linear programming relaxation of the problem. Our main results are as follows: There is a polynomial-time algorithm A such that A(I) ≤ OPT(I) + O(log2 OPT(I)). There is a polynomial-time algorithm A such that, if m(I) denotes the number of distinct sizes of pieces occurring in instance I, then A(I) ≤ OPT(I) + O(log2 m(I)). There is an approximation scheme which accepts as input an instance I and a positive real number e, and produces as output a packing using as most (1 + e) OPT(I) + O(e-2) bins. Its execution time is O(e-c n log n), where c is a constant. These are the best asymptotic performance bounds that have been achieved to date for polynomial-time bin-packing. Each of our algorithms makes at most O(log n) calls on the LP relaxation subroutine and takes at most O(n log n) time for other operations. The LP relaxation of bin packing was solved efficiently in practice by Gilmore and Gomory. We prove its membership in P, despite the fact that it has an astronomically large number of variables.