This paper is focused on a discussion of parameters and heuristics that are expected to assist multihop routing in becoming more sensitive to node mobility. We provide a discussion concerning existing and a few proposed parameters. Moreover, the work also discusses two new heuristics based on the notion of link duration. The heuristics are compared based on a meaningful set of scenarios that attain different mobility aspects.
A second category of work that tries to make routing more sensitive to node mobility relates to throughput variation measurement as a way to determine node mobility. For instance, Suyang and Evans have used the slope of change of throughput in a link vs. the link load to estimate topology changes @cite_0 . Based on history, through throughput monitoring, a decrease, according to Suyang and Evans, means that there is a true change in the physical topology. They have attributed the changes to increase in the node distance and increase in interference. Even with good attributes of avoiding interference and detecting mobility collectively, node mobility individually has attributes that have not been addressed. Nodes may exhibit movement that does not necessarily impact the route stability.
@cite_0
2022637917 2101681600 2127699957 2115678412
In mobile networks, distance variations caused by node mobility generate fluctuations in the channel gains. Such fluctuations can be treated as another type of fading besides multipath effects. In this paper, the interference statistics in mobile random networks are characterized by incorporating the distance variations of mobile nodes to the channel gain fluctuations. The mean interference is calculated at the origin and at the border of a finite mobile network. The network performance is evaluated in terms of the outage probability. Compared to a static network, the interference in a single snapshot does not change under uniform mobility models. However, random waypoint mobility increases (decreases) the interference at the origin (at the border). Furthermore, due to the correlation of the node locations, the interference and outage are temporally and spatially correlated. We quantify the temporal correlation of the interference and outage in mobile Poisson networks in terms of the correlation coefficient and conditional outage probability, respectively. The results show that it is essential that routing, MAC, and retransmission schemes need to be smart (i.e., correlation-aware) to avoid bursts of transmission failures. In wireless networks, distance variations caused by node mobility generate fluctuations of the channel gains. Such fluctuations can be treated as another type of fading besides multi-path effects. In this paper, we characterize the interference statistics in mobile random networks by mapping the distance variations of mobile nodes to the channel gain fluctuations. Network performance is evaluated in terms of the outage probability. A nearest-interferer approximation is employed. This approximation provides a tight lower bound on the outage probability. Comparing to a static network, we show that the interference distribution does not change under high mobility and random walk models, but random waypoint mobility increases interference. This paper describes two techniques that improve throughput in an ad hoc network in the presence of nodes that agree to forward packets but fail to do so. To mitigate this problem, we propose categorizing nodes based upon their dynamically measured behavior. We use a watchdog that identifies misbehaving nodes and a pathrater that helps routing protocols avoid these nodes. Through simulation we evaluate watchdog and pathrater using packet throughput, percentage of overhead (routing) transmissions, and the accuracy of misbehaving node detection. When used together in a network with moderate mobility, the two techniques increase throughput by 17 in the presence of 40 misbehaving nodes, while increasing the percentage of overhead transmissions from the standard routing protocol's 9 to 17 . During extreme mobility, watchdog and pathrater can increase network throughput by 27 , while increasing the overhead transmissions from the standard routing protocol's 12 to 24 . Gupta and Kumar (2000) introduced a random model to study throughput scaling in a wireless network with static nodes, and showed that the throughput per source-destination pair is Theta(1 radic(nlogn)). Grossglauser and Tse (2001) showed that when nodes are mobile it is possible to have a constant throughput scaling per source-destination pair. In most applications, delay is also a key metric of network performance. It is expected that high throughput is achieved at the cost of high delay and that one can be improved at the cost of the other. The focus of this paper is on studying this tradeoff for wireless networks in a general framework. Optimal throughput-delay scaling laws for static and mobile wireless networks are established. For static networks, it is shown that the optimal throughput-delay tradeoff is given by D(n)=Theta(nT(n)), where T(n) and D(n) are the throughput and delay scaling, respectively. For mobile networks, a simple proof of the throughput scaling of Theta(1) for the Grossglauser-Tse scheme is given and the associated delay scaling is shown to be Theta(nlogn). The optimal throughput-delay tradeoff for mobile networks is also established. To capture physical movement in the real world, a random-walk (RW) model for node mobility is assumed. It is shown that for throughput of Oscr(1 radic(nlogn)), which can also be achieved in static networks, the throughput-delay tradeoff is the same as in static networks, i.e., D(n)=Theta(nT(n)). Surprisingly, for almost any throughput of a higher order, the delay is shown to be Theta(nlogn), which is the delay for throughput of Theta(1). Our result, thus, suggests that the use of mobility to increase throughput, even slightly, in real-world networks would necessitate an abrupt and very large increase in delay.