Previous approaches to training syntax-based sentiment classification models required phrase-level annotated corpora, which are not readily available in many languages other than English. Thus, we propose the use of tree-structured Long Short-Term Memory with an attention mechanism that pays attention to each subtree of the parse tree. Experimental results indicate that our model achieves the state-of-the-art performance in a Japanese sentiment classification task.
Based on psychological studies, the human ability of intuition of attention @cite_30 has been introduced into many computer science fields. The main function of this ability is deciding which part of an input needs to be focused on.
@cite_30
2806422867 119228284 1980711281 1497599070
During the 60s and 70s, AI researchers explored intuitions about intelligence by writing programs that displayed intelligent behavior. Many good ideas came out from this work but programs written by hand were not robust or general. After the 80s, research increasingly shifted to the development of learners capable of inferring behavior and functions from experience and data, and solvers capable of tackling well-defined but intractable models like SAT, classical planning, Bayesian networks, and POMDPs. The learning approach has achieved considerable success but results in black boxes that do not have the flexibility, transparency, and generality of their model-based counterparts. Model-based approaches, on the other hand, require models and scalable algorithms. Model-free learners and model-based solvers have close parallels with Systems 1 and 2 in current theories of the human mind: the first, a fast, opaque, and inflexible intuitive mind; the second, a slow, transparent, and flexible analytical mind. In this paper, I review developments in AI and draw on these theories to discuss the gap between model-free learners and model-based solvers, a gap that needs to be bridged in order to have intelligent systems that are robust and general. Although William James declared in 1890, "Everyone knows what attention is," today there are many different and sometimes opposing views on the subject. This fragmented theoretical landscape may be because most of the theories and models of attention offer explanations in natural language or in a pictorial manner rather than providing a quantitative and unambiguous statement of the theory. They focus on the manifestations of attention instead of its rationale. In this book, John Tsotsos develops a formal model of visual attention with the goal of providing a theoretical explanation for why humans (and animals) must have the capacity to attend. He takes a unique approach to the theory, using the full breadth of the language of computation--rather than simply the language of mathematics--as the formal means of description. The result, the Selective Tuning model of vision and attention, explains attentive behavior in humans and provides a foundation for building computer systems that see with human-like characteristics. The overarching conclusion is that human vision is based on a general purpose processor that can be dynamically tuned to the task and the scene viewed on a moment-by-moment basis. Tsotsos offers a comprehensive, up-to-date overview of attention theories and models and a full description of the Selective Tuning model, confining the formal elements to two chapters and two appendixes. The text is accompanied by more than 100 illustrations in black and white and color; additional color illustrations and movies are available on the book's Web site Humans and other primates shift their gaze to allocate processing resources to a subset of the visual input. Understanding and emulating the way that human observers free-view a natural scene has both scientific and economic impact. It has therefore attracted the attention from researchers in a wide range of science and engineering disciplines. With the ever increasing computational power, machine learning has become a popular tool to mine human data in the exploration of how people direct their gaze when inspecting a visual scene. This paper reviews recent advances in learning saliency-based visual attention and discusses several key issues in this topic. A number of psychophysical studies concerning the detection, localization and recognition of objects in the visual field have suggested a two-stage theory of human visual perception. The first stage is the “preattentive” mode, in which simple features are processed rapidly and in parallel over the entire visual field. In the second, “attentive” mode, a specialized processing focus, usually called the focus of attention, is directed to particular locations in the visual field. The analysis of complex forms and the recognition of objects are associated with this second stage.1 The computational justification for such a hypothesis comes from the realization that while it is possible to imagine specific algorithms performing tasks such as shape analysis and recognition at specific locations, it is difficult to imagine these algorithms operating in parallel over the whole visual scene, since such an approach will quickly lead to a combinatorial explosion in terms of required computational resources.2 This is essentially the major critique of Minsky and Papert to a universal application of perceptrons in visual perception.3 Taken together, these empirical and theoretical studies suggest that beyond a certain preprocessing stage, the analysis of visual information proceeds in a sequence of operations, each one applied to a selected location (or locations).