We provide a framework for modeling social network formation through conditional multinomial logit models from discrete choice and random utility theory, in which each new edge is viewed as a “choice” made by a node to connect to another node, based on (generic) features of the other nodes available to make a connection. This perspective on network formation unifies existing models such as preferential attachment, triadic closure, and node fitness, which are all special cases, and thereby provides a flexible means for conceptualizing, estimating, and comparing models. The lens of discrete choice theory also provides several new tools for analyzing social network formation; for example, the significance of node features can be evaluated in a statistically rigorous manner, and mixtures of existing models can be estimated by adapting known expectation-maximization algorithms. We demonstrate the flexibility of our framework through examples that analyze a number of synthetic and real-world datasets. For example, we provide rigorous methods for estimating preferential attachment models and show how to separate the effects of preferential attachment and triadic closure. Non-parametric estimates of the importance of degree show a highly linear trend, and we expose the importance of looking carefully at nodes with degree zero. Examining the formation of a large citation graph, we find evidence for an increased role of degree when accounting for age.
There is a long history of parameter estimation in network formation processes @cite_67 @cite_19 . Probably the most studied formation model is preferential attachment @cite_52 , which relates the likelihood of new nodes connecting to a node @math to @math 's degree. More references on PA, since we claim it is the most studied? The original justification of the model was based on the degree distribution of the resulting graph qualitatively matching those of several early large-scale empirical networks. Shortly after, a number of authors proposed non-parametric methods to measure preferential attachment by counting what the degrees of the nodes getting edges are and normalizing them by the relative likelihood of those degrees @cite_41 @cite_7 @cite_73 . There are several generalizations of preferential attachment, where node @math is chosen proportional to some function @math of the degree @math of node @math (here, @math is standard preferential attachment). TODO: Need references if claiming there are several generalizations Much of this research has focused on the case when @math , i.e., attachment is preferential to some (latent) power @math of the degree @cite_17 .
@cite_67 @cite_7 @cite_41 @cite_52 @cite_19 @cite_73 @cite_17
2204454685 2891925796 2016986674 2082986408
Preferential attachment is a stochastic process that has been proposed to explain certain topological features characteristic of complex networks from diverse domains. The systematic investigation of preferential attachment is an important area of research in network science, not only for the theoretical matter of verifying whether this hypothesized process is operative in real-world networks, but also for the practical insights that follow from knowledge of its functional form. Here we describe a maximum likelihood based estimation method for the measurement of preferential attachment in temporal complex networks. We call the method PAFit, and implement it in an R package of the same name. PAFit constitutes an advance over previous methods primarily because we based it on a nonparametric statistical framework that enables attachment kernel estimation free of any assumptions about its functional form. We show this results in PAFit outperforming the popular methods of Jeong and Newman in Monte Carlo simulations. What is more, we found that the application of PAFit to a publically available Flickr social network dataset yielded clear evidence for a deviation of the attachment kernel from the popularly assumed log-linear form. Independent of our main work, we provide a correction to a consequential error in Newman’s original method which had evidently gone unnoticed since its publication over a decade ago. Our work introduces an approach for estimating the contribution of attachment mechanisms to the formation of growing networks. We present a generic model in which growth is driven by the continuous attachment of new nodes according to random and preferential linkage with a fixed probability. Past approaches apply likelihood analysis to estimate the probability of occurrence of each mechanism at a particular network instance, exploiting the concavity of the likelihood function at each point in time. However, the probability of connecting to existing nodes, and consequently the likelihood function itself, varies as networks grow. We establish conditions under which applying likelihood analysis guarantees the existence of a local maximum of the time-varying likelihood function and prove that a expectation maximization algorithm provides a convergent estimate. Furthermore, the in-degree distributions of the nodes in the growing networks is analytically characterized. Simulations show that, under the proposed conditions, expectation maximization and maximum-likelihood accurately estimate the actual contribution of each mechanism, and in-degree distributions converge to a stationary distributions. We consider a growing network, whose growth algorithm is based on the preferential attachment typical for scale-free constructions, but where the long-range bonds are disadvantaged. Thus, the probability of getting connected to a site at distance d is proportional to @math where is a tunable parameter of the model. We show that the properties of the networks grown with @math are close to those of the genuine scale-free construction, while for @math the structure of the network is quite different. Thus, in this regime, the node degree distribution is no longer a power law, and it is well represented by a stretched exponential. On the other hand, the small-world property of the growing networks is preserved at all values of . Based on the empirical analysis of the dependency network in 18 Java projects, we develop a novel model of network growth which considersboth: an attachment mechanism and the addition of new nodes with a heterogeneous distribution of their initial degree, k0. Empirically we find that the cumulative degree distributions of initial degrees and of the final network, follow power-law behaviors: P(k0) ∝ k01−α, and P(k) ∝ k1−γ, respectively. For the total number of links as a function of the network size, we find empirically K(N) ∝ Nβ, where β is (at the beginning of thenetwork evolution) between 1.25 and 2, while converging to ∼ 1 for large N. This indicates a transition from a growth regime with increasing network density towards a sustainable regime, which revents a collapse because of ever increasing dependencies. Our theoretical framework is able to predict relations between the exponents α, β, γ, which also link issues of software engineering and developer activity. These relations are verified by means of computer simulations and empirical investigations. They indicate that the growth of real Open Source Software networks occurs on the edge between two regimes, which are either dominated by the initial degree distribution of added nodes, or by the preferential attachment mechanism. Hence, the heterogeneous degree distribution of newly added nodes, found empirically, is essential to describe the laws of sustainable growth in networks.