Let @math and @math be sets of @math red and @math blue points in the plane, respectively, with @math . Let @math be a perfect matching between points from @math and @math , using @math straight line segments to match the points, that is, each point is an endpoint of exactly one line segment, and each line segment has one red and one blue endpoint. We forbid line segments to cross. Denote the length of a longest line segment in @math with @math , which we also call the [ ] value, bn of @math . We aim to find a matching under given constraints that minimizes @math . Any such matching is called a [ ] bottleneck matching of @math .
In @cite_0 , Chang, Tang and Lee gave an @math -time algorithm for computing a bottleneck matching of a point set, but allowing crossings. This result was extended by Efrat and Katz in @cite_9 to higher-dimensional Euclidean spaces.
@cite_0 @cite_9
2065158139 2080059421 2144383545 2289848075
Given a set of pointsV in the plane, the Euclidean bottleneck matching problem is to match each point with some other point such that the longest Euclidean distance between matched points, resulting from this matching, is minimized. To solve this problem, we definek-relative neighborhood graphs, (kRNG) which are derived from Toussaint's relative neighborhood graphs (RNG). Two points are calledk-relative neighbors if and only if there are less thank points ofV which are closer to both of the two points than the two points are to each other. AkRNG is an undirected graph (V,E r k) whereE r k is the set of pairs of points ofV which arek-relative neighbors. We prove that there exists an optimal solution of the Euclidean bottleneck matching problem which is a subset ofE r 17. We also prove that ¦E r k¦ < 18kn wheren is the number of points in setV. Our algorithm would construct a 17RNG first. This takesO(n2) time. We then use Gabow and Tarjan's bottleneck maximum cardinality matching algorithm for general graphs whose time-complexity isO((n logn)0.5m), wherem is the number of edges in the graph, to solve the bottleneck maximum cardinality matching problem in the 17RNG. This takesO(n1.5 log0.5n) time. The total time-complexity of our algorithm for the Euclidean bottleneck matching problem isO(n2 +n1.5 log0.5n). Abstract We extend the planar results of (1992) to higher dimensions, and show that given a set A of 2n points in d -space it is possible to compute a Euclidean bottleneck matching of A in roughly O (n 1.5 ) time, for d≤6 , and in subquadratic time, for any constant d>6 . If the underlying norm is L ∞ , then it is possible to compute a bottleneck matching of A in O (n 1.5 log 0.5 n) time, for any constant d≥2 . Given n points, called terminals, in the plane ℝ2 and a positive integer k, the bottleneck Steiner tree problem is to find k Steiner points from ℝ2 and a spanning tree on the n+k points that minimizes its longest edge length. Edge length is measured by an underlying distance function on ℝ2, usually, the Euclidean or the L 1 metric. This problem is known to be NP-hard. In this paper, we study this problem in the L p metric for any 1≤p≤∞, and aim to find an exact algorithm which is efficient for small fixed k. We present the first fixed-parameter tractable algorithm running in f(k)⋅nlog 2 n time for the L 1 and the L ∞ metrics, and the first exact algorithm for the L p metric for any fixed rational p with 1<p<∞ whose time complexity is f(k)⋅(n k +nlog n), where f(k) is a function dependent only on k. Note that prior to this paper there was no known exact algorithm even for the L 2 metric. Motivated by a crane assignment problem, we consider a Euclidean bipartite matching problem with edge-crossing constraints. Specifically, given n red points and n blue points in the plane, we want to construct a perfect matching between red and blue points that minimizes the length of the longest edge, while imposing a constraint that no two edges may cross each other. We show that the problem cannot be approximately solved within a factor less than 1:277 in polynomial time unless P = NP. We give simple dynamic programming algorithms that solve our problem in two special cases, namely (1) the case where the red and blue points form the vertices of a convex polygon and (2) the case where the red points are collinear and the blue points lie to one side of the line through the red points.