We present PoWerStore, the first efficient robust storage protocol that achieves optimal latency without using digital signatures. PoWerStore's robustness comprises tolerating asynchrony, maximum number of Byzantine storage servers, any number of Byzantine readers and crash-faulty writers, and guaranteeing wait-freedom and linearizability of read write operations. PoWerStore's efficiency stems from combining lightweight authentication, erasure coding and metadata write-backs where readers write-back only metadata to achieve linearizability. At the heart of PoWerStore are Proofs of Writing (PoW): a novel storage technique based on lightweight cryptography. PoW enable reads and writes in the single-writer variant of PoWerStore to have latency of 2 rounds of communication between a client and storage servers in the worst-case (which we show optimal). We further present and implement a multi-writer PoWerStore variant featuring 3-round writes reads where the third read round is invoked only under active attacks, and show that it outperforms existing robust storage protocols, including crash-tolerant ones.
A seminal crash-tolerant read write storage implementation assuming a majority of correct processes was presented in @cite_13 . In the original single-writer variant of @cite_13 , read operations always take 2 rounds between a client and servers with write-backs in the second round. On the other hand all write operations complete in a single round; in the multi-writer variant @cite_5 , the second write round is necessary. Server state modifications by readers introduced by @cite_13 are unavoidable; namely, @cite_23 showed a @math lower bound on the number of servers that a reader has to modify in any wait-free linearizable storage. However, robust storage implementations differ in the strategy employed by readers: in some protocols readers write-back data (e.g., @cite_13 @cite_47 @cite_42 @cite_37 @cite_49 @cite_33 ) whereas in others readers only write metadata to servers (e.g., @cite_23 @cite_18 @cite_41 ).
@cite_37 @cite_18 @cite_33 @cite_41 @cite_42 @cite_23 @cite_49 @cite_5 @cite_47 @cite_13
2089883915 2155405969 2171337572 1487382749
We study the time-complexity of robust atomic read write storage from fault-prone storage components in asynchronous message-passing systems. Robustness here means wait-free tolerating the largest possible number t of Byzantine storage component failures (optimal resilience) without relying on data authentication. We show that no single-writer multiple-reader (SWMR) robust atomic storage implementation exists if (a) read operations complete in less than four communication round-trips (rounds), and (b) the time complexity of write operations is constant. More precisely, we present two lower bounds. The first is a read lower bound stating that three rounds of communication are necessary to read from a SWMR robust atomic storage. The second is a write lower bound, showing that Ω(log(t)) write rounds are necessary to read in three rounds from such a storage. Applied to known results, our lower bounds close a fundamental gap: we show that time-optimal robust atomic storage can be obtained using well-known transformations from regular to atomic storage and existing time-optimal regular storage implementations. This paper studies the time complexity of reading unauthenticated data from a distributed storage made of a set of failure-prone base objects. More specifically, we consider the abstraction of a robust read write storage that provides wait-free access to unauthenticated data over a set of base storage objects with t possible failures, out of which at most b are arbitrary and the rest are simple crash failures.We prove a 2 communication round-trip lower bound for reading from a safe storage that uses at most 2t+2b base objects, independently of the number or round-trips needed by the writer. We then prove the lower bound tight by exhibiting a regular storage that uses 2t+b+1 base objects (optimal resilience) and features 2 communication round-trips for both read and write operations. This paper describes a decentralized consistency protocol for survivable storage that exploits local data versioning within each storage-node. Such versioning enables the protocol to efficiently provide linearizability and wait-freedom of read and write operations to erasure-coded data in asynchronous environments with Byzantine failures of clients and servers. By exploiting versioning storage-nodes, the protocol shifts most work to clients and allows highly optimistic operation: reads occur in a single round-trip unless clients observe concurrency or write failures. Measurements of a storage system prototype using this protocol show that it scales well with the number of failures tolerated, and its performance compares favorably with an efficient implementation of Byzantine-tolerant state machine replication. Byzantine fault-tolerant storage systems can provide high availability in hazardous environments, but the redundant servers they require increase software development and hardware costs. In order to minimize the number of servers required to implement fault-tolerant storage services, we develop a new algorithm that uses a "Listeners" pattern of network communication to detect and resolve ordering ambiguities created by concurrent accesses to the system. Our protocol requires 3f + 1 servers to tolerate up to f Byzantine faults--f fewer than the 4f + 1 required by existing protocols for non-self-verifying data. In addition, SBQ-L provides atomic consistency semantics, which is stronger than the regular or pseudo-atomic semantics provided by these existing protocols. We show that this protocol is optimal in the number of servers-- any protocol that provides safe semantics or stronger requires at least 3f + 1 servers to tolerate f Byzantine faults in an asynchronous system. Finally, we examine a non-confirmable writes variation of the SBQ-L protocol where a client cannot determine when its writes complete. We show that SBQ-L with non-confirmable writes provides regular semantics with 2f + 1 servers and that this number of servers is minimal.