In this paper we present the Sampling Privacy mechanism for privately releasing personal data. Sampling Privacy is a sampling based privacy mechanism that satisfies differential privacy.
Sampling whereby a centralized aggregator randomly discards responses has been previously formulated as a mechanism to amplify privacy @cite_24 @cite_18 @cite_26 @cite_12 @cite_13 . The intuition is that when sampling approximates the original aggregate information, an attacker is unable to distinguish when sampling is performed and which data owners are sampled. These privacy mechanisms range from sampling without a sanitization mechanism, sampling to amplify a differentially private mechanism, sampling that tolerates a bias, and even sampling a weaker privacy notion such as k-anonymity to amplify the privacy guarantees.
@cite_18 @cite_26 @cite_24 @cite_13 @cite_12
2130099852 2154086287 2036035006 2090593019
There has been increasing interest in the problem of building accurate data mining models over aggregate data, while protecting privacy at the level of individual records. One approach for this problem is to randomize the values in individual records, and only disclose the randomized values. The model is then built over the randomized data, after first compensating for the randomization (at the aggregate level). This approach is potentially vulnerable to privacy breaches: based on the distribution of the data, one may be able to learn with high confidence that some of the randomized records satisfy a specified property, even though privacy is preserved on average.In this paper, we present a new formulation of privacy breaches, together with a methodology, "amplification", for limiting them. Unlike earlier approaches, amplification makes it is possible to guarantee limits on privacy breaches without any knowledge of the distribution of the original data. We instantiate this methodology for the problem of mining association rules, and modify the algorithm from [9] to limit privacy breaches without knowledge of the data distribution. Next, we address the problem that the amount of randomization required to avoid privacy breaches (when mining association rules) results in very long transactions. By using pseudorandom generators and carefully choosing seeds such that the desired items from the original transaction are present in the randomized transaction, we can send just the seed instead of the transaction, resulting in a dramatic drop in communication and storage cost. Finally, we define new information measures that take privacy breaches into account when quantifying the amount of privacy preserved by randomization. A mechanism for releasing information about a statistical database with sensitive data must resolve a trade-off between utility and privacy. Publishing fully accurate information maximizes utility while minimizing privacy, while publishing random noise accomplishes the opposite. Privacy can be rigorously quantified using the framework of differential privacy, which requires that a mechanism's output distribution is nearly the same whether or not a given database row is included or excluded. The goal of this paper is strong and general utility guarantees, subject to differential privacy. We pursue mechanisms that guarantee near-optimal utility to every potential user, independent of its side information (modeled as a prior distribution over query results) and preferences (modeled via a loss function). Our main result is: for each fixed count query and differential privacy level, there is a geometric mechanism M* -- a discrete variant of the simple and well-studied Laplace mechanism -- that is simultaneously expected loss-minimizing for every possible user, subject to the differential privacy constraint. This is an extremely strong utility guarantee: every potential user u, no matter what its side information and preferences, derives as much utility from M* as from interacting with a differentially private mechanism Mu that is optimally tailored to u. More precisely, for every user u there is an optimal mechanism Mu for it that factors into a user-independent part (the geometric mechanism M*) followed by user-specific post-processing that can be delegated to the user itself. The first part of our proof of this result characterizes the optimal differentially private mechanism for a fixed but arbitrary user in terms of a certain basic feasible solution to a linear program with constraints that encode differential privacy. The second part shows that all of the relevant vertices of this polytope (ranging over all possible users) are derivable from the geometric mechanism via suitable remappings of its range. Random sampling is an appealing approach to build synopses of large data streams because random samples can be used for a broad spectrum of analytical tasks. Users are often interested in analyzing only the most recent fraction of the data stream in order to avoid outdated results. In this paper, we focus on sampling schemes that sample from a sliding window over a recent time interval; such windows are a popular and highly comprehensible method to model recency. In this setting, the main challenge is to guarantee an upper bound on the space consumption of the sample while using the allotted space efficiently at the same time. The difficulty arises from the fact that the number of items in the window is unknown in advance and may vary significantly over time, so that the sampling fraction has to be adjusted dynamically. We consider uniform sampling schemes, which produce each sample of the same size with equal probability, and stratified sampling schemes, in which the window is divided into smaller strata and a uniform sample is maintained per stratum. For uniform sampling, we prove that it is impossible to guarantee a minimum sample size in bounded space. We then introduce a novel sampling scheme called bounded priority sampling (BPS), which requires only bounded space. We derive a lower bound on the expected sample size and show that BPS quickly adapts to changing data rates. For stratified sampling, we propose a merge-based stratification scheme (MBS), which maintains strata of approximately equal size. Compared to naive stratification, MBS has the advantage that the sample is evenly distributed across the window, so that no part of the window is over- or underrepresented. We conclude the paper with a feasibility study of our algorithms on large real-world datasets. A mechanism for releasing information about a statistical database with sensitive data must resolve a trade-off between utility and privacy. Publishing fully accurate information maximizes utility while minimizing privacy, while publishing random noise accomplishes the opposite. Privacy can be rigorously quantified using the framework of differential privacy, which requires that a mechanism's output distribution is nearly the same whether a given database row is included. The goal of this paper is to formulate and provide strong and general utility guarantees, subject to differential privacy. We pursue mechanisms that guarantee near-optimal utility to every potential user, independent of its side information (modeled as a prior distribution over query results) and preferences (modeled via a symmetric and monotone loss function). Our main result is the following: for each fixed count query and differential privacy level, there is a geometric mechanism @math ---a discrete variant of the simple and well-studi...