Given an undirected @math -node unweighted graph @math , a spanner with stretch function @math is a subgraph @math such that, if two nodes are at distance @math in @math , then they are at distance at most @math in @math . Spanners are very well studied in the literature. The typical goal is to construct the sparsest possible spanner for a given stretch function. In this paper we study pairwise spanners, where we require to approximate the @math - @math distance only for pairs @math in a given set @math . Such @math -spanners were studied before [Coppersmith,Elkin'05] only in the special case that @math is the identity function, i.e. distances between relevant pairs must be preserved exactly (a.k.a. pairwise preservers). Here we present pairwise spanners which are at the same time sparser than the best known preservers (on the same @math ) and of the best known spanners (with the same @math ). In more detail, for arbitrary @math , we show that there exists a @math -spanner of size @math with @math . Alternatively, for any @math , there exists a @math -spanner of size @math with @math . We also consider the relevant special case that there is a critical set of nodes @math , and we wish to approximate either the distances within nodes in @math or from nodes in @math to any other node. We show that there exists an @math -spanner of size @math with @math , and an @math -spanner of size @math with @math . All the mentioned pairwise spanners can be constructed in polynomial time.
Compared to the preservers in @cite_9 , we achieve sparser pairwise spanners with additive stretch @math for @math , and a sparser subsetwise spanners for @math . Interestingly, our sourcewise spanners are always sparser than the pairwise preservers from @cite_9 .
@cite_9
2562627112 2809995963 2951859740 2508647357
Let G=(V,E) be an undirected unweighted graph on n vertices. A subgraph H of G is called an (all-pairs) purely additive spanner with stretch β if for every (u,v)∈V×V, d i s t H (u,v)≤d i s t G (u,v) + β. The problem of computing sparse spanners with small stretch β is well-studied. Here we consider the following variant: we are given ( P V V ) and we seek a sparse subgraph H where d i s t H (u,v)≤d i s t G (u,v) + β for each ((u,v) P ). That is, distances for pairs outside ( P ) need not be well-approximated in H. Such a subgraph is called a pairwise spanner with additive stretch β and our goal is to construct such subgraphs that are sparser than all-pairs spanners with the same stretch. We show sparse pairwise spanners with additive stretch 4 and with additive stretch 6. We also consider the following special cases: ( P = S V ) and ( P = S T ), where S⊆V and T⊆V, and show sparser pairwise spanners for these cases. An (α,β)-spanner of an n-vertex graph G = (V,E) is a subgraph H of G satisfying that dist(u, v, H) ≤ α·dist(u, v, G) + β for every pair (u, v) ∈ V ×V, where dist(u,v,G′) denotes the distance between u and v in G′ ⊆ G. It is known that for every integer k ≥ 1, every graph G has a polynomially constructible (2k − 1,0)-spanner of size O(n 1 + 1 k ). This size-stretch bound is essentially optimal by the girth conjecture. Yet, it is important to note that any argument based on the girth only applies to adjacent vertices. It is therefore intriguing to ask if one can “bypass” the conjecture by settling for a multiplicative stretch of 2k − 1 only for neighboring vertex pairs, while maintaining a strictly better multiplicative stretch for the rest of the pairs. We answer this question in the affirmative and introduce the notion of k-hybrid spanners, in which non neighboring vertex pairs enjoy a multiplicative k stretch and the neighboring vertex pairs enjoy a multiplicative (2k − 1) stretch (hence, tight by the conjecture). We show that for every unweighted n-vertex graph G, there is a (polynomially constructible) k-hybrid spanner with O(k 2 ·n 1 + 1 k ) edges. This should be compared against the current best (α,β) spanner construction of [5] that obtains (k,k − 1) stretch with O(k ·n 1 + 1 k ) edges. An alternative natural approach to bypass the girth conjecture is to allow ourself to take care only of a subset of pairs S ×V for a given subset of vertices S ⊆ V referred to here as sources. Spanners in which the distances in S ×V are bounded are referred to as sourcewise spanners. Several constructions for this variant are provided (e.g., multiplicative sourcewise spanners, additive sourcewise spanners and more). Given an undirected @math -node unweighted graph @math , a spanner with stretch function @math is a subgraph @math such that, if two nodes are at distance @math in @math , then they are at distance at most @math in @math . Spanners are very well studied in the literature. The typical goal is to construct the sparsest possible spanner for a given stretch function. In this paper we study pairwise spanners, where we require to approximate the @math - @math distance only for pairs @math in a given set @math . Such @math -spanners were studied before [Coppersmith,Elkin'05] only in the special case that @math is the identity function, i.e. distances between relevant pairs must be preserved exactly (a.k.a. pairwise preservers). Here we present pairwise spanners which are at the same time sparser than the best known preservers (on the same @math ) and of the best known spanners (with the same @math ). In more detail, for arbitrary @math , we show that there exists a @math -spanner of size @math with @math . Alternatively, for any @math , there exists a @math -spanner of size @math with @math . We also consider the relevant special case that there is a critical set of nodes @math , and we wish to approximate either the distances within nodes in @math or from nodes in @math to any other node. We show that there exists an @math -spanner of size @math with @math , and an @math -spanner of size @math with @math . All the mentioned pairwise spanners can be constructed in polynomial time. Spanners, emulators, and approximate distance oracles can be viewed as lossy compression schemes that represent an unweighted graph metric in small space, say O(n1+Δ) bits. There is an inherent tradeoff between the sparsity parameter Δ and the stretch function f of the compression scheme, but the qualitative nature of this tradeoff has remained a persistent open problem. It has been known for some time that when Δ ≥ 1 3 there are schemes with constant additive stretch (distance d is stretched to at most f(d) = d + O(1)), and recent results of Abboud and Bodwin show that when Δ In this paper we show that the lower bound of Abboud and Bodwin is just the first step in a hierarchy of lower bounds that characterize the asymptotic behavior of the optimal stretch function f for sparsity parameter Δ ∈ (0,1 3). Specifically, for any integer k ≥ 2, any compression scheme with size [EQUATION] has a sublinear additive stretch function f: f(d) = d + Ω(d1−1 k). This lower bound matches Thorup and Zwick's (2006) construction of sublinear additive emulators. It also shows that Elkin and Peleg's (1 + ϵ, β)-spanners have an essentially optimal tradeoff between Δ, ϵ, and β, and that the sublinear additive spanners of Pettie (2009) and Chechik (2013) are not too far from optimal. To complement these lower bounds we present a new construction of (1 + ϵ, O(k ϵ)k−1)-spanners with size [EQUATION], where hk Our lower bound technique exhibits several interesting degrees of freedom in the framework of Abboud and Bodwin. By carefully exploiting these freedoms, we are able to obtain lower bounds for several related combinatorial objects. We get lower bounds on the size of (β, ϵ)-hopsets, matching Elkin and Neiman's construction (2016), and lower bounds on shortcutting sets for digraphs that preserve the transitive closure. Our lower bound simplifies Hesse's (2003) refutation of Thorup's conjecture (1992), which stated that adding a linear number of shortcuts suffices to reduce the diameter to polylogarithmic. Finally, we show matching upper and lower bounds for graph compression schemes that work for graph metrics with girth at least 2γ + 1. One consequence is that 's (2010) additive O(γ)-spanners with size [EQUATION] cannot be improved in the exponent.