In this paper, we consider a class of constrained clustering problems of points in @math , where @math could be rather high. A common feature of these problems is that their optimal clusterings no longer have the locality property (due to the additional constraints), which is a key property required by many algorithms for their unconstrained counterparts. To overcome the difficulty caused by the loss of locality, we present in this paper a unified framework, called Peeling-and-Enclosing (PnE) , to iteratively solve two variants of the constrained clustering problems, constrained @math -means clustering ( @math -CMeans) and constrained @math -median clustering ( @math -CMedian). Our framework is based on two standalone geometric techniques, called Simplex Lemma and Weaker Simplex Lemma , for @math -CMeans and @math -CMedian, respectively. The simplex lemma (or weaker simplex lemma) enables us to efficiently approximate the mean (or median) point of an unknown set of points by searching a small-size grid, independent of the dimensionality of the space, in a simplex (or the surrounding region of a simplex), and thus can be used to handle high dimensional data. If @math and @math are fixed numbers, our framework generates, in nearly linear time ( i.e., @math ), @math @math -tuple candidates for the @math mean or median points, and one of them induces a @math -approximation for @math -CMeans or @math -CMedian, where @math is the number of points. Combining this unified framework with a problem-specific selection algorithm (which determines the best @math -tuple candidate), we obtain a @math -approximation for each of the constrained clustering problems. We expect that our technique will be applicable to other constrained clustering problems without locality.
As for the hardness of the problem, Dasgupta @cite_3 showed that it is NP-hard for @math -means clustering in high dimensional space even if @math ; @cite_45 proved that there is no PTAS for @math -means clustering if both @math and @math are large, unless @math . Guruswami and Indyk @cite_16 showed that it is NP-hard to obtain any PTAS for @math -median clustering if @math is not a constant and @math is @math .
@cite_45 @cite_3 @cite_16
2018165630 2143654071 2582351091 2001663593
We consider @math -median clustering in finite metric spaces and @math -means clustering in Euclidean spaces, in the setting where @math is part of the input (not a constant). For the @math -means problem, show that if the optimal @math -means clustering of the input is more expensive than the optimal @math -means clustering by a factor of @math , then one can achieve a @math -approximation to the @math -means optimal in time polynomial in @math and @math by using a variant of Lloyd's algorithm. In this work we substantially improve this approximation guarantee. We show that given only the condition that the @math -means optimal is more expensive than the @math -means optimal by a factor @math for some constant @math , we can obtain a PTAS. In particular, under this assumption, for any @math we achieve a @math -approximation to the @math -means optimal in time polynomial in @math and @math , and exponential in @math and @math . We thus decouple the strength of the assumption from the quality of the approximation ratio. We also give a PTAS for the @math -median problem in finite metrics under the analogous assumption as well. For @math -means, we in addition give a randomized algorithm with improved running time of @math . Our technique also obtains a PTAS under the assumption of that all @math approximations are @math -close to a desired target clustering, in the case that all target clusters have size greater than @math and @math is constant. Note that the motivation of is that for many clustering problems, the objective function is only a proxy for the true goal of getting close to the target. From this perspective, our improvement is that for @math -means in Euclidean spaces we reduce the distance of the clustering found to the target from @math to @math when all target clusters are large, and for @math -median we improve the largeness'' condition needed in the work of to get exactly @math -close from @math to @math . Our results are based on a new notion of clustering stability. We consider the problem of clustering a collection of elements based on pairwise judgments of similarity and dissimilarity. N. (2002) cast the problem thus: given a graph G whose edges are labeled "+" (similar) or "-" (dissimilar), partition the vertices into clusters so that the number of pairs correctly (resp. incorrectly) classified with respect to the input labeling is maximized (resp. minimized). Complete graphs, where the classifier labels every edge, and general graphs, where some edges are not labeled, are both worth studying. We answer several questions left open by N. (2002) and provide a sound overview of clustering with qualitative information. We give a factor 4 approximation for minimization on complete graphs, and a factor O(log n) approximation for general graphs. For the maximization version, a PTAS for complete graphs is shown by N. (2002); we give a factor 0.7664 approximation for general graphs, noting that a PTAS is unlikely by proving APX-hardness. We also prove the APX-hardness of minimization on complete graphs. The @math -Means clustering problem on @math points is NP-Hard for any dimension @math , however, for the 1D case there exists exact polynomial time algorithms. Previous literature reported an @math time dynamic programming algorithm that uses @math space. It turns out that the problem has been considered under a different name more than twenty years ago. We present all the existing work that had been overlooked and compare the various solutions theoretically. Moreover, we show how to reduce the space usage for some of them, as well as generalize them to data structures that can quickly report an optimal @math -Means clustering for any @math . Finally we also generalize all the algorithms to work for the absolute distance and to work for any Bregman Divergence. We complement our theoretical contributions by experiments that compare the practical performance of the various algorithms. par>We prove some non-approximability results for restrictions of basic combinatorial optimization problems to instances of bounded “degreeror bounded “width.” Specifically: We prove that the Max 3SAT problem on instances where each variable occurs in at most B clauses, is hard to approximate to within a factor @math , unless @math . H stad [18] proved that the problem is approximable to within a factor @math in polynomial time, and that is hard to approximate to within a factor @math . Our result uses a new randomized reduction from general instances of Max 3SAT to bounded-occurrences instances. The randomized reduction applies to other Max SNP problems as well. We observe that the Set Cover problem on instances where each set has size at most B is hard to approximate to within a factor @math unless @math . The result follows from an appropriate setting of parameters in Feige's reduction [11]. This is essentially tight in light of the existence of @math -approximate algorithms [20, 23, 9] We present a new PCP construction, based on applying parallel repetition to the inner verifier,'' and we provide a tight analysis for it. Using the new construction, and some modifications to known reductions from PCP to Hitting Set, we prove that Hitting Set with sets of size B is hard to approximate to within a factor @math . The problem can be approximated to within a factor B [19], and it is the Vertex Cover problem for B =2. The relationship between hardness of approximation and set size seems to have not been explored before. We observe that the Independent Set problem on graphs having degree at most B is hard to approximate to within a factor @math , unless P = NP . This follows from a comination of results by Clementi and Trevisan [28] and Reingold, Vadhan and Wigderson [27]. It had been observed that the problem is hard to approximate to within a factor @math unless P = NP [1]. An algorithm achieving factor @math is also known [21, 2, 30, 16 .