With social media becoming increasingly pop-ular on which lots of news and real-time eventsare reported, developing automated questionanswering systems is critical to the effective-ness of many applications that rely on real-time knowledge. While previous datasets haveconcentrated on question answering (QA) forformal text like news and Wikipedia, wepresent the first large-scale dataset for QA oversocial media data. To ensure that the tweetswe collected are useful, we only gather tweetsused by journalists to write news articles. Wethen ask human annotators to write questionsand answers upon these tweets. Unlike otherQA datasets like SQuAD in which the answersare extractive, we allow the answers to be ab-stractive. We show that two recently proposedneural models that perform well on formaltexts are limited in their performance when ap-plied to our dataset. In addition, even the fine-tuned BERT model is still lagging behind hu-man performance with a large margin. Our re-sults thus point to the need of improved QAsystems targeting social media text.
Traditional core NLP research typically focuses on English newswire datasets such as the Penn Treebank @cite_12 . In recent years, with the increasing usage of social media platforms, several NLP techniques and datasets for processing social media text have been proposed. For example, build a Twitter part-of-speech tagger based on 1,827 manually annotated tweets. annotated 800 tweets, and performed an empirical study for part-of-speech tagging and chunking on a new Twitter dataset. They also investigated the task of Twitter Named Entity Recognition, utilizing a dataset of 2,400 annotated tweets. annotated 929 tweets, and built the first dependency parser for tweets, whereas built the Chinese counterpart based on 1,000 annotated Weibo posts. To the best of our knowledge, question answering and reading comprehension over short and noisy social media data are rarely studied in NLP, and our annotated dataset is also an order of magnitude large than the above public social-media datasets.
@cite_12
2153848201 2740582239 2250493512 2294875610
People tweet more than 100 Million times daily, yielding a noisy, informal, but sometimes informative corpus of 140-character messages that mirrors the zeitgeist in an unprecedented manner. The performance of standard NLP tools is severely degraded on tweets. This paper addresses this issue by re-building the NLP pipeline beginning with part-of-speech tagging, through chunking, to named-entity recognition. Our novel T-ner system doubles F1 score compared with the Stanford NER system. T-ner leverages the redundancy inherent in tweets to achieve this performance, using LabeledLDA to exploit Freebase dictionaries as a source of distant supervision. LabeledLDA outperforms co-training, increasing F1 by 25 over ten common entity types. Our NLP tools are available at: http: github.com aritter twitter_nlp NLP tasks are often limited by scarcity of manually annotated data. In social media sentiment analysis and related tasks, researchers have therefore used binarized emoticons and specific hashtags as forms of distant supervision. Our paper shows that by extending the distant supervision to a more diverse set of noisy labels, the models can learn richer representations. Through emoji prediction on a dataset of 1246 million tweets containing one of 64 common emojis we obtain state-of-the-art performance on 8 benchmark datasets within sentiment, emotion and sarcasm detection using a single pretrained model. Our analyses confirm that the diversity of our emotional labels yield a performance improvement over previous distant supervision approaches. In natural language processing (NLP) annotation projects, we use inter-annotator agreement measures and annotation guidelines to ensure consistent annotations. However, annotation guidelines often make linguistically debatable and even somewhat arbitrary decisions, and interannotator agreement is often less than perfect. While annotation projects usually specify how to deal with linguistically debatable phenomena, annotator disagreements typically still stem from these “hard” cases. This indicates that some errors are more debatable than others. In this paper, we use small samples of doublyannotated part-of-speech (POS) data for Twitter to estimate annotation reliability and show how those metrics of likely interannotator agreement can be implemented in the loss functions of POS taggers. We find that these cost-sensitive algorithms perform better across annotation projects and, more surprisingly, even on data annotated according to the same guidelines. Finally, we show that POS tagging models sensitive to inter-annotator agreement perform better on the downstream task of chunking. In a separate study, we were interested in understanding people's Q&A habits on Twitter. Finding questions within Twitter turned out to be a difficult challenge, so we considered applying some traditional NLP approaches to the problem. On the one hand, Twitter is full of idiosyncrasies, which make processing it difficult. On the other it is very restricted in length and tends to employ simple syntactic constructions, which could help the performance of NLP processing. In order to find out the viability of NLP and Twitter, we built a pipeline of tools to work specifically with Twitter input for the task of finding questions in tweets. This work is still preliminary, but in this paper we discuss the techniques we used and the lessons we learned.