Deep neural networks (DNNs) have shown phenomenal success in a wide range of applications. However, recent studies have discovered that they are vulnerable to Adversarial Examples, i.e., original samples with added subtle perturbations. Such perturbations are often too small and imperceptible to humans, yet they can easily fool the neural networks. Few defense techniques against adversarial examples have been proposed, but they require modifying the target model or prior knowledge of adversarial examples generation methods. Likewise, their performance remarkably drops upon encountering adversarial example types not used during the training stage. In this paper, we propose a new framework that can be used to enhance DNNs' robustness by detecting adversarial examples. In particular, we employ the decision layer of independently trained models as features for posterior detection. The proposed framework doesn't require any prior knowledge of adversarial examples generation techniques, and can be directly augmented with unmodified off-the-shelf models. Experiments on the standard MNIST and CIFAR10 datasets show that it generalizes well across not only different adversarial examples generation methods but also various additive perturbations. Specifically, distinct binary classifiers trained on top of our proposed features can achieve a high detection rate (>90 ) in a set of white-box attacks and maintain this performance when tested against unseen attacks.
Adversarial attacks (samples with adversarially-crafted small perturbations) have recently emerged as a significant threat to the deep learning techniques, thereby this finding may hinder the large scale adoption of DNNs-based systems in practical applications. There exists a number of methods to generate adversarial samples or adversarial examples (AEs) mainly based on the gradient of networks @cite_26 or solving optimization problems @cite_34 , and so on. Very few works have attempted to give scientific reasoning for the vulnerability phenomena of DNNs to AEs. For instance, authors in @cite_34 gave preliminary explanation that since the input space is densely populated by low-probability adversarial pockets, thus each point in the space is closer to many AEs. These AEs points can be easily doctored to attain the desired model outcome. In turn, Goodfellow @cite_26 argued that linear nature of DNNs-based classifiers is the main source of vulnerability. While, the work in @cite_27 discussed boundary tilting'' view and argued that usually AEs lie in regions where the decision boundary is close to the manifold of training data.
@cite_27 @cite_26 @cite_34
2799031185 2964006983 2798302089 2759471388
In recent years, defending adversarial perturbations to natural examples in order to build robust machine learning models trained by deep neural networks (DNNs) has become an emerging research field in the conjunction of deep learning and security. In particular, MagNet consisting of an adversary detector and a data reformer is by far one of the strongest defenses in the black-box oblivious attack setting, where the attacker aims to craft transferable adversarial examples from an undefended DNN model to bypass an unknown defense module deployed on the same DNN model. Under this setting, MagNet can successfully defend a variety of attacks in DNNs, including the high-confidence adversarial examples generated by the Carlini and Wagner's attack based on the @math distortion metric. However, in this paper, under the same attack setting we show that adversarial examples crafted based on the @math distortion metric can easily bypass MagNet and mislead the target DNN image classifiers on MNIST and CIFAR-10. We also provide explanations on why the considered approach can yield adversarial examples with superior attack performance and conduct extensive experiments on variants of MagNet to verify its lack of robustness to @math distortion based attacks. Notably, our results substantially weaken the assumption of effective threat models on MagNet that require knowing the deployed defense technique when attacking DNNs (i.e., the gray-box attack setting). Recent research has revealed that the output of Deep Neural Networks (DNN) can be easily altered by adding relatively small perturbations to the input vector. In this paper, we analyze an attack in an extremely limited scenario where only one pixel can be modified. For that we propose a novel method for generating one-pixel adversarial perturbations based on differential evolution(DE). It requires less adversarial information(a black-box attack) and can fool more types of networks due to the inherent features of DE. The results show that 68.36 of the natural images in CIFAR-10 test dataset and 41.22 of the ImageNet (ILSVRC 2012) validation images can be perturbed to at least one target class by modifying just one pixel with 73.22 and 5.52 confidence on average. Thus, the proposed attack explores a different take on adversarial machine learning in an extreme limited scenario, showing that current DNNs are also vulnerable to such low dimension attacks. Besides, we also illustrate an important application of DE (or broadly speaking, evolutionary computation) in the domain of adversarial machine learning: creating tools that can effectively generate low-cost adversarial attacks against neural networks for evaluating robustness. Recent studies show that the state-of-the-art deep neural networks (DNNs) are vulnerable to adversarial examples, resulting from small-magnitude perturbations added to the input. Given that that emerging physical systems are using DNNs in safety-critical situations, adversarial examples could mislead these systems and cause dangerous situations. Therefore, understanding adversarial examples in the physical world is an important step towards developing resilient learning algorithms. We propose a general attack algorithm, Robust Physical Perturbations (RP2), to generate robust visual adversarial perturbations under different physical conditions. Using the real-world case of road sign classification, we show that adversarial examples generated using RP2 achieve high targeted misclassification rates against standard-architecture road sign classifiers in the physical world under various environmental conditions, including viewpoints. Due to the current lack of a standardized testing method, we propose a two-stage evaluation methodology for robust physical adversarial examples consisting of lab and field tests. Using this methodology, we evaluate the efficacy of physical adversarial manipulations on real objects. With a perturbation in the form of only black and white stickers, we attack a real stop sign, causing targeted misclassification in 100 of the images obtained in lab settings, and in 84.8 of the captured video frames obtained on a moving vehicle (field test) for the target classifier. Recent studies show that the state-of-the-art deep neural networks (DNNs) are vulnerable to adversarial examples, resulting from small-magnitude perturbations added to the input. Given that that emerging physical systems are using DNNs in safety-critical situations, adversarial examples could mislead these systems and cause dangerous situations.Therefore, understanding adversarial examples in the physical world is an important step towards developing resilient learning algorithms. We propose a general attack algorithm,Robust Physical Perturbations (RP2), to generate robust visual adversarial perturbations under different physical conditions. Using the real-world case of road sign classification, we show that adversarial examples generated using RP2 achieve high targeted misclassification rates against standard-architecture road sign classifiers in the physical world under various environmental conditions, including viewpoints. Due to the current lack of a standardized testing method, we propose a two-stage evaluation methodology for robust physical adversarial examples consisting of lab and field tests. Using this methodology, we evaluate the efficacy of physical adversarial manipulations on real objects. Witha perturbation in the form of only black and white stickers,we attack a real stop sign, causing targeted misclassification in 100 of the images obtained in lab settings, and in 84.8 of the captured video frames obtained on a moving vehicle(field test) for the target classifier.