Inverse classification is the process of manipulating an instance such that it is more likely to conform to a specific class. Past methods that address such a problem have shortcomings. Greedy methods make changes that are overly radical, often relying on data that is strictly discrete. Other methods rely on certain data points, the presence of which cannot be guaranteed. In this paper we propose a general framework and method that overcomes these and other limitations. The formulation of our method uses any differentiable classification function. We demonstrate the method by using Gaussian kernel SVMs. We constrain the inverse classification to occur on features that can actually be changed, each of which incurs an individual cost. We further subject such changes to fall within a certain level of cumulative change (budget). Our framework can also accommodate the estimation of features whose values change as a consequence of actions taken (indirectly changeable features). Furthermore, we propose two methods for specifying feature-value ranges that result in different algorithmic behavior. We apply our method, and a proposed sensitivity analysis-based benchmark method, to two freely available datasets: Student Performance, from the UCI Machine Learning Repository and a real-world cardiovascular disease dataset. The results obtained demonstrate the validity and benefits of our framework and method.
Past works on inverse classification can be looked at from three perspectives: the manner in which the algorithm operates, the type of data the algorithm operates on, and the framework that guides the process of obtaining recommendations. Algorithm operation, which represents the optimization method employed, can be broken down into two groups: @cite_11 @cite_23 @cite_5 @cite_2 and @cite_7 @cite_4 . Greedy methods tend to focus on extreme objectives, which may not be realistic in the real world, while nongreedy methods tend to focus on more moderate objectives. This work uses the latter.
@cite_4 @cite_7 @cite_23 @cite_2 @cite_5 @cite_11
2065312988 2112993448 165387623 2169847772
We propose a methodology that uses data envelopment analysis (DEA) for solving the inverse classification problem. An inverse classification problem involves finding out how predictor attributes of a case can be changed so that the case can be classified into a different and more desirable class. For a binary classification problem and non-negative decision-making attributes, we show that under the assumption of conditional monotonicity, and convexity of classes, DEA can be used for inverse classification problem. We illustrate the application of our proposed methodology on a hypothetical and a real-life bankruptcy prediction data. Many methods have been proposed to solve the image classification problem for a large number of categories. Among them, methods based on tree-based representations achieve good trade-off between accuracy and test time efficiency. While focusing on learning a tree-shaped hierarchy and the corresponding set of classifiers, most of them [11, 2, 14] use a greedy prediction algorithm for test time efficiency. We argue that the dramatic decrease in accuracy at high efficiency is caused by the specific design choice of the learning and greedy prediction algorithms. In this work, we propose a classifier which achieves a better trade-off between efficiency and accuracy with a given tree-shaped hierarchy. First, we convert the classification problem as finding the best path in the hierarchy, and a novel branch-and-bound-like algorithm is introduced to efficiently search for the best path. Second, we jointly train the classifiers using a novel Structured SVM (SSVM) formulation with additional bound constraints. As a result, our method achieves a significant 4.65 , 5.43 , and 4.07 (relative 24.82 , 41.64 , and 109.79 ) improvement in accuracy at high efficiency compared to state-of-the-art greedy "tree-based" methods [14] on Caltech-256 [15], SUN [32] and Image Net 1K [9] dataset, respectively. Finally, we show that our branch-and-bound-like algorithm naturally ranks the paths in the hierarchy (Fig. 8) so that users can further process them. We propose a general dual-fitting technique for analyzing online scheduling algorithms in the unrelated machines setting where the objective function involves weighted flow-time, and we allow the machines of the on-line algorithm to have (1 + e)-extra speed than the offline optimum (the so-called speed augmentation model). Typically, such algorithms are analyzed using non-trivial potential functions which yield little insight into the proof technique. We propose that one can often analyze such algorithms by looking at the dual (or Lagrangian dual) of the linear (or convex) program for the corresponding scheduling problem, and finding a feasible dual solution as the on-line algorithm proceeds. As representative cases, we get the following results: • For the problem of minimizing weighted flow-time, we give an O (1 e)-competitive greedy algorithm. This is an improvement by a factor of 1 e on the competitive ratio of the greedy algorithm of Chadha-Garg-Kumar-Muralidhara. • For the problem of minimizing weighted lk norm of flow-time, we show that a greedy algorithm gives an O (1 e)-competitive ratio. This marginally improves the result of Im and Moseley. • For the problem of minimizing weighted flow-time plus energy, and when the energy function f(s) is equal to sγ, γ > 1, we show that a natural greedy algorithm is O(γ2)-competitive. Prior to our work, such a result was known for the related machines setting only (Gupta-Krishnaswamy-Pruhs). This work addresses graph-based semi-supervised classification and betweenness computation in large, sparse, networks (several millions of nodes). The objective of semi-supervised classification is to assign a label to unlabeled nodes using the whole topology of the graph and the labeling at our disposal. Two approaches are developed to avoid explicit computation of pairwise proximity between the nodes of the graph, which would be impractical for graphs containing millions of nodes. The first approach directly computes, for each class, the sum of the similarities between the nodes to classify and the labeled nodes of the class, as suggested initially in [1,2]. Along this approach, two algorithms exploiting different state-of-the-art kernels on a graph are developed. The same strategy can also be used in order to compute a betweenness measure. The second approach works on a trellis structure built from biased random walks on the graph, extending an idea introduced in [3]. These random walks allow to define a biased bounded betweenness for the nodes of interest, defined separately for each class. All the proposed algorithms have a linear computing time in the number of edges while providing good results, and hence are applicable to large sparse networks. They are empirically validated on medium-size standard data sets and are shown to be competitive with state-of-the-art techniques. Finally, we processed a novel data set, which is made available for benchmarking, for multi-class classification in a large network: the U.S. patents citation network containing 3M nodes (of six different classes) and 38M edges. The three proposed algorithms achieve competitive results (around 85 classification rate) on this large network-they classify the unlabeled nodes within a few minutes on a standard workstation.