We study the problem of obtaining deterministic black-box polynomial identity testing algorithms (PIT) for algebraic branching programs (ABPs) that are read-once and oblivious. This class has an deterministic white-box polynomial identity testing algorithm (due to Raz and Shpilka), but prior to this work there was no known such black-box algorithm. The main result of this work gives the first quasi-polynomial sized hitting sets for size S circuits from this class, when the order of the variables is known. As our hitting set is of size exp(lg^2 S), this is analogous (in the terminology of boolean pseudorandomness) to a seed-length of lg^2 S, which is the seed length of the pseudorandom generators of Nisan and Impagliazzo-Nisan-Wigderson for read-once oblivious boolean branching programs. Our results are stronger for branching programs of bounded width, where we give a hitting set of size exp(lg^2 S lglg S), corresponding to a seed length of lg^2 S lglg S. This is in stark contrast to the known results for read-once oblivious boolean branching programs of bounded width, where no pseudorandom generator (or hitting set) with seed length o(lg^2 S) is known. In follow up work, we strengthened a result of Mulmuley, and showed that derandomizing a particular case of the Noether Normalization Lemma is reducible to black-box PIT of read-once oblivious ABPs. Using the results of the present work, this gives a derandomization of Noether Normalization in that case, which Mulmuley conjectured would difficult due to its relations to problems in algebraic geometry. We also show that several other circuit classes can be black-box reduced to read-once oblivious ABPs, including set-multilinear ABPs (a generalization of depth-3 set-multilinear formulas), non-commutative ABPs (generalizing non-commutative formulas), and (semi-)diagonal depth-4 circuits (as introduced by Saxena).
We note that in the aforementioned @cite_54 , the authors showed how to deterministically learn sparse non-commutative polynomials in time polynomial in the number of variables, degree and sparsity. In contrast, for such polynomials our deterministic algorithm requires quasi-polynomial time. For general non-commutative ABPs @cite_54 also obtained a deterministic polynomial time learning algorithm, but here they need to have the ability to query the ABP also at internal nodes and not just at the output node. Our deterministic algorithm runs in quasi-polynomial time but it does not need to query the ABP at intermediate computations.
@cite_54
2606436810 2122213509 1562749094 2103860626
In this paper we present a deterministic polynomial time algorithm for testing if a symbolic matrix in non-commuting variables over @math is invertible or not. The analogous question for commuting variables is the celebrated polynomial identity testing (PIT) for symbolic determinants. In contrast to the commutative case, which has an efficient probabilistic algorithm, the best previous algorithm for the non-commutative setting required exponential time (whether or not randomization is allowed). The algorithm efficiently solves the "word problem" for the free skew field, and the identity testing problem for arithmetic formulae with division over non-commuting variables, two problems which had only exponential-time algorithms prior to this work. The main contribution of this paper is a complexity analysis of an existing algorithm due to Gurvits, who proved it was polynomial time for certain classes of inputs. We prove it always runs in polynomial time. The main component of our analysis is a simple (given the necessary known tools) lower bound on central notion of capacity of operators (introduced by Gurvits). We extend the algorithm to actually approximate capacity to any accuracy in polynomial time, and use this analysis to give quantitative bounds on the continuity of capacity (the latter is used in a subsequent paper on Brascamp-Lieb inequalities). Symbolic matrices in non-commuting variables, and the related structural and algorithmic questions, have a remarkable number of diverse origins and motivations. They arise independently in (commutative) invariant theory and representation theory, linear algebra, optimization, linear system theory, quantum information theory, approximation of the permanent and naturally in non-commutative algebra. We provide a detailed account of some of these sources and their interconnections. Using ideas from automata theory we design a new efficient (deterministic) identity test for the noncommutative polynomial identity testing problem (first introduced and studied in [RS05, BW05]). More precisely, given as input a noncommutative circuit C x1, ldrldrldr , xn computing a polynomial in F x1, ldrldrldr , xn of degree d with at most t monomials, where the variables xi are noncommuting, we give a deterministic polynomial identity test that checks if C equiv 0 and runs in time polynomial in d, n, |C|, and t. The same methods works in a black-box setting: given a noncommuting black-box polynomial f isin F x1, ldrldrldr , xn of degree d with t monomials we can, in fact, reconstruct the entire polynomial f in time polynomial in n, d and t. Indeed, we apply this idea to the reconstruction of black-box noncommuting algebraic branching programs (the ABPs considered by Nisan in [N91] and Raz-Shpilka in [RS05]). Assuming that the black-box model allows us to query the ABP for the output at any given gate then we can reconstruct an (equivalent) ABP in deterministic polynomial time. Finally, we turn to commutative identity testing and explore the complexity of the problem when the coefficients of the input polynomial come from an arbitrary finite commutative ring with unity whose elements are uniformly encoded as strings and the ring operations are given by an oracle. We show that several algorithmic results for polynomial identity testing over fields also hold when the coefficients come from such finite rings. In this paper we study polynomial identity testing of sums of @math read-once algebraic branching programs ( @math -RO-ABPs), generalizing the work in (Shpilka and Volkovich 2008,2009), who considered sums of @math read-once formulas ( @math -RO-formulas). We show that @math -RO-ABPs are strictly more powerful than @math -RO-formulas, for any @math , where @math is the number of variables. We obtain the following results: 1) Given free access to the RO-ABPs in the sum, we get a deterministic algorithm that runs in time @math , where @math bounds the size of any largest RO-ABP given on the input. This implies we have a deterministic polynomial time algorithm for testing whether the sum of a constant number of RO-ABPs computes the zero polynomial. 2) Given black-box access to the RO-ABPs computing the individual polynomials in the sum, we get a deterministic algorithm that runs in time @math . 3) Finally, given only black-box access to the polynomial computed by the sum of the @math RO-ABPs, we obtain an @math time deterministic algorithm. We give a deterministic polynomial time algorithm for polynomial identity testing in the following two cases: 1. Non commutative arithmetic formulas: the algorithm gets as an input an arithmetic formula in the non-commuting variables x sub i ,...,x sub n and determines whether or not the output of the formula is identically 0 (as a formal expression). 2. Pure arithmetic circuits: the algorithm gets as an input a pure arithmetic circuit (as defined by N. Nisan and A. Wigderson (1996)) in the variables x sub i ,...,x sub n and determines whether or not the output of the circuit is identically 0 (as a formal expression). We also give a deterministic polynomial time identity testing algorithm for non commutative algebraic branching programs as defined by N. Nisan (1991). One application is a deterministic polynomial time identity testing for multilinear arithmetic circuits of depth 3. Finally, we observe an exponential lower bound for the size of pure arithmetic circuits for the permanent and for the determinant. (Only lower bounds for the depth of pure circuits were previously known by N. Nisan and A. Wigderson (1996).