The class QMA(k), introduced by , consists of all languages that can be verified using k unentangled quantum proofs. Many of the simplest questions about this class have remained embarrassingly open: for example, can we give any evidence that k quantum proofs are more powerful than one? Does QMA(k)=QMA(2) for k>=2? Can QMA(k) protocols be amplified to exponentially small error? In this paper, we make progress on all of the above questions. First, we give a protocol by which a verifier can be convinced that a 3SAT formula of size n is satisfiable, with constant soundness, given O(sqrt(n)) unentangled quantum witnesses with O(log n) qubits each. Our protocol relies on the existence of very short PCPs. Second, we show that assuming a weak version of the Additivity Conjecture from quantum information theory, any QMA(2) protocol can be amplified to exponentially small error, and QMA(k)=QMA(2) for all k>=2. Third, we prove the nonexistence of "perfect disentanglers" for simulating multiple Merlins with one.
Third, Blier and Tapp @cite_17 recently (and independently of us) gave an interesting @math protocol for an @math -complete problem, namely @math . In this protocol, Arthur verifies that an @math -vertex graph @math is @math -colorable, using two unentangled witnesses with only @math qubits each. There is a crucial caveat, though: if @math is @math -colorable, then Arthur can only detect this with probability @math rather than constant probability. Indeed, if the soundness gap were constant rather than @math , then Blier and Tapp's protocol could presumably be scaled up by an exponential to show @math !
@cite_17
2528943279 2889042315 2078958987 2121696574
We study a one-parameter family of discrete dynamical systems called the @math -color firefly cellular automata (FCAs), which were introduced recently by the author. At each discrete time @math , each vertex in a graph has a state in @math , and a special state @math is designated as the blinking' state. At step @math , simultaneously for all vertices, the state of a vertex increments from @math to @math unless @math and at least one of its neighbors is in the state @math . A central question about this system is that on what class of network topologies synchrony is guaranteed to emerge. In a previous work, we have shown that for @math , every @math -coloring on a finite tree synchronizes iff the maximum degree is less than @math , and asked whether this behavior holds for all @math . In this paper, we answer the question positively for @math and negatively for all @math by constructing counterexamples on trees with maximum degree at most @math . Oliveira conjectured that the order of the mixing time of the exclusion process with @math -particles on an arbitrary @math -vertex graph is at most that of the mixing-time of @math independent particles. We verify this up to a constant factor for @math -regular graphs when each edge rings at rate @math in various cases: (1) when @math or (2) when @math the spectral-gap of a single walk is @math and @math or (3) when @math for some constant @math . In these cases our analysis yields a probabilistic proof of a weaker version of Aldous' famous spectral-gap conjecture (resolved by ). We also prove a general bound which is at worst @math , which is within a @math factor from Oliveira's conjecture when @math . As applications we get new mixing bounds: (a) @math for expanders, (b) order @math for the hypercube @math and (c) order @math for vertex-transitive graphs of moderate growth and for supercritical percolation on a fixed dimensional torus. In this paper, we provide a detailed comparison between a fully randomized protocol for rumor spreading on a complete graph and a quasirandom protocol introduced by Doerr, Friedrich, and Sauerwald [Quasirandom rumor spreading, in Proceedings of the 19th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, ACM, New York, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2008, pp. 773-781]. In the former, initially there is one vertex which holds a piece of information, and during each round every one of the informed vertices chooses uniformly at random and independently one of its neighbors and informs it. In the quasirandom version of this method (cf. Doerr, Friedrich, and Sauerwald) each vertex has a cyclic list of its neighbors. Once a vertex has been informed, it chooses uniformly at random only one neighbor. In the following round, it informs this neighbor, and at each subsequent round it picks the next neighbor from its list and informs it. We give a precise analysis of the evolution of the quasirandom protocol on the complete graph with @math vertices and show that it evolves essentially in the same way as the randomized protocol. In particular, if @math denotes the number of rounds that are needed until all vertices are informed, we show that for any slowly growing function @math , we have @math , with probability @math . Suppose in a graph G vertices can be either red or blue. Let k be odd. At each time step, each vertex v in G polls k random neighbours and takes the majority colour. If it does not have k neighbours, it simply polls all of them, or all less one if the degree of v is even. We study this protocol on graphs of a given degree sequence, in the following setting: initially each vertex of G is red independently with probability α < 1 2 , and is otherwise blue. We show that if α is sufficiently biased, then with high probability consensus is reached on the initial global majority within O ( log k log k n ) steps if 5 ? k ? d , and O ( log d log d n ) steps if k d . Here, d ? 5 is the effective minimum degree, the smallest integer which occurs ? ( n ) times in the degree sequence. We further show that on such graphs, any local protocol in which a vertex does not change colour if all its neighbours have that same colour, takes time at least ? ( log d log d n ) , with high probability. Additionally, we demonstrate how the technique for the above sparse graphs can be applied in a straightforward manner to get bounds for the Erd?s-Renyi random graphs in the connected regime.