Feature-based object matching is a fundamental problem for many applications in computer vision, such as object recognition, 3D reconstruction, tracking, and motion segmentation. In this work, we consider simultaneously matching object instances in a set of images, where both inlier and outlier features are extracted. The task is to identify the inlier features and establish their consistent correspondences across the image set. This is a challenging combinatorial problem, and the problem complexity grows exponentially with the image number. To this end, we propose a novel framework, termed ROML, to address this problem. ROML optimizes simultaneously a partial permutation matrix (PPM) for each image, and feature correspondences are established by the obtained PPMs. Two of our key contributions are summarized as follows. (1) We formulate the problem as rank and sparsity minimization for PPM optimization, and treat simultaneous optimization of multiple PPMs as a regularized consensus problem in the context of distributed optimization. (2) We use the ADMM method to solve the thus formulated ROML problem, in which a subproblem associated with a single PPM optimization appears to be a difficult integer quadratic program (IQP). We prove that under wildly applicable conditions, this IQP is equivalent to a linear sum assignment problem (LSAP), which can be efficiently solved to an exact solution. Extensive experiments on rigid non-rigid object matching, matching instances of a common object category, and common object localization show the efficacy of our proposed method.
Greedy approaches build a matching that has the lowest cost at each iteration, which has the obvious weakness that decisions once made, are fixed and may later be shown to be suboptimal. GRASP improves over greedy approaches by progressively constructing a list of best candidate matches and randomly selecting one from them. The process is repeated until all matches are exhausted. A final local search over the neighborhood of obtained matches may be used to further optimize the solution. In @cite_23 , Poore and Robertson presented a Lagrangian relaxation method that progressively relaxes the original and intermediate recovery MiAPs to linear assignment problems, by incorporating constraints of each MiAP into its objective function via the Lagrangian. However, this method involves implicitly enumerative procedure, and is difficult to implement and analyze.
@cite_23
2168324649 2605027943 2141499077 2107698341
When the Lagrangian relaxation based methods are applied to solve power system unit commitment, the identical solutions to the subproblems associated with identical units may cause the dual solution to be far away from the optimal solution and serious solution oscillations. As a result, the quality of the feasible solution obtained may be very unsatisfactory. This issue has been long recognized as an inherent disadvantage of Lagrangian relaxation based methods. In this paper, the homogeneous solution issue is identified and analyzed through a simple example. Based on this analysis, a successive subproblem solving method is developed. The new method combines the concepts of augmented Lagrangian relaxation and surrogate subgradient to produce a good search direction at the high level. The low level subproblems including those corresponding to the identical units are solved successively so that the commitments of the identical units may not be homogeneous in the dual solution. Compared with the standard Lagrangian relaxation method, the new method can obtain better dual solutions and avoid the solution oscillations. Numerical testing shows the new method is efficient and the quality of the feasible solution is greatly improved. Copyright © 2017, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (www.aaai.org). All rights reserved. Motivated by the fact that in several cases a matching in a graph is stable if and only if it is produced by a greedy algorithm, we study the problem of computing a maximum weight greedy matching on weighted graphs, termed GREEDY-MATCHING. In wide contrast to the maximum weight matching problem, for which many efficient algorithms are known, we prove that GREEDYMATCHING is strongly NP-hard and APX-complete, and thus it does not admit a PTAS unless P=NP, even on graphs with maximum degree at most 3 and with at most three different integer edge weights. Furthermore we prove that GREEDYMATCHING is strongly NP-hard if the input graph is in addition bipartite. Moreover we consider three natural parameters of the problem, for which we establish a sharp threshold behavior between NP-hardness and computational tractability. On the positive side, we present a randomized approximation algorithm (RGMA) for GREEDYMATCHING on a special class of weighted graphs, called bush graphs. We highlight an unexpected connection between RGMA and the approximation of maximum cardinality matching in unweighted graphs via randomized greedy algorithms. We show that, if the approximation ratio of RGMA is θ, then for every ϵ > 0 the randomized MRG algorithm of ( 1995) gives a (ρ - ϵ)-approximation for the maximum cardinality matching. We conjecture that a tight bound for ρ is 2 3; we prove our conjecture true for four subclasses of bush graphs. Proving a tight bound for the approximation ratio of MRG on unweighted graphs (and thus also proving a tight value for ρ) is a long-standing open problem (Poloczek and Szegedy 2012). This unexpected relation of our RGMA algorithm with the MRG algorithm may provide new insights for solving this problem. The random assignment problem asks for the minimum-cost perfect matching in the complete n × n bipartite graph Knn with i.i.d. edge weights, say uniform on [0, 1]. In a remarkable work by Aldous [Aldous, D. 2001. The ζ(2) limit in the random assignment problem. RSA18 381--418], the optimal cost was shown to converge to ζ(2) as n → ∞, as conjectured by Mezard and Parisi [Mezard, M., G. Parisi. 1987. On the solution of the random link matching problem. J. Phys.48 1451--1459] through the so-called cavity method. The latter also suggested a nonrigorous decentralized strategy for finding the optimum, which turned out to be an instance of the belief propagation (BP) heuristic discussed by Pearl [Pearl, J. 1988. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco]. In this paper we use the objective method to analyze the performance of BP as the size of the underlying graph becomes large. Specifically, we establish that the dynamic of BP on Knn converges in distribution as n → ∞ to an appropriately defined dynamic on the Poisson weighted infinite tree, and we then prove correlation decay for this limiting dynamic. As a consequence, we obtain that BP finds an asymptotically correct assignment in O(n2) time only. This contrasts with both the worst-case upper bound for convergence of BP derived by [Bayati, M., D. Shah, M. Sharma. 2008. Max-product for maximum weight matching: Convergence, correctness, and LP duality. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory54(3) 1241--1251.] and the best-known computational cost of Θ(n3) achieved by Edmonds and Karp's algorithm [Edmonds, J., R. Karp. 1972. Theoretical improvements in algorithmic efficiency for network flow problems. J. ACM19 248--264]. Motivated by online advertisement and exchange settings, greedy randomized algorithms for the maximum matching problem have been studied, in which the algorithm makes (random) decisions that are essentially oblivious to the input graph. Any greedy algorithm can achieve performance ratio 0.5, which is the expected number of matched nodes to the number of nodes in a maximum matching. Since Aronson, Dyer, Frieze and Suen proved that the Modified Randomized Greedy algorithm achieves performance ratio 0.5 + e (where e = 1 400000) on arbitrary graphs in the mid-nineties, no further attempts in the literature have been made to improve this theoretical ratio for arbitrary graphs until two papers were published in FOCS 2012. In this paper, we revisit the Ranking algorithm using the LP framework. Special care is given to analyze the structural properties of the Ranking algorithm in order to derive the LP constraints, of which one known as the boundary constraint requires totally new analysis and is crucial to the success of our LP. We use continuous LP relaxation to analyze the limiting behavior as the finite LP grows. Of particular interest are new duality and complementary slackness characterizations that can handle the monotone and the boundary constraints in continuous LP. Our work achieves the currently best theoretical performance ratio of [EQUATION] on arbitrary graphs. Moreover, experiments suggest that Ranking cannot perform better than 0.724 in general.