In this paper we propose an edge-direct visual odometry algorithm that efficiently utilizes edge pixels to find the relative pose that minimizes the photometric error between images. Prior work on exploiting edge pixels instead treats edges as features and employ various techniques to match edge lines or pixels, which adds unnecessary complexity. Direct methods typically operate on all pixel intensities, which proves to be highly redundant. In contrast our method builds on direct visual odometry methods naturally with minimal added computation. It is not only more efficient than direct dense methods since we iterate with a fraction of the pixels, but also more accurate. We achieve high accuracy and efficiency by extracting edges from only one image, and utilize robust Gauss-Newton to minimize the photometric error of these edge pixels. This simultaneously finds the edge pixels in the reference image, as well as the relative camera pose that minimizes the photometric error. We test various edge detectors, including learned edges, and determine that the optimal edge detector for this method is the Canny edge detection algorithm using automatic thresholding. We highlight key differences between our edge direct method and direct dense methods, in particular how higher levels of image pyramids can lead to significant aliasing effects and result in incorrect solution convergence. We show experimentally that reducing the photometric error of edge pixels also reduces the photometric error of all pixels, and we show through an ablation study the increase in accuracy obtained by optimizing edge pixels only. We evaluate our method on the RGB-D TUM benchmark on which we achieve state-of-the-art performance.
The extension of direct methods using edge pixels is a logical direction, yet to the best of our knowledge no work has solely used edge pixels in a direct method minimizing the photometric error. @cite_18 the authors reduce a Euclidean geometric error using the distance transform on edges which does not utilize all information available in the scene. @cite_0 the authors minimize a joint error function combining photometric error over all pixels along with geometric error over edge pixels. Minimizing a joint error function always suffers from the decision on how best to weight each function, and the weighting can have significant effect on the final converged solution. @cite_10 , the authors threshold by gradients, which does not guarantee edges due to noise. They additionally select texture-less regions as well.
@cite_0 @cite_18 @cite_10
2064451896 2061052400 2334682945 2006227471
In this paper, we propose a dense visual SLAM method for RGB-D cameras that minimizes both the photometric and the depth error over all pixels. In contrast to sparse, feature-based methods, this allows us to better exploit the available information in the image data which leads to higher pose accuracy. Furthermore, we propose an entropy-based similarity measure for keyframe selection and loop closure detection. From all successful matches, we build up a graph that we optimize using the g2o framework. We evaluated our approach extensively on publicly available benchmark datasets, and found that it performs well in scenes with low texture as well as low structure. In direct comparison to several state-of-the-art methods, our approach yields a significantly lower trajectory error. We release our software as open-source. We present a new image editing method, particularly effective for sharpening major edges by increasing the steepness of transition while eliminating a manageable degree of low-amplitude structures. The seemingly contradictive effect is achieved in an optimization framework making use of L0 gradient minimization, which can globally control how many non-zero gradients are resulted in to approximate prominent structure in a sparsity-control manner. Unlike other edge-preserving smoothing approaches, our method does not depend on local features, but instead globally locates important edges. It, as a fundamental tool, finds many applications and is particularly beneficial to edge extraction, clip-art JPEG artifact removal, and non-photorealistic effect generation. The paper addresses the problem of camera tracking, which denotes the continuous image-based computation of a camera’s position and orientation with respect to a reference frame. The method aims at regular cameras, which means that 3D-3D registration methods applicable to RGB-D cameras are not an option. The tracked frame contains only 2D information, thus requiring a solution to the absolute pose or 2D-3D registration problem. While traditional solutions to camera tracking [3] rely on sparse feature correspondences, the community has recently seen a number of direct photometric registration methods such as [8] and [1]. [1] is conceptually similar to [8], however gains computational efficiency by reducing the computation from dense to semi-dense regions that correspond to a thresholded edge-map of the image. Photometric methods have the more general advantage of compensating for appearance variations caused by perspective view-point changes, whereas classical sparse methods often rely on static feature descriptors only (providing at most rotation and scale invariant properties [5, 6]). However, photometric registration techniques inherently suffer from the disability to overcome large disparities, where large sometimes means even just a couple of pixels [7]. Many photometric registration techniques therefore depend on pyramidal subsampling schemes in order to alleviate this problem. The goal of the present paper is a novel 2D-3D registration paradigm for semi-dense depth maps that relies on the Iterative Closest Point (ICP) technique, and thus a reintroduction of geometric error minimization as a valid alternative for real-time monocular camera tracking in the case of semi-dense features. An example semi-dense depth map is indicated in Figure 1. In comparison to photometric registration techniques, our ICP technique has the conceptual advantage of requiring neither isotropic enlargement of the employed semi-dense regions, nor pyramidal subsampling. The work is in line with [2], Tomono [9], and Klein and Murray [4], which already attempt curve or edge registration in 2D using ICP. Based on a hypothesized relative pose, the basic idea consists of warping a reference curve into the tracked image based on a prior 3D model or depth (in our case semi-dense) inside a reference frame. From a mathematical point of view, our idea may be formulated as follows. Let In this article, we introduce a new global optimization method to the field of multiview 3D reconstruction. While global minimization has been proposed in a discrete formulation in form of the maxflow-mincut framework, we suggest the use of a continuous convex relaxation scheme. Specifically, we propose to cast the problem of 3D shape reconstruction as one of minimizing a spatially continuous convex functional. In qualitative and quantitative evaluation we demonstrate several advantages of the proposed continuous formulation over the discrete graph cut solution. Firstly, geometric properties such as weighted boundary length and surface area are represented in a numerically consistent manner: The continuous convex relaxation assures that the algorithm does not suffer from metrication errors in the sense that the reconstruction converges to the continuous solution as the spatial resolution is increased. Moreover, memory requirements are reduced, allowing for globally optimal reconstructions at higher resolutions. We study three different energy models for multiview reconstruction, which are based on a common variational template unifying regional volumetric terms and on-surface photoconsistency. The three models use data measurements at increasing levels of sophistication. While the first two approaches are based on a classical silhouette-based volume subdivision, the third one relies on stereo information to define regional costs. Furthermore, this scheme is exploited to compute a precise photoconsistency measure as opposed to the classical estimation. All three models are compared on standard data sets demonstrating their advantages and shortcomings. For the third one, which gives the most accurate results, a more exhaustive qualitative and quantitative evaluation is presented.