We show that the ratio of matched individuals to blocking pairs grows linearly with the number of propose–accept rounds executed by the Gale–Shapley algorithm for the stable marriage problem. Consequently, the participants can arrive at an almost stable matching even without full information about the problem instance; for each participant, knowing only its local neighbourhood is enough. In distributed-systems parlance, this means that if each person has only a constant number of acceptable partners, an almost stable matching emerges after a constant number of synchronous communication rounds. We apply our results to give a distributed (2+e)-approximation algorithm for maximum-weight matching in bicoloured graphs and a centralised randomised constant-time approximation scheme for estimating the size of a stable matching.
Our centralised constant-time approximation algorithm in Theorem is based on the ideas of Parnas and Ron @cite_9 and Nguyen and Onak @cite_21 . Their work presents constant-time approximation algorithms for estimating the size of a maximal matching, maximum-cardinality matching, and maximum-weight matching. Our work complements this line of research by presenting an algorithm for estimating the size of a stable matching.
@cite_9 @cite_21
2768321248 2019340823 1563534733 2109330224
We present a simple randomized reduction from fully-dynamic integral matching algorithms to fully-dynamic approximately-maximal" fractional matching algorithms. Applying this reduction to the recent fractional matching algorithm of Bhattacharya, Henzinger, and Nanongkai (SODA 2017), we obtain a novel result for the integral problem. Specifically, our main result is a randomized fully-dynamic @math -approximate integral matching algorithm with small polylog worst-case update time. For the @math -approximation regime only a fractional fully-dynamic @math -matching algorithm with worst-case polylog update time was previously known, due to (SODA 2017). Our algorithm is the first algorithm that maintains approximate matchings with worst-case update time better than polynomial, for any constant approximation ratio. We give a 3 2 -approximation algorithm for finding stable matchings that runs in O(m) time. The previous most well-known algorithm, by McDermid, has the same approximation ratio but runs in O(n3 2m) time, where n denotes the number of people andm is the total length of the preference lists in a given instance. In addition, the algorithm and the analysis are much simpler. We also give the extension of the algorithm for computing stable many-to-many matchings. In an instance of the stable marriage problem with ties and incomplete preference lists, stable matchings can have different sizes. It is APX-hard to compute a maximum cardinality stable matching, but there have recently been proposed polynomial-time approximation algorithms, with constant performance guarantees for both the general version of this problem, and for several special cases. Our contribution is to describe a @math -approximation algorithm for the general version of this problem, improving upon the recent @math -approximation algorithm of Kiraly. Interest in such algorithms arises because of the problem's application to centralized matching schemes, the best known of which involve the assignment of graduating medical students to hospitals in various countries. We present a technique for transforming classical approximation algorithms into constant-time algorithms that approximate the size of the optimal solution. Our technique is applicable to a certain subclass of algorithms that compute a solution in a constant number of phases. The technique is based on greedily considering local improvements in random order.The problems amenable to our technique include vertex cover, maximum matching, maximum weight matching, set cover, and minimum dominating set. For example, for maximum matching, we give the first constant-time algorithm that for the class of graphs of degree bounded by d, computes the maximum matching size to within epsivn, for any epsivn > 0, where n is the number of nodes in the graph. The running time of the algorithm is independent of n, and only depends on d and epsiv.