In recent years, with the popularization of deep learning frameworks and large datasets, researchers have started parallelizing their models in order to train faster. This is crucially important, because they typically explore many hyperparameters in order to find the best ones for their applications. This process is time consuming and, consequently, speeding up training improves productivity. One approach to parallelize deep learning models followed by many researchers is based on weak scaling. The minibatches increase in size as new GPUs are added to the system. In addition, new learning rates schedules have been proposed to fix optimization issues that occur with large minibatch sizes. In this paper, however, we show that the recommendations provided by recent work do not apply to models that lack large datasets. In fact, we argument in favor of using strong scaling for achieving reliable performance in such cases. We evaluated our approach with up to 32 GPUs and show that weak scaling not only does not have the same accuracy as the sequential model, it also fails to converge most of time. Meanwhile, strong scaling has good scalability while having exactly the same accuracy of a sequential implementation.
Tensorflow has also parallel execution capabilities built-in @cite_1 . In this framework, the programmer specifies a set of operations to be placed in the available devices. These devices can be processors and accelerators (GPUs and TPUs) that are distributed across a cluster of computers. A common strategy is to split the data and processing units into parameter servers and workers nodes. The parameter servers are responsible for holding the network weights and other parameters, while the workers are responsible for computing the forward and backward passes of the model.
@cite_1
2402144811 2953384591 1991315896 2155568054
TensorFlow is a machine learning system that operates at large scale and in heterogeneous environments. Tensor-Flow uses dataflow graphs to represent computation, shared state, and the operations that mutate that state. It maps the nodes of a dataflow graph across many machines in a cluster, and within a machine across multiple computational devices, including multicore CPUs, general-purpose GPUs, and custom-designed ASICs known as Tensor Processing Units (TPUs). This architecture gives flexibility to the application developer: whereas in previous "parameter server" designs the management of shared state is built into the system, TensorFlow enables developers to experiment with novel optimizations and training algorithms. TensorFlow supports a variety of applications, with a focus on training and inference on deep neural networks. Several Google services use TensorFlow in production, we have released it as an open-source project, and it has become widely used for machine learning research. In this paper, we describe the TensorFlow dataflow model and demonstrate the compelling performance that TensorFlow achieves for several real-world applications. TensorFlow is a machine learning system that operates at large scale and in heterogeneous environments. TensorFlow uses dataflow graphs to represent computation, shared state, and the operations that mutate that state. It maps the nodes of a dataflow graph across many machines in a cluster, and within a machine across multiple computational devices, including multicore CPUs, general-purpose GPUs, and custom designed ASICs known as Tensor Processing Units (TPUs). This architecture gives flexibility to the application developer: whereas in previous "parameter server" designs the management of shared state is built into the system, TensorFlow enables developers to experiment with novel optimizations and training algorithms. TensorFlow supports a variety of applications, with particularly strong support for training and inference on deep neural networks. Several Google services use TensorFlow in production, we have released it as an open-source project, and it has become widely used for machine learning research. In this paper, we describe the TensorFlow dataflow model in contrast to existing systems, and demonstrate the compelling performance that TensorFlow achieves for several real-world applications. In this paper, we propose a solution framework to enable the work sharing of parallel processing by the coordination of CPUs and GPUs on hybrid PC clusters based on the high-level parallel language XcalableMPdev. Basic XcalableMP enables high-level parallel programming using sequential code directives that support data distribution and loop task distribution among multiple nodes on a PC cluster. XcalableMP-dev is an extension of XcalableMP for a hybrid PC cluster, where each node is equipped with accelerated computing devices such as GPUs, many-core environments, etc. Our new framework proposed here, named XcalableMP-dev Star PU, enables the distribution of data and loop execution among multiple GPUs and multiple CPU cores on each node. We employ a Star PU run-time system for task management with dynamic load balancing. Because of the large performance gap between CPUs and GPUs, the key issue for work sharing among CPU and GPU resources is the task size control assigned to different devices. Since the compiler of the new system is still under construction, we evaluated the performance of hybrid work sharing among four nodes of a GPU cluster and confirmed that the performance gain by the traditional XcalableMP-dev system on NVIDIA CUDA is up to 1.4 times faster than GPU-only execution. Manycore accelerators such as graphics processor units (GPUs) organize processing units into single-instruction, multiple data “cores” to improve throughput per unit hardware cost. Programming models for these accelerators encourage applications to run kernels with large groups of parallel scalar threads. The hardware groups these threads into warps wavefronts and executes them in lockstep-dubbed single-instruction, multiple-thread (SIMT) by NVIDIA. While current GPUs employ a per-warp (or per-wavefront) stack to manage divergent control flow, it incurs decreased efficiency for applications with nested, data-dependent control flow. In this paper, we propose and evaluate the benefits of extending the sharing of resources in a block of warps, already used for scratchpad memory, to exploit control flow locality among threads (where such sharing may at first seem detrimental). In our proposal, warps within a thread block share a common block-wide stack for divergence handling. At a divergent branch, threads are compacted into new warps in hardware. Our simulation results show that this compaction mechanism provides an average speedup of 22 over a baseline per-warp, stack-based reconvergence mechanism, and 17 versus dynamic warp formation on a set of CUDA applications that suffer significantly from control flow divergence.