Semi-supervised learning (SSL) uses unlabeled data for training and has been shown to greatly improve performances when compared to a supervised approach on the labeled data available. This claim depends both on the amount of labeled data available and on the algorithm used. In this paper, we compute analytically the gap between the best fully-supervised approach on labeled data and the best semi-supervised approach using both labeled and unlabeled data. We quantify the best possible increase in performance obtained thanks to the unlabeled data, i.e. we compute the accuracy increase due to the information contained in the unlabeled data. Our work deals with a simple high-dimensional Gaussian mixture model for the data in a Bayesian setting. Our rigorous analysis builds on recent theoretical breakthroughs in high-dimensional inference and a large body of mathematical tools from statistical physics initially developed for spin glasses.
Using exact but non-rigorous methods from statistical physics, @cite_17 @cite_27 determines the critical values for @math and @math at which it becomes information-theoretically possible to reconstruct the membership into clusters better than chance. Rigorous results on this model are given in @cite_10 where bounds on the critical values are obtained. The precises thresholds were then determined in @cite_2 . Our analysis builds on the techniques derived in this last reference with two main modifications: additional work is required to compute the classification accuracy (as opposed to the mean squared error) and to incorporate the side information.
@cite_2 @cite_27 @cite_10 @cite_17
2531902758 2949962875 2964292545 2035265484
We consider the problem of Gaussian mixture clustering in the high-dimensional limit where the data consists of m points in n dimensions, n,m → ∞ and α = m n stays finite. Using exact but non-rigorous methods from statistical physics, we determine the critical value of α and the distance between the clusters at which it becomes information-theoretically possible to reconstruct the membership into clusters better than chance. We also determine the accuracy achievable by the Bayes-optimal estimation algorithm. In particular, we find that when the number of clusters is sufficiently large, r > 4+2√α, there is a gap between the threshold for information-theoretically optimal performance and the threshold at which known algorithms succeed. In sparse principal component analysis we are given noisy observations of a low-rank matrix of dimension @math and seek to reconstruct it under additional sparsity assumptions. In particular, we assume here each of the principal components @math has at most @math non-zero entries. We are particularly interested in the high dimensional regime wherein @math is comparable to, or even much larger than @math . In an influential paper, johnstone2004sparse introduced a simple algorithm that estimates the support of the principal vectors @math by the largest entries in the diagonal of the empirical covariance. This method can be shown to identify the correct support with high probability if @math , and to fail with high probability if @math for two constants @math . Despite a considerable amount of work over the last ten years, no practical algorithm exists with provably better support recovery guarantees. Here we analyze a covariance thresholding algorithm that was recently proposed by KrauthgamerSPCA . On the basis of numerical simulations (for the rank-one case), these authors conjectured that covariance thresholding correctly recover the support with high probability for @math (assuming @math of the same order as @math ). We prove this conjecture, and in fact establish a more general guarantee including higher-rank as well as @math much smaller than @math . Recent lower bounds berthet2013computational, ma2015sum suggest that no polynomial time algorithm can do significantly better. The key technical component of our analysis develops new bounds on the norm of kernel random matrices, in regimes that were not considered before. We consider the problem of clustering a graph @math into two communities by observing a subset of the vertex correlations. Specifically, we consider the inverse problem with observed variables @math , where @math is the incidence matrix of a graph @math , @math is the vector of unknown vertex variables (with a uniform prior), and @math is a noise vector with Bernoulli @math i.i.d. entries. All variables and operations are Boolean. This model is motivated by coding, synchronization, and community detection problems. In particular, it corresponds to a stochastic block model or a correlation clustering problem with two communities and censored edges. Without noise, exact recovery (up to global flip) of @math is possible if and only the graph @math is connected, with a sharp threshold at the edge probability @math for Erdős-Renyi random graphs. The first goal of this paper is to determine how the edge probability @math needs to scale to allow exact recovery in the presence of noise. Defining the degree rate of the graph by @math , it is shown that exact recovery is possible if and only if @math . In other words, @math is the information theoretic threshold for exact recovery at low-SNR. In addition, an efficient recovery algorithm based on semidefinite programming is proposed and shown to succeed in the threshold regime up to twice the optimal rate. For a deterministic graph @math , defining the degree rate as @math , where @math is the minimum degree of the graph, it is shown that the proposed method achieves the rate @math , where @math is the spectral gap of the graph @math . We are interested in the clusters formed by a Poisson ensemble of Markovian loops on infinite graphs. This model was introduced and studied in Le Jan (C R Math Acad Sci Paris 350(13–14):643–646, 2012, Ill J Math 57(2):525–558, 2013). It is a model with long range correlations with two parameters ( ) and ( ). The non-negative parameter ( ) measures the amount of loops, and ( ) plays the role of killing on vertices penalizing ( ( >0 )) or favoring ( ( <0 )) appearance of large loops. It was shown in Le Jan (Ill J Math 57(2):525–558, 2013) that for any fixed ( ) and large enough ( ), there exists an infinite cluster in the loop percolation on ( Z ^d ). In the present article, we show a non-trivial phase transition on the integer lattice ( Z ^d ) ( (d 3 )) for ( =0 ). More precisely, we show that there is no loop percolation for ( =0 ) and ( ) small enough. Interestingly, we observe a critical like behavior on the whole sub-critical domain of ( ), namely, for ( =0 ) and any sub-critical value of ( ), the probability of one-arm event decays at most polynomially. For (d 5 ), we prove that there exists a non-trivial threshold for the finiteness of the expected cluster size. For ( ) below this threshold, we calculate, up to a constant factor, the decay of the probability of one-arm event, two point function, and the tail distribution of the cluster size. These rates are comparable with the ones obtained from a single large loop and only depend on the dimension. For (d=3 ) or 4, we give better lower bounds on the decay of the probability of one-arm event, which show importance of small loops for long connections. In addition, we show that the one-arm exponent in dimension 3 depends on the intensity ( ).