The framework of Integral Quadratic Constraints (IQC) introduced by (2014) reduces the computation of upper bounds on the convergence rate of several optimization algorithms to semi-definite programming (SDP). In particular, this technique was applied to Nesterov's accelerated method (NAM). For quadratic functions, this SDP was explicitly solved leading to a new bound on the convergence rate of NAM, and for arbitrary strongly convex functions it was shown numerically that IQC can improve bounds from Nesterov (2004). Unfortunately, an explicit analytic solution to the SDP was not provided. In this paper, we provide such an analytical solution, obtaining a new general and explicit upper bound on the convergence rate of NAM, which we further optimize over its parameters. To the best of our knowledge, this is the best, and explicit, upper bound on the convergence rate of NAM for strongly convex functions.
Finally, @cite_7 gives a possible geometric interpretation of why NAM accelerates convergence. For their NAM-type method, the result @math is obtained, basically re-deriving .
@cite_7
2164075197 2075660001 584312462 1922736325
We propose and analyze a new parallel coordinate descent method—NSync—in which at each iteration a random subset of coordinates is updated, in parallel, allowing for the subsets to be chosen using an arbitrary probability law. This is the first method of this type. We derive convergence rates under a strong convexity assumption, and comment on how to assign probabilities to the sets to optimize the bound. The complexity and practical performance of the method can outperform its uniform variant by an order of magnitude. Surprisingly, the strategy of updating a single randomly selected coordinate per iteration—with optimal probabilities—may require less iterations, both in theory and practice, than the strategy of updating all coordinates at every iteration. In this paper we analyze the randomized block-coordinate descent (RBCD) methods proposed in Nesterov (SIAM J Optim 22(2):341---362, 2012), Richtarik and Takaă? (Math Program 144(1---2):1---38, 2014) for minimizing the sum of a smooth convex function and a block-separable convex function, and derive improved bounds on their convergence rates. In particular, we extend Nesterov's technique developed in Nesterov (SIAM J Optim 22(2):341---362, 2012) for analyzing the RBCD method for minimizing a smooth convex function over a block-separable closed convex set to the aforementioned more general problem and obtain a sharper expected-value type of convergence rate than the one implied in Richtarik and Takaă? (Math Program 144(1---2):1---38, 2014). As a result, we also obtain a better high-probability type of iteration complexity. In addition, for unconstrained smooth convex minimization, we develop a new technique called randomized estimate sequence to analyze the accelerated RBCD method proposed by Nesterov (SIAM J Optim 22(2):341---362, 2012) and establish a sharper expected-value type of convergence rate than the one given in Nesterov (SIAM J Optim 22(2):341---362, 2012). We introduce a generic scheme for accelerating first-order optimization methods in the sense of Nesterov, which builds upon a new analysis of the accelerated proximal point algorithm. Our approach consists of minimizing a convex objective by approximately solving a sequence of well-chosen auxiliary problems, leading to faster convergence. This strategy applies to a large class of algorithms, including gradient descent, block coordinate descent, SAG, SAGA, SDCA, SVRG, Finito MISO, and their proximal variants. For all of these methods, we provide acceleration and explicit support for non-strongly convex objectives. In addition to theoretical speed-up, we also show that acceleration is useful in practice, especially for ill-conditioned problems where we measure significant improvements. We provide a new proof of the linear convergence of the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) when one of the objective terms is strongly convex. Our proof is based on a framework for analyzing optimization algorithms introduced in (2014), reducing algorithm convergence to verifying the stability of a dynamical system. This approach generalizes a number of existing results and obviates any assumptions about specific choices of algorithm parameters. On a numerical example, we demonstrate that minimizing the derived bound on the convergence rate provides a practical approach to selecting algorithm parameters for particular ADMM instances. We complement our upper bound by constructing a nearly-matching lower bound on the worst-case rate of convergence.