Arrow's Impossibility Theorem states that any constitution which satisfies Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives (IIA) and Unanimity and is not a Dictator has to be non-transitive. In this paper we study quantitative versions of Arrow theorem. Consider @math voters who vote independently at random, each following the uniform distribution over the 6 rankings of 3 alternatives. Arrow's theorem implies that any constitution which satisfies IIA and Unanimity and is not a dictator has a probability of at least @math for a non-transitive outcome. When @math is large, @math is a very small probability, and the question arises if for large number of voters it is possible to avoid paradoxes with probability close to 1. Here we give a negative answer to this question by proving that for every @math , there exists a @math , which depends on @math only, such that for all @math , and all constitutions on 3 alternatives, if the constitution satisfies: The IIA condition. For every pair of alternatives @math , the probability that the constitution ranks @math above @math is at least @math . For every voter @math , the probability that the social choice function agrees with a dictatorship on @math at most @math . Then the probability of a non-transitive outcome is at least @math .
As noted in @cite_5 , there is an interesting connection between quantitative Arrow statements and the concept of testing introduced in @cite_12 @cite_16 which was studied and used extensively since. Roughly speaking a property of functions is testable if it is possible to perform a randomized test for the property such that if the probability that the function passes the test is close to @math , then the function has to be close to a function with the property (say in the hamming distance). In terms of testing, our result states that among all functions satisfying the IIA property, the Transitivity property is testable. Moreover, the natural test "works": i.e., in order to test for transitivity, one can pick a random input and check if the outcome is transitive.
@cite_5 @cite_16 @cite_12
1970630090 2950427777 2038521541 2091126969
In this paper, we consider the question of determining whether a function f has property P or is e-far from any function with property P. A property testing algorithm is given a sample of the value of f on instances drawn according to some distribution. In some cases, it is also allowed to query f on instances of its choice. We study this question for different properties and establish some connections to problems in learning theory and approximation. In particular, we focus our attention on testing graph properties. Given access to a graph G in the form of being able to query whether an edge exists or not between a pair of vertices, we devise algorithms to test whether the underlying graph has properties such as being bipartite, k -Colorable, or having a p -Clique (clique of density p with respect to the vertex set). Our graph property testing algorithms are probabilistic and make assertions that are correct with high probability, while making a number of queries that is independent of the size of the graph. Moreover, the property testing algorithms can be used to efficiently (i.e., in time linear in the number of vertices) construct partitions of the graph that correspond to the property being tested, if it holds for the input graph. We characterize the set of properties of Boolean-valued functions on a finite domain @math that are testable with a constant number of samples. Specifically, we show that a property @math is testable with a constant number of samples if and only if it is (essentially) a @math -part symmetric property for some constant @math , where a property is @math -part symmetric if there is a partition @math of @math such that whether @math satisfies the property is determined solely by the densities of @math on @math . We use this characterization to obtain a number of corollaries, namely: (i) A graph property @math is testable with a constant number of samples if and only if whether a graph @math satisfies @math is (essentially) determined by the edge density of @math . (ii) An affine-invariant property @math of functions @math is testable with a constant number of samples if and only if whether @math satisfies @math is (essentially) determined by the density of @math . (iii) For every constant @math , monotonicity of functions @math on the @math -dimensional hypergrid is testable with a constant number of samples. The field of property testing studies algorithms that distinguish, using a small number of queries, between inputs which satisfy a given property, and those that are far' from satisfying the property. Testing properties that are defined in terms of monotonicity has been extensively investigated, primarily in the context of the monotonicity of a sequence of integers, or the monotonicity of a function over the n-dimensional hypercube 1,l,m n. These works resulted in monotonicity testers whose query complexity is at most polylogarithmic in the size of the domain.We show that in its most general setting, testing that Boolean functions are close to monotone is equivalent, with respect to the number of required queries, to several other testing problems in logic and graph theory. These problems include: testing that a Boolean assignment of variables is close to an assignment that satisfies a specific 2-CNF formula, testing that a set of vertices is close to one that is a vertex cover of a specific graph, and testing that a set of vertices is close to a clique.We then investigate the query complexity of monotonicity testing of both Boolean and integer functions over general partial orders. We give algorithms and lower bounds for the general problem, as well as for some interesting special cases. In proving a general lower bound, we construct graphs with combinatorial properties that may be of independent interest. Combinatorial property testing, initiated by Rubinfeld and Sudan [23] and formally defined by Goldreich, Goldwasser and Ron in [18], deals with the following relaxation of decision problems: Given a fixed property P and an input f, distinguish between the case that f satisfies P, and the case that no input that differs from f in less than some fixed fraction of the places satisfies P. An (e, q)-test for P is a randomized algorithm that queries at most q places of an input f and distinguishes with probability 2 3 between the case that f has the property and the case that at least an e-fraction of the places of f need to be changed in order for it to have the property. Here we concentrate on labeled, d-dimensional grids, where the grid is viewed as a partially ordered set (poset) in the standard way (i.e. as a product order of total orders). The main result here presents an (e, poly(1 e))-test for every property of 0 1 labeled, d-dimensional grids that is characterized by a finite collection of forbidden induced posets. Such properties include the “monotonicity” property studied in [9,8,13], other more complicated forbidden chain patterns, and general forbidden poset patterns. We also present a (less efficient) test for such properties of labeled grids with larger fixed size alphabets. All the above tests have in addition a 1-sided error probability. This class of properties is related to properties that are defined by certain first order formulae with no quantifier alternation over the syntax containing the grid order relations. We also show that with one quantifier alternation, a certain property can be defined, for which no test with query complexity of O(n 1 4) (for a small enough fixed e) exists. The above results identify new classes of properties that are defined by means of restricted logics, and that are efficiently testable. They also lay out a platform that bridges some previous results.