Active learning aims to select a small subset of data for annotation such that a classifier learned on the data is highly accurate. This is usually done using heuristic selection methods, however the effectiveness of such methods is limited and moreover, the performance of heuristics varies between datasets. To address these shortcomings, we introduce a novel formulation by reframing the active learning as a reinforcement learning problem and explicitly learning a data selection policy, where the policy takes the role of the active learning heuristic. Importantly, our method allows the selection policy learned using simulation on one language to be transferred to other languages. We demonstrate our method using cross-lingual named entity recognition, observing uniform improvements over traditional active learning.
As supervised learning methods often require a lot of training data, active learning is a technique that selects a subset of data to annotate for training the best classifier. Existing active learning (AL) algorithms can be generally considered as three categories: 1) uncertainty sampling @cite_13 @cite_17 , which selects the data about which the current classifier is the most uncertain; 2) query by committee @cite_2 , which selects the data about which the committee'' disagree most; and 3) expected error reduction @cite_11 , which selects the data that can contribute the largest model loss reduction for the current classifier once labelled. Applications of active learning to NLP include text classification @cite_7 @cite_17 , relation classification @cite_14 , and structured prediction @cite_29 @cite_3 @cite_8 @cite_0 . Qian2014BilingualAL used uncertainty sampling to jointly perform on English and Chinese. stratos2015simple and zhang2016name deployed uncertainty-based AL algorithms for languages with the minimal supervision.
@cite_14 @cite_7 @cite_8 @cite_29 @cite_17 @cite_3 @cite_0 @cite_2 @cite_13 @cite_11
94418491 2252069213 2037771830 2188373600
Mining data with minimal annotation costs requires efficient active approaches, that ideally select the optimal candidate for labelling under a user-specified classification performance measure. Common generic approaches, that are usable with any classifier and any performance measure, are either slow like error reduction, or heuristics like uncertainty sampling. In contrast, our Probabilistic Active Learning (PAL) approach offers versatility, direct optimisation of a performance measure and computational efficiency. Given a labelling candidate from a pool, PAL models both the candidate’s label and the true posterior in its neighbourhood as random variables. By computing the expectation of the gain in classification performance over both random variables, PAL then selects the candidate that in expectation will improve the classification performance the most. Extending our recent poster, we discuss the properties of PAL and perform a thorough experimental evaluation on several synthetic and real-world data sets of different sizes. Results show comparable or better classification performance than error reduction and uncertainty sampling, yet PAL has the same asymptotic time complexity as uncertainty sampling and is faster than error reduction. Active learning (AL) consists of asking human annotators to annotate automatically selected data that are assumed to bring the most benefit in the creation of a classifier. AL allows to learn accurate systems with much less annotated data than what is required by pure supervised learning algorithms, hence limiting the tedious effort of annotating a large collection of data. We experimentally investigate the behavior of several AL strategies for sequence labeling tasks (in a partially-labeled scenario) tailored on Partially-Labeled Conditional Random Fields, on four sequence labeling tasks: phrase chunking, part-of-speech tagging, named-entity recognition, and bioentity recognition. Active learning (AL) is an increasingly popular strategy for mitigating the amount of labeled data required to train classifiers, thereby reducing annotator effort. We describe a real-world, deployed application of AL to the problem of biomedical citation screening for systematic reviews at the Tufts Medical Center's Evidence-based Practice Center. We propose a novel active learning strategy that exploits a priori domain knowledge provided by the expert (specifically, labeled features)and extend this model via a Linear Programming algorithm for situations where the expert can provide ranked labeled features. Our methods outperform existing AL strategies on three real-world systematic review datasets. We argue that evaluation must be specific to the scenario under consideration. To this end, we propose a new evaluation framework for finite-pool scenarios, wherein the primary aim is to label a fixed set of examples rather than to simply induce a good predictive model. We use a method from medical decision theory for eliciting the relative costs of false positives and false negatives from the domain expert, constructing a utility measure of classification performance that integrates the expert preferences. Our findings suggest that the expert can, and should, provide more information than instance labels alone. In addition to achieving strong empirical results on the citation screening problem, this work outlines many important steps for moving away from simulated active learning and toward deploying AL for real-world applications. Recognizing human activities from wearable sensor data is an important problem, particularly for health and eldercare applications. However, collecting sufficient labeled training data is challenging, especially since interpreting IMU traces is difficult for human annotators. Recently, crowdsourcing through services such as Amazon's Mechanical Turk has emerged as a promising alternative for annotating such data, with active learning (Cohn, Ghahramani, and Jordan 1996) serving as a natural method for affordably selecting an appropriate subset of instances to label. Unfortunately, since most active learning strategies are greedy methods that select the most uncertain sample, they are very sensitive to annotation errors (which corrupt a significant fraction of crowdsourced labels). This paper proposes methods for robust active learning under these conditions. Specifically, we make three contributions: 1) we obtain better initial labels by asking labelers to solve a related task; 2) we propose a new principled method for selecting instances in active learning that is more robust to annotation noise; 3) we estimate confidence scores for labels acquired from MTurk and ask workers to relabel samples that receive low scores under this metric. The proposed method is shown to significantly outperform existing techniques both under controlled noise conditions and in real active learning scenarios. The resulting method trains classifiers that are close in accuracy to those trained using ground-truth data.