One of the most influential recent results in network analysis is that many natural networks exhibit a power-law or log-normal degree distribution. This has inspired numerous generative models that match this property. However, more recent work has shown that while these generative models do have the right degree distribution, they are not good models for real life networks due to their differences on other important metrics like conductance. We believe this is, in part, because many of these real-world networks have very different joint degree distributions, i.e. the probability that a randomly selected edge will be between nodes of degree k and l. Assortativity is a sufficient statistic of the joint degree distribution, and it has been previously noted that social networks tend to be assortative, while biological and technological networks tend to be disassortative. We suggest understanding the relationship between network structure and the joint degree distribution of graphs is an interesting avenue of further research. An important tool for such studies are algorithms that can generate random instances of graphs with the same joint degree distribution. This is the main topic of this paper and we study the problem from both a theoretical and practical perspective. We provide an algorithm for constructing simple graphs from a given joint degree distribution, and a Monte Carlo Markov Chain method for sampling them. We also show that the state space of simple graphs with a fixed degree distribution is connected via end point switches. We empirically evaluate the mixing time of this Markov Chain by using experiments based on the autocorrelation of each edge. These experiments show that our Markov Chain mixes quickly on real graphs, allowing for utilization of our techniques in practice.
Another vein of related work is that of who introduce the concept of @math -series @cite_21 @cite_17 . In this model, @math refers to the dimension of the distribution and @math is the joint degree distribution. They propose a heuristic for generating random @math -graphs for a fixed @math distribution via edge rewirings. However, their method can get stuck if there exists a degree in the graph for which there is only 1 node with that degree. This is because the state space is not connected. We provide a theoretically sound method of doing this. Finally, Newman also studies the problem of fixing an assortativity value, finding a with that value, and then sampling a random graph with that distribution using Markov Chains @cite_50 @cite_36 . His Markov Chain starts at any graph with the correct degree distribution and converges to a pseudograph with the correct joint remaining degree distribution. By contrast, our work provides a theoretically sound way of constructing a simple graph with a given joint degree distribution first, and our Markov Chain only has simple graphs with the same joint degree distribution as its state space.
@cite_36 @cite_21 @cite_50 @cite_17
2025598851 2950224979 2102902005 1978479505
One of the most influential recent results in network analysis is that many natural networks exhibit a power-law or log-normal degree distribution. This has inspired numerous generative models that match this property. However, more recent work has shown that while these generative models do have the right degree distribution, they are not good models for real-life networks due to their differences on other important metrics like conductance. We believe this is, in part, because many of these real-world networks have very different joint degree distributions, that is, the probability that a randomly selected edge will be between nodes of degree k and l. Assortativity is a sufficient statistic of the joint degree distribution, and it has been previously noted that social networks tend to be assortative, while biological and technological networks tend to be disassortative. We suggest understanding the relationship between network structure and the joint degree distribution of graphs is an interesting avenue of further research. An important tool for such studies are algorithms that can generate random instances of graphs with the same joint degree distribution. This is the main topic of this article, and we study the problem from both a theoretical and practical perspective. We provide an algorithm for constructing simple graphs from a given joint degree distribution, and a Monte Carlo Markov chain method for sampling them. We also show that the state space of simple graphs with a fixed degree distribution is connected via endpoint switches. We empirically evaluate the mixing time of this Markov chain by using experiments based on the autocorrelation of each edge. These experiments show that our Markov chain mixes quickly on these real graphs, allowing for utilization of our techniques in practice. In this work we show that for every @math , such that for all @math where the parameters of the model do not depend on @math . They also provide a rare example where one can prove a polynomial time mixing of Gibbs sampler in a situation where the actual mixing time is slower than @math . Our proof exploits in novel ways the local treelike structure of Erd o s-R 'enyi random graphs, comparison and block dynamics arguments and a recent result of Weitz. Our results extend to much more general families of graphs which are sparse in some average sense and to much more general interactions. In particular, they apply to any graph for which every vertex @math of the graph has a neighborhood @math of radius @math in which the induced sub-graph is a tree union at most @math edges and where for each simple path in @math the sum of the vertex degrees along the path is @math . Moreover, our result apply also in the case of arbitrary external fields and provide the first FPRAS for sampling the Ising distribution in this case. We finally present a non Markov Chain algorithm for sampling the distribution which is effective for a wider range of parameters. In particular, for @math it applies for all external fields and @math , where @math is the critical point for decay of correlation for the Ising model on @math . Consider a Markov chain on an infinite tree T = (V,E) rooted at . In such a chain, once the initial root state ( ) is chosen, each vertex iteratively chooses its state from the one of its parent by an application of a Markov transition rule (and all such applications are independent). Let µj denote the resulting measure for ( ) = j. µj is defined on configurations = ( (x))x2V 2 A V , where A is some finite set. Let µ n denote the restriction of µ to the sigma-algebra generated by the variables (x) where x is at distance exactly n from . Letting n = maxi,j2A dTV (µ n ,µ n ), where dTV denotes total variation distance, we say that the reconstruction problem is solvable if liminfn!1 n > 0. Reconstruction solvability roughly means that the n’th level of the tree contains a non-vanishing amount of information on the root of the tree, as n ! 1. In this paper we study the problem of robust reconstruction. Let be a non degenerate distribution on A and > 0. Let be chosen according to µ n and 0 be obtained from by letting for each node independently (v) = 0 (v) with probability 1 and 0 (v) to be an independent sample from otherwise. We denote by µ n [, ] the resulting measure on 0 . The measure µ n [, ] is a perturbation of the measure µ n . Letting n(, ) = maxi,j2A dTV (µ n [, ],µ n [, ]), we say that the reconstruction problem is -robust-solvable if liminfn!1 n(, ) > 0 for all 0 1, where 2(M) is the second largest eigenvalue of M (in absolute value), then for all non-degenerate , the reconstruction problem is -robust-solvable. We prove a converse and show that the reconstruction problem is not -robust-solvable if B| 2(M)| 2 < 1. This proves a conjecture by the second author and Peres. We also consider other models of noise and general trees. Random graphs with a given degree sequence are a useful model capturing several features absent in the classical Erd˝os-Renyi model, such as dependent edges and non-binomial degrees. In this paper, we use a characterization due to Erd˝os and Gallai to develop a sequential algorithm for generating a random labeled graph with a given degree sequence. The algorithm is easy to implement and allows surprisingly ecient sequential importance sampling. Applications are given, in- cluding simulating a biological network and estimating the number of graphs with a given degree sequence. 1. Introduction. Random graphs with given vertex degrees have recently attracted great interest as a model for many real-world complex networks, including the World Wide Web, peer-to-peer networks, social networks, and biological networks. Newman (58) contains an excellent survey of these networks, with extensive references. A common approach to simulating these systems is to study (empirically or theoretically) the degrees of the vertices in instances of the network, and then to generate a random graph with the appropriate degrees. Graphs with prescribed degrees also appear in random matrix theory and string theory, which can call for large simulations based on random k-regular graphs. Throughout, we are concerned with generating simple graphs, i.e., no loops or multiple edges are allowed (the problem becomes considerably easier if loops and multiple edges are allowed). The main result of this paper is a new sequential importance sampling algorithm for generating random graphs with a given degree sequence. The idea is to build up the graph sequentially, at each stage choosing an edge from a list of candidates with probability proportional to the degrees. Most previously studied algorithms for this problem sometimes either get stuck or produce loops or multiple edges in the output, which is handled by starting over and trying again. Often for such algorithms, the probability of a restart being needed on a trial rapidly approaches 1 as the degree parameters grow, resulting in an enormous number of trials being needed on average to obtain a simple graph. A major advantage of our algorithm is that it never gets stuck. This is achieved using the Erd˝os- Gallai characterization, which is explained in Section 2, and a carefully chosen order of edge selection.