Machine-translated text plays an important role in modern life by smoothing communication from various communities using different languages. However, unnatural translation may lead to misunderstanding, a detector is thus needed to avoid the unfortunate mistakes. While a previous method measured the naturalness of continuous words using a N-gram language model, another method matched noncontinuous words across sentences but this method ignores such words in an individual sentence. We have developed a method matching similar words throughout the paragraph and estimating the paragraph-level coherence, that can identify machine-translated text. Experiment evaluates on 2000 English human-generated and 2000 English machine-translated paragraphs from German showing that the coherence-based method achieves high performance (accuracy = 87.0 ; equal error rate = 13.0 ). It is efficiently better than previous methods (best accuracy = 72.4 ; equal error rate = 29.7 ). Similar experiments on Dutch and Japanese obtain 89.2 and 97.9 accuracy, respectively. The results demonstrate the persistence of the proposed method in various languages with different resource levels.
Another approach recognizes machine-generated text by analyzing a histogram of word distribution. For example, Labb 'e and Labb 'e suggested an inter-textual metric for estimating the similarity of word distributions @cite_1 . This metric is perfectly used for classifying artificial and real papers with accuracy up to 100 method pointed out that a word distribution of human text is closer with a Zipfian distribution than that of machine one. They also offered some valuable features to support the word distribution, that is specific phrases (e.g., idiom, clich 'e , ancient, dialect, phrasal verb) and co-reference resolution. The restriction of distribution-based methods is that they are only stable with a large number of words. However, the deficiency is revealed on homologous texts that refers to same sources such as paraphrasing and translation because such text mostly contains a same set of words.
@cite_1
2794070657 2251796964 2122514299 114321176
Computer-generated text plays a pivotal role in various applications, but the quality of the generated text is much lower than that of human-generated text. The use of artificially generated “machine text” can thus negatively affect such practical applications as website generation and text corpora collection. A method for distinguishing computer- and human-generated text is thus needed. Previous methods extract fluency features from a limited internal corpus and use them to identify the generated text. We have extended this approach to also estimate fluency using an enormous external corpus. We have also developed a method for extracting and distinguishing the noises characteristically created by a person or a machine. For example, people frequently use spoken noise words (2morrow, wanna, etc.) and misspelled ones (comin, hapy, etc.) while machines frequently generate incorrect expressions (such as untranslated phrases). A method combining these fluency and noise features was evaluated using 1000 original English messages and 1000 artificial English ones translated from Spanish. The results show that this combined method had the highest accuracy (80.35 ) and the lowest equal error rate (19.44 ) compared with one of state-of-the-art methods, which uses syntactic parser. Moreover, experiments using texts in other languages produced similar results, demonstrated that our proposed method works consistently across various languages. Corpus-based approaches to machine translation (MT) rely on the availability of parallel corpora. To produce user-acceptable translation outputs, such systems need high quality data to be efficiently trained, optimized and evaluated. However, building high quality dataset is a relatively expensive task. In this paper, we describe the data collection and analysis of a large database of 10.881 SMT translation output hypotheses manually corrected. These post-editions were collected using Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, following some ethical guidelines. A complete analysis of the collected data pointed out a high quality of the corrections with more than 87 of the collected post-editions that improve hypotheses and more than 94 of the crowdsourced post-editions which are at least of professional quality. We also post-edited 1,500 gold-standard reference translations (of bilingual parallel corpora generated by professional) and noticed that 72 of these translations needed to be corrected during post-edition. We computed a proximity measure between the different kind of translations and pointed out that reference translations are as far from the hypotheses as from the corrected hypotheses (i.e. the post-editions). In light of these last findings, we discuss the adequation of text-based generated reference translations to train setence-to-sentence based SMT systems. Most previous work on trainable language generation has focused on two paradigms: (a) using a generation decisions of an existing generator. Both approaches rely on the existence of a handcrafted generation component, which is likely to limit their scalability to new domains. The first contribution of this article is to present Bagel, a fully data-driven generation method that treats the language generation task as a search for the most likely sequence of semantic concepts and realization phrases, according to Factored Language Models (FLMs). As domain utterances are not readily available for most natural language generation tasks, a large creative effort is required to produce the data necessary to represent human linguistic variation for nontrivial domains. This article is based on the assumption that learning to produce paraphrases can be facilitated by collecting data from a large sample of untrained annotators using crowdsourcing—rather than a few domain experts—by relying on a coarse meaning representation. A second contribution of this article is to use crowdsourced data to show how dialogue naturalness can be improved by learning to vary the output utterances generated for a given semantic input. Two data-driven methods for generating paraphrases in dialogue are presented: (a) by sampling from the n-best list of realizations produced by Bagel's FLM reranker; and (b) by learning a structured perceptron predicting whether candidate realizations are valid paraphrases. We train Bagel on a set of 1,956 utterances produced by 137 annotators, which covers 10 types of dialogue acts and 128 semantic concepts in a tourist information system for Cambridge. An automated evaluation shows that Bagel outperforms utterance class LM baselines on this domain. A human evaluation of 600 resynthesized dialogue extracts shows that Bagel's FLM output produces utterances comparable to a handcrafted baseline, whereas the perceptron classifier performs worse. Interestingly, human judges find the system sampling from the n-best list to be more natural than a system always returning the first-best utterance. The judges are also more willing to interact with the n-best system in the future. These results suggest that capturing the large variation found in human language using data-driven methods is beneficial for dialogue interaction. An unsupervised iterative approach for extracting a new lexicon (or unknown words) from a Chinese text corpus is proposed in this paper. Instead of using a non-iterative segmentation-merging-filtering-and-disambiguation approach, the proposed method iteratively integrates the contextual constraints (among word candidates) and a joint character association metric to progressively improve the segmentation results of the input corpus (and thus the new word list.) An augmented dictionary, which includes potential unknown words (in addition to known words), is used to segment the input corpus, unlike traditional approaches which use only known words for segmentation. In the segmentation process, the augmented dictionary is used to impose contextual constraints over known words and potential unknown words within input sentences; an unsupervised Viterbi Training process is then applied to ensure that the selected potential unknown words (and known words) maximize the likelihood of the input corpus. On the other hand, the joint character association metric (which reflects the global character association characteristics across the corpus) is derived by integrating several commonly used word association metrics, such as mutual information and entropy, with a joint Gaussian mixture density function; such integration allows the filter to use multiple features simultaneously to evaluate character association, unlike traditional filters which apply multiple features independently. The proposed method then allows the contextual constraints and the joint character association metric to enhance each other; this is achieved by iteratively applying the joint association metric to truncate unlikely unknown words in the augmented dictionary and using the segmentation result to improve the estimation of the joint association metric. The refined augmented dictionary and improved estimation are then used in the next iteration to acquire better segmentation and carry out more reliable filtering. Experiments show that both the precision and recall rates are improved almost monotonically, in contrast to non-iterative segmentation-merging-filtering-and-disambiguation approaches, which often sacrifice precision for recall or vice versa. With a corpus of 311,591 sentences, the performance is 76 (bigram), 54 (trigram), and 70 (quadragram) in F-measure, which is significantly better than using the non-iterative approach with F-measures of 74 (bigram), 46 (trigram), and 58 (quadragram).