We consider the robustness of computational hardness of problems whose input is obtained by applying independent random deletions to worst-case instances. For some classical @math -hard problems on graphs, such as Coloring, Vertex-Cover, and Hamiltonicity, we examine the complexity of these problems when edges (or vertices) of an arbitrary graph are deleted independently with probability @math . We prove that for @math -vertex graphs, these problems remain as hard as in the worst-case, as long as @math for arbitrary @math , unless @math . We also prove hardness results for Constraint Satisfaction Problems, where random deletions are applied to clauses or variables, as well as the Subset-Sum problem, where items of a given instance are deleted at random.
Similar reasoning applies to @math formulas. It is well known that there exists @math such that a random @math formula in which each possible clause is added independently with probability @math can be solved with high probability using the pure literal heuristic @cite_15 . As observed in @cite_15 , if this heuristic fails in finding a satisfying assignment for a formula @math it will still fail to find a satisfying assignment if clauses are added to @math . This implies that for any @math -variable @math formula @math , if @math , then the clause-percolated formula is satisfiable and furthermore a satisfying assignment can be found in polynomial time using the pure literal heuristic.
@cite_15
1963913579 2290712804 99448414 2952621790
We analyze the pure literal rule heuristic for computing a satisfying assignment to a random 3-CNF formula with n variables. We show that the pure literal rule by itself finds satisfying assignments for almost all 3-CNF formulas with up to 1.63n clauses, but it fails for more than 1.7n clauses. As an aside we show that the value of maximum satisfiability for random 3-CNF formulas is tightly concentrated around its mean. Let @math be a uniformly distributed random @math -SAT formula with @math variables and @math clauses. For clauses variables ratio @math the formula @math is satisfiable with high probability. However, no efficient algorithm is known to provably find a satisfying assignment beyond @math with a non-vanishing probability. Non-rigorous statistical mechanics work on @math -CNF led to the development of a new efficient "message passing algorithm" called [M ', Science 2002]. Experiments conducted for @math suggest that the algorithm finds satisfying assignments close to @math . However, in the present paper we prove that the basic version of Survey Propagation Guided Decimation fails to solve random @math -SAT formulas efficiently already for @math with @math almost a factor @math below @math . Finding a satisfying assignment for a k-CNF formula (k ≥ 3), assuming such exists, is a notoriously hard problem. In this work we consider the uniform distribution over satisfiable k-CNF formulas with a linear number of clauses (clause-variable ratio greater than some constant). We rigorously analyze the structure of the space of satisfying assignments of a random formula in that distribution, showing that basically all satisfying assignments are clustered in one cluster, and agree on all but a small, though constant proportion, number of variables. This observation enables us to describe a polynomial time algorithm that finds whp a satisfying assignment for such formulas, thus asserting that most satisfiable k-CNF formulas are easy (whenever the clause-variable ratio is greater than some constant). This should be contrasted with the setting of very sparse k-CNF formulas (which are satisfiable whp), where experimental results show some regime of clause density to be difficult for many SAT heuristics. One explanation for this phenomena, backed up by partially non-rigorous analytical tools from statistical physics, is the complicated clustering of the solution space at that regime, unlike the more “regular” structure that denser formulas possess. Thus in some sense, our result rigorously supports this explanation. key words: computational and structural complexity, algorithms and data structures, message passing algorithms, SAT. Let @math be a nontrivial @math -ary predicate. Consider a random instance of the constraint satisfaction problem @math on @math variables with @math constraints, each being @math applied to @math randomly chosen literals. Provided the constraint density satisfies @math , such an instance is unsatisfiable with high probability. The problem is to efficiently find a proof of unsatisfiability. We show that whenever the predicate @math supports a @math - probability distribution on its satisfying assignments, the sum of squares (SOS) algorithm of degree @math (which runs in time @math ) refute a random instance of @math . In particular, the polynomial-time SOS algorithm requires @math constraints to refute random instances of CSP @math when @math supports a @math -wise uniform distribution on its satisfying assignments. Together with recent work of [LRS15], our result also implies that polynomial-size semidefinite programming relaxation for refutation requires at least @math constraints. Our results (which also extend with no change to CSPs over larger alphabets) subsume all previously known lower bounds for semialgebraic refutation of random CSPs. For every constraint predicate @math , they give a three-way hardness tradeoff between the density of constraints, the SOS degree (hence running time), and the strength of the refutation. By recent algorithmic results of [AOW15] and [RRS16], this full three-way tradeoff is , up to lower-order factors.