We study the large-coalition asymptotics of fingerprinting and group testing and derive explicit decoders that provably achieve capacity for many of the considered models. We do this both for simple decoders (which are fast but commonly require larger code lengths) and for joint decoders (which may be slower but achieve the best code lengths). We further make the distinction between informed decoding, where the pirate strategy is exactly known, and uninformed decoding, and we design decoding schemes for both settings. For fingerprinting, we show that if the pirate strategy is known, the Neyman-Pearson-based log-likelihood decoders provably achieve capacity, regardless of the strategy. The decoder built against the interleaving attack is further shown to be a universal decoder, able to deal with arbitrary attacks and achieving the uninformed capacity. This universal decoder is shown to be closely related to the Lagrange-optimized decoder of and the empirical mutual information decoder of Moulin. Joint decoders are also proposed, and we conjecture that these also achieve the corresponding joint capacities. For group testing, the simple decoder for the classical model is shown to be more efficient than the one of and it provably achieves the simple group testing capacity. For generalizations of this model such as noisy group testing, the resulting simple decoders also achieve the corresponding simple capacities.
Work on the fingerprinting game described above started in the late 90s, and lower bounds on the code length were established of the order @math @cite_25 , until in 2003 Tardos @cite_8 proved a lower bound of the order @math and described a scheme with @math , showing this bound is tight. Since the leading constants of the upper and lower bounds did not match, later work on fingerprinting focused on finding the optimal leading constant.
@cite_25 @cite_8
2087879325 2083594366 1541113101 1968422945
We study the Tardos' probabilistic fingerprinting scheme and show that its codeword length may be shortened by a factor of approximately 4. We achieve this by retracing Tardos' analysis of the scheme and extracting from it all constants that were arbitrarily selected. We replace those constants with parameters and derive a set of inequalities that those parameters must satisfy so that the desired security properties of the scheme still hold. Then we look for a solution of those inequalities in which the parameter that governs the codeword length is minimal. A further reduction in the codeword length is achieved by decoupling the error probability of falsely accusing innocent users from the error probability of missing all colluding pirates. Finally, we simulate the Tardos scheme and show that, in practice, one may use codewords that are shorter than those in the original Tardos scheme by a factor of at least 16. We study a fingerprinting game in which the number of colluders and the collusion channel are unknown. The encoder embeds fingerprints into a host sequence and provides the decoder with the capability to trace back pirated copies to the colluders. Fingerprinting capacity has recently been derived as the limit value of a sequence of maximin games with mutual information as their payoff functions. However, these games generally do not admit saddle-point solutions and are very hard to solve numerically. Here under the so-called Boneh-Shaw marking assumption, we reformulate the capacity as the value of a single two-person zero-sum game, and show that it is achieved by a saddle-point solution. If the maximal coalition size is k and the fingerprinting alphabet is binary, we show that capacity decays quadratically with k. Furthermore, we prove rigorously that the asymptotic capacity is 1 (k221n2) and we confirm our earlier conjecture that Tardos' choice of the arcsine distribution asymptotically maximizes the mutual information payoff function while the interleaving attack minimizes it. Along with the asymptotics, numerical solutions to the game for small k are also presented. It is known that Tardos's collusion-secure probabilistic fingerprinting code (Tardos code) has length of theoretically minimal order. However, Tardos code uses certain continuous probability distribution, which causes that huge amount of extra memory is required in a practical use. An essential solution is to replace the continuous distributions with finite discrete ones, preserving the security. In this paper, we determine the optimal finite distribution for the purpose of reducing memory amount; the required extra memory is reduced to less than 1 32 of the original in some practical setting. Moreover, the code length is also reduced (to, asymptotically, about 20.6 of Tardos code), and some further practical problems such as approximation errors are also considered. It has been proven that the code lengths of Tardos's collusion-secure fingerprinting codes are of theoretically minimal order with respect to the number of adversarial users (pirates). However, the code lengths can be further reduced as some preceding studies have revealed. In this article we improve a recent discrete variant of Tardos's codes, and give a security proof of our codes under an assumption weaker than the original Marking Assumption. Our analysis shows that our codes have significantly shorter lengths than Tardos's codes. For example, when c = 8, our code length is about 4.94 of Tardos's code in a practical setting and about 4.62 in a certain limit case. Our code lengths for large c are asymptotically about 5.35 of Tardos's codes.