Clustering is a fundamental task in data analysis, and spectral clustering has been recognized as a promising approach to it. Given a graph describing the relationship between data, spectral clustering explores the underlying cluster structure in two stages. The first stage embeds the nodes of the graph into real space, and the second stage groups the embedded nodes into several clusters. The use of the @math -means method in the grouping stage is currently standard practice. We present a spectral clustering algorithm that uses convex programming in the grouping stage, and study how well it works. The concept behind the algorithm design lies in the following observation. The nodes with the largest degree in each cluster may be found by computing an enclosing ellipsoid for embedded nodes in real space, and the clusters may be identified by using those nodes. We show that the observations are valid, and the algorithm returns clusters to provide the conductance of graph, if the gap assumption, introduced by Peng el al. at COLT 2015, is satisfied. We also give an experimental assessment of the algorithm's performance.
We next describe the results of Kolev and Mehlhorn in @cite_29 . They showed the following statement in Theorem 1.2 of the paper. Set @math as After suitable renumbering of the output of the algorithm, we have Accordingly, if @math , We see that the results of Kolev and Mehlhorn improve the approximation accuracy of by a factor of @math and weakens the gap assumption. Kolev and Mehlhorn also studied a spectral clustering algorithm that uses a @math -means method based on the Lloyd's algorithm and examined the performance.
@cite_29
2950958145 2089135543 1521197246 2604884452
We consider the problem of selecting the best subset of exactly @math columns from an @math matrix @math . We present and analyze a novel two-stage algorithm that runs in @math time and returns as output an @math matrix @math consisting of exactly @math columns of @math . In the first (randomized) stage, the algorithm randomly selects @math columns according to a judiciously-chosen probability distribution that depends on information in the top- @math right singular subspace of @math . In the second (deterministic) stage, the algorithm applies a deterministic column-selection procedure to select and return exactly @math columns from the set of columns selected in the first stage. Let @math be the @math matrix containing those @math columns, let @math denote the projection matrix onto the span of those columns, and let @math denote the best rank- @math approximation to the matrix @math . Then, we prove that, with probability at least 0.8, @math This Frobenius norm bound is only a factor of @math worse than the best previously existing existential result and is roughly @math better than the best previous algorithmic result for the Frobenius norm version of this Column Subset Selection Problem (CSSP). We also prove that, with probability at least 0.8, @math This spectral norm bound is not directly comparable to the best previously existing bounds for the spectral norm version of this CSSP. Our bound depends on @math , whereas previous results depend on @math ; if these two quantities are comparable, then our bound is asymptotically worse by a @math factor. We give efficient algorithms for volume sampling, i.e., for picking @math -subsets of the rows of any given matrix with probabilities proportional to the squared volumes of the simplices defined by them and the origin (or the squared volumes of the parallelepipeds defined by these subsets of rows). In other words, we can efficiently sample @math -subsets of @math with probabilities proportional to the corresponding @math by @math principal minors of any given @math by @math positive semi definite matrix. This solves an open problem from the monograph on spectral algorithms by Kannan and Vempala (see Section @math of KV , also implicit in BDM, DRVW ). Our first algorithm for volume sampling @math -subsets of rows from an @math -by- @math matrix runs in @math arithmetic operations (where @math is the exponent of matrix multiplication) and a second variant of it for @math -approximate volume sampling runs in @math arithmetic operations, which is almost linear in the size of the input (i.e., the number of entries) for small @math . Our efficient volume sampling algorithms imply the following results for low-rank matrix approximation: (1) Given @math , in @math arithmetic operations we can find @math of its rows such that projecting onto their span gives a @math -approximation to the matrix of rank @math closest to @math under the Frobenius norm. This improves the @math -approximation of Boutsidis, Drineas and Mahoney BDM and matches the lower bound shown in DRVW . The method of conditional expectations gives a algorithm with the same complexity. The running time can be improved to @math at the cost of losing an extra @math in the approximation factor. (2) The same rows and projection as in the previous point give a @math -approximation to the matrix of rank @math closest to @math under the spectral norm. In this paper, we show an almost matching lower bound of @math , even for @math . We study a statistical model for the tensor principal component analysis problem introduced by Montanari and Richard: Given a order- @math tensor @math of the form @math , where @math is a signal-to-noise ratio, @math is a unit vector, and @math is a random noise tensor, the goal is to recover the planted vector @math . For the case that @math has iid standard Gaussian entries, we give an efficient algorithm to recover @math whenever @math , and certify that the recovered vector is close to a maximum likelihood estimator, all with high probability over the random choice of @math . The previous best algorithms with provable guarantees required @math . In the regime @math , natural tensor-unfolding-based spectral relaxations for the underlying optimization problem break down (in the sense that their integrality gap is large). To go beyond this barrier, we use convex relaxations based on the sum-of-squares method. Our recovery algorithm proceeds by rounding a degree- @math sum-of-squares relaxations of the maximum-likelihood-estimation problem for the statistical model. To complement our algorithmic results, we show that degree- @math sum-of-squares relaxations break down for @math , which demonstrates that improving our current guarantees (by more than logarithmic factors) would require new techniques or might even be intractable. Finally, we show how to exploit additional problem structure in order to solve our sum-of-squares relaxations, up to some approximation, very efficiently. Our fastest algorithm runs in nearly-linear time using shifted (matrix) power iteration and has similar guarantees as above. The analysis of this algorithm also confirms a variant of a conjecture of Montanari and Richard about singular vectors of tensor unfoldings. We consider the problem of provably optimal exploration in reinforcement learning for finite horizon MDPs. We show that an optimistic modification to value iteration achieves a regret bound of @math where @math is the time horizon, @math the number of states, @math the number of actions and @math the number of time-steps. This result improves over the best previous known bound @math achieved by the UCRL2 algorithm of , 2010. The key significance of our new results is that when @math and @math , it leads to a regret of @math that matches the established lower bound of @math up to a logarithmic factor. Our analysis contains two key insights. We use careful application of concentration inequalities to the optimal value function as a whole, rather than to the transitions probabilities (to improve scaling in @math ), and we define Bernstein-based "exploration bonuses" that use the empirical variance of the estimated values at the next states (to improve scaling in @math ).