There are at least two kinds of similarity. Relational similarity is correspondence between relations, in contrast with attributional similarity, which is correspondence between attributes. When two words have a high degree of attributional similarity, we call them synonyms. When two pairs of words have a high degree of relational similarity, we say that their relations are analogous. For example, the word pair mason:stone is analogous to the pair carpenter:wood. This paper introduces Latent Relational Analysis (LRA), a method for measuring relational similarity. LRA has potential applications in many areas, including information extraction, word sense disambiguation, and information retrieval. Recently the Vector Space Model (VSM) of information retrieval has been adapted to measuring relational similarity, achieving a score of 47 on a collection of 374 college-level multiple-choice word analogy questions. In the VSM approach, the relation between a pair of words is characterized by a vector of frequencies of predefined patterns in a large corpus. LRA extends the VSM approach in three ways: (1) the patterns are derived automatically from the corpus, (2) the Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) is used to smooth the frequency data, and (3) automatically generated synonyms are used to explore variations of the word pairs. LRA achieves 56 on the 374 analogy questions, statistically equivalent to the average human score of 57 . On the related problem of classifying semantic relations, LRA achieves similar gains over the VSM.
Metaphorical language is very common in our daily life; so common that we are usually unaware of it @cite_46 . gentner01 argue that novel metaphors are understood using analogy, but conventional metaphors are simply recalled from memory. A conventional metaphor is a metaphor that has become entrenched in our language @cite_46 . dolan95 describes an algorithm that can recognize conventional metaphors, but is not suited to novel metaphors. This suggests that it may be fruitful to combine Dolan's algorithm for handling conventional metaphorical language with LRA and SME for handling novel metaphors.
@cite_46
163945276 56200336 2167609405 110796091
The reliable automated identification of metaphors still remains a challenge in metaphor research due to ambiguity between semantic and contextual interpretation of individual lexical items. In this article, we describe a novel approach to metaphor identification which is based on three intersecting methods: imageability, topic chaining, and semantic clustering. Our hypothesis is that metaphors are likely to use highly imageable words that do not generally have a topical or semantic association with the surrounding context. Our method is thus the following: (1) identify the highly imageable portions of a paragraph, using psycholinguistic measures of imageability, (2) exclude imageability peaks that are part of a topic chain, and (3) exclude imageability peaks that show a semantic relationship to the main topics. We are currently working towards fully automating this method for a number of languages. Besides making our thoughts more vivid and filling our communication with richer imagery, metaphor also plays an important structural role in our cognition. Although there is a consensus in the linguistics and NLP research communities that the phenomenon of metaphor is not restricted to similarity-based extensions of meanings of isolated words, but rather involves reconceptualization of a whole area of experience (target domain) in terms of another (source domain), there still has been no proposal for a comprehensive procedure for annotation of cross-domain mappings. However, a corpus annotated for conceptual mappings could provide a new starting point for both linguistic and cognitive experiments. The annotation scheme we present in this paper is a step towards filling this gap. We test our procedure in an experimental setting involving multiple annotators and estimate their agreement on the task. The associated corpus annotated for source target domain mappings will be publicly available. Many AI researchers and cognitive scientists have argued that analogy is the core of cognition. The most influential work on computational modeling of analogy-making is Structure Mapping Theory (SMT) and its implementation in the Structure Mapping Engine (SME). A limitation of SME is the requirement for complex hand-coded representations. We introduce the Latent Relation Mapping Engine (LRME), which combines ideas from SME and Latent Relational Analysis (LRA) in order to remove the requirement for hand-coded representations. LRME builds analogical mappings between lists of words, using a large corpus of raw text to automatically discover the semantic relations among the words. We evaluate LRME on a set of twenty analogical mapping problems, ten based on scientific analogies and ten based on common metaphors. LRME achieves human-level performance on the twenty problems. We compare LRME with a variety of alternative approaches and find that they are not able to reach the same level of performance. Humans have an uncanny ability to learn new concepts with very few examples. Cognitive theories have suggested that this is done by utilizing prior experience of related tasks. We propose to emulate this process in machines, by transforming new problems into old ones. These transformations are called metaphors. Obviously, the learner is not given a metaphor, but must acquire one through a learning process. We show that learning metaphors yield better results than existing transfer learning methods. Moreover, we argue that metaphors give a qualitative assessment of task relatedness.