Over 50 million scholarly articles have been published: they constitute a unique repository of knowledge. In particular, one may infer from them relations between scientific concepts, such as synonyms and hyponyms. Artificial neural networks have been recently explored for relation extraction. In this work, we continue this line of work and present a system based on a convolutional neural network to extract relations. Our model ranked first in the SemEval-2017 task 10 (ScienceIE) for relation extraction in scientific articles (subtask C).
Supervised methods for relation extraction commonly employ support vector machines @cite_10 @cite_36 @cite_1 @cite_21 , na " ve Bayes @cite_38 , maximum entropy @cite_18 , or conditional random fields @cite_28 . These methods require the practitioner to handcraft features, such as surface features, lexical features, syntactic features @cite_30 or features derived from existing ontologies @cite_14 . The use of kernels based on dependency trees has also been explored @cite_12 @cite_11 @cite_8 .
@cite_30 @cite_38 @cite_18 @cite_14 @cite_8 @cite_36 @cite_28 @cite_21 @cite_1 @cite_10 @cite_12 @cite_11
2060515712 2107598941 910440858 1604644367
The wealth of interaction information provided in biomedical articles motivated the implementation of text mining approaches to automatically extract biomedical relations. This paper presents an unsupervised method based on pattern clustering and sentence parsing to deal with biomedical relation extraction. Pattern clustering algorithm is based on Polynomial Kernel method, which identifies interaction words from unlabeled data; these interaction words are then used in relation extraction between entity pairs. Dependency parsing and phrase structure parsing are combined for relation extraction. Based on the semi-supervised KNN algorithm, we extend the proposed unsupervised approach to a semi-supervised approach by combining pattern clustering, dependency parsing and phrase structure parsing rules. We evaluated the approaches on two different tasks: (1) Protein–protein interactions extraction, and (2) Gene–suicide association extraction. The evaluation of task (1) on the benchmark dataset (AImed corpus) showed that our proposed unsupervised approach outperformed three supervised methods. The three supervised methods are rule based, SVM based, and Kernel based separately. The proposed semi-supervised approach is superior to the existing semi-supervised methods. The evaluation on gene–suicide association extraction on a smaller dataset from Genetic Association Database and a larger dataset from publicly available PubMed showed that the proposed unsupervised and semi-supervised methods achieved much higher F-scores than co-occurrence based method. Modern models of relation extraction for tasks like ACE are based on supervised learning of relations from small hand-labeled corpora. We investigate an alternative paradigm that does not require labeled corpora, avoiding the domain dependence of ACE-style algorithms, and allowing the use of corpora of any size. Our experiments use Freebase, a large semantic database of several thousand relations, to provide distant supervision. For each pair of entities that appears in some Freebase relation, we find all sentences containing those entities in a large unlabeled corpus and extract textual features to train a relation classifier. Our algorithm combines the advantages of supervised IE (combining 400,000 noisy pattern features in a probabilistic classifier) and unsupervised IE (extracting large numbers of relations from large corpora of any domain). Our model is able to extract 10,000 instances of 102 relations at a precision of 67.6 . We also analyze feature performance, showing that syntactic parse features are particularly helpful for relations that are ambiguous or lexically distant in their expression. The goal of relation extraction is to detect relations between two entities in free text. In a sentence, a relation instance usually comprises a small number of words, which yields a sparse feature representation. To make better use of limited information in a relation instance, parsing trees and combined features are employed widely to capture the local dependencies of relation instances. However, the performance of parsing tree-based systems is often degraded by chunking or parsing errors. Combined features are used widely, but few studies have addressed how features can be combined to achieve optimal performance. Thus, in this study, we propose a feature assembly method for relation extraction. Six types of candidate features (head noun, POS tag, n-gram, omni-word, etc.) are employed as atomic features and six constraint conditions (singleton, position, syntax, etc.) are used to combine these features in different settings. Depending on the utilization of candidate features, different constraint conditions can be explored to achieve the optimal extraction performance. Our method is effective for capturing local dependencies and it reduces the errors caused by inaccurate parsing. We tested the proposed method using the ACE 2005 Chinese and English corpora, and it achieved state-of-the-art performance, where it was significantly superior to existing methods. Several recent works on relation extraction have been applying the distant supervision paradigm: instead of relying on annotated text to learn how to predict relations, they employ existing knowledge bases (KBs) as source of supervision. Crucially, these approaches are trained based on the assumption that each sentence which mentions the two related entities is an expression of the given relation. Here we argue that this leads to noisy patterns that hurt precision, in particular if the knowledge base is not directly related to the text we are working with. We present a novel approach to distant supervision that can alleviate this problem based on the following two ideas: First, we use a factor graph to explicitly model the decision whether two entities are related, and the decision whether this relation is mentioned in a given sentence; second, we apply constraint-driven semi-supervision to train this model without any knowledge about which sentences express the relations in our training KB. We apply our approach to extract relations from the New York Times corpus and use Freebase as knowledge base. When compared to a state-of-the-art approach for relation extraction under distant supervision, we achieve 31 error reduction.