This paper develops a theory for group Lasso using a concept called strong group sparsity. Our result shows that group Lasso is superior to standard Lasso for strongly group-sparse signals. This provides a convincing theoretical justification for using group sparse regularization when the underlying group structure is consistent with the data. Moreover, the theory predicts some limitations of the group Lasso formulation that are confirmed by simulation studies.
In @cite_13 , the authors attempted to derive a bound on the number of samples needed to recover block sparse signals, where the coefficients in each block are either all zero or all nonzero. In our terminology, this corresponds to the case of group sparsity with equal size groups. The algorithm considered there is a special case of ) with @math . However, their result is very loose, and does not demonstrate the advantage of group Lasso over standard Lasso.
@cite_13
2077964948 2106460483 2127300249 2538773003
This paper develops a theory for group Lasso using a concept called strong group sparsity. Our result shows that group Lasso is superior to standard Lasso for strongly group-sparse signals. This provides a convincing theoretical justification for using group sparse regularization when the underlying group structure is consistent with the data. Moreover, the theory predicts some limitations of the group Lasso formulation that are confirmed by simulation studies. This paper considers the problem of sparse signal recovery when the decoder has prior information on the sparsity pattern of the data. The data vector x=[x1,...,xN]T has a randomly generated sparsity pattern, where the i-th entry is non-zero with probability pi. Given knowledge of these probabilities, the decoder attempts to recover x based on M random noisy projections. Information-theoretic limits on the number of measurements needed to recover the support set of x perfectly are given, and it is shown that significantly fewer measurements can be used if the prior distribution is sufficiently non-uniform. Furthermore, extensions of Basis Pursuit, LASSO, and Orthogonal Matching Pursuit which exploit the prior information are presented. The improved performance of these methods over their standard counterparts is demonstrated using simulations. The problem of consistently estimating the sparsity pattern of a vector β* ∈ RP based on observations contaminated by noise arises in various contexts, including signal denoising, sparse approximation, compressed sensing, and model selection. We analyze the behavior of l1-constrained quadratic programming (QP), also referred to as the Lasso, for recovering the sparsity pattern. Our main result is to establish precise conditions on the problern dimension p, the number k of nonzero elements in β*, and the number of observations n that are necessary and sufficient for sparsity pattern recovery using the Lasso. We first analyze the case of observations made using deterministic design matrices and sub-Gaussian additive noise, and provide sufficient conditions for support recovery and l∞-error bounds, as well as results showing the necessity of incoherence and bounds on the minimum value. We then turn to the case of random designs, in which each row of the design is drawn from a N(0, Σ) ensemble. For a broad class of Gaussian ensembles satisfying mutual incoherence conditions, we compute explicit values of thresholds 0 0, if n > 2(θu + δ)k log(p - k), then the Lasso succeeds in recovering the sparsity pattern with probability converging to one for large problems, whereas for n < 2(θl - δ)k log(p - k), then the probability of successful recovery converges to zero. For the special case of the uniform Gaussian ensemble (Σ = I p×p), we show that θl = θu = 1, so that the precise threshold n = 2k log (p - k) is exactly determined. This paper investigates a new learning formulation called dynamic group sparsity. It is a natural extension of the standard sparsity concept in compressive sensing, and is motivated by the observation that in some practical sparse data the nonzero coefficients are often not random but tend to be clustered. Intuitively, better results can be achieved in these cases by reasonably utilizing both clustering and sparsity priors. Motivated by this idea, we have developed a new greedy sparse recovery algorithm, which prunes data residues in the iterative process according to both sparsity and group clustering priors rather than only sparsity as in previous methods. The proposed algorithm can recover stably sparse data with clustering trends using far fewer measurements and computations than current state-of-the-art algorithms with provable guarantees. Moreover, our algorithm can adaptively learn the dynamic group structure and the sparsity number if they are not available in the practical applications. We have applied the algorithm to sparse recovery and background subtraction in videos. Numerous experiments with improved performance over previous methods further validate our theoretical proofs and the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.