We present in this paper a novel framework for morpheme segmentation which uses the morpho-syntactic regularities preserved by word representations, in addition to orthographic features, to segment words into morphemes. This framework is the first to consider vocabulary-wide syntactico-semantic information for this task. We also analyze the deficiencies of available benchmarking datasets and introduce our own dataset that was created on the basis of compositionality. We validate our algorithm across datasets and present state-of-the-art results.
MORSE introduces semantic information into its morpheme segmenters via distributed word representations while also relying on orthographic features. Inspired by the work of @cite_32 , instead of merely evaluating semantic relatedness, we are the first to evaluate the morphological relationship via the difference vector of morphologically related words. Comparing the difference vectors of multiple pairs across the corpus following the same morphological relation, gives MORSE a vocabulary-wide evaluation of morphological relations learned.
@cite_32
1975638594 2153419563 1727944201 2951512404
Morphological segmentation breaks words into morphemes (the basic semantic units). It is a key component for natural language processing systems. Unsupervised morphological segmentation is attractive, because in every language there are virtually unlimited supplies of text, but very few labeled resources. However, most existing model-based systems for unsupervised morphological segmentation use directed generative models, making it difficult to leverage arbitrary overlapping features that are potentially helpful to learning. In this paper, we present the first log-linear model for unsupervised morphological segmentation. Our model uses overlapping features such as morphemes and their contexts, and incorporates exponential priors inspired by the minimum description length (MDL) principle. We present efficient algorithms for learning and inference by combining contrastive estimation with sampling. Our system, based on monolingual features only, outperforms a state-of-the-art system by a large margin, even when the latter uses bilingual information such as phrasal alignment and phonetic correspondence. On the Arabic Penn Treebank, our system reduces F1 error by 11 compared to Morfessor. We introduce an approach to learn discriminative visual representations while exploiting external semantic knowledge about object category relationships. Given a hierarchical taxonomy that captures semantic similarity between the objects, we learn a corresponding tree of metrics (ToM). In this tree, we have one metric for each non-leaf node of the object hierarchy, and each metric is responsible for discriminating among its immediate subcategory children. Specifically, a Mahalanobis metric learned for a given node must satisfy the appropriate (dis)similarity constraints generated only among its subtree members' training instances. To further exploit the semantics, we introduce a novel regularizer coupling the metrics that prefers a sparse disjoint set of features to be selected for each metric relative to its ancestor (supercategory) nodes' metrics. Intuitively, this reflects that visual cues most useful to distinguish the generic classes (e.g., feline vs. canine) should be different than those cues most useful to distinguish their component fine-grained classes (e.g., Persian cat vs. Siamese cat). We validate our approach with multiple image datasets using the WordNet taxonomy, show its advantages over alternative metric learning approaches, and analyze the meaning of attribute features selected by our algorithm. We present an algorithm that takes an unannotated corpus as its input, and returns a ranked list of probable morphologically related pairs as its output. The algorithm tries to discover morphologically related pairs by looking for pairs that are both orthographically and semantically similar, where orthographic similarity is measured in terms of minimum edit distance, and semantic similarity is measured in terms of mutual information. The procedure does not rely on a morpheme concatenation model, nor on distributional properties of word substrings (such as affix frequency). Experiments with German and English input give encouraging results, both in terms of precision (proportion of good pairs found at various cutoff points of the ranked list), and in terms of a qualitative analysis of the types of morphological patterns discovered by the algorithm. We present an algorithm that takes an unannotated corpus as its input, and returns a ranked list of probable morphologically related pairs as its output. The algorithm tries to discover morphologically related pairs by looking for pairs that are both orthographically and semantically similar, where orthographic similarity is measured in terms of minimum edit distance, and semantic similarity is measured in terms of mutual information. The procedure does not rely on a morpheme concatenation model, nor on distributional properties of word substrings (such as affix frequency). Experiments with German and English input give encouraging results, both in terms of precision (proportion of good pairs found at various cutoff points of the ranked list), and in terms of a qualitative analysis of the types of morphological patterns discovered by the algorithm.