To find interesting structure in networks, community detection algorithms have to take into account not only the network topology, but also dynamics of interactions between nodes. We investigate this claim using the paradigm of synchronization in a network of coupled oscillators. As the network evolves to a global steady state, nodes belonging to the same community synchronize faster than nodes belonging to different communities. Traditionally, nodes in network synchronization models are coupled via one-to-one, or conservative interactions. However, social interactions are often one-to-many, as for example, in social media, where users broadcast messages to all their followers. We formulate a novel model of synchronization in a network of coupled oscillators in which the oscillators are coupled via one-to-many, or non-conservative interactions. We study the dynamics of different interaction models and contrast their spectral properties. To find multi-scale community structure in a network of interacting nodes, we define a similarity function that measures the degree to which nodes are synchronized and use it to hierarchically cluster nodes. We study real-world social networks, including networks of two social media providers. To evaluate the quality of the discovered communities in a social media network we propose a community quality metric based on user activity. We find that conservative and non-conservative interaction models lead to dramatically different views of community structure even within the same network. Our work offers a novel mathematical framework for exploring the relationship between network structure, topology and dynamics.
It might be argued that taking interactions into account eventually leads to a weighted graph and off-the shelf community detection algorithms for weighted graphs @cite_4 might be applied. However, like in the unweighted case, application of a community detection method on a weighted graph without taking the nature of interaction process into account, might lead to unsatisfactory results. For example, if conductance minimization algorithm is applied on a weighted graph, whose weights are a consequence of a non-conservative process, the structure detected might differ significantly from ground truth. Our method on the other hand learns the weights from the interaction process and then detects structure dynamically. Learning the underlying interaction process from the activity logs of nodes of the network and using this process to determine the community structure is the course of future work.
@cite_4
1967022297
Communities of vertices within a giant network such as the World-Wide Web are likely to be vastly smaller than the network itself. However, Fortunato and Barth ' e lemy have proved that modularity maximization algorithms for community detection may fail to resolve communities with fewer than @math edges, where @math is the number of edges in the entire network. This resolution limit leads modularity maximization algorithms to have notoriously poor accuracy on many real networks. Fortunato and Barth ' e lemy's argument can be extended to networks with weighted edges as well, and we derive this corollary argument. We conclude that weighted modularity algorithms may fail to resolve communities with fewer than @math total edge weight, where @math is the total edge weight in the network and @math is the maximum weight of an inter-community edge. If @math is small, then small communities can be resolved. Given a weighted or unweighted network, we describe how to derive new edge weights in order to achieve a low @math , we modify the CNM'' community detection algorithm to maximize weighted modularity, and show that the resulting algorithm has greatly improved accuracy. In experiments with an emerging community standard benchmark, we find that our simple CNM variant is competitive with the most accurate community detection methods yet proposed.