Machine-translated text plays an important role in modern life by smoothing communication from various communities using different languages. However, unnatural translation may lead to misunderstanding, a detector is thus needed to avoid the unfortunate mistakes. While a previous method measured the naturalness of continuous words using a N-gram language model, another method matched noncontinuous words across sentences but this method ignores such words in an individual sentence. We have developed a method matching similar words throughout the paragraph and estimating the paragraph-level coherence, that can identify machine-translated text. Experiment evaluates on 2000 English human-generated and 2000 English machine-translated paragraphs from German showing that the coherence-based method achieves high performance (accuracy = 87.0 ; equal error rate = 13.0 ). It is efficiently better than previous methods (best accuracy = 72.4 ; equal error rate = 29.7 ). Similar experiments on Dutch and Japanese obtain 89.2 and 97.9 accuracy, respectively. The results demonstrate the persistence of the proposed method in various languages with different resource levels.
Another approach recognizes machine-generated text by analyzing a histogram of word distribution. For example, Labb 'e and Labb 'e suggested an inter-textual metric for estimating the similarity of word distributions @cite_1 . This metric is perfectly used for classifying artificial and real papers with accuracy up to 100 method pointed out that a word distribution of human text is closer with a Zipfian distribution than that of machine one. They also offered some valuable features to support the word distribution, that is specific phrases (e.g., idiom, clich 'e , ancient, dialect, phrasal verb) and co-reference resolution. The restriction of distribution-based methods is that they are only stable with a large number of words. However, the deficiency is revealed on homologous texts that refers to same sources such as paraphrasing and translation because such text mostly contains a same set of words.
@cite_1
2794070657
Computer-generated text plays a pivotal role in various applications, but the quality of the generated text is much lower than that of human-generated text. The use of artificially generated “machine text” can thus negatively affect such practical applications as website generation and text corpora collection. A method for distinguishing computer- and human-generated text is thus needed. Previous methods extract fluency features from a limited internal corpus and use them to identify the generated text. We have extended this approach to also estimate fluency using an enormous external corpus. We have also developed a method for extracting and distinguishing the noises characteristically created by a person or a machine. For example, people frequently use spoken noise words (2morrow, wanna, etc.) and misspelled ones (comin, hapy, etc.) while machines frequently generate incorrect expressions (such as untranslated phrases). A method combining these fluency and noise features was evaluated using 1000 original English messages and 1000 artificial English ones translated from Spanish. The results show that this combined method had the highest accuracy (80.35 ) and the lowest equal error rate (19.44 ) compared with one of state-of-the-art methods, which uses syntactic parser. Moreover, experiments using texts in other languages produced similar results, demonstrated that our proposed method works consistently across various languages.