Similarity metrics are a core component of many information retrieval and machine learning systems. In this work we propose a method capable of learning a similarity metric from data equipped with a binary relation. By considering only the similarity constraints, and initially ignoring the features, we are able to learn target vectors for each instance using one of several appropriately designed loss functions. A regression model can then be constructed that maps novel feature vectors to the same target vector space, resulting in a feature extractor that computes vectors for which a predefined metric is a meaningful measure of similarity. We present results on both multiclass and multi-label classification datasets that demonstrate considerably faster convergence, as well as higher accuracy on the majority of the intrinsic evaluation tasks and all extrinsic evaluation tasks.
The large margin nearest neighbours (LMNN) @cite_14 algorithm employs semidefinite programming to optimise a loss function composed of two terms. Specifically, there are two evaluations of Equation . One term draws very similar instances together, and the other encourages a margin to be formed between dissimilar instances. As the name suggests, the motivation for the development of this algorithm was to improve the accuracy of @math -Nearest Neighbours ( @math -NN) classifiers.
@cite_14
1826077941
Support Vector Machines, SVMs, and the Large Margin Nearest Neighbor algorithm, LMNN, are two very popular learning algorithms with quite different learning biases. In this paper we bring them into a unified view and show that they have a much stronger relation than what is commonly thought. We analyze SVMs from a metric learning perspective and cast them as a metric learning problem, a view which helps us uncover the relations of the two algorithms. We show that LMNN can be seen as learning a set of local SVM-like models in a quadratic space. Along the way and inspired by the metric-based interpretation of SVM s we derive a novel variant of SVMs, epsilon-SVM, to which LMNN is even more similar. We give a unified view of LMNN and the different SVM variants. Finally we provide some preliminary experiments on a number of benchmark datasets in which show that epsilon-SVM compares favorably both with respect to LMNN and SVM.