There are at least two kinds of similarity. Relational similarity is correspondence between relations, in contrast with attributional similarity, which is correspondence between attributes. When two words have a high degree of attributional similarity, we call them synonyms. When two pairs of words have a high degree of relational similarity, we say that their relations are analogous. For example, the word pair mason:stone is analogous to the pair carpenter:wood. This paper introduces Latent Relational Analysis (LRA), a method for measuring relational similarity. LRA has potential applications in many areas, including information extraction, word sense disambiguation, and information retrieval. Recently the Vector Space Model (VSM) of information retrieval has been adapted to measuring relational similarity, achieving a score of 47 on a collection of 374 college-level multiple-choice word analogy questions. In the VSM approach, the relation between a pair of words is characterized by a vector of frequencies of predefined patterns in a large corpus. LRA extends the VSM approach in three ways: (1) the patterns are derived automatically from the corpus, (2) the Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) is used to smooth the frequency data, and (3) automatically generated synonyms are used to explore variations of the word pairs. LRA achieves 56 on the 374 analogy questions, statistically equivalent to the average human score of 57 . On the related problem of classifying semantic relations, LRA achieves similar gains over the VSM.
The problem of relation extraction is, given an input document and a specific relation @math , extract all pairs of entities (if any) that have the relation @math in the document. The problem was introduced as part of the Message Understanding Conferences (MUC) in 1998. zelenko03 present a kernel method for extracting the relations person-affiliation and organization-location . For example, in the sentence John Smith is the chief scientist of the Hardcom Corporation,'' there is a person-affiliation relation between John Smith'' and Hardcom Corporation'' @cite_12 . This is similar to the problem of classifying semantic relations (), except that information extraction focuses on the relation between a specific pair of entities in a specific document, rather than a general pair of words in general text. Therefore an algorithm for classifying semantic relations should be useful for information extraction.
@cite_12
2152380671
Traditional relation extraction seeks to identify pre-specified semantic relations within natural language text, while open Information Extraction (Open IE) takes a more general approach, and looks for a variety of relations without restriction to a fixed relation set. With this generalization comes the question, what is a relation? For example, should the more general task be restricted to relations mediated by verbs, nouns, or both? To help answer this question, we propose two levels of subtasks for Open IE. One task is to determine if a sentence potentially contains a relation between two entities? The other task looks to confirm explicit relation words for two entities. We propose multiple SVM models with dependency tree kernels for both tasks. For explicit relation extraction, our system can extract both noun and verb relations. Our results on three datasets show that our system is superior when compared to state-of-the-art systems like REVERB and OLLIE for both tasks. For example, in some experiments our system achieves 33 improvement on nominal relation extraction over OLLIE. In addition we propose an unsupervised rule-based approach which can serve as a strong baseline for Open IE systems.