In this paper, we present the first large-scale and systematic study to characterize the code reuse practice in the Ethereum smart contract ecosystem. We first performed a detailed similarity comparison study on a dataset of 10 million contracts we had harvested, and then we further conducted a qualitative analysis to characterize the diversity of the ecosystem, understand the correlation between code reuse and vulnerabilities, and detect the plagiarist DApps. Our analysis revealed that over 96 of the contracts had duplicates, while a large number of them were similar, which suggests that the ecosystem is highly homogeneous. Our results also suggested that roughly 9.7 of the similar contract pairs have exactly the same vulnerabilities, which we assume were introduced by code clones. In addition, we identified 41 DApps clusters, involving 73 plagiarized DApps which had caused huge financial loss to the original creators, accounting for 1 3 of the original market volume.
Code clone detection techniques have been studied extensively for dozens of years, including text-based techniques @cite_51 @cite_57 , token-based techniques @cite_41 @cite_2 @cite_50 @cite_14 , counting-based techniques @cite_74 @cite_33 , and syntactic approaches @cite_26 @cite_58 @cite_18 , etc. These techniques were also widely explored in related domains, such as mobile app repackaging detection @cite_31 @cite_70 @cite_56 @cite_77 . In this work, we take advantage of a customized fuzzy hashing technique @cite_52 , which is both light-weight and effective. Note that we did not rely on heavy-weight methods such as comparing the control-flow graph (CFG) and program dependency graph (PDG), mainly due to two reasons. First, our approach should be scalable. Second, the simplicity of smart contracts and EVM bytecode, , the relatively simple logic and function invocations, makes it unnecessary to adopt those heavy approaches. A limited number of studies have explored to study code clones in the smart contracts. For example, Kiffer . identified substantial code reuse in Ethereum @cite_7 . Furthermore, Liu proposed ECLONE @cite_19 , which is able to detect semantic clones for smart contracts. However, none of them have measured the ecosystem in large-scale, and characterized their security impacts.
@cite_18 @cite_14 @cite_26 @cite_33 @cite_7 @cite_41 @cite_70 @cite_52 @cite_56 @cite_57 @cite_77 @cite_19 @cite_50 @cite_2 @cite_74 @cite_31 @cite_58 @cite_51
2511803001 2899305453 2125260159 2286236884 2104609444 2166278331 2157532207 2584966780 2298313545 2041190309 2807866521 2547865220 2088479623 2165739648 2101832700 2098347799 2025962632 2018986336
Code clone detection is an important problem for software maintenance and evolution. Many approaches consider either structure or identifiers, but none of the existing detection techniques model both sources of information. These techniques also depend on generic, handcrafted features to represent code fragments. We introduce learning-based detection techniques where everything for representing terms and fragments in source code is mined from the repository. Our code analysis supports a framework, which relies on deep learning, for automatically linking patterns mined at the lexical level with patterns mined at the syntactic level. We evaluated our novel learning-based approach for code clone detection with respect to feasibility from the point of view of software maintainers. We sampled and manually evaluated 398 file- and 480 method-level pairs across eight real-world Java systems; 93 of the file- and method-level samples were evaluated to be true positives. Among the true positives, we found pairs mapping to all four clone types. We compared our approach to a traditional structure-oriented technique and found that our learning-based approach detected clones that were either undetected or suboptimally reported by the prominent tool Deckard. Our results affirm that our learning-based approach is suitable for clone detection and a tenable technique for researchers. The Ethereum ecosystem has created a prosperity of smart contract applications in public blockchains, with transparent, traceable and programmable transactions. However, the flexibility that everybody can write and deploy smart contracts on Ethereum causes a large collection of similar contracts, i.e., clones. In practice, smart contract clones may amplify severe threats like security attacks, resource waste etc. In this paper, we have developed EClone, a semantic clone detector for Ethereum. The key insight of our clone detection is Symbolic Transaction Sketch, i.e., a set of critical semantic properties generated from symbolic transaction. Sketches of two smart contracts will be normalized into numeric vectors with a same length. Then, the clone detection problem is modeled as a similarity computation process where sketches and other syntactic information are combined. We have applied EClone in identifying semantic clones of deployed Ethereum smart contracts and achieved an accuracy of 93.27 . A demo video of EClone is at https: youtu.be IRasOVv6vyc. Several techniques have been developed for identifying similar code fragments in programs. These similar fragments, referred to as code clones, can be used to identify redundant code, locate bugs, or gain insight into program design. Existing scalable approaches to clone detection are limited to finding program fragments that are similar only in their contiguous syntax. Other, semantics-based approaches are more resilient to differences in syntax, such as reordered statements, related statements interleaved with other unrelated statements, or the use of semantically equivalent control structures. However, none of these techniques have scaled to real world code bases. These approaches capture semantic information from Program Dependence Graphs (PDGs), program representations that encode data and control dependencies between statements and predicates. Our definition of a code clone is also based on this representation: we consider program fragments with isomorphic PDGs to be clones. In this paper, we present the first scalable clone detection algorithm based on this definition of semantic clones. Our insight is the reduction of the difficult graph similarity problem to a simpler tree similarity problem by mapping carefully selected PDG subgraphs to their related structured syntax. We efficiently solve the tree similarity problem to create a scalable analysis. We have implemented this algorithm in a practical tool and performed evaluations on several million-line open source projects, including the Linux kernel. Compared with previous approaches, our tool locates significantly more clones, which are often more semantically interesting than simple copied and pasted code fragments. Despite a decade of active research, there has been a marked lack in clone detection techniques that scale to large repositories for detecting near-miss clones. In this paper, we present a token-based clone detector, SourcererCC, that can detect both exact and near-miss clones from large inter-project repositories using a standard workstation. It exploits an optimized inverted-index to quickly query the potential clones of a given code block. Filtering heuristics based on token ordering are used to significantly reduce the size of the index, the number of code-block comparisons needed to detect the clones, as well as the number of required token-comparisons needed to judge a potential clone. We evaluate the scalability, execution time, recall and precision of SourcererCC, and compare it to four publicly available and state-of-the-art tools. To measure recall, we use two recent benchmarks: (1) a big benchmark of real clones, BigCloneBench, and (2) a Mutation Injection-based framework of thousands of fine-grained artificial clones. We find SourcererCC has both high recall and precision, and is able to scale to a large inter-project repository (25K projects, 250MLOC) using a standard workstation. While finding clones in source code has drawn considerable attention, there has been only very little work in finding similar fragments in binary code and intermediate languages, such as Java bytecode. Some recent studies showed that it is possible to find distinct sets of clone pairs in bytecode representation of source code, which are not always detectable at source code-level. In this paper, we present a bytecode clone detection approach, called SeByte, which exploits the benefits of compilers (the bytecode representation) for detecting a specific type of semantic clones in Java bytecode. SeByte is a hybrid metric-based approach that takes advantage of both, Semantic Web technologies and Set theory. We use a two-step analysis process: (1) Pattern matching via Semantic Web querying and reasoning, and (2) Content matching, using Jaccard coefficient for set similarity measurement. Semantic Web-based pattern matching helps us to find method blocks which share similar patterns even in case of extreme dissimilarity (e.g., numerous repetitions or large gaps). Although it leads to high recall, it gives high false positive rate. We thus use the content matching (via Jaccard) to reduce false positive rate by focusing on content semantic resemblance. Our evaluation of four Java systems and five other tools shows that SeByte can detect a large number of semantic clones that are either not detected or supported by source code based clone detectors. Reusing software through copying and pasting is a continuous plague in software development despite the fact that it creates serious maintenance problems. Various techniques have been proposed to find duplicated redundant code (also known as software clones). A recent study has compared these techniques and shown that token-based clone detection based on suffix trees is extremely fast but yields clone candidates that are often no syntactic units. Current techniques based on abstract syntax trees--on the other hand--find syntactic clones but are considerably less efficient. This paper describes how we can make use of suffix trees to find clones in abstract syntax trees. This new approach is able to find syntactic clones in linear time and space. The paper reports the results of several large case studies in which we empirically compare the new technique to other techniques using the Bellon benchmark for clone detectors. Existing research suggests that a considerable fraction (5-10 ) of the source code of large scale computer programs is duplicate code ("clones"). Detection and removal of such clones promises decreased software maintenance costs of possibly the same magnitude. Previous work was limited to detection of either near misses differing only in single lexems, or near misses only between complete functions. The paper presents simple and practical methods for detecting exact and near miss clones over arbitrary program fragments in program source code by using abstract syntax trees. Previous work also did not suggest practical means for removing detected clones. Since our methods operate in terms of the program structure, clones could be removed by mechanical methods producing in-lined procedures or standard preprocessor macros. A tool using these techniques is applied to a C production software system of some 400 K source lines, and the results confirm detected levels of duplication found by previous work. The tool produces macro bodies needed for clone removal, and macro invocations to replace the clones. The tool uses a variation of the well known compiler method for detecting common sub expressions. This method determines exact tree matches; a number of adjustments are needed to detect equivalent statement sequences, commutative operands, and nearly exact matches. We additionally suggest that clone detection could also be useful in producing more structured code, and in reverse engineering to discover domain concepts and their implementations. If two fragments of source code are identical to each other, they are called code clones. Code clones introduce difficulties in software maintenance and cause bug propagation. In this paper, we present a machine learning framework to automatically detect clones in software, which is able to detect Types-3 and the most complicated kind of clones, Type-4 clones. Previously used traditional features are often weak in detecting the semantic clones The novel aspects of our approach are the extraction of features from abstract syntax trees (AST) and program dependency graphs (PDG), representation of a pair of code fragments as a vector and the use of classification algorithms. The key benefit of this approach is that our approach can find both syntactic and semantic clones extremely well. Our evaluation indicates that using our new AST and PDG features is a viable methodology, since they improve detecting clones on the IJaDataset 2.0. Code duplication or copying a code fragment and then reuse by pasting with or without any modiflcations is a well known code smell in software maintenance. Several studies show that about 5 to 20 of a software systems can contain duplicated code, which is basically the results of copying existing code fragments and using then by pasting with or without minor modiflcations. One of the major shortcomings of such duplicated fragments is that if a bug is detected in a code fragment, all the other fragments similar to it should be investigated to check the possible existence of the same bug in the similar fragments. Refactoring of the duplicated code is another prime issue in software maintenance although several studies claim that refactoring of certain clones are not desirable and there is a risk of removing them. However, it is also widely agreed that clones should at least be detected. In this paper, we survey the state of the art in clone detection research. First, we describe the clone terms commonly used in the literature along with their corresponding mappings to the commonly used clone types. Second, we provide a review of the existing clone taxonomies, detection approaches and experimental evaluations of clone detection tools. Applications of clone detection research to other domains of software engineering and in the same time how other domain can assist clone detection research have also been pointed out. Finally, this paper concludes by pointing out several open problems related to clone detection research. Abstract Context Reusing software by means of copy and paste is a frequent activity in software development. The duplicated code is known as a software clone and the activity is known as code cloning . Software clones may lead to bug propagation and serious maintenance problems. Objective This study reports an extensive systematic literature review of software clones in general and software clone detection in particular. Method We used the standard systematic literature review method based on a comprehensive set of 213 articles from a total of 2039 articles published in 11 leading journals and 37 premier conferences and workshops. Results Existing literature about software clones is classified broadly into different categories. The importance of semantic clone detection and model based clone detection led to different classifications. Empirical evaluation of clone detection tools techniques is presented. Clone management, its benefits and cross cutting nature is reported. Number of studies pertaining to nine different types of clones is reported. Thirteen intermediate representations and 24 match detection techniques are reported. Conclusion We call for an increased awareness of the potential benefits of software clone management, and identify the need to develop semantic and model clone detection techniques. Recommendations are given for future research. Source code clones are categorized into four types of increasing difficulty of detection, ranging from purely textual (Type-1) to purely semantic (Type-4). Most clone detectors reported in the literature work well up to Type-3, which accounts for syntactic differences. In between Type-3 and Type-4, however, there lies a spectrum of clones that, although still exhibiting some syntactic similarities, are extremely hard to detect – the Twilight Zone. Most clone detectors reported in the literature fail to operate in this zone. We present Oreo, a novel approach to source code clone detection that not only detects Type-1 to Type-3 clones accurately, but is also capable of detecting harder-to-detect clones in the Twilight Zone. Oreo is built using a combination of machine learning, information retrieval, and software metrics. We evaluate the recall of Oreo on BigCloneBench, and perform manual evaluation for precision. Oreo has both high recall and precision. More importantly, it pushes the boundary in detection of clones with moderate to weak syntactic similarity in a scalable manner If two fragments of source code are identical to each other, they are called code clones. Code clones introduce difficulties in software maintenance and cause bug propagation. Coarse-grained clone detectors have higher precision than fine-grained, but fine-grained detectors have higher recall than coarse-grained. In this paper, we present a hybrid clone detection technique that first uses a coarse-grained technique to analyze clones effectively to improve precision. Subsequently, we use a fine-grained detector to obtain additional information about the clones and to improve recall. Our method detects Type-1 and Type-2 clones using hash values for blocks, and gapped code clones (Type-3) using block detection and subsequent comparison between them using Levenshtein distance and Cosine measures with varying thresholds. Besides traditional problems such as potential bugs, (smartphone) application clones on Android markets bring new threats. That is, attackers clone the code from legitimate Android applications, assemble it with malicious code or advertisements, and publish these purpose-added" app clones on the same or other markets for benefits. Three inherent and unique characteristics make app clones difficult to detect by existing techniques: a billion opcode problem caused by cross-market publishing, gap between code clones and app clones, and prevalent Type 2 and Type 3 clones. Existing techniques achieve either accuracy or scalability, but not both. To achieve both goals, we use a geometry characteristic, called centroid, of dependency graphs to measure the similarity between methods (code fragments) in two apps. Then we synthesize the method-level similarities and draw a Y N conclusion on app (core functionality) cloning. The observed centroid effect" and the inherent monotonicity" property enable our approach to achieve both high accuracy and scalability. We implemented the app clone detection system and evaluated it on five whole Android markets (including 150,145 apps, 203 million methods and 26 billion opcodes). It takes less than one hour to perform cross-market app clone detection on the five markets after generating centroids only once. This paper examines the effectiveness of a new language- specific parser-based but lightweight clone detection approach. Exploiting a novel application of a source transformation system, the method accurately finds near-miss clones using an efficient text line comparison technique. The transformation system assists the method in three ways. First, using agile parsing it provides user-specified flexible pretty- printing to remove noise, standardize formatting and break program statements into parts such that potential changes can be detected as simple linewise text differences. Second, it provides efficient flexible extraction of potential clones to be compared using island grammars and agile parsing to select granularities and enumerate potential clones. Third, using transformation rules it provides flexible code normalization to allow for local editing differences between similar code segments and filtering out of uninteresting parts of potential clones. In this paper we introduce the theory and practice of the framework and demonstrate its use in finding function clones in C code. Early experiments indicate that the method is capable of finding near-miss clones with high precision and recall, and with reasonable performance. Over the last decade many techniques and tools for software clone detection have been proposed. In this paper, we provide a qualitative comparison and evaluation of the current state-of-the-art in clone detection techniques and tools, and organize the large amount of information into a coherent conceptual framework. We begin with background concepts, a generic clone detection process and an overall taxonomy of current techniques and tools. We then classify, compare and evaluate the techniques and tools in two different dimensions. First, we classify and compare approaches based on a number of facets, each of which has a set of (possibly overlapping) attributes. Second, we qualitatively evaluate the classified techniques and tools with respect to a taxonomy of editing scenarios designed to model the creation of Type-1, Type-2, Type-3 and Type-4 clones. Finally, we provide examples of how one might use the results of this study to choose the most appropriate clone detection tool or technique in the context of a particular set of goals and constraints. The primary contributions of this paper are: (1) a schema for classifying clone detection techniques and tools and a classification of current clone detectors based on this schema, and (2) a taxonomy of editing scenarios that produce different clone types and a qualitative evaluation of current clone detectors based on this taxonomy. The new hybrid clone detection tool NICAD combines the strengths and overcomes the limitations of both text-based and AST-based clone detection techniques and exploits novel applications of a source transformation system to yield highly accurate identification of cloned code in software systems. In this paper, we present an in-depth study of near-miss function clones in open source software using NICAD. We examine more than 20 open source C, Java and Cn systems, including the entire Linux Kernel, Apache httpd, J2SDK-Swing and db4o and compare their use of cloned code in several different dimensions, including language, clone size, clone similarity, clone location and clone density both by proportion of cloned functions and lines of cloned code. We manually verify all detected clones and provide a complete catalogue of different clones in an online repository in a variety of formats. These validated results can be used as a cloning reference for these systems and as a benchmark for evaluating other clone detection tools. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. In this paper we provide an empirical study of function clones in more than 20 open source C, Java and Cn systems of varying kinds and sizes including the entire Linux Kernel, using the new hybrid clone detection method, NICAD. We manually verify all the detected clones and provide a complete catalogue of the different clones in an online repository in a variety of formats. Our studies show that there are a large number of near-miss function clones in those systems. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Many clone detection tools and techniques have been introduced in the literature, and these tools have been used to manage clones and study their effects on software maintenance and evolution. However, the performance of these modern tools is not well known, especially recall. In this paper, we evaluate and compare the recall of eleven modern clone detection tools using four benchmark frameworks, including: (1) Bellon's Framework, (2) our modification to Bellon's Framework to improve the accuracy of its clone matching metrics, (3) 's extension of Bellon's Framework which adds type 3 gap awareness to the framework, and (4) our Mutation and Injection Framework. Bellon's Framework uses a curated corpus of manually validated clones detected by tools contemporary to 2002. In contrast, our Mutation and Injection Framework synthesizes a corpus of artificial clones using a cloning taxonomy produced in 2009. While still very popular in the clone community, there is some concern that Bellon's corpus may not be accurate for modern clone detection tools. We investigate the accuracy of the frameworks by (1) checking for anomalies in their results, (2) checking for agreement between the frameworks, and (3) checking for agreement with our expectations of these tools. Our expectations are researched and flexible. While expectations may contain inaccuracies, they are valuable for identifying possible inaccuracies in a benchmark. We find anomalies in the results of Bellon's Framework, and disagreement with both our expectations and the Mutation Framework. We conclude that Bellon's Framework may not be accurate for modern tools, and that an update of its corpus with clones detected by the modern tools is warranted. The results of the Mutation Framework agree with our expectations in most cases. We suggest that it is a good solution for evaluating modern tools. Clone detection techniques essentially cluster textually, syntactically and or semantically similar code fragments in or across software systems. For large datasets, similarity identification is costly both in terms of time and memory, and especially so when detecting near-miss clones where lines could be modified, added and or deleted in the copied fragments. The capability and effectiveness of a clone detection tool mostly depends on the code similarity measurement technique it uses. A variety of similarity measurement approaches have been used for clone detection, including fingerprint based approaches, which have had varying degrees of success notwithstanding some limitations. In this paper, we investigate the effectiveness of simhash, a state of the art fingerprint based data similarity measurement technique for detecting both exact and near-miss clones in large scale software systems. Our experimental data show that simhash is indeed effective in identifying various types of clones in a software system despite wide variations in experimental circumstances. The approach is also suitable as a core capability for building other tools, such as tools for: incremental clone detection, code searching, and clone management.