This paper is focused on a discussion of parameters and heuristics that are expected to assist multihop routing in becoming more sensitive to node mobility. We provide a discussion concerning existing and a few proposed parameters. Moreover, the work also discusses two new heuristics based on the notion of link duration. The heuristics are compared based on a meaningful set of scenarios that attain different mobility aspects.
A fourth category of work relies on as a measure of improving routing in terms of mobility sensitivity. @cite_9 have proposed whose basic idea is to detect link changes in a quicker way, by increasing the HELLO sending rate. Albeit interesting, such rate only assists in understanding that some nodes may be on the move, but not exactly which.
@cite_9
2127699957
This paper describes two techniques that improve throughput in an ad hoc network in the presence of nodes that agree to forward packets but fail to do so. To mitigate this problem, we propose categorizing nodes based upon their dynamically measured behavior. We use a watchdog that identifies misbehaving nodes and a pathrater that helps routing protocols avoid these nodes. Through simulation we evaluate watchdog and pathrater using packet throughput, percentage of overhead (routing) transmissions, and the accuracy of misbehaving node detection. When used together in a network with moderate mobility, the two techniques increase throughput by 17 in the presence of 40 misbehaving nodes, while increasing the percentage of overhead transmissions from the standard routing protocol's 9 to 17 . During extreme mobility, watchdog and pathrater can increase network throughput by 27 , while increasing the overhead transmissions from the standard routing protocol's 12 to 24 .