Shamir's celebrated secret sharing scheme provides an efficient method for encoding a secret of arbitrary length @math among any @math players such that for a threshold parameter @math , (i) the knowledge of any @math shares does not reveal any information about the secret and, (ii) any choice of @math shares fully reveals the secret. It is known that any such threshold secret sharing scheme necessarily requires shares of length @math , and in this sense Shamir's scheme is optimal. The more general notion of ramp schemes requires the reconstruction of secret from any @math shares, for a positive integer gap parameter @math . Ramp secret sharing scheme necessarily requires shares of length @math . Other than the bound related to secret length @math , the share lengths of ramp schemes can not go below a quantity that depends only on the gap ratio @math . In this work, we study secret sharing in the extremal case of bit-long shares and arbitrarily small gap ratio @math , where standard ramp secret sharing becomes impossible. We show, however, that a slightly relaxed but equally effective notion of semantic security for the secret, and negligible reconstruction error probability, eliminate the impossibility. Moreover, we provide explicit constructions of such schemes. One of the consequences of our relaxation is that, unlike standard ramp schemes with perfect secrecy, adaptive and non-adaptive adversaries need different analysis and construction. For non-adaptive adversaries, we explicitly construct secret sharing schemes that provide secrecy against any @math fraction of observed shares, and reconstruction from any @math fraction of shares, for any choices of @math . Our construction achieves secret length @math , which we show to be optimal. For adaptive adversaries, we construct explicit schemes attaining a secret length @math .
The notion of secrecy in wiretap codes has evolved over years. More recently the notion of semantic security for wiretap model has been introduced @cite_6 , which allows arbitrary message distribution and is shown to be equivalent to negligible leakage with respect to statistical distance. There remains one last distinction between semantically secure wiretap model and secret sharing with fixed share size. That is the nature of the main and wiretapper channels are typically stochastic (e.g., the erasure channel with random i.i.d. erasures), whereas for secret sharing a worst-case guarantee for the erasure patterns is required. Namely, in secret sharing, reconstruction with overwhelming probability is required for every choice of @math or more shares, and privacy of the secret is required for every (adaptive or non-adaptive) choice of the @math shares observed by the adversary.
@cite_6
2123658733
In this work, the critical role of noisy feedback in enhancing the secrecy capacity of the wiretap channel is established. Unlike previous works, where a noiseless public discussion channel is used for feedback, the feed-forward and feedback signals share the same noisy channel in the present model. Quite interestingly, this noisy feedback model is shown to be more advantageous in the current setting. More specifically, the discrete memoryless modulo-additive channel with a full-duplex destination node is considered first, and it is shown that the judicious use of feedback increases the secrecy capacity to the capacity of the source-destination channel in the absence of the wiretapper. In the achievability scheme, the feedback signal corresponds to a private key, known only to the destination. In the half-duplex scheme, a novel feedback technique that always achieves a positive perfect secrecy rate (even when the source-wiretapper channel is less noisy than the source-destination channel) is proposed. These results hinge on the modulo-additive property of the channel, which is exploited by the destination to perform encryption over the channel without revealing its key to the source. Finally, this scheme is extended to the continuous real valued modulo-Lambda channel where it is shown that the secrecy capacity with feedback is also equal to the capacity in the absence of the wiretapper.