Recently there has been a significant effort to handle quantitative properties in formal verification and synthesis. While weighted automata over finite and infinite words provide a natural and flexible framework to express quantitative properties, perhaps surprisingly, some basic system properties such as average response time cannot be expressed using weighted automata, nor in any other know decidable formalism. In this work, we introduce nested weighted automata as a natural extension of weighted automata which makes it possible to express important quantitative properties such as average response time. In nested weighted automata, a master automaton spins off and collects results from weighted slave automata, each of which computes a quantity along a finite portion of an infinite word. Nested weighted automata can be viewed as the quantitative analogue of monitor automata, which are used in run-time verification. We establish an almost complete decidability picture for the basic decision problems about nested weighted automata, and illustrate their applicability in several domains. In particular, nested weighted automata can be used to decide average response time properties.
Register automata. Another related model for specifying quantitative properties are @cite_19 , which are parametrized by cost functions. The main differences between @cite_19 and nested weighted automata are as follows: (i) register automata are over finite words, whereas we consider infinite words, and (ii) we consider nested control of automata, whereas register automaton are non-nested. As a result, both in terms of expressiveness and decidability results nested weighted automata are very different from register automata. For example, the emptiness of register automata with max and sum value functions is decidable, while we show emptiness to be undecidable for deterministic nested weighted automata with these value functions.
@cite_19
1835836356
Weighted automata map input words to numerical values. Applications of weighted automata include formal verification of quantitative properties, as well as text, speech, and image processing. In the 90's, Krob studied the decidability of problems on rational series, which strongly relate to weighted automata. In particular, it follows from Krob's results that the universality problem (that is, deciding whether the values of all words are below some threshold) is decidable for weighted automata with weights in N ∪ ∞ , and that the equality problem is undecidable when the weights are in N ∪ ∞ . In this paper we continue the study of the borders of decidability in weighted automata, describe alternative and direct proofs of the above results, and tighten them further. Unlike the proofs of Krob, which are algebraic in their nature, our proofs stay in the terrain of state machines, and the reduction is from the halting problem of a two-counter machine. This enables us to significantly simplify Krob's reasoning and strengthen the results to apply already to a very simple class of automata: all the states are accepting, there are no initial nor final weights, and all the weights are from the set -1, 0, 1 . The fact we work directly with automata enables us to tighten also the decidability results and to show that the universality problem for weighted automata with weights in N ∪ ∞ , and in fact even with weights in Q≥0 ∪ ∞ , is PSPACE-complete. Our results thus draw a sharper picture about the decidability of decision problems for weighted automata, in both the front of equality vs. universality and the front of the N ∪ ∞ vs. the Z ∪ ∞ domains.