Highlighting while reading is a natural behavior for people to track salient content of a document. It would be desirable to teach an extractive summarizer to do the same. However, a major obstacle to the development of a supervised summarizer is the lack of ground-truth. Manual annotation of extraction units is cost-prohibitive, whereas acquiring labels by automatically aligning human abstracts and source documents can yield inferior results. In this paper we describe a novel framework to guide a supervised, extractive summarization system with question-answering rewards. We argue that quality summaries should serve as a document surrogate to answer important questions, and such question-answer pairs can be conveniently obtained from human abstracts. The system learns to promote summaries that are informative, fluent, and perform competitively on question-answering. Our results compare favorably with those reported by strong summarization baselines as evaluated by automatic metrics and human assessors.
Extractive summarization has seen growing popularity in the past decades @cite_32 . The methods focus on selecting representative sentences from the document(s) and optionally deleting unimportant sentence constituents to form a summary @cite_23 @cite_38 @cite_24 @cite_19 @cite_50 @cite_13 @cite_15 @cite_30 @cite_18 @cite_49 @cite_5 . A majority of the methods are unsupervised. They estimate sentence importance based on the sentence's length and position in the document, whether the sentence contains topical content and its relationship with other sentences. The summarization objective is to select a handful of sentences to maximize the coverage of important content while minimizing summary redundancy. Although unsupervised methods are promising, they cannot benefit from the large-scale training data harvested from the Web @cite_41 @cite_3 @cite_46 .
@cite_30 @cite_38 @cite_18 @cite_41 @cite_46 @cite_32 @cite_3 @cite_24 @cite_19 @cite_23 @cite_50 @cite_49 @cite_5 @cite_15 @cite_13
179757531 1843891098 2341349540 2120543014 2250968833 2568676725 2250483006 2105542801 2288604516 2896255318 2053818817 1526736613 2162704429 2250327935 2065354331
Many methods, including supervised and unsupervised algorithms, have been developed for extractive document summarization. Most supervised methods consider the summarization task as a two-class classification problem and classify each sentence individually without leveraging the relationship among sentences. The unsupervised methods use heuristic rules to select the most informative sentences into a summary directly, which are hard to generalize. In this paper, we present a Conditional Random Fields (CRF) based framework to keep the merits of the above two kinds of approaches while avoiding their disadvantages. What is more, the proposed framework can take the outcomes of previous methods as features and seamlessly integrate them. The key idea of our approach is to treat the summarization task as a sequence labeling problem. In this view, each document is a sequence of sentences and the summarization procedure labels the sentences by 1 and 0. The label of a sentence depends on the assignment of labels of others. We compared our proposed approach with eight existing methods on an open benchmark data set. The results show that our approach can improve the performance by more than 7.1 and 12.1 over the best supervised baseline and unsupervised baseline respectively in terms of two popular metrics F1 and ROUGE-2. Detailed analysis of the improvement is presented as well. Summarization based on text extraction is inherently limited, but generation-style abstractive methods have proven challenging to build. In this work, we propose a fully data-driven approach to abstractive sentence summarization. Our method utilizes a local attention-based model that generates each word of the summary conditioned on the input sentence. While the model is structurally simple, it can easily be trained end-to-end and scales to a large amount of training data. The model shows significant performance gains on the DUC-2004 shared task compared with several strong baselines. Summarization based on text extraction is inherently limited, but generation-style abstractive methods have proven challenging to build. In this work, we propose a fully data-driven approach to abstractive sentence summarization. Our method utilizes a local attention-based model that generates each word of the summary conditioned on the input sentence. While the model is structurally simple, it can easily be trained end-to-end and scales to a large amount of training data. The model shows significant performance gains on the DUC-2004 shared task compared with several strong baselines. Extractive methods for multi-document summarization are mainly governed by information overlap, coherence, and content constraints. We present an unsupervised probabilistic approach to model the hidden abstract concepts across documents as well as the correlation between these concepts, to generate topically coherent and non-redundant summaries. Based on human evaluations our models generate summaries with higher linguistic quality in terms of coherence, readability, and redundancy compared to benchmark systems. Although our system is unsupervised and optimized for topical coherence, we achieve a 44.1 ROUGE on the DUC-07 test set, roughly in the range of state-of-the-art supervised models. We present an approach for extractive single-document summarization. Our approach is based on a weighted graphical representation of documents obtained by topic modeling. We optimize importance, coherence and non-redundancy simultaneously using ILP. We compare ROUGE scores of our system with state-of-the-art results on scientific articles from PLOS Medicine and on DUC 2002 data. Human judges evaluate the coherence of summaries generated by our system in comparision to two baselines. Our approach obtains competitive performance. Extractive summarization aims to generate a summary by ranking sentences, whose performance relies heavily on the quality of sentence features. In this paper, a document summarization framework based on convolutional neural networks is successfully developed to learn sentence features and perform sentence ranking jointly. We adapt the original CNN model to address a regression process for sentence ranking. Pre-trained word vectors are used to enhance the performance of our model. We evaluate our proposed method on the DUC 2002 and 2004 datasets covering single and multi-document summarization tasks respectively. The proposed system achieves competitive or even better performance compared with state-of-the-art document summarization systems. The most successful approaches to extractive text summarization seek to maximize bigram coverage subject to a budget constraint. In this work, we propose instead to maximize semantic volume. We embed each sentence in a semantic space and construct a summary by choosing a subset of sentences whose convex hull maximizes volume in that space. We provide a greedy algorithm based on the GramSchmidt process to efficiently perform volume maximization. Our method outperforms the state-of-the-art summarization approaches on benchmark datasets. Scoring sentences in documents given abstract summaries created by humans is important in extractive multi-document summarization. In this paper, we formulate extractive summarization as a two step learning problem building a generative model for pattern discovery and a regression model for inference. We calculate scores for sentences in document clusters based on their latent characteristics using a hierarchical topic model. Then, using these scores, we train a regression model based on the lexical and structural characteristics of the sentences, and use the model to score sentences of new documents to form a summary. Our system advances current state-of-the-art improving ROUGE scores by 7 . Generated summaries are less redundant and more coherent based upon manual quality evaluations. Extractive document summarization aims to conclude given documents by extracting some salient sentences. Often, it faces two challenges: 1) how to model the information redundancy among candidate sentences; 2) how to select the most appropriate sentences. This paper attempts to build a strong summarizer DivSelect+CNNLM by presenting new algorithms to optimize each of them. Concretely, it proposes CNNLM, a novel neural network language model (NNLM) based on convolutional neural network (CNN), to project sentences into dense distributed representations, then models sentence redundancy by cosine similarity. Afterwards, it formulates the selection process as an optimization problem, constructing a diversified selection process (DivSelect) with the aim of selecting some sentences which have high prestige, meantime, are dissimilar with each other. Experimental results on DUC2002 and DUC2004 benchmark data sets demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. We propose a unified model combining the strength of extractive and abstractive summarization. On the one hand, a simple extractive model can obtain sentence-level attention with high ROUGE scores but less readable. On the other hand, a more complicated abstractive model can obtain word-level dynamic attention to generate a more readable paragraph. In our model, sentence-level attention is used to modulate the word-level attention such that words in less attended sentences are less likely to be generated. Moreover, a novel inconsistency loss function is introduced to penalize the inconsistency between two levels of attentions. By end-to-end training our model with the inconsistency loss and original losses of extractive and abstractive models, we achieve state-of-the-art ROUGE scores while being the most informative and readable summarization on the CNN Daily Mail dataset in a solid human evaluation. One of the important Natural Language Processing applications is Text Summarization, which helps users to manage the vast amount of information available, by condensing documents' content and extracting the most relevant facts or topics included. Text Summarization can be classified according to the type of summary: extractive, and abstractive. Extractive summary is the procedure of identifying important sections of the text and producing them verbatim while abstractive summary aims to produce important material in a new generalized form. In this paper, a novel approach is presented to create an abstractive summary for a single document using a rich semantic graph reducing technique. The approach summaries the input document by creating a rich semantic graph for the original document, reducing the generated graph, and then generating the abstractive summary from the reduced graph. Besides, a simulated case study is presented to show how the original text was minimized to fifty percent. Web queries often give rise to a lot of documents and the user is overwhelmed by the information. Query-specific extractive summarization of a selected set of retrieved documents helps the user to get a gist of the information. The current extractive summary generation systems focus on extracting query-relevant sentences from the documents. However, the selected sentences are presented either in the order in which the documents were considered or in the order in which they were selected. This approach does not guarantee a coherent summary. In this paper, we propose incremental integrated graph to represent the sentences in a collection of documents. Sentences from the documents are merged into a master sequence to improve coherence and flow. The same ordering is used for sequencing the sentences in the extracted summary. User evaluations indicate that the proposed technique markedly improves the user satisfaction with regard to coherence in the summary. We propose a novel approach for unsupervised extractive summarization. Our approach builds a semantic graph for the document to be summarized. Summary extraction is then formulated as optimizing submodular functions defined on the semantic graph. The optimization is theoretically guaranteed to be near-optimal under the framework of submodularity. Extensive experiments on the ICSI meeting summarization task on both human transcripts and automatic speech recognition (ASR) outputs show that the graph-based submodular selection approach consistently outperforms the maximum marginal relevance (MMR) approach, a concept-based approach using integer linear programming (ILP), and a recursive graph-based ranking algorithm using Google's PageRank. We present a new method to generate extractive multi-document summaries. The method uses Integer Linear Programming to jointly maximize the importance of the sentences it includes in the summary and their diversity, without exceeding a maximum allowed summary length. To obtain an importance score for each sentence, it uses a Support Vector Regression model trained on human-authored summaries, whereas the diversity of the selected sentences is measured as the number of distinct word bigrams in the resulting summary. Experimental results on widely used benchmarks show that our method achieves state of the art results, when compared to competitive extractive summarizers, while being computationally efficient as well. Extractive summarization is the strategy of concatenating extracts taken from a corpus into a summary, while abstractive summarization involves paraphrasing the corpus using novel sentences. We define a novel measure of corpus controversiality of opinions contained in evaluative text, and report the results of a user study comparing extractive and NLG-based abstractive summarization at different levels of controversiality. While the abstractive summarizer performs better overall, the results suggest that the margin by which abstraction outperforms extraction is greater when controversiality is high, providing a context in which the need for generation-based methods is especially great.