Recently, a parametrized class of loss functions called @math -loss, @math , has been introduced for classification. This family, which includes the log-loss and the 0-1 loss as special cases, comes with compelling properties including an equivalent margin-based form which is classification-calibrated for all @math . We introduce a generalization of this family to the entire range of @math and establish how the parameter @math enables the practitioner to choose among a host of operating conditions that are important in modern machine learning tasks. We prove that smaller @math values are more conducive to faster optimization; in fact, @math -loss is convex for @math and quasi-convex for @math . Moreover, we establish bounds to quantify the degradation of the local-quasi-convexity of the optimization landscape as @math increases; we show that this directly translates to a computational slow down. On the other hand, our theoretical results also suggest that larger @math values lead to better generalization performance. This is a consequence of the ability of the @math -loss to limit the effect of less likely data as @math increases from 1, thereby facilitating robustness to outliers and noise in the training data. We provide strong evidence supporting this assertion with several experiments on benchmark datasets that establish the efficacy of @math -loss for @math in robustness to errors in the training data. Of equal interest is the fact that, for @math , our experiments show that the decreased robustness seems to counteract class imbalances in training data.
Surrogate loss functions for the @math - @math loss have been widely of interest to the machine learning and statistics communities @cite_18 @cite_2 @cite_0 @cite_10 @cite_13 @cite_17 @cite_3 @cite_14 @cite_20 @cite_23 . Recently, there has been renewed interest in alternative losses for classification @cite_6 @cite_3 @cite_23 @cite_17 @cite_5 other than the oft-used log-loss. During the inception of the field, convex losses were widely considered optimal @cite_18 @cite_13 @cite_10 @cite_0 . However, more recent works propose the use of non-convex losses as a means to moderate the behavior of an algorithm @cite_17 @cite_9 @cite_3 @cite_2 . In particular, motivated by superior robustness and classification accuracy of non-convex losses, Mei @cite_17 studied the empirical landscape of such functions. Along these lines, Hazan @cite_7 introduce SLQC as a means to study the unimodality of quasi-convex functions and their optimization characteristics. For SLQC functions, they introduce Normalized Gradient Descent algorithm and prove its convergence guarantees. Using their methodology, we consider @math -loss under logistic regression for binary classification and derive intuition about the operating characteristics of @math -loss.
@cite_13 @cite_18 @cite_14 @cite_7 @cite_9 @cite_3 @cite_6 @cite_0 @cite_23 @cite_2 @cite_5 @cite_10 @cite_20 @cite_17
2101557761 1863660263 1982032418 2188209982 2912269121 2151532749 2134829400 1969623397 2212774062 2034365297 1964840769 2803642127 2951301236 1825821140
We study losses for binary classification and class probability estimation and extend the understanding of them from margin losses to general composite losses which are the composition of a proper loss with a link function. We characterise when margin losses can be proper composite losses, explicitly show how to determine a symmetric loss in full from half of one of its partial losses, introduce an intrinsic parametrisation of composite binary losses and give a complete characterisation of the relationship between proper losses and "classification calibrated" losses. We also consider the question of the "best" surrogate binary loss. We introduce a precise notion of "best" and show there exist situations where two convex surrogate losses are incommensurable. We provide a complete explicit characterisation of the convexity of composite binary losses in terms of the link function and the weight function associated with the proper loss which make up the composite loss. This characterisation suggests new ways of "surrogate tuning" as well as providing an explicit characterisation of when Bregman divergences on the unit interval are convex in their second argument. Finally, in an appendix we present some new algorithm-independent results on the relationship between properness, convexity and robustness to misclassification noise for binary losses and show that all convex proper losses are non-robust to misclassification noise. Learning with non-modular losses is an important problem when sets of predictions are made simultaneously. The main tools for constructing convex surrogate loss functions for set prediction are margin rescaling and slack rescaling. In this work, we show that these strategies lead to tight convex surrogates iff the underlying loss function is increasing in the number of incorrect predictions. However, gradient or cutting-plane computation for these functions is NP-hard for nonsupermodular loss functions. We propose instead a novel convex surrogate loss function for submodular losses, the Lovasz hinge, which leads to O(p log p) complexity with O(p) oracle accesses to the loss function to compute a gradient or cutting-plane. As a result, we have developed the first tractable convex surrogates in the literature for submodular losses. We demonstrate the utility of this novel convex surrogate through a real world image labeling task. Many of the classification algorithms developed in the machine learning literature, including the support vector machine and boosting, can be viewed as minimum contrast methods that minimize a convex surrogate of the 0–1 loss function. The convexity makes these algorithms computationally efficient. The use of a surrogate, however, has statistical consequences that must be balanced against the computational virtues of convexity. To study these issues, we provide a general quantitative relationship between the risk as assessed using the 0–1 loss and the risk as assessed using any nonnegative surrogate loss function. We show that this relationship gives nontrivial upper bounds on excess risk under the weakest possible condition on the loss function—that it satisfies a pointwise form of Fisher consistency for classification. The relationship is based on a simple variational transformation of the loss function that is easy to compute in many applications. We also present a refined version of this result in the... We study consistency properties of surrogate loss functions for general multiclass learning problems, defined by a general multiclass loss matrix. We extend the notion of classification calibration, which has been studied for binary and multiclass 0-1 classification problems (and for certain other specific learning problems), to the general multiclass setting, and derive necessary and sufficient conditions for a surrogate loss to be calibrated with respect to a loss matrix in this setting. We then introduce the notion of convex calibration dimension of a multiclass loss matrix, which measures the smallest 'size' of a prediction space in which it is possible to design a convex surrogate that is calibrated with respect to the loss matrix. We derive both upper and lower bounds on this quantity, and use these results to analyze various loss matrices. In particular, we apply our framework to study various subset ranking losses, and use the convex calibration dimension as a tool to show both the existence and non-existence of various types of convex calibrated surrogates for these losses. Our results strengthen recent results of (2010) and (2012) on the non-existence of certain types of convex calibrated surrogates in subset ranking. We anticipate the convex calibration dimension may prove to be a useful tool in the study and design of surrogate losses for general multiclass learning problems. We present @math -loss, @math , a tunable loss function for binary classification that bridges log-loss ( @math ) and @math - @math loss ( @math ). We prove that @math -loss has an equivalent margin-based form and is classification-calibrated, two desirable properties for a good surrogate loss function for the ideal yet intractable @math - @math loss. For logistic regression-based classification, we provide an upper bound on the difference between the empirical and expected risk for @math -loss by exploiting its Lipschitzianity along with recent results on the landscape features of empirical risk functions. Finally, we show that @math -loss with @math performs better than log-loss on MNIST for logistic regression. Problems of data classification can be studied in the framework of regularization theory as ill-posed problems. In this framework, loss functions play an important role in the application of regularization theory to classification. In this paper, we review some important convex loss functions, including hinge loss, square loss, modified square loss, exponential loss, logistic regression loss, as well as some non-convex loss functions, such as sigmoid loss, @math -loss, ramp loss, normalized sigmoid loss, and the loss function of 2 layer neural network. Based on the analysis of these loss functions, we propose a new differentiable non-convex loss function, called smoothed 0-1 loss function, which is a natural approximation of the 0-1 loss function. To compare the performance of different loss functions, we propose two binary classification algorithms for binary classification, one for convex loss functions, the other for non-convex loss functions. A set of experiments are launched on several binary data sets from the UCI repository. The results show that the proposed smoothed 0-1 loss function is robust, especially for those noisy data sets with many outliers. While convex losses for binary classification are attractive due to the existence of numerous (provably) efficient methods for finding their global optima, they are sensitive to outliers. On the other hand, while the nonconvex 0-1 loss is robust to outliers, it is NP-hard to optimize and thus rarely directly optimized in practice. In this paper, however, we do just that: we explore a variety of practical methods for direct (approximate) optimization of the 0-1 loss based on branch and bound search, combinatorial search, and coordinate descent on smooth, differentiable relaxations of 0-1 loss. Empirically, we compare our proposed algorithms to logistic regression, SVM, and the Bayes point machine showing that the proposed 0-1 loss optimization algorithms perform at least as well and offer a clear advantage in the presence of outliers. To this end, we believe this work reiterates the importance of 0-1 loss and its robustness properties while challenging the notion that it is difficult to directly optimize. Surrogate losses underlie numerous state-of-the-art binary classification algorithms, such as support vector machines and boosting. The impact of a surrogate loss on the statistical performance of an algorithm is well-understood in symmetric classification settings, where the misclassification costs are equal and the loss is a margin loss. In particular, classification-calibrated losses are known to imply desirable properties such as consistency. While numerous efforts have been made to extend surrogate loss-based algorithms to asymmetric settings, to deal with unequal misclassification costs or training data imbalance, considerably less attention has been paid to whether the modified loss is still calibrated in some sense. This article extends the theory of classification-calibrated losses to asymmetric problems. As in the symmetric case, it is shown that calibrated asymmetric surrogate losses give rise to excess risk bounds, which control the expected misclassification cost in terms of the excess surrogate risk. This theory is illustrated on the class of uneven margin losses, and the uneven hinge, squared error, exponential, and sigmoid losses are treated in detail. We address the problem of designing surrogate losses for learning scoring functions in the context of label ranking. We extend to ranking problems a notion of order-preserving losses previously introduced for multiclass classification, and show that these losses lead to consistent formulations with respect to a family of ranking evaluation metrics. An order-preserving loss can be tailored for a given evaluation metric by appropriately setting some weights depending on this metric and the observed supervision. These weights, called the standard form of the supervision, do not always exist, but we show that previous consistency results for ranking were proved in special cases where they do. We then evaluate a new pairwise loss consistent with the (Normalized) Discounted Cumulative Gain on benchmark datasets. In this letter, we investigate the impact of choosing different loss functions from the viewpoint of statistical learning theory. We introduce a convexity assumption, which is met by all loss functions commonly used in the literature, and study how the bound on the estimation error changes with the loss. We also derive a general result on the minimizer of the expected risk for a convex loss function in the case of classification. The main outcome of our analysis is that for classification, the hinge loss appears to be the loss of choice. Other things being equal, the hinge loss leads to a convergence rate practically indistinguishable from the logistic loss rate and much better than the square loss rate. Furthermore, if the hypothesis space is sufficiently rich, the bounds obtained for the hinge loss are not loosened by the thresholding stage. The goal of binary classification is to estimate a discriminant function y from observations of covariate vectors and corresponding binary labels. We consider an elaboration of this problem in which the covariates are not available directly but are transformed by a dimensionality-reducing quantizer Q. We present conditions on loss functions such that empirical risk minimization yields Bayes consistency when both the discriminant function and the quantizer are estimated. These conditions are stated in terms of a general correspondence between loss functions and a class of functionals known as Ali-Silvey or -divergence functionals. Whereas this correspondence was established by Blackwell [Proc. 2nd Berkeley Symp. Probab. Statist. 1 (1951) 93-102. Univ. California Press, Berkeley] for the 0-1 loss, we extend the correspondence to the broader class of surrogate loss functions that play a key role in the general theory of Bayes consistency for binary classification. Our result makes it possible to pick out the (strict) subset of surrogate loss functions that yield Bayes consistency for joint estimation of the discriminant function and the quantizer. We study binary classification in the presence of class-conditional random noise, where the learner gets to see labels that are flipped independently with some probability, and where the flip probability depends on the class. Our goal is to devise learning algorithms that are efficient and statistically consistent with respect to commonly used utility measures. In particular, we look at a family of measures motivated by their application in domains where cost-sensitive learning is necessary (for example, when there is class imbalance). In contrast to most of the existing literature on consistent classification that are limited to the classical 0-1 loss, our analysis includes more general utility measures such as the AM measure (arithmetic mean of True Positive Rate and True Negative Rate). For this problem of cost-sensitive learning under class-conditional random noise, we develop two approaches that are based on suitably modifying surrogate losses. First, we provide a simple unbiased estimator of any loss, and obtain performance bounds for empirical utility maximization in the presence of i.i.d. data with noisy labels. If the loss function satis_es a simple symmetry condition, we show that using unbiased estimator leads to an efficient algorithm for empirical maximization. Second, by leveraging a reduction of risk minimization under noisy labels to classification with weighted 0-1 loss, we suggest the use of a simple weighted surrogate loss, for which we are able to obtain strong utility bounds. This approach implies that methods already used in practice, such as biased SVM and weighted logistic regression, are provably noise-tolerant. For two practically important measures in our family, we show that the proposed methods are competitive with respect to recently proposed methods for dealing with label noise in several benchmark data sets. We propose a new algorithm for minimizing regularized empirical loss: Stochastic Dual Newton Ascent (SDNA). Our method is dual in nature: in each iteration we update a random subset of the dual variables. However, unlike existing methods such as stochastic dual coordinate ascent, SDNA is capable of utilizing all curvature information contained in the examples, which leads to striking improvements in both theory and practice - sometimes by orders of magnitude. In the special case when an L2-regularizer is used in the primal, the dual problem is a concave quadratic maximization problem plus a separable term. In this regime, SDNA in each step solves a proximal subproblem involving a random principal submatrix of the Hessian of the quadratic function; whence the name of the method. If, in addition, the loss functions are quadratic, our method can be interpreted as a novel variant of the recently introduced Iterative Hessian Sketch. We discuss binary classification from only positive and unlabeled data (PU classification), which is conceivable in various real-world machine learning problems. Since unlabeled data consists of both positive and negative data, simply separating positive and unlabeled data yields a biased solution. Recently, it was shown that the bias can be canceled by using a particular non-convex loss such as the ramp loss. However, classifier training with a non-convex loss is not straightforward in practice. In this paper, we discuss a convex formulation for PU classification that can still cancel the bias. The key idea is to use different loss functions for positive and unlabeled samples. However, in this setup, the hinge loss is not permissible. As an alternative, we propose the double hinge loss. Theoretically, we prove that the estimators converge to the optimal solutions at the optimal parametric rate. Experimentally, we demonstrate that PU classification with the double hinge loss performs as accurate as the non-convex method, with a much lower computational cost.