Subjective questions such as does neymar dive', or is clinton lying', or is trump a fascist', are popular queries to web search engines, as can be seen by autocompletion suggestions on Google, Yahoo and Bing. In the era of cognitive computing, beyond search, they could be handled as hypotheses issued for evaluation. Our vision is to leverage on unstructured data and metadata of the rich user-generated multimedia that is often shared as material evidence in favor or against hypotheses in social media platforms. In this paper we present two preliminary experiments along those lines and discuss challenges for a cognitive computing system that collects material evidence from user-generated multimedia towards aggregating it into some form of collective decision on the hypothesis.
@cite_12 . The validation of natural language claims on arbitrary properties does not seem to suit well sentiment analysis techniques. We show why by means of an example from our collected web claims. The sentence '' receives positive sentiment, while the author clearly does not appreciate his perceived Neymar's behavior. So claim polarity detection taken as sentiment detection is misleading here.
@cite_12
2030841861
This paper presents some results on lexicon-based classification of sentiment polarity in web reviews of products written in Brazilian Portuguese. They represent a first step towards a robust opinion miner from reviews of technology products. The evaluation shows the performance of 3 different sentiment lexicons combined with simple strategies. It is also discussed the risk of considering the rating provided by the writers for the purpose of evaluating the algorithms. The results show that the better combination is the version of the algorithm that deals also with negation and intensification and uses the sentiment lexicon Sent ilex. The average F-measure achieved 0.73.