In contrast to XML query languages as e.g. XPath which require knowledge on the query language as well as on the document structure, keyword search is open to anybody. As the size of XML sources grows rapidly, the need for efficient search indices on XML data that support keyword search increases. In this paper, we present an approach of XML keyword search which is based on the DAG of the XML data, where repeated substructures are considered only once, and therefore, have to be searched only once. As our performance evaluation shows, this DAG-based extension of the set intersection search algorithm[1], [2], can lead to search times that are on large documents more than twice as fast as the search times of the XML-based approach. Additionally, we utilize a smaller index, i.e., we consume less main memory to compute the results.
@cite_9 presents an anchor-based approach to compute the SLCA. From the set of current nodes of each relevant keyword list, they search the so-called anchor, i.e., that node that is closest to all current nodes. As soon as an anchor is identified, they try to exchange each node @math of each other keyword list @math by the next node next( @math ) of @math , in order to check, whether next( @math ) is closer to the anchor than @math and whether next( @math ) defines a new anchor. Finally, the set of anchor nodes form the set of LCA candidates that do not have another LCA candidate child is then reduced to the set of SLCA nodes.
@cite_9
2141957180
Given a set @math of @math strings of total length @math , our task is to report the "most relevant"strings for a given query pattern @math . This involves somewhat more advanced query functionality than the usual pattern matching, as some notion of "most relevant" is involved. In information retrieval literature, this task is best achieved by using inverted indexes. However, inverted indexes work only for some predefined set of patterns. In the pattern matching community, the most popular pattern-matching data structures are suffix trees and suffix arrays. However, a typical suffix tree search involves going through all the occurrences of the pattern over the entire string collection, which might be a lot more than the required relevant documents. The first formal framework to study such kind of retrieval problems was given by [Muthukrishnan, 2002]. He considered two metrics for relevance: frequency and proximity. He took a threshold-based approach on these metrics and gave data structures taking @math words of space. We study this problem in a slightly different framework of reporting the top @math most relevant documents (in sorted order) under similar and more general relevance metrics. Our framework gives linear space data structure with optimal query times for arbitrary score functions. As a corollary, it improves the space utilization for the problems in [Muthukrishnan, 2002] while maintaining optimal query performance. We also develop compressed variants of these data structures for several specific relevance metrics.