A binary string transmitted via a memoryless i.i.d. deletion channel is received as a subsequence of the original input. From this, one obtains a posterior distribution on the channel input, corresponding to a set of candidate supersequences weighted by the number of times the received subsequence can be embedded in them. In a previous work it is conjectured on the basis of experimental data that the entropy of the posterior is minimized and maximized by the constant and the alternating strings, respectively. In this work, we present an algorithm for counting the number of subsequence embeddings using a run-length encoding of strings. We then describe two different ways of clustering the space of supersequences and prove that their cardinality depends only on the length of the received subsequence and its Hamming weight, but not its exact form. Then, we consider supersequences that contain a single embedding of a fixed subsequence, referred to as singletons, and provide a closed form expression for enumerating them using the same run-length encoding. We prove an analogous result for the minimization and maximization of the number of singletons, by the alternating and the uniform strings, respectively. Next, we prove the original minimal entropy conjecture for the special cases of single and double deletions using similar clustering techniques and the same run-length encoding, which allow us to characterize the distribution of the number of subsequence embeddings in the space of compatible supersequences to demonstrate the effect of an entropy decreasing operation.
Perhaps rather surprisingly, the problem of determining the number of occurrences of a fixed subsequence in random sequences has not received the same amount and level of attention from the various communities. The state-of-the-art in the finite-length regime remains rather limited in scope. More precisely, the distribution of the number of occurrences constitutes a central problem in coding theory, with a maximum likelihood decoding argument, which represents the holy grail in the study of deletion channels. A comprehensive survey, which among other things, outlines the significance of figuring out this particular distribution is given by Mitzenmacher in @cite_13 .
@cite_13
2963712885
This paper studies problems in data reconstruction, an important area with numerous applications. In particular, we examine the reconstruction of binary and nonbinary sequences from synchronization (insertion deletion-correcting) codes. These sequences have been corrupted by a fixed number of symbol insertions (larger than the minimum edit distance of the code), yielding a number of distinct traces to be used for reconstruction. We wish to know the minimum number of traces needed for exact reconstruction. This is a general version of a problem tackled by Levenshtein for uncoded sequences. We introduce an exact formula for the maximum number of common supersequences shared by sequences at a certain edit distance, yielding an upper bound on the number of distinct traces necessary to guarantee exact reconstruction. Without specific knowledge of the code words, this upper bound is tight. We apply our results to the famous single deletion insertion-correcting Varshamov–Tenengolts (VT) codes and show that a significant number of VT code word pairs achieve the worst case number of outputs needed for exact reconstruction. We also consider extensions to other channels, such as adversarial deletion and insertion deletion channels and probabilistic channels.