Clustering is a fundamental task in data analysis, and spectral clustering has been recognized as a promising approach to it. Given a graph describing the relationship between data, spectral clustering explores the underlying cluster structure in two stages. The first stage embeds the nodes of the graph into real space, and the second stage groups the embedded nodes into several clusters. The use of the @math -means method in the grouping stage is currently standard practice. We present a spectral clustering algorithm that uses convex programming in the grouping stage, and study how well it works. The concept behind the algorithm design lies in the following observation. The nodes with the largest degree in each cluster may be found by computing an enclosing ellipsoid for embedded nodes in real space, and the clusters may be identified by using those nodes. We show that the observations are valid, and the algorithm returns clusters to provide the conductance of graph, if the gap assumption, introduced by Peng el al. at COLT 2015, is satisfied. We also give an experimental assessment of the algorithm's performance.
We next describe the results of Kolev and Mehlhorn in @cite_29 . They showed the following statement in Theorem 1.2 of the paper. Set @math as After suitable renumbering of the output of the algorithm, we have Accordingly, if @math , We see that the results of Kolev and Mehlhorn improve the approximation accuracy of by a factor of @math and weakens the gap assumption. Kolev and Mehlhorn also studied a spectral clustering algorithm that uses a @math -means method based on the Lloyd's algorithm and examined the performance.
@cite_29
2950958145
We consider the problem of selecting the best subset of exactly @math columns from an @math matrix @math . We present and analyze a novel two-stage algorithm that runs in @math time and returns as output an @math matrix @math consisting of exactly @math columns of @math . In the first (randomized) stage, the algorithm randomly selects @math columns according to a judiciously-chosen probability distribution that depends on information in the top- @math right singular subspace of @math . In the second (deterministic) stage, the algorithm applies a deterministic column-selection procedure to select and return exactly @math columns from the set of columns selected in the first stage. Let @math be the @math matrix containing those @math columns, let @math denote the projection matrix onto the span of those columns, and let @math denote the best rank- @math approximation to the matrix @math . Then, we prove that, with probability at least 0.8, @math This Frobenius norm bound is only a factor of @math worse than the best previously existing existential result and is roughly @math better than the best previous algorithmic result for the Frobenius norm version of this Column Subset Selection Problem (CSSP). We also prove that, with probability at least 0.8, @math This spectral norm bound is not directly comparable to the best previously existing bounds for the spectral norm version of this CSSP. Our bound depends on @math , whereas previous results depend on @math ; if these two quantities are comparable, then our bound is asymptotically worse by a @math factor.