Efficiently querying Description Logic (DL) ontologies is becoming a vital task in various data-intensive DL applications. Considered as a basic service for answering object queries over DL ontologies, instance checking can be realized by using the most specific concept (MSC) method, which converts instance checking into subsumption problems. This method, however, loses its simplicity and efficiency when applied to large and complex ontologies, as it tends to generate very large MSCs that could lead to intractable reasoning. In this paper, we propose a revision to this MSC method for DL SHI , allowing it to generate much simpler and smaller concepts that are specific enough to answer a given query. With independence between computed MSCs, scalability for query answering can also be achieved by distributing and parallelizing the computations. An empirical evaluation shows the efficacy of our revised MSC method and the significant efficiency achieved when using it for answering object queries.
On the other hand, for efficient ABox reasoning and instance checking, various optimization techniques have been developed, including lazy unfolding, absorption, heuristic guided search, exploration of Horn clauses of DLs @cite_28 @cite_0 @cite_45 , model merging @cite_40 and extended pseudo model merging technique @cite_32 @cite_11 .
@cite_28 @cite_32 @cite_0 @cite_40 @cite_45 @cite_11
183822441 1543879878 94495030 182717014 176609766 1548134621
A fundamental problem in Description Logics (DLs) is satisfiability, the problem of checking if a given DL terminology T remains sufficiently unconstrained to enable at least one instance of a given DL concept C to exist. It has been known for some time that lazy unfolding is an important optimization technique in model building algorithms for satisfiability [2]. It is also imperative for large terminologies to be manipulated by an absorption generation process to maximize the benefits of lazy unfolding in such algorithms, thereby reducing the combinatorial effects of disjunction in underlying chase procedures [5]. In this paper, we propose a generalization of the absorption theory and algorithms developed by Horrocks and Tobies [6, 7]. The generalization, called binary absorption, makes it possible for lazy unfolding to be used for parts of terminologies not handled by current absorption algorithms and theory. The basic idea of binary absorption is to avoid the need to internalize (at least some of the) terminological axioms of the form This paper investigates optimization techniques and data structures exploiting the use of so-called pseudo models. These techniques are applied to speed up TBox and ABox reasoning for the description logics ALCNHR+ and ALC(D). The advances are demonstrated by an empirical analysis using the description logic system RACE that implements TBox and ABox reasoning for ALCNHR+. Recently, several approaches have been proposed on combining description logic (DL) reasoning with database techniques. In this paper we report on the LAS (Large Abox Store) system extending the DL reasoner Racer with a database used to store and query Tbox and Abox information. LAS stores for given knowledge bases their taxonomy and their complete Abox in its database. The Aboxes may contain role assertions. LAS can answer Tbox and Abox queries by combining SQL queries with DL reasoning. The architecture of LAS is based on merging techniques for so-called individual pseudo models. Automated verification of multi-threaded programs is difficult. Direct treatment of all possible thread interleavings by reasoning about the program globally is a prohibitively expensive task, even for small programs. Rely-guarantee reasoning is a promising technique to address this challenge by reducing the verification problem to reasoning about each thread individually with the help of assertions about other threads. In this paper, we propose a proof rule that uses rely-guarantee reasoning for compositional verification of termination properties. The crux of our proof rule lies in its compositionality wrt. the thread structure of the program and wrt. the applied termination arguments --- transition invariants. We present a method for automating the proof rule using an abstraction refinement procedure that is based on solving recursion-free Horn clauses. To deal with termination, we extend an existing Horn-clause solver with the capability to handle well-foundedness constraints. Finally, we present an experimental evaluation of our algorithm on a set of micro-benchmarks. Horn clause logic programming can be extended to include abduction with integrity constraints. In the resulting extension of logic programming, negation by failure can be simulated by making negative conditions abducible and by imposing appropriate denials and disjunctions as integrity constraints. This gives an alternative semantics for negation by failure, which generalises the stable model semantics of negation by failure. The abductive extension of logic programming extends negation by failure in three ways: (1) computation can be perfonned in alternative minimal models, (2) positive as well as negative conditions can be made abducible, and (3) other integrity constraints can also be accommodated. * This paper was written while the first author was at Imperial College. 235 Introduction The tenn "abduction" was introduced by the philosopher Charles Peirce [1931] to refer to a particular kind of hypothetical reasoning. In the simplest case, it has the fonn: From A and A fB infer B as a possible "explanation" of A. Abduction has been given prominence in Charniak and McDennot's [1985] "Introduction to Artificial Intelligence", where it has been applied to expert systems and story comprehension. Independently, several authors have developed deductive techniques to drive the generation of abductive hypotheses. Cox and Pietrzykowski [1986] construct hypotheses from the "dead ends" of linear resolution proofs. Finger and Genesereth [1985] generate "deductive solutions to design problems" using the "residue" left behind in resolution proofs. Poole, Goebel and Aleliunas [1987] also use linear resolution to generate hypotheses. All impose the restriction that hypotheses should be consistent with the "knowledge base". Abduction is a fonn of non-monotonic reasoning, because hypotheses which are consistent with one state of a knowledge base may become inconSistent when new knowledge is added. Poole [1988] argues that abduction is preferable to noh-monotonic logics for default reasoning. In this view, defaults are hypotheses fonnulated within classical logic rather than conclusions derived withln some fonn of non-monotonic logic. The similarity between abduction and default reasoning was also pointed out in [Kowalski, 1979]. In this paper we show how abduction can be integrated with logic programming, and we concentrate on the use of abduction to generalise negation by failure. Conditional Answers Compared with Abduction In the simplest case, a logic program consists of a set of Horn Clauses, which are used backward to_reduce goals to sub goals. The initial goal is solved when there are no subgollls left; We critically evaluate the current state of research in multiple query opGrnization, synthesize the requirements for a modular opCrnizer, and propose an architecture. Our objective is to facilitate future research by providing modular subproblems and a good general-purpose data structure. In rhe context of this archiuzcture. we provide an improved subsumption algorithm. and discuss migration paths from single-query to multiple-query oplimizers. The architecture has three key ingredients. First. each type of work is performed at an appropriate level of abstraction. Segond, a uniform and very compact representation stores all candidate strategies. Finally, search is handled as a discrete optimization problem separable horn the query processing tasks. 1. Problem Definition and Objectives A multiple query optimizer (h4QO) takes several queries as input and seeks to generate a good multi-strategy, an executable operator gaph that simultaneously computes answers to all the queries. The idea is to save by evaluating common subexpressions only once. The commonalities to be exploited include identical selections and joins, predicates that subsume other predicates, and also costly physical operators such as relation scans and SOULS. The multiple query optimization problem is to find a multi-strategy that minimizes the total cost (with overlap exploited). Figure 1 .l shows a multi-strategy generated exploiting commonalities among queries Ql-Q3 at both the logical and physical level. To be really satisfactory, a multi-query optimization algorithm must offer solution quality, ejjiciency, and ease of Permission to copy without fee all a part of this mataial is granted provided that the copies are nut made a diitributed for direct commercial advantage, the VIDB copyright notice and the title of the publication and its date appear, and notice is given that copying is by permission of the Very Large Da Blse Endowment. To copy otherwise. urturepublim identify many kinds of commonalities (e.g., by predicate splitting, sharing relation scans); and search effectively to choose a good combination of l-strategies. Efficiency requires that the optimization avoid a combinatorial explosion of possibilities, and that within those it considers, redundant work on common subexpressions be minimized. ‘Finally, ease of implementation is crucial an algorithm will be practically useful only if it is conceptually simple, easy to attach to an optimizer, and requires relatively little additional soft-