Low latency services such as credit-card fraud detection and website targeted advertisement rely on Big Data platforms (e.g., Lucene, Graphchi, Cassandra) which run on top of memory managed runtimes, such as the JVM. These platforms, however, suffer from unpredictable and unacceptably high pause times due to inadequate memory management decisions (e.g., allocating objects with very different lifetimes next to each other, resulting in memory fragmentation). This leads to long and frequent application pause times, breaking Service Level Agreements (SLAs). This problem has been previously identified and results show that current memory management techniques are ill-suited for applications that hold in memory massive amounts of middle to long-lived objects (which is the case for a wide spectrum of Big Data applications). Previous works try to reduce such application pauses by allocating objects off-heap or in special allocation regions generations, thus alleviating the pressure on memory management. However, all these solutions require a combination of programmer effort and knowledge, source code access, or off-line profiling, with clear negative impact on programmer productivity and or application performance. This paper presents ROLP, a runtime object lifetime profiling system. ROLP profiles application code at runtime in order to identify which allocation contexts create objects with middle to long lifetimes, given that such objects need to be handled differently (regarding short-lived ones). This profiling information greatly improves memory management decisions, leading to long tail latencies reduction of up to 51 for Lucene, 85 for GraphChi, and 60 for Cassandra, with negligible throughput and memory overhead. ROLP is implemented for the OpenJDK 8 HotSpot JVM and it does not require any programmer effort or source code access.
@cite_14 performs online profiling to optimize memory allocation operations; it performs a single allocation (improvement over allocation inlining) of a block big enough to fit multiple objects that are allocated in sequence. Objects need not have parent-child or sibling relationships among them because it is the control-flow relations between hot code flows and locations that are monitored, as we address in our work. So, while allocations may take place in different methods, equivalent GC behavior is ensured. However, while doing online profiling, it only addresses initial allocation and not the issue of pretenuring objects.
@cite_14
2079366392
This paper introduces dynamic object colocation, an optimization to reduce copying costs in generational and other incremental garbage collectors by allocating connected objects together in the same space. Previous work indicates that connected objects belong together because they often have similar lifetimes. Generational collectors, however, allocate all new objects in a nursery space. If these objects are connected to data structures residing in the mature space, the collector must copy them. Our solution is a cooperative optimization that exploits compiler analysis to make runtime allocation decisions. The compiler analysis discovers potential object connectivity for newly allocated objects. It then replaces these allocations with calls to coalloc, which takes an extra parameter called the colocator object. At runtime, coalloc determines the location of the colocator and allocates the new object together with it in either the nursery or mature space. Unlike pretenuring, colocation makes precise per-object allocation decisions and does not require lifetime analysis or allocation site homogeneity. Experimental results for SPEC Java benchmarks using Jikes RVM show colocation can reduce garbage collection time by 50 to 75 , and total performance by up to 1 .