We present PoWerStore, the first efficient robust storage protocol that achieves optimal latency without using digital signatures. PoWerStore's robustness comprises tolerating asynchrony, maximum number of Byzantine storage servers, any number of Byzantine readers and crash-faulty writers, and guaranteeing wait-freedom and linearizability of read write operations. PoWerStore's efficiency stems from combining lightweight authentication, erasure coding and metadata write-backs where readers write-back only metadata to achieve linearizability. At the heart of PoWerStore are Proofs of Writing (PoW): a novel storage technique based on lightweight cryptography. PoW enable reads and writes in the single-writer variant of PoWerStore to have latency of 2 rounds of communication between a client and storage servers in the worst-case (which we show optimal). We further present and implement a multi-writer PoWerStore variant featuring 3-round writes reads where the third read round is invoked only under active attacks, and show that it outperforms existing robust storage protocols, including crash-tolerant ones.
In the unauthenticated model, @cite_16 ruled out the existence of optimally resilient robust Byzantine fault-tolerant storage implementation where all write operations finish after a single communication round. This explained the previous difficulties in reaching optimal resilience in unauthenticated BFT storage implementations where several protocols have used @math servers @cite_2 @cite_1 . Furthermore, @cite_33 showed the impossibility of reading from a robust optimally resilient linearizable storage in two communication rounds; in addition, if operations perform a constant number of rounds, even reading in three rounds is impossible @cite_33 . These results imply that the optimal latency of a robust optimally resilient and linearizable BFT storage in the unauthenticated model is 2 rounds for writes and 4 rounds for reads, even in the single writer case. This can be achieved by the regular-to-linearizable transformation of the regular @cite_27 storage protocol of @cite_10 . Hence, it is not surprising that other robust BFT storage protocols in the unauthenticated model focused on optimizing common-case latency with either an unbounded number of read rounds in the worst case @cite_12 @cite_49 or a number of read rounds dependent on the number of faulty processes @math @cite_0 @cite_42 .
@cite_33 @cite_42 @cite_1 @cite_0 @cite_27 @cite_49 @cite_2 @cite_16 @cite_10 @cite_12
2089883915 1487382749 2155405969 2114579022 2171337572 2124037649 1498481277 2129467152 2074527773 1965159636
We study the time-complexity of robust atomic read write storage from fault-prone storage components in asynchronous message-passing systems. Robustness here means wait-free tolerating the largest possible number t of Byzantine storage component failures (optimal resilience) without relying on data authentication. We show that no single-writer multiple-reader (SWMR) robust atomic storage implementation exists if (a) read operations complete in less than four communication round-trips (rounds), and (b) the time complexity of write operations is constant. More precisely, we present two lower bounds. The first is a read lower bound stating that three rounds of communication are necessary to read from a SWMR robust atomic storage. The second is a write lower bound, showing that Ω(log(t)) write rounds are necessary to read in three rounds from such a storage. Applied to known results, our lower bounds close a fundamental gap: we show that time-optimal robust atomic storage can be obtained using well-known transformations from regular to atomic storage and existing time-optimal regular storage implementations. Byzantine fault-tolerant storage systems can provide high availability in hazardous environments, but the redundant servers they require increase software development and hardware costs. In order to minimize the number of servers required to implement fault-tolerant storage services, we develop a new algorithm that uses a "Listeners" pattern of network communication to detect and resolve ordering ambiguities created by concurrent accesses to the system. Our protocol requires 3f + 1 servers to tolerate up to f Byzantine faults--f fewer than the 4f + 1 required by existing protocols for non-self-verifying data. In addition, SBQ-L provides atomic consistency semantics, which is stronger than the regular or pseudo-atomic semantics provided by these existing protocols. We show that this protocol is optimal in the number of servers-- any protocol that provides safe semantics or stronger requires at least 3f + 1 servers to tolerate f Byzantine faults in an asynchronous system. Finally, we examine a non-confirmable writes variation of the SBQ-L protocol where a client cannot determine when its writes complete. We show that SBQ-L with non-confirmable writes provides regular semantics with 2f + 1 servers and that this number of servers is minimal. This paper studies the time complexity of reading unauthenticated data from a distributed storage made of a set of failure-prone base objects. More specifically, we consider the abstraction of a robust read write storage that provides wait-free access to unauthenticated data over a set of base storage objects with t possible failures, out of which at most b are arbitrary and the rest are simple crash failures.We prove a 2 communication round-trip lower bound for reading from a safe storage that uses at most 2t+2b base objects, independently of the number or round-trips needed by the writer. We then prove the lower bound tight by exhibiting a regular storage that uses 2t+b+1 base objects (optimal resilience) and features 2 communication round-trips for both read and write operations. Our growing reliance on online services accessible on the Internet demands highly available systems that provide correct service without interruptions. Software bugs, operator mistakes, and malicious attacks are a major cause of service interruptions and they can cause arbitrary behavior, that is, Byzantine faults. This article describes a new replication algorithm, BFT, that can be used to build highly available systems that tolerate Byzantine faults. BFT can be used in practice to implement real services: it performs well, it is safe in asynchronous environments such as the Internet, it incorporates mechanisms to defend against Byzantine-faulty clients, and it recovers replicas proactively. The recovery mechanism allows the algorithm to tolerate any number of faults over the lifetime of the system provided fewer than 1 3 of the replicas become faulty within a small window of vulnerability. BFT has been implemented as a generic program library with a simple interface. We used the library to implement the first Byzantine-fault-tolerant NFS file system, BFS. The BFT library and BFS perform well because the library incorporates several important optimizations, the most important of which is the use of symmetric cryptography to authenticate messages. The performance results show that BFS performs 2p faster to 24p slower than production implementations of the NFS protocol that are not replicated. This supports our claim that the BFT library can be used to build practical systems that tolerate Byzantine faults. This paper describes a decentralized consistency protocol for survivable storage that exploits local data versioning within each storage-node. Such versioning enables the protocol to efficiently provide linearizability and wait-freedom of read and write operations to erasure-coded data in asynchronous environments with Byzantine failures of clients and servers. By exploiting versioning storage-nodes, the protocol shifts most work to clients and allows highly optimistic operation: reads occur in a single round-trip unless clients observe concurrency or write failures. Measurements of a storage system prototype using this protocol show that it scales well with the number of failures tolerated, and its performance compares favorably with an efficient implementation of Byzantine-tolerant state machine replication. We present Abstract (ABortable STate mAChine replicaTion), a new abstraction for designing and reconfiguring generalized replicated state machines that are, unlike traditional state machines, allowed to abort executing a client’s request if “something goes wrong.” Abstract can be used to considerably simplify the incremental development of efficient Byzantine fault-tolerant state machine replication ( BFT ) protocols that are notorious for being difficult to develop. In short, we treat a BFT protocol as a composition of Abstract instances. Each instance is developed and analyzed independently and optimized for specific system conditions. We illustrate the power of Abstract through several interesting examples. We first show how Abstract can yield benefits of a state-of-the-art BFT protocol in a less painful and error-prone manner. Namely, we develop AZyzzyva, a new protocol that mimics the celebrated best-case behavior of Zyzzyva using less than 35p of the Zyzzyva code. To cover worst-case situations, our abstraction enables one to use in AZyzzyva any existing BFT protocol. We then present Aliph, a new BFT protocol that outperforms previous BFT protocols in terms of both latency (by up to 360p) and throughput (by up to 30p). Finally, we present R-Aliph, an implementation of Aliph that is robust, that is, whose performance degrades gracefully in the presence of Byzantine replicas and Byzantine clients. In round-by-round models of distributed computing processes run in a sequence of (synchronous or asynchronous) rounds. The advantage of the round-by-round approach is that invariants established in the first round are preserved in later rounds. An elegant asynchronous round-by-round shared memory model, is the iterated snapshots model (IS). Instead of the snapshots model where processes share an array m[ċ] that can be accessed any number of times, indexed by process ID, where Pi writes to m[i] and can take a snapshot of the entire array, we have processes share a two-dimensional array m[ċ, ċ], indexed by iteration number and by process ID, where Pi in iteration r writes once to m[r, i] and takes one snapshot of row r, m[r, ċ]. The IS model lends itself more easily to combinatorial analysis. However, to show that whenever a task is impossible in the IS model the task is impossible in the snapshots model, a simulation is needed. Such a simulation was presented by Borowsky and Gafni in PODC97; namely, it was shown how to take a wait-free protocol for the snapshots model, and transform it into a protocol for the IS model, solving the same task. In this paper we present a new simulation from the snapshots model to the IS model, and show that it can be extended to work with models stronger that wait-free. The main contribution is to show that the simulation can work with models that have access to certain communication objects, called 01-tasks. This extends the result of Gafni, Rajsbaum and Herlihy in DISC'2006 stating that renaming is strictly weaker than set agreement from the IS model to the usual non-iterated wait-free read write shared memory model. We also show that our simulation works with t-resilient models and the more general dependent process failure model of Junqueira and Marzullo. This version of the simulation extends previous results by Herlihy and Rajsbaum in PODC'2010 and DISC'2010 about the topological connectivity of a protocol complex in an iterated dependent process failure model, to the corresponding non-iterated model. There are currently two approaches to providing Byzantine-fault-tolerant state machine replication: a replica-based approach, e.g., BFT, that uses communication between replicas to agree on a proposed ordering of requests, and a quorum-based approach, such as Q U, in which clients contact replicas directly to optimistically execute operations. Both approaches have shortcomings: the quadratic cost of inter-replica communication is un-necessary when there is no contention, and Q U requires a large number of replicas and performs poorly under contention. We present HQ, a hybrid Byzantine-fault-tolerant state machine replication protocol that overcomes these problems. HQ employs a lightweight quorum-based protocol when there is no contention, but uses BFT to resolve contention when it arises. Furthermore, HQ uses only 3f + 1 replicas to tolerate f faults, providing optimal resilience to node failures. We implemented a prototype of HQ, and we compare its performance to BFT and Q U analytically and experimentally. Additionally, in this work we use a new implementation of BFT designed to scale as the number of faults increases. Our results show that both HQ and our new implementation of BFT scale as f increases; additionally our hybrid approach of using BFT to handle contention works well. We present Byzantine Disk Paxos, an asynchronous shared-memory consensus algorithm that uses a collection of n < 3t disks, t of which may fail by becoming non-responsive or arbitrarily corrupted. We give two constructions of this algorithm; that is, we construct two different t-tolerant (i.e., tolerating up to t disk failures) building blocks, each of which can be used, along with a leader oracle, to solve consensus. One building block is a t-tolerant wait-free shared safe register. The second building block is a t-tolerant regular register that satisfies a weaker termination (liveness) condition than wait freedom: its write operations are wait-free, whereas its read operations are guaranteed to return only in executions with a finite number of writes. We call this termination condition finite writes (FW), and show that wait-free consensus is solvable with FW-terminating registers and a leader oracle. We construct each of these t-tolerant registers from n < 3t base registers, t of which can be non-responsive or Byzantine. All the previous t-tolerant wait-free constructions in this model used at least 4t + 1 fault-prone registers, and we are not familiar with any prior FW-terminating constructions in this model. Modern Byzantine fault-tolerant state machine replication (BFT) protocols involve about 20,000 lines of challenging C++ code encompassing synchronization, networking and cryptography. They are notoriously difficult to develop, test and prove. We present a new abstraction to simplify these tasks. We treat a BFT protocol as a composition of instances of our abstraction. Each instance is developed and analyzed independently. To illustrate our approach, we first show how our abstraction can be used to obtain the benefits of a state-of-the-art BFT protocol with much less pain. Namely, we develop AZyzzyva, a new protocol that mimics the behavior of Zyzzyva in best-case situations (for which Zyzzyva was optimized) using less than 24 of the actual code of Zyzzyva. To cover worst-case situations, our abstraction enables to use in AZyzzyva any existing BFT protocol, typically, a classical one like PBFT which has been tested and proved correct. We then present Aliph, a new BFT protocol that outperforms previous BFT protocols both in terms of latency (by up to 30 ) and throughput (by up to 360 ). The development of Aliph required two new instances of our abstraction. Each instance contains less than 25 of the code needed to develop state-of-the-art BFT protocols.