Vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication is a key component of the future autonomous driving systems. V2V can provide an improved awareness of the surrounding environment, and the knowledge about the future actions of nearby vehicles. However, V2V communication is subject to different kind of failures and delays, so a distributed fault-tolerant approach is required for safe and efficient transportation. This work considers fully autonomous vehicles that operates using local sensory information, and aided with fault-tolerant V2V communication. The sensors provide all basic functionality, but are overridden by V2V whenever is possible to increase the efficiency. As an example scenario, we consider intersection crossing (IC) with autonomous vehicles that cooperate via V2V communication, and propose a fully distributed and a fault-tolerant algorithm for this problem. According to our numerical results, based on a real data set, we show the crossing delay is only slightly increased in the presence of a burst of V2V failures, and that V2V can be successfully used in most scenarios.
In @cite_23 , the authors provide a survey on vehicle detection techniques, with a focus on computer vision. The sensors are classified into two groups: active (such as lasers, radars and lidars) and passive (such as cameras, and acoustic sensors), and then compared to each other in terms of range, cost and many other features. The radar is considered as the best active sensor, since it provides long-range ( @math ) real-time detection even under very bad weather (e.g., foggy, rainy) conditions. On the other hand, a radar is not able to determine the shape of the object, which can be done with lidar, a costly alternative. These problems encouraged authors to focus on passive sensors, such as cameras. Cameras are low-cost sensors, able to provide a very precise information about the objects. However, their main drawback is a high complexity of data processing, low range during nights, and sensitivity to weather conditions. Note that authors did not consider any kind of communication between vehicles that would resolve some of the sensors' problems.
@cite_23
2767597440
Vehicle detection and tracking in real scenarios are key components to develop assisted and autonomous driving systems. Lidar sensors are specially suitable for this task, as they bring robustness to harsh weather conditions while providing accurate spatial information. However, the resolution provided by point cloud data is very scarce in comparison to camera images. In this work we explore the possibilities of Deep Learning (DL) methodologies applied to low resolution 3D lidar sensors such as the Velodyne VLP-16 (PUCK), in the context of vehicle detection and tracking. For this purpose we developed a lidar-based system that uses a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), to perform point-wise vehicle detection using PUCK data, and Multi-Hypothesis Extended Kalman Filters (MH-EKF), to estimate the actual position and velocities of the detected vehicles. Comparative studies between the proposed lower resolution (VLP-16) tracking system and a high-end system, using Velodyne HDL-64, were carried out on the Kitti Tracking Benchmark dataset. Moreover, to analyze the influence of the CNN-based vehicle detection approach, comparisons were also performed with respect to the geometric-only detector. The results demonstrate that the proposed low resolution Deep Learning architecture is able to successfully accomplish the vehicle detection task, outperforming the geometric baseline approach. Moreover, it has been observed that our system achieves a similar tracking performance to the high-end HDL-64 sensor at close range. On the other hand, at long range, detection is limited to half the distance of the higher-end sensor.