We consider scheduling of colored packets with transition costs which form a general metric space. We design a @math competitive algorithm. Our main result is a hardness result of @math which matches the competitive ratio of the algorithm for each metric space separately. In particular, we improve the hardness result of Azar at el. 2009 for uniform metric spaces. We also extend our result to weighted directed graphs which obey the triangular inequality and show a @math competitive algorithm and a nearly-matching hardness result. In proving our hardness results we use some interesting non-standard embedding.
In the bounded delay model @cite_14 we are given a sequence of incoming packets. Each packet is characterized by a value and a deadline. The goal is to find a schedule that maximizes the number of packets that were transmitted before the deadline. The earliest deadline first (EDF) strategy is known to achieve an optimal throughput when all the packets have the same value. For arbitrary values the following results are known. A deterministic competitive algorithm of about @math @cite_27 @cite_31 and a hardness result of @math @cite_5 @cite_30 @cite_20 . A randomized competitive algorithm of @math @cite_18 @cite_19 and a hardness result of @math @cite_30 . For additional papers related to the bounded delay model see @cite_16 @cite_24 @cite_8 .
@cite_30 @cite_18 @cite_14 @cite_8 @cite_24 @cite_19 @cite_27 @cite_5 @cite_31 @cite_16 @cite_20
1537647641 2076648698 2101261740 2155749359 2952044966 2094169594 2144862578 2027034953 1544216698 2168521983 2054524518
We study the online problem of multiplexing packets with arbitrary deadlines in bounded multi-buffer switch. In this model, a switch consists of m input buffers each with bounded capacity B and one output port. Each arriving packet is associated with a value and a deadline that specifies the time limit till the packet can be transmitted. At each time step the switch can select any non-empty buffer and transmit one packet from that buffer. In the preemptive model, stored packets may be preempted from their buffers due to lack of buffer space or discarded due to the violation of the deadline constraints. If preemption is not allowed, every packet accepted and stored in the buffer must be transmitted before its deadline has expired. The goal is to maximize the benefit of the packets transmitted by their deadlines. To date, most models for packets with deadlines assumed a single buffer. To the best of our knowledge this is the first time a bounded multi-buffer switch is used with arbitrary deadline constraints Our main result is a 9.82-competitive deterministic algorithm for packets with arbitrary values and deadlines. Note that the greedy algorithm is not competitive. For the non-preemptive model we present a 2-competitive deterministic algorithm for the unit value packets. For arbitrary values we present a randomized algorithm whose competitiveness is logarithmic in the ratio between the largest and the smallest value of the packets in the sequence We consider packet scheduling in a network providing differentiated services, where each packet is assigned a value. We study various queueing models for supporting QoS (Quality of Service). In the nonpreemptive model, packets accepted to the queue will be transmitted eventually and cannot be dropped. The FIFO preemptive model allows packets accepted to the queue to be preempted (dropped) prior to their departure, while ensuring that transmitted packets are sent in the order of arrival. In the bounded delay model, packets must be transmitted before a certain deadline, otherwise it is lost (while transmission ordering is allowed to be arbitrary). In all models the goal of the buffer policy is to maximize the total value of the accepted packets.Let α be the ratio between the maximal and minimal value. For the non-preemptive model we derive a Θ(log &alpha) competitive ratio, both exhibiting a buffer policy and a general lower bound. For the interesting case of two distinct values, we give an 2α--1 α competitive buffer policy, which exactly matches the lower bound. We also analyze a RED-like policy and derive its competitive ratio, which is approximately 2α--0.5 α for two values and Θ(log α) for multiple values. In addition we improve the previous known lower and upper bounds of the Fixed Partition and Flexible Partition policies.For the FIFO preemptive model, we improve the general lower bound and show a tight bound for the special case of queue size 2. We prove that the bounded delay model with uniform delay 2 is equivalent to a modified FIFO preemptive model with queue size 2. We then give improved upper and lower bounds on the 2-uniform bounded delay model. We also give lower bound for the 2-variable bounded delay model, which matches the previously known upper bound. We consider buffer management of unit packets with deadlines for a multi-port device with reconfiguration overhead. The goal is to maximize the throughput of the device, i.e., the number of packets delivered by their deadline. For a single port or with free reconfiguration, the problem reduces to the well-known packets scheduling problem, where the celebrated earliest-deadline-first (EDF) strategy is optimal 1-competitive. However, EDF is not 1-competitive when there is a reconfiguration overhead. We design an online algorithm that achieves a competitive ratio of 1 - o(1) when the ratio between the minimum laxity of the packets and the number of ports tends to infinity. This is one of the rare cases where one can design an almost 1-competitive algorithm. One ingredient of our analysis, which may be interesting on its own right, is a perturbation theorem on EDF for the classical packets scheduling problem. Specifically, we show that a small perturbation in the release and deadline times cannot significantly degrade the optimal throughput. This implies that EDF is robust in the sense that its throughput is close to the optimum even when the deadlines are not precisely known. Motivated by the quality-of-service (QoS) buffer management problem, we consider online scheduling of packets with hard deadlines in a finite capacity queue. At any time, a queue can store at most b isin Z + packets. Packets arrive over time. Each packet is associated with a non-negative value and an integer deadline. In each time step, only one packet is allowed to be sent. Our objective is to maximize the total value gained by the packets sent by their deadlines in an online manner. Due to the Internet traffic's chaotic characteristics, no stochastic assumptions are made on the packet input sequences. This model is called a finite-queue model. We use competitive analysis to measure an online algorithm's performance versus an unrealizable optimal offline algorithm who constructs the worst possible input based on the knowledge of the online algorithm. For the finite-queue model, we first present a deterministic 3-competitive memoryless online algorithm. Then, we give a randomized (Phi 2 = (1+radic(5) 2) 2 ap 2.618)-competitive memoryless online algorithm. The algorithmic framework and its theoretical analysis include several interesting features. First, our algorithms use (possibly) modified characteristics of packets; these characteristics may not be same as those specified in the input sequence. Second, our analysis method is different from the classical potential function approach. We use a simple charging scheme, which depends on a clever modification (during the course of the algorithm) on the packets in the queue of the optimal offline algorithm. We then prove that a set of invariants holds at the end of each time step. Finally, we analyze the two proposed algorithm in a relaxed model, in which packets have no hard deadlines but an order. We conclude that both algorithms have the same competitive ratios in the relaxed model. We consider the optimal online packet scheduling problem in a single-user energy harvesting wireless communication system, where energy is harvested from natural renewable sources, making future energy arrivals instants and amounts random in nature. The most general case of arbitrary energy arrivals is considered where neither the future energy arrival instants or amount, nor their distribution is known. The problem considered is to adaptively change the transmission rate according to the causal energy arrival information, such that the time by which all packets are delivered is minimized. We assume that all bits have arrived and are ready at the source before the transmission begins. For a minimization problem, the utility of an online algorithm is tested by finding its competitive ratio or competitiveness that is defined to be the maximum of the ratio of the gain of the online algorithm with the optimal offline algorithm over all input sequences. We derive a lower and upper bound on the competitive ratio of any online algorithm to minimize the total transmission time in an energy harvesting system. The upper bound is obtained using a lazy' transmission policy that chooses its transmission power to minimize the transmission time assuming that no further energy arrivals are going to occur in future. The lazy transmission policy is shown to be strictly two-competitive. We also derive an adversarial lower bound that shows that competitive ratio of any online algorithm is at least 1.325. In this paper, we consider a source node that operates over a time varying channel with energy harvesting capability. The goal of the source is to maximize the average number of successfully delivered packets per time slot. The source is able to choose whether to transmit a packet or defer the transmission in each time slot. The decision which is chosen by the source depends on the channel information available and the length of the energy queue. We formulate the problem of finding the optimal policy as a Markovian decision problem. We show some properties of the value function that represents the discounted number of successfully delivered packets per time slot. We prove that the optimal policy is a threshold type policy depending on the state of the channel and the length of the energy queue. We also derive an upper bound for the average number of packets per time slots successfully received by the destination. We show using numerical results that this bound is a tight bound on the performance of the optimal policy. And we consider the case of time varying channel but without channel state information (CSI). Then, we study the impact of channel time varying nature and the availability of CSI. In this case, we show that the optimal policy is a greedy policy. The performance of this greedy policy is also calculated. We consider the question of obtaining tight delay guarantees for throughout-optimal link scheduling in arbitrary topology wireless ad-hoc networks. We consider two classes of scheduling policies: 1) a maximum queue-length weighted independent set scheduling policy, and 2) a randomized independent set scheduling policy where the independent set scheduling probabilities are selected optimally. Both policies stabilize all queues for any set of feasible packet arrival rates, and are therefore throughput-optimal. For these policies and i.i.d. packet arrivals, we show that the average packet delay is bounded by a constant that depends on the chromatic number of the interference graph, and the overall load on the network. We also prove that this upper bound is asymptotically tight in the sense that there exist classes of topologies where the expected delay attained by any scheduling policy is lower bounded by the same constant. Through simulations we examine the scaling of the average packet delay with respect to the overall load on the network, and the chromatic number of the link interference graph. We consider the question of obtaining tight delay guarantees for throughout-optimal link scheduling in arbitrary topology wireless ad-hoc networks. Two classes of scheduling policies are considered: 1) a maximum queue-length weighted independent set scheduling policy and 2) a randomized independent set scheduling policy where the set scheduling probabilities are selected optimally. Both policies stabilize all queues for any set of feasible packet arrival rates, and are therefore throughput-optimal. For these policies, we show that the average packet delay is bounded by a constant that depends on the chromatic number of the interference graph, and the arrival slack in the system-a metric representing the overall load on the network. We prove that this upper bound is asymptotically tight in the sense that there exist classes of topologies where the expected delay attained by any scheduling policy is lower bounded by the same constant. We extend our upper bounds to the case of multi-hop sessions. Through simulations, we study how our analysis compares with actual delays computed for i.i.d., Markovian, and trace-driven packet arrival processes. Motivated by providing differentiated services in the Internet, we consider online buffer management algorithms for quality-of-service network switches. We study a multi-buffer model . Packets have values and deadlines; they arrive at a switch over time. The switch consists of multiple buffers whose sizes are bounded. In each time step, only one pending packet can be sent. Our objective is to maximize the total value of the packets sent by their deadlines. We employ competitive analysis to measure an online algorithm's performance. In this paper, we first show that the lower bound of competitive ratio of a broad family of online algorithms is 2. Then we propose a ( @math )-competitive deterministic algorithm, which is improved from the previously best-known result 9.82 (Azar and Levy. SWAT 2006). In this paper, we investigate the optimal packet scheduling problem in a two-user multiple access communication system, where the transmitters are able to harvest energy from the nature. Under a deterministic system setting, we assume that the energy harvesting times and harvested energy amounts are known before the transmission starts. For the packet arrivals, we assume that packets have already arrived and are ready to be transmitted at the transmitter before the transmission starts. Our goal is to minimize the time by which all packets from both users are delivered to the destination through controlling the transmission powers and transmission rates of both users. We first develop a generalized iterative backward waterfilling algorithm to characterize the maximum departure region of the transmitters for any given deadline T. Then, based on the sequence of maximum departure regions at energy arrival instants, we decompose the transmission completion time minimization problem into convex optimization problems and solve the overall problem efficiently. As the Internet becomes more mature, there is a realization that improving the performance of routers has the potential to substantially improve Internet performance in general. Currently, most routers forward packets in a First-In-First-Out (FIFO) order. However, the diversity of applications supported by modern IP-based networks has resulted in unpredictable packet flows, and heterogeneous network traffic. Thus, it is becoming more reasonable to consider differentiating between different types of packets, and perhaps to consider allowing packets to specify a deadline by which it must be processed. These issues have made buffer management at routers a critical issue in providing effective quality of service to the various applications that use the network. In this paper, we study an online problem in which each packet is described by its discrete arrival time, non-negative weight and discrete deadline; arriving packets are buffered for delivery and all packets have the same processing time. The packets arrive online, and our objective is to maximize the sum of weights of those packets that are sent by their deadlines. We describe an online deterministic algorithm with a competitive ratio of 1.854, improving the best previous known competitive ratio of 1.939 ( STACS 2004). The algorithmic framework we use has several interesting features. First, we do not use a potential function. Instead, after each step we modify the adversary's buffer. Second, we introduce "dummy packets" to facilitate the decision making.