Evolutionary Learning proceeds by evolving a population of classifiers, from which it generally returns (with some notable exceptions) the single best-of-run classifier as final result. In the meanwhile, Ensemble Learning, one of the most efficient approaches in supervised Machine Learning for the last decade, proceeds by building a population of diverse classifiers. Ensemble Learning with Evolutionary Computation thus receives increasing attention. The Evolutionary Ensemble Learning (EEL) approach presented in this paper features two contributions. First, a new fitness function, inspired by co-evolution and enforcing the classifier diversity, is presented. Further, a new selection criterion based on the classification margin is proposed. This criterion is used to extract the classifier ensemble from the final population only (Off-line) or incrementally along evolution (On-line). Experiments on a set of benchmark problems show that Off-line outperforms single-hypothesis evolutionary learning and state-of-art Boosting and generates smaller classifier ensembles.
The MOO perspective was further investigated by Chandra and Yao in the DIVACE system, a highly sophisticated system for the multi-level evolution of ensemble of classifiers @cite_9 @cite_13 . In @cite_13 , the top-level evolution simultaneously minimizes the error rate (accuracy) and maximizes the negative correlation (diversity). In @cite_9 , the negative correlation-inspired criterion is replaced by a ; the difference concerns the misclassification of examples that are correctly classified by other classifiers. Finally, the ensemble is constructed either by keeping all classifiers in the final population, or by clustering the final population (after their phenotypic distance) and selecting a classifier in each cluster.
@cite_9 @cite_13
2010941383 2734283703
Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for the construction of neural ensembles is a relatively new area of research. We recently proposed an ensemble learning algorithm called DIVACE (DIVerse and ACcurate Ensemble learning algorithm). It was shown that DIVACE tries to find an optimal trade-off between diversity and accuracy as it searches for an ensemble for some particular pattern recognition task by treating these two objectives explicitly separately. A detailed discussion of DIVACE together with further experimental studies form the essence of this paper. A new diversity measure which we call Pairwise Failure Crediting (PFC) is proposed. This measure forms one of the two evolutionary pressures being exerted explicitly in DIVACE. Experiments with this diversity measure as well as comparisons with previously studied approaches are hence considered. Detailed analysis of the results show that DIVACE, as a concept, has promise. Abstract In the last years, multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) have been extensively used to generate sets of fuzzy rule-based classifiers (FRBCs) with different trade-offs between accuracy and interpretability. Since the computation of the accuracy for each chromosome evaluation requires the scan of the overall training set, these approaches have proved to be very expensive in terms of execution time and memory occupation. For this reason, they have not been applied to very large datasets yet. On the other hand, just for these datasets, interpretability of classifiers would be very desirable. In the last years the advent of a number of open source cluster computing frameworks has however opened new interesting perspectives. In this paper, we exploit one of these frameworks, namely Apache Spark, and propose the first distributed multi-objective evolutionary approach to learn concurrently the rule and data bases of FRBCs by maximizing accuracy and minimizing complexity. During the evolutionary process, the computation of the fitness is divided among the cluster nodes, thus allowing the designer to distribute both the computational complexity and the dataset storing. We have performed a number of experiments on ten real-world big datasets, evaluating our distributed approach in terms of both classification rate and scalability, and comparing it with two well-known state-of-art distributed classifiers. Finally, we have evaluated the achievable speedup on a small computer cluster. We present that the distributed version can efficiently extract compact rule bases with high accuracy, preserving the interpretability of the rule base, and can manage big datasets even with modest hardware support.