Named entity discovery (NED) is an important information retrieval problem that can be decomposed into two sub-problems. The first sub-problem, named entity recognition (NER), aims to tag pre-defined sets of words in a vocabulary (called "named entities": names, places, locations, ...) when they appear in natural language. The second subproblem, named entity linking identification (NEL), considers these entity mentions as queries to be identified in a pre-existing database. In this paper, we consider the NEL problem, and assume a set of queries (or mentions) that have to be identified within a knowledge base. This knowledge base is represented by a text database paired with a semantic graph. We present state-of-the-art methods in NEL, and propose a 2-step method for individual identification of named entities. Our approach is well-motivated by the limitations brought by recent deep learning approaches that lack interpratability, and require lots of parameter tuning along with large volume of annotated data. First of all, we propose a filtering algorithm designed with information retrieval and text mining techniques, aiming to maximize precision at K (typically for 5 <= K <=20). Then, we introduce two graph-based methods for named entity identification to maximize precision at 1 by re-ranking the remaining top entity candidates. The first identification method is using parametrized graph mining, and the second similarity with graph kernels. Our approach capitalizes on a fine-grained classification of entities from annotated web data. We present our algorithms in details, and show experimentally on standard datasets (NIST TAC-KBP, CONLL AIDA) their performance in terms of precision are better than any graph-based method reported, and competitive with state-of-the-art systems. Finally, we conclude on the advantages of our graph-based approach compared to recent deep learning methods.
Equation can be formulated as a boolean integer program, but the nature of @math being arbitrarly complex (e.g shortest-path function) does not allow to solve the general case, especially when @math . Therefore, other formulations are preferred : a rule-based individual linking has been proposed @cite_7 , and @cite_14 proposed a collective formulation for entity linking decisions, in which evidence can be reinforced into high-probability decisions.
@cite_14 @cite_7
1515930456 2003412429
The problem of deciding the satisfiability of a quantifier-free formula with respect to a background theory, also known as Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT), is gaining increasing relevance in verification: representation capabilities beyond propositional logic allow for a natural modeling of real-world problems (e.g., pipeline and RTL circuits verification, proof obligations in software systems). In this paper, we focus on the case where the background theory is the combination T1∪T2 of two simpler theories. Many SMT procedures combine a boolean model enumeration with a decision procedure for T1∪T2, where conjunctions of literals can be decided by an integration schema such as Nelson-Oppen, via a structured exchange of interface formulae (e.g., equalities in the case of convex theories, disjunctions of equalities otherwise). We propose a new approach for SMT(T1∪T2), called Delayed Theory Combination, which does not require a decision procedure for T1∪T2, but only individual decision procedures for T1 and T2, which are directly integrated into the boolean model enumerator. This approach is much simpler and natural, allows each of the solvers to be implemented and optimized without taking into account the others, and it nicely encompasses the case of non-convex theories. We show the effectiveness of the approach by a thorough experimental comparison. Symbolic decision trees are not the only way to correlate the relationship between flags and numeric variables. Boolean formulae can also represent such relationships where the integer variables are modelled with bit-vectors of propositional variables. Boolean formulae can be composed to express the semantics of a block and program state, but they are hardly tractable, hence the need to compute their abstractions. This paper shows how incremental SAT can be applied to derive range and set abstractions for bit-vectors that are constrained by Boolean formulae.