People might not be close-at-hand but they still are - by virtue of the social network. The social network has transformed lives in many ways. People can express their views, opinions and life experiences on various platforms be it Twitter, Facebook or any other medium there is. Such events constitute of reviewing a product or service, conveying views on political banters, predicting share prices or giving feedback on the government policies like Demonetization or GST. These social platforms can be used to investigate the insights of the emotional curve that the general public is generating. This kind of analysis can help make a product better, predict the future prospects and also to implement the public policies in a better way. Such kind of research on sentiment analysis is increasing rapidly. In this research paper, we have performed temporal analysis and spatial analysis on 1,42,508 and 58,613 tweets respectively and these tweets were posted during the post-GST implementation period from July 04, 2017 to July 25, 2017. The tweets were collected using the Twitter streaming API. A well-known lexicon, National Research Council Canada (NRC) emotion Lexicon is used for opinion mining that exhibits a blend of eight basic emotions i.e. joy, trust, anticipation, surprise, fear sadness, anger, disgust and two sentiments i.e. positive and negative for 6,554 words.
A similar paper is @cite_4 which has presented a work that identifies fake tweets by using various features from tweets and twitter accounts.
@cite_4
2555891875
The utilization of social media material in journalistic workflows is increasing, demanding automated methods for the identification of mis- and disinformation. Since textual contradiction across social media posts can be a signal of rumorousness, we seek to model how claims in Twitter posts are being textually contradicted. We identify two different contexts in which contradiction emerges: its broader form can be observed across independently posted tweets and its more specific form in threaded conversations. We define how the two scenarios differ in terms of central elements of argumentation: claims and conversation structure. We design and evaluate models for the two scenarios uniformly as 3-way Recognizing Textual Entailment tasks in order to represent claims and conversation structure implicitly in a generic inference model, while previous studies used explicit or no representation of these properties. To address noisy text, our classifiers use simple similarity features derived from the string and part-of-speech level. Corpus statistics reveal distribution differences for these features in contradictory as opposed to non-contradictory tweet relations, and the classifiers yield state of the art performance.