We consider the problem of asynchronous online testing, aimed at providing control of the false discovery rate (FDR) during a continual stream of data collection and testing, where each test may be a sequential test that can start and stop at arbitrary times. This setting increasingly characterizes real-world applications in science and industry, where teams of researchers across large organizations may conduct tests of hypotheses in a decentralized manner. The overlap in time and space also tends to induce dependencies among test statistics, a challenge for classical methodology, which either assumes (overly optimistically) independence or (overly pessimistically) arbitrary dependence between test statistics. We present a general framework that addresses both of these issues via a unified computational abstraction that we refer to as "conflict sets." We show how this framework yields algorithms with formal FDR guarantees under a more intermediate, local notion of dependence. We illustrate these algorithms in simulation experiments, comparing to existing algorithms for online FDR control.
There is a large and growing literature on false discoveries in multiple testing, aimed at solving a range of problems, often addressing issues of scientific reproducibility in research @cite_8 . Here we focus on work whose methods or objectives have the most overlap with ours. In particular, we focus on literature on online'' methods in multiple testing, and compare and contrast those solutions to the ones we propose. The most salient difference is that we address the general problem of asynchrony; when there is no asynchrony, our approach recovers a slew of existing methods, including work by , , , .
@cite_8
1792016789
ABSTRACTMultiple testing problems arising in modern scientific applications can involve simultaneously testing thousands or even millions of hypotheses, with relatively few true signals. In this article, we consider the multiple testing problem where prior information is available (for instance, from an earlier study under different experimental conditions), that can allow us to test the hypotheses as a ranked list to increase the number of discoveries. Given an ordered list of n hypotheses, the aim is to select a data-dependent cutoff k and declare the first k hypotheses to be statistically significant while bounding the false discovery rate (FDR). Generalizing several existing methods, we develop a family of “accumulation tests” to choose a cutoff k that adapts to the amount of signal at the top of the ranked list. We introduce a new method in this family, the HingeExp method, which offers higher power to detect true signals compared to existing techniques. Our theoretical results prove that these metho...