We consider the totally asymmetric simple exclusion process in a critical scaling parametrized by @math , which creates a shock in the particle density of order @math @math the observation time. When starting from step initial data, we provide bounds on the limiting law which in particular imply that in the double limit @math one recovers the product limit law and the degeneration of the correlation length observed at shocks of order @math . This result is shown to apply to a general last-passage percolation model. We also obtain bounds on the two-point functions of several @math processes.
Here we rehash some of the known results that we will use in this paper, and describe the method of proof from @cite_20 , which is relevant to this paper.
@cite_20
2607925462
A citing sentence is one that appears in a scientific article and cites previous work. Citing sentences have been studied and used in many applications. For example, they have been used in scientific paper summarization, automatic survey generation, paraphrase identification, and citation function classification. Citing sentences that cite multiple papers are common in scientific writing. This observation should be taken into consideration when using citing sentences in applications. For instance, when a citing sentence is used in a summary of a scientific paper, only the fragments of the sentence that are relevant to the summarized paper should be included in the summary. In this paper, we present and compare three different approaches for identifying the fragments of a citing sentence that are related to a given target reference. Our methods are: word classification, sequence labeling, and segment classification. Our experiments show that segment classification achieves the best results. Previous research indicates that during the past 20 years, the highest-quality work has been published in an increasingly diverse and larger group of journals. In this article, we examine whether this diversification has also affected the handful of elite journals that are traditionally considered to be the best. We examine citation patterns during the past 40 years of seven long-standing traditionally elite journals and six journals that have been increasing in importance during the past 20 years. To be among the top 5 or 1 cited papers, papers now need about twice as many citations as they did 40 years ago. Since the late 1980s and early 1990s, elite journals have been publishing a decreasing proportion of these top-cited papers. This also applies to the two journals that are typically considered as the top venues and often used as bibliometric indicators of "excellence": Science and Nature. On the other hand, several new and established journals are publishing an increasing proportion of the most-cited papers. These changes bring new challenges and opportunities for all parties. Journals can enact policies to increase or maintain their relative position in the journal hierarchy. Researchers now have the option to publish in more diverse venues knowing that their work can still reach the same audiences. Finally, evaluators and administrators need to know that although there will always be a certain prestige associated with publishing in "elite" journals, journal hierarchies are in constant flux. In recent years scholars have built maps of science by connecting the academic fields that cite each other, are cited together, or that cite a similar literature. But since scholars cannot always publish in the fields they cite, or that cite them, these science maps are only rough proxies for the potential of a scholar, organization, or country, to enter a new academic field. Here we use a large dataset of scholarly publications disambiguated at the individual level to create a map of science-or research space-where links connect pairs of fields based on the probability that an individual has published in both of them. We find that the research space is a significantly more accurate predictor of the fields that individuals and organizations will enter in the future than citation based science maps. At the country level, however, the research space and citations based science maps are equally accurate. These findings show that data on career trajectories-the set of fields that individuals have previously published in-provide more accurate predictors of future research output for more focalized units-such as individuals or organizations-than citation based science maps. With the tremendous amount of research publications, recommending relevant papers to researchers to fulfill their information need becomes a significant problem. The major challenge to be tackled by our work is that given a target paper, how to effectively recommend a set of relevant papers from an existing citation network. In this paper, we propose a novel method to address the problem by incorporating various citation relations for a proper set of papers, which are more relevant but with a very limited size. The proposed method has two unique properties. Firstly, a metric called Local Relation Strength is defined to measure the dependency between cited and citing papers. Secondly, a model called Global Relation Strength is proposed to capture the relevance between two papers in the whole citation graph. We evaluate our proposed model on a real-world publication dataset and conduct an extensive comparison with the state-of-the-art baseline methods. The experimental results demonstrate that our method can have a promising improvement over the state-of-the-art techniques. Bell’s theorem [1] refutes local theories based on Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen’s (EPR’s) “elements of reality” [2]. A recently introduced proof without inequalities [3] presents the same logical structure as that of Hardy’s proof [4], but exhibits a greater contradiction between EPR local elements of reality and quantum mechanics. Here a simpler version of the proof in [3] will be introduced. This new version parallels Mermin’s reformulation [5] of Greenberger, Horne, and Zeilinger’s (GHZ’s) proof [6] and, besides being simpler, it emphasizes the fact that [3] is also an “all versus nothing” [7] or GHZ-type proof of Bell’s theorem, albeit with only two observers. In addition, this new approach will allow us to derive an inequality between correlation functions which is violated by quantum mechanics. Moreover, this new version will also constitute the basis for a new stateindependent proof of the Kochen-Specker (KS) theorem [8]. The whole set of new results provides a wider perspective on the relations between the most relevant proofs of no hidden variables. Consider four qubits, labeled 1, 2, 3, 4, prepared in the state jc1234 1 j0011 2 j0110 2 j1001 1 j1100 , (1) which, as can be easily checked, is the product of two singlet states, jc 2 13 ≠j c 2 24. Let us suppose that qubits 1 and 2 fly apart from qubits 3 and 4, and that an observer, Alice, performs measurements on qubits 1 and 2, while in a spacelike separated region a second observer, Bob, performs measurements on qubits 3 For more than three and one-half decades, beginning in the early 1960s, a heavy emphasis on proof finding has been a key component of the Argonne paradigm, whose use has directly led to significant advances in automated reasoning and important contributions to mathematics and logic. The theorems studied range from the trivial to the deep, even including some that corresponded to open questions. Often the paradigm asks for a theorem whose proof is in hand but that cannot be obtained in a fully automated manner by the program in use. The theorem whose hypothesis consists solely of the Meredith single axiom for two-valued sentential (or propositional) calculus and whose conclusion is the Lukasiewicz three-axiom system for that area of formal logic was just such a theorem. Featured in this article is the methodology that enabled the program OTTER to find the first fully automated proof of the cited theorem, a proof with the intriguing property that none of its steps contains a term of the form i>n(i>n(i>t)) for any term i>t. As evidence of the power of the new methodology, the article also discusses OTTER's success in obtaining the first known proof of a theorem concerning a single axiom of Lukasiewicz. Vande Vate 1989 described the polytope whose extreme points are the stable core matchings in the Marriage Problem. Rothblum 1989 simplified and extended this result. This paper explores a corresponding linear program, its dual and consequences of the fact that the dual solutions have an unusually direct relation to the primal solutions. This close relationship allows us to provide simple proofs both of Vande Vate and Rothblum's results and of other important results about the core of marriage markets. These proofs help explain the structure shared by the marriage problem without sidepayments and the assignment game with sidepayments. The paper further explores "fractional" matchings, which may be interpreted as lotteries over possible matches or as time-sharing arrangements. We show that those fractional matchings in the Stable Marriage Polytope form a lattice with respect to a partial ordering that involves stochastic dominance. Thus, all expected utility functions corresponding to the same ordinal preferences will agree on the relevant comparisons. Finally, we provide linear programming proofs of slightly stronger versions of known incentive compatibility results. This article challenges recent research (Evans, 2008) reporting that the concentration of cited scientific literature increases with the online availability of articles and journals. Using Thomson Reuters' Web of Science, the present article analyses changes in the concentration of citations received (2- and 5-year citation windows) by papers published between 1900 and 2005. Three measures of concentration are used: the percentage of papers that received at least one citation (cited papers); the percentage of papers needed to account for 20 , 50 , and 80 of the citations; and the Herfindahl-Hirschman index (HHI). These measures are used for four broad disciplines: natural sciences and engineering, medical fields, social sciences, and the humanities. All these measures converge and show that, contrary to what was reported by Evans, the dispersion of citations is actually increasing. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. We give a new proof showing that it is NP-hard to color a 3-colorable graph using just 4 colors. This result is already known , [S. Khanna, N. Linial, and S. Safra, Combinatorica, 20 (2000), pp. 393--415], but our proof is novel because it does not rely on the PCP theorem, while the known one does. This highlights a qualitative difference between the known hardness result for coloring 3-colorable graphs and the factor @math hardness for approximating the chromatic number of general graphs, as the latter result is known to imply (some form of) PCP theorem [M. Bellare, O. Goldreich, and M. Sudan, SIAM J. Comput., 27 (1998), pp. 805--915]. Another aspect in which our proof is novel is in its use of the PCP theorem to show that 4-coloring of 3-colorable graphs remains NP-hard even on bounded-degree graphs (this hardness result does not seem to follow from the earlier reduction of Khanna, Linial, and Safra). We point out that such graphs can always be colored using O(1) colors by a simple greedy algorithm, while the best known algorithm for coloring (general) 3-colorable graphs requires @math colors. Our proof technique also shows that there is an @math such that it is NP-hard to legally 4-color even a @math fraction of the edges of a 3-colorable graph. The old Asian legend about the blind men and the elephant comes to mind when looking at how different authors of scientific papers describe a piece of related prior work. It turns out that different citations to the same paper often focus on different aspects of that paper and that neither provides a full description of its full set of contributions. In this article, we will describe our investigation of this phenomenon. We studied citation summaries in the context of research papers in the biomedical domain. A citation summary is the set of citing sentences for a given article and can be used as a surrogate for the actual article in a variety of scenarios. It contains information that was deemed by peers to be important. Our study shows that citation summaries overlap to some extent with the abstracts of the papers and that they also differ from them in that they focus on different aspects of these papers than do the abstracts. In addition to this, co-cited articles (which are pairs of articles cited by another article) tend to be similar. We show results based on a lexical similarity metric called cohesion to justify our claims. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Abstract Documents in computer-readable form can be used to provide information about other documents, i.e. those they cite. To do this efficiently requires procedures for computer recognition of citing statements. This is not easy, especially for multi-sentence citing statements. Computer recognition procedures have been developed which are accurate to the following extent: 73 of the words in statements selected by computer procedures as being citing statements are words which are correctly attributable to the corresponding documents. The retrieval effectiveness of computer-recognized citing statements was tested in the following way. First, for eight retrieval requests in inorganiic chemistry, average recall by search of Chemical Abstracts Service indexing and Chemical Abstracts abstract text words was found to be 50 . Words from citing statements referring to the papers to be retrieved were then added to the index terms and abstract words as additional access points, and searching was repeated. Average recall increased to 70 . Only words from citing statements published within a year of the cited papers were used. The retrieval effect of citing statement words alone (published within a year) without index or abstract terms was the following: average recall was 40 . When just the words of the titles of the cited papers were added to those citing statement words, average recall increased to 50 . Theorem provers were also called 'proof checkers' because that is what they were in the beginning. They have grown powerful, however, capable in many cases to automatically produce complicated proofs. In particular, higher order logic based theorem provers such as HOL and PVS became popular because the logic is well known and very expressive. They are generally considered to be potential platforms to embed a programming logic for the purpose of formal verification. In this paper we investigate a number of most commonly used methods of embedding programming logics in such theorem provers and expose problems we discover. We will also propose an alternative approach : hybrid embedding. Complete formal verification is the only known way to guarantee that a system is free of programming errors. We present our experience in performing the formal, machine-checked verification of the seL4 microkernel from an abstract specification down to its C implementation. We assume correctness of compiler, assembly code, and hardware, and we used a unique design approach that fuses formal and operating systems techniques. To our knowledge, this is the first formal proof of functional correctness of a complete, general-purpose operating-system kernel. Functional correctness means here that the implementation always strictly follows our high-level abstract specification of kernel behaviour. This encompasses traditional design and implementation safety properties such as the kernel will never crash, and it will never perform an unsafe operation. It also proves much more: we can predict precisely how the kernel will behave in every possible situation. seL4, a third-generation microkernel of L4 provenance, comprises 8,700 lines of C code and 600 lines of assembler. Its performance is comparable to other high-performance L4 kernels. In this paper I will discuss the fundamental ideas behind proof assistants: What are they and what is a proof anyway? I give a short history of the main ideas, emphasizing the way they ensure the correctness of the mathematics formalized. I will also briefly discuss the places where proof assistants are used and how we envision their extended use in the future. While being an introduction into the world of proof assistants and the main issues behind them, this paper is also a position paper that pushes the further use of proof assistants. We believe that these systems will become the future of mathematics, where definitions, statements, computations and proofs are all available in a computerized form. An important application is and will be in computer supported modelling and verification of systems. But there is still a long road ahead and I will indicate what we believe is needed for the further proliferation of proof assistants. This note provides a condition under which lscr1 minimization (also known as basis pursuit) can recover short linear combinations of complex vectors chosen from fixed, overcomplete collection. This condition has already been established in the real setting by Fuchs, who used convex analysis. The proof given here is more direct This contribution aims to give a basic introduction to diffusion-like methods. There are many different methods commonly used for regularization tasks. Some of them will be briefly introduced and their connection to diffusion shown. In addition to this we will go into some detail for diffusion-like methods in a narrower sense, i.e. methods based on PDEs similar to diffusion PDEs known from physics. Main issues highlighted here are which PDE to use, how diffusivities in such a PDE are constructed, and which discretization is suitable for a given task. The category of event structures is known to embed fully and faithfully in the category of presheaves over pomsets. Here a characterisation of the presheaves represented by event structures is presented. The proof goes via a characterisation of the presheaves represented by event structures when the morphisms on event structures are "strict" in that they preserve the partial order of causal dependency. Relevance feedback is an automatic process, introduced over 20 years ago, designed to produce query formulations following an initial retrieval operation. The principal relevance feedback methods described over the years are examined briefly, and evaluation data are included to demonstrate the effectiveness of the various methods. Prescriptions are given for conducting text retrieval operations iteratively using relevance feedback. The emergence and global adoption of social media has rendered possible the real-time estimation of population-scale sentiment, bearing profound implications for our understanding of human behavior. Given the growing assortment of sentiment measuring instruments, comparisons between them are evidently required. Here, we perform detailed tests of 6 dictionary-based methods applied to 4 different corpora, and briefly examine a further 20 methods. We show that a dictionary-based method will only perform both reliably and meaningfully if (1) the dictionary covers a sufficiently large enough portion of a given text's lexicon when weighted by word usage frequency; and (2) words are scored on a continuous scale. In a document network such as a citation network of scientific documents, web-logs, etc., the content produced by authors exhibits their interest in certain topics. In addition some authors influence other authors' interests. In this work, we propose to model the influence of cited authors along with the interests of citing authors. Moreover, we hypothesize that apart from the citations present in documents, the context surrounding the citation mention provides extra topical information about the cited authors. However, associating terms in the context to the cited authors remains an open problem. We propose novel document generation schemes that incorporate the context while simultaneously modeling the interests of citing authors and influence of the cited authors. Our experiments show significant improvements over baseline models for various evaluation criteria such as link prediction between document and cited author, and quantitatively explaining unseen text.