We present two algorithms for the Group Mutual Exclusion (GME) Problem that satisfy the properties of Mutual Exclusion, Starvation Freedom, Bounded Exit, Concurrent Entry and First Come First Served. Both our algorithms use only simple read and write instructions, have O(N) Shared Space complexity and O(N) Remote Memory Reference (RMR) complexity in the Cache Coherency (CC) model. Our first algorithm is developed by generalizing the well-known Lamport's Bakery Algorithm for the classical mutual exclusion problem, while preserving its simplicity and elegance. However, it uses unbounded shared registers. Our second algorithm uses only bounded registers and is developed by generalizing Taubenfeld's Black and White Bakery Algorithm to solve the classical mutual exclusion problem using only bounded shared registers. We show that contrary to common perception our algorithms are the first to achieve these properties with these combination of complexities.
In 2004 (which is in the future of @cite_6 and @cite_12 ), Taubenfeld @cite_1 came up with an elegant algorithm called that solves the classical mutual exclusion problem with only bounded shared registers. His approach is a lot simpler than a prior method that bounds the registers of the Lamport's Bakery Algorithm developed by in @cite_0 . Our second algorithm, presented in is a generalization of the Black and White Bakery Algorithm to solve the GME problem. Our algorithm satisfies the properties P1 through P5 and runs in linear time and space using bounded shared registers. Thus, our algorithm is the first one to solve the open problem originally posed by Hadzilacos, a decade and a half ago.
@cite_0 @cite_1 @cite_12 @cite_6
1575611302 2141927253 1973537074
In the group mutual exclusion problem [6], which generalizes mutual exclusion [2], a process chooses a session when it requests entry to the Critical Section. A group mutual exclusion algorithm must ensure that the mutual exclusion property holds: If two processes are in the Critical Section at the same time, then they request the same session. In addition to mutual exclusion, lockout freedom, bounded exit and concurrent entering are basic properties that are desirable in any group mutual exclusion algorithm.Hadzilacos in [4] first introduced a fairness condition, called first-come-first-served (FCFS), for group mutual exclusion. The only known FCFS group mutual exclusion algorithm is due to Hadzilacos [4], and requires Θ(N2) bounded shared registers, where N is the number of processes. We present a FCFS group mutual exclusion algorithm that uses only Θ(N) bounded shared registers. (The existence of such an algorithm was posed as an open problem by Hadzilacos.)Next, we demonstrate that the FCFS property does not fully capture our intuitive notion of fairness. We therefore propose an additional fairness property, called first-in-first-enabled (FIFE). Finally, we present a reduction that transforms any "abortable" FCFS mutual exclusion algorithm M into a group mutual exclusion algorithm G. Thus, different group mutual exclusion algorithms can be obtained by instantiating M with different abortable FCFS mutual exclusion algorithms. The group mutual exclusion algorithms so obtained satisfy all of the properties mentioned above: mutual exclusion, lockout freedom, bounded exit, concurrent entering, FCFS, and FIFE. Lamport's Bakery algorithm is among the best known mutual exclusion algorithms. A drawback of Lamport's algorithm is that it requires unbounded registers for communication among processes. By making a small modification to Lamport's algorithm, we remove the need for unbounded registers. The main appeal of our algorithm lies in the fact that it overcomes a drawback of a famous algorithm while preserving its elegance. Group mutual exclusion is an interesting generalization of the mutual exclusion problem. This problem was introduced by Joung, and some algorithms for the problem have been proposed by incorporating mutual exclusion algorithms. Group mutual exclusion occurs naturally in a situation where a resource can be shared by processes of the same group, but not by processes of different groups. It is also called the congenial talking philosophers problem. In this paper we propose three algorithms based on ticket orders for the group mutual exclusion problem in the asynchronous shared memory model. The first algorithm is a simple modification of the Bakery algorithm. It satisfies group mutual exclusion, but does not satisfy lockout freedom. The second and the third algorithms are further modifications from the first one in order to satisfy lockout freedom and to improve the concurrency performance. They use single-writer shared variables, together with two multi-writer shared variables that are never concurrently written. The third algorithm has another desirable property, called smooth admission. By this property, during the period that the resource is occupied by the leader, a process wishing to join the same group as the leader's group can be granted use of the resource in constant time. Assuming that there is an a priori agreement between processes on the names of shared memory locations, as done in almost all the publications on shared memory algorithms, is tantamount to assuming that agreement has already been solved at the lower-level. From a theoretical point of view, it is intriguing to figure out how coordination can be achieved without relying on such lower-level agreement. In order to better understand the new model, we have designed new algorithms without relying on such a priori lower-level agreement, and proved space lower bounds and impossibility results for several important problems, such as mutual exclusion, consensus, election and renaming. Using these results, we identify fundamental differences between the standard model where there is a lower-level agreement about the shared register's names and the strictly weaker model where there is no such agreement. We present Byzantine Disk Paxos, an asynchronous shared-memory consensus algorithm that uses a collection of n < 3t disks, t of which may fail by becoming non-responsive or arbitrarily corrupted. We give two constructions of this algorithm; that is, we construct two different t-tolerant (i.e., tolerating up to t disk failures) building blocks, each of which can be used, along with a leader oracle, to solve consensus. One building block is a t-tolerant wait-free shared safe register. The second building block is a t-tolerant regular register that satisfies a weaker termination (liveness) condition than wait freedom: its write operations are wait-free, whereas its read operations are guaranteed to return only in executions with a finite number of writes. We call this termination condition finite writes (FW), and show that wait-free consensus is solvable with FW-terminating registers and a leader oracle. We construct each of these t-tolerant registers from n < 3t base registers, t of which can be non-responsive or Byzantine. All the previous t-tolerant wait-free constructions in this model used at least 4t + 1 fault-prone registers, and we are not familiar with any prior FW-terminating constructions in this model. The snapshot object is an important tool for constructing wait-free asynchronous algorithms. We relate the snapshot object to the lattice agreement decision problem. It is shown that any algorithm for solving lattice agreement can be transformed into an implementation of a snapshot object. The overhead cost of this transformation is only a linear number of read and write operations on atomic single-writer multi-reader registers. The transformation uses an unbounded amount of shared memory. We present a deterministic algorithm for lattice agreement that used O(log2 n) operations on 2-processor Test & Set registers, plus O(n) operations on atomic single-writer multi-reader registers. The shared objects are used by the algorithm in a dynamic mode, that is, the identity of the processors that access each of the shared objects is determined dynamically during the execution of the algorithm. By a randomized implementation of 2-processors Test & Set registers from atomic registers, this algorithm implies a randomized algorithm for lattice agreement that uses an expected number of O(n) operations on (dynamic) atomic single-writer multi-reader registers. Combined with our transformation this yields implementations of atomic snapshots with the same complexity. Citation relationship between scientific publications has been successfully used for scholarly bibliometrics, information retrieval and data mining tasks, and citation-based recommendation algorithms are well documented. While previous studies investigated citation relations from various viewpoints, most of them share the same assumption that, if paper1 cites paper2 (or author1 cites author2), they are connected, regardless of citation importance, sentiment, reason, topic, or motivation. However, this assumption is oversimplified. In this study, we employ an innovative "context-rich heterogeneous network" approach, which paves a new way for citation recommendation task. In the network, we characterize 1) the importance of citation relationships between citing and cited papers, and 2) the topical citation motivation. Unlike earlier studies, the citation information, in this paper, is characterized by citation textual contexts extracted from the full-text citing paper. We also propose algorithm to cope with the situation when large portion of full-text missing information exists in the bibliographic repository. Evaluation results show that, context-rich heterogeneous network can significantly enhance the citation recommendation performance. In a document network such as a citation network of scientific documents, web-logs, etc., the content produced by authors exhibits their interest in certain topics. In addition some authors influence other authors' interests. In this work, we propose to model the influence of cited authors along with the interests of citing authors. Moreover, we hypothesize that apart from the citations present in documents, the context surrounding the citation mention provides extra topical information about the cited authors. However, associating terms in the context to the cited authors remains an open problem. We propose novel document generation schemes that incorporate the context while simultaneously modeling the interests of citing authors and influence of the cited authors. Our experiments show significant improvements over baseline models for various evaluation criteria such as link prediction between document and cited author, and quantitatively explaining unseen text. Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to suggest an alternative to the widely used Times Cited criterion for analysing citation networks. The approach involves taking account of the natures of the papers that cite a given paper, so as to differentiate between papers that attract the same number of citations.Design methodology approach – ArticleRank is an algorithm that has been derived from Google's PageRank algorithm to measure the influence of journal articles. ArticleRank is applied to two datasets – a citation network based on an early paper on webometrics, and a self‐citation network based on the 19 most cited papers in the Journal of Documentation – using citation data taken from the Web of Knowledge database.Findings – ArticleRank values provide a different ranking of a set of papers from that provided by the corresponding Times Cited values, and overcomes the inability of the latter to differentiate between papers with the same numbers of citations. The difference in rankings between Times Cited ... We propose a deterministic model for associating costs with strings that is parameterized by operations of interest (such as addition, scaling, and minimum), a notion of regularity that provides a yardstick to measure expressiveness, and study decision problems and theoretical properties of resulting classes of cost functions. Our definition of regularity relies on the theory of string-to-tree transducers, and allows associating costs with events that are conditioned on regular properties of future events. Our model of cost register automata allows computation of regular functions using multiple "write-only" registers whose values can be combined using the allowed set of operations. We show that the classical shortest-path algorithms as well as the algorithms designed for computing discounted costs can be adapted for solving the min-cost problems for the more general classes of functions specified in our model. Cost register automata with the operations of minimum and increment give a deterministic model that is equivalent to weighted automata, an extensively studied nondeterministic model, and this connection results in new insights and new open problems. A citing sentence is one that appears in a scientific article and cites previous work. Citing sentences have been studied and used in many applications. For example, they have been used in scientific paper summarization, automatic survey generation, paraphrase identification, and citation function classification. Citing sentences that cite multiple papers are common in scientific writing. This observation should be taken into consideration when using citing sentences in applications. For instance, when a citing sentence is used in a summary of a scientific paper, only the fragments of the sentence that are relevant to the summarized paper should be included in the summary. In this paper, we present and compare three different approaches for identifying the fragments of a citing sentence that are related to a given target reference. Our methods are: word classification, sequence labeling, and segment classification. Our experiments show that segment classification achieves the best results. Emulators that translate algorithms from the shared-memory model to two different message-passing models are presented. Both are achieved by implementing a wait-free, atomic, single-writer multi-reader register in unreliable, asynchronous networks. The two message-passing models considered are a complete network with processor failures and an arbitrary network with dynamic link failures. These results make it possible to view the shared-memory model as a higher-level language for designing algorithms in asynchronous distributed systems. Any wait-free algorithm based on atomic, single-writer multi-reader registers can be automatically emulated in message-passing systems, provided that at least a majority of the processors are not faulty and remain connected. The overhead introduced by these emulations is polynomial in the number of processors in the system. Immediate new results are obtained by applying the emulators to known shared-memory algorithms. These include, among others, protocols to solve the following problems in the message-passing model in the presence of processor or link failures: multi-writer multi-reader registers, concurrent time-stamp systems, l -exclusion, atomic snapshots, randomized consensus, and implementation of data structures. In recent years scholars have built maps of science by connecting the academic fields that cite each other, are cited together, or that cite a similar literature. But since scholars cannot always publish in the fields they cite, or that cite them, these science maps are only rough proxies for the potential of a scholar, organization, or country, to enter a new academic field. Here we use a large dataset of scholarly publications disambiguated at the individual level to create a map of science-or research space-where links connect pairs of fields based on the probability that an individual has published in both of them. We find that the research space is a significantly more accurate predictor of the fields that individuals and organizations will enter in the future than citation based science maps. At the country level, however, the research space and citations based science maps are equally accurate. These findings show that data on career trajectories-the set of fields that individuals have previously published in-provide more accurate predictors of future research output for more focalized units-such as individuals or organizations-than citation based science maps. The main aim of this note is to show that a polynomial-time algorithm for the scheduling problem 1|r j ; p j = p| ∑ Uj given by Carlier in (1981) is incorrect. In this problem we are given n jobs with release times and deadlines. All jobs have the same processing time p. The objective is to find a non-preemptive schedule that maximizes the number of jobs completed by their deadlines. The feasibility version of this problem, where we ask whether all jobs can meet their deadlines, has been studied thoroughly. Polynomial-time algorithms for this version were first found, independently, by Simons (1978) and Carlier (1981). A faster algorithm, with running time O(n log n), was subsequently given by (1981). The elegant feasibility algorithm of Carlier (1981) is based on dynamic programming and it processes jobs from left to right on the time-axis. For each time t, it constructs a partial schedule with jobs that complete at or before time t. Carlier also attempted to apply the same technique to design a polynomial-time algorithm for the maximization version, 1|r j ; p j = p| ∑ Uj , and claimed an O(n3 log n)-time algorithm. His result is now widely cited in the literature. We show, however, that this algorithm is not correct, by giving an instance on which it produces a sub-optimal schedule. Our counter-example can be, in fact, extended to support a broader claim, namely that even the general approach from Carlier (1981) cannot yield a polynomial-time algorithm. By this general approach we mean a class of algorithms that processes the input from left to right and make decisions based on the deadline ordering, and not their exact values. The question remains as to how efficiently can we solve the scheduling problem 1|r j ; p j = p| ∑ Uj . Baptiste (1999) gave an O(n7)-time algorithm for the more general version of this problem where jobs have weights. We show how to modify his algorithm to obtain a faster, O(n5)-time algorithm for the non-weighted case. These last two results are discussed only briefly in this note. The complete proofs can be found in the full version of this paper, see (2004). Historically, papers have been physically bound to the journal in which they were published; but in the digital age papers are available individually, no longer tied to their respective journals. Hence, papers now can be read and cited based on their own merits, independently of the journal's physical availability, reputation, or impact factor (IF). We compare the strength of the relationship between journals' IFs and the actual citations received by their respective papers from 1902 to 2009. Throughout most of the 20th century, papers' citation rates were increasingly linked to their respective journals' IFs. However, since 1990, the advent of the digital age, the relation between IFs and paper citations has been weakening. This began first in physics, a field that was quick to make the transition into the electronic domain. Furthermore, since 1990 the overall proportion of highly cited papers coming from highly cited journals has been decreasing and, of these highly cited papers, the proportion not coming from highly cited journals has been increasing. Should this pattern continue, it might bring an end to the use of the IF as a way to evaluate the quality of journals, papers, and researchers. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Abstract Documents in computer-readable form can be used to provide information about other documents, i.e. those they cite. To do this efficiently requires procedures for computer recognition of citing statements. This is not easy, especially for multi-sentence citing statements. Computer recognition procedures have been developed which are accurate to the following extent: 73 of the words in statements selected by computer procedures as being citing statements are words which are correctly attributable to the corresponding documents. The retrieval effectiveness of computer-recognized citing statements was tested in the following way. First, for eight retrieval requests in inorganiic chemistry, average recall by search of Chemical Abstracts Service indexing and Chemical Abstracts abstract text words was found to be 50 . Words from citing statements referring to the papers to be retrieved were then added to the index terms and abstract words as additional access points, and searching was repeated. Average recall increased to 70 . Only words from citing statements published within a year of the cited papers were used. The retrieval effect of citing statement words alone (published within a year) without index or abstract terms was the following: average recall was 40 . When just the words of the titles of the cited papers were added to those citing statement words, average recall increased to 50 . We present a deterministic (1+o(1))-approximation O(n1 2+o(1)+D1+o(1))-time algorithm for solving the single-source shortest paths problem on distributed weighted networks (the CONGEST model); here n is the number of nodes in the network and D is its (hop) diameter. This is the first non-trivial deterministic algorithm for this problem. It also improves (i) the running time of the randomized (1+o(1))-approximation O(n1 2D1 4+D)-time algorithm of Nanongkai [STOC 2014] by a factor of as large as n1 8, and (ii) the O(є−1logє−1)-approximation factor of Lenzen and Patt-Shamir’s O(n1 2+є+D)-time algorithm [STOC 2013] within the same running time. Our running time matches the known time lower bound of Ω(n1 2 logn + D) [Das STOC 2011] modulo some lower-order terms, thus essentially settling the status of this problem which was raised at least a decade ago [Elkin SIGACT News 2004]. It also implies a (2+o(1))-approximation O(n1 2+o(1)+D1+o(1))-time algorithm for approximating a network’s weighted diameter which almost matches the lower bound by [PODC 2012]. In achieving this result, we develop two techniques which might be of independent interest and useful in other settings: (i) a deterministic process that replaces the “hitting set argument” commonly used for shortest paths computation in various settings, and (ii) a simple, deterministic, construction of an (no(1), o(1))-hop set of size O(n1+o(1)). We combine these techniques with many distributed algorithmic techniques, some of which from problems that are not directly related to shortest paths, e.g. ruling sets [ STOC 1987], source detection [Lenzen, Peleg PODC 2013], and partial distance estimation [Lenzen, Patt-Shamir PODC 2015]. Our hop set construction also leads to single-source shortest paths algorithms in two other settings: (i) a (1+o(1))-approximation O(no(1))-time algorithm on congested cliques, and (ii) a (1+o(1))-approximation O(no(1)logW)-pass O(n1+o(1)logW)-space streaming algorithm, when edge weights are in 1, 2, …, W . The first result answers an open problem in [Nanongkai, STOC 2014]. The second result partially answers an open problem raised by McGregor in 2006 [ sublinear.info , Problem 14]. We present randomized algorithms that solve Subset Sum and Knapsack instances with n items in O*(20.86n) time, where the O*(·) notation suppresses factors polynomial in the input size, and polynomial space, assuming random read-only access to exponentially many random bits. These results can be extended to solve Binary Linear Programming on n variables with few constraints in a similar running time. We also show that for any constant k≥ 2, random instances of k-Sum can be solved using O(nk-0.5(n)) time and O(logn) space, without the assumption of random access to random bits. Underlying these results is an algorithm that determines whether two given lists of length n with integers bounded by a polynomial in n share a common value. Assuming random read-only access to random bits, we show that this problem can be solved using O(logn) space significantly faster than the trivial O(n2) time algorithm if no value occurs too often in the same list. In a shared-memory system, n independent asynchronous processes, with distinct names in the range 0, ..., N-1 , communicate by reading and writing to shared registers. An algorithm is wait-free if a process completes its execution regardless of the behavior of other processes. This paper considers wait-free algorithms whose complexity adjusts to the level of contention in the system: An algorithm is adaptive (to total contention) if its step complexity depends only on the actual number of active processes, k; this number is unknown in advance and may change in different executions of the algorithm. Adaptive algorithms are presented for two important decision problems, lattice agreement and (6k-1)-renaming; the step complexity of both algorithms is O(k log k). An interesting component of the (6k-1)-renaming algorithm is an O(N) algorithm for (2k-1)-renaming; this improves on the best previously known (2k-1)-renaming algorithm, which has O(Nnk) step complexity. The efficient renaming algorithm can be modified into an O(N) implementation of atomic snapshots using dynamic single-writer multi-reader registers. The best known implementations of atomic snapshots have step complexity O(N log N) using static single-writer multi-reader registers, and O(N) using multi-writer multi-reader registers. Scholars are increasingly citing electronic “web references” which are not preserved in libraries or full text archives. WebCite is a new standard for citing web references. To “webcite” a document involves archiving the cited Web page through www.webcitation.org and citing the WebCite permalink instead of (or in addition to) the unstable live Web page. This journal has amended its “instructions for authors” accordingly, asking authors to archive cited Web pages before submitting a manuscript. Almost 200 other journals are already using the system. We discuss the rationale for WebCite, its technology, and how scholars, editors, and publishers can benefit from the service. Citing scholars initiate an archiving process of all cited Web references, ideally before they submit a manuscript. Authors of online documents and websites which are expected to be cited by others can ensure that their work is permanently available by creating an archived copy using WebCite and providing the citation information including the WebCite link on their Web document(s). Editors should ask their authors to cache all cited Web addresses (Uniform Resource Locators, or URLs) “prospectively” before submitting their manuscripts to their journal. Editors and publishers should also instruct their copyeditors to cache cited Web material if the author has not done so already. Finally, WebCite can process publisher submitted “citing articles” (submitted for example as eXtensible Markup Language [XML] documents) to automatically archive all cited Web pages shortly before or on publication. Finally, WebCite can act as a focussed crawler, caching retrospectively references of already published articles. Copyright issues are addressed by honouring respective Internet standards (robot exclusion files, no-cache and no-archive tags). Long-term preservation is ensured by agreements with libraries and digital preservation organizations. The resulting WebCite Index may also have applications for research assessment exercises, being able to measure the impact of Web services and published Web documents through access and Web citation metrics. @PARASPLIT [J Med Internet Res 2005;7(5):e60]