Abstract In 1992, Kalai and Kleitman proved that the diameter of a d -dimensional polyhedron with n facets is at most n 2 + log 2 d . In 2014, Todd improved the Kalai–Kleitman bound to ( n − d ) log 2 d . We improve the Todd bound to ( n − d ) − 1 + log 2 d for n ≥ d ≥ 7 , ( n − d ) − 2 + log 2 d for n ≥ d ≥ 37 , and ( n − d ) − 3 + log 2 d + O 1 ∕ d for n ≥ d ≥ 1 .
We also note that there are studies that attempt to understand the behavior of @math when the number of facets is sufficiently large. Gallagher and Kim @cite_23 provided an upper bound on the diameter of a normal simplicial complex and showed the tail-polynomiality ; more specifically, they showed that the diameter is bounded from above by a polynomial in @math when @math is sufficiently large. An alternative simpler proof for such tail-polynomial upper bounds can be found in Mizuno and Sukegawa @cite_13 . In contrast, in this paper, we assume that @math is large, and try to utilize this assumption to strengthen the previous results.
@cite_13 @cite_23
2338231399 2298099604
Let @math denote the maximum diameter of a @math -dimensional polyhedron with @math facets. In this paper, we propose a unified analysis of a recursive inequality about @math established by Kalai and Kleitman in 1992. This yields much simpler proofs of a tail--polynomial and tail--almost--linear bounds on @math which are recently discussed by Gallagher and Kim. In 1992, Kalai and Kleitman proved a quasipolynomial upper bound on the diameters of convex polyhedra. Todd and Sukegawa-Kitahara proved tail-quasipolynomial bounds on the diameters of polyhedra. These tail bounds apply when the number of facets is greater than a certain function of the dimension. We prove tail-quasipolynomial bounds on the diameters of polytopes and normal simplicial complexes. We also prove tail-polynomial upper bounds on the diameters of polyhedra. Let @math denote a random symmetric @math matrix whose upper diagonal entries are independent and identically distributed Bernoulli random variables (which take values @math and @math with probability @math each). It is widely conjectured that @math is singular with probability at most @math . On the other hand, the best known upper bound on the singularity probability of @math , due to Vershynin (2011), is @math , for some unspecified small constant @math . This improves on a polynomial singularity bound due to Costello, Tao, and Vu (2005), and a bound of Nguyen (2011) showing that the singularity probability decays faster than any polynomial. In this paper, improving on all previous results, we show that the probability of singularity of @math is at most @math for all sufficiently large @math . The proof utilizes and extends a novel combinatorial approach to discrete random matrix theory, which has been recently introduced by the authors together with Luh and Samotij. We derive a new upper bound on the diameter of a polyhedron @math P = x ? R n : A x ≤ b , where @math A ? Z m × n . The bound is polynomial in @math n and the largest absolute value of a sub-determinant of @math A , denoted by @math Δ . More precisely, we show that the diameter of @math P is bounded by @math O ( Δ 2 n 4 log n Δ ) . If @math P is bounded, then we show that the diameter of @math P is at most @math O ( Δ 2 n 3.5 log n Δ ) . For the special case in which @math A is a totally unimodular matrix, the bounds are @math O ( n 4 log n ) and @math O ( n 3.5 log n ) respectively. This improves over the previous best bound of @math O ( m 16 n 3 ( log m n ) 3 ) due to Dyer and Frieze (Math Program 64:1---16, 1994). Index Coding has received considerable attention recently motivated in part by real-world applications and in part by its connection to Network Coding. The basic setting of Index Coding encodes the problem input as an undirected graph and the fundamental parameter is the broadcast rate @math , the average communication cost per bit for sufficiently long messages (i.e. the non-linear vector capacity). Recent nontrivial bounds on @math were derived from the study of other Index Coding capacities (e.g. the scalar capacity @math ) by Bar- (2006), Lubetzky and Stav (2007) and (2008). However, these indirect bounds shed little light on the behavior of @math : there was no known polynomial-time algorithm for approximating @math in a general network to within a nontrivial (i.e. @math ) factor, and the exact value of @math remained unknown for any graph where Index Coding is nontrivial. Our main contribution is a direct information-theoretic analysis of the broadcast rate @math using linear programs, in contrast to previous approaches that compared @math with graph-theoretic parameters. This allows us to resolve the aforementioned two open questions. We provide a polynomial-time algorithm with a nontrivial approximation ratio for computing @math in a general network along with a polynomial-time decision procedure for recognizing instances with @math . In addition, we pinpoint @math precisely for various classes of graphs (e.g. for various Cayley graphs of cyclic groups) thereby simultaneously improving the previously known upper and lower bounds for these graphs. Via this approach we construct graphs where the difference between @math and its trivial lower bound is linear in the number of vertices and ones where @math is uniformly bounded while its upper bound derived from the naive encoding scheme is polynomially worse. We study the problem of approximating the commuting-operator value of a two-player non-local game. It is well-known that it is @math -complete to decide whether the classical value of a non-local game is 1 or @math . Furthermore, as long as @math is small enough, this result does not depend on the gap @math . In contrast, a recent result of Fitzsimons, Ji, Vidick, and Yuen shows that the complexity of computing the quantum value grows without bound as the gap @math decreases. In this paper, we show that this also holds for the commuting-operator value of a game. Specifically, in the language of multi-prover interactive proofs, we show that the power of @math (proofs with two provers, one round, completeness probability @math , soundness probability @math , and commuting-operator strategies) can increase without bound as the gap @math gets arbitrarily small. Our results also extend naturally in two ways, to perfect zero-knowledge protocols, and to lower bounds on the complexity of computing the approximately-commuting value of a game. Thus we get lower bounds on the complexity class @math - @math of perfect zero-knowledge multi-prover proofs with approximately-commuting operator strategies, as the gap @math gets arbitrarily small. While we do not know any computable time upper bound on the class @math , a result of the first author and Vidick shows that for @math and @math , the class @math , with constant communication from the provers, is contained in @math . We give a lower bound of @math (ignoring constants inside the function) for this class, which is tight up to polynomial factors assuming the exponential time hypothesis. The k-means method is a widely used clustering algorithm. One of its distinguished features is its speed in practice. Its worst-case running-time, however, is exponential, leaving a gap between practical and theoretical performance. Arthur and Vassilvitskii (FOCS 2006) aimed at closing this gap, and they proved a bound of @math on the smoothed running-time of the k-means method, where n is the number of data points and @math is the standard deviation of the Gaussian perturbation. This bound, though better than the worst-case bound, is still much larger than the running-time observed in practice. We improve the smoothed analysis of the k-means method by showing two upper bounds on the expected running-time of k-means. First, we prove that the expected running-time is bounded by a polynomial in @math and @math . Second, we prove an upper bound of @math , where d is the dimension of the data space. The polynomial is independent of k and d, and we obtain a polynomial bound for the expected running-time for @math . Finally, we show that k-means runs in smoothed polynomial time for one-dimensional instances. In this paper we show a new way of constructing deterministic polynomial-time approximation algorithms for computing complex-valued evaluations of a large class of graph polynomials on bounded degree graphs. In particular, our approach works for the Tutte polynomial and independence polynomial, as well as partition functions of complex-valued spin and edge-coloring models. More specifically, we define a large class of graph polynomials @math and show that if @math and there is a disk @math centered at zero in the complex plane such that @math does not vanish on @math for all bounded degree graphs @math , then for each @math in the interior of @math there exists a deterministic polynomial-time approximation algorithm for evaluating @math at @math . This gives an explicit connection between absence of zeros of graph polynomials and the existence of efficient approximation algorithms, allowing us to show new relationships between well-known conjectures. Our work builds on a recent line of work initiated b... We study a natural network creation game, in which each node locally tries to minimize its local diameter or its local average distance to other nodes by swapping one incident edge at a time. The central question is what structure the resulting equilibrium graphs have, in particular, how well they globally minimize diameter. For the local-average-distance version, we prove an upper bound of @math , a lower bound of 3, and a tight bound of exactly 2 for trees, and give evidence of a general polylogarithmic upper bound. For the local-diameter version, we prove a lower bound of @math and a tight upper bound of 3 for trees. The same bounds apply, up to constant factors, to the price of anarchy. Our network creation games are closely related to the previously studied unilateral network creation game. The main difference is that our model has no parameter @math for the link creation cost, so our results effectively apply for all values of @math without additional effort; furthe... Let @math be an arbitrary polynomial of degree @math with @math non-zero integer coefficients of absolute value less than @math . In this paper, we answer the open question whether the real roots of @math can be computed with a number of arithmetic operations over the rational numbers that is polynomial in the input size of the sparse representation of @math . More precisely, we give a deterministic, complete, and certified algorithm that determines isolating intervals for all real roots of @math with @math many exact arithmetic operations over the rational numbers. When using approximate but certified arithmetic, the bit complexity of our algorithm is bounded by @math , where @math means that we ignore logarithmic. Hence, for sufficiently sparse polynomials (i.e. @math for a positive constant @math ), the bit complexity is @math . We also prove that the latter bound is optimal up to logarithmic factors. We introduce a new approach to isolate the real roots of a square-free polynomial @math with real coefficients. It is assumed that each coefficient of @math can be approximated to any specified error bound. The presented method is exact, complete and deterministic. Due to its similarities to the Descartes method, we also consider it practical and easy to implement. Compared to previous approaches, our new method achieves a significantly better bit complexity. It is further shown that the hardness of isolating the real roots of @math is exclusively determined by the geometry of the roots and not by the complexity or the size of the coefficients. For the special case where @math has integer coefficients of maximal bitsize @math , our bound on the bit complexity writes as @math which improves the best bounds known for existing practical algorithms by a factor of @math . The crucial idea underlying the new approach is to run an approximate version of the Descartes method, where, in each subdivision step, we only consider approximations of the intermediate results to a certain precision. We give an upper bound on the maximal precision that is needed for isolating the roots of @math . For integer polynomials, this bound is by a factor @math lower than that of the precision needed when using exact arithmetic explaining the improved bound on the bit complexity. Let @math and @math be standard normal random variables with covariance matrices @math and @math , respectively. Slepian's lemma says that if @math for @math , the lower bound @math is at least @math . In this paper an upper bound is given. The usefulness of the upper bound is justified with three concrete applications: (i) the new law of the iterated logarithm of Erdős and Revesz, (ii) the probability that a random polynomial does not have a real zero and (iii) the random pursuit problem for fractional Brownian particles. In particular, a conjecture of Kesten (1992) on the random pursuit problem for Brownian particles is confirmed, which leads to estimates of principal eigenvalues. We show a worst-case lower bound and a smoothed upper bound on the number of iterations performed by the Iterative Closest Point (ICP) algorithm. First proposed by Besl and McKay, the algorithm is widely used in computational geometry, where it is known for its simplicity and its observed speed. The theoretical study of ICP was initiated by Ezra, Sharir, and Efrat, who showed that the worst-case running time to align two sets of @math points in @math is between @math and @math . We substantially tighten this gap by improving the lower bound to @math . To help reconcile this bound with the algorithm's observed speed, we also show that the smoothed complexity of ICP is polynomial, independent of the dimensionality of the data. Using similar methods, we improve the best known smoothed upper bound for the popular k-means method to @math , once again independent of the dimension. The sign-rank of a matrix @math with @math entries is the least rank of a real matrix @math with @math for all @math . We obtain the first exponential lower bound on the sign-rank of a function in @math . Namely, let @math . We show that the matrix @math has sign-rank @math . This in particular implies that @math , which solves a longstanding open problem in communication complexity posed by Babai, Frankl, and Simon [Proceedings of the 27th Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 1986, pp. 337-347]. Our result additionally implies a lower bound in learning theory. Specifically, let @math be functions such that every DNF formula @math of polynomial size has the representation @math for some reals @math . We prove that then @math , which essentially matches an upper bound of @math , due to Klivans and Servedio [J. Comput. System Sci., 68 (2004), pp. 303-318]. Finally, our work yields the first exponential lower bound on the size of threshold-of-majority circuits computing a function in @math . This substantially generalizes and strengthens the results of Krause and Pudlak [Theoret. Comput. Sci., 174 (1997), pp. 137-156]. The problems of finding shortest common supersequences (SCS) and longest common subsequences (LCS) are two well-known NP -hard problems that have applications in many areas including computational molecular biology, data compression, robot motion planning and scheduling, text editing, etc. A lot of fruitless effort has been spent in searching for good approximation algorithms for these problems. In this paper, we show that these problems are inherently hard to approximate in the worst case. In particular, we prove that (i) SCS does not have a polynomial time linear approximation algorithm, unless P = NP ; (ii) There exists a constant @math such that, if SCS has a polynomial time approximation algorithm with ratio @math , where @math is the number of input sequences, then NP is contained in DTIME @math ; (iii) There exists a constant @math such that, if LCS has a polynomial time approximation algorithm with performance ratio @math , then P = NP . The proofs utilize the recent results of [Proc. 23rd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 1992, pp. 14-23] on the complexity of approximation problems. In the second part of the paper, we introduce a new method for analyzing the average-case performance of algorithms for sequences, based on Kolmogorov complexity. Despite the above nonapproximability results, we show that near optimal solutions for both SCS and LCS can be found on the average. More precisely, consider a fixed alphabet @math and suppose that the input sequences are generated randomly according to the uniform probability distribution and are of the same length @math . Moreover, assume that the number of input sequences is polynomial in @math . Then, there are simple greedy algorithms which approximate SCS and LCS with expected additive errors @math and @math for any @math , respectively. Incidentally, our analyses also provide tight upper and lower bounds on the expected LCS and SCS lengths for a set of random sequences, solving a generalization of another well-known open question on the expected LCS length for two random sequences [K. Alexander, The rate of convergence of the mean length of the longest common subsequence, 1992, manuscript],[V. Chvatal and D. Sankoff, J. Appl. Probab., 12 (1975), pp. 306-315], [D. Sankoff and J. Kruskall, eds., Time Warps, String Edits, and Macromolecules: The Theory and Practice of Sequence Comparison, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1983]. We present a method for solving the shortest transshipmen problem - also known as uncapacitated minimum cost flow - up to a multiplicative error of @math in undirected graphs with polynomially bounded integer edge weights using a tailored gradient descent algorithm. An important special case of the transshipment problem is the single-source shortest paths (SSSP) problem. Our gradient descent algorithm takes @math iterations, and in each iteration it needs to solve the transshipment problem up to a multiplicative error of @math , where @math is the number of nodes. In particular, this allows us to perform a single iteration by computing a solution on a sparse spanner of logarithmic stretch. As a consequence, we improve prior work by obtaining the following results: (1) Broadcast congest model: @math -approximate SSSP using @math rounds, where @math is the (hop) diameter of the network. (2) Broadcast congested clique model: @math -approximate transshipment and SSSP using @math rounds. (3) Multipass streaming model: @math -approximate transshipment and SSSP using @math space and @math passes. The previously fastest algorithms for these models leverage sparse hop sets. We bypass the hop set construction; computing a spanner is sufficient with our method. The above bounds assume non-negative integer edge weights that are polynomially bounded in @math ; for general non-negative weights, running times scale with the logarithm of the maximum ratio between non-zero weights. In case of asymmetric costs, running times scale with the maximum ratio between the costs of both directions over all edges. A token located at some vertex @math of a connected, undirected graph G on n vertices is said to be taking a “random walk” on G if, whenever it is instructed to move, it moves with equal probability to any of the neighbors of @math . The authors consider the following problem: Suppose that two tokens are placed on G, and at each tick of the clock a certain demon decides which of them is to make the next move. The demon is trying to keep the tokens apart as long as possible. What is the expected time M before they meet?The problem arises in the study of self-stabilizing systems, a topic of recent interest in distributed computing. Since previous upper bounds for M were exponential in n, the issue was to obtain a polynomial bound. The authors use a novel potential function argument to show that in the worst case @math . We consider multiobjective and parametric versions of the global minimum cut problem in undirected graphs and bounded-rank hypergraphs with multiple edge cost functions. For a fixed number of edge cost functions, we show that the total number of supported non-dominated (SND) cuts is bounded by a polynomial in the numbers of nodes and edges, i.e., is strongly polynomial. This bound also applies to the combinatorial facet complexity of the problem, i.e., the maximum number of facets (linear pieces) of the parametric curve for the parametrized (linear combination) objective, over the set of all parameter vectors such that the parametrized edge costs are nonnegative and the parametrized cut costs are positive. We sharpen this bound in the case of two objectives (the bicriteria problem), for which we also derive a strongly polynomial upper bound on the total number of non-dominated (Pareto optimal) cuts. In particular, the bicriteria global minimum cut problem in an n-node graph admits @math O(n3logn) SND cuts and @math O(n5logn) Pareto optimal cuts. These results significantly improve on earlier graph cut results by Mulmuley (SIAM J Comput 28(4):1460---1509, 1999) and Armon and Zwick (Algorithmica 46(1):15---26, 2006). They also imply that the parametric curve and all SND cuts, and, for the bicriteria problems, all Pareto optimal cuts, can be computed in strongly polynomial time when the number of objectives is fixed. We present a generalized novel upper-bound (and encoding scheme) - in the form of the minimum value of a linear program - for optimal index coding. Our scheme combines the notions of local chromatic number and partial clique covering into a new definition of the local partial clique cover, which outperforms the previous bounds such as the one by Arbabjolfaei and Kim, 2014. Further, we look at the upper bound derived recently by , 2015, and extend their @math - @math (Generalized Interlinked Cycle) construction to @math - @math graphs, which are a generalization of @math -partial cliques. For any real number @math , we nearly completely characterize the space complexity of estimating @math for @math matrices @math in which each row and each column has @math non-zero entries and whose entries are presented one at a time in a data stream model. Here the @math are the singular values of @math , and when @math , @math is the @math -th power of the Schatten @math -norm. We show that when @math is not an even integer, to obtain a @math -approximation to @math with constant probability, any @math -pass algorithm requires @math bits of space, where @math as @math and @math is a constant independent of @math . However, when @math is an even integer, we give an upper bound of @math bits of space, which holds even in the turnstile data stream model. The latter is optimal up to @math factors. Our results considerably strengthen lower bounds in previous work for arbitrary (not necessarily sparse) matrices @math : the previous best lower bound was @math for @math , @math for @math and @math for @math . We note for @math , while our lower bound for even integers is the same, for other @math in this range our lower bound is @math , which is considerably stronger than the previous @math for small enough constant @math . We obtain similar near-linear lower bounds for Ky-Fan norms, SVD entropy, eigenvalue shrinkers, and M-estimators, many of which could have been solvable in logarithmic space prior to our work.