Internet of Things connects lots of small constrained devices to the Internet. As in any other environment, communication security is important and cryptographic algorithms are one of many elements that we use in order to keep messages secure. It is necessary to use algorithms that do not require high computational power, lightweight ciphers are therefore an ideal candidate for this purpose. Since these devices work in various environments, it is necessary to test security of implementations of cryptographic algorithms. In this paper, we explore a possibility of attacking an ultralightweight cipher PRESENT by using a multiple fault attack. Utilizing the Differential Fault Analysis technique, we were able to recover the secret key with two faulty encryptions and an exhaustive search of 216 remaining key bits. Our attack aims at four nibbles in the penultimate round of the cipher, causing faulty output in all nibbles of the output. We also provide a practical attack scenario by exploiting Hardware Trojan (HT) technique for the proposed fault injection in a Xilinx Spartan-6 FPGA.
@cite_11 used a combination of differential fault analysis and statistical cryptanalysis techniques to attack lightweight block ciphers. They tested their methodology on PRESENT-80 and PRINT-48. The attack on PRESENT is aimed at middle rounds of algorithm, using single random S-box and multiple S-boxes fault attack. The main outcome of the paper is an extension of the fault model from the usual fault model, which aims at ultimate or penultimate rounds, to the other rounds as well.
@cite_11
2094781296
Differential fault analysis is one of the most efficient side channel attack techniques that threat the security of block cipher. However, it often requires a penultimate or an antepenultimate round faulty encryption and is not suitable for middle round fault. This paper presents attacks combining differential fault analysis with statistical cryptanalysis techniques against lightweight ciphers. The analysis makes use of statistical cryptanalysis techniques in practice rather than theoretically, and exploits the weakness of bit-permutation adopted by many lightweight block ciphers under fault attack. Specific attacks against PRESENT and PRINT CIPHER are given to prove the validity. The result shows that about one fifth of the iterative rounds are needed to be protected for these lightweight ciphers with bit-permutation. PRESENT is a hardware-optimized 64-bit lightweight block cipher which supports 80-and 128-bit secret keys. In this paper, we propose a differential fault analysis DFA on PRESENT-80 128. The proposed attack is based on a 2-byte random fault model. In detail, by inducing several 2-byte random faults in input registers after 28 rounds, our attack recovers the secret key of the target algorithm. From simulation results, our attacks on PRESENT-80 128 can recover the secret key by inducing only two and three 2-byte random faults, respectively. These are superior to known DFA results on them. PRESENT is a lightweight block cipher designed by A. in 2007 for extremely constrained environments such as RFID tags and sensor networks, where the AES is not suitable for. In this paper, the strength of PRESENT against the differential fault attack on the key schedule is explored. Our attack adopts the nibble oriented model of random faults and assumes that the attacker can induce a single nibble fault on the round key. The attack can efficiently recover the secret key with the computational complexity of @math , and sixty-four pairs of correct and faulty cipher texts on average. In this paper, we present two differential fault analyses on PRESENT-80 which is a lightweight block cipher. The first attack is a basic attack which induces a fault on only one bit of intermediate states, and we can obtain the last subkey of the block cipher, given 48 faulty cipher texts on average. The second attack can retrieve the master key of the block cipher, given 18 faulty cipher texts on average. In the latter attack, we assume that we can induce faults on a single nibble of intermediate states. Given those faulty cipher texts, the computational complexity of attacks is negligible. This article proposes an enhanced differential fault analysis (DFA) method named as fault-propagation pattern-based DFA (FPP-DFA). The main idea of FPP-DFA is using the FPP of the ciphertext difference to predict the fault location and the fault-propagation path. It shows that FPP-DFA is very effective on SPN structure block ciphers using bitwise permutation, which is applied to two block ciphers. The first is PRESENT with the substitution-permutation sequence. With the fault model of injecting one nibble fault into the r-2nd round, on average 8 and 16 faults can reduce the key search space of PRESENT-80 128 to 214.7 and 221.1, respectively. The second is PRINTcipher with the permutation-substitution sequence. For the first time, it shows that although the permutation of PRINTcipher is secret key dependent, FPP-DFA still works well on it. With the fault model of injecting one nibble fault into the r-2nd round, 12 and 24 effective faults can reduce the key search space of PRINTcipher-48 96 to 213.7 and 222.8, respectively. The stream cipher Salsa20 was introduced by Bernstein in 2005 as a candidate in the eSTREAM project, accompanied by the reduced versions Salsa20 8 and Salsa20 12. ChaCha is a variant of Salsa20 aiming at bringing better diffusion for similar performance. Variants of Salsa20 with up to 7 rounds (instead of 20) have been broken by differential cryptanalysis, while ChaCha has not been analyzed yet. We introduce a novel method for differential cryptanalysis of Salsa20 and ChaCha, inspired by correlation attacks and related to the notion of neutral bits. This is the first application of neutral bits in stream cipher cryptanalysis. It allows us to break the 256-bit version of Salsa20 8, to bring faster attacks on the 7-round variant, and to break 6- and 7-round ChaCha. In a second part, we analyze the compression function Rumba, built as the XOR of four Salsa20 instances and returning a 512-bit output. We find collision and preimage attacks for two simplified variants, then we discuss differential attacks on the original version, and exploit a high-probability differential to reduce complexity of collision search from 2256to 279for 3-round Rumba. To prove the correctness of our approach we provide examples of collisions and near-collisions on simplified versions. In this article, we describe a methodology that aims at either breaking or proving the security of CRT-RSA implementations against fault injection attacks. In the specific case-study of the BellCoRe attack, our work bridges a gap between formal proofs and implementation-level attacks. We apply our results to three implementations of CRT-RSA, namely the unprotected one, that of Shamir, and that of Our findings are that many attacks are possible on both the unprotected and the Shamir implementations, while the implementation of is resistant to all single-fault attacks. It is also resistant to double-fault attacks if we consider the less powerful threat model of its authors. The literature about fault analysis typically describes fault injection mechanisms, e.g. glitches and lasers, and cryptanalytic techniques to exploit faults based on some assumed fault model. Our work narrows the gap between both topics. We thoroughly analyse how clock glitches affect a commercial low-cost processor by performing a large number of experiments on five devices. We observe that the effects of fault injection on two-stage pipeline devices are more complex than commonly reported in the literature. While injecting a fault is relatively easy, injecting an exploitable fault is hard. We further observe that the easiest to inject and reliable fault is to replace instructions, and that random faults do not occur. Finally we explain how typical fault attacks can be mounted on this device, and describe a new attack for which the fault injection is easy and the cryptanalysis trivial. Implementations of cryptographic algorithms continue to proliferate in consumer products due to the increasing demand for secure transmission of confidential information. Although the current standard cryptographic algorithms proved to withstand exhaustive attacks, their hardware and software implementations have exhibited vulnerabilities to side channel attacks, e.g., power analysis and fault injection attacks. This paper focuses on fault injection attacks that have been shown to require inexpensive equipment and a short amount of time. The paper provides a comprehensive description of these attacks on cryptographic devices and the countermeasures that have been developed against them. After a brief review of the widely used cryptographic algorithms, we classify the currently known fault injection attacks into low-cost ones (which a single attacker with a modest budget can mount) and high-cost ones (requiring highly skilled attackers with a large budget). We then list the attacks that have been developed for the important and commonly used ciphers and indicate which ones have been successfully used in practice. The known countermeasures against the previously described fault injection attacks are then presented, including intrusion detection and fault detection. We conclude the survey with a discussion on the interaction between fault injection attacks (and the corresponding countermeasures) and power analysis attacks. Injection of transient faults as a way to attack cryptographic implementations has been largely studied in the last decade. Several attacks that use electromagnetic fault injection against hardware or software architectures have already been presented. On micro controllers, electromagnetic fault injection has mostly been seen as a way to skip assembly instructions or subroutine calls. However, to the best of our knowledge, no precise study about the impact of an electromagnetic glitch fault injection on a micro controller has been proposed yet. The aim of this paper is twofold: providing a more in-depth study of the effects of electromagnetic glitch fault injection on a state-of-the-art micro controller and building an associated register-transfer level fault model. We consider broadcasting among n processors, f of which can be faulty. A fault-free processor, called the source, holds a piece of information which has to be transmitted to all other fault-free processors. We assume that the fraction f n of faulty processors is bounded by a constant γ<1 . Transmissions are fault free. Faults are assumed to be of the crash type: faulty processors do not send or receive messages. We use the whispering model: pairs of processors communicating in one round must form a matching. A fault-free processor sending a message to another processor becomes aware of whether this processor is faulty or fault free and can adapt future transmissions accordingly. The main result of the paper is a broadcasting algorithm working in O( log n) rounds and using O(n) messages of logarithmic size, in the worst case. This is an improvement of the result from [17] where O ((log n) 2 ) rounds were used. Our method also gives the first algorithm for adaptive distributed fault diagnosis in O( log n) rounds. In order to provide security for a device, cryptographic algorithms are implemented on them. Even devices using a cryptographically secure algorithm may be vulnerable to implementation attacks like side channel analysis or fault attacks. Most fault attacks on RSA concentrate on the vulnerability of the Chinese Remainder Theorem to fault injections. A few other attacks on RSA which do not use this speed-up technique have been published. Nevertheless, these attacks require a quite precise fault injection like a bit flip or target a special operation without any possibility to check if the fault was injected in the intended way, like in safe-error attacks.In this paper we propose a new attack on square and multiply, based on a manipulation of the control flow. Furthermore, we show how to realize this attack in practice using non-invasive spike attacks and discuss impacts of different side channel analysis countermeasures on our attack. The attack was performed using low cost equipment. Two different kinds of Byzantine Agreement for distributed systems with processor faults are defined and compared. The first is required when coordinated actions may be performed by each participant at different times. This kind is called Simultaneous Byzantine Agreement (SBA). This paper deals with the number of rounds of message exchange required to reach Byzantine Agreement of either kind (BA). If an algorithm allows its participants to reach Byzantine agreement in every execution in which at most t participants are faulty, then the algorithm is said to tolerate t faults. It is well known that any BA algorithm that tolerates t faults (with t n - 1 where n denotes the total number of processors) must run at least t + 1 rounds in some execution. However, it might be supposed that in executions where the number f of actual faults is small compared to t , the number of rounds could be correspondingly small. A corollary of our first result states that (when t n - 1) any algorithm for SBA must run t + 1 rounds in some execution where there are no faults. For EBA (with t n - 1), a lower bound of min( t + 1, f + 2) rounds is proved. Finally, an algorithm for EBA is presented that achieves the lower bound, provided that t is on the order of the square root of the total number of processors. Cryptosystems are highly sensitive to physical attacks, which lead security developers to design more and more complex countermeasures. Nonetheless, no proof of flaw absence has been given for any implementation of these countermeasures. This paper aims to formally verify an implementation of one published countermeasure against fault injection attacks. More precisely, the formal verification concerns Vigilant’s CRT-RSA countermeasure which is designed to sufficiently protect CRT-RSA implementations against fault attacks. The goal is to formally verify whether any possible fault injection threatening the pseudo-code is detected by the countermeasure according to a predefined attack model. The problem in cryptanalysis can be described as an unknown and the neural networks are ideal tools for blackbox system identification. In this paper, a mathematical black-box model is developed and system identification techniques are combined with adaptive system techniques, to construct the Neuro-Identifier. The Neuro-Identifier is discussed as a black-box model to attack the target cipher systems. In this paper a new addition in cryptography. Has been presented, and the methods of classical and stream cryptosystems are discussed. The constructing of Neuro-Identifier mode is to achieve two objectives: the first one is to emulator construction Neuro-model for the target cipher system, while the second is to (cryptanalysis) determine the key from given plaintext-ciphertext pair. DES, the Data Encryption Standard, is one of several cryptographic standards. The authors of this text detail their cryptanalytic "attack" upon DES and several other systems, using creative and novel tactics to demonstrate how they broke DES up into 16 rounds of coding. The methodology used offers valuable insights to cryptographers and cryptanalysts alike in creating new encryption standards, strengthening current ones, and exploring new ways to test important data protection schemes. This book introduces a new cryptographic method, called differential cryptanalysis, which can be applied to analyze cryptosystems. It describes the cryptanalysis of DES, deals with the influence of its building blocks on security, and analyzes modified variants. The differential cryptanalysis of "Feal" and several other cryptosystems is also described. This method can also be used to cryptanalyze hash functions, as is exemplified by the cryptanalysis of "Snefru". Software fault localization, the act of identifying the locations of faults in a program, is widely recognized to be one of the most tedious, time consuming, and expensive – yet equally critical – activities in program debugging. Due to the increasing scale and complexity of software today, manually locating faults when failures occur is rapidly becoming infeasible, and consequently, there is a strong demand for techniques that can guide software developers to the locations of faults in a program with minimal human intervention. This demand in turn has fueled the proposal and development of a broad spectrum of fault localization techniques, each of which aims to streamline the fault localization process and make it more effective by attacking the problem in a unique way. In this article, we catalog and provide a comprehensive overview of such techniques and discuss key issues and concerns that are pertinent to software fault localization as a whole. Are randomized consensus algorithms more powerful than deterministic ones? Seemingly so, since randomized algorithms exist that reach consensus in expected constant number of rounds, whereas the deterministic counterparts are constrained by the r ≥ t + 1 lower bound in the number of communication rounds, where t is the maximum number of faults to be tolerated. Adversarial examples are perturbed inputs designed to fool machine learning models. Adversarial training injects such examples into training data to increase robustness. To scale this technique to large datasets, perturbations are crafted using fast single-step methods that maximize a linear approximation of the model's loss. We show that this form of adversarial training converges to a degenerate global minimum, wherein small curvature artifacts near the data points obfuscate a linear approximation of the loss. The model thus learns to generate weak perturbations, rather than defend against strong ones. As a result, we find that adversarial training remains vulnerable to black-box attacks, where we transfer perturbations computed on undefended models, as well as to a powerful novel single-step attack that escapes the non-smooth vicinity of the input data via a small random step. We further introduce Ensemble Adversarial Training, a technique that augments training data with perturbations transferred from other models. On ImageNet, Ensemble Adversarial Training yields models with strong robustness to black-box attacks. In particular, our most robust model won the first round of the NIPS 2017 competition on Defenses against Adversarial Attacks. Since the first publication of a successful practical two-fault attack on protected CRT-RSA surprisingly little attention was given by the research community to an ensuing new challenge. The reason for it seems to be two-fold. One is that generic higher order fault attacks are very difficult to model and thus finding robust countermeasures is also difficult. Another reason may be that the published experiment was carried out on an outdated 8 bit microcontroller and thus was not perceived as a serious threat to create a sense of urgency in addressing this new menace. In this paper we describe two-fault attacks on protected CRT-RSA implementations running on an advanced 32 bit ARM Cortex M3 core. To our knowledge, this is the first practical result of two fault laser attacks on a protected cryptographic application. Considering that laser attacks are much more accurate in targeting a particular variable, the significance of our result cannot be overlooked.