The minimum-weight @math -edge-connected spanning subgraph (2-ECSS) problem is a natural generalization of the well-studied minimum-weight spanning tree (MST) problem, and it has received considerable attention in the area of network design. The latter problem asks for a minimum-weight subgraph with an edge connectivity of @math between each pair of vertices while the former strengthens this edge-connectivity requirement to @math . Despite this resemblance, the 2-ECSS problem is considerably more complex than MST. While MST admits a linear-time centralized exact algorithm, 2-ECSS is NP-hard and the best known centralized approximation algorithm for it (that runs in polynomial time) gives a @math -approximation. In this paper, we give a deterministic distributed algorithm with round complexity of @math that computes a @math -approximation of 2-ECSS, for any constant @math . Up to logarithmic factors, this complexity matches the @math lower bound that can be derived from Das [STOC'11], as shown by Censor-Hillel and Dory [OPODIS'17]. Our result is the first distributed constant approximation for 2-ECSS in the nearly optimal time and it improves on a recent randomized algorithm of Dory [PODC'18], which achieved an @math -approximation in @math rounds. We also present an alternative algorithm for @math -approximation, whose round complexity is linear in the low-congestion shortcut parameter of the network, following a framework introduced by Ghaffari and Haeupler [SODA'16]. This algorithm has round complexity @math in worst-case networks but it provably runs much faster in many well-behaved graph families of interest. For instance, it runs in @math time in planar networks and those with bounded genus, bounded path-width or bounded tree-width.
The problem of computing a minimum 2-ECSS is known to be NP-hard, by a reduction from the Hamiltonian cycle problem @cite_26 . This already shows that 2-ECSS is much harder than the closely related problem of MST, which admits a linear-time (randomized) centralized exact algorithm @cite_8 . The best known centralized (polynomial-time) approximation algorithms for 2-ECSS give a @math -approximation @cite_25 @cite_13 . These algorithms also give a @math -approximation for the more general minimum-weight @math -edge-connected spanning subgraph ( @math -ECSS). If all edge-weights are equal (i.e., in the unweighted case), then the best known approximation factors become @math and @math , respectively, for 2-ECSS @cite_2 and @math -ECSS @cite_31 .
@cite_26 @cite_8 @cite_2 @cite_31 @cite_13 @cite_25
1605196620 2138304862 1999799345 2083162966 2092113566
We consider the distributed construction of a minimum weight 2- edge-connected spanning subgraph (2-ECSS) of a given weighted or unweighted graph. A 2-ECSS of a graph is a subgraph that, for each pair of vertices, contains at least two edge-disjoint paths connecting these vertices. The problem of finding a minimum weight 2-ECSS is NP-hard and a natural extension of the distributed MST construction problem, one of the most fundamental problems in the area of distributed computation. We present a distributed 3 2-approximation algorithm for the unweighted 2-ECSS construction problem that requires O(n) communication rounds and O(m) messages. Moreover, we present a distributed 3-approximation algorithm for the weighted 2-ECSS construction problem that requires O(nlogn) communication rounds and O(nlog2 n+m) messages. An efficient heuristic is presented for the problem of finding a minimum-size k-connected spanning subgraph of a given (undirected or directed) graph G=(V,E). There are four versions of the problem, depending on whether G is undirected or directed, and whether the spanning subgraph is required to be k-node connected (k-NCSS) or k-edge connected (k-ECSS). The approximation guarantees are as follows: min-size k-NCSS of an undirected graph 1+[1 k], min-size k-NCSS of a directed graph 1+[1 k], min-size k-ECSS of an undirected graph 1+[7 k], & min-size k-ECSS of a directed graph 1+[4 spl radic k]. The heuristic is based on a subroutine for the degree-constrained subgraph (b-matching) problem. It is simple, deterministic, and runs in time O(k|E| sup 2 ). For undirected graphs and k=2, a (deterministic) parallel NC version of the heuristic finds a 2-node connected (or a-edge connected) spanning subgraph whose size is within a factor of (1.5+ spl epsiv ) of minimum, where spl epsiv >0 is a constant. The smallest k-ECSS problem is, given a graph along with an integer k, find a spanning subgraph that is k-edge connected and contains the fewest possible number of edges. We examine a natural approximation algorithm based on rounding an LP solution. A tight bound on the approximation ratio is 1 + 3-k for undirected graphs with k > 1 odd, 1 + 2-k for undirected graphs with k even, and 1 + 2-k for directed graphs with k arbitrary. Using iterated rounding improves the first upper bound to 1 + 2-k. On the hardness side we show that for some absolute constant c > 0, for any integer k ≥ 2 (k ≥ 1), a polynomial-time algorithm approximating the smallest k-ECSS on undirected (directed) multigraphs to within ratio 1 + c-k would imply P = NP. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. NETWORKS, 2009 We give a 7.18-approximation algorithm for the minimum latency problem that uses only @math calls to the prize-collecting Steiner tree (PCST) subroutine of Goemans and Williamson. This improves the previous best algorithms in both performance guarantee and running time. A previous algorithm of Goemans and Kleinberg for the minimum latency problem requires an approximation algorithm for the @math -minimum spanning tree ( @math -MST) problem which is called as a black box for each value of @math . Their algorithm can achieve an approximation factor of 10.77 while making @math PCST calls, a factor of 8.98 using @math PCST calls, or a factor of @math using @math PCST calls, via the @math -MST algorithms of Garg, Arya and Ramesh, and Arora and Karakostas, respectively. Here @math denotes the number of nodes in the instance, and @math is the largest edge cost in the input. In all cases, the running time is dominated by the PCST calls. Since the PCST subroutine can be implemented to run in @math time, the overall running time of our algorithm is @math . We also give a faster randomized version of our algorithm that achieves the same approximation guarantee in expectation, but uses only @math PCST calls, and derandomize it to obtain a deterministic algorithm with factor @math , using @math PCST calls. The basic idea for our improvement is that we do not treat the @math -MST algorithm as a black box. This allows us to take advantage of some special situations in which the PCST subroutine delivers a 2-approximate @math -MST. We are able to obtain the same approximation ratio that would be given by Goemans and Kleinberg if we had access to 2-approximate @math -MSTs for all values of @math , even though we have them only for some values of @math that we are not able to specify in advance. We also extend our algorithm to a weighted version of the minimum latency problem. We present a general approximation technique for a large class of graph problems. Our technique mostly applies to problems of covering, at minimum cost, the vertices of a graph with trees, cycles or paths satisfying certain requirements. In particular, many basic combinatorial optimization problems fit in this framework, including the shortest path, minimum-cost spanning tree, minimum-weight perfect matching, traveling salesman and Steiner tree problems. Our technique produces approximation algorithms that run in @math time and come within a factor of 2 of optimal for most of these problems. For instance, we obtain a 2-approximation algorithm for the minimum-weight perfect matching problem under the triangle inequality. Our running time of @math time compares favorably with the best strongly polynomial exact algorithms running in @math time for dense graphs. A similar result is obtained for the 2-matching problem and its variants. We also derive the first approximation algorithms for many NP-complete problems, including the non-fixed point-to-point connection problem, the exact path partitioning problem and complex location-design problems. Moreover, for the prize-collecting traveling salesman or Steiner tree problems, we obtain 2-approximation algorithms, therefore improving the previously best-known performance guarantees of 2.5 and 3, respectively [Math. Programming, 59 (1993), pp. 413--420]. We consider the following generalization of the binary search problem. A search strategy is required to locate an unknown target node @math in a given tree @math . Upon querying a node @math of the tree, the strategy receives as a reply an indication of the connected component of @math containing the target @math . The cost of querying each node is given by a known non-negative weight function, and the considered objective is to minimize the total query cost for a worst-case choice of the target. Designing an optimal strategy for a weighted tree search instance is known to be strongly NP-hard, in contrast to the unweighted variant of the problem which can be solved optimally in linear time. Here, we show that weighted tree search admits a quasi-polynomial time approximation scheme: for any @math , there exists a @math -approximation strategy with a computation time of @math . Thus, the problem is not APX-hard, unless @math . By applying a generic reduction, we obtain as a corollary that the studied problem admits a polynomial-time @math -approximation. This improves previous @math -approximation approaches, where the @math -notation disregards @math -factors. We study the directed minimum latency problem: given an n-vertex asymmetric metric (V,d) with a root vertex ri¾? V, find a spanning path originating at rthat minimizes the sum of latencies at all vertices (the latency of any vertex vi¾? Vis the distance from rto valong the path). This problem has been well-studied on symmetric metrics, and the best known approximation guarantee is 3.59 [3]. For any @math O( n^ ^3 ) @math =O( n )$, which implies (for any fixed i¾?> 0) a polynomial time O(n1 2 + i¾?)-approximation algorithm for directed latency. In the special case of metrics induced by shortest-paths in an unweighted directed graph, we give an O(log2n) approximation algorithm. As a consequence, we also obtain an O(log2n) approximation algorithm for minimizing the weighted completion time in no-wait permutation flowshop scheduling. We note that even in unweighted directed graphs, the directed latency problem is at least as hard to approximate as the well-studied asymmetric traveling salesman problem, for which the best known approximation guarantee is O(logn). We present algorithmic and hardness results for network design problems with degree or order constraints. The first problem we consider is the Survivable Network Design problem with degree constraints on vertices. The objective is to find a minimum cost subgraph which satisfies connectivity requirements between vertices and also degree upper bounds @math on the vertices. This includes the well-studied Minimum Bounded Degree Spanning Tree problem as a special case. Our main result is a @math -approximation algorithm for the edge-connectivity Survivable Network Design problem with degree constraints, where the cost of the returned solution is at most twice the cost of an optimum solution (satisfying the degree bounds) and the degree of each vertex @math is at most @math . This implies the first constant factor (bicriteria) approximation algorithms for many degree constrained network design problems, including the Minimum Bounded Degree Steiner Forest problem. Our results also extend to directed graphs and provide the first constant factor (bicriteria) approximation algorithms for the Minimum Bounded Degree Arborescence problem and the Minimum Bounded Degree Strongly @math -Edge-Connected Subgraph problem. In contrast, we show that the vertex-connectivity Survivable Network Design problem with degree constraints is hard to approximate, even when the cost of every edge is zero. A striking aspect of our algorithmic result is its simplicity. It is based on the iterative relaxation method, which is an extension of Jain's iterative rounding method. This provides an elegant and unifying algorithmic framework for a broad range of network design problems. We also study the problem of finding a minimum cost @math -edge-connected subgraph with at least @math vertices, which we call the @math -subgraph problem. This generalizes some well-studied classical problems such as the @math -MST and the minimum cost @math -edge-connected subgraph problems. We give a polylogarithmic approximation for the @math -subgraph problem. However, by relating it to the Densest @math -Subgraph problem, we provide evidence that the @math -subgraph problem might be hard to approximate for arbitrary @math . In the distributed all-pairs shortest paths problem (APSP), every node in the weighted undirected distributed network (the CONGEST model) needs to know the distance from every other node using least number of communication rounds (typically called time complexity ). The problem admits @math -approximation @math -time algorithm and a nearly-tight @math lower bound [Nanongkai, STOC'14; Lenzen and Patt-Shamir PODC'15] @math , @math and @math hide polylogarithmic factors. Note that the lower bounds also hold even in the unweighted case and in the weighted case with polynomial approximation ratios LenzenP_podc13,HolzerW12,PelegRT12,Nanongkai-STOC14 . . For the exact case, Elkin [STOC'17] presented an @math time bound, which was later improved to @math [Huang, Nanongkai, Saranurak FOCS'17]. It was shown that any super-linear lower bound (in @math ) requires a new technique [Censor-Hillel, Khoury, Paz, DISC'17], but otherwise it remained widely open whether there exists a @math -time algorithm for the exact case, which would match the best possible approximation algorithm. This paper resolves this question positively: we present a randomized (Las Vegas) @math -time algorithm, matching the lower bound up to polylogarithmic factors. Like the previous @math bound, our result works for directed graphs with zero (and even negative) edge weights. In addition to the improved running time, our algorithm works in a more general setting than that required by the previous @math bound; in our setting (i) the communication is only along edge directions (as opposed to bidirectional), and (ii) edge weights are arbitrary (as opposed to integers in 1, 2, ... poly(n) ). ... We present a probabilistic algorithm that, given a connected graph G (represented by adjacency lists) of average degree d, with edge weights in the set 1,...,w , and given a parameter @math , estimates in time @math the weight of the minimum spanning tree (MST) of G with a relative error of at most @math . Note that the running time does not depend on the number of vertices in G. We also prove a nearly matching lower bound of @math on the probe and time complexity of any approximation algorithm for MST weight. The essential component of our algorithm is a procedure for estimating in time @math the number of connected components of an unweighted graph to within an additive error of @math . (This becomes @math for @math .) The time bound is shown to be tight up to within the @math factor. Our connected-components algorithm picks @math vertices in the graph and then grows "local spanning trees" whose sizes are specified by a stochastic process. From the local information collected in this way, the algorithm is able to infer, with high confidence, an estimate of the number of connected components. We then show how estimates on the number of components in various subgraphs of G can be used to estimate the weight of its MST. A spanning tree in a graph is the smallest connected spanning subgraph. Given a graph, how does one find the smallest (i.e., least number of edges) 2-connected spanning subgraph (connectivity refers to both edge and vertex connectivity, if not specified)? Unfortunately, the problem is known to be NP-hard. We consider the problem of finding a better approximation to the smallest 2-connected subgraph, by an efficient algorithm. For 2-edge connectivity, our algorithm guarantees a solution that is no more than 3 2 times the optimal. For 2-vertex connectivity, our algorithm guarantees a solution that is no more than 5 3 times the optimal. The previous best approximation factor is 2 for each of these problems. The new algorithms (and their analyses) depend upon a structure called a carving of a graph, which is of independent interest. We show that approximating the optimal solution to within an additive constant is NP-hard as well. We also consider the case where the graph has edge weights. For this case, we show that an approximation factor of 2 is possible in polynomial time for finding a k -edge connected spanning subgraph. This improves an approximation factor of 3 for k = 2, due to Frederickson and Ja´Ja´ [1981], and extends it for any k (with an increased running time though). The Euclidean @math -means problem is a classical problem that has been extensively studied in the theoretical computer science, machine learning and the computational geometry communities. In this problem, we are given a set of @math points in Euclidean space @math , and the goal is to choose @math centers in @math so that the sum of squared distances of each point to its nearest center is minimized. The best approximation algorithms for this problem include a polynomial time constant factor approximation for general @math and a @math -approximation which runs in time @math . At the other extreme, the only known computational complexity result for this problem is NP-hardness [ADHP'09]. The main difficulty in obtaining hardness results stems from the Euclidean nature of the problem, and the fact that any point in @math can be a potential center. This gap in understanding left open the intriguing possibility that the problem might admit a PTAS for all @math . In this paper we provide the first hardness of approximation for the Euclidean @math -means problem. Concretely, we show that there exists a constant @math such that it is NP-hard to approximate the @math -means objective to within a factor of @math . We show this via an efficient reduction from the vertex cover problem on triangle-free graphs: given a triangle-free graph, the goal is to choose the fewest number of vertices which are incident on all the edges. Additionally, we give a proof that the current best hardness results for vertex cover can be carried over to triangle-free graphs. To show this we transform @math , a known hard vertex cover instance, by taking a graph product with a suitably chosen graph @math , and showing that the size of the (normalized) maximum independent set is almost exactly preserved in the product graph using a spectral analysis, which might be of independent interest. Let G=(V,E) be an unweighted undirected graph on n vertices. A simple argument shows that computing all distances in G with an additive one-sided error of at most 1 is as hard as Boolean matrix multiplication. Building on recent work of [SIAM J. Comput., 28 (1999), pp. 1167--1181], we describe an @math -time algorithm APASP2 for computing all distances in G with an additive one-sided error of at most 2. Algorithm APASP2 is simple, easy to implement, and faster than the fastest known matrix-multiplication algorithm. Furthermore, for every even k>2, we describe an @math -time algorithm APASPk for computing all distances in G with an additive one-sided error of at most k. We also give an @math -time algorithm @math for producing stretch 3 estimated distances in an unweighted and undirected graph on n vertices. No constant stretch factor was previously achieved in @math time. We say that a weighted graph F=(V,E') k-emulates an unweighted graph G=(V,E) if for every @math we have @math . We show that every unweighted graph on n vertices has a 2-emulator with @math edges and a 4-emulator with @math edges. These results are asymptotically tight. Finally, we show that any weighted undirected graph on n vertices has a 3-spanner with @math edges and that such a 3-spanner can be built in @math time. We also describe an @math -time algorithm for estimating all distances in a weighted undirected graph on n vertices with a stretch factor of at most 3. We present the best known algorithms for approximating the minimum-size undirected @math -edge connected spanning subgraph. For simple graphs our approximation ratio is @math . The more precise version of this bound requires @math , and for all such @math it improves the long-standing performance ratio of Cheriyan and Thurimella [SIAM J. Comput., 30 (2000), pp. 528-560], @math . The improvement comes in two steps. First we show that for simple @math -edge connected graphs, any laminar family of degree @math sets is smaller than the general bound ( @math versus @math ). This immediately implies that iterated rounding improves the performance ratio of Cheriyan and Thurimella. The second step carefully chooses good edges for rounding. For multigraphs our approximation ratio is @math . This improves the previous ratio @math [H. N. Gabow, M. X. Goemans, E. Tardos, and D. P. Williamson, Networks, 53 (2009), pp. 345-357]. It is of interest since it is known that for some constant @math , an approximation ratio @math implies @math . Our approximation ratio extends to the minimum-size Steiner network problem, where @math denotes the average vertex demand. The algorithm exploits rounding properties of the first two linear programs in iterated rounding. In metric asymmetric traveling salesperson problems the input is a complete directed graph in which edge weights satisfy the triangle inequality, and one is required to find a minimum weight walk that visits all vertices. In the asymmetric traveling salesperson problem (ATSP) the walk is required to be cyclic. In asymmetric traveling salesperson path problem (ATSPP), the walk is required to start at vertex sand to end at vertex t. We improve the approximation ratio for ATSP from @math to @math . This improvement is based on a modification of the algorithm of [JACM 05] that achieved the previous best approximation ratio. We also show a reduction from ATSPP to ATSP that loses a factor of at most 2 + i¾?in the approximation ratio, where i¾?> 0 can be chosen to be arbitrarily small, and the running time of the reduction is polynomial for every fixed i¾?. Combined with our improved approximation ratio for ATSP, this establishes an approximation ratio of @math for ATSPP, improving over the previous best ratio of 4log e ni¾? 2.76log 2 nof Chekuri and Pal [Approx 2006]. We give the first improvement to the space approximation trade-off of distance oracles since the seminal result of Thorup and Zwick [STOC'01]. For unweighted graphs, our distance oracle has size @math and, when queried about vertices at distance @math , returns a path of length @math . For weighted graphs with @math edges, our distance oracle has size @math and returns a factor 2 approximation. Based on a plausible conjecture about the hardness of set intersection queries, we show that a 2-approximate distance oracle requires space @math . For unweighted graphs, this implies a @math space lower bound to achieve approximation @math . par>We prove some non-approximability results for restrictions of basic combinatorial optimization problems to instances of bounded “degreeror bounded “width.” Specifically: We prove that the Max 3SAT problem on instances where each variable occurs in at most B clauses, is hard to approximate to within a factor @math , unless @math . H stad [18] proved that the problem is approximable to within a factor @math in polynomial time, and that is hard to approximate to within a factor @math . Our result uses a new randomized reduction from general instances of Max 3SAT to bounded-occurrences instances. The randomized reduction applies to other Max SNP problems as well. We observe that the Set Cover problem on instances where each set has size at most B is hard to approximate to within a factor @math unless @math . The result follows from an appropriate setting of parameters in Feige's reduction [11]. This is essentially tight in light of the existence of @math -approximate algorithms [20, 23, 9] We present a new PCP construction, based on applying parallel repetition to the inner verifier,'' and we provide a tight analysis for it. Using the new construction, and some modifications to known reductions from PCP to Hitting Set, we prove that Hitting Set with sets of size B is hard to approximate to within a factor @math . The problem can be approximated to within a factor B [19], and it is the Vertex Cover problem for B =2. The relationship between hardness of approximation and set size seems to have not been explored before. We observe that the Independent Set problem on graphs having degree at most B is hard to approximate to within a factor @math , unless P = NP . This follows from a comination of results by Clementi and Trevisan [28] and Reingold, Vadhan and Wigderson [27]. It had been observed that the problem is hard to approximate to within a factor @math unless P = NP [1]. An algorithm achieving factor @math is also known [21, 2, 30, 16 . Let G=(V,E) be a weighted undirected graph where all weights are at least one. We consider the following generalization of feedback set problems. Let @math be a subset of the vertices. A cycle is called interesting if it intersects the set S. A subset feedback edge (vertex) set is a subset of the edges (vertices) that intersects all interesting cycles. In minimum subset feedback problems the goal is to find such sets of minimum weight. This problem has a variety of applications, among them genetic linkage analysis and circuit testing. The case in which S consists of a single vertex is equivalent to the multiway cut problem, in which the goal is to separate a given set of terminals. Hence, the subset feedback problem is NP-complete and also generalizes the multiway cut problem. We provide a polynomial time algorithm for approximating the subset feedback edge set problem that achieves an approximation factor of two. This implies a @math -approximation algorithm for the subset feedback vertex set problem, where @math is the maximum degree in G. We also consider the multicut problem and show how to achieve an @math approximation factor for this problem, where @math is the value of the optimal fractional solution. To achieve the @math factor we employ a bootstrapping technique. In 1966, Graham showed that a simple procedure called list scheduling yields a 2-approximation algorithm for the central problem of scheduling precedence constrained jobs on identical machines to minimize makespan. To date this has remained the best algorithm, and whether it can or cannot be improved has become a major open problem in scheduling theory. We address this problem by establishing a quite surprising relation between the approximability of the considered problem and that of scheduling precedence constrained jobs on a single machine to minimize weighted completion time. More specifically, we prove that if the single machine problem is hard to approximate within a factor of @math , then the considered parallel machine problem, even in the case of unit processing times, is hard to approximate within a factor of @math , where @math tends to 0 as @math tends to 0. Combining this with Bansal and Khot's recent hardness result for the single machine problem gives that it is NP-hard to improve upon the approximation ratio obtained by Graham, assuming a new variant of the unique games conjecture. A Fixed-Parameter Tractable ( ) @math -approximation algorithm for a minimization (resp. maximization) parameterized problem @math is an FPT algorithm that, given an instance @math computes a solution of cost at most @math (resp. @math ) if a solution of cost at most (resp. at least) @math exists; otherwise the output can be arbitrary. For well-known intractable problems such as the W[1]-hard Clique and W[2]-hard Set Cover problems, the natural question is whether we can get any -approximation. It is widely believed that both Clique and Set-Cover admit no FPT @math -approximation algorithm, for any increasing function @math . Assuming standard conjectures such as the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) eth-paturi and the Projection Games Conjecture (PGC) r3 , we make the first progress towards proving this conjecture by showing that 1. Under the ETH and PGC, there exist constants @math such that the Set Cover problem does not admit an FPT approximation algorithm with ratio @math in @math time, where @math is the size of the universe and @math is the number of sets. 2. Unless @math , for every @math there exists a constant @math such that Clique has no FPT cost approximation with ratio @math in @math time, where @math is the number of vertices in the graph. In the second part of the paper we consider various W[1]-hard problems such as , , Directed Steiner Network and . For all these problem we give polynomial time @math -approximation algorithms for some small function @math (the largest approximation ratio we give is @math ).