We show that for any @math there is an XOR game @math with @math inputs for one player and @math inputs for the other player such that @math ebits are required for any strategy achieving bias that is at least a multiplicative factor @math from optimal. This gives an exponential improvement in both the number of inputs or outputs and the noise tolerance of any previously-known self-test for highly entangled states. Up to the exponent @math the scaling of our bound with @math is tight: for any XOR game there is an @math -optimal strategy using @math ebits, irrespective of the number of questions in the game.
The general study of optimal strategies in XOR games was initiated by Tsirelson, who shows @cite_18 that for any XOR game with @math and @math inputs per party there is an optimal strategy that uses a maximally entangled state of dimension at most @math , where @math is the largest integer that satisfies @math and @math . To establish this Tsirelson first proves that to each player's input in the game can be associated a real @math -dimensional unit vector, @math for Alice and @math for Bob, such that the correlations @math achieve the optimal quantum bias in the game. Tsirelson then uses a clever construction, based on a representation of the Clifford algebra, to show that these vectors can be mapped to observables and a maximally entangled state in dimension @math that achieve precisely the same correlations. Slofstra @cite_24 shows that Tsirelson's bound is tight for a slight variant of the @math game.
@cite_24 @cite_18
2089619338 1973948469
We give an explicit family of XOR games with O(n)-bit questions requiring 2n ebits to play near-optimally. More generally, we introduce a new technique for proving lower bounds on the amount of entanglement required by an XOR game: we show that near-optimal strategies for an XOR game G correspond to approximate representations of a certain C*-algebra associated to G. Our results extend an earlier theorem of Tsirelson characterising the set of quantum strategies which implement extremal quantum correlations. We show that any language in nondeterministic time @math , where the number of iterated exponentials is an arbitrary function @math , can be decided by a multiprover interactive proof system with a classical polynomial-time verifier and a constant number of quantum entangled provers, with completeness @math and soundness @math , where the number of iterated exponentials is @math and @math is a universal constant. The result was previously known for @math and @math ; we obtain it for any time-constructible function @math . The result is based on a compression technique for interactive proof systems with entangled provers that significantly simplifies and strengthens a protocol compression result of Ji (STOC'17). As a separate consequence of this technique we obtain a different proof of Slofstra's recent result (unpublished) on the uncomputability of the entangled value of multiprover games. Finally, we show that even minor improvements to our compression result would yield remarkable consequences in computational complexity theory and the foundations of quantum mechanics: first, it would imply that the class MIP* contains all computable languages; second, it would provide a negative resolution to a multipartite version of Tsirelson's problem on the relation between the commuting operator and tensor product models for quantum correlations. We show a parallel repetition theorem for the entangled value @math of any two-player one-round game @math where the questions @math to Alice and Bob are drawn from a product distribution on @math . We show that for the @math -fold product @math of the game @math (which represents the game @math played in parallel @math times independently), @math , where @math and @math represent the sets from which the answers of Alice and Bob are drawn. This paper investigates various aspects of the nonlocal effects that can arise when entangled quantum information is shared between two parties. A natural framework for studying nonlocality is that of cooperative games with incomplete information, where two cooperating players may share entanglement. Here, nonlocality can be quantified in terms of the values of such games. We review some examples of non-locality and show that it can profoundly affect the soundness of two-prover interactive proof systems. We then establish limits on nonlocal behavior by upper-bounding the values of several of these games. These upper bounds can be regarded as generalizations of the so-called Tsirelson inequality. We also investigate the amount of entanglement required by optimal and nearly optimal quantum strategies. Consider the following probabilistic one-player game: The board is a graph with @math vertices, which initially contains no edges. In each step, a new edge is drawn uniformly at random from all nonedges and is presented to the player, henceforth called Painter. Painter must assign one of @math available colors to each edge immediately, where @math is a fixed integer. The game is over as soon as a monochromatic copy of some fixed graph @math has been created, and Painter's goal is to “survive” for as many steps as possible before this happens. We present a new technique for deriving upper bounds on the threshold of this game, i.e., on the typical number of steps Painter will survive with an optimal strategy. More specifically, we consider a deterministic two-player variant of the game where the edges are chosen not randomly, but by a second player Builder. However, Builder has to adhere to the restriction that, for some real number @math , the ratio of edges to vertices in all subgraphs of the evolving board ne... We study the problem of approximating the commuting-operator value of a two-player non-local game. It is well-known that it is @math -complete to decide whether the classical value of a non-local game is 1 or @math . Furthermore, as long as @math is small enough, this result does not depend on the gap @math . In contrast, a recent result of Fitzsimons, Ji, Vidick, and Yuen shows that the complexity of computing the quantum value grows without bound as the gap @math decreases. In this paper, we show that this also holds for the commuting-operator value of a game. Specifically, in the language of multi-prover interactive proofs, we show that the power of @math (proofs with two provers, one round, completeness probability @math , soundness probability @math , and commuting-operator strategies) can increase without bound as the gap @math gets arbitrarily small. Our results also extend naturally in two ways, to perfect zero-knowledge protocols, and to lower bounds on the complexity of computing the approximately-commuting value of a game. Thus we get lower bounds on the complexity class @math - @math of perfect zero-knowledge multi-prover proofs with approximately-commuting operator strategies, as the gap @math gets arbitrarily small. While we do not know any computable time upper bound on the class @math , a result of the first author and Vidick shows that for @math and @math , the class @math , with constant communication from the provers, is contained in @math . We give a lower bound of @math (ignoring constants inside the function) for this class, which is tight up to polynomial factors assuming the exponential time hypothesis. This paper investigates a zero-sum game played on a weighted connected graph @math between two players, the tree player and the edge player. At each play, the tree player chooses a spanning tree @math and the edge player chooses an edge @math . The payoff to the edge player is @math , defined as follows: If @math lies in the tree @math then @math ; if @math does not lie in the tree then @math , where @math is the weight of edge @math and @math is the weight of the unique cycle formed when edge @math is added to the tree @math . The main result is that the value of the game on any @math -vertex graph is bounded above by @math . It is conjectured that the value of the game is @math . The game arises in connection with the @math -server problem on a road network; i.e., a metric space that can be represented as a multigraph @math in which each edge @math represents a road of length @math . It is shown that, if the value of the game on @math is @math , then there is a randomized strategy that achieves a competitive ratio of @math against any oblivious adversary. Thus, on any @math -vertex road network, there is a randomized algorithm for the @math -server problem that is @math competitive against oblivious adversaries. At the heart of the analysis of the game is an algorithm that provides an approximate solution for the simple network design problem. Specifically, for any @math -vertex weighted, connected multigraph, the algorithm constructs a spanning tree @math such that the average, over all edges @math , of @math is less than or equal to @math . This result has potential application to the design of communication networks. It also improves substantially known estimates concerning the existence of a sparse basis for the cycle space of a graph. We present the first formal mathematical presentation of the generalized Russian cards problem, and provide rigorous security definitions that capture both basic and extended versions of weak and perfect security notions. In the generalized Russian cards problem, three players, Alice, Bob, and Cathy, are dealt a deck of @math cards, each given @math , @math , and @math cards, respectively. The goal is for Alice and Bob to learn each other's hands via public communication, without Cathy learning the fate of any particular card. The basic idea is that Alice announces a set of possible hands she might hold, and Bob, using knowledge of his own hand, should be able to learn Alice's cards from this announcement, but Cathy should not. Using a combinatorial approach, we are able to give a nice characterization of informative strategies (i.e., strategies allowing Bob to learn Alice's hand), having optimal communication complexity, namely the set of possible hands Alice announces must be equivalent to a large set of @math -designs, where @math . We also provide some interesting necessary conditions for certain types of deals to be simultaneously informative and secure. That is, for deals satisfying @math for some @math , where @math and the strategy is assumed to satisfy a strong version of security (namely perfect @math -security), we show that @math and hence @math . We also give a precise characterization of informative and perfectly @math -secure deals of the form @math satisfying @math involving @math -designs. We study identifiability for bilinear inverse problems under sparsity and subspace constraints. We show that, up to a global scaling ambiguity, almost all such maps are injective on the set of pairs of sparse vectors if the number of measurements @math exceeds @math , where @math and @math denote the sparsity of the two input vectors, and injective on the set of pairs of vectors lying in known subspaces of dimensions @math and @math if @math . We also prove that both these bounds are tight in the sense that one cannot have injectivity for a smaller number of measurements. Our proof technique draws from algebraic geometry. As an application we derive optimal identifiability conditions for the deconvolution problem, thus improving on recent work of [1]. We provide the first two-party protocol allowing Alice and Bob to evaluate privately even against active adversaries any completely positive, trace-preserving map @math @math , given as a quantum circuit, upon their joint quantum input state @math . Our protocol leaks no more to any active adversary than an ideal functionality for @math provided Alice and Bob have the cryptographic resources for active secure two-party classical computation. Our protocol is constructed from the protocol for the same task secure against specious adversaries presented in [4]. We introduce quantum XOR games, a model of two-player, one-round games that extends the model of XOR games by allowing the referee’s questions to the players to be quantum states. We give examples showing that quantum XOR games exhibit a wide range of behaviors that are known not to exist for standard XOR games, such as cases in which the use of entanglement leads to an arbitrarily large advantage over the use of no entanglement. By invoking two deep extensions of Grothendieck’s inequality, we present an efficient algorithm that gives a constant-factor approximation to the best performance that players can obtain in a given game, both in the case that they have no shared entanglement and that they share unlimited entanglement. As a byproduct of the algorithm, we prove some additional interesting properties of quantum XOR games, such as the fact that sharing a maximally entangled state of arbitrary dimension gives only a small advantage over having no entanglement at all. We study a model of communication complexity that encompasses many well-studied problems, including classical and quantum communication complexity, the complexity of simulating distributions arising from bipartite measurements of shared quantum states, and XOR games. In this model, Alice gets an input x, Bob gets an input y, and their goal is to each produce an output a, b distributed according to some pre-specified joint distribution p(a, b|x, y). Our results apply to any non-signaling distribution, that is, those where Alice's marginal distribution does not depend on Bob's input, and vice versa. By taking a geometric view of the non-signaling distributions, we introduce a simple new technique based on affine combinations of lower-complexity distributions, and we give the first general technique to apply to all these settings, with elementary proofs and very intuitive interpretations. Specifically, we introduce two complexity measures, one which gives lower bounds on classical communication, and one for quantum communication. These measures can be expressed as convex optimization problems. We show that the dual formulations have a striking interpretation, since they coincide with maximum violations of Bell and Tsirelson inequalities. The dual expressions are closely related to the winning probability of XOR games. Despite their apparent simplicity, these lower bounds subsume many known communication complexity lower bound methods, most notably the recent lower bounds of Linial and Shraibman for the special case of Boolean functions. We show that as in the case of Boolean functions, the gap between the quantum and classical lower bounds is at most linear in the size of the support of the distribution, and does not depend on the size of the inputs. This translates into a bound on the gap between maximal Bell and Tsirelson inequality violations, which was previously known only for the case of distributions with Boolean outcomes and uniform marginals. It also allows us to show that for some distributions, information theoretic methods are necessary to prove strong lower bounds. Finally, we give an exponential upper bound on quantum and classical communication complexity in the simultaneous messages model, for any non-signaling distribution. One consequence of this is a simple proof that any quantum distribution can be approximated with a constant number of bits of communication. Tsirelson's problem asks whether the commuting operator model for two-party quantum correlations is equivalent to the tensor-product model. We give a negative answer to this question by showing that there are non-local games which have perfect commuting-operator strategies, but do not have perfect tensor-product strategies. The weak Tsirelson problem, which is known to be equivalent to Connes embedding problem, remains open. The examples we construct are instances of (binary) linear system games. For such games, previous results state that the existence of perfect strategies is controlled by the solution group of the linear system. Our main result is that every finitely-presented group embeds in some solution group. As an additional consequence, we show that the problem of determining whether a linear system game has a perfect commuting-operator strategy is undecidable. In this paper we prove lower bounds on randomized multiparty communication complexity, mainly in the message-passing model, where messages are sent player-to-player. Some of our results apply to the blackboard model, where each message is written on a blackboard for all players to see. We introduce a new technique for proving such bounds, called symmetrization, which is natural, intuitive, and often easy to use. For example, for the problem where each of @math players gets a bit-vector of length @math , and the goal is to compute the coordinatewise XOR of these vectors, we prove a tight lower bound of @math in the blackboard model. For the same problem with AND instead of XOR, we prove a lower bound of roughly @math in the message-passing model (assuming @math ) and @math in the blackboard model. We also prove lower bounds for bitwise majority, for a graph-connectivity problem, and for other problems; the technique seems applicable to a wide range of other problems as well. A... In the generalized Russian cards problem, we have a card deck @math of @math cards and three participants, Alice, Bob, and Cathy, dealt @math , @math , and @math cards, respectively. Once the cards are dealt, Alice and Bob wish to privately communicate their hands to each other via public announcements, without the advantage of a shared secret or public key infrastructure. Cathy should remain ignorant of all but her own cards after Alice and Bob have made their announcements. Notions for Cathy's ignorance in the literature range from Cathy not learning the fate of any individual card with certainty (weak @math -security) to not gaining any probabilistic advantage in guessing the fate of some set of @math cards (perfect @math -security). As we demonstrate, the generalized Russian cards problem has close ties to the field of combinatorial designs, on which we rely heavily, particularly for perfect security notions. Our main result establishes an equivalence between perfectly @math -secure strategies and @math -designs on @math points with block size @math , when announcements are chosen uniformly at random from the set of possible announcements. We also provide construction methods and example solutions, including a construction that yields perfect @math -security against Cathy when @math . We leverage a known combinatorial design to construct a strategy with @math , @math , and @math that is perfectly @math -secure. Finally, we consider a variant of the problem that yields solutions that are easy to construct and optimal with respect to both the number of announcements and level of security achieved. Moreover, this is the first method obtaining weak @math -security that allows Alice to hold an arbitrary number of cards and Cathy to hold a set of @math cards. Alternatively, the construction yields solutions for arbitrary @math , @math and any @math . We study theoretically and numerically the entanglement entropy of the @math -dimensional free fermions whose one body Hamiltonian is the Anderson model. Using basic facts of the exponential Anderson localization, we show first that the disorder averaged entanglement entropy @math of the @math dimension cube @math of side length @math admits the area law scaling @math even in the gapless case, thereby manifesting the area law in the mean for our model. For @math and @math we obtain then asymptotic bounds for the entanglement entropy of typical realizations of disorder and use them to show that the entanglement entropy is not selfaveraging, i.e., has non vanishing random fluctuations even if @math . We study the following one-person game against a random graph process: the Player's goal is to @math -colour a random sequence of edges @math of a complete graph on @math vertices, avoiding a monochromatic triangle for as long as possible. The game is over when a monochromatic triangle is created. The online version of the game requires that the Player should colour each edge as it comes, before looking at the next edge.While it is not hard to prove that the expected length of this game is about @math , the proof of the upper bound suggests the following relaxation: instead of colouring online, the random graph is generated in only two rounds, and the Player colours the edges of the first round before the edges of the second round are thrown in. Given the size of the first round, how many edges can there be in the second round for the Player to be likely to win? In the extreme case, when the first round consists of a random graph with @math edges, where @math is a positive constant, we show that the Player can win with high probability only if constantly many edges are generated in the second round. We analyse a randomized pursuit-evasion game played by two players on a graph, a hunter and a rabbit. Let @math be any connected, undirected graph with @math nodes. The game is played in rounds and in each round both the hunter and the rabbit are located at a node of the graph. Between rounds both the hunter and the rabbit can stay at the current node or move to another node. The hunter is assumed to be restricted to the graph @math : in every round, the hunter can move using at most one edge. For the rabbit we investigate two models: in one model the rabbit is restricted to the same graph as the hunter, and in the other model the rabbit is unrestricted, i.e., it can jump to an arbitrary node in every round.We say that the rabbit is caught as soon as hunter and rabbit are located at the same node in a round. The goal of the hunter is to catch the rabbit in as few rounds as possible, whereas the rabbit aims to maximize the number of rounds until it is caught. Given a randomized hunter strategy for @math , the escape length for that strategy is the worst case expected number of rounds it takes the hunter to catch the rabbit, where the worst case is with regard to all (possibly randomized) rabbit strategies. Our main result is a hunter strategy for general graphs with an escape length of only @math against restricted as well as unrestricted rabbits. This bound is close to optimal since @math is a trivial lower bound on the escape length in both models. Furthermore, we prove that our upper bound is optimal up to constant factors against unrestricted rabbits. This paper studies a cooperative card game called Hanabi from an algorithmic combinatorial game theory viewpoint. The aim of the game is to play cards from @math to @math in increasing order (this has to be done independently in @math different colors). Cards are drawn from a deck one by one. Drawn cards are either immediately played, discarded or stored for future use (overall each player can store up to @math cards). We introduce a simplified mathematical model of a single-player version of the game, and show several complexity results: the game is intractable in a general setting, but becomes tractable (and even linear) in some interesting restricted cases (i.e., for small values of @math and @math ). The @math -online Ramsey game is a combinatorial game between two players, Builder and Painter. Starting from an infinite set of isolated vertices, Builder draws an edge at each step and Painter immediately paints the edge red or blue. Builder's goal is to force Painter to create either a red @math or a blue @math using as few edges as possible. The online Ramsey number @math is the minimum number of edges Builder needs to guarantee a win in the @math -online Ramsey game. By analyzing the special case where Painter plays randomly, we obtain an exponential improvement [ r (n,n) 2^ (2- 2 )n + O(1) ] for the lower bound on the diagonal online Ramsey number, as well as a corresponding improvement [ r (m,n) n^ (2- 2 )m + O(1) ] for the off-diagonal case, where @math is fixed and @math . Using a different randomized Painter strategy and the Lopsided Lov 'asz Local Lemma, we prove that @math , determining this function up to a polylogarithmic factor. We also improve the upper bound in the off-diagonal case for @math . In connection with the online Ramsey game with random Painter, we study the problem of finding a copy of a target graph @math in a sufficiently large unknown Erd o s--R ' e nyi random graph @math using as few queries as possible, where each query reveals whether or not a particular pair of vertices are adjacent. We call this problem the Subgraph Query Problem. We determine the order of the number of queries needed for complete graphs up to five vertices and prove general bounds for this problem.