Given an undirected @math -node unweighted graph @math , a spanner with stretch function @math is a subgraph @math such that, if two nodes are at distance @math in @math , then they are at distance at most @math in @math . Spanners are very well studied in the literature. The typical goal is to construct the sparsest possible spanner for a given stretch function. In this paper we study pairwise spanners, where we require to approximate the @math - @math distance only for pairs @math in a given set @math . Such @math -spanners were studied before [Coppersmith,Elkin'05] only in the special case that @math is the identity function, i.e. distances between relevant pairs must be preserved exactly (a.k.a. pairwise preservers). Here we present pairwise spanners which are at the same time sparser than the best known preservers (on the same @math ) and of the best known spanners (with the same @math ). In more detail, for arbitrary @math , we show that there exists a @math -spanner of size @math with @math . Alternatively, for any @math , there exists a @math -spanner of size @math with @math . We also consider the relevant special case that there is a critical set of nodes @math , and we wish to approximate either the distances within nodes in @math or from nodes in @math to any other node. We show that there exists an @math -spanner of size @math with @math , and an @math -spanner of size @math with @math . All the mentioned pairwise spanners can be constructed in polynomial time.
Compared to the preservers in @cite_9 , we achieve sparser pairwise spanners with additive stretch @math for @math , and a sparser subsetwise spanners for @math . Interestingly, our sourcewise spanners are always sparser than the pairwise preservers from @cite_9 .
@cite_9
2060898859
Given an undirected @math -node unweighted graph @math , a spanner with stretch function @math is a subgraph @math such that, if two nodes are at distance @math in @math , then they are at distance at most @math in @math . Spanners are very well studied in the literature. The typical goal is to construct the sparsest possible spanner for a given stretch function. In this paper we study pairwise spanners, where we require to approximate the @math - @math distance only for pairs @math in a given set @math . Such @math -spanners were studied before [Coppersmith,Elkin'05] only in the special case that @math is the identity function, i.e. distances between relevant pairs must be preserved exactly (a.k.a. pairwise preservers). Here we present pairwise spanners which are at the same time sparser than the best known preservers (on the same @math ) and of the best known spanners (with the same @math ). In more detail, for arbitrary @math , we show that there exists a @math -spanner of size @math with @math . Alternatively, for any @math , there exists a @math -spanner of size @math with @math . We also consider the relevant special case that there is a critical set of nodes @math , and we wish to approximate either the distances within nodes in @math or from nodes in @math to any other node. We show that there exists an @math -spanner of size @math with @math , and an @math -spanner of size @math with @math . All the mentioned pairwise spanners can be constructed in polynomial time. Let G=(V,E) be an undirected unweighted graph on n vertices. A subgraph H of G is called an (all-pairs) purely additive spanner with stretch β if for every (u,v)∈V×V, d i s t H (u,v)≤d i s t G (u,v) + β. The problem of computing sparse spanners with small stretch β is well-studied. Here we consider the following variant: we are given ( P V V ) and we seek a sparse subgraph H where d i s t H (u,v)≤d i s t G (u,v) + β for each ((u,v) P ). That is, distances for pairs outside ( P ) need not be well-approximated in H. Such a subgraph is called a pairwise spanner with additive stretch β and our goal is to construct such subgraphs that are sparser than all-pairs spanners with the same stretch. We show sparse pairwise spanners with additive stretch 4 and with additive stretch 6. We also consider the following special cases: ( P = S V ) and ( P = S T ), where S⊆V and T⊆V, and show sparser pairwise spanners for these cases. An (α,β)-spanner of an n-vertex graph G = (V,E) is a subgraph H of G satisfying that dist(u, v, H) ≤ α·dist(u, v, G) + β for every pair (u, v) ∈ V ×V, where dist(u,v,G′) denotes the distance between u and v in G′ ⊆ G. It is known that for every integer k ≥ 1, every graph G has a polynomially constructible (2k − 1,0)-spanner of size O(n 1 + 1 k ). This size-stretch bound is essentially optimal by the girth conjecture. Yet, it is important to note that any argument based on the girth only applies to adjacent vertices. It is therefore intriguing to ask if one can “bypass” the conjecture by settling for a multiplicative stretch of 2k − 1 only for neighboring vertex pairs, while maintaining a strictly better multiplicative stretch for the rest of the pairs. We answer this question in the affirmative and introduce the notion of k-hybrid spanners, in which non neighboring vertex pairs enjoy a multiplicative k stretch and the neighboring vertex pairs enjoy a multiplicative (2k − 1) stretch (hence, tight by the conjecture). We show that for every unweighted n-vertex graph G, there is a (polynomially constructible) k-hybrid spanner with O(k 2 ·n 1 + 1 k ) edges. This should be compared against the current best (α,β) spanner construction of [5] that obtains (k,k − 1) stretch with O(k ·n 1 + 1 k ) edges. An alternative natural approach to bypass the girth conjecture is to allow ourself to take care only of a subset of pairs S ×V for a given subset of vertices S ⊆ V referred to here as sources. Spanners in which the distances in S ×V are bounded are referred to as sourcewise spanners. Several constructions for this variant are provided (e.g., multiplicative sourcewise spanners, additive sourcewise spanners and more). We address the following problem: Given a complete @math -partite geometric graph @math whose vertex set is a set of @math points in @math , compute a spanner of @math that has a “small” stretch factor and “few” edges. We present two algorithms for this problem. The first algorithm computes a @math -spanner of @math with @math edges in @math time. The second algorithm computes a @math -spanner of @math with @math edges in @math time. The latter result is optimal: We show that for any @math , spanners with @math edges and stretch factor less than 3 do not exist for all complete @math -partite geometric graphs. We introduce and study the notions of pairwise and sourcewise preservers. Given an undirected N-vertex graph G = (V,E) and a set P of pairs of vertices, let G' = (V,H), H E, be called a pairwise preserver of G with respect to P if for every pair u,w P, distG'(u,w) = distG(u,w). For a set S V of sources, a pairwise preserver of G with respect to the set of all pairs P = (S 2) of sources is called a sourcewise preserver of G with respect to S. We prove that for every undirected possibly weighted N-vertex graph G and every set P of P = O(N1 2) pairs of vertices of G, there exists a linear-size pairwise preserver of G with respect to P. Consequently, for every subset S V of S = O(N1 4) sources, there exists a linear-size sourcewise preserver of G with respect to S. On the negative side we show that neither of the two exponents (1 2 and 1 4) can be improved even when the attention is restricted to unweighted graphs. Our lower bounds involve constructions of dense convexly independent sets of vectors with small Euclidean norms. We believe that the link between the areas of discrete geometry and spanners that we establish is of independent interest and might be useful in the study of other problems in the area of low-distortion embeddings. An @math -spanner of a graph G is a subgraph H such that @math for every pair of vertices u,w, where distG'(u,w) denotes the distance between two vertices u and v in G'. It is known that every graph G has a polynomially constructible @math -spanner (also known as multiplicative @math -spanner) of size @math for every integer @math , and a polynomially constructible (1,2)-spanner (also known as additive 2-spanner) of size @math . This paper explores hybrid spanner constructions (involving both multiplicative and additive factors) for general graphs and shows that the multiplicative factor can be made arbitrarily close to 1 while keeping the spanner size arbitrarily close to O(n), at the cost of allowing the additive term to be a sufficiently large constant. More formally, we show that for any constant @math there exists a constant @math such that for every @math -vertex graph G there is an efficiently constructible @math -spanner of size @math . A natural requirement of many distributed structures is fault-tolerance: after some failures, whatever remains from the structure should still be effective for whatever remains from the network. In this paper we examine spanners of general graphs that are tolerant to vertex failures, and significantly improve their dependence on the number of faults @math , for all stretch bounds. For stretch @math we design a simple transformation that converts every @math -spanner construction with at most @math edges into an @math -fault-tolerant @math -spanner construction with at most @math edges. Applying this to standard greedy spanner constructions gives @math -fault tolerant @math -spanners with @math edges. The previous construction by Chechik, Langberg, Peleg, and Roddity [STOC 2009] depends similarly on @math but exponentially on @math (approximately like @math ). For the case @math and unit-length edges, an @math -approximation algorithm is known from recent work of Dinitz and Krauthgamer [arXiv 2010], where several spanner results are obtained using a common approach of rounding a natural flow-based linear programming relaxation. Here we use a different (stronger) LP relaxation and improve the approximation ratio to @math , which is, notably, independent of the number of faults @math . We further strengthen this bound in terms of the maximum degree by using the Local Lemma. Finally, we show that most of our constructions are inherently local by designing equivalent distributed algorithms in the LOCAL model of distributed computation. Let G=(V,E) be an unweighted undirected graph on n vertices. A simple argument shows that computing all distances in G with an additive one-sided error of at most 1 is as hard as Boolean matrix multiplication. Building on recent work of [SIAM J. Comput., 28 (1999), pp. 1167--1181], we describe an @math -time algorithm APASP2 for computing all distances in G with an additive one-sided error of at most 2. Algorithm APASP2 is simple, easy to implement, and faster than the fastest known matrix-multiplication algorithm. Furthermore, for every even k>2, we describe an @math -time algorithm APASPk for computing all distances in G with an additive one-sided error of at most k. We also give an @math -time algorithm @math for producing stretch 3 estimated distances in an unweighted and undirected graph on n vertices. No constant stretch factor was previously achieved in @math time. We say that a weighted graph F=(V,E') k-emulates an unweighted graph G=(V,E) if for every @math we have @math . We show that every unweighted graph on n vertices has a 2-emulator with @math edges and a 4-emulator with @math edges. These results are asymptotically tight. Finally, we show that any weighted undirected graph on n vertices has a 3-spanner with @math edges and that such a 3-spanner can be built in @math time. We also describe an @math -time algorithm for estimating all distances in a weighted undirected graph on n vertices with a stretch factor of at most 3. We introduce a family of directed geometric graphs, denoted @math , that depend on two parameters @math and @math . For @math and @math , the @math graph is a strong @math -spanner, with @math . The out-degree of a node in the @math graph is at most @math . Moreover, we show that routing can be achieved locally on @math . Next, we show that all strong @math -spanners are also @math -spanners of the unit disk graph. Simulations for various values of the parameters @math and @math indicate that for random point sets, the spanning ratio of @math is better than the proven theoretical bounds. [43] devised a distributed1 algorithm in the CONGEST model, that given a parameter k = 1, 2, ..., constructs an O(k)-spanner of an input unweighted n-vertex graph with O(n1+1 k) expected edges in O(k) rounds of communication. In this paper we improve the result of [43], by showing a k-round distributed algorithm in the same model, that constructs a (2k − 1)-spanner with O(n1+1 k ϵ) edges, with probability 1 − ϵ, for any ϵ > 0. Moreover, when k = ω(log n), our algorithm produces (still in k rounds) ultra-sparse spanners, i.e., spanners of size n(1 + o(1)), with probability 1 − o(1). To our knowledge, this is the first distributed algorithm in the CONGEST or in the PRAM models that constructs spanners or skeletons (i.e., connected spanning subgraphs) that sparse. Our algorithm can also be implemented in linear time in the standard centralized model, and for large k, it provides spanners that are sparser than any other spanner given by a known (near-)linear time algorithm. We also devise improved bounds (and algorithms realizing these bounds) for (1 + ϵ, β)-spanners and emulators. In particular, we show that for any unweighted n-vertex graph and any ϵ > 0, there exists a [EQUATION]-emulator with O(n) edges. All previous constructions of (1 + ϵ, β)-spanners and emulators employ a superlinear number of edges, for all choices of parameters. Finally, we provide some applications of our results to approximate shortest paths' computation in unweighted graphs. A spanner is a sparse subgraph that approximately preserves the pairwise distances of the original graph. It is well known that there is a smooth tradeoff between the sparsity of a spanner and the quality of its approximation, so long as distance error is measured multiplicatively. A central open question in the field is to prove or disprove whether such a tradeoff exists also in the regime of additive error. That is, is it true that for all e>0, there is a constant ke such that every graph has a spanner on O(n1+e) edges that preserves its pairwise distances up to +ke? Previous lower bounds are consistent with a positive resolution to this question, while previous upper bounds exhibit the beginning of a tradeoff curve: all graphs have +2 spanners on O(n3 2) edges, +4 spanners on O(n7 5) edges, and +6 spanners on O(n4 3) edges. However, progress has mysteriously halted at the n4 3 bound, and despite significant effort from the community, the question has remained open for all 0 Our main result is a surprising negative resolution of the open question, even in a highly generalized setting. We show a new information theoretic incompressibility bound: there is no function that compresses graphs into O(n4 3 − e) bits so that distance information can be recovered within +no(1) error. As a special case of our theorem, we get a tight lower bound on the sparsity of additive spanners: the +6 spanner on O(n4 3) edges cannot be improved in the exponent, even if any subpolynomial amount of additive error is allowed. Our theorem implies new lower bounds for related objects as well; for example, the twenty-year-old +4 emulator on O(n4 3) edges also cannot be improved in the exponent unless the error allowance is polynomial. Central to our construction is a new type of graph product, which we call the Obstacle Product. Intuitively, it takes two graphs G,H and produces a new graph G H whose shortest paths structure looks locally like H but globally like G. This paper considers additive and purely additive spanners. We present a new purely additive spanner of size O(n7 5) with additive stretch 4. This construction fills in the gap between the two existing constructions for purely additive spanners, one for 2-additive spanner of size O(n3 2) and the other for 6-additive spanner of size O(n4 3), and thus answers a main open question in this area. In addition, we present a construction for additive spanners with O(n1+δ) edges and additive stretch of O(n1 2−3δ 2) for any 3 17 ≤ δ < 1 3, improving the stretch of the existing constructions from O(n1−3δ) to O(√n1−3δ). Finally, we show that our (1,n1 2−3δ 2)-spanner construction can be tweaked to give a sublinear additive spanner of size O(n1+3 17) with additive stretch O(√distance). We show that the greedy spanner algorithm constructs a @math -spanner of weight @math for a point set in metrics of doubling dimension @math , resolving an open problem posed by Gottlieb. Our result generalizes the result by Narasimhan and Smid who showed that a point set in @math -dimension Euclidean space has a @math -spanner of weight at most @math . Our proof only uses the packing property of doubling metrics and thus implies a much simpler proof for the same result in Euclidean space. The greedy spanner is arguably the simplest and most well-studied spanner construction. Experimental results demonstrate that it is at least as good as any other spanner construction, in terms of both the size and weight parameters. However, a rigorous proof for this statement has remained elusive. In this work we fill in the theoretical gap via a surprisingly simple observation: The greedy spanner is (or existentially near-optimal) for several important graph families. Focusing on the weight parameter, the state-of-the-art spanner constructions for both general graphs (due to Chechik and Wulff-Nilsen [SODA'16]) and doubling metrics (due to Gottlieb [FOCS'15]) are complex. Plugging our observation on these results, we conclude that the greedy spanner achieves near-optimal weight guarantees for both general graphs and doubling metrics, thus resolving two longstanding conjectures in the area. Further, we observe that approximate-greedy algorithms are existentially near-optimal as well. Consequently, we provide an @math -time construction of @math -spanners for doubling metrics with constant lightness and degree. Our construction improves Gottlieb's construction, whose runtime is @math and whose number of edges and degree are unbounded, and remarkably, it matches the state-of-the-art Euclidean result (due to [SICOMP'02]) in all the involved parameters (up to dependencies on @math and the dimension). Asymptotically optimal planners, such as PRM*, guarantee that solutions approach optimal as the number of iterations increases. Roadmaps with this property, however, may grow too large for storing on resource-constrained robots and for achieving efficient online query resolution. By relaxing optimality, asymptotically near-optimal planners produce sparser graphs by not including all edges. The idea stems from graph spanners, which produce sparse subgraphs that guarantee near-optimality. Existing asymptotically optimal and near-optimal planners, however, include all sampled configurations as roadmap nodes, meaning only infinite-size graphs have the desired properties. To address this limitation, this work describes SPARS, an algorithm that returns a sparse roadmap spanner. The method provides the following properties: (a) probabilistic completeness, (b) asymptotic near-optimality and (c) the probability of adding nodes to the spanner converges to zero as iterations increase. The last point suggests that finite-size data structures with asymptotic near-optimality in continuous spaces may indeed exist. The approach builds simultaneously a dense graph similar to PRM* and its roadmap spanner, meaning that upon construction an infinite-size graph is still needed asymptotically. An extension of SPARS is also presented, termed SPARS2, which removes the dependency on building a dense graph for constructing the sparse roadmap spanner and for which it is shown that the same desirable properties hold. Simulations for rigid-body motion planning show that algorithms for constructing sparse roadmap spanners indeed provide small data structures and result in faster query resolution. The rate of node addition is shown to decrease over time and practically the quality of solutions is considerably better than the theoretical bounds. Upon construction, the memory requirements of SPARS2 are significantly smaller but there is a small sacrifice in the size of the final spanner relative to SPARS. Part I. Introduction: 1. Introduction 2. Algorithms and graphs 3. The algebraic computation-tree model Part II. Spanners Based on Simplical Cones: 4. Spanners based on the Q-graph 5. Cones in higher dimensional space and Q-graphs 6. Geometric analysis: the gap property 7. The gap-greedy algorithm 8. Enumerating distances using spanners of bounded degree Part III. The Well Separated Pair Decomposition and its Applications: 9. The well-separated pair decomposition 10. Applications of well-separated pairs 11. The Dumbbell theorem 12. Shortcutting trees and spanners with low spanner diameter 13. Approximating the stretch factor of Euclidean graphs Part IV. The Path Greedy Algorithm: 14. Geometric analysis: the leapfrog property 15. The path-greedy algorithm Part V. Further Results and Applications: 16. The distance range hierarchy 17. Approximating shortest paths in spanners 18. Fault-tolerant spanners 19. Designing approximation algorithms with spanners 20. Further results and open problems. Spanners, emulators, and approximate distance oracles can be viewed as lossy compression schemes that represent an unweighted graph metric in small space, say O(n1+Δ) bits. There is an inherent tradeoff between the sparsity parameter Δ and the stretch function f of the compression scheme, but the qualitative nature of this tradeoff has remained a persistent open problem. It has been known for some time that when Δ ≥ 1 3 there are schemes with constant additive stretch (distance d is stretched to at most f(d) = d + O(1)), and recent results of Abboud and Bodwin show that when Δ In this paper we show that the lower bound of Abboud and Bodwin is just the first step in a hierarchy of lower bounds that characterize the asymptotic behavior of the optimal stretch function f for sparsity parameter Δ ∈ (0,1 3). Specifically, for any integer k ≥ 2, any compression scheme with size [EQUATION] has a sublinear additive stretch function f: f(d) = d + Ω(d1−1 k). This lower bound matches Thorup and Zwick's (2006) construction of sublinear additive emulators. It also shows that Elkin and Peleg's (1 + ϵ, β)-spanners have an essentially optimal tradeoff between Δ, ϵ, and β, and that the sublinear additive spanners of Pettie (2009) and Chechik (2013) are not too far from optimal. To complement these lower bounds we present a new construction of (1 + ϵ, O(k ϵ)k−1)-spanners with size [EQUATION], where hk Our lower bound technique exhibits several interesting degrees of freedom in the framework of Abboud and Bodwin. By carefully exploiting these freedoms, we are able to obtain lower bounds for several related combinatorial objects. We get lower bounds on the size of (β, ϵ)-hopsets, matching Elkin and Neiman's construction (2016), and lower bounds on shortcutting sets for digraphs that preserve the transitive closure. Our lower bound simplifies Hesse's (2003) refutation of Thorup's conjecture (1992), which stated that adding a linear number of shortcuts suffices to reduce the diameter to polylogarithmic. Finally, we show matching upper and lower bounds for graph compression schemes that work for graph metrics with girth at least 2γ + 1. One consequence is that 's (2010) additive O(γ)-spanners with size [EQUATION] cannot be improved in the exponent. Thorup and Zwick showed that for any integer k≥ 1, it is possible to preprocess any positively weighted undirected graph G=(V,E), with |E|=m and |V|=n, in O(kmn @math ) expected time and construct a data structure (a (2k–1)-approximate distance oracle) of size O(kn @math ) capable of returning in O(k) time an approximation @math of the distance δ(u,v) from u to v in G that satisfies @math , for any two vertices u,v∈ V. They also presented a much slower O(kmn) time deterministic algorithm for constructing approximate distance oracle with the slightly larger size of O(kn @math log n). We present here a deterministic O(kmn @math ) time algorithm for constructing oracles of size O(kn @math ). Our deterministic algorithm is slower than the randomized one by only a logarithmic factor. Using our derandomization technique we also obtain the first deterministic linear time algorithm for constructing optimal spanners of weighted graphs. We do that by derandomizing the O(km) expected time algorithm of Baswana and Sen (ICALP’03) for constructing (2k–1)-spanners of size O(kn @math ) of weighted undirected graphs without incurring any asymptotic loss in the running time or in the size of the spanners produced. A spanner is a sparse subgraph of a given graph that preserves approximate distance between each pair of vertices. In precise words, a t-spanner of a graph G = (V,E), for any t ∈ N, is a subgraph (V,ES), ES ⊆ E such that, for any u, v ∈ V , their distance in the subgraph is at most t times their distance in the original graph. The parameter t is called the stretch associated with the t-spanner. The concept of spanner was defined formally by Peleg and Schaffer [13] though the associated notion was used implicitly by Awerbuch [3] in the context of network synchronizers. Computing tspanner of smallest size for a given graph is a well motivated combinatorial problem with numerous applications in the area of distributed systems, communication networks and all pairs approximate shortest paths (see [4, 13] and references therein). However, computing t-spanner of smallest size for a graph is NP-hard. In fact, for t > 2, it is NP-hard [6] even to approximate the smallest size of t-spanner of a graph with ratio O(2(1−μ) lnn) for any μ > 0. Having realized this fact, researchers have pursued another direction : to design an efficient algorithm which, for a given graph on n vertices, outputs a t-spanner whose size is of the order of the maximum size of the sparsest tspanner of a graph on n vertices. A 43 years old girth lower bound conjecture by Erdős [7] implies that there are graphs on n vertices whose 2k as well as (2k− 1)spanner will requireΩ(n1+1 k) edges. This conjecture A t-spanner is a graph on a set of points Swith the following property: Between any pair of points there is a path in the spanner whose total length is at most ttimes the actual distance between the points. In this paper, we consider points residing in a metric space equipped with doubling dimension i¾?, and show how to construct a dynamic (1 + i¾?)-spanner with degree i¾?i¾? O(i¾?)in @math update time. When i¾?and i¾?are taken as constants, the degree and update times are optimal.