The emergence of high-dimensional data in various areas has brought new challenges to the ensemble clustering research. To deal with the curse of dimensionality, considerable efforts in ensemble clustering have been made by incorporating various subspace-based techniques. Besides the emphasis on subspaces, rather limited attention has been paid to the potential diversity in similarity dissimilarity metrics. It remains a surprisingly open problem in ensemble clustering how to create and aggregate a large number of diversified metrics, and furthermore, how to jointly exploit the multi-level diversity in the large number of metrics, subspaces, and clusters, in a unified framework. To tackle this problem, this paper proposes a novel multi-diversified ensemble clustering approach. In particular, we create a large number of diversified metrics by randomizing a scaled exponential similarity kernel, which are then coupled with random subspaces to form a large set of metric-subspace pairs. Based on the similarity matrices derived from these metric-subspace pairs, an ensemble of diversified base clusterings can thereby be constructed. Further, an entropy-based criterion is adopted to explore the cluster-wise diversity in ensembles, based on which the consensus function is therefore presented. Experimental results on twenty high-dimensional datasets have confirmed the superiority of our approach over the state-of-the-art.
The median partition based methods @cite_15 @cite_4 @cite_34 typically formulate the ensemble clustering problem into an optimization problem which aims to find the median partition such that the similarity between the base partitions (i.e., base clusterings) and the median partition is maximized. The median partition problem is NP-hard @cite_4 . To find an approximate solution, @cite_4 cast the median partition problem into a maximum likelihood problem and solved it by the EM algorithm. Franek and Jiang @cite_34 reduced the ensemble clustering problem to an Euclidean median problem and solved it by the Weiszfeld algorithm @cite_40 . @cite_15 formulated the ensemble clustering problem into a binary linear programming problem and obtained an approximate solution based on the factor graph model and the max-product belief propagation @cite_0 .
@cite_4 @cite_0 @cite_40 @cite_15 @cite_34
2115346774 2137813581 2161669108 1648123822 2025549250
Ensemble clustering is a recently evolving research direction in cluster analysis and has found several different application domains. In this work the complex ensemble clustering problem is reduced to the well-known Euclidean median problem by clustering embedding in vector spaces. The Euclidean median problem is solved by the Weiszfeld algorithm and an inverse transformation maps the Euclidean median back into the clustering domain. In the experiment study different evaluation strategies are considered. The proposed embedding strategy is compared to several state-of-art ensemble clustering algorithms and demonstrates superior performance. HighlightsThis paper presents a novel approach to solving the ensemble clustering problem.An embedding method successful for strings and graphs is adapted to clusterings.An extensive experiment study is presented.The proposed method is superior to several state-of-the-art related algorithms. We present the first constant-factor approximation algorithm for the metric k-median problem. The k-median problem is one of the most well-studied clustering problems, i.e., those problems in which the aim is to partition a given set of points into clusters so that the points within a cluster are relatively close with respect to some measure. For the metric k-median problem, we are given n points in a metric space. We select k of these to be cluster centers and then assign each point to its closest selected center. If point j is assigned to a center i, the cost incurred is proportional to the distance between i and j. The goal is to select the k centers that minimize the sum of the assignment costs. We give a 62 3-approximation algorithm for this problem. This improves upon the best previously known result of O(log k log log k), which was obtained by refining and derandomizing a randomized O(log n log log n)-approximation algorithm of Bartal. Clustering ensembles have emerged as a powerful method for improving both the robustness as well as the stability of unsupervised classification solutions. However, finding a consensus clustering from multiple partitions is a difficult problem that can be approached from graph-based, combinatorial, or statistical perspectives. This study extends previous research on clustering ensembles in several respects. First, we introduce a unified representation for multiple clusterings and formulate the corresponding categorical clustering problem. Second, we propose a probabilistic model of consensus using a finite mixture of multinomial distributions in a space of clusterings. A combined partition is found as a solution to the corresponding maximum-likelihood problem using the EM algorithm. Third, we define a new consensus function that is related to the classical intraclass variance criterion using the generalized mutual information definition. Finally, we demonstrate the efficacy of combining partitions generated by weak clustering algorithms that use data projections and random data splits. A simple explanatory model is offered for the behavior of combinations of such weak clustering components. Combination accuracy is analyzed as a function of several parameters that control the power and resolution of component partitions as well as the number of partitions. We also analyze clustering ensembles with incomplete information and the effect of missing cluster labels on the quality of overall consensus. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods on several real-world data sets. A critical problem in cluster ensemble research is how to combine multiple clusterings to yield a final superior clustering result. Leveraging advanced graph partitioning techniques, we solve this problem by reducing it to a graph partitioning problem. We introduce a new reduction method that constructs a bipartite graph from a given cluster ensemble. The resulting graph models both instances and clusters of the ensemble simultaneously as vertices in the graph. Our approach retains all of the information provided by a given ensemble, allowing the similarity among instances and the similarity among clusters to be considered collectively in forming the final clustering. Further, the resulting graph partitioning problem can be solved efficiently. We empirically evaluate the proposed approach against two commonly used graph formulations and show that it is more robust and achieves comparable or better performance in comparison to its competitors. In this paper, we propose a new ensemble clustering approach termed ensemble clustering using factor graph (ECFG). Compared to the existing approaches, our approach has three main advantages: (1) the cluster number is obtained automatically and need not to be specified in advance; (2) the reliability of each base clustering can be estimated in an unsupervised manner and exploited in the consensus process; (3) our approach is efficient for processing ensembles with large data sizes and large ensemble sizes. In this paper, we introduce the concept of super-object, which serves as a compact and adaptive representation for the ensemble data and significantly facilitates the computation. Through the probabilistic formulation, we cast the ensemble clustering problem into a binary linear programming (BLP) problem. The BLP problem is NP-hard. To solve this optimization problem, we propose an efficient solver based on factor graph. The constrained objective function is represented as a factor graph and the max-product belief propagation is utilized to generate the solution insensitive to initialization and converged to the neighborhood maximum. Extensive experiments are conducted on multiple real-world datasets, which demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our approach against the state-of-the-art approaches. HighlightsIntroduce the super-object representation to facilitate the consensus process.Probabilistically formulate the ensemble clustering problem into a BLP problem.Propose an efficient solver for the BLP problem based on factor graph.The cluster number of the consensus clustering is estimated automatically.Our method achieves the state-of-the-art performance in effectiveness and efficiency. Clustering is a fundamental tool in data mining. It partitions points into groups (clusters) and may be used to make decisions for each point based on its group. However, this process may harm protected (minority) classes if the clustering algorithm does not adequately represent them in desirable clusters -- especially if the data is already biased. At NIPS 2017, proposed a model for fair clustering requiring the representation in each cluster to (approximately) preserve the global fraction of each protected class. Restricting to two protected classes, they developed both a 4-approximation for the fair @math -center problem and a @math -approximation for the fair @math -median problem, where @math is a parameter for the fairness model. For multiple protected classes, the best known result is a 14-approximation for fair @math -center. We extend and improve the known results. Firstly, we give a 5-approximation for the fair @math -center problem with multiple protected classes. Secondly, we propose a relaxed fairness notion under which we can give bicriteria constant-factor approximations for all of the classical clustering objectives @math -center, @math -supplier, @math -median, @math -means and facility location. The latter approximations are achieved by a framework that takes an arbitrary existing unfair (integral) solution and a fair (fractional) LP solution and combines them into an essentially fair clustering with a weakly supervised rounding scheme. In this way, a fair clustering can be established belatedly, in a situation where the centers are already fixed. Clustering ensembles have emerged as a powerful method for improving both the robustness and the stability of unsupervised classification solutions. However, finding a consensus clustering from multiple partitions is a difficult problem that can be approached from graph-based, combinatorial or statistical perspectives. We offer a probabilistic model of consensus using a finite mixture of multinomial distributions in a space of clustering. A combined partition is found as a solution to the corresponding maximum likelihood problem using the GA algorithm. The excellent scalability of this algorithm and comprehensible underlying model are particularly important for clustering of large datasets. This study includes two sections, at the first, calculate correlation matrix. this matrix show correlation between samples and we found the best samples that can be in the center of clusters. In the other section a genetic algorithm is employed to produce the most stable partitions from an evolving ensemble (population) of clustering algorithms along with a special objective function. The objective function evaluates multiple partitions according to changes caused by data perturbations and prefers those clustering that are least susceptible to those perturbations. In a document network such as a citation network of scientific documents, web-logs, etc., the content produced by authors exhibits their interest in certain topics. In addition some authors influence other authors' interests. In this work, we propose to model the influence of cited authors along with the interests of citing authors. Moreover, we hypothesize that apart from the citations present in documents, the context surrounding the citation mention provides extra topical information about the cited authors. However, associating terms in the context to the cited authors remains an open problem. We propose novel document generation schemes that incorporate the context while simultaneously modeling the interests of citing authors and influence of the cited authors. Our experiments show significant improvements over baseline models for various evaluation criteria such as link prediction between document and cited author, and quantitatively explaining unseen text. A new form of document coupling called co-citation is defined as the frequency with which two documents are cited together. The co-citation frequency of two scientific papers can be determined by comparing lists of citing documents in the Science Citation Index and counting identical entries. Networks of co-cited papers can be generated for specific scientific specialties, and an example is drawn from the literature of particle physics. Co-citation patterns are found to differ significantly from bibliographic coupling patterns, but to agree generally with patterns of direct citation. Clusters of co-cited papers provide a new way to study the specialty structure of science. They may provide a new approach to indexing and to the creation of SDI profiles. Abstract Documents in computer-readable form can be used to provide information about other documents, i.e. those they cite. To do this efficiently requires procedures for computer recognition of citing statements. This is not easy, especially for multi-sentence citing statements. Computer recognition procedures have been developed which are accurate to the following extent: 73 of the words in statements selected by computer procedures as being citing statements are words which are correctly attributable to the corresponding documents. The retrieval effectiveness of computer-recognized citing statements was tested in the following way. First, for eight retrieval requests in inorganiic chemistry, average recall by search of Chemical Abstracts Service indexing and Chemical Abstracts abstract text words was found to be 50 . Words from citing statements referring to the papers to be retrieved were then added to the index terms and abstract words as additional access points, and searching was repeated. Average recall increased to 70 . Only words from citing statements published within a year of the cited papers were used. The retrieval effect of citing statement words alone (published within a year) without index or abstract terms was the following: average recall was 40 . When just the words of the titles of the cited papers were added to those citing statement words, average recall increased to 50 . Data clustering is an important task and has found applications in numerous real-world problems. Since no single clustering algorithm is able to identify all different types of cluster shapes and structures, ensemble clustering was proposed to combine different partitions of the same data generated by multiple clustering algorithms. The key idea of most ensemble clustering algorithms is to find a partition that is consistent with most of the available partitions of the input data. One problem with these algorithms is their inability to handle uncertain data pairs, i.e. data pairs for which about half of the partitions put them into the same cluster and the other half do the opposite. When the number of uncertain data pairs is large, they can mislead the ensemble clustering algorithm in generating the final partition. To overcome this limitation, we propose an ensemble clustering approach based on the technique of matrix completion. The proposed algorithm constructs a partially observed similarity matrix based on the data pairs whose cluster memberships are agreed upon by most of the clustering algorithms in the ensemble. It then deploys the matrix completion algorithm to complete the similarity matrix. The final data partition is computed by applying an efficient spectral clustering algorithm to the completed matrix. Our empirical studies with multiple real-world datasets show that the proposed algorithm performs significantly better than the state-of-the-art algorithms for ensemble clustering. Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to suggest an alternative to the widely used Times Cited criterion for analysing citation networks. The approach involves taking account of the natures of the papers that cite a given paper, so as to differentiate between papers that attract the same number of citations.Design methodology approach – ArticleRank is an algorithm that has been derived from Google's PageRank algorithm to measure the influence of journal articles. ArticleRank is applied to two datasets – a citation network based on an early paper on webometrics, and a self‐citation network based on the 19 most cited papers in the Journal of Documentation – using citation data taken from the Web of Knowledge database.Findings – ArticleRank values provide a different ranking of a set of papers from that provided by the corresponding Times Cited values, and overcomes the inability of the latter to differentiate between papers with the same numbers of citations. The difference in rankings between Times Cited ... A citing sentence is one that appears in a scientific article and cites previous work. Citing sentences have been studied and used in many applications. For example, they have been used in scientific paper summarization, automatic survey generation, paraphrase identification, and citation function classification. Citing sentences that cite multiple papers are common in scientific writing. This observation should be taken into consideration when using citing sentences in applications. For instance, when a citing sentence is used in a summary of a scientific paper, only the fragments of the sentence that are relevant to the summarized paper should be included in the summary. In this paper, we present and compare three different approaches for identifying the fragments of a citing sentence that are related to a given target reference. Our methods are: word classification, sequence labeling, and segment classification. Our experiments show that segment classification achieves the best results. In recent years scholars have built maps of science by connecting the academic fields that cite each other, are cited together, or that cite a similar literature. But since scholars cannot always publish in the fields they cite, or that cite them, these science maps are only rough proxies for the potential of a scholar, organization, or country, to enter a new academic field. Here we use a large dataset of scholarly publications disambiguated at the individual level to create a map of science-or research space-where links connect pairs of fields based on the probability that an individual has published in both of them. We find that the research space is a significantly more accurate predictor of the fields that individuals and organizations will enter in the future than citation based science maps. At the country level, however, the research space and citations based science maps are equally accurate. These findings show that data on career trajectories-the set of fields that individuals have previously published in-provide more accurate predictors of future research output for more focalized units-such as individuals or organizations-than citation based science maps. We present new approximation algorithms for the @math -median and @math -means clustering problems. To this end, we obtain small coresets for @math -median and @math -means clustering in general metric spaces and in Euclidean spaces. In @math , these coresets are of size with polynomial dependency on the dimension @math . This leads to @math -approximation algorithms to the optimal @math -median and @math -means clustering in @math , with running time @math , where @math is the number of points. This improves over previous results. We use those coresets to maintain a @math -approximate @math -median and @math -means clustering of a stream of points in @math , using @math space. These are the first streaming algorithms, for those problems, that have space complexity with polynomial dependency on the dimension. This paper introduces the problem of combining multiple partitionings of a set of objects into a single consolidated clustering without accessing the features or algorithms that determined these partitionings. We first identify several application scenarios for the resultant 'knowledge reuse' framework that we call cluster ensembles. The cluster ensemble problem is then formalized as a combinatorial optimization problem in terms of shared mutual information. In addition to a direct maximization approach, we propose three effective and efficient techniques for obtaining high-quality combiners (consensus functions). The first combiner induces a similarity measure from the partitionings and then reclusters the objects. The second combiner is based on hypergraph partitioning. The third one collapses groups of clusters into meta-clusters which then compete for each object to determine the combined clustering. Due to the low computational costs of our techniques, it is quite feasible to use a supra-consensus function that evaluates all three approaches against the objective function and picks the best solution for a given situation. We evaluate the effectiveness of cluster ensembles in three qualitatively different application scenarios: (i) where the original clusters were formed based on non-identical sets of features, (ii) where the original clustering algorithms worked on non-identical sets of objects, and (iii) where a common data-set is used and the main purpose of combining multiple clusterings is to improve the quality and robustness of the solution. Promising results are obtained in all three situations for synthetic as well as real data-sets. In PODS 2003, Babcock, Datar, Motwani and O'Callaghan gave the first streaming solution for the k-median problem on sliding windows using O(frack k tau^4 W^2tau log^2 W) space, with a O(2^O(1 tau)) approximation factor, where W is the window size and tau in (0,1 2) is a user-specified parameter. They left as an open question whether it is possible to improve this to polylogarithmic space. Despite much progress on clustering and sliding windows, this question has remained open for more than a decade. In this paper, we partially answer the main open question posed by Babcock, Datar, Motwani and O'Callaghan. We present an algorithm yielding an exponential improvement in space compared to the previous result given in Babcock, et al In particular, we give the first polylogarithmic space (alpha,beta)-approximation for metric k-median clustering in the sliding window model, where alpha and beta are constants, under the assumption, also made by , that the optimal k-median cost on any given window is bounded by a polynomial in the window size. We justify this assumption by showing that when the cost is exponential in the window size, no sublinear space approximation is possible. Our main technical contribution is a simple but elegant extension of smooth functions as introduced by Braverman and Ostrovsky, which allows us to apply well-known techniques for solving problems in the sliding window model to functions that are not smooth, such as the k-median cost. The sliding window model is useful for discounting stale data in data stream applications. In this model, data elements arrive continually and only the most recent N elements are used when answering queries. We present a novel technique for solving two important and related problems in the sliding window model---maintaining variance and maintaining a k--median clustering. Our solution to the problem of maintaining variance provides a continually updated estimate of the variance of the last N values in a data stream with relative error of at most e using O(1 e 2 log N) memory. We present a constant-factor approximation algorithm which maintains an approximate k--median solution for the last N data points using O(k τ4 N2τ log2 N) memory, where τ < 1 2 is a parameter which trades off the space bound with the approximation factor of O(2O(1 τ)). The Bregman k-median problem is defined as follows. Given a Bregman divergence Dφ and a finite set @math of size n, our goal is to find a set C of size k such that the sum of errors cost(P,C)=∑p∈P min c∈C Dφ(p,c) is minimized. The Bregman k-median problem plays an important role in many applications, e.g., information theory, statistics, text classification, and speech processing. We study a generalization of the kmeans++ seeding of Arthur and Vassilvitskii (SODA '07). We prove for an almost arbitrary Bregman divergence that if the input set consists of k well separated clusters, then with probability @math this seeding step alone finds an @math -approximate solution. Thereby, we generalize an earlier result of (FOCS '06) from the case of the Euclidean k-means problem to the Bregman k-median problem. Additionally, this result leads to a constant factor approximation algorithm for the Bregman k-median problem using at most @math arithmetic operations, including evaluations of Bregman divergence Dφ. The classical center based clustering problems such as k-means median center assume that the optimal clusters satisfy the locality property that the points in the same cluster are close to each other. A number of clustering problems arise in machine learning where the optimal clusters do not follow such a locality property. For instance, consider the r -gather clustering problem where there is an additional constraint that each of the clusters should have at least r points or the capacitated clustering problem where there is an upper bound on the cluster sizes. Consider a variant of the k-means problem that may be regarded as a general version of such problems. Here, the optimal clusters O 1, ..., O k are an arbitrary partition of the dataset and the goal is to output k-centers c 1, ..., c k such that the objective function ( _ i = 1 ^ k _ x O_ i ||x - c_ i ||^ 2 ) is minimized. It is not difficult to argue that any algorithm (without knowing the optimal clusters) that outputs a single set of k centers, will not behave well as far as optimizing the above objective function is concerned. However, this does not rule out the existence of algorithms that output a list of such k centers such that at least one of these k centers behaves well. Given an error parameter e > 0, let l denote the size of the smallest list of k-centers such that at least one of the k-centers gives a (1 + e) approximation w.r.t. the objective function above. In this paper, we show an upper bound on l by giving a randomized algorithm that outputs a list of (2^ O (k ) ) k-centers. We also give a closely matching lower bound of (2^ (k ) ). Moreover, our algorithm runs in time (O (n d 2^ O (k ) ) ). This is a significant improvement over the previous result of Ding and Xu (2015) who gave an algorithm with running time O(n d ⋅ (log n) k ⋅ 2 p o l y(k e)) and output a list of size O((log n) k ⋅ 2 p o l y(k e)). Our techniques generalize for the k-median problem and for many other settings where non-Euclidean distance measures are involved.