The (maximum receiver-centric) interference of a geometric graph (von (2005)) is studied. It is shown that, with high probability, the following results hold for a set, V, of n points independently and uniformly distributed in the unit d-cube, for constant dimension d: (1) there exists a connected graph with vertex set V that has interference O((log n)^ 1 3 ); (2) no connected graph with vertex set V has interference o((log n)^ 1 4 ); and (3) the minimum spanning tree of @math has interference Theta(( n)^ 1 2 ).
In higher dimensions, Khabbazian, Durocher, and Haghnegahdar @cite_0 use their version of log to show that minimum spanning trees of random point sets have at most logarithmic interference. Part 1 of main improves the upper bound in durocher to @math and Part 1 of lower-bound gives a matching lower bound.
@cite_0
2951358293
We consider distance labeling schemes for trees: given a tree with n nodes, label the nodes with binary strings such that, given the labels of any two nodes, one can determine, by looking only at the labels, the distance in the tree between the two nodes. A lower bound by [, J. Alg., 2004] and an upper bound by Peleg [Peleg, J. Graph Theory, 2000] establish that labels must use Theta(log^2(n)) bits. [, ESA, 2001] show that for very small approximate stretch, labels use Theta(log(n) log(log(n))) bits. Several other papers investigate various variants such as, for example, small distances in trees [, SODA, 2003]. We improve the known upper and lower bounds of exact distance labeling by showing that 1 4*log^2(n) bits are needed and that 1 2*log^2(n) bits are sufficient. We also give (1 + epsilon)-stretch labeling schemes using Theta(log(n)) bits for constant epsilon > 0. (1 + epsilon)-stretch labeling schemes with polylogarithmic label size have previously been established for doubling dimension graphs by Talwar [Talwar, STOC, 2004]. In addition, we present matching upper and lower bounds for distance labeling for caterpillars, showing that labels must have size 2*log(n) - Theta(log(log(n))). For simple paths with k nodes and edge weights in [1,n], we show that labels must have size (k - 1) k*log(n) + Theta(log(k)). We study an online unit-job scheduling problem arising in buffer management. Each job is specified by its release time, deadline, and a nonnegative weight. Due to overloading conditions, some jobs have to be dropped. The goal is to maximize the total weight of scheduled jobs. We present several competitive online algorithms for various versions of unit-job scheduling, as well as some lower bounds on the competitive ratios. We first give a randomized algorithm RMix with competitive ratio of e (e-1) 1.582. This is the first algorithm for this problem with competitive ratio smaller than 2. Then we consider s-bounded instances, where the span of each job (deadline minus release time) is at most s. We give a 1.25-competitive randomized algorithm for 2-bounded instances, matching the known lower bound. We also give a deterministic algorithm Edf"@a, whose competitive ratio on s-bounded instances is 2-2 s+o(1 s). For 3-bounded instances its ratio is @f 1.618, matching the known lower bound. In s-uniform instances, the span of each job is exactly s. We show that no randomized algorithm can be better than 1.25-competitive on s-uniform instances, if the span s is unbounded. For s=2, our proof gives a lower bound of 4-22 1.172. Also, in the 2-uniform case, we prove a lower bound of 2 1.414 for deterministic memoryless algorithms, matching a known upper bound. Finally, we investigate the multiprocessor case and give a 1 (1-(mm+1)^m)-competitive algorithm for m processors. We also show improved lower bounds for the general and s-uniform cases. The problem of verifying a Minimum Spanning Tree (MST) was introduced by Tarjan in a sequential setting. Given a graph and a tree that spans it, the algorithm is required to check whether this tree is an MST. This paper investigates the problem in the distributed setting, where the input is given in a distributed manner, i.e., every node “knows” which of its own emanating edges belong to the tree. Informally, the distributed MST verification problem is the following. Label the vertices of the graph in such a way that for every node, given (its own state and label and) the labels of its neighbors only, the node can detect whether these edges are indeed its MST edges. In this paper, we present such a verification scheme with a maximum label size of O(log n log W), where n is the number of nodes and W is the largest weight of an edge. We also give a matching lower bound of Ω(log n log W) (as long as W > (log n)1+e for some fixed e > 0). Both our bounds improve previously known bounds for the problem. We prove new upper and lower bounds on the sample complexity of (a#x03B5;, a#x03B4;) differentially private algorithms for releasing approximate answers to threshold functions. A threshold function cx over a totally ordered domain X evaluates to cx(y) = 1 if y a#x2264; x, and evaluates to 0 otherwise. We give the first nontrivial lower bound for releasing thresholds with (a#x03B5;, a#x03B4;) differential privacy, showing that the task is impossible over an infinite domain X, and moreover requires sample complexity n a#x2265; (log* |X|), which grows with the size of the domain. Inspired by the techniques used to prove this lower bound, we give an algorithm for releasing thresholds with n a#x2264; 2(1+o(1)) log* |X| samples. This improves the previous best upper bound of 8(1+o(1)) log* |X| (, RANDOM'13). Our sample complexity upper and lower bounds also apply to the tasks of learning distributions with respect to Kolmogorov distance and of properly PAC learning thresholds with differential privacy. The lower bound gives the first separation between the sample complexity of properly learning a concept class with (a#x03B5;, a#x03B4;) differential privacy and learning without privacy. For properly learning thresholds in 'dimensions, this lower bound extends to n a#x2265; (l a#x2219; log* |X|). To obtain our results, we give reductions in both directions from releasing and properly learning thresholds and the simpler interior point problem. Given a database D of elements from X, the interior point problem asks for an element between the smallest and largest elements in D. We introduce new recursive constructions for bounding the sample complexity of the interior point problem, as well as further reductions and techniques for proving impossibility results for other basic problems in differential privacy. Let P be a Poisson process of intensity one in a square S n of area n. We construct a random geometric graph G n , k by joining each point of P to its k ≡ k(n) nearest neighbours. Recently, Xue and Kumar proved that if k ≤ 0.074 log n then the probability that G n , k is connected tends to 0 as n → ∞ while, if k ≥ 5.1774 log n, then the probability that G n , k is connected tends to 1 as n → ∞. They conjectured that the threshold for connectivity is k = (1 + o(1)) log n. In this paper we improve these lower and upper bounds to 0.3043 log n and 0.5139 log n, respectively, disproving this conjecture. We also establish lower and upper bounds of 0.7209 log n and 0.9967 log n for the directed version of this problem. A related question concerns coverage. With G n , k as above, we surround each vertex by the smallest (closed) disc containing its k nearest neighbours. We prove that if k ≤ 0.7209 log n then the probability that these discs cover S n tends to 0 as n → ∞ while, if k > 0.9967 log n, then the probability that the discs cover S n tends to 1 as n → ∞. We consider distributed broadcasting in radio networks, modeled as undirected graphs, whose nodes have no information on the topology of the network, nor even on their immediate neighborhood. For randomized broadcasting, we give an algorithm working in expected time O(D log(n D) + log2 n) in n-node radio networks of diameter D, which is optimal, as it matches the lower bounds of [1] and Kushilevitz and Mansour [14]. Our algorithm improves the best previously known randomized broadcasting algorithm of Bar-Yehuda, Goldreich and Itai [3], running in expected time O(D log n + log2 n). For deterministic broadcasting, we show the lower bound Ω(n(log n) (log (n D)))) on broadcasting time in n-node radio networks of diameter D. This implies previously known lower bounds of Bar-Yehuda, Goldreich and Itai [3] and Bruschi and Del Pinto [5], and is sharper than any of them in many cases. We also give an algorithm working in time O(n log n), thus shrinking -- for the first time -- the gap between the upper and the lower bound on deterministic broadcasting time to a logarithmic factor. In this paper we consider the problem of computing an ϵ-optimal policy of a discounted Markov Decision Process (DMDP) provided we can only access its transition function through a generative sampling model that given any state-action pair samples from the transition function in O(1) time. Given such a DMDP with states , actions , discount factor γ∈(0,1), and rewards in range [0,1] we provide an algorithm which computes an ϵ-optimal policy with probability 1−δ where both the run time spent and number of sample taken is upper bounded by O[ | || | (1−γ)3ϵ2 log( | || | (1−γ)δϵ )log( 1 (1−γ)ϵ )] . For fixed values of ϵ, this improves upon the previous best known bounds by a factor of (1−γ)−1 and matches the sample complexity lower bounds proved in azar2013minimax up to logarithmic factors. We also extend our method to computing ϵ-optimal policies for finite-horizon MDP with a generative model and provide a nearly matching sample complexity lower bound. We study approximation hardness of the Minimum Dominating Set problem and its variants in undirected and directed graphs. Using a similar result obtained by Trevisan for Minimum Set Cover we prove the first explicit approximation lower bounds for various kinds of domination problems (connected, total, independent) in bounded degree graphs. Asymptotically, for degree bound approaching infinity, these bounds almost match the known upper bounds. The results are applied to improve the lower bounds for other related problems such as Maximum Induced Matching and Maximum Leaf Spanning Tree. We consider exploration problems where a robot has to construct a complete map of an unknown environment. We assume that the environment is modeled by a directed, strongly connected graph. The robot's task is to visit all nodes and edges of the graph using the minimum number R of edge traversals. Deng and Papadimitriou [ Proceedings of the 31st Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science, 1990, pp. 356--361] showed an upper bound for R of dO(d) m and Koutsoupias (reported by Deng and Papadimitriou) gave a lower bound of @math , where m is the number of edges in the graph and d is the minimum number of edges that have to be added to make the graph Eulerian. We give the first subexponential algorithm for this exploration problem, which achieves an upper bound of dO(log d) m. We also show a matching lower bound of @math for our algorithm. Additionally, we give lower bounds of @math , respectively, @math for various other natural exploration algorithms. We show how to compute any symmetric Boolean function on n variables over any field (as well as the integers) with a probabilistic polynomial of degree O(a#x221A;n log(1 a#x03B5;))) and error at most a#x03B5;. The degree dependence on n and a#x03B5; is optimal, matching a lower bound of Razborov (1987) and Smolensky (1987) for the MAJORITY function. The proof is constructive: a low-degree polynomial can be efficiently sampled from the distribution. This polynomial construction is combined with other algebraic ideas to give the first sub quadratic time algorithm for computing a (worst-case) batch of Hamming distances in super logarithmic dimensions, exactly. To illustrate, let c(n): N -> N. Suppose we are given a database D of n vectors in 0, 1 (c(n) log n) and a collection of n query vectors Q in the same dimension. For all u in Q, we wish to compute a v in D with minimum Hamming distance from u. We solve this problem in n(2-1 O(c(n) log2 c(n))) randomized time. Hence, the problem is in "truly sub quadratic" time for O(log n) dimensions, and in sub quadratic time for d = o((log2 n) (log log n)2). We apply the algorithm to computing pairs with maximum inner product, closest pair in l1 for vectors with bounded integer entries, and pairs with maximum Jaccard coefficients. In the d-dimensional bin packing problem (VBP), one is given vectors x1,x2, ... ,xn ∈ Rd and the goal is to find a partition into a minimum number of feasible sets: 1,2 ... ,n = ∪is Bi. A set Bi is feasible if ∑j ∈ Bi xj ≤ 1, where 1 denotes the all 1's vector. For online VBP, it has been outstanding for almost 20 years to clarify the gap between the best lower bound Ω(1) on the competitive ratio versus the best upper bound of O(d). We settle this by describing a Ω(d1-e) lower bound. We also give strong lower bounds (of Ω(d1 B-e) ) if the bin size B ∈ Z+ is allowed to grow. Finally, we discuss almost-matching upper bound results for general values of B; we show an upper bound whose exponent is additively "shifted by 1" from the lower bound exponent. We give deterministic distributed algorithms that given i¾?> 0 find in a planar graph G, (1±i¾?)-approximations of a maximum independent set, a maximum matching, and a minimum dominating set. The algorithms run in O(log*|G|) rounds. In addition, we prove that no faster deterministic approximation is possible and show that if randomization is allowed it is possible to beat the lower bound for deterministic algorithms. In this letter, we derive new lower bounds on the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the contact distance in the Poisson hole process (PHP) for two cases: 1) reference point is selected uniformly at random from @math independently of the PHP and 2) reference point is located at the center of a hole selected uniformly at random from the PHP. While one can derive upper bounds on the CDF of contact distance by simply ignoring the effect of holes, deriving lower bounds is known to be relatively more challenging. As a part of our proof, we introduce a tractable way of bounding the effect of all the holes in a PHP, which can be used to study other properties of a PHP as well. We give near-optimal space bounds in the streaming model for linear algebra problems that include estimation of matrix products, linear regression, low-rank approximation, and approximation of matrix rank. In the streaming model, sketches of input matrices are maintained under updates of matrix entries; we prove results for turnstile updates, given in an arbitrary order. We give the first lower bounds known for the space needed by the sketches, for a given estimation error e. We sharpen prior upper bounds, with respect to combinations of space, failure probability, and number of passes. The sketch we use for matrix A is simply STA, where S is a sign matrix. Our results include the following upper and lower bounds on the bits of space needed for 1-pass algorithms. Here A is an n x d matrix, B is an n x d' matrix, and c := d+d'. These results are given for fixed failure probability; for failure probability δ>0, the upper bounds require a factor of log(1 δ) more space. We assume the inputs have integer entries specified by O(log(nc)) bits, or O(log(nd)) bits. (Matrix Product) Output matrix C with F(ATB-C) ≤ e F(A) F(B). We show that Θ(ce-2log(nc)) space is needed. (Linear Regression) For d'=1, so that B is a vector b, find x so that Ax-b ≤ (1+e) minx' ∈ Reald Ax'-b. We show that Θ(d2e-1 log(nd)) space is needed. (Rank-k Approximation) Find matrix tAk of rank no more than k, so that F(A-tAk) ≤ (1+e) F A-Ak , where Ak is the best rank-k approximation to A. Our lower bound is Ω(ke-1(n+d)log(nd)) space, and we give a one-pass algorithm matching this when A is given row-wise or column-wise. For general updates, we give a one-pass algorithm needing [O(ke-2(n + d e2)log(nd))] space. We also give upper and lower bounds for algorithms using multiple passes, and a sketching analog of the CUR decomposition. We consider the multi-armed bandit problem under the PAC ("probably approximately correct") model. It was shown by Even- (2002) that given n arms, a total of O((n e2)log(1 δ)) trials suffices in order to find an e-optimal arm with probability at least 1-δ. We establish a matching lower bound on the expected number of trials under any sampling policy. We furthermore generalize the lower bound, and show an explicit dependence on the (unknown) statistics of the arms. We also provide a similar bound within a Bayesian setting. The case where the statistics of the arms are known but the identities of the arms are not, is also discussed. For this case, we provide a lower bound of Θ((1 e2)(n+log(1 δ))) on the expected number of trials, as well as a sampling policy with a matching upper bound. If instead of the expected number of trials, we consider the maximum (over all sample paths) number of trials, we establish a matching upper and lower bound of the form Θ((n e2)log(1 δ)). Finally, we derive lower bounds on the expected regret, in the spirit of Lai and Robbins. We study randomized algorithms for the online vector bin packing and vector scheduling problems. For vector bin packing, we achieve a competitive ratio of O(d1 B), where d is the number of dimensions and B the size of a bin. This improves the previous bound of O(d1 (B−1)) by a polynomial factor, and is tight up to logarithmic factors. For vector scheduling, we show a lower bound of [EQUATION] on the competitive ratio of randomized algorithms, which is the first result for randomized algorithms and is asymptotically tight. Finally, we analyze the widely used "power of two choices' algorithm for vector scheduling, and show that its competitive ratio is [EQUATION], which is optimal up to the additive O(log log n) term that also appears in the scalar version of this algorithm. In this simple model, a decision tree algorithm must determine whether an unknown digraph on nodes 1, 2, …, n has a given property by asking questions of the form “Is edge in the graph?”. The complexity of a property is the number of questions which must be asked in the worst case. Aanderaa and Rosenberg conjectured that any monotone, nontrivial, (isomorphism-invariant) n-node digraph property has complexity O( n 2 ). This bound was proved by Rivest and Vuillemin and subsequently improved to n 2 4+ o ( n 2 ). In Part I, we give a bound of n 2 2+ o ( n 2 ). Whether these properties are evasive remains open. In Part II, we investigate the power of randomness in recognizing these properties by considering randomized decision tree algorithms in which coins may be flipped to determine the next edge to be queried. Yao's lower bound on the randomized complexity of any monotone nontrivial graph property is improved from O( n log 1 12 n ) to O( n 5 4 ), and improved bounds for the complexity of monotone, nontrivial bipartite graph properties are shown. The goal of multiobjective optimization is to find a set of best compromise solutions for typically conflicting objectives. Due to the complex nature of most real-life problems, only an approximation to such an optimal set can be obtained within reasonable (computing) time. To compare such approximations, and thereby the performance of multiobjective optimizers providing them, unary quality measures are usually applied. Among these, the hypervolume indicator (or S-metric) is of particular relevance due to its favorable properties. Moreover, this indicator has been successfully integrated into stochastic optimizers, such as evolutionary algorithms, where it serves as a guidance criterion for finding good approximations to the Pareto front. Recent results show that computing the hypervolume indicator can be seen as solving a specialized version of Klee's measure problem. In general, Klee's measure problem can be solved with O(n logn + nd 2logn) comparisons for an input instance of size n in d dimensions; as of this writing, it is unknown whether a lower bound higher than Omega(n log n) can be proven. In this paper, we derive a lower bound of Omega(n log n) for the complexity of computing the hypervolume indicator in any number of dimensions d > 1 by reducing the so-called uniformgap problem to it. For the 3-D case, we also present a matching upper bound of O(n log n) comparisons that is obtained by extending an algorithm for finding the maxima of a point set. We consider packet scheduling in a network providing differentiated services, where each packet is assigned a value. We study various queueing models for supporting QoS (Quality of Service). In the nonpreemptive model, packets accepted to the queue will be transmitted eventually and cannot be dropped. The FIFO preemptive model allows packets accepted to the queue to be preempted (dropped) prior to their departure, while ensuring that transmitted packets are sent in the order of arrival. In the bounded delay model, packets must be transmitted before a certain deadline, otherwise it is lost (while transmission ordering is allowed to be arbitrary). In all models the goal of the buffer policy is to maximize the total value of the accepted packets.Let α be the ratio between the maximal and minimal value. For the non-preemptive model we derive a Θ(log &alpha) competitive ratio, both exhibiting a buffer policy and a general lower bound. For the interesting case of two distinct values, we give an 2α--1 α competitive buffer policy, which exactly matches the lower bound. We also analyze a RED-like policy and derive its competitive ratio, which is approximately 2α--0.5 α for two values and Θ(log α) for multiple values. In addition we improve the previous known lower and upper bounds of the Fixed Partition and Flexible Partition policies.For the FIFO preemptive model, we improve the general lower bound and show a tight bound for the special case of queue size 2. We prove that the bounded delay model with uniform delay 2 is equivalent to a modified FIFO preemptive model with queue size 2. We then give improved upper and lower bounds on the 2-uniform bounded delay model. We also give lower bound for the 2-variable bounded delay model, which matches the previously known upper bound. We consider the problem of inferring the most likely social network given connectivity constraints imposed by observations of outbreaks within the network. Given a set of vertices (or agents) V and constraints (or observations) Si ⊆ V we seek to find a minimum log-likelihood cost (or maximum likelihood) set of edges (or connections) E such that each Si induces a connected subgraph of (V, E). For the offline version of the problem, we prove an Ω(log(n)) hardness of approximation result for uniform cost networks and give an algorithm that almost matches this bound, even for arbitrary costs. Then we consider the online problem, where the constraints are satisfied as they arrive. We give an O(n log(n))-competitive algorithm for the arbitrary cost online problem, which has an Ω(n)-competitive lower bound.We look at the uniform cost case as well and give an O(n2 3 log2 3(n))-competitive algorithm against an oblivious adversary, as well as an Ω(√n)-competitive lower bound against an adaptive adversary. We examine cases when the underlying network graph is known to be a star or a path, and prove matching upper and lower bounds of Θ(log(n)) on the competitive ratio for them.