The class QMA(k), introduced by , consists of all languages that can be verified using k unentangled quantum proofs. Many of the simplest questions about this class have remained embarrassingly open: for example, can we give any evidence that k quantum proofs are more powerful than one? Does QMA(k)=QMA(2) for k>=2? Can QMA(k) protocols be amplified to exponentially small error? In this paper, we make progress on all of the above questions. First, we give a protocol by which a verifier can be convinced that a 3SAT formula of size n is satisfiable, with constant soundness, given O(sqrt(n)) unentangled quantum witnesses with O(log n) qubits each. Our protocol relies on the existence of very short PCPs. Second, we show that assuming a weak version of the Additivity Conjecture from quantum information theory, any QMA(2) protocol can be amplified to exponentially small error, and QMA(k)=QMA(2) for all k>=2. Third, we prove the nonexistence of "perfect disentanglers" for simulating multiple Merlins with one.
When we try to understand @math , we encounter at least three basic questions. First, do multiple quantum proofs ever actually help? That is, can we find some sort of evidence that @math for some @math ? Second, can @math protocols be amplified to exponentially small error? Third, are two Merlins the most we ever need? That is, does @math for all @math ? The second and third questions are motivated, in part, by an analogy to classical ---where the Parallel Repetition Theorem of Raz @cite_14 and the @math theorem of Ben- @cite_18 turned out to be crucial for understanding the class @math .
@cite_18 @cite_14
2080578129 1970259241
We show a parallel repetition theorem for the entangled value @math of any two-player one-round game @math where the questions @math to Alice and Bob are drawn from a product distribution on @math . We show that for the @math -fold product @math of the game @math (which represents the game @math played in parallel @math times independently), @math , where @math and @math represent the sets from which the answers of Alice and Bob are drawn. We show that any language in nondeterministic time @math , where the number of iterated exponentials is an arbitrary function @math , can be decided by a multiprover interactive proof system with a classical polynomial-time verifier and a constant number of quantum entangled provers, with completeness @math and soundness @math , where the number of iterated exponentials is @math and @math is a universal constant. The result was previously known for @math and @math ; we obtain it for any time-constructible function @math . The result is based on a compression technique for interactive proof systems with entangled provers that significantly simplifies and strengthens a protocol compression result of Ji (STOC'17). As a separate consequence of this technique we obtain a different proof of Slofstra's recent result (unpublished) on the uncomputability of the entangled value of multiprover games. Finally, we show that even minor improvements to our compression result would yield remarkable consequences in computational complexity theory and the foundations of quantum mechanics: first, it would imply that the class MIP* contains all computable languages; second, it would provide a negative resolution to a multipartite version of Tsirelson's problem on the relation between the commuting operator and tensor product models for quantum correlations.