A computer implemented method of estimating a cardinality of a stream, comprising: receiving a query for estimating a cardinality of a stream comprising a plurality of elements, obtaining a sample comprising a group of the plurality of elements randomly sampled from the respective stream, computing a first and second data structures for the sample used to compute an estimated sample cardinality of the sample and a ratio indicative of a proportion between the estimated sample cardinality and the estimated cardinality of the stream and computing the estimated cardinality of the stream by applying the ratio to the estimated sample cardinality. Where the first data structure comprises a plurality of maximal hash values computed for the sample using a plurality of hash functions and the second data structure comprises a fixed- size subset of the elements having a minimal hash value among the elements of the group.
Many early works in the database literature tried to address the problem of estimating the cardinality from small samples; until the mid 1990s, this was the prevalent approach @cite_9 . A sample of the data was collected and sophisticated estimators applied on the distributions of the values (see @cite_10 @cite_9 for relevant references). However, because these estimators were sensitive to the order of the elements and their repetition pattern, they failed to provide accurate estimates (see pages 19-21 in @cite_10 ).
@cite_9 @cite_10
2500232297 2022858489
Purpose  The purpose of this paper is to suggest an alternative to the widely used Times Cited criterion for analysing citation networks. The approach involves taking account of the natures of the papers that cite a given paper, so as to differentiate between papers that attract the same number of citations.Design methodology approach  ArticleRank is an algorithm that has been derived from Google's PageRank algorithm to measure the influence of journal articles. ArticleRank is applied to two datasets  a citation network based on an early paper on webometrics, and a selfcitation network based on the 19 most cited papers in the Journal of Documentation  using citation data taken from the Web of Knowledge database.Findings  ArticleRank values provide a different ranking of a set of papers from that provided by the corresponding Times Cited values, and overcomes the inability of the latter to differentiate between papers with the same numbers of citations. The difference in rankings between Times Cited ... Scholars are increasingly citing electronic web references which are not preserved in libraries or full text archives. WebCite is a new standard for citing web references. To webcite a document involves archiving the cited Web page through www.webcitation.org and citing the WebCite permalink instead of (or in addition to) the unstable live Web page. This journal has amended its instructions for authors accordingly, asking authors to archive cited Web pages before submitting a manuscript. Almost 200 other journals are already using the system. We discuss the rationale for WebCite, its technology, and how scholars, editors, and publishers can benefit from the service. Citing scholars initiate an archiving process of all cited Web references, ideally before they submit a manuscript. Authors of online documents and websites which are expected to be cited by others can ensure that their work is permanently available by creating an archived copy using WebCite and providing the citation information including the WebCite link on their Web document(s). Editors should ask their authors to cache all cited Web addresses (Uniform Resource Locators, or URLs) prospectively before submitting their manuscripts to their journal. Editors and publishers should also instruct their copyeditors to cache cited Web material if the author has not done so already. Finally, WebCite can process publisher submitted citing articles (submitted for example as eXtensible Markup Language [XML] documents) to automatically archive all cited Web pages shortly before or on publication. Finally, WebCite can act as a focussed crawler, caching retrospectively references of already published articles. Copyright issues