Many real-world networks are prohibitively large for data retrieval, storage and analysis of all of its nodes and links. Understanding the structure and dynamics of these networks entails creating a smaller representative sample of the full graph while preserving its relevant topological properties. In this report, we show that graph sampling algorithms currently proposed in the literature are not able to preserve network properties even with sample sizes containing as many as 20 of the nodes from the original graph. We present a new sampling algorithm, called Tiny Sample Extractor, with a new goal of a sample size smaller than 5 of the original graph while preserving two key properties of a network, the degree distribution and its clustering co- efficient. Our approach is based on a new empirical method of estimating measurement biases in crawling algorithms and compensating for them accordingly. We present a detailed comparison of best known graph sampling algorithms, focusing in particular on how the properties of the sample subgraphs converge to those of the original graph as they grow. These results show that our sampling algorithm extracts a smaller subgraph than other algorithms while also achieving a closer convergence to the degree distribution, measured by the degree exponent, of the original graph. The subgraph generated by the Tiny Sample Extractor, however, is not necessarily representative of the full graph with regard to other proper ties such as assortativity. This indicates that the problem of extracting a truly representative small subgraph from a large graph remains unsolved.
A variety of strategies have been used to shrink'' a graph for purposes of analysis. Shrinking a graph by extracting an actual subgraph allows one to discover patterns in the subgraph that can be validated later in the original graph because of the one-to-one correspondence between the nodes in the two graphs. The generation of synthetic topologies which have a specific set of properties in them @cite_12 @cite_6 , though useful in many contexts, is not considered in this report.
@cite_6 @cite_12
2038550366 1965973321
In this paper, we develop methods to ''sample'' a small realistic graph from a large Internet topology. Despite recent activity, modeling and generation of realistic graphs resembling the Internet is still not a resolved issue. All previous work has attempted to grow such graphs from scratch. We address the complementary problem of shrinking an existing topology. In more detail, this work has three parts. First, we propose a number of reduction methods that can be categorized into three classes: (a) deletion methods, (b) contraction methods, and (c) exploration methods. We prove that some of them maintain key properties of the initial graph. We implement our methods and show that we can effectively reduce the nodes of an Internet graph by as much as 70 while maintaining its important properties. Second, we show that our reduced graphs compare favorably against construction-based generators. Finally, we successfully validate the effectiveness of our best methods in an actual performance evaluation study of multicast routing. Apart from its practical applications, the problem of graph sampling is of independent interest. An argument graph is a graph where each node denotes an argument, and each arc denotes an attack by one argument on another. It offers a valuable starting point for theoretical analysis of argumentation following the proposals by Dung. However, the definition of an argument graph does not take into account the belief in the attacks. In particular, when constructing an argument graph from informal arguments, where each argument is described in free text, it is often evident that there is uncertainty about whether some of the attacks hold. This might be because there is some expressed doubt that an attack holds or because there is some imprecision in the language used in the arguments. In this paper, we use the set of spanning subgraphs of an argument graph as a sample space. A spanning subgraph contains all the arguments, and a subset of the attacks, of the argument graph. We assign a probability value to each spanning subgraph such that the sum of the assignments is 1. This means we can reflect the uncertainty over which is the actual subgraph using this probability distribution. Using the probability distribution over subgraphs, we can then determine the probability that a set of arguments is admissible or an extension. We can also obtain the probability of an attack relationship in the original argument graph as a marginal distribution (i.e. it is the sum of the probability assigned to each subgraph containing that attack relationship). We investigate some of the features of this proposal, and we consider the utility of our framework for capturing some practical argumentation scenarios.