This paper explores the problem of matching entities across different knowledge graphs. Given a query entity in one knowledge graph, we wish to find the corresponding real-world entity in another knowledge graph. We formalize this problem and present two large-scale datasets for this task based on exiting cross-ontology links between DBpedia and Wikidata, focused on several hundred thousand ambiguous entities. Using a classification-based approach, we find that a simple multi-layered perceptron based on representations derived from RDF2Vec graph embeddings of entities in each knowledge graph is sufficient to achieve high accuracy, with only small amounts of training data. The contributions of our work are datasets for examining this problem and strong baselines on which future work can be based.
The Semantic Web community has studied the problem of matching entities across knowledge graphs, for example, the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) on ontology matching in knowledge graphs. However, the benchmarks used in these evaluations are quite small. For example, the benchmark @cite_11 has a total of only 1800 instances and 50,000 triples.
@cite_11
1536049010
Ontology matching, the task of determining relations that hold among terms of two different ontologies, is a key issue in the Semantic Web and other related fields. In order to compare the behaviour of different ontology matching systems, the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) has established a periodical controlled evaluation that comes in a yearly event. We present here our participation in the 2008 initiative. Our schema-based alignment algorithm compares each pair of ontology terms by, firstly, extracting their ontological contexts up to a certain depth (enriched by using transitive entailment) and, secondly, combining different elementary ontology matching techniques (e.g., lexical distances and vector space modelling). Benchmark results show a very good behaviour in terms of precision, while preserving an acceptable recall. Based on our experience, we have also included some remarks about the nature of benchmark test cases that, in our opinion, could help improving the OAEI tests in the future.