We compare a novel Knowledge-based Reinforcement Learning (KB-RL) approach with the traditional Neural Network (NN) method in solving a classical task of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) field. Neural networks became very prominent in recent years and, combined with Reinforcement Learning, proved to be very effective for one of the frontier challenges in AI - playing the game of Go. Our experiment shows that a KB-RL system is able to outperform a NN in a task typical for NN, such as optimizing a regression problem. Furthermore, KB-RL offers a range of advantages in comparison to the traditional Machine Learning methods. Particularly, there is no need for a large dataset to start and succeed with this approach, its learning process takes considerably less effort, and its decisions are fully controllable, explicit and predictable.
As the result of NNs' popularity, little attention has been paid to other AI approaches, such as symbolism, evolutionarism, or Bayesian statistics @cite_0 . More recently, though, new studies emerge that show successful results in applying alternative approaches to AI tasks. For example, Denis G Willson at el. show that their evolutionary algorithm can outperform the deep neural network approach in playing Atari games @cite_2 . More studies are targeting General AI as, for instance, the CYC project @cite_19 . Some researchers advocate that the combination of different techniques into one powerful AI system is the way to go @cite_8 .
@cite_0 @cite_19 @cite_8 @cite_2
2275841169 2071718761 2806422867 2807874935
A citing sentence is one that appears in a scientific article and cites previous work. Citing sentences have been studied and used in many applications. For example, they have been used in scientific paper summarization, automatic survey generation, paraphrase identification, and citation function classification. Citing sentences that cite multiple papers are common in scientific writing. This observation should be taken into consideration when using citing sentences in applications. For instance, when a citing sentence is used in a summary of a scientific paper, only the fragments of the sentence that are relevant to the summarized paper should be included in the summary. In this paper, we present and compare three different approaches for identifying the fragments of a citing sentence that are related to a given target reference. Our methods are: word classification, sequence labeling, and segment classification. Our experiments show that segment classification achieves the best results. Purpose  The purpose of this paper is to suggest an alternative to the widely used Times Cited criterion for analysing citation networks. The approach involves taking account of the natures of the papers that cite a given paper, so as to differentiate between papers that attract the same number of citations.Design methodology approach  ArticleRank is an algorithm that has been derived from Google's PageRank algorithm to measure the influence of journal articles. ArticleRank is applied to two datasets  a citation network based on an early paper on webometrics, and a selfcitation network based on the 19 most cited papers in the Journal of Documentation  using citation data taken from the Web of Knowledge database.Findings  ArticleRank values provide a different ranking of a set of papers from that provided by the corresponding Times Cited values, and overcomes the inability of the latter to differentiate between papers with the same numbers of citations. The difference in rankings between Times Cited ... Citation relationship between scientific publications has been successfully used for scholarly bibliometrics, information retrieval and data mining tasks, and citation-based recommendation algorithms are well documented. While previous studies investigated citation relations from various viewpoints, most of them share the same assumption that, if paper1 cites paper2 (or author1 cites author2), they are connected, regardless of citation importance, sentiment, reason, topic, or motivation. However, this assumption is oversimplified. In this study, we employ an innovative "context-rich heterogeneous network" approach, which paves a new way for citation recommendation task. In the network, we characterize 1) the importance of citation relationships between citing and cited papers, and 2) the topical citation motivation. Unlike earlier studies, the citation information, in this paper, is characterized by citation textual contexts extracted from the full-text citing paper. We also propose algorithm to cope with the situation when large portion of full-text missing information exists in the bibliographic repository. Evaluation results show that, context-rich heterogeneous network can significantly enhance the citation recommendation performance. A new form of document coupling called co-citation is defined as the frequency with which two documents are cited together. The co-citation frequency of two scientific papers can be determined by comparing lists of citing documents in the Science Citation Index and counting identical entries. Networks of co-cited papers can be generated for specific scientific specialties, and an example is drawn from the literature of particle physics. Co-citation patterns are found to differ significantly from bibliographic coupling patterns, but to agree generally with patterns of direct citation. Clusters of co-cited papers provide a new way to study the specialty structure of science. They may provide a new approach to indexing and to the creation of SDI profiles.