Single node failures represent more than 85 of all node failures in the today's large communication networks such as the Internet. Also, these node failures are usually transient. Consequently, having the routing paths globally recomputed does not pay off since the failed nodes recover fairly quickly, and the recomputed routing paths need to be discarded. Instead, we develop algorithms and protocols for dealing with such transient single node failures by suppressing the failure (instead of advertising it across the network), and routing messages to the destination via alternate paths that do not use the failed node. We compare our solution to that of Ref. [11] wherein the authors have presented a "Failure Insensitive Routing" protocol as a proactive recovery scheme for handling transient node failures. We show that our algorithms are faster by an order of magnitude while our paths are equally good. We show via simulation results that our paths are usually within 15 of the optimal for randomly generated graph with 100-1000 nodes.
Refs. @cite_5 @cite_0 present protocols based on local re-routing for dealing with transient single link and single node failures respectively. They demonstrate via simulations that the recovery paths computed by their algorithm are usually within 15 the theoretically optimal alternate paths.
@cite_0 @cite_5
2107096560 2114234222
Single node failures represent more than 85 of all node failures in the today's large communication networks such as the Internet. Also, these node failures are usually transient. Consequently, having the routing paths globally recomputed does not pay off since the failed nodes recover fairly quickly, and the recomputed routing paths need to be discarded. Instead, we develop algorithms and protocols for dealing with such transient single node failures by suppressing the failure (instead of advertising it across the network), and routing messages to the destination via alternate paths that do not use the failed node. We compare our solution to that of Ref. [11] wherein the authors have presented a "Failure Insensitive Routing" protocol as a proactive recovery scheme for handling transient node failures. We show that our algorithms are faster by an order of magnitude while our paths are equally good. We show via simulation results that our paths are usually within 15 of the optimal for randomly generated graph with 100-1000 nodes. We investigate the single link failure recovery problem and its application to the alternate path routing problem for ATM networks, and the k-replacement edges for each edge of a minimum cost spanning tree. Specifically, given a 2-connected graph G, a specified node s, and a shortest paths tree Ts = e1, e2, . . . , eni1 of s, where ei = (xi, yi) and xi = parentTs(yi), find a shortest path from yi to s in the graph G for 1  i  n i 1. We present an O(m + n log n) time algorithm for this problem and a linear time algorithm for the case when all weights are equal. When the edge weights are integers, we present an algorithm that takes O(m + Tsort(n)) time, where Tsort(n) is the time required to sort n integers. We establish a lower bound of (min(m p n, n 2 )) for the directed version of our problem under the path comparison model, where Ts is the shortest paths destination tree of s. We show that any solution to the single link recovery problem can be adapted to solve the alternate path routing problem in ATM networks. Our technique for the single link failure recovery problem is adapted to find the k-replacement edges for the tree edges of a minimum cost spanning tree in O(m + n log n) time.