The Lovasz Local Lemma due to Erdos and Lovasz is a powerful tool in proving the existence of rare events. We present an extension of this lemma, which works well when the event to be shown to exist is a conjunction of individual events, each of which asserts that a random variable does not deviate much from its mean. As applications, we consider two classes of NP-hard integer programs: minimax and covering integer programs. A key technique, randomized rounding of linear relaxations, was developed by Raghavan and Thompson to derive good approximation algorithms for such problems. We use our extension of the Local Lemma to prove that randomized rounding produces, with non-zero probability, much better feasible solutions than known before, if the constraint matrices of these integer programs are column-sparse (e.g., routing using short paths, problems on hypergraphs with small dimension degree). This complements certain well-known results from discrepancy theory. We also generalize the method of pessimistic estimators due to Raghavan, to obtain constructive (algorithmic) versions of our results for covering integer programs.
A key corollary of our results is that for families of instances of CIPs, we get a good ( @math or @math ) integrality gap if @math grows at least as fast as @math . Bounds on the result of a greedy algorithm for CIPs relative to the optimal solution, are known @cite_29 @cite_7 . Our bound improves that of @cite_29 and is incomparable with @cite_7 ; for any given @math , @math , and the unit vector @math , our bound improves on @cite_7 if @math is more than a certain threshold. As it stands, randomized rounding produces such improved solutions for several CIPs only with a very low, sometimes exponentially small, probability. Thus, it does not imply a randomized algorithm, often. To this end, we generalize Raghavan's method of pessimistic estimators to derive an algorithmic (polynomial-time) version of our results for CIPs, in .
@cite_29 @cite_7
2073127061 2001911901
Random constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) are known to exhibit threshold phenomena: given a uniformly random instance of a CSP with @math variables and @math clauses, there is a value of @math beyond which the CSP will be unsatisfiable with high probability. Strong refutation is the problem of certifying that no variable assignment satisfies more than a constant fraction of clauses; this is the natural algorithmic problem in the unsatisfiable regime (when @math ). Intuitively, strong refutation should become easier as the clause density @math grows, because the contradictions introduced by the random clauses become more locally apparent. For CSPs such as @math -SAT and @math -XOR, there is a long-standing gap between the clause density at which efficient strong refutation algorithms are known, @math , and the clause density at which instances become unsatisfiable with high probability, @math . In this paper, we give spectral and sum-of-squares algorithms for strongly refuting random @math -XOR instances with clause density @math in time @math or in @math rounds of the sum-of-squares hierarchy, for any @math and any integer @math . Our algorithms provide a smooth transition between the clause density at which polynomial-time algorithms are known at @math , and brute-force refutation at the satisfiability threshold when @math . We also leverage our @math -XOR results to obtain strong refutation algorithms for SAT (or any other Boolean CSP) at similar clause densities. Our algorithms match the known sum-of-squares lower bounds due to Grigoriev and Schonebeck, up to logarithmic factors. Additionally, we extend our techniques to give new results for certifying upper bounds on the injec Over the past 30 years numerous algorithms have been designed for symmetry breaking problems in the LOCAL model, such as maximal matching, MIS, vertex coloring, and edge-coloring. For most problems the best randomized algorithm is at least exponentially faster than the best deterministic algorithm. In this paper we prove that these exponential gaps are necessary and establish connections between the deterministic and randomized complexities in the LOCAL model. Each result has a very compelling take-away message: 1. Fast @math -coloring of trees requires random bits: Building on the recent lower bounds of , we prove that the randomized complexity of @math -coloring a tree with maximum degree @math is @math , whereas its deterministic complexity is @math for any @math . This also establishes a large separation between the deterministic complexity of @math -coloring and @math -coloring trees. 2. Randomized lower bounds imply deterministic lower bounds: We prove that any deterministic algorithm for a natural class of problems that runs in @math rounds can be transformed to run in @math rounds. If the transformed algorithm violates a lower bound (even allowing randomization), then one can conclude that the problem requires @math time deterministically. 3. Deterministic lower bounds imply randomized lower bounds: We prove that the randomized complexity of any natural problem on instances of size @math is at least its deterministic complexity on instances of size @math . This shows that a deterministic @math lower bound for any problem implies a randomized @math lower bound. It also illustrates that the graph shattering technique is absolutely essential to the LOCAL model.