We study the problem of obtaining deterministic black-box polynomial identity testing algorithms (PIT) for algebraic branching programs (ABPs) that are read-once and oblivious. This class has an deterministic white-box polynomial identity testing algorithm (due to Raz and Shpilka), but prior to this work there was no known such black-box algorithm. The main result of this work gives the first quasi-polynomial sized hitting sets for size S circuits from this class, when the order of the variables is known. As our hitting set is of size exp(lg^2 S), this is analogous (in the terminology of boolean pseudorandomness) to a seed-length of lg^2 S, which is the seed length of the pseudorandom generators of Nisan and Impagliazzo-Nisan-Wigderson for read-once oblivious boolean branching programs. Our results are stronger for branching programs of bounded width, where we give a hitting set of size exp(lg^2 S lglg S), corresponding to a seed length of lg^2 S lglg S. This is in stark contrast to the known results for read-once oblivious boolean branching programs of bounded width, where no pseudorandom generator (or hitting set) with seed length o(lg^2 S) is known. In follow up work, we strengthened a result of Mulmuley, and showed that derandomizing a particular case of the Noether Normalization Lemma is reducible to black-box PIT of read-once oblivious ABPs. Using the results of the present work, this gives a derandomization of Noether Normalization in that case, which Mulmuley conjectured would difficult due to its relations to problems in algebraic geometry. We also show that several other circuit classes can be black-box reduced to read-once oblivious ABPs, including set-multilinear ABPs (a generalization of depth-3 set-multilinear formulas), non-commutative ABPs (generalizing non-commutative formulas), and (semi-)diagonal depth-4 circuits (as introduced by Saxena).
Similarly, the PIT problem has also been studied in the non-commutative model. While the work of Raz and Shpilka @cite_12 establishes a white-box PIT algorithm for non-commutative ABPs, the black-box PIT question for this model is more intricate since one cannot immediately apply the usual Schwartz-Zippel algorithm over non-commutative domains. However, Bogdanov and Wee @cite_13 showed how, leveraging the ideas in the Amitsur-Levitzki theorem @cite_18 , one can reduce non-commutative black-box PIT questions to commutative black-box PIT questions. By then appealing to Schwartz-Zippel, they give the first randomized algorithm for non-commutative PIT. They also discussed the possibility of derandomizing their result and raise a conjecture that if true would lead to a hitting set of size @math for non-commutative ABPs of size @math . Our Theorem gives a hitting set of size @math and does not require unproven assumptions.
@cite_18 @cite_13 @cite_12
1968380471 2148231801 2103860626
We study the problem of polynomial identity testing (PIT) for depth 2 arithmetic circuits over matrix algebra. We show that identity testing of depth 3 (SPS) arithmetic circuits over a field F is polynomial time equivalent to identity testing of depth 2 (PS) arithmetic circuits over U2(F), the algebra of upper-triangular 2 2 matrices with entries from F. Such a connection is a bit surprising since we also show that, as computational models, PS circuits over U2(F) are strictly weaker than SPS circuits over F. The equivalence further implies that PIT of SPS circuits reduces to PIT of width-2 commutative Algebraic Branching Programs(ABP). Further, we give a deterministic polynomial time identity testing algorithm for a PS circuit of size s over commutative algebras of dimension O(log s log log s) over F. Over commutative algebras of dimension poly(s), we show that identity testing of PS circuits is at least as hard as that of SPS circuits over F. Mulmuley [Mul12a] recently gave an explicit version of Noethers Normalization lemma for ring of invariants of matrices under simultaneous conjugation, under the conjecture that there are deterministic black-box algorithms for polynomial identity testing (PIT). He argued that this gives evidence that constructing such algorithms for PIT is beyond current techniques. In this work, we show this is not the case. That is, we improve Mulmuleys reduction and correspondingly weaken the conjecture regarding PIT needed to give explicit Noether Normalization. We then observe that the weaker conjecture has recently been nearly settled by the authors ([FS12]), who gave quasipolynomial size hitting sets for the class of read-once oblivious algebraic branching programs (ROABPs). This gives the desired explicit Noether Normalization unconditionally, up to quasipolynomial factors. As a consequence of our proof we give a deterministic parallel polynomial-time algorithm for deciding if two matrix tuples have intersecting orbit closures, under simultaneous conjugation. We also study the strength of conjectures that Mulmuley requires to obtain similar results as ours. We prove that his conjectures are stronger, in the sense that the computational model he needs PIT algorithms for is equivalent to the well-known algebraic branching program (ABP) model, which is provably stronger than the ROABP model. Finally, we consider the depth-3 diagonal circuit model as defined by Saxena [Sax08], as PIT algorithms for this model also have implications in Mulmuleys work. Previous work (such as [ASS12] and [FS12]) have given quasipolynomial size hitting sets for this model. In this work, we give a much simpler constru In this paper we present a deterministic polynomial time algorithm for testing if a symbolic matrix in non-commuting variables over @math is invertible or not. The analogous question for commuting variables is the celebrated polynomial identity testing (PIT) for symbolic determinants. In contrast to the commutative case, which has an efficient probabilistic algorithm, the best previous algorithm for the non-commutative setting required exponential time (whether or not randomization is allowed). The algorithm efficiently solves the "word problem" for the free skew field, and the identity testing problem for arithmetic formulae with division over non-commuting variables, two problems which had only exponential-time algorithms prior to this work. The main contribution of this paper is a complexity analysis of an existing algorithm due to Gurvits, who proved it was polynomial time for certain classes of inputs. We prove it always runs in polynomial time. The main component of our analysis is a simple (given the necessary known tools) lower bound on central notion of capacity of operators (introduced by Gurvits). We extend the algorithm to actually approximate capacity to any accuracy in polynomial time, and use this analysis to give quantitative bounds on the continuity of capacity (the latter is used in a subsequent paper on Brascamp-Lieb inequalities). Symbolic matrices in non-commuting variables, and the related structural and algorithmic questions, have a remarkable number of diverse origins and motivations. They arise independently in (commutative) invariant theory and representation theory, linear algebra, optimization, linear system theory, quantum information theory, approximation