Ensemble methods such as boosting combine multiple learners to obtain better prediction than could be obtained from any individual learner. Here we propose a principled framework for directly constructing ensemble learning methods from kernel methods. Unlike previous studies showing the equivalence between boosting and support vector machines (SVMs), which needs a translation procedure, we show that it is possible to design boosting-like procedure to solve the SVM optimization problems. In other words, it is possible to design ensemble methods directly from SVM without any middle procedure. This finding not only enables us to design new ensemble learning methods directly from kernel methods, but also makes it possible to take advantage of those highly-optimized fast linear SVM solvers for ensemble learning. We exemplify this framework for designing binary ensemble learning as well as a new multi-class ensemble learning methods. Experimental results demonstrate the flexibility and usefulness of the proposed framework.
The general connection between SVM and boosting has been discussed by a few researchers @cite_1 @cite_2 at a high level. To our knowledge, the work here is the first one that attempts to build ensemble models by solving SVM's optimization problem. We review some closest work next. Boosting has been extensively studied in the past decade @cite_21 @cite_1 @cite_6 @cite_24 @cite_17 . Our methods are close to @cite_24 @cite_17 in that we also use column generation (CG) to select weak learners and fully-correctively update weak learners' coefficients. Because we are solving the SVM problem, instead of the @math regularized boosting problem, conventional CG cannot be directly applied. We use CG in a novel way---instead of looking at dual constraints, we rely on the KKT conditions.
@cite_21 @cite_1 @cite_6 @cite_24 @cite_2 @cite_17
1988790447 1975846642 2103000819 1578080815 2143386126 2125607229
In the first part of the paper we consider the problem of dynamically apportioning resources among a set of options in a worst-case on-line framework. The model we study can be interpreted as a broad, abstract extension of the well-studied on-line prediction model to a general decision-theoretic setting. We show that the multiplicative weight-update Littlestone?Warmuth rule can be adapted to this model, yielding bounds that are slightly weaker in some cases, but applicable to a considerably more general class of learning problems. We show how the resulting learning algorithm can be applied to a variety of problems, including gambling, multiple-outcome prediction, repeated games, and prediction of points in Rn. In the second part of the paper we apply the multiplicative weight-update technique to derive a new boosting algorithm. This boosting algorithm does not require any prior knowledge about the performance of the weak learning algorithm. We also study generalizations of the new boosting algorithm to the problem of learning functions whose range, rather than being binary, is an arbitrary finite set or a bounded segment of the real line. One of the surprising recurring phenomena observed in experiments with boosting is that the test error of the generated classifier usually does not increase as its size becomes very large, and often is observed to decrease even after the training error reaches zero. In this paper, we show that this phenomenon is related to the distribution of margins of the training examples with respect to the generated voting classification rule, where the margin of an example is simply the difference between the number of correct votes and the maximum number of votes received by any incorrect label. We show that techniques used in the analysis of Vapnik's support vector classifiers and of neural networks with small weights can be applied to voting methods to relate the margin distribution to the test error. We also show theoretically and experimentally that boosting is especially effective at increasing the margins of the training examples. Finally, we compare our explanation to those based on the bias-variance decomposition. Boosting combines a set of moderately accurate weak classifiers to form a highly accurate predictor. Compared with binary boosting classification, multi-class boosting received less attention. We propose a novel multi-class boosting formulation here. Unlike most previous multi-class boosting algorithms which decompose a multi-boost problem into multiple independent binary boosting problems, we formulate a direct optimization method for training multi-class boosting. Moreover, by explicitly deriving the La-grange dual of the formulated primal optimization problem, we design totally-corrective boosting using the column generation technique in convex optimization. At each iteration, all weak classifiers' weights are updated. Our experiments on various data sets demonstrate that our direct multi-class boosting achieves competitive test accuracy compared with state-of-the-art multi-class boosting in the literature. We examine linear program (LP) approaches to boosting and demonstrate their efficient solution using LPBoost, a column generation based simplex method. We formulate the problem as if all possible weak hypotheses had already been generated. The labels produced by the weak hypotheses become the new feature space of the problem. The boosting task becomes to construct a learning function in the label space that minimizes misclassification error and maximizes the soft margin. We prove that for classification, minimizing the 1-norm soft margin error function directly optimizes a generalization error bound. The equivalent linear program can be efficiently solved using column generation techniques developed for large-scale optimization problems. The resulting LPBoost algorithm can be used to solve any LP boosting formulation by iteratively optimizing the dual misclassification costs in a restricted LP and dynamically generating weak hypotheses to make new LP columns. We provide algorithms for soft margin classification, confidence-rated, and regression boosting problems. Unlike gradient boosting algorithms, which may converge in the limit only, LPBoost converges in a finite number of iterations to a global solution satisfying mathematically well-defined optimality conditions. The optimal solutions of LPBoost are very sparse in contrast with gradient based methods. Computationally, LPBoost is competitive in quality and computational cost to AdaBoost. We show via an equivalence of mathematical programs that a support vector (SV) algorithm can be translated into an equivalent boosting-like algorithm and vice versa. We exemplify this translation procedure for a new algorithm: one-class leveraging, starting from the one-class support vector machine (1-SVM). This is a first step toward unsupervised learning in a boosting framework. Building on so-called barrier methods known from the theory of constrained optimization, it returns a function, written as a convex combination of base hypotheses, that characterizes whether a given test point is likely to have been generated from the distribution underlying the training data. Simulations on one-class classification problems demonstrate the usefulness of our approach. We study boosting algorithms from a new perspective. We show that the Lagrange dual problems of l1-norm-regularized AdaBoost, LogitBoost, and soft-margin LPBoost with generalized hinge loss are all entropy maximization problems. By looking at the dual problems of these boosting algorithms, we show that the success of boosting algorithms can be understood in terms of maintaining a better margin distribution by maximizing margins and at the same time controlling the margin variance. We also theoretically prove that approximately, l1-norm-regularized AdaBoost maximizes the average margin, instead of the minimum margin. The duality formulation also enables us to develop column-generation-based optimization algorithms, which are totally corrective. We show that they exhibit almost identical classification results to that of standard stagewise additive boosting algorithms but with much faster convergence rates. Therefore, fewer weak classifiers are needed to build the ensemble using our proposed optimization technique.