A variety of fan-based wikis about episodic fiction (e.g., television shows, novels, movies) exist on the World Wide Web. These wikis provide a wealth of information about complex stories, but if readers are behind in their viewing they run the risk of encountering "spoilers" -- information that gives away key plot points before the intended time of the show's writers. Enterprising readers might browse the wiki in a web archive so as to view the page prior to a specific episode date and thereby avoid spoilers. Unfortunately, due to how web archives choose the "best" page, it is still possible to see spoilers (especially in sparse archives). In this paper we discuss how to use Memento to avoid spoilers. Memento uses TimeGates to determine which best archived page to give back to the user, currently using a minimum distance heuristic. We quantify how this heuristic is inadequate for avoiding spoilers, analyzing data collected from fan wikis and the Internet Archive. We create an algorithm for calculating the probability of encountering a spoiler in a given wiki article. We conduct an experiment with 16 wiki sites for popular television shows. We find that 38 of those pages are unavailable in the Internet Archive. We find that when accessing fan wiki pages in the Internet Archive there is as much as a 66 chance of encountering a spoiler. Using sample access logs from the Internet Archive, we find that 19 of actual requests to the Wayback Machine for wikia.com pages ended in spoilers. We suggest the use of a different minimum distance heuristic, minpast, for wikis, using the desired datetime as an upper bound.
Almedia, Mozafari, and Cho produced one of the first studies of the behavior of contributors to Wikipedia @cite_23 . The authors discover that there are distinct groups of Wikipedia contributors. They suggest that as the number of articles increases, the contributors' attention is split among more and more content, resulting in the larger number of revising contributors rather than article creators. This informs our notion of number of edits as a surrogate to the popularity of a page.
@cite_23
2115055535
A recent phenomenon on the Web is the emergence and proliferation of new social media systems allowing social interaction between people. One of the most popular of these systems is Wikipedia that allows users to create content in a collaborative way. Despite its current popularity, not much is known about how users interact with Wikipedia and how it has evolved over time. In this paper we aim to provide a first, extensive study of the user behavior on Wikipedia and its evolution. Compared to prior studies, our work differs in several ways. First, previous studies on the analysis of the user workloads (for systems such as peer-to-peer systems [10] and Web servers [2]) have mainly focused on understanding the users who are accessing information. In contrast, Wikipedia’s provides us with the opportunity to understand how users create and maintain information since it provides the complete evolution history of its content. Second, the main focus of prior studies is evaluating the implication of the user workloads on the system performance, while our study is trying to understand the evolution of the data corpus and the user behavior themselves. Our main findings include that (1) the evolution and updates of Wikipedia is governed by a self-similar process, not by the Poisson process that has been observed for the general Web [4, 6] and (2) the exponential growth of Wikipedia is mainly driven by its rapidly increasing user base, indicating the importance of its open editorial policy for its current success. We also find that (3) the number of updates made to the Wikipedia articles exhibit a power-law distribution, but the distribution is less skewed than those obtained from other studies.