In this work, we addressed the issue of applying a stochastic classifier and a local, fuzzy confusion matrix under the framework of multi-label classification. We proposed a novel solution to the problem of correcting label pairwise ensembles. The main step of the correction procedure is to compute classifier- specific competence and cross-competence measures, which estimates error pattern of the underlying classifier. We considered two improvements of the method of obtaining confusion matrices. The first one is aimed to deal with imbalanced labels. The other utilizes double labelled instances which are usually removed during the pairwise transformation. The proposed methods were evaluated using 29 benchmark datasets. In order to assess the efficiency of the introduced models, they were compared against 1 state-of-the-art approach and the correction scheme based on the original method of confusion matrix estimation. The comparison was performed using four different multi-label evaluation measures: macro and micro-averaged F1 loss, zero-one loss and Hamming loss. Additionally, we investigated relations between classification quality, which is expressed in terms of different quality criteria, and characteristics of multi-label datasets such as average imbalance ratio or label density. The experimental study reveals that the correction approaches significantly outperforms the reference method only in terms of zero-one loss.
Multi-label classification algorithms can be broadly divided into two main groups: set transformation algorithms and algorithm adaptation approaches @cite_27 @cite_53 . Algorithm adaptation methods are based upon existing multi-class methods which are tailored to solve multi-label classification problem directly. A great example of such methods are Multi-label back propagation method for artificial neuron networks @cite_32 , multi label KNN algorithm @cite_33 , the ML Hoeffding trees @cite_30 , the Structured SVM approach @cite_19 . Another branch of research that falls under the algorithm adaptation framework is to adapt known deep learning algorithms to solve multi-label task @cite_12 .
@cite_30 @cite_33 @cite_53 @cite_32 @cite_19 @cite_27 @cite_12
2038624061 2052684427 1491576965 2119466907 2096748209 55768394 1567302070
Many challenging real world problems involve multi-label data streams. Efficient methods exist for multi-label classification in non-streaming scenarios. However, learning in evolving streaming scenarios is more challenging, as classifiers must be able to deal with huge numbers of examples and to adapt to change using limited time and memory while being ready to predict at any point. This paper proposes a new experimental framework for learning and evaluating on multi-label data streams, and uses it to study the performance of various methods. From this study, we develop a multi-label Hoeffding tree with multi-label classifiers at the leaves. We show empirically that this method is well suited to this challenging task. Using our new framework, which allows us to generate realistic multi-label data streams with concept drift (as well as real data), we compare with a selection of baseline methods, as well as new learning methods from the literature, and show that our Hoeffding tree method achieves fast and more accurate performance. Multi-label learning originated from the investigation of text categorization problem, where each document may belong to several predefined topics simultaneously. In multi-label learning, the training set is composed of instances each associated with a set of labels, and the task is to predict the label sets of unseen instances through analyzing training instances with known label sets. In this paper, a multi-label lazy learning approach named ML-KNN is presented, which is derived from the traditional K-nearest neighbor (KNN) algorithm. In detail, for each unseen instance, its K nearest neighbors in the training set are firstly identified. After that, based on statistical information gained from the label sets of these neighboring instances, i.e. the number of neighboring instances belonging to each possible class, maximum a posteriori (MAP) principle is utilized to determine the label set for the unseen instance. Experiments on three different real-world multi-label learning problems, i.e. Yeast gene functional analysis, natural scene classification and automatic web page categorization, show that ML-KNN achieves superior performance to some well-established multi-label learning algorithms. Multi-label learning is quite a recent supervised learning paradigm. Owing to its capabilities to improve performance in problems where a pattern may have more than one associated class, it has attracted the attention of researchers, producing an increasing number of publications. This study presents an up-to-date overview about multi-label learning with the aim of sorting and describing the main approaches developed till now. The formal definition of the paradigm, the analysis of its impact on the literature, its main applications, works developed, pitfalls and guidelines, and ongoing research are presented. WIREs Data Mining Knowl Discov 2014, 4:411-444. doi: 10.1002 widm.1139 In multilabel learning, each instance in the training set is associated with a set of labels and the task is to output a label set whose size is unknown a priori for each unseen instance. In this paper, this problem is addressed in the way that a neural network algorithm named BP-MLL, i.e., backpropagation for multilabel learning, is proposed. It is derived from the popular backpropagation algorithm through employing a novel error function capturing the characteristics of multilabel learning, i.e., the labels belonging to an instance should be ranked higher than those not belonging to that instance. Applications to two real-world multilabel learning problems, i.e., functional genomics and text categorization, show that the performance of BP-MLL is superior to that of some well-established multilabel learning algorithms Multilabel classification (ML) aims to assign a set of labels to an instance. This generalization of multiclass classification yields to the redefinition of loss functions and the learning tasks become harder. The objective of this paper is to gain insights into the relations of optimization aims and some of the most popular performance measures: subset (or 0 1), Hamming, and the example-based F-measure. To make a fair comparison, we implemented three ML learners for optimizing explicitly each one of these measures in a common framework. This can be done considering a subset of labels as a structured output. Then, we use structured output support vector machines tailored to optimize a given loss function. The paper includes an exhaustive experimental comparison. The conclusion is that in most cases, the optimization of the Hamming loss produces the best or competitive scores. This is a practical result since the Hamming loss can be minimized using a bunch of binary classifiers, one for each label separately, and therefore, it is a scalable and fast method to learn ML tasks. Additionally, we observe that in noise-free learning tasks optimizing the subset loss is the best option, but the differences are very small. We have also noticed that the biggest room for improvement can be found when the goal is to optimize an F-measure in noisy learning tasks. A large body of research in supervised learning deals with the analysis of single-label data, where training examples are associated with a single label λ from a set of disjoint labels L. However, training examples in several application domains are often associated with a set of labels Y ⊆ L. Such data are called multi-label. Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) has demonstrated promising performance in single-label image classification tasks. However, how CNN best copes with multi-label images still remains an open problem, mainly due to the complex underlying object layouts and insufficient multi-label training images. In this work, we propose a flexible deep CNN infrastructure, called Hypotheses-CNN-Pooling (HCP), where an arbitrary number of object segment hypotheses are taken as the inputs, then a shared CNN is connected with each hypothesis, and finally the CNN output results from different hypotheses are aggregated with max pooling to produce the ultimate multi-label predictions. Some unique characteristics of this flexible deep CNN infrastructure include: 1) no ground-truth bounding box information is required for training; 2) the whole HCP infrastructure is robust to possibly noisy and or redundant hypotheses; 3) the shared CNN is flexible and can be well pre-trained with a large-scale single-label image dataset, e.g., ImageNet; and 4) it may naturally output multi-label prediction results. Experimental results on Pascal VOC 2007 and VOC 2012 multi-label image datasets well demonstrate the superiority of the proposed HCP infrastructure over other state-of-the-arts. In particular, the mAP reaches 90.5 by HCP only and 93.2 after the fusion with our complementary result in [12] based on hand-crafted features on the VOC 2012 dataset.