Manual counts of mitotic figures, which are determined in the tumor region with the highest mitotic activity, are a key parameter of most tumor grading schemes. It is however strongly dependent on the area selection. To reduce potential variability of prognosis due to this, we propose to use an algorithmic field of interest prediction to assess the area of highest mitotic activity in a whole-slide image. Methods: We evaluated two state-of-the-art methods, all based on the use of deep convolutional neural networks on their ability to predict the mitotic count in digital histopathology slides. We evaluated them on a novel dataset of 32 completely annotated whole slide images from canine cutaneous mast cell tumors (CMCT) and one publicly available human mamma carcinoma (HMC) dataset. We first compared the mitotic counts (MC) predicted by the two models with the ground truth MC on both data sets. Second, for the CMCT data set, we compared the computationally predicted position and MC of the area of highest mitotic activity with size-equivalent areas selected by eight veterinary pathologists. Results: We found a high correlation between the mitotic count as predicted by the models (Pearson's correlation coefficient between 0.931 and 0.962 for the CMCT data set and between 0.801 and 0.986 for the HMC data set) on the slides. For the CMCT data set, this is also reflected in the predicted position representing mitotic counts in mostly the upper quartile of the slide's ground truth MC distribution. Further, we found strong differences between experts in position selection. Conclusion: While the mitotic counts in areas selected by the experts substantially varied, both algorithmic approaches were consistently able to generate a good estimate of the area of highest mitotic count. To achieve better inter-rater agreement, we propose to use computer-based area selection for manual mitotic count.
Lozanski have shown that inter-rater concordance of grades for count of centroblasts significantly benefits from a preselection of HPF @cite_3 . Fauzi have shown that computer-aided preselection systems for HPF can increase overall reader accuracy @cite_13 in follicular lymphoma grading based on density of centroblasts. We thus propose to predict the area of highest mitotic activity in a complete WSI to aid the human expert in finding a more accurate prognosis.
@cite_13 @cite_3
2198024083 2099218265
Background Follicular lymphoma (FL) is one of the most common lymphoid malignancies in the western world. FL cases are stratified into three histological grades based on the average centroblast count per high power field (HPF). The centroblast count is performed manually by the pathologist using an optical microscope and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained tissue section. Although this is the current clinical practice, it suffers from high inter- and intra-observer variability and is vulnerable to sampling bias. Context: Pathologists grade follicular lymphoma (FL) cases by selecting 10, random high power fields (HPFs), counting the number of centroblasts (CBs) in these HPFs under the microscope and then calculating the average CB count for the whole slide. Previous studies have demonstrated that there is high inter-reader variability among pathologists using this methodology in grading. Aims: The objective of this study was to explore if newly available digital reading technologies can reduce inter-reader variability. Settings and Design: In this study, we considered three different reading conditions (RCs) in grading FL: (1) Conventional (glass-slide based) to establish the baseline, (2) digital whole slide viewing, (3) digital whole slide viewing with selected HPFs. Six board-certified pathologists from five different institutions read 17 FL slides in these three different RCs. Results: Although there was relative poor consensus in conventional reading, with lack of consensus in 41.2 of cases, which was similar to previously reported studies; we found that digital reading with pre-selected fields improved the inter-reader agreement, with only 5.9 lacking consensus among pathologists. Conclusions: Digital whole slide RC resulted in the worst concordance among pathologists while digital whole slide reading selected HPFs improved the concordance. Further studies are underway to determine if this performance can be sustained with a larger dataset and our automated HPF and CB detection algorithms can be employed to further improve the concordance.