Real-world applications could benefit from the ability to automatically generate a fine-grained ranking of photo aesthetics. However, previous methods for image aesthetics analysis have primarily focused on the coarse, binary categorization of images into high- or low-aesthetic categories. In this work, we propose to learn a deep convolutional neural network to rank photo aesthetics in which the relative ranking of photo aesthetics are directly modeled in the loss function. Our model incorporates joint learning of meaningful photographic attributes and image content information which can help regularize the complicated photo aesthetics rating problem. To train and analyze this model, we have assembled a new aesthetics and attributes database (AADB) which contains aesthetic scores and meaningful attributes assigned to each image by multiple human raters. Anonymized rater identities are recorded across images allowing us to exploit intra-rater consistency using a novel sampling strategy when computing the ranking loss of training image pairs. We show the proposed sampling strategy is very effective and robust in face of subjective judgement of image aesthetics by individuals with different aesthetic tastes. Experiments demonstrate that our unified model can generate aesthetic rankings that are more consistent with human ratings. To further validate our model, we show that by simply thresholding the estimated aesthetic scores, we are able to achieve state-or-the-art classification performance on the existing AVA dataset benchmark.
To make use of image content information such as scene categories or choice of photographic subject, Luo al propose to segment regions and extract visual features based on the categorization of photo content @cite_28 . Other work, such as @cite_16 @cite_4 , has also demonstrated that image content is useful for aesthetics analysis. However, it has been assumed that the category labels are provided both during training and testing. To our knowledge, there is only one paper @cite_29 that attempts to jointly predict content semantics and aesthetics labels. @cite_29 , Murray al propose to rank images w.r.t aesthetics in a three-way classification problem (high-, medium- and low-aesthetics quality). However, their work has some limitations because (1) deciding the thresholds between nearby classes is non-trivial, and (2) the final classification model outputs a hard label which is less useful than a continuous rating.
@cite_28 @cite_29 @cite_16 @cite_4
1997095443 2036878610 2078807908
Automatically assessing photo quality from the perspective of visual aesthetics is of great interest in high-level vision research and has drawn much attention in recent years. In this paper, we propose content-based photo quality assessment using regional and global features. Under this framework, subject areas, which draw the most attentions of human eyes, are first extracted. Then regional features extracted from subject areas and the background regions are combined with global features to assess the photo quality. Since professional photographers may adopt different photographic techniques and may have different aesthetic criteria in mind when taking different types of photos (e.g. landscape versus portrait), we propose to segment regions and extract visual features in different ways according to the categorization of photo content. Therefore we divide the photos into seven categories based on their content and develop a set of new subject area extraction methods and new visual features, which are specially designed for different categories. This argument is supported by extensive experimental comparisons of existing photo quality assessment approaches as well as our new regional and global features over different categories of photos. Our new features significantly outperform the state-of-the-art methods. Another contribution of this work is to construct a large and diversified benchmark database for the research of photo quality assessment. It includes 17, 613 photos with manually labeled ground truth. Most works on image retrieval from text queries have addressed the problem of retrieving semantically relevant images. However, the ability to assess the aesthetic quality of an image is an increasingly important differentiating factor for search engines. In this work, given a semantic query, we are interested in retrieving images which are semantically relevant and score highly in terms of aesthetics visual quality. We use large-margin classifiers and rankers to learn statistical models capable of ordering images based on the aesthetic and semantic information. In particular, we compare two families of approaches: while the first one attempts to learn a single ranker which takes into account both semantic and aesthetic information, the second one learns separate semantic and aesthetic models. We carry out a quantitative and qualitative evaluation on a recentlypublished large-scale dataset and we show that the second family of techniques significantly outperforms the first one. With the ever-expanding volume of visual content available, the ability to organize and navigate such content by aesthetic preference is becoming increasingly important. While still in its nascent stage, research into computational models of aesthetic preference already shows great potential. However, to advance research, realistic, diverse and challenging databases are needed. To this end, we introduce a new large-scale database for conducting Aesthetic Visual Analysis: AVA. It contains over 250,000 images along with a rich variety of meta-data including a large number of aesthetic scores for each image, semantic labels for over 60 categories as well as labels related to photographic style. We show the advantages of AVA with respect to existing databases in terms of scale, diversity, and heterogeneity of annotations. We then describe several key insights into aesthetic preference afforded by AVA. Finally, we demonstrate, through three applications, how the large scale of AVA can be leveraged to improve performance on existing preference tasks.