Considering the high heterogeneity of the ontologies published on the web, ontology matching is a crucial issue whose aim is to establish links between an entity of a source ontology and one or several entities from a target ontology. Perfectible similarity measures, considered as sources of information, are combined to establish these links. The theory of belief functions is a powerful mathematical tool for combining such uncertain information. In this paper, we introduce a decision process based on a distance measure to identify the best possible matching entities for a given source entity.
In @cite_5 , the authors focused on integrating uncertainty when matching ontologies. The proposed method modeled and combined the outputs of three ontology matchers. For an entity e @math , the frame of discernment @math is composed of mappings between e and all the concepts in an ontology @math . The different similarity values obtained through the application of the three matchers are interpreted as mass values. Then, a combination of the results of the three matchers is performed.
@cite_5
1500155021
An ontology matching method (or a matcher) aims at matching every entity (or concept) in one ontology to the most suitable entity (or entities) in another ontology. Usually it is almost impossible to find a perfect match in the second ontology for every entity in the first ontology, so a matcher generally returns a set of possible matches with some weights (uncertainty) attached to each pair of match. In order to improve a matching result, several matchers can be used and the matched results from these matchers are combined with suitable approaches. In this paper, we first propose two new matchers among three matchers we use. We then address the need of dealing with uncertainties in mapping by investigating how some uncertainty reasoning frameworks can be used to combine matching results. We apply both the Dempster Shafer theory of evidence (DS theory) and Possibility Theory to merge the results computed by different matchers. Our experimental results and comparisons with related work indicate that integrating these theories to deal with uncertain ontology matching is a promising way to improve the overall matching results.