Fine grained recognition distinguishes among categories with subtle visual differences. To help identify fine grained categories, other information besides images has been used. However, there has been little effort on using geolocation information to improve fine grained classification accuracy. Our contributions to this field are twofold. First, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper which systematically examined various ways of incorporating geolocation information to fine grained images classification - from geolocation priors, to post-processing, to feature modulation. Secondly, to overcome the situation where no fine grained dataset has complete geolocation information, we introduce, and will make public, two fine grained datasets with geolocation by providing complementary information to existing popular datasets - iNaturalist and YFCC100M. Results on these datasets show that, the best geo-aware network can achieve 8.9 top-1 accuracy increase on iNaturalist and 5.9 increase on YFCC100M, compared with image only models' results. In addition, for small image baseline models like Mobilenet V2, the best geo-aware network gives 12.6 higher top-1 accuracy than image only model, achieving even higher performance than Inception V3 models without geolocation. Our work gives incentives to use geolocation information to improve fine grained recognition for both server and on-device models.
There are, however, only few works in fine grained recognition that have tried using geolocation to improve accuracy. Berg in @cite_23 made a simulated geolocation fine grained dataset by combining an image only dataset and a geo only dataset. Then, Bayesian based geolocation priors were used to improve the classification accuracy. A few participants of PlantCLEF2016 competition @cite_26 tried using geolocation information. The competition contains plant species in and around France where only minority of the images contain geolocation. A few non neural network based methods were tried, but with no obvious improvements @cite_46 @cite_21 .
@cite_46 @cite_26 @cite_21 @cite_23
2529366711 2524426358 1993309459
This paper describes the participation of the Floristic consortium to the LifeCLEF 2016 plant identification challenge[18]. The aim of the task was to produce a list of relevant species for a large set of plant images related to 1000 species of trees, herbs and ferns living in Western Europe, knowing that some of these images belonged to unseen categories in the training set like plant species from other areas, horticultural plants or even off topic images (people, keyboards, animals, etc). To address this challenge, we first experimented as a baseline, without any rejection procedure, a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) approach based on a slightly modified GoogLeNet model. In a second run, we applied a simple rejection criteria based on probability threshold estimation on the output of the CNN, one for each species, for removing automatically species propositions judged irrelevant. In the third run, rather than definitely eliminating some species predictions with the risk to remove false negative propositions, we applied various attenuation factors in order to revise the probability distributions given by the CNN as confident score expressing how much a query was related or not to the known species. More precisely, for this last run we used the geographical information and several cohesion measures in terms of observation, "organ" tags and taxonomy (genus and family levels) based on a knn similarity search results within the training set. The LifeCLEF plant identification challenge aims at evaluating plant identification methods and systems at a very large scale, close to the conditions of a real-world biodiversity monitoring scenario. The 2016-th edition was actually conducted on a set of more than 110K images illustrating 1000 plant species living in West Europe, built through a large-scale participatory sensing platform initiated in 2011 and which now involves tens of thousands of contributors. The main novelty over the previous years is that the identification task was evaluated as an open-set recognition problem, i.e. a problem in which the recognition system has to be robust to unknown and never seen categories. Beyond the brute-force classification across the known classes of the training set, the big challenge was thus to automatically reject the false positive classification hits that are caused by the unknown classes. This overview presents more precisely the resources and assessments of the challenge, summarizes the approaches and systems employed by the participating research groups, and provides an analysis of the main outcomes. We address the problem of large-scale fine-grained visual categorization, describing new methods we have used to produce an online field guide to 500 North American bird species. We focus on the challenges raised when such a system is asked to distinguish between highly similar species of birds. First, we introduce "one-vs-most classifiers." By eliminating highly similar species during training, these classifiers achieve more accurate and intuitive results than common one-vs-all classifiers. Second, we show how to estimate spatio-temporal class priors from observations that are sampled at irregular and biased locations. We show how these priors can be used to significantly improve performance. We then show state-of-the-art recognition performance on a new, large dataset that we make publicly available. These recognition methods are integrated into the online field guide, which is also publicly available.