Unsupervised domain adaptation for classification tasks has achieved great progress in leveraging the knowledge in a labeled (source) domain to improve the task performance in an unlabeled (target) domain by mitigating the effect of distribution discrepancy. However, most existing methods can only handle unsupervised closed set domain adaptation (UCSDA), where the source and target domains share the same label set. In this paper, we target a more challenging but realistic setting: unsupervised open set domain adaptation (UOSDA), where the target domain has unknown classes that the source domain does not have. This study is the first to give the generalization bound of open set domain adaptation through theoretically investigating the risk of the target classifier on the unknown classes. The proposed generalization bound for open set domain adaptation has a special term, namely open set difference, which reflects the risk of the target classifier on unknown classes. According to this generalization bound, we propose a novel and theoretically guided unsupervised open set domain adaptation method: Distribution Alignment with Open Difference (DAOD), which is based on the structural risk minimization principle and open set difference regularization. The experiments on several benchmark datasets show the superior performance of the proposed UOSDA method compared with the state-of-the-art methods in the literature.
The instance reweighting method reduces distribution discrepancy by weighting the source samples. (KMM) @cite_25 defines the weights as the density ratio between the source domain and the target domain. @cite_22 provided a theoretical analysis for important instance reweighting methods. However, when the domain discrepancy is substantially large, a large number of effective source samples will be down-weighted, resulting in the loss of effective information.
@cite_22 @cite_25
2111272908 2112483442
In real supervised learning scenarios, it is not uncommon that the training and test sample follow different probability distributions, thus rendering the necessity to correct the sampling bias. Focusing on a particular covariate shift problem, we derive high probability confidence bounds for the kernel mean matching (KMM) estimator, whose convergence rate turns out to depend on some regularity measure of the regression function and also on some capacity measure of the kernel. By comparing KMM with the natural plug-in estimator, we establish the superiority of the former hence provide concrete evidence understanding to the effectiveness of KMM under covariate shift. We consider the scenario where training and test data are drawn from different distributions, commonly referred to as sample selection bias. Most algorithms for this setting try to first recover sampling distributions and then make appropriate corrections based on the distribution estimate. We present a nonparametric method which directly produces resampling weights without distribution estimation. Our method works by matching distributions between training and testing sets in feature space. Experimental results demonstrate that our method works well in practice.