Reproducibly achieving proper implant alignment is a critical step in total hip arthroplasty procedures that has been shown to substantially affect patient outcome. In current practice, correct alignment of the acetabular cup is verified in C-arm x-ray images that are acquired in an anterior–posterior (AP) view. Favorable surgical outcome is, therefore, heavily dependent on the surgeon’s experience in understanding the 3-D orientation of a hemispheric implant from 2-D AP projection images. This work proposes an easy to use intraoperative component planning system based on two C-arm x-ray images that are combined with 3-D augmented reality (AR) visualization that simplifies impactor and cup placement according to the planning by providing a real-time RGBD data overlay. We evaluate the feasibility of our system in a user study comprising four orthopedic surgeons at the Johns Hopkins Hospital and report errors in translation, anteversion, and abduction as low as 1.98 mm, 1.10 deg, and 0.53 deg, respectively. The promising performance of this AR solution shows that deploying this system could eliminate the need for excessive radiation, simplify the intervention, and enable reproducibly accurate placement of acetabular implants.
Image-less navigation systems do not require any pre-operatively acquired radiology data. In this method, the pelvic plane is located in 3D by only identifying anatomical landmarks on the surface of the patient using a tracked pointer reference tool and optically visible markers attached to the patient @cite_8 . This approach showed improvement in terms of cup positioning @cite_3 . However, few number of samples points for registration as well as pelvis tilts resulted in unreliable registration @cite_13 .
@cite_13 @cite_3 @cite_8
2024975040 2301995156 1934602296
Abstract We prospectively evaluated acetabular cup placement in total hip arthroplasty with an imageless computer navigation system or using conventional manual technique. The achieved cup orientation in the manual group had substantially larger variances and greater placement error than the navigation cases. The use of navigation was abandoned in 3 cases because of excessive pelvic tilt and unreliable registration of the pelvis. Computer navigation system helped improve the accuracy of the acetabular cup placement for total hip arthroplasty in this study. The variation between the intraoperative navigation readings and the computed tomographic values suggests that relying on palpation of bony landmarks through drapes and tissue is a limitation of this method. Further, the variation in pelvic tilt has an effect on cup placement that requires further studies. In a prospective randomised clinical study acetabular components were implanted either freehand (n = 30) or using CT-based (n = 30) or imageless navigation (n = 30). The position of the component was determined post-operatively on CT scans of the pelvis. @PARASPLIT Following conventional freehand placement of the acetabular component, only 14 of the 30 were within the safe zone as defined by (40° inclination sd 10°; 15° anteversion sd 10°). After computer-assisted navigation 25 of 30 acetabular components (CT-based) and 28 of 30 components (imageless) were positioned within this limit (overall p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between CT-based and imageless navigation (p = 0.23); both showed a significant reduction in variation of the position of the acetabular component compared with conventional freehand arthroplasty (p < 0.001). The duration of the operation was increased by eight minutes with imageless and by 17 minutes with CT-based navigation. @PARASPLIT Imageless navigation proved as reliable as that using CT in positioning the acetabular component. The invention includes: a locating system; a computer, interfaced to the locating system and interpreting the positions of tracked objects in a generic computer model of a patient's hip geometry; a software module, executable on the computer, which defines the patient's pelvic plane without reference to previously obtained radiological data, by locating at least three pelvic landmarks; and a pelvic tracking marker, fixable to the pelvic bone and trackable by the locating system, to track in real time the orientation of the defined pelvic plane. Preferably, the system also includes a femoral tracking marker, securely attachable to a femur of the patient by a non-penetrating ligature and trackable by the locating system to detect changes in leg length and femoral offset.