We present a parser for Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR). We treat English-to-AMR conversion within the framework of string-to-tree, syntax-based machine translation (SBMT). To make this work, we transform the AMR structure into a form suitable for the mechanics of SBMT and useful for modeling. We introduce an AMR-specific language model and add data and features drawn from semantic resources. Our resulting AMR parser improves upon state-of-the-art results by 7 Smatch points.
Earlier work on using machine translation techniques for semantic parsing includes that of . That work applies the IBM machine translation models @cite_14 to English paired with a non-structural formal language of air travel queries. In a similar vein, use IBM models and their Alignment Template approach to analyze a relatively large corpus of German train scheduling inquiries. The formal language they generate is not structural and has a vocabulary of less than 30 types; it may thus be seen as an instance of semantic role labeling rather than semantic representation parsing.
@cite_14
2006969979
We describe a series of five statistical models of the translation process and give algorithms for estimating the parameters of these models given a set of pairs of sentences that are translations of one another. We define a concept of word-by-word alignment between such pairs of sentences. For any given pair of such sentences each of our models assigns a probability to each of the possible word-by-word alignments. We give an algorithm for seeking the most probable of these alignments. Although the algorithm is suboptimal, the alignment thus obtained accounts well for the word-by-word relationships in the pair of sentences. We have a great deal of data in French and English from the proceedings of the Canadian Parliament. Accordingly, we have restricted our work to these two languages; but we feel that because our algorithms have minimal linguistic content they would work well on other pairs of languages. We also feel, again because of the minimal linguistic content of our algorithms, that it is reasonable to argue that word-by-word alignments are inherent in any sufficiently large bilingual corpus.