Anecdotal evidence has emerged suggesting that state-sponsored organizations, like the Russian Internet Research Agency, have exploited mainstream social. Their primary goal is apparently to conduct information warfare operations to manipulate public opinion using accounts disguised as "normal" people. To increase engagement and credibility of their posts, these accounts regularly share images. However, the use of images by state-sponsored accounts has yet to be examined by the research community. In this work, we address this gap by analyzing a ground truth dataset of 1.8M images posted to Twitter by called Russian trolls. More specifically, we analyze the content of the images, as well as the posting activity of the accounts. Among other things, we find that image posting activity of Russian trolls is tightly coupled with real-world events, and that their targets, as well as the content shared, changed over time. When looking at the interplay between domains that shared the same images as state-sponsored trolls, we find clear cut differences in the origin and or spread of images across the Web. Overall, our findings provide new insight into how state-sponsored trolls operate, and specifically how they use imagery to achieve their goals.
Other work has studied state-sponsored accounts' behavior on, and use of, social networks. Specifically, @cite_16 analyze the advertisements purchased by Russian accounts on Facebook. By performing clustering and semantic analysis, they identify their targeted campaigns over time, concluding that their main goal is to sway division on the community, and also that the most effective campaigns share similar characteristics. @cite_46 compare a set of Russian troll accounts against a random set of Twitter users, showing that Russian troll accounts exhibit different behaviors in the use of the Twitter platform when compared to random users. In follow up work, @cite_0 analyze the activities of Russian and Iranian trolls on Twitter and Reddit. They find substantial differences between them (e.g., Russian trolls were pro-Trump, Iranian ones anti-Trump), that their behavior and targets vary greatly over time, and that Russian trolls discuss different topics across Web communities (e.g., they discuss about cryptocurrencies on Reddit but not on Twitter). Also, @cite_28 examine the exploitation of various Web platforms (e.g., social networks and search engines), showing that state-sponsored accounts use them to advance their propaganda by promoting content and their own controlled domains.
@cite_0 @cite_28 @cite_46 @cite_16
2900289476 2897648888 2786091114 2963635075
Over the past few years, extensive anecdotal evidence emerged that suggests the involvement of state-sponsored actors (or "trolls") in online political campaigns with the goal to manipulate public opinion and sow discord. Recently, Twitter and Reddit released ground truth data about Russian and Iranian state-sponsored actors that were active on their platforms. In this paper, we analyze these ground truth datasets across several axes to understand how these actors operate, how they evolve over time, who are their targets, how their strategies changed over time, and what is their influence to the Web's information ecosystem. Among other things we find: a) campaigns of these actors were influenced by real-world events; b) these actors were employing different tactics and had different targets over time, thus their automated detection is not straightforward; and c) Russian trolls were clearly pro-Trump, whereas Iranian trolls were anti-Trump. Finally, using Hawkes Processes, we quantified the influence that these actors had to four Web communities: Reddit, Twitter, 4chan's Politically Incorrect board ( pol ), and Gab, finding that Russian trolls were more influential than Iranians with the exception of pol . The Russia-based Internet Research Agency (IRA) carried out a broad information campaign in the U.S. before and after the 2016 presidential election. The organization created an expansive set of internet properties: web domains, Facebook pages, and Twitter bots, which received traffic via purchased Facebook ads, tweets, and search engines indexing their domains. We investigate the scope of IRA activities in 2017, joining data from Facebook and Twitter with logs from the Internet Explorer 11 and Edge browsers and the Bing.com search engine. The studies demonstrate both the ease with which malicious actors can harness social media and search engines for propaganda campaigns, and the ability to track and understand such activities by fusing content and activity resources from multiple internet services. We show how cross-platform analyses can provide an unprecedented lens on attempts to manipulate opinions and elections in democracies. Over the past couple of years, anecdotal evidence has emerged linking coordinated campaigns by state-sponsored actors with efforts to manipulate public opinion on the Web, often around major political events, through dedicated accounts, or "trolls." Although they are often involved in spreading disinformation on social media, there is little understanding of how these trolls operate, what type of content they disseminate, and most importantly their influence on the information ecosystem. In this paper, we shed light on these questions by analyzing 27K tweets posted by 1K Twitter users identified as having ties with Russia's Internet Research Agency and thus likely state-sponsored trolls. We compare their behavior to a random set of Twitter users, finding interesting differences in terms of the content they disseminate, the evolution of their account, as well as their general behavior and use of the Twitter platform. Then, using a statistical model known as Hawkes Processes, we quantify the influence that these accounts had on the dissemination of news on social platforms such as Twitter, Reddit, and 4chan. Overall, our findings indicate that Russian troll accounts managed to stay active for long periods of time and to reach a substantial number of Twitter users with their messages. When looking at their ability of spreading news content and making it viral, however, we find that their effect on social platforms was minor, with the significant exception of news published by the Russian state-sponsored news outlet RT (Russia Today). One of the key aspects of the United States democracy is free and fair elections that allow for a peaceful transfer of power from one President to the next. The 2016 US presidential election stands out due to suspected foreign influence before, during, and after the election. A significant portion of that suspected influence was carried out via social media. In this paper, we look specifically at 3,500 Facebook ads allegedly purchased by the Russian government. These ads were released on May 10, 2018 by the US Congress House Intelligence Committee. We analyzed the ads using natural language processing techniques to determine textual and semantic features associated with the most effective ones. We clustered the ads over time into the various campaigns and the labeled parties associated with them. We also studied the effectiveness of Ads on an individual, campaign and party basis. The most effective ads tend to have less positive sentiment, focus on past events and are more specific and personalized in nature. The more effective campaigns also show such similar characteristics. The campaigns’ duration and promotion of the Ads suggest a desire to sow division rather than sway the election.