Neural machine learning methods, such as deep neural networks (DNN), have achieved remarkable success in a number of complex data processing tasks. These methods have arguably had their strongest impact on tasks such as image and audio processing - data processing domains in which humans have long held clear advantages over conventional algorithms. In contrast to biological neural systems, which are capable of learning continuously, deep artificial networks have a limited ability for incorporating new information in an already trained network. As a result, methods for continuous learning are potentially highly impactful in enabling the application of deep networks to dynamic data sets. Here, inspired by the process of adult neurogenesis in the hippocampus, we explore the potential for adding new neurons to deep layers of artificial neural networks in order to facilitate their acquisition of novel information while preserving previously trained data representations. Our results on the MNIST handwritten digit dataset and the NIST SD 19 dataset, which includes lower and upper case letters and digits, demonstrate that neurogenesis is well suited for addressing the stability-plasticity dilemma that has long challenged adaptive machine learning algorithms.
Yosinski evaluated transfer capability via high-level layer reuse in specific DNNs @cite_2 . Transferring learning in this way increased recipient network performance, though the closer the target task was to the base task, the better the transfer. Transferring more specific layers could actually cause performance degradation however. Likewise, Kandaswamy, et al, used layer transfer as a means to transfer capability in Convolutional Neural Networks and Stacked Denoising AEs @cite_21 . Transferring capability in this way resulted in a reduction in overall computation time and lower classification errors. These papers use fixed-sized DNNs, except for additional output nodes for new classes, and demonstrate that features in early layers are more general than features in later layers and thus, more transferable to new classes.
@cite_21 @cite_2
2096422372 2949667497
Transfer Learning is a paradigm in machine learning to solve a target problem by reusing the learning with minor modifications from a different but related source problem. In this paper we propose a novel feature transference approach, especially when the source and the target problems are drawn from different distributions. We use deep neural networks to transfer either low or middle or higher-layer features for a machine trained in either unsupervised or supervised way. Applying this feature transference approach on Convolutional Neural Network and Stacked Denoising Autoencoder on four different datasets, we achieve lower classification error rate with significant reduction in computation time with lower-layer features trained in supervised way and higher-layer features trained in unsupervised way for classifying images of uppercase and lowercase letters dataset. Many deep neural networks trained on natural images exhibit a curious phenomenon in common: on the first layer they learn features similar to Gabor filters and color blobs. Such first-layer features appear not to be specific to a particular dataset or task, but general in that they are applicable to many datasets and tasks. Features must eventually transition from general to specific by the last layer of the network, but this transition has not been studied extensively. In this paper we experimentally quantify the generality versus specificity of neurons in each layer of a deep convolutional neural network and report a few surprising results. Transferability is negatively affected by two distinct issues: (1) the specialization of higher layer neurons to their original task at the expense of performance on the target task, which was expected, and (2) optimization difficulties related to splitting networks between co-adapted neurons, which was not expected. In an example network trained on ImageNet, we demonstrate that either of these two issues may dominate, depending on whether features are transferred from the bottom, middle, or top of the network. We also document that the transferability of features decreases as the distance between the base task and target task increases, but that transferring features even from distant tasks can be better than using random features. A final surprising result is that initializing a network with transferred features from almost any number of layers can produce a boost to generalization that lingers even after fine-tuning to the target dataset.