This paper proposes a simple test for compositionality (i.e., literal usage) of a word or phrase in a context-specific way. The test is computationally simple, relying on no external resources and only uses a set of trained word vectors. Experiments show that the proposed method is competitive with state of the art and displays high accuracy in context-specific compositionality detection of a variety of natural language phenomena (idiomaticity, sarcasm, metaphor) for different datasets in multiple languages. The key insight is to connect compositionality to a curious geometric property of word embeddings, which is of independent interest.
@cite_25 proposes a detection method according to lexical imaginability, topic chaining and semantic clustering. Their method is also based on the linguistic resource of MRCPD. @cite_16 focuses on Subject-Verb-Object and Adjective-Noun structures, and use word abstractness and imagineability as well as supersenses as features for metaphor detection. Besides MRCPD, they also have recourse to WordNet for word supersenses.
@cite_16 @cite_25
2126530744 163945276
We show that it is possible to reliably discriminate whether a syntactic construction is meant literally or metaphorically using lexical semantic features of the words that participate in the construction. Our model is constructed using English resources, and we obtain state-of-the-art performance relative to previous work in this language. Using a model transfer approach by pivoting through a bilingual dictionary, we show our model can identify metaphoric expressions in other languages. We provide results on three new test sets in Spanish, Farsi, and Russian. The results support the hypothesis that metaphors are conceptual, rather than lexical, in nature. The reliable automated identification of metaphors still remains a challenge in metaphor research due to ambiguity between semantic and contextual interpretation of individual lexical items. In this article, we describe a novel approach to metaphor identification which is based on three intersecting methods: imageability, topic chaining, and semantic clustering. Our hypothesis is that metaphors are likely to use highly imageable words that do not generally have a topical or semantic association with the surrounding context. Our method is thus the following: (1) identify the highly imageable portions of a paragraph, using psycholinguistic measures of imageability, (2) exclude imageability peaks that are part of a topic chain, and (3) exclude imageability peaks that show a semantic relationship to the main topics. We are currently working towards fully automating this method for a number of languages.