Abstract While the public claim concern for their privacy, they frequently appear to overlook it. This disparity between concern and behaviour is known as the Privacy Paradox. Such issues are particularly prevalent on wearable devices. These products can store personal data, such as text messages and contact details. However, owners rarely use protective features. Educational games can be effective in encouraging changes in behaviour. Therefore, we developed the first privacy game for (Android) Wear OS watches. 10 participants used smartwatches for two months, allowing their high-level settings to be monitored. Five individuals were randomly assigned to our treatment group, and they played a dynamically-customised privacy-themed game. To minimise confounding variables, the other five received the same app but lacking the privacy topic. The treatment group improved their protection, with their usage of screen locks significantly increasing ( p = 0.043). In contrast, 80 of the control group continued to never restrict their settings. After the posttest phase, we evaluated behavioural rationale through semi-structured interviews. Privacy concerns became more nuanced in the treatment group, with opinions aligning with behaviour. Actions appeared influenced primarily by three factors: convenience, privacy salience and data sensitivity. This is the first smartwatch game to encourage privacy-protective behaviour.
Albayram2017a later explored whether videos can encourage the use of Two-Factor Authentication (2FA). Through a 2x2x2 design, they generated and evaluated eight videos. Their content varied on whether risk, self-efficacy and contingency were included. When the first two components were highlighted in the videos, participants were found to adopt 2FA. Both risk and self-efficacy are considered within PMT, and we also use the theory to encourage alterations. However, while Albayram2017a used Amazon Mechanical Turk, we analyse participants through a field study. Our in-person approach delivers several advantages. Since our behaviour is empirical rather than self-reported, it should be less prone to falsehood @cite_38 . With participants using a real smartwatch in a native environment, our findings should also have external validity. Finally, although our in-person approach limited our sample size, it supported rationale extraction through rich interviews.
@cite_38
2551851611
Technological innovations are increasingly helping people expand their social capital through online networks by offering new opportunities for sharing personal information. Online social networks are perceived to provide individuals new benefits and have led to a surge of personal data uploaded, stored, and shared. While privacy concerns are a major issue for many users of social networking sites, studies have shown that their information disclosing behavior does not align with their concerns. This gap between behavior and concern is called the privacy paradox. Several theories have been explored to explain this, but with inconsistent and incomplete results. This study investigates the paradox using a construal level theory lens. We show how a privacy breach, not yet experienced and psychologically distant, has less weight in everyday choices than more concrete and psychologically-near social networking activities and discuss the implications for research and practice. An explanation of the information privacy paradox using Construal Level Theory.Intentions mediate the relationship between privacy concerns and self-disclosure behavior.Social Rewards predict online behavior through near-future intentions.Privacy Concerns relate to distant-future intentions, but do not directly affect the online behavior.Privacy concerns indirectly affect online behavior through near-future intentions.