The prediction of defects in a target project based on data from external projects is called Cross-Project Defect Prediction (CPDP). Several methods have been proposed to improve the predictive performance of CPDP models. However, there is a lack of comparison among state-of-the-art methods. Moreover, previous work has shown that the most suitable method for a project can vary according to the project being predicted. This makes the choice of which method to use difficult. We provide an extensive experimental comparison of 31 CPDP methods derived from state-of-the-art approaches, applied to 47 versions of 15 open source software projects. Four methods stood out as presenting the best performances across datasets. However, the most suitable among these methods still varies according to the project being predicted. Therefore, we propose and evaluate a meta-learning solution designed to automatically select and recommend the most suitable CPDP method for a project. Our results show that the meta-learning solution is able to learn from previous experiences and recommend suitable methods dynamically. When compared to the base methods, however, the proposed solution presented minor difference of performance. These results provide valuable knowledge about the possibilities and limitations of a meta-learning solution applied for CPDP.
In the traditional classification task, as described in Section , each example of a dataset is associated with a single label @math from a set of disjoint labels @math , where @math and @math . The learning task is called binary classification when @math and multi-class classification when @math . In a classification task, each example is associated with a set of labels @math @cite_31 .
@cite_31
2146241755
Multi-label classification methods are increasingly required by modern applications, such as protein function classification, music categorization, and semantic scene classification. This article introduces the task of multi-label classification, organizes the sparse related literature into a structured presentation and performs comparative experimental results of certain multilabel classification methods. It also contributes the definition of concepts for the quantification of the multi-label nature of a data set.