Cross-lingual Text Classification (CLC) consists of automatically classifying, according to a common set C of classes, documents each written in one of a set of languages L, and doing so more accurately than when “naively” classifying each document via its corresponding language-specific classifier. To obtain an increase in the classification accuracy for a given language, the system thus needs to also leverage the training examples written in the other languages. We tackle “multilabel” CLC via funnelling, a new ensemble learning method that we propose here. Funnelling consists of generating a two-tier classification system where all documents, irrespective of language, are classified by the same (second-tier) classifier. For this classifier, all documents are represented in a common, language-independent feature space consisting of the posterior probabilities generated by first-tier, language-dependent classifiers. This allows the classification of all test documents, of any language, to benefit from the information present in all training documents, of any language. We present substantial experiments, run on publicly available multilingual text collections, in which funnelling is shown to significantly outperform a number of state-of-the-art baselines. All code and datasets (in vector form) are made publicly available.
It certainly that exist in multilabel settings @cite_28 @cite_5 @cite_18 , which is not possible when (as customarily done) a multilabel classification task is solved as @math independent binary classification problems. In fact, for an unlabelled document @math the meta-classifier receives @math inputs from the base classifier which has classified @math , and returns @math outputs, which means that the input for class @math has a potential impact on the output for class @math , for every choice of @math and @math . For instance, the fact that for @math the posterior probability for class Skiing is high might bring additional evidence that @math belongs to class Snowboarding ; this could be the result of several training documents labelled by Snowboarding having, in their @math vectors, a high value for class Skiing .
@cite_28 @cite_5 @cite_18
66588809 2108672713 2146241755
In this paper we present methods of enhancing existing discriminative classifiers for multi-labeled predictions. Discriminative methods like support vector machines perform very well for uni-labeled text classification tasks. Multi-labeled classification is a harder task subject to relatively less attention. In the multi-labeled setting, classes are often related to each other or part of a is-a hierarchy. We present a new technique for combining text features and features indicating relationships between classes, which can be used with any discriminative algorithm. We also present two enhancements to the margin of SVMs for building better models in the presence of overlapping classes. We present results of experiments on real world text benchmark datasets. Our new methods beat accuracy of existing methods with statistically significant improvements. Music listeners frequently use words to describe music. Personalized music recommendation systems such as Last.fm and Pandora rely on manual annotations (tags) as a mechanism for querying and navigating large music collections. A well-known issue in such recommendation systems is known as the cold-start problem: it is not possible to recommend new songs tracks until those songs tracks have been manually annotated. Automatic tag annotation based on content analysis is a potential solution to this problem and has recently been gaining attention. We describe how stacked generalization can be used to improve the performance of a state-of-the-art automatic tag annotation system for music based on audio content analysis and report results on two publicly available datasets. Multi-label classification methods are increasingly required by modern applications, such as protein function classification, music categorization, and semantic scene classification. This article introduces the task of multi-label classification, organizes the sparse related literature into a structured presentation and performs comparative experimental results of certain multilabel classification methods. It also contributes the definition of concepts for the quantification of the multi-label nature of a data set.