A content can be replicated in more than one node, in Information Centric Networks (ICNs). Thus, more than one path can be followed to reach the same content, and it is necessary to decide the interface(s) to be selected in every network node to forward content requests towards such multiple content containers. A multipath forwarding strategy defines how to perform this choice. In this paper we propose a general analytical model to evaluate the effect of multipath forwarding strategies on the performance of an ICN content delivery, whose congestion control follows a receiver driven, loss-based AIMD scheme. We use the model to understand the behavior of ICN multipath forwarding strategies proposed in the literature so far, and to devise and evaluate a novel strategy. The considered multipath forwarding strategies are also evaluated in a realistic network setting, by using the PlanetLab testbed.
* TCP IP multipath In TCP IP networks, multipath issues have been abundantly discussed in the literature @cite_7 . We briefly report some reference approaches to exploit end-to-end and in-network multipath.
@cite_7
2120545656
The Internet would be more efficient and robust if routers could flexibly divide traffic over multiple paths. Often, having one or two extra paths is sufficient for customizing paths for different applications, improving security, reacting to failures, and balancing load. However, support for Internet-wide multipath routing faces two significant barriers. First, multipath routing could impose significant computational and storage overhead in a network the size of the Internet. Second, the independent networks that comprise the Internet will not relinquish control over the flow of traffic without appropriate incentives. In this article, we survey flexible multipath routing techniques that are both scalable and incentive compatible. Techniques covered include: multihoming, tagging, tunneling, and extensions to existing Internet routing protocols.