Recognizing sarcasm often requires a deep understanding of multiple sources of information, including the utterance, the conversational context, and real world facts. Most of the current sarcasm detection systems consider only the utterance in isolation. There are some limited attempts toward taking into account the conversational context. In this paper, we propose an interpretable end-to-end model that combines information from both the utterance and the conversational context to detect sarcasm, and demonstrate its effectiveness through empirical evaluations. We also study the behavior of the proposed model to provide explanations for the model's decisions. Importantly, our model is capable of determining the impact of utterance and conversational context on the model's decisions. Finally, we provide an ablation study to illustrate the impact of different components of the proposed model.
The last category of methods aims to detect sarcasm based on the understanding of the conversation (other than simply extracting features from the context). To the best of our knowledge, there is just one conversation dependent sarcasm detection system @cite_28 , which focuses on modeling conversational context using a variety of LSTMs to help sarcasm detection. They effectively demonstrated the importance and impact of considering conversational context for sarcasm detection.
@cite_28
2737498144
Computational models for sarcasm detection have often relied on the content of utterances in isolation. However, speaker's sarcastic intent is not always obvious without additional context. Focusing on social media discussions, we investigate two issues: (1) does modeling of conversation context help in sarcasm detection and (2) can we understand what part of conversation context triggered the sarcastic reply. To address the first issue, we investigate several types of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks that can model both the conversation context and the sarcastic response. We show that the conditional LSTM network (, 2015) and LSTM networks with sentence level attention on context and response outperform the LSTM model that reads only the response. To address the second issue, we present a qualitative analysis of attention weights produced by the LSTM models with attention and discuss the results compared with human performance on the task.