Given a set of detections, detected at each time instant independently, we investigate how to associate them across time. This is done by propagating labels on a set of graphs, each graph capturing how either the spatio-temporal or the appearance cues promote the assignment of identical or distinct labels to a pair of detections. The graph construction is motivated by a locally linear embedding of the detection features. Interestingly, the neighborhood of a node in appearance graph is defined to include all the nodes for which the appearance feature is available (even if they are temporally distant). This gives our framework the uncommon ability to exploit the appearance features that are available only sporadically. Once the graphs have been defined, multi-object tracking is formulated as the problem of finding a label assignment that is consistent with the constraints captured each graph, which results into a difference of convex (DC) program. We propose to decompose the global objective function into node-wise sub-problems. This not only allows a computationally efficient solution, but also supports an incremental and scalable construction of the graph, thereby making the framework applicable to large graphs and practical tracking scenarios. Moreover, it opens the possibility of parallel implementation.
Our label propagation method by node-wise optimization cannot be truly characterized as a distributed computation but it raises this possibility for future developments. In such a scenario, we noticed that in @cite_29 , the authors devise a proximal optimization on graph that has quadratic convergence by using the Nesterov's method @cite_16 . Knowing if their approach, which assumes positive graph weights for forcing convex optimization, can be adapted to general weights and DC minimization is a matter of future study.
@cite_29 @cite_16
1997250627 2124541940
We present a distributed proximal-gradient method for optimizing the average of convex functions, each of which is the private local objective of an agent in a network with time-varying topology. The local objectives have distinct differentiable components, but they share a common nondifferentiable component, which has a favorable structure suitable for effective computation of the proximal operator. In our method, each agent iteratively updates its estimate of the global minimum by optimizing its local objective function, and exchanging estimates with others via communication in the network. Using Nesterov-type acceleration techniques and multiple communication steps per iteration, we show that this method converges at the rate 1 k (where k is the number of communication rounds between the agents), which is faster than the convergence rate of the existing distributed methods for solving this problem. The superior convergence rate of our method is also verified by numerical experiments. It was in the middle of the 1980s, when the seminal paper by Kar markar opened a new epoch in nonlinear optimization. The importance of this paper, containing a new polynomial-time algorithm for linear op timization problems, was not only in its complexity bound. At that time, the most surprising feature of this algorithm was that the theoretical pre diction of its high efficiency was supported by excellent computational results. This unusual fact dramatically changed the style and direc tions of the research in nonlinear optimization. Thereafter it became more and more common that the new methods were provided with a complexity analysis, which was considered a better justification of their efficiency than computational experiments. In a new rapidly develop ing field, which got the name "polynomial-time interior-point methods", such a justification was obligatory. Afteralmost fifteen years of intensive research, the main results of this development started to appear in monographs [12, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19]. Approximately at that time the author was asked to prepare a new course on nonlinear optimization for graduate students. The idea was to create a course which would reflect the new developments in the field. Actually, this was a major challenge. At the time only the theory of interior-point methods for linear optimization was polished enough to be explained to students. The general theory of self-concordant functions had appeared in print only once in the form of research monograph [12].