Classic clone detection approaches are hardly capable of finding redundant code that has been developed independently, i.e., is not the result of copy&paste. To automatically detect such functionally similar code of independent origin, we experimented with a dynamic detection approach that applies random testing to selected chunks of code similar to Jiang&Su's approach. We found that such an approach faces several limitations in its application to diverse Java systems. This paper details on our insights regarding these challenges of dynamic detection of functionally similar code fragments. Our findings support a substantiated discussion on detection approaches and serve as a starting point for future research.
To the best of our knowledge, the work of Jiang &Su @cite_7 is the only published attempt of automatically mining semantically equivalent code from a large code base. Thus, we compare our approach and results in detail to their paper in this section. The most obvious difference is that our tool chain works on Java code, while their tool, called , deals with the C language. For a more systematic comparison, we structure the comparison according the different phases of the detection pipeline.
@cite_7
2136099030
Similar code may exist in large software projects due to some common software engineering practices, such as copying and pasting code and n-version programming. Although previous work has studied syntactic equivalence and small-scale, coarse-grained program-level and function-level semantic equivalence, it is not known whether significant fine-grained, code-level semantic duplications exist. Detecting such semantic equivalence is also desirable because it can enable many applications such as code understanding, maintenance, and optimization. In this paper, we introduce the first algorithm to automatically mine functionally equivalent code fragments of arbitrary size - down to an executable statement. Our notion of functional equivalence is based on input and output behavior. Inspired by Schwartz's randomized polynomial identity testing, we develop our core algorithm using automated random testing: (1) candidate code fragments are automatically extracted from the input program; and (2) random inputs are generated to partition the code fragments based on their output values on the generated inputs. We implemented the algorithm and conducted a large-scale empirical evaluation of it on the Linux kernel 2.6.24. Our results show that there exist many functionally equivalent code fragments that are syntactically different (i.e., they are unlikely due to copying and pasting code). The algorithm also scales to million-line programs; it was able to analyze the Linux kernel with several days of parallel processing.