In the framework of distributed network computing, it is known that, for every network predicate, each network configuration that satisfies this predicate can be proved using distributed certificates which can be verified locally. However, this requires to leak information about the identities of the nodes in the certificates, which might not be applicable in a context in which privacy is desirable. Unfortunately, it is known that if one insists on certificates independent of the node identities, then not all network predicates can be proved using distributed certificates that can be verified locally. In this paper, we prove that, for every network predicate, there is a distributed protocol satisfying the following two properties: (1) for every network configuration that is legal w.r.t. the predicate, and for any attempt by an adversary to prove the illegality of that configuration using distributed certificates, there is a locally verifiable proof that the adversary is wrong, also using distributed certificates; (2) for every network configuration that is illegal w.r.t. the predicate, there is a proof of that illegality, using distributed certificates, such that no matter the way an adversary assigns its own set of distributed certificates in an attempt to prove the legality of the configuration, the actual illegality of the configuration will be locally detected. In both cases, the certificates are independent of the identities of the nodes. These results are achieved by investigating the so-called local hierarchy of complexity classes in which the certificates do not exploit the node identities. Indeed, we give a characterization of such a hierarchy, which is of its own interest
Finally, it is worth mentioning that the ability to decide a distributed language locally has impact on the ability to design algorithms @cite_8 for that language (i.e., computing outputs @math such that the configuration @math is legal w.r.t. the specification of the task). For instance, it is known that if @math is locally decidable, then any randomized local construction algorithm for @math can be derandomized @cite_12 . This result has been recently extended @cite_14 to the case of languages that are locally decidable by a randomized algorithm (i.e., extended from @math to @math according to the notations in @cite_10 ). More generally, the reader is invited to consult @cite_3 @cite_6 @cite_9 @cite_4 @cite_1 @cite_5 for good introductions to local computing, and or samples of significant results related to local computing.
@cite_14 @cite_4 @cite_8 @cite_9 @cite_1 @cite_3 @cite_6 @cite_5 @cite_10 @cite_12
1975579567 1502920553 2054910423 1568961751 2163172376 2592539685 2138623498 1999120866 2017345786
In this paper, we carry on investigating the line of research questioning the power of randomization for the design of distributed algorithms. In their seminal paper, Naor and Stockmeyer [STOC 1993] established that, in the context of network computing, in which all nodes execute the same algorithm in parallel, any construction task that can be solved locally by a randomized Monte-Carlo algorithm can also be solved locally by a deterministic algorithm. This result however holds in a specific context. In particular, it holds only for distributed tasks whose solutions can be locally checked by a deterministic algorithm. In this paper, we extend the result of Naor and Stockmeyer to a wider class of tasks. Specifically, we prove that the same derandomization result holds for every task whose solutions can be locally checked using a 2-sided error randomized Monte-Carlo algorithm. This extension finds applications to, e.g., the design of lower bounds for construction tasks which tolerate that some nodes compute incorrect values. In a nutshell, we show that randomization does not help for solving such resilient tasks. In this paper we extend the lower bound technique by Linial for local coloring and maximal independent sets. We show that constant approximations to maximum independent sets on a ring require at least log-star time. More generally, the product of approximation quality and running time cannot be less than log-star. Using a generalized ring topology, we gain identical lower bounds for approximations to minimum dominating sets. Since our generalized ring topology is contained in a number of geometric graphs such as the unit disk graph, our bounds directly apply as lower bounds for quite a few algorithmic problems in wireless networking. Having in mind these and other results about local approximations of maximum independent sets and minimum dominating sets, one might think that the former are always at least as difficult to obtain as the latter. Conversely, we show that graphs exist, where a maximum independent set can be determined without any communication, while finding even an approximation to a minimum dominating set is as hard as in general graphs. This paper concerns a number of algorithmic problems on graphs and how they may be solved in a distributed fashion. The computational model is such that each node of the graph is occupied by a processor which has its own ID. Processors are restricted to collecting data from others which are at a distance at most t away from them in t time units, but are otherwise computationally unbounded. This model focuses on the issue of locality in distributed processing, namely, to what extent a global solution to a computational problem can be obtained from locally available data.Three results are proved within this model: • A 3-coloring of an n-cycle requires time @math . This bound is tight, by previous work of Cole and Vishkin. • Any algorithm for coloring the d-regular tree of radius r which runs for time at most @math requires at least @math colors. • In an n-vertex graph of largest degree @math , an @math -coloring may be found in time @math . In a max-min LP, the objective is to maximise ω subject to Ax ≤ 1, Cx ≥ ω1, and x ≥ 0 for nonnegative matrices A and C. We present a local algorithm (constant-time distributed algorithm) for approximating max-min LPs. The approximation ratio of our algorithm is the best possible for any local algorithm; there is a matching unconditional lower bound. A local algorithm is a distributed algorithm that runs in constant time, independently of the size of the network. Being highly scalable and fault tolerant, such algorithms are ideal in the operation of large-scale distributed systems. Furthermore, even though the model of local algorithms is very limited, in recent years we have seen many positive results for nontrivial problems. This work surveys the state-of-the-art in the field, covering impossibility results, deterministic local algorithms, randomized local algorithms, and local algorithms for geometric graphs. A central theme in distributed network algorithms concerns understanding and coping with the issue of locality. Yet despite considerable progress, research efforts in this direction have not yet resulted in a solid basis in the form of a fundamental computational complexity theory for locality. Inspired by sequential complexity theory, we focus on a complexity theory for distributed decision problems. In the context of locality, solving a decision problem requires the processors to independently inspect their local neighborhoods and then collectively decide whether a given global input instance belongs to some specified language. We consider the standard LOCAL model of computation and define LD(t) (for local decision) as the class of decision problems that can be solved in t communication rounds. We first study the intriguing question of whether randomization helps in local distributed computing, and to what extent. Specifically, we define the corresponding randomized class BPLD(t,p,q), containing all languages for which there exists a randomized algorithm that runs in t rounds, accepts correct instances with probability at least p, and rejects incorrect ones with probability at least q. We show that p2 p q = 1 is a threshold for the containment of LD(t) in BPLD(t,p,q). More precisely, we show that there exists a language that does not belong to LD(t) for any t=o(n) but does belong to BPLD(0,p,q) for any p,q ∈ (0,1) such that p2 p q ≤ 1. On the other hand, we show that, restricted to hereditary languages, BPLD(t,p,q)=LD(O(t)), for any function t, and any p, q ∈ (0,1) such that p2 p q > 1. In addition, we investigate the impact of nondeterminism on local decision, and establish several structural results inspired by classical computational complexity theory. Specifically, we show that nondeterminism does help, but that this help is limited, as there exist languages that cannot be decided locally nondeterministically. Perhaps surprisingly, it turns out that it is the combination of randomization with nondeterminism that enables to decide all languages in constant time. Finally, we introduce the notion of local reduction, and establish a couple of completeness results. The purpose of this paper is a study of computation that can be done locally in a distributed network, where "locally" means within time (or distance) independent of the size of the network. Locally checkable labeling (LCL) problems are considered, where the legality of a labeling can be checked locally (e.g., coloring). The results include the following: There are nontrivial LCL problems that have local algorithms. There is a variant of the dining philosophers problem that can be solved locally. Randomization cannot make an LCL problem local; i.e., if a problem has a local randomized algorithm then it has a local deterministic algorithm. It is undecidable, in general, whether a given LCL has a local algorithm. However, it is decidable whether a given LCL has an algorithm that operates in a given time @math . Any LCL problem that has a local algorithm has one that is order-invariant (the algorithm depends only on the order of the processor IDs).