We propose a novel probabilistic dimensionality reduction framework that can naturally integrate the generative model and the locality information of data. Based on this framework, we present a new model, which is able to learn a smooth skeleton of embedding points in a low-dimensional space from high-dimensional noisy data. The formulation of the new model can be equivalently interpreted as two coupled learning problem, i.e., structure learning and the learning of projection matrix. This interpretation motivates the learning of the embedding points that can directly form an explicit graph structure. We develop a new method to learn the embedding points that form a spanning tree, which is further extended to obtain a discriminative and compact feature representation for clustering problems. Unlike traditional clustering methods, we assume that centers of clusters should be close to each other if they are connected in a learned graph, and other cluster centers should be distant. This can greatly facilitate data visualization and scientific discovery in downstream analysis. Extensive experiments are performed that demonstrate that the proposed framework is able to obtain discriminative feature representations, and correctly recover the intrinsic structures of various real-world datasets.
where @math is the dual variable subject to the preserving constraint associated to edge @math , and @math denotes the second smallest eigenvalue of a symmetric matrix @cite_19 ..
@cite_19
2155402588
We present a unified duality view of several recently emerged spectral methods for nonlinear dimensionality reduction, including Isomap, locally linear embedding, Laplacian eigenmaps, and maximum variance unfolding. We discuss the duality theory for the maximum variance unfolding problem, and show that other methods are directly related to either its primal formulation or its dual formulation, or can be interpreted from the optimality conditions. This duality framework reveals close connections between these seemingly quite different algorithms. In particular, it resolves the myth about these methods in using either the top eigenvectors of a dense matrix, or the bottom eigenvectors of a sparse matrix --- these two eigenspaces are exactly aligned at primal-dual optimality.