Consensus is one of the most fundamental distributed computing problems. In particular, it serves as a building block in many replication based fault-tolerant systems and in particular in multiple recent blockchain solutions. Depending on its exact variant and other environmental assumptions, solving consensus requires multiple communication rounds. Yet, there are known optimistic protocols that guarantee termination in a single communication round under favorable conditions. In this paper we present a generic optimizer than can turn any consensus protocol into an optimized protocol that terminates in a single communication round whenever all nodes start with the same predetermined value and no Byzantine failures occur (although node crashes are allowed). This is regardless of the network timing assumptions and additional oracle capabilities assumed by the base consensus protocol being optimized. In the case of benign failures, our optimizer works whenever the number of faulty nodes @math . For Byzantine behavior, our optimizer's resiliency depends on the validity variant sought. In the case of classical validity, it can accommodate @math Byzantine failures. With the more recent external validity function assumption, it works whenever @math . Either way, our optimizer only relies on oral messages, thereby imposing very light-weight crypto requirements.
The condition based approach for solving consensus identifies various sets of input values that enable solving consensus fast @cite_7 . This is by treating the set of input values held by all processes as an input vector to the problem. Specifically, the work in @cite_11 showed that when the possible input vectors correspond to error correcting codes, then consensus is solvable in a single communication round regardless of synchrony assumptions.
@cite_7 @cite_11
2021482754 2139686511
This article introduces and explores the condition-based approach to solve the consensus problem in asynchronous systems. The approach studies conditions that identify sets of input vectors for which it is possible to solve consensus despite the occurrence of up to f process crashes. The first main result defines acceptable conditions and shows that these are exactly the conditions for which a consensus protocol exists. Two examples of realistic acceptable conditions are presented, and proved to be maximal, in the sense that they cannot be extended and remain acceptable. The second main result is a generic consensus shared-memory protocol for any acceptable condition. The protocol always guarantees agreement and validity, and terminates (at least) when the inputs satisfy the condition with which the protocol has been instantiated, or when there are no crashes. An efficient version of the protocol is then designed for the message passing model that works when f < n 2, and it is shown that no such protocol exists when f ≥ n 2. It is also shown how the protocol's safety can be traded for its liveness. The condition-based approach identifies sets of input vectors, called conditions, for which it is possible to design an asynchronous protocol solving a distributed problem despite process crashes. This paper establishes a direct correlation between distributed agreement problems and error-correcting codes. In particular, crash failures in distributed agreement problems correspond to erasure failures in error-correcting codes and Byzantine and value domain faults correspond to corruption errors. This correlation is exemplified by concentrating on two well-known agreement problems, namely, consensus and interactive consistency, in the context of the condition-based approach. Specifically, the paper presents the following results: first, it shows that the conditions that allow interactive consistency to be solved despite fc crashes and fc value domain faults correspond exactly to the set of error-correcting codes capable of recovering from fc erasures and fc corruptions. Second, the paper proves that consensus can be solved despite fc crash failures if the condition corresponds to a code whose Hamming distance is fc + 1 and Byzantine consensus can be solved despite fb Byzantine faults if the Hamming distance of the code is 2 fb + 1. Finally, the paper uses the above relations to establish several results in distributed agreement that are derived from known results in error-correcting codes and vice versa.