We study the Moran process as adapted by Lieberman, Hauert and Nowak. This is a model of an evolving population on a graph where certain individuals, called "mutants" have fitness r and other individuals, called "non-mutants" have fitness 1. We focus on the situation where the mutation is advantageous, in the sense that r > 1. A family of directed graphs is said to be strongly amplifying if the extinction probability tends to 0 when the Moran process is run on graphs in this family. The most-amplifying known family of directed graphs is the family of megastars of We show that this family is optimal, up to logarithmic factors, since every strongly-connected n-vertex digraph has extinction probability Omega(n^(-1 2)). Next, we show that there is an infinite family of undirected graphs, called dense incubators, whose extinction probability is O(n^(-1 3)). We show that this is optimal, up to constant factors. Finally, we introduce sparse incubators, for varying edge density, and show that the extinction probability of these graphs is O(n m), where m is the number of edges. Again, we show that this is optimal, up to constant factors.
The best-known lower bounds on the extinction probability of connected undirected graphs are in @cite_8 @cite_13 . Theorem 1 of @cite_9 shows that there is a constant @math such that for every @math the extinction probability is at least @math .
@cite_9 @cite_13 @cite_8
2205121374 2568440864
This work extends what is known so far for a basic model of evolutionary antagonism in undirected networks (graphs). More specifically, this work studies the generalized Moran process, as introduced by Lieberman, Hauert, and Nowak [Nature, 433:312-316, 2005], where the individuals of a population reside on the vertices of an undirected connected graph. The initial population has a single mutant of a fitness value r (typically r>1), residing at some vertex v of the graph, while every other vertex is initially occupied by an individual of fitness 1. At every step of this process, an individual (i.e. vertex) is randomly chosen for reproduction with probability proportional to its fitness, and then it places a copy of itself on a random neighbor, thus replacing the individual that was residing there. The main quantity of interest is the fixation probability, i.e. the probability that eventually the whole graph is occupied by descendants of the mutant. In this work we concentrate on the fixation probability when the mutant is initially on a specific vertex v, thus refining the older notion of which studied the fixation probability when the initial mutant is placed at a random vertex. We then aim at finding graphs that have many "strong starts" (or many "weak starts") for the mutant. Thus we introduce a parameterized notion of selective amplifiers (resp. selective suppressors) of evolution. We prove the existence of strong selective amplifiers (i.e. for h(n)=Θ(n) vertices v the fixation probability of v is at least @math for a function c(r) that depends only on r), and the existence of quite strong selective suppressors. Regarding the traditional notion of fixation probability from a random start, we provide strong upper and lower bounds: first we demonstrate the non-existence of "strong universal" amplifiers, and second we prove the Thermal Theorem which states that for any undirected graph, when the mutant starts at vertex v, the fixation probability at least @math . This theorem (which extends the "Isothermal Theorem" of for regular graphs) implies an almost tight lower bound for the usual notion of fixation probability. Our proof techniques are original and are based on new domination arguments which may be of general interest in Markov Processes that are of the general birth-death type. Evolutionary dynamics has been traditionally studied in the context of homogeneous populations, mainly described by the Moran process [P. Moran, Random processes in genetics, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 54 (1) (1958) 60-71]. Recently, this approach has been generalized in [E. Lieberman, C. Hauert, M.A. Nowak, Evolutionary dynamics on graphs, Nature 433 (2005) 312-316] by arranging individuals on the nodes of a network (in general, directed). In this setting, the existence of directed arcs enables the simulation of extreme phenomena, where the fixation probability of a randomly placed mutant (i.e., the probability that the offspring of the mutant eventually spread over the whole population) is arbitrarily small or large. On the other hand, undirected networks (i.e., undirected graphs) seem to have a smoother behavior, and thus it is more challenging to find suppressors amplifiers of selection, that is, graphs with smaller greater fixation probability than the complete graph (i.e., the homogeneous population). In this paper we focus on undirected graphs. We present the first class of undirected graphs which act as suppressors of selection, by achieving a fixation probability that is at most one half of that of the complete graph, as the number of vertices increases. Moreover, we provide some generic upper and lower bounds for the fixation probability of general undirected graphs. As our main contribution, we introduce the natural alternative of the model proposed in [E. Lieberman, C. Hauert, M.A. Nowak, Evolutionary dynamics on graphs, Nature 433 (2005) 312-316]. In our new evolutionary model, all individuals interact simultaneously and the result is a compromise between aggressive and non-aggressive individuals. We prove that our new model of mutual influences admits a potential function, which guarantees the convergence of the system for any graph topology and any initial fitness vector of the individuals. Furthermore, we prove fast convergence to the stable state for the case of the complete graph, as well as we provide almost tight bounds on the limit fitness of the individuals. Apart from being important on its own, this new evolutionary model appears to be useful also in the abstract modeling of control mechanisms over invading populations in networks. We demonstrate this by introducing and analyzing two alternative control approaches, for which we bound the time needed to stabilize to the ''healthy'' state of the system.