In this paper, we study the robust subspace clustering problem, which aims to cluster the given possibly noisy data points into their underlying subspaces. A large pool of previous subspace clustering methods focus on the graph construction by different regularization of the representation coefficient. We instead focus on the robustness of the model to non-Gaussian noises. We propose a new robust clustering method by using the correntropy induced metric, which is robust for handling the non-Gaussian and impulsive noises. Also we further extend the method for handling the data with outlier rows features. The multiplicative form of half-quadratic optimization is used to optimize the non-convex correntropy objective function of the proposed models. Extensive experiments on face datasets well demonstrate that the proposed methods are more robust to corruptions and occlusions.
The above methods share the common formulation as shown in ). The Frobenius norm and L21 norm are used as the loss function while the L1 norm, nuclear norm and Frobenius are used to control the affinity matrix. Different formulations require different solvers for these problems. In this work, we show that the L1 norm, L21 norm and nuclear norm all satisfy certain conditions, and thus the previous subspace clustering methods, including SSC, LRR and MSR, can be unified within a general framework from the perspective of half-quadratic optimization @cite_11 . The relationship between the general framework and the previous optimization methods for sparse and low rank minimization is also presented in this work.
@cite_11
2030507150
We address the minimization of regularized convex cost functions which are customarily used for edge-preserving restoration and reconstruction of signals and images. In order to accelerate computation, the multiplicative and the additive half-quadratic reformulation of the original cost-function have been pioneered in Geman and Reynolds [IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intelligence, 14 (1992), pp. 367--383] and Geman and Yang IEEE Trans. Image Process., 4 (1995), pp. 932--946]. The alternate minimization of the resultant (augmented) cost-functions has a simple explicit form. The goal of this paper is to provide a systematic analysis of the convergence rate achieved by these methods. For the multiplicative and additive half-quadratic regularizations, we determine their upper bounds for their root-convergence factors. The bound for the multiplicative form is seen to be always smaller than the bound for the additive form. Experiments show that the number of iterations required for convergence for the multiplicative form is always less than that for the additive form. However, the computational cost of each iteration is much higher for the multiplicative form than for the additive form. The global assessment is that minimization using the additive form of half-quadratic regularization is faster than using the multiplicative form. When the additive form is applicable, it is hence recommended. Extensive experiments demonstrate that in our MATLAB implementation, both methods are substantially faster (in terms of computational times) than the standard MATLAB Optimization Toolbox routines used in our comparison study.