Destination prediction is an essential task in a variety of mobile applications. In this paper, we optimize the matrix operation and adapt a semi-lazy framework to improve the prediction accuracy and efficiency of a state-of-the-art approach. To this end, we employ efficient dynamic-programming by devising several data constructs including Efficient Transition Probability and Transition Probabilities with Detours that are capable of pinpointing the minimum amount of computation. We prove that our method achieves one order of cut in both time and space complexity. The experimental results on real-world and synthetic datasets have shown that our solution consistently outperforms its state-of-the-art counterparts in terms of both efficiency (approximately over 100 times faster) and accuracy (above 30 increase).
Krumm and Horvitz @cite_4 incorporated in their approach multiple features including driving efficiency, ground cover, trip times etc. and employed an open-world model to capture the probabilities of users leaving for places which have never been visited in the past. @cite_0 employed a sophisticated context-aware behavior model PROCAB to infer intersection decisions, routes and destinations of drivers. @cite_25 demonstrated the breach of privacy induced by insurance schemes through predicting the destinations by exploiting only the speed data of a vehicle. The aim of our work differs from all the preceding research since we concentrate on destination prediction using only the historical trajectories.
@cite_0 @cite_4 @cite_25
2115450697 2147693219 2950988509
We present PROCAB, an efficient method for Probabilistically Reasoning from Observed Context-Aware Behavior. It models the context-dependent utilities and underlying reasons that people take different actions. The model generalizes to unseen situations and scales to incorporate rich contextual information. We train our model using the route preferences of 25 taxi drivers demonstrated in over 100,000 miles of collected data, and demonstrate the performance of our model by inferring: (1) decision at next intersection, (2) route to known destination, and (3) destination given partially traveled route. We describe a method called Predestination that uses a history of a driver's destinations, along with data about driving behaviors, to predict where a driver is going as a trip progresses. Driving behaviors include types of destinations, driving efficiency, and trip times. Beyond considering previously visited destinations, Predestination leverages an open-world modeling methodology that considers the likelihood of users visiting previously unobserved locations based on trends in the data and on the background properties of locations. This allows our algorithm to smoothly transition between “out of the box” with no training data to more fully trained with increasing numbers of observations. Multiple components of the analysis are fused via Bayesian inference to produce a probabilistic map of destinations. Our algorithm was trained and tested on hold-out data drawn from a database of GPS driving data gathered from 169 different subjects who drove 7,335 different trips. Today people increasingly have the opportunity to opt-in to "usage-based" automotive insurance programs for reducing insurance premiums. In these programs, participants install devices in their vehicles that monitor their driving behavior, which raises some privacy concerns. Some devices collect fine-grained speed data to monitor driving habits. Companies that use these devices claim that their approach is privacy-preserving because speedometer measurements do not have physical locations. However, we show that with knowledge of the user's home location, as the insurance companies have, speed data is sufficient to discover driving routes and destinations when trip data is collected over a period of weeks. To demonstrate the real-world applicability of our approach we applied our algorithm, elastic pathing, to data collected over hundreds of driving trips occurring over several months. With this data and our approach, we were able to predict trip destinations to within 250 meters of ground truth in 10 of the traces and within 500 meters in 20 of the traces. This result, combined with the amount of speed data that is being collected by insurance companies, constitutes a substantial breach of privacy because a person's regular driving pattern can be deduced with repeated examples of the same paths with just a few weeks of monitoring.