A significant part of the largest Knowledge Graph today, the Linked Open Data cloud, consists of metadata about documents such as publications, news reports, and other media articles. While the widespread access to the document metadata is a tremendous advancement, it is yet not so easy to assign semantic annotations and organize the documents along semantic concepts. Providing semantic annotations like concepts in SKOS thesauri is a classical research topic, but typically it is conducted on the full-text of the documents. For the first time, we offer a systematic comparison of classification approaches to investigate how far semantic annotations can be conducted using just the metadata of the documents such as titles published as labels on the Linked Open Data cloud. We compare the classifications obtained from analyzing the documents' titles with semantic annotations obtained from analyzing the full-text. Apart from the prominent text classification baselines kNN and SVM, we also compare recent techniques of Learning to Rank and neural networks and revisit the traditional methods logistic regression, Rocchio, and Naive Bayes. The results show that across three of our four datasets, the performance of the classifications using only titles reaches over 90 of the quality compared to the classification performance when using the full-text. Thus, conducting document classification by just using the titles is a reasonable approach for automated semantic annotation and opens up new possibilities for enriching Knowledge Graphs.
Most earlier work on the multi-label classification task with many possible output labels relies on nearest neighbor searches (kNN). Using the union of labels as well as separately voting for each individual label among neighbors is a common choice in these nearest neighbor-based classifiers @cite_2 @cite_34 @cite_13 @cite_3 @cite_19 . Concept extraction @cite_15 refers to explicitly finding known concept-specific phrases in the documents. The extracted concepts are re-weighted by inverse document frequency, as in the well-known TF-IDF @cite_28 retrieval model. In our prior work @cite_5 , we have conducted an exhaustive comparison of concept extraction and feature re-weighting methods using kNN as a multi-label classifier.
@cite_28 @cite_3 @cite_19 @cite_2 @cite_5 @cite_15 @cite_34 @cite_13
1978394996 2052684427 2538769922 2068903979 2146241755
The experimental evidence accumulated over the past 20 years indicates that textindexing systems based on the assignment of appropriately weighted single terms produce retrieval results that are superior to those obtainable with other more elaborate text representations. These results depend crucially on the choice of effective term weighting systems. This paper summarizes the insights gained in automatic term weighting, and provides baseline single term indexing models with which other more elaborate content analysis procedures can be compared. Multi-label learning originated from the investigation of text categorization problem, where each document may belong to several predefined topics simultaneously. In multi-label learning, the training set is composed of instances each associated with a set of labels, and the task is to predict the label sets of unseen instances through analyzing training instances with known label sets. In this paper, a multi-label lazy learning approach named ML-KNN is presented, which is derived from the traditional K-nearest neighbor (KNN) algorithm. In detail, for each unseen instance, its K nearest neighbors in the training set are firstly identified. After that, based on statistical information gained from the label sets of these neighboring instances, i.e. the number of neighboring instances belonging to each possible class, maximum a posteriori (MAP) principle is utilized to determine the label set for the unseen instance. Experiments on three different real-world multi-label learning problems, i.e. Yeast gene functional analysis, natural scene classification and automatic web page categorization, show that ML-KNN achieves superior performance to some well-established multi-label learning algorithms. Extracting parts of a text document relevant to a class label is a critical information retrieval task. We propose a semi-supervised multi-label topic model for jointly achieving document and sentence-level class inferences. Under our model, each sentence is associated with only a subset of the document's labels (including possibly none of them), with the label set of the document the union of the labels of all of its sentences. For training, we use both labeled documents, and, typically, a larger set of unlabeled documents. Our model, in a semisupervised fashion, discovers the topics present, learns associations between topics and class labels, predicts labels for new (or unlabeled) documents, and determines label associations for each sentence in every document. For learning, our model does not require any ground-truth labels on sentences. We develop a Hamiltonian Monte Carlo based algorithm for efficiently sampling from the joint label distribution over all sentences, a very high-dimensional discrete space. Our experiments show that our approach outperforms several benchmark methods with respect to both document and sentence-level classification, as well as test set log-likelihood. All code for replicating our experiments is available from https: github.com hsoleimani MLTM. When recommending news items, most of the traditional algorithms are based on TF-IDF, i.e., a term-based weighting method which is mostly used in information retrieval and text mining. However, many new technologies have been made available since the introduction of TF-IDF. This paper proposes a new method for recommending news items based on TF-IDF and a domain ontology. It is demonstrated that adapting TF-IDF with the semantics of a domain ontology, resulting in Concept Frequency - Inverse Document Frequency (CF-IDF), yields better results than using the original TF-IDF method. CF-IDF is built and tested in Athena, a recommender extension to the Hermes news personalization framework. Athena employs a user profile to store concepts or terms found in news items browsed by the user. The framework recommends new articles to the user using a traditional TF-IDF recommender and the CF-IDF recommender. A statistical evaluation of both methods shows that the use of an ontology significantly improves the performance of a traditional recommender. Multi-label classification methods are increasingly required by modern applications, such as protein function classification, music categorization, and semantic scene classification. This article introduces the task of multi-label classification, organizes the sparse related literature into a structured presentation and performs comparative experimental results of certain multilabel classification methods. It also contributes the definition of concepts for the quantification of the multi-label nature of a data set.