Influence maximization (IM) has been extensively studied for better viral marketing. However, previous works put less emphasis on how balancedly the audience are affected across different communities and how diversely the seed nodes are selected. In this paper, we incorporate audience diversity and seed diversity into the IM task. From the model perspective, in order to characterize both influence spread and diversity in our objective function, we adopt three commonly used utilities in economics (i.e., Perfect Substitutes, Perfect Complements and Cobb-Douglas). We validate our choices of these three functions by showing their nice properties. From the algorithmic perspective, we present various approximation strategies to maximize the utilities. In audience diversification, we propose a solution-dependent approximation algorithm to circumvent the hardness results. In seed diversification, we prove a ( @math ) approximation ratio based on non-monotonic submodular maximization. Experimental results show that our framework outperforms other natural heuristics both in utility maximization and result diversification.
@cite_31 @cite_8 @cite_7 study how to maximize the diversity of in a network. Their goal is to recommend diverse content to the audience so that friends can have different knowledge. This is different from our goal to diversify the influenced nodes with the same piece of content. To the best of our knowledge, @cite_23 is the only previous work exploring audience seed diversity in social influence maximization. However, their objective is essentially a weighted sum of spread and diversity. In contrast, our framework systematically studies a family of utility functions from the perspective of economics @cite_0 .
@cite_7 @cite_8 @cite_0 @cite_23 @cite_31
2963864976 2890093401 2090317466 2041860676 2963383366
Social media have a great potential to improve information dissemination in our society, yet, they have been held accountable for a number of undesirable effects, such as polarization and filter bubbles. It is thus important to understand these negative phenomena and develop methods to combat them. In this paper we propose a novel approach to address the problem of breaking filter bubbles in social media. We do so by aiming to maximize the diversity of the information exposed to connected social-media users. We formulate the problem of maximizing the diversity of exposure as a quadratic-knapsack problem. We show that the proposed diversity-maximization problem is inapproximable, and thus, we resort to polynomial non-approximable algorithms, inspired by solutions developed for the quadratic knapsack problem, as well as scalable greedy heuristics. We complement our algorithms with instance-specific upper bounds, which are used to provide empirical approximation guarantees for the given problem instances. Our experimental evaluation shows that a proposed greedy algorithm followed by randomized local search is the algorithm of choice given its quality-vs.-efficiency trade-off. Social-media platforms have created new ways for citizens to stay informed and participate in public debates. However, to enable a healthy environment for information sharing, social deliberation, and opinion formation, citizens need to be exposed to sufficiently diverse viewpoints that challenge their assumptions, instead of being trapped inside filter bubbles. In this paper, we take a step in this direction and propose a novel approach to maximize the diversity of exposure in a social network. We formulate the problem in the context of information propagation, as a task of recommending a small number of news articles to selected users. We propose a realistic setting where we take into account content and user leanings, and the probability of further sharing an article. This setting allows us to capture the balance between maximizing the spread of information and ensuring the exposure of users to diverse viewpoints. The resulting problem can be cast as maximizing a monotone and submodular function subject to a matroid constraint on the allocation of articles to users. It is a challenging generalization of the influence maximization problem. Yet, we are able to devise scalable approximation algorithms by introducing a novel extension to the notion of random reverse-reachable sets. We experimentally demonstrate the efficiency and scalability of our algorithm on several real-world datasets. The worldwide best-selling intermediate microeconomics textbook is distinguished by its remarkably up-to-date and rigorous yet accessible analytical approach. The seventh edition has been carefully updated and revised, adding a wealth of new applications and examples that analyse the important lessons offered by eBay, drug companies, the Yellow Pages and even Maine Lobstermen. For better viral marketing, there has been a lot of research on social influence maximization. However, the problem that who is influenced and how diverse the influenced population is, which is important in real-world marketing, has largely been neglected. To that end, in this paper, we propose to consider the magnitude of influence and the diversity of the influenced crowd simultaneously. Specifically, we formulate it as an optimization problem, i.e., diversified social influence maximization. First, we present a general framework for this problem, under which we construct a class of diversity measures to quantify the diversity of the influenced crowd. Meanwhile, we prove that a simple greedy algorithm guarantees to provide a near-optimal solution to the optimization problem. Furthermore, we relax the problem by focusing on the diversity of the nodes targeted for initial activation, and show how this relaxed form could be used to diversify the results of many heuristics, e.g., PageRank. Finally, we run extensive experiments on two real-world datasets, showing that our formulation is effective in generating diverse results. Social media has brought a revolution on how people are consuming news. Beyond the undoubtedly large number of advantages brought by social-media platforms, a point of criticism has been the creation of echo chambers and filter bubbles, caused by social homophily and algorithmic personalization. In this paper we address the problem of balancing the information exposure in a social network. We assume that two opposing campaigns (or viewpoints) are present in the network, and that network nodes have different preferences towards these campaigns. Our goal is to find two sets of nodes to employ in the respective campaigns, so that the overall information exposure for the two campaigns is balanced. We formally define the problem, characterize its hardness, develop approximation algorithms, and present experimental evaluation results. Our model is inspired by the literature on influence maximization, but we offer significant novelties. First, balance of information exposure is modeled by a symmetric difference function, which is neither monotone nor submodular, and thus, not amenable to existing approaches. Second, while previous papers consider a setting with selfish agents and provide bounds on best response strategies (i.e., move of the last player), we consider a setting with a centralized agent and provide bounds for a global objective function.