We study the wireless scheduling problem in the SINR model. More specifically, given a set of @math links, each a sender-receiver pair, we wish to partition (or ) the links into the minimum number of slots, each satisfying interference constraints allowing simultaneous transmission. In the basic problem, all senders transmit with the same uniform power. We give a distributed @math -approximation algorithm for the scheduling problem, matching the best ratio known for centralized algorithms. It holds in arbitrary metric space and for every length-monotone and sublinear power assignment. It is based on an algorithm of Kesselheim and V "ocking, whose analysis we improve by a logarithmic factor. We show that every distributed algorithm uses @math slots to schedule certain instances that require only two slots, which implies that the best possible absolute performance guarantee is logarithmic.
In @cite_11 , the authors introduce a versatile measure, the maximum average affectance @math , defined by @math The authors then show two results. On the one hand, they show that @math where @math . On the other hand, they present a natural algorithm (we use the same algorithm in this work) which schedules all links in @math slots, thus achieving a @math approximation. We can show (Appendix ) that both of these bounds are tight. Thus it is not possible to obtain improved approximation using the measure @math .
@cite_11
2152723361
We present and analyze simple distributed contention resolution protocols for wireless networks. In our setting, one is given n pairs of senders and receivers located in a metric space. Each sender wants to transmit a signal to its receiver at a prespecified power level, e. g., all senders use the same, uniform power level as it is typically implemented in practice. Our analysis is based on the physical model in which the success of a transmission depends on the Signal-to-Interference-plus-Noise-Ratio (SINR). The objective is to minimize the number of time slots until all signals are successfully transmitted. Our main technical contribution is the introduction of a measure called maximum average affectance enabling us to analyze random contention-resolution algorithms in which each packet is transmitted in each step with a fixed probability depending on the maximum average affectance. We prove that the schedule generated this way is only an O(log2 n) factor longer than the optimal one, provided that the prespecified power levels satisfy natural monontonicity properties. By modifying the algorithm, senders need not to know the maximum average affectance in advance but only static information about the network. In addition, we extend our approach to multi-hop communication achieving the same appoximation factor.