Word embeddings are already well studied in the general domain, usually trained on large text corpora, and have been evaluated for example on word similarity and analogy tasks, but also as an input to downstream NLP processes. In contrast, in this work we explore the suitability of word embedding technologies in the specialized digital humanities domain. After training embedding models of various types on two popular fantasy novel book series, we evaluate their performance on two task types: term analogies, and word intrusion. To this end, we manually construct test datasets with domain experts. Among the contributions are the evaluation of various word embedding techniques on the different task types, with the findings that even embeddings trained on small corpora perform well for example on the word intrusion task. Furthermore, we provide extensive and high-quality datasets in digital humanities for further investigation, as well as the implementation to easily reproduce or extend the experiments.
@cite_33 identify problems associated with evaluating embedding models only on word similarity tasks and suggested to rather conduct task- and domain-specific evaluations.
@cite_33
2387546565
Lacking standardized extrinsic evaluation methods for vector representations of words, the NLP community has relied heavily on word similarity tasks as a proxy for intrinsic evaluation of word vectors. Word similarity evaluation, which correlates the distance between vectors and human judgments of semantic similarity is attractive, because it is computationally inexpensive and fast. In this paper we present several problems associated with the evaluation of word vectors on word similarity datasets, and summarize existing solutions. Our study suggests that the use of word similarity tasks for evaluation of word vectors is not sustainable and calls for further research on evaluation methods.