While Microservices promise several beneficial characteristics for sustainable long-term software evolution, little empirical research covers what concrete activities industry applies for the evolvability assurance of Microservices and how technical debt is handled in such systems. Since insights into the current state of practice are very important for researchers, we performed a qualitative interview study to explore applied evolvability assurance processes, the usage of tools, metrics, and patterns, as well as participants' reflections on the topic. In 17 semi-structured interviews, we discussed 14 different Microservice-based systems with software professionals from 10 companies and how the sustainable evolution of these systems was ensured. Interview transcripts were analyzed with a detailed coding system and the constant comparison method. We found that especially systems for external customers relied on central governance for the assurance. Participants saw guidelines like architectural principles as important to ensure a base consistency for evolvability. Interviewees also valued manual activities like code review or boy scouting, even though automation and tool support was described as very important. Source code quality was the primary target for the usage of tools and metrics. Despite most reported issues being related to Architectural Technical Debt (ATD), our participants did not apply any architectural or service-oriented tools and metrics. While participants generally saw their Microservices as evolvable, service cutting and finding an appropriate service granularity with low coupling and high cohesion were reported as challenging. Future Microservices research in the areas of evolution and technical debt should take these findings and industry sentiments into account.
The same authors @cite_5 investigate technical debt interest by means of a long term case study where they monitored the migration of a monolithic legacy system to Microservices. The study aims to characterize technical debt and its growth comparatively in both architectural styles. As a preliminary result, they found that the total amount of technical debt grew much faster in the Microservice-based system.
@cite_5
2898248239
Continuous Architecture (CA) is an approach that supports companies in decreasing the time between deliveries. Migration to microservices is one of the most common situations when companies adopt continuous architecting processes [4]. Companies commonly adopt an initial migration strategy to extract some components from the monolithic system as microservices, making use of simplified microservices patterns [5][4]. As an example, companies commonly directly connect the microservices to the legacy monolithic system and do not adopt any message bus at the beginning. When the system starts to grow in complexity, they usually start re-architecting their systems, considering different architectural patterns. Some companies introduce API gateway patterns to simplify the management and load balancing of the different services, while others also consider a lightweight message bus [4][5][6]. All these architectural changes require deep refactoring of the system, thereby increasing the risk of new faults being introduced. In this paper, we report the preliminary results of work in progress, where we monitored the TD of an SME (SMEs = small and medium enterprises) that adopted a CA approach while migrating a legacy monolithic system to an ecosystem of microservices. To the best of our knowledge, no studies exist on the impact of postponed activities on the TD, especially in the context of CA and microservices. This work will help companies understand how TD grows and changes over time while at the same time opening up new avenues for future research on the analysis of TD interest in continuous architecting processes.