This paper details LTG-Oslo team's participation in the sentiment track of the NEGES 2019 evaluation campaign. We participated in the task with a hierarchical multi-task network, which used shared lower-layers in a deep BiLSTM to predict negation, while the higher layers were dedicated to predicting document-level sentiment. The multi-task component shows promise as a way to incorporate information on negation into deep neural sentiment classifiers, despite the fact that the absolute results on the test set were relatively low for a binary classification task.
Much work was done within the biomedical domain @cite_9 @cite_23 @cite_22 due largely to the availability of the BioScope corpus @cite_11 , which is annotated for negation cues and scopes. The *SEM shared task @cite_34 instead focused on detection of negation cues and scopes in a corpus of sentences taken from the works of Aurthur Conan Doyle.
@cite_22 @cite_9 @cite_23 @cite_34 @cite_11
2032021697 2035703356 2105827650 1954622760 1982464493
This article explores a combination of deep and shallow approaches to the problem of resolving the scope of speculation and negation within a sentence, specifically in the domain of biomedical research literature. The first part of the article focuses on speculation. After first showing how speculation cues can be accurately identified using a very simple classifier informed only by local lexical context, we go on to explore two different syntactic approaches to resolving the in-sentence scopes of these cues. Whereas one uses manually crafted rules operating over dependency structures, the other automatically learns a discriminative ranking function over nodes in constituent trees. We provide an in-depth error analysis and discussion of various linguistic properties characterizing the problem, and show that although both approaches perform well in isolation, even better results can be obtained by combining them, yielding the best published results to date on the CoNLL-2010 Shared Task data. The last part of the article describes how our speculation system is ported to also resolve the scope of negation. With only modest modifications to the initial design, the system obtains state-of-the-art results on this task also. In this paper we present a machine learning system that finds the scope of negation in biomedical texts. The system consists of two memory-based engines, one that decides if the tokens in a sentence are negation signals, and another that finds the full scope of these negation signals. Our approach to negation detection differs in two main aspects from existing research on negation. First, we focus on finding the scope of negation signals, instead of determining whether a term is negated or not. Second, we apply supervised machine learning techniques, whereas most existing systems apply rule-based algorithms. As far as we know, this way of approaching the negation scope finding task is novel. Finding negation signals and their scope in text is an important subtask in information extraction. In this paper we present a machine learning system that finds the scope of negation in biomedical texts. The system combines several classifiers and works in two phases. To investigate the robustness of the approach, the system is tested on the three subcorpora of the BioScope corpus representing different text types. It achieves the best results to date for this task, with an error reduction of 32.07 compared to current state of the art results. The Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics (*SEM) each year hosts a shared task on semantic related topics. In its first edition held in 2012, the shared task was dedicated to resolving the scope and focus of negation. This paper presents the specifications, datasets and evaluation criteria of the task. An overview of participating systems is provided and their results are summarized. Background Detecting uncertain and negative assertions is essential in most BioMedical Text Mining tasks where, in general, the aim is to derive factual knowledge from textual data. This article reports on a corpus annotation project that has produced a freely available resource for research on handling negation and uncertainty in biomedical texts (we call this corpus the BioScope corpus).