Anticoagulant therapy for symptomatic calf deep vein thrombosis (CACTUS) a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial.
BACKGROUND The efficacy and safety of anticoagulant treatment is not established for patients with acute symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the calf. We aimed to assess whether therapeutic anticoagulation is superior to placebo in patients with symptomatic calf DVT. METHODS In this randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial, we enrolled low risk outpatients (without active cancer or previous venous thromboembolic disease) with a first acute symptomatic DVT in the calf from 23 university medical centres or community medical clinics in Canada, France, and Switzerland. We randomly assigned (1:1) patients to receive either the low molecular weight heparin nadroparin (171 UI/kg, subcutaneously, once a day) or placebo (saline 0*9% subcutaneously, once a day) for 6 weeks (42 days) Central randomisation was done using a computer generated randomisation list, stratified by study centre. Random allocation sequences of variable block size were centrally determined by an independent research clinical centre. Study staff, patients, and outcome assessors (central adjudication committee) were masked to group assignment. Numbered boxes of active drug or placebo were provided to pharmacies in identical packaging. All patients were prescribed compression stockings and followed up for 90 days. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite measure of extension of calf DVT to proximal veins, contralateral proximal DVT, and symptomatic pulmonary embolism at day 42 in the modified intention to treat population. The primary safety outcome was major or clinically relevant non major bleeding at day 42. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00421538. FINDINGS Between Feb 1, 2008, and Nov 30, 2014, we screened 746 patients, enrolling 259 patients (50% of the prespecified sample size) before the trial steering committee terminated the trial because of expiry of study drug and slow recruitment. The intention to treat analysis population comprised 122 patients in the nadroparin group and 130 in the placebo group. There was no significant difference between the groups in the composite primary outcome, which occurred in four patients (3% in the nadroparin group and in seven (5% in the placebo group (risk difference 2*1% 95% CI 7*8 to 3*5; p=0*54) Bleeding occurred in five patients (4% in the nadroparin group and no patients in the placebo group (risk difference 4*1, 95% CI 0*4 to 9*2; p=0*0255) In the nadroparin group one patient died from metastatic pancreatic cancer and one patient was diagnosed with heparin induced thrombocytopenia type 2. INTERPRETATION Nadroparin was not superior to placebo in reducing the risk of proximal extension or venous thromboembolic events in low risk outpatients with symptomatic calf DVT, but did increase the risk of bleeding. Avoidance of systematic anticoagulation for calf DVT could have a substantial impact on individual patients and from a public health perspective. FUNDING Swiss National Science Foundation, the Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique in France, and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
The Lancet. Haematology