The temporal nature of legitimation: the case of IFRS8
Abstract Legitimation can operate on an episodic or continual basis [Suchman, M.C. (1995) Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3) 571 610] We examine the temporal legitimation of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB)'s actions during the adoption and review of International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 8 'Operating Segments' We conceptualise the controversy surrounding IFRS8 as an episode when the IASB sought segmental reporting convergence with the US standard, Statement of Financial Accounting Standard 131. Interpreting evidence from 15 (20) semi structured interviews undertaken in 2009 (2011) before (after) entities reported under IFRS8, reveals its adoption precipitated an episodic legitimacy threat from selected audiences to the actions of the IASB. We discuss the IASB's attempt to influence legitimation for this episode through commitment to a post implementation review [IFRS Foundation. (2011) Post implementation reviews: Plan for developing the framework for conducting post implementation reviews. IASB Board meeting February 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2011, from http:/www.ifrs.org/NR/rdonlyres/3E1502E4 F1E8 4907 838B FFB20C7268ED/0/PIR02111st2ndb04obs.pdf] of IFRS8. Interpreting legitimacy concerns across diverse audiences about specific actions of the IASB (the introduction of IFRS8) enables us to draw conclusions about the resilience of the IASB as a standard setting organisation, in itself.