Lies that feel honest: Dissociating between incentive and deviance processing when evaluating dishonesty
This study investigated neural responses to evaluations of lies made by others. Participants learned about other individuals who were instructed to privately roll a die twice and report the outcome of the first roll to determine their pay (with higher rolls leading to higher pay) Participants evaluated three types of outcomes: honest reports, justifiable lies (reporting the second outcome instead of the first) or unjustifiable lies (reporting a different outcome than both die rolls) Evaluating lies relative to honest reports was associated with increased activation in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) insula and lateral prefrontal cortex. Moreover, justifiable lies were associated with even stronger activity in the dorsal ACC and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex compared to unjustifiable lies. These activities were more pronounced for justifiable lies where the deviance from the real outcome was larger. Together, these findings have implications for understanding how humans judge misconduct behavior of others.
Biological Psychology