Public attitudes toward stuttering in Europe: Within country and between country comparisons.
INTRODUCTION Epidemiological research methods have been shown to be useful in determining factors that might predict commonly reported negative public attitudes toward stuttering. Previous research has suggested that stuttering attitudes of respondents from North America and Europe (i.e. "The West" though characterized by stereotypes and potential stigma, are more positive than those from several other regions of the world. This inference assumes that public attitudes within various regions characterized by "The West" are similar. PURPOSE This study aimed to determine the extent to which public stuttering attitudes are similar or different both within regions of three different European countries and between or among five different European countries or similar geographic areas. It also aimed to compare these European attitudes to attitudes from 135 samples around the world using a standard measure. MATERIAL AND METHODS Using convenience sampling, 1111 adult respondents from eight different investigations completed the Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes Stuttering (POSHA S) in the dominant language of each country or area. In Study I, the authors compared attitudes within three different regions of Bosnia Herzegovina, Italy, and Norway. In Study II, the authors compared attitudes between combined samples from Bosnia Herzegovina, Italy, and Norway (with additional respondents from Sweden) and two other samples, one from Germany and the other from Ireland and England. RESULTS Attitudes of adults from the three samples within Bosnia Herzegovina, Italy, and Norway were remarkably similar. By contrast, attitudes between the five different countries or area were quite dramatically different. Demographic variables on the POSHA S did not predict the rank order of these between country/area differences. Compared to the POSHA S worldwide database, European attitudes ranged from less positive than average (i.e. Italians) to more positive than average (i.e. Norwegians and Swedes) CONCLUSION Factors related to national identity appear to play a significant role in differences in public attitudes in Europe and should be explored in future research.
Journal of communication disorders