The effect of an interactive delirium e learning tool on healthcare workers' delirium recognition, knowledge and strain in caring for delirious patients: a pilot pre test/post test study
BackgroundStudies investigating the effectiveness of delirium e learning tools in clinical practice are scarce. The aim of this study is to determine the effect of a delirium e learning tool on healthcare workers' delirium recognition, delirium knowledge and care strain in delirium.MethodsA pilot pre posttest study in a convenience sample of 59 healthcare workers recruited from medical, surgical, geronto psychiatric and rehabilitation units of a university hospital. The intervention consisted of a live information session on how to use the e learning tool and, a 2 month self active learning program. The tool included 11 e modules integrating knowledge and skill development in prevention, detection and management of delirium. Case vignettes, the Delirium Knowledge Questionnaire, and the Strain of Care for Delirium Index were used to measure delirium recognition, delirium knowledge and experienced care strain in delirium respectively. Subgroup analyses were performed for healthcare workers completing 0 to 6 versus 7 to 11 modules.ResultsThe delirium recognition score improved significantly (mean 3.1 SD 0.9 versus 2.7 1.1; P 0.04) and more healthcare workers identified hypoactive (P 0.04) and hyperactive (P 0.007) delirium in the posttest compared to the pretest phase. A significant difference in the change of recognition levels over time between the 0 to 6 and 7 to 11 module groups was demonstrated (P 0.03) with an improved recognition level in the posttest phase within the 7 to 11 module group (P 0.007) After adjustment for potential confounders, this difference in the change over time was not significant (P 0.07) and no change in recognition levels within the 7 to 11 module group was noted (P 0.19) The knowledge score significantly improved in the posttest compared to the pretest phase (mean 31.7 SD2.6 versus 28.3 4.5; P 0.001) with a significant increased level within the 7 to 11 module group (unadjusted P 0.001/adjusted P 0.02) Overall, no difference between posttest and pretest phases was documented for care strain (P 0.46).ConclusionThe e learning tool improved healthcare workers' delirium recognition and knowledge. The effect of the tool is related to its level of completion, but was less explicit after controlling for potential confounders and warrants further investigation. The level of strain did not improve.
BMC medical education