Surgical Regenerative Treatments for Peri Implantitis: Meta analysis of Recent Findings in a Systematic Literature Review
ABSTRACT Objectives The purpose of the present study was to systematically review the literature on the surgical regenerative treatment of the peri implantitis and to determine an effective therapeutic predictable option for their clinical management. Material and Methods The study searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from 2006 to 2016. Clinical human studies that had reported changes in probing depth (PD) and/or bleeding on probing (BOP) and/or radiologic marginal bone level (RBL) changes after peri implantitis surgical treatment at 12 month follow up or longer were included accordingly to PRISMA guidelines. Results The initial search obtained 883 citations. After screening and determination of eligibility, 18 articles were included in the review. The meta analysis of selected studies revealed that the weighted mean RBL fill was 1.97 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58 to 2.35 mm) PD reduction was 2.78 mm (95% CI 2.31 to 3.25 mm) and BOP reduced by 52.5% (95% CI 41.6 to 63.1% Defect fill in studies using and not using barrier membranes for graft coverage was 1.86 mm (95% CI 1.36 to 2.36 mm) and 2.12 mm (95% CI 1.46 to 2.78 mm) correspondingly. High heterogeneity among the studies regarding defects morphology, surgical protocols, and selection of biomaterials were found. Conclusions All included studies underlined an improvement of clinical conditions after the surgical regenerative treatment of peri implantitis, however, there is a lack of scientific evidence in the literature regarding the superiority of the regenerative versus non regenerative surgical treatment. The presence of a barrier membrane or submergence in the regenerative procedure does not seem to be fundamental in order to obtain clinical success of the surgery.
Journal of oral maxillofacial research