Five year clinical results of cervical total disc replacement compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2 level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption clinical trial.
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to report the outcome of a study of 2 level cervical total disc replacement (Mobi C) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) Although the long term outcome of single level disc replacement has been extensively described, there have not been previous reports of the 5 year outcome of 2 level cervical disc replacement. METHODS This study reports the 5 year results of a prospective, randomized US FDA investigational device exemption (IDE) study conducted at 24 centers in patients with 2 level, contiguous, cervical spondylosis. Clinical outcomes at up to 60 months were evaluated, including validated outcome measures, incidence of reoperation, and adverse events. The complete study data and methodology were critically reviewed by 3 independent surgeon authors without affiliation with the IDE study or financial or institutional bias toward the study sponsor. RESULTS A total of 225 patients received the Mobi C cervical total disc replacement device and 105 patients received ACDF. The Mobi C and ACDF follow up rates were 90.7% and 86.7% respectively (p 0.39) at 60 months. There was significant improvement in all outcome scores relative to baseline at all time points. The Mobi C patients had significantly more improvement than ACDF patients in terms of Neck Disability Index score, SF 12 Physical Component Summary, and overall satisfaction with treatment at 60 months. The reoperation rate was significantly lower with Mobi C (4% versus ACDF (16% There were no significant differences in the adverse event rate between groups. CONCLUSIONS Both cervical total disc replacement and ACDF significantly improved general and disease specific measures compared with baseline. However, there was significantly greater improvement in general and disease specific outcome measures and a lower rate of reoperation in the 2 level disc replacement patients versus ACDF control patients. Clinical trial registration no. NCT00389597 clinicaltrials.gov
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine