On the Size of Pairing Based Non interactive Arguments
Non interactive arguments enable a prover to convince a verifier that a statement is true. Recently there has been a lot of progress both in theory and practice on constructing highly efficient non interactive arguments with small size and low verification complexity, so called succinct non interactive arguments SNARGs and succinct non interactive arguments of knowledge SNARKs. Many constructions of SNARGs rely on pairing based cryptography. In these constructions a proof consists of a number of group elements and the verification consists of checking a number of pairing product equations. The question we address in this article is how efficient pairing based SNARGs can be. Our first contribution is a pairing based preprocessing SNARK for arithmetic circuit satisfiability, which is an NP complete language. In our SNARK we work with asymmetric pairings for higher efficiency, a proof is only 3 group elements, and verification consists of checking a single pairing product equations using 3 pairings ini 3/4 ?total. Our SNARK is zero knowledge and does not reveal anything about the witness the prover uses to make the proof. As our second contribution we answer an open question of Bitansky, Chiesa, Ishai, Ostrovsky and Paneth TCC 2013 by showing that linear interactive proofs cannot have a linear decision procedure. It follows from this that SNARGs where the prover and verifier use generic asymmetric bilinear group operations cannot consist of a single group element. This gives the first lower bound for pairing based SNARGs. It remains an intriguing open problem whether this lower bound can be extended to rule out 2 group element SNARGs, which would prove optimality of our 3 element construction.
EUROCRYPT