Improving the accounting of field emissions in the carbon footprint of agricultural products: a comparison of default IPCC methods with readily available medium effort modeling approaches
PurposeThe estimations of greenhouse gas (GHG) field emissions from fertilization and soil carbon changes are challenges associated with calculating the carbon footprint (CFP) of agricultural products. At the regional level, the IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (2006a) Tier 1 approach, based on default emission factors, insufficiently accounts for emission variability resulting from pedo climatic conditions or management practices. However, Tier 2 and 3 approaches are usually considered too complex to be practicable. In this paper, we discuss different readily available medium effort methods to improve the accuracy of GHG emission estimates.MethodsWe present four case studies two wheat crops in Germany and two peach orchards in Italy to test the performance of Tier 1, 2, and 3 methodologies and compare the estimated results with available field measurements. The methodologies selected at Tier 2 and Tier 3 level are characterized by simple implementation and data collection, for which only a medium level of effort for stakeholders is required. The Tier 2 method consists of calculating direct and indirect N2O, emissions from fertilization with a multivariate empirical model which accounts for pedo climatic and crop management conditions. The Tier 3 method entails simulation of soil carbon stock change using the Rothamsted carbon model.Results and discussionRelevant differences were found among the tested methodologies: in all case studies, the Tier 1 approach exceeded the Tier 2 estimations for fertilizer induced emissions (up to +50 and the measurements. Using this higher Tier approach reduced the estimated CFP calculation of annual crops by 4 and 21 and that of the perennial crop by 7 Removals related to positive soil carbon change calculated using the Tier 1 approach also exceeded the Tier 3 calculations for the studied annual crops (up to +90 but considerably underrated the Tier 3 estimations and measurements for perennial crops 75 In this case, the impact of the selected Tier method on the final CFP results was even more relevant: an increase of 194 and 88 for the studied annual crops and a decrease of 67 for the perennial crop case study.ConclusionsThe use of higher Tiers for the estimation of land based emissions is strongly recommended to improve the accuracy of the CFP results. The suggested medium effort methods tested in this study represent a good compromise between complexity reduction and accuracy improvement and can be considered reliable for the assessment of GHG mitigation potentials.
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment