Diagnostic Accuracy of Intracochlear Test Electrode for Acoustic Nerve Monitoring in Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery
Objectives: Cochlear implants (CIs) are a well-known hearing restoration option for patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) in cases of neurofibromatosis type-2 and, more recently, for patients with sporadic VS. One of the main limitations when performing CI during VS surgery is the capability to preserve the acoustic nerve (AN) anatomically and functionally. Significant efforts have been directed toward developing an intraoperative testing method for monitoring the AN function to determine if, after tumor removal, it is suitable for conducting stimuli delivered by a CI. However, all these methods have significant limitations, and none of them have documented diagnostic efficacy. To overcome these limitations and to obtain reliable information before CI insertion, a minimally invasive intracochlear test electrode (TE) has been recently developed. This TE has demonstrated to be suitable to test the integrity of the AN before CI in patients without any residual hearing by recording electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABR). The present study constitutes the next phase of this research, which was to determine the usefulness of EABR obtained intraoperatively with the intracochlear TE after the resection of a VS and to calculate its diagnostic accuracy to assess the functionality of the AN for CI. Design: This was a prospective, multicenter study of diagnostic accuracy. It was conducted in three tertiary referral centers between January 2015 and 2018. This study was designed following the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) statement guidelines. The STARD statement are guidelines to improve the completeness and transparency of reports of diagnostic accuracy studies. The diagnostic accuracy of the EABR evoked with the intracochlear TE after tumor removal was studied. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated. Patients eligible for the study were consecutive adults undergoing surgery for VS with simultaneous CI. The test under evaluation (index test) was the EABR obtained with the intracochlear TE after resection of the tumor. The reference test (gold standard) was the presence of auditory perception with the CI, defined as the presence of sound detection on an audiogram at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz of no greater than 50 dB. In all the cases, auditory perception was verified by the presence of a positive EABR evoked with the CI. Results: Twenty-one patients were included during the study period; seven patients were excluded from the diagnostic efficacy analysis due to inconclusive EABR results or absence of the gold standard to compare (they did not finally receive the CI). Thus, the outcome of the gold standard was assessed in 14 cases: 9 cases had positive EABR, all of them obtained auditory perception with the CI, and 5 cases had negative EABR, only one case had auditory perception with the CI, which constitutes the only false negative of this study. Accuracy of the TE was 93% (95% confidence interval, 66 to 100%), sensitivity 90% (95% confidence interval, 71 to 100%), specificity 100% (95% confidence interval, 100 to 100%), positive predictive value 100% (95% confidence interval, 100 to 100%), and negative predictive value 80% (95% confidence interval, 45 to 100%). Conclusions: EABR elicited with the intracochlear TE had a diagnostic accuracy of 93% for predicting auditory perception with CIs after VS removal. These results suggest that the intracochlear TE can be used intraoperatively after tumor removal to test the integrity of the AN as a useful tool to complement the surgeon’s perception for decision-making regarding implantation.