Improving the EU's Status in the UN and the UN System: An Objective without a Strategy?
The Lisbon Treaty emphasizes the EU’s commitment to multilateralism, stating that it ‘shall seek to develop relations and build partnerships with [...] international, regional or global organisations’ and to ‘promote multilateral solutions to common problems, in particular in the framework of the United Nations’ (Article 21(1), second para., TEU). One of its key goals in external relations is ‘to support and work for effective multilateralism, with the United Nations at its core’. However these global ambitions are often not matched by the level of participation and representation that the EU enjoys in the UN and the UN system. This contribution examines some of the legal and political issues that are at play as the EU attempts to enhance its cooperation with and representation in the UN and the UN system. It examines these issues with regard to UN bodies that have been identified as targets for closer co-operation and others where the EU could potentially pursue upgraded status. It analyses both the EU’s participation in the respective fora and the legal and political potential for improving the Union’s status. The EU not only remains faced with a series of internal and external obstacles as a participant within the UN and the UN system, barring it from taking up its leading role at the global level – it currently also lacks a convincing strategy to overcome them.
The EU Performance in Relation to Palestine’s Membership of UNESCO
This chapter explores the European Union’s (EU’s) post-Lisbon performance at the United Nations (UN), focusing on the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization’s (UNESCO’s) 31 October 2011 decision to grant Palestine membership. Falling into two parts, it shows that the EU scores better for output than for outcome and impact, and better for outcome than for impact. Part 1 reviews the literature on the EU’s functioning at UNESCO and looks into the dynamics of policy-formation, coordination and representation. Part 2 explores the EU’s involvement in the decision mentioned above, focusing on output, outcome and impact. The conclusion summarises the main findings and explores the way forward.
The European Community and the Adoption of International Food Standards within the Codex Alimentarius Commission
This article examines the way the European Community defends its interests in food safety matters within the Codex Alimentarius Commission. It shows that the European Community has strengthened its position as a policymaker within the Codex Commission. It also describes how the European members of the Codex Commission engaged (with mixed results) in the defence of certain principles typical of European food policy. These controversial principles are the precautionary principle, the need to consider factors other than science in determining food standards, and the need to label and make traceable food derived from biotechnology. Lastly, the article evaluates the function of the Codex Commission. Since, in at least two cases the discussions within the Codex Commission did not prevent WTO litigation, the value of the Codex Commission may be questioned. However, the overall assessment of the Codex Commission's activity is positive, since it provides an important and not easily replaceable forum to debate food safety issues, which are particularly sensitive for Codex members of the European Community.