Gwent Reviews Its Needs
Gwent Education Authority systematically evaluates its policies, procedures, administration and the financial arrangements for young people with special educational needs. Julien Kramer, director of education, London Borough of Greenwich, until recently divisional director of education, School Support and Finance, Gwent, who has been working with service partners, the voluntary bodies and the district auditor, highlights strengths and weaknesses in service arrangements in Gwent and sets an agenda for change in anticipation of the requirements of the 1993 Education Act.
Special educational needs and the voluntary groups. A report on the consultative process
Abstract Derbyshire an English county authority, recently held a series of consultative meetings with the voluntary bodies and support organisations to review its educational arrangements for children and young people with special educational needs and to plan future provision. The consultative process is described and discussed. Issues emerging from the consultations are assessed against a background of current special educational needs developments in the education service and with regard to the changing nature of those English voluntary organisations representing the interests of young people with serious learning difficulties or serious disability.
The New ‘U’
Today's talk about tenure must be framed within broader discussions about the role of the university. Our university system is now over one hundred years old, the “Old-Time College” is gone, the “cold war” university is no longer viable, and the foundations of the modern “multiversity” are cracking, so it is time to talk about change. But change is not necessarily reform, and resisting change probably will not keep things the way they are, so academics must understand the forces reshaping the university. Whenever I listen to colleagues defend the status quo by saying that the United States has a university system that is the envy of the world, I hear echoes of the Detroit automobile industry's casual dismissal of foreign competitors in the early 1960s. The decision not to change did not preserve the auto industry, and it is unlikely to preserve public universities as we know them. The current debates about tenure began with ideological attacks on “tenured radicals” who used their secure jobs to subvert conservative cultural values. The attack on tenure gathered steam as fiscal hawks in financially-strapped states looked for ways to save money and found huge state university systems with budgets to match. When asked why he robbed banks, the legendary Willie Sutton replied, “Because that's where the money is.” When asked why they are robbing tenure, legislators, regents, and administrators reply, “Because that's where the money is.” Personnel costs are a large share of university budgets and tenure ties the hands of administrators and legislators accustomed to using purse strings to control universities.