Local Politics and Democracy in Thailand
Abstract This article aimed to explain the development of the Thai local politics and democracy which originated from the concept of the administration decentralization, and to promote the importance of democracy basic principles learning. In developed countries it is evident that the progress of politics and democracy experienced the processes of tolerance, majority rules and minority rights, conflict solving, negotiation, and benefits assimilation. The early stage of the initiation of the Thai local administration, under the District Administration Act of the year 1994 has also caused the conflicts and violence to life and properties, as well as crimes and corruptions of those involved with local politicians. However, the experience from the past two decades has led to the development of communities and local politicians resulting in the development of public utilities including roads, water supply, water sources, public spaces, public properties, and local economy. The centralized phenomena, including the number of votes in the elections, protests, and silence during the coup d’etat, reflected the failure and weaknesses of the national administration. Thus, the development of local administration can be considered as a good lesson in solving conflicts and violence in the nation's politics.
Violência e política
For most of the political theory, the relationship between violence and politics has been left aside as an unpleasant fact about which it is better not to think. The article discusses this relationship, by taking three points of departure. (1) The question of the use of violence amplifies the Machiavellian drama of politics: the search for effectiveness in action in tension with the observance of normative principles. (2) It is possible to say, with Girard, that the political order is constituted to exorcise violence. The fact that politics seeks to prevent the irruption of what is in its substrate reinforces that tension. (3) In all this discussion, however, the focus is on open violence. The structural or systemic violence, linked to the current forms of domination and oppression, is set aside and is not marked as a deviation from the acceptable political modes. But their material effects are as clear as those of open violence. Thus, there is no way to discuss the relationship between violence and politics without introducing structural violence, which is often embedded in the very institutions that should prevent overt violence.
Method validation in pharmaceutical analysis
Method validation in pharmaceutical analysis , Method validation in pharmaceutical analysis , کتابخانه دیجیتال جندی شاپور اهواز