Evaluation of skin absorbed doses during manipulation of radioactive sources: a comparison between the VARSKIN code and Monte Carlo simulations
The evaluation of skin doses during manipulation of radioactive sources can be a critical issue for which the most accurate calculation strategies available should be used. The aim of this work was to compare the results of the analytical approach used in VARSKIN with the simulation of radiation transport and interaction by Monte Carlo calculations in GAMOS (GEANT4-based Architecture for Medicine-Oriented Simulations), and to provide an accurate and versatile tool for the evaluation of skin doses from radionuclide sources of any realistic shape (e.g. cylindrical, parallelepiped), even in the presence of multiple interposed absorber layers. A set of 20 radionuclides (pure β, β–γ, Auger and γ emitters) from among the most frequently employed in nuclear medicine and laboratory practices were selected for comparison. We studied a point-like and a cylindrical source, in the presence of varying thicknesses of absorbing layers. We found a general agreement for most nuclides when the source was directly in contact with skin or in the presence of a thin layer of absorbing material. However, when the thickness of the absorber increased, significant differences were found for several nuclides. In these cases, the proposed method based on a dedicated Monte Carlo simulation could give more accurate results in a reasonable time, which could optimise accuracy when assessing skin doses in routine as well as incidental exposure scenarios.
An analytical method for computing voxel S values for electrons and photons.
PURPOSE
The use of voxel S values (VSVs) is perhaps the most common approach to radiation dosimetry for nonuniform distributions of activity within organs or tumors. However, VSVs are currently available only for a limited number of voxel sizes and radionuclides. The objective of this study was to develop a general method to evaluate them for any spectrum of electrons and photons in any cubic voxel dimension of practical interest for clinical dosimetry in targeted radionuclide therapy.


METHODS
The authors developed a Monte Carlo simulation in Geant4 in order to evaluate the energy deposited per disintegration (E(dep)) in a voxelized region of soft tissue from monoenergetic electrons (10-2000 keV) or photons (10-1000 keV) homogeneously distributed in the central voxel, considering voxel dimensions ranging from 3 mm to 10 mm. E(dep) was represented as a function of a dimensionless quantity termed the "normalized radius," R(n) = R∕l, where l is the voxel size and R is the distance from the origin. The authors introduced two parametric functions in order to fit the electron and photon results, and they interpolated the parameters to derive VSVs for any energy and voxel side within the ranges mentioned above. In order to validate the results, the authors determined VSV for two radionuclides ((131)I and (89)Sr) and two voxel dimensions and they compared them with reference data. A validation study in a simple sphere model, accounting for tissue inhomogeneities, is presented.


RESULTS
The E(dep)(R(n)) for both monoenergetic electrons and photons exhibit a smooth variation with energy and voxel size, implying that VSVs for monoenergetic electrons or photons may be derived by interpolation over the range of energies and dimensions considered. By integration, S values for continuous emission spectra from β(-) decay may be derived as well.


CONCLUSIONS
The approach allows the determination of VSVs for monoenergetic (Auger or conversion) electrons and (x-ray or gamma-ray) photons by means of two functions whose parameters can be interpolated from tabular data provided. Through integration, it is possible to generalize the method to any continuous (beta) spectrum, allowing to calculate VSVs for any electron and photon emitter in a voxelized structure.
Analysis of the stress wave effect during coal breakage by a high-pressure abrasive air jet
In view of the defects of borehole collapse, inhibition of gas desorption and migration of gas existing in hydraulic fracturing and other hydraulic permeability–increasing measures for soft coal seams with low-permeability technology is proposed for coal breakage by a high-pressure abrasive gas jet for relieving pressure and increasing permeability. The comparative analysis of gas jet flow field structure between convergent nozzle and Laval nozzle has been given by numerical simulation. For Laval nozzle, the expansion wave and compression wave alternate and move forward steadily in gas jet and vanish when potential core length reaches maximum. So, the Laval nozzle can form more stable flow filed structure of gas jet and avoid shock wave in gas jet. Furthermore, a high-speed camera is adopted to analyze the jet structure and verify the conclusion of numerical simulation. Based on thermodynamic theory, this article calculates and analyzes the critical local sound velocity and pressure generated from the stress wave during the process of coal breakage by the gas jet. Furthermore, experimental coal breakage by a high-pressure abrasive gas jet is carried out. The high-pressure abrasive gas jet impacts the coal body as a quasi-static load and a dynamic load and forms corrosion pits on the surface of the coal body. Penetrating cracks are formed within the coal in the pattern of the loaded stress wave which leads to coal breakage. The effects of porosity and permeability on the propagation of the stress wave in coal are analyzed by establishing the dispersion equation for the spread of the stress wave in coal. The results show that porosity has a significant effect on wave velocity and that the attenuation of the stress wave is intensified with an increase in porosity. Moreover, the stress wave attenuation is more obvious at high frequency. The effect of permeability on the wave velocity is not significant at low frequencies. In contrast, at high frequency and relatively low permeability, the wave velocity increases with the permeability, and the attenuation of the wave velocity initially increases and then decreases. When the permeability is greater than 10−11 m2, the wave velocity is not affected by the permeability. However, the stress wave is not attenuated.