Quantitative determination of glufosinate in biological samples by liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection after p-nitrobenzoyl derivatization.
We have established a new HPLC method for derivatizing and quantifying glufosinate (GLUF) in human serum and urine using p-nitrobenzoyl chloride (PNBC). The p-nitrobenzoyl derivative of GLUF (PNB-GLUF) was produced quantitatively over 10 min at room temperature. PNB-GLUF possesses the property of ultraviolet (UV) light absorption with a lambda(max) of 272.8 nm, and was isolated from biological specimens by reversed-phase chromatography using Inertsil Ph-3. In experiments at a UV wavelength of 273 nm, GLUF has a quantitative detection limit of 0.005 microg/ml, and when it was added to both serum and urine to yield concentrations of 0.1-1000 microg/ml, its recovery rate was quite satisfactory: at least 93.8% in all cases. Further, the measured amounts of GLUF in 23 serum samples from patients intoxicated by ingestion of GLUF compared favorably with those obtained by fluorescence derivatization-HPLC using 9-fluorenylmethyl chloroformate (R=0.998). This technique of analysis is, in addition, applicable for Glyphosat, which possesses a chemical structure resembling that of GLUF, and it will be of great use in the determination of these two compounds.
Neurological effects of glufosinate poisoning with a brief review
Herbicides containing glufosinate ammonium are widely used in many countries including Japan. Many Japanese cases of accidental and suicidal poisoning by glufosinate have been reported since 1989. We report a case of a 64- year old man who ingested glufosinate in an attempted suicide. The patient suffered mental disturbances and hematological changes together with gastrointestinal effects shortly after ingesting the poison, and later developed generalized convulsions, impaired respiration and circulatory failure. During recovery he exhibited loss of short-term memory (retrograde and anterograde amnesia). Neurotoxicity is a characteristic of glufosinate poisoning, although the mechanism is not clear. From the analysis of clinical symptoms of previously published cases, glufosinate toxicity appears to arise both from the active ingredient and the surfactant in the formulation.
History, criminology and the ‘use’ of the past
This article considers why, despite an apparent congruence of subject matter and methodologies, the disciplines of sociological criminology and criminal justice history are not more closely aligned. It contends that intellectual traffic between the two fields is not usually limited by institutional barriers, nor is it a legacy of the disciplinary antipathy which existed between history and sociology in Britain during the mid-twentieth century. Rather, it is due to the different ‘purposes’ with which sociological criminologists and criminal justice historians imbue their work and to the differing disciplinary perceptions of the relationship between the past, present and future which result from this. These different ‘purposes’ are traced via a consideration of the paths of development of the two disciplines from the 1940s. The article concludes by proposing an arena for future collaboration between criminal justice historians and sociological criminologists.