A linear model for determining coordination of two adjacent signalized intersections
Purpose – Urban networks are usually divided into several open or closed sub‐networks. Signal coordination has been recognized as one of the most efficient methods of controlling sub‐networks that have independently optimized timing plans. However, coordinating adjacent intersections in a network is a basic prerequisite to optimizing signal‐timing plans for sub‐networks. This paper aims to develop a linear model to support decisions regarding coordination of adjacent signals.Design/methodology/approach – This paper aims to develop a linear model to support decisions regarding coordination of adjacent signals. The tests of this model which using the field data differ from those for calibration from various roadways, indicating that the model has transferability. Evaluations using microscopic simulation show that the model can objectively determine whether or not to interconnect adjacent signals depending on various traffic demands.Findings – The model was calibrated by stepwise regression analysis with a t...
Modelling correlation degree between two adjacent signalised intersections for dynamic subarea partition
Correlation degree between adjacent signalised intersections is considered as the most important component in subarea partition algorithm. In this study, contributing factors for subarea partition are selected by taking into consideration the differences with respect to cycle lengths, link length and path flow between upstream and downstream coordinated phases. Their impacts on performance index of subarea partition are further studied using numerical experiments. The study then proceeds to propose a correlation degree index (CI) as an alternative for the performance index in order to reduce the computational complexity. The relationship between CI and the contributing factors is established to predict the correlation degree. Finally, the model is validated using field survey data.
Complications of motility peg placement for porous hydroxyapatite orbital implants
Aim: To evaluate the complications associated with pegging of porous hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Methods: Complications associated with pegging were retrospectively reviewed from the charts of 100 of 133 patients with hydroxyapatite implantation from 1993 to 2000. Results: 48 (48%) of the 100 hydroxyapatite implanted patients who had undergone pegging were found to have problems with their pegs, including discharge (45.8%), peg falling out (20.8%), pyogenic granulomas (16.7%), popping peg (14.6%), hydroxyapatite visible around peg hole (8.3%), part of peg shaft visible (6.2%), peg drilled off centre (6.2%), peg drilled at an angle (4.2%), and excess movement of peg (4.2%). The standard peg fell out statistically more often than the peg and sleeve system (Yates's corrected χ2, p=0.038). There was a trend towards complications of the peg with use of a standard peg (versus sleeved peg) (p=0.226). Conclusions: There are several potential complications of pegging. Most complications are minor and can be managed successfully.