DETERMINING PHASE-SPACE PROPERTIES OF THE LEDA RFQ OUTPUT BEAM
Quadruple scans were used to characterize the LEDA RFQ beam. Experimental data were fit to computer simulation models for the rms beam size. The codes were found to be inadequate in accurately reproducing details of the wire scanner data. When this discrepancy is resolved, we plan to fit using all the data in wire scanner profiles, not just the rms value.
High Power Operations of LEDA
The LEDA RFQ, a 350-MHz continuous wave (CW) radio-frequency quadrupole (RFQ), successfully accelerated a 100-mA CW proton beam from 75 keV to 6.7 MeV. We have accumulated 111 hr of beam on time with at least 90 mA of CW output beam current. The 8-m-long RFQ accelerates a dc, 75-keV, ~106-mA H+ beam from the LEDA injector with ~94% transmission. When operating the RFQ at the RF power level for which it was designed, the peak electrical field on the vane tips is 33 MV/m. However, to maintain the high transmission quoted above with the CW beam, it was necessary to operate the RFQ with field levels ~10% higher than design. The RFQ dissipates 1.5 MW of RF power when operating with this field. Three klystrons provide the 2.2 MW of RF power required by the RFQ to accelerate the 100-mA beam. The beam power is 670 kW. Some of the challenges that were met in accelerating a 100-mA CW proton beam to 6.7 MeV, will be discussed.
Fieldwork in geography teaching: A critical review of the literature and approaches
Abstract Virtually all lecturers in geography recognise the importance of fieldwork as a vital mode of teaching in the subject. This paper draws on material produced as part of a HEFCE review of teaching and learning in the field and assesses the implications of recent changes in higher education for field studies in geography. The literature on the development of, and recent changes in, fieldwork practice is reviewed and assumptions about appropriate forms of teaching and assessment are challenged. The need for carefully integrated preparation of project‐orientated fieldwork is stressed and the importance of debriefing and feedback after field visits is emphasised. Various suggestions for guidelines on good practice are presented. Finally, a range of future issues and problems in fieldwork is identified and discussed.