Structures of 5,5-disubstituted cyanoiminobarbituric acids
O. A. Erastov, S. N. Ignat'eva, and T. V. Malkova, Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin., No. i0, 1313-1319 (1971). Japanese Patent No. 8271; Ref. Zh. Khim., No. 16, 58000P (1959). Japanese Patent No. 8871; Ref. Zh. Khim., No. 18, 74348P (1960). Japanese Patent No. 9538; Ref. Zh. Khim., No. 9, N79P (1971). B. I. Shapira, A. A. Malina, G. Z. Yakovleva, et al., Khim.farm. Zh., No. 6, 46-49 (1969). F. Korte and F. Wusten, Tetrahedron, 19, No. 9, 1423-1436 (1963).
Orthoamide, IX über die Umsetzung CH‐acider Verbindungen mit Amidacetalen, einem Aminal‐tert.‐butylester und Tris‐dimethylamino‐methan
Orthoamide reagieren mit wasserfreier Blausaure und Alkinen zu 2-Dimethylamino-2-alkoxy-nitrilen (2, 4, 6, 8, 10), 2.2-Bis-dimethylamino-nitrilen (12, 12a) und 3.3-Bis-dimethylamino-alkinen-(l) (14–16). Aus Methan-Derivaten und Dimethylformamid-diathylacetal (1) ent-stehen in der Warme die alkylierten Methan-Derivate (25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 34) und mit dem Aminal-tert.-butylester 11 unter milden Reaktionsbedingungen die Tetramethylformamidini-um-Salze(31,32, 33,35). 
 
 
 
Orthoamides, IX: Reaction of CH-Acidic Compounds with Amide Acetals, an Aminal-tert-butylester and Tris(dimethylamino)methane 
 
 
 
Orthoamides react with hydrogen cyanide and alkynes to give 2-dimethylamino-2-alkoxy-nitriles (2, 4, 6, 8, 10), 2,2-bis(dimethylamino)nitriles (12,12a), and 3,3-bis(dimethylamino)-alkynes (14–16). Methane derivatives heated with dimethylformamide diathylacetal (1) react to form the alkylated methane derivatives (25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 34), whereas under mild conditions methane derivatives react with the aminal tert-butylester 11 to produce tetramethyl-formamidinium salts (31, 32, 33, 35).
The Politics of Truth: Power in Nietzsche’s Epistemology
This article concerns first a curiosity found in Friedrich Nietzsche’s The Antichrist. In the midst of a heated attack on Christianity, Nietzsche detours into a discussion of epistemology. I argue that this turn indicates the importance of epistemology, and illustrates its political and moral character. The weak, who cannot tolerate uncertainty and shades of gray, seek to impose an epistemology of clarity and certainty. At the same time, the strong, who revel in ambiguity, seek to enjoy the richness and subtlety of a non-dichotomous view of the world. This is a political struggle because the weak cannot allow the strong’s epistemology to exist, let alone prevail. It is not surprising, then, that Nietzsche talks about epistemology in the midst of attacking Christianity: its view of truth is essential to its mission of taming the nobles. Here, I consider Nietzsche as a political thinker in a different light. Political battles are fought far beyond the halls of government. Nietzsche is a political thinker; one, however, who looks at politics in an uncommon way.