RESPONSE OF NITROGEN FERTILIZATION ON BT AND NON-BT COTTON (Gossypium hirsutum) HYBRIDS
A field experiment was conducted during 2006 and 2007 (June- December) at New Delhi to assess the performance of three cotton hybrids of which two Bt (MRC 6304 & RCH 317) and one non-Bt cotton hybrid LHH 144 (North zone check) in response to nitrogen fertilization (0, 60, 120 and 180 kg ha -1 ). Based on pooled analysis, both Bt hybrids produced similar seed cotton yield (SCY). Bt hybrid have produced 7.1 bolls/plant (on an average) and bolls 0.48 g heavier than non Bt hybrid LHH 144 that lead to 1.07 t ha -1 higher SCY of Bt hybrids than non-Bt hybrid (1.93 t ha -1 ). Though the N uptake by cotton hybrids was statistically similar N harvest index (NHI) was higher in Bt hybrid (57.85) as compared to non-Bt hybrid (40.5). The agronomic N use efficiency (ANUE) was highest in MRC 6304 Bt (6.44) and least in LHH 144 non-Bt cotton (3.91). Cotton growth, yield attributes, SCY, and N uptake increased with each successive increase to the highest level of 180 kg ha -1 however, the N response of cotton was quadratic in nature with optimum dose of 173.0 kg ha -1 . The NHI decreased with increase in N dose i.e. from the highest of 56.3 in control to the lowest of 48.8 with 180 kg ha -1 N fertilization. ANUE and physiological NUE that was highest with 60 (5.73) and 120 kg N fertilization (17.05), respectively and decreased with further increase in N dose. The cotton hybrid x N interaction effect revealed that Bt cottons have quadratic N response while non-Bt cotton has linear N response. From the economic point of view, Bt hybrids with 120 kg Nha -1 could be optimum dose for cotton cultivation. DOI:  http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/sja.v11i1.18389 SAARC J. Agri., 11(1): 121-132 (2013)
Fertilizers, BT technology, and insecticides contributed to 60%, 23%, and 17%, respectively to the increase in BT cotton yield: An analysis from 2000 to 2014 in India
Complementary technologies and agricultural practices capable of sustaining profitability to the farmers cultivating BtCotton in India require urgent attention. In India, approval of Btcotton, cultivation of fertilizer-intensive hybrids, higher dose of fertilizer application by farmers, usage of novel pesticides all happened simultaneously during the same period (2002-04) which makes very difficult to identify the individual effect in the yield gain of cotton. In this background, we attempted to understand the proportionate contribution of fertilizers, BT technology and novel group of pesticides in enhancing cotton yield in India. For the analysis, linear regression model and change in partial factor productivity (PFP) of cotton was considered in four different scenarios for yield estimation between 2000 and 2014, i.e. Scenario I: Cotton yield in the absence of technology and enhanced fertilizers usage, Scenario II: Cotton yield only due to enhanced fertilizer usage, Scenario III: Cotton yield with enhanced fertilizer and application of novel pesticides for the insect control, and Scenario IV: Cotton yield due to BT technology, enhanced use of fertilizer, and novel insecticides (actual yield of Cotton in India during Bt phase).Their comparison showed that the individual effect of fertilizers, BT technology and insecticides contributed to 60%, 23% and 17% of cotton yield, respectively in India. Further, 18% reduction in PFP was observed recently as compared to 2003-08. Besides, 125 Kg/ha of fertilizers was identified as optimum dose for sustaining high yield in cotton. Thus, present analysis identified the individual effect of different technologies contributing to the yield of cotton in India which can be used in decision making processes for crop improvement. Further, in our opinion, three strategies namely drip fertigation, intercrossing Bt and non-Bt hybrids for resistance management in bollworms, and IPM for sucking pests will primarily drive the research priorities and policy actions for the next 5 to 10 years in sustaining the economic benefits of the six million cotton farmers in India.
Perceived job importance and job performance satisfaction of selected clinical nutrition management responsibilities.
A nationwide survey of clinical nutrition managers was conducted to assess perceived importance of selected job responsibilities and perceived performance satisfaction of those job responsibilities. A questionnaire was developed to achieve the study objectives, validated by an expert panel, and pilot-tested prior to data collection. All members of the American Dietetic Association's Clinical Nutrition Management dietetic practice group (N=1,668) were asked to rate the importance of selected job responsibilities and their satisfaction with those responsibilities using Likert-type scales with descriptions. Results revealed that clinical nutrition managers perceived all job responsibilities listed in the questionnaire to be important (ie, the mean score of each responsibility was >3.0 of a 4.0 scale). Respondents rated regulatory-related job responsibilities as most important and were most satisfied with their performance of these responsibilities. Following regulatory-related responsibilities, clinical nutrition managers perceived patient satisfaction and staff retention to be more important than other responsibilities. In general, clinical nutrition managers were more satisfied with their job performance for job responsibilities that they ranked as more important.