Leaching of Arsenic from Wastes of Arsenic Removal Systems
Arsenic in groundwater was first detected in Bangladesh at Chapai Nawabgonj district in 1993. Since then arsenic contamination problem has been reported from almost every parts of the country. It is estimated that approximately 27% of the wells are contaminated with levels above 50ppb, the current drinking water standard for arsenic in Bangladesh (Kinninburg, D. G., et al., 2001). It is also estimated that about 77 million people are at risk of arsenic poisoning. A number of technologies are now available for end-of-the-pipe treatment arsenic present in groundwater. These are primarily based on coagulation and filtration. Some of the technologies use alum or ferric chloride as coagulants followed by filtration through a sand column. Other technologies are based on sedimentation and/or filtration through activated/doubly activated column/granular ferric hydroxide column. Aggressive leaching adopted in the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) at pH ≤ 5 when applied to the wastes collected from different arsenic removal units has not produced lechate concentrations significant enough to term the wastes toxic as per the USEPA regulatory levels. However, TCLP may not be suitable for assessment of long-term leaching of arsenic from arsenicrich waste, because such leaching may be kinetically restricted. Thus, modification of TCLP to represent the natural leaching environment comparable to real disposal conditions is necessary. Tests under modified TCLP may provide different results. The users are currently practicing a number of arsenic-sludge disposal options. The sub-aqueous disposal 162 Fate of Arsenic in the Environment and buried in mud or mixed with organic matters has been considered for studying the anaerobic leaching of arsenic from solids and multiphasic sludge. This option addresses the situation where the users dispose the sludge/waste into a nearby pond where it is mixed with mud and a small amount of domestic sewage. For both the solid wastes and the mutiphasic sludge, the leaching of arsenic into the overlying aqueous phase showed similar trend where the arsenic concentration peaked within the first week and then tapered off and disappeared after twelve weeks. Absence of residual arsenic in the solids following anaerobic leaching indicate that a significant amount of arsenic is lost through biomethylation induced by the presence of organic matters used in the leaching experiment.
Anaerobic Disposal of Arsenic-Bearing Wastes Results in Low Microbially Mediated Arsenic Volatilization.
The removal of arsenic from drinking water sources produces arsenic-bearing wastes, which are disposed of in a variety of ways. Several disposal options involve anaerobic environments, including mixing arsenic waste with cow dung, landfills, anaerobic digesters, and pond sediments. Though poorly understood, the production of gaseous arsenic species in these environments can be a primary goal (cow dung mixing) or an unintended consequence (anaerobic digesters). Once formed, these gaseous arsenic species are readily diluted in the atmosphere. Arsenic volatilization can be mediated by the enzyme arsenite S-adenosylmethionine methyltransferase (ArsM) or through the enzymes involved in methanogenesis. In this study, methanogenic mesocosms with arsenic-bearing ferric iron waste from an electrocoagulation drinking water treatment system were used to evaluate the role of methanogenesis in arsenic volatilization using methanogen inhibitors. Arsenic volatilization was highest in methanogenic mesocosms, but represented <0.02% of the total arsenic added. 16S rRNA cDNA sequencing, qPCR of mcrA transcripts, and functional gene array-based analysis of arsM expression, revealed that arsenic volatilization correlated with methanogenic activity. Aqueous arsenic concentrations increased in all mesocosms, indicating that unintended contamination may result from disposal in anaerobic environments. This highlights that more research is needed before recommending anaerobic disposal intended to promote arsenic volatilization.
Numerical tools applied to power reactor noise analysis
In order to be able to calculate the space- and frequency-dependent neutron noise in real inhomogeneous systems in two-group theory, a code was developed for the calculation of the Green's function (dynamic transfer function) of such systems. This paper reports on the development as well as the test and application of the numerical tools employed. The code that was developed yields the space-dependence of the fluctuations of the neutron flux induced by fluctuating properties of the medium in the two-group diffusion approximation and in a two-dimensional representation of heterogeneous systems, for both critical systems and non-critical systems with an external source. Some applications of these tools to power reactor noise analysis are then described, including the unfolding of the parameters of the noise source from the induced neutron noise, measured at a few discrete locations throughout the core. Other concrete applications concern the study of the space-dependence of the Decay Ratio in Boiling Water Reactors, the noise-based estimation of the Moderator Temperature Coefficient of reactivity in Pressurized Water Reactors, the modeling of the beam- and shell-mode core-barrel vibrations in Pressurized Water Reactors, and the investigation of the validity of the point-kinetic approximation in subcritical systems driven by an external source. In most of these applications, calculations performed using the code are compared with at-power plant measurements. Power reactor noise analysis applications of the above type, i.e. core monitoring without disturbing plant operation, is of particular interest in the framework of the extensive program of power uprates worldwide.