A TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT PLANNING MODEL: THE LOAD-NODE CONCEPT
Abstract The use of the traffic assignment model in urban transportation planning is universal; however, traffic assignment in its present form is expensive, cumbersome, and has serious limitations. In this research the authors have developed and tested the load-node concept of traffic assignment which reduces many of these problems. In the load-node concept the corners of zone boundaries are used for points of trip origins and destinations. In this manner the zone centroids and associated connector linkages of the network are removed. This results in a substantial reduction in network coding. In this study the total number of nodes required to define the network decreased by almost 3000 to 995 and the number of links in the network decreased by two-thirds. The forecasted 1990 Phoenix metropolitan area was used to test this approach and the average link volumes of all-or-nothing capacity restraint assignments using both the load-node and zone centroid concepts formed the basis of the comparison. The analyses indicated the average link volumes of the two concepts are comparable. A probable reduction in computer time of 40 + per cent was obtained when the load-node concept was used. The authors suggest that this approach is primarily adaptable for planning purposes and not design. With respect to the design use of traffic assignment results, the travel between adjacent zones is seldom included in the major arterial street and freeway traffic volumes obtained from zone centroid assignment. This may result in a substantial underestimation of future traffic volume and turning movements particularly if stepped down 24-hr assignments are used for design purposes. The load-node approach does assign travel between adjacent zones.
Traffic Assignment in Practice: Overview and Guidelines for Users
This paper presents an overview of the elements of traffic assignment and a synthesis of the problems that may be encountered in applying traffic-assignment models in practice. The elements include preparing the transportation network, establishing the origin-destination (OD) demands, identifying a traffic-assignment technique, calibrating and validating a model, and forecasting. The practical problems of traffic assignment are classified into four categories: network-representation problems, system-subarea data-translation problems, model-calibration problems, and forecasting problems. The paper presents the state of the art in traffic-assignment elements and provides specific guidelines on their implementation in practice and on the resolution of the identified problems. This paper is one of a series being produced by the Urban Transportation Division (UTD) Transportation Planning Committee of ASCE.
Hobbes and the Reception of Leviathan
Although there has been much discussion of the reception of Hobbes’s work, Hobbes’s response to his own reception has rarely received much consideration. This article looks at Hobbes’s engagements with his critics. Far from being rearguard actions by a philosopher under siege, or disingenuous attempts to curry favour with those in power, they can be read as moments when Hobbes in fact sought to convert what he saw as the “truth of speculation into the utility of practice.”