Interview Techniques in International Criminal Court and Tribunals
In this chapter we will discuss the interview techniques that interviewers report being used in international criminal courts and tribunals such as at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and the International Criminal Court (ICC) with regards to suspects and “insider witnesses” to alleged international crimes (war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide). Much of the evidence in these trials is elicited from witnesses, victims and suspects, and therefore the way in which they are interviewed is critical to successful prosecutions of the guilty. Interviewing of suspects is as important as interviewing victims and witnesses, as this can assist with information gathering and the process towards establishing the truth (or at least partial truth) of these horrendous crimes and their surrounding context. The interviewers came from a variety of cultural and educational backgrounds (including both law enforcement and the legal profession) and, as such, international criminal investigators and prosecutors are likely to be influenced by their national training and experience. These differences may impact significantly on the interview processes and techniques used to interview individuals concerning international crimes such as genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. Yet despite these differences, the interviewers endorsed establishing rapport, using open questions, and encouraging free-recall. They also emphasised the importance of using evidence effectively and being aware of cultural issues. The need for specialised training of all investigators was also highlighted, in order to ensure a certain level of competency in specific techniques.
Negotiated history: the historical record in international criminal law and plea bargaining
One of the most important functions of the international criminal trial is to create an accurate and accessible historical record. This paper analyses to what extent plea bargaining can hinder or facilitate the establishment of the historical record. Drawing on the experience of the ICTY and the ICTR the author makes a number of proposals as to what how and to extent plea bargaining should be used at the ICC to advance rather than to obstruct the historical record.
Investigative Interviewing of Suspected Sex Offenders: A Review of What Constitutes Best Practice
Research on the topic of investigative interviewing of suspected sex offenders is still in its infancy, with the majority of work to date focusing on developing theories underlying confessions, and reflecting on the value of specific interview techniques that have been observed in the field. This paper provides a synthesis of the literature in order to produce a preliminary guide to best practice for the interviewing of this particular interviewee group. Specifically, this review is structured around five elements that should be considered when planning for and administering the interview. These elements include: (a) establishing rapport, (b) introducing the topic of concern, (c) eliciting narrative detail, (d) clarification/specific questions and (e) closure. The unique contribution of this paper is its practical focus, and its synthesis of findings across a variety of streams, including the general eyewitness memory literature, legislation and case law, therapeutic literature, and research specifically related to the interviewing of offenders (including confessions). At the conclusion of the review, recommendations are offered for further research.