Influence of reinforcement arrangement in flexural fire behavior of hollow core slabs
Abstract This paper describes standard scale fire tests conducted on four precast prestressed hollow core slabs configurations under flexure. The influence of the reinforcement arrangement was investigated using two test parameters: the average axis distance (from 30.1 to 46.7 mm), and the type of reinforcement (5 mm diameter wires and 9.5 mm diameter strands). An ISO 834 standard fire was applied maintaining the load level in a four-point test arrangement constant. The results presented different failure mechanisms, types of cracks, spalling patterns, and fire resistance ratings and it was shown that wires displayed optimal behavior as opposed to strands. A comparison was carried out with the current verification methods provided in Eurocode 2 part 1–2, and showed that verification methods tend to overestimate the calculation of fire resistance when both wire and strands are moved away from the exposed surface.
Shear capacity of prestressed hollow core slabs in slim floor constructions
Research in Finland and Germany reveals that the shear strength of hollow core slabs is reduced considerably due to transverse stresses when the slabs are bedded on flexible supports (e.g. slender beams). The aim of the present investigation is to analyse the load bearing behaviour of hollow core slabs supported on shallow steel beams, so-called slim floor constructions. This paper describes four full-scale tests on two-span floor systems and reference tests on single slabs with rigid supports. The observed shear strengths are compared with predicted failure loads according to international code provisions. Finally, recommendations regarding the design and the construction on flexible supports are given.
Recalculation of Mass Defects
THE well-known mass defect curve of the old nuclear scheme calculated with regard to α-particles and protons presented a difficulty with its minimum of binding energy for tin and an increasing portion between tin and lead. On the other hand, the mass defect values against protons give a rather smoothly decreasing curve.1 As has already been pointed out,2 the number of α-particles must be considerably reduced from the point of view of the new scheme, which does not admit any electrons in nuclei, but only neutrons and protons (presumably joined as α-particles). The curve of mass defect against protons and neutrons (perhaps with a single ‘central’ α-particle) is very similar to the old curve against protons, but decreases less rapidly. Clearly the new mass defect values relatively to α-particles, neutrons and protons must lie somewhere between the old values computed relative to protons and α-particles respectively (because the number of α-particles is decreased). We may emphasise that this new mass defect curve shows no increasing portion between tin and lead. For illustration we give two typical values: Old: 50Sn124 = 31α + 12&#38;epsiv;; mass defect = 0.158 (in mass units); 82Pb208 = 52α + 22&#38;epsiv;; mass defect = 0.035. New: 50Sn124= 25α + 24ω (ω = neutron); mass defect = 0.304; 82Pb208 = 41α + 44ω; mass defect = 0.366.