[Audiological evaluation of the middle ear implant--temporal auditory acuity].
Temporal auditory acuities provided by the middle ear implant (MEI) and by the hearing aid (HA) were compared in ten patients implanted with the MEI. Test sounds used in the experiment were tone bursts [rise and fall time: 25 msec, duration (t): 982-1000 msec, interval (T): 1000 msec] of 500 Hz or 2000 Hz at 70 dBSPL. A speaker was placed in front of a subject one meter apart. At first, the subject adjusted the gain control of outer unit at the most comfortable loudness level. He heard totally fifty times of the test sounds, which varied in duration each 2 msec difference between 982 and 1000 msec and were provided in random manner. Therefore, sound of each duration was given 5 times. The notch [= (T-t) x 2] of the test sounds recognized by the patients was regarded as time gap. Fifty percent discrimination thresholds, which were indicated by the gap times of the test sounds half identified, were obtained as the index of the temporal auditory acuity. Following the above test, performance of the HA was investigated by use of the same procedure. The results indicated that the temporal auditory acuities of the MEI were superior to those of the HA at 500 Hz (P less than 0.01) and 2000 Hz (P less than 0.001). When the intensity of the test sound at 2000 Hz decreased from 70 dBSPL to 60 or 50 dBSPL, the temporal auditory acuities of the MEI and the HA were almost depreciated together with consistent difference in the test of 6 patients (P less than 0.01, 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Long-term results using a piezoelectric semi-implantable middle ear hearing device: the Rion Device E-type.
The Rion Device E-type (RDE) has been applied to 39 patients with severe mixed deafness that could not be rehabilitated by surgical means or the conventional hearing aid. Careful follow-up studies have been conducted on all of them to assess clinical and audiologic results. The device could function more than 10 years, affording natural quality of hearing without howling and wearing discomforts. Functional principles of the device, indications, and surgical methods of implantation are described. The failures and delayed problems were also presented together with the preventive measures.
Audition via electromagnetic induction.
Three normal and two hard-of-hearing subjects were studied using an electromagnetic induction system. A magnet attached to the tympanic membrane or ossicles served as transducer and a clinical audiometer with primary induction coil attached to the output was the energy source. The coil was placed on the patient's mastoid. Pure-tone and speech testing were performed in this manner and compared with conventional audiometry. Sound sensations produced by both methods were compared, and no differences in speech intelligibility were noted.