Free Trade Today by Jagdish Bhagwati Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford, 2002, pp. 121. Free Trade under Fire by Douglas A. Irwin Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford, 2002, pp. 253.
Free Trade Today by Jagdish Bhagwati and Free Trade under Fire by Douglas A. Irwin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bijit Bora The Role of the World Trade Organization in Global Governance by Gary P. Sampson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Miles Kahler The Political Economy of Environmental Protectionism by Achim Körber . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Axel Michaelowa
Trade concentration and dynamics of the Norwegian imports: an application of R-MANOVA model
This article proposes to analyse trade concentration and dynamics of the Norwegian import's expenditures by applying the two-way random effect MANOVA (R-MANOVA) model. The MANOVA model factors considered in this econometric analysis are origin continents or countries (spatial effects) and the business cycles (dynamic effects). The R-MANOVA model fit estimation results confirms that the Norwegian import trade is sustainable in both short and long run controlling for the effect of both origin continent and business cycles. More importantly, the expenditure and the share of Norwegian imports across the continents show considerable dynamics. The overall econometric estimation results suggest that across all continents the Norwegian import expenditure is increasing with time. However, the share of the Norwegian import expenditures across continents is relatively stable. The analysis confirms that European exporters will be the leading partners for Norwegian import expenditures in future trade patterns. The ranking of the remaining continents in descending order will be Asia and Oceania, North and Central America, South America and Africa.
Police and Political Violence in the 1960s and 1970s: Germany and Italy in a Comparative Perspective
Notwithstanding the significant differences between the German and Italian police models (federal and civil vs. centralised and militarised), in both countries the confrontation with the protest movements of the 1960s and 1970s had a profound impact on police conceptions and public order strategies. Police forces in some German federal states (West Berlin) followed a hard line until the late 1960s, while in others (Munich, Hamburg) reforms to the Weimar-centred police intervention tactics took place beginning in the early to mid-1960s. In Italy, traditional police conceptions and strategies remained largely unchanged and re-emerged in 1968. Here, a movement from within the police led to the demilitarisation and unionisation of the state police in 1981. In both countries, fighting left-wing terrorism in the 1970s stimulated technical modernisation and enhanced the centralisation of the police. In critical response to police tactics, in the late 1970s Germany police matters were increasingly perceived as a concern not only of the state but of civil society—even if policing remained a highly contested terrain. In Italy, such matters largely remained state concerns in which only politicians and internal security specialists were entitled to intervene.