Cross-border consumer conflicts — A French-German experience
The paper informs about and analyses the interim results of a joint initiative of European consumer associations to combat misleading marketing practices originating in Germany and directed towards French consumers. The traditional enforcement mechanisms have so far been unable to provide adequate remedies for cross-border complaints which will occur with more regularity the closer the internal market of the EC comes to completion. The author discusses strategies to take action against the tortfeasor in the country where the wrongful practices originate, rather than, as provided for by the traditional conflict rules, at the place where the injury occurs.ZusammenfassungDer Aufsatz berichtet und analysiert die Zwischenergebnisse einer gemeinsamen Initiative von europäischen Verbraucherorganisationen, die irreführende Wettbewerbspraktiken bekämpfen wollen, die ihren Ausgangspunkt in Deutschland haben und gegen französische Verbraucher gerichtet sind. Die herkömmlichen Rechtsdurchsetzungsmechanismen sind bislang ungeeignet, einen ausreichenden Rechtsschutz bei granzüberschreitenden Beschwerden zu gewährleisten, die mit der Vollendung des Binnenmarktes zunehmend um sich greifen. Der Autor diskutiert Strategien, um gegen den wettbewerbswidrig Handelnden im Verursachungstaat vorzugehen, d.h. dort, wo die Handlungen ihren Ursprung nehmen, und nicht erst dort, wie unter traditionellem internationalem Recht, wo sie ihre schädigenden Auswirkungen haben.
Administrative and Judicial Enforcement in Consumer Protection: The Way Forward
The paper analyses the relationship between administrative and judicial enforcement in Consumer Protection. It first sets out the European state of development with regard to injunctions, thereby focusing on the different models of the European group actions and the regulation of standing, as well as comparing ex post ante and ex post intervention. The second part reframes the European debate in the light of the US and Canadian experiences and formulates a whole set of policy options. In the final part we propose a set of policy recommendations that the Commission should consider in the process of reviewing the collective redress directive and more in general the European policies concerning collective redress.
The Bastille: A History of a Symbol of Despotism and Freedom
This book is both an analysis of the Bastille as cultural paradigm and a case study on the history of French political culture. It examines in particular the storming and subsequent fall of the Bastille in Paris on July 14, 1789 and how it came to represent the cornerstone of the French Revolution, becoming a symbol of the repression of the Old Regime. Lusebrink and Reichardt use this semiotic reading of the Bastille to reveal how historical symbols are generated; what these symbols’ functions are in the collective memory of societies; and how they are used by social, political, and ideological groups.

To facilitate the symbolic nature of the investigation, this analysis of the evolving signification of the Bastille moves from the French Revolution to the nineteenth century to contemporary history. The narrative also shifts from France to other cultural arenas, like the modern European colonial sphere, where the overthrow of the Bastille acquired radical new signification in the decolonization period of the 1940s and 1950s. The Bastille demonstrates the potency of the interdisciplinary historical research that has characterized the end of this century, combining quantitative and qualitative approaches, and taking its methodological tools from history, sociology, linguistics, and cultural and literary studies.