Elemental analysis of whole blood using proton-induced X-ray emmission.
A technique for the analysis of trace elements in whole blood was developed using proton-induced x-ray emission. Samples of 0.1 ml whole blood from humans and mice were dried, weighed, and then ashed in a plasma asher. Targets were prepared by placing drops made from the ash and a 100-ppM Pd solution onto Formvar backings. The samples were irradiated with 2.25-MeV protons, and the x-rays analyzed in a nondispersive x-ray detector. The elements Fe, Cu, Zn, Se, and Rb were detected with a precision of 7, 18, 7, 50, and 19%, respectively, in human whole blood. The precision of the technique was determined by statistical analyses of two different sets of 27 samples. The system was found to be linear for variations in elemental concentration. The accuracy for deterrmination of Zn was found to be within 10% by comparison to atomic absorption spectrometry.
Application of the group substoichiometric separation of gold, mercuric, and cupric diethyldithiocarbamates to determining them by means of activation analysis
The substoichiometric method has been applied to group separation. By a single extraction gold and mercury were separated quantitatively, and copper substoichiometrically, at the same time. Zinc diethyldithiocarbamate has been used as the chelating agent. The group of elements was separated from 2N H2SO4 and 0.1N HClO4 medium. This method of group separation was applied to the activation analysis of biological materials and metallic tin.
The Role of Democratic Politics in Transforming Moral Convictions into Law
Professor Michael Perry's new book, Morality, Politics, and Law, is an ambitious attempt to address the extent to which moral and religious beliefs in a pluralistic society, such as ours, can legitimately influence law. He departs from the common opinion in legal circles that moral beliefs are a matter of taste or "values," and defends an older conception that it is possible to attain moral "knowledge." ' He also departs from the "liberal political-philosophical project," 2 which claims that it is possible (and desirable) for governments to steer a neutral course between competing moral understandings of the good. This, he suggests, is an illusion, and a disguise for the imposition of a particular moral structure without opportunity for open deliberation and reflection. Professor Perry brings some refreshing common sense to these riddles of moral philosophy. His "naturalist" approach has obvious roots in Aristotle-not a bad place to begin thinking about ethics. His dismissal of