Narrow-Track Agricultural Tractors: A Survey on the Load of the Hand-Operated Foldable Rollbar.
To protect the driver in case of a tractor overturn, narrow-track tractors (used in vineyards and orchards) can be equipped with a rollover protective structure (ROPS) consisting of a two-pillar front-mounted foldable rollbar. The transition from the horizontal (rest) to the vertical (protection) position of this ROPS is performed manually by the driver. In addition to the time spent performing this task many times each day, a moderate physical load is required, given that these rollbars often have a mass of some tens of kilograms. In practice, neglect and poor attention to safety lead to the foldable rollbar remaining continuously in the rest position rather than being moved to the vertical (protection) position. Several rollover accidents have been fatal for the driver because the tractor, although equipped with a two-pillar front-mounted ROPS, had the rollbar in the horizontal position at the time of the event, thus assuring no protection to the driver. This issue is quite serious. To remove at least one of the problems for the proper management of this type of ROPS, the OECD has recently updated its Code 6 by introducing an optional test addressing the manual handling of front-mounted rollbars, providing a maximum load of 100 N. Several tests were conducted on new rollbars to ascertain the accuracy of this limit. The 100 N value was generally exceeded, which is cause for criticism. Indeed, a more appropriate reference for manual handling in this case would be the higher loads (up to 250 N) already provided by other standards for non-continuous tasks.
Evaluation of risk factors in fatal accidents in agriculture
Many fatal accidents happen in agriculture and some of them are not officially recorded. The aim of this research was to compare official to real data about fatal accidents in agriculture and to characterize and evaluate the main risk factors associated with them. A comparative study of 388 fatal accidents related to agricultural machinery, occurred in Spain during the last five years, has been conducted. Official records only account for 61.85% of the deaths. Older people are the social group with the highest risk but children and nonfarmers are risk groups too. The main cause of death was the overturn of tractors lacking roll-over protective structures (ROPS) since from 272 fatal overturns detected; only one occurred in tractors equipped with homologated ROPS. Many overturns happened while tractor driving along roads and tracks. Terrain conditions as slopes, ditches and obstacles are also risk factors. A total of eleven risk factors have been characterized but the concurrence of at least two of them is required to cause a fatal accident. Most accidents are caused by the overlapping of three or more risk factors. Therefore, accidents are preventable when trying to circumvent all described risk factors because the probability of concurrence of at
Agricultural work related injury and Ill-health and the economic cost
This paper contains a literature review of the occupational injuries and ill-health in agriculture world-wide and a survey of the attempts that have been made to estimate the resulting economic and social costs.Agricultural workers suffer a wide variety of disorders as a result of their occupation. These range from minor (cuts, bruises) to more severe (deep wounds, fractures), permanent (amputation, spinal cord injury) and fatal injury. Ill-health as a result of contact with animals, micro-organisms, plant material dusts or chemicals are associated with certain types of agriculture. There is an underlying but unquantified incidence of pain, stress and injury as a result of ergonomic problems due to poor working procedures and conditions. Statistics from many countries or regions show that agriculture consistently has one of the highest accident and injury rates of the industrial sectors.There are many causes for the work related injury and ill-health in agricultural workers. In developed countries, tractors and other machinery cause a significant proportion of the accidents and are a major cause of occupational deaths. In less developed countries, accidents due to hand tools such as hoes, sickles and cutting instruments are most prevalent. Animals are a significant cause of injury and ill-health in many countries. Debilitating allergic reactions in the respiratory tract or the skin are caused by exposures to organic dusts, or by contact with allergenic plants in the field respectively. Where comparative data are available, occupational pesticide poisoning in agriculture is a small proportion (< 1–4%) of the total work related disorders.Because of the wide variety of occupational risks to agricultural workers, it is emphasised that if one type of agricultural practice is replaced by another then the risks from the alternative procedure need to be considered. If, for example, agrochemical pest control practices are replaced by methods involving the increased use of machinery, draught animals or manual operations, then an assessment of the resulting risks should be taken into account.Some of the economic costs of occupational injury and ill-health in agriculture can be quantified directly, such as medical costs, the cost of rehabilitation and loss of earnings. Other costs are more difficult to estimate such as loss of opportunity and income foregone for permanent and fatal injury and for the effect on a victim’s family. The estimation of the overall economic costs to farming communities and national agriculture requires further development. When one agricultural practice is replaced wholly or partly by another, for example agrochemical pest control by alternative control methods, then it is necessary to take into account the occupational health costs of the alternative procedure for realistic comparative assessment.There are a number of issues which require continued or increased attention by the relevant national and international authorities and by the agricultural industry. These include the improved collection and collation of occupational health statistics, a better understanding of the extent of ergonomic problems in agriculture, more realistic assessments of the cost of occupational injury and ill-health and the continued need to reduce occupational health disorders by appropriate training and education in agricultural practices and the use of agricultural equipment.