The Attractiveness of Harmonized Investment Funds Evidence on Romanian Investment Fund Market
This paper explores the latest trends in Romanian investment fund industry by examining the investors’ prudentially behavior before and after the crisis. We focus our study on a data set from the Romanian National Securities Commission (abr. CNVMR), with evidence on quarterly data on net sales value, number of units of funds and number of investors. This study provides two contributions. First, it presents the newest UCITS regulations to maintain investors’ trust in these investment vehicles. On the other hand, it provides a comparative analysis on open-end and close-end funds evidence. As a result, the paper concludes that open funds are more attractive for the domestic capital as compared to closed funds, but their evolution according to the preference for certain types is rather similar, in the sense that money market or diversified funds are preferred, as they offer a higher degree of certainty during crisis periods.
Shifting investments strategy from equity funds to money market funds – the case of Romanian open - end fund market during the financial crisis
Mutual funds are one of the key suppliers of liquidity in Romanian capital market. This paper uses quarterly data on Romanian openend funds starting with 2006 until 2010. We find that significant negative flows (outflows) were registered beginning with the end of 2007 (equity funds), during 2008 (equity funds, balanced funds, other funds and bond funds in the last 2 quarters of the year) and from 2009 to 2010 (in the case of money market funds). There is evidence that the changing market conditions attract differently the incoming flows in these mutual funds. This is the reason why such perturbations affect investors’ confidence for these investment vehicles and impose the reorientation of the investment funds and of their investors to other alternatives in order to preserve their capital.
Volatility Rules: Valuing Emerging Market Companies
As the center of gravity shifts from developed markets in the United States to emerging markets in Asia and Latin America, analysts are also grappling with estimation questions that arise more frequently with emerging market companies. In this paper, we begin by looking at common errors that show up in emerging market company valuations. We then deal with two big issues that underlie these valuations. The first relates to country risk and how best to deal with it in valuation. In particular, what are the country risks that we should incorporate into cash flows and when does country risk affect discount rates? The second arises from the lack of transparency and poor corporate governance that characterize many emerging market companies. We close the paper by examining how best to do relative valuation in emerging markets, especially when the comparable companies are listed in other markets.