Dissolution of salts crystallised in building materials using ultrasound: an alternative to NORMAL (1983) standard methodology.
Our aim in the present work is to extract salts from ornamental stone using a faster and less tedious method than the customarily used NORMAL method [NORMAL, Dosaggio dei Sali Solubili, CNR-ICR, Roma, Italy (1983) 13/83]. For extraction in aqueous medium, the latter method requires shaking for 72 h at a temperature of 60 degrees C. Our aim is to attempt to shorten this time to less than 1 h using ultrasound. The results of the present study indicate that there is a good correlation between the amount of salts extracted applying the method described in the NORMAL (1983) normative and the amounts extracted with the method proposed here, subjecting the material to ultrasound (50 KHz) for 45 min.
Optimization of two methods based on ultrasound energy as alternative to European standards for soluble salts extraction from building materials.
The Italian recommendation NORMAL 13/83, later replaced by the UNI 11087/2003 norm, were used as standard for soluble salts extraction from construction materials. These standards are based on long-time stirring (72 and 2h, respectively) of the sample in deionized water. In this work two ultrasound based methods were optimized in order to reduce the extraction time while efficiency is improved. The instrumental variables involved in the extraction assisted by ultrasound bath and focused ultrasounds were optimized by experimental design. As long as it was possible, the same non-instrumental parameters values as those of standard methods were used in order to compare the results obtained on a mortar sample showing a black crust by the standards and the optimized methods. The optimal extraction time for the ultrasounds bath was found to be of two hours. Although the extraction time was equal to the standard UNI 11087/2003, the obtained extraction recovery was improved up to 119%. The focused ultrasound system achieved also better recoveries (up to 106%) depending on the analyte in 1h treatment time. The repeatabilities of the proposed ultrasound based methods were comparables to those of the standards. Therefore, the selection of one or the other of the ultrasound based methods will depend on topics such as laboratory facilities or number of samples, and not in aspects related with their quality parameters.
Equilibrium Cross-section of Meandering and Braided Rivers
THERE are two simple models which describe the equilibrium state of a channel cross-section with constant conditions, one static, the other dynamic. In the first case equilibrium is said to hold when all grains on the bed are just at the threshold of movement1. Because movement is produced by a combination of fluid drag and the downslope gravity component and because the fluid drag is greatest in the centre of the channel, the channel slopes can increase up the sides to compensate for the decrease in drag. The resulting profile is roughly a parabola1 and is very similar to many natural channel forms. This static model is particularly relevant to the design of some canals where discharges are fairly constant and the bed material is normally immobile. Natural rivers transport sediment, however, and the mean channel form develops at high stages when nearly all the bed material is in intermittent motion. When sediment is transported as bed load it must be continually tending to creep downslope into the centre of the channel under the influence of gravity. If, however, the channel maintains a constant profile there must be an equal and opposite tendency at all points for the sediment to move sideways upslope. Apart from buoyant upthrust, the only other force acting on the grains is the fluid drag acting in the direction of the water flow, leading to the second model. When river channels are in dynamic equilibrium the flow along the bed has a sideways component up the channel banks which exactly compensates the tendency of the sediment to move downslope under the influence of gravity. As water flowing sideways along the bed must return to the channel centre along the surface this implies that the river has a double spiral secondary flow (Fig. 1). Although double spiral flow in straight channels has been demonstrated2,3, single spiral flow in meander bends is better known1. As, however, the sense of the spiral changes from one bend to the next, it follows from considerations of continuity and symmetry that in the straight reaches between bends there is a transitional double spiral structure (Fig. 1 C). In short the secondary flow in river channels is a double spiral which is asymmetrically developed in bends so that one vortex momentarily excludes the other at the crest of the meander. The two spirals adjoin where the flow attaches itself to the bed and diverges sideways; this line is also the thalweg or deepest part of the channel. It is no coincidence that the same hypothesis of double spiral flow is commonly used to explain the origin of many sand ridge bed configurations formed parallel to the flow, such as primary current lineation, sand ribbons, tidal current ridges and longitudinal aeolian dunes and draas4,5. River channels are analogous to the troughs between longitudinal sand ridges in certain other respects too: they arise spontaneously during sediment transport, reach a dynamic equilibrium by interaction with the flow and are associated with transverse structures, forming meander bars, that migrate downstream. In short, there is a good case for saying that the entire form of a river channel is a bed configuration sensu stricto.