Different Reaction Patterns in the Baylis-Hillman Reaction of Aryl Aldehydes with Phenyl Vinyl Ketone, Phenyl Acrylate and Phenyl Thioacrylate
In the Baylis-Hillman reaction of aryl aldehydes with phenyl vinyl ketone we have observed exclusive formation of diadducts 4, and that the yields of diadduct can reach 80% with increasing amounts of phenyl vinyl ketone. On the other hand, for phenyl acrylate and phenyl thioacrylate, only the normal Baylis-Hillman adduct was obtained. The effects of substituents were also examined and a plausible reaction mechanism is proposed for the formation of compounds 4.
New discovery in the traditional Baylis-Hillman reaction of arylaldehydes with methyl vinyl ketone
In the Baylis-Hillman reaction of arylaldehydes with methyl 
vinyl ketone, we found that, besides the normal Baylis-Hillman reaction 
product 1, the diadduct 2 can also be formed at the same time and the yield 
of 2 can reach 55% by increasing the amount of methyl vinyl ketone; but for 
acrylonitrile and methyl acrylate, only the normal Baylis-Hillman adduct 
was obtained; the substituent’s effects were also examined and a 
plausible reaction mechanism was proposed for the formation of 2.
The politics of becoming bodies: Sex, gender and intersubjectivity in motion
Abstract This paper presents readers with one (research) story about (sexed and gendered) bodies not as objects with inherent boundaries and properties but as material-discursive phenomena. In telling such a story I examine the role that the screendance, Becoming Bodies , has played in knowledge production and argue for a less ontologically ‘old fashioned’ view of what counts as ‘evidence’. Throughout the paper I draw from a range of feminisms: biological, phenomenological, poststructural, psychoanalytical, and post humanist and performative scholarship of sex and gender. These discourses contest nature/nurture, male/female, body/mind dualisms, and take the political and ethical view that bodies are not neutral; that sex and gender, being a woman or a man are both socially and biologically constructed forms of identity (similar to class and race) that are acquired and learned through socio-cultural regimes of discipline and intersubjective bodily practices. Building on this dynamic and developmental bio-psycho-social view I discuss selected aspects of interview data: (1) the material-discursive tensions and contradictions of sexing and gendering bodies and (2) troubling the intersubjective implications of this for clinical practices.