EFFECTIVENESS OF THE ANESTHETIC AQUI-S® 20E IN MARINE FINFISH AND ELASMOBRANCHS
Abstract Immersion anesthetics are used in hatchery settings by veterinarians, field biologists, and laboratory researchers to aid in handling finfish for medical procedures, research purposes, and moderating perceived stress responses. The only Food and Drug Administration– (FDA) approved anesthetic for food fish, tricaine methanesulfonate, requires a 21-d withdrawal period prior to harvest. Ten percent eugenol (AQUI-S® 20E) has been gaining momentum for FDA approval because of its 0-d withdrawal time if fish are not of harvestable size within 72 h of exposure. We performed two trials to determine appropriate anesthetic doses for two cultured marine finfish: Atractoscion nobilis (white seabass, WSB) and Seriola lalandi (California yellowtail, YT). Fish were held in a treated water bath for 10 min or until opercular beat rate slowed to a rate of <2 beats/min. Based on these results, we conducted a field trial with wild Paralabrax maculatofasciatus (spotted bay bass), Paralabrax nebulifer (barred sand bass), Paralichthys californicus (California halibut), Triakis semifasciata (leopard shark), and Mustelus californicus (grey smooth-hound) at a single dosing regime, with animals held 5–10 min in anesthetic baths. Anesthetic dosing of 35–55 mg L−1 provided relatively fast induction and good anesthetic maintenance in cultured and wild finfish. Anesthetic induction times were comparable among S. lalandi and A. nobilis at 35–mg L−1 to 75–mg L−1 doses, but recovery times were variable. Mortality rates of 20-90% were observed at higher doses (75 mg L−1 and 100 mg L−1, A. nobilis; 55 mg L−1 and 75 mg L−1, S. lalandi). The apparent increase in sensitivity of S. lalandi may have been associated with nutritional stress in the fish tested. There were no differences in time to anesthesia or recovery among wild finfish species tested at a single dose. Anesthetic induction, maintenance, and recovery were less predictable in the elasmobranch species tested and additional trials are needed to determine optimal dosing.
Salinity Has Limited Influence on Sedation of Sunshine Bass with AQUI‐S 20E (10% Eugenol)
AbstractWe evaluated sedation and recovery of juvenile sunshine bass (male Striped Bass Morone saxatilis × female White Bass M. chrysops) exposed to AQUI-S 20E (10% eugenol; 60 mg/L) in freshwater or increasingly brackish salinities (nominal salinities of 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 g/L). Induction and recovery times were significantly affected by salinity, but the magnitude of the effects was relatively small. Induction was fastest (0.90 min) among fish tested at 25 g/L salinity and slowest (1.07 min) among those tested at 0 g/L salinity, but this was the only significant difference observed in induction times between treatments. Recovery was also faster among fish that were tested at higher salinities and slower among fish that were tested at lower salinities (range = 2.63–3.91 min), but significant differences were not noted for each pairwise comparison. Most fish (65%) exhibited slight agitation and gasping or piping at the surface during sedation, but these behaviors were less common among fish held at ...
Time and Heritage
As a historian studying what can be considered a form of intellectual history, I have slowly come to adopt Michel de Certeau’s observation made at the end of the 1980s that ‘objectifying the past, for the last three centuries, has undoubtedly left unconsidered time within a discipline that has continued to use it as a taxonomic instrument’. To a certain degree, time has become commonplace for the historian who has preserved or instrumentalized it. It is not considered because it is inconceivable, but because we do not think of it or, more simply, we do not think about it. As a historian attempting to pay attention to the time I’m living in, I have thus, like many others, noticed the swift development of the category of the present until it has become obvious that the present is omnipresent. This is what I refer to here as ‘presentism’.