Illuminated Physiology and Medical Uses of Light
ABSTRACT The purpose of this paper is to bring a broader understanding to the physiology of light metabolism in the human body and to present novel techniques of utilizing light diagnostically and therapeutically. Much work has been done to use light to achieve altered states of consciousness, and there is much research documenting the presence and activities of light within the body. However, this paper seeks to promote the utilization of light as a primary treatment. A brief explanation of the author's novel diagnostic technique, BioResonance Scanning™, and novel treatment technique called NeuroPhotonic TherapyTM is detailed with clinical gems and case review
Evidence of photon emission from DNA in living systems
nur bedingt brauchbar. Mit Dunkelfeld-Rastertransmissionsbetrieb, Abbildung mittels Sekund~irelektronen, Feinbereichsbeugung und energiedispersiver R6ntgenmikroanalyse konnten die obengenannten Minerale best~itigt und folgende weitere Akzessorien bestimmt werden: Thallium(I)chlorid (T1C1) in wtirfeligen Kristalten (Fig. 1), Franklinit (ZnFe204) in Oktaedern und Bleiglanz (PbS) in nicht nfiher definierbaren, eher rundlichen Gebilden; alle in Grbl3en zwischen 0,I -0 ,8 gin. Calcit bildet teils idiomorphe Rhomboeder, Sylvin Wiirfel und Syngenit h/iufig idiomorphe, leistenf6rmige Kristalle. Die T1und PbVerbindungen finden sich anscheinend nur in die agglomerierten Sulfat-K6rner eingebettet. Als weitere Gemengteile treten vereinzelt Kristalte einer eigenstfindigen K-SVerbindung (vermutl. die Hoch-Modifikation yon Arkanit, K2SO4) und eines K-A1Silicats (vermutl. ein Schichtsilicat) auf. Thallium konnte in keiner der anderen Verbindungen mit Sicherheit nachgewiesen werden, demzufolge scheint TIC1 der einzige T1-Trfiger in dieser Staubprobe zu sein.
Euthanasia — again: “Letting die” is not in the patient's best interests: a case for active euthanasia
Recent discussions in the Journal on the subject of euthanasia have relied on intuitive appeals to distinctions traditionally considered to be morally relevant, such as the distinction between acts and omissions (or killing and letting die), or ordinary and extraordinary means of treatment. These discussions remained inconclusive. However, the question of euthanasia no longer remains inconclusive if one adopts the perspective suggested by the United States President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research and by the World Medical Assembly – that a doctor should act in his or her patient's best interests. From this vantage point, it is argued, there will be instances when active euthanasia is the proper cause of action.