Project management: a quality management approach
Excellent publications have been available on project management for many years and much discussion has taken place extolling the virtues of this aspect of management and its great influence on the overall successful operation of organizations in all sectors. When being considered in its generic form, project management can also be applied to any set of activities, and in this context it is no less than a universal management tool. This paper examines the feasibility and practicality of applying a quality management approach to project management. The model used for the analysis is the criteria of the Canada Awards for Excellence, the internationally recognized quality award program.
A multi-objective approach for decision making during the project life cycle
This paper is concerned with the multi-objective nature of projects and proposes a comprehensive methodology for the decision making process during the project life cycle. We address a situation in which several decisions are considered, where each may affect the major project objectives: time, cost and scope. The objectives are formally defined and a multi-objective, mixed-integer, linear-programming formulation for the decision selection is developed. We then provide the decision maker with a set of non-dominated alternatives, each associated with a subset of the feasible decisions.
Relationships Between Food Preferences and Food Acceptance Ratings
A study was conducted to assess relationships between food preference ratings and food acceptability ratings. Acceptability ratings for each of two discriminably different samples of nine food items were obtained using the 9-point hedonic scale. Regression analysis indicated that no linear relationship existed between these ratings and either hedonic or frequency preference ratings of the foods. In addition, the range of acceptability ratings was smaller than the range of corresponding’preference ratings. Panelists’expressed preferences had no effect on their assignment of differential acceptance ratings to different samples of the items. Correlations between preference ratings of laboratory panelists and military field panelists were good, in spite of higher absolute preference ratings assigned by the laboratory panel.