3-D Seismic Interpretation: Time-lapse seismic
We saw in chapter 5 how seismic data can be used in favourable cases to infer the nature of fluid fill (gas, oil or brine) in a reservoir. An application of this is to follow the way that fluids move through a reservoir during production, by carrying out a baseline seismic survey before production begins and then repeat surveys over the production lifetime. Where 3-D surveys are repeated in this way, they are often referred to as 4-D seismic , with the idea that time is the extra dimension over standard 3-D. Differences in seismic amplitudes or travel-times between the surveys can reveal the movement of fluid contacts (e.g. where produced oil has been replaced by brine) or the extent of pressure changes that affect reservoir properties. As sketched in figs. 8.1 and 8.2, it is not always straightforward to separate out the causes of the changes. At a producing well, the pressure drops, and if it drops far enough then gas will come out of solution. This will result in a decrease in both P velocity and in density, resulting in a drop in acoustic impedance. On the other hand, the drop in pore pressure causes an increase in P velocity and density. At a water injector (fig. 8.2), we replace oil by water, which in itself would increase P velocity and density; however, the injection also increases the pore pressure, which causes the reverse effect on P velocity and density.
Time-lapse seismic in reservoir management
“This book, prepared for use with the first SEG / EAGE Distinguished Instructor Short Course, discusses Â"time-lapse seismicÂ" and enables geoscientists to assess the value and risk of this new technology. It covers the rationale and driving forces behind time-lapse seismic by examining the limitations of existing methods of tracking fluid flow between wells. It examines those reservoir properties that change with time and what can be observed on seismic data over elapsed time. The repeatability of seismic data and the use of Â"legacyÂ" data sets are discussed, along with a review of the seismic data acquisition schemes and data processing requirements for time-lapse analysis. The rock-physics foundation for data analysis and interpretation options also are described. A selection of industry case histories illustrates many of these points. The reader will gain an understanding of key success factors, key calibration requirements, and key uncertainties of time-lapse seismic in reservoir management.”
Archaeological Survey of Dangoyama Kofun by 3DGPR
We presented a three-dimensional ground penetrating radar (3DGPR) system for the archeological investigation in a harsh site, where we have to deal with many trees and/or great topographic variations. This system consists of a commercial GPR system with a laser positioning system. With this system, we can move the GPR antenna freely, on which a positioning detector can record accurate position for each GPR data trace. We applied our 3DGPR system at Dangoyama Kofun, a burial mound, in Fukushima prefecture, Japan. A lot of trees and bushes covered the survey area and cannot be cut. We acquired six datasets in two days in this area. We successfully imaged the boundary between the original surface of the burial mound and the covering soil clearly at about 0.3 m depth around the mound. Furthermore, we found some strong reflections appeared at 0.8 m depth in the top area of the mound, which can be from the artificial parts of the burial mound. The results would greatly aid the following archaeological excavation. In addition, we compared the non-interpolated depth slice with interpolated depth slice at same position and demonstrated that the interpolation process on threedimensional GPR data may introduce some artifacts which might mislead our interpretation.