Effect of composition and curing type of composite on adaptation to dentin cavity wall.
Adaptation to dentin cavity wall of three marketed and eight experimental composites was investigated by measuring polymerization contraction in cylindrical dentin cavities and by SEM observation. The cavity adaptation of light cured composites was always inferior to that of the chemically cured composite and, in the experimental composites, the optimum filler content was obtained.These facts indicate that cavity adaptation is affected significantly by the flow of the composites from the free surface into the cavity during polymerization.
Effect of combining dentin bonding agents.
The wall-to-wall polymerization contraction of a light-cured composite was measured in cylindrical dentin cavities treated with the bonding agents: Scotchbond, Clearfil Bond, Gluma/Scotchbond, Gluma/Silux Enamel Bond or Gluma/Clearfil Bond. Marginal gaps were prevented in 29 out of 30 cases when Gluma was used in combination with Clearfil Bond. This combination mediates a mean bond strength between composite and dentin of 20 MPa.
Bonding of restorative resins to dentin by means of methacryloylchloride and methacryloyl-R-isocyanate.
The bonding of restorative resins to dentin by means of an intermediary monomer containing a carboxylic acid chloride or an isocyanate group was investigated. Such intermediary monomers are supposed to react with the organic constituent of dentin. Bond strengths were enhanced by the use of the intermediary monomers, resulting in mean bond strengths of 0.13 kg/mm 2. Bond strengths of this order of size are probably too low to be of clinical interest.