Hydrogen Sulfide Issues at Coal Combustion Residual and Municipal Solid Waste Disposal Facilities
Historically, coal combustion residuals (CCRs) have been stored in and/or disposed of in dedicated ponds and landfills. In the future, we anticipate that CCRs will also be placed in dedicated units that comply with the new U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) design, construction, and operating regulations. In the interim, as old CCR units are being closed and new units are not yet available, industry professionals are increasingly interested in the co-disposal of CCR in existing municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills.
Bacterial and thermochemical sulfate reduction in diagenetic settings — old and new insights
The association of dissolved sulfate and hydrocarbons is thermodynamically unstable in virtually all diagenetic environments. Hence, redox-reactions occur, whereby sulfate is reduced by hydrocarbons either bacterially (bacterial sulfate reductiona BSR) or inorganically (thermochemical sulphate reductiona TSR). Their geologically and economically significant products are similar. Based on empirical evidence, BSR and TSR occur in two mutually exclusive thermal regimes, i.e. low-temperature and hightemperature diagenetic environments, respectively. BSR is common in diagenetic settings from 0 up to about 60‐808C. Above this temperature range, almost all sulfate-reducing microbes cease to metabolize. Those few types of hyperthermophilic microbes that can form H2S at higher temperatures appear to be very rare and do not normally occur and/or metabolize in geologic settings that are otherwise conducive to BSR. TSR appears to be common in geologic settings with temperatures of about 100‐1408C, but in some settings temperatures of 160‐1808C appear to be necessary. TSR does not have a sharply defined, generally valid minimum temperature because the onset and rate of TSR are governed by several factors that vary from place to place, i.e. the composition of the available organic reactants, kinetic inhibitors and/or catalysts, anhydrite dissolution rates, wettability, as well as migration and diffusion rates of the major reactants toward one another. BSR is geologically instantaneous in most geologic settings. Rates of TSR are much lower, but still geologically significant. TSR may form sour gas reservoirs and/or MVT deposits in several tens of thousands to a few million years in the temperature range of 100‐1408C. BSR and TSR may be exothermic or endothermic, depending mainly on the presence or absence of specific organic reactants. However, if the reactions are exothermic, the amount of heat liberated is very small, and this heat usually dissipates quickly. Hence, heat anomalies found in association with TSR settings are normally not generated by TSR. The main organic reactants for BSR are organic acids and other products of aerobic or fermentative biodegradation. The main organic reactants for TSR are branched and n-alkanes, followed by cyclic and mono-aromatic species, in the gasoline range. Sulfate is derived almost invariably from the dissolution of gypsum and/or anhydrite, which may be primary or secondary deposits at or near the redox-reaction site(s). The products of BSR and TSR are similar, but their relative amounts vary widely and are determined by a number of locally variable factors, including availability of reactants, formation water chemistry, and wettability. The primary inorganic reaction products in both thermal regimes are H2S(HS 2 ) and HCO3 (CO2). The presence of alkali earth metals often results in the formation of carbonates, particularly calcite and dolomite. Other carbonates, i.e. ankerite, siderite, witherite, strontianite, may form if the respective metal cations are available. Iron sulfides, galena, and sphalerite form as by-products of hydrogen sulfide generation, if the respective transition or base metals are present or transported to a BSR/TSR reaction site. Elemental sulfur may accumulate as a volumetrically significant
On the use of the Hardening Soil Small Strain model in geotechnical practice
This article highlights the importance of using advanced constitutive soil models in numerical modelling as daily geotechnical practice. In this context, the Hardening Soil (HS) model is presented as the most advanced soil model implemented in the ZSoil finite element code. The article recalls the basic features of the HS model and it explains their role in numerical simulations. The role of pre-failure non-linear behaviour of soils is also discussed. An application of the HS model is illustrated on typical geotechnical problems such as retaining wall excavation, tunnel excavation and undrained loading followed by consolidation.