Inward FDI in Germany and its policy context
With a stable economic and political system, open capital markets, the largest domestic market in Europe, and European Union (EU) membership, Germany has attracted competitive and export-oriented multinational enterprises (MNEs) since the 1960s. In the 1990s —after German unification and the opening up of Eastern Europe— inward foreign direct investment (IFDI) grew more slowly than expected despite the increased market potential. In recent years, the German economy strengthened and the wage and cost gaps against its main competitors narrowed, contributing to higher IFDI. With the financial and economic crises, German IFDI declined considerably in 2008 but started to rise again in 2009. At the end of 2008, Germany ranked among the top four developed countries as host for IFDI. Germany's open investment regime was tightened in 2009, in reaction to the emergence of sovereign wealth funds (SWFs). Trends and developments Country-level developments The successful reintegration of Germany into the world economy after the Second World War, as well as the European unification process, stimulated IFDI in Germany. Already in the 1960s, many of the largest MNEs worldwide (like General Motors or IBM) had established affiliates in Germany. In 1990, the year of the German reunification, the consolidated primary and secondary IFDI stock amounted to US$ 111 billion. 1 Since then, it has risen six-fold, to reach US$ 666 * Thomas Jost (thomas.jost@h-ab.de) is Professor of Economics at the University of Applied Sciences Aschaffenburg. The author wishes to thank Alexandra Angress, Jörn Kleinert and Beatrix Stejskal-Passler for their helpful comments. The views expressed by the author of this Profile do not necessarily reflect opinions of Columbia University, its partners and supporters. Columbia FDI Profiles is a peer-reviewed series. 1 The German inward FDI stock figures that are used most for analysis in this article are consolidated primary and secondary direct investment stock figures. This is a very special calculation done by Deutsche Bundesbank, looking through dependent (majority foreign owned) holding companies in Germany and including their direct investment enterprises in Germany. These figures are not comparable with the figures of most other countries, taking only primary FDI into account. The primary FDI stock in Germany is much higher than the consolidated primary and secondary one, because FDI in dependent holding companies is much higher than the FDI stock in their direct investment enterprises, which replace the dependent holding companies by consolidation. The reason for this is that the holding companies receive …
Inward Investment and the Drivers of Post Recession Recovery in Germany
Summary This paper examines changes in the drivers of productivity in Germany over the period 1997-2012. We start by comparing the performance of German firms and inward investors before and during the recovery from the recent global financial crisis of 2008 across a range of sectors, and subsequently examine the channels through which different firms are able to generate productivity. Our results show that foreign investors are more productive than German MNEs and purely domestic firms, with the gap narrowing in the manufacturing sector, but growing in the service sector during the recovery period. We also contrast those firms for whom productivity growth is related to greater use of intangible assets, compared with those for whom productivity is linked to cash flow. Productivity of inward investors is driven by cash flow rather than intangible assets, these being limited to high-technology investors from the EU and the USA.
Reforming universities is key to technology transfer
This article explores the role universities in building indigenous capacity in science and technology in developing countries. Key players in the knowledge-based global economy, universities have an opportunity to participate in the effort of using technology to help alleviate poverty, create wealth, improve public health and ensure long-term environmental well-being. But, according to the author, they can only do so if they become stronger learning and research institutions, and engage in fundamental reforms to become both superior sources of information and unique mechanisms for promoting innovation.