Combustion, Fuels and Emissions for Industrial Gas Turbines
It is important that gas turbines used in Oil & Gas applications can burn a wide variety of fuels with the minimum impact on the environment or economics. Many types of gaseous and liquid fuels that can be used in Gas Turbines are discussed, as will be the two basic types of combustion system employed – ‘conventional’ and ‘Dry Low Emissions’ – along with the flexibility of these systems to accept different types of fuel. Some of the common contaminants found in fuels are discussed along with the impact these have on the operability and maintenance of industrial and aero-derivative gas turbines. Topics include: Types of gas turbines Types of exhaust emissions regulated Conventional combustion systems Dry Low (Pre-mixed) emissions combustion systems Fuel quality requirements ‘Pipeline’ quality Natural Gas fuels Premium liquid fuels (diesel, kerosene) Wellhead Gases as a Gas Turbine Fuel Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) Biogas fuels Refinery and process off gases Syngas Natural Gas Liquids and LPG fuels Crude Oil Operational impact of contaminants Water in fuel Storing fuels correctly
Study of biodiesel specifications for heavy-duty gas turbine application
Implementing a 20% biodiesel blend in diesel fuel (B20) has been launched since January 1th, 2016, and it was increased to 30% (B30) on January 1th, 2020, implemented in all sectors, including power generators. Gas turbines utilized as power generators designed to use natural gas or diesel fuel as fuel. Therefore, a study to use biodiesel blend as fuel in gas turbines was required. A comparative study was conducted to analyze the fuel requirements of General Electric’s (GE) Heavy Duty (HD) Gas Turbine specification compared to either of SNI 7182: 2015 and EN 14214 specifications. An assessment was conducted on samples of two biodiesel quality levels called biodiesel and distilled biodiesel to meet the GE HD Gas Turbine’s requirements. This study indicates that the biodiesel quality standards, both SNI 7182: 2015 and EN 14214, are insufficient to meet the gas turbine fuel specifications of the GE HD gas turbine. It is required a more specific quality standard dedicated to gas turbines. On the other hand, among the two samples, distilled biodiesel fulfills the fuel requirements of GE HD gas turbines and might be utilized as fuel for this type of gas turbine. According to the result of this study, a test run of 100% biodiesel (B100) as gas turbine fuel can be proposed to be implemented immediately.
Impacts of climate and land use changes on flood risk management for the Schijn River, Belgium
Abstract Flooding is the most common natural disaster in Europe. Modern flood risk management relies not only infrastructure development but also on governmental and non-governmental actors applying legal, economic and communicative water management instruments. Within the European Union (EU), flood management closely relies on policy set at the EU and national levels. It is now recognized that a sound understanding of climate change is required in addition to current management by taking into account land use change and socio-political context, as climate and land use changes have major impacts on hydrological responses. This paper investigates the hydrological behavior due to urbanization under current and future climate scenarios of high summer and high winter rainfall for 20 sub-catchments of the Schijn River, located in the Flanders region near Antwerp, Belgium. As urbanization increases and existing rainfall-runoff models neglecting the specific behavior of urban runoff, a hydrological model was developed based on a basic reservoir concept and applied to the existing rainfall-runoff model (PDM) flow to examine the specific urban contribution. Results revealed that peak flow for urban runoff and the total peak flow (i.e. rural and urban runoff) were significantly higher (i.e. ranges from 200% to 500%) than the existing rainfall-runoff model (PDM) flows, because of faster and more peaked urban runoff response. The impact of climate change on current and future conditions was also assessed by estimating peak flows with respect to return periods from the flood frequency curve. The predicted peak flow of high summer future climate scenario was significantly higher (i.e. ranges from 200% to 250%) than that of the current climatic condition for this region. Furthermore, hourly peak flow and daily volume ratios of 100-year return period for the highest, lowest and average impervious area were projected for the time horizon of the year 2100. It is concluded that climate change impacts contribute the most in producing peak flow in coming years, while increased urbanization takes the second place for both hourly and daily values. Results on urbanization effect and climate change impact assessment are useful to the water managers for spatial planning, emergency planning and insurance industry.