Alternative Energy in American Indian Country: Catering to Both Sides of the Coin
This article looks at both sides of the renewable energy “coin” in relation to American Indian country. On the one side, it appears that tribal governments are opposed to any energy development on their lands. All told, however, this couldn’t be further from the truth – tribes merely seek a seat at the table when decisions are made regarding developments that will adversely affect their lands and/or areas of cultural significance. Indeed, contrary to being opposed to alternative energy development, tribes are very actively seeking to develop their lands in a manner that is consistent with their cultures and traditions. But, large-scale alternative energy projects are virtually absent from Indian country. This article argues that the oft-overlooked other side of the renewable energy “coin” are the federal regulations that hinder these projects from coming to fruition. The final section of the article will discuss what Congress is – and is not – doing regarding the two sides of this “coin.”
Do windy areas have more wind turbines: An empirical analysis of wind installed capacity in Native tribal nations
The decarbonization of the electricity sector is leading to a substantial increase in the demand for wind energy. Will tribal nations, which account for 7.8% of utility-scale wind capacity, benefit from this policy shift? To examine why tribal nations vary in translating wind energy potential into wind installed capacity, we have constructed an original dataset of the potential as well as the location of wind turbines across tribal nations. Our statistical analysis of 286 tribal nations suggests that wind energy potential is not associated with wind installed capacity. Instead, casino square footage, a proxy for tribal nation’s administrative capacity and business acumen, is associated with wind installed capacity. Political orientation plays a role as well: tribal nations are more likely to have wind installed capacity when they value tribal sovereignty. While tribes suffering from natural disasters do not install more wind turbines, those receiving federal grants for wind energy projects, and located in states that already have a substantial number of wind turbines, are more apt to have wind turbines. Surprisingly, tribes located in states with renewable portfolio standards do not show an association with installed wind turbines capacity.
ISOLATION OF BOVINE PARAINFLUENZA-3 VIRUS IN CHICK EMBRYOS
Myxovirus parainfluenza-3 (SF-4 bovine strain) was first isolated in tissue cultures of embryonic bovine kidney (EBK) cells (Reisinger, Heddleston, and Manthei, J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 135:147, 1959). This agent is antigenically and biologically related to the human HA-1 strain isolated previously by Chanock et al. in monkey kidney cells (Abinanti and Huebner, Virology 8:391, 1959; Abinanti et al., Proc. Soc. Exptl. Biol. Med. 106:466,1961). At present, both viruses are isolated and propagated in tissue cultures, and tissue-culture products are employed for most research purposes. This investigation indicates that bovine parainfluenza-3 virus can be isolated and produced in 14-day-old embryonated hen's eggs, and that the developing chick embryo is highly susceptible to parainfluenza-3 virus infection. Isolation of parainfluenza-3 virus in chick embryos was compared with isolation in tissue cultures. EBK tissue cultures, maintained in Earle's balanced salts (BSS) with 5.0% calf serum and 0.5% lactalbumin hydrolysate (Nutritional Biochemicals Corp., Cleveland, Ohio), were inoculated with 0.2 ml of nasal-swab material (nasal swabs suspended in 4.0 ml of BSS) from 14 calves with signs of shipping fever. After incubation at 36 C for 6 days, fluids from cultures not showing cytopathic effects were subcultured in fresh cells, and the remaining monolayers were examined for noncytopathic virus by the adsorption-hemagglutination (hemadsorption) test of Vogel and Sholokov (Science 126:358, 1957). Infectious fluids from positive cultures were retained for parainfluenza-3 virus identification. Embryonated hen's eggs (14 days old) were inoculated by the amniotic route with 0.1 ml of nasalswab material. After 4 days at 36 C, the amniotic fluids were harvested and tested for virus by inoculation of EBK cells. Parainfluenza-3 virus was identified by serum-neutralization tests in tissue cultures with immune rabbit serum prepared against the original SF-4 bovine virus isolate. Parainfluenza-3 virus was isolated from six nasal-swab suspensions in both EBK cells and 14-day-old chick embryos. Five embryonated eggs and an equal number of tissue cultures were inoculated with each suspension and, in all cases, eggs were infected more frequently than were corresponding tissue cultures inoculated with larger doses of the same material. The isolation of parainfluenza-3 virus from two samples was complicated in tissue cultures by the presence of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR) virus which also produces cytopathic effects in EBK cells. IBR virus did not interfere with the isolation of parainfluenza-3 virus in embryonated eggs and was not demonstrated in amniotic fluids 4 days after virus inoculation. Noncytopathic virus, demonstrable by hemadsorption, was not isolated. When three nasal-swab samples containing parainfluenza-3 virus were diluted 1:2 and 1:20 in BSS, virus was isolated from the lower concen-