Review of the Policy, Regulatory Mechanisms and Administration of Biosafety in Eastern and Southern Africa: A study of Kenya, South Africa, Malawi and the ASARECA initiative
This report summarises the results of a review of the policy, regulatory mechanisms and 
administration of biosafety in Kenya, Malawi and South Africa and under the ASARECA regional 
initiative. The report focuses on the current situation and provides insights as to the form that 
developments in the area of regulation of biotechnology are likely to take. 
The first section is an introduction, which provides the definition and scope of biotechnology as 
used in this report. It provides a brief status of agricultural research; the areas of research and the 
actors involved in biotechnology in the study countries. With the exception of South Africa, 
experimentation in transgenic crops is still under development. Most of the current agricultural 
biotechnology R&D activities focus on improving crop productivity. The actors are mainly National 
Agriculture Research Institutes, International Agricultural Research Centres and universities. 
Private sector involvement is in the form of multinational companies. 
The second section discusses the frameworks for the regulation of biotechnology. These include 
international obligations, regional attempts, as well as national efforts in regulating biotechnology in 
the study countries. Regulation at the national level has been in the form of national policies, 
national strategies and through legislation. In Kenya and in most countries under the ASARECA 
initiative, acts of parliament are yet to be enacted. The proposed bill and regulations in Kenya and 
the proposed regional regulatory structure under ASARECA are discussed with the aim of 
providing an insight as to the trend regulation in these jurisdictions is likely to take. 
The third section is a discussion on institutional arrangements in the field of agricultural 
biotechnology. Who are the institutional actors? What are the synergies? What is the institutional 
capacity in terms of human resources and physical infrastructure? This section also explores the 
commercialisation and innovation attempts in the study countries. It examines public perception 
and acceptance of modern biotechnology and ends with a brief mention on intellectual property 
protection in the study countries. South Africa has a developed institutional structure with 
impressive facilities and adequate human resource capacity. Critical mass in modern biotechnology 
in the other study countries is yet to be attained. Facilities for experimentation in GM technology 
are likewise lacking in Kenya, Malawi and other ASARECA countries. 
The fourth section summarises the review and presents the way forward. South Africa is best 
placed to handle applications for testing transgenics such as the rosette-resistant groundnut 
developed by ICRISAT. A representative from the Malawi biosafety committee should be involved 
in the testing of the groundnuts in RSA as part of a capacity building exercise and also to pave the 
way for the testing of the groundnuts in Malawi. In Kenya, there are indications that once an event 
is approved elsewhere, it is likely to receive timely approval subject to any additional testing that 
the National Biosafety Board may deem necessary. ICRISAT would have to collaborate with the 
KARI Institutional Biosafety Committee through which the application to the National Biosafety 
Committee would be made.
Perspectives on Agricultural Transformation: A View from Africa
Contents: Introduction: Setting the Stage Agricultural Recovery and Structural Transformation in African Countries Globalisation and Structural Transformation in Sub-Saharan Africa Accelerating Africa's Structural Transformation: Lessons from East Asia Technology Profitability and Agricultural Transformation: Concepts, Evidence, and Policy Implications Agricultural Biotechnology: Current and Future Trends and Implications for Africa Efficiency and Equity in Public Investment in Agriculture: Lessons from Soil Fertility Research in Kenya The Impact of Market Reform on Agricultural Transformation in Mali False Promise or False Premise? The Experience of Food and Input Market Reform in Eastern and Southern Africa Building African Scientific and Managerial Capacity for Transforming Agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa Synthesis: What Have We Learned About Promoting Agricultural Transformation in Sub-Saharan Africa? Challenges for the Future Index.
The Tsetse Problem on the Eastern Cattle Route in the Gold Coast
1. Primary fly-belts round Makongo consisted of three different vegetational communities: a Cynometra-Vitex association along the main length of the Makongo river, on a clay soil; a Ficus congensis association along the river close to the town, on a sandy soil; and Isoberlinia doka woodland on moist sandy soil north-west and south of Makongo. 2. Secondary fly-belts of less dense vegetation occur in the orchard bush savannah round Makongo, and these are not colonised until the commencement of the rainy season. 3. Glossina tachinoides and G. palpalis both occurred in the riverside communities, and G. palpalis alone in the Isoberlinia woodland. 4. Along the river G. palpalis outnumbered G. tachinoides by 3:1 in the dry season. At the commencement of the rains G. tachinoides increased more quickly than G. palpalis , bringing their numbers very nearly equal, but at the end of the rains there was a decrease in G. tachinoides which restored the original proportion. 5. G. morsitans had been found at Makongo formerly but was not met with at the time of this investigation, its absence being due to the disappearance of the larger antelope from the neighbourhood. 6. Smaller game animals, small mammals and reptiles afforded an adequate food supply for tsetse in the fly-belts, and also passing herds of cattle, as well as natives from the village and travellers. 7. The distribution of G. palpalis within the fly-belts was markedly influenced by the proximity of a cattle road along which herds of cattle passed almost daily, and by village water-holes. 8. During the dry season the primary foci were always found to be the places of greatest relative humidity, and the fly does not tend to move out of these until the general atmospheric humidity has reached a certain fairly high degree. 9. In clearing the fly-belts the removal of all primary foci within a quarter of a mile of the town and of thick bush within 100 yards of water-holes was undertaken. The work lasted from the beginning of February to the end of March 1931. 10. The effect of clearing the Isoberlinia doka woodland was to banish G. palpalis completely, and it never returned to these clearings. 11. On clearing the riverside Ficus congensis fly-belt, G. tachinoides was practically eliminated for the first three months, but reappeared in the clearings in June when there was a general increase and up-stream migration of this fly. G. palpalis remained in this clearing in fluctuating numbers up to June, when observations were suspended. 12. 565 marked tsetse were liberated in the fly-belts immediately previous to clearing. Of G. palpalis 12·7% were recaptured in the clearings and 11% outside the clearings. Of G. tachinoides 5·5% were recaptured in the clearings and 6·8% outside.