Pitfall Trapping of Microtus townsendii
A field population of Microtus townsendii was trapped concurrently with live-traps and pitfall traps throughout the spring and summer of 1975. The population was at peak densities, with a maximum of 519 voles per acre. The number enumerated by pitfalls was up to two times larger than the number enumerated by live-traps. Capture of a large number of young in pitfalls indicated that mortality was higher among post-weanlings than among any other age group. Recruitment to live-traps was largely restricted to animals over 40 g, whereas in pitfalls animals were generally lighter. Over half of the 1,100 animals captured first by pitfalls were never caught by live-traps. Among those subsequently entering live-traps, many stayed away for 6 to 10 weeks, and some of the smaller ones stayed away even longer. Few animals dispersed to other nearby trapping grids. Pitfall trapping and live-trapping sample different subpopulations, young animals and transient adults being a large fraction of the individuals caught in pitfalls.
Influence of pitfall versus Longworth livetraps, bait addition, and drift fences on trap success and mortality of shrews
Pitfall trapping is believed to be the most efficient method for capturing shrews (Sorex spp.); however, Longworth live-traps have been used successfully in North America and Great Britain. Due to high metabolic rates, previous attempts to livetrap shrews have been faced with very high (exceeding 95 % in some circumstances) mortality rates. Here we report the results of two experiments attempting to integrate successful livetrapping of shrews into standard rodent trapping protocols. In Experiment 1 we compared efficiency of pitfall and Longworth live-traps operated with drift fences on 1-ha trapping grids for capturing vagrant shrews (Sorex vagrans) on agricultural set-asides in Delta, British Columbia, Canada. A total of 100 trap stations, on each of three trapping grids, were equipped with a 3-m-long drift fence and randomly assigned either one pitfall at the centre of each fence, or two Longworth traps, one at each end of the fence. In addition, we randomly selected 50 % of trap stations and provided 6 g of mealworms (Tenebrio molitor) larvae as bait. In response to high mortality rates, we varied the frequency of trap checks, with intervals of 12–14 h (long), 6–9 h (medium) and 3–4 h (short). Contrary to our predictions, Longworth traps captured significantly more shrews than pitfall traps. We observed the highest mean mortality rates in traps without mealworms, checked at long intervals. Shrews in mealworm-baited traps checked at short intervals experienced no mortality. Mortality rates in mealworm-baited traps checked at short and medium intervals were similar (t = −1.33, P = 0.20, Bonferroni-corrected alpha = 0.004). In Experiment 2, we attempted to determine the relative gains in efficiency when using drift fences in conjunction with Longworth and pitfall traps. However, due to small sample size, we were unable to detect significant differences. A trapping protocol using Longworth traps in conjunction with drift fences, provided with mealworms as food, and checked at a maximum interval of 8 h should be sufficient to effectively include shrews in rodent livetrapping studies.
A Study of Population Growth and Control Exhibited in the Laboratory by Prairie Deermice
Freely growing laboratory populations of prairie deermice were founded by releasing four adult males and four adult females into enclosures containing food and water in excess of utilization. Growth ceased in each population at markedly variable numerical levels though under similar conditions of the physical environment. Control of population growth was achieved by one of two means: cessation of reproduction or failure of young to survive. Reproduction by females founding the populations was significantly more frequent than that of females born into the populations. The evidence suggests that factors controlling the growth of laboratory populations of prairie deermice are basically behavioral, are a result of intrinsic differences in each population and are not directly related to the number of animals in each population per se. See full-text article at JSTOR