High thermal conductivity SiC/SiC composites for fusion applications
SiC/SiC composites offer excellent potential for fusion energy as well as numerous commercial applications. High manufacturing cost and very low through-the-thickness (transverse) thermal conductivity (below 15 W/m K) hinders wider applications of SiC/SiC composites. To overcome these obstacles, a low cost chemical vapor reaction (CVR) process was developed to fabricate crystalline, high-purity SiC fibers. Several variations of the CVR process were used to fabricate SiC/SiC composites. An unirradiated, 4-mm thick SiC/SiC composite was completely CVR-converted from a converted SiC fiber preform with a pitch graphite matrix, and exhibited a bulk density of 2.65 g/cc, 10% open porosity, room temperature (RT) and 1000°C thermal conductivity values of 70 and 35 W/m K, respectively, and an RT bend strength of 200 MPa.
OF SiC f / SiC COMPOSITES FOR FUSION REACTORS
SiCf/SiC composites are being considered as a candidate structural material for fusion reactors due to their low induced radioactivity by 14 MeV neutron irradiation, high temperature strength and low activation properties. Use of these materials need a strong research and development effort in order to solve some critical issues such as thermal conductivity, radiation stability, hermeticity, chemical compatibility with the fusion environment. The purpose of this paper is to present an overview of current research in material development, properties and irradiation response of new SiCf/SiC composites.
Intensification of Bubble Disintegration and Dispersion by Mechanical Stirring in Gas Injection Refining
Water model experiments were performed for establishing highly efficient gas injection refining processes. Mechanical stirring was applied to disintegrate the injected bubbles and to disperse them widely in the bath. The bubble disintegration and dispersion were investigated by changing rotation mode (direction of rotation), rotation speed, blade size of the impeller and gas flow rate. Forward rotation of the impeller induced a stable tangential flow and could not disperse bubbles in the bath due to formation of a vortex around the impeller shaft. The tangential flow could be suppressed by forward–interrupt rotation, which could reduce the vortex formation to some degree. However, forward–interrupt rotation could not disperse the bubbles widely in the bath. Forward–reverse rotation could prevent the vortex formation completely and create a strong shear stress field, which intensified the bubble disintegration and dispersion in the bath. Higher impeller rotation speed and larger blade length in forward–reverse rotation could enhance the bubble disintegration and make the dispersed bubbles smaller. The bubble dispersion zone became wider with larger blade length. The bubble size tended to be larger at higher gas flow rates. However, its dependence on the gas flow rate became smaller at higher impeller rotation speed.