Peak Locations and Relative Phase of Different Decay Modes of the a_{1} Axial Vector Resonance in Diffractive Production.
We show that a single I=1 spin-parity J^{PC}=1^{++} a_{1} resonance can manifest itself as two separated mass peaks, one decaying into an S-wave ρπ system and the second decaying into a P-wave f_{0}(980)π system, with a rapid increase of the phase difference between their amplitudes arising mainly from the structure of the diffractive production process. This study clarifies questions related to the mass, width, and decay rates of the a_{1} resonance raised by the recent high statistics data of the COMPASS Collaboration on a_{1} production in πN→πππN at high energies.
Light isovector resonances in 
π−p→π−π−π+p
 at 
190  GeV/c
We have performed the most comprehensive resonance-model fit of pi(-)pi(-)pi(+) states using the results of our previously published partial-wave analysis (PWA) of a large data set of diffractive-d ...
The twofold emergence of the $a_1$ axial vector meson in high energy hadronic production
The high statistics COMPASS results on diffractive dissociation $\pi N \rightarrow \pi \pi \pi N$ suggest that the isospin $I=1$ spin-parity $J^{PC}= 1^{++}$ $a_1(1260)$ resonance could be split into two states: $a_1(1260)$ decaying into an S-wave $\rho\pi$ system, and $a_1^\prime(1420)$ decaying into a P-wave $f_0(980)\pi$ system. We analyse the reaction by incorporating our previous treatment of resonant re-scattering corrections in the Drell-Deck forward production process. Our results show that the COMPASS results are fully consistent with the existence of a single axial-vector $a_1$ resonance. The characteristic structure of the production process, which differs in the two orbital angular momentum states, plays a crucial role in this determination. Provided the theoretical analysis of the reaction is done in a consistent manner, this single resonance produces two peaks at different locations in the two channels, with a rapid increase of the phase difference between their amplitudes arising mainly from the structure of the production process itself, and not from a dynamical resonance effect. In addition, this analysis clarifies questions related to the mass, width, and decay rates of the $a_1$ resonance.