Chemotaxis of larval soybean cyst nematode,Heterodera glycines Race 3, to root leachates and ions
Second-stage larvae of the soybean cyst nematodeHeterodera glycines Race 3 were attracted in an in vitro bioassay to pooled leachates of soybean roots that were expressed as root gram-hours (1 g of root/hr/vol). Their responses were dosage dependent with maximal attraction to a 5 root g-hr/ml source. Optimal bioassay conditions used 24 hr for gradient formation and 1.5 hr for larval movement. Individual plants produced leachate with little variation in biological activity. Production was constant for five days of preparation. The attractive activity of root leachate declined with storage at 4 °C and heating over 30 °C, but loss of activity was reduced by freezing. Extraction and Sep-Pak fractionation indicated that the attractions(s) was water-soluble. Larvae were attracted also to several ionic solutions.
Nitrate analogs as attractants for soybean cyst nematode
Soybean cyst nematode (SCN) Heterodera glycines Ichinohe, a plant parasite, is one of the most serious pests of soybean. In this paper, we report that SCN is attracted to nitrate and its analogs. We performed attraction assays to screen for novel attractants for SCN and found that nitrates were attractants for SCN and SCN recognized nitrate gradients. However, attraction of SCN to nitrates was not observed on agar containing nitrate. To further elucidate the attraction mechanism in SCN, we performed attraction assays using nitrate analogs (, , ). SCN was attracted to all nitrate analogs; however, attraction of SCN to nitrate analogs was not observed on agar containing nitrate. In contrast, SCN was attracted to azuki root, irrespective of presence or absence of nitrate in agar media. Our results suggest that the attraction mechanisms differ between plant-derived attractant and nitrate. Nitrate and its analogs regulate the attraction of soybean cyst nematode.
Synthetic Hatching Agents for Heterodera Schachtii Schm. and Their Mode of Action
Two hundred and eighty-three compounds were tested for their hatching activity for Heterodera schachtii Schmidt, 31 of these, at the given concentrations, gave hatches equal to or greater than that obtained with beet root diffusate. No correlation was found between hatching activity and redox potential for the 25 redox compounds examined. The structure of the artificial hatching agents and the mechanism of hatching are discussed.