The influence of different tempers on the composition of pottery
The modification of the raw clay by the potter to produce a paste suitable for the intended purposes adds a layer of obfuscation to the problem of provenancing the original clay source by chemical fingerprinting. By preparing different pastes from the same commercially available raw clay and their chemical analysis by Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis, an experiment under controlled conditions (tempers, mixing ratios, firing temperatures and sampling methods) sheds light on the influence of different tempers. The results show that two different sampling procedures (drilling and grinding) have almost no influence on the chemical fingerprint with the exception of the elemental concentrations of As, Zr, and Hf. This may be due to the volatility of the compounds (As) or the presence of zircon crystals (containing Zr and Hf) which are partly lost during drilling. Three different firing temperatures show no significant influence as well. The application of the modified Mahalanobis distance introduced by Beier and Mommsen in 1995 as a statistical filter and the introduction of a ‘dilution factor’ to the raw data show that the influence of quartz-dominated tempers can be filtered out of the data, resolving the underlying chemical fingerprint of the original clay source. At the same time, by mathematically removing the additional spread introduced by dilution, even subtle differences between similar pastes can be resolved by standard multivariate statistical means.
Eastern Mediterranean Economic Exchange during the Iron Age: Portable X-Ray Fluorescence and Neutron Activation Analysis of Cypriot-Style Pottery in the Amuq Valley, Turkey
Two markers of regional exchange in the Eastern Mediterranean during the first millennium BCE are the White Painted and Bichrome Wares from Cyprus’s Cypro-Geometric and Cypro-Archaic periods. Although these ceramics are often assumed to be imports from Cyprus, excavations in southern Turkey at sites such as Tarsus-Gözlükule, Kilise Tepe, Sirkeli Höyük, and Kinet Höyük suggest that at least some of this pottery was produced locally, requiring a major revision of our understanding of economic interaction in the Eastern Mediterranean. We employ a combination of portable x-ray fluorescence and neutron activation analysis to investigate the White Painted and Bichrome Wares recovered from Tell Tayinat, Çatal Höyük, and Tell Judaidah, three sites in the Amuq Valley of southeastern Anatolia. Our results demonstrate that a clear geochemical distinction exists between imported and local versions of this pottery. Through comparison with legacy datasets, we locate the likely origin of the imported pottery in the Circum-Troodos sediments of central and southern Cyprus. The secondary and tertiary settlements of Çatal Höyük and Tell Judaidah had access only to this imported material. In contrast, the inhabitants of Tell Tayinat, capital city of the region, consumed both imported and locally produced White Painted and Bichrome Wares. This pattern cannot be explained in purely economic terms whereby the frequency of imports decreases as distance from the point of production increases. Instead, we suggest that elite feasting practices drove demand, resulting in either local potters producing Cypriot-style pottery or Cypriot potters settling in the vicinity of Tell Tayinat. These findings offer new insights into the relationship between historically attested Iron Age kingdoms in southern Turkey and Cyprus and complicate our understanding of exchange in the Eastern Mediterranean during the Iron Age.
The Role of Petrography in the Study of Archaeological Ceramics
Petrographic microscopy is a venerable geological technique that has been used in the service of archaeology at least since the 1930s (e.g., Shepard, 1936, 1939). Compared to newer, sophisticated, “high-tech” approaches to the study of the compositional analysis of ceramics (e.g., neutron activation or acid extraction), petrography surely rates the appellation “old fashioned.”The goal of this chapter is to describe and evaluate critically the current status and potential of ceramic petrography as an approach to the compositional analysis of archaeological ceramics, especially in light of the increasingly widespread and successful application of newer technologies for determining the elemental composition of ceramics that might be seen as rendering petrography obsolete (useful earlier reviews of ceramic petrography may be found in Freestone, 1991 and 1995; Peacock, 1970; Williams, 1983).