Arthrodesis of the equine proximal interphalangeal joint: a biomechanical comparison of two 7-hole 3.5-mm broad and two 5-hole 4.5-mm narrow dynamic compression plates.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the biomechanical characteristics and mode of failure of two different dynamic compression plate (DCP) techniques for proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) arthrodesis in horses.


STUDY DESIGN
Randomized block-design blocking on horse (1-5), method of fixation (two 7-hole, 3.5-mm broad DCP vs two 5-hole, 4.5-mm narrow DCP), side (left, right), and end (front, hind). Constructs were loaded to failure in 3-point bending in a dorsal-to-palmar (plantar) direction.


SAMPLE POPULATION
Ten paired limbs from 5 equine cadavers.


METHODS
Two 7-hole, 3.5-mm broad dynamic compression plates (bDCP) were used in 1 limb of a pair, and two 5-hole 4.5-mm narrow dynamic compression plates (nDCP) were used on the contralateral limb. Plates were positioned abaxially across the dorsomedial and dorsolateral aspect of the PIPJ. Arthrodesis constructs were loaded (19 mm/s) in 3-point bending in a dorsal-to-palmar (plantar) direction using a materials-testing machine. Composite stiffness, yield point, and maximal bending moment at failure were obtained from bending moment-angular deformation curves. Data were analyzed using ANOVA, X(2) analysis, and Fisher's exact tests; the power of the test was calculated when differences were not significant.


RESULTS
There were no significant differences in composite stiffness (P >.05; power = 0.8 @ delta = 21.9%), yield point (P >.05; power = 0.8 @ delta = 34.4%), or maximal bending moment (P >.05; power = 0.8 @ delta = 17.8%) between the two fixation techniques. For bDCP constructs, 11% (15 of 140) of the 3.5-mm screws were damaged; 7 of the screw heads pulled through plates where the plates bent, 1 screw head broke off, and 7 screws were bent or pulled out of the phalanx. For nDCP constructs, 8% (8 of 100) of the 4.5-mm screws were damaged; 1 screw head pulled through a plate, 1 screw head broke off, and 6 screws were bent or pulled out of the phalanx.


CONCLUSIONS
There were no biomechanical or failure differences between bDCP and nDCP fixation of the PIPJ in horses when evaluated in single-cycle 3-point bending to failure.


CLINICAL RELEVANCE
There is no biomechanical advantage to the use of two 7-hole, 3.5-mm bDCP in equine proximal interphalangeal arthrodesis compared with two 5-hole, 4.5-mm nDCP. Two 5-hole, 4.5-mm nDCP may be easier to place, whereas two 7-hole, 3.5-mm bDCP may provide more versatility in fracture repair.
The holding power of orthopedic screws in vivo.
Great difficulty is encountered in choosing screws for internal fixation, for screws differ in material, geometry, dimension, and in insertion technique. Recently claims have been made that self-tapping screws cause necrosis of bone and result in fibrous tissue formation, with loss of holding power. This investigation was undertaken to study the healing of bone about screws inserted for a period of 3 months. Self tapping and non-self tapping screws were employed. The Vitallium screws not only differed in dimension, but also in configuration of the thread, with the smaller of the self-tapping screws exhibiting a "V" thread in distinction to the buttress thread of the larger screw. The histologic data were correlated with the holding power of the screws as obtained by means of a push out test, performed with the aid of an Instrom testing machine. The largest screw tested, the 4.5 mm non-self tapping stainless steel AO screw (Type 1), provided the greatest safety factor to push out loading over the period tested in the unloaded system. The self tapping and non-self tapping screws of similar material and size were found to maintain comparable holding power at all intervals tested in vivo in the unloaded system. No histological differentiation could be made with regard to both death or tissue reaction around the implant, between the stainless steel or cobalt chromium alloy materials, nor between the self tapping and non-self tapping insertion methods.
A technique for large-field, superficial electron therapy.
The application of electron beams to radiation therapy has received increased attention in recent years. This interest stems largely from the special characteristics of the electron depth-dose distribution; the fall-off in depth dose near the end of the range of the electrons is particularly rapid for electron beams having energies less than about 10 Mev. Such an electron beam is suitable for the treatment of widespread, superficial lesions, where it is desirable to minimize the dose to deep tissues. All the common sources of super-voltage x-rays, apart from radioactive substances, are inherently capable of producing an external beam of electrons, though with varying degrees of complexity. Electrons of about the energy suitable for superficial therapy (several Mev) may be used to produce an x-ray beam which is sufficiently penetrating for the treatment of even the deepest lesions. The Stanford medical linear accelerator was designed to provide both x-rays and electron beams. The accelerator and its applic...