A EDUCAÇÃO FÍSICA ESCOLAR NO ÂMBITO DAS POLÍTICAS DE AMPLIAÇÃO DO TEMPO ESCOLAR: REFLEXÕES A PARTIR DA LEGISLAÇÃO EDUCACIONAL BRASILEIRA
This study falls within the intersection of two themes: school physical education and the expansion of school time . Understanding that physical education seems oblivious to this debate , which can be perceived by the few and / or non-existent studies on such issues, this paper aims to present the evolution of educational legislation dealing with the expansion of the school day and then propose an analysis of school physical education in the context of these policies . The study helps with the start of a debate about the characteristics of the schools extended time and / or full building and methodological strategies that contribute towards a socially relevant physical education in this " new" school that has style.
Tempo de escola e qualidade na educação pública
The present study is a reflection on the relationship between school hours and the quality of the educational work de- livered at school. Full-time school, which is increasingly adopted by the Brazilian public school system, is analyzed from the stand point of the studies on school effectiveness and the cultural and historical conditions that define it. The different concepts sup- porting the full-time pedagogical and administrative propositions, which are translated into different institutional solutions, are also approached.
The New ‘U’
Today's talk about tenure must be framed within broader discussions about the role of the university. Our university system is now over one hundred years old, the “Old-Time College” is gone, the “cold war” university is no longer viable, and the foundations of the modern “multiversity” are cracking, so it is time to talk about change. But change is not necessarily reform, and resisting change probably will not keep things the way they are, so academics must understand the forces reshaping the university. Whenever I listen to colleagues defend the status quo by saying that the United States has a university system that is the envy of the world, I hear echoes of the Detroit automobile industry's casual dismissal of foreign competitors in the early 1960s. The decision not to change did not preserve the auto industry, and it is unlikely to preserve public universities as we know them. The current debates about tenure began with ideological attacks on “tenured radicals” who used their secure jobs to subvert conservative cultural values. The attack on tenure gathered steam as fiscal hawks in financially-strapped states looked for ways to save money and found huge state university systems with budgets to match. When asked why he robbed banks, the legendary Willie Sutton replied, “Because that's where the money is.” When asked why they are robbing tenure, legislators, regents, and administrators reply, “Because that's where the money is.” Personnel costs are a large share of university budgets and tenure ties the hands of administrators and legislators accustomed to using purse strings to control universities.