Ts-MARE VOLCANISM AND BASALT PETROGENESIS : " ASTOUNDING FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS ( AFC ) "-DEVELOPED OVER THE LAST FIFTEEN YEARS
• _-,'_',._ NOT FILMED
A model for small‐impact erosion applied to the lunar surface
A model for erosion of the lunar surface by impact of small projectiles is developed that provides an analytic representation of the change of crater shape as a function of time. The model is applied to the erosion of craters approximately 1 meter to 1 km in diameter. The lifetime of a crater in this size range, which is steadily eroded by impact, is approximately proportional to its radius. The model predicts the observed steady-state size frequency distribution of small lunar craters and the dependence of this distribution on the crater-production curve.
A Novel Approach for Evaluation of Multivariate Individual Bioequivalence
....................................................................................................................... XV PART – I ................................................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER 1 BIOEQUIVALENCE ................................................................................ 2 1.1 BIOEQUIVALENCE ............................................................................................................ 2 1.2 PHARMACOKINETIC (PK) PARAMETERS .......................................................................... 4 1.3 DESIGN OF BIOEQUIVALENCE STUDIES ............................................................................ 7 CHAPTER 2 ESTIMATION OF BIOEQUIVALENCE ............................................ 10 2.1 TYPES OF BIOEQUIVALENCE MEASURES ....................................................................... 10 2.1.1 Average Bioequivalence ........................................................................................ 10 2.1.2 Population Bioequivalence .................................................................................... 10 2.1.3 Individual Bioequivalence ..................................................................................... 11 2.2 ASSESSMENT OF AVERAGE BIOEQUIVALENCE ............................................................... 12 2.2.1 Confidence Interval Approach ............................................................................... 13 2.2.2 Interval Hypothesis approach ............................................................................... 14 2.3 BASIS FOR POPULATION AND INDIVIDUAL BIOEQUIVALENCE ........................................ 16 2.4 ASSESSMENT OF POPULATION BIOEQUIVALENCE .......................................................... 20 2.5 ASSESSMENT OF INDIVIDUAL BIOEQUIVALENCE ........................................................... 22