Trademark Transactions in EU Law – Refining the Approach to Selective Distribution Networks and National Unfair Competition Law
Given the rudimentary nature of the current set of EU rules, the regulation of trademark transactions in the EU depends on a harmonious interplay of harmonized EU law on the one hand, and individual national laws on the other. This configuration of the system places a particular responsibility on the Court of Justice of the European Union. Interpreting harmonized EU rules, the Court ought to consider the impact of its decision on the proper functioning of national law. An overambitious approach seeking to maximize the harmonizing effect of the rudimentary set of EU norms will almost inevitably lead to unsatisfactory results. After a short overview of EU objects of property rules and present amendment proposals, two decisions of the CJEU will be brought into focus to illustrate this point. The decision in Copad/Dior gives rise to concerns about harmonized rules in the Trade Mark Directive becoming a straitjacket offering insufficient breathing space for the reconciliation of licensor, licensee and third party interests, while the case Martin Y Paz/Depuydt sheds light on the potential corrosive effect on national unfair competition law. The analysis shows the structural deficiencies of the current EU system and the need for additional fine-tuning based on both EU and national norms.
Flexibility Grave – Partial Reproduction Focus and Closed System Fetishism in CJEU, Pelham
In the ongoing discussion about the impact of fundamental rights on EU copyright law, the Pelham judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has received much attention. However, the decision also raises important legal-doctrinal issues. The CJEU employs the harmonized right of reproduction as a vehicle to regulate adaptations of pre-existing source material. Moreover, the Court insists on a balancing of interests within the EU matrix of exclusive rights and limitations. The closed list of limitations in EU copyright law, however, can hardly be expected to offer sufficient breathing space for adaptation scenarios. As the Information Society Directive did not harmonize the right of adaptation, there was no need to include indispensable free adaptation rules that have evolved at the national level, such as the German “free use” doctrine. Instead of embracing national rules of equity and fairness to fill the gap, the CJEU is reluctant to borrow from the legal traditions of EU Member States and misses an important opportunity to provide guidance for the regulation of adaptations outside the sound sampling arena. After an introduction to the German “Metall auf Metall” saga that led to the Pelham decision, the following analysis sheds light on these developments in EU copyright law and discusses problems arising from the approach taken by the CJEU.
Reconceptualizing Vagrancy and Reconstructing the Vagrant: A Socio-Legal Analysis of Criminal Law Reform in Canada, 1953-1972
This article explores significant reforms to the vagrancy section of the Criminal Code during the mid-to-late twentieth century. By locating the reforms within their unique social, political, and economic climates, I examine how they reconceptualized the offence of vagrancy and concomitantly reconstructed the vagrant as a social problem. The reforms played a seminal role in reducing the number of vagrancy offences, eventually leading to the demise of vagrancy in the criminal law. Yet, while the "vagrant" ceased to exist in the law, the law still continues to preserve vestiges of the vagrant in a highly gendered manner.