AUTHORITY CONFLICT OF THE COURTS IN ACEH: A CASE STUDY OF SETTLEMENT FOR CHILDREN SECLUSION IN CHILDREN PROTECTION
This study is aims to discuss about Shari’a Courts, Adat Courts and The Juvenile Criminal Courts authority. And also to discuss about the concept of legal certainty, child protections and conflict jurisdiction of the courts cases involving Khalwat Moslem children in Aceh. These study adopted two approaches, namely normative and empirical approaches.The results showed that, all courts have jurisdiction to try cases of Khalwat Moslem children in Aceh. Therefore, there is legal uncertainty and conflict of jurisdiction courts. At the same time, resulting in the protection of the child is not fully guaranteed. Keywords: Cases of Khalwat Children, Child Protection, Conflict Jurisdiction of Courts, Legal Certainty
Penyelesaian Kasus Mesum melalui Peradilan Adat Gampong di Aceh (Suatu Kajian Kasus di Banda Aceh)
Treatment nasty case in Banda Aceh, Aceh province could also be implemented through Local Customary Courts. Settlement through customary courts always be informal or through peace way. On the other hand, Aceh Qanun No. 14 of nasty arranges it as well, in which the nasty cases will be resolved by the Syarâ€™iyah Court. This study aimed to see, if the Local Customary Court has the authority to deal with nasty case, and whether the decision made by the Local Customary Court shall be final and tight. The study was conducted by interviewing Local Customary Court judges, Wilayatul Hisbah and Communities. The method used was a qualitative study. The result showed that both the Local Customary Courts and the Syarâ€˜iyah Court have the same authority in handling the nasty case in Banda Aceh. In fact, sometimes, the local customary courts also resolve cases that have been categorized as adultery. Treatment cases of nasty, with local customary court have no final and strong legal force, because if the parties are not satisfied with the decision of the Customary Court, they can still bring the Government of Aceh in order to perform an amendment to the articles of those Qanun. Then, the special cases that are categorized as adultery should immediately be resolved by the Syarâ€™iyah Court.
The Area of Freedom, Security and Justice ten years on: Successes and future challenges under the Stockholm Programme. CEPS Paperbacks. June 2010
This book celebrates the tenth anniversary of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (AFSJ) by bringing together the views of key practitioners and policy-makers who have played an outstanding role in thinking about and shaping EU policies on freedom, security and justice. 
 
Ten years ago, the member states transferred competences to the EU for law and policy-making in the fields of immigration, asylum and border controls, and began the transfer process for criminal justice and policing. This decade of European cooperation on AFSJ policies has experienced very dynamic convergence, the enactment of a large body of European law and the setting-up of numerous EU agencies working in these domains. Such dynamism in policy-making has not been without challenges and vulnerabilities, however. As this collective volume shows, the main dilemmas that lie ahead relate to an effective (while more plural) institutional framework under the Treaty of Lisbon, stronger judicial scrutiny through a greater role for national courts and the Court of Justice in Luxembourg, better mechanisms for evaluating and monitoring the implementation of EU AFSJ law and a more solid fundamental rights strategy. The contributions in this volume address the progress achieved so far in these policy areas, identify the challenges for future European cooperation in the AFSJ and put forward possible paths for making more progress in the next generation of the EU’s AFSJ.