Trends in the Development of Machinery and Associated Technology ” TMT 2010 , Mediterranean Cruise , 11-18 September 2010 ANNEAL HARDENING EFFECT IN SINTERED COPPER ALLOYS DEPENDENCE ON ALLOYING ELEMENTS AND DEFORMATION
This paper reports results of investigation carried out on sintered copper alloys: Cu-8at%Ni, Cu8at %Zn, Cu-8at%Al, Cu-8at%Ag, Cu-4at%Ni-4at%Sn, Cu-4at%Ni-4at%Zn and Cu-4at%Au. For comparison, investigation carried out on the sintered copper. The sintered alloys, as well as pure copper, were subjected to the same thermomechanical treatment. Thermomechanical treatment included cold rolling of 30,50 and 70% in reduction. Isochronal and isothermal annealing up to the recrystallization temperature were performed, followed with hardness and electrical conductivity measuring. This investigation shows that hardness and electrical conductivity of cold deformed copper-alloys increase after annealing in the temperature range of 160 400°C, due to anneal hardening effect. Electrical conductivity decreases with increasing the amount of alloying elements. During the annealing the electrical conductivity slowly increases for both set of the samples copper and alloys due to recovery and recrystallization
Influence of Alloying on the Anneal Hardening Effect in Sintered Copper Alloys
Copper and copper alloys were prepared by a powder metallurgical method. Sintered copper and copper alloys were subjected to cold rolling with different degrees of deformation. The alloy in the cold-rolled state was isochronally annealed up to the recrystallization temperature during which the hardness was measured. These investigations show that anneal hardening effect occurs in a temperature range of 473-673 K.
Perceived job importance and job performance satisfaction of selected clinical nutrition management responsibilities.
A nationwide survey of clinical nutrition managers was conducted to assess perceived importance of selected job responsibilities and perceived performance satisfaction of those job responsibilities. A questionnaire was developed to achieve the study objectives, validated by an expert panel, and pilot-tested prior to data collection. All members of the American Dietetic Association's Clinical Nutrition Management dietetic practice group (N=1,668) were asked to rate the importance of selected job responsibilities and their satisfaction with those responsibilities using Likert-type scales with descriptions. Results revealed that clinical nutrition managers perceived all job responsibilities listed in the questionnaire to be important (ie, the mean score of each responsibility was >3.0 of a 4.0 scale). Respondents rated regulatory-related job responsibilities as most important and were most satisfied with their performance of these responsibilities. Following regulatory-related responsibilities, clinical nutrition managers perceived patient satisfaction and staff retention to be more important than other responsibilities. In general, clinical nutrition managers were more satisfied with their job performance for job responsibilities that they ranked as more important.