The aromaticity/antiaromaticity continuum. 1. Comparison of the aromaticity of the dianion and the antiaromaticity of the dication of tetrabenzo[5.5]fulvalene via magnetic measures.
The aromaticity of the dianion (2) and the antiaromaticity of the dication (3) of tetrabenzo[5.5]fulvalene have been evaluated through magnetic criteria, (1)H NMR shifts, nucleus-independent chemical shifts, NICS, and magnetic susceptibility exaltation, Lambda. The sum of the NICS values, using the GIAO (gauge-independent atomic orbital) method, for 2 is -35.2; that of 3 is +38.2, indicating the aromaticity of 2 and the antiaromaticity of 3. Calculation of magnetic susceptibility exaltation using the CSGT (continuous set of gauge transformations) method gives a similar result, with Lambda of -81.8 ppm cgs for 2 and 95.8 ppm cgs for 3. The general validity of these values is supported by excellent agreement between the NMR shifts calculated by the GIAO and CSGT methods with experimental shifts. Comparison of 1H NMR shifts with those of model compounds allows evaluation of the magnitude of the diatropic shift in 2 and paratropic shift in 3 and supports their assignment as aromatic/antiaromatic, respectively. The agreement between calculated and experimental 1H NMR shifts is excellent for 3 in the absence of counterions but much better for 2 when counterions are included. Inclusion of counterions in the evaluation of diatropic shift for 2 gave a smaller shift than in the absence of counterions, suggesting a decreased aromaticity. When counterions were included in the calculation of Lambda, the value was also decreased, suggesting a decreased aromaticity. This observation has important consequences in the use of experimental data for the evaluation of aromaticity, and presumably antiaromaticity, of anions since, in most cases, there will be close interaction with counterions.
σ-Aromaticity and σ-antiaromaticity
Abstract The concepts of σ-aromaticity and σ-antiaromaticity have been examined in the light of their connection with the type of the electronic shell of skeletal bonds. Electron count rules for σ-skeletal electrons have been formulated for both small saturated and unsaturated cyclic compounds. The electronic shells of the conjugated compounds are classified into 4 types by their properties of gp- and σ-aromaticity and/or π- and gs-antiaromaticity depending on the type of filling up of the π- and σ-skeletal subsystems. Experimental and calculational data regarding rearrangements and ways of stabilization of a variety of carbocyclic compounds have been systematized on the basis of approaches developed to the concepts of π- and σ-aromaticity and antiaromaticity.
Negatively charged phospholipids trigger the interaction of a bacterial Tat substrate precursor protein with lipid monolayers.
Folded proteins can be translocated across biological membranes via the Tat machinery. It has been shown in vitro that these Tat substrates can interact with membranes prior to translocation. Here we report a monolayer and infrared reflection-absorption spectroscopic (IRRAS) study of the initial states of this membrane interaction, the binding to a lipid monolayer at the air/water interface serving as a model for half of a biological membrane. Using the model Tat substrate HiPIP (high potential iron-sulfur protein) from Allochromatium vinosum, we found that the precursor preferentially interacts with monolayers of negatively charged phospholipids. The signal peptide is essential for the interaction of the precursor protein with the monolayer because the mature HiPIP protein showed no interaction with the lipid monolayer. However, the individual signal peptide interacted differently with the monolayer compared to the complete precursor protein. IRRA spectroscopy indicated that the individual signal peptide forms mainly aggregated β-sheet structures. This β-sheet formation did not occur for the signal peptide when being part of the full length precursor. In this case it adopted an α-helical structure upon membrane insertion. The importance of the signal peptide and the mature domain for the membrane interaction is discussed in terms of current ideas of Tat substrate-membrane interactions.