Occupational Thorium Exposure or Self-Poisoning?
Thoriated electrodes are used in TIG (Tungsten Inert Gas) welding [1]. Thorium intake may happen during grinding and welding operations using thoriated electrodes [2]. The use of thoriated tungsten electrodes may be at the origin of a potential hazard [3]. The annual commited effective dose from inhalation of 232Th, 230Th, 228Th and 228Ra is usually below 1mSv for a full-time TIG welder [4]. Electrode consumption during welding was primarily the result of tip sharpening. Indeed, less than 3% of weight loss was attributable to the welding process [5].
[Thorium: analysis and dosimetry of thorium welding electrodes].
The use of thoriated tungsten electrodes may be at the origin of a potential hazard for the personnel involved in the use of electrodes, as well as the general population. To assess this hazard, the electrode radioactivity measurements by alpha and beta counting has been conducted. The radioelements were identified by alpha and gamma spectromety. It appeared that there was a radioactive disequilibrium between thorium-232 (Th-232) and it daughters atoms. Additionally, some thorium 230 (Th-230) belonging to the uranium chain, was present. The chemical separation and the milling processing had affected the radioactive composition and the thorium in the electrodes, doesn't exactly corresponds to natural thorium. Radiation doses were also assessed: film and photoluminescence dosimetry were undertaken. Finally smears method showed a alpha removable area contamination. Even if the hazard is weak. As a matter of fact, it must not be neglected because it was complex, for the thorium was always accompanied by Th-232 progeny, alpha emitters but also beta and gamma emitters.
The use of internal standards in ICP-MS.
Careful study of the matrix effect in ICP-MS showed that, in all cases studied, the magnitude of the signal suppression or enhancement depends in a regular way on the mass number. Hence, accurate correction for non-spectral interferences is only possible using an internal standard with mass number close to that of the analyte element(s). It is also shown that using an internal standard with mass number close to that of the analyte improves the precision. For both cases, the ionization energy of the internal standard seems to be of no or only secondary importance. To obtain optimal precision and accuracy, the internal standard should be selected as close in mass number as possible to that of the analyte element(s). When a number of elements over a considerable mass range are to be determined, several internal standards have to be used.