DO COMPARATIVE AND REGIONAL STUDIES OF NATIONALISM INTERSECT?
The question behind this article evolved from two separate observations. While the expansion of comparative and cross-regional research has been actively promoted by leading scholars of the Middle East (and was later encouraged by such bodies as the Middle East Studies Association and this journal), so has the incorporation of scholarly insights from area studies been urged by leading political scientists as a prerequisite for revitalizing all of the discipline's subfields and institutionally endorsed by the American Political Science Association. Viewed as interrelated, these observations prompted the question framing this text: if the aims of many Middle East scholars and institutions are compatible with the aims of many political scientists and their association, why have they remained largely parallel, as suggested by scholars within both fields?
The Quality of Theory and the Comparative Disadvantage of Area Studies
The 1990s were not kind to area studies. They were particularly cruel to Middle East specialists, and even more particularly, perhaps, to social scientists. The job market has slumped as relevant departments have lost positions. Departures and retirements were only irregularly replaced. Foundation officers and other officials in other grant-making agencies who promote guidelines and programs stressed thematics, policy-relevance, and cross-cultural comparisons. Publishers came to avoid monographic studies and seemed increasingly allergic to single-country studies (of most countries). Rashid Khalidi’s Presidential Address to the 1994 MESA conference is only the best known of a host of warnings, jeremiads, and even eulogies offered with respect to current prospects for Middle East studies.
β-Thalassemia Mutations and Haplotype Analysis in Lebanon
The molecular basis of β-thalassemia in Lebanon reflects the heterogeneity of the Lebanese population. Eighteen different mutations were identified among a total of 277 chromosomes. There is evidence of clustering of some mutations in particular geographic regions or among specific religious groups. Haplotype analysis, using seven restriction sites was performed on a total of 110 samples and 11 different haplotypes were identified. The five most common mutations were each found on two different haplotypes, and most linkages were as previously reported in other Mediterranean populations, with a few exceptions, also showing some clustering.