Field research on the performance of various drainage materials in Lithuania
Abstract Field evaluation of the performance of a drainage system or of various drainage materials is a long-lasting research, very often with disappointing results. These disappointing results stem either from a too wide a spread of the field data, or one or more necessary parameters which were not measured, or an insufficient knowledge of the flow occurrence in the vicinity of the drain resulting in a wrong interpretation and evaluation of the research findings. Yet, a correct evaluation of the performance of a drainage system is of primary importance to ascertain the real value of a drainage system or to compare various drainage materials. As a result of the wide spread of field data within a measuring season, a large amount of data from several seasons is required to obtain reliable results. From discharge and total head loss measurements a second-degree polynomial results which only permits a determination of whether the design criteria are met. The similarity with Hooghoudt’s equation allows the determination of soil hydraulic conductivity and the equivalent depth of the impervious layer. With this data the drain spacing can be checked. Too wide a spacing can be the cause of malfunctioning of a drainage system, but the drainage materials can also affect its performance. To evaluate or compare drainage materials it is necessary to measure the so-called approach-flow head loss in the vicinity of the drain. The relationship between discharge and approach-flow head loss should theoretically be linear and the regression coefficient gives the approach-flow resistance. However, the relationship depends to a large extent on the approach-flow occurrence in the vicinity of the drain. For non-linear relationships, the approach-flow resistance can be estimated from the slope of the tangent line, which tends to a constant value at greater discharges for flow patterns covering the whole drain circumference. The approach-flow resistance depends on the hydraulic conductivity of the soil and does not permit a direct comparison of various drainage materials. Therefore, the approach-flow constant or the dimensionless approach-flow resistance is calculated. This parameter is related to the material itself and to the installation conditions reflected in the hydraulic conductivity of the trench backfill. Consequently the comparison of the various drainage materials includes the trench backfill. The approach-flow head loss fraction is that part of the total head loss which is dissipated by the approach-flow. The relationship between approach-flow head loss and total head loss should theoretically be and is, indeed, linear so that the slope of the regression line gives the approach-flow head loss fraction. This parameter combines the influence of drainage material and flow pattern so that real flow situations in the vicinity of the drain, which are not necessarily the same for all materials, can be compared.
The Impact of Agriculture Drainage Reconstruction on Ground Water Recession Close to the Subgrade
Good drainage is the most important design consideration for a road, both to miniaturize road maintenance costs and maximize the time the road is operational. The lack of good drainage led to the structural damages and costly repairs. Many of roads are built in intensively drained agricultural land. The effective way to drain subgrades is reconstruction of existing agricultural drainage. The impact of cross-subsurface drainage system on water level fluctuation was measured using Plane geofiltration mathematical model, one of 3D geofiltration modelling programs. The hydraulic permeability characteristics were determined in field of Pikeliai, close to local road in Kėdainiai district, Lithuania. This object is composed of clay and loamy soils. Subsurface cross drains trenches spacing of 20 m, 30 m and 40 m were simulated. The hydraulic permeability of cross drain trenches and lateral trenches modelled was from 0.006 m/a day to 6 m/a day. The simulation of cross drains trenches showed that the most effective distance between them are 20 m. The highest water depression occurs when the permeability of cross drain trenches and lateral trenches is ~ 6 m/day, at the distance of 20 m. The water recession is 20 cm lower compared to the drainage systems without cross drains trenches. By installing cross drains trenches every 30 m, water recession is 10 cm lower when the trench permeability is about 6 m/day. When increasing the distance between the cross drains up to 40 m their influence disappears.
DETERMINATION OF THE OPTIMUM BASE CHARACTERISTICS FOR PAVEMENTS
In recent years, it has become apparent that the design and maintenance of pavement drainage extends the service life of pavements. Most pavement structures now incorporate subsurface layers. Part of the function of these subsurface layers is to drain away excess water, which can be extremely deleterious to the life of the pavement. To assure the effectiveness of such drainage layers after they have been spread and compacted, simple, rapid, in-situ permeability and stability testing and end-result specification are needed. This report includes conclusions and recommendations related to four main study objectives: (1) Determine the optimal range for in-place stability and in-place permeability based on Iowa aggregate sources; (2) Evaluate the feasibility of an air permeameter for determining the permeability of open and well-graded drainage layers in situ; (3) Develop reliable end-result quality control/quality assurance specifications for stability and permeability; and (4) Refine aggregate placement and construction methods to optimize uniformity.