The heritability of resistance to early blight in diploid potatoes (Solanum tuberosum, subsp.Phureja andStenotomum)
The heritability of resistance to early blight caused byAlternaria solani (Ell. & Martin) Son was estimated for field grown, diploid potatoes at Fletcher, North Carolina in 1981. Fourteen breeding lines, selected from a random mated hybrid population ofSolanum tuberosum, subsp.phureja andstenotomum, were used. Resistance was measured as the slope obtained by regressing the logit of the disease proportion Y, measured as % defoliation, on time. A wide range of resistance was found. Narrow-sense heritability, as determined by offspring-midparent regression, on an individual plant basis, was calculated to be 0.825.
Screening potatoes for field resistance to early blight
A satisfactory method has been developed for screening potato clones for field resistance to early ligbht. Differences in clonal resistance can be evaluated and have proven to be consistent. Resistance to foliar infection appears to be generally associated with plant maturity. Late maturing selections are generally quite resistant and early maturing selections are usually extremely susceptible. Differences in resistance among named varieties from throughout the world were extremely variable.
The relationship of potato black ringspot virus to tobacco ringspot and allied viruses
SUMMARY 
 
The relationship between potato black ringspot virus (PBRV), isolates of tobacco ringspot virus from blueberry (TRSV-B), cherry (TRSV-C) and calico-diseased potato (TRSV-P), and eucharis mottle virus (EuMV) was examined in tests of three types. In gel-diffusion precipitin tests, the reaction end-points of antisera, and spur formation, indicated that PBRV and TRSV-P are very closely related but not identical antigenically, as are TRSV-B and TRSV-C, and that these two pairs are more distantly related to each other and to EuMV. In plant-protection tests in Nicotiana angustifolia, PBRV, TRSV-B and EuMV conferred protection against the homologous virus but not against one another. PBRV, but not TRSV-B, conferred protection against TRSV-P. In tests with the two RNA species of PBRV, infectivity increased greatly when preparations of RNA-1 and RNA-2 were mixed, and both species are probably needed for infection. Infectivity did not increase when RNA-1 or RNA-2 of PBRV was mixed with RNA-2 or RNA-1, respectively, of TRSV-B; the two viruses seem too distantly related to form pseudo-recombinants. 
 
 
 
It is concluded that PBRV and tobacco ringspot virus should be considered separate viruses, and that TRSV-P should be considered a strain of PBRV. EuMV should perhaps be recognised as a virus distinct from, but related to, PBRV and tobacco ringspot virus.