BEST PRACTICES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF TACK COAT : PART 1 , LABORATORY STUDY Prepared
Tack coat is a light layer of diluted asphalt that is applied to hot mix asphalt concrete (HMA) or Portland cement concrete (PCC) pavement surfaces to ensure good interface bonding between layers. Interface bonding is affected by several factors; including tack coat (type, application rate, curing time, application temperature, and asphalt residue content), pavement surface characteristics (asphalt content, aggregate type and gradation, and surface texture), and environmental conditions. This study evaluated interface bonding between two HMA layers by conducting a laboratory shear performance test. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of various tack coats and determine the optimum residual application rates for three pavement surfaces: unmilled aged nontrafficked, milled aged, and unmilled aged trafficked HMA. The study also examined the influences of tack coat curing time, temperature, HMA type, and surface texture on the performance of tack coats. The study considered four tack coat materials: SS-1hp, high float emulsion (HFE), SS-1vh (very hard, no-track emulsion), and straight asphalt (PG 64-22). The tack coat was optimized at residual rates of 0.00, 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, and 0.08 gal/yd2 (0.00, 0.09, 0.18, 0.26, and 0.36 L/m2). Three curing times were considered: 0.25, 2, and 24 hr. Two overlay mixes (9.5-mm surface mix and 4.75-mm surface mix) were used. Prior to testing, the specimens were conditioned at four temperatures: 5°F, 41°F, 77°F, and 113°F (–15°C, 5°C, 25°C, and 45°C). The study found that the optimum tack coat residual rate was 0.04 gal/yd2 (0.18 L/m2) for trafficked and nontrafficked unmilled aged HMA surfaces, while the optimum residual rate for milled HMA was 0.06 gal/yd2 (0.26 L/m2). SS-1vh tack coat showed superior performance over the other tested tack coats. The optimum curing time was determined to be 2 hr. Milling the surface improved interface shear strength. The interface shear resistance was greater when the surface nominal maximum aggregate size (NMAS) increased from 4.75 mm to 9.5 mm. Increasing the temperature resulted in a reduction in shear strength.
Pavement layer interface shear strength using a hyperbolic mohr-coulomb model and finite element analysis
This paper presents a laboratory and numerical evaluation of interface shear strength between two hot-mix asphalt (HMA) layers. Pavement layer interface shear strength is discussed using a frictional Mohr-Coulomb-based plasticity model. The interfacial response was captured at two different loading states: pure shear and shear with compression. Direct shear testing was performed at the interface between two HMA layers to determine the effectiveness of two tack coat materials: SS-1hp and SS-1vh. Two overlays (9.5 mm and 4.75 mm nominal maximum aggregate size [NMAS]) were applied over unmilled aged nontrafficked surface. The interface shear tests were conducted at various normal pressure levels (0, 0.138, and 0.276 MPa; 0, 20, and 40 psi, respectively) at room temperature (25°C [77°F]). The measured interface shear stresses were compared with those predicted from vehicular loading in a typical thick pavement structure. A three-dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) pavement model was built to evaluate the interfacial stresses at the interface between HMA layers under moving vehicular loading. According to the results obtained from the experimental program, several parameters were found to be influential on the interlayer response. These are vehicle loading (load and tire inflation pressure) and maneuvering (braking, acceleration, and cornering). The paper also introduces the stress ratio concept for evaluating critical interface conditions. The stress ratio can be calculated based on the ratio of predicted interface stresses and interface shear strength.
Hygroscopic Expansion of some Casting Investments
CREDIT is generally given to Taggart1 for introducing the cast gold inlay to the dental profession. Although he realized that gold shrinks when cooled from molten state to solid state of room temperature, the investment available to him did not supply sufficient compensation. In 1910, Van Horn2 published a paper dealing with a method by which he obtained the compensation by means of wax expansion. The next major research in connection with this problem was the work of Coleman3 at the National Bureau of Standards. He determined the gold shrinkage to be 1.25 per cent and presented a casting technic with compensation values of quantitative nature. The total compensation for the gold shrinkage was obtained by the combination of the setting and thermal expansion of the mold. This procedure is the general practice followed at the present time for compensation. There are some disadvantages to this method. Skinner has indicated the difficulty of obtaining smooth castings and the improper compensation for the casting shrinkage.4 It has been found by Hollenback5 and Scheu6a that castings made at a high temperature are rougher than those made at a low temperature (450° C.), depending upon the great difference in thermal expansion between plaster of Paris and silica, which causes a poor union of the fine particles. This may also result in friability and there may be some warpage due to the differential expansion. A method which provides sufficient compensation at a low mold temperature is the hygroscopic casting technic.b Wilson7 showed that certain plasters expand as much as 0.0044 inch to the inch by taking up moisture from the air. With this information at hand, Scheula, b tested some commercial investment to determine what results the addition of moisture would have. He found6b: (1) All of the casting investments that were tested expanded. (2) The thicker the mix, the greater the expansion. (3) A mix with hot water expanded more than one with cold water. (4) The time at which the mix is placed in the water is of great importance. It was found that if the mix is placed in the water early, it would not expand so much as when placed in a little later. It was also found that if the mix was placed in the water after a certain time, it could not expand to the maximal amount. (5) The temperature of the water in which the mix is placed is important, for two reasons; (a) the temperature of the water controls slightly the expansion of the investment, and (b) water at a temperature of 1000 F. slightly softens the wax pattern so that the fine margins are not marred while expansion is taking place. The mix should remain in the water at least 20 minutes to obtain the full expansion, after which time no further expansion is obtained.