Summing It Up : How Do We Evaluate the Total Public Interest ?
publication quickly rose to the top of the " all-time best seller list " of Great Lakes Fishery Commission publications. It has been widely circulated and widely used as a guide to Great Lakes fishery values by the Great Lakes fishery management community, mainly because little other information has been available on this topic. Managers have been increasingly required over the last decade or two to evaluate fisheries programs and needs by courts, by legislatures and by their own administrations. The 1979 publication was intended as a handy reference to current research findings on Great Lakes fishery values, in response to this need. However, it soon became apparent that more was needed. Managers needed a better explanation of the reasoning behind these evaluations. When economists use market-based ideas to examine non-market situations, either new terminology must be invented, or old terminology must be stretched into a new environment. Things easily get lost in the translation. This publication, then, is more than just an update. It is also an attempt to explain the reasoning behind these estimates, including some of the subtle differences between closely related values. We realize that one small publication such as this is still insufficient. Managers and administrators must take additional steps if they are to use the full power of economics to their benefit. All members of the committee that worked on this publication look forward to working with members of the management community in an effort to more fully utilize economic information, both on an individual basis and in more formal efforts such as those conducted by the Great Lakes Fishery Commission. We also welcome feedback on the usefulness of this publication, so we can improve the next one. These estimates were developed by a workshop or " committee " of economists, listed below, who have actively worked on Great Lakes fisheries values and impacts over the last few years. After this publication was drafted, all members were asked to verify and update the information, as well as to comment in any other way. Thus, this publication represents a consensus of a diverse group of economics researchers and practitioners from the region. The author has benefited from comments on earlier versions by almost all members of the group, particularly those of Leroy J. Hushak, as well as from comments We were gratified to see, in putting these data together, that many new studies have been …
The use of alkalinity and conductivity measurements to estimate concentrations of 3-trifluormethyl-4-nitrophenol required for treating lamprey streams
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Optical rotatory dispersion and absolute configuration—III
Abstract Optical rotatory dispersion measurements on pyrrolidine, piperidine, and tetrahydro-isoquinoline alkaloids indicate that the absolute configuration of the α-asymmetric center may be assigned directly from the dispersion curve, provided either that the nitrogen atom is not protonated, or that the compound contains a chromophore absorbing above 200 mμ.