The Wind-Induced Vibration Response for Tower Crane Based on Virtual Excitation Method
The Dynamics characteristic of Tower Crane is complicated under the wind excitation which complicates the wind-induced vibration response analysis. The random wind-induced response analysis of tower crane is presented based on finite element method and Virtual Excitation Method. The pulsating wind loads are changed into multiple-point correlation stationary excitation. This papers uses Davenport's wind speed spectrum which does not change with height, and considers multiple-point correlation of wind-induction. The Tower Crane is employed as a numerical example, the response spectra and Mean Square Root (RMS) of the tower crane is obtained by wind-induced vibration. The results indicate that the vibration of the tower crane has a large response in low frequency and the One-third Octave acceleration RMS is lower, the influences of the wind-induced vibration on comfort are analyzed.
A Smart Tower Crane to Mitigate Turbulent Wind Loads
Abstract Tower cranes have, in general, low structural damping, leading to challenges with respect to vibrations induced by natural hazards. Crane failures due to wind excitations are very common around the world. In the present research work, a smart tower crane equipped with pairs of collocated sensors and actuators is proposed to mitigate turbulent wind. A three-dimensional finite element model of the crane is created using MATLAB®/Structural Dynamics Toolbox. Modal analysis is performed to calculate natural frequencies and corresponding mode shapes. Dynamic analysis of the crane is carried out under turbulent wind excitation. A decentralized active vibration control method is then used to prevent collapse of the crane. Active damping is added to the tower crane using pairs of force actuators–displacement sensors collocated on selected elements. A robust control strategy based on decentralized direct velocity feedback is implemented. The vibrations of the tower crane in all directions are significantly damped. It is concluded that the proposed smart tower crane model is highly efficient in mitigating the turbulent wind loads.
Positive Rights and State Constitutions: The Limits of Federal Rationality Review
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1132 I. STATE CONSTITUTIONAL WELFARE PRACTICE ............................................................. 1144 A. A Mandatory Obligation: The New York Example .................................................. 1144 B. A Typology of Current State Court Decisions .......................................................... 1145 IT. RECONSIDERING FEDERAL RATIONALITY REVIEW IN STATE CONSTITUTIONAL WELFARE CASES ................................................................................ 1153 A. Rationality Review and Positive Rights .................................................................. 1155 B. Rationality Review and Democratic Legitimacy .................................................... 1157 C. Rationality Review and Judicial Finality ............................................................. xi61 D. Rationality Review and Federalism ......................................................................... i166 E. Rationality Review Revisited .................................................................................... 1169 III. TOWARD A NEW STANDARD OF REVIEW ......................................................................... 1169 A. The Need for Judicial Review .................................................................................. 1170 B. Institutional Competence and Welfare Litigation ................................................... 1175 I. State Courts as Fact Gatherers ......................................................................... 1175 2. State Courts as Policymakers ......................................................................... " 179 3. State Courts as Rights Enforcers ..................................................................... 1182 C. A Jurisprudence of Consequences .............................................................................. 1183 D. Why Education and Not Welfare? ........................................................................... i86 E. Implications for Welfare Litigation ........................................................................... i9i IV. CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................ 1194