Low-cost optical sub-assemblies for metro access applications
The fiber optic communications industry is experiencing significant change as datacom 10 Gb/s Ethernet (10 GbE) networks merge with telecom SONET 10G networks in the drive to reach metro access applications. Lower data rate (1G Ethernet, 1G and 2G fiber channel, and SONET OC-48) applications have already merged to some extent as various versions are available within the SFF or SFP standard transceiver form factors. Traditional 10 Gb/s optical subassemblies (OSAs), developed for SONET OC-192 applications, used variations of the expensive butterfly type package. However, smaller form factor modules (such as the XFP that uses SFF optical connectors and LC duplex optical connectors) require much smaller OSAs. To meet the size limitation of packaging 10G OSAs into the XFP transceiver and also meet the 10 GbE market challenge of providing low-cost solutions, new 10 Gb/s OSA components are needed.
Performance comparison of small form factor fiber optic connectors
A comparison of Small Form Factor (SFF) fiber optic connectors is presented for LC, MT-RJ, SC-DC, and VF-45. Multimode and singlemode jumper cables were tested using industry standard test procedures and bench marked against the industry standard SC Duplex connector. Initial loss data as well as stress testing was performed. Variations were found in the performance of the connectors types and between connectors of the same type from different suppliers. In some cases the connectors out performed the SC Duplex on some tests but no connectors out performed the SC Duplex on all tests with the mechanical stress tests of axial and off-axial pull being the most difficult to exceed. These connectors are rapidly developing and are at different levels of maturity but none of them tested out to be a fully mature replacement for the SC Duplex connector yet.
Fitting of data to a Frenkel‐effect model of conduction in insulators
In some published work, the omission of the voltage from the preexponential factor in the current expression derived from the Frenkel effect has resulted in error in constants calculated from the data. This is illustrated with an example from the literature in which the data fit a Schottky model much more closely than the Frenkel model.