Structure of the Bushveld Complex from resistivity measurements
Knowledge of the deep structure of the arc-like bodies constituting the Bushveld Complex (South Africa) is essential not only to understand the emplacement history of this huge layered intrusion, but also for success in the exploration for the platiniferous Merensky Reef and chromitite layers occurring near its base. Despite many studies the structure of the complex has remained obscure. Here we describe new insights into the structure and additional geophysical boundary conditions, based on a geoelectrical study. This has provided a geoelectrical stratigraphy according to which a conductive layer below the granitic rocks, of both the eastern and western compartments of the Complex, is correlated with sedimentary rocks of the Transvaal Sequence over large areas, rather than with the mafic sequence as conventionally assumed. A new feature of this model is that the mafic sequence in both compartments occurs as segments of an inward-dipping sheet transgressing the layering of the sedimentary rocks into which it intruded. The geoelectrical model supports earlier gravity models in that mafic rocks are absent from the central part of the Complex, but shows that here the Bushveld granite directly overlies Archaean basement rather than Transvaal Sequence rocks as previously accepted.
Connectivity between the western and eastern limbs of the Bushveld Complex
Abstract The mafic layered rocks of the Bushveld Complex are 6–8 km thick and crop out over an area of 65,000 km 2 . Previous interpretations of the Bouguer gravity anomalies suggested that the intrusion consisted of two totally separate bodies. However, the mafic sequences in these arcuate western and eastern limbs are remarkably similar, with at least six petrologically distinctive layers and sequences being recognisable in both limbs. Such similarity of sequences in two totally discrete bodies 200–300 km apart is petrologically implausible, and it is suggested that they formed within a single lopolithic intrusion. All previous Bouguer gravity models failed to consider the isostatic response of the crust to emplacement of this huge mass of mafic magma. Isostatic adjustment as a result of this intrusion would have caused the base of the crust to be depressed by as much as 6 km. With this revised whole crustal model, it becomes possible to construct a gravity model, consistent with observed data, which includes a 6 km-thick sequence of mafic rocks connecting the western and eastern limbs of the Bushveld Complex. The exact depth at which the mafic rocks of the Bushveld Complex lie in the centre of the structure cannot be constrained by the gravity data. Such a first-order model is an approximation, because there have been subsequent deformation and structural readjustments in the crust, some of them probably related to the emplacement of the Bushveld Complex. Specifically, the observed geometry of the rocks around the Crocodile River, Dennilton, Marble Hall and Malope Domes suggests that major upwarping of the crust occurred on a variety of scales, triggered by emplacement of the Bushveld Complex.
On the use of the Hardening Soil Small Strain model in geotechnical practice
This article highlights the importance of using advanced constitutive soil models in numerical modelling as daily geotechnical practice. In this context, the Hardening Soil (HS) model is presented as the most advanced soil model implemented in the ZSoil finite element code. The article recalls the basic features of the HS model and it explains their role in numerical simulations. The role of pre-failure non-linear behaviour of soils is also discussed. An application of the HS model is illustrated on typical geotechnical problems such as retaining wall excavation, tunnel excavation and undrained loading followed by consolidation.