Parliament on the Centre-Right, Government on the Left: Explaining Basque Exceptionalism
The Autonomous Elections of 2009 entailed a large change in Basque politics, given that the PNV, the party that had been governing the Basque institutions continuously since 1980, was removed from power by the PSE–EE. However, the Basques did not vote very differently compared to other elections, the majority voting for nationalist parties, as it has been doing since 1980, and for centre-right parties, as it had done at the beginning of the autonomy and as of 2001. In this article, we aim to explain how, despite this clear tendency towards nationalism and the centre-right, a leftist and non-nationalist party is currently governing in the Basque Country.
Más allá de la autoubicación: por qué el nacionalismo predice mejor el comportamiento electoral en el País Vasco Beyond Self-placement: Why Nationalism is a Better Predictor of Electoral Behaviour in the Basque Country
Most analysts agree that in the Basque Country, the nationalism cleavage is more important for political party competition than the left-right divide. Recent studies, however, suggest that self-placement on the left-right scale is a better predictor of electoral behaviour than self-placement on a nationalism scale. We have attempted to solve this seeming paradox by showing that self-placement along the left-right axis is related to preferences regarding many different areas, and is therefore not necessarily coincident with the classic understanding of “left” and “right”. Once the preferences regarding certain issues were operationalised, the Basque nationalism-Spanish nationalism divide was found to be a more important factor for electoral decisions than the left-right divide.
Protection of the Marine Environment: The International and National Regulation of Deep Seabed Mining Activities
This chapter provides an overview of the international and national regulatory framework pertaining to deep seabed mining activities. It begins by discussing the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, the backdrop for all marine activities – be they national or international – and examines the obligations of states to protect the marine environment from the harmful effects arising from deep seabed mining. Next, the chapter examines the international regime for deep seabed mining (i.e. “activities in the Area”), explaining the “common heritage of mankind” status of the Area (i.e. the international seabed); the functions of the International Seabed Authority (ISA), the international organization established to govern deep seabed mining in the Area; and the concept of state sponsorship of non-state entities (i.e. private actors) for deep seabed mining in the Area. The chapter follows with a discussion of the development of national legislation to regulate deep seabed mining, examining efforts in the Pacific region where many prospective deep-sea mining sites are located. This includes a look at the legislative regimes of several Pacific Island nations, namely, Papua New Guinea, Tonga and the Cook Islands, for whom deep seabed mining may soon become a reality – as well as New Zealand and Japan, countries with comparatively developed rule of law and legislative regimes that have undertaken or considered deep seabed mining in their national waters. Overall, the chapter critically describes and evaluates the current regulatory status in the international and national seabed areas and highlights some salient gaps that require urgent attention in order to ensure marine environmental protection and mitigate impacts on humans.