LESSONS TO BE LEARNED: THE DECISION OF THE SOCIAL BENEFITS TRIBUNAL IN TRANCHEMONTAGNE V. ONTARIO (DIRECTOR, DISABILITY SUPPORT PROGRAM)
In April 2009, the Ontario Social Benefits Tribunal ended a 10 years battle for appellants, Norman Werbeski and Robert Tranchemontagne in its deliberation that the Ontario Disability Supports Program Act violated their rights as enshrined in the Ontario Human Rights Code when it failed to recognize their alcoholism as a disability. 

Drawing specific excerpts from the Respondents (Ontario government) defence and the Social Benefit Tribunal’s decision, the essay looks at how government policy affects persons with substance addiction and argues that Section 5(2) of the ODSPA places burdens on substance abusers and contributes significantly to their social stigma. 

The outcomes of excluding substance addiction from the United States Social Assistance Programmes are reviewed and referred to in analyzing the Respondent’s claims. The conclusion highlights how this case reflects key steps towards greater inclusion for persons with disabilities and in particular for those whose disability is addiction and alcoholism. 

Keywords: Social Benefits Tribunal, Ontario Disability Supports Program Act, alcoholism, disability, stigma
The probable impacts of the removal of the addiction disability benefit in Ontario.
In Ontario, those dependent on substances are no longer eligible for welfare payments based on an addiction disability. While the impact of this program has not been assessed, evidence from a similar policy shift in the USA suggests deleterious effects on the health and social functioning of about half of those who lose this form of social support. A review of the research on the chronic-illness view of addiction, the fostering of stigma by exclusionary social policies, and the negative effects on mental health and homeless status associated with the loss of welfare benefits leads to the conclusion that this is an ill-advised policy for Ontario. Its continuation there, and its extension to other provinces, is not recommended.
Application of resource allocation optimisation to provide profitable options for dairy production systems
A linear program (LP) model analysed resource use on a 100 ha dairy farm. A single optimum-profit combination was established for resources which were either optimised or constrained. It was found that, with a fixed herd of 320 milking cows, when production increased from 305 kg milksolids per cow (kg MS/cow) to 415 kg MS/cow, cash profit increased by 65%. This required additional supplements. If, however, feed demand and supply were optimised at 415 kg MS/cow, the LP reduced milking cow number rather than buy in feed to meet the increased feed demand from higher production per cow. At all production levels chosen between 305 and 415 kgMS/cow, it was most economic to dry off and cull cows early in dry summers to optimise feed demand vs. feed grown; use nitrogen (N) fertiliser to avoid a feed deficit only when response rates of better than 10 kgDM to 1 kg N could be expected; not use N for growing supplements to harvest. Pasture cover, within defined constraint levels, provided a buffer for feed demand and supply fluctuations. The study highlights the importance of assessing production, income and cost in an integrated framework to identify the point at which individual resources become limiting.