Public dialogue between Church and Others through a communicative mode of madanggŭk : A practical theological perspective
The privatized and ghettoized church behind the wall is confronted by a dual crisis - an internal crisis of identity and an external crisis of relevance. Therefore, to shape a dialogic relationship through public dialogue is an essential task of the public church, the so-called "go-to-all" church.
To execute "public dialogue" as the commission to the 'go-to-all" three actions are necessary: (1) going outside the wall of the church, (2) entering into dialogue with the "all," and (3) making disciples, baptizing, and teaching the all. How will the church dialogue with the other? In view of these three actions, this article researches three main elements of public dialogue - (1) a place / field for public dialogue, (2) a new communicative pattern for public dialogue, and (3) a medium for public dialogue.
This article concerns an art-cultural pattern of public dialogue, particularly madanggk. Mandanggk is a compound noun: madang (open place) + k (theatre). Mandanggk contains the three elements for public dialogue - (1) place, (2) a medium, and (3) communicative principles for public dialogue.
The poverty of affluence.
Every word to utter from the writer involves the element of this life. The writer really shows how the simple words can maximize how the impression of this book is uttered directly for the readers. Even you have known about the content of poverty of affluence so much, you can easily do it for your better connection. In delivering the presence of the book concept, you can find out the boo site here.
PUBLIC HEALTH AT THE CROSSROADS.
... The results achieved during the past fifty years by a public health campaign based on the threefold program of environmental sanitation, control of communicable disease by bacteriological and serological methods and education in personal hygiene, constitute without exaggeration one of the most startling and revolutionary events in the whole history of the human race. The death rate from all causes in New York City (according to Dr. D. B. Armstrong) was 31 per 1,000 in 1824, 41 per 1,000 in 1851, and still 29 per 1,000 in 1875. Then began the fall, from 29 in 1875, to 12 in 1925, a reduction of threefiftfhs in a period of fifty years. As Professor Willcox has recently pointed out, "the statement that in 1879-80 the crude death rate or average number of persons dying annually in each 1,000 of the population ofNew York-Brooklyn was 22, while in 1919-20 it was 13, does not convey much meaning to the average citizen. But when the