Effect of sulfur passivation on 6H-SiC surface stability
Based on first-principles calculation, the surface stability of S-passivated 6H-SiC in different terminals are researched through investigating surface energy, charge distribution and density of states with the change of sulfur coverage from1/4 monolayer (ML) to 1 monolayer (ML). Our calculations show that S-passivated Si-terminal surface performs better than Si-terminal surface. Surface-state of 6H-SiC is reduced by about 1-4 electrons/eV due to S passivation. Meanwhile as the sulfur coverage increasing, surface energy is decreased from about -5.2eV/nm2 to about -40 eV/nm2 which leads to a more stable structure. According to theoretical calculation and mechanism analysis, the most stable structure is 3/4 ML sulfur atoms absorb in bridge site on Si-terminal surface.
Photoemission study of Si-rich 4H-SiC surfaces and initial SiO2 SiC interface formation
Photoemission studies of Si-rich polar and nonpolar 4H-SiC surfaces before and after oxygen exposures are reported. For the clean Si-rich (0001) -3×3 surface, three prominent surface-shifted compon ...
Legal Process and the Discovery of Better Policies for Fostering Innovation and Growth
Our chapter concerns how legal process can lead to efficient policies for fostering innovation and growth. Future innovation will depend at least as much on how laws are made as on a priori analyses of the optimal content of those laws. Of particular importance is whether U.S. choice of law and choice of forum rules promote an efficient market for law. Our analysis supports three suggestions for improving the law to support growth. First, the rules governing the selection of the jurisdiction whose law governs productive activity can significantly affect growth and innovation. Second, any proposal aimed at increasing growth through a change in law or legal institutions should take account of the existence of multiple jurisdictions and parties’ ability to choose the jurisdiction whose law controls their transactions. Third, we suggest harnessing the power of jurisdictional competition among the states through a federal law enforcing contracting parties’ choice of law except to the extent states legislatively override the choice of law and regulate local transactions. We apply this analysis to several areas of the law that are critical to growth and innovation: non-competition clauses, business associations, the legal profession, internet law, insurance, property law, products liability, and franchise regulation.