Is There a Criteria in Legal Writing That Can Guarantee Success
Writing can be an intellectually challenging task for young postgraduate law students or lawyers in their early years. This article aims at facilitating young lawyers to seek their 'voice' taking Competition Law and more precisely Resale Price Maintenance as an example in order to apply certain criteria, but also drawing on psychological aspects of writing that are absolutely vital in its success or failure.
An Arrow to the Heart: The Love and Death of Postmodern Legal Scholarship
This Article responds to two critiques of postmodern legal scholarship published by Dennis W. Arrow in the Michigan and Texas Law Reviews. Arrow raises the modernist criticisms that are most often leveled against postmodern legal scholars. If Arrow and the other critics were to be believed, postmodernists are muddle-headed thinkers who write indecipherable jargon-filled nonsense. Even worse, they are irresponsible nihilists who lack political convictions. Such criticisms of postmodernism are unpersuasive because the typical modernist depiction of postmodern legal thought is seriously inaccurate. It is little more than a caricature.The modernists, in other words, are imprecise and downright wrong. Now, some of the critics, including Arrow, might be smiling and thinking their response: 'Aha! You can’t even use the word ‘wrong’ without contradicting yourself because, after all, you’re a postmodernist. And postmodernism repudiates concepts like truth and falsity, and rightness and wrongness. And precision. How can a postmodernist demand precision with a straight face.' But this modernist response is precisely the problem. The typical modernist characterization of postmodernism - as rejecting all conceptions of rightness, goodness, and judgment - is wrong. And I use that word again purposefully to stress that concepts like truth and falsity, rightness and wrongness, and so forth are entirely consistent with postmodernism. Indeed, as explained in this Article, postmodernism explains how we understand such concepts in the first place.
Business Crime: Its Nature and Control
Part 1 The nature of business crime: business crime and organizational deviance the nature of business crime. Part 2 Empirical studies of business crime: employee crime and industrial relations - disputed definitions insurance fraud - can the insurance industry control it? taxation - enforcement, equity and effectiveness liquidations and receiverships - the battle for control, by Sally Wheeler financial institutions - securities and investments the regulation of industry - safety versus profits. Part 3 Control.