Trends in the Development of Machinery and Associated Technology ” TMT 2010 , Mediterranean Cruise , 11-18 September 2010 ANNEAL HARDENING EFFECT IN SINTERED COPPER ALLOYS DEPENDENCE ON ALLOYING ELEMENTS AND DEFORMATION
This paper reports results of investigation carried out on sintered copper alloys: Cu-8at%Ni, Cu8at %Zn, Cu-8at%Al, Cu-8at%Ag, Cu-4at%Ni-4at%Sn, Cu-4at%Ni-4at%Zn and Cu-4at%Au. For comparison, investigation carried out on the sintered copper. The sintered alloys, as well as pure copper, were subjected to the same thermomechanical treatment. Thermomechanical treatment included cold rolling of 30,50 and 70% in reduction. Isochronal and isothermal annealing up to the recrystallization temperature were performed, followed with hardness and electrical conductivity measuring. This investigation shows that hardness and electrical conductivity of cold deformed copper-alloys increase after annealing in the temperature range of 160 400°C, due to anneal hardening effect. Electrical conductivity decreases with increasing the amount of alloying elements. During the annealing the electrical conductivity slowly increases for both set of the samples copper and alloys due to recovery and recrystallization
The mechanisms of anneal hardening in Cu-Al alloys
The anneal hardening behavior of a Cu-16 at. pct. Al alloy was investigated by tensile testing, measurement of Young’s modulus and electrical resistivity, and electron microscopy. It was shown that three main stages of annealing processes can be distinguished. Stage 1 atT ≤ 150°C is characterized by vacancy annihilation and short-range diffusional processes giving rise to three successive, low maxima in yield and tensile strength. Substages in this temperature range are also evident from resistivity measurements. Stage 2 at 150 ≲ 275°C is essentially associated with solute segregation to dislocations giving rise to the main increase in flow stress. In Stage 3 at 725 ≤T ≤ 350°C recrystallization takes place.
Hobbes and the Reception of Leviathan
Although there has been much discussion of the reception of Hobbes’s work, Hobbes’s response to his own reception has rarely received much consideration. This article looks at Hobbes’s engagements with his critics. Far from being rearguard actions by a philosopher under siege, or disingenuous attempts to curry favour with those in power, they can be read as moments when Hobbes in fact sought to convert what he saw as the “truth of speculation into the utility of practice.”