Notice of Retraction Impact of the Positive list system on vegetable trade between China and Japan
This article estimates influence of the Positive list system on the Sino-Japanese vegetables trade amount through establishing simultaneous equation model and choosing three-stage least squares method. The results indicated that the Positive list system implemented by Japan has a remarkable negative effect on chinese vegetables export to Japan, but the influence only has a short-term effect and the long-term influence is not remarkable.
Comparative Study on Grain Subsidy Policy both at Home and Aboard and Its Enlightenment
Through the analysis of the United States,EU and Japan,the comparison with China was made from four aspects: subsidy goals,inputs,mechanisms and trends.So good experiences could be found to provide the reference for the reform and adjustment of grain subsidy policy in China in the early 21st century.
The Area of Freedom, Security and Justice ten years on: Successes and future challenges under the Stockholm Programme. CEPS Paperbacks. June 2010
This book celebrates the tenth anniversary of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (AFSJ) by bringing together the views of key practitioners and policy-makers who have played an outstanding role in thinking about and shaping EU policies on freedom, security and justice. 
 
Ten years ago, the member states transferred competences to the EU for law and policy-making in the fields of immigration, asylum and border controls, and began the transfer process for criminal justice and policing. This decade of European cooperation on AFSJ policies has experienced very dynamic convergence, the enactment of a large body of European law and the setting-up of numerous EU agencies working in these domains. Such dynamism in policy-making has not been without challenges and vulnerabilities, however. As this collective volume shows, the main dilemmas that lie ahead relate to an effective (while more plural) institutional framework under the Treaty of Lisbon, stronger judicial scrutiny through a greater role for national courts and the Court of Justice in Luxembourg, better mechanisms for evaluating and monitoring the implementation of EU AFSJ law and a more solid fundamental rights strategy. The contributions in this volume address the progress achieved so far in these policy areas, identify the challenges for future European cooperation in the AFSJ and put forward possible paths for making more progress in the next generation of the EU’s AFSJ.