PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE UT AUTOMATED ROAD MAINTENANCE MACHINE
This final report mainly focuses on evaluating the overall performance of the University of Texas' (UT's) Automated Road Maintenance Machine (ARMM). First, the ARMM's man-machine-balanced control loop was further developed then rigorously tested and evaluated based on (1) accuracy, (2) time, and (3) quality of the resultant seal. For the efficiency evaluation, thirty pavement crack images, which included longitudinal, transverse, and block cracking, were collected from a UT research campus, and field trials were completed at five locations (Austin, San Antonio, Dallas, Corpus Christi, and Travis County) in the state of Texas. Several additional significant improvements were made to the ARMM during the course of this project. Second, the ARMM's productivity was estimated based on (1) the results of the efficiency evaluation of the man-machine control loop, (2) observations made during the series of field trials, and (3) a productivity model. The mathematical model that predicts the productivity of the ARMM under various work conditions was developed as a means for job estimating and for rating the performance of the ARMM. The ARMM's estimated productivity was then compared with the typical productivity rate associated with conventional crack sealing methods. Evaluation results from the field trials and implementation recommendations are also made in this final project report. It was concluded that the introduction of automated methods to the pavement crack-sealing process will improve productivity and quality and can reduce costs and safety risks. The latter is a direct result of reducing normal crew sizes of seven to eight workers to only three to four workers. The reduction in crew size and the increase in productivity of the sealing process translate directly into significant potential cost savings. By automatically recording work completed, the ARMM should help improve project controls; by its ability to work at night, the ARMM should reduce road user costs.
A laboratory prototype of automatic pavement crack sealing based on a modified 3D printer
ABSTRACT Cracking is a common fault in asphalt and concrete pavements, which causes water damage and further defects if not repaired in timely fashion. Conventional pavement crack sealing methods based on machines and manual operations are generally subjective, labour-intensive, risky, and inefficient. A laboratory prototype of an automatic pavement crack sealing platform is proposed in this paper, which uses a modified three-dimensional (3D) printer and computer vision. A modified 3D printer based on fused deposition modelling (FDM) was combined with an image capturing platform, an image processing algorithm and a path planning method to form the automated pavement crack sealing platform, which can automatically detect pavement cracks and seal them with bitumen emulsion sealant. Specimens of concrete pavement slabs with cracks were produced in the laboratory to test the proposed method, and the cracks were then detected and sealed by the proposed platform. The results show that 3D printing is an effective method for automated pavement crack sealing, which is recommended in the field of automatic road maintenance and repair.
School Principals and Education Law: What do they know, what do they need to know?
Principals now work in complex and challenging environments where uncertainty and change are the hallmarks of their roles and responsibilities. As such, the knowledge and capability demands on principals have expanded, including those related to education law. While these matters attracted some research interest a number of years ago, there has been little recent work in the area of principals and education law. This article reports on an exploratory study into aspects of the legal knowledge held by Tasmanian government school principals, particularly concerning non-sexual physical contact between teachers and students. The research was undertaken using a small-scale, mixed-methods research design, which required principals to respond to various legal scenarios. Three key findings emerged from the study. First, principals used two different levels of working knowledge about education law  one related to legal problems, and the other to legally-related routine activities. Second, on the particular topic of physical contact, some knowledge held by principals was not legally accurate. Third, for major legal issues, participants indicated that they acquired access to information from legal experts. The situation for routine legal matters was less clear, although in-service training and practical experience were identified as potential sources of knowledge. Participants recognised the importance of a sound knowledge of education law, especially for dealing with security and safety issues and preferred to access further information through in-service training. Notably, the findings of the study are broadly consistent with those from earlier Australian and international research, suggesting that much remains to be done in the area of principals’ education law knowledge.