Development of face surrogate for impact protection design for cyclist
Bicycle usage for exercise, recreation, and commuting to work in Australia shows that pedal cycling is the fourth most popular activity with 10.6% increase in participants between 2001 and 2007. As with other means of transport, accident and injury becomes common although mandatory bicycle helmet wearing has been introduced. The research aims to develop a face surrogate made of sandwich of rigid foam and rubber sheets to represent human facial bone under blunt impact. The facial surrogate will serve as an important test device for further development of facial-impact protection for cyclist. A test procedure was developed to simulate the energy of impact and record data to evaluate the effect of impact on facial bones. Drop tests were performed to establish a suitable combination of materials. It was found that the sandwich structure of rigid extruded-polystyrene foam (density of 40 kg/m with a pattern of 6-mm-holes), Neoprene rubber sponge, and Abrasaflex rubber backing, had impact characteristics comparable to that of human facial bone. In particular, the foam thickness of 30 mm and 25 mm was found suitable to represent human zygoma (cheekbone) and maxilla (upper-jaw bone), respectively. Keywords—Facial impact protection, face surrogate, cyclist, accident prevention
The circumstances and scope for prevention of maxillofacial injuries in cyclists.
A prospective study of cyclists with maxillofacial injuries attending Accident and Emergency departments in South Wales was carried out over a 12 month period. 65% of the 104 accident victims were aged under 14 years, and 81% were male. Only 14% were wearing helmets. Injuries were mapped to 9 facial zones. Nearly half the victims sustained injury to the central facial zone. There was an association between head injury (HI) and the location of impact on the face (p < 0.0001 Chi-square = 41 df = 8), the nature of the accident (p < 0.012 Chi-square = 10.9 df = 3), and type of injury in the impact zone (p < 0.007 Chi-square = 13.4 df = 4). More patients with facial injuries but without facial bone fractures sustained HIs than those with fractures. The facial skeleton may protect the brain by absorbing impact. The high incidence of midface injuries could be reduced by incorporating a facebar in helmet design.
Pediatric head injuries and deaths from bicycling in the United States.
OBJECTIVE
To estimate the potential benefit of increasing bicycle helmet use among children and adolescents in the United States.


DESIGN
All bicycle-related deaths (Multiple Cause-of-Death Public Use Data Tapes, 1989 through 1992) and bicycle-related injuries treated in sampled emergency departments (National Electronic Injury Surveillance System, 1989 through 1993) were used to calculate traumatic brain injury-associated death and head injury rates per 1,000,000 US residents. Preventable injuries and deaths were estimated by calculating the population-attributable risk of head injury due to nonuse of bicycle helmets.


PATIENTS
US residents aged 0 through 19 years who were injured or who died as a result of a bicycle crash.


RESULTS
An average of 247 traumatic brain injury deaths and 140,000 head injuries among children and adolescents younger than 20 years were related to bicycle crashes each year in the United States. As many as 184 deaths and 116,000 head injuries might have been prevented annually if these riders had worn helmets. An additional 19,000 mouth and chin injuries were treated each year. The youngest age groups had the highest proportions of both head and mouth injuries.


CONCLUSION
There continues to be a need to advocate for greater use of bicycle helmets, particularly among young children. Helmet design changes should be considered to prevent mouth injuries.