V-RICH MINERALS IN CONTACT-METAMORPHOSED SILURIAN SEDEX DEPOSITS IN THE POBLET AREA, SOUTHWESTERN CATALONIA, SPAIN
The Lower Llandoverian metasedimentary rocks of the Prades Mountains, southwestern Catalonia, Spain, consist of interstratified anorthite-rich beds, chert beds, phosphate beds, sulfide-rich black shale (with mainly pyrrhotite and minor chalcopyrite), massive sulfide lenses and calc-silicate beds. These metasedimentary rocks are anomalously enriched in V and Cr, and have disseminated minerals of precious metals: mainly sperrylite and palladian lollingite. The V- and Cr-rich associations are the result of an isochemical metamorphism of V- and Cr-rich protoliths. The contact metamorphism of V-rich shale produced metapelitic hornfels with V-rich aluminosilicates and V–Cr oxides. The occurrence of V oxides in apparent equilibrium with V-rich silicates suggests a limit for the V and Cr contents in these aluminosilicates at the conditions of thermal metamorphism. On the other hand, metamorphism of anorthite- and V-,Cr-rich sedimentary rocks produced V- and Cr-rich silicates, such as goldmanite, V-rich amphiboles, V-rich titanite and V-rich allanite.
Goldmanite from the black slates of the Ogcheon belt, Korea
Abstract Goldmanite, the vanadium analogue of grossular and andradite, was found as subrounded green porphyroblasts ranging from 0.1 to 1.7 mm in size in the carbonaceous black slates from the Deokpyeong area of the Ogcheon belt in Korea. A radiating aggregate of slightly curved blades of goldmanite crystals displays birefringence and replaces the fine-grained black matrix. The V2O3 content ranges from 21.9 to 26.6 wt.% (24.0 wt.% average), higher than previously reported values. The calculated mole % of the goldmanite end-member ranges from 72 to 91. Its cell dimension was calculated to be 12.04 Å from X-ray diffraction. The black slate in the Deokpyeong area is the richest known accessible source of relatively pure goldmanite.
Time and Heritage
As a historian studying what can be considered a form of intellectual history, I have slowly come to adopt Michel de Certeau’s observation made at the end of the 1980s that ‘objectifying the past, for the last three centuries, has undoubtedly left unconsidered time within a discipline that has continued to use it as a taxonomic instrument’. To a certain degree, time has become commonplace for the historian who has preserved or instrumentalized it. It is not considered because it is inconceivable, but because we do not think of it or, more simply, we do not think about it. As a historian attempting to pay attention to the time I’m living in, I have thus, like many others, noticed the swift development of the category of the present until it has become obvious that the present is omnipresent. This is what I refer to here as ‘presentism’.