Interpretability into Lukasiewicz algebras
In this paper we give a characterization of all the interpretations of the varieties of bounded distributive lattices, De Morgan algebras and Lukasiewicz algebras of order m in the variety of Lukasiewicz algebras of order n. In the case of distributive lattices we give a structure theorem that is generalized to De Morgan algebras and to Lukasiewicz algebras of order m. In the last two cases we also give the number of such interpretations.
Equivalence between Varieties of Łukasiewicz–Moisil Algebras and Rings

 The Post, axled and Łukasiewicz–Moisil algebras are important lattices studied in algebraic logic. In this paper, we investigate a useful interpretation between these algebras and some rings. We give a term equivalence between Post algebras of order $p$ and $p$-rings, $p$ prime and lift this result to the axled Łukasiewicz–Moisil algebra $L \cong B_s \times P$ and the ring $\prod ^s F_2 \times \prod ^l F_p$, where $B_s$ is a Boolean algebra of order $2^s$, $P$ a $p$-valued Post algebra of order $p^l$ and $F_p$ is the prime field of order $p$.
Italian Influence on the Development of Calvinist Scholasticism
THIS ARTICLE TRIES to show that the rise of Calvinist scholasticism, which was the most important development in Calvinist theology during the second half of the sixteenth century, stemmed largely from several converging Italian influences, particularly from the writings of Peter Martyr Vermigli and Jerome Zanchi. Here Calvinist theology refers not only to the personal thought of John Calvin but also to the teachings of the founders of the Reformed or Calvinist tradition as it spread out from Geneva and Switzerland to France, Germany, England, Scotland, Poland, and the Low Countries. In this context Calvin emerges as the brightest star in a galaxy of Reformed theologians which includes Heinrich Bullinger, Pierre Viret, Theodore Beza and Wolfgang Musculus as well as Martyr, Zanchi and others. These theologians were often more influential than Calvin himself at a given place or time or on a given point of doctrine. Bullinger, Martyr, and Martin Bucer were all more important for spreading Calvinist ideas to Edwardian England than was John Calvin. Early Elizabethan Protestantism looked more to Zurich than to Geneva, as did early Polish Calvinism. German Calvinism owed more to Heidelberg than to Geneva.' These leaders developed their theologies sometimes in mutual dependence, sometimes with surprising independence. By no means was their relation to Calvin simply that of disciple to master, for each gave a personal nuance to his style of Calvinism. Thus the sixteenth century Jesuit Cornelius Schulting states on the opening page of his five volume polemic against Calvin and Peter Martyr that Martyr was clearer and far more learned than Calvin.2 Recently John Bray has pointed out that research in seventeenth century Calvinism leads "to the conclusion that the impact of Calvin upon the Calvinistic movement has been greatly over-rated. It may well be that some of