Examination of the hexamethylenetetramine procedure for separation of thorium from rare earths and for determination of thorium.
An examination has been made of the efficiency of the gravimetric reagent hexamethylenetetramine in the separation of thorium from rare earths and in the determination of thorium. Losses to the filtrate, beaker and filter paper are evaluated as well as the extent of rare earth and other contamination of the thorium hydroxide precipitate. When hydroxylamine is used as the reducing agent to keep cerium in the tervalent state, excellent separations are obtained. The efficacy of the reagent is offset by the loss of small amounts of thorium to the precipitation vessel, the scavenging properties of the precipitate for silica and the difficulty in evaluating a true reagent blank.
Effects of hexamethylenetetramine (HMTA) on the aqueous solution structure, dynamics and ion solvation scenario: A concentration and temperature dependent study with potential HMTA models
Abstract The local hydrogen bonding structure of water and its dynamics in hexamethylenetetramine (HMTA) solution is investigated by using classical molecular dynamics simulations. In this study, we have compared two potential HMTA models with different Lennard-Jones (L-J) combination rules. We have considered five different concentrations of HMTA, ranging from pure water to 6.181 m HMTA at 298 K, whereas to calculate the temperature dependence from 298 K to 353 K, we have used 4.187 m concentration of HMTA. From the radial distribution function, it is observed that the addition of HMTA facilitates structural making of water, whereas our calculated values of the tetrahedral order parameter and asphericity of water suggests disordered structure with increasing HMTA concentration. Also there is a significant development of self-aggregation among water and HMTA molecules at higher concentration of HMTA. The self-diffusion coefficient values of water and HMTA is found to be decreased with increasing HMTA concentration in the solution, whereas at concentrations below 1.0 m, it matches well with the experimental observations. Our calculated activation energy of diffusion for HMTA (4.10 ± 0.2 kcal/g mol for Model-II), is very close to the experimental observation (4.34–4.44 kcal/g mol). The structure of the hydration shell of ions of different charges and sizes is also investigated in the presence of HMTA. For all the models, it is observed that the structural and dynamical properties of water and the hydration shell of ion shows negligible difference with varying concentration and temperature. In contrast, the ion−HMTA correlations are model dependent. It is suggested that the HMTA model-I (AM) is the suitable model for representing ion-solvation structure and dynamics particularly at lower concentrations of aqueous-HMTA solution.
Medieval Modal Theories and Modal Logic Handbook of the History of Logic. Volume 2: Mediaeval and Renaissance Logic
1The translation of the Categories is edited by L. Minio-Paluello in Aristoteles Latinus 1.1-5 (Bruges-Paris: Descl~e de Brouwer, 1961) and the translation of the De interpretatione by L. Minio-Paluello in Aristoteles Latinus II.1-2 (Bruges-Paris: Descl~e de Brouwer, 1965). The translation of Porphyry's Isagoge is edited by L. Minio-Paluello and B.G. Dod in Aristoteles Latinus 1.6-7 (Bruges-Paris: Descl~e de Brouwer, 1966). Boethius's commentary on Aristotle's Categories is found in Patrologia Latina (ed. J.-P. Migne), 64, 159-294, De syllogismis categoricis in Patrologia Latina 64, 793-832, In Ciceronis Topica in Patrologia Latina 64, 1039-1169; an English translation with notes and an introduction by E. Stump, and De differentiis topicis in Patrologia Latina 64, 1174-1216; an English translation with notes and essays by E. Stump, Boethius's De topicis differentiis (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1978), Boethius's In Ciceronis Topica (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1988). Boethius's two commentaries on De interpretatione are edited by C. Meiser (Leipzig: Teubner, 1877-1880), his two commentaries on Porphyry's Isagoge by S. Brandt, Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum 48 (Leipzig: G. Freytag, Vienna: F.Tempsky, 1906), De hypotheticis syllogismis by L. Obertello (Brescia: Paideia, 1969) and De divisione by J. Magee, with a translation and commentary (Leiden: Brill, 1998). Some other ancient works were also used, such as Apuleius's Peri hermeneias (ed. C. Moreschini in Opera III (Stuttgart: Teubner, 1991), Augustine's Dialectica, trans, with notes by B.D. Jackson from the text edited by J. Pinborg, Synthese Historical Library 16 (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1975), and pseudo-Augustinean De decern categoriis, ed. L. Minio-Paluello, in Aristoteles Latinus 1.1-5, 133-75. For the sources of eleventh and twelfth century logic, see J. Marenbon, 'Medieval Latin Commentaries and Glosses on Aristotelian Logical Texts, Before c. 1150 AD' in Ch. Burnett (ed.), Glosses and Commentaries on Aristotelian Logical Tezts (Warburg Institute Surveys and Texts 23), (London: Warburg Institute, 1993), 77-127, republished and revised in J. Marenbon, Aristotelian Logic, Platonism, and the Contezt of Early Medieval Philosophy in the West, Variorum Collected Studies Series (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000). 2Analytica priora, ed. L. Minio-Paluello, Aristoteles Latinus III.l-4 (Bruges-Paris: Descl~e de Brouwer, 1962), Analytica posteriora, ed. L. Minio-Paluello and B.G. Dod, Aristoteles Latinns IV.l-4 (Bruges-Paris: Descl~e de Brouwer, 1968), Topica, ed. L. Minio-Paluello and B.G.