A Survey of Twentieth-century Literary Theory and Criticism in Chinese
In their article "A Survey of Twentieth-century Literary Theory and Criticism in Chinese"
Xiaoming Chen and Anfeng Sheng survey Chinese-language scholarship that for the reason of the East-
West divide is less known in the West. Although heavily influenced by both Western and Soviet Marxist
thought, twentieth-century Chinese literary theorization and criticism produced much incisive
scholarship based on the vast knowledge existing in Chinese culture and literary scholarship. Chen and
Sheng survey pioneering works by numerous Chinese literary theorists and critics who have been
influential in their own time and exerted persistent modeling influences until today and the article is
meant to adjust the anonymous position of Chinese literary theorization in the West and thus to
contribute to the diversity of literary studies.
Comparative Literature in Chinese: A Survey of Books Published 2000-2013
Part of the American Studies Commons, Comparative Literature Commons, Education Commons, European Languages and Societies Commons, Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other Film and Media Studies Commons, Reading and Language Commons, Rhetoric and Composition Commons, Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons, Television Commons, and the Theatre and Performance Studies Commons
Commentary: Scholarship as a Way of Life—Character and Virtue in the Age of Big Humanities
From the Renaissance to the nineteenth century, most European scholars considered moral cultivation as the primary purpose of the humanities. The humanities were human not just because they concerned the products of the human mind but also because they transformed scholars and students into better human beings. During the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the rise of Big Humanities questioned this moral purpose. However, Big Humanities also reemphasized the importance of epistemic virtues for scholarship. The language of epistemic virtues helped scholars create new communities of learning and scholarship. Within these communities, the language of virtues established common standards of collaboration and granted scholars a sense of purpose. Many of these scholars also continued to associate epistemic virtues with moral virtues.