Mitigation of Arc Flash hazard by using protection solution
This paper gives an introduction to the problematic phenomena of arc flashing. For protection engineers important terms and facts in the NFPA 70E standard and the IEEE 1584 standard will be presented. The importance of the fault clearing time will be discussed in detail. Protection schemes which achieve fast fault clearing times for bus faults and feeder faults will be reviewed. In this paper an application will be introduced which is based on the reverse interlocking scheme. Additionally it offers a new solution that achieves a fast fault clearing time for bus faults and close in faults. This is normally the area within a substation, where arc flashing can cause a potential hazard for operators. This application will eliminate the problem of longer fault clearing times for faults close to the bus due to the co-ordination with radial feeders relays. This paper will discuss the necessary settings considerations and will show the limits of this application
Aspects of Arc-Flash Protection and Prediction
Abstract This paper provides a technological review of arc-flash protection of air insulated switchgear. It covers the whole range starting from switchgear design aspects until ultra-fast arc elimination. Special attention is paid to proactive technologies enabling preemptive detection of slowly developing faults. Various arc faults indicating phenomena are examined, and several sensor technologies for online monitoring are evaluated. Because preventive or predictive measures cannot totally eliminate the risk of arc faults, reactive protection by fast operating protection is justified. Two major reactive protection approaches are discussed: the current-limiting approach and the arcing time based approach. The benefits of protection based on simultaneous detection of light and overcurrent are explained. Finally the paper discusses arc elimination technologies and evaluates the concerns related to short-circuit devices.
LABORATORY AND FIELD TESTING OF SEED SPACING UNIFORMITY FOR SUGARBEET PLANTERS
Five planter configurations were evaluated for seed spacing uniformity at three field speeds using a seed 
location method in the field and a laboratory method involving an opto-electronic sensor system. Planter seed spacing 
uniformity was described using the Coefficient of Precision (CP3) measure. Results showed that CP3 measures 
determined using the laboratory test method were significantly different from those determined using the field test method. 
This indicated the laboratory test method cannot be used to predict planter seed spacing uniformity in the field. Seed 
spacing uniformity determined in laboratory tests was higher than, or equal to, seed spacing uniformity determined in 
field tests. This indicated the laboratory test method may be useful to screen out planters or planter units with poor 
uniformity of seed metering. Field testing of the planters that perform well in laboratory tests must be conducted to 
adequately determine the seed spacing uniformity of those planters in the field. Results from laboratory and field tests 
could be useful in determining areas for improvement of planters or planter units.