The calculation of the shadow factor of single coil filament
A computer method for calculating the power-reduction factor of a single-coil filament is presented. The filament of incandescent lamps is coiled, which is why a fraction of radiation is trapped in the filament. The relationships between the geometric parameters of a cylindrical helix (pitch ratio and mandrel ratio) and the shadow factor are developed. A FORTRAN program based on the numerical solution of algebraic equations and on three-dimensional numerical integration has been developed.<<ETX>>
The Coiling Factor in the Tungsten Filament Lamps
Papers on tungsten lamps appearing in the pedagogic journals have been essentially assuming straight wire filaments however, in actual practice it is either single coiled or double coiled. This paper reports for the first time the D.D. Van Hover expression for the value of resistance of a coil and Milan R. Vukcevich theory based on coiled-ribbon filament for the radiation energy value from a coil. These expressions are applied to the coiled-wire filaments lamps of 6, 10, 25, 40, 60, 100, 200, 300, and 500 watts to estimate the values of pitch ratio, mandrel ratio and the temperature of the corresponding coil. For simplicity only the single coiled filament lamp cases are considered.
Comparison of Binaural Release from Forward Masking in Animals and Humans. Electrophysiological Studies
Evoked potentials in the inferior colliculus and auditory areas of the cortex were studied in anesthetized guinea pigs and long-latency auditory evoked potentials (LAEP) were studied in waking humans using sequential binaural presentation of pairs of clicks – the masker and the masked signal – with a variable interval between them, to provide the conditions needed for the psychophysical phenomenon of direct forward masking. Introduction of phase differences between the masker and the masked signal led to decreases in suppression of responses to the masked signal and to faster recovery of the reaction types recorded. The greatest relative differences between response magnitudes to antiphase and synphase masked signals were seen at the beginning of the recovery process, and were 1.6, 1.5, and 1.4 respectively for responses from the inferior colliculus, auditory area of the cortex, and LAEP at stimulus intensities of 50–65 dB sound pressure level, differences subsequently decreasing to zero. There was a positive correlation between this measure and the stimulus intensity. The greatest differences between the time at which the recovery process ended for responses to antiphase and synphase masked signals were 4, 250, and about 2000 msec respectively for the inferior colliculus, auditory area of the cortex, and LAEP.