Characteristic analysis of journal bearing under thin film lubrication—Layered Viscosity Model
Journal bearing is a kind of widely used bearing and its study never stops. The analysis is carried to journal bearing with layered viscosity model in this paper. Layered Viscosity Model regards viscosity as piecewise function and averages every segment in order to get more accurate expression, and the pressure distributing, load capacity and friction are obtained for journal sliding bearing under thin film lubrication. The condition of thin film lubrication actualizing is made certain. The theoretical base is provided for the analysis of aggradation and liniment surface layer lubrication. This work could promote the understanding and research of the mechanism of the nano - scale thin film lubrication.
Velocity Analysis for Continuous Viscosity Modelunder Thin Film Lubrication
The lubrication of bearings is directly affected by the flow properties of the liquid lubricant. One key feature of lubricant is its viscosity distribution in the bearing. The distribution is dependent on the adsorbent properties of the surface and the velocity distribution of the lubricant. This paper is only connected with the velocity analysis on the cross-gap flow. Because of increasing the speed, apart from increasing the temperature, the other features of lubricant will be changed. This paper describes the fluid velocity profiles for continuous viscosity model in the bearing.
Is match ethics an oxymoron?
BACKGROUND
Graduate medical education has undergone economic and structural changes-changes that have placed increasing pressure on medical students and programs to match effectively. This study documents the experiences, perceptions, and ethical dilemmas of medical students with the 1998 match process.


METHODS
Surveyed were 437 senior students from three medical schools. Students were questioned about: interviewing practices, communication with programs, commitments made, ethical dilemmas faced, and the match process itself. Data were analyzed using Student's t test, the chi-square test, and descriptive statistics.


RESULTS
In all, 314 (72%) students responded. Programs expect postinterview communication from students (57%). Students perceive that programs are making "informal" commitments (43%), lying to them (33%), and encouraging their unethical behavior in order to match (21%). Ethical dilemmas are related to requests for informal commitments.


CONCLUSIONS
The NRMP's ruling that denounces prematch commitments is being broken by students and programs alike, resulting in the promotion of unprofessional behavior and gamesmanship.