Racial Profiling: Legal and Constitutional Issues
Racial profiling is the practice of targeting individuals for police or security detention based on their race or ethnicity in the belief that certain minority groups are more likely to engage in unlawful behavior. Examples of racial profiling by law enforcement agencies suggest that minorities are disproportionately the subject of security-related practices. The issue has periodically attracted congressional interest and several courts have considered the constitutional ramifications of the practice as an "unreasonable search and seizure" under the Fourth Amendment and, more recently, as a denial of the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection guarantee. A variety of federal and state statutes provide potential relief to individuals who claim that their rights are violated by race-based law enforcement practices and policies.
Forfeiting legal protections to prevent crime
In many ways, policing is a noteworthy feature of the field of criminal law. Its diverse mandate includes ensuring public order, and preventing and investigating crime. Though these roles have been traditionally managed as distinct functions, as prevention subsumes the others they are becoming more closely aligned in practice. This contribution will assess the role that AI has played in strengthening the mandate for crime prevention. It will argue that AI has been a critical tool in advancing crime prevention, but its use has outpaced legal processes and individuals may face violations of their legal interests in a legal framework ill-equipped for countering robust crime prevention measures. The article will ultimately advocate the expanding and strengthening of the legal protections afforded to criminal suspects in preventative investigations, while also addressing the way in which AI alters the enforcement of legal standards.
La inseguridad jurídica en normas de contratación estatal
It is established by different studies that the issue of government procurement has been marred by several factors, the test objective to publicize these factors, we take as starting point the constant conflict between the branches of government to try and organize this subject; will collect and analyze diverse regulatory and case material in order to achieve evidence and demonstrate the different concepts of constant change that produces excessive regulation of the subject procurement and is in turn causing rapid changes that result in legal uncertainty for our law on the Contract Status.