Summary justice: the price of treason for eight World War II German prisoners of war
Thesis (M.A.)--Wichita State University, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Dept. of History.
The War at Sea
Setting Up Step 1: Neutral units can be included in any fleet unless historical restrictions are in play; in that case, neutral units can't be used by any fleet. Step 4: The first player selects either side of the map on which to deploy his fleet. Ignore the Player 1 and Player 2 setup area designations on the battle zone diagrams on pages 5 and 6. If Aircraft are set up in the same sector as a Carrier, place them either on the Carrier model or touching it to indicate that they are based on that Carrier. The basing capacity of the Carrier must be observed. Also place a card matching each Aircraft unit beneath that Carrier's card. These cards remain stacked with the Carrier's card until the Air Return phase; see Air Return Phase, below. If your fleet contains more ships than can legally stack in your deployment area, you can "overstack" sectors. Ships must be spread as evenly as possible; no sector can contain three ships until every sector contains at least two, no sector can contain four until all contain at least three, and so on. By the end of your first Sea Movement phase, all of your ships must be positioned legally according to the stacking rules.
The Area of Freedom, Security and Justice ten years on: Successes and future challenges under the Stockholm Programme. CEPS Paperbacks. June 2010
This book celebrates the tenth anniversary of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (AFSJ) by bringing together the views of key practitioners and policy-makers who have played an outstanding role in thinking about and shaping EU policies on freedom, security and justice. 
 
Ten years ago, the member states transferred competences to the EU for law and policy-making in the fields of immigration, asylum and border controls, and began the transfer process for criminal justice and policing. This decade of European cooperation on AFSJ policies has experienced very dynamic convergence, the enactment of a large body of European law and the setting-up of numerous EU agencies working in these domains. Such dynamism in policy-making has not been without challenges and vulnerabilities, however. As this collective volume shows, the main dilemmas that lie ahead relate to an effective (while more plural) institutional framework under the Treaty of Lisbon, stronger judicial scrutiny through a greater role for national courts and the Court of Justice in Luxembourg, better mechanisms for evaluating and monitoring the implementation of EU AFSJ law and a more solid fundamental rights strategy. The contributions in this volume address the progress achieved so far in these policy areas, identify the challenges for future European cooperation in the AFSJ and put forward possible paths for making more progress in the next generation of the EU’s AFSJ.