Trajectory correction maneuver design based on B-plane targeting for low-thruster
For the interplanetary mission, the spacecraft must require the trajectory correction maneuver (TCM) to reduce the trajectory error due to the influence of unexpected external perturbation forces. There are many kinds of researches focused on these TCM techniques for the impulsive thrust. Among them, the B-plane targeting method is mainly applied to the interplanetary mission as TCM method. However, there are brilliant developments in the propulsion systems; especially the electrical propulsion system is adopted in some spacecraft. Thus, it is necessary to design the TCM algorithm for such low-thruster for future interplanetary missions. Therefore, in this paper, the TCM algorithm for the low thrust such like electrical propulsion system is suggested to correct the target B-vector and target time to closest approach (TCA). To design the low thrust guidance scheme, the Lyapunov feedback control is used in this paper.
Interplanetary mission design handbook. Volume 1, part 3: Earth to Jupiter ballistic mission opportunities, 1985-2005
Graphical data necessary for the preliminary design of ballistic missions to Saturn are provided. Contours of launch energy requirements as well as many other launch and Saturn arrival parameters, are presented in launch date/arrival date space for all launch opportunities from 1985 through 2005. In addition, an extensive text is included which explains mission design methods, from launch window development to Saturn probe and orbiter arrival design, utilizing the graphical data in this volume as well as numerous equations elating various parameters. This is the first of a planned series of mission design documents which will apply to all planets and some other bodies in the solar system.
Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: a systematic review.
INTRODUCTION
Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in western countries. The objective of this systematic review was to show that laparoscopic-assisted colon resection for cancer is not inferior to open colectomy with respect to cancer survival and perioperative outcomes.


METHOD
We performed a comprehensive literature review. Inclusion criteria were adults aged over 16 years with a colon resection for documented colon cancer and randomized controlled trials with laparoscopic- assisted or open resections. We excluded studies that did not document colon cancer recurrence in their article. We assessed data extraction and study quality and performed a quantitative data analysis.


RESULTS
Six published and 4 unpublished studies fulfilled our inclusion criteria, with a total of 1262 patients. All primary and secondary outcomes showed good homogeneity, except for morbidity, which was described heterogeneously between the studies. There was no disadvantage to laparoscopic colon resection in any of these primary and secondary outcomes, compared with the conventional open technique.


CONCLUSION
The results of this study suggest that, although there is no definitive answer, present evidence indicates that laparoscopic colon cancer resection is as safe and efficacious as the conventional open technique.