A 5 EE-157 MEASURING THE RHEOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF BITUMINOUS BINDERS FINAL RESULTS FROM THE ROUND ROBIN TEST OF THE BNPÉ / P 04 / GE 1 WORKING GROUP ( FRANCE )
In a previous paper presented at the 2008 E&E Congress, the French mirror group (BNPé/P04/GE1) of the CEN/TC336 – WG1 committee (bituminous binder) has reported the results of a round robin test on DSR complex modulus measurements involving two paving grade bitumen (10/20 and 50/70 classes) and three modified binders (plastomer, elastomer and cross-linked elastomer). This paper presents the outcome of the follow-up studies which had been decided at the time. In a first step, a number of dedicated investigations have been made to identify the potential contribution of different factors to the variation in measurement results. In particular, the impact of waiting time after test sample preparation, gap setting procedure, bonding temperature, conditioning times and temperature sweep procedure have been investigated. How to establish the limits of the linear domain of visco-elasticity is another issue which has been dealt with. This has allowed to define more stringent operating conditions which have then been followed by the participating laboratories for a final round robin limited to a pure bitumen (50/70) and the “most difficult” PmB (high level of plastomer modified product). In comparison to the first round robin, reproducibility was indeed improved, even for the modified product. The BNPé/P04/GE1 work does thus further open the way for the definition of binder performance indicators based on DSR measurements. This will however only be possible (especially for modified binders) if operating conditions are strictly defined and followed.
The Influence of Thermal History on Binder Rutting Indicators
ABSTRACT Binder properties, believed to relate to asphalt rutting, were investigated and compared with each other. Included are: parameters derived from oscillatory tests (e.g. the “zero” shear viscosity and the SHRP rutting parameter), parameters derived from static and repeated creep tests and the traditional R&B softening point. Various binders were tested, including low and high polymer modified bitumen, and bitumen modified with commercial waxes. This study shows that for unmodified bitumen all the investigated binder parameters correlate well with each other and would give similar classifications regarding the rutting susceptibility. For modified binders, the parameters related to low frequency or long loading times, give a different ranking than those related to higher frequencies, as for example the SHRP parameter. The storing and preparation conditions prior to the rheological measurement can have a large influence, especially in the range of long loading times or low frequencies. For elastomer modified binders, the homogenization temperature and the corresponding change in micro-structure can have a large impact. For binders with semi-crystalline modifiers, the storage time and storage temperature before testing can introduce large changes in the polymer network building up. The thermal history effects in rheological tests can be related to variations in crystallinity, as shown by calorimetry, or to variations in morphology, as revealed by fluorescence microscopy. Some of the binders were also investigated in the presence of filler, to see if the thermal effects play a similar role in mastic (binder+filler) as in the neat binder.
The General Theory of Relativity
THE WORD “SPECIAL” IN “SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY” means that the theory is restricted to those frames of reference for which the law of inertia holds, that is, inertial frames of reference.* Einstein sometimes referred to them as Galilean frames of reference. At first glance, it does not seem reasonable to expect that the principle of relativity can be extended to non-inertial frames. The reasons are fairly obvious. The principle of relativity that we have been using states that the laws of physics have the same form in all frames of reference to which the principle applies. In other words there should be no way to determine by an experiment which of two frames of reference is in motion relative to the other.