The social security appointee system.
Abstract The aim of this article is to analyse the operation of the social security appointee system, evaluating it from the point of view of the claimant, the appointee and the public. Consideration is given to the criteria for appointment, the appointment process, the effect of the appointment and the controls after an appointment is made. The Law Commission's proposals in relation to the appointee system are discussed and further suggestions are made for reform. The background research to the article has focused on the Northern Ireland appointee system which is identical to that operated in Great Britain.
Mental handicap and the law
Include: The situation of the individual, of parents and carers in relation to their rights and capacities. Civil and criminal responsibility. Education and employment. The role of the Health Authority and the Local Authority. Financial affairs. Housing and care. The National Health Service and Community Care Act 1990 and the Mental Health Act 1983.
Mentally ill and non-mentally-ill patients' abilities to understand informed consent disclosures for medication
The perormance of two groups of hospitalized mentally ill patients (schizophrenia and major depression) and two groups of non-mentally-ill patients (patients hospitalized for ischemic heart disease and non-ill primary care patients) was compared on a standardized, objective instrument for assessing patients' understanding of information relevant for patient decision making (consent) about treatment with medication. Generally, hospitalized schizophrenic patients manifested significantly poorer understanding of “informed consent” disclosures about potential medication than did the other groups. Considerable variance, however, was apparent within the schizophrenic group and was related to a number of clinical and demographic variables. The results are interpreted with reference to issues of compatence to consent to or refuse treatment.