Pseudo-random-bit-sequence phase modulation for reduced errors in a fiber optic gyroscope.
Low noise and drift in a laser-driven fiber optic gyroscope (FOG) are demonstrated by interrogating the sensor with a low-coherence laser. The laser coherence was reduced by broadening its optical spectrum using an external electro-optic phase modulator driven by either a sinusoidal or a pseudo-random bit sequence (PRBS) waveform. The noise reduction measured in a FOG driven by a modulated laser agrees with the calculations based on the broadened laser spectrum. Using PRBS modulation, the linewidth of a laser was broadened from 10 MHz to more than 10 GHz, leading to a measured FOG noise of only 0.00073  deg/√h and a drift of 0.023  deg/h. To the best of our knowledge, these are the lowest noise and drift reported in a laser-driven FOG, and this noise is below the requirement for the inertial navigation of aircraft.
Excess noise in fiber gyroscope sources
Excess noise was measured in three potential interferometric fiber gyroscope sources, superluminescent diodes at 0.83 and 1.3 mu m, and a superfluorescent fiber source at 1.06 mu m. All three sources showed limiting signal-to-noise ratios in the 128-132 dB range (1 Hz bandwidth at 100 kHz), in agreement with their measured linewidths. The impact of the excess noise on the fiber gyro random walk coefficient is shown. It is pointed out that the noise source considered is important for interferometric fiber optic gyros because it imposes a limitation that does not arise in optical gyros which use narrowband sources.<<ETX>>
The potential vorticity flux through the Yucatan Channel and the Loop Current in the Gulf of Mexico
Two‐year‐long time series of current and density structure measurements across the Yucatan Channel's main section allow the calculation of the time‐dependent potential vorticity flux between the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea, which is characterized by alternating periods of positive (cyclonic) and negative (anti‐cyclonic) vorticity influx. Periods of negative cumulative vorticity influx are related to the Loop Current extending into the Gulf of Mexico, whereas periods of positive cumulative vorticity influx relate to a Loop Current retraction, sometimes coincident with the shedding of an anti‐cyclonic eddy.