IV Remote imprinting of frequency information onto ormus atoms during their passage into magnesium phosphate. Possible application for distant healing.
Making use of a previous finding that “ormus” atoms (see below) from Dead Sea salt solution would pass rapidly into magnesium phosphate crystals, and then gain greatly in dowsable energy, these experiments tested a prediction that information from the local environment could be imprinted during this process. Remote imprinting was done, as previously reported, by means of quantum entanglement between a pair of identical images on paper, and the imprinted frequencies were dowsed blind by a published method. The possible application is suggested of this kind of method for distant healing. Ormus is a general term now often applied to the Orbitally Rearranged Monoatomic Elemental forms (“ORMEs”) of a number of metals. The following have been identified as having ormus forms: gold, silver, copper, cobalt and nickel, platinum, palladium, rhodium, iridium, ruthenium, and osmium. They are widely-distributed, and found in most soils (especially volcanic) all natural waters (especially sea waters) and all living organisms. When in the ormus, “high-spin” or “mstate”, some of the atom's electrons are thought to be present as Cooper pairs. This renders the element non-metallic, and unable to engage in chemical reactions. It also acquires some extraordinary properties, including superconductivity (shown by magnetic levitation) and Josephson tunneling. There is much evidence for biological effects of ormus supplements, including improved health of humans and animals, and increases (often astounding) in plant growth. For further information on ormus see Barry Carter's extensive web-site (1). The vague term “subtle energy” or “life-energy”, can now be more scientifically defined. Whereas the usual concept of energy is associated with increase in entropy, and thus disorder, subtle- or lifeenergy is associated with order. Within living organisms it can account for the departure of their thermodynamics from the randomness of most non-living matter. It has been given the apt term “syntropy”, as the complement of entropy, by Luigi Fantappie (see article by Di Corpo and Vannini (2)). The molecules which constitute an organism can only take up and maintain such extraordinary organisation by virtue of large-scale quantum coherence (3,4). However, besides living organisms, any centre of large-scale quantum coherence, including geometric sources such as
Reflected light modulated by biofields.
In this issue, is an article by Sargsyan, Karamyan, and Avagyan (pp. 1137–1144) describing an experimental technique leading to a simple device for the noninvasive assessment of physiologic states of living systems in general. Yet, there is much more to it than that. To cover the underlying fundamentals, the authors cite one of their publications on the physics of quantum-mechanical interactions between living macroscopic systems. This in turn draws on Bohm’s interpretation of the Schrödinger equation in terms of ‘‘hidden’’ variables and extends its applicability from nuclear particles to macroscopic systems, thereby in principle offering the possibility that the properties of living systems can be determined precisely given sufficient information, in effect bypassing the ‘‘uncertainty principle.’’ Referring to their article in this issue (pp. 1137–1144), the reader will see that the device shown in their Figure 1 is based on the modulation of light reflected from a glass plate by the aura or field of a biological object placed 10–15 mm behind it. The result is a statistically significant change in the reflected light. They have developed a practical device from this, which they name the BIOSCOPE. In this Editorial, I shall attempt to explain the underlying physics as simply as I can. The authors give me an opening for this by citing my work on coherent frequencies in macroscopic quantum systems such as water and living systems by suggesting that ‘‘[i]t would be interesting to compare frequencies measured by Smith with those obtained by means of the BIOSCOPE.’’ In their Figure 12, there is a recording of the BIOSCOPE signal obtained from a hand when Arsenicum alb. 30C had been placed on the palm of the other hand. In it, there is a periodicity of 14 cycles in 10 seconds (1.4 Hz) with a modulation of about half a cycle (0.05 Hz). My specimen of Arsenicum alb. 30C had five frequencies, two of which were 1.371 Hz and 0.04125 Hz. So, it looks as though we are both measuring the same physical quantity. Before I could start writing this Editorial, I had to do some experiments to understand in simple terms what physics might be involved in the BIOSCOPE. The authors investigated the BIOSCOPE response to various objects. These included a metal plate, fruits, an anesthetized rat, a human presence at 2–3 m, a person’s conscious intention transmitted from another room, and a human hand placed a few centimeters from the detector on which acupuncture meridians could be detected. A common feature is the possibility that the BIOSCOPE detects endogenous frequencies in the aura of living systems. In physics, any ‘‘action at a distance’’ effect is very important since one can determine what will transmit and what will block an interaction. I set up the basic arrangement as shown in the authors’ Figure 1. I used a light-emitting diode (LED) flashlight as the light source and an optically polished glass plate backed by a black card. I replaced their ‘‘biological system’’ by a glass tube of frequency-imprinted water at 10-mm distance from the glass plate as a source. The effects in the reflected light were detected using a glass tube of water imprinted with the same frequency placed in the position of their ‘‘photo-detector.’’ This water would not take up any frequency imprint from the reflected light until it was potentized with a magnet; then it took up the frequency of the source. This only happened when the light was turned on, confirming that the information was in the light beam and not radiation from the source. The information was still in the reflected light if the glass plate was replaced by a plate of fused silica, polystyrene, or polymethyl methacrylate. Optical glass color filters showed this effect but an ultraviolet (UV) filter only showed the effect when UV light was used, which means that the plate must not be completely absorbing at all wavelengths used. The effect in the reflected light is polarized. It is still in the light after further reflection from a mirror. There was no effect in light reflected from an open water surface. The effect was transmitted through aluminium foil or a brass plate placed between the source and the glass plate. If the glass plate was sealed in a plastic bag containing silica gel desiccant, there was no effect. This implies that the interaction between the light and the frequency field of the source takes place at a surface film of moisture on the glass. This moisture film also can take a frequency imprint using the succussed ferrite ring potentizing method. There is a critical separation between the source and the glass plate of about 12.5 cm, at which distance the interaction disappears abruptly, so the effect must be associated with reflection at the surface of the glass plate and not scattering in the surrounding air. Although light is reflected from the glass plate at all angles of incidence, it only contains the information at angles of incidence less than *608, the Brewster angle, beyond which reflection from the glass increases and may obscure measurements. A coherence domain disappears when the magnetic energy ordering it becomes equal to dissipative thermal energy. To detect this point, the experiment was carried out in a mu-metal box containing a coil so fields below the ambient
Noctilucent cloud observations over Greenland by a Rayleigh lidar
We report on the detection of noctilucent clouds (NLCs) by a Rayleigh lidar system located on the west coast of Greenland during operations in July and August 1994. The lidar detected NLCs in the zenith on three nights (July 28–29, July 31–August 1, and August 4). The lidar measurements are presented at temporal (1 minute) and spatial (192 meter) resolutions exceeding previously reported lidar measurements of NLCs and reveal significantly more structure in the clouds. Unique cloud features are observed for each night NLCs were detected. Because of the large backscatter ratio associated with NLCs, the volume backscatter coefficient for the cloud particles can be determined more accurately from the lidar signal than the backscatter ratio as the upper mesospheric molecular number density is negligible in the volume backscatter coefficient calculation. The volume backscatter coefficient values determined from the three nights of NLC observations would be classified by current models as moderate to extreme. The extreme backscatter from NLC measurements on August 4 tests the assumptions used in existing models.