Leaching of Arsenic from Wastes of Arsenic Removal Systems
Arsenic in groundwater was first detected in Bangladesh at Chapai Nawabgonj district in 1993. Since then arsenic contamination problem has been reported from almost every parts of the country. It is estimated that approximately 27% of the wells are contaminated with levels above 50ppb, the current drinking water standard for arsenic in Bangladesh (Kinninburg, D. G., et al., 2001). It is also estimated that about 77 million people are at risk of arsenic poisoning. A number of technologies are now available for end-of-the-pipe treatment arsenic present in groundwater. These are primarily based on coagulation and filtration. Some of the technologies use alum or ferric chloride as coagulants followed by filtration through a sand column. Other technologies are based on sedimentation and/or filtration through activated/doubly activated column/granular ferric hydroxide column. Aggressive leaching adopted in the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) at pH ≤ 5 when applied to the wastes collected from different arsenic removal units has not produced lechate concentrations significant enough to term the wastes toxic as per the USEPA regulatory levels. However, TCLP may not be suitable for assessment of long-term leaching of arsenic from arsenicrich waste, because such leaching may be kinetically restricted. Thus, modification of TCLP to represent the natural leaching environment comparable to real disposal conditions is necessary. Tests under modified TCLP may provide different results. The users are currently practicing a number of arsenic-sludge disposal options. The sub-aqueous disposal 162 Fate of Arsenic in the Environment and buried in mud or mixed with organic matters has been considered for studying the anaerobic leaching of arsenic from solids and multiphasic sludge. This option addresses the situation where the users dispose the sludge/waste into a nearby pond where it is mixed with mud and a small amount of domestic sewage. For both the solid wastes and the mutiphasic sludge, the leaching of arsenic into the overlying aqueous phase showed similar trend where the arsenic concentration peaked within the first week and then tapered off and disappeared after twelve weeks. Absence of residual arsenic in the solids following anaerobic leaching indicate that a significant amount of arsenic is lost through biomethylation induced by the presence of organic matters used in the leaching experiment.
Arsenic remediation of drinking water using iron-oxide coated coal bottom ash
We describe laboratory and field results of a novel arsenic removal adsorbent called ‘Arsenic Removal Using Bottom Ash’ (ARUBA). ARUBA is prepared by coating particles of coal bottom ash, a waste material from coal fired power plants, with iron (hydr)oxide. The coating process is simple and conducted at room temperature and atmospheric pressure. Material costs for ARUBA are estimated to be low (∼ $0.08 per kg) and arsenic remediation with ARUBA has the potential to be affordable to resource-constrained communities. ARUBA is used for removing arsenic via a dispersal-and-removal process, and we envision that ARUBA would be used in community-scale water treatment centers. We show that ARUBA is able to reduce arsenic concentrations in contaminated Bangladesh groundwater to below the Bangladesh standard of 50 ppb. Using the Langmuir isotherm (R2 = 0.77) ARUBA's adsorption capacity in treating real groundwater is 2.6 × 10− 6mol/g (0.20 mg/g). Time-to-90% (defined as the time interval for ARUBA to remove 90% of the total amount of arsenic that is removed at equilibrium) is less than 1 hour. Reaction rates (pseudo–second-order kinetic model, R2 ≥ 0.99) increase from 2.4 × 105 to 7.2 × 105 g mol− 1min− 1 as the groundwater arsenic concentration decreases from 560 to 170 ppb. We show that ARUBA's arsenic adsorption density (AAD), defined as the milligrams of arsenic removed at equilibrium per gram of ARUBA added, is linearly dependent on the initial arsenic concentration of the groundwater sample, for initial arsenic concentrations of up to 1600 ppb and an ARUBA dose of 4.0 g/L. This makes it easy to determine the amount of ARUBA required to treat a groundwater source when its arsenic concentration is known and less than 1600 ppb. Storing contaminated groundwater for two to three days before treatment is seen to significantly increase ARUBA's AAD. ARUBA can be separated from treated water by coagulation and clarification, which is expected to be less expensive than filtration of micron-scale particles, further contributing to the affordability of a community-scale water treatment center.
Turbine blade temperature calculation and life estimation - a sensitivity analysis
Abstract The overall operating cost of the modern gas turbines is greatly influenced by the durability of hot section components operating at high temperatures. In turbine operating conditions, some defects may occur which can decrease hot section life. In the present paper, methods used for calculating blade temperature and life are demonstrated and validated. Using these methods, a set of sensitivity analyses on the parameters affecting temperature and life of a high pressure, high temperature turbine first stage blade is carried out. Investigated uncertainties are: (1) blade coating thickness, (2) coolant inlet pressure and temperature (as a result of secondary air system), and (3) gas turbine load variation. Results show that increasing thermal barrier coating thickness by 3 times, leads to rise in the blade life by 9 times. In addition, considering inlet cooling temperature and pressure, deviation in temperature has greater effect on blade life. One of the interesting points that can be realized from the results is that 300 hours operation at 70% load can be equal to one hour operation at base load.