A methodology for automated evaluation of projects quality
The paper is devoted to the evaluation of the projects quality as an essential element of the quality assurance efforts. A methodology suitable for the quality evaluation of large-scale European networking educational projects is presented starting with an overview of its phases and important characteristics. Next the basic recommendations given by the methodology related to the quality of project deliverables, quality evaluation procedures and automation of the evaluation are introduced to identify the proposed approach to projects quality.
Oakland on quality management
Part One The Foundations of TQM Understanding quality Models and frameworks for total quality management Leadership and commitment Part Two Planning Policy, strategy and goal deployment Partnerships and resources Design for quality Part Three Performance Performance measurement frameworks Self-assessment, audits and reviews Benchmarking Part Four Processes Process management Process redesign/ engineering Quality management system Continuous improvement Part Five People 14 Human resource management Culture change through teamwork Communications, innovation and learning Part Six Implementation Implementing TQM
The General Theory of Relativity
THE WORD “SPECIAL” IN “SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY” means that the theory is restricted to those frames of reference for which the law of inertia holds, that is, inertial frames of reference.* Einstein sometimes referred to them as Galilean frames of reference. At first glance, it does not seem reasonable to expect that the principle of relativity can be extended to non-inertial frames. The reasons are fairly obvious. The principle of relativity that we have been using states that the laws of physics have the same form in all frames of reference to which the principle applies. In other words there should be no way to determine by an experiment which of two frames of reference is in motion relative to the other.