Letter to a Dead Playwright: Daily Grind, Vicki Reynolds, and Archive Fever
’Nothing is less reliable, nothing is less clear today than the word “archive”,’ observed Jacques Derrida in his book Archive Fever: a Freudian Impression (1996). This paper reflects on the unsettling process of establishing (or commencing) an archive for the Melbourne Workers Theatre, to form part of the AusStage digital archive which records information on live performance in Australia. Glenn D'Cruz's paper juxtaposes two disparate but connected registers of writing: an open letter to a deceased Australian playwright, Vicki Reynolds, and a critical reflection on the politics of the archive with reference to Derrida's account of archive fever, which he characterizes as an ‘irrepressible desire to return to the origin, a homesickness, a nostalgia for the return to the most archaic place of absolute commencement’. Using Derrida's commentary on questions of memory, authority, inscription, hauntology, and heritage to identify some of the philosophical and ethical aporias he encountered while working on the project, D’Cruz pays particular attention to what Derrida calls the spectral structure of the archive, and stages a conversation with the ghosts that haunt the digitized Melbourne Workers Theatre documents. He also unpacks the logic of Derrida's so-called messianic account of the archive, which ‘opens out of the future’, thereby affirming the future-to-come, and unsettling the normative notion of the archive as a repository for what has passed. Glenn D’Cruz teaches at Deakin University, Australia. He is the author of Midnight's Orphans: Anglo-Indians in Post/Colonial Literature (Peter Lang, 2006) and editor of Class Act: Melbourne Workers Theatre 1987–2007 (Vulgar Press, 2007).
Class act : Melbourne Workers Theatre 1987 - 2007.
Celebrates the company's artistic achievements and successes over the last two decades through interviews, essays and high quality images of key productions, and recounts its history, its evolving relationship with the embattled trade union movement, and its on-going engagement with working class, indigenous and migrant communities.
Live art: Definition and documentation
This paper considers the inter‐disciplinarity of ‘Live Art’ as a field of work and as a performance practice. Setting contemporary British Live Art against earlier British and North American performance art practices, the paper considers the intersection between performance art and theatre and precedents for contemporary Live Art's resistance to critical discourse and definition. In this context, the paper goes on to address the implications of such work for the relationship between critical discourse and its object, for performance theory, and considers the relationship between critical discourse, documentation and the ‘event’ both would remember. In doing so, the essay introduces and discusses the implications of the differing responses to these problems which shape the varied contributions to this issue of Contemporary Theatre Review.