Interview Techniques in International Criminal Court and Tribunals
In this chapter we will discuss the interview techniques that interviewers report being used in international criminal courts and tribunals such as at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and the International Criminal Court (ICC) with regards to suspects and “insider witnesses” to alleged international crimes (war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide). Much of the evidence in these trials is elicited from witnesses, victims and suspects, and therefore the way in which they are interviewed is critical to successful prosecutions of the guilty. Interviewing of suspects is as important as interviewing victims and witnesses, as this can assist with information gathering and the process towards establishing the truth (or at least partial truth) of these horrendous crimes and their surrounding context. The interviewers came from a variety of cultural and educational backgrounds (including both law enforcement and the legal profession) and, as such, international criminal investigators and prosecutors are likely to be influenced by their national training and experience. These differences may impact significantly on the interview processes and techniques used to interview individuals concerning international crimes such as genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. Yet despite these differences, the interviewers endorsed establishing rapport, using open questions, and encouraging free-recall. They also emphasised the importance of using evidence effectively and being aware of cultural issues. The need for specialised training of all investigators was also highlighted, in order to ensure a certain level of competency in specific techniques.
Evaluating police interviewing practices with suspects in child-sexual abuse cases
This article examined adherence to current best practice recommendations for police interviewing of individuals suspected of committing child-sexual offences. We analysed 81 police records of interviews (electronically recorded and then transcribed) with suspects in child-sexual abuse cases in England and Australia. Overall we found areas of skilled practice, indicating that police interviewing in Australia and England is in a far better place than 20 years ago. However, this study also demonstrated that there is still a gap between the recommended guidelines for interviewing and what actually happens in practice. Specifically, limitations were found in the following areas: transparency of the interview process; introduction of allegations; disclosure of evidence; questioning techniques; and the interviewing approach or manner adopted. The practical implications of these findings are discussed.
The Area of Freedom, Security and Justice ten years on: Successes and future challenges under the Stockholm Programme. CEPS Paperbacks. June 2010
This book celebrates the tenth anniversary of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (AFSJ) by bringing together the views of key practitioners and policy-makers who have played an outstanding role in thinking about and shaping EU policies on freedom, security and justice. 
 
Ten years ago, the member states transferred competences to the EU for law and policy-making in the fields of immigration, asylum and border controls, and began the transfer process for criminal justice and policing. This decade of European cooperation on AFSJ policies has experienced very dynamic convergence, the enactment of a large body of European law and the setting-up of numerous EU agencies working in these domains. Such dynamism in policy-making has not been without challenges and vulnerabilities, however. As this collective volume shows, the main dilemmas that lie ahead relate to an effective (while more plural) institutional framework under the Treaty of Lisbon, stronger judicial scrutiny through a greater role for national courts and the Court of Justice in Luxembourg, better mechanisms for evaluating and monitoring the implementation of EU AFSJ law and a more solid fundamental rights strategy. The contributions in this volume address the progress achieved so far in these policy areas, identify the challenges for future European cooperation in the AFSJ and put forward possible paths for making more progress in the next generation of the EU’s AFSJ.