NEITHER BEIJING NOR HANOI BUT A CUBAN MARKET SOCIALISM
AbstractThe recently announced 'updating' of the Cuban socialist model, a euphemism for what is in reality a shifttowards a policy of 'market socialism', has logically raised the supposition on the part of some commentators that Havana is copying the Chinese or Vietnamese model of development. This article derives from an examination of studies of both the Chinese and Vietnamese economic reform processes and compares them with the Cuban example. It concludes that while the Cuban market socialist project has undoubtedly been informed by a study of their Asian counterparts and inevitably resembles them in some aspects, there are so many differences between each country's social, economic, geographic and historical characteristics, context and experience, that the Cuban model, forged out of its own circumstances and praxis, is potentially a new and unique form.Keywords: China, Vietnam, Cuba, market socialism, economic reformsIntroductionCuba, Vietnam and China superficially have a lot in common. They are all socialist states with single party systems led by a Communist Party that claims the mantle of representing the whole population. They all adopted socialist systems in response to colonial or neo-colonial domination and interference and, in the case of Vietnam and Cuba, they adopted socialism on the back of an explicitly nationalist revolution. Both Vietnam and Cuba fought the United States in their respective ways. However, historic and political similarities such as these tend to mask huge differences. At a time when Cuba is now obviously adopting what has come to be termed a 'market socialist' model, after the two processes that are already under way in China and Vietnam, there is perhaps an inevitable tendency to see the Cuban process as being a copy of those that have taken place in its Asian counterparts. In this article I agree that there are characteristics of the Cuban process that inevitably resemble policies that have been adopted in both China and Vietnam but I also argue that the many and huge differences between the Cuban situation and those of its Asian partners mean that the Cuban model is a very different and potentially new and unique form of market socialism.Cuba, Vietnam and China ComparedIn order to arrive at a suitable point of departure for discussion, the figures in Table 1 provide basic comparators that I believe should be taken into account when asking the question whether or not or how far Cuba might be following a Chinese or Vietnamese path. The table provides evidence that the physical, geographical, economic and historical differences between the three countries are far greater than the mere political similarity of apparently opting for a market socialist solution to the crises that each faced in terms of the challenges their respective state socialist models faced.An analysis of the table shows that China is an economy of unprecedented scale with an enormous domestic market. Vietnam is smaller but nevertheless significantly larger than Cuba in terms of its land area and population. By comparison Cuba is a small island economy of very limited scale.China and Vietnam are thousands of miles away from the United States while Havana is just 171km from US shores. This geographical difference apart, the historic influence and the former hegemonic relationship make the relationship between the US and Cuba very different from that which pertains in the cases of either Vietnam or China.Chinese and Vietnamese societies, values, traditions, demographics, and their multiple ethnic and religious minorities, make them very different from those of the more homogeneous Cuban society. There are 56 and 54 recognised ethnic groups in China and Vietnam respectively, whereas in Cuba there are officially none. Although Cuba is a racially differentiated society, culturally and linguistically it is homogeneous.Furthermore, both China and Vietnam emerged from ancient Asian feudalistic societies through an experience of colonialism that was very different from the way in which Cuba was colonised. …
Reforming the Cuban Economic Model: Causes and Prospects
Facing the global financial crisis, Cuba has been obliged to reform its socio-economic system in order to preserve its social model. The serious difficulties which confronted the island are explained both by external factors (mainly the sanctions imposed by the United States, the global systemic crisis and natural disasters) and by internal factors (the bureaucracy, corruption, low productivity, hypertrophy of the public sector and the lack of a culture of debate, among others). This article examines the proposed causes and prospects for the reform of the economic model presented at the 7th meeting of the Cuban Communist Party Congress and adopted by the Cuban Parliament in August 2011, after major changes resulting from a widespread popular debate.
Transforming socialist economies : lessons for Cuba and beyond
Transforming Socialist Economies: Lessons for Cuba and Beyond argues that countries with centrally-planned economies can pursue divergent paths towards market liberalization. The book reviews the reform processes of China, the Central Asian Republics, Eastern Europe, Russia, Vietnam, and the role of the international financial institutions, and draws lessons for Cuba, a country on the verge of wider economic transformation.