Assessing Administrative Capacity and Costs of Cash Transfer Schemes in Zambia ? Implications for Rollout
The Ministry of Community Development and Social Services (MCDSS) has taken the decision to rollout in 2009 a national social cash transfer scheme (SCTS) to cover the whole country by 2012. Thus far, social cash transfer schemes are being piloted in five districts in Southern and Eastern Provinces. The schemes are using structures created for the implementation of the Public Welfare Assistance System (PWAS) which rise from community level all the way to the national level. The adoption of pilot SCTS in Zambia follows the growing acceptance of social cash transfers as a means for assisting extremely poor households. Partly, this is due to the positive impact of conditional cash transfers in Latin America with respect to school enrolments, improved health and reduction in poverty levels for participating households. An evaluation of the Kalomo SCTS revealed a number of achievements with respect to impact on the beneficiaries including a rise in self-esteem and confidence among beneficiaries, reduced incidence of begging, increased food consumption, increased asset ownership and positive impacts for the local economy. Field work for this assessment although not focused on assessing impacts noted qualitative evidence of these findings. Implementation of pilot schemes started in 2004 with the Kalomo SCTS followed by one in 2005 in Kazungula, 2006 in Chipata and in 2007 in Monze and Katete. The schemes have been implemented with some variation so that they ?generate information on the feasibility, costs and benefits and negative impacts of a Social Cash Transfer Scheme?? (Zulu and Schuring, May 2007, p.1). Each of the pilot scheme has been designed to form a part of the learning agenda that would utilise lessons towards the design of a national social cash transfer. It is also being assessed as to the extent to which the PWAS structures are able to accommodate social cash transfer along existing social welfare activities.
A REVIEW OF UNICEF'S R OLE IN CASH TRANSFERS TO EMERGENCY AFFECTED POPULATIONS
A Review of UNICEF’s Role in cash Transfers in Emergencies © United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), New York, 2007 UNICEF 3 UN Plaza, NY, NY 10017 October, 2007 This is a working document. It has been prepared to facilitate the exchange of knowledge and to stimulate discussion. The text has not been edited to official publication standards and UNICEF accepts no responsibility for errors. The designations in this publication do not imply an opinion on legal status of any country or territory, or of its authorities, or the delimitation of frontiers. For further information, please contact: Office of Emergency Programmes UNICEF, 3 United Nations Plaza New York, NY 10017, USA Tel. (1 212) 326 7000, Fax (1 212) 326 7037
Antenatal haemoglobin profile at the Port Moresby General Hospital.
From 1 November 1995 to 10 April 1996, 1001 consecutive mothers who had attended the Port Moresby General Hospital (PMGH) antenatal clinic and were delivered in the Maternity Unit of the PMGH were surveyed for their antenatal haemoglobin (Hb) levels. One or more Hb results had been noted in the antenatal records of 997 subjects. The mean of the first Hb level for this sample was 10.6 +/- 1.72 g/dl. The first Hb level was below 10.0 g/dl in 33% of the 997 subjects. The dates were reliable in 777 subjects. The mean first Hb for this group was the same as for the total sample. A subgroup of 449 subjects with reliable dates and first Hb measurement at < or = 26 weeks gestation had a first Hb mean of 10.9 +/- 1.78 g/dl. Among those with reliable dates, 569 had two or more Hb measurements, the last being at > or = 34 weeks. In this subgroup, the mean of the last Hb was 11.1 +/- 1.60 g/dl. The first Hb was measured at < or = 26 weeks in 352 subjects in this subgroup. The means for the first and last Hb levels for this subset were 10.9 +/- 1.78 and 11.1 +/- 1.57 g/dl, respectively; the paired t test did not show any difference between the first and last Hb levels. For subjects in the total sample who had two or more Hb measurements, the mean for the lowest Hb level was 10.0 +/- 1.54; 45% had levels below 10.0 g/dl at some time during the pregnancy.