Characterization of tin selenides synthesized by high-energy milling
Tin selenides SnSeX (x=1,2) were synthesized from tin and selenium powder precursors by high-energy milling in the planetary ball mill Pulverisette 6 (Fritsch, Germany). The orthorhombic tin selenide SnSe and the hexagonal tin diselenide SnSe2 phases were formed after 4 min and 5 min of milling, respectively. Specific surface area of both selenides increased with increasing time of mechanochemical synthesis. The particle size distribution analysis demonstrated that the synthesized products contain agglomerated selenide particles consisting of numerous idiomorphic tin selenide crystals, measuring from 2 to more than 100 nm in diameter, which were also documented by TEM. UV-Vis spectrophotometry confirmed that tin selenide particles do not behave as quantum dots.
Atmospheric pressure chemical vapour deposition of SnSe and SnSe2 thin films on glass
Abstract Atmospheric pressure chemical vapour deposition of tin monoselenide and tin diselenide films on glass substrate was achieved by reaction of diethyl selenide with tin tetrachloride at 350–650 °C. X-ray diffraction showed that all the films were crystalline and matched the reported pattern for SnSe and/or SnSe2. Wavelength dispersive analysis by X-rays show a variable Sn:Se ratio from 1:1 to 1:2 depending on conditions. The deposition temperature, flow rates and position on the substrate determined whether mixed SnSe–SnSe2, pure SnSe or pure SnSe2 thin films could be obtained. SnSe films were obtained at 650 °C with a SnCl4 to Et2Se ratio greater than 10. The SnSe films were silver–black in appearance and adhesive. SnSe2 films were obtained at 600–650 °C they had a black appearance and were composed of 10 to 80 μm sized adherent crystals. Films of SnSe only 100 nm thick showed complete absorbtion at 300–1100 nm.
Recalculation of Mass Defects
THE well-known mass defect curve of the old nuclear scheme calculated with regard to α-particles and protons presented a difficulty with its minimum of binding energy for tin and an increasing portion between tin and lead. On the other hand, the mass defect values against protons give a rather smoothly decreasing curve.1 As has already been pointed out,2 the number of α-particles must be considerably reduced from the point of view of the new scheme, which does not admit any electrons in nuclei, but only neutrons and protons (presumably joined as α-particles). The curve of mass defect against protons and neutrons (perhaps with a single ‘central’ α-particle) is very similar to the old curve against protons, but decreases less rapidly. Clearly the new mass defect values relatively to α-particles, neutrons and protons must lie somewhere between the old values computed relative to protons and α-particles respectively (because the number of α-particles is decreased). We may emphasise that this new mass defect curve shows no increasing portion between tin and lead. For illustration we give two typical values: Old: 50Sn124 = 31α + 12&#38;epsiv;; mass defect = 0.158 (in mass units); 82Pb208 = 52α + 22&#38;epsiv;; mass defect = 0.035. New: 50Sn124= 25α + 24ω (ω = neutron); mass defect = 0.304; 82Pb208 = 41α + 44ω; mass defect = 0.366.