Неокласична економска теорија и проблеми економског развоја (Neoclassical Economic Theory and the Problems of Economic Development)
Serbian Abstract: У раду се разматрају карактеристике савремене владајуће неокласичне економске теорије и њен однос према проблемима економског развоја. Показује се да, с претпоставкама једнаке вредности и значаја свих делатности, и свемоћи саморегулишућег тржишта, она нема могућности и снаге да објасни факторе економског развоја, настанка и ширења сиромаштва, како у некој засебно узетој земљи тако и у међународним односима. Као нова парадигма, која треба да је замени, истиче се Други канон, који се заснива на вишевековној традицији и биолошким метафорама. Он води порекло из епохе Ренесансе, потврђен је вишевековним искуством савремених развијених привреда, кроз примену политика које оне данас забрањују за примену неразвијеним земљама, док их оне саме користе. За разлику од неокласичних политика, оваплоћених у (нео)либералној политици Вашингтонског договора, које доводе до деиндустријализације, политике Другог канона, засноване на политикама обрасца Маршаловог плана, доводе насупрот томе до индустријализације као претпоставке изласка неразвијених земаља из кризе и сиромаштва. Замена неокласичне економске парадигме појављује се у том смислу и као претпоставка увећања квалитета макроекономског образовања и дужна је да обезбеди боље разумевање економских проблема и процеса.English Abstract: Paper considers the characteristics of contemporary dominant neoclascical economic theory and their relation to economic development. It was showed that it, with presumptions of the same value and significance of all economic activities, and borderless power of self-regulated market, not have possibilities and force to explain factors of economic development, genesis and widening of poverty, as in one separate country as in international relations. As new paradigm, that should to change neoclascical, it is emphasized Other canon, that is on many centuries tradition and biological metaphors grounded. That dates back to the Renaissance, was proved through experience of the now developed economies, through the use of policies that in contemporary world are forbidden for the underdeveloped countries, while the developed that use. Contrary to neoclassical policies, realized in (neo)liberal politics of Washington consensus, that lead to de-industrialization, policies of the Other canon, on policies like Marshall plan grounded, lead contrary to industrialization as the condition to leave the underdeveloped countries from crisis and poverty. Change of neoclassical economic paradigm in this sense is the condition for the growth of the quality of macroeconomic education and should to ensure better understanding of economic problems and processes.
Transformaciona kriza i perspektive privrede Srbije u epohi globalizacije i finansijske krize
English Abstract: Paper considers the theoretic foundations, results and perspectives of transition process in Serbian economy. The foundations of that process were the postulats of neoclassical economics, the mainstream in recent world and domestic economic thought. They determined the goal, the methodology, and the ideological basis of transition process, and resulted especially in Washington Consensus, originally formulated by John Williamson in 1989, and that was implemented other among in eastern and south-eastern Europe. The implemented neoclassical proces took the form of either shock-therapy or gradualism, however each approach involved their combination. The results of the reforms, based on Consensus, showed, with some exceptions, that these countries realized deep and long-term economic fall, followed by similar processes in other spheres. Contrary to ordinary opinions that transition crisis show as result of inconsistency in reforms taking, this is normaly its result. As an analogue is the Morgenthau’s plan for West Germany observed, that has promoted Germany to industrial disarmament, and that would lead to its poverty and its transformation into raw material basis for the developed economies, and to impossibility of survival of the existing number of population. Fortunately for the Germany, Morgenthau’s plan was abandoned and Marshall’s plan was introduced. It lead to industrial renewal of Germany. For the transition countries it is also necessary, considering the practice and basic principles of the Other Canon, which have they origins as far as from the economic policy of the king Henry VII, to acess re-industrialization in the same way, which is the necessity for renewall of economies, and for overcoming the long-term crisis. Serbian Abstract: U radu se razmatraju teorijski osnovi, rezultati i perspektive procesa tranzicije privrede Srbije. Osnove ovog procesa cinili su postulati neoklasicne ekonomije, glavnog toka u danasnjoj svetskoj i domacoj ekonomskoj misli. Oni su opredelili cilj, metodologiju i ideolosku osnovu tranzicionog procesa, i rezultovali su Vasingtonskim konsenzusom, kojeg je originalno formulisao Džon Vilijamson 1989, i koji je primenjen i na zemlje istocne i jugoistocne Evrope. Primenjeni neoklasicni model uzimao je oblike sok-terapije ili gradualizma, ali je ipak svaki pristup inkorporirao njihovu kombinaciju. Rezultati reformi u ovim zemljama, zasnovanih na Konsenzusu, pokazuju, uz manje izuzetke, dubok i dugotrajan ekonomski pad, uz negativne procese i u drugim sferama. Nasuprot uobicajenim misljenjima da je tranziciona kriza rezultat nedoslednosti u sprovođenju reformi, ona je upravo suprotno njihov zakonomeran rezultat. Kao analog istice se Morgentauov plan za Z. Nemacku, kojim je nakon Drugog svetskog rata bilo predviđeno da ona bude industrijski razoružana, sto bi vodilo njenom siromasenju i pretvaranju u sirovinski dodatak razvijenim privredama, ali time i onemogucilo opstanak tadasnjeg broja stanovnika. Na srecu po Nemacku, Morgentauov plan je zamenjen Marsalovim koji joj je obezbedio industrijsku obnovu. I za tranzicione zemlje potrebno je, u skladu s postavkama i praksom Drugog kanona, koji potice od ekonomske politike kralja Henrija VII, pristupiti reindustrijalizaciji, kao nužnom uslovu oživljavanja privreda i izlaska iz dugotrajne krize.
Total Lobbying : What Lobbyists Want (and How They Try to Get It)
1. Studying lobbyists and lobbying 2. Lobbying and lobbyists in the United States: a primer 3. Public policy lobbying, part 1 4. Public policy lobbying, part 2 5. Land-use lobbying 6. Procurement lobbying 7. Summary and conclusions.