Clinician Perception of a Machine Learning Based Early Warning System Designed to Predict Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock.
OBJECTIVE To assess clinician perceptions of a machine learning based early warning system to predict severe sepsis and septic shock (Early Warning System 2.0) DESIGN Prospective observational study. SETTING Tertiary teaching hospital in Philadelphia, PA. PATIENTS Non ICU admissions November December 2016. INTERVENTIONS During a 6 week study period conducted 5 months after Early Warning System 2.0 alert implementation, nurses and providers were surveyed twice about their perceptions of the alert's helpfulness and impact on care, first within 6 hours of the alert, and again 48 hours after the alert. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS For the 362 alerts triggered, 180 nurses (50% response rate) and 107 providers (30% response rate) completed the first survey. Of these, 43 nurses (24% response rate) and 44 providers (41% response rate) completed the second survey. Few (24% nurses, 13% providers) identified new clinical findings after responding to the alert. Perceptions of the presence of sepsis at the time of alert were discrepant between nurses (13% and providers (40% The majority of clinicians reported no change in perception of the patient's risk for sepsis (55% nurses, 62% providers) A third of nurses (30% but few providers (9% reported the alert changed management. Almost half of nurses (42% but less than a fifth of providers (16% found the alert helpful at 6 hours. CONCLUSIONS In general, clinical perceptions of Early Warning System 2.0 were poor. Nurses and providers differed in their perceptions of sepsis and alert benefits. These findings highlight the challenges of achieving acceptance of predictive and machine learning based sepsis alerts.
Critical care medicine