Towards an Explanation Space to Align Humans and Explainable AI Teamwork
Providing meaningful and actionable explanations to end users is a fundamental prerequisite for implementing explainable intelligent systems in the real world. Explainability is a situated interaction between a user and the AI system rather than being static design principles. The content of explanations is context dependent and must be defined by evidence about the user and its context. This paper seeks to operationalize this concept by proposing a formative architecture that defines the explanation space from a user inspired perspective. The architecture comprises five intertwined components to outline explanation requirements for a task: (1) the end users mental models, (2) the end users cognitive process, (3) the user interface, (4) the human explainer agent, and the (5) agent process. We first define each component of the architecture. Then we present the Abstracted Explanation Space, a modeling tool that aggregates the architecture's components to support designers in systematically aligning explanations with the end users work practices, needs, and goals. It guides the specifications of what needs to be explained (content end users mental model) why this explanation is necessary (context end users cognitive process) to delimit how to explain it (format human explainer agent and user interface) and when should the explanations be given. We then exemplify the tool's use in an ongoing case study in the aircraft maintenance domain. Finally, we discuss possible contributions of the tool, known limitations/areas for improvement, and future work to be done. Keywords Explainable AI; User Centered Design; Interdisciplinary study; Human AI Teaming 1 ar X iv :2 10 6. 01 50 3v 1 cs .A I] 2 J un 2 02 1
ArXiv