Tomato endophyte bacteria diversity under long term organic agricultural manipulation systems
Purpose: Differences were observed in both microbial structure and physicochemical properties were observed in the organic and conventional agricultural systems. However, very little is known about the diversity of endophytic bacterial communities in plants grown in separate manipulation systems. The goal of this work was to get a broader overview of the diversity and dynamics of the tomato endophytic bacteria in the different agricultural manipulation systems.Methods: The structure of endophyte bacterial communities under different growth periods (seeding stage, flowering stage, fruiting stage and harvesting stage) agricultural manipulation practices (organic and conventional systems) and organ type (root or stem) were explored by using 16Sr RNA gene profiling in this study.Results: A total of 2,014,992 part 16 SRRNA gene sequences were obtained. These sequences revealed large scale functional taxonomy units (OTUs) That is, there are 648 different OTUS in libraries, and 96 OTUs are common. Tomato endophytes consisted mainly of four phylloxera, of which Proteobacteria was the most represented, followed by Formigiotes, bacteriophages, Actinobacteria, Gamma proteobacteria, the most abundant class of proteobacteria, bacteriobacteria, and so on. Proteobacteria are low. General enterobacteriaceae, Vecella, Bacillus, Mesorizobium and Chrysobacterium were shared by all growth periods. Rich endophytic bacterial diversity was observed at the seedling stage (DI) and endophytic bacterial diversity at the flowering stage and fruiting stage was low. Significant difference in endophytic bacterial communities emerged from roots and different host biographical stages, and tomato exerts greater influence on endophyte bacteria compared to organ type (main) agricultural manipulation methods.Conclusions: Tomato endophyte microbiota have a distinct structure in different growth periods. Bacillus were enriched seeding stage and decreased in the fruiting stage while Mesorhizobium increased during in the fruiting stage. Tomato have distinct endosphere microbiota by comparing beta diversity of microbiota in different growth periods, compared with the manipulation resume and organ type. And a strong correlation was observed between the structure of the microbiota in the whole dataset and soil chemistry which indicated that the soil type and treatment affected the endosphere microbiota of tomato. Organ type (niche) exert more influence on the tomato microbiota compared with manipulation treatments between organic farming and conventional farming.