Americanism and financial accounting theory Part 2: The 'modern business enterprise' America's transition to capitalism, and the genesis of management accounting
The paper uses accounting evidence to explore when and how capitalism came to America. It continues the search for capitalists in American history begun in 'Americanism and financial accounting theory. Part 1: Was America Born Capitalist? Part 1 concluded that America was not 'born capitalist' in Marx's sense, and that the capitalist mentality had not appeared in farming even by the late 19th century, on southern slave plantations by the Civil War, or in manufacturing enterprises by the 1830s. This paper (Part 2) challenges Alfred Chandler's thesis that the 'modern business enterprise' brought 'a new type of capitalism' from around the mid 19th century. It re examines accounting evidence from the Boston textile mills, the railroads, and the iron and steel industry. It concludes that the Boston Associates who historians often see as 'proto capitalists' the 'managerial capitalists' Chandler sees on the railroads, and the 'entrepreneurial capitalists' he sees in the iron and steel industry and elsewhere, remained semi capitalists because their capitals and workers were not 'free' The paper re examines the 'costing renaissance' the introduction and spread of product costing, standard costing, ROI and flexible budgets, and the evidence in Chandler's and Johnson and Kaplan's studies of the DuPont Powder Company and General Motors. This suggests that capitalism only appeared in America by around 1900, after more than two decades of intense conflict between 'capital and labour' and became established by the 1920s. This is the critical turning point in American business history, not the appearance of 'managerial capitalism' the paper argues. It concludes that America did not catch up with British capitalism until the late 1920s because its ruling elite faced an ideological problem created by its exceptional transition from a society of simple commodity producers and semi capitalists, particularly the threat of popular socialism. The final paper, Part 3: 'Adam Smith, the rise and fall of socialism, and Irving Fisher's theory of accounting' argues that Fisher made a seminal contribution to solving this problem, but his legacy is a pathological theory of financial accounting.