Quality defects in market beef and dairy cows and bulls sold through livestock auction markets in the Western United States: II. Relative effects on selling price.
Relative effects of Beef Quality Assurance (BQA) related defects in market beef and dairy cows and bulls on selling price at auction was evaluated during 2008. The presence and severity of 23 BQA related traits were determined during sales in Idaho, California, and Utah. Overall, 18,949 unique lots consisting of 23,479 animals were assessed during 125 dairy sales and 79 beef sales. Mean sale price SD (per 45.5 kg) for market beef cows, beef bulls, dairy cows, and dairy bulls was $45.15 9.42, $56.30 9.21, $42.23 12.26, and $55.10 9.07, respectively. When combined, all recorded traits explained 36% of the variation in selling price in beef cows, 35% in beef bulls, 61% in dairy cows, and 56% in dairy bulls. Premiums and discounts were determined in comparison with a "par" or "base" animal. Compared with a base BCS 5 beef cow (on a 9 point beef scale) BCS 1 to 4 cows were discounted (P 0.0001) whereas premiums (P 0.05) were estimated for BCS 6 to 8. Compared with a base BCS 3.0 dairy cow (on a 5 point dairy scale) more body condition resulted in a premium (P 0.001) whereas a less than desirable BCS of 2.0 or 2.5 was discounted (P 0.0001) Emaciated or near emaciated cows (beef BCS 1 or 2; dairy BCS 1.0 or 1.5) were discounted (P 0.0001) Compared with base cows weighing 545 to 635 kg, lighter BW beef cows were discounted (P 0.0001) whereas heavier beef cows received (P 0.05) a premium. Compared with a base dairy cow weighing 636 to 727 kg, lighter BW cows were discounted (P 0.0001) whereas heavier cows (727 to 909 kg) received a premium (P 0.01) Beef and dairy cows with any evidence of lameness were discounted (P 0.0001) Presence of ocular neoplasia in the precancerous stage discounted (P 0.05) beef cows and discounted (P 0.01) dairy cows, whereas at the cancerous stage, it discounted (P 0.0001) all cows. Hide color influenced (P 0.0001) selling price in beef cattle but had no effect (P 0.17) in dairy cows. Animals that were visibly sick were discounted (P 0.0001) Results suggest that improving BCS and BW, which producers can do at the farm or ranch level, positively affects sale price. Furthermore, animals that are visibly sick or have a defect associated with a possible antibiotic risk will be discounted. Ultimately, animals with minor quality defects should be sold in a timely manner before the defect advances and the discount increases.
Journal of animal science