The Direct and Indirect Effects of Clinical Empathy on Well Being among Pre Medical Students: A Structural Equation Model Approach
Background: Empathy is a well established facet of clinical competency that research suggests is associated with enhanced medical student well being. Since little is known about empathy and well being before students enter medical school during pre medical education the main goal of this study is to test a conceptual model of how clinical empathy is related to two indicators of well being, depression, and burnout among pre medical students. The theoretical model hypothesizes that three dimensions of clinical empathy Perspective Taking, Compassionate Care, and Standing in Patients' Shoes will be directly and negatively related to depression, as well as indirectly through its inverse relationship with three facets of burnout, Emotional Exhaustion, Poor Academic Efficacy, and Cynicism. Methods: Using survey data from a sample of 132 pre medical students at an American Midwestern university, this study employs structural equation modeling (SEM) to test the theoretical model of the relationships between empathy, burnout, and depression among pre medical students. We identify the direct effects of the three dimensions of the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy (JSE S) on depression (CES D) as well as the indirect effects of clinical empathy on depression through the three dimensions of the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI S) Results: SEM analyses show that while none of the three dimensions of the JSE S are directly related to depression, clinical empathy does significantly affect depression indirectly through burnout. Specifically, as predicted, we find that Perspective Taking decreases Emotional Exhaustion, but, contrary to expectations, Compassionate Care increases it. And, the positive relationship between Compassionate Care and Emotional Exhaustion is particularly strong. In turn, Perspective Taking and Compassionate Care are associated with depression in opposite directions and to different degrees. Conclusions: Findings suggest that clinical empathy as measured by the JSE S produces both positive and negative effects on personal well being. We conclude that further conceptual clarity of clinical empathy is needed to better discern how the different dimensions impact different indicators of well being. Given that pre medical education is a crucial time for emotional socialization, the challenge for medical education will be fostering the positive, cognitive aspects of clinical empathy while simultaneously mitigating the adverse effects of affective empathy on medical student well being.