Quantitative evaluation of the matrix effect in bioanalytical methods based on LC MS: A comparison of two approaches
HIGHLIGHTSNine analytes of different structure were studied.Lack of relevant differences between both calculation methods.CV( of IS norm matrix factor was 0.5% higher than IS norm relative matrix effect.Method adopted by European Medicines Agency seems to be slightly more conservative. ABSTRACT Liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (LC MS) is a powerful tool for studying pharmacokinetics and toxicokinetics. Reliable bioanalysis requires the characterization of the matrix effect, i.e. influence of the endogenous or exogenous compounds on the analyte signal intensity. We have compared two methods for the quantitation of matrix effect. The CVs( of internal standard normalized matrix factors recommended by the European Medicines Agency were evaluated against internal standard normalized relative matrix effects derived from Matuszewski et al. (2003) Both methods use post extraction spiked samples, but matrix factors require also neat solutions. We have tested both approaches using analytes of diverse chemical structures. The study did not reveal relevant differences in the results obtained with both calculation methods. After normalization with the internal standard, the CV( of the matrix factor was on average 0.5% higher than the corresponding relative matrix effect. The method adopted by the European Medicines Agency seems to be slightly more conservative in the analyzed datasets. Nine analytes of different structures enabled a general overview of the problem, still, further studies are encouraged to confirm our observations.
Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis