Small and large number discrimination in guppies
Non verbal numerical behavior in human infants, human adults, and non human primates appears to be rooted in two distinct mechanisms: a precise system for tracking and comparing small numbers of items simultaneously (up to 3 or 4 items) and an approximate system for estimating numerical magnitude of a group of objects. The most striking evidence that these two mechanisms are distinct comes from the apparent inability of young human infants and non human primates to compare quantites across the small <3 or 4)/large >4) number boundary. We ask whether this distinction is present in lower animal species more distantly related to humans, guppies (Poecilia reticulata) We found that, like human infants and non human primates, fish succeed at comparisons between large numbers only (5 vs. 10) succeed at comparisons between small numbers only (3 vs. 4) but systematically fail at comparisons that closely span the small/large boundary (3 vs. 5) Furthermore, increasing the distance between the small and large number resulted in successful discriminations (3 vs. 6, 3 vs. 7, and 3 vs. 9) This pattern of successes and failures is similar to those observed in human infants and non human primates to suggest that the two systems are present and functionally distinct across a wide variety of animal species.
Animal Cognition