24077597
Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: review of literature and proposal of new diagnostic and classification criteria.
Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) is an immunological pulmonary disorder caused by hypersensitivity to Aspergillus fumigatus, manifesting with poorly controlled asthma, recurrent pulmonary infiltrates and bronchiectasis. There are estimated to be in excess of four million patients affected world-wide. The importance of recognizing ABPA relates to the improvement of patient symptoms, and delay in development or prevention of bronchiectasis, one manifestation of permanent lung damage in ABPA. Environmental factors may not be the only pathogenetic factors because not all asthmatics develop ABPA despite being exposed to the same environment. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis is probably a polygenic disorder, which does not remit completely once expressed, although long-term remissions do occur. In a genetically predisposed individual, inhaled conidia of A. fumigatus germinate into hyphae with release of antigens that activate the innate and adaptive immune responses (Th2 CD4(+) T cell responses) of the lung. The International Society for Human and Animal Mycology (ISHAM) has constituted a working group on ABPA complicating asthma (www.abpaworkinggroup.org), which convened an international conference to summarize the current state of knowledge, and formulate consensus-based guidelines for diagnosis and therapy. New diagnosis and staging criteria for ABPA are proposed. Although a small number of randomized controlled trials have been conducted, long-term management remains poorly studied. Primary therapy consists of oral corticosteroids to control exacerbations, itraconazole as a steroid-sparing agent and optimized asthma therapy. Uncertainties surround the prevention and management of bronchiectasis, chronic pulmonary aspergillosis and aspergilloma as complications, concurrent rhinosinusitis and environmental control. There is need for new oral antifungal agents and immunomodulatory therapy.
33491888
Noninvasive ventilation in ARDS caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis: report of three cases and review of literature
26068481
Efficacy and safety of iodopovidone pleurodesis through tube thoracostomy.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of iodopovidone as an agent for pleurodesis through tube thoracostomy in patients with recurrent pleural effusions and pneumothorax.


METHODS
This was a prospective study in which pleurodesis was performed with a solution of 20 mL 10% iodopovidone and 80 mL normal saline solution infused through a tube thoracostomy and left in the pleural cavity for 4 h.


RESULTS
A total of 64 patients (34 men) with a mean (+/-SD) age of 47.1 +/- 15.4 years were included. There were 37 cases of pleural effusion and 27 of pneumothorax. A complete response (neither reaccumulation of fluid nor recurrence of pneumothorax) was obtained in 32 (86.5%) patients with pleural effusion and 25 (92.6%) patients with pneumothorax. A second procedure (i.e. repeated pleurodesis) was attempted successfully in four patients in the pleural effusion group. All patients experienced chest pain to a varying degree as recorded on a Visual Analogue Scale (median 50.5, range 10-95). Seven patients developed fever and one immunocompromised patient developed empyema following the procedure. There were no recurrences at a median follow up of 5 months (range 3-15 months) in the pleural effusion group, and 13 months (range 6-24 months) in the pneumothorax group.


CONCLUSIONS
Iodopovidone can be used as an effective and safe agent for (chemical) pleurodesis (through tube thoracostomy), which is inexpensive and readily available.
22528299
Pulmonary hypertension as a presenting manifestation of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis.
The case of a 46-year-old lady who presented with respiratory failure and pulmonary hypertension in the absence of clinical signs of asthma or bronchiectasis, and in whom a diagnosis of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergilloma [ABPA] was made subsequently on the basis of radiological and laboratory investigations is reported. Symptomatic and objective improvement was seen with corticosteroid therapy. To the best of the authors' knowledge, such an occurrence has not been reported previously. This case highlights the importance of keeping a high index of suspicion while investigating a patient with pulmonary hypertension in whom the aetiology is not apparent on initial evaluation. Identification of the disease, in its early-stage, can prevent progression to bronchiectasis and fibrotic lung disease, and thus, patients can be saved from the morbidity related to end-stage disease.
45999589
Noninvasive ventilation in acute heart failure.
3038618
Is the mortality higher in the pulmonary vs the extrapulmonary ARDS? A meta analysis.
BACKGROUND AND AIM
ARDS can occur from the following two pathogenetic pathways: a direct pulmonary injury (ARDSp); and an indirect injury (ARDSexp). The predisposing clinical factor can influence the pathogenesis and clinical outcome of ARDS. This metaanalysis was aimed at evaluating whether there is any difference in mortality between the two groups.


METHODS
We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases for relevant studies published from 1987 to 2007, and included studies that have reported mortality in the two groups of ARDS. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) to assess mortality in patients with ARDSp vs patients with ARDSexp and pooled the results using three different statistical models.


RESULTS
Our search yielded 34 studies. In all, the studies involved 4,311 patients with 2,330 patients in the ARDSp group and 1,981 patients in the ARDSexp group. The OR of mortality in ARDSp group compared to the ARDSexp group was 1.11 (95% CI, 0.88 to 1.39), as determined by the random-effects model; 1.04 (95% CI, 0.92 to 1.18), as determined by the fixed-effects model; and 1.04 (95% CI, 0.92 to 1.18), as determined by the exact method, indicating that mortality is similar in the two groups. The mortality was no different whether the studies were classified as prospective (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.51) or retrospective (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.69); small (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.60) or large (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.49); or observational (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.49) or interventional (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.19). There was methodological and statistical heterogeneity (I(2), 50.9%; 95% CI, 21.3 to 66.2%; chi(2) statistic, 67.22; p = 0.0004).


CONCLUSIONS
The results of this study suggest that there is no difference in mortality between these two groups. Further studies should focus on specific etiologies within the subgroups rather than focusing on the broader division of ARDSp and ARDSexp.
32720111
Assessment of some tumorigenic risks associated with fresh and used cutting oil.
10037944
Mandibular reconstruction using extraoral trifocal bone transport: report of a case using a new device.
A newly designed mandibular stabilization and transport distraction system is an extraoral assembly of a half-elliptical rod, with movable clamp attachments that serves the dual purpose of stabilization and transport distraction osteogenesis of mandibular segmental defects. The rod is threaded and made of stainless steel, and it conforms to the shape of the human mandible. Mandibular stabilization and bone transport are accomplished with the help of different assemblies that are attached onto this rod. There are 3 different assemblies having separate functions but achieving the same goals of mandibular stabilization and bone transport. All the assemblies have a common base unit that moves on threads of the curved rod in a graduated manner, controlled by a spanner. One full turn of 360° moves the assembly by a distance of 1 mm. The first assembly is the stabilization assembly, which helps in the rigid fixation of the frame to the mandible by use of at least 2 clamp units on either side of the midline. It helps in stabilization of the mandibular segments in an anatomic position. The bone transport assembly consists of 1 or 2 moveable clamp assemblies that are fixed at 1 end to the transport disc of the mandible, while the base unit assembly glides and engages on the threads of the distraction rod. This allows bone regeneration and laying down of new bone in the natural position along the path of movement of the transport disc in a curvilinear manner. This system allows mandibular regenera-
20840764
Thiazide diuretics in advanced chronic kidney disease.
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is prevalent in 3%-4% of the adult population in the United States, and the vast majority of these people are hypertensive. Compared with those with essential hypertension, hypertension in CKD remains poorly controlled despite the use of multiple antihypertensive drugs. Hypervolemia is thought to be a major cause of hypertension, and diuretics are useful to improve blood pressure control in CKD. Non-osmotic storage of sodium in the skin and muscle may be a novel mechanism by which sodium may modulate hypertension; further work is need to study this novel phenomenon with diuretics. Among people with stage 4 CKD, loop diuretics are recommended over thiazides. Thiazide diuretics are deemed ineffective in people with stage 4 CKD. Review of the literature suggests that thiazides may be useful even among people with advanced CKD. They cause a negative sodium balance, increasing sodium excretion by 10%-15% and weight loss by 1-2 kg in observational studies. Observational data show improvement in seated clinic blood pressure of about 10-15 mm Hg systolic and 5-10 mm Hg diastolic, whereas randomized trials show about 15 mm Hg improvement in mean arterial pressure. Volume depletion, hyponatremia, hypokalemia, hypercalcemia, and acute kidney injury are adverse effects that should be closely monitored. Our review suggests that adequately powered randomized trials are needed before the use of thiazide diuretics can be firmly recommended in those with advanced CKD.
40070884
Relative plasma volume monitoring for identifying volume-sensitive and -resistant hypertension.
The measurement and management of volume state among long-term dialysis patients has not received much attention. Recent reports suggest that relative plasma volume monitoring may be useful in identifying patients who have volume excess. Among patients who have evidence of excess volume by relative plasma volume monitoring, excess volume removal leads to improvement in interdialytic ambulatory blood pressure. Implementation of this technique can result in improved classification of patients into volume-sensitive and -resistant categories and therefore improve the management of hypertension.
9031611
Hypertension in hemodialysis patients treated with atenolol or lisinopril: a randomized controlled trial.
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this study was to determine among maintenance hemodialysis patients with echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy and hypertension whether in comparison with a β-blocker-based antihypertensive therapy, an angiotensin converting enzyme-inhibitor-based antihypertensive therapy causes a greater regression of left ventricular hypertrophy.


METHODS
Subjects were randomly assigned to either open-label lisinopril (n = 100) or atenolol (n = 100) each administered three times per week after dialysis. Monthly monitored home blood pressure (BP) was controlled to <140/90 mmHg with medications, dry weight adjustment and sodium restriction. The primary outcome was the change in left ventricular mass index (LVMI) from baseline to 12 months.


RESULTS
At baseline, 44-h ambulatory BP was similar in the atenolol (151.5/87.1 mmHg) and lisinopril groups, and improved similarly over time in both groups. However, monthly measured home BP was consistently higher in the lisinopril group despite the need for both a greater number of antihypertensive agents and a greater reduction in dry weight. An independent data safety monitoring board recommended termination because of cardiovascular safety. Serious cardiovascular events in the atenolol group occurred in 16 subjects, who had 20 events, and in the lisinopril group in 28 subjects, who had 43 events {incidence rate ratio (IRR) 2.36 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.36-4.23, P = 0.001]}. Combined serious adverse events of myocardial infarction, stroke and hospitalization for heart failure or cardiovascular death in the atenolol group occurred in 10 subjects, who had 11 events and in the lisinopril group in 17 subjects, who had 23 events (IRR 2.29, P = 0.021). Hospitalizations for heart failure were worse in the lisinopril group (IRR 3.13, P = 0.021). All-cause hospitalizations were higher in the lisinopril group [IRR 1.61 (95% CI 1.18-2.19, P = 0.002)]. LVMI improved with time; no difference between drugs was noted.


CONCLUSIONS
Among maintenance dialysis patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy, atenolol-based antihypertensive therapy may be superior to lisinopril-based therapy in preventing cardiovascular morbidity and all-cause hospitalizations. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00582114).