38466120
Novel therapeutic agents in ovarian cancer.
AIMS
Epithelial ovarian cancer is responsible for 4% of all cancer deaths in women, and the five-year overall survival of patients with advanced disease is 30-40%. Treatment currently comprises a combination of surgery and chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel. The main reason for treatment failure is that the majority of patients present with advanced disease, and current drugs are unable to effect a cure even in chemosensitive patients. This article systematically reviews novel therapeutic strategies that have been evaluated in patients with ovarian cancer in the last 5 years.


METHODS
Pubmed (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?DB=pubmed) and American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual conference abstracts were searched using the terms "(phase I OR phase II OR phase III OR phase 1 OR phase 2 OR phase 3) AND (ovary OR ovarian) AND (cancer OR carcinoma)" from January 2000 to May 2005 to identify studies for potential inclusion in this review. Reviews of novel therapies in ovarian cancer were also used to identify additional clinical trials.


FINDINGS
A wide range of therapeutic strategies are currently being evaluated in ovarian cancer. These include novel cytotoxics, small molecule inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, gene therapy and immuno-therapy strategies. The rationale for the development of these agents includes enhancement of efficacy by targeting novel biological pathways, re-sensitisation to existing drugs, simplification of drug administration and/or reduction of drug-toxicity.


CONCLUSIONS
Current developments have the potential to result in substantial improvements in the outlook for women with ovarian cancer.
8134220
Prognostic factors in ovarian cancer: how close are we to a complete picture?
Prognostic factors in ovarian cancer: how close are we to a complete picture? Ovarian cancer is the fourth most common cause of cancer-related death in women, but is the most lethal of the gynaeco-logical malignancies with 30–40% overall survival at 5 years [1]. This is in part because the majority of patients with ova-rian cancer present with advanced disease, and treatment options at presentation are confined to a combination of debulking surgery and platinum based chemotherapy, which are only partially effective [2]. Consequently, almost all patients with advanced disease ultimately relapse and die of their disease. Advances in the management of these patients are therefore urgently required. Prognostic factors are defined as phenotypes which correlate with overall survival. In general prognostic factors reflect the intrinsic biology of a tumour (e.g. histological subtype, grade), disease extent (e.g. stage) and/or the capacity of a patient to cope with the morbidity associated with the tumour and treatment (e.g. performance status). As well as these pretreatment factors, others which may impact on outcome include the treatment received by a patient (e.g. optimal surgical cytore-duction, platinum-based chemotherapy), and the effect of treatment on the tumour (e.g. complete response) or the patient (e.g. myelosuppression). As clinical tools, prognostic factors can potentially help in individualising treatment for patients. In properly staged early disease (stage Ia/b), patients have a better prognosis and the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy may be confined to those with adverse features (e.g. histological subtype or grade) [3]. In this context a prognostic factor with a good positive or negative predictive value for individual patients, would be useful in deciding which patients should receive chemotherapy and those for whom the toxicity was not justified. In contrast, in advanced disease, the majority of patients benefit from paclitaxel –carboplatin chemotherapy and debulking surgery. As there are no established alternatives for patients with either good or poor prognosis, pretreatment prognostic stratification has little influence on clinical management [2]. Instead, pre-treatment markers predictive of response or resistance to individual cytotoxic drugs would be more useful in this context for treatment selection. As research tools, prognostic factors can help identify subgroups of patients with especially poor prognosis and alert us to the need to develop alternative treatment strategies for these patients, while in clinical trials prognostic factors are used to balance patients between treatment arms to minimise the risk of confounding. Prognostic factor studies can also provide useful insights into …
26099246
Expression profiling and individualisation of treatment for ovarian cancer.
Ovarian cancer is the commonest cause of gynaecological cancer-related mortality. Patients with this disease generally undergo surgery followed by platinum-taxane chemotherapy, with additional chemotherapy at relapse. Although the prognosis for patients with advanced cancer is poor--a five-year survival of only 30-40%--there is a wide range of outcomes for individual patients. To date, clinico-pathological variables such as age, stage, grade, histology, debulking status and response to chemotherapy continue to provide the basis on which treatment decisions are made for individual patients. Immunohistochemical markers and information on p53 mutation status have been extensively evaluated in ovarian cancer, but have not yet been shown to be sufficiently informative to influence clinical decisions on a routine basis. The recent advent of expression profiling has provided a new impetus to identifying clinically useful prognostic markers. The ambition of personalised medicine through microarray-based profiling appears to be realistic, but further studies on large uniform cohorts are needed before this potential is fully realised.
20955522
Ovarian cancer: strategies for overcoming resistance to chemotherapy
Ovarian cancer is responsible for 4% of deaths from cancer in women. Treatment comprises a combination of surgery and chemotherapy, but patients typically experience disease relapse within 2 years of the initial treatment. Further treatment can extend survival, although relapse eventually occurs again. A better understanding of the mechanisms that underlie this drug resistance should allow treatment to be optimized, so that substantial improvements in the outlook for women with this disease can be achieved.
36066210
First-line therapy for ovarian cancer with carboplatin followed by paclitaxel-gemcitabine (SCOTROC5): a feasibility study and comparative analysis of the SCOTROC series.
BACKGROUND
We have conducted a series of four feasibility studies in stage Ic-IV ovarian cancer exploring six sequential first-line schedules with the same entry criteria in a total of 339 patients. Here we present the results of the sixth study, and an analysis of the overall series.


METHODS
In this trial patients received 4 cycles of carboplatin AUC 7 every 3 weeks, followed by 4 cycles of concurrent paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) (day 1) and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8) every 3 weeks. The primary end-point of the trial was feasibility of administering all cycles of planned chemotherapy to >60% of patients.


RESULTS
Fifty-four patients were recruited to the trial between June 05 and June 06. A total of 40 (74.1%) patients received all 8 cycles of treatment. Reasons for early discontinuation included toxicity (n=8) and disease progression (n=4). The overall response rate was 73.7%, and the median progression free survival (PFS) was 14.2 months with a median follow-up of 24 months. A comparative analysis of all six regimens from the SCOTROC series suggests that the sequential schedule in which paclitaxel was given weekly (median PFS 19.5m) is most effective.


CONCLUSION
The sequential schedule explored in this trial is feasible, but comparative efficacy analysis suggests that trials involving weekly paclitaxel should be prioritised for further study.
25760349
Antihypertensive agents and arterial stiffness: relevance to reducing cardiovascular risk in the chronic kidney disease patient.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
Arterial stiffness is a sign of diffuse adventitial macrovascular disease. The purpose of the present review is to discuss, in patients with chronic kidney disease, the pathophysiology of increased arterial stiffness, the role of antihypertensive therapy on reduction of arterial stiffness, and the clinical ways by which the prognostication of cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic kidney disease can be refined using arterial stiffness monitoring.


RECENT FINDINGS
Arterial stiffness is increased with increasing prevalence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors. In patients with chronic kidney disease some unique factors further increase the risk of arterial stiffness, and include volume overload, activation of the renin-angiotensin system, anemia, and dysregulated mineral metabolism. Arterial stiffness is increased even in patients with early-stage chronic kidney disease. Blood pressure reduction when accompanied by a reduction in arterial stiffness is associated with improved prognosis. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers can preferentially improve arterial stiffness, which may be an additional mechanism of cardiovascular protection with these agents.


SUMMARY
The impact of improvement in arterial stiffness with antihypertensive agents on cardiovascular outcomes needs well designed clinical trials.
37464296
Introduction to Special Issue on Molecular Basis for Cancer Prevention with Bioactive Food Components in Nutrition and Cancer--an International Journal.
The advance of technology and understanding of the process of cancer development suggests that the reported lesser incidence and death due to cancer in countries other than the Western and European countries might also be due to under- diagnosed and under-represented cases. Further, increases in life span as well as ignorance about the disease puts populations in South and South East Asian countries at higher risk to develop cancer. With the increasing rate of cancer incidence every year in non -Western countries, cancer is estimated to become the deadliest disease in coming decades. Conventional chemo- and radio-therapies during the past three decades have not been able to contain the disease, and also have serious side effects. Many natural agents, especially small molecules from plants are non-toxic, easily available and may have anticancer potential. Thus, screening phytochemicals as anticancer agents could be a better approach in cancer prevention and treatment. This chemoprevention approach may have translational significance for prevention and treatment of cancer. 
 
Therefore to emphasize the potential role of phytochemicals in cancer prevention and therapy, it was our privilege to host the International Symposium on Recent Advances in Cancer Research: Therapeutics to Chemoprevention, at Central University of Gujarat (CUG), Gandhinagar. The conference was co-organized by the University of Colorado Denver, USA; University of Pittsburgh, USA; University of Oklahoma, USA, during 8–9 February, 2012. Modern biological strategies, specifically the latest developments for the targeted prevention and treatment of cancer via dietary, natural and synthetic agents were discussed in detail. The symposium also emphasized the translational aspect of cancer chemoprevention strategies for various cancers. 
 
The symposium deliberations include the ideas for combinatorial chemoprevention by phytochemicals as a promising approach for cancer control and emerging trends for the use of herbal radio-modulators to sensitize the cancer cells for apoptotic cell death. Many bioactive phytochemicals such as silibinin, benzyl isothiocyanate, anthocyanidins, nexrutine, tocopherol, etc. were discussed for their in vivo efficacy in animal tumor models, associated mechanisms and translational potential. Targeting tumor microenvironment with small molecules was found promising and having translational potential for prostate and breast cancer chemoprevention. 
 
The novel work and ideas presented at the symposium were helpful in guiding the research orientation of scientists, especially the young researchers who will be benefitted at all levels of their career development. Since chemoprevention of cancer is becoming an attractive approach for controlling cancer, we felt that the deliberations of this symposium should reach to the wider section of the researchers. Therefore, it was planned to bring out a special issue on Molecular Basis for Cancer Prevention with Bioactive Food Components in Nutrition and Cancer – An International Journal. We appreciate the researchers for contributing their novel work and ideas to this special issue. We are grateful to the Editor of Nutrition and Cancer – An International Journal, for his initiative to bring out this special issue on this relevant topic. We believe that this volume will be enlightening for the researchers working in the area of cancer chemoprevention.
30136783
Blood pressure goal in chronic kidney disease: what is the evidence?
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
Most guidelines recommend that seated clinic blood pressure (BP) be targeted to less than 130/80 mmHg in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The evidence underlying these recommendations is the subject of this review.


RECENT FINDINGS
The best evidence to target a certain level of BP in patients with CKD comes from randomized trials. Only three trials have prospectively examined the level to which BP should be lowered. These trials conducted exclusively among patients with CKD have demonstrated that compared to a less aggressive BP goal, a BP goal of less than 130/80 mmHg neither saves lives nor protects the kidney or the cardiovascular system.


SUMMARY
It is reasonable to achieve a goal of less than 140/90 mmHg in most patients with CKD. More aggressive lowering is not firmly supported by current data. Since BP control is important, hypertension therapy should be individualized. Individualization through home BP measurements to diagnose, monitor and treat hypertension appears to be an attractive option.
9534946
Tuberculous dilated cardiomyopathy: an under-recognized entity?
BackgroundTuberculosis (TB) is a common public health problem in many parts of the world. TB is generally believed to spare these four organs-heart, skeletal muscle, thyroid and pancreas. We describe a rare case of myocardial TB diagnosed on a post-mortem cardiac biopsy.Case presentationPatient presented with history suggestive of congestive heart failure. We describe the clinical presentation, investigations and outcome of this case, and review the literature on the involvement of myocardium by TB.ConclusionInvolvement of myocardium by TB is rare. However it should be suspected as a cause of congestive heart failure in any patient with features suggestive of TB. Increasing recognition of the entity and the use of endomyocardial biopsy may help us detect more cases of this "curable" form of cardiomyopathy.
27841467
Median intradialytic blood pressure can track changes evoked by probing dry-weight.
BACKGROUND
Median BP obtained over a single dialysis treatment can diagnose hypertension among hemodialysis patients. Whether median BP is as useful to track change in BP is unknown.


DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS
Among patients participating in the dry-weight reduction in hypertensive hemodialysis patients (DRIP) trial, interdialytic ambulatory BP was recorded at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks. The mean interdialytic ambulatory BP was compared to the following recordings: predialysis on one dialysis treatment (Pre1), predialysis averaged over 2 weeks of dialysis treatment (Pre6), postdialysis on one dialysis treatment (Post1), postdialysis averaged over 2 weeks of dialysis treatment (Post6), and median intradialytic BP over one treatment.


RESULTS
Pre1 was unable to detect change in ambulatory BP. Although Pre6 was able to detect change, it overestimated the ambulatory BP. On average, the magnitude of reduction in Post1 in response to probing dry-weight was nearly twice that obtained by ambulatory BP monitoring. Even Post6 overestimated the magnitude of reduction in BP at 8 weeks. Median systolic BP was responsive to probing dry-weight and neither overestimated nor underestimated the interdialytic ambulatory systolic BP at baseline or over time. However, the SD of the differences between median systolic BP and interdialytic ambulatory systolic BP varied from 16 to 20 mmHg.


CONCLUSIONS
Median intradialytic BP recordings can detect change in ambulatory BP evoked by reduction in dry-weight at the population level. Because of wide agreement limits between intradialytic and interdialytic BP, the individual prediction of ambulatory BP from median intradialytic BP can be misleading.