Diversity of bryophyte vegetation in some forest types in Estonia: a comparison of old unmanaged and managed forests
The bryophyte vegetation of 3 pairs of unmanaged and managed forest stands, representing Oxalis drained peatland, Aegopodium and Oxalis forest site type, were compared. The total number of bryophyte species in unmanaged stands was 74 and that in managed stands 54. Out of the 20 species occurring only in unmanaged forests, 9 grow on decaying wood, and 3 on trunks or bases of big trees; 13 of them were hepatics. In unmanaged forests 11 hemerophobic species were recorded altogether. Although the difference in substrate and species diversity between unmanaged and managed stands is not statistically significant, in unmanaged forests more substrates characteristic for an old-growth stand are available, and the percentage of species preferring dryer habitats or prolonged humidity is a bit higher than in managed forests; the percentage of species associated with better illuminated habitats is higher in managed forests. Analysis of classification structure of the bryophyte layer synusia shows that the number of societies is also higher in unmanaged forests. This is associated with more numerous microhabitats; the average light and humidity indices calculated for every society, confirm this conclusion. The large discrepancy in bryophyte layer classification structure in old-growth and managed forests of the same forest site type is manifested not so much by species content in synusia as by their abundance proportions. The larger diversity of classification units in unmanaged forests is also seen at the synusia facies level; four of nine facies are confined exclusively to unmanaged stands. This is a strong argument for the informativeness of bryophyte layer classification structure for purposes of indication and monitoring as well.