Reasoning in Reference Games: Individual vs. Population Level Probabilistic Modeling
Recent advances in probabilistic pragmatics have achieved considerable success in modeling speakers' and listeners' pragmatic reasoning as probabilistic inference. However, these models are usually applied to population level data, and so implicitly suggest a homogeneous population without individual differences. Here we investigate potential individual differences in Theory of Mind related depth of pragmatic reasoning in so called reference games that require drawing ad hoc Quantity implicatures of varying complexity. We show by Bayesian model comparison that a model that assumes a heterogenous population is a better predictor of our data, especially for comprehension. We discuss the implications for the treatment of individual differences in probabilistic models of language use.
PloS one