Day care PNL using 'Santosh PGI hemostatic seal' versus standard PNL: A randomized controlled study
Introduction To compare the outcomes of tubeless day care PNL using hemostatic seal in the access tract versus standard PNL. Material and methods It was a prospective randomized controlled study. Cases were randomized to either the day care group with hemostatic seal (DCS) or the control group where patients were admitted and a nephrostomy tube was placed at the conclusion of surgery. Results A total of 180 cases were screened and out of these, 113 were included in the final analysis. The stone clearance rates were comparable in both the groups. The mean drop in hemoglobin was significantly lower in DCS group than the control group (1.05 0.68 vs. 1.30 0.58 gm/dl, p 0.038).Mean postoperative pain score, analgesic requirement (paracetamol) and duration of hospital stay were also significantly lower in the DCS group (3.79 1.23 vs. 6.12 0.96, 1.48 0.50 vs. 4.09 1.11 grams and 0.48 0.26 vs. 4.74 1.53 days respectively; p <0.05) The incidence of urine leakage through the access tract site was significantly lower in the DCS subgroup when compared to the controls (3.6% vs. 21.1% p <0.05) Cases in the DCS group resumed their normal activities in a significantly shorter time (8.05 3.05 vs.18.42 4.42 days; p <0.05) Higher proportion of cases in the DCS group got re admitted, although it was not a statistically significant number (7.1% vs. 1.8% p 0.21) Conclusions Tubeless day care PNL with composite hemostatic tract seal is considered safe. It resulted in a significant reduction of blood loss and analgesic requirement with significantly reduced hospital stay, nephrostomy tube site morbidity and time required to resume normal activity when compared to the standard PNL. However, patients must be compliant with the given instructions and should have access to a health care facility, as few of them may need re admission.
Central European journal of urology