Prognostic Implications of Biomarker Assessments in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes at High Cardiovascular Risk: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Importance Cardiac biomarkers provide insights into pathophysiologic processes and offer an attractive strategy for the assessment of cardiovascular risk. Objective To assess the incremental prognostic value of biomarkers that reflect different pathophysiologic processes in patients with type 2 diabetes. Design, Setting, and Participants The Saxagliptin Assessment of Vascular Outcomes Recorded in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus (SAVOR) Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 53 is a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled clinical trial that evaluated the safety of saxagliptin vs placebo in 16 492 outpatients with type 2 diabetes with overt cardiovascular disease (CVD) or multiple risk factors. In this secondary analysis, widely used biomarkers were evaluated to ascertain whether they would provide incremental prognostic value in the risk stratification. Median follow up was 2.1 years (interquartile range, 1.8 2.3 years) The study was performed from May 10, 2010, to June 15, 2013. Interventions Randomization to saxagliptin vs placebo in addition to standard care. Main Outcomes and Measures Concentrations of high sensitivity troponin T, N terminal pro B type natriuretic peptide, and high sensitivity C reactive protein were analyzed continuously and by established cut points. Cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and hospitalization for heart failure (HF) were adjudicated by a blinded events committee. Results Of the 16 492 patients, 5455 (33.1% were female and 11 037 (66.9% were male. Mean (SD) age was 65.0 (8.5) years (range, 39 99 years) Baseline biomarkers were measured in 12 310 patients. Elevated levels of each biomarker were associated significantly with increased risk for all cardiovascular end points. When added to clinical variables, biomarkers significantly improved the discrimination and appropriate reclassification of risk. Elevated high sensitivity troponin T was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 3.07; 95% CI, 2.35 4.02; P .001) myocardial infarction (AHR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.69 2.67; P .001) and hospitalization for HF (AHR, 3.85; 95% CI, 2.82 5.27; P .001) Elevated N terminal pro B type natriuretic peptide was also associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death (AHR, 3.09; 95% CI, 2.46 3.89; P .001) myocardial infarction (AHR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.51 2.53; P .001) and hospitalization for HF (AHR, 3.92; 95% CI, 3.11 4.92; P .001) Elevated high sensitivity C reactive protein was more weakly associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death (AHR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.22 1.82; P .001) and hospitalization for HF (AHR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.20 1.81; P .001) Consistent results were seen in patients with or without established CVD. Conclusions and Relevance A substantial proportion of patients with stable type 2 diabetes with established CVD or multiple clinical risk factors have evidence of ongoing myocardial injury, hemodynamic stress, or systemic inflammation. Biomarker risk stratification thus challenges the traditional differentiation between primary and secondary prevention based simply on clinical history. Strategies to improve risk stratification in patients with type 2 diabetes, with or without CVD, should consider incorporation of biomarker data into standard risk algorithms. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01107886.
JAMA cardiology