La propiedad industrial y su normativa vigente
Propiedad Industrial de 1955; c) esta desaplicacion trajo una serie de consecuencias que la Ley de Propiedad Industrial no puede resolver; d) que la Ley de Propiedad Industrial no esta adaptada al acuerdo sobre los ADPIC. En sintesis, la Decision 486 es necesaria dentro del ordenamiento juridico venezolano para llenar los vacios legales que la senalada Ley no puede llenar. PAlAbRAs clAve: propiedad industrial, desaplicacion, decision 486. The aims of this article is to explain the substance of industrial property, the disengagement of Decision 486 and the legal effects that brought such disengagement. To support the study the fundamental base of the following legislation was taken: The Constitution of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Decision 486 (Common Regime of Industrial Property) Industrial Property Law, Law on Administrative Procedures. Therefore, the methodology is the documentary, descriptive and comparative type, the revised documents are framed in laws and other texts reflected in the references to this investigation. The conclusions drawn were: a) Today the legal regulations on industrial property to prevent abuses that undermine this right within the above context are imperative, b) Decision 486 was abruptly abolished by an official notice where grants full effect is back to the Industrial Property Act 1955, c) This disengagement brought a number of consequences that the Industrial Property Law can not resolve, d) The Industrial Property Act is not adapted to the TRIPS Agreement. the Decision 486 is required within the Venezuelan legal system to fill the legal gaps that this law can not fill. KeY WORDs: industrial property, disengagement, decision 486. Industrial Property and regulations