120877057
A Yukawa interaction in infinite volume
AbstractWe prove the existence of the Heisenberg picture field operators for quantum fields with a Yukawa interaction. The interaction density
$$g:\Psi ^ + (x) \Psi (x) \Phi (x):$$
 has a momentum cutoff on the Fermions, but no spatial form factor, and is thus translation invariant.
117116150
Exact Renormalization Group for Gauge Theories
Renormalization group ideas have been extremely important to progress in our understanding of gauge field theory. Particularly the idea of asymptotic freedom leads us to hope that nonabelian gauge theories exist in four dimensions and yet are capable of producing the physics we observe — quarks confined in meson and baryon states. For a thorough understanding of the ultraviolet behavior of gauge theories, we need to go beyond the approximation of the theory at some momentum scale by theories with one or a small number of coupling constants. In other words, we need a method of performing exact renormalization group transformations, keeping control of higher order effects, nonlocal effects, and large field effects that are usually ignored.
13103184
An Exchange Identity for Non-linear Fields
We establish a useful identity for intertwining a creation or annihilation operator with the heat kernel of a self-interacting bosonic field theory.
124187143
On the approach to the critical point
The mass perturbation yields a new construction for Even + Linear quantum field models. For rp4 models, the Schwinger functions are differentiable in the parameter 6 = 5y~, in the single phase region, and are continuous ac. For the Isingd model, d >_ 2 classical bounds on the critical exponents, e. g. 1 y 2v, are a consequence of an Ornstein-Zernike type upper bound on the two point function.
117474017
Absolute bounds on vertices and couplings
We prove absolute upper and/or lower bounds on ~ and cp6 dimensionless vertices and physical coupling constants. 1. DEFINITIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS We derive absolute bounds on ~p4 and qJ6 dimensionless coupling constants g. For instance, in a pure ~p4 model we prove ( 1.1 ) 0 g const., in the single phase region (no symmetry breaking). We also obtain bounds on associated vertex functions and on connected parts. Our general methods presumably have other consequences for n-particle amplitudes, n >_ 8, which we do not pursue here. DEFINITIONS. Let (1) Supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant MPS 74-13252. (2) Supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant MPS 73-05037. Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré Section A Vol. XXII, n° 2 1975. 8 98 J. GLIMM AND A. JAFFE denote the n-point (Euclidean) Schwinger function, and let ( 1 ... n )~ denote its connected part. We let denote the Fourier transform of 1 ... We encounter often, and denote it x(p). We use the standard spectral representation where dp(a) is the spectral measure. Furthermore, we let denote the n-point Euclidean vertex function (thus r(n) is the amputated, one particle irreducible part of ST"~(~)). In an even theory, we have for example, where pi + ... + 7?e = 0, where (X, ~ X) is a partition of 0?i,..., p6) into two subsets of three elements, and where Px is the sum of the momenta in X. We let d 4 denote the space-time dimension and let m denote the mass gap. Note that has the dimension of mass to the power d 2). We define the dimensionless amplitude by and the associated coupling constant by (1.9) = For example, where x * x(0). Annales de l ’Institut Henri Poincaré Section A 99 ABSOLUTE BOUNDS ON VERTICES AND COUPLINGS ASSUMPTIONS. We make some or all of the following assumptions. In the case of weakly coupled assumptions (a)-( f) have been proved, while for single phase, even models (h)-(i) have been proved. We expect (a)-( f ) to hold for single phase and models, while (h)-(i) are expected for all single phase even ~ models, d 4. The evidence for the validity of (1.4) in qJ1 comes from perturbation theory. The proof of (i) in even, single phase has been established by Cartier (private communication). (a) The Wightman axioms for a scalar boson field, or the Osterwalder. Schrader axioms for the corresponding Euclidean theory. The two point function satisfies (1.4). In particular we are assuming that is finite. (b) A positive mass gap, m > 0. M~=0. (d) The second Griffiths inequality, where (Ai, A2) is a partition of (1, ..., n). For instance, ( f ) The measure dp(a) contains a delta function at a = m2, of unit strength (This is a renormalization hypothesis). (h) In the case of a cp4 interaction, it is appropriate to assume the Lebowitz inequality ( 1234 )~ ~ 0, or the set of Lebowitz inequalities, where W is an (odd) subset of U. (i) In the case of a pure cp4 model, we assume ( 1.13) ( 123456 ~T >_ 0. 2. BOUNDS ON QUARTIC COUPLINGS THEOREM 2 .1. (i) Assume (a)-(d) above. Then Vol. XXII, no 2 1975. 100 J. GLIMM AND A. JAFFE (ii) Assume ( f ) also, then x >_ m 2, so (2.2) const. (iii) Assume (h) also, then (2 . 3) 0 g~4~ const. x 2m ~ const. Remark 1. The constants are pure numbers, independent of all parameters. They can be determined explicitly by the proof. Remark 2. The upper bound on is related to the picture of « critical point dominance » discussed in [7]. According to this picture, for d 4, g~4~ assumes its maximum value at the critical point, i. e. at the onset of phase transitions. According to standard ideas, m = 0 at the critical point. Remark 3. For d 4, the limit ~,o ( = bare cp4 coupling constant) oo with m fixed plays a role in the application of the Callan-Symanzik equations to the study of critical phenomena [2]. We use Theorem 2.1 below, combined with bounds from [3], to show that either this limit exists, or that in this limit g(4) 0 (see Corollary 2 . 4). If g~4~ is monotone in the dimensionless charge À-omg-4, then the alternative g(4) ~ 0 is excluded. The possibility that g~4~ is monotone is discussed in [1], and is a consequence of conventional assumptions made in the study of the Callan-Symanzik equations. Remark 4. Other bounds on quartic couplings have been established by Lukaszuk and Martin [4], see also Healy [5]. Their bounds require different assumptions and methods, and yield different conclusions. In the case of a pure cp4 model we also obtain bounds on g~4~(p) 0. THEOREM 2.2. Assume (a)-(h) above. There exists 5 > 0, such that if 6m, then g~4~(p) is analytic in p and bounded uniformly by Proof of Theorem 2.1. By the positivity of dp (Wightman positivity condition) (2. 5) 12~0, so the right side of (1.11) is positive. By symmetry we then have Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré Section A 101 ABSOLUTE BOUNDS ON VERTICES AND COUPLINGS Here each Ai is either or else a permutation of (12~(34~13X24). We bound each Ai using Proposition A2.1, of Appendix 2, An elementary estimate shows that each At is integrable over dxidx2dx3. By homogeneity, and (A2.1), from which we conclude By ( 1. 8), with n = 4, and (1. 6) we have (2 .1 ). The theorem then follows. Proof of Theorem 2 . 2. Assuming (h) and (2 . 6), We bound the power series coefficients of expanding about p = 0. The derivatives become multiplication by ix j in the Fourier transform, and are dominated by the exponential decrease of (2. 8), estimated by (A2.1). Thus the power series in momenta converges for I Pi I m/3, and establishes the analyticity and boundedness of St4)(p), Finally, the analyticity and boundedness of follows from (1.4), for I p I m, yielding Thus g(4)(p) is analytic in p and with the constant independent of p, m, A for This completes the proof. We have also proved. COROLLARY 2.3. Assuming (a)-(h), Si-4)(p) is analytic for I ~ ~m and bounded uniformly by (2. 9). We now let be the n-point Schwinger function for a model satisVol. XXII, nO 2 -1975. 102 J. GLIMM AND A. JAFFE fying (a)-(h) and labelled by the index j (for instance, may be the cp2 model, labelled by the bare coupling and mass m). COROLLARY 2.4. Assume mj is bounded away from zero. Then either there exists a convergent subsequence of Schwinger functions i with satisfying (a)-(h), or else 0. Proof Assume for some p, with sm, there is a subsequence of gr(p) bounded away from zero. Then by (2.4) This bound (uniform in r) on proves a uniform bound for a suitable Schwartz space norm j . 109. Thus by Theorem 1 of [3], a convergent subsequence of Schwinger functions exists, and is a tempered distribution. The properties (a)-(h) follow from the corresponding properties in the approximate theories. Conversely, if 0 for each p with |pi| I 6m, the uniform bound (2.4) ensures that the family of analytic functions gj(p) converges to the analytic function zero. 3. BOUNDS ON In this section we prove preliminary bounds on ST. THEOREM 3.1. (i) Assume (a)-(h). Then there exists 6 > 0 such that if then Si:6)(p) is analytic and bounded by (ii) Assume (a)-(i). Then The constants are pure numbers, independent of the parameters. Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré Section A 103 ABSOLUTE BOUNDS ON VERTICES AND COUPLINGS Proof. We consider p = 0. The extension to p # 0 follows the proof of Theorem 2.2. Using (/), we have The definition of the six point connected part is Here Y = (Yi, Y2) ranges over the fifteen partitions of (1, 2, ..., 6) into two and four element subsets, while Z = (Zi, Z2, Z3) ranges over the fifteen partitions of (l, ..., 6) into three pairs. Thus where E’ omits the partition ( 12 )( 3456 ). We use (h) and the definition of( 1234 )r to obtain where E’ omits the three partitions which contain the factory Zi) =(12). By symmetry, where j = 1, 2, ..., 15 labels the two element subsets of (1, ... , 6), and (Z~, Z2’~, Z3’~) one of the twelve partitions of (1, ..., 6) into three pairs, no one of which is j. We now follow the proof of Theorem 2.1 to obtain proving one side of (3 .1 ). We next use (1.12) (see [3]) with U = (3456) to obtain where W ranges over the eight odd subsets of U. Thus by (3.4), Vol. XXII, nO 2 1975. 104 J. GLIMM AND A. JAFFE where E" ranges over the six partitions containing both 1 and 2 in the four element subset. By the definition of ( 1234 )T, By (1.11) we note that -.
116890750
Constructive field theory
38895150
Polarization pursuers' guide
We calculate the detectability of the polarization of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) as a function of the sky coverage, angular resolution, and instrumental sensitivity for a hypothetical experiment. We consider the gradient component of the polarization from density perturbations (scalar modes) and the curl component from gravitational waves (tensor modes). We show that the amplitude (and thus the detectability) of the polarization from density perturbations is roughly the same in any model as long as the model fits the big-bang-nucleosynthesis (BBN) baryon density and degree-scale anisotropy measurements. The degree-scale polarization is smaller (and accordingly more difficult to detect) if the baryon density is higher. We show that the sensitivity to the polarization from density perturbations and gravitational waves is improved (by a factor of 30) in a fixed-time experiment with a deeper survey of a smaller region of sky.
119363100
Estimating the power spectrum of the cosmic microwave background
We develop two methods for estimating the power spectrum, C_l, of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) from data and apply them to the COBE/DMR and Saskatoon datasets. One method involves a direct evaluation of the likelihood function, and the other is an estimator that is a minimum-variance weighted quadratic function of the data. Applied iteratively, the quadratic estimator is not distinct from likelihood analysis, but is rather a rapid means of finding the power spectrum that maximizes the likelihood function. Our results bear this out: direct evaluation and quadratic estimation converge to the same C_ls. The quadratic estimator can also be used to directly determine cosmological parameters and their uncertainties. While the two methods both require O(N^3) operations, the quadratic is much faster, and both are applicable to datasets with arbitrary chopping patterns and noise correlations. We also discuss approximations that may reduce it to O(N^2) thus making it practical for forthcoming megapixel datasets.
2204032
Planck 2013 results. II. Low frequency instrument data processing
We describe the processing of the 531 billion raw data samples from the High Frequency Instrument (hereafter HFI), which we performed to produce six temperature maps from the first 473 days of Planck-HFI survey data. These maps provide an accurate rendition of the sky emission at 100, 143, 217, 353, 545, and 857 GHz with an angular resolution ranging from 9.7 to 4.6 arcmin. The detector noise per (effective) beam solid angle is respectively, 10, 6, 12 and 39 microKelvin in HFI four lowest frequency channel (100--353 GHz) and 13 and 14 kJy/sr for the 545 and 857 GHz channels. Using the 143 GHz channel as a reference, these two high frequency channels are intercalibrated within 5% and the 353 GHz relative calibration is at the percent level. The 100 and 217 GHz channels, which together with the 143 GHz channel determine the high-multipole part of the CMB power spectrum (50 < l <2500), are intercalibrated at better than 0.2 %.
4412370
A flat Universe from high-resolution maps of the cosmic microwave background radiation
The blackbody radiation left over from the Big Bang has been transformed by the expansion of the Universe into the nearly isotropic 2.73 K cosmic microwave background. Tiny inhomogeneities in the early Universe left their imprint on the microwave background in the form of small anisotropies in its temperature. These anisotropies contain information about basic cosmological parameters, particularly the total energy density and curvature of the Universe. Here we report the first images of resolved structure in the microwave background anisotropies over a significant part of the sky. Maps at four frequencies clearly distinguish the microwave background from foreground emission. We compute the angular power spectrum of the microwave background, and find a peak at Legendre multipole lpeak = (197 ± 6), with an amplitude ΔT200 = (69 ± 8) µK. This is consistent with that expected for cold dark matter models in a flat (euclidean) Universe, as favoured by standard inflationary models.
17654256
Likelihood analysis of large scale flows
We apply a likelihood analysis to the data of \markcite{Lauer \& Postman 1994} With $P(k)$ parametrized by $(\sigma_8, \Gamma)$, the likelihood function peaks at $\sigma_8\simeq0.3$, $\Gamma\lesssim0.025$, indicating at face value very strong large-scale power, though at a level incompatible with COBE\@. There is, however, a ridge of likelihood such that more conventional power spectra do not seem strongly disfavored. The likelihood calculated using as data only the components of the bulk flow solution peaks at higher $\sigma_8$, in agreement with other analyses, but is rather broad. The likelihood incorporating both bulk flow and shear gives a different picture. The components of the shear are all low, and this pulls the peak to lower amplitudes as a compromise. 
The Lauer \& Postman velocity data alone are therefore {\em consistent}\/ with models with very strong large scale power which generates a large bulk flow, but the small shear (which also probes fairly large scales) requires that the power would have to be at {\em very}\/ large scales, which is strongly disfavored by COBE\@. The velocity data also seem compatible with more conventional $P(k)$ with $0.2\lesssim\Gamma\lesssim0.5$, and the likelihood is peaked around $\sigma_8\sim1$, in which case the bulk flow is a moderate, but not extreme, statistical fluctuation. 
Applying the same techniques to the data of \markcite{Riess, Press, \& Kirshner 1995}, the results are quite different. The flow is not inconsistent with the microwave dipole and we derive only an upper limit to the amplitude of the power spectrum: $\sigma_8\lesssim1.5$ at roughly 99\%.