12973910
Axigluon production in hadronic collisions.
Recently proposed chiral-color models predict the existence of a massive color octet of vector bosons, the axigluon. In this paper we investigate axigluon production in hadronic collisions. We compute the single-jet inclusive cross section and the two-jet invariant-mass distribution for the CERN collider, the Fermilab Tevatron, and the Superconducting Super Collider. We use CERN data to exclude axigluon masses between 125 and 275 GeV, subject to a mild constraint on the width.
17634589
Radiative electroweak symmetry breaking in a Little Higgs model
We present a new Little Higgs model, motivated by the deconstruction of a five-dimensional gauge-Higgs model. The approximate global symmetry is SO(5)0 × SO(5)1, breaking to SO(5), with a gauged subgroup of [SU(2)0L × U(1)0R] × O(4)1, breaking to SU(2)L ×U(1)Y . Radiative corrections produce an additional small vacuum misalignment, breaking the electroweak symmetry down to U(1)EM. Novel features of this model are: the only un-eaten pseudo-Goldstone boson in the effective theory is the Higgs boson; the model contains a custodial symmetry, which ensures that $ \widehat{T} = 0 $ at tree-level; and the potential for the Higgs boson is generated entirely through one-loop radiative corrections. A small negative mass-squared in the Higgs potential is obtained by a cancellation between the contribution of two heavy partners of the top quark, which is readily achieved over much of the parameter space. We can then obtain both a vacuum expectation value of v = 246 GeV and a light Higgs boson mass, which is strongly correlated with the masses of the two heavy top quark partners. For a scale of the global symmetry breaking of f = 1 TeV and using a single cutoff for the fermion loops, the Higgs boson mass satisfies 120 GeV ≲ MH ≲ 150 GeV over much of the range of parameter space. For f raised to 10 TeV, these values increase by about 40 GeV. Effects at the ultraviolet cutoff scale may also raise the predicted values of the Higgs boson mass, but the model still favors MH ≲ 200GeV.
17272111
Effects of fermion localization in Higgsless theories and electroweak constraints
Abstract Extra-dimensional Higgsless models with electroweak symmetry breaking through boundary conditions generically have difficulties with electroweak precision constraints, when the fermions are localized to the “branes” in the fifth dimension. In this Letter we show that these constraints can be relaxed by allowing the light fermions to have a finite extent into the bulk of the fifth dimension. The T and U electroweak parameters can be naturally suppressed by a custodial symmetry, while the S parameter can be made to vanish through a cancellation, if the leakage into the bulk of the light gauge fields and the light left-handed fermion fields are of the same size. This cancellation is possible while allowing realistic values for the first two generations of fermion masses, although special treatment is probably required for the top quark. We present this idea here in the context of a specific continuum theory-space model; however, it can be applied to any five-dimensional Higgsless model, either with a flat or a warped background.
6678978
Ultrahigh-energy neutrino–nucleon cross sections and perturbative unitarity
Abstract Unitarity relates the total cross section for neutrino–nucleon scattering to the neutrino–nucleon forward scattering amplitude. Assuming the validity of the perturbative expansion of the forward amplitude in the weak coupling constant, we derive a unitarity bound on the inelastic cross section. The inelastic cross section saturates this bound at a typical neutrino energy E ν ≃10 8  GeV. This implies that calculations of the inelastic cross section that use current parton distribution functions and lowest order weak perturbation theory are unreliable above this energy.
17090149
Higgsless electroweak symmetry breaking from theory space
We investigate unitarity of W+W− scattering in the context of theory space models of the form U(1) × [SU(2)]N × SU(2)N+1, which are broken down to U(1)EM by non-linear Σ fields, without the presence of a physical Higgs Boson. By allowing the couplings of the U(1) and the final SU(2)N+1 to vary, we can fit the W and Z masses, and we find that the coefficient of the term in the amplitude that grows as E2/mW2 at high energies is suppressed by a factor of (N+1)−2. In the N+1→∞ limit the model becomes a 5-dimensional SU(2) gauge theory defined on an interval, where boundary terms at the two ends of the interval break the SU(2) down to U(1)EM. These boundary terms also modify the Kaluza-Klein (KK) mass spectrum, so that the lightest KK states can be identified as the W and Z bosons. The T parameter, which measures custodial symmetry breaking, is naturally small in these models. Depending on how matter fields are included, the strongest experimental constraints come from precision electroweak limits on the S parameter.
118429632
Higgs Boson Cross Section from CTEQ-TEA Global Analysis
We study the uncertainties of the Higgs boson production cross section through the gluon fusion subprocess at the LHC (with $\sqrt s=7, 8$ and $14$ TeV) arising from the uncertainties of the parton distribution functions (PDFs) and of the value of the strong coupling constant $\alpha_s(M_Z)$. These uncertainties are computed by two complementary approaches, based on the Hessian and the Lagrange Multiplier methods within the CTEQ-TEA global analysis framework. We find that their predictions for the Higgs boson cross section are in good agreement. Furthermore, the result of the Lagrange Multiplier method supports the prescriptions we have previously provided for using the Hessian method to calculate the combined PDF and $\alpha_s$ uncertainties, and to estimate the uncertainties at the $68\%$ confidence level by scaling them from the $90\%$ confidence level.
20398756
Comment on "Conformal transformations single out a unique measure of distance"
We discuss the consequences of the incorrectness [see the Erratum Phys. Rev. D 49, 1145(E) (1994)] of Cotsakis' paper and add two related remarks. The scope of this Comment is to encourage further research on ``which of the conformally equivalent metrics is the physical one.''