119453045
Quantum Physics: A Functional Integral Point of View
This book is addressed to one problem and to three audiences. The problem is the mathematical structure of modem physics: statistical physics, quantum mechanics, and quantum fields. The unity of mathemati cal structure for problems of diverse origin in physics should be no surprise. For classical physics it is provided, for example, by a common mathematical formalism based on the wave equation and Laplace's equation. The unity transcends mathematical structure and encompasses basic phenomena as well. Thus particle physicists, nuclear physicists, and con densed matter physicists have considered similar scientific problems from complementary points of view. The mathematical structure presented here can be described in various terms: partial differential equations in an infinite number of independent variables, linear operators on infinite dimensional spaces, or probability theory and analysis over function spaces. This mathematical structure of quantization is a generalization of the theory of partial differential equa tions, very much as the latter generalizes the theory of ordinary differential equations. Our central theme is the quantization of a nonlinear partial differential equation and the physics of systems with an infinite number of degrees of freedom. Mathematicians, theoretical physicists, and specialists in mathematical physics are the three audiences to which the book is addressed. Each of the three parts is written with a different scientific perspective."
117116150
Exact Renormalization Group for Gauge Theories
Renormalization group ideas have been extremely important to progress in our understanding of gauge field theory. Particularly the idea of asymptotic freedom leads us to hope that nonabelian gauge theories exist in four dimensions and yet are capable of producing the physics we observe — quarks confined in meson and baryon states. For a thorough understanding of the ultraviolet behavior of gauge theories, we need to go beyond the approximation of the theory at some momentum scale by theories with one or a small number of coupling constants. In other words, we need a method of performing exact renormalization group transformations, keeping control of higher order effects, nonlocal effects, and large field effects that are usually ignored.
124187143
On the approach to the critical point
The mass perturbation yields a new construction for Even + Linear quantum field models. For rp4 models, the Schwinger functions are differentiable in the parameter 6 = 5y~, in the single phase region, and are continuous ac. For the Isingd model, d >_ 2 classical bounds on the critical exponents, e. g. 1 y 2v, are a consequence of an Ornstein-Zernike type upper bound on the two point function.
13103184
An Exchange Identity for Non-linear Fields
We establish a useful identity for intertwining a creation or annihilation operator with the heat kernel of a self-interacting bosonic field theory.
117474017
Absolute bounds on vertices and couplings
We prove absolute upper and/or lower bounds on ~ and cp6 dimensionless vertices and physical coupling constants. 1. DEFINITIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS We derive absolute bounds on ~p4 and qJ6 dimensionless coupling constants g. For instance, in a pure ~p4 model we prove ( 1.1 ) 0 g const., in the single phase region (no symmetry breaking). We also obtain bounds on associated vertex functions and on connected parts. Our general methods presumably have other consequences for n-particle amplitudes, n >_ 8, which we do not pursue here. DEFINITIONS. Let (1) Supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant MPS 74-13252. (2) Supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant MPS 73-05037. Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré Section A Vol. XXII, n° 2 1975. 8 98 J. GLIMM AND A. JAFFE denote the n-point (Euclidean) Schwinger function, and let ( 1 ... n )~ denote its connected part. We let denote the Fourier transform of 1 ... We encounter often, and denote it x(p). We use the standard spectral representation where dp(a) is the spectral measure. Furthermore, we let denote the n-point Euclidean vertex function (thus r(n) is the amputated, one particle irreducible part of ST"~(~)). In an even theory, we have for example, where pi + ... + 7?e = 0, where (X, ~ X) is a partition of 0?i,..., p6) into two subsets of three elements, and where Px is the sum of the momenta in X. We let d 4 denote the space-time dimension and let m denote the mass gap. Note that has the dimension of mass to the power d 2). We define the dimensionless amplitude by and the associated coupling constant by (1.9) = For example, where x * x(0). Annales de l ’Institut Henri Poincaré Section A 99 ABSOLUTE BOUNDS ON VERTICES AND COUPLINGS ASSUMPTIONS. We make some or all of the following assumptions. In the case of weakly coupled assumptions (a)-( f) have been proved, while for single phase, even models (h)-(i) have been proved. We expect (a)-( f ) to hold for single phase and models, while (h)-(i) are expected for all single phase even ~ models, d 4. The evidence for the validity of (1.4) in qJ1 comes from perturbation theory. The proof of (i) in even, single phase has been established by Cartier (private communication). (a) The Wightman axioms for a scalar boson field, or the Osterwalder. Schrader axioms for the corresponding Euclidean theory. The two point function satisfies (1.4). In particular we are assuming that is finite. (b) A positive mass gap, m > 0. M~=0. (d) The second Griffiths inequality, where (Ai, A2) is a partition of (1, ..., n). For instance, ( f ) The measure dp(a) contains a delta function at a = m2, of unit strength (This is a renormalization hypothesis). (h) In the case of a cp4 interaction, it is appropriate to assume the Lebowitz inequality ( 1234 )~ ~ 0, or the set of Lebowitz inequalities, where W is an (odd) subset of U. (i) In the case of a pure cp4 model, we assume ( 1.13) ( 123456 ~T >_ 0. 2. BOUNDS ON QUARTIC COUPLINGS THEOREM 2 .1. (i) Assume (a)-(d) above. Then Vol. XXII, no 2 1975. 100 J. GLIMM AND A. JAFFE (ii) Assume ( f ) also, then x >_ m 2, so (2.2) const. (iii) Assume (h) also, then (2 . 3) 0 g~4~ const. x 2m ~ const. Remark 1. The constants are pure numbers, independent of all parameters. They can be determined explicitly by the proof. Remark 2. The upper bound on is related to the picture of « critical point dominance » discussed in [7]. According to this picture, for d 4, g~4~ assumes its maximum value at the critical point, i. e. at the onset of phase transitions. According to standard ideas, m = 0 at the critical point. Remark 3. For d 4, the limit ~,o ( = bare cp4 coupling constant) oo with m fixed plays a role in the application of the Callan-Symanzik equations to the study of critical phenomena [2]. We use Theorem 2.1 below, combined with bounds from [3], to show that either this limit exists, or that in this limit g(4) 0 (see Corollary 2 . 4). If g~4~ is monotone in the dimensionless charge À-omg-4, then the alternative g(4) ~ 0 is excluded. The possibility that g~4~ is monotone is discussed in [1], and is a consequence of conventional assumptions made in the study of the Callan-Symanzik equations. Remark 4. Other bounds on quartic couplings have been established by Lukaszuk and Martin [4], see also Healy [5]. Their bounds require different assumptions and methods, and yield different conclusions. In the case of a pure cp4 model we also obtain bounds on g~4~(p) 0. THEOREM 2.2. Assume (a)-(h) above. There exists 5 > 0, such that if 6m, then g~4~(p) is analytic in p and bounded uniformly by Proof of Theorem 2.1. By the positivity of dp (Wightman positivity condition) (2. 5) 12~0, so the right side of (1.11) is positive. By symmetry we then have Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré Section A 101 ABSOLUTE BOUNDS ON VERTICES AND COUPLINGS Here each Ai is either or else a permutation of (12~(34~13X24). We bound each Ai using Proposition A2.1, of Appendix 2, An elementary estimate shows that each At is integrable over dxidx2dx3. By homogeneity, and (A2.1), from which we conclude By ( 1. 8), with n = 4, and (1. 6) we have (2 .1 ). The theorem then follows. Proof of Theorem 2 . 2. Assuming (h) and (2 . 6), We bound the power series coefficients of expanding about p = 0. The derivatives become multiplication by ix j in the Fourier transform, and are dominated by the exponential decrease of (2. 8), estimated by (A2.1). Thus the power series in momenta converges for I Pi I m/3, and establishes the analyticity and boundedness of St4)(p), Finally, the analyticity and boundedness of follows from (1.4), for I p I m, yielding Thus g(4)(p) is analytic in p and with the constant independent of p, m, A for This completes the proof. We have also proved. COROLLARY 2.3. Assuming (a)-(h), Si-4)(p) is analytic for I ~ ~m and bounded uniformly by (2. 9). We now let be the n-point Schwinger function for a model satisVol. XXII, nO 2 -1975. 102 J. GLIMM AND A. JAFFE fying (a)-(h) and labelled by the index j (for instance, may be the cp2 model, labelled by the bare coupling and mass m). COROLLARY 2.4. Assume mj is bounded away from zero. Then either there exists a convergent subsequence of Schwinger functions i with satisfying (a)-(h), or else 0. Proof Assume for some p, with sm, there is a subsequence of gr(p) bounded away from zero. Then by (2.4) This bound (uniform in r) on proves a uniform bound for a suitable Schwartz space norm j . 109. Thus by Theorem 1 of [3], a convergent subsequence of Schwinger functions exists, and is a tempered distribution. The properties (a)-(h) follow from the corresponding properties in the approximate theories. Conversely, if 0 for each p with |pi| I 6m, the uniform bound (2.4) ensures that the family of analytic functions gj(p) converges to the analytic function zero. 3. BOUNDS ON In this section we prove preliminary bounds on ST. THEOREM 3.1. (i) Assume (a)-(h). Then there exists 6 > 0 such that if then Si:6)(p) is analytic and bounded by (ii) Assume (a)-(i). Then The constants are pure numbers, independent of the parameters. Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré Section A 103 ABSOLUTE BOUNDS ON VERTICES AND COUPLINGS Proof. We consider p = 0. The extension to p # 0 follows the proof of Theorem 2.2. Using (/), we have The definition of the six point connected part is Here Y = (Yi, Y2) ranges over the fifteen partitions of (1, 2, ..., 6) into two and four element subsets, while Z = (Zi, Z2, Z3) ranges over the fifteen partitions of (l, ..., 6) into three pairs. Thus where E’ omits the partition ( 12 )( 3456 ). We use (h) and the definition of( 1234 )r to obtain where E’ omits the three partitions which contain the factory Zi) =(12). By symmetry, where j = 1, 2, ..., 15 labels the two element subsets of (1, ... , 6), and (Z~, Z2’~, Z3’~) one of the twelve partitions of (1, ..., 6) into three pairs, no one of which is j. We now follow the proof of Theorem 2.1 to obtain proving one side of (3 .1 ). We next use (1.12) (see [3]) with U = (3456) to obtain where W ranges over the eight odd subsets of U. Thus by (3.4), Vol. XXII, nO 2 1975. 104 J. GLIMM AND A. JAFFE where E" ranges over the six partitions containing both 1 and 2 in the four element subset. By the definition of ( 1234 )T, By (1.11) we note that -.
116890750
Constructive field theory
53953960
CMB and Inflation: the Report from Snowmass 2001
Accelerator–based efforts spanning decades have revealed no direct evidence of physics beyond the Standard Model. Although this is likely to change with the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) or possibly even with the current (higher–luminosity) run at the Tevatron, we point out that astrophysical evidence for physics beyond the standard model has already grown to be conclusive. Observations indicate the need for • inflation, • dark energy, • dark matter, and • massive neutrinos. In short, cosmology is delivering on its promise of probing fundamental physics. These results are creating intellectual excitement in the high energy physics community. They also signal an opportunity. The prospects are bright for further progress in our understanding of fundamental physics, via cosmology, and researchers trained in particle physics should not only be interested, but are well–equipped to contribute. Indeed, a number of particle physicists have become actively engaged in astrophysical observations. In this report we review the current status of observations of the temperature of the cosmic microwave background (CMB), and explain how they provide evidence of an inflationary era of expansion in the early Universe and the existence of “dark energy”. One of our intentions in providing this review is to demonstrate that cosmology has a track record which suggests that we have some understanding of the system we are studying. This track record bolsters the case that we will be able to get meaningful answers to the more detailed questions that are motivating planned observations. These future observations, which we discuss, include more detailed measurement of temperature maps, detection and measurement of polarization (including the modes generated by gravitational waves) and Sunyaev–Zeldovich surveys. Of course, observational cosmology is much broader than the topics we are covering, and the interested reader is encouraged to consult the other P4 and E6 subtopic reports.
119098089
Improved method for detecting local discontinuities in CMB data by finite differencing
An unexpected distribution of temperatures in the CMB could be a sign of new physics. In particular, the existence of cosmic defects could be indicated by temperature discontinuities via the Kaiser-Stebbins effect. In this paper, we show how performing finite differences on a CMB map, with the noise regularized in harmonic space, may expose such discontinuities, and we report the results of this process on the 7-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe data.
13718662
Planck 2013 results. XXVI. Background geometry and topology of the Universe
Maps of cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature and polarization from the 2015 release of Planck data provide the highestquality full-sky view of the surface of last scattering available to date. This enables us to detect possible departures from a globally isotropic cosmology. We present the first searches using CMB polarization for correlations induced by a possible non-trivial topology with a fundamental domain that intersects, or nearly intersects, the last-scattering surface (at comoving distance χrec), both via a direct scan for matched circular patterns at the intersections and by an optimal likelihood calculation for specific topologies. We specialize to flat spaces with cubic toroidal (T3) and slab (T1) topologies, finding that explicit searches for the latter are sensitive to other topologies with antipodal symmetry. These searches yield no detection of a compact topology with a scale below the diameter of the last-scattering surface. The limits on the radius ℛi of the largest sphere inscribed in the fundamental domain (at log-likelihood ratio Δlnℒ > −5 relative to a simply-connected flat Planck best-fit model) are: ℛi > 0.97 χrec for the T3 cubic torus; and ℛi > 0.56 χrec for the T1 slab. The limit for the T3 cubic torus from the matched-circles search is numerically equivalent, ℛi > 0.97 χrec at 99% confidence level from polarization data alone. We also perform a Bayesian search for an anisotropic global Bianchi VIIh geometry. In the non-physical setting, where the Bianchi cosmology is decoupled from the standard cosmology, Planck temperature data favour the inclusion of a Bianchi component with a Bayes factor of at least 2.3 units of log-evidence. However, the cosmological parameters that generate this pattern are in strong disagreement with those found from CMB anisotropy data alone. Fitting the induced polarization pattern for this model to the Planck data requires an amplitude of −0.10 ± 0.04 compared to the value of + 1 if the model were to be correct. In the physically motivated setting, where the Bianchi parameters are coupled and fitted simultaneously with the standard cosmological parameters, we find no evidence for a Bianchi VIIh cosmology and constrain the vorticity of such models to (ω/H)0 < 7.6 × 10-10 (95% CL).
119363100
Estimating the power spectrum of the cosmic microwave background
We develop two methods for estimating the power spectrum, C_l, of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) from data and apply them to the COBE/DMR and Saskatoon datasets. One method involves a direct evaluation of the likelihood function, and the other is an estimator that is a minimum-variance weighted quadratic function of the data. Applied iteratively, the quadratic estimator is not distinct from likelihood analysis, but is rather a rapid means of finding the power spectrum that maximizes the likelihood function. Our results bear this out: direct evaluation and quadratic estimation converge to the same C_ls. The quadratic estimator can also be used to directly determine cosmological parameters and their uncertainties. While the two methods both require O(N^3) operations, the quadratic is much faster, and both are applicable to datasets with arbitrary chopping patterns and noise correlations. We also discuss approximations that may reduce it to O(N^2) thus making it practical for forthcoming megapixel datasets.
118588305
Likelihood Analysis of Galaxy Surveys
One of the major goals of cosmological observations is to test theories of structure formation. The most straightforward way to carry out such tests is to compute the likelihood function L, the probability of getting the data given the theory. We write down this function for a general galaxy survey. The full likelihood function is very complex, depending on all of the $n$-point functions of the theory under consideration. Even in the simplest case, where only the two point function is non-vanishing (Gaussian perturbations), L cannot be calculated exactly, primarily because of the Poisson nature of the galaxy distribution. Here we expand L about the (trivial) zero correlation limit. As a first application, we take the binned values of the two point function as free parameters and show that L peaks at $(DD - DR + RR)/DD$. Using Monte Carlo techniques, we compare this estimator with the traditional $DD/DR$ and Landy & Szalay estimators. More generally, the success of this expansion should pave the way for further applications of the likelihood function.