17961150
Bending of Light by Gravity Waves
We describe the statistical properties of light rays propagating though a random sea of gravity waves and compare with the case for scalar metric perturbations from density inhomogeneities. For scalar fluctuations, the deflection angle grows as the square root of the path length D in the manner of a random walk, and the rms displacement of a ray from the unperturbed trajectory grows as D3/2. For gravity waves the situation is very different. The mean square deflection angle remains finite and is dominated by the effect of the metric fluctuations at the ends of the ray, and the mean square displacement grows only as the logarithm of the path length. In terms of power spectra, the displacement for scalar perturbations has P(k) ∝ 1/k4 while, for gravity waves, the trajectories of photons have P(k) ∝ 1/k, which is a scale-invariant or "flicker noise" process, and departures from rectilinear motion are suppressed relative to the scalar case by a factor of ~(λ/D)3/2, where λ is the characteristic scale of the metric fluctuations and D is the path length. This result casts doubt on the viability of some recent proposals for detecting or constraining the gravity wave background by astronomical measurements.
119468667
Gravitational Waves Probe the Coalescence Rate of Massive Black Hole Binaries
We calculate the expected nHz-μHz gravitational wave (GW) spectrum from coalescing massive black hole (MBH) binaries resulting from mergers of their host galaxies. We consider detection of this spectrum by precision pulsar timing and a future pulsar timing array. The spectrum depends on the merger rate of massive galaxies, the demographics of MBHs at low and high redshift, and the dynamics of MBH binaries. We apply recent theoretical and observational work on all of these fronts. The spectrum has a characteristic strain hc(f) ~ 10-15(f/yr-1)-2/3, just below the detection limit from recent analysis of precision pulsar timing measurements. However, the amplitude of the spectrum is still very uncertain owing to approximations in the theoretical formulation of the model, to our lack of knowledge of the merger rate and MBH population at high redshift, and to the dynamical problem of removing enough angular momentum from the MBH binary to reach a GW-dominated regime.
17460509
Simultaneous Estimation of Noise and Signal in Cosmic Microwave Background Experiments
To correctly analyse data sets from current microwave detection technology, one is forced to estimate the sky signal and experimental noise simultaneously. Given a time-ordered data set we propose a formalism and method for estimating the signal and associated errors without prior knowledge of the noise power spectrum. We derive the method using a Bayesian formalism and relate it to the standard methods; in particular we show how this leads to a change in the estimate of the noise covariance matrix of the sky signal. We study the convergence and accuracy of the method on two mock observational strategies and discuss its application to a currently-favoured calibration procedure.
122687802
Imaging the early universe with the BOOMERanG Experiment
The BOOMERanG experiment has recently detected temperature fluctuations the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), the otherwise isotropic radiation coming from the early Universe. These anisotropies have a low contrast (about 30 ppm) and feature a peculiar angular power spectrum at angles corresponding to sub-horizon scales at recombination. In the current cosmological model, these structures result from acoustic oscillations in the primeval plasma. In the framework of the Hot Big Bang theory with the inflationary hypothesis, the statistical properties of the image of the CMB allow us to measure most of the cosmological parameters.
15621530
Constraining large–scale structure theories with the cosmic background radiation
The case is strong that cosmic microwave background (CMB) and large scale structure (LSS) observations can be combined to determine the theory of structure formation and the cosmological parameters that define it. We review: the relevant (10+) parameters associated with the inflation model of fluctuation generation and the matter content of the universe; the relation between LSS and primary and secondary CMB anisotropy probes as a function of wavenumber; how COBE constraints on energy injection rule out explosions as a dominant source of LSS; and how current anisotropy band–powers in multipole–space, at levels ca. 10−5)2, strongly support the gravitational instability theory and suggest the universe could not have reionized too early. We use Bayesian analysis methods to determine what current CMB and CMB+LSS data imply for inflation–based Gaussian fluctuations in tilted &Lgr;CDM, &Lgr;hCDM and oCDM model sequences with cosmological age 11 – 15 Gyr, consisting of mixtures of baryons, cold ‘c’ (and possibly hot ‘h’) dark matter, vacuum energy &Lgr;, and curvature energy ‘o’ in open cosmologies. For example, we find the slope of the initial spectrum is within about 5% of the (preferred) scale–invariant form when just the CMB data are used, and for &Lgr;CDM when LSS data are combined with CMB; with both, a non–zero value of Ω&Lgr; is strongly preferred (ca. ⅔ for a 13 Gyr sequence, similar to the value from SNIa). The oCDM sequence prefers Ωtot < 1, but is overall much less likely than the flat Ω&Lgr; ≠ 0 sequence with CMB+LSS. We also review the rosy forecasts of angular power spectra and parameter estimates from future balloon and satellite experiments when foreground and systematic effects are ignored to show where cosmic parameter determination can go with CMB information alone.
119408227
CMB likelihood functions for beginners and experts
Although the broad outlines of the appropriate pipeline for cosmological likelihood analysis with CMB data has been known for several years, only recently have we had to contend with the full, large-scale, computationally challenging problem involving both highly-correlated noise and extremely large datasets (N>1000). In this talk we concentrate on the beginning and end of this process. First, we discuss estimating the noise covariance from the data itself in a rigorous and unbiased way; this is essentially an iterated minimum-variance mapmaking approach. We also discuss the unbiased determination of cosmological parameters from estimates of the power spectrum or experimental bandpowers.
15199369
Quantum Yang-Mills theory
Since the early part of the twentieth century, it has been understood that the description of nature at the subatomic scale requires quantum mechanics. In quantum mechanics, the position and velocity of a particle are noncommuting operators acting on a Hilbert space, and classical notions such as “the trajectory of a particle” do not apply. But quantum mechanics of particles is not the whole story. In nineteenth and early twentieth century physics, many aspects of nature were described in terms of fields—the electric and magnetic fields that enter in Maxwell’s equations, and the gravitational field governed by Einstein’s equations. Since fields interact with particles, it became clear by the late 1920’s that an internally coherent account of nature must incorporate quantum concepts for fields as well as for particles. After doing this, quantities such as the components of the electric field at different points in space-time become non-commuting operators. When one attempts to construct a Hilbert space on which these operators act, one finds many surprises. The distinction between fields and particles breaks down, since the Hilbert space of a quantum field is constructed in terms of particle-like excitations. Conventional particles, such as electrons, are reinterpreted as states of the quantized field. In the process, one finds the prediction of “antimatter;” for every particle, there must be a corresponding antiparticle, with the same mass and opposite electric charge. Soon after P. A. M. Dirac predicted this on the basis of quantum field theory, the “positron” or oppositely charged antiparticle of the electron was discovered in cosmic rays. The most important Quantum Field Theories (QFT’s) for describing elementary particle physics are gauge theories. The classical example of a gauge theory is Maxwell’s theory of electromagnetism. For electromagnetism the gauge symmetry group is the abelian group U(1). If A denotes the U(1) gauge connection, locally a one-form on space-time, then the curvature or electromagnetic field tensor is the two-form F = dA, and Maxwell’s equations in the absence of charges and currents read 0 = dF = d ∗ F . Here ∗ denotes the Hodge duality operator; indeed Hodge introduced his celebrated theory of harmonic forms as a generalization of the solutions to Maxwell’s equations. Maxwell’s equations describe large-scale electric and magnetic fields and also—as Maxwell discovered—the propagation of light waves, at a characteristic velocity, the speed of light.
12216720
Twist fields and broken supersymmetry
A twist field on a cylindrical space–time has the defining property that translation about a spatial circle results in multiplying the field by a phase. In this paper we investigate how such multivalued twist fields fit into the framework of constructive quantum field theory. Twisted theories have an interest in their own right; the twists also serve as infrared regulators that partially preserve the underlying symmetries of the Hamiltonian. The main focus of this paper is to investigate the extent that boson–fermion twist-field systems are compatible with the Lie symmetry and with the N=2 supersymmetry that one expects in the same examples without twists. We consider free systems and nonlinear boson–fermion interactions that arise from a holomorphic, quasihomogeneous, polynomial superpotential. We choose the twisting angles to lie on a chosen line in twist parameter space (leaving one free twist parameter). Doing this, we can obtain Lie symmetry and half the number of supersymmetry generators that one ex...
117682886
Quantum field theory : a selection of papers in memorian Kurt Symanzik
To the Memory of Kurt Symanzik.- Monte Carlo Simulations for Quantum Field Theories Involving Fermions.- SU(2) Lattice Gauge Theory: Standard Action Versus Symanzik's Tree-Improved Action.- On-shell Improved Lattice Gauge Theories.- On the Modular Structure of Local Algebras of Observables.- The Intersection of Brownian Paths as a Case Study of a Renormalization Group Method for Quantum Field Theory.- Intersection Properties of Simple Random Walks: A Renormalization Group Approach.- Self-Avoiding Walk in 5 or More Dimensions.- Indecomposable Representations with Invariant Inner Product A Theory of the Gupta-Bleuler Triplet.- Classical Models of Confinement II.- The Energy-Momentum Spectrum in Local Field Theories with Broken Lorentz-Symmetry.- Large Deviations for Stationary Gaussian Processes.- Reduction in the Number of Coupling Parameters.- Conformal Gauges and Renormalized Equations of Motion in Massless Quantum Electrodynamics.- Longitudinal Jet Cross Sections in Order ?s2.- Convergent Perturbation Expansions for Euclidean Quantum Field Theory.- Renormalization of the Higgs Model: Minimizers, Propagators and the Stability of Mean Field Theory.
123158581
The energy momentum spectrum and vacuum expectation values in quantum field theory, II
We prove that theP(ϕ)2 quantum field theory satisfies the spectral condition. The space time translationa=(x, t) is implemented by the unitary groupU(a)=exp(itH−ixP), and the joint spectrum of the energy operatorH and the momentum operatorP is contained in the forward cone. We also obtain bounds on certain vacuum expectation values of products of field operators. Our proofs involve an analysis of the limitV→∞ for approximate theories in a periodic box of volumeV. Assuming the existence of a uniform mass gap, we are able to establish all the Wightman axioms with the exception of the Lorentz invariance of the vacuum.
118881742
Constructive Field Theory, Phase II
It now appears possible to study a realm of problems in CFT which, two years ago, appeared an order of magnitude too difficult to tackle. The finishing touches have just been put on the first paper of this sort1, and in this talk I will describe some of the basic ideas; these ideas are simple, although the details of the paper are complicated. The main question that I will discuss today has been around as long as field theory: Namely how does an interacting field model react to perturbations by an external source? Such perturbations of \(\textup{P}\left (\phi \right )_{2}\), or in fact any reasonable local perturbations of the \(\textup{P}\left (\phi \right )_{2}\) model, have been shown to be regular by James Glimm and myself1. As a consequence, (i) further properties of the original model have been established1, (ii) some new breakthroughs are being made2 and (iii) these methods appear promising for use in the study of more singular models than \(\textup{P}\left (\phi \right )_{2}\).