Pilot Rod Vaughan was left with a head injury after he says a drone crashed into his plane while flying in Waihi.

Hanging upside down in a Waihi cornfield with blood in his eyes pilot Rod Vaughan did not have time to wonder what his aircraft had hit before crash landing.

Now his wounds are healing he is certain it was a drone.

If he is correct it will be the first time a drone has taken down an aircraft in New Zealand, but there have been many reported near-misses.

MATT SHAND/STUFF The light plane crashed upside down in a cornfield in Waihi on Wednesday.

Recently a drone came within five metres of an incoming 777-200 plane approaching Auckland putting 278 passengers at risk.

READ MORE:

* Air NZ calls for tougher drone restrictions after near-miss with plane

* Drone flying around Auckland airport delays and diverts 20 flights

Vaughan, a former investigative journalist who was once punched by Sir Bob Jones, was out enjoying a flight in a Aeroprakt Foxbat with his son on Wednesday afternoon.

supplied Shortly after landing in the bumpy paddock the aircraft flipped 180 degrees.

As they were taking in the sights of the local gold mine, disaster struck.

"Without any warning a tornado of air was just racing inside the cockpit," he said.

The force of the impact, and pressure of the wind, dislodged the two doors which dangled behind the aircraft still tethered to the airframe.

supplied Pilot Rod Vaughan was able to get himself out of the wreckage but suffered a head injury.

"I immediately looked to get the plane on the ground. We were about 1600 to 1700 feet at the time and we came down in about 30 seconds."

Vaughan aimed the stricken aircraft at a cleared corn paddock near Ford Rd.

"There was a hedge that I think I clipped on the way," he said.

Jason Oxenham Veteran TV journalist Rod Vaughan, who was once punched by Sir Bob Jones (FILE).

The bumpy paddock put too much pressure on the front wheel. It buckled causing the plane to flip 180 degrees.

Vaughan and his son were able to walk away from the crash but not without injury.

His son was able to brace himself during the crash so suffered only bruising from the seatbelt. Vaughan cut his head in the crash.

"We got ourselves out and called for help," he said. "We could have been killed."

Vaughan said the fact the window imploded in the manner it did left him with three theories.

"One would be a bird strike but we didn't see any bird activity in the area," he said.

"The second would be a high velocity rifle shot but I think we can rule that out.

"Another option is a drone."

Vaughan said he hopes the Civil Aviation Authority conducts a thorough investigation into the incident but he admits the truth might never come out.

"I don't think someone is going to put their hand up and say, 'I am missing a drone and it was last seen flying near your aircraft'."

Vaughan says spotting a drone while flying is nearly impossible and the prevalence of drones is putting amateur airmen at risk.

"Kids can buy drones for $90 at the Warehouse," he said.

"It's hard enough to spot a plane in the air which is why we rely on radio reports but drone operators are not using radios."

The CAA said they are still conducting an investigation and will make comment when more information comes to hand.

President of the Airline Pilots Association Tim Robinson said he's alarmed at the number of near misses involving drones and is also calling for greater regulation.

"There's been a growth in the sale of drones recently which is why there needs to be tighter regulation."

Robinson said it's time New Zealand fell in line with other countries when it came to regulation.

"Registration of drones over 250g is already in place in the United States and Australia. It's easy in the United States where they have an online registration."

He thinks fixing the problem will require a multi-faceted approach but sees the onus of understanding regulations as falling on the person flying the drone.</s>WELLINGTON, New Zealand (AP) - Air New Zealand said Tuesday that a drone came within meters of a flight descending into Auckland Airport from Tokyo, putting the safety of 278 passengers and crew at risk.

After Sunday's incident, the national carrier is calling for prison terms for drone operators who endanger lives.

Air New Zealand said the pilots of Flight NZ92 spotted the drone about 5 meters (16.4 feet) from their Boeing 777-200 at a point in their descent when it was impossible to take evasive action.

FILE - In this Aug. 23, 2015, file photo, an Air New Zealand passenger plane flies past the moon on its way to the Los Angeles International Airport from London, in Whittier, Calif. Air New Zealand said a drone came within meters of a flight descending into Auckland Airport from Tokyo, putting the safety of 278 passengers and crew at risk. The national carrier is calling for prison terms for drone operators who endanger lives after the incident Sunday, March 25, 2018. (AP Photo/Nick Ut, File)

The airline said the drone passed so close that the crew worried it had been sucked into an engine, although a later inspection showed that hadn't happened.

"It's clear the time has now come for tougher deterrents for reckless drone use around airports to safeguard travelers," David Morgan, the airline's chief operations and integrity standards officer, said in a statement.

He called for penalties to be imposed more consistently and also called for better education around drones.

The airline said it was the second example of reckless drone use this month, after an Air New Zealand pilot reported the presence of a drone within controlled airspace on March 6 at Auckland Airport. That incident prompted the airport to halt all flights for 30 minutes.

Under current regulations, drone operators who breach aviation rules can be fined up to 5,000 New Zealand dollars ($3,600).

New Zealand's Civil Aviation Authority said it supported the airline's call for better education, and that a government-led group was considering new drone regulations.

"There is no excuse for anyone flying a drone near an airport without authorization or in the flight path of aircraft," Graeme Harris, the director of civil aviation, said in a statement. "Such action is highly irresponsible and is the height of stupidity."

Harris said New Zealand was not alone in trying to grapple with a rapid rise in the use of drones in its skies.</s>Wellington, New Zealand (AP) — Air New Zealand said Tuesday that a drone came within meters of a flight descending into Auckland Airport from Tokyo, putting the safety of 278 passengers and crew at risk.

After Sunday’s incident, the national carrier is calling for prison terms for drone operators who endanger lives.

Air New Zealand said the pilots of Flight NZ92 spotted the drone about 5 meters (16 feet) from their Boeing 777-200 at a point in their descent when it was impossible to take evasive action.

The airline said the drone passed so close that the crew worried it had been sucked into an engine, although a later inspection showed that hadn’t happened.

“It’s clear the time has now come for tougher deterrents for reckless drone use around airports to safeguard travelers,” David Morgan, the airline’s chief operations and integrity standards officer, said in a statement.

He called for penalties to be imposed more consistently and also called for better education around drones.

The airline said it was the second example of reckless drone use this month, after an Air New Zealand pilot reported the presence of a drone within controlled airspace on March 6 at Auckland Airport. That incident prompted the airport to halt all flights for 30 minutes.

Under current regulations, drone operators who breach aviation rules can be fined up to 5,000 New Zealand dollars ($3,600).

New Zealand’s Civil Aviation Authority said it supported the airline’s call for better education, and that a government-led group was considering new drone regulations.

“There is no excuse for anyone flying a drone near an airport without authorization or in the flight path of aircraft,” Graeme Harris, the director of civil aviation, said in a statement. “Such action is highly irresponsible and is the height of stupidity.”

Harris said New Zealand was not alone in trying to grapple with a rapid rise in the use of drones in its skies.</s>A NEAR miss between a drone and a Boeing 777-200 on descent into Auckland has prompted Air New Zealand to call for jail time for people who endanger lives with remotely piloted aircraft.

The incident on Sunday afternoon saw the drone pass so close to the aircraft that crew was worried it had been ingested by one of the engines, putting the safety of 278 passengers and crew at risk.

A subsequent inspection proved the drone did not enter the engine but estimates are the drone came within 5m of the 777 arriving from Haneda, Tokyo.

READ: Drone near miss over Perth on airlineratings.com

Drone owners are prohibited from operating the aircraft near airports and in controlled airspace used by commercial aircraft.

Air New Zealand said this was the second example of reckless drone use potentially endangering passenger safety this month.

Flight operations at Auckland airport were halted for 30 minutes on March 6 when one of the company’s pilots spotted a drone in controlled airspace.

Air New Zealand chief operations and integrity standards officer David Morgan said serious drone incidents were on the rise.

He said policy makers need to protect the traveling public with greater education, tighter regulation and stronger penalties for irresponsible operators.

“NZ92 was just metres away from a serious incident on Sunday,’’ Morgan said.

“The pilots spotted the drone at a point in the descent where it was not possible to take evasive action. It passed so close to the incoming aircraft that they were concerned it may have been ingested into the engine.”

“It’s clear the time has now come for tougher deterrents for reckless drone use around airports to safeguard travellers, including imposing prison terms in the case of life-threating incidents.”

Under current New Zealand regulations, individual drone operators who breach Civil Aviation Rules can receive a fine of up to $NZ5000.

The burgeoning use of drones has caused concerns about the technology’s impact on commercial aviation around the world.

Aviation agencies in a number of jurisdictions are looking at how best to regulate the machines, particularly among recreational users.

The International Air Transport Association has also called on regulators to pay more attention to the problem.

“The great majority of drone owners operate their devices responsibly, but it is also the case that the number of incidents is rising,’’ IATA director general Alexandre de Juniac said at the time.

“There is significant work being developed at ICAO to produce standards for the larger drones that are equipped to share the airspace with manned aircraft.

“However, we need to ensure that the smaller drones, whether intended for recreational or commercial use, are kept out of airspace used for approach and landing operations of air transport.”</s>WELLINGTON, New Zealand — Air New Zealand says a drone came within meters of a flight descending into Auckland Airport from Tokyo, putting the safety of 278 passengers and crew at risk.

The national carrier is calling for prison terms for drone operators who endanger lives after the incident Sunday.

Air New Zealand says the pilots of Flight NZ92 spotted the drone about five meters from their Boeing 777-200 at a point in their descent when it was impossible to take evasive action.

The airline says the drone passed so close the crew worried it had been sucked into the engine, although a later inspection showed that hadn’t happened.

Under current regulations, drone operators who breach aviation rules can be fined up to 5,000 New Zealand dollars ($3,600).</s>Air New Zealand is calling for tighter regulation of drones after one of its aircraft came within a few feet of one on approach to Auckland Airport

The flight, a Boeing 777-200 operating NZ092 from Tokyo Haneda, was on its descent into Auckland when it encountered a drone the airline estimated to be only five metres (16 feet) away.

The airline said the incident is the second example of “reckless drone use” this month after one of its pilots reported a drone within controlled airspace near Auckland Airport on March 6. The airport halted flight operations for 30 minutes during the incident.

The airline’s Chief Operations Integrity and Standards Officer Captain David Morgan said serious drone incidents are on the increase and policy-makers need to protect the public. He said NZ092 was “just metres away from a serious incident.

“The pilots spotted the drone at a point in the descent where it was not possible to take evasive action. It passed so close to the incoming aircraft that they were concerned it may have been ingested into the engine.”

He called for tougher deterrents for reckless drone use around airports, including prison terms in the case of life-threatening incidents.

Under current New Zealand regulations, individual drone operators who breach Civil Aviation Rules can receive a fine of up to NZD$5000 (USD$3,650).</s>Air New Zealand is demanding tougher rules for drone operators after a near-miss at Auckland Airport involving a flight with 278 people onboard.

NZ92 from Tokyo was coming into land at Auckland when it encountered a drone estimated to be just five metres away from the 777-200 aircraft on Sunday.

“The incident is the second example of reckless drone use potentially endangering passenger safety this month, with flight operations at Auckland Airport halted for 30 minutes on 6 March when an Air New Zealand pilot reported a drone within controlled airspace,” Air NZ said.

Air New Zealand chief operations and integrity standards officer Captain David Morgan said serious drone incidents were on the rise - and policymakers need to take action and introduce stronger penalties for irresponsible operators.

“NZ92 was just metres away from a serious incident on Sunday,” he said.

“The pilots spotted the drone at a point in the descent where it was not possible to take evasive action.

“It passed so close to the incoming aircraft that they were concerned it may have been ingested into the engine.”

A later inspection of the aircraft showed the drone had not gone into the engine.

But it was clear “the time has now come” for tougher deterrents regarding reckless drone use around airports in order to safeguard travellers.

That included introducing the penalty of imprisonment in the case of life-threatening incidents.

Under current regulations, individual drone operators who breach Civil Aviation Rules can receive a fine of up to NZ$5000 (US$3,645).

Morgan said Air New Zealand was committed to pushing for tougher and more consistent penalties to raise awareness of the regulations around drone use and the potentially serious consequences of breaching them.

Only one drone operator prosecuted in five years

Air traffic control organisation Airways had also expressed its concern around an increasing number of drone sightings in controlled airspace.

In a statement, the organisation said it had received reports of more than one unauthorised drone operating per week, over the past year.

“Air traffic control technology is currently unable to detect small objects such as drones so we rely on drone operators to follow the rules and register with us before they fly to ensure all aircraft are integrated safely into our airspace.”

Airways was “actively looking” for solutions, it said, and a new system would be trialled within the next three months.

The airline’s call for action follows near figures that show that the huge growth in the use of drones in the past five years has seen a marked rise in complaints to the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA).

But enforcement action is yet to take off, with only about four per cent of complaints resulting in disciplinary measures.

Data provided under the Official Information Act by the CAA to the Herald shows a total of 696 complaints against Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) have been made since March 2013, but only 27 of those have resulted in enforcement action.

Hobby and commercial drones exploded in popularity around 2014 and have become more popular as their prices become cheaper, their technology improves and they become ever more accessible.

But their rise in popularity has also come with the introduction of legalities and ethics, with the CAA releasing new rules for the flying of unmanned aircraft in August 2015.

Of the 27 complaints where action was taken, 11 resulted in warning letters, 15 in infringement notices and one person was prosecuted. 669 resulted in no enforcement action taken.

Information provided by the CAA said when no enforcement action is taken, the Special Flight Operations and Recreational Aviation Unit of the CAA conducts educational activities to assist operators’ compliance with Civil Aviation Rules.

The first case the CAA launched against a drone operator was in 2016.

Simon Roy Reeve, 38, was found guilty on three charges involving flying his drone at Pines Beach, north of Christchurch, while fire crews and a helicopter battled a blazing scrub fire.

Reeve was charged with causing danger by operating his drone and two counts of breaching controlled airspace.

At his sentencing in July 2016 he was ordered to make a NZ$500 (US$365) donation to a charity of his choice and discharged without conviction. He was also fined NZ$250 (US$182) for breaching controlled airspace.

Despite this being the only CAA prosecution against a drone operator, figures detailing the rise in complaints to the CAA show that concerns reported have risen from a total of eight in the year between March 2013-2014, to 289 reports between March 2017-2018.

The top five reasons for these complaints were; no consent for flight over person or property, operating in controlled airspace without clearance, hazardous operations, operating within 4km of an aerodrome, and proximity with other aircraft.

The Civil Aviation Rules, detailed in Part 101 and Part 102 of the Civil Aviation Act, also address not operating an aircraft that is 25kg or larger without certification, flying only in daylight, and minimising hazards to persons, property and other aircraft.

Director of Civil Aviation Graeme Harris said the CAA supports the call by Air NZ for greater education and awareness of the rules for flying drones.

“New Zealand is not alone in having difficulty coming to terms with the rapid rise in drone use in our skies.

“This is a very new technology that is available for both commercial and recreational purposes. We do not want to unreasonably curb the use of drones but we are absolutely committed to ensuring they are used safely.”

He said a new digital media campaign would be launched in the coming months and a review of current drone rules is nearing completion.

“Around the world governments are applying a risk-based approach to the evolution of drone regulation as they attempt to facilitate the economic and safety benefits the technology offers while at the same time managing the new risks they create,” Harris said.

“There is no excuse for anyone flying a drone near an airport without authorisation or in the flight path of aircraft. Such action is highly irresponsible and is the height of stupidity.

“Current law provides significant penalties for such action and the CAA will act against anyone who puts the lives of the travelling public at risk.”

While the CAA is responsible for investigating inappropriate drone usage, the Privacy Commissioner and Police also have some jurisdiction to look into infractions.

Police frontline staff are often required to respond to incidents, but forward all details to the CAA.

“If a [drone] is used in the commission of a criminal act, police may consider charging the operator with an appropriate criminal offence,” a spokeswoman said.

A case that went to court after police action was that of Chilean tourist Jorge Eduardo Riquelme Cruz.

Cruz, 33, was convicted in February this year on one charge of operating an unmanned drone in a manner that caused unnecessary danger to firefighting pilots and their helicopters.

Riquelme Cruz illegally flew a drone through a firefighting operation in Central Otago on January 3 and his actions meant seven helicopters were grounded, causing a delay in battling a 200ha bush fire on Mt Alpha.

He was convicted at the Hamilton District Court and the judge ordered the forfeiture of his drone to the Crown.

Privacy Commissioner John Edwards told the Herald in February that he was keen to look into whether action being taken against drone operators was sufficient.

“Whether those rules are actually fit for purpose and are being enforced is something I think I need to have a look at and I am going to discuss this with the CAA,” he said.

“One of the difficulties I have, and I assume the CAA would also have, is that there is no registration of the devices so it is very difficult to actually find out who is operating it and therefore have someone to investigate.”

A spokesperson for the Office of the Privacy Commissioner said since February its office has had discussions with the CAA on how it can improve its guidance for drone users.

“Our office is taking the approach to driving the message that people should be respectful of the privacy of others in the community and in other settings.

“CCTV cameras, drones, mobile phones are all of a type of potentially privacy-intrusive technology. So much depends on whether they are used responsibly or irresponsibly. We obviously advocate for responsible use.”

President of the NZ Airline Pilots Association Tim Robinson said laws around the use of drones need to be enforced appropriately.

“Drone-related accidents and incidents have potential to put the welfare and lives of air transport crew and the travelling public at risk.

“There is a need for better education and regulation for the use of drones, as many drone operators are unaware of the risks and rules about where they can be operated,” he said.

“We look forward to working with the Ministry of Transport and the CAA regarding improved education action and enforcement, including the possibility of registration in line with international best practice.”

This year alone, the Herald has reported on many stories of drones allegedly being used inappropriately.

In February Morgaine Halligan and her mother Melissa Rays reported a drone hovering over private property while they were sunbathing, and then early in March a Waiheke Island man told the story of a drone spying on him while he was getting dressed for bed.

This incident was followed a few days later by a Drone causing delays at Auckland Airport after flights were diverted because a drone was spotted on the approach to the runway.

A CAA spokeswoman said if someone believes a drone is breaching Civil Aviation Rules they should try to get as much information as possible about the drone and operator and report it to the CAA.

Read the original article at The New Zealand Herald
A New Zealand light aircraft pilot Rod Vaughan claims that his plane was brought down at Waihi after colliding with a drone. If true, it would be the first such incident in the country.