Example #2: In Linamar, which was previously discussed, the employer argued that the worker got injured because he didn’t use a spotter as required. But the court noted that the training wasn’t clear as to the proper use of a spotter.
The court also noted that the employer didn’t provide any training on how to use a spotter. The court found that the employer was responsible for the worker’s injury because the employer failed to provide adequate training on how to use a spotter.
Translation: The court also pointed out that the employer did not provide any training on how to use a spotter. The court determined that the employer was responsible for the worker’s injury because the employer failed to provide sufficient training on how to use a spotter.
 The court also noted that the employer didn’t provide any training on how to use a spotter. The court found that the employer was responsible for the worker’s injury because the employer failed to provide adequate training on how to use a spotter.


Translation: The court also pointed out that the employer did not provide any training on how to use a spotter. The court determined that the employer was responsible for the worker’s injury because the employer failed to provide sufficient training on how to use a spotter.