The aggregation of the number of threat systems and their innate quality complicates the ability of any coalition of (NATO) forces to establish a no-fly zone and deter the regime. It would likely require double the number of assets deployed against Libya with no guarantee of success. This facet of the conflict has reduced the effectiveness of the political pressures. As advanced threat systems proliferate, conflicts in a high threat environment will likely become the rule instead of the exception.
Translation: La agregación de los sistemas de amenaza y su calidad inherente complica la capacidad de cualquier fuerza de coalición (NATO) para establecer una zona prohibida al vuelo y detener al régimen. Esto probablemente requeriría el doble de los recursos desplegados contra Libia sin garantía de éxito. Esta faceta del conflicto ha reducido la
Translation: The aggregation of threat systems and their inherent quality complicates the capacity of any coalition force (NATO) to establish a no-fly zone and stop the regime. This probably requires twice the resources deployed against Libya without any guarantee of success. This aspect of the conflict has reduced the confidence of allies in NATO's ability


Translation: La agregación de los sistemas de amenaza y su calidad inherente complica la capacidad de cualquier fuerza de coalición (NATO) para establecer una zona prohibida al vuelo y detener al régimen. Esto probablemente requeriría el doble de los recursos desplegados contra Libia sin garantía de éxito. Esta faceta del conflicto ha reducido la
 confianza de los aliados en la capacidad de NATO para garantizar la seguridad de la región.

Translation: The aggregation of threat systems and their inherent quality complicates the capacity of any coalition force (NATO) to establish a no-fly zone and stop the regime. This probably requires twice the resources deployed against Libya without any guarantee of success. This aspect of the conflict has reduced the confidence of allies in NATO's ability