Datasets:

amrachraf

/

arXiv-full-text-chunked

like 0

Metabolic scaling in small life forms Mark E. Ritchie & Christopher P. Kempes March 4, 2024 Abstract Metabolic scaling is one of the most important patterns in biology. Theory explaining the 3/4-power size-scaling of biological metabolic rate does not predict the non-linear scaling observed for smaller life forms. Here we present a new model for cells <10−8m3that maximizes power from the reaction-displacement dynamics of enzyme-catalyzed reactions. Maximum metabolic rate is achieved through an allocation of cell volume to optimize a ratio of reaction velocity to molecular movement. Small cells<10−17m3generate power under diffusion by diluting enzyme con- centration as cell volume increases. Larger cells require bulk flow of cy- toplasm generated by molecular motors. These outcomes predict curves with literature-reported parameters that match the observed scaling of metabolic rates for unicells, and predicts the volume at which Prokary- otes transition to Eukaryotes. We thus reveal multiple size-dependent physical constraints for microbes in a model that extends prior work to provide a parsimonious hypothesis for how metabolism scales across small life.Introduction Understanding how and why organisms differ in their demand for and use of resources is a key objective of biologists [1–3] and critical to understanding the response of biodiversity and ecosystem function to global changes [4, 5]. A fundamental and often-debated pattern is how metabolic rate, B, scales with body mass, M[1, 6, 7], followng the form B=B0Mβ. (1) Data for vertebrates and vascular plants [8–12]show an average interspe- cific scaling exponent of 3/4. This relationship has inspired diverse theories [10, 11, 13–15], including the network model, which derives 3/4 from the need for organisms to supply the entire body volume with resources from vascular resource distribution networks that minimize energy dissipation. More recent analyses [1, 16–20] that include organisms from the smallest 11 orders of mag- nitude in size that largely lack vascular distribution networks, show a variable 1arXiv:2403.00001v1 [physics.bio-ph] 16 Dec 2023

2403.00001v1.pdf

83124c16-4f04-4a6b-8ad4-3e73b121d81c

metabolic scaling exponent that changes across size ranges from scaling expo- nents as high as 2 – super-linear scaling – for the smallest range and near 3/4 for the largest organisms. Understanding the basis for this variation is impor- tant, as many different organism features can be derived from this metabolic scaling, including how maximum growth rates and ribosomal abundances scale with cell size along with key tradeoffs between features [21, 22]. However, there is no general, parsimonious theory derived from physical and chemical principles that addresses this size-dependent scaling for these smallest organisms [16]. Here we propose a combined thermodynamic and reaction description of metabolic rate for a cell. We assume that natural selection will favor organisms that can perform more work per time (power) for material synthesis, replica- tion, repair, locomotion, and other cellular functions [23]. While often co-limited by materials in the environment, optimizing this power faces cellular trade-offs concerning both environmental and intra-cellular physical constraints.Conse- quently, we optimize cellular features to maximize the free energy produced by the conversion of chemical substrates to products, where heat and products may inhibit metabolism if not moved away from reaction sites. This thermodynamic approach provides a framework for considering the two processes, conversion and displacement, simultaneously. Thermodynamics of reaction and molecular dis- placement We assume that work is proportional to the volume of reactive surface, where macromolecular catalytic enzymes are freely dispersed in the cytoplasm or at- tached to the membranes, cytoskeleton, and/or other organelles within the en- tity [24]. However, a portion of cell volume is needed to allow substrates from the environment to reach reaction surfaces and to allow displacement of reac- tion products away from reaction structures. This sets up a conflict between the volume devoted to metabolic processes and that devoted to transport. Here we derive a physical and chemical principles-based theory for metabolic scaling for metabolic rate across the roughly 11 orders of magnitude in volume of or- ganisms that lack branching vascular systems.

2403.00001v1.pdf

585f2078-83c3-4e35-9996-7bdb23343ac1

We describe metabolism from a reaction-displacement thermodynamic system centered on or near reaction surfaces and its generation of free energy within a spherical space otherwise obstructed by surfaces at which reactions occur. Our framework applies to uni- cellular Prokaryotes, Archaea, and Eukaryotes along with eukaryotic organelles. Our basic model, which we expand on in stages, is to consider metabolism in a sphere described by the following reaction-diffusion model ∂A ∂t=D1 r2∂ ∂r r2∂A ∂r −kAZ ∂P ∂t=D1 r2∂ ∂r r2∂P ∂r +kAZ (2) 2

2403.00001v1.pdf

9833ce0f-1632-4f0d-9919-8c06c823f2a3

where the product, P(r), substrate, A(r), and enzyme, Z(r), concentrations (mol m−3) are all a function of radius, r, inside a sphere, and where the dynamics are one dimensional in spherical coordinates with spherical symmetry. Additionally, k=kcat/KMis the reaction constant ((m3mol−1s−1)) and Dis a displacement coefficient (e.g. molecular diffusivity in some cases) and has units of (m2s−1) so that each rate is a change in concentration (mol m−3 s−1). We consider the steady-state dynamics, representing a persistent entity and its metabolism in a fixed environment over time, allowing us to solve for closed-form solutions of P(r) and A(r) under a given concentration of Z(see SI).The steady-state free energy production at any location in the cell is given by J∗(r) =kRTA∗ZlnA∗Keq P∗ (3) where Keqis the equilibrium constant of the energy producing reaction (which can be interrelated with ∆ G0),Tis temperature, and Ris the ideal gas constant. The entire metabolism (given as a power in watts) of the entire cell is then described by B= 4πkRTZ 1−3Ve(rc) 4πr3cZrc 0x2A(x) lnKeqA(x) P(x) dx (4) where rcis the radius of the cell and Veis the essential volume required for other for other cellular materials, such as DNA, and is unavailable for energy generation. In this system, we can maximize power (free energy/time), B(Watts), as a function of Z. If there were no tradeoffs, then Bwould be maximized by the largest feasible Zat a given size (a cell full of enzymes).

2403.00001v1.pdf

065053a5-3078-490b-8e6f-a15ce99bf764

However, the need to move substrate into different regions of the cell and to displace products away from reaction sites introduces a trade-off between the effective diffusion coefficient, D, and enzyme concentration, Z. An increase in Zcorresponds to a decrease in diffusivity [25, 26], and this leads to an optimal enzyme concentration corresponding to a maximal metabolic rate (see SI). 1 Optimal tradeoffs Maximizing power over the whole cell, at a given cell size rcsubject to vari- ation in the concentration of enzymes, Z, we find that the optimal enzyme concentration Z∗follows Z=1 e6KeqD0 kr2c1/(1−γ) (5) where γis the scaling between diffusivity and enzyme concentration at high enzyme concentrations, and D0is the normalization constant for that scaling relationship (see SI). Remarkably, this relationship shows that the optimal en- zyme concentration in cells can be predicted from a few fundamental thermo- dynamic, Keq, and kinetic, k, constants (Figure 1). Note that Z∗depends on 3

2403.00001v1.pdf

7cf59801-48ea-463d-a66e-ec2aebc680ec

a ratio of reaction rate, k, to a diffusivity normalization for small molecules in the cytoplasm, D0. Using the known relationship for diffusivity with enzyme concentration, where γ≈ −3/2 for sufficiently high concentrations [26], we obtain Z=Z0V−4/15 c . (6) Previous studies have shown that total protein count scales with cell size following a power law with an exponent <1 [22], but these relationships have no fundamental explanation. Our optimization predicts that protein concentra- tion should become more dilute as cells become larger following an exponent of −4/15≈ −0.27, which is indistinguishable from the best fit exponent to data of−0.30±0.06 (Figure 1).10-2110-2010-1910-1810-1710-160.0050.0100.0500.1000.500 Cell Volume(m3)Enzyme Concentration(mol/m3)PredictionBest Fit PredictionMedian -4-20246810020040060080010001200 Log10(k)Frequency Figure 1: (A) The scaling of the concentration of a single enzyme with cell volume. The solid line is the prediction from our theory (exponent = 0 .27) and the dashed line is the best fit to data (exponent = 0 .30±0.06) compiled across the range of bacteria (calculated from total protein abundance scaling in [22]). (B) The distribution of kvalues for a few thousand enzymes [27] with the median value show in red compared to the best fit of our model (dashed black line). The prediction for Zwas determined by optimizing metabolic rate and so we also predict the relationship for maximum metabolic rate: B=B0V11/15 c 1−ve Vc .

2403.00001v1.pdf

f0a14bb1-b419-4463-9668-ffd95aa24a83

(7) Here B0is a constant that is a complicated function of diffusivity, kinetic and thermodynamic parameters (see SI), and Veis the volume of other essential macromolecules which follows Ve=v0Vα cwith α= 0.83 [22]. Metabolic scaling Equation 7 provides excellent agreement with observed metabolic rates for prokaryotes (Fig. 2). Metabolic rate has strong, non-power law curvature for 4

2403.00001v1.pdf

f81aaa62-bd78-40e0-ba8a-71febe9e47d7

10-1910-1610-1310-1010-1610-1210-8 Cell Volume(m3)Metabolic Rate(W) = 1.26β = 1/3β = 0.90βProkaryotesEukaryotesFigure 2: The prediction for prokayote (red) and eukaryote (blue) metabolic rate along with compiled data [16]. The red dashed curve to the right of the Prokaryote data indicates the scaling of metabolism with an exponent of 1 /3 once diffusivity has saturated to the molecular maximum value. Likewise curva- ture of the bulk flow model at the largest sizes results from dilution of enzymes by increasing densities of molecular motors. small cell sizes driven by the volume V erequired for macromolecules not in- volved in reactions, such as DNA, and this is what leads to the apparent super- linear ( β >1) scaling previously observed for prokaryotes [16]. This curvature quickly relaxes for larger cells due to the sublinear ( β <1) scaling of Ve.For cell sizes up to about the volume of E. coli (≈10−18m3) the power law ap- proximation is superlinear (SI Figure 4) with an approximate exponent of 1 .68 which agrees well with the previous estimates of 1 .75 [16]. For larger bacteria, the scaling of Bconverges on the sublinear scaling of 11/15 = 0 .73. For intermediate prokaryote cell sizes, binning the data to re- move oversampling of certain cell volumes and scatter, shows exceptionally good agreement between our model and the data (SI Figure 5). These results are not in conflict with the overall superlinear fit to all of the prokaryotic data [16], but show that this is a consequence of a complicated set of scale transitions and shifting constraints. Thus, downstream models that derive results from the scaling exponent of metabolic rate (e.g. [21, 22]) will gain accuracy and predic- tive power by starting from our more complex model. For example, models of growth which assume a power law for metabolism [21] should incorporate the curvature described in Equation 7. 5

2403.00001v1.pdf

92961388-a4d0-4b75-855a-65c3cc2fedd8

Size-dependent failure of diffusion and emergence of transport mechanisms The trade-off between decreasing enzyme concentration and increased diffusivity applies only for high concentrations of the enzyme. Eventually, for large enough cells, sufficiently low enzyme concentrations are reached such that D=Dmax, the maximum diffusivity of small molecules in water (see SI). Once diffusivity saturates, the optimal concentration follows Z∝V−2/3 c (see SI) yielding B∝ V1/3 c(Fig. 2, dashed red curve) and a metabolic rate controlled by diffusion across the cell membrane. Such scaling also avoids thermodynamic shutdown (power = 0) that can occur in the center of larger cells. Shutdown can occur when Dmaxis not fast enough to sufficiently displace reaction products and avoid reaction reversal.These changes may result in body designs, such as large central vacuoles, filamented rods, membrane bound organelles, and extreme polyploidy [22, 28–30] that minimize the potential for interior thermodynamic shutdown, but yield a relatively slow metabolic rate for prokaryotes larger than 10−17m3[22]. With further increases in cell volume, metabolic rate can only be increased by increasing the rate of molecular displacement, as Zis well below the concen- tration that influences diffusivity. A variety of means for increasing transport in cells exist (e.g. [31–40]) with most attributable to the addition of structures, such as molecular motors or transport proteins, that each generate active trans- port of molecules or viscous bulk flow of cytoplasm over at least some local region within the cell. We model this as an enhanced effective diffusivity of Dtrans.We model this as an enhanced effective diffusivity of Dtrans. For example, the movement of molecules along a cytoskeletal network and randomly arranged regions of bulk flow with a random flow direction can each be thought of as random walks with long single steps, and so displacement in the simplest summary model for all of these processes can be described as an enhanced diffusion (e.g. [31, 34–36, 39–42]). A new trade-off is introduced between the space occupied by dedicated transport structures versus the space devoted to catalyzing reactions (enzymes and supporting structures).

2403.00001v1.pdf

b9aa9f1c-494a-4a75-ab86-53cfab641532

This ef- fective diffusivity and volume tradeoffs are captured by D′= (1−ρ)Dmax+ρDtrans (8) and ∂A ∂t=D′1 r2∂ ∂r r2∂A ∂r −kcatAZ ∂P ∂t=D′1 r2∂ ∂r r2∂P ∂r +kcatAZ0 (9) where Dtrans is the enhanced diffusivity in the region affected by the active transport or bulk flow, ρis the fraction of the average cellular volume that is associated with active transport or bulk flow, and ϵis the ratio of the effec- tive volume of active transport to the volume of the structures generating that 6

2403.00001v1.pdf

5b256d4a-dd79-4883-bb9f-fb64b49c3193

transport (e.g. the ratio of the volume of a region of enhanced transport to a molecular motor or transport protein’s volume). We optimize total metabolic rate (see SI) at a given cell volume as a function ofρand find that ρgrows with cell size following a complicated function (see SI) that scales like ≈V0.10 cfor small cell sizes and ≈V2/3 cin the limit of large cell sizes. This density scaling implies that the volume dedicated to transport structures scales super-linearly with overall cell size ( ≈V1.1 cto≈V5/3 c).Thus, for cell sizes larger than 10−17m3, the effective diffusivity parameter can increase with cell volume but at the expense of an ever-increasing proportion of cell volume devoted to transport. This yields a size-dependent curve for maximum metabolic power in logarithmic space (blue curve in Fig. 3) that fits the available data for metabolic rate of Eukaryotes (again with average transport and reaction kinetic parameters).Over the middle size range of the single cell Eukaryotes, metabolic rate should approximate a power law with an exponent of 0 .90 which agrees very well with the power law fit to data of 0 .90±0.17 [16, 21]. However, the super-linear scaling of the required volume of transport molecules means that motors and transport proteins begin to substantially reduce the volume for reaction structures. This transport volume requirement ultimately may limit metabolic rate, and impose a theoretical upper limit to Eukaryote size of 10−9 m3which compares well to the size of the largest unicellular organisms in the metabolic database (Fig. 2). Discussion These analyses produce a series of metabolic scaling curves (Fig. 2) across a succession of cell (or organism) volume ranges. Each curve is associated with a particular mode of reaction volume and molecular displacement mechanisms, with molecular diffusion at the smallest sizes then with an enhanced diffusion within devoted transport regions at the largest sizes (Fig. 3). Across the size spectrum, optimal metabolic rate is set by the tradeoff be- tween volume for transport and volume for metabolic reactions.

2403.00001v1.pdf

a59ba39a-a6b4-4d32-a5bc-50d5311027f0

For prokary- otes, the smallest cells require space for other macromolecules such as DNA, which limit the space available for catalytic reaction enzymes. The largest un- structured prokaryotes face the slow scaling of metabolism set by the maximum diffusivity of small molecules in water. For unicellular eukaryotes, transport molecules provide the needed increase in molecular movement and metabolism scales almost linearly with cell volume. At the largest sizes, unicellular eukary- otes reach a sharp decrease dictated by the required overpacking of transport structures to assure the necessary effective diffusivity throughout the cell. Col- lectively, these curves merge to form an overall nonlinear relationship between metabolic rate and size that fit observed data very strongly (Fig. 2) and predict the scaling of protein and other material concentrations and the size at which major transitions in body plans occur. These curves clearly depart from the prediction of a single scaling exponent of 3/4 predicted by the theory for the optimal organization of vascular networks, 7

2403.00001v1.pdf

9971b42a-e9c8-445e-9cf8-1f7caf54e68e

EukaryotesSmallest Bacteria - Volume Constrained (Densely Packed Macromolecules) -Low DiffusivityMedium Bacteria - Optimal enzyme concentration set by tradeoff between diffusivity and metabolismSmall/Medium Eukaryotes - Optimal transport set by tradeoff between volume for reactions and movementLargest Eukaryotes - Transport mechanisms overpack the cellLarge cell without transport - Saturated diffusion -Enzyme concentration set by thermodynamic shutdown Asymptotic Limits Asymptotic LimitsSuperlinear ScalingSublinear ScalingProkaryotesβ≈0.87—DNA—Ribosomes—Enzymes—Example Transport—Substrates β=1/3β=11/15β>2β≈1.26 Superlinear Scaling10-2010-1710-1410-11Cell Volume(m3)rc=100nmrc=1000nmrc=105nm —Product Substrate transport (e.g. Diffusion)Product transport (e.g.Diffusion)Product transport (e.g. Diffusion)Figure 3: Representations of cells with increasing cell radius filled by cell com- ponents DNA, enzymes, ribosomes, and eventually molecular motors [43]. The scaling regimes and key limitations faced by cells of each category are also in- dicated. 8

2403.00001v1.pdf

f0d387b7-df40-4868-8e92-62e596884cb6

and support the general hypothesis that the smallest forms of life face differ- ent physical constraints, with different accompanying solutions, for maximizing metabolic power. However, the derived mechanisms here tend, as a first approx- imation, to a sublinear scaling not far from 3 /4. For example, the mid range bacteria are predicted to scale like 11 /15 = 0 .73, and the largest eukaryotes scale like ≈.80 as curvature sets in. These scalings for both small life and for organisms with vascular systems occur for very different mechanistic reasons, but are linked by the fundamental need for life to allocate and organize space to achieve sufficiently high rates of molecular displacement. Our results thus support more general arguments for why metabolic scaling should not be either surface area to volume scaling ( β= 2/3) or strictly proportional to volume (isometric, β= 1). Our work suggests that previous analyses of prokaryote metabolic scal- ing with all of the data [16], which found super-linear scaling, requires size- dependent shifts in physical constraints that accompany shifts in scaling to approximate a super-linear power law.Our results demonstrate that the overall super-linear pattern is driven by strong curvature away from a power law at the smallest cell sizes. Downstream extension of the fits using all data have been used to derive other features such as the increase in growth rate with cell size and the total abundance of ribosomes [21, 22]. Such models may gain accuracy and improved resolution in size ranges by incorporating the more complicated metabolic scal- ing derived here. In addition, other cellular constraint perspectives have been proposed for explaining scaling in bacteria such as biosynthetic costs of the membrane [44], ribosome and protein abundances and costs [22, 45], the spatial location and number of organelles and genomes [16, 29], the increasing number of genes and their cost [16, 29, 45, 46], and transporter optimizations associated with the environment (e.g. [23] for a review). In addition, the deployment of phase separation as another means for enhancing reaction rates [47, 48] and the spatial architecture of macromolecules [49, 50] may also be important for cellular scaling.

2403.00001v1.pdf

7f652f35-0462-4108-be86-ec319d8695bd

These are all important biophysical, physiological, and evolu- tionary considerations, and it will be important to integrate these additional constraints with cellular scaling in a more complicated optimization approach [23] that combines these costs with the diffusive tradeoffs employed here. Large prokaryotes also deploy active molecular transport and so the two models presented here represent bounding cases where large prokaryotes ( E. coliand bigger) and small unicellular eukaryotes. Multicellular organisms over- come the limit faced by the largest single cells by evolving mechanisms of bulk flow among cells. At its extreme, optimizing such bulk flow through tubular vascular systems to minimize energy dissipation (friction) produces the well- known B∝M3/4[10, 11, 13, 51–53]. Taken together, our results and vascular network models show that, organisms across the tree of life may face univer- sal tradeoffs between biochemical reactions and the space devoted to transport, where larger organisms must employ increasingly energy-requiring methods to increase molecular transport velocities. Our results also predict the scaling of materials within the cell. For small 9

2403.00001v1.pdf

44769aed-65b2-4e59-b7e2-8881bf5350af

entities relying on diffusion, we predict the total mass of enzymes (protein) to scale as V11/15 c , which closely agrees with observed scaling proportional to V0.70 c[22]. We also predict the minimum size and volume scaling at which cells should produce molecular motors, microtubules and other cytoskeletal material and other mechanisms to enhance diffusivity (Fig. 2). These scaling predictions cannot yet be tested, as they predate the measurement of such volumes or masses for diverse species and cell sizes, with just recently-developed microscopy techniques. However, the largest prokaryotes are known for unusual storage capacity [22, 28], many copies of the genome [29], and surprising amount of cytoskeleton [54]. All of these characteristics may give hints to the eukaryotic transition, and indeed Asgard archaea, which are suggested to be the eukaryotic ancestor, have several atypical cellular morphological characteristics [54–56].Our results suggest that active transport in and/or bulk flow of the cyto- plasm is likely required to generate free energy even in single cell organisms such as larger Prokaryotes and single-cell Eukaryotes. Extrapolation of the required molecular movement in our models further suggests that smaller multicellular organisms may require mechanisms such as contraction of tissues and/or loco- motion to generate bulk transport of intercellular fluids without an organized single source vascular system. Extending further, branching pressurized circu- latory networks may be required to sustain metabolism for organisms >1 g, a hypothesis supported by evidence that smallest mechanical pumping circulatory systems are limited by damping of pulsatile flow [10]. Our results now provide a physical and chemical explanation for the unique metabolic scaling exhibited by the smallest 11 orders of magnitude in organism size. We demonstrate that these life forms face significant design constraints, set by limited space for macromolecules and diffusive molecular movement, and the continuing need for faster molecular displacement mechanisms for the largest unicellulars.

2403.00001v1.pdf

b19435b5-3d75-4e05-9057-e9fb10387339

The predicted scaling relationships as organisms shift across the different transport limitation domains suggest that natural selection has ad- dressed this sequence of problems during the evolution of larger cell body sizes. Such evolution has led to cells with clustered reaction surfaces, channels of cyto- plasm for transporting molecules, molecular motors and cytoskeletal structures to enhance diffusion and then finally by mechanical pumping mechanisms that preview the evolution of powered branched circulatory systems. Our work now extends prior theory to provide a parsimonious hypothesis for how metabolism and the materials that support such activity scale across all life. References [1] J. H. Brown, J. F. Gillooly, A. P. Allen, V. M. Savage, and G. B. West, “Toward a metabolic theory of ecology,” Ecology , vol. 85, no. 7, pp. 1771– 1789, 2004. [2] B. Enquist et al. , “Scaling metabolism from organisms to ecosystems,” Nature , vol. 423, pp. 639–642, 2003. 10

2403.00001v1.pdf

a79fa63e-eaef-4ffb-acde-9613e82f7fe1

[3] M. Kaspari, “Using the metabolic theory of ecology to predict global pat- terns of abundance,” Ecology , vol. 85, no. 7, pp. 1800–1802, 2004. [4] M. Ritchie, Scale, heterogeneity, and the structure and diversity of ecological communities . Princeton: Princeton University, 2009. [5] S. Pawar, A. Dell, and V. Savage, “Dimensionality of consumer search space drives trophic interaction strengths,” Nature , vol. 486, pp. 485–489, 2012. [6] P. Agutter and J. Tuszynski, “Analytic theories of allometric scaling,” Jour- nal of Experimental Biology , vol. 214, no. 7, pp. 1055–1062, 2011. [7] D. Glazier, “A unifying explanation for diverse metabolic scaling in animals and plants,” Biological Reviews , vol. 85, pp. 111–138, 2010. [8] K. Schmidt-Nielsen, Scaling: why is animal size so important?[8] K. Schmidt-Nielsen, Scaling: why is animal size so important? Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press, 1984. [9] R. Peters, The ecological implications of body size . Cambridge UK: Cam- bridge University Press, 1986. [10] G. B. West, J. H. Brown, and B. J. Enquist, “A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology,” Science , vol. 276, no. 5309, pp. 122–126, 1997. [11] G. B. West, J. H. Brown, and B. J. Enquist, “A general model for the struc- ture and allometry of plant vascular systems,” Nature , vol. 400, no. 6745, pp. 664–667, 1999.400, no. 6745, pp. 664–667, 1999. [12] S. Mori, K. Yamaji, A. Ishida, S. G. Prokushkin, O. V. Masyagina, A. Hag- ihara, A. R. Hoque, R. Suwa, A. Osawa, T. Nishizono, et al. , “Mixed-power scaling of whole-plant respiration from seedlings to giant trees,” Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences , vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 1447–1451, 2010. [13] J. R. Banavar, J. Damuth, A. Maritan, and A. Rinaldo, “Supply–demand balance and metabolic scaling,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , vol. 99, no. 16, pp. 10506–10509, 2002. [14] J. Banavar et al. , “A general basis for quarter-power scaling in animals,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , vol. 107, pp.

2403.00001v1.pdf

3917ec83-5a55-4753-a76d-3e1c120bb70d

107, pp. 15816–15820, 2010. [15] J. Maino, M. Kearney, R. Nisbet, and S. Kooijman, “Reconciling theories for metabolic scaling,” Journal of Animal Ecology , vol. 83, pp. 20–29, 2014. [16] J. P. DeLong, J. G. Okie, M. E. Moses, R. M. Sibly, and J. H. Brown, “Shifts in metabolic scaling, production, and efficiency across major evo- lutionary transitions of life,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences , vol. 107, no. 29, pp. 12941–12945, 2010. 11

2403.00001v1.pdf

2fde9df2-ee98-4a1b-b7e4-37fd0357fc1e

[17] D. Glazier, “Metabolic scaling in complex living systems,” Systems , vol. 2, no. 4, p. 451, 2014. [18] T. Kolokotrones, V. Savage, E. Deeds, and W. Fontana, “Curvature in metabolic scaling,” Nature , vol. 464, no. 7289, pp. 753–756, 2010. [19] G. West and J. Brown, “The origin of allometric scaling laws in biology from genomes to ecosystems: towards a quantitative unifying theory of biological structure and organization,” Journal of Experimental Biology , vol. 208, pp. 1575–1592, 2005. [20] A. Makarieva et al. , “Mean mass-specific metabolic rates are strikingly similar across life’s major domains: Evidence for life’s metabolic optimum,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , vol. 105, pp. 16994–16999, 2008.105, pp. 16994–16999, 2008. [21] C. P. Kempes, S. Dutkiewicz, and M. J. Follows, “Growth, metabolic par- titioning, and the size of microorganisms,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 495–500, 2012. [22] C. P. Kempes, L. Wang, J. P. Amend, J. Doyle, and T. Hoehler, “Evo- lutionary tradeoffs in cellular composition across diverse bacteria,” The ISME journal , vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 2145–2157, 2016. [23] C. P. Kempes, M. Koehl, and G. B. West, “The scales that limit: the phys- ical boundaries of evolution,” Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution , vol. 7, p. 242, 2019. [24] L. Demetrius, “Quantum statistics and allometric scaling of organisms,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , vol.

2403.00001v1.pdf

4ee77d85-745b-4fd1-b18d-97deddde6fd6

322, pp. 477– 490, 2003. [25] D. S. Banks and C. Fradin, “Anomalous diffusion of proteins due to molec- ular crowding,” Biophysical journal , vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 2960–2971, 2005. [26] F. Roosen-Runge, M. Hennig, F. Zhang, R. M. Jacobs, M. Sztucki, H. Schober, T. Seydel, and F. Schreiber, “Protein self-diffusion in crowded solutions,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , vol. 108, no. 29, pp. 11815–11820, 2011. [27] A. Bar-Even, E. Noor, Y. Savir, W. Liebermeister, D. Davidi, D. S. Tawfik, and R. Milo, “The moderately efficient enzyme: evolutionary and physico- chemical trends shaping enzyme parameters,” Biochemistry , vol. 50, no. 21, pp. 4402–4410, 2011.50, no. 21, pp. 4402–4410, 2011. [28] H. Schulz, T. Brinkhoff, T. G. Ferdelman, M. H. Marin´ e, A. Teske, and B. B. Jørgensen, “Dense populations of a giant sulfur bacterium in namib- ian shelf sediments,” Science , vol. 284, no. 5413, pp. 493–495, 1999. 12

2403.00001v1.pdf

a99c4715-81d2-4c58-b03e-048687e620d4

[29] N. Lane and W. Martin, “The energetics of genome complexity,” Nature , vol. 467, no. 7318, pp. 929–934, 2010. [30] J.-M. Volland, S. Gonzalez-Rizzo, O. Gros, T. Tyml, N. Ivanova, F. Schulz, D. Goudeau, N. H. Elisabeth, N. Nath, D. Udwary, et al. , “A centimeter- long bacterium with dna contained in metabolically active, membrane- bound organelles,” Science , vol. 376, no. 6600, pp. 1453–1458, 2022. [31] K. Luby-Phelps, “Cytoarchitecture and physical properties of cytoplasm: volume, viscosity, diffusion, intracellular surface area,” International review of cytology , vol. 192, pp. 189–221, 1999. [32] S. M. Hurtley, “Cell biology of the cytoskeleton,” 1998.[33] M. Xu, J. L. Ross, L. Valdez, and A. Sen, “Direct single molecule imaging of enhanced enzyme diffusion,” Physical review letters , vol. 123, no. 12, p. 128101, 2019. [34] N. Fakhri, A. D. Wessel, C. Willms, M. Pasquali, D. R. Klopfenstein, F. C. MacKintosh, and C. F. Schmidt, “High-resolution mapping of intracellular fluctuations using carbon nanotubes,” Science , vol. 344, no. 6187, pp. 1031– 1035, 2014. [35] C. P. Brangwynne, G. H. Koenderink, F. C. MacKintosh, and D. A. Weitz, “Intracellular transport by active diffusion,” Trends in cell biology , vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 423–427, 2009.19, no. 9, pp. 423–427, 2009. [36] P. C. Bressloff and J. M. Newby, “Stochastic models of intracellular trans- port,” Reviews of Modern Physics , vol. 85, no. 1, p. 135, 2013. [37] S. S. Mogre, A. I. Brown, and E. F. Koslover, “Getting around the cell: physical transport in the intracellular world,” Physical Biology , vol. 17, no. 6, p. 061003, 2020. [38] Z. Qu, D. Schildknecht, S. Shadkhoo, E. Amaya, J. Jiang, H. J. Lee, D. Lar- ios, F. Yang, R. Phillips, and M. Thomson, “Persistent fluid flows defined by active matter boundaries,” Communications Physics , vol. 4, no. 1, p. 198, 2021.

2403.00001v1.pdf

b3551327-97df-4f15-af1e-858e1683e62c

4, no. 1, p. 198, 2021. [39] M. J. Bowick, N. Fakhri, M. C. Marchetti, and S. Ramaswamy, “Symme- try, thermodynamics, and topology in active matter,” Physical Review X , vol. 12, no. 1, p. 010501, 2022. [40] M. Guo, A. J. Ehrlicher, M. H. Jensen, M. Renz, J. R. Moore, R. D. Goldman, J. Lippincott-Schwartz, F. C. Mackintosh, and D. A. Weitz, “Probing the stochastic, motor-driven properties of the cytoplasm using force spectrum microscopy,” Cell, vol. 158, no. 4, pp. 822–832, 2014. [41] R. Lipowsky, S. Klumpp, and T. M. Nieuwenhuizen, “Random walks of cytoskeletal motors in open and closed compartments,” Physical Review Letters , vol. 87, no. 10, p.87, no. 10, p. 108101, 2001. 13

2403.00001v1.pdf

5abccc3e-eacb-4bda-88ef-1fee4fe4c1d8

[42] P. Pierobon, M. Mobilia, R. Kouyos, and E. Frey, “Bottleneck-induced transitions in a minimal model for intracellular transport,” Physical Review E, vol. 74, no. 3, p. 031906, 2006. [43] BioRender.com, “Created with biorender.com.” [44] B. Trickovic and M. Lynch, “Resource allocation to cell envelopes and the scaling of bacterial growth rate,” BioRxiv , pp. 2022–01, 2022. [45] M. Lynch and G. K. Marinov, “The bioenergetic costs of a gene,” Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences , vol. 112, no. 51, pp. 15690–15695, 2015. [46] S. Alberti, “Phase separation in biology,” Current Biology , vol. 27, no. 20, pp. R1097–R1102, 2017.20, pp. R1097–R1102, 2017. [47] C. A. Azaldegui, A. G. Vecchiarelli, and J. S. Biteen, “The emergence of phase separation as an organizing principle in bacteria,” Biophysical journal , vol. 120, no. 7, pp. 1123–1138, 2021. [48] D. Zwicker, “The intertwined physics of active chemical reactions and phase separation,” Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science , p. 101606, 2022. [49] M. Castellana, S. Hsin-Jung Li, and N. S. Wingreen, “Spatial organiza- tion of bacterial transcription and translation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , vol. 113, no. 33, pp. 9286–9291, 2016. [50] N. S. Wingreen and K. C. Huang, “Physics of intracellular organization in bacteria,” Annual Review of Microbiology , vol. 69, pp. 361–379, 2015.69, pp. 361–379, 2015. [51] G. B. West, J. H. Brown, and B. J. Enquist, “The fourth dimension of life: fractal geometry and allometric scaling of organisms,” science , vol. 284, no. 5420, pp. 1677–1679, 1999. [52] V. M. Savage, L. P. Bentley, B. J. Enquist, J. S. Sperry, D. Smith, P. B. Reich, and E. Von Allmen, “Hydraulic trade-offs and space filling enable better predictions of vascular structure and function in plants,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , vol. 107, no. 52, pp. 22722–22727, 2010. [53] A. B. Brummer, V. M. Savage, and B. J. Enquist, “A general model for metabolic scaling in self-similar asymmetric networks,” PLoS computa- tional biology , vol. 13, no. 3, p. e1005394, 2017.

2403.00001v1.pdf

4d1f072f-585d-491e-9e68-9fd9b4cc3038

13, no. 3, p. e1005394, 2017. [54] T. Rodrigues-Oliveira, F. Wollweber, R. I. Ponce-Toledo, J. Xu, S. K.-M. Rittmann, A. Klingl, M. Pilhofer, and C. Schleper, “Actin cytoskeleton and complex cell architecture in an asgard archaeon,” Nature , vol. 613, no. 7943, pp. 332–339, 2023. 14

2403.00001v1.pdf

ba169250-503c-4a85-80d6-f76736ecad0a

[55] B. Avcı, J. Brandt, D. Nachmias, N. Elia, M. Albertsen, T. J. Ettema, A. Schramm, and K. U. Kjeldsen, “Spatial separation of ribosomes and dna in asgard archaeal cells,” The ISME Journal , vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 606– 610, 2022. [56] H. Imachi, M. K. Nobu, N. Nakahara, Y. Morono, M. Ogawara, Y. Takaki, Y. Takano, K. Uematsu, T. Ikuta, M. Ito, et al. , “Isolation of an archaeon at the prokaryote–eukaryote interface,” Nature , vol. 577, no. 7791, pp. 519– 525, 2020. 2 Supplementary Material 15

2403.00001v1.pdf

870325b7-e9c4-4ce4-9ec9-a3fa75ca5d69

3 Diffusions Tradeoffs The coupled diffusion equations to be solved for steady state are D(Z) x2A′′(x) + 2xA′(x)
x2−kZA(x)! = 0 (10) D(Z) x2P′′(x) + 2xP′(x)
x2+kZA(x)! = 0 (11) with the boundary conditions A(rc) = A0 (12) A′(0) = 0 (13) P(rc) = P0.(14) The solution to these equations is A(r) =A0rccsch rc√ kZ√ D(Z) sinh r√ kZ√ D(Z) r(15) Following a similar derivation, the corresponding equation for Pis P(r) =A0+P0−A0rccsch rc√ kZ√ D(Z) sinh r√ kZ√ D(Z) r(16) Returning to the integral which represents the full metabolic rate of the cell, can can use these solutions for AandPset constraints on Z. To avoid thermodynamic shutdown we needKeqA(r) P(r)>1 which, given the solutions above, leads to the condition rcsch r√ kZp D(Z)! <A0(1 +Keq)rccsch rc√ kZ√ D(Z) A0+P0.

2403.00001v1.pdf

c9f9d259-5d63-4d86-b2d5-2b8283bd3418

(17) Thermodynamic shutdown is a problem for the interior of the cell and so we are interested in checking this condition for r= 0. Evaluating the above inequality atr= 0 and expanding in small rcleads to Z D(Z)<6(A0Keq−P0) A0kr2c(1 +Keq). (18) This equation isn’t fully solved because the diffusivity, D, depends on Z. Previ- ous work has shown that for large enough Zchanges in diffusivity will approx- imately follow a power law [26], and so we can consider D(Z) =D0Zγwhich yields Z <6D0(A0Keq−P0) A0kr2c(1 +Keq)1 1−γ (19) 16

2403.00001v1.pdf

3b0cc831-4809-4220-a784-b827a52d6078

which for P≈0 is Z <6D0Keq kr2c(1 +Keq)1 1−γ . (20) This equation states how the concentration of enzyme should either concentrate or dilute with cell size to avoid thermodynamic limitations. Given that γ≈ −3/2 [26] we have that Z∝r−4/5 c or Z∝V−4/15 c . (21) It should be noted that given Equation 20, Zis bounded by a concentration that is diluting out as cells increase in size. This should set a hard upper bound where the cellular concentrations start to reach discrete numbers of enzymes. Thus, under a fixed tradeoff for diffusivity an upper bound on cell volume is predicted by the dilution of enzyme concentrations required to avoid thermody- namic shutdown. It should be noted that once Zreaches sufficiently low concentrations diffu- sivity saturates to a maximum value set by molecular motion in the fluid [26].At this point D(Z) =Dmaxand we have Z <6DmaxA0Keq A0kr2c(1 +Keq). (22) In this limit Zwill scale like V−2/3 c to avoid thermodynamic shutdown. Thermodynamic Optimization More generally, we are interested in the concentrations of enzymes that would optimize cellular metabolic rate. The above arguments give us a bounding expectation for the scaling of enzyme concentration, but we can replace these with the complete optimization of cellular metabolic rate, B. Specifically, we are interested in∂B ∂Z= 0. (23) where the total metabolism integrated over a cell is B= 4πRTkZ 1−3Ve(rc) 4πr3cZrc 0r2A(r) logKeqA(r) P(r) dr. (24) Considering cases where the environmental concentration of the product is low, P0≈0, the integrand is given by A0rcrZcsch √ kZrcp D(Z)! sinh √ kZrp D(Z)!

2403.00001v1.pdf

0bf9550a-5fdb-43bd-9de4-2fe1e21789e1

sinh √ kZrp D(Z)! log Keqrc rsinh√ kZrc√ D(Z) csch√ kZr√ D(Z) −rc  (25) 17

2403.00001v1.pdf

73264691-9737-4802-9961-8947016a368e

We approximate this integral considering small rcand with, D(Z) =D0Zγ, the dependence of diffusivity on Z. Given these assumptions integrand is well approximated by A0√ krcr2z3/2csch√ kZrc√D0zγ log Keqrc √ D0Zγsinh √ kZrc√ D0Zγ! √ kZ−rc  √D0Zγ(26) leading to the solution of the integral as B=A0RTk3/2rcZ3/2 4πr3 c−3Ve
csch√ kZrc √D0Zγ log Keqrc √ D0Zγsinh √ kZrc√ D0Zγ! √ kZ−rc  3√D0Zγ.(27) In the small radius limit the derivative, ∂B/∂Z , is then well approximated by ∂B ∂Z≈A0RTkV e 1−γ−log6KeqD0zγ−1 kr2c . (28) Setting this to zero leads to Zopt=1 e6KeqD0 kr2c1/(1−γ) . (29) This optimal solution of Zoptcan be substituted back into the approximate solu- tion for total metabolic rate, B, which we find does a good job of approximating the full numerical integral. If we take γ=−3/2 this gives Zopt=62/5K2/5 eqD2/5 0 ek2/5r4/5 c. (30) This solution shows that the optimal Zscales like Z∝r−4/5 c∝V−4/15 c (31) in agreement with our considerations above for thermodynamic shutdown.

2403.00001v1.pdf

4b51c756-a3f7-4812-80fa-f0c7ead41206

The corresponding solution for metabolic rate is given by B=29/10A0RTk3/5K9/10 eqD2/5 0csch√ 6√ Keq e5/4 4πr3 c−3Ve
log K3/2 eq e5/4sinh √ 6√ Keq e5/4! √ 6−√ Keq  10√ 3e9/4r4/5 c (32) which scales like B≈r11/5 c∝V11/15 c (33) 18

2403.00001v1.pdf

f53965ec-cf28-4396-9906-e6b4e6f1609b

predicting that metabolic rate will scale slightly sublinearly for sufficiently large size. It should be note that this is the approximate scaling of Bover a range of larger cell sizes, but the full form of Bis more complicated a small cells sizes, especially considering the factor of (1 −Ve(rc)/Vc) multiplying the entire scaling where Ve=v0Vα cwith α= 0.83 [22]. Figure 4 shows the full solution of Bwith more strongly superlinear scaling because of the small-size curvature. 10-2010-1910-1810-1710-1610-15012345 Cell Volume(m3)Effective Scaling Exponent(β) Figure 4: The approximation of the local scaling exponent across the range of bacterial volumes. The dashed line is 11 /15 which the complete model converges on for large cell volumes. Saturated Diffusivity It should be noted that at very low Zthe diffusivity saturates to a constant maximum behavior and stops following a power law.In this case diffusivity reaches the maximum molecular diffusivity, D=Dmax, and the above equations lead a optimal enzyme concentration of Zopt=6DmaxKeq ekr2c(34) and corresponding metabolic rate of B=2√ 6A0RTD maxK3/2 eqcschq 6 ep Keq 4πr3 c−3Ve
log 1√e 6sinh√ 6 e√ Keq K3/2 eq−1 Keq  e3/2r2c. (35) Here enzyme concentration will scale like Z∝V−2/3 c andB∝V1/3 c. However, these scalings are unlikely to be observed because of the shift to employing active 19

2403.00001v1.pdf

dcb79d97-1983-4ab9-bb85-5ccb177a9f79

transport, and these results are only shown to illustrate the extreme limitation faced by large cells if they only used molecular diffusion. 10-2110-2010-1910-1810-1710-1610-1510-1910-1610-1310-10 Cell Volume(m3)Metabolic Rate(W) Figure 5: Comparison of the model prediction (red curve) with bacterial data (red points) and the binned averages of those data (black points) same data. 4 Active Transport Tradeoffs Our model for active transport treats diffusion in the cell as ∂A ∂t=D′1 r2∂ ∂r r2∂A ∂r −kcatAZ ∂P ∂t=D′1 r2∂ ∂r r2∂P ∂r +kcatAZ0 (36) with a modified effective diffusivity, D′, that follows D′= (1−ρ)Dmax+ρDtrans. (37) where ρis the fraction of cell volume occupied by transport structures.(37) where ρis the fraction of cell volume occupied by transport structures. Here we define an effective volume (region with enhanced transport) of a transport structure, and ρis the ratio of the total of these effective volumes to the total cell volume. The optimization of metabolism now depends on tradeoffs between the adjusted diffusivity and the space occupied by the transport structures, where total metabolism follows B= 4πRTkZ (1−ρϵ)Zrc 0r2A(r) logKeqA(r) P(r) dr. (38) where ϵis the ratio of the volume of a transport structure to the effective volume of enhanced transport that structure creates. The solutions for A(r) and P(r) are the same as in Equations 15 and 16. 20

2403.00001v1.pdf

31d44698-5887-4b79-8939-784ae143b7c7

We are again interested in optimizing cellular metabolic rate, B, where now we are looking for solutions to ∂B ∂ρ= 0. (39) The integration of Bis well approximated by B≈C(1−ρϵ)csch√ kZrc √ ρDtrans +Dmax(1−ρ) log Keqrc√ kZ√ ρDtrans +Dmax(1−ρ) sinh√ krc√ Z√ ρDtrans +Dmax (1−ρ) −rc  3p ρDtrans +Dmax(1−ρ). (40) C≡4πA0RTk3/2r4 cZ3/2(41) for small values of rc. Again we are considering the regime where transport, now represented by the adjusted diffusivity D′, is large relative to the scale of the cell.

2403.00001v1.pdf

f7505534-3e18-4474-bdbe-def0af9ad20f

Taking the derivative of this this solution and again approximating it for small rcand also for small Dmax(the maximum molecular diffusivity) we have ∂B ∂ρ≈r3 cA0RTkZ 1−ρϵ 1 + log 6Dtrans Keqρ kr2cZ 3ρ= 0. (42) which gives the optimal fraction of transport structures as ρ=1 ϵW 6eDtrans Keq kr2cZϵ (43) where Wis the Lambert Wfunction (the product logarithm). For small rcthis is well approximated by ρ=1 ϵlog 6eDtrans Keq kr2 cZϵ (44) Similar to our solutions above for the enzyme concentration tradeoffs in bacteria, this function again highlights that optimal metabolic values depend onDKeq kr2c.Taking all of this together we have that the optimal metabolic rate follows B=1 3A0RTkr3 cZ 1 + 1 /log6DtransKeq kr2cZϵ log 6DtransKeq kr2cZϵ 1 + log 6Dtrans Keq kr2 cZϵ . (45) This scales like B∝r3 c∝Vcwith a logarithmic correction term. This explains why the scaling of metabolism in Eukaryotes is close to linear with cell volume but actually sublinear due to the logarithmic terms. Figure 6 gives the approx- imate local exponent of Bwith cell size. The full range of Eukaryotes is well approximated by β= 0.90 which agrees with data as discussed in the maintext. 21

2403.00001v1.pdf

209403d0-9339-48c3-9717-39f966a5f3bc

10-2010-1810-1610-1410-1210-100.50.60.70.80.91.0 Cell Volume(m3)Effective Scaling Exponent(β)Figure 6: The approximation of the local scaling exponent across the range of bacterial volumes. The dashed line is 11 /15 which the complete model converges on for large cell volumes. This function also comes with an asymptotic limit that occurs because trans- portors begin to overpack the cell. This limit occurs when W6eDtransKeq kr2cZϵ = 1 (46) which corresponds to an maximum single cell eukaryote of Vc,max =8√ 6πD3/2 transK3/2 eq k3/2Z3/2ϵ3/2. (47) This solution mirrors the molecular diffusion limit but with an altered diffusivity. 22

2403.00001v1.pdf

f1824219-4fa8-43c2-b048-87410aac4ca6

arXiv:2403.00002v1 [math.DG] 24 Dec 2023Gradient Estimate for Fisher-KPP Equation on Finsler metric measure spaces Bin Shen and Dingli Xia Abstract In this manuscript, we study the positive solutions of the Fi nslerian Fisher-KPP equation ut= ∆∇uu+cu(1−u). The Fisher-KPP equation is widely applied and connected tom any mathematical branches. We establish the global gradient estimates on com pact Finsler metric measure manifold with the traditional CD(K,N)condition, which is developed by S. Ohta and K.-T. Sturm in Finsler geometry. Furthermore, With the assis- tance of a new comparison theorem developed by the first autho r, we also give the gradient estimate on forward complete noncompact local ly finite misalign- ment Finsler metric measure spaces with the mixed weighted c urvature bounded below and some non-Riemannian curvatures norm-bounded.Keywords: gradient estimate, Fisher-KPP equation, Finsler metric me asure space, weighted Ricci curvature, mixed weighted Ricci curvature MSC Classification: 35K55 , 53C60 , 58J35 1 Introduction . The Fisher-KPP equation on a complete Riemannian manifold Mis given by ut= ∆u+cu(1−u), (1.1) whereuis a real-valued function on M×[0,∞) andcis a positive constant. The equation was proposed by R. A. Fisher in 1937 to describe the pr opagation of an evolutionarily advantageous gene in a population, and was also in dependently describedinaseminalpaperbyA.N.Kolmogorov,I.G.Petrovskii,a ndN.S.Piskunov in the same year; for this reason, it is often referred to in the litera ture as the name of Fisher–KPP equation. 1

2403.00002v1.pdf

e9d2ce44-3f6f-41d1-904b-450fe500f0c0

Since the two papers in 1937, there have been extensive investigat ions on travel- ing wave solutions and asymptotic behavior in terms of spreading spe eds for various evolution systems. Traveling waves were adopted to study the non linear PDEs, such as the nonlinear reaction-diffusion equations modeling physical and biological phenomena (cf. [ 22][23]), the integral and integrodifferential population models (cf. [2][7][15][16][30]), the lattice differential systems (cf. [ 6][11][12][14][21][40]), and the time-delayed reaction-diffusion equations (cf. [ 29][38]). In 2017, Cao et al. [ 10] derived differential Harnack estimates for positive solutions to (1.1) on Riemannian manifolds with nonnegative Ricci curvature. The idea comes from [8][9], in which a systematic method was developed to find a Harnack inequa lity for geometric evolution equations.Actually, they obtained the follo wing theorem. Theorem A. [10]Let(M,g)be ann-dimensional complete noncompact Riemannian manifold with nonnegative Ricci curvature, and let u(x,t) :M×[0,∞)→Rbe a positive solution to ( 1.1), where uisC2inxandC1int. letf=logu, then we have ∆f+α|∇f|2+βef+φ(t)≥0.

2403.00002v1.pdf

8396846d-82ba-40c2-b43f-ac1e43c83b61

(1.2) for all xandt, provided that 0< α < 1as well as−cn(2+√ 2) 4(1−α)< β <min{−cn(1+α) 4α2−4α+2n,−cn(2−√ 2) 4(1−α)}<0, where φ(t) =u(e2µwt v−w−1 µ+w) 1−e2µwt,withµ= βc√ 2(1−α) c(−cn−8β(1−α)), v=( 4β(1−α) n+c) ·√ 2(1−α) c(−cn−8β(1−α))andw=√ 2(1−α) n. Utilizing Theorem A, one can integrate along space-time curves to ge t a Harnack inequality. However, it is different from the classical Li–Yau Harnack inequality [ 20] in form. Gradient estimates play an important role in studying elliptic an d parabolic operators.Gradient estimates play an important role in studying elliptic an d parabolic operators. The method originated first in [ 44] and [13], and was further developed by Li and Yau [ 20], Li [19], Negrin [ 24], P. Souplet and Q. Zhang [ 37], Y. Yang [ 43], etc.. Recent gradient estimates under the geometric flow include [ 4] and [3]. For more results on the nonlinear PDEs, one may refer to [ 1][18]. In 2018,following the line in [ 19], X. Geng and S. Hou [ 17] provedthe positive solu- tions to the Fisher–KPP equation on complete Riemannian manifolds. T hey derived a gradient estimate, and got the classic Harnack inequality by using it, which extended the recent result of Cao, Liu, Pendleton and Ward [ 10].In2009,uponthefoundationalinvestigationsofgradientestimat iononRiemannian manifolds, S. Ohtainitially put forwardasophisticatedframeworkfo r gradientestima- tion applicable to the heat equation on compact Finsler manifolds [ 25]. Subsequently, in the year2014,C.Xia [ 41]undertookacomprehensiveanalysisofharmonicfunctions within the context of both compact and non-compact (specifically, forward complete) Finsler structures by utilizing an advanced form of Moser’s iterative technique. Pro- gressingfurther,Q.Xia[ 42] deliveredintricategradientestimatesforpositivesolutions to the heat equation on forward complete Finsler spaces, employing methodologies analogous to those documented in [ 41]. The first author [ 32] proposed a method for global and local gradient estimates on Finsler metric measure space s, which was also used to solve the Finslerian Schr¨ odinger equation.Later, the firs t author [ 31] gives the gradient estimates of bounded solutions to the Finslerian Allen-Cahn equation. 2

2403.00002v1.pdf

0dcdc049-dc20-421f-ac62-50e45401cbc1

In this paper, we study the Fisher-KPP equation ( 1.1) on a Finsler metric measure manifold ( M,F,µ), where cis a positive constant, the solution of ( 1.1) is a function u(x) onM×[0,∞). Our main theorems in this paper are as follows Theorem 1.1. Let(M,F,µ)be a compact Finsler metric measure space with dimen- sionaln≥2, whose weighted Ricci curvature satisfies RicN≥ −K, for some positive constant K. Assume the reversibility of Mhas upper bound ρ0. Suppose uis a bounded positive smooth solution of the Fisher-KPP parabolic equat ion (1.1) onM×[0,∞), then we have F2(∇u) u2+2c(1−u)−2ut u≤2(N+n)ρ2 0K+27√ 2(N+n)3 2M1c.(1.3) where,M1= supu(x,t).(1.3) where,M1= supu(x,t). Similarily, on a noncompact forward complete Finsler manifold, the follo wing local gradient estimates is obtained. Theorem 1.2. Let(M,F,µ)be a complete noncompact Finsler metric measure space. Denote by B(p,2R)the forward geodesic ball centered at pwith forward radius 2 R. Suppose the mixed weighted Ricci curvaturemRicN≥ −K(2R)inB(p,2R)with K(2R)≥0, and the misalignment αsatisfies α≤A(2R)inB(p,2R). Moreover, the non-Riemannian tensors satisfy F(U)+F∗(T)+F(divC(V))≤K0.Assume u(x,t) is a bounded positive smooth solution of the Fisher-KPP para bolic equation ( 1.1) on M×[0,∞), then we have F2 ∇u(∇u) u2+sc(1−u)−sut u≤C1(N,n,ǫ)(s2 t+s2K(2R) (s−1)+sc qM1) +C2(N,n,ǫ,A (2R))s2 R2{ 1+R[ 1+√ K(2R)] +s2 s−1} .(1.4) onB(p,R)for0< ε <1,s >1,q >0, such that2(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)s−1 sq≥1 ε−1+(2s−1)2 8, whereC1,C2are positive constants. 2 Preliminary . In this section, we introduce the fundamental principles governing Finsler metric measure spaces (refer to [ 32] for more details).

2403.00002v1.pdf

f3fdc244-ada7-4420-a1ed-a9aacc20ac27

A Finsler metric space is a triple (M,F,µ), which indicatesthatadifferentialmanifold isequipped with aFinslerm etric Fand a measure µ. Suppose the local coordinate of the tangent bundle is ( x,y), where xis the point on Mandyis the direction on TxM. A Finsler metric Fis a nonnegative function F:TM→[0,+∞) satisfies that (i)Fis smooth and positive on TM\{0}; (ii)Fis a positive homogenousnorm, i.e., F(x,ky) =kF(x,y) for any ( x,y)∈TM and for any k >0; 3

2403.00002v1.pdf

24be2a28-3e69-4538-81aa-f633b1e1944c

(iii)Fis strongly pseudo-convex, namely, for any ( x,y)∈TM\ {0}, the fundamental tensor is a positive definite matrix defined by gij(x,y) :=1 2∂F2 ∂yi∂yj(x,y). (2.1) Unlike the Riemann metric, the Finsler metric is defined locally as the nor m on the tangent space at each point, and globally as a metric on the pull-b ack bundle, so there are a large number of non-Riemannian geometric quantities on a Finsler metric measure space. The Cartan tensor is defined by C(X,Y,Z) :=CijkXiYjZk=1 4∂3F2(x,y) ∂yi∂yj∂ykXiYjZk, (2.2) for any local vector fields X,Y,Z. There is a unique almost g-compatible and torsion-freeconnection o n the pull-back tangent bundle π∗TMof the Finsler manifold ( M,F) called the Chern connection.It is determined by ∇XY−∇YX= [X,Y]; (2.3) w(gy(X,Y))−gy(∇ZX,Y)−gy(X,∇ZY) = 2Cy(∇Zy,X,Y),(2.4) for anyX,Y,Z∈TM\ {0}, whereCyis the Cartan tensor. The Chern connection coefficients are locally denoted by Γi jk(x,y) in a natural coordinate system, which could induce the spray coefficients as Gi=1 2Γi jkyjyk. The spray is given by G=yiδ δxi−2Gi∂ ∂yi, (2.5) in whichδ δxi=∂ δxi−Nj i∂ ∂yjand the nonlinear connection coefficients are locally induced from the spray coefficients by Ni j=∂Gi ∂yj.

2403.00002v1.pdf

2cb38b34-d418-4422-8a70-bbed1bee70f8

The Chern connection can define the Chern Riemannian curvature Rand Chern non-Riemannian connection P. Denote by Ω the curvature form of the Chern connection, so that Ω(X,Y)Z=R(X,Y)Z+P(X,∇Yy,Z), (2.6) for anyX,Y,Z∈TM\{0}, where locally Ri j kl=δΓi jl δxk+δΓi jk δxl+Γi kmΓm jl−Γi lmΓm jk, Pi j kl=−∂Γi jk ∂yl. (2.7) Customarily, we denote the horizontalChern derivativeby ” |” and the verticalChern derivative by ”;”. For example, vi|j=δ δxjvi−Γk ijvk, vi;j=∂ ∂yjvi, (2.8) 4

2403.00002v1.pdf

ab2cfbcb-d999-4f1a-83bf-443e377ed284

for any 1-form v=vidxion the pull-back bundle. The angular metric form hyis defined by hy(u,v) =gy(u,v)−1 F2(y)gy(y,u)gy(y,v), (2.9) for anyy,u,v∈TxMwithy̸= 0 Thus, for any two linearly independent vectors y,v∈TxM\ {0}, which span a tangent plane Π y=span{y,v}, the flag curvature with pole yis defined by K(P,y) =K(y,x) :=Ry(y,u,u,y) F2(y)hy(u,u), (2.10) which is locally expressed by K(y,u) =−Rijklyiujykul (gikgjl−gilgjk)yiujykul.(2.11) The Ricci curvature is defined by Ric(v) :=F2(v)n−1∑ i=1K(y,ei), (2.12) wheree1,...,e n−1,v F(v)form an orthonormal basis of TxMwith respect to gy. The Landsberg curvature of ( M,F) is given by L:=Li jk∂i⊗dxj⊗dxk, Li jk=−yjPi j kl. (2.13) By the zero homogeneity, according to the Euler lemma, it easy to se e that Cijkyi=Lijkyi= 0 (2.14) H.B. Rademacher introduced the concepts of reversibility and reve rsible manifolds [28], which are also closely related to the analytical assumptions on Finsle r manifolds.

2403.00002v1.pdf

e4e3e455-69c0-43a0-a8a6-429a0369a83a

A Finsler metric is defined to be reversible if F(x,V) =¯F(x,V) for any point xand any vector field V, where¯F(x,V) :=F(x,−V) is called the reversed Finsler metric of F. ρ:=sup x∈Msup V̸=0F(x,V) F(x,V). (2.15) Obviously, Fis reversible if and only if ρ≡1. A Finsler manifold ( M,F) is said to have finite reversibility if ρ <+∞. Later, K. Ball, E. Carlen, and E. Lieb introduced the concepts of un iform smooth- ness and uniform convexityin Banachspace theory[ 5], whose geometricinterpretation in Finsler geometry was provided by S. Ohta [ 26]. We say Fsatisfies uniform convex- ity and uniform smoothness if there exist uniform positive constant sκ∗andκ, called 5

2403.00002v1.pdf

7c30c4de-4141-418e-9a55-3aeed229fbab

the uniform convexity constant and the uniform smoothness cons tant, respectively, such that for any x∈M,V∈TxM\{0}, andW∈TxM, we have κ∗F2(x,y)≤gV(y,y)≤κF2(x,y). (2.16) wheregV= (gij(x,V)) is the Riemannian metric on Minduced from Fwith respect to the reference vector V. In this situation, the reversibility ρcould be controlled by κandκ∗as 1≤ρ≤min{√κ.√ 1/κ∗}. (2.17) Fis Riemannian if and only if κ= 1 if and only if κ∗= 1 [26]. The Riemannian structure is inconsistent when the reference vect ors are different. For example, given three different local non-vanishing vector fields aroundx, namely, V,W,Y, the norm of YaboutgVandgWmaybe not the same in general case.The ratiogV(Y,Y) =gW(Y,Y) is a function about V,W,Y. Based on this fact, [ 32] defined an important constant on a Finsler manifold, called the misalign ment. Definition 2.1. ([32]). For a Finsler manifold (M,F), the misalignment of a Finsler metric at point xis defined by α(x) =sup V,W,Y∈SxMgV(Y,Y) gW(Y,Y). (2.18) Moreover, the global misalignment of the Finsler metric is d efined by α=sup X∈MαM(x) =sup X∈Msup V,W,Y∈SxMgV(Y,Y) gW(Y,Y). (2.19) it also provided in [ 32] some characterizations of the misalignment. Especially, a Finsler manifold ( M,F) is a Riemannian manifold if and only if αM= 1.Moreover, a Finsler manifold ( M,F) is uniform convexity and uniform smoothness if and only if it satisfies finite misalignment. Since that, we have gaven an important class of Finsler manifold as th e following. Definition 2.2. We call a Finsler manifold (M,F)has finite misalignment if there is a positive constant Asuch that α≤A, and has locally finite misalignment if for any compact subset Ω⊂M, there is a constant A(Ω)depending on Ωsuch that α(x)≤A(ω)for anyx∈Ω. So far, we have briefly introduced some Riemannian or non-Riemannia n local quantities and tensors in Finsler geometry corresponding to Rieman nian geometric quantities. Next, we will introduce more tensors related to the mea suredµ.

2403.00002v1.pdf

42e52fbc-5982-47bf-8ec3-6de99e187ff9

Next, we will introduce more tensors related to the mea suredµ. For any smooth function f:M→R, df denotes its differential 1-form and its gradient ∇fis defined as the dual of the 1-form via the Legendre transformat ion, namely,∇f(x) :=l−1(df(x))∈TxM. Locally it can be written as ∇f=gij(x.∇f)∂f ∂xi∂ ∂xj. (2.20) onMf:=df̸= 0. The Hessian of fis defined via the Chern connection by 6

2403.00002v1.pdf

143878e1-5253-45ea-8e39-ef66a2c9d6e2

∇2f(X,Y) =g∇f(∇∇f X∇f,Y). (2.21) It can be shown that ∇2f(X,Y) is symmetric [ 27]. For any two points p,qonM, the distance function is defined by dp(q) :=d(p,q) := inf γ∫1 0F(γ(t),˙γ(t))dt. (2.22) where the infimum is taken overall the C1curvesγ: [0,1]→Msuch that γ(0) =p andγ(1) =q. Fixed a base point ponM, we denote the forward distance function by r. That is, r(x) =d(p,x), with d denotes the forward distance. The forward distance function ris a function defined on the Finsler manifold M. dris a 1-form on M, whose dual is a gradient vector field, noted by ∇r.Precisely, ∇r=gij(x,∇r)∂r ∂xi∂ ∂xjTakingtheChernhorizontalderivativeof ∇ryieldstheHessian of distance function ∇2r. Locally, in a natural coordinate system ∇2r(∂ ∂xi,∂ ∂xj) =∇j∇ir=∂2r ∂xi∂xj−Γk ij(x,∇r)∂r ∂xk. (2.23) In (2.23), the derivative is taken in the direction ∇rnaturally. Generally, we can take the derivative in any direction. Suppose Vis a local vector field around xonM. Note that the distance function may not be symmetric about pandqunlessFis reversible. AC2curveγis called a geodesic if locally ¨γ(t)+2Gi(γ(t),˙γ(t)) = 0. (2.24) whereGi(x,y) are the spray coefficients.

2403.00002v1.pdf

1ff6282a-fb71-4a51-a8c5-7621b31706dd

A forward geodesic ball centered at p with radius Rcan be represented by B+ R(p) :={q∈M:d(p,q)< R} (2.25) Adopting the exponential map, a Finsler manifold ( M,F) is said to be forward complete or forward geodesically complete if the exponential map is d efined on the entireTM. Thus, any two points in a forward complete manifold Mcan be connected by a minimal forwardgeodesic. Moreover,the forwardclosed balls B+ R(p) are compact. A Finsler metric measure space ( M,F,dµ) is a Finsler manifold equipped with a given measure µ. In local coordinates {xi}n i=1, we can express the volume form as dµ=σ(x)dx1...dxn. For any y∈TxM\{0}, define τ(x,y) :=log√ detgij(x,y) σ(x). (2.26) which is called the distortion of ( M,F,dµ). The definition of the S-curvature is given in the following.The definition of the S-curvature is given in the following. Definition 2.3. ([35][34]). Suppose (M,F,dµ)is a Finsler metric measure space. For any point x∈M, letγ=γ(t)be a forward geodesic from x with the initial tangent vector˙γ(0) =y. The S-curvature of (M,F,dµ)is S(x,y) :=d dtτ=d dt(1 2logdet(gij)−logσ(x))(γ(t),˙γ(t))|t=0.(2.27) 7

2403.00002v1.pdf

ac37a5d4-c22c-4937-9131-461ee68dcacb

Definition 2.3means that the S-curvature is the changing of distortion alo ng the geodesic in direction y. Modeled on the definition of Tcurvature in [ 36], [32] defined the difference of ∇τon the tangent sphere, denoted by T, Definition 2.4. ([32]). The difference of ∇τon the tangent bundle is a tensor denoted byT, which is given by T(V,W) :=∇Vτ(V)−∇Wτ(W). (2.28) for vector fields V,WonM. Locally, it is T(V,W) =Ti(V,w)dxi, with Ti=δ δxiτk(V)−δ δxiτk(W). (2.29) Obviously, T(V,W) is anti-symmetric about VandW, that is, T(V,W) = −T(W,V) for any nonvanishing VandW.If in local coordinates {xi}n i=1, expressing dµ=eφdx1...dxn, the divergence of a smooth vector field Vcan be written as divdµV=n∑ i=1(∂Vi ∂xi+Vi∂φ ∂xi). (2.30) The Finsler Laplacian of a function fonMcould now be given by ∆ dµf:= divdµ(∇f), noticing that ∆ dµ= ∆∇ff, where ∆∇f dµf:=divdµ(∇∇ff) is in the view of weighted Laplacian with ∇∇ff:={ gij(x,∇f)∂f ∂xi∂ ∂xjfor x∈Mf; 0 for x /∈Mf.(2.31) A Finsler Laplacian is better to be viewed in a weak sense due to the lack of regularity.

2403.00002v1.pdf

c5551da6-32e5-4f06-a25a-48f6f33e094a

Concretely, assuming f∈W1,p(M), ∫ Mφ∆dµfdµ=−∫ Mdφ(∇f)dµ, (2.32) for any test function φ∈C∞ 0(M). On the other hand, the Laplacian of a function fon a Riemannian manifold is the trace of the Hessian of fwith respect to the Riemannian metric g. On a Finsler metric measure space ( M,F,dµ), the weighted Hessian ˜H(f) of a function fonMf= {x∈M:∇f|x̸= 0}is defined in [ 39] by ˜H(f)(X,Y) =∇2f(X,Y)−S(∇f) n−1h∇f(X,Y), (2.33) whereh∇fis the angular metric form in the direction ∇f, given in ( 2.9) It is clear that˜H(f) is still a symmetric bilinear form with ∆f=tr∇f˜H(f).(2.34) 8

2403.00002v1.pdf

d209cc62-f593-4352-b817-80080e166e6c

Inspired by this, [ 32] defined the mixed weighted Hessian ˜HV(f)(X,Y) =∇2(f)(X,X)−S(∇f) n−1hV,∇f(X,X), (2.35) wherehV,∇fis the mixed angular metric form in the directions Vand∇f, which is defined by hV,∇f(X,Y) =gV(X,Y)−1 F2 V(∇f)gV(X,∇f)gV(Y,∇f),(2.36) for any vector X,Y. It is necessary to remark that h∇f,∇f=h∇f, so that ˜H∇f(f) =˜H(f) for any function fonM. With the assistance of the S-curvature, one can present the defi nition of the weighted Ricci curvature as the following. Definition 2.5. ([27][34]).Definition 2.5. ([27][34]). Given a unit vector V∈TxMand an positive integral numberk, the weighted Ricci curvature is defined by Rick(V) :=  Ric(x,V)+˙S(x,V) if S(x,V) = 0and k=n or k =∞ −∞ if S(x,V)̸= 0and if k =n Ric(x,V)+˙S(x,V)−S2(x,V) k−nif n < k < ∞ (2.37) where the derivative is taken along the geodesic started fro mxin the direction of V. AccordingtothedefinitionofweightedRiccicurvature,B.Wudefin edtheweighted flag curvature when k=N∈(1,n)∪(n,∞) in [39]. We have completely introduced this concept for any kin [32]. Definition 2.6. ([32]).

2403.00002v1.pdf

8307d7ad-3f9d-49e0-8d38-29b16765f52c

Definition 2.6. ([32]). Let(M,F,dµ)be a Finsler metric measure space, and V,W∈ TxMbe linearly independent vectors. The weighted flag curvatur eKk(V,W)is defined by Kk(V,W) :=  K(V;W)+˙S(V) (n−1)F2(V)if S(x,V) = 0and k=n or k =∞; −∞ if S(x,V)̸= 0and if k =n; K(V;W)+˙S(V) (n−1)F2(V)−S2(V) (n−1)(k−n)F2(V)if n < k < ∞, (2.38) where the derivative is taken along the geodesic started fro mxin the direction of V. Moreover, it has also been defined the mixed weighted Ricci curvatu re in [32], denoted bymRick. 9

2403.00002v1.pdf

463a8341-8416-47f2-bbad-5ae75e8edfc8

Definition 2.7. ([32])Given two unit vectors V,W∈TxMand an positive integral numberk, the mixed weighted Ricci curvaturemRick(V,W) =mRick W(V)is defined by mRick W(V) :=  trWRV(V)+˙S(x,V)if S(x,V) = 0and k=n or k =∞; −∞ if S(x,V)̸= 0and if k =n; trWRV(V)+˙S(x,V)−S2(V) k−nif n < k < ∞, (2.39) where the derivative is taken along the geodesic started fro mxin the direction of V, andtrWRV(V) =gij(W)gV(RV(ei,V)V,ej)means taking trace of the flag curvature with respect to g(x,W). Remark 2.1.Remark 2.1. The weighted Ricci curvature is a special case of the mixed we ighted Ricci curvature, i.e., Rick(V) =mRick V(V). Defining the function ctc(r)as ctc(r) =  √ccot√cr, c > 0, 1/r, c = 0,√−ccoth√−cr c <0.(2.40) the following weighted Hessian comparison theorem is cited from Theorem 3.3 in [ 39]. Theorem 2.1. ([32]).

2403.00002v1.pdf

aed4e45c-132a-493d-a920-51edac7d8482

Theorem 2.1. ([32]). Let(M,F,dµ)be a forward complete n-dimensional Finsler metric measure space with finite misalignment α. Denote the forward distance function byrand byVa fixed vector field on M. Suppose the mixed weighted Ricci curvature RicN(V,∇r)ofMis bounded from below by −KwithK >0, for some N > n, as well as the non-Riemannian curvatures U,TanddivC(V) =Cij k|i(V)Vkδ δxjsatisfy the norm bounds by F(U)+F(T)+F∗(divC(V))≤K0. Then, by setting l=K/C(N,α) withC(N,α) =N+(α−1)n−α, wherever risC2, the nonlinear Laplacian of rwith reference vector Vsatisfies ∆Vr≤C(N,α)ctl(r)+√αK0. (2.41) 3 Global gradient estimates on compact Finsler manifolds .(2.41) 3 Global gradient estimates on compact Finsler manifolds . Inthissection,wewillfocusontheglobalgradientestimatesofpos itivesolutionsto the Fisher-KPP equation ( 1.1) on compact Finsler manifolds, with the weighted Ricci curvature bounded from below. This condition of curvature is exte nsively employed within the realm of Finsler geometric analysis. Supposethat uisapositivesolutionon M×[0,∞)totheFisher-KPPequation( 1.1) . We define the function W(x,t) =u−q, whereqis a positive constant to be fixed later. We now have the following lemma. 10

2403.00002v1.pdf

7402d866-d770-467b-aab2-e065f752c30e

Lemma 3.1. Letube a positive solution on M×[0,∞)to the Fisher-KPP equation (1.1) andW(x,t) =u−q, thenWsatisfies that (∆∇u−∂t)W=q+1 qF2(∇W) W+cqW−cqWq−1 q. (3.1) Proof.The gradient of Wwith respect to ∇uis the dual of d Wby the pull-back metricg∇u. Precisely, ∇W=−qu−q−1∇uonMandWt=−qu−q−1ut, so we have F2 ∇u(∇W) =q2u−2q−2F2 ∇u(∇u). (3.2) tr∇u(∇∇u)2W=q(q+1)u−q−2F2 ∇u(∇u)−qu−q−1tr∇u(∇∇u)2u.(3.3) Wt W=−qut u. (3.4) Then we deduce that in the distributional sense on Mu, ∆∇uW=divµ(∇∇uW) =e−φ∂ ∂xi(eφgijWi) =tr∇u(∇∇u)2W−S(∇W) =q(q+1)u−q−2F2 ∇u(∇u)−qu−q−1∆∇uu.(3.5) wherever ∇u̸= 0 Combine with ( 1.1) and (3.2), we have ∆∇uW=q+1 qF2 ∇u(∇W) W−qu−q−1[ut−cu(1−u)] =q+1 qF2 ∇u(∇W) W+Wt+cqW−cqWq−1 q.(3.6) After the transformation, we obtain the Lemma 3.1. Now, we follow the line in [ 19].

2403.00002v1.pdf

015d3707-0428-45ec-9197-80b7ab74bbc0

Now, we follow the line in [ 19]. Define three functions as the follow.   H0(x,t) =F2 ∇u(∇W) W2+ac(1−W−1 q), H1=Wt W, H=H0+βH1,(3.7) wherea,βare two positive constants to be determined later. Direct calculatio ns provide that ∇∇uH0=∇∇uF2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2−2F2 ∇u(∇∇uW)∇∇uW W3+ac qW−q+1 q∇∇uW,(3.8) 11

2403.00002v1.pdf

48526bdd-f7ae-4aa6-b0d6-f91d31a75369

and tr∇u(∇∇u)2H0=2 W2[dW(∇∇u(tr∇u(∇∇u)2W))+Ric(∇∇uW)+(∇∇u)2W2 HS(∇u)] −8 W3g∇u((∇∇u)2W,∇∇uW⊗∇∇uW)+6F4 ∇u(∇∇uW) W4 −2F2 ∇u(∇∇uW)tr∇u(∇∇u)2W W3−ac(q+1) q2W−1 q W2F2 ∇u(∇∇uW) +ac qW−q+1 qtr∇u(∇∇u)2W, (3.9) onMu, where we have employed the Ricci-type identity in [ 33].On the other hand, it satisfies that ∇∇u(S(∇∇uW)) =˙S(∇∇uW)+g∇u((∇∇u)2W,∇∇uτ⊗∇∇uW),(3.10) and ∇∇u(tr∇u(∇∇u)2W) =∇∇u(∆∇uW)+˙S(∇∇uW)+g∇u((∇∇u)2W,∇∇uτ⊗∇∇uW). (3.11) Plugging ( 3.10) and (3.11) into (3.9) yields tr∇u(∇∇u)2H0=2 W2[dW(∇∇u(∆∇uW)+g∇u((∇∇u)2W,

2403.00002v1.pdf

4ce2f453-e77b-48c8-9118-fe3aee655342

∇∇uτ⊗∇∇uW) +˙S(∇∇uW)+Ric(∇∇uW)+(∇∇u)2W2 HS(∇u)] +6F4 ∇u(∇∇uW) W4−2F2 ∇u(∇∇uW)(∆∇uW+S(∇∇uW)) W3 −8 W3g∇u((∇∇u)2W,∇∇uW⊗∇∇uW) −ac(q+1) q2W−1 q W2F2 ∇u(∇∇uW)+ac qW−q+1 q(∆∇uW+S(∇∇uW)), (3.12) wherever ∇u̸= 0.(3.12) wherever ∇u̸= 0. By a basic computation of Finsler geometry, we could get ∆∇uH0=divµ(∇∇H0) =tr∇u(∇∇u)2H0−dτ(∇∇uH0)+2C∇u ∇2u(∇∇uH0),(3.13) where we have already employed the fact that C(∇u,·,·) = 0 and C∇u ∇2u(∇∇uH0) = uk |iCij k(∇u)Hj. The notation “ |” denotes the horizontal derivative with respect to the 12

2403.00002v1.pdf

f8f5b900-29f8-4d27-9763-3a269338cb96

Chern connection in the direction ∇u. It follows from C∇u ∇2u(∇∇uH0) =uk |iCij k(∇u)[2WlWl|j−2F2(∇W)W−3Wj+1 qacW−q+1 qWj] =2uk |i W2[(Cij kWj)|lWl−Cij k|lWjWl] =−2uk |i W2Lij kWj =0,(3.14) that (3.13) is equal to ∆∇uH0=divµ(∇∇uH0) =tr∇u(∇∇u)2H0−dτ(∇∇uH0). (3.15) Combining it with ( 3.12), we could find that ∆∇uH0=2 W2[g∇u(∇∇u(∆∇uW),∇∇uW)+Ric∞(∇W)+(∇∇u)2W2 HS(∇u)] −8 W3g∇u((∇∇u)2W,∇∇uW⊗∇∇uW)−2F2 ∇u(∇∇uW)(∆∇uW) W3 +6F4 ∇u(∇∇uW) W4−ac(q+1) q2W−1 q W2F2 ∇u(∇∇uW)+ac qW−q+1 q∆∇uW, (3.16) by noticing that dτ(∇∇uH) = 2dτ[g∇u((∇∇u)2W,

2403.00002v1.pdf

5caca265-98bf-44f2-812a-3b9d02b79d78

∇∇uW) W2−F2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W3∇∇uW+ac 2qW−q+1 q∇∇uW]. Therefore, H0(x,t) satisfies that ∂H0(x,t) ∂t=∂tF2 ∇u(∇W) W2−2F2 ∇u(∇∇uW)Wt W3+ac qW−q+1 qWt. (3.17) Because of ∇Wt= (∇W)t, it follows for ∇∇uH1that ∇∇uH1=∇(Wt W) =∇Wt W−Wt∇W W2. (3.18) It asserts by direct caiculation that ∂ ∂t(∆∇uW) = ∆∇uWt, (3.19) 13

2403.00002v1.pdf

f216e152-c438-4cbd-8009-2a28dce00e39

arccording to [ 32]. Thus, for H1, one may find that ∆∇uH1=W(∆∇uW)t−2(∇∇uW)t∇∇uW−∆∇uWWt W2+2WtF2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W3, (3.20) so that ( ∆∇u−∂t) H1=2 qg∇u(∇∇uH1,∇∇ulogW)+cW−1 q−1Wt.(3.21) Moreover, one could calculate that 2 W2g∇u(∇∇u(∆∇uW),∇∇uW)−1 W2∂tF2(∇W) =4(q+1) qg∇u((∇∇u)2W,∇∇uW⊗∇∇uW) W3 +2cF2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2[q−(q−1)W−1 q]−2(q+1) qF4 ∇u(∇∇uW) W4,(3.22) −2F2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W3(∆∇u−∂t)W=−2(q+1) qF4 ∇u(∇∇uW) W4−2cqF2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2 +2cqW−1 qF2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2, (3.

2403.00002v1.pdf

2d4bca8a-cf8a-47cc-a2c0-3f1dc31e5b88

(3.23) as well as ac qW−q+1 q(∆∇u−∂t)W=ac(q+1) q2F2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2W−1 q+ac2W−1 q−ac2W−2 q, (3.24) Plugging ( 3.22)-(3.24) into (3.16) and (3.17) yields ( ∆∇u−∂t) H0=4(1−q) qg∇u((∇∇u)2W,∇∇uW⊗∇∇uW) W3+2q−2 qF4 ∇u(∇∇uW) W4 +2∥(∇∇u)2W∥2 HS(∇u) W2+ac2W−1 q(1−W−1 q)+2Ric∞(∇∇uW) W2 +2cW−1 qF2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2. (3.25) It asserts from the h¨ older inequality that 2g∇u((∇∇u)2W,∇∇uW⊗∇∇uW) W3≤ε∥(∇∇u)2W∥2 HS(∇u) W2+1 εF4 ∇u(∇∇uW) W4.(3.26) 14

2403.00002v1.pdf

208ef052-135c-48ba-8d5b-b43e9f4a30f5

Thus, when 0 < ε <1, it satisfies that 4(1−q) qg∇u((∇∇u)2W,∇∇uW⊗∇∇uW) W3+2(∇∇u)2W2 HS(∇u) W2+2(q−2) qF4 ∇u(∇W) W4 ≥4 qg∇u((∇∇u)2W,∇∇uW⊗∇∇uW) W3+2(1−ε)(∇∇u)2W2 HS(∇u) W2 +2(1−1 ε−2 q)F4 ∇u(∇∇uW) W4.(3.27) According to the equality(a+b)2 n=a2 N−b2 N−n+N(N−n) n(a N+b N−b)2, for any N > n, the following inequality holds by substituting a,bandNby ∆∇uW,˙S(∇∇uW) and N−ε(N−n), respectively. Namely, (∇∇u)2W2 HS(∇u)≥(tr∇u(∇∇u)2W)2 n=(∆∇uW+S(∇∇uW))2 n ≥(∆∇uW)2 N−ε(N−n)−(S(∇∇uW))2 (1−ε)(N−n),(3.

2403.00002v1.pdf

53ed87f2-3c84-48ed-94b5-31a889811870

(3.28) so that 2(1−ε)(∇∇u)2W2 HS(∇u) W2+2Ric∞(∇∇uW) W2 ≥2(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)(∆∇uW)2 W2−2S((∇∇uW))2 (N−n)W2+2Ric∞(∇∇uW) W2 ≥2(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)(∆∇uW)2 W2+2RicN(∇∇uW) W2.(3.29) Moreover, it’s easy to infer that g∇u(∇∇uH0,∇∇ulogW) =2g∇u((∇∇u)2W,∇∇uW⊗∇∇uW) W3−2F4 ∇u(∇∇uW) W4 +acW−1 q qF2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2. (3.30) It is deduced from ( 3.25) by combining ( 3.27)-(3.30) and employing the definition of weighted Ricci curvature that 15

2403.00002v1.pdf

fafdd174-9350-4fc1-a9fe-38e320e3e40e

( ∆∇u−∂t) H0≥2(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)(∆∇uW)2 W2+2RicN(∇∇uW) W2 +2 qg∇u( ∇∇uH0,∇∇ulogW) +2( 1−1 ε)F4 ∇u( ∇∇uW) W4 +ac2W−1 q(1−W−1 q)+2cF2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2W−1 q( 1−a q2) ,(3.31) onMu.

2403.00002v1.pdf

830adcfc-eec6-4489-b303-e72b69b401ce

Letβ=a q, combining with ( 3.21), we have ( ∆∇u−∂t) H≥2(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)(∆∇uW)2 W2−2(1 ε−1)F4 ∇u( ∇∇uW) W4 +2 qg∇u( ∇∇uH,∇∇ulogW) +2c( 1−a q2)F2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2W−1 q +ac2W−1 q(1−W−1 q)+ac qW1 q−1Wt+2RicN(∇∇uW) W2.(3.32) Noticing∆∇uW W=q aH+(q+1 q−q a)F2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2, and setting a=sq2, we get that ∆∇uW W=1 sqH+(q+1 q−1 sq)F2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2=1 sqH+(q+1−1 s q)F2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2. (3.33) Plugging it into ( 3.32), we arrive at the following lemma. Lemma 3.2. Let(M,F,µ)be a forward complete Finsler metric measure space, and denoteMu={x∈M| ∇u(x)̸= 0}. ForH=F2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2+ac(1−W−1 q)+βWt Wwith a=sq2,β=a q,β=a q, it satisfies on Muthat ( ∆∇u−∂t) H≥[2(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)(sq+s−1)2 s2q2−2(1 ε−1)]F4 ∇u(∇∇uW) W4 +2(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)1 s2q2H2+4(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)sq+s−1 s2q2HF2 ∇u( ∇∇uW) W2 +2 qg∇u( ∇∇uH,∇∇ulogW) +(c−2cs)F2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2W−1 q +cW−1 qH+2RicN(∇∇uW) W2. (3.34) 16

2403.00002v1.pdf

59b09d65-6331-40a9-b040-93298ad0762f

Employing Lemma 3.2, the following global gradient estimate theorem could be obtained by utilizing the maximum principle argument, which was first ad opted in [27] and was applied also in [ 32][31]. Theorem 3.1. Let(M,F,µ)be a compact Finsler metric measure manifold whose weighted Ricci curvature satisfies RicN≥ −K, for some positive constant K. Assume the bound of the reversibility on Misρ0. Suppose u(x,t)is a bounded positive smooth solution of the Fisher-KPP parabolic equation ( 1.1) onM×[0,∞), then we have F2(∇u) u2+sc(1−u)−sut u≤[N−ε(N−n)] 2(1−ε)(s−1)s2K+√ N−ε(N−n) 2(1−ε)s qM1c.(3.35) where,0< ε <1,s >1,q >0, such that2(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)s−1 sq≥1 ε−1 +(2s−1)2 8, and M1= supu(x,t). Proof.Lemma3.2implies that ( 3.34) holds in the distributional sense on M. For any nonnegative test function ϕ, we have −∫T 0∫ M[dϕ(∇H)−ϕtH]dµdt≥∫T 0∫ Mϕβdµdt. (3.36) whereβdenotes the RHS of ( 3.34). Assumey0= (x0,t0)∈B(p,2R)×[0,∞) be the point where Hachieves its maxi- mum. Without loss of generality, we could assume H(x0,t0)≥0, otherwise the result will be satisfied trivially. We claim that β(x0,t0)≤0.

2403.00002v1.pdf

bc3d6b03-c29e-4646-9051-9ad1de36f4d6

We claim that β(x0,t0)≤0. Otherwise, βis strictly positive at ( x0,t0), so that β(x0,t0) is positive in a small neighborhood of ( x0,t0) onM, which may be denoted by U. Chosen a test function ϕ whose compact support Vis contained in U, we know from ( 3.36) thatHis a weak, local subharmonic function in a neighborhood V⊂U.It is a contradiction because (x0,t0) is a inner point of V. Because of β(x0,t0)≤0 and∇∇uH(y0) = 0, we arrive at 0≥2(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)1 s2q2H2+[2(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)(sq+s−1)2 s2q2−2(1 ε−1)]F4 ∇u(∇∇uW) W4 +4(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)sq+s−1 s2q2HF2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2+(c−2cs)F2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2W−1 q +cW−1 qH+2RicN(∇∇uW) W2. (3.37) 17

2403.00002v1.pdf

7e03a681-9eb0-4cf5-b3e0-f3bde867ccc6

It follows from the h¨ older inequality that 2RicN(∇∇uW) W2≥ −2Kρ2 0F2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2 ≥ −[2(1−ε)(s−1)2 N−ε(N−n)F4 ∇u(∇∇uW) s2q2W4+(N−ε(N−n))s2q2 2(1−ε)(s−1)2ρ4 0K2] , (3.38) and (c−2cs)F2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2W−1 q≥ −[(2s−1)2 4F4 ∇u(∇∇uW) W4+W−2 qc2] ≥ −[(2s−1)2 4F4 ∇u(∇∇uW) W4+M2 1c2] ,(3.39) whereM1= supu(x).

2403.00002v1.pdf

0304aded-3598-401e-9f18-d5edb87dde8f

Now, let q >0 such that2(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)s−1 sq≥1 ε−1 +(2s−1)2 8. Combining with ( 3.37), we get 2(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)1 s2q2H2≤(N−ε(N−n))s2q2 2(1−ε)(s−1)2ρ4 0K2+M2 1c2 −4(1−ε)(sq+s−1) [N−ε(N−n)]s2q2HF2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2−cW−1 qH ≤(N−ε(N−n))s2q2 2(1−ε)(s−1)2ρ4 0K2+M2 1c2.(3.40) Hence H≤[N−ε(N−n)] 2(1−ε)(s−1)s2q2ρ2 0K+√ N−ε(N−n) 2(1−ε)M1csq. (3.41) we achieve the global gradient estimates on compact Finsler manifold s. Remark 3.1. Theorem 1.1follows by taking ε=1 2,s= 2,q=2 27(N+n)in Theorem 3.1. 4 Local gradient estimates on forward complete Finsler spaces In this section, we prove the local gradient estimates on forward c omplete Finsler metric measure spaces with the assistance of Lemma 3.2and the Comparison theorem (cf. Theorem 2.1). Theorem 4.1. Let(M,F,µ)be a complete noncompact Finsler metric measure space. Denote by B(p,2R)the forward geodesic ball centered at pwith forward radius 2R.Suppose the mixed weighted Ricci curvaturemRicN≥ −K(2R)inB(p,2R)with 18

2403.00002v1.pdf

f4b78d2b-61a9-404d-91be-f1965d200b39

K(2R)≥0, and the misalignment αsatisfies α≤A(2R)inB(p,2R). Moreover, the non-Riemannian tensors satisfy F(U)+F∗(T)+F(divC(V))≤K0.Assume u(x,t) is a bounded positive smooth solution of the Fisher-KPP para bolic equation ( 1.1) on M×[0,∞), then we have F2 ∇u(∇u) u2+sc(1−u)−sut u ≤N−ε(N−n) 2(1−ε)s2 t+N−ε(N−n) 2(1−ε)(s−1)s2K(2R)+sc q√ N−ε(N−n) 2(1−ε)M1 +[N−ε(N−n)]s2 2(1−ε)R2{ C3[1+R(1+√ K(2R))]+[N−ε(N−n)]s2 4(1−ε)(s−1)C2 1+2C2 1} .(4.1) onB(p,R)for0< ε <1,s >1,q >0, such that2(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)s−1 sq≥1 ε−1+(2s−1)2 8, whereC1,C2are positive constants. Proof.In noncompact situation, we choose the cut-off function ˜ ϕ∈C2[0,+∞), such that { ˜ϕ(r) = 1r≤1 ˜ϕ(r) = 0r≥2.(4.2) So ˜ϕ(r)∈[0,1]. In addition, we supposed that −C1≤˜ϕ′(r) ˜ϕ1 2(r)≤0,−C2≤˜ϕ′′(r), (4.3) whereC1,C2are positive constants. For a fixed point p, denote by r(x) the forward distance function from pto any pointx.

2403.00002v1.pdf

5aeace5c-b088-4a9f-8690-e0a5d6bc8dea

We define the cut-off function by ϕ(x) = ˜ϕ(r(x) R). So that F∇u(∇∇uϕ)≤√αC1 Rϕ1 2. (4.4) According to the curvature conditions and the Laplacian compariso n theorem on forward complete Finsler manifolds, it satisfies the Laplacian estimat ion [32] that ∆∇uϕ=˜ϕ′∆∇ur R+˜ϕ′′F2 ∇u(∇∇ur) R2 ≥ −C1 R[ C(N,A)√ K(2R) C(N,A)coth( R√ K(2R) C(N,A)) +C0(K0,A)] −αC2 R2 ≥ −C3 R2[1+R(1+√ K(2R))], (4.5) 19

2403.00002v1.pdf

eb238b94-b9ab-4c76-ae6e-3f923b0f6d72

whereC3=C3(N,A,K 0) is a constant depending on K0,NandA. Defining Z=tH(x,t), we suppose that the support of function ϕ(x)Z(x,t) is contained in Bp(2R). For any fixed T >0, let (x0,t0) be the point where ϕ(x)Z(x,t) achieves its positive maximum, at which it satisfies that ∇(ϕZ) = 0,∂(ϕZ) ∂t≥0,∆(ϕZ)≤0. (4.6) (4.6) implies that ∇Z=−∇ϕ ϕZ, (4.7) and ∆ϕ·Z+2g∇u(∇∇uϕ,∇∇uZ)+ϕ(∆−∂ ∂t)Z≤0, (4.8) at the maximum point ( x0,t0). Letβ=a q,a=sq2, employing Lemma 3.2,Letβ=a q,a=sq2, employing Lemma 3.2, we have (∆−∂ ∂t)Z=t(∆−∂ ∂t)H−H ≥[2(1−ε)(sq+s−1)2 N−ε(N−n)s2q2−2(1 ε−1)]F4 ∇u(∇∇uW) W4t +2(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)1 s2q2Z21 t+4(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)sq+s−1 ε2q2F2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2Z +2 qg∇u(∇∇uZ,

2403.00002v1.pdf

e408fd20-cdd0-480e-84dd-880a163f08ba

∇∇ulogW)+cW−1 qZ+(c−2cs)F2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2W−1 qt +cW−1 qZ−2K(2R)F2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2t−Z t. (4.9) It follows from the h¨ older inequality that 2K(2R)tF2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2≤2(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)(s−1)2 s2q2F4 ∇u( ∇∇uW) W4t +N−ε(N−n) 2(1−ε)s2q2 (s−1)2K2t,(4.10) and (c−2cs)F2 ∇u(∇∇uW) W2W−1 qt≥ −((2s−1)2 4F4 ∇u(∇∇uW) W4t+c2M2 1t) .(4.11) 20

2403.00002v1.pdf

f97c1121-57df-482f-bd4c-55f0be563f6e

Substituting ( 4.10) and (4.11) into (4.9), and choosing s >1,q >0, such that 2(1−ε) ns−1 sq≥1 ε−1+(2s−1)2 8, one may find that (∆−∂ ∂t)Z≥2(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)1 s2q2Z21 t+4(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)sq+s−1 s2q2F2 ∇u( ∇∇uW) W2Z +2 qg∇u( ∇∇uZ,∇∇ulogW) −Z t−N−ε(N−n) 2(1−ε)s2q2 (s−1)2K2t−c2M2 1t.(4.12) Substituting ( 4.12) into (4.8) and noticing ( 4.7), we have 2(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)1 s2q2Z21 tϕ+4(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)sq+s−1 s2q2F2 ∇u( ∇∇uW) W2Zϕ −2Z qg∇u(∇∇uϕ,∇∇uW W)−Zϕ t−N−ε(N−n) 2(1−ε)s2q2 (s−1)2K2(2R)ϕt −C2M2 1tϕ−C3 R2[1+R(1+√ K(2R))]Z−2αC2 1 R2Z≤0.

2403.00002v1.pdf

792ed6c2-8324-4ab1-8735-d49eea6492da

(4.13) It’s easy to know that 2Z qg∇u(∇∇uϕ,∇∇uW W)≤4(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)sq+s−1 s2q2F2 ∇u(∇W) W2Zϕ +N−ε(N−n) 4(1−ε)s2Z sq+s−1F2 ∇u(∇∇uϕ) ϕ.(4.14) Multiplying through by tϕat (4.13) and utilizing ( 4.14), we get that 2(1−ε) N−ε(N−n)1 s2q2Z2ϕ2−Zϕ−t{ 2αC2 1 R2 +N−ε(N−n) 4(1−ε)s2 (sq+s−1)αC2 1 R2+C3 R2[1+R(1+√ K(2R))]} Zϕ −t2[N−ε(N−n) 2(1−ε)s2q2 (s−1)2K2+C2M2 1] ≤0.(4.15) 21

2403.00002v1.pdf

c3ae824d-7a99-4586-98d9-04cd04e0678c

which implies that Zϕ≤[N−ε(N−n)]s2q2 2(1−ε){ 1+t( N−ε(N−n) 4(1−ε)s2 (sq+s−1)C2 1 R2 +C3 R2[1+R(1+√ K(2R))]+2C2 1 R2)} +t√ [N−ε(N−n)]s2q2 2(1−ε)√ [N−ε(N−n)]s2q2 2(1−ε)(s−1)2AK2+c2M2 1,(4.16) is satisfied at ( x0,t0).Clearly, corresponding to the assumption of ( x0,t0), one can deduce that sup x∈BpZ(x,T)≤Z(x0,t0)ϕ(x0) ≤[N−ε(N−n)]s2q2 2(1−ε){ 1+T( N−ε(N−n) 4(1−ε)s2 (sq+s−1)C2 1 R2+2C2 1 R2 +C3 R2[1+R(1+√ K(2R))])} +T√ [N−ε(N−n)]s2q2 2(1−ε)√ [N−ε(N−n)]s2q2 2(1−ε)(s−1)2AK(2R)2+c2M2 1.(4.17) Recall a result that, if a1,a2,a3≥0 then√a1√a2+a3≤√a1a2+√a1a3.

2403.00002v1.pdf

ec9d0e7b-b0dd-47ac-903b-e36ed54f09a3

Thus, F2 ∇u(∇u) u2+sc(1−u)−sut u ≤N−ε(N−n) 2(1−ε)s2 t+N−ε(N−n) 2(1−ε)(s−1)s2K(2R)+sc q√ N−ε(N−n) 2(1−ε)M1 +[N−ε(N−n)]s2 2(1−ε)R2{ C3[1+R(1+√ K(2R))]+[N−ε(N−n)]s2 4(1−ε)(s−1)C2 1+2C2 1} , (4.18) onB(p,2R), which is the desired inequality. Remark 4.1. Theorem 1.2follows from Theorem 4.1directly. References [1] G. Albanese and M. Rigoli. Lichnerowicz-type equations on complet e manifolds. Adv. Nonlinear Anal, 5(3), 223–250, 2016. 22

2403.00002v1.pdf

8c41c29a-9fc5-4cc3-84f0-6f24c083d24e

[2] C. Atkinson and G. Reuter. Deterministic epidemic waves. Math. P roc. Cam- bridge Philos. Soc., 80(2), 315–330, 1976. [3] M. Bailesteanu. Gradient estimates for the Heat equation under the Ricci- Harmonic map flow. Adv. Geom., 15(4), 445–454, 2015. [4] M. Bailesteanu, X. Cao, and A. Pulemotov. Gradient estimates fo r the Heat equation under the Ricci flow. J. Funct. Anal., 258(10), 3517–354 2, 2010. [5] K. Ball, E. A. Carlen, and E. H. Lieb. Sharp uniform convexity and s moothness inequalities for trace norms. Invent. Math., 115, 463–482, 1994. [6] P. W. Bates, X. Chen, and A. J. Chmaj.Traveling waves of bistab le dynamics on a lattice. Sima. J. Math. Anal., 35(2), 520–546, 2003. [7] K. Brown and J. Carr. Deterministic epidemic waves of critical velo city. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 81(3), 431–433, 1977. [8] X. Cao. Differential Harnack estimates for backward Heat equa tions with potentials under the Ricci flow. J. Funct. Anal., 255(4), 1024–103 8, 2008. [9] X. Cao and R. S. Hamilton. Differential Harnack estimates for time -dependent Heat equations with potentials. Geom. Funct. Anal., 19, 989–1000, 2009. [10] X. Cao, B. Liu, I. Pendleton, and A. Ward. Differential Harnack estimates for Fisher’s equation.Differential Harnack estimates for Fisher’s equation. Pac. J. Math., 290(2), 273–300, 2017. [11] X. Chen and J. Guo. Existence and asymptotic stability of trave ling waves of discrete quasilinear monostable equations. J. Differ. Equations, 18 4(2), 549–569, 2002. [12] X. Chen and J. Guo. Uniqueness and existence of traveling wave s for discrete quasilinear monostable dynamics. Math. Ann., 326(1), 123–146, 20 03. [13] S. Cheng and S. -T. Yau. Differential equations on Riemannian ma nifolds and their geometric applications. Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 28(3), 333 –354, 1975. [14] S.-N. Chow, J. Mallet-Paret, and W. Shen.

2403.00002v1.pdf

6b972e83-f68a-42c3-8e1e-44e5e6da14ac

Chow, J. Mallet-Paret, and W. Shen. Traveling waves in latt ice dynamical systems. J. Differ. Equations, 149(2), 248–291, 1998. [15] O. Diekmann. Thresholds and traveling waves for the geograph ical spread of infection. J. Math. Biol., 6(2), 109–130, 1978. [16] O. Diekmann and H. G. Kaper. On the bounded solutions of a nonlin ear convolution equation. Nonlinear Anal., 2(6), 721–737, 1978. [17] X. Geng and S. Hou. Gradient estimates for the Fisher–KPP equ ation on Riemannian manifolds. Boundary Value Probl., 2018(1), 1–12, 2018. 23

2403.00002v1.pdf

095b69e5-4ae8-44b9-93d3-0adcc670168a

[18] M. Ghergu and V. Radulescu. Nonlinear PDEs: Mathematical mod els in biol- ogy, chemistry and population genetics. Springer Monographs in Ma thematics. Springer, Heidelberg, 2011. [19] J. Li. Gradient estimates and Harnack inequalities for nonlinear p arabolic and nonlinear elliptic equations on Riemannian manifolds. J. Funct. Anal., 10 0(2), 233–256, 1991. [20] P. Li and S.-T. Yau. On the parabolic kernel of the Schr¨ odinge r operator. Acta Math. 156, 153–201, 1986. [21] J. Mallet-Paret. The global structure of traveling waves in spa tially discrete dynamical systems. J. Dyn. Differ. Equations , 11, 49–127, 1999. [22] J. D. Murray. Mathematical biology: I: An introduction. interd isciplinary applied mathematics.interd isciplinary applied mathematics. J. Math. Biol., Springer, New York, 2002. [23] J. D. Murray. Mathematical biology: II: Spatial models and biom edical applica- tions. J. Math. Biol., Springer, New York, 2003. [24] E. Negrin. Gradient estimates and a Liouville type theorem for th e Schr¨ odinger operator. J. Funct. Anal., 127(1), 198–203, 1995. [25] S. Ohta. Finsler interpolation inequalities. Calc. Var. Partial Diffe r. Equations, 36(2), 211–249, 2009. [26] S. Ohta. Nonlinear geometric analysis on Finsler manifolds. Eur. J . Math. 3(4), 916–952, 2017. [27] S. Ohta and K.-T. Sturm.[27] S. Ohta and K.-T. Sturm. Bochner–Weitzenb¨ ock formula and L i–Yau estimates on Finsler manifolds. Adv. Math., 252, 429–448, 2014. [28] H.-B. Rademacher. A sphere theorem for non-reversible Finsle r metrics. Math. Ann., 328(3), 373–387, 2004. [29] K. W. Schaaf. Asymptotic behavior and traveling wave solutions for parabolic functional differential equations. Trans. Am. Math. Soc., 302(2) , 587–615, 1987. [30] K. Schumacher. Traveling-front solutions for integro-differe ntial equations. I., Walter de Gruyter, New York, 1980. [31] B. Shen. Gradient estimates of the Finslerian Allen-Cahn equatio n. preprint. [32] B. Shen.

2403.00002v1.pdf

c4e93276-be42-45d9-8932-838b5e57e620

[32] B. Shen. Operators on nonlinear metric measure spaces I: A ne w Laplacian comparison theorem on Finsler manifolds and a generalized Li-Yau app roach to gradient estimates of Finslerian Schr¨ odinger equation. arXiv:2312 .06617v1,2023. 24

2403.00002v1.pdf

6a0cdf64-d773-4461-b3e7-2ec93430dd18

[33] B. Shen. Vanishing of killing vector fields on compact Finsler manifo lds. Kodai Math. J, 41(1), 1–15, 2018. [34] Y. Shen and Z. Shen. Introduction to modern Finsler geometry . World Scientific Publishing Company, 2016. [35] Z. Shen. Volume comparison and its applications in Riemann–finsler geometry. Sib. Adv. Math. Siberian, 128(2), 306–328, 1997. [36] Z. Shen. Lectures on Finsler geometry. World Scientific, Singap ore, 2001. [37] P. Souplet and Q.-S. Zhang. Sharp gradient estimate and Yau’s L iouville theorem for the Heat equation on noncompact manifolds. Bull. Lond. Math. S oc., 38(6), 1045–1053, 2006.S oc., 38(6), 1045–1053, 2006. [38] H. R. Thieme and X.-Q. Zhao. Asymptotic speeds of spread and t raveling waves for integral equations and delayed reaction–diffusion models. J. Diff er. Equations, 195(2), 430–470, 2003. [39] B.Wu.ComparisontheoremsinFinslergeometrywithweightedcu rvaturebounds and related results. J. Korean Math. Soc., 52(3), 603–624, 2015 . [40] J. Wu and X. Zou. Asymptotic and periodic boundary value proble ms of mixed fdes and wave solutions of lattice differential equations. J. Differ. E quations , 135(2), 315–357, 1997. [41] C. Xia. Local gradient estimate for Harmonic functions on Finsle r manifolds. Calc. Var. Partial Differ.

2403.00002v1.pdf

6f97744c-644c-47b4-b3fc-fecbc23ae8d9

Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equations , 51(3-4), 849–865, 2014. [42] Q. Xia. Geometric and functional inequalities on Finsler manifolds. J. Geom. Anal., 30(3), 3099–3148, 2020. [43] Y. Yang. Gradient estimates for a nonlinear parabolic equation o n Riemannian manifolds. Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 136(11), 4095–4102, 2008. [44] S.-T. Yau. Harmonic functions on complete Riemannian manifolds. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. , 28(2), 201–228, 1975. 25

2403.00002v1.pdf

b4745bb8-7b11-4e3b-9419-f526f6c1ea3b

Radical Pair Mechanism and the Role of Chirality-Induced Spin Selectivity during Planaria Regeneration: Effect of Weak Magnetic Field on ROS levels Yash Tiwari, Parul Raghuvanshi, and Vishvendra Singh Poonia∗ Department of Electronics and Communication, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, India (Dated: March 4, 2024) Planarian is an intriguing model system wherein the effect of electric and magnetic fields can be studied on various biochemical pathways during cell morphogenesis. Recent experimental observa- tions have demonstrated the non-trivial modulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels by weak magnetic field during planaria regeneration. However, the underlying biophysical mechanism behind this remains elusive. In this paper, we study the radical pair mechanism to explain the effect of weak magnetic fields on ROS modulation during planaria regeneration to explain the experimental results. We also investigate the effect of chirality-induced spin selectivity (CISS) on ROS levels by including it in the framework of the radical pair mechanism.We conclude that the inclusion of CISS not only explains the experimental results better but also allows for the radical pair model to have more parametric space to satisfy the experimental constraints. This study explains the crucial process of ROS modulation by the weak magnetic field with and without CISS thereby paving the way to unravel the vast domain of ROS modulation for desired outcomes. I. INTRODUCTION Several research studies emphasize the significant im- pact of electromagnetic fields on diverse biological pro- cesses and systems [1–3]. Morphogenesis, a biological process, is affected by electromagnetic fields, with pla- narians serving as a notable model for comprehending morphogenesis and cell communication. Planarians, rec- ognized for their exceptional regenerative abilities, are often studied in this context [4–9]. Planaria’s impres- sive regenerative ability is due to the presence of a set of robust adult stem cells known as neoblasts. Once injured, these cells migrate to the injured site and form a special- ized structure known as a blastema.The blastema sub- sequently undergoes multiplication and transformation, regenerating the lost body parts like the head, trunk, or tail [10–14]. The formation of the blastema is influ- enced by specific signaling molecules known as reactive oxygen species (ROS). Blocking and activation of these molecules contribute to the change in the formation of blastema. Consequently, this impacts the growth of new tissues and affects the process of planarian regeneration [15–17]. Recent insights into how living organisms in- teract with electromagnetic radiation indicate the possi- bility of discovering novel techniques for controlling ROS within the body using weak magnetic fields (WMFs) [17]. However, the exact biophysical mechanism behind the ef- fect of weak magnetic fields on ROS levels is not fully known. Radical pair mechanism has been proposed to elucidate the impact of weak magnetic fields on modula- tion of ROS levels [18–25].

2403.00003v1.pdf

ccadbbb0-6848-4c6c-8940-69da54167e60

More generally, the radical pair mechanism (RPM) has emerged as a prominent theory explaining the effect of magnetic field on various biological and chemical sys- tems [23, 26–29] In particular, it has been studied in de- tail for the cryptochrome protein present in bird’s retina ∗[email protected] is considered a potential explanation for the avian magnetoreception [30–34]. Moreover, it has recently been reported that CISS might play a role in conjunc- tion with radical pairs in birds for the navigational com- pass [35–37]. The radical pair mechanism involves elec- tron transport steps during the formation and recombina- tion [32, 38, 39]. This involves the movement of electrons through protein molecules. Owing to the chirality of pro- tein molecules, the chiral-induced spin selectivity (CISS) effect could play an essential role in the electron trans- port part of the reaction.Although the exact role of CISS in the avian magnetoreception has been debated, there are strong evidence in support of its presence in various biochemical reactions involving electron transfer or rear- rangement in chiral molecules [40–44]. The origin of CISS is attributed to the spin-orbit interaction and the electro- static potential provided by the chiral molecules [45–52]. In this work, we examine the radical pair mechanism in light of recent experimental work pertaining to ROS level modulation by the weak magnetic field [53]. Further- more, we also investigate the effect of chirality-induced spin selectivity (CISS) in the modulation of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) in the planarian system. To achieve this, we establish a theoretical model of the CISS- assisted radical pair mechanism, aligning our simulated results with experimental data [17].Our investigation of the CISS-assisted radical pair mechanism is structured around three key considerations: 1) the absolute yield of the reaction, 2) the ratio of yield values at the ex- perimental point of interest, and 3) the number of nu- clei configurations that adhere to the experimental trend. Additionally, we explore two scenarios: 1) CISS presence exclusively during the formation of radicals and 2) CISS presence during both the formation and recombination of radical pairs. The manuscript has been organized as follows: Section II discusses the simulation methodology followed for analysis. Section III discusses the results, where subsection III A discusses the RP model with no CISS subsection III B discusses the RP model with CISS,arXiv:2403.00003v1 [physics.bio-ph] 9 Jan 2024

2403.00003v1.pdf

3773431d-c0f1-4000-9abb-62154e0f0eeb

2 FIG. 1. The schematic for the CISS-assisted radical pair mechanism for planaria regeneration where Ddenotes the donor molecule, Arepresents the acceptor molecule. D.+is the donor radical, A.−is the acceptor radical. kSis the singlet recombination rate constant, and kTis the triplet recombina- tion constant. The red arrows represent the role of CISS in the reaction pathways since it involves electron transport. subsection III C explores the impact of singlet and triplet recombination rate on planaria regeneration and III D discuss a system with higher number of nuclei. Finally, we discuss the shortcomings and conclusions of the study. II. METHODOLOGY In the radical pair model of the planaria regeneration, an electron is excited in the acceptor molecule, creating a vacancy in the ground state. Another electron from a neighboring donor molecule travels in the chiral medium to fill this vacancy. It results in the formation of a radical pair.It results in the formation of a radical pair. The spin operator of the electron on the donor molecule is ˆSDzand on the acceptor molecule is ˆSAz. Therefore, the spin state of the above-formed radical pair is governed by the following Hamiltonian [31, 37, 54] ˆH=ω.(ˆSAz+ˆSDz) +X i∈D,AX kˆSi.Aik.ˆIik −J(2ˆSA.ˆSD+ 0.5) + ˆSA.D.ˆSB(1) where ω=g¯µB¯B,¯B=B0¯zwhere B0corresponds to the applied magnetic field. JandDare the exchange and dipolar interactions. Ais the hyperfine tensor depicting interactions between electrons and neighboring nuclear spins. The spin state of the radical pair evolves under the zeeman and hyperfine interactions. Along with this evo- lution, the radical pair also recombines back to the sin- FIG. 2.

2403.00003v1.pdf

de4e50ae-3e14-4f7d-a2b5-325a7b9d28d3

2. The radical pair formation begins with the donor molecule (D) and the acceptor molecule (A) in their ground states. The reaction initiates with the excitation of the ac- ceptor molecule, causing an electron to transition to a higher energy state and leaving a vacancy in the ground state of the acceptor molecule. Only a specific electron spin movement occurs when the surrounding medium is fully chiral. This movement involves the transfer of an electron from the ground state of the donor molecule to fill the vacancy in the ground state of the acceptor molecule. This leads to the formation of the radical pair on donor ion D.+and acceptor ion A.−. glet yield and triplet yield shown in Fig. 1. The singlet yield corresponds to the ground state while the triplet state corresponds to reactive oxygen species(ROS) con- centrationFig. 1). The radical pair formation begins with the donor molecule (D) and the acceptor molecule (A) in their ground states.The reaction initiates with the excitation of the acceptor molecule, causing an electron to transition to a higher energy state and leaving a va- cancy in the ground state of the acceptor molecule. Elec- tron transfer occurs from the ground state of the donor molecule to fill the vacancy in the ground state of the ac- ceptor molecule. This leads to the formation of the rad- ical pair on donor ion D.+and acceptor ion A.−. Fig,2 illustrates the formation of the radical pair in a chiral medium where the spin state of the electron |↓⟩is al- lowed in the forward propagation of the electron. In a non-chiral case, both |↓⟩and|↑⟩will be allowed in the formation of the radical pair. The recombination of the radical pair involves the tran- sition from the donor ion D.+and acceptor ion A.−to their respective ground states, as well as the generation of regenerative oxygen species. This process occurs in three stages. Stage 1 is the initial stage where the radical pair is formed.Stage 1 is the initial stage where the radical pair is formed. The chirality of the medium allows only the |↓⟩ state to move from the donor ion D.+to the acceptor ion A.−as illustrated in Fig.2. In Stage 2, the system exists in a superposition of singlet and triplet states. The spins of the isolated electrons on D.+andA.−change due to their interaction with the nuclei (hyperfine interaction). This stage is affected by the system Hamiltonian (Eq.1). In stage 3, because the forward movement allowed the |↓⟩state, the |↑⟩state will move in the opposite (back- ward) direction for recombination. This recombination yield leads to the formation of the respective singlet and

2403.00003v1.pdf

d3874f92-4fd6-470e-9cc8-4ebfd6ddce69

3 FIG. 3. The recombination of the radical pair involves the transition from the donor ion D.+and acceptor ion A.−to their respective ground states, as well as the generation of re- generative oxygen species. This process occurs in three stages. Stage 1 is the initial stage where the radical pair is formed. The chirality of the medium allows only the |↓⟩state to move from the donor ion D.+to the acceptor ion A.−. In Stage 2, the system exists in a superposition of singlet and triplet states. The spins of the isolated electrons on D.+andA.− change due to their interaction with the nuclei (hyperfine in- teraction). In stage 3, because the forward movement allowed the|↓⟩state, the |↑⟩state will move in the opposite (back- ward) direction for recombination. triplet yield. The triplet yield would contribute towards the ROS signaling, whereas the singlet yield would con- tribute towards the ground state of the donor and accep- tor molecule.In Fig.3, we have illustrated it for a fully chiral medium and how chirality affects the formation of the yield. Due to chirality, since only |↑⟩is allowed, we observe that yield formation of the yield of triplet state |↓↓⟩is inhibited. The CISS effect plays a role in forming (Fig.2) and recombining (Fig.3) the radical pair as it involves electron transport through the chiral protein molecule. Therefore, the action of CISS is captured by the initial state PIand recombination state PSandPT, shown with red arrows in Fig. 1.1. |ψIn⟩=1√ 2cos(χ 2)|S⟩+sin(χ 2)|T0⟩ (2)PIn=|ψIn⟩⟨ψIn|= 0 0 0 0 0 0.5(1−sinχ)−0.5cosχ 0 0−0.5cosχ 0.5(1−sinχ) 0 0 0 0 0  (3) Then the initial state density matrix is given as: PInitial =PIn⊗I Z, whereI Zcorresponds to the mixed state of nuclei, and Zis the size of the nu- clear Hilbert space.

2403.00003v1.pdf

9b060c7a-d5cf-4a7b-b49a-cf94bbd00a2e

The singlet recombination operator PS=|ψS⟩⟨ψS|accounts for recombination to the ground state where: |ψS⟩=1√ 2cos(χ 2)|S⟩ −sin(χ 2)|T0⟩ (4) PS=|ψS⟩⟨ψS|= 0 0 0 0 0 0.5(1 + sinχ)−0.5cosχ 0 0−0.5cosχ 0.5(1−sinχ) 0 0 0 0 0  (5) The triplet recombination operator PT=PT++PT−+ PT0accounts for recombination to the reactive oxygen species concentration. PT+correspond to triplet state when net magnetic moment mS= 1.PT+correspond to triplet state when net magnetic moment mS= 1. PT−correspond to triplet state when net magnetic moment mS=−1 andPT0correspond to triplet state when net magnetic moment mS= 0 |ψT0⟩=1√ 2sin(χ 2)|S⟩+cos(χ 2)|T0⟩ (6) PT0=|ψT0⟩⟨ψT0|= 0 0 0 0 0 0.5(1−sinχ) 0 .5cosχ 0 0 0 .5cosχ 0.5cosχ 0 0 0 .5cosχ 0.5(1 + sinχ) 0 0 0 0 0  (7) PT+= 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PT−= 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 −sinχ  (8) The CISS parameter χ∈[0,π 2] depends on the spin selectivity of the protein medium; χ= 0 corresponding to no CISS and χ=π/2 corresponding to the full CISS.The master equation governing the state evolution of the system is given as: dˆρ dt=−i[ˆH,ˆρ(t)]−1 2kS{PS,ˆρ(t)} −1 2kT{PT,ˆρ(t)}(9) Where kSis the singlet recombination rate, and kTis the triplet recombination rate. [ A, B] =AB−BAcorrespond to the commutator whereas, {A, B}=AB+BAis the anti-commutator.

2403.00003v1.pdf

76cbc59e-25b9-4486-8cfe-d61932a99a73

4 III. RESULTS As the literature states, the triplet yield is directly related to reactive oxygen species (ROS) concentration [17, 53]. Consequently, it is crucial to determine how the distribution of triplet yield varies concerning the external magnetic field. Defining the yield product of the triplet state ( ϕT) is imperative; therefore, it is defined according to Eq.10. ϕT=kTZ∞ 0Tr[ˆρ(t)ˆPT]dt (10) ˆρ(t) is the solution of the master equation Eq.9, Tris the trace over the state density matrix ρ. As reported in [17, 53], the ROS yield follows the following distribution ROS at B z= 45µT > ROS at B z= 200 µT ROS at B z= 200 µT < ROS at B z= 500 µT ROS at B z= 45µT < ROS at B z= 500 µT(11) Hence, if RPM dictates the generation of reactive oxy- gen species (ROS), a plot of triplet yield ( ϕT) against the external magnetic field ( B0) should exhibit a strong correlation with the aforementioned experimental find- ings. In [17, 53], it is documented that the two nuclei involved may be an oxide ( O˙− 2) and tryptophan ( Trp˙+). The oxygen nucleus in O˙− 2is nonmagnetic and, thus, does not contribute to the hyperfine interaction. Conversely, tryptophan contains multiple magnetic nuclei of nitrogen and hydrogen.Conversely, tryptophan contains multiple magnetic nuclei of nitrogen and hydrogen. Considering the biological context where distances between nuclei and electrons are variable, a parametric approach has been adopted, specifically ad- dressing the hyperfine interaction of tryptophan with an electron. A. Radical Pair model with no CISS for planaria regeneration In our initial investigation into the feasibility of the radical pair mechanism, we have defined three quantities that will assist us in our investigation. L1=ϕT(45µT) ϕT(200µT);L2=ϕT(500µT) ϕT(200µT);L3=ϕT(500µT) ϕT(45µT) (12) Based on the experimental results reported in [17, 53], we expect parameters L1, L2, L3to have values at least greater than 1. We initially perform analysis consider- ing there is no CISS ( χ= 0) in the system and try to ascertain the planaria response to the external magnetic field.In Figure 4, the triplet yield ( ϕT) is plotted against the external magnetic field ( B0) for χ= 0 (no CISS) FIG. 4. Triplet Yield ϕTwith respect to external mag- netic field B0forχ= 0 at kS= 108andkT= 106with D= 0 and J= 0 at hyperfine configuration [ axx, ayy, azz] = [0.54,0.06,0.24]mT. The three important points on the plot labeled as A, B, C are our focus points since these points cor- relate to the ROS yield given in experimental data. Point A correspond to ϕT(45µT),Bcorrespond to ϕT(200µT) and C correspond to ϕT(500µT) atkS= 108andkT= 106, with D= 0 and J= 0, under the hyperfine configuration [ axx, ayy, azz] = [0.54,0.06,0.24]mT.

2403.00003v1.pdf

57052d49-0b7f-4eaa-b26f-45d1d18a1210

The figure highlights points of inter- est corresponding to experimental conditions in planaria: AforϕTat 45 µT,BforϕTat 200 µT, and CforϕTat 500µT. The experimental plot from references [17, 53] is displayed at the bottom of Figure 4, demonstrating the concentration of reactive oxygen species (ROC) in the experimental outcome. A parametric analysis was conducted for all values of [axx, ayy, azz], with each component ranging from 0 to 3 mT(step size 0.06 mT), ensuring that all three param- eters ( L1, L2, L3) yield values greater than unity. Out of 132,651 possible hyperfine tensors, approximately 39 values met the desired condition. From Figure 4, the ob- served values were L1= 1.132, L2= 1.131, L3= 1.001. Although ideally, a higher value of these ratios is pre- ferred, the range of these ratios for all 39 possible hyper- fine tensors was between 1-1.25.The maximum values of hyperfine tensor [ axx, ayy, azz], where L1, L2, L3are greater than unity, were found to be [0 .54,0.06,0.24]mT . Consequently, the desired trend was only observed for low hyperfine values. Additionally, it was noted that the

2403.00003v1.pdf

4927bc37-1786-4f93-99f9-2ac67fa05e8c

5 FIG. 5. Triplet Yield ϕTwith respect to external magnetic fieldB0for five values of χ= 0,π 6,π 4,π 3,π 2atkS= 108and kT= 106with D= 0 and J= 0 at hyperfine configuration [axx, ayy, azz] = [0 ,0.78,0.84]mTwhen CISS is present only in formation of the radical. absolute value of ϕTwas relatively low. In the next section, chirality will be introduced to inves- tigate whether spin selectivity provides a more accurate model that closely aligns with the experimental outcome. B. Radical Pair model with CISS for planaria regeneration This section introduces spin selectivity arising from chirality, taking into account the nonzero value of χ. Initially, we focus on spin selectivity during the forma- tion of the radical pair from the acceptor and donor molecules.Consequently, the initial density matrix, de- noted as ˆPIn, is influenced by variations in the CISS pa- rameter χ. However, the recombination operators are observed under the no CISS case ( χ= 0), representing the standard singlet and triplet projection operators. In the subsequent part, we explore the role of CISS in both the formation and recombination of the radical. Thus, χ will impact not only the initial density matrix ˆPInbut also recombination operators ˆPSand ˆPT. This work cal- culates the result for the fixed orientation of the CISS axis to the hyperfine z-axis [37]. 1. CISS only at the formation of radical pair In Figure 5, the triplet yield ( ϕT) is graphed against the external magnetic field for five different values of χ= 0,π 6,π 4,π 3,π 2.

2403.00003v1.pdf

7958cc4c-9cc0-43b1-9be4-0ec9b66acf32

This analysis is conducted at kS= 108and kT= 106, with D= 0 and J= 0, and under the hyperfine configuration [ axx, ayy, azz] = [0 ,0.78,0.84]mT. Notably,TABLE I. ϕTfor radical pair model based on ( O2−Trp˙+with one nuclei. The nuclei have spin one and hyperfine interaction as [axx, ayy, azz] = [0 ,0.78,0.84]mTon the parametric nuclei D= 0 and J= 0 at kS= 108andkT= 106when CISS is only involved in the formation of the radical.χ L 1 L2 L3 0 7.686209e-01 8.887843e-01 8.648002e-01 π 61.449013e+00 1.296792e+00 1.117383e+00 π 42.135162e+00 1.556124e+00 1.372103e+00 π 32.877980e+00 1.746496e+00 1.647860e+00 π 24.194939e+00 1.963228e+00 2.136756e+00 TABLE II. Number of hyperfine tensors for which L1, L2, L3 are greater than unity when each of the components from hyperfine tensor [ axx, ayy, azz] atkS= 108andkT= 106 when CISS is only involved in the formation of radical pair.χ= 0χ=π 6χ=π 4χ=π 3χ=π 2 39 1617 1241 1168 1119 CISS is present only during the formation of the radical in this scenario. We list the values of L1, L2, L3in Tab.I for Fig 5. It is noteworthy that when CISS exclusively influences the formation of the radical, the observed trend aligns with the experimental findings. A distinctive peak is ev- ident at 500 µTwhen CISS is considered. Specifically, when χ=π 2, there is a notable increase in the ratio L1 by at least four times. Tab. II provides the count of hyperfine tensors corresponding to the five χvalues that meet the criteria 11 at kS= 108andkT= 106, consider- ing CISS solely in the formation of the radical pair. FIG. 6.FIG. 6. Triplet Yield ϕTwith respect to external magnetic fieldB0for five values of χ= 0,π 6,π 4,π 3,π 2atkS= 108and kT= 106with D= 0 and J= 0 at two different hyperfine configuration. (a) [ axx, ayy, azz] = [0 .12,0.12,0]mTand (b) [axx, ayy, azz] = [0 ,0.72,0.9]mT

2403.00003v1.pdf

1698d139-7548-4f4c-a51a-6a6cf9d6c732

6 TABLE III. ϕTfor radical pair model based on ( O2−Trp˙+ with one nuclei. The nuclei have spin one and hyperfine in- teraction as [[ axx, ayy, azz] = [0 .12,0.12,0]mT] on the para- metric nuclei D= 0 and J= 0 at kS= 108andkT= 106. χ L 1 L2 L3 0 6.046398e-01 5.396299e-01 1.120471e+00 π 61.129513e+00 1.066700e+00 1.058885e+00 π 41.139740e+00 1.076713e+00 1.058536e+00 π 31.163884e+00 1.097928e+00 1.060073e+00 π 21.189569e+00 1.184886e+00 1.003952e+00 TABLE IV.ϕTfor radical pair model based on ( O2−Trp˙+ with one nuclei. The nuclei have spin one and hyperfine inter- action as [[ axx, ayy, azz] = [0 .,0.72,0.9]mT] on the parametric nuclei D= 0 and J= 0 at kS= 108andkT= 106. χ L 1 L2 L3 0 8.047046e-01 9.240207e-01 8.708729e-01 π 62.021043e+00 1.196555e+00 1.689051e+00 π 42.125519e+00 1.034806e+00 2.054027e+00 π 31.688496e+00 7.109065e-01 2.375131e+00 π 21.574199e+00 4.780075e-01 3.293252e+00 2.CISS at formation and recombination of radical pair In Fig.6, we plotted triplet yield ϕTwith respect to external magnetic field for five values of χ= 0,π 6,π 4,π 3,π 2atkS= 108andkT= 106with D= 0 and J= 0 at two different hyperfine configura- tion. (a) [ axx, ayy, azz] = [0 .12,0.12,0]mT and (b) [axx, ayy, azz] = [0 ,0.72,0.9]mT. We list the values of L1, L2, L3in Tab.III and Tab.IV for all five values of χ. Our parametric analysis found no single combination of hyperfine values for which L1, L2, L3are greater than one for all five values of χatkS= 108and kT= 106.

2403.00003v1.pdf

1d9c183b-3828-4fcd-8f25-5caffa116d5a

The closest result observed was when [axx, ayy, azz] = [0 .12,0.12,0]mTwhen χ=π 6,π 4,π 3,π 2 all reported a value of L1, L2, L3greater than 1 however this was not observed for χ= 0. It was observed that the values of ϕTatχ=π 2are at least ten times larger than that for the case when χ= 0. However, the values of the ratio L1, L2, L3remain almost the same. Moreover, the number of hyperfine tensors corresponding to five values of χwhich satisfy criteria 11 at kS= 108andkT= 106is given in V when CISS acts both in formation and recombination of radical pair.Hence, we summarize the difference in the cases when TABLE V. Number of hyperfine tensors for which L1, L2, L3 are greater than unity when each of the components from hyperfine tensor [ axx, ayy, azz] atkS= 108andkT= 106 χ= 0χ=π 6χ=π 4χ=π 3χ=π 2 39 17 6 2 12TABLE VI.Number of hyperfine values for which L1, L2, L3 are greater than unity when each of the components from hyperfine tensor [ axx, ayy, azz] is varied from 0 to 3mT such that we cover 132,651 tensor values at χ= 0. kS↓, kT→104105106107108 104250 10 90 140 6 105315 58 78 135 7 10638 103 69 111 7 107238 340 223 17 17 1082903 3227 39 5 6 CISS is only present at the formation of the radical (Case A) and when CISS is present both in the formation and recombination of radicals (Case B). 1. Case A has a lower value of triplet yield at 45,200,500µTcompared to Case B; hence, case B seems more favorable. 2.2. Case A shows an improved increase in the ratio ofL1, L2, L3due to CISS compared to Case B at around the same hyperfine tensor; hence, case A seems more favorable. 3. Case A has more number of hyperfine tensor for χ̸= 0 compared to case B. Since this reaction oc- curs in a biological system, this property gives the system more degree of freedom and reaction and is not bounded by strict values of hyperfine tensors. Therefore, case A is more promising if we consider this property. C. Triplet Yield for varying recombination rates In this section, our aim was to investigate the impact of singlet and triplet recombination rates on the yield of the triplet product, ϕT. The goal is to discern a trend that aligns with experimental findings, as articulated in Eq.11, across the maximum number of hyperfine tensors. 1. No CISS Recognizing that the planaria reaction transpires in a biological medium, we have exercised the discretion to consider hyperfine tensors.Tabulated in TabVI are the counts of hyperfine configurations, out of the 132,651 possible configurations, that adhere to the observed ex- perimental trend when χ= 0. Our observation indicates that when χ= 0, rate com- binations with kS= 108andkT= 105exhibit the max- imum number of hyperfine configurations satisfying the experimental conditions. However, the absolute value of triplet yield is low due to the diminished triplet recombi- nation rate. Consequently, a higher triplet rate leads to an increased triplet yield value; nevertheless, the rapid

2403.00003v1.pdf

656216c5-1d6c-426d-b2c9-93d372b71cdf

7 TABLE VII. Number of hyperfine values for which L1, L2, L3 are greater than unity when each of the components from hyperfine tensor [ axx, ayy, azz] is varied from 0 to 3mT such that we cover 132,651 tensor values at χ=π 2when CISS only act in formation of radical pair. kS↓, kT→104105106107108 104312 149 59 229 565 10515935 77 51 226 561 10614671 26423 104 213 556 10737912 22972 5268 471 477 10810886 6692 1119 426 478 recombination rate renders the yield less sensitive to the external magnetic field. This results in a limited number of hyperfine tensor values that meet the specified criteria. Additionally, it was observed that no rate combination resulted in L1, L2, L3≥2 (table not shown). 2.2. With CISS When χ=π 2, we have calculated the number of combinations of hyperfine tensors for which L1, L2, L3 is greater than unity. This has been done for case A (Tab.VII) and case B (Tab.VIII) at χ=π 2. We generally observe an increase in the number of hyper- fine tensors for either case when compared to when χ= 0. However, in case A, the number of hyperfine tensors for which L1, L2, L3is greater than unity is much greater compared to case B for most values of kSandkT. We have also computed the maximum values of L1, L2, L3when each component of the hyperfine ten- sor [axx, ayy, azz] varies from 0 to 3 mT, covering a total of 132,651 tensor values at χ=π 2for case A (Tab.XIII) and case B (Tab.XIV).Notably, significant values of L1, L2, L3are observed when kTis in the range of 104and 105, with the singlet recombination rate be- ing at least a hundred times (107and 108) for both the cases.We also observe that L1, L2, L3values are higher for case A compared to case B. We have also calculated the maximum absolute value of triplet yield (ROS level) at 45 µT,200µT,500µTfor case A (Tab.XVI) and case B (Tab.XV) It is essential to acknowledge that the rate combination resulting in the maximum value of L1, L2, L3 tends to yield lower values of triplet yield compared to yields observed at other rates. This implies that at χ=π 2, one can either achieve the maximum value of the ratio L1, L2, L3or attain the absolute yield value by adjusting the recombination rates. D. A higher nuclei study This section examines whether the intended experi- mental outcomes are observed for higher nuclei or if theTABLE VIII.The number of hyperfine values for which L1, L2, L3are greater than unity when each of the compo- nents from hyperfine tensor [ axx, ayy, azz] is varied from 0 to 3mT such that we cover 132,651 tensor values at χ=π 2 when CISS acts both in formation and recombination of rad- ical pair. kS↓, kT→104105106107108 1048791 13086 24432 18670 All 10516775 16771 26936 20022 885 10625311 32965 24915 829 0 1075191 4197 599 0 0 108328 191 12 0 0 FIG. 7.

2403.00003v1.pdf

039b15af-ea72-44a1-83dd-a6ddcaed5ad9

7. Triplet Yield ϕTwith respect to external magnetic field B0for five values of χ= 0,π 6,π 4,π 3,π 2atkS= 108 andkT= 106with D= 0 and J= 0 at hyperfine con- figuration [ axx, ayy, azz] = [0 .12,0.12,0]mTfor spin 1 nucleus and [axx, ayy, azz] = [0 .18,0.18,0]mTfor spin1 2nucleus when CISS is present at formation and recombination. trend diverges. Given in [17, 53], indicating that the sec- ond nucleus might be tryptophan, we assume the second nucleus to be spin-half, akin to hydrogen. We vary it sim- ilarly to a single-nuclei system, but with two nuclei, the number of parameters increases to six.We sampled 51 points from 0 to 3 mT for each component of the hyper- fine tensor for a single nuclei system, resulting in 132,651 combinations. This number is 516tensors for two nuclei systems a very large value. Consequently, we selected values for the hyperfine tensor of the first nucleus that satisfy the conditions outlined in the criteria 11 as given in the preceding section of one nucleus study and varied the hyperfine tensor for the second nucleus. We observe in Fig.7 that for a two nuclei system, we observe the desired trend for χ=π 2. The L1, L2, L3are listed in Tab.IX for five values of χ. We observe that compared to single nucleus case with hyperfine tensor [axx, ayy, azz] = [0 .12,0.12,0]mTFig.(6.a), we observe

2403.00003v1.pdf

3af7cf13-9989-4273-ac97-ed326f745747